Portal vein immunosuppressant levels and islet graft toxicity

Assessment of tissue-engineered islet graft viability by fluorine magnetic resonance spectroscopy

INTRODUCTION

Despite significant progress in the last decade, islet transplantation remains an experimental therapy for a limited number of patients with type 1 diabetes. Tissue-engineered approaches may provide promising alternatives to the current clinical protocol and would benefit greatly from concurrent development of graft quality assessment techniques. This study was designed to evaluate whether viability of tissue-engineered islet grafts can be assessed using fluorine magnetic resonance spectroscopy ((19)F-MRS), by the noninvasive measurement of oxygen partial pressure (pO(2)) and the subsequent calculation of islet oxygen consumption rate (OCR).

METHODS

Scaffolds composed of porcine plasma were seeded with human islets and perfluorodecalin. Each graft was covered with the same volume of culture media in a Petri dish. Four scaffolds were seeded with various numbers (0-8000) of islet equivalents (IE) aliquoted from the same preparation. After randomizing run order, grafts were examined by (19)F-MRS at 37°C using a 5T spectrometer and a single-loop surface coil placed underneath. A standard inversion recovery sequence was used to obtain characteristic (19)F spin-lattice relaxation times (T1), which were converted to steady-state average pO(2) estimates using a previously determined linear calibration (R(2) = 1.000). Each condition was assessed using replicate (19)F-MRS measurements (n = 6-8).

RESULTS

Grafts exhibited IE dose-dependent increases in T1 and decreases in pO(2) estimates. From the difference between scaffold pO(2) estimates and ambient pO(2), the islet preparation OCR was calculated to be 95 ± 12 (mean ± standard error of the mean) nmol/(min·mg DNA) using theoretical modeling. This value compared well with OCR values measured using established methods for human islet preparations.

CONCLUSIONS

(19)F-MRS can be used for noninvasive pre- and possibly posttransplant assessment of tissue-engineered islet graft viability by estimating the amount of viable, oxygen-consuming tissue in a scaffold.

The caspase inhibitor IDN-6556 (PF3491390) improves marginal mass engraftment after islet transplantation in mice

BACKGROUND

Islet transplantation has become a viable option for selected type 1 diabetic patients; however, a significant portion need to return to exogenous insulin. The predominant factors include impaired islet engraftment and early islet loss. Caspase inhibition is a potent way to improve islet engraftment, but all tested compounds so far have not been clinically relevant. IDN-6556 (PF3491390) has already been used clinically and can be delivered orally with high portal vein concentrations.

METHODS

Mice were given a marginal mass islet graft of either mouse or human islets and treated with either IDN-6556 (10 or 20 mg/kg ip bid) or vehicle and followed for diabetes reversal. At 1 month post-transplant, mice were subjected to a glucose tolerance test and an assessment of graft mass. In separate experiments, human islets were cultured with IDN-6556 or vehicle to assess for islet survival and viability.

RESULTS

In both syngeneic mouse islets and human islets transplanted into immunodeficient mice, IDN-6556 (20 mg/kg) given for 7 days post-transplant led to a significantly enhanced rate of diabetes reversal as compared to vehicle. In addition, mice receiving caspase inhibitor displayed improved glucose tolerance and graft survival at the 1-month point. We also found protective effects in vitro for islet viability and marked reduction in apoptosis in vivo.

CONCLUSION

Taken together, these results demonstrate the effectiveness of caspase inhibition with IDN-6556 on islet transplantation and in particular islet engraftment and survival.

Mesenchymal stem cells prevent acute rejection and prolong graft function in pancreatic islet transplantation

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic islet transplantation is a promising cell-based therapy for type 1 diabetes (insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus), a disease triggered by the immune response against autoantigens of beta-cells. However, the recurrence of immune response after transplantation and the diabetogenic and growth-stunting side effects of immunosuppressants are major challenges to the application of islet transplantation. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have recently been reported to modulate the immune response in allogeneic transplantation.

METHODS

The ability of MSCs, either syngeneic or allogeneic to recipients, to prevent acute rejection and improve glycemic control was investigated in rats with diabetes given a marginal mass of pancreatic islets through the portal vein.

RESULTS

Reduced glucose levels and low-grade rejections were observed up to 15 days after transplantation upon triple-dose administration of MSCs, indicating that MSCs prolong graft function by preventing acute rejection. The efficacy of MSCs was associated with a reduction of pro-inflammatory cytokines and was independent of the administration route. Efficacy was similar for MSCs whether syngeneic or allogeneic to recipients and comparable to that of immunosuppressive therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

The results show that MSCs modulate the immune response through a down-regulation of pro-inflammatory cytokines, suggesting that MSCs may prevent acute rejection and improve graft function in portal vein pancreatic islet transplantation.

Islet grafting and imaging in a bioengineered intramuscular space

BACKGROUND

Because the hepatic portal system may not be the optimal site for islet transplantation, several extrahepatic sites have been studied. Here, we examine an intramuscular transplantation site, bioengineered to better support islet neovascularization, engraftment, and survival, and we demonstrate that at this novel site, grafted beta cell mass may be quantitated in a real-time noninvasive manner by positron emission tomography (PET) imaging.

METHODS

Streptozotocin-induced rats were pretreated intramuscularly with a biocompatible angiogenic scaffold received syngeneic islet transplants 2 weeks later. The recipients were monitored serially by blood glucose and glucose tolerance measurements and by PET imaging of the transplant site with [11C] dihydrotetrabenazine. Parallel histopathologic evaluation of the grafts was performed using insulin staining and evaluation of microvasularity.

RESULTS

Reversal of hyperglycemia by islet transplantation was most successful in recipients pretreated with bioscaffolds containing angiogenic factors when compared with those who received no bioscaffolds or bioscaffolds not treated with angiogenic factors. PET imaging with [11C] dihydrotetrabenazine, insulin staining, and microvascular density patterns were consistent with islet survival, increased levels of angiogenesis, and with reversal of hyperglycemia.

CONCLUSIONS

Induction of increased neovascularization at an intramuscular site significantly improves islet transplant engraftment and survival compared with controls. The use of a nonhepatic transplant site may avoid intrahepatic complications and permit the use of PET imaging to measure and follow transplanted beta cell mass in real time. These findings have important implications for effective islet implantation outside of the liver and offer promising possibilities for improving islet survival, monitoring, and even prevention of islet loss.

Pancreatic islet transplantation into the bone marrow of the rat

BACKGROUND

The liver is the current site for pancreatic islet transplantation, but presents important technical complications and limitations. We asked whether pancreatic islets could be engrafted in the bone marrow, an easily accessible and widely distributed transplant site that may lack the limitations seen in the liver.

METHODS

We implanted pancreatic islet isografts (Lewis islets to Lewis rats), allografts (Wistar Furth islets to Sprague Dawley rats), and xenografts (Tilapia islets to Sprague Dawley rats) into the bone marrow of nondiabetic recipients and assessed survival by histology and immunocytochemistry. No immunosuppression was used.

RESULTS

Isografts and allografts showed positive staining for insulin and glucagon and no evidence of allograft rejection up to 21 days posttransplant. Xenografts were acutely rejected.

CONCLUSIONS

The bone marrow may be an attractive alternative site for pancreatic islet transplantation. The acceptance of allografts and isografts but rejection of xenografts suggests a selective phenomenon for the inflammatory process.

Pancreatic islet cell transplant for treatment of diabetes

Islet cell transplantation recently has emerged as one the most promising therapeutic approaches to improving glycometabolic control in type 1 diabetic patients, and, in many cases, to obtaining insulin independence. Islet cell transplantation requires a relatively short hospital stay and has the advantage of being a relatively noninvasive procedure. The rate of insulin independence 1 year after islet cell transplantation has improved significantly in recent years (60% at 1 year after transplantation compared to the 15% in the past years). Data from a recent international trial confirmed that islet cell transplantation potentially can be a cure for type 1 diabetes. Recent data indicate that insulin independence after islet cell transplantation is associated with an improvement in glucose metabolism and quality of life and with a reduction in hypoglycemic episodes. Islet cell transplantation is still in its initial stages, and many obstacles still need to be overcome. Once clinical islet transplantation has been established, this treatment could be offered to diabetic patients long before the onset of diabetic complications or to patients with life-threatening hypoglycemic unawareness and brittle diabetes.

Vascular endothelial growth factor as a survival factor for human islets: effect of immunosuppressive drugs

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS

Rapamycin, part of the immunosuppressive regimen of the Edmonton protocol, has been shown to inhibit vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) production and VEGF-mediated survival signalling in tumour cell lines. This study investigates the survival-promoting activities of VEGF in human islets and the effects of rapamycin on islet viability.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Levels of VEGF and its receptors in isolated human islets and whole pancreas was determined by western blotting and immunostaining. Islet viability following VEGF or immunosuppressive drug treatment was determined using a 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay. Islet VEGF release was measured by ELISA. Mouse islets infected with an adenovirus expressing the gene for VEGF were transplanted syngeneically into streptozotocin-induced diabetic mice, with blood glucose levels measured three times per week.

RESULTS

Isolated human islets produced multiple isoforms of VEGF and VEGF receptors 1, 2 and 3 and the coreceptor neuropilin 1. Exogenous VEGF (10 ng/ml) prevented human islet death induced by serum starvation, which suggests that VEGF can act as a survival factor for human islets. Transplantation of mouse islets infected with a VEGF-expressing adenovirus in a syngeneic model, improved glycaemic control at day 1 post-transplantation (p < 0.05). Rapamycin at 10 and 100 ng/ml significantly reduced islet VEGF release (by 37 +/- 4% and 43 +/- 6%, respectively; p < 0.05) and at 100 ng/ml reduced islet viability (by 36 +/- 9%) and insulin release (by 47 +/- 7%, all vs vehicle-treated controls; p < 0.05). Tacrolimus had no effect on islet VEGF release or viability.

CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION

Our data suggest that rapamycin may have deleterious effects on islet survival post-transplantation, both through a direct effect on islet viability and indirectly through blockade of VEGF-mediated revascularisation.

Islet cell transplantation today

INTRODUCTION

Long-term studies strongly suggest that tight control of blood glucose can prevent the development and retard the progression of chronic complications of type 1 diabetes mellitus. In contrast to conventional insulin treatment, replacement of a patient's islets of Langerhans either by pancreas organ transplantation or by isolated islet transplantation is the only treatment to achieve a constant normoglycemic state and avoiding hypoglycemic episodes, a typical adverse event of multiple daily insulin injections. However, the cost of this benefit is still the need for immunosuppressive treatment of the recipient with all its potential risks.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Islet cell transplantation offers the advantage of being performed as a minimally invasive procedure in which islets can be perfused percutaneously into the liver via the portal vein. Between January 1990 and December 2004, 458 pancreatic islet transplants worldwide have been reported to the International Islet Transplant Registry (ITR) at our Third Medical Department, University of Giessen/Germany.

RESULTS

Data analysis of islet cell transplants performed in the last 5 years (1999-2004) shows at 1 year after adult islet transplantation a patient survival rate of 97%, a functioning islet graft in 82% of the cases, whereas insulin independence was meanwhile achieved in 43% of the cases. However, using a novel protocol established by the Edmonton Center/Canada, the insulin independence rates have improved significantly reaching meanwhile a 50-80% level.

CONCLUSION

Finally, the concept of islet cell or stem cell transplantation is most attractive, as it offers many perspectives: islet cell availability could become unlimited and islet or stem cells my be transplanted without life-long immunosuppressive treatment of the recipient, just to mention two of them.

Development of an ectopic site for islet transplantation, using biodegradable scaffolds

Clinical islet transplantation in liver has achieved normoglycemia. However, this site may not be ideal for islet survival. To create a more optimal site for islet transplantation, we have developed a construct with biodegradable scaffolds. Islets were seeded in scaffolds and transplanted into the epididymal fat pad of diabetic BALB/c mice. Controls included islets transplanted underneath the kidney capsule or into the fat pad without scaffolds. All animals with islets in scaffolds or the kidney became normoglycemic and maintained this metabolic state. When islets were transplanted without scaffolds the time to achieve normoglycemia was significantly increased and less than 45% of mice survived. An oral glucose tolerance test was performed on the scaffold and kidney groups with similar blood glucose levels and area under the curve values between the groups. Grafts were removed at more than 100 days posttransplantation and all animals became hyperglycemic. There was no significant difference in insulin content between the grafts and all grafts were well vascularized with insulin-positive beta cells. Therefore, islets in scaffolds function and restore diabetic animals to normoglycemic levels, similar to islets transplanted underneath the kidney capsule, suggesting scaffolds can be used to create a site for islet transplantation.

Prevention of core cell damage in isolated islets of Langerhans by low temperature preconditioning

AIM: To study the core cell damage in isolated islets of Langerhans and its prevention by low temperature preconditioning (26 °C).

METHODS: Islets were cultured at 37 °C for 7-14 d after isolation, and then at 26 °C for 2, 4 and 7 d before additional culture at 37 °C for another 7 d. Core cell damage in the isolated islets was monitored by video-microscopy and analyzed quantitatively by use of a computer-assisted image analysis system. The analysis included daily measurement of the diameter and the area of the isolated islets and the area of the core cell damage that developed in those islets over time during culture. Histology and TdT-mediated dUTP-biotin nick end labeling (TUNEL) assay were used to characterize the cell damage and to monitor islet function.

RESULTS: Microscopic analysis showed that during the 7 to 14 d of culture at 37 °C, core cell damage occurred in the larger islets with diameters >200 μm, which included both necrotic and apoptotic cell death. Low temperature (26 °C) culture could prevent core cell damage of isolated islets. The 7-d culture procedure at 26 °C could inhibit most of the core cell (excluding diameters>300 μm) damages when the islets were re-warmed at 37 °C.

CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that core cell damage within isolated islets of Langerhans correlates with the size of islets. Low temperature (26 °C) culture can prevent core cell damage in isolated islets, and successfully precondition these islets for incubation at 37 °C. These novel findings may help to understand the pathophysiology of early loss of islet tissue after transplantation, and may provide a new strategy to improve graft function in the clinical setting of islet transplantation.

{beta}-Cell function following human islet transplantation for type 1 diabetes

Islet transplantation can provide metabolic stability for patients with type 1 diabetes; however, more than one donor pancreas is usually required to achieve insulin independence. To evaluate possible mechanistic defects underlying impaired graft function, we studied five subjects at 3 months and four subjects at 12 months following intraportal islet transplantation who had received comparable islet equivalents per kilogram (12,601 +/- 1,732 vs. 14,384 +/- 2,379, respectively). C-peptide responses, as measures of beta-cell function, were significantly impaired in both transplant groups when compared with healthy control subjects (P < 0.05) after intravenous glucose (0.3 g/kg), an orally consumed meal (600 kcal), and intravenous arginine (5 g), with the greatest impairment to intravenous glucose and a greater impairment seen in the 12-month compared with the 3-month transplant group. A glucose-potentiated arginine test, performed only in insulin-independent transplant subjects (n = 5), demonstrated significant impairments in the glucose-potentiation slope (P < 0.05) and the maximal response to arginine (AR(max); P < 0.05), a measure of beta-cell secretory capacity. Because AR(max) provides an estimate of the functional beta-cell mass, these results suggest that a low engrafted beta-cell mass may account for the functional defects observed after islet transplantation.

Islet allograft survival in nonhuman primates immunosuppressed with basiliximab, RAD, and FTY720

OBJECTIVE

In a preclinical, nonhuman primate islet allotransplant model, the authors evaluated a novel immunosuppressive combination of basiliximab for induction and of RAD and FTY720 for maintenance.

METHODS

Five ABO-compatible and mixed lymphocyte reactivity-mismatched streptozotocin-induced diabetic juvenile cynomolgus monkeys underwent transplantation intraportally with 48-hr cultured 10,000 islet equivalents per kilogram. Induction immunosuppression was with intravenous basiliximab (10 mg on postoperative days 0 and 4). Maintenance immunosuppression was with RAD (everolimus) (0.075 mg/kg per day administered subcutaneously) and FTY720 (0.3 mg/kg per day administered orally), both administered on day -2 through day 180 posttransplant.

RESULTS

All five recipients tolerated their transplants and immunosuppressive therapy well, without adverse events or infectious complications. Insulin requirements pretransplant were 2.6 to 4.0 U/kg per day. All recipients became normoglycemic and insulin-independent posttransplant. Posttransplant serum C-peptide levels averaged 2.7 ng/mL (range, 0.6-6.2 ng/mL). Morning blood glucose levels ranged from less than 100 mg/dL to 150 mg/dL. Posttransplant acute C-peptide response to intravenous arginine averaged 1.3 ng/mL (range, 0.23-2.72 ng/mL). In one recipient with subtherapeutic RAD blood levels on day 7 posttransplant, exogenous insulin was resumed 100 days posttransplant; basal C-peptide levels remained positive in this recipient and averaged 2.6 ng/mL. The other four recipients remained insulin-independent for more than 6 months.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides preliminary evidence of the safety and efficacy of corticosteroid- and calcineurin inhibitor-free immunosuppression in a relevant preclinical transplant model. These findings provide a strong rationale for evaluating this nondiabetogenic regimen in a clinical trial of islet transplants in type 1 diabetic recipients.

Recovery of the endogenous beta cell function in the NOD model of autoimmune diabetes

In light of accumulating evidence that the endocrine pancreas has regenerative properties and that hematopoietic chimerism can abrogate destruction of beta cells in autoimmune diabetes, we addressed the question of whether recovery of physiologically adequate endogenous insulin regulation could be achieved in the nonobese diabetic (NOD) mice rendered allogeneic chimerae. Allogeneic bone marrow (BM) was transplanted into NOD mice at the preclinical and overtly clinical stages of the disease using lethal and nonlethal doses of radiation for recipient conditioning. Islets of Langerhans, syngeneic to the BM donors, were transplanted under kidney capsules of the overtly diabetic animals to sustain euglycemia for the time span required for recovery of the endogenous pancreas. Nephrectomies of the graft-bearing organs were performed 14 weeks later to confirm the restoration of endogenous insulin regulation. Reparative processes in the pancreata were assessed histologically and immunohistochemically. The level of chimerism in NOD recipients was evaluated by flow cytometric analysis. We have shown that as low as 1% of initial allogeneic chimerism can reverse the diabetogenic processes in islets of Langerhans in prediabetic NOD mice, and that restoration of endogenous beta cell function to physiologically sufficient levels is achievable even if the allogeneic BM transplantation is performed after the clinical onset of diabetes. If the same pattern of islet regeneration were shown in humans, induction of an autoimmunity-free status by establishment of a low level of chimerism, or other alternative means, might become a new therapy for type 1 diabetes.

Elevated portal vein drug levels of sirolimus and tacrolimus in islet transplant recipients: local immunosuppression or islet toxicity?

The recent success of islet transplantation using the Edmonton protocol involved the use of sirolimus, tacrolimus, and daclizumab for immunosuppression. Islets were infused into the portal circulation after transhepatic access. This protocol provided a unique opportunity to measure sirolimus and tacrolimus levels from the portal vein and compare them to systemic venous levels. A total of 11 portal venous samples with a corresponding peripheral venous sample were obtained from patients undergoing a first or second islet infusion and medication levels were obtained on both types of specimens. The portal-to-systemic drug level ratio ranged from 0.95 to 2.71 for sirolimus and 1.0 to 3.12 for tacrolimus. Given the potential toxicity of these agents to islets, the findings in this study may have implications for designing the next generation of immunosuppressive protocols for islet transplantation.

Rapamycin has a deleterious effect on MIN-6 cells and rat and human islets

Rapamycin (sirolimus) is a macrolide fungicide with immunosuppressant properties that is used in human islet transplantation. Little is known about the effects of rapamycin on MIN-6 cells and islets. Rapamycin had a dose-dependent, time-dependent, and glucose-independent deleterious effect on MIN-6 cell viability. At day 1, using the MTT method, 0.01 nmol/l rapamycin reduced cell viability to 83 +/- 6% of control (P < 0.05). Using the calcein AM method, at day 2, 10 nmol/l rapamycin caused a reduction in cell viability to 73 +/- 5% of control (P < 0.001). Furthermore, 10 and 100 nmol/l rapamycin caused apoptosis in MIN-6 cells as assessed by the transferase-mediated dUTP nick-end labeling assay. Compared with control, there was a 3.1 +/- 0.6-fold increase (P < 0.01) in apoptosis in MIN-6 cells treated with 10 nmol/l rapamycin. A supra-therapeutic rapamycin concentration of 100 nmol/l significantly impaired glucose- and carbachol-stimulated insulin secretion in rat islets and had a deleterious effect on the viability of rat and human islets, causing apoptosis of both alpha- and beta-cells.

Magnetic resonance-defined periportal steatosis following intraportal islet transplantation: a functional footprint of islet graft survival?

There is growing interest in more widespread application of isolated islet transplantation for the treatment of type 1 diabetes; however, the sequelae of long-term islet residence within the liver are unknown. We report herein a consequence of intraportal islet transplantation, specifically the development of periportal hepatic steatosis apparently induced by the local secretion of insulin within the liver.

Pancreatic Islet Cell Transplantation

Pancreatic islet cell transplantation as a treatment for diabetes has hitherto been confined to small patient cohorts with limited success. This article summarizes the results of islet cell transplantation before and after the advent of the new 'Edmonton protocol' of immunosuppression and management of the donor pancreas. Adopting this regimen has achieved unprecedented success and renewed interest in this potential cure for diabetes. Central to recent improvements in the technique has been the transplantation of an adequate islet mass. Improved methods to procure, isolate, and purify islets for clinical use are now being adopted as a new 'gold standard'. The use of new immunosuppressive drugs has further improved clinical results. Corticosteroid sparing-based regimens, and agents such as humanized monoclonal antibodies, are likely to form the mainstay of immunosuppressive protocols with the aim of achieving donor-specific tolerance. Alternative sources of islet cells are also required to expand the technique in an era of reduced numbers of donor pancreata. Manipulation of stem cells and xenotransplantation may yet yield sufficient islets to overcome the problem of donor shortage. Islet cell transplantation now forms the basis of a prospective multicenter trial under the aegis of the Immune Tolerance Network. The results of this are awaited, but it appears that islet cell transplantation may yet emerge as an effective treatment option for some members of the diabetic population.

Defining optimal immunosuppression for islet transplantation based on reduced diabetogenicity in canine islet autografts

BACKGROUND

The recent results of clinical islet transplantation have improved substantially with the introduction of a more potent but less diabetogenic immunosuppressant protocol. The successful development of this protocol was based in part on the outcomes of studies reported herein, addressing the diabetogenic potential of a series of immunosuppressant agents used alone or in combination in a canine islet autograft model. Although it is recognized that failure to achieve long-term insulin independence in human islet allotransplantation has been multifactorial, with low engraftment mass, acute or chronic rejection, autoimmune recurrence, loss of islet-acinar integrity, heterotopic site, denervation, and insulin resistance all being implicated to varying degrees, avoidance of diabetogenic immunosuppression has been pivotal to the enhanced outcomes of clinical islet transplantation. We here explore the effects of clinically relevant doses of cyclosporine or tacrolimus when given alone or in combination with glucocorticoids on long-term canine islet autograft function.

METHOD

Dogs (n=8) underwent total pancreatectomy, islet isolation, and intrasplenic autotransplantation and were normoglycemic with stable long-term graft function 3 months to 8 years posttransplant. The frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test (FSIGT) was performed predrug (baseline), at 1 month of therapy (on drug), and again 1 month after withdrawal of therapy (postdrug).

RESULTS

Monotherapy treatments with low- or high-dose prednisone, Neoral, or tacrolimus had minimal impact on islet autograft function. The combination of Neoral and prednisone led to a marked impairment in glucose decay (25% decline from 1.77+/-0.2 to 1.24+/-0.2, P<0.05), without significant change in insulin responsiveness or glucose effectiveness. However, insulin sensitivity was markedly impaired while on therapy (7.10+/-1.2 to 3.10+/-0.5, P<0.01). Importantly, glucose decay and insulin sensitivity failed to return to baseline after withdrawal of therapy. The combination of tacrolimus and glucocorticoids led to permanent and irreversible diabetes in all recipients (n=6, P<0.001). Similar treatment of healthy control dogs led to a 44% decrease in glucose decay (P<0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Immunosuppression must be specifically tailored for islet transplantation and be glucocorticoid free if insulin independence is to be sustained clinically.

Intrahepatic islet transplantation in type 1 diabetic patients does not restore hypoglycemic hormonal counterregulation or symptom recognition after insulin independence

Islet allotransplantation can provide prolonged insulin independence in selected individuals with type 1 diabetes. Whether islet transplantation also restores hypoglycemic counterregulation is unclear. To determine if hypoglycemic counterregulation is restored by islet transplantation, we studied hormone responses and hypoglycemic symptom recognition in seven insulin-independent islet transplant recipients using a 3-h stepped hypoglycemic clamp, and compared their responses to those of nontransplanted type 1 diabetic subjects and nondiabetic control subjects. Glucagon responses of islet transplant recipients to hypoglycemia were significantly less than that observed in control subjects (incremental glucagon [mean +/- SE]: -12 +/- 12 vs. 64 +/- 22 pg/ml, respectively; P < 0.05), and not significantly different from that of nontransplanted type 1 diabetic subjects (-17 +/- 10 pg/ml). Epinephrine responses and symptom recognition were also not restored by islet transplantation (incremental epinephrine [mean +/- SE]: 195 +/- 128 [islet transplant recipients] vs. 238 +/- 73 [type 1 diabetic subjects] vs. 633 +/- 139 pg/ml [nondiabetic control subjects], P < 0.05 vs. control; peak symptom scores: 3.3 +/- 0.9 [islet transplant recipients] vs. 3.1 +/- 1.1 [type 1 diabetic subjects] vs. 6.7 +/- 0.8 [nondiabetic control subjects]). Thus the results indicate that despite providing prolonged insulin independence and near-normal glycemic control in these patients with long-standing type 1 diabetes, hypoglycemic hormonal counterregulation and symptom recognition were not restored by intrahepatic islet transplantation.

Inhibitory effects of immunosuppressive drugs on insulin secretion from HIT-T15 cells and Wistar rat islets

Until recently, islet allotransplantation for type 1 diabetic patients has been largely unsuccessful. Previous pharmacologic studies of single drugs have suggested that one factor contributing to this poor success is toxicity of immunosuppressive drugs on transplanted islets. However, no comprehensive study of agents currently used for islet transplantation has been previously reported. Consequently, we exposed HIT-T15 cells and Wistar rat islets to various concentrations of five immunosuppressive agents for 48 and 24 hr, respectively, and measured glucose-stimulated insulin secretion during subsequent static incubations. Results are expressed as percent reduction of insulin secretion at the lower and upper limits, respectively, of plasma drug concentrations used in clinical transplantation compared with control (no drug exposure). Insulin secretion from HIT-T15 cells was significantly inhibited by 74% and 90% after exposure to methylprednisolone (P<0.05), 11% and 24% after exposure to cyclosporine (P<0.01), 60% and 83% after exposure to mycophenolate (P<0.05), 56% and 63% after exposure to sirolimus (P<0.001), and 10% and 20% after exposure to tacrolimus (P<0.001). Insulin secretion from Wistar rat islets was reduced by 0% and 48% after exposure to mycophenolate (P<0.001) and 20% and 31% after exposure to tacrolimus (P<0.05). No reduction in insulin secretion was observed from either HIT-T15 cells or rat islets after exposure to daclizumab. The results support the hypothesis that toxicity of certain immunosuppressive drugs on beta-cell function plays a role in the poor success of islet allotransplantation. This is especially true of intrahepatically transplanted islets, which are exposed to higher portal concentrations of immunosuppressive agents. These findings support the use of low-dose immunosuppressive drug protocols in clinical islet transplantation.

Factors influencing Islet of Langerhans graft function and monitoring

Transplantation of islet of Langerhans represents a viable therapeutic option for insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Dramatic progress has been recently reported with the introduction of a glucocorticoid-free immunosuppressive regimen that improved success rate, namely, insulin independence for 1 year or more, from 8% to 100%. The fate of islet grafts is determined by many concurrent phenomena, some of which are common to organ grafts (i.e. rejection), while others are unique to nonvascularized cell transplants, including transplant cell mass and viability, as well as nonspecific inflammation at the site of implant. Moreover, islet grafts lack clinical markers of early rejection, making it difficult to recognize imminent rejection and to implement intervention with graft-saving immunosuppressive regimens. In the present review, we will address the problems influencing islet graft success and the monitoring of islet cell graft function.

Human islet cell transplantation--future prospects

BACKGROUND

Islet transplantation has the potential to cure diabetes mellitus. Nevertheless despite successful reversal of diabetes in many small animal models, the clinical situation has been far more challenging. The aim of this review is to discuss why insulin-independence after islet allotransplantation has been so difficult to achieve.

METHODS

A literature review was undertaken using Medline from 1975 to July 2000. Results reported to the International Islet Transplant Registry (ITR) up to December 1998 were also analysed.

RESULTS

Up to December 1998, 405 islet allotransplants have been reported the ITR. Of those accurately documented between 1990 and 1998 (n = 267) only 12% have achieved insulin-independence (greater than 7 days). However with refined peri-transplant protocols insulin independence at 1 year can reach 20%.

CONCLUSIONS

There are many factors which can explain the failure of achieving insulin-independence after islet allotransplantation. These include the use of diabetogenic immunosuppressive agents to abrogate both islet allo-immunity and auto-immunity, the critical islet mass to achieve insulin-independence and the detrimental effects of transplanting islets in an ectopic site. However recent evidence most notably from the Edmonton group demonstrates that islet allotransplantation still has great potential to become an established treatment option for diabetic patients.