1
|
Natale P, Palmer SC, Navaneethan SD, Craig JC, Strippoli GF. Angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers for preventing the progression of diabetic kidney disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2024; 4:CD006257. [PMID: 38682786 PMCID: PMC11057222 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd006257.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/01/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Guidelines suggest that adults with diabetes and kidney disease receive treatment with angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB). This is an update of a Cochrane review published in 2006. OBJECTIVES We compared the efficacy and safety of ACEi and ARB therapy (either as monotherapy or in combination) on cardiovascular and kidney outcomes in adults with diabetes and kidney disease. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplants Register of Studies to 17 March 2024 through contact with the Information Specialist using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) Search Portal, and ClinicalTrials.gov. SELECTION CRITERIA We included studies evaluating ACEi or ARB alone or in combination, compared to each other, placebo or no treatment in people with diabetes and kidney disease. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two authors independently assessed the risk of bias and extracted data. Summary estimates of effect were obtained using a random-effects model, and results were expressed as risk ratios (RR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) for dichotomous outcomes and mean difference (MD) or standardised mean difference (SMD) and 95% CI for continuous outcomes. Confidence in the evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. MAIN RESULTS One hundred and nine studies (28,341 randomised participants) were eligible for inclusion. Overall, the risk of bias was high. Compared to placebo or no treatment, ACEi may make little or no difference to all-cause death (24 studies, 7413 participants: RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.15; I2 = 23%; low certainty) and with similar withdrawals from treatment (7 studies, 5306 participants: RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.19; I2 = 0%; low certainty). ACEi may prevent kidney failure (8 studies, 6643 participants: RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.39 to 0.94; I2 = 0%; low certainty). Compared to placebo or no treatment, ARB may make little or no difference to all-cause death (11 studies, 4260 participants: RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.16; I2 = 0%; low certainty). ARB have uncertain effects on withdrawal from treatment (3 studies, 721 participants: RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.58 to 1.26; I2 = 2%; low certainty) and cardiovascular death (6 studies, 878 participants: RR 3.36, 95% CI 0.93 to 12.07; low certainty). ARB may prevent kidney failure (3 studies, 3227 participants: RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.94; I2 = 0%; low certainty), doubling of serum creatinine (SCr) (4 studies, 3280 participants: RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.97; I2 = 32%; low certainty), and the progression from microalbuminuria to macroalbuminuria (5 studies, 815 participants: RR 0.44, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.85; I2 = 74%; low certainty). Compared to ACEi, ARB had uncertain effects on all-cause death (15 studies, 1739 participants: RR 1.13, 95% CI 0.68 to 1.88; I2 = 0%; low certainty), withdrawal from treatment (6 studies, 612 participants: RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.28; I2 = 0%; low certainty), cardiovascular death (13 studies, 1606 participants: RR 1.15, 95% CI 0.45 to 2.98; I2 = 0%; low certainty), kidney failure (3 studies, 837 participants: RR 0.56, 95% CI 0.29 to 1.07; I2 = 0%; low certainty), and doubling of SCr (2 studies, 767 participants: RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.52 to 1.48; I2 = 0%; low certainty). Compared to ACEi plus ARB, ACEi alone has uncertain effects on all-cause death (6 studies, 1166 participants: RR 1.08, 95% CI 0.49 to 2.40; I2 = 20%; low certainty), withdrawal from treatment (2 studies, 172 participants: RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.33 to 1.86; I2 = 0%; low certainty), cardiovascular death (4 studies, 994 participants: RR 3.02, 95% CI 0.61 to 14.85; low certainty), kidney failure (3 studies, 880 participants: RR 1.36, 95% CI 0.79 to 2.32; I2 = 0%; low certainty), and doubling of SCr (2 studies, 813 participants: RR 1.14, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.85; I2 = 0%; low certainty). Compared to ACEi plus ARB, ARB alone has uncertain effects on all-cause death (7 studies, 2607 participants: RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.76 to 1.37; I2 = 0%; low certainty), withdrawn from treatment (3 studies, 1615 participants: RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.53 to 1.24; I2 = 0%; low certainty), cardiovascular death (4 studies, 992 participants: RR 3.03, 95% CI 0.62 to 14.93; low certainty), kidney failure (4 studies, 2321 participants: RR 1.15, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.95; I2 = 29%; low certainty), and doubling of SCr (3 studies, 2252 participants: RR 1.18, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.64; I2 = 0%; low certainty). Comparative effects of different ACEi or ARB and low-dose versus high-dose ARB were rarely evaluated. No study compared different doses of ACEi. Adverse events of ACEi and ARB were rarely reported. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS ACEi or ARB may make little or no difference to all-cause and cardiovascular death compared to placebo or no treatment in people with diabetes and kidney disease but may prevent kidney failure. ARB may prevent the doubling of SCr and the progression from microalbuminuria to macroalbuminuria compared with a placebo or no treatment. Despite the international guidelines suggesting not combining ACEi and ARB treatment, the effects of ACEi or ARB monotherapy compared to dual therapy have not been adequately assessed. The limited data availability and the low quality of the included studies prevented the assessment of the benefits and harms of ACEi or ARB in people with diabetes and kidney disease. Low and very low certainty evidence indicates that it is possible that further studies might provide different results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrizia Natale
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
- Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area (DIMEPRE-J), University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy
| | - Suetonia C Palmer
- Department of Medicine, University of Otago Christchurch, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | | | - Jonathan C Craig
- Cochrane Kidney and Transplant, Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, Australia
- College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Giovanni Fm Strippoli
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area (DIMEPRE-J), University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy
- Cochrane Kidney and Transplant, Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rossing P, Caramori ML, Chan JC, Heerspink HJ, Hurst C, Khunti K, Liew A, Michos ED, Navaneethan SD, Olowu WA, Sadusky T, Tandon N, Tuttle KR, Wanner C, Wilkens KG, Zoungas S, de Boer IH. KDIGO 2022 Clinical Practice Guideline for Diabetes Management in Chronic Kidney Disease. Kidney Int 2022; 102:S1-S127. [PMID: 36272764 DOI: 10.1016/j.kint.2022.06.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 345] [Impact Index Per Article: 172.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2022] [Accepted: 06/21/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
3
|
Cheung AK, Chang TI, Cushman WC, Furth SL, Hou FF, Ix JH, Knoll GA, Muntner P, Pecoits-Filho R, Sarnak MJ, Tobe SW, Tomson CR, Mann JF. KDIGO 2021 Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Blood Pressure in Chronic Kidney Disease. Kidney Int 2021; 99:S1-S87. [PMID: 33637192 DOI: 10.1016/j.kint.2020.11.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 428] [Impact Index Per Article: 142.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2020] [Accepted: 11/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
|
4
|
de Boer IH, Caramori ML, Chan JC, Heerspink HJ, Hurst C, Khunti K, Liew A, Michos ED, Navaneethan SD, Olowu WA, Sadusky T, Tandon N, Tuttle KR, Wanner C, Wilkens KG, Zoungas S, Rossing P. KDIGO 2020 Clinical Practice Guideline for Diabetes Management in Chronic Kidney Disease. Kidney Int 2020; 98:S1-S115. [PMID: 32998798 DOI: 10.1016/j.kint.2020.06.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 581] [Impact Index Per Article: 145.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2020] [Accepted: 06/25/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
|
5
|
Liu X, Ma L, Li Z. Effects of renin-angiotensin system blockers on renal and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with diabetic nephropathy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Endocrinol Invest 2020; 43:959-972. [PMID: 31939197 DOI: 10.1007/s40618-020-01179-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2018] [Accepted: 01/06/2020] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to evaluate the effect f angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) on renal or cardiovascular outcomes in patients with diabetic nephropathy (DN). METHODS PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the treatment effects of ACEI and ARB on renal or cardiovascular outcomes in patients with DN until August 2017. The outcomes included end-stage renal disease (ESRD), doubling of serum creatinine levels, all-cause mortality, major cardiovascular events (MACEs), myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, and cardiac death. Relative risks (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used for calculating the summary results using a random-effects model. RESULTS Twenty-four RCTs including 57,818 patients with DN and 891 events of ESRD, 1050 doubling of serum creatinine concentration, 4352 all-cause mortality, 6342 MACEs, 1073 MI, 2900 stroke, and 1674 cardiac deaths were reported. Overall, the summary results suggested that in patients with DN, receiving ACEI did not have a significant effect on ESRD, doubling of serum creatinine levels, all-cause mortality, MI, stroke, and cardiac death, while ACEI significantly reduced the risk of total MACEs. Furthermore, ARB therapy was associated with a low risk of ESRD and doubling of serum creatinine levels, while it did not differ significantly on all-cause mortality, MACEs, MI, stroke, and cardiac death in patients with DN. CONCLUSIONS Patients with DN receiving ACEI had significantly reduced the risk of total MACEs, and ARB could reduce the incidence of ESRD and the doubling of serum creatinine levels.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- X Liu
- Department of Nephrology, Beijing Luhe Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - L Ma
- Department of Nephrology, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Z Li
- Department of Nephrology, Beijing Luhe Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Exploring the binding interaction between bovine serum albumin and perindopril as well as influence of metal ions using multi-spectroscopic, molecular docking and DFT calculation. Chem Phys 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.chemphys.2019.110641] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
|
7
|
Lévy BI, Taddei S. Vascular legacy beyond blood pressure control: benefits of perindopril/indapamide combination in hypertensive patients with diabetes. Curr Med Res Opin 2018; 34:1557-1570. [PMID: 29307229 DOI: 10.1080/03007995.2018.1425674] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Much of the chronic care of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and hypertension involves the prevention of diabetic complications. Renin-angiotensin system inhibitors are recommended as first-line therapies because of their nephroprotective properties. Their combination with metabolically neutral diuretics is recommended to reduce blood pressure, morbidity and mortality. Our objective was to review the mechanisms by which the combination of the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, perindopril, and metabolically neutral thiazide-like diuretic, indapamide, targets the pathways involved in microvascular and macrovascular diabetic complications. METHODS For this narrative review, extensive literature searches were performed using PubMed/Medline. Articles published in English describing clinical trials and mechanism of action studies that were relevant to the treatment of patients with perindopril and/or indapamide were included. RESULTS Perindopril/indapamide treatment has been shown to reduce blood pressure and to have significant beneficial effects on arterial distensibility, kidney structure and function, and endothelial function. Recent data also suggests that perindopril may reduce the deleterious accumulation of advanced glycation end products in diabetic tissue. In the Action in Diabetes and Vascular Disease: Preterax and Diamicron MR Controlled Evaluation diabetes trial, perindopril/indapamide treatment significantly reduced the relative risk of microvascular and macrovascular events by 9%, cardiovascular mortality by 18%, and all-cause mortality by 14%. Interestingly, 6 years after the end of the double-blind period, follow-up data showed that the beneficial effects on mortality continued to be significant even though differences in blood pressure and glycated hemoglobin levels had not been significant for several years. Together this data suggests that treatment with perindopril/indapamide has microvascular and macrovascular effects that extend beyond blood pressure lowering and that this treatment might confer a long-lasting beneficial vascular legacy. CONCLUSION Moving forward, understanding the pathophysiological bases of the effects that extend beyond those of blood pressure control will help us differentiate between anti-hypertensive choices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Stefano Taddei
- b Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine , University of Pisa , Pisa , Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Xie X, Liu Y, Perkovic V, Li X, Ninomiya T, Hou W, Zhao N, Liu L, Lv J, Zhang H, Wang H. Renin-Angiotensin System Inhibitors and Kidney and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients With CKD: A Bayesian Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials. Am J Kidney Dis 2015; 67:728-41. [PMID: 26597926 DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2015.10.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 258] [Impact Index Per Article: 28.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2014] [Accepted: 10/10/2015] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is much uncertainty regarding the relative effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) in populations with chronic kidney disease (CKD). STUDY DESIGN Systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis. SETTING & POPULATION Patients with CKD treated with renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors. SELECTION CRITERIA FOR STUDIES Randomized trials in patients with CKD treated with RAS inhibitors. PREDICTOR ACE inhibitors and ARBs compared to each other and to placebo and active controls. OUTCOME Primary outcome was kidney failure; secondary outcomes were major cardiovascular events, all-cause death. RESULTS 119 randomized controlled trials (n = 64,768) were included. ACE inhibitors and ARBs reduced the odds of kidney failure by 39% and 30% (ORs of 0.61 [95% credible interval, 0.47-0.79] and 0.70 [95% credible interval, 0.52-0.89]), respectively, compared to placebo, and by 35% and 25% (ORs of 0.65 [95% credible interval, 0.51-0.80] and 0.75 [95% credible interval, 0.54-0.97]), respectively, compared with other active controls, whereas other active controls did not show evidence of a significant effect on kidney failure. Both ACE inhibitors and ARBs produced odds reductions for major cardiovascular events (ORs of 0.82 [95% credible interval, 0.71-0.92] and 0.76 [95% credible interval, 0.62-0.89], respectively) versus placebo. Comparisons did not show significant effects on risk for cardiovascular death. ACE inhibitors but not ARBs significantly reduced the odds of all-cause death versus active controls (OR, 0.72; 95% credible interval, 0.53-0.92). Compared with ARBs, ACE inhibitors were consistently associated with higher probabilities of reducing kidney failure, cardiovascular death, or all-cause death. LIMITATIONS Trials with RAS inhibitor therapy were included; trials with direct comparisons of other active controls with placebo were not included. CONCLUSIONS Use of ACE inhibitors or ARBs in people with CKD reduces the risk for kidney failure and cardiovascular events. ACE inhibitors also reduced the risk for all-cause mortality and were possibly superior to ARBs for kidney failure, cardiovascular death, and all-cause mortality in patients with CKD, suggesting that they could be the first choice for treatment in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xinfang Xie
- Renal Division, Peking University First Hospital; Peking University Institute of Nephrology; Key Laboratory of Renal Disease, Ministry of Health of China; Key Laboratory of Chronic Kidney Disease Prevention and Treatment (Peking University), Ministry of Education, Peking, China
| | - Youxia Liu
- Renal Division, Peking University First Hospital; Peking University Institute of Nephrology; Key Laboratory of Renal Disease, Ministry of Health of China; Key Laboratory of Chronic Kidney Disease Prevention and Treatment (Peking University), Ministry of Education, Peking, China
| | - Vlado Perkovic
- The George Institute for Global Health, the University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Xiangling Li
- Department of Nephrology, Affiliated Hospital of Weifang Medical College, Weifang, Shandong, China
| | - Toshiharu Ninomiya
- The George Institute for Global Health, the University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Wanyin Hou
- Renal Division, Peking University First Hospital; Peking University Institute of Nephrology; Key Laboratory of Renal Disease, Ministry of Health of China; Key Laboratory of Chronic Kidney Disease Prevention and Treatment (Peking University), Ministry of Education, Peking, China
| | - Na Zhao
- Renal Division, Peking University First Hospital; Peking University Institute of Nephrology; Key Laboratory of Renal Disease, Ministry of Health of China; Key Laboratory of Chronic Kidney Disease Prevention and Treatment (Peking University), Ministry of Education, Peking, China
| | - Lijun Liu
- Renal Division, Peking University First Hospital; Peking University Institute of Nephrology; Key Laboratory of Renal Disease, Ministry of Health of China; Key Laboratory of Chronic Kidney Disease Prevention and Treatment (Peking University), Ministry of Education, Peking, China
| | - Jicheng Lv
- Renal Division, Peking University First Hospital; Peking University Institute of Nephrology; Key Laboratory of Renal Disease, Ministry of Health of China; Key Laboratory of Chronic Kidney Disease Prevention and Treatment (Peking University), Ministry of Education, Peking, China; The George Institute for Global Health, the University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
| | - Hong Zhang
- Renal Division, Peking University First Hospital; Peking University Institute of Nephrology; Key Laboratory of Renal Disease, Ministry of Health of China; Key Laboratory of Chronic Kidney Disease Prevention and Treatment (Peking University), Ministry of Education, Peking, China.
| | - Haiyan Wang
- Renal Division, Peking University First Hospital; Peking University Institute of Nephrology; Key Laboratory of Renal Disease, Ministry of Health of China; Key Laboratory of Chronic Kidney Disease Prevention and Treatment (Peking University), Ministry of Education, Peking, China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ding D, Du Y, Qiu Z, Yan S, Chen F, Wang M, Yang S, Zhou Y, Hu X, Deng Y, Wang S, Wang L, Zhang H, Wu H, Yu X, Zhou Z, Liao Y, Chen X. Vaccination against type 1 angiotensin receptor prevents streptozotocin-induced diabetic nephropathy. J Mol Med (Berl) 2015; 94:207-18. [PMID: 26407577 PMCID: PMC4762923 DOI: 10.1007/s00109-015-1343-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2015] [Revised: 09/08/2015] [Accepted: 09/16/2015] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Abstract Recently, our group has developed a therapeutic hypertensive vaccine against angiotensin (Ang) II type 1 receptor (AT1R) named ATRQβ-001. To explore its potential effectiveness on streptozotocin-induced diabetic nephropathy, male Sprague Dawley rats were randomly divided into two groups: a control and a diabetic model. After 1 week, the diabetic rats were divided into four subgroups (each with 15 rats) for 14-week treatments with saline, olmesartan, ATRQβ-001, and Qβ virus-like particle (VLP), respectively. In addition to lower blood pressure, ATRQβ-001 vaccination ameliorated biochemical parameter changes of renal dysfunction, mesangial expansion, and fibrosis through inhibiting oxidative stress, macrophage infiltration, and proinflammatory factor expression. Furthermore, ATRQβ-001 vaccination suppressed renal Ang II-AT1R activation and abrogated the downregulation of angiotensin-converting enzyme 2-Ang (1–7), similar to olmesartan treatment, while no obvious feedback activation of circulating or local renin-angiotensin system (RAS) was only observed in vaccine group. In rat mesangial cells, the anti-ATR-001 antibody inhibited high glucose-induced transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF)-β1/Smad3 signal pathway. Additionally, no significant immune-mediated damage was detected in vaccinated animals. In conclusion, the ATRQβ-001 vaccine ameliorated streptozotocin-induced diabetic renal injury via modulating two RAS axes and inhibiting TGF-β1/Smad3 signal pathway, providing a novel, safe, and promising method to treat diabetic nephropathy. Key messages Overactivation of RAS plays a crucial role in the development of the DN. Our aim was to verify the effectiveness of ATRQβ-001 vaccine in STZ-induced DN. The ATRQβ-001 modulated two RAS axes and inhibited TGF-β1/Smad3 signal pathway. The vaccine therapy may provide a novel, safe, and promising method to treat DN.
Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00109-015-1343-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dan Ding
- Laboratory of Cardiovascular Immunology, Key Laboratory of Molecular Targeted Therapies of the Ministry of Education, Institute of Cardiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, China
| | - Yimei Du
- Laboratory of Cardiovascular Immunology, Key Laboratory of Molecular Targeted Therapies of the Ministry of Education, Institute of Cardiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, China
| | - Zhihua Qiu
- Laboratory of Cardiovascular Immunology, Key Laboratory of Molecular Targeted Therapies of the Ministry of Education, Institute of Cardiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, China
| | - Sen Yan
- Fuwai Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Fen Chen
- Laboratory of Cardiovascular Immunology, Key Laboratory of Molecular Targeted Therapies of the Ministry of Education, Institute of Cardiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, China
| | - Min Wang
- Laboratory of Cardiovascular Immunology, Key Laboratory of Molecular Targeted Therapies of the Ministry of Education, Institute of Cardiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, China
| | - Shijun Yang
- Laboratory of Cardiovascular Immunology, Key Laboratory of Molecular Targeted Therapies of the Ministry of Education, Institute of Cardiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, China
| | - Yanzhao Zhou
- Laboratory of Cardiovascular Immunology, Key Laboratory of Molecular Targeted Therapies of the Ministry of Education, Institute of Cardiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, China
| | - Xiajun Hu
- Laboratory of Cardiovascular Immunology, Key Laboratory of Molecular Targeted Therapies of the Ministry of Education, Institute of Cardiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, China
| | - Yihuan Deng
- Laboratory of Cardiovascular Immunology, Key Laboratory of Molecular Targeted Therapies of the Ministry of Education, Institute of Cardiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, China
| | - Shijia Wang
- Laboratory of Cardiovascular Immunology, Key Laboratory of Molecular Targeted Therapies of the Ministry of Education, Institute of Cardiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, China
| | - Liangping Wang
- Laboratory of Cardiovascular Immunology, Key Laboratory of Molecular Targeted Therapies of the Ministry of Education, Institute of Cardiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, China
| | - Hongrong Zhang
- Laboratory of Cardiovascular Immunology, Key Laboratory of Molecular Targeted Therapies of the Ministry of Education, Institute of Cardiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, China
| | - Hailang Wu
- Laboratory of Cardiovascular Immunology, Key Laboratory of Molecular Targeted Therapies of the Ministry of Education, Institute of Cardiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, China
| | - Xian Yu
- Laboratory of Cardiovascular Immunology, Key Laboratory of Molecular Targeted Therapies of the Ministry of Education, Institute of Cardiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, China
| | - Zihua Zhou
- Laboratory of Cardiovascular Immunology, Key Laboratory of Molecular Targeted Therapies of the Ministry of Education, Institute of Cardiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, China
| | - Yuhua Liao
- Laboratory of Cardiovascular Immunology, Key Laboratory of Molecular Targeted Therapies of the Ministry of Education, Institute of Cardiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, China
| | - Xiao Chen
- Laboratory of Cardiovascular Immunology, Key Laboratory of Molecular Targeted Therapies of the Ministry of Education, Institute of Cardiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, China.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Robiner WN, Strand TD, Mauer M. Adherence and renal biopsy feasibility in the Renin Angiotensin-System Study (RASS) primary prevention diabetes trial. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2013; 102:25-34. [PMID: 24050942 PMCID: PMC4452734 DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2013.06.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2012] [Revised: 05/22/2013] [Accepted: 06/06/2013] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
AIMS Enhancing adherence in research trials is fundamental to the proper testing of treatment hypotheses. METHODS Regimen and follow-up adherence as well as factors associated with adherence in the Renin Angiotensin-System Study (RASS) diabetic nephropathy primary prevention trial were evaluated. Adherence to medication (i.e., pill count), follow-up visits, and follow-up renal biopsies was evaluated. RESULTS 89.8% of subjects completed the second renal biopsy. 96% of follow-up visits were attended within prescribed time windows. Mean medication adherence was 85.6%. Subgroup analyses revealed greater declines in the least adherent participants over time. Factors associated with greater adherence levels included older age, type 1 diabetes (TIDM) duration, lower HbA1c and blood pressure, GFR, ethnicity, and participants', principal investigators' (PI), and trial coordinators' (TC) baseline predictions of adherence. CONCLUSIONS T1DM patients without nephropathy were willing to take experimental medications and undergo repeat renal biopsies. Although overall adherence was excellent, patterns of adherence varied among participants, suggesting the need to better track adherence and to develop customized and targeted approaches for promoting adherence to clinical research regimens. Staff subjective predictions of adherence were imprecise, supporting need for further development of adherence predictors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William N. Robiner
- Health Psychology, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School, USA
- Corresponding author at: Health Psychology, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School, MMC 741, 420 Delaware Street S.E., Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA. Tel.: +1 612 624 1479; fax: +1 612 624 3189. (W.N. Robiner)
| | - Trudy D. Strand
- Health Psychology, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School, USA
- Division of Pediatric Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota Medical School, 2450 Riverside Avenue, 6th Floor East Building, MB681, Minneapolis, MN 55454, USA
| | - Michael Mauer
- Health Psychology, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School, USA
- Division of Pediatric Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota Medical School, 2450 Riverside Avenue, 6th Floor East Building, MB681, Minneapolis, MN 55454, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Maione A, Navaneethan SD, Graziano G, Mitchell R, Johnson D, Mann JFE, Gao P, Craig JC, Tognoni G, Perkovic V, Nicolucci A, De Cosmo S, Sasso A, Lamacchia O, Cignarelli M, Manfreda VM, Gentile G, Strippoli GFM. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers and combined therapy in patients with micro- and macroalbuminuria and other cardiovascular risk factors: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2011; 26:2827-47. [PMID: 21372254 DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfq792] [Citation(s) in RCA: 70] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A recent clinical trial showed harmful renal effects with the combined use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) and angiotensin-II receptor blockers (ARB) in people with diabetes or vascular disease. We examined the benefits and risks of these agents in people with albuminuria and one or more cardiovascular risk factors. METHODS MEDLINE, EMBASE and Renal Health Library were searched for trials comparing ACEI, ARB or their combination with placebo or with one another in people with albuminuria and one or more cardiovascular risk factor. RESULTS Eighty-five trials (21,708 patients) were included. There was no significant reduction in the risk of all-cause mortality or fatal cardiac-cerebrovascular outcomes with ACEI versus placebo, ARB versus placebo, ACEI versus ARB or with combined therapy with ACEI + ARB versus monotherapy. There was a significant reduction in the risk of nonfatal cardiovascular events with ACEI versus placebo but not with ARB versus placebo, ACEI versus ARB or with combined therapy with ACEI + ARB versus monotherapy. Development of end-stage kidney disease and progression of microalbuminuria to macroalbuminuria were reduced significantly with ACEI versus placebo and ARB versus placebo but not with combined therapy with ACEI + ARB versus monotherapy. CONCLUSIONS ACEI and ARB exert independent renal and nonfatal cardiovascular benefits while their effects on mortality and fatal cardiovascular disease are uncertain. There is a lack of evidence to support the use of combination therapy. A comparative clinical trial with ACE, ARB and its combination in people with albuminuria and a cardiovascular risk factor is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ausilia Maione
- Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Epidemiology, Mario Negri Sud Consortium, S. Maria Imbaro (Ch), Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
van der Meer IM, Cravedi P, Remuzzi G. The role of renin angiotensin system inhibition in kidney repair. FIBROGENESIS & TISSUE REPAIR 2010; 3:7. [PMID: 20441574 PMCID: PMC2888753 DOI: 10.1186/1755-1536-3-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2010] [Accepted: 05/04/2010] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
Chronic kidney diseases share common pathogenic mechanisms that, independently from the initial injury, lead to glomerular hyperfiltration, proteinuria, and progressive renal scarring and function loss. Inhibition of the renin angiotensin system (RAS) has been consistently found to reduce or halt the progressive deterioration of renal function through reduction of blood pressure and proteinuria, the two main determinants of renal function decline. In few instances, RAS inhibition may even promote amelioration of the glomerular filtration rate. Animal data suggest that chronic therapy with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor type I blockers promotes regression of glomerulosclerosis, even in later phases of the disease. In humans, studies investigating the effect of angiotensin II inhibition on renal structural changes have shown inconsistent results, possibly due to small numbers and/or short duration of follow-up. Whether regression of glomerulosclerosis relies on a direct regenerative effect of RAS inhibition or on spontaneous kidney self-repair after the injury has been removed is still unknown. Improved understanding of mechanisms that promote renal regeneration may help in designing specific therapies to prevent the development of end-stage renal disease. This is a desirable goal, considering the economic burden of chronic kidney diseases and their effect on morbidity and mortality.
Collapse
|
13
|
Futrakul N, Vongthavarawat V, Chairatanarat T, Sirisalipotch S, Futrakul P, Suwanwalaikorn S. Altered Renal Function in Normoalbuminuric Type 2 Diabetes. Ren Fail 2009; 26:727-8. [PMID: 15600266 DOI: 10.1081/jdi-200037135] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Altered renal function namely enhanced FE Mg and impaired hemodynamics is observed in normoalbuminuric type 2 diabetes. Since FE Mg correlates directly with tubulointerstitial fibrosis, enhanced FE Mg reflects tubulointerstitial disease even in normoalbuminuric type 2 diabetes. This implies that microalbuminuria is not sensitive to early detect diabetic nephropathy.
Collapse
|
14
|
Futrakul N, Sridama V, Futrakul P. Microalbuminuria--a biomarker of renal microvascular disease. Ren Fail 2009; 31:140-3. [PMID: 19212911 DOI: 10.1080/08860220802595948] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Microalbuminuria (amount greater than 30-300 mg/day) reflects an abnormal glomerular capillary permeability to protein. It is usually dependent upon three mechanisms. First, loss of negatively charged surface of the glomerular capillary wall secondary to circulating toxic substances injury-namely, oxidative stress and proinflammatory cytokines-allows the albumin with negatively charged surface to freely escape into the urine. Second, intraglomerular hypertension and hemodynamic maladjustment secondary to glomerular endothelial dysfunction increases filtration pressure and enhances sized selective proteinuria leakage. Third, podocyte injury leads to a vicious cycle of hemodynamic maladjustment and endothelial and podocyte injuries. All three of these mechanisms induce glomerular endothelial injury and microalbuminuria, which reflects renal microvascular disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Narisa Futrakul
- Department of Physiology, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Sarafidis PA, Stafylas PC, Kanaki AI, Lasaridis AN. Effects of renin-angiotensin system blockers on renal outcomes and all-cause mortality in patients with diabetic nephropathy: an updated meta-analysis. Am J Hypertens 2008; 21:922-9. [PMID: 18535536 DOI: 10.1038/ajh.2008.206] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In contrast to previous studies, recent data questioned the ability of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blockers to delay progression of diabetic nephropathy. This study evaluated the effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARBs) in patients with diabetic nephropathy. METHODS A systematic literature search of MEDLINE/PubMed and EMBASE databases was performed to identify randomized trials published up to June 2007 comparing the effects of ACEIs or ARBs with placebo and/or a regimen not including a RAAS blocker on the incidence of end-stage renal disease (ESRD), doubling of serum creatinine (DSC), or death from any cause in patients with diabetic nephropathy. Treatment effects were summarized as relative risks (RRs) using the Mantel-Haenszel fixed-effects model. RESULTS Of the 1,028 originally identified studies, 24 fulfilled the inclusion criteria (20 using ACEIs and 4 using ARBs). Use of ACEIs was associated with a trend toward reduction of ESRD incidence (RR 0.70; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.46-1.05) and use of ARBs with significant reduction of ESRD risk (RR 0.78; 95% CI 0.67-0.91). Both drug classes were associated with reduction in the risk of DSC (RR 0.71; 95% CI 0.56-0.91 for ACEIs and RR 0.79; 95% CI 0.68-0.91 for ARBs) but none affected all-cause mortality (RR 0.96; 95% CI 0.85-1.09 for ACEIs and RR 0.99; 95% CI 0.85-1.16 for ARBs). CONCLUSION Treatment of patients with diabetic nephropathy with a RAAS blocker reduces the risks of ESRD and DSC, but does not affect all-cause mortality. These findings are added to the evidence of a renoprotective role of RAAS blockers in such patients.
Collapse
|
16
|
Stafylas PC, Sarafidis PA, Grekas DM, Lasaridis AN. A cost-effectiveness analysis of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers in diabetic nephropathy. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2008; 9:751-9. [PMID: 17917502 DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-6175.2007.07182.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
The aim of this study was to estimate the cost-effectiveness of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blockers in patients with diabetic nephropathy. A cost-effectiveness analysis was performed based on a meta-analysis of studies investigating the effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) as part of a treatment regimen on the incidence of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in patients with diabetic nephropathy. The primary outcome was the cost to prevent 1 patient from developing ESRD. Cost analysis was performed from a third-party payer perspective in 2006 US dollars. As part of a treatment regimen, ARBs significantly reduced the incidence of ESRD and doubling of serum creatinine concentration (P<.05) but not total mortality. The cost to prevent 1 patient from developing ESRD was $31,729 (95% confidence interval, $19,443-$85,442; P<.01), $189,190 (P=.13) and $51,585 (P=.068) for patients receiving ARBs, ACE inhibitors, or either of them, respectively. This study demonstrates that blocking the RAAS, which delays the progression to ESRD, appears to be cost-effective. The current analysis favors ARBs in terms of cost-effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Panagiotis C Stafylas
- 1st Department of Medicine, AHEPA University Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Jerums G, Panagiotopoulos S, Premaratne E, Power DA, MacIsaac RJ. Lowering of proteinuria in response to antihypertensive therapy predicts improved renal function in late but not in early diabetic nephropathy: a pooled analysis. Am J Nephrol 2008; 28:614-27. [PMID: 18285683 DOI: 10.1159/000117461] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2007] [Accepted: 01/02/2008] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
In late diabetic nephropathy (DN) the initial lowering of albumin excretion rate (AER) with antihypertensive therapy is proportional to the degree of subsequent preservation of glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Whether a similar relationship exists between AER and GFR in early diabetes is not known. The present analysis has compared AER and GFR responses to antihypertensive therapy in 33 published studies (77 treatment groups) of early and late DN in type 1 (T1) and type 2 (T2) diabetes, analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis. Prospective trials were included if the initial change in AER during the first year of therapy and the change in GFR during at least 2 years of follow-up could be estimated from group mean data. The initial % decreases in AER were 5.9 +/- 4.3 (T1), 10.5 +/- 5.4 (T2, normotensive) and 18.4 +/- 6.2 (T2, hypertensive) in early DN and 7.6 +/- 11.1 (T1) and 20.8 +/- 5.5 (T2) in late DN. The corresponding annual % rates of decline of GFR were 2.0 +/- 0.5 (T1), 1.6 +/- 0.5 (T2, normotensive) and 2.1 +/- 0.3 (T2, hypertensive) in early DN and 9.8 +/- 1.5 (T1) and 9.2 +/- 1.1 (T2) in late DN. AER and GFR responses in each treatment group were closely correlated in late nephropathy (T1, r = -0.67, p = 0.03; T2, r = 0.57, p = 0.02) but not in early nephropathy. In contrast to late DN, the initial decrease in AER with antihypertensive therapy was not shown to predict the subsequent rate of decline of GFR in early DN. It follows that assessment of renoprotection during antihypertensive therapy in early nephropathy should be based not only on albuminuria but also on the GFR response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- George Jerums
- Endocrine Centre, Austin Health and University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Vic., Australia
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Kelly DJ, Zhang Y, Moe G, Naik G, Gilbert RE. Aliskiren, a novel renin inhibitor, is renoprotective in a model of advanced diabetic nephropathy in rats. Diabetologia 2007; 50:2398-404. [PMID: 17828524 DOI: 10.1007/s00125-007-0795-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 136] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2007] [Accepted: 07/11/2007] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS Blockade of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) with either ACE inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blocker is a key therapeutic strategy in slowing progression of diabetic nephropathy. Interruption of the RAS may also be achieved by blocking the activity of renin, the rate-limiting step in angiotensin II biosynthesis. However, it is not known whether drugs in this class also reduce the structural and functional manifestations of diabetic nephropathy. METHODS Using diabetic transgenic (mRen-2)27 rats, a rodent model of advanced diabetic nephropathy, we compared the efficacy of the renin inhibitor, aliskiren (10 mg kg(-1) day(-1) by osmotic mini-pump), with the ACE inhibitor, perindopril (0.2 mg kg(-1) day(-1) in drinking water), over a 16 week period. RESULTS Both perindopril and aliskiren reduced blood pressure, albuminuria and structural injury in experimental diabetic nephropathy, although not to the same extent. Aliskiren, at the dose used, did not reduce systemic blood pressure as much as perindopril, but both compounds were equally effective in reducing albuminuria and glomerulosclerosis in diabetic animals. The magnitude of interstitial fibrosis was attenuated to a greater degree by aliskiren than by perindopril. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION These findings suggest that therapies aimed at different targets within the RAS may not have identical effects in attenuating structural injury in experimental diabetic nephropathy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D J Kelly
- Department of Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital, University of Melbourne, Fitzroy, VIC 3065, Australia.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Abstract
Diabetes is currently one of the leading causes of end-stage renal failure requiring renal replacement therapy in the Western World. About 15% to 20% of type 1 diabetic patients and 30% to 40% of type 2 diabetic patients will eventually develop end-stage renal failure. To prevent the development or progression of diabetic kidney disease, good glycaemic control remains the cornerstone in the management of diabetic patients. Beyond glycaemic control, other metabolic factors have been shown to be involved in the development of diabetic kidney disease, i.e. advanced glycation endproducts (AGEs) and the aldose reductase pathway. Furthermore, an adequate control of high blood pressure and treatment of microalbuminuria are major therapeutic targes. To achieve adequate blood pressure control, a combination therapy with different classes of antihypertensive agents is often necessary, especially including angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers. Other vasoactive factors involved in diabetic nephropathy such as endothelin and nitric oxide will be covered briefly. Besides hyperglycaemia and high blood pressure, other risk factors have been identified in the development or progression of diabetic kidney disease: smoking, hyperlipidaemia, obesity and high protein intake. Their impact on renal function will be highlighted. Finally, recent research has also identified intracellular pathways such as the diacylglycerol-protein kinase C pathway and several growth factors, such as growth hormone, insulin-like growth factor, transforming growth factor-beta, vascular endothelial growth factor, and platelet derived growth factor as players in diabetic kidney disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B F Schrijvers
- Endocrinologie, Dienst voor Inwendige Ziekten, Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent, België.
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Borer JS. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition: a landmark advance in treatment for cardiovascular diseases. Eur Heart J Suppl 2007. [DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/sum037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
|
21
|
Marre M, Leye A. Effects of perindopril in hypertensive patients with or without type 2 diabetes mellitus, and with altered insulin sensitivity. Diab Vasc Dis Res 2007; 4:163-73. [PMID: 17907106 DOI: 10.3132/dvdr.2007.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Impaired insulin sensitivity and hypertension are risk factors for atherosclerosis, which in turn leads to a variety of cardiovascular diseases. In both conditions, the risks of morbidity and mortality appear to be further increased. Impaired insulin sensitivity is also a precursor for diabetes. The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) is implicated in the development of both hypertension and insulin resistance. Antihypertensive agents that act by blocking the RAAS, such as angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, may improve insulin sensitivity and therefore prevent the deleterious consequences of insulin resistance, including type 2 diabetes. ACE inhibitors appear to improve insulin sensitivity in patients with hypertension and insulin resistance, including diabetes. This review assesses the literature surrounding the use of the ACE inhibitor perindopril in patients with hypertension and varying degrees of insulin resistance, including the effects of perindopril in preventing the development of diabetes and subsequent cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michel Marre
- Service d'Endocrinologie Diabétologie Nutrition, Groupe Hospitalier Bichat-Claude Bernard, 46 rue Henri Huchard, 75877 Paris Cedex 18, France.
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Strippoli GFM, Bonifati C, Craig M, Navaneethan SD, Craig JC. Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor antagonists for preventing the progression of diabetic kidney disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006; 2006:CD006257. [PMID: 17054288 PMCID: PMC6956646 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd006257] [Citation(s) in RCA: 107] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) and angiotensin II receptor antagonists (AIIRA) are considered to be equally effective for patients with diabetic kidney disease (DKD), but renal and not mortality outcomes have usually been considered. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the benefits and harms ACEi and AIIRA in patients with DKD. SEARCH STRATEGY We searched MEDLINE (1966 to December 2005), EMBASE (1980 to December 2005), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library issue 4 2005) and contacted known investigators. SELECTION CRITERIA Studies comparing ACEi or AIIRA with placebo or each other in patients with DKD were included. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. Statistical analyses were performed using the random effects model and results expressed as relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Heterogeneity among studies was explored using the Cochran Q statistic and the I(2) test, subgroup analyses and random effects metaregression. MAIN RESULTS Fifty studies (13,215 patients) were identified. Thirty eight compared ACEi with placebo, five compared AIIRA with placebo and seven compared ACEi and AIIRA directly. There was no significant difference in the risk of all-cause mortality for ACEi versus placebo (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.17) and AIIRA versus placebo (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.17). A subgroup analysis of studies using full-dose ACEi versus studies using half or less than half the maximum tolerable dose of ACEi showed a significant reduction in the risk of all-cause mortality with the use of full-dose ACEi (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.98). Baseline mortality rates were similar in the ACEi and AIIRA studies. The effects of ACEi and AIIRA on renal outcomes (ESKD, doubling of creatinine, prevention of progression of micro- to macroalbuminuria, remission of micro- to normoalbuminuria) were similarly beneficial. Reliable estimates of effect of ACEi versus AIIRA could not be obtained from the three studies in which they were compared directly because of their small sample size. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Although the survival benefits of ACEi are known for patients with DKD, the relative effects on survival of ACEi with AIIRA are unknown due to the lack of adequate direct comparison studies. In placebo controlled studies, only ACEi (at the maximum tolerable dose, but not lower so-called renal doses) were found to significantly reduce the risk of all-cause mortality. Renal and toxicity profiles of these two classes of agents were not significantly different.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G F M Strippoli
- NHMRC Centre for Clinical Research Excellence in Renal Medicine, Cochrane Renal Group, Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Locked Bag 4001, Westmead, NSW, Australia.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Effects of benazepril on renal function and kidney expression of matrix metalloproteinase-2 and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-2 in diabetic rats. Chin Med J (Engl) 2006. [DOI: 10.1097/00029330-200605020-00004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
|
24
|
Abstract
Management of hypertension is the mainstay of prevention and treatment of diabetic renal disease; evidence suggests that tight blood pressure control slows renal disease progression in established diabetic nephropathy. Inhibition of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) has renoprotective effects over and above those achieved by lowering systemic blood pressure. To date, however, no long-term study using hard end points has directly compared current mechanisms for RAAS inhibition, angiotensin II receptor blockade (ARB) and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition. This issue was addressed in the recently published Diabetics Exposed to Telmisartan and Enalapril (DETAIL) study, a head-to-head comparison of telmisartan and enalapril in 250 patients with hypertension and type 2 diabetes mellitus and early-stage nephropathy. After 5 years' treatment, change in glomerular filtration rate (GFR), the primary efficacy end point, was equivalent in the 2 treatment groups, as were all secondary end points. The expected steep decline in GFR in the first year was followed by a lesser decrease in the second year and then almost complete stabilization of renal function at > or =3 years. Over 5 years, no patient went into end-stage renal disease or required dialysis. There were also no increases in albumin excretion rate, nor was there an increase in creatinine beyond 200 mumol/L. Incidence of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality was extremely low in both treatment groups, a remarkable outcome given that almost 50% of patients had evidence of cardiovascular disease at randomization. Inhibition of the RAAS should play a major part in management of patients with type 2 diabetes with nephropathy, for which both telmisartan and enalapril provide long-term renoprotection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony Barnett
- Division of Medical Sciences, University of Birmingham and Birmingham Heartlands and Solihull National Health Service Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Rimola A, Londoño MC, Guevara G, Bruguera M, Navasa M, Forns X, García-Retortillo M, García-Valdecasas JC, Rodes J. Beneficial effect of angiotensin-blocking agents on graft fibrosis in hepatitis C recurrence after liver transplantation. Transplantation 2004; 78:686-91. [PMID: 15371669 DOI: 10.1097/01.tp.0000128913.09774.ce] [Citation(s) in RCA: 79] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hepatitis C recurrence after liver transplantation is often associated with accelerated graft fibrosis and progression to cirrhosis. Because drugs blocking the action of angiotensin-II can reduce fibrosis in different human and experimental models, we assessed the possible beneficial effect of these drugs on graft fibrosis in hepatitis C recurrence after liver transplantation. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed the charts of 128 liver-transplant recipients with hepatitis C recurrence. Twenty-seven patients (group I) received angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin-II receptor antagonists as antihypertensive treatment, and 101 patients (group II) did not receive these drugs. RESULTS No significant differences were found between groups I and II in demographic, clinical, and laboratory data. In contrast, cirrhosis in the graft was less frequently observed in group I than in group II during postransplant follow-up: 15% versus 35% (P=0.035), respectively, with a probability of cirrhosis of 9% versus 32% at 5 years after transplantation and 35% versus 70% at 10 years (P=0.0049). Furthermore, the fibrosis stage (scored from 0-4) in the liver biopsy obtained at the end of follow-up was significantly lower in group I than in group II (median [and range]: 1 [0-4] vs. 2 [0-4]; P=0.038), and the fibrosis progression index (increase of fibrosis stage per year) was also lower in group I than in group II (0.21 [0-0.45] vs. 0.52 [0-2.58]; P=0.006). CONCLUSION The administration of angiotensin-blocking agents may be beneficial to reduce the development of graft fibrosis in hepatitis C recurrence after liver transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antoni Rimola
- Liver Unit, Hospital Clinic, IDIBAPS, Villaroal 170, 08036 Barcelona, Spain.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Schrijvers BF, De Vriese AS, Flyvbjerg A. From hyperglycemia to diabetic kidney disease: the role of metabolic, hemodynamic, intracellular factors and growth factors/cytokines. Endocr Rev 2004; 25:971-1010. [PMID: 15583025 DOI: 10.1210/er.2003-0018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 242] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
At present, diabetic kidney disease affects about 15-25% of type 1 and 30-40% of type 2 diabetic patients. Several decades of extensive research has elucidated various pathways to be implicated in the development of diabetic kidney disease. This review focuses on the metabolic factors beyond blood glucose that are involved in the pathogenesis of diabetic kidney disease, i.e., advanced glycation end-products and the aldose reductase system. Furthermore, the contribution of hemodynamic factors, the renin-angiotensin system, the endothelin system, and the nitric oxide system, as well as the prominent role of the intracellular signaling molecule protein kinase C are discussed. Finally, the respective roles of TGF-beta, GH and IGFs, vascular endothelial growth factor, and platelet-derived growth factor are covered. The complex interplay between these different pathways will be highlighted. A brief introduction to each system and description of its expression in the normal kidney is followed by in vitro, experimental, and clinical evidence addressing the role of the system in diabetic kidney disease. Finally, well-known and potential therapeutic strategies targeting each system are discussed, ending with an overall conclusion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bieke F Schrijvers
- Medical Department M/Medical Research Laboratories, Clinical Institute, Aarhus University Hospital, Nørrebrogade 44, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Torffvit O, Tapia J, Rippe B, Alm P, Willner J, Tencer J. Ambulatory blood pressure in type 2 diabetic patients with albuminuria: relation to the renal function and structural lesions. J Diabetes Complications 2004; 18:328-35. [PMID: 15531182 DOI: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2004.03.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2003] [Revised: 02/18/2004] [Accepted: 03/12/2004] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS To investigate possible relationships between ambulatory blood pressure (BP) and renal structure and function in type 2 diabetic patients. METHODS Renal biopsies were performed on 39 patients with urine albumin concentrations above 100 mg/l. BP was investigated with a 24-h, automated, portable BP device. RESULTS None of the patients in the study had signs of other renal disease than nephrosclerosis or diabetic nephropathy. Ten patients had slight, 13 intermediate, and 6 severe diabetic nephropathy on the renal biopsy. Among the remaining patients, 4 had normal microscopy findings and 6 had nephrosclerosis. The degree of albuminuria correlated to the systolic BP during the day (r = .43; P < .01) and night (r = .49; P < .01). The glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was associated with the systolic BP daytime (r = -.32; P < .05) and nighttime (r = -.47; P < .01). Neither degree of albuminuria nor GFR was associated with the diastolic BP levels. The degree of the glomerular pathology correlated to the systolic BP during daytime (P < .05), whereas the degree of interstitial fibrosis did not correlate to the BP levels. CONCLUSIONS We have demonstrated that degree of albuminuria and GFR was significantly associated with daytime and nocturnal BP and glomerular structure with daytime BP. Furthermore, no renal disease other than diabetic nephropathy was found.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ole Torffvit
- Department of Medicine, University Hospital of Lund, S-221 85 Lund, Sweden.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Gilbert RE, Krum H, Wilkinson-Berka J, Kelly DJ. The renin-angiotensin system and the long-term complications of diabetes: pathophysiological and therapeutic considerations. Diabet Med 2003; 20:607-21. [PMID: 12873287 DOI: 10.1046/j.1464-5491.2003.00979.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
The relationship between the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) and the progression of diabetic renal disease has been a major focus of investigation over the past 20 years. More recently, experimental and clinical studies have also suggested that the RAS may have a pathogenetic role at other sites of micro- and macrovascular injury in diabetes. Complementing major advances into the understanding of the local, as distinct from the systemic RAS, a number of large clinical trials have examined whether blockade of the RAS might provide protection from the long-term complications of diabetes, beyond that due to blood pressure reduction alone. While some controversy remains, these studies have, in general, suggested that angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition and more recently, angiotensin receptor blockade reduce the development and progression of diabetic nephropathy, cardiovascular disease and possibly retinopathy. This review will focus on recent developments in our understanding of the tissue-based RAS and its role in end-organ injury in diabetes, the results of recent clinical trials and newer strategies for the pharmacological manipulation of the RAS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R E Gilbert
- University of Melbourne, Department of Medicine (St. Vincent's Hospital), Victoria, Australia.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Mifsud SA, Skinner SL, Cooper ME, Kelly DJ, Wilkinson-Berka JL. Effects of low-dose and early versus late perindopril treatment on the progression of severe diabetic nephropathy in (mREN-2)27 rats. J Am Soc Nephrol 2002; 13:684-692. [PMID: 11856772 DOI: 10.1681/asn.v133684] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
It was previously reported that transgenic (mRen-2)27 rats with streptozotocin-induced diabetes mellitus progressively develop advanced nephropathy in 12 wk. These lesions are largely prevented when the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor perindopril is administered from the time of induction of diabetes mellitus. This study aimed to determine the lowest dose of early perindopril treatment required for substantial improvement of renal function and structure and to investigate whether late intervention prevents or reverses the progression of established renal lesions. At 6 wk of age, female heterozygous Ren-2 rats were randomized to receive either streptozotocin (diabetic) or citrate buffer (control). Rats were gavaged, beginning early after the induction of diabetes mellitus or the administration of control vehicle, with 0, 0.02, 0.2, or 2 mg/kg per d perindopril for 12 wk. A separate group of diabetic Ren-2 rats received late treatment with 2 mg/kg per d perindopril throughout week 8 to week 12, when rats were hypertensive and albuminuric and exhibited increased kidney weight and glomerulosclerotic index (GSI). Among diabetic rats, early 0.02 mg/kg per d perindopril treatment reduced systolic BP, GSI, and renal collagen staining but had no effect on albuminuria or kidney hypertrophy. Early 0.2 or 2 mg/kg per d perindopril treatment further reduced systolic BP, GSI, and renal collagen staining and decreased albuminuria and kidney hypertrophy. Late intervention was as antihypertensive and antialbuminuric as early 0.2 or 2 mg/kg per d perindopril treatment but did not prevent a moderate increase in GSI. In conclusion, early treatment with 0.2 mg/kg per d perindopril was the lowest dosage to largely prevent severe diabetic nephropathy in transgenic Ren-2 rats. Late-onset perindopril treatment of diabetic rats with established nephropathy was as efficacious as early treatment with respect to various renal parameters, such as albuminuria, but was associated with moderate progression of glomerulosclerosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sally A Mifsud
- *Department of Physiology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia; Department of Medicine, Austin and Repatriation Medical Centre, West Heidelberg, Australia; and Department of Medicine, St. Vincent's Hospital, Fitzroy, Australia
| | - Sandford L Skinner
- *Department of Physiology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia; Department of Medicine, Austin and Repatriation Medical Centre, West Heidelberg, Australia; and Department of Medicine, St. Vincent's Hospital, Fitzroy, Australia
| | - Mark E Cooper
- *Department of Physiology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia; Department of Medicine, Austin and Repatriation Medical Centre, West Heidelberg, Australia; and Department of Medicine, St. Vincent's Hospital, Fitzroy, Australia
| | - Darren J Kelly
- *Department of Physiology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia; Department of Medicine, Austin and Repatriation Medical Centre, West Heidelberg, Australia; and Department of Medicine, St. Vincent's Hospital, Fitzroy, Australia
| | - Jennifer L Wilkinson-Berka
- *Department of Physiology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia; Department of Medicine, Austin and Repatriation Medical Centre, West Heidelberg, Australia; and Department of Medicine, St. Vincent's Hospital, Fitzroy, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
White KE, Pinel N, Cordonnier DJ, Bilous RW. Does ACE inhibition slow progression of glomerulopathy in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus? Diabet Med 2001; 18:933-6. [PMID: 11703440 DOI: 10.1046/j.1464-5491.2001.00607.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
AIMS To examine the effect of ACE inhibition on glomerular structure in Type 2 diabetic patients with nephropathy. METHODS Twenty-two patients were randomized to receive either perindopril (PE) or placebo (PO) and biopsied at baseline and after 2 years. Nineteen patients completed the study and data on interstitial changes, examined by light microscopy, have already been published. Only 11 patients (five PE, six PO) had sufficient tissue at baseline and follow-up to provide material for detailed electron microscopic examination. RESULTS At baseline, mean +/- sd age (PE vs. PO) was 48 +/- 12 vs. 45 +/- 7 years; creatinine clearance 116 +/- 24 vs. 128 +/- 68 ml/min; median (range) proteinuria 0.7 (0.1-1.0) vs. 0.5 (0.07-3.9) g/24 h (P = NS for all). This cohort of 11 patients showed the same interstitial changes as the whole group. Between-group analysis showed that the change in interstitial volume fraction was significantly greater in the PO compared with PE group (0.10 +/- 0.07 vs. -0.001 +/- 0.04, P = 0.020). There were no significant changes in proteinuria or glomerular structural parameters (mesangial volume fraction PO 0.40 +/- 0.17 to 0.42 +/- 0.21; PE 0.29 +/- 0.08 to 0.28 +/- 0.14) in either treatment group. CONCLUSIONS Interstitial changes appear to be more sensitive to ACE inhibition than glomerulopathy. Larger patient groups and longer treatment periods are necessary in order to detect any possible impact of ACE inhibition on the glomerular changes in Type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K E White
- Department of Medicine, University of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Jerums G, Allen TJ, Campbell DJ, Cooper ME, Gilbert RE, Hammond JJ, Raffaele J, Tsalamandris C. Long-term comparison between perindopril and nifedipine in normotensive patients with type 1 diabetes and microalbuminuria. Am J Kidney Dis 2001; 37:890-9. [PMID: 11325669 DOI: 10.1016/s0272-6386(05)80003-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor with a dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker in preventing progression to macroalbuminuria and/or a decline in renal function in normotensive patients with type 1 diabetes and microalbuminuria. Forty-two patients were randomized to treatment with either perindopril, slow-release nifedipine, or placebo. In the first 3 months, drug dosage was titrated to achieve a decrease in diastolic blood pressure of at least 5 mm HG: Thirty-three patients had a minimum of 24 months' data, and 25 patients were followed up beyond 36 months (mean, 67 +/- 4 months). Patients were studied every 3 months and at the end of the treatment period; those who remained normotensive discontinued therapy and were followed up for an additional 3 months. Baseline geometric mean albumin excretion rates (AERs) were as follows: perindopril, 66 microg/min; nifedipine, 59 microg/min; and placebo, 66 microg/min. During the first 3 years, 7 of the perindopril-treated but none of the placebo or nifedipine-treated patients reverted to normoalbuminuria (P < 0.01). Median AERs at 3 years of treatment in each group were 23 microg/min for perindopril, 122 microg/min for nifedipine, and 112 microg/min for placebo patients (P < 0.01). In patients with more than 3 years' follow-up, median AERs decreased by 45% in the first year and then stabilized in the perindopril group, but increased by 17.6% in the nifedipine group and 27.6% in the placebo group (P < 0.03) in the first year, then increased progressively. In these same patients, there was a significant decline in glomerular filtration rate in the nifedipine group (-7.8 +/- 1.8 mL/min/1.73 m(2)/y), but not in the other two groups (perindopril, -1.0 +/- 1.2 mL/min/1.73 m(2)/y; placebo, -1.3 +/- 1.1 mL/min/1.73 m(2)/y; P = 0.004). At the end of the study, cessation of treatment for 3 months was associated with a doubling of AERs in the perindopril-treated group, but no change in the other two groups (P < 0.001). In conclusion, long-term perindopril therapy is more effective than nifedipine or placebo in delaying the progression of diabetic nephropathy and reducing AER to the normoalbuminuric range (<20 microg/min) in normotensive patients with type 1 diabetes and microalbuminuria.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Jerums
- Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Austin & Repatriation Medical Centre, Heidelberg 3084, VIC, Australia.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Effect of 3 years of antihypertensive therapy on renal structure in type 1 diabetic patients with albuminuria: the European Study for the Prevention of Renal Disease in Type 1 Diabetes (ESPRIT). Diabetes 2001; 50:843-50. [PMID: 11289051 DOI: 10.2337/diabetes.50.4.843] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
In the treatment of diabetic nephropathy, ACE inhibitor therapy reduces albumin excretion and slows the rate of decline in glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Our study was designed to investigate whether these effects lay in amelioration of the underlying glomerular structural abnormalities. A total of 54 type 1 diabetic patients with albuminuria and blood pressure (BP) <150/90 mmHg were randomized to receive 10 mg enalapril once daily, 10 mg nifedipine retard twice daily, or placebo in a multicenter double-blind study of 3 years' duration. Renal biopsy was performed at baseline and follow-up, and tissue was analyzed by standard morphometric methods. BP, GFR, albumin excretion rate (AER), and HbA1c were measured every 6 months. Enalapril lowered AER after 6 months by 26% (P < 0.05); however, this reduction was not sustained at 3 years. There was no significant effect of nifedipine or placebo on AER. GFR decreased by a similar average rate of 4.1 ml x min(-1) x year(-1) (95% CI 2.6-5.6) in all three groups. BP and HbA1c were unchanged throughout the study in all groups. At baseline, nearly all biopsies showed classic appearances of diabetic glomerulopathy. There was no detectable effect of enalapril compared with either nifedipine or placebo on renal structure over 3 years. However, we found that patients with increased AER have established glomerulopathy and a progressive average decline in GFR of 4.1 ml x min(-1) x year(-1) in the absence of overt hypertension, and baseline AER appeared predictive of subsequent mesangial volume fraction (r = 0.20, P = 0.0018). In this small cohort of nonhypertensive patients studied for 3 years, disease evolution appears unaffected by treatment with either enalapril or nifedipine.
Collapse
|
33
|
Kshirsagar AV, Joy MS, Hogan SL, Falk RJ, Colindres RE. Effect of ACE inhibitors in diabetic and nondiabetic chronic renal disease: a systematic overview of randomized placebo-controlled trials. Am J Kidney Dis 2000; 35:695-707. [PMID: 10739792 DOI: 10.1016/s0272-6386(00)70018-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 140] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Clinical trials have shown the beneficial effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors in delaying the progression of diabetic renal disease. There is less evidence from primary clinical trials of nondiabetic renal disease. We performed an updated meta-analysis to determine the efficacy of ACE inhibitors in slowing the progression of renal disease over a broad range of functional renal impairment. We included published and unpublished randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel trials with at least 1 year of follow-up available from January 1970 to June 1999. In nine trials of subjects with diabetic nephropathy and microalbuminuria, the relative risk for developing macroalbuminuria was 0.35 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.24 to 0.53) for individuals treated with an ACE inhibitor compared with placebo. In seven trials of subjects with overt proteinuria and renal insufficiency from a variety of causes (30% diabetes, 70% nondiabetes), the relative risk for doubling of serum creatinine concentration or developing end-stage renal disease was 0.60 (95% CI, 0.49 to 0.73) for individuals treated with an ACE inhibitor compared with placebo. Treatment of individuals with chronic renal insufficiency with ACE inhibitors delays the progression of disease compared with placebo across a spectrum of disease causes and renal dysfunction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A V Kshirsagar
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 27599-7155, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Taylor AA, Sunthornyothin S. The case for combining angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and calcium-channel blockers. Curr Hypertens Rep 1999; 1:446-53. [PMID: 10981104 DOI: 10.1007/s11906-999-0062-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
Tight blood pressure control among diabetic and nondiabetic patients with hypertension is perhaps the single most effective intervention used to delay progression to end-stage renal disease (ESRD). The renoprotective actions of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors in patients with diabetic and hypertensive nephropathy is well established. Drugs of this class fairly uniformly reduce glomerulosclerosis, delay the deterioration in renal function, and improve proteinuria, a predictive surrogate marker for renal injury. Calcium- channel blockers (CCBs) in the phenylalkylamine (verapamil) and benzothiazepine (diltiazem) classes also improve proteinuria and delay the progression of renal disease in diabetic and nondiabetic hypertensive nephropathy beyond that attributable to blood pressure control. The short-acting dihydropyridine CCBs worsen proteinuria and accelerate renal injury in both animal models and humans with hypertension or diabetes. A very limited number of studies in animals or humans with hypertension or diabetes have demonstrated at least an additive renoprotective effect when the combination of ACE inhibitors and nondihydropyridine CCBs has been compared with each agent administered as monotherapy. Because patients with impaired renal function and either hypertension or diabetes appear to benefit from aggressive blood pressure reduction, many of these patients will require two or more drugs to achieve the currently recommended blood pressure goals. Combinations of ACE inhibitor and CCB are attractive because they may provide better blood pressure control, appear to be better tolerated with fewer side effects than either drug alone, and may exert a greater renoprotective effect in patients at risk for renal failure than either an ACE inhibitor or a CCB.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A A Taylor
- Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Room 802E, One Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|