Lipid modifications of G protein subunits

Beyond the G protein α subunit: investigating the functional impact of other components of the Gαi3 heterotrimers

BACKGROUND

Specific interactions between G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) and G proteins play a key role in mediating signaling events. While there is little doubt regarding receptor preference for Gα subunits, the preferences for specific Gβ and Gγ subunits and the effects of different Gβγ dimer compositions on GPCR signaling are poorly understood. In this study, we aimed to investigate the subcellular localization and functional response of Gαi3-based heterotrimers with different combinations of Gβ and Gγ subunits.

METHODS

Live-cell imaging microscopy and colocalization analysis were used to investigate the subcellular localization of Gαi3 in combination with Gβ1 or Gβ2 heterotrimers, along with representative Gγ subunits. Furthermore, fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy (FLIM-FRET) was used to investigate the nanoscale distribution of Gαi3-based heterotrimers in the plasma membrane, specifically with the dopamine D2 receptor (D2R). In addition, the functional response of the system was assessed by monitoring intracellular cAMP levels and conducting bioinformatics analysis to further characterize the heterotrimer complexes.

RESULTS

Our results show that Gαi3 heterotrimers mainly localize to the plasma membrane, although the degree of colocalization is influenced by the accompanying Gβ and Gγ subunits. Heterotrimers containing Gβ2 showed slightly lower membrane localization compared to those containing Gβ1, but certain combinations, such as Gαi3β2γ8 and Gαi3β2γ10, deviated from this trend. Examination of the spatial arrangement of Gαi3 in relation to D2R and of changes in intracellular cAMP level showed that the strongest functional response is observed for those trimers for which the distance between the receptor and the Gα subunit is smallest, i.e. complexes containing Gβ1 and Gγ8 or Gγ10 subunit. Deprivation of Gαi3 lipid modifications resulted in a significant decrease in the amount of protein present in the cell membrane, but did not always affect intracellular cAMP levels.

CONCLUSION

Our studies show that the composition of G protein heterotrimers has a significant impact on the strength and specificity of GPCR-mediated signaling. Different heterotrimers may exhibit different conformations, which further affects the interactions of heterotrimers and GPCRs, as well as their interactions with membrane lipids. This study contributes to the understanding of the complex signaling mechanisms underlying GPCR-G-protein interactions and highlights the importance of the diversity of Gβ and Gγ subunits in G-protein signaling pathways. Video Abstract.

G protein-coupled receptor signaling: transducers and effectors

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are of considerable interest due to their importance in a wide range of physiological functions and in a large number of Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved drugs as therapeutic entities. With continued study of their function and mechanism of action, there is a greater understanding of how effector molecules interact with a receptor to initiate downstream effector signaling. This review aims to explore the signaling pathways, dynamic structures, and physiological relevance in the cardiovascular system of the three most important GPCR signaling effectors: heterotrimeric G proteins, GPCR kinases (GRKs), and β-arrestins. We will first summarize their prominent roles in GPCR pharmacology before transitioning into less well-explored areas. As new technologies are developed and applied to studying GPCR structure and their downstream effectors, there is increasing appreciation for the elegance of the regulatory mechanisms that mediate intracellular signaling and function.

Strategies towards Targeting Gαi/s Proteins: Scanning of Protein-Protein Interaction Sites To Overcome Inaccessibility

Heterotrimeric G proteins are classified into four subfamilies and play a key role in signal transduction. They transmit extracellular signals to intracellular effectors subsequent to the activation of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), which are targeted by over 30 % of FDA-approved drugs. However, addressing G proteins as drug targets represents a compelling alternative, for example, when G proteins act independently of the corresponding GPCRs, or in cases of complex multifunctional diseases, when a large number of different GPCRs are involved. In contrast to Gαq, efforts to target Gαi/s by suitable chemical compounds has not been successful so far. Here, a comprehensive analysis was conducted examining the most important interface regions of Gαi/s with its upstream and downstream interaction partners. By assigning the existing compounds and the performed approaches to the respective interfaces, the druggability of the individual interfaces was ranked to provide perspectives for selective targeting of Gαi/s in the future.

G protein-coupled receptor-G protein interactions: a single-molecule perspective

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) regulate many cellular and physiological processes, responding to a diverse range of extracellular stimuli including hormones, neurotransmitters, odorants, and light. Decades of biochemical and pharmacological studies have provided fundamental insights into the mechanisms of GPCR signaling. Thanks to recent advances in structural biology, we now possess an atomistic understanding of receptor activation and G protein coupling. However, how GPCRs and G proteins interact in living cells to confer signaling efficiency and specificity remains insufficiently understood. The development of advanced optical methods, including single-molecule microscopy, has provided the means to study receptors and G proteins in living cells with unprecedented spatio-temporal resolution. The results of these studies reveal an unexpected level of complexity, whereby GPCRs undergo transient interactions among themselves as well as with G proteins and structural elements of the plasma membrane to form short-lived signaling nanodomains that likely confer both rapidity and specificity to GPCR signaling. These findings may provide new strategies to pharmaceutically modulate GPCR function, which might eventually pave the way to innovative drugs for common diseases such as diabetes or heart failure.

Effects of Post-translational Modifications on Membrane Localization and Signaling of Prostanoid GPCR-G Protein Complexes and the Role of Hypoxia

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) play a pivotal role in the adaptive responses to cellular stresses such as hypoxia. In addition to influencing cellular gene expression profiles, hypoxic microenvironments can perturb membrane protein localization, altering GPCR effector scaffolding and altering downstream signaling. Studies using proteomics approaches have revealed significant regulation of GPCR and G proteins by their state of post-translational modification. The aim of this review is to examine the effects of post-translational modifications on membrane localization and signaling of GPCR-G protein complexes, with an emphasis on vascular prostanoid receptors, and to highlight what is known about the effect of cellular hypoxia on these mechanisms. Understanding post-translational modifications of protein targets will help to define GPCR targets in treatment of disease, and to inform research into mechanisms of hypoxic cellular responses.

Insights into the Regulatory Properties of Human Adenylyl Cyclase Type 9

Membrane-bound adenylyl cyclase (AC) isoforms have distinct regulatory mechanisms that contribute to their signaling specificity and physiologic roles. Although insight into the physiologic relevance of AC9 has progressed, the understanding of AC9 regulation is muddled with conflicting studies. Currently, modes of AC9 regulation include stimulation by Gαs, protein kinase C (PKC) βII, or calcium-calmodulin kinase II (CaMKII) and inhibition by Gαi/o, novel PKC isoforms, or calcium-calcineurin. Conversely, the original cloning of human AC9 reported that AC9 is insensitive to Gαi inhibition. The purpose of our study was to clarify which proposed regulators of AC9 act directly or indirectly, particularly with respect to Gαi/o. The proposed regulators, including G proteins (Gαs, Gαi, Gαo, Gβγ), protein kinases (PKCβII, CaMKII), and forskolin, were systematically evaluated using classic in vitro AC assays and cell-based cAMP accumulation assays in COS-7 cells. Our studies show that AC9 is directly regulated by Gαs with weak conditional activation by forskolin; other modes of proposed regulation either occur indirectly or possibly require additional scaffolding proteins to facilitate regulation. We also show that AC9 contributes to basal cAMP production; knockdown or knockout of endogenous AC9 reduces basal AC activity in COS-7 cells and splenocytes. Importantly, although AC9 is not directly inhibited by Gαi/o, it can heterodimerize with Gαi/o-regulated isoforms, AC5 and AC6.

Regulation of G Protein βγ Signaling

Heterotrimeric guanine nucleotide-binding proteins (G proteins) deliver external signals to the cell interior, upon activation by the external signal stimulated G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs).While the activated GPCRs control several pathways independently, activated G proteins control the vast majority of cellular and physiological functions, ranging from vision to cardiovascular homeostasis. Activated GPCRs dissociate GαGDPβγ heterotrimer into GαGTP and free Gβγ. Earlier, GαGTP was recognized as the primary signal transducer of the pathway and Gβγ as a passive signaling modality that facilitates the activity of Gα. However, Gβγ later found to regulate more number of pathways than GαGTP does. Once liberated from the heterotrimer, free Gβγ interacts and activates a diverse range of signaling regulators including kinases, lipases, GTPases, and ion channels, and it does not require any posttranslation modifications. Gβγ family consists of 48 members, which show cell- and tissue-specific expressions, and recent reports show that cells employ the subtype diversity in Gβγ to achieve desired signaling outcomes. In addition to activated GPCRs, which induce free Gβγ generation and the rate of GTP hydrolysis in Gα, which sequester Gβγ in the heterotrimer, terminating Gβγ signaling, additional regulatory mechanisms exist to regulate Gβγ activity. In this chapter, we discuss structure and function, subtype diversity and its significance in signaling regulation, effector activation, regulatory mechanisms as well as the disease relevance of Gβγ in eukaryotes.

Protein Lipidation: Occurrence, Mechanisms, Biological Functions, and Enabling Technologies

Protein lipidation, including cysteine prenylation, N-terminal glycine myristoylation, cysteine palmitoylation, and serine and lysine fatty acylation, occurs in many proteins in eukaryotic cells and regulates numerous biological pathways, such as membrane trafficking, protein secretion, signal transduction, and apoptosis. We provide a comprehensive review of protein lipidation, including descriptions of proteins known to be modified and the functions of the modifications, the enzymes that control them, and the tools and technologies developed to study them. We also highlight key questions about protein lipidation that remain to be answered, the challenges associated with answering such questions, and possible solutions to overcome these challenges.

Recombinant Synthesis of Hybrid Lipid-Peptide Polymer Fusions that Self-Assemble and Encapsulate Hydrophobic Drugs

Inspired by biohybrid molecules that are synthesized in Nature through post-translational modification (PTM), we have exploited a eukaryotic PTM to recombinantly synthesize lipid-polypeptide hybrid materials. By co-expressing yeast N-myristoyltransferase with an elastin-like polypeptide (ELP) fused to a short recognition sequence in E. coli, we show robust and high-yield modification of the ELP with myristic acid. The ELP's reversible phase behavior is retained upon myristoylation and can be tuned to span a 30-60 °C. Myristoylated ELPs provide a versatile platform for genetically pre-programming self-assembly into micelles of varied size and shape. Their lipid cores can be loaded with hydrophobic small molecules by passive diffusion. Encapsulated doxorubicin and paclitaxel exhibit cytotoxic effects on 4T1 and PC3-luc cells, respectively, with potencies similar to chemically conjugated counterparts, and longer plasma circulation than free drug upon intravenous injection in mice.

Effect of N-Terminal Myristoylation on the Active Conformation of Gαi1-GTP

G proteins are part of the G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) signal transduction cascade in which they transfer a signal from the membrane-embedded GPCR to other proteins in the cell. In the case of the inhibitory G-protein heterotrimer, permanent N-terminal myristoylation can transiently localize the Gα_i subunit at the membrane as well as crucially influence Gα_i's function in the GTP-bound conformation. The attachment of lipids to proteins is known to be essential for membrane trafficking; however, our results suggest that lipidation is also important for protein-protein interactions during signal transduction. Here we investigate the effect of myristoylation on the structure and dynamics of soluble Gα_i1 and its possible implication for signal transduction. A 2 μs classical molecular dynamics simulation of a myristoylated Gα_i1-GTP complex suggests that the myristoyl-induced conformational changes of the switch II and alpha helical domains create new possibilities for protein-protein interactions and emphasize the importance of permanent lipid attachment for the conformation and functional tunability of signaling proteins.

Invited review: Activation of G proteins by GTP and the mechanism of Gα-catalyzed GTP hydrolysis

This review addresses the regulatory consequences of the binding of GTP to the alpha subunits (Gα) of heterotrimeric G proteins, the reaction mechanism of GTP hydrolysis catalyzed by Gα and the means by which GTPase activating proteins (GAPs) stimulate the GTPase activity of Gα. The high energy of GTP binding is used to restrain and stabilize the conformation of the Gα switch segments, particularly switch II, to afford stable complementary to the surfaces of Gα effectors, while excluding interaction with Gβγ, the regulatory binding partner of GDP-bound Gα. Upon GTP hydrolysis, the energy of these conformational restraints is dissipated and the two switch segments, particularly switch II, become flexible and are able to adopt a conformation suitable for tight binding to Gβγ. Catalytic site pre-organization presents a significant activation energy barrier to Gα GTPase activity. The glutamine residue near the N-terminus of switch II (Glncat ) must adopt a conformation in which it orients and stabilizes the γ phosphate and the water nucleophile for an in-line attack. The transition state is probably loose with dissociative character; phosphoryl transfer may be concerted. The catalytic arginine in switch I (Argcat ), together with amide hydrogen bonds from the phosphate binding loop, stabilize charge at the β-γ bridge oxygen of the leaving group. GAPs that harbor "regulator of protein signaling" (RGS) domains, or structurally unrelated domains within G protein effectors that function as GAPs, accelerate catalysis by stabilizing the pre-transition state for Gα-catalyzed GTP hydrolysis, primarily by restraining Argcat and Glncat to their catalytic conformations. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Biopolymers 105: 449-462, 2016.

N-myristoyltransferase is a cell wall target in Aspergillus fumigatus

Treatment of filamentous fungal infections relies on a limited repertoire of antifungal agents. Compounds possessing novel modes of action are urgently required. N-myristoylation is a ubiquitous modification of eukaryotic proteins. The enzyme N-myristoyltransferase (NMT) has been considered a potential therapeutic target in protozoa and yeasts. Here, we show that the filamentous fungal pathogen Aspergillus fumigatus possesses an active NMT enzyme that is essential for survival. Surprisingly, partial repression of the gene revealed downstream effects of N-myristoylation on cell wall morphology. Screening a library of inhibitors led to the discovery of a pyrazole sulphonamide compound that inhibits the enzyme and is fungicidal under partially repressive nmt conditions. Together with a crystallographic complex showing the inhibitor binding in the peptide substrate pocket, we provide evidence of NMT being a potential drug target in A. fumigatus.

In vitro myristoylation assay of Arabidopsis proteins

Myristoylation is a lipid modification conserved among eukaryotes and involves the addition of a 14-carbon myristoyl moiety to a glycine at the N-terminus of cargo proteins. Since not every protein with an N-terminal glycine is myristoylated, experimental verification is necessary to determine which proteins are indeed myristoylated. Here we describe an in vitro myristoylation assay for the Arabidopsis heterotrimeric G protein alpha subunit, GPA1, as well as the Arabidopsis SALT OVERLY SENSITIVE3. This method can be easily adopted to other proteins of interest.

Linking receptor activation to changes in Sw I and II of Gα proteins

G-protein coupled receptors catalyze nucleotide exchange on G proteins, which results in subunit dissociation and effector activation. In the recent β2AR-Gs structure, portions of Switch I and II of Gα are not fully elucidated. We paired fluorescence studies of receptor-Gαi interactions with the β2AR-Gs and other Gi structures to investigate changes in Switch I and II during receptor activation and GTP binding. The β2/β3 loop containing Leu194 of Gαi is located between Switches I and II, in close proximity to IC2 of the receptor and the C-terminus of Gα, thus providing an allosteric connection between these Switches and receptor activation. We compared the environment of residues in myristoylated Gαi proteins in the heterotrimer to that upon receptor activation and subsequent GTP binding. Upon receptor activation, residues in both Switch regions are less solvent-exposed, as compared to the heterotrimer. Upon GTPγS binding, the environment of several residues in Switch I resemble the receptor-bound state, while Switch II residues display effects on their environment which are consistent with their role in GTP binding and Gβγ dissociation. The ability to merge available crystal structures with solution studies is a powerful tool to gain insight into conformational changes associated with receptor-mediated Gi protein activation.

Nucleotide exchange factors: Kinetic analyses and the rationale for studying kinetics of GEFs

Exchange factors are enzymes that catalyze the exchange of GTP for GDP on guanine nucleotide binding proteins. Progress in understanding the molecular basis of action and the cellular functions of these enzymes has largely come from structural determinations (e.g., crystal structures) and studying effects on cells when expression levels of the exchange factors are perturbed or mutated exchange factors are expressed. Proportionally little effort has been expended on studying the kinetics of exchange; however, reaction rates are central to understanding enzymes. Here, we discuss the importance of kinetic analysis of exchange factors for guanine nucleotide binding proteins, with a focus on ADP-ribosylation factor (Arf) and heterotrimeric G proteins, for providing unique insights into molecular mechanisms and regulation as well as how kinetic analyses are used to complement other approaches.

Myristoylation exerts direct and allosteric effects on Gα conformation and dynamics in solution

Coupling of heterotrimeric G proteins to activated G protein-coupled receptors results in nucleotide exchange on the Gα subunit, which in turn decreases its affinity for both Gβγ and activated receptors. N-Terminal myristoylation of Gα subunits aids in membrane localization of inactive G proteins. Despite the presence of the covalently attached myristoyl group, Gα proteins are highly soluble after GTP binding. This study investigated factors facilitating the solubility of the activated, myristoylated protein. In doing so, we also identified myristoylation-dependent differences in regions of Gα known to play important roles in interactions with receptors, effectors, and nucleotide binding. Amide hydrogen-deuterium exchange and site-directed fluorescence of activated proteins revealed a solvent-protected amino terminus that was enhanced by myristoylation. Furthermore, fluorescence quenching confirmed that the myristoylated amino terminus is in proximity to the Switch II region in the activated protein. Myristoylation also stabilized the interaction between the guanine ring and the base of the α5 helix that contacts the bound nucleotide. The allosteric effects of myristoylation on protein structure, function, and localization indicate that the myristoylated amino terminus of Gα(i) functions as a myristoyl switch, with implications for myristoylation in the stabilization of nucleotide binding and in the spatial regulation of G protein signaling.

Comparative analysis of cone and rod transducins using chimeric Gα subunits

The molecular nature of transducin-α subunits (Gα(t)) may contribute to the distinct physiology of cone and rod photoreceptors. Biochemical properties of mammalian cone Gα(t2) subunits and their differences with rod Gα(t1) are largely unknown. Here, we examined properties of chimeric Gα(t2) in comparison with its rod counterpart. The key biochemical difference between the rod- and cone-like Gα(t) was ~10-fold higher intrinsic nucleotide exchange on the chimeric Gα(t2). Presented mutational analysis suggests that weaker interdomain interactions between the GTPase (Ras-like) domain and the helical domain in Gα(t2) are in part responsible for its increased spontaneous nucleotide exchange. However, the rates of R*-dependent nucleotide exchange of chimeric Gα(t2) and Gα(t1) were equivalent. Furthermore, chimeric Gα(t2) and Gα(t1) exhibited similar rates of intrinsic GTPase activity as well as similar acceleration of GTP hydrolysis by the RGS domain of RGS9. Our results suggest that the activation and inactivation properties of cone and rod Gα(t) subunits in an in vitro reconstituted system are comparable.

Interaction of a G protein with an activated receptor opens the interdomain interface in the alpha subunit

In G-protein signaling, an activated receptor catalyzes GDP/GTP exchange on the G(α) subunit of a heterotrimeric G protein. In an initial step, receptor interaction with G(α) acts to allosterically trigger GDP release from a binding site located between the nucleotide binding domain and a helical domain, but the molecular mechanism is unknown. In this study, site-directed spin labeling and double electron-electron resonance spectroscopy are employed to reveal a large-scale separation of the domains that provides a direct pathway for nucleotide escape. Cross-linking studies show that the domain separation is required for receptor enhancement of nucleotide exchange rates. The interdomain opening is coupled to receptor binding via the C-terminal helix of G(α), the extension of which is a high-affinity receptor binding element.

Trp fluorescence reveals an activation-dependent cation-pi interaction in the Switch II region of Galphai proteins

Crystal structures of Galpha(i) (and closely related family member Galpha(t)) reveal much of what we currently know about G protein structure, including changes which occur in Switch regions. Galpha(t) exhibits a low rate of basal (uncatalyzed) nucleotide exchange and an ordered Switch II region in the GDP-bound state, unlike Galpha(i), which exhibits higher basal exchange and a disordered Switch II region in Galpha(i)GDP structures. Using purified Galpha(i) and Galpha(t), we examined the intrinsic tryptophan fluorescence of these proteins, which reports conformational changes associated with activation and deactivation of Galpha proteins. In addition to the expected enhancement in tryptophan fluorescence intensity, activation of GalphaGDP proteins was accompanied by a modest but notable red shift in tryptophan emission maxima. We identified a cation-pi interaction between tryptophan and arginine residues in the Switch II of Galpha(i) family proteins that mediates the observed red shift in emission maxima. Furthermore, amino-terminal myristoylation of Galpha(i) resulted in a less polar environment for tryptophan residues in the GTPase domain, consistent with an interaction between the myristoylated amino terminus and the GTPase domain of Galpha proteins. These results reveal unique insights into conformational changes which occur upon activation and deactivation of G proteins in solution.

A sweet cycle for Arabidopsis G-proteins: Recent discoveries and controversies in plant G-protein signal transduction

Heterotrimeric G-proteins are a class of signal transduction proteins highly conserved throughout evolution that serve as dynamic molecular switches regulating the intracellular communication initiated by extracellular signals including sensory information. This property is achieved by a guanine nucleotide cycle wherein the inactive, signaling-incompetent Galpha subunit is normally bound to GDP; activation to signaling-competent Galpha occurs through the exchange of GDP for GTP (typically catalyzed via seven-transmembrane domain G-protein coupled receptors [GPCRs]), which dissociates the Gbetagamma dimer from Galpha-GTP and initiates signal transduction. The hydrolysis of GTP, greatly accelerated by "Regulator of G-protein Signaling" (RGS) proteins, returns Galpha to its inactive GDP-bound form and terminates signaling. Through extensive characterization of mammalian Galpha isoforms, the rate-limiting step in this cycle is currently considered to be the GDP/GTP exchange rate, which can be orders of magnitude slower than the GTP hydrolysis rate. However, we have recently demonstrated that, in Arabidopsis, the guanine nucleotide cycle appears to be limited by the rate of GTP hydrolysis rather than nucleotide exchange. This finding has important implications for the mechanism of sugar sensing in Arabidopsis. We also discuss these data on Arabidopsis G-protein nucleotide cycling in relation to recent reports of putative plant GPCRs and heterotrimeric G-protein effectors in Arabidopsis.

Receptor-mediated changes at the myristoylated amino terminus of Galpha(il) proteins

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) catalyze nucleotide release in heterotrimeric G proteins, the slow step in G protein activation. G i/o family proteins are permanently, cotranslationally myristoylated at the extreme amino terminus. While myristoylation of the amino terminus has long been known to aid in anchoring G i proteins to the membrane, the role of myristoylation with regard to interaction with activated receptors is not known. Previous studies have characterized activation-dependent changes in the amino terminus of Galpha proteins in solution [Medkova, M. (2002) Biochemistry 41, 9963-9972; Preininger, A. M. (2003) Biochemistry 42, 7931-7941], but changes in the environment of specific residues within the Galpha i1 amino terminus during receptor-mediated G i activation have not been reported. Using site-specific fluorescence labeling of individual residues along a stretch of the Galpha il amino terminus, we found specific changes in the environment of these residues upon interaction with the activated receptor and following GTPgammaS binding. These changes map to a distinct surface of the amino-terminal helix opposite the Gbetagamma binding interface. The receptor-dependent fluorescence changes are consistent with a myristoylated amino terminus in the proximity of the membrane and/or receptor. Myristoylation affects both the rate and intensity of receptor activation-dependent changes detected at several residues along the amino terminus (with no significant effect on the rate of receptor-mediated GTPgammaS binding). This work demonstrates that the myristoylated amino terminus of Galpha il proteins undergoes receptor-mediated changes during the dynamic process of G protein signaling.

Membrane interactions of G proteins and other related proteins

Guanine nucleotide-binding proteins, G proteins, propagate incoming messages from receptors to effector proteins. They switch from an inactive to active state by exchanging a GDP molecule for GTP, and they return to the inactive form by hydrolyzing GTP to GDP. Small monomeric G proteins, such as Ras, are involved in controlling cell proliferation, differentiation and apoptosis, and they interact with membranes through isoprenyl moieties, fatty acyl moieties, and electrostatic interactions. This protein-lipid binding facilitates productive encounters of Ras and Raf proteins in defined membrane regions, so that signals can subsequently proceed through MEK and ERK kinases, which constitute the canonical MAP kinase signaling cassette. On the other hand, heterotrimeric G proteins undergo co/post-translational modifications in the alpha (myristic and/or palmitic acid) and the gamma (farnesol or geranylgeraniol) subunits. These modifications not only assist the G protein to localize to the membrane but they also help distribute the heterotrimer (Galphabetagamma) and the subunits generated upon activation (Galpha and Gbetagamma) to appropriate membrane microdomains. These proteins transduce messages from ubiquitous serpentine receptors, which control important functions such as taste, vision, blood pressure, body weight, cell proliferation, mood, etc. Moreover, the exchange of GDP by GTP is triggered by nucleotide exchange factors. Membrane receptors that activate G proteins can be considered as such, but other cytosolic, membranal or amphitropic proteins can accelerate the rate of G protein exchange or even activate this process in the absence of receptor-mediated activation. These and other protein-protein interactions of G proteins with other signaling proteins are regulated by their lipid preferences. Thus, G protein-lipid interactions control the features of messages and cell physiology.

G proteins in signal transduction: the regulation of phospholipase C

The hydrolysis of phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate by specific phospholipase C (PLC) enzymes produces two second messengers, inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate and diacylglycerol. Heterotrimeric guanine nucleotide-binding regulatory proteins (G proteins) of the Gq subfamily activate the PLC beta 1 isoform of PLC. We have purified three isozymes of PLC beta: PLC beta 1 and PLC beta 3 from rat brain and PLC beta 2 from HL-60 cells. Whereas the beta 1 and beta 2 isozymes appear restricted to a few cell types, beta 3 is broadly distributed. Gq alpha (the alpha subunit of the Gq subfamily) can activate all three isoforms but PLC beta 2 is much less sensitive. Thus all three enzymes are potential effectors for pertussis toxin-insensitive regulation by hormones. The three beta isozymes can also be activated by purified beta gamma subunits. The PLC beta 3 isoform gives the greatest activation with beta gamma; PLC beta 1 is least responsive. The results indicate that all the known isoforms of mammalian PLC beta can be regulated at unique sites by both Gq alpha and beta gamma subunits. The effect of beta gamma subunits may provide a pathway for the regulation of PLC beta isozymes by pertussis toxin-sensitive G proteins or may indicate that the alpha subunit of Gq and its associated beta gamma both participate in regulation of the same phospholipase molecule.

Structural basis of effector regulation and signal termination in heterotrimeric Galpha proteins

This chapter addresses, from a molecular structural perspective gained from examination of x-ray crystallographic and biochemical data, the mechanisms by which GTP-bound Galpha subunits of heterotrimeric G proteins recognize and regulate effectors. The mechanism of GTP hydrolysis by Galpha and rate acceleration by GAPs are also considered. The effector recognition site in all Galpha homologues is formed almost entirely of the residues extending from the C-terminal half of alpha2 (Switch II) together with the alpha3 helix and its junction with the beta5 strand. Effector binding does not induce substantial changes in the structure of Galpha*GTP. Effectors are structurally diverse. Different effectors may recognize distinct subsets of effector-binding residues of the same Galpha protein. Specificity may also be conferred by differences in the main chain conformation of effector-binding regions of Galpha subunits. Several Galpha regulatory mechanisms are operative. In the regulation of GMP phospodiesterase, Galphat sequesters an inhibitory subunit. Galphas is an allosteric activator and inhibitor of adenylyl cyclase, and Galphai is an allosteric inhibitor. Galphaq does not appear to regulate GRK, but is rather sequestered by it. GTP hydrolysis terminates the signaling state of Galpha. The binding energy of GTP that is used to stabilize the Galpha:effector complex is dissipated in this reaction. Chemical steps of GTP hydrolysis, specifically, formation of a dissociative transition state, is rate limiting in Ras, a model G protein GTPase, even in the presence of a GAP; however, the energy of enzyme reorganization to produce a catalytically active conformation appears to be substantial. It is possible that the collapse of the switch regions, associated with Galpha deactivation, also encounters a kinetic barrier, and is coupled to product (Pi) release or an event preceding formation of the GDP*Pi complex. Evidence for a catalytic intermediate, possibly metaphosphate, is discussed. Galpha GAPs, whether exogenous proteins or effector-linked domains, bind to a discrete locus of Galpha that is composed of Switch I and the N-terminus of Switch II. This site is immediately adjacent to, but does not substantially overlap, the Galpha effector binding site. Interactions of effectors and exogenous GAPs with Galpha proteins can be synergistic or antagonistic, mediated by allosteric interactions among the three molecules. Unlike GAPs for small GTPases, Galpha GAPs supply no catalytic residues, but rather appear to reduce the activation energy for catalytic activation of the Galpha catalytic site.

A recombinant transductor–effector system: In vitro study of G inhibitory protein (G-alpha-i1) direct activators

Mutations and altered functionality of the inhibitory subfamily of G proteins (Gi) are involved in pathological states. Compounds able to activate Gi in a receptor-independent manner would be useful to treat these pathological conditions. Aimed to study Gi direct activation we have reconstituted a recombinant transductor-effector complex cloning both the mammalian Galpha(i1) subunit and adenylate cyclase (AC). The myristoylation of Galpha, fundamental for interaction with AC, was obtained in the procaryotic expression host Escherichia coli transformed with a single plasmid containing both the coding sequences for human Galpha(i1) and Saccharomyces cerevisiae myristoyl transferase. AC-V isoform was obtained by the expression of its cytosolic domains. A recent synthesized molecule, named BC5, was tested to evaluate its pharmacological profile in a Gi/AC cell-free complex model. In this functional transductor-effector system BC5 was able to activate Gi signalling, moreover providing a new tool to give a better insight into G-protein receptor-independent modulation.

Association of two membrane proteins encoded by herpes simplex virus type 2, UL11 and UL56

Herpes simplex virus (HSV) acquires envelope by budding into trans-Golgi network (TGN)-derived vesicles. Previous studies showed that the UL11 gene product enables efficient virion envelopment and export from infected cells and is incorporated into virions as tegument protein. At its N-terminus, UL11 is dually acylated by myristoic and palmitoic acids. Fatty acylation of UL11 provides both membrane binding strength and Golgi-targeting specificity. We show here that UL11 interacts with UL56 protein, a tail-anchored type II membrane protein encoded by HSV, which associated with the Golgi apparatus and cytoplasmic vesicles. We previously showed that UL56 is involved in vesicular transport in infected cells. The UL11-UL56 complex localized to the perinuclear region of the cytoplasm in infected cells. Fatty acylation of UL11 was important for the formation of the UL11-UL56 protein complex. Taken together, our results identify a novel interaction between two HSV proteins facilitated by mutual interactions with Golgi-derived vesicles.

G-protein-coupled receptor-associated A-kinase anchoring proteins: AKAP79 and AKAP250 (gravin)

A-kinase anchoring proteins (AKAPs) define an expanding group of scaffold proteins that display a signature binding site for the RI/RII subunit of protein kinase A. AKAPs are multivalent and a subset of these scaffold proteins also display the ability to associate with the prototypic member of G-protein-coupled receptors, the beta(2)-adrenergic receptor. Both AKAP79 (also known as AKAP5) and AKAP250 (also known as gravin or AKAP12) have been shown to associate with the beta(2)-adrenergic receptor, but each directs downstream signaling events in decidedly different manners. The primary structures, common and unique protein motifs are of interest. Both proteins display largely natively unfolded primary sequences that provide a necklace on which short, structured regions of sequence are found. Membrane association appears to involve both interactions with the lipid bilayer via docking to a G-protein-coupled receptor as well as interactions of short positively charged domains with the inner leaflet of the cell membrane. Gravin, unlike AKAP79, displays a canonical site at its N-terminus that is subject to N-myristoylation. AKAP79 appears to function in switching signaling pathways of the receptor from adenylylcyclase to activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade. Gravin, in contrast, is essential for the resensitization and recycling of the receptors following agonist-induced activation, desensitization, and internalization. Each AKAP provides a template that enables space-time continuum features to G-protein-coupled signaling pathways as well as a paradigm for explaining apparent compartmentalization of cell signaling.

Biochemical characterization of RGS14: RGS14 activity towards G-protein alpha subunits is independent of its binding to Rap2A

RGS (regulators of G-protein signalling) modulate signalling by acting as GAPs (GTPase-activating proteins) for alpha subunits of heterotrimeric G-proteins. RGS14 accelerates GTP hydrolysis by G(ialpha) family members through its RGS domain and suppresses guanine nucleotide dissociation from G(ialpha1) and G(ialpha3) subunits through its C-terminal GoLoco domain. Additionally, RGS14 binds the activated forms of the small GTPases Rap1 and Rap2 by virtue of tandem RBDs (Raf-like Ras/Rap binding domains). RGS14 was identified in a screen for Rap2 effectors [Traver, Splingard, Gaudriault and De Gunzburg (2004) Biochem. J. 379, 627-632]. In the present study, we tested whether Rap binding regulates RGS14's biochemical activities. We found that RGS14 activity towards heterotrimeric G-proteins, as either a GAP or a GDI (guanine nucleotide dissociation inhibitor), was unaffected by Rap binding. Extending our biochemical characterization of RGS14, we also examined whether RGS14 can suppress guanine nucleotide exchange on G(ialpha1) in the context of the heterotrimer. We found that a heterotrimer composed of N-myristoylated G(ialpha1) and prenylated G(betagamma) is resistant to the GDI activity of the GoLoco domain of RGS14. This is consistent with models of GoLoco domain action on free G(alpha) and suggests that RGS14 alone cannot induce subunit dissociation to promote receptor-independent activation of G(betagamma)-mediated signalling pathways.

The N terminus of GTP gamma S-activated transducin alpha-subunit interacts with the C terminus of the cGMP phosphodiesterase gamma-subunit

Dynamic regulation of G-protein signaling in the phototransduction cascade ensures the high temporal resolution of vision. In a key step, the activated alpha-subunit of transducin (Galphat-GTP) activates the cGMP phosphodiesterase (PDE) by binding the inhibitory gamma-subunit (PDEgamma). Significant progress in understanding the interaction between Galphat and PDEgamma was achieved by solving the crystal structure of the PDEgamma C-terminal peptide bound to Galphat in the transition state for GTP hydrolysis (Slep, K. C., Kercher, M. A., He, W., Cowan, C. W., Wensel, T. G., and Sigler, P. B. (2001) Nature 409, 1071-1077). However, some of the structural elements of each molecule were absent in the crystal structure. We have probed the binding surface between the PDEgamma C terminus and activated Galphat bound to guanosine 5'-O-(3-thio)-triphosphate (GTPgammaS) using a series of full-length PDEgamma photoprobes generated by intein-mediated expressed protein ligation. For each of seven PDEgamma photoprobe species, expressed protein ligation allowed one benzoyl-L-phenylalaine substitution at selected hydrophobic C-terminal positions, and the addition of a biotin affinity tag at the extreme C terminus. We have detected photocross-linking from several PDEgamma C-terminal positions to the Galphat-GTPgammaS N terminus, particularly from PDEgamma residue 73. The overall percentage of cross-linking to the Galphat-GTPgammaSN terminus was analyzed using a far Western method for examining Galphat-GTPgammaS proteolytic digestion patterns. Furthermore, mass spectrometric analysis of cross-links to Galphat from a benzoyl-phenylalanine replacement at PDEgamma position 86 localized the region of photoinsertion to Galphat N-terminal residues Galphat-(22-26). This novel Galphat/PDEgamma interaction suggests that the transducin N terminus plays an active role in signal transduction.

G-protein alpha subunit interaction and guanine nucleotide dissociation inhibitor activity of the dual GoLoco motif protein PCP-2 (Purkinje cell protein-2)

Purkinje cell protein-2 (PCP-2; L7/GPSM4) is a GoLoco motif-containing protein that is specifically expressed in Purkinje and retinal ON bipolar cells. An alternative splice variant of PCP-2 has recently been isolated which contains two GoLoco motifs. Although the second GoLoco motif (GL2) of PCP-2 has been reported to interact with Galpha-subunits, a complete biochemical analysis of each individual motif of PCP-2 has not been performed. We demonstrate that the first GoLoco motif (GL1) of PCP-2 is equipotent as a guanine nucleotide dissociation inhibitor (GDI) towards Galphai1 and Galphai2, while it has sevenfold lower GDI activity for Galphai3 and greater than 20-fold lower GDI activity against Galphao. In contrast we found PCP-2 GL2 to be essentially equipotent as a GDI for all Galphai subunits, but it had negligible activity toward Galphao. Using co-immunoprecipitation from COS-7 cells, we found that PCP-2 was only able to interact with Galphai1 but not Galphao nor Galpha-subunits from other families (Galphas, Galphaq, or Galpha12). Mutational analysis of a non-canonical residue (glycine 24) in human PCP-2 GL1 provided evidence for heterogeneity in mechanisms of Galphai interactions with GoLoco motifs. Collectively, the data demonstrate that PCP-2 is a comparatively weak GoLoco motif protein that exhibits highest affinity interactions and GDI activity toward Galphai1, Galphai2, and Galphai3 subunits.

Resistance to inhibitors of cholinesterase 8A catalyzes release of Galphai-GTP and nuclear mitotic apparatus protein (NuMA) from NuMA/LGN/Galphai-GDP complexes

Resistance to inhibitors of cholinesterase (Ric) 8A is a guanine nucleotide exchange factor that activates certain G protein alpha-subunits. Genetic studies in Caenorhabditis elegans and Drosophila melanogaster have placed RIC-8 in a previously uncharacterized G protein signaling pathway that regulates centrosome movements during cell division. Components of this pathway include G protein subunits of the Galphai class, GPR or GoLoco domain-containing proteins, RGS (regulator of G protein signaling) proteins, and accessory factors. These proteins interact to regulate microtubule pulling forces during mitotic movement of chromosomes. It is unclear how the GTP-binding and hydrolysis cycle of Galphai functions in the context of this pathway. In mammals, the GoLoco domain-containing protein LGN (GPSM2), the LGN- and microtubule-binding nuclear mitotic apparatus protein (NuMA), and Galphai regulate a similar process. We find that mammalian Ric-8A dissociates Galphai-GDP/LGN/NuMA complexes catalytically, releasing activated Galphai-GTP in vitro. Ric-8A-stimulated activation of Galphai caused concomitant liberation of NuMA from LGN. We conclude that Ric-8A efficiently utilizes GoLoco/Galphai-GDP complexes as substrates in vitro and suggest that Ric-8A-stimulated release of Galphai-GTP and/or NuMA regulates the microtubule pulling forces on centrosomes during cell division.

G alpha selectivity and inhibitor function of the multiple GoLoco motif protein GPSM2/LGN

GPSM2 (G-protein signalling modulator 2; also known as LGN or mammalian Pins) is a protein that regulates mitotic spindle organization and cell division. GPSM2 contains seven tetratricopeptide repeats (TPR) and four Galpha(i/o)-Loco (GoLoco) motifs. GPSM2 has guanine nucleotide dissociation inhibitor (GDI) activity towards both Galpha(o)- and Galpha(i)-subunits; however, a systematic analysis of its individual GoLoco motifs has not been described. We analyzed each of the four individual GoLoco motifs from GPSM2, assessing their relative binding affinities and GDI potencies for Galpha(i1), Galpha(i2), and Galpha(i3) and Galpha(o). Each of the four GPSM2 GoLoco motifs (36-43 amino acids in length) was expressed in bacteria as a GST-fusion protein and purified to homogeneity. The binding of each of the four GST-GoLoco motifs to Galpha(i1)-, Galpha(o)-, and Galpha(s)-subunits was assessed by surface plasmon resonance; all of the motifs bound Galpha(i1), but exhibited low affinity towards Galpha(o). GDI activity was assessed by a fluorescence-based nucleotide-binding assay, revealing that all four GoLoco motifs are functional as GDIs for Galpha(i1), Galpha(i2), and Galpha(i3). Consistent with our binding studies, the GDI activity of GPSM2 GoLoco motifs on Galpha(o) was significantly lower than that toward Galpha(i1), suggesting that the in vivo targets of GPSM2 are most likely to be Galpha(i)-subunits.

Galpha subunit Gpa2 recruits kelch repeat subunits that inhibit receptor-G protein coupling during cAMP-induced dimorphic transitions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

All eukaryotic cells sense extracellular stimuli and activate intracellular signaling cascades via G protein-coupled receptors (GPCR) and associated heterotrimeric G proteins. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae GPCR Gpr1 and associated Galpha subunit Gpa2 sense extracellular carbon sources (including glucose) to govern filamentous growth. In contrast to conventional Galpha subunits, Gpa2 forms an atypical G protein complex with the kelch repeat Gbeta mimic proteins Gpb1 and Gpb2. Gpb1/2 negatively regulate cAMP signaling by inhibiting Gpa2 and an as yet unidentified target. Here we show that Gpa2 requires lipid modifications of its N-terminus for membrane localization but association with the Gpr1 receptor or Gpb1/2 subunits is dispensable for membrane targeting. Instead, Gpa2 promotes membrane localization of its associated Gbeta mimic subunit Gpb2. We also show that the Gpa2 N-terminus binds both to Gpb2 and to the C-terminal tail of the Gpr1 receptor and that Gpb1/2 binding interferes with Gpr1 receptor coupling to Gpa2. Our studies invoke novel mechanisms involving GPCR-G protein modules that may be conserved in multicellular eukaryotes.

Modeling of Galpha(s) and Galpha(i) regulation of human type V and VI adenylyl cyclase

We examined the kinetics of Galpha(s) and Galpha(i) regulation of human type V and type VI adenylyl cyclase (AC V and AC VI) in order to better model interactions between AC and its regulators. Activation of AC VI by Galpha(s) displayed classical Michaelis-Menten kinetics, whereas AC V activation by Galpha(s) was cooperative with a Hill coefficient of 1.4. The basal activity of human AC V, but not that of AC VI, was inhibited by Galpha(i). Both enzymes showed greater inhibition by Galpha(i) at low Galpha(s) concentrations; however, human AC V was activated by Galpha(i) at high Galpha(s) concentrations. Neither regulator had an effect on the K(m) for Mg-ATP. Mutations made within the Galpha(s) binding pocket of AC V (N1090D) and VI (F1078S) displayed 6- and 14-fold greater EC(50) values for Galpha(s) activation but had no effect on Galpha(i) inhibition of basal activity or K(m) for Mg-ATP. Galpha(s)-stimulated AC VI-F1078S was not significantly inhibited by Galpha(i), despite normal inhibition by Galpha(i) upon forskolin stimulation. Mechanistic models for Galpha(s) and Galpha(i) regulation of AC V and VI were derived to describe these results. Our models are consistent with previous studies, predicting a decrease in affinity of Galpha(i) in the presence of Galpha(s). For AC VI, Galpha(s) is required for inhibition but not binding by Galpha(i). For AC V, binding of two molecules of Galpha(s) and Galpha(i) to an AC dimer are required to fully describe the data. These models highlight the differences between AC V and VI and the complex interactions with two important regulators.

Reciprocal Signaling between the Transcriptional Co-Factor Eya2 and Specific Members of the Gαi Family

As part of a program to elucidate signaling processes controlled by the heterotrimeric G protein Galphaz, a human fetal brain cDNA library was screened for proteins that specifically interact with the activated form of Galphaz. One of the most-encountered molecules in this screen was Eya2, a member of the Eyes absent family of proteins. Mammalian Eya proteins are predominantly cytosolic proteins that are known to interact with members of the Sine oculis (Six) family of homeodomain transcription factors. This interaction facilitates the translocation of Eya into the nucleus, where the Eya/Six complex regulates transcription during critical stages of embryonic development. In vitro binding studies confirmed that Galphaz interacts with Eya2 in an activation-dependent fashion; furthermore, most other members of the Galphai family including Galphai1, Galphai2, and Galphai3 were found to interact with Eya2. It is interesting that one of the most abundant Galphai proteins, Galphao, did not interact with Eya2. Coexpression of the activated forms of Galphai1, Galphai2, and Galphai3, but not Galphao, with Eya2 recruited Eya2 to the plasma membrane, prevented Eya2 translocation into the nucleus, and abrogated Eya2/Six4-mediated transcription. In addition, Eya2 impinged on G protein-mediated signaling, as evidenced by its ability to relieve Galphai2-mediated inhibition of adenylyl cyclase. These results demonstrate that the interaction between the Galphai proteins and Eya2 may impact on seemingly disparate regulatory events involving both classes of proteins.

An Important Functional Role of the N Terminus Domain of Type VI Adenylyl Cyclase in Gαi-mediated Inhibition

We show herein that removal of the first 86 amino acids (aa) of the N terminus (designated N) of type VI adenylyl cyclase (ACVI) caused the resultant ACVI mutant (ACVI-DeltaA87) to be more greatly inhibited by a Galpha(i)-coupled receptor or activated Galpha(i) protein. Moreover, in vitro binding of the full-length N and C1a domain (designated C1a), which interacts with Galpha(i), was detected. A truncated N terminus (aa 1-86) also interacted with C1a, suggesting that the C1a-interacting region is located within aa 1-86. Mutation analyses further revealed that N might interact with C1a in the region (aa 434-505) where Galpha(i) is bound. Mutations of two residues (Leu-472 and Val-476) located in this N-binding region of C1a suppressed the interaction between recombinant N and C1a and markedly reduced Galpha(i)-mediated inhibition of ACVI-DeltaA87. Further biochemical analyses of the effect of internal mutations of Leu-472/Val-476 on Galpha(i)-mediated inhibition of wild-type ACVI and ACVI-DeltaA87 suggested that N modulates the Galpha(i)-mediated inhibition of ACVI via binding to C1a when the level of Galpha(i) is low (i.e. around the IC(50) value) and that a more complicated interfering mode results when the level of Galpha(i) is high (i.e. approximately 10- to 20-fold of the IC(50) value). Collectively, data presented herein suggest a novel function of the N terminus of ACVI in Galpha(i)-mediated regulation.

The myristoylated amino terminus of Galpha(i)(1) plays a critical role in the structure and function of Galpha(i)(1) subunits in solution

To determine the role of the myristoylated amino terminus of Galpha in G protein activation, nine individual cysteine mutations along the myristoylated amino terminus of Galpha(i) were expressed in a functionally Cys-less background. Thiol reactive EPR and fluorescent probes were attached to each site as local reporters of mobility and conformational changes upon activation of Galpha(i)GDP by AlF(4)(-), as well as binding to Gbetagamma. EPR and steady state fluorescence anisotropy are consistent with a high degree of immobility for labeled residues in solution all along the amino terminus of myristoylated Galpha(i). This is in contrast to the high mobility of this region in nonmyristoylated Galpha(i) [Medkova, M., et al. (2002) Biochemistry 41, 9962-9972]. Steady state fluorescence measurements revealed pronounced increases in fluorescence upon activation for residues 14-17 and 21 located midway through the 30-amino acid stretch comprising the amino-terminal region. Collectively, the data suggest that myristoylation is an important structural determinant of the amino terminus of Galpha(i) proteins.

Characterization of Saccharomyces cerevisiae acyl-protein thioesterase 1, the enzyme responsible for G protein alpha subunit deacylation in vivo

Thioacylation is a reversible lipid modification of proteins that plays a role in the regulation of signal transduction. Acyl-protein thioesterase 1 (APT1) was identified as an enzyme capable of deacylating some thioacylated proteins in vitro. Saccharomyces cerevisiae open reading frame YLR118c encodes an enzyme homologous to Rattus norvegicus APT1. We demonstrate that the catalytic activity of the protein encoded by the yeast open reading frame is similar to that of rat APT1, and we designate the protein S. cerevisiae Apt1p. Yeasts bearing a disruption of the APT1 gene lack significant biochemically detectable acyl-protein thioesterase activity. They also fail to deacylate Gpa1p, the yeast G alpha subunit, in metabolic radiolabeling studies. We conclude that native APT1 is the enzyme responsible for G alpha subunit deacylation in S. cerevisiae and presumably other eukaryotes as well.

Mechanism of Galpha i-mediated inhibition of type V adenylyl cyclase

The topology of mammalian adenylyl cyclase reveals an integral membrane protein composed of an alternating series of membrane and cytoplasmic domains (C1 and C2). The stimulatory G protein, Galpha(s), binds within a cleft in the C2 domain of adenylyl cyclase while Galpha(i) binds within the opposite cleft in the C1 domain. The mechanism of these two regulators also appears to be in opposition. Activation of adenylyl cyclase by Galpha(s) or forskolin results in a 100-fold increase in the apparent affinity of the two domains for one another. We show herein that Galpha(i) reduces C1/C2 domain interaction and thus formation of the adenylyl cyclase catalytic site. Mutants that increase the affinity of C1 for C2 decrease the ability of Galpha(i) to inhibit the enzyme. In addition, Galpha(i) can influence binding of molecules to the catalytic site, which resides at the C1/C2 interface. Adenylyl cyclase can bind substrate analogs in the presence of Galpha(i) but cannot simultaneously bind Galpha(i) and transition state analogs such as 2'd3'-AMP. Galpha(i) also cannot inhibit the membrane-bound enzyme in the presence of manganese, which increases the affinity of adenylyl cyclase for ATP and substrate analogs. Thus homologous G protein alpha-subunits promote bidirectional regulation at the domain interface of the pseudosymmetrical adenylyl cyclase enzyme.

Dissecting receptor-G protein specificity using G alpha chimeras

In conclusion, by taking advantage of the overall sequence homology and structural similarity of G alpha subunits, functional chimeric G alpha subunits can be generated and used as tools for the identification of sequence-specific factors that mediate receptor: G protein specificity. The [35S]GTP gamma S binding assay and the affinity shift activity assay are two sensitive biochemical approaches that can be used to assess receptor: G protein coupling in vitro. These in vitro assays limit confounding influences from cellular proteins and allow for the strict control of receptor: G protein ratios.

Functional interaction between bovine rhodopsin and G protein transducin

To elucidate the mechanisms of specific coupling of bovine rhodopsin with the G protein transducin (G(t)), we have constructed the bovine rhodopsin mutants whose second or third cytoplasmic loop (loop 2 or 3) was replaced with the corresponding loop of the G(o)-coupled scallop rhodopsin and investigated the difference in the activation abilities for G(t), G(o), and G(i) among these mutants and wild type. We have also prepared the Galpha(i) mutants whose C-terminal 11 or 5 amino acids were replaced with those of Galpha(t), Galpha(o), and Galpha(q) to evaluate the role of the C-terminal tail of the alpha-subunit on the specific coupling of bovine rhodopsin with G(t). Replacement of loop 2 of bovine rhodopsin with that of the scallop rhodopsin caused about a 40% loss of G(t) and G(o) activation, whereas that of loop 3 enhanced the G(o) activation four times with a 60% decrease in the G(t) activation. These results indicated that loop 3 of bovine rhodopsin is one of the regions responsible for the specific coupling with G(t). Loop 3 of bovine rhodopsin discriminates the difference of the 6-amino acid sequence (region A) at a position adjacent to the C-terminal 5 amino acids of the G protein, resulting in the different activation efficiency between G(t) and G(o). In addition, the binding of region A to loop 3 of bovine rhodopsin is essential for activation of G(t) but not G(i), even though the sequence of the region A is almost identical between Galpha(t) and Galpha(i). These results suggest that the binding of loop 3 of bovine rhodopsin to region A in Galpha(t) is one of the mechanisms of specific G(t) activation by bovine rhodopsin.

Receptor-G protein gamma specificity: gamma11 shows unique potency for A(1) adenosine and 5-HT(1A) receptors

G protein coupled receptors activate signal transducing guanine nucleotide-binding proteins (G proteins), which consist of an alpha subunit and a betagamma dimer. Whole cell studies have reported that receptors signal through specific betagamma subtypes. Membrane reconstitution studies with the adenosine A(1) and alpha(2A) adrenergic receptors have reached a similar conclusion. We aimed to test the generality of this finding by comparing the gamma subtype specificity for four G(i)-coupled receptors: alpha(2A) adrenergic; A1 adenosine (A(1)-R); 5-hydroxytryptamine(1A) (5-HT(1A)-R); mu opioid. Membranes were reconstituted with Galpha(i)(1) and five gamma subtypes (dimerized to beta1). Using a sensitive alpha-betagamma binding assay, we show that all recombinant betagamma (except beta1gamma1) had comparable affinity for alpha(i)(1). Using high affinity agonist binding as a measure of receptor-G protein coupling, betagamma-containing gamma11 was the most potent for A(1)-R and 5-HT(1A)-R (p < 0.05, one way ANOVA) while gamma7 was most potent for the other two receptors. gamma11 was 3-8-fold more potent for the A(1)-R than were the other gamma subtypes. Also, gamma11 was 2-8-fold more potent for A(1)-R than at the other receptors, suggesting a unique coupling specificity of the A(1)-R for gamma11. In contrast, the discrimination by receptors for the other betagamma subtypes (beta1 and gamma1, gamma2, gamma7, and gamma10) was limited (2-3-fold). Thus the exquisite betagamma specificity of individual receptors reported in whole cell studies may depend on in vivo mechanisms beyond direct receptor recognition of betagamma subtypes.