Hevein-like protein domains as a possible cause for allergen cross-reactivity between latex and banana

Relationship between perioperative anaphylaxis and history of allergies or allergic diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis with meta-regression

STUDY OBJECTIVE

We conducted this meta-analysis to summarize the available evidence and evaluate the relationship between a history of allergies/allergic diseases and perioperative anaphylaxis to offer preventive decision support.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.

SETTING

We searched the MEDLINE (OVID), EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases for observational studies. Two investigators independently performed the search, screened the articles, and collected the study details.

MEASUREMENTS

Several databases were systematically searched to evaluate the relationship between a history of allergies/allergic diseases and perioperative anaphylaxis using subgroup analysis, sensitivity analysis and meta-regression.

MAIN RESULTS

A total of 19 studies involving 672 anaphylaxis episodes, 5608 immune-mediated reactions, and 1126 severe episodes met the eligibility criteria and were included in this meta-analysis. Drug allergies, food allergies, a history of allergies, and atopy increased the incidence of perioperative anaphylaxis (Drug allergies, odds ratio [OR] 3.54, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.07-11.69; Food allergies, OR 2.29, 95% CI 1.23-4.26; A history of allergies, OR 4.86, 95% CI 3.65-6.49; Atopy, OR 3.58, 95% CI 1.47-8.71), but not the presence of immune-mediated reactions and the severity of perioperative anaphylaxis.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with previous drug allergies, food allergies, a history of allergies, or atopy are more likely to develop anaphylaxis during the perioperative period. Additional studies should be carried out to determine whether a history of allergies/allergic diseases is a major factor for perioperative anaphylaxis when confounders are controlled.

Are Dietary Lectins Relevant Allergens in Plant Food Allergy?

Lectins or carbohydrate-binding proteins are widely distributed in seeds and vegetative parts of edible plant species. A few lectins from different fruits and vegetables have been identified as potential food allergens, including wheat agglutinin, hevein (Hev b 6.02) from the rubber tree and chitinases containing a hevein domain from different fruits and vegetables. However, other well-known lectins from legumes have been demonstrated to behave as potential food allergens taking into account their ability to specifically bind IgE from allergic patients, trigger the degranulation of sensitized basophils, and to elicit interleukin secretion in sensitized people. These allergens include members from the different families of higher plant lectins, including legume lectins, type II ribosome-inactivating proteins (RIP-II), wheat germ agglutinin (WGA), jacalin-related lectins, GNA (Galanthus nivalis agglutinin)-like lectins, and Nictaba-related lectins. Most of these potentially active lectin allergens belong to the group of seed storage proteins (legume lectins), pathogenesis-related protein family PR-3 comprising hevein and class I, II, IV, V, VI, and VII chitinases containing a hevein domain, and type II ribosome-inactivating proteins containing a ricin B-chain domain (RIP-II). In the present review, we present an exhaustive survey of both the structural organization and structural features responsible for the allergenic potency of lectins, with special reference to lectins from dietary plant species/tissues consumed in Western countries.

Chitinases as Food Allergens

Food allergies originate from adverse immune reactions to some food components. Ingestion of food allergens can cause effects of varying severity, from mild itching to severe anaphylaxis reactions. Currently there are no clues to predict the allergenic potency of a molecule, nor are cures for food allergies available. Cutting-edge research on allergens is aimed at increasing information on their diffusion and understanding structure-allergenicity relationships. In this context, purified recombinant allergens are valuable tools for advances in the diagnostic and immunotherapeutic fields. Chitinases are a group of allergens often found in plant fruits, but also identified in edible insects. They are classified into different families and classes for which structural analyses and identification of epitopes have been only partially carried out. Moreover, also their presence in common allergen databases is not complete. In this review we provide a summary of the identified food allergenic chitinases, their main structural characteristics, and a clear division in the different classes.

Overview of plant chitinases identified as food allergens

Food allergies are induced by proteins belonging to a limited number of families. Unfortunately, relationships between protein structure and capacity to induce the immune response have not been completely clarified yet, which precludes possible improvements in the diagnosis, prevention, and therapy of allergies. Plant chitinases constitute a good example of food allergenic proteins for which structural analysis of allergenicity has only been carried out partially. In plants, there are at least five structural classes of chitinases plus a number of chitinase-related polypeptides. Their allergenicity has been mostly investigated for chitinases of class I, due to both their higher prevalence among plant chitinases and by the high structural similarity between their substrate-binding domain and hevein, a well-known allergen present in the latex of rubber trees. Even if allergenic molecules have been identified for at least three other classes of plant chitinases, the involvement of the different structural motifs in the allergenicity of molecules has been disregarded so far. In this review, we provide a structurally based catalog of plant chitinases investigated for allergenicity, which could be a useful base for further studies aimed at better clarifying the structure-allergenicity relationships for this protein family.

Food allergies resulting from immunological cross-reactivity with inhalant allergens: Guidelines from the German Society for Allergology and Clinical Immunology (DGAKI), the German Dermatology Society (DDG), the Association of German Allergologists (AeDA) and the Society for Pediatric Allergology and Environmental Medicine (GPA)

A large proportion of immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated food allergies in older children, adolescents and adults are caused by cross-reactive allergenic structures. Primary sensitization is most commonly to inhalant allergens (e.g. Bet v 1, the major birch pollen allergen). IgE can be activated by various cross-reactive allergens and lead to a variety of clinical manifestations. In general, local and mild — in rare cases also severe and systemic — reactions occur directly after consumption of the food containing the cross-reactive allergen (e. g. plant-derived foods containing proteins of the Bet v 1 family). In clinical practice, sensitization to the primary responsible inhalant and/or food allergen can be detected by skin prick tests and/or in vitro detection of specific IgE. Component-based diagnostic methods can support clinical diagnosis. For individual allergens, these methods may be helpful to estimate the risk of systemic reactions. Confirmation of sensitization by oral provocation testing is important particulary in the case of unclear case history. New, as yet unrecognized allergens can also cause cross-reactions.

The therapeutic potential of specific immunotherapy (SIT) with inhalant allergens and their effect on pollen-associated food allergies is currently unclear: results vary and placebo-controlled trials will be necessary in the future. Pollen allergies are very common. Altogether allergic sensitization to pollen and cross-reactive food allergens are very common in our latitudes. The actual relevance has to be assessed on an individual basis using the clinical information.

Cite this as Worm M, Jappe U, Kleine-Tebbe J, Schäfer C, Reese I, Saloga J, Treudler R, Zuberbier T, Wassmann A, Fuchs T, Dölle S, Raithel M, Ballmer-Weber B, Niggemann B, Werfel T. Food allergies resulting from immunological cross-reactivity with inhalant allergens. Allergo J Int 2014; 23: 1–16 DOI 10.1007/s40629-014-0004-6

The influence of chitin on the immune response to the house dust mite allergen Blo T 12

BACKGROUND

Information about the biological properties of Blomia tropicalis allergens is scarce. It is predicted that Blo t 12, an allergen with two described isoforms, contains a chitin-binding domain, similar to that found in peritrophins. Th2 adjuvant properties have been described for chitin. Therefore, it is feasible that binding to this carbohydrate influences its allergenicity. We aimed to evaluate the chitin-binding activity of Blo t 12 isoallergens and its effect on airway inflammation and antibody responses in a murine model of allergen sensitization.

METHODS

Chitin-binding assays were conducted with the recombinant isoallergens Blo t 12.0101 and Blo t 12.0102. BALB/c mice were sensitized via i.p. with any of the two isoforms (alone, with chitin or alum) and then challenged intranasally. Methacholine-induced bronchial hyperreactivity was tested by whole-body plethysmography and lung sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin and periodic-acid Schiff. Total IgE and allergen-specific IgE, IgG1 and IgG2 levels were measured by ELISA.

RESULTS

The two isoforms bound chitin, but Blo t 12.0101 showed a stronger binding capacity. Both isoforms induced total and allergen-specific IgE, airway hyperreactivity, bronchial inflammation and mucus secretion without any adjuvant; however, when administered with chitin, Blo t 12.0101 induced higher total IgE levels. The IgG1/IgG2a ratio was significantly higher in mice immunized with Blo t 12.0101 than those immunized with Blo t 12.0102. As peritrophins, Blo t 12 was detected in mite feces.

CONCLUSIONS

Blo t 12 isoforms are chitin-binding proteins that induce airway inflammation and bronchial hyperreactivity. However, for Blo t 12.0101, chitin reinforces its effects on total IgE production.

The clinical meaning of positive latex sIgE in patients with food/pollen adverse reactions

Natural rubber latex allergy (NRL-A) is an international problem of public health. About 50-60% of NRL-A patients may present adverse reactions after ingestion of cross-reacting vegetable foods. This condition, called "Latex-fruit Syndrome", is a matter of research. The aim of our study is to distinguish between clinical/subclinical latex-fruit syndrome and cross-sensitization to latex and food/pollen allergens on the basis of latex recombinant allergens. We studied 51 patients with food hypersensitivity and serological evidence of NRL sensitization. The subjects underwent an accurate allergological evaluation (skin prick test with latex, food and pollen extracts, specific IgE to latex and recombinant allergens, challenge provocation tests). The patients were divided in two groups: group A) 34 patients with clinical and serological latex and fruit/vegetable allergies; group B) 17 patients allergic to fruits/vegetables and/or pollens, with serological, but not clinical NRL-A. All the latex challenge tests resulted positive in group A patients and only two patients of group B presented positive cutaneous challenge tests. Moreover, specific IgE-antibodies were detected to rHev b 5, to rHev b 6.01, to rHev b 6.02 and to rHev b 8 (and other profilins) of group A patients, while in group B we observed a monosensitization to Hev b8, probably linked to a cross-sensitization to pollens and foods. At the present state of knowledge, we need a multi-parametric approach based on a combination of clinical history, diagnostic tests (CRD) and latex challenge tests to make diagnosis of latex-fruit syndrome.

Sensitization profiles to purified plant food allergens among pediatric patients with allergy to banana

Banana fruit allergy is well known, but neither immunoglobulin E recognition patterns to purified plant food allergens nor true prevalences of putative banana allergens have been established. This study aimed to characterize β-1,3-glucanase and thaumatin-like protein (TLP) as banana allergens, testing them, together with other plant food allergens, in 51 children with allergic reactions after banana ingestion and both positive specific IgE and skin prick test (SPT) to banana. Banana β-1,3-glucanase and TLP were isolated and characterized. Both banana allergens, together with kiwifruit TLP Act d 2, avocado class I chitinase Pers a 1, palm pollen profilin Pho d 2 and peach fruit lipid transfer protein (LTP) Pru p 3, were tested by in vitro and in vivo assays. Banana β-1,3-glucanase (Mus a 5) was glycosylated, whereas banana TLP (Mus a 4) was not, in contrast with its homologous kiwi allergen Act d 2. Specific IgE to both banana allergens, as well as to peach Pru p 3, was found in over 70% of sera from banana-allergic children, and Mus a 4 and Pru p 3 provoked positive SPT responses in 6 of the 12 tested patients, whereas Mus a 5 in only one of them. Both peptidic epitopes and cross-reactive carbohydrate determinants were involved in the IgE-binding to Mus a 5, whereas cross-reactivity between Mus a 4 and Act d 2 was only based on common IgE protein epitopes. Profilin Pho d 2 elicited a relevant proportion of positive responses on in vitro (41%) and in vivo (58%) tests. Therefore, Mus a 4 and LTP behave as major banana allergens in the study population, and profilin seems to be also a relevant allergen. Mus a 5 is an equivocal allergenic protein, showing high IgE-binding to its attached complex glycan, and low in vivo potency.

Latex-allergic patients sensitized to the major allergen hevein and hevein-like domains of class I chitinases show no increased frequency of latex-associated plant food allergy

Allergies to certain fruits such as banana, avocado, chestnut and kiwi are described in 30–70% of latex-allergic patients. This association is attributed to the cross-reactivity between the major latex allergen hevein and hevein-like domains (HLDs) from fruit class I chitinases. We aimed to assess the extent of cross-reactivity between hevein and HLDs using sera from latex-allergic patients with and without plant food allergy. Hevein and HLDs of latex, banana, and avocado chitinases were expressed in Escherichia coli as fusion proteins with the maltose-binding protein and purified by affinity chromatography. IgE binding to these proteins was studied in sera from 59 latex-allergic patients and 20 banana-allergic patients without latex allergy by ELISA and ELISA inhibition. Additionally, 16,408 allergic patients’ sera were tested for IgE binding to hevein, latex chitinase, and wheat germ agglutinin using an allergen microarray. Hevein-specific IgE was detected in 34/59 (58%) latex-allergic patients’ sera. HLDs of latex, banana, and avocado chitinases were recognized by 21 (36%), 20 (34%), and 9 (15%) sera, respectively. In contrast, only one of 20 banana-allergic patients without latex allergy was sensitized to chitinase HLDs. In most tested latex-allergic patients’ sera, IgE binding to hevein was only partially reduced by preincubation with HLDs. Among hevein-sensitized, latex-allergic patients, the percentage of plant food allergy (15/34 = 44%) was equal to latex-allergic patients without hevein sensitization (11/25 = 44%). In the general allergic population, 230 of 16,408 sera (1.4%) reacted to hevein and/or a hevein-like allergen. Of these, 128 sera showed an isolated sensitization to hevein, whereas only 17 bound to latex chitinase or wheat germ agglutinin without hevein sensitization. In conclusion, the IgE response to HLDs is elicited by hevein as sensitizing allergen in most cases. Despite considerable cross-reactivity between these allergens, no correlation between latex-associated plant food allergy and sensitization to hevein or HLDs was found.

Specific detection of banana residue in processed foods using polymerase chain reaction

Specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR) methods were developed for the detection of banana residue in processed foods. For high banana specificity, the primer set BAN-F/BAN-R was designed on the basis of the large subunit of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase (rbcL) genes of chloroplasts and used to obtain amplified products specific to banana by both conventional and real-time PCR. To confirm the specificity of these methods, genomic DNA samples from 31 other species were examined; no amplification products were detected. Subsequently, eight kinds of processed foods containing banana were investigated using these methods to confirm the presence of banana DNA. Conventional PCR had a detection limit of 1 ppm (w/w) banana DNA spiked in 50 ng of salmon testis DNA, whereas SYBR Green I real-time semiquantitative PCR had a detection limit as low as 10 ppm banana DNA. Thus, both methods show high sensitivity and may be applicable as specific tools for the detection of trace amounts of banana in commercial food products.

Latex glove use by food handlers: the case for nonlatex gloves

There is increasing concern that continued exposure to latex products can predispose individuals, particularly those who are atopic (allergy prone), to latex allergy. Latex allergy as a serious hazard has been well documented in the health care industry. There are also well-documented cases of food handlers who have had allergic reactions after the use of latex gloves. The contamination of food with latex proteins by food handlers using latex gloves can also result in potentially severe allergic reactions in latex-allergic consumers. We review latex allergy and present the case for avoiding latex glove use by food handlers in the food and hospitality industries. Adopting the use of nonlatex gloves has benefits for workers, consumers, and the food industry.

Latex allergy: a model for therapy

Allergy to natural rubber latex products emerged as an important clinical condition following an increase in the use of latex gloves for barrier protection in the early 1980s. In addition to latex glove users, other high-risk groups with different latex exposure include spina bifida patients and others with multiple surgical procedures. Subjects with fruit and vegetable allergy are also at risk due to cross-reactive allergens. Following the significant advances in the identification and characterization of common aeroallergens, latex allergy was well placed to become an excellent model of therapy. Awareness of latex allergy and modes of sensitization enabled epidemiological studies to inform allergen avoidance initiatives, substantially reducing inadvertent exposure in major hospitals in Western countries. Spina bifida is often identified in utero or soon after birth, allowing vigorous latex allergen avoidance with enhanced efficacy of primary prevention. However, changing demographics of latex allergy and technological revolution in countries such as China and India are predicted to unleash a second wave of latex allergy reemphasizing the incentive for improved manufacturing procedures for latex products. The desirable high tensile strength and elasticity of natural rubber latex have made the commercial identification of good alternatives very difficult but this would also be attractive for primary prevention. In addition, an effective specific immunotherapy regimen would be valuable for selected high-risk atopic individuals. Current subcutaneous and sublingual immunotherapy schedules have been tested for treatment of latex allergy with evidence of efficacy but the risks of adverse events are high. For such potent allergens as latex, hypoallergenic but T cell-reactive preparations are required for clinical use. Identification of allergenic components of latex products, with generation of monoclonal antibodies and recombinant allergens, allowed sequence determination and mapping of T cell and B cell epitopes. Together, these reagents and data facilitated improved diagnostics and investigation of novel-specific therapeutics. Potential hypoallergenic latex preparations identified include modified non-IgE-reactive allergen molecules and short T cell epitope peptides. The co-administration of adjunct therapies such as anti-IgE or corticosteroids and of appropriate adjuvants for induction of regulatory T cell response offers promise for clinically effective, safe latex-specific vaccines.

Latex allergy: low prevalence of immunoglobulin E to highly purified proteins Hev b 2 and Hev b 13

BACKGROUND

Hevea brasiliensis (Hev b) 2 and Hev b 13 have recently been identified as major latex allergens by detecting specific IgE antibodies in >50% of sera from Hev b latex-allergic individuals.

OBJECTIVE

We assessed the prevalence rates for sensitization to extensively purified latex allergens in patients from three diverse geographical areas.

METHODS

Native Hev b 2, Hev b 5, Hev b 6.01 and Hev b 13 were purified by non-denaturating chromatography and were used in ELISAs to assess sera from 215 latex-allergic patients and 172 atopic non-sensitized controls from Finland, Spain and the United States to detect allergen-specific IgE antibodies.

RESULTS

Unexpectedly, even highly purified Hev b 13 contained epitope(s) to which Hev b 6-specific human IgE antibodies bound effectively. Further purification, however, reduced the prevalence of IgE antibody reactivity to low levels: 15%, 5% and 11% for Hev b 2, and 18%, 30% and 27% for Hev b 13 among latex-allergic Finnish, Spanish and American patients, respectively. Interestingly, Finnish patients had a lower prevalence of Hev b 5-specific IgE antibody (28%) as compared with Spanish (49%) and American (71%) patients. The prevalence of Hev b 6.01-specific IgE reactivity was uniformly >50% in all three populations.

CONCLUSION

Neither Hev b 2 nor Hev b 13 appear to be major latex allergens when evaluated in serological assays using highly purified allergens. The reason(s) for the observed differences in published sensitization rates in various geographic regions requires further study. The purity of the allergen preparations has a marked impact on the accuracy of latex-specific IgE antibody detection in epidemiological studies and in the serological diagnosis of latex allergy.

Gastrointestinal digestion of food allergens: effect on their allergenicity

This paper reviews the in vitro digestion models developed to assess the stability digestion of food allergens, as well as the factors derived from the methodology and food structure that may affect the assay results. The adequacy of using the digestion stability of food allergens as a criterion for assessing potential allergenicity is also discussed. Data based on the traditional pepsin digestibility test in simulated gastric fluid are discussed in detail, with special attention to the influence of the pH and pepsin: allergen ratio in the pepsinolysis rate. This review points out the importance of using physiologically relevant in vitro digestion systems for evaluating digestibility of allergens. This would imply the sequential use of digestive enzymes in physiological concentrations, simulation of the stomach/small intestine environment (multi-phase models) with addition of surfactants such as phospholipids or bile salts, as well as the consideration of the gastrointestinal transit and the effect of the food matrices on the allergen digestion and subsequent absorption through the intestinal mucosa. In vitro gastrointestinal digestion protocols should be preferably combined with immunological assays in order to elucidate the role of large digestion-resistant fragments and the influence of the food matrix on the stimulation of the immune system.

Self-reported allergy to latex gloves among health care workers in Jordan

The objective of this study is to determine the prevalence of natural rubber latex allergy and its associated factors among health care workers in Jordan based on a self-administered questionnaire. In this cross-sectional study, the data were obtained through a self-reported hand-delivered questionnaire that was distributed to 500 health care workers who use natural rubber latex gloves. A total of 420 (84%) health care workers responded by filling the questionnaire. Of the total number of 420 health care workers who filled the questionnaire, 57 (13.6%) reported allergy to latex gloves. The prevalence of allergy to latex gloves was significantly higher for those who had allergy to some foodstuffs (especially avocado, kiwifruits and chestnuts) or with history of eczema and hay fever. However, allergy to latex gloves was independent of gender, age, job, family history, type of gloves, hours of use/day and number of years of use. It is concluded that a high rate of allergy to latex gloves was reported among health care workers in Jordan.

Molecular cloning of Indian jujube (Zizyphus mauritiana) allergen Ziz m 1 with sequence similarity to plant class III chitinases

Indian jujube (Zizyphus mauritiana) is a sweet fruit that is abundantly cultivated in Taiwan. We have previously identified 42 and 30 kDa allergens that are cross-reactive with latex allergen from crude Indian jujube extract. This study aimed to clone the 30 kDa Ziz m 1 Z. mauritiana allergen. The Ziz m 1 encoding cDNA was isolated from a ZAPII cDNA library constructed from Z. mauritiana mRNA, sequenced and expressed in Pichia pastoris. The protein predicted from the cDNA sequence has 330 amino acids, the first 25 of which constituted a putative signal peptide. The deduced molecular mass of the mature protein is 33.86 kDa, while its isoelectric point is estimated at 4.36. The recombinant Ziz m 1 showed chitinase activity, possessed IgE binding capacity, and had IgE cross-reactivity with the latex allergen. Moreover, anti-recombinant Ziz m 1 antibody-based ELISA was able to detect commercial skin testing latex reagent, laboratory prepared latex and Indian jujube extracts. Recombinant Ziz m 1 showed 87.5% skin reactivities on eight latex- and Indian jujube-sensitive subjects. Although no sequence similarity was found to other known allergens, Ziz m 1 was found to have amino acid sequence identity (39-45.3%) to many plant chitinases including chitinase (45.2%) of Hevea brasiliensis (hevamine), class III chitinases of Vigna angularis (45.3%), Capsicum annuum (44.7%) and Oryza sativa (41.2%). A conserved domain search revealed that Ziz m 1 belongs to the family 18 glycosyl hydrolases. The recombinant allergen may therefore be of value for diagnosis and therapeutic purposes, and the further characterization of Indian jujube allergen may help to elucidate the mechanism underlying latex-fruit syndrome.

[Latex allergy]

Latex allergy has become an increasing cause of morbility in the last few years and is now recognized as an international health problem. The prevalence of latex sensitization among the general population is less than 1 %. The groups at highest risk include healthcare workers, rubber industry workers, patients with a history of multiple surgical procedures, particularly children with spina bifida and urogenital abnormalities, atopic individuals, and patients with certain fruit allergies (especially kiwi, avocado, chestnut and banana). The molecular and immunological characteristics of several natural latex allergens have been identified. Symptoms range from contact urticaria to anaphylaxis. Diagnosis is based on clinical history and is confirmed by skin prick tests. Measurement of serum specific IgE to latex can also be useful. The best treatment is latex avoidance and substitution by other materials. However, because latex products are ubiquitous in medical and nonmedical devices of daily use, a latex-free environment is not easy to achieve. In some patients, immunotherapy could be an alternative.

Characterization of B- and T-cell responses and HLA-DR4 binding motifs of the latex allergen Hev b 6.01 (prohevein) and its post-transcriptionally formed proteins Hev b 6.02 and Hev b 6.03

BACKGROUND

Multiple immunoglobulin E (IgE)-binding proteins in natural rubber latex extracts have been identified. In the case of Hev b 6 a differentiation was made between the precursor protein prohevein (Hev b 6.01) and its two post-transcriptionally formed proteins, the N-terminal hevein (Hev b 6.02) and the C-terminal domain (Hev b 6.03). All three components act as independent allergens. The aim of this study was a detailed analysis of the T-cell responses and the IgE-binding capacity of Hev b 6.01, Hev b 6.02 and Hev b 6.03 by using these allergens as recombinant maltose-binding fusion (MBP) proteins and the usage of synthetic modified hevein peptides.

METHODS

Latex-allergic health care workers (HCWs) suffering from rhinitis, conjunctivitis, contact urticaria and/or asthma with increased specific IgE-antibodies to latex were tested for their IgE-binding capacity and T-cell reactivity (by proliferation response) to the recombinant MBP-rHev b 6.01, MBP-rHev b 6.02, MBP-rHev b 6.03, to native Hev b 6.02, to modified hevein peptides and wheat germ agglutinin (WGA). For testing of the human leucocyte antigen (HLA) class II restriction of MBP-rHev b 6.01 induced peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) responses, monoclonal antibodies against HLA-DR, HLA-DP or HLA-DQ were added.

RESULTS

Seventeen of 18 (94%) serum samples from latex-allergic HCWs had increased levels of specific IgE to MBP-rHev b 6.01, 16 (89%) to MBP-rHev b 6.02 and 13 (72%) to MBP-rHev b 6.03. A significant difference existed between the specific IgE-values of MBP-rHev b 6.02 and MBP-rHev b 6.03 (P < 0.01). Proliferation responses of PBMC of the same 18 latex-allergic patients were positive for MBP-rHev b 6.01 and MBP-rHev b 6.03 in 83 and 67% of the tested PBMC suspension, whereas the proliferation responses induced with MBP-rHev b 6.02 or native Hev b 6.02 were very low (5.6 and 22.2%). Sera from nine additional latex-allergic patients showed specific IgE binding to the native Hev b 6.02, but none of these sera showed specific IgE binding to the modified Hev b 6.02-peptides [whereby all eight cysteine residues were substituted by serine (C --> S) or by alanine (C --> A)]. Proliferation responses induced by the modified Hev b 6.02 peptides were not significantly different from that induced by Hev b 6.02. Potential HLA-DR4Dw4(DRB1*0401)-restricted T-cell epitopes of Hev b 6.01 predicted by two computer algorithms were only found in the Hev b 6.03-part of Hev b 6.01.

CONCLUSION

In the Hev b 6.01 precursor the regions responsible for IgE binding and those for inducing the T-cell proliferation responses are settled in different parts of the protein. The Hev b 6.02 domain is responsible for IgE binding and carries discontinuous B-cell epitopes whereas Hev b 6.03 is a better inducer of a proliferation response and contains HLA-DR4-binding motifs.

Type I allergy to elderberry (Sambucus nigra) is elicited by a 33.2 kDa allergen with significant homology to ribosomal inactivating proteins

BACKGROUND

Patients suffering from allergic rhinoconjunctivitis and dyspnoea during summer may exhibit these symptoms after contact with flowers or dietary products of the elderberry tree Sambucus nigra.

OBJECTIVE

Patients with a history of summer hayfever were tested in a routine setting for sensitization to elderberry. Nine patients having allergic symptoms due to elderberry and specific sensitization were investigated in detail. We studied the responsible allergens in extracts from elderberry pollen, flowers and berries, and investigated cross-reactivity with allergens from birch, grass and mugwort.

METHODS

Sera from patients were tested for IgE reactivity to elderberry proteins by one-dimensional (1D) and 2D electrophoresis/immunoblotting. Inhibition studies with defined allergens and elderberry-specific antibodies were used to evaluate cross-reactivity. The main elderberry allergen was purified by gel filtration and reversed-phase HPLC, and subjected to mass spectrometry. The in-gel-digested allergen was analysed by the MS/MS sequence analysis and peptide mapping. The N-terminal sequence of the predominant allergen was analysed.

RESULTS

0.6% of 3668 randomly tested patients showed positive skin prick test and/or RAST to elderberry. IgE in patients' sera detected a predominant allergen of 33.2 kDa in extracts from elderberry pollen, flowers and berries, with an isoelectric point at pH 7.0. Pre-incubation of sera with extracts from birch, mugwort or grass pollen rendered insignificant or no inhibition of IgE binding to blotted elderberry proteins. Specific mouse antisera reacted exclusively with proteins from elderberry. N-terminal sequence analysis, as well as MS/MS spectrometry of the purified elderberry allergen, indicated homology with ribosomal inactivating proteins (RIPs).

CONCLUSION

We present evidence that the elderberry plant S. nigra harbours allergenic potency. Independent methodologies argue for a significant homology of the predominant 33.2 kDa elderberry allergen with homology to RIPs. We conclude that this protein is a candidate for a major elderberry allergen with designation Sam n 1.

Cross-reactivity between obeche wood (Triplochiton scleroxylon) and natural rubber latex

BACKGROUND

Several studies have shown that allergy to natural rubber latex is associated with cross reactivity to other plants. We have investigated a possible cross reactivity with a tree belonging to the Sterculiaceae family, Tryplochiton scleroxylon, in a patient allergic to obeche wood, that began to suffer symptoms of allergy in contact with latex.

METHODS

Determinations of specific IgE by CAP to obeche, natural rubber latex (NRL) and recombinant allergens of latex were done. Immunoblotting was performed to study allergens detected by serum of our patient. CAP-inhibition methods were used to study cross-reactive between NRL and obeche wood.

RESULTS

In obeche extract, 4 bands were found of an apparent molecular weight of 18, 38, 75 and 199 kDa. In NRL extract the allergens have a molecular weight around 18, 21, 32, 38, 60, 70 and 199 kDa. IgE to latex was almost completely inhibited (96%) by the obeche extract in CAP-inhibition studies. Using obeche extract as inhibitor, IgE binding to native hevein (nHevb 6.02) was reduced by 25%.

CONCLUSIONS

The results obtained in CAP-inhibition demonstrate the existence of cross-reactivity between proteins in NRL and obeche wood. In our patient, a band of apparent molecular weight of 38 kDa could be the most important allergen.

Analysis of avocado allergen (Prs a 1) IgE-binding peptides generated by simulated gastric fluid digestion

BACKGROUND

Resistance to pepsin digestion has been claimed to be a characteristic of food allergens that can induce severe adverse reactions. Moreover, pepsin treatment is included in protocols to evaluate the potential allergenicity of transgenic foods. Allergenic plant class I chitinases, such as avocado Prs a 1, are the panallergens involved in the latex-fruit syndrome. Previous reports indicated their susceptibility to simulated gastric fluid (SGF) digestion.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to evaluate the IgE-binding capacity and the in vivo reactivity of the SGF products of the avocado allergen Prs a 1.

METHODS

Patients with a clinical history of latex-fruit allergy syndrome, a positive skin prick test (SPT) response to Prs a 1, and specific IgE to avocado were selected. Untreated and SGF-digested Prs a 1 samples were analyzed by means of IgE and IgG immunoblotting, IgE immunoblotting and ELISA-inhibition assays, and SPTs. Peptides from SGF-digested samples were fractionated by means of HPLC, characterized by N-terminal amino acid sequencing and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization analysis, and tested for in vivo reactivity with SPTs.

RESULTS

Neither protein staining nor IgE immunoblotting with a pool of sera from allergic patients resulted in the detection of any band after SDS-PAGE separation of an SGF-digested sample of Prs a 1. However, this sample showed a similar inhibitory potency to that of untreated Prs a 1 in both immunoblot- and ELISA-inhibition assays (up to 70% inhibition of the IgE binding to crude avocado extract) and induced positive SPT responses in 5 of 8 allergic patients. Peptides from SGF-digested Prs a 1 were separated by means of HPLC, and 4 of them reached more than 50% inhibition values when using avocado extract as the solid phase in ELISA-inhibition assays. Reactive peptides were located both in the N-terminal hevein-like domain and in the catalytic domain of Prs a 1. Those corresponding to the hevein-like domain (approximately 5100 d) produced positive SPT responses in 5 of 8 allergic patients, whereas 2 peptides located in the catalytic domain (approximately 1400 and 2500 d) were reactive in 2 or 3 of the 8 patients.

CONCLUSION

Prs a 1 was extensively degradated when subjected to SGF digestion. However, the resulting peptides, particularly those corresponding to the hevein-like domain, were clearly reactive both in vitro and in vivo.

Occupational allergies caused by latex

Allergy to natural rubber latex is an important cause of occupational allergy in healthcare workers. Disposable medical gloves are the major reservoir of latex allergens, particularly powdered gloves, in healthcare delivery settings. Diagnosis of latex allergy requires a history of exacerbation of cutaneous, respiratory, ocular, or systemic signs and symptoms after exposure to natural rubber latex products; and evidence of sensitization by patch testing, skin testing, measurement of latex-specific IgE antibodies, or challenge testing. Optimal management of latex allergy involves education concerning cross-reacting allergens, reduction of cutaneous or mucosal contact with dipped rubber products, and minimization of exposure to latex aeroallergens in work environments.

Molecular cloning, purification, and IgE-binding of a recombinant class I chitinase from Hevea brasiliensis leaves (rHev b 11.0102)

BACKGROUND

Class I chitinase in natural rubber latex (NRL) has been assumed to be an important allergen, especially concerning its cross-reactivity with fruits like avocado and banana.

OBJECTIVES

The present study aimed to produce a recombinant latex class I chitinase from Hevea brasiliensis leaves and to study its immunoglobulin (Ig)E-binding reactivity.

METHODS

A class I chitinase-specific complementary DNA from H. brasiliensis leaves was synthesized, subcloned, sequenced and overexpressed in fusion with the maltose-binding protein (MBP) in Escherichia coli. The IgE-binding reactivity of this protein was studied by the Pharmacia CAP System and by immunoblot experiments using sera from latex-allergic patients.

RESULTS

The rHev b 11.0102 was found to have a length of 295 amino acid residues and contains an N-terminal hevein-like domain with a 56% homology to hevein. Analysis by the CAP method revealed the presence of rHev b 11.0102-specific IgE antibodies in 17 of 58 sera (29%) of IgE-mediated latex-allergic subjects tested. Immunoblot analysis of the MBP-rHev b 11.0102 fusion protein and the MBP carrier protein as a negative control confirmed the IgE-reactivity of rHev b 11.0102.

CONCLUSION

Due to its IgE-reactivity rHev b 11.0102 represents an allergen of intermediate prevalence in NRL. Its property to cross-react with certain fruits makes it an important supplement in the diagnostic panel of recombinant NRL allergens.

Cataract surgery for natural rubber latex allergic patients

The prevalence of reactions against natural rubber latex (NRL) is thought to be increasing in both the general public and healthcare workers. These can vary from mild benign skin reactions to bronchospasm, anaphylactic shock, and death. Difficulties exist for ophthalmic departments wishing to establish protocols in providing 'latex-free environments' for patients undergoing cataract surgery. Currently no legislation exists regarding the labelling of NRL-containing products in the United Kingdom with information on a product's NRL content provided by the manufacturer on a voluntary basis only. It is hoped this review article will act as a basic guide in the management of NRL-sensitive patients undergoing cataract surgery in the United Kingdom.

Latex-fruit syndrome

Natural rubber latex immunoglobulin E-mediated hypersensitivity is probably one of the most relevant challenges that has been faced in the treatment of allergies during recent years. Additionally, allergen cross-reactivity has arisen as another very important problem, in the difficulty in diagnosing it and in its clinical implications. It is clear that some latex allergens cross-react with plant-derived food allergens, the so-called latex-fruit syndrome, with evident clinical consequences. Although the foods most frequently involved are banana, avocado, kiwi, and chestnut, several others are also implicated. Investigations point to a group of defense-related plant proteins, class I chitinases, which cross-react with a major latex allergen, hevein, as the panallergens responsible for the syndrome. This review focuses on our current understanding of the latex-fruit syndrome.

Heterogeneity of banana allergy: characterization of allergens in banana-allergic patients

BACKGROUND

Banana is a frequent cause of food allergy, particularly in latex-sensitized patients.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to get insights in immunoglobulin (Ig)E antibody responses of patients with a history of allergic reaction to banana but not to latex.

METHODS

In four patients who complained about symptoms after banana consumption, skin prick tests (SPTs) with aeroallergens, latex, banana, avocado, and kiwi were performed. Total and specific serum IgE to birch pollen, rBet v 1 and rBet v 2, latex, banana, avocado, and kiwi were determined by the CAP method (Pharmacia Diagnostics, Uppsala, Sweden). Allergens were identified by immunoblotting with banana extract and recombinant banana profilin. Two patients underwent double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenges (DBPCFC) with banana.

RESULTS

All patients showed a positive SPT to banana, and three were IgE-CAP positive (> or = class 2). Two patients were also sensitized (SPT and CAP) to latex, avocado, kiwi, and birch pollen. In the immunoblot these two patients' sera reacted to 32- to 34-kDa proteins, which had already been described as major banana allergens. In both patients banana allergy was confirmed by DBPCFC. The third patient also had a sensitization to avocado, but not to latex or pollen. Immunoblot analysis detected a single band at 70 kDa. The fourth patient was sensitized to birch pollen, rBet v 1 and rBet v 2, but not to latex. Immunoblot analysis in this patient's serum was positive with recombinant banana profilin.

CONCLUSIONS

The relevance of banana as a source of food allergy was confirmed in two patients by DBPCFC. In 1 of 2 patients, in whom banana allergy was not a consequence of latex sensitization, a 70-kDa protein was identified as a banana allergen, and in the other patient profilin was detected as a putative cross-reactive allergen.

The abundant class III chitinase homolog in young developing banana fruits behaves as a transient vegetative storage protein and most probably serves as an important supply of amino acids for the synthesis of ripening-associated proteins

Analyses of the protein content and composition revealed dramatic changes in gene expression during in situ banana (Musa spp.) fruit formation/ripening. The total banana protein content rapidly increases during the first 60 to 70 d, but remains constant for the rest of fruit formation/ripening. During the phase of rapid protein accumulation, an inactive homolog of class III chitinases accounts for up to 40% (w/v) of the total protein. Concomitant with the arrest of net protein accumulation, the chitinase-related protein (CRP) progressively decreases and several novel proteins appear in the electropherograms. Hence, CRP behaves as a fruit-specific vegetative storage protein that accumulates during early fruit formation and serves as a source of amino acids for the synthesis of ripening-associated proteins. Analyses of individual proteins revealed that a thaumatin-like protein, a beta-1,3-glucanase, a class I chitinase, and a mannose-binding lectin are the most abundant ripening-associated proteins. Because during the ripening of prematurely harvested bananas, similar changes take place as in the in situ ripening bananas, CRP present in immature fruits is a sufficient source of amino acids for a quasi-normal synthesis of ripening-associated proteins. However, it is evident that the conversion of CRP in ripening-associated proteins takes place at an accelerated rate, especially when climacteric ripening is induced by ethylene. The present report also includes a discussion of the accumulation of the major banana allergens and the identification of suitable promoters for the production of vaccines in transgenic bananas.

Recent developments in latex allergy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Immediate allergic reactions to natural rubber latex continue to be an important medical and occupational health problem. In this review we focus on progress made in understanding the significance of occupational exposure and epidemiology, risk groups, diagnosis and prevention of natural rubber latex allergy. We also discuss methods aimed at quantification of clinically relevant natural rubber latex allergens and studies on B-cell epitopes of major natural rubber latex allergens.

RECENT FINDINGS

Prospective studies have been published focusing on the prevention of natural rubber latex allergy. Efforts to identify and characterize new natural rubber latex allergens were continued in several research groups. The use of purified allergens or proteins produced by recombinant DNA technology was assessed in studies aimed at improving the diagnosis of natural rubber latex allergy as well as in developing quantitative methods for the measurement of specific natural rubber latex allergens. For the first time, conformational immunoglobulin E epitopes were identified in a major natural rubber latex allergen, hevein, using a novel chimera-based allergen epitope mapping strategy.

SUMMARY

Measures taken in health care to reduce exposure to natural rubber latex products seem to be effective in reducing the number of new sensitizations. A few new minor natural rubber latex allergens, probably important in allergen cross reactions, were identified, and some nonmedical natural rubber latex products were found to be potentially dangerous to natural rubber latex-allergic patients. Sensitive and specific immunoassays for quantification of clinically relevant natural rubber latex allergens in manufactured products were developed in some laboratories. These assays may eventually replace the nonspecific total protein measurement, currently advocated by health authorities in the indirect estimation of allergen amounts in natural rubber latex products. Knowledge about conformational immunoglobulin-binding B-cell epitopes of major allergens is expected to be helpful in designing optimal reagents to specific immunotherapy.

A history of latex allergy

Archaeologists have found that latex items were used as early as 1600 BC, but it took until approximately 1900 AD before surgical gloves were commonly used. Descriptions of apparent allergic reactions to natural rubber appeared in the medical literature in 1927, and irritant and delayed-contact reactions were reported in 1933. Although irritant and delayed-contact reactions to rubber products were increasingly recognized, immediate-type allergic reactions were not reported again until 1979. However, after 1980, increasing numbers of contact urticarial reactions to latex were reported, and investigations suggested that many of these reactions were IgE-mediated. In 1984, the first anaphylactic reactions caused by latex surgical gloves were reported, followed in 1991 by the first report of a fatal anaphylactic reaction to latex. Increasing recognition of latex allergy led to divergent paths of investigation. Critical early questions were whether the observed reactions were truly IgE-mediated, and if they were IgE-mediated, what was the source of the allergen? If the allergen was present in latex products, where did it come from? Was it present in raw latex or was it added during processing? As knowledge about the allergens improved, efforts were made to develop and test materials for skin testing and for allergen-specific IgE assays. Now more than 10 unique proteins are recognized as major latex allergens. Although much has been learned about latex allergy, important unanswered questions remain, including the sources of latex exposure that led to sensitization, why latex allergy increased dramatically during the 1980s, and the prevalence of latex allergy in diverse populations. This review concentrates on the history of latex use in medicine and the dramatic emergence of immediate-type latex allergy.

[Latex-fruit syndrome]

During the last decade, latex IgE-mediated allergy has been recognized as a very important medical problem. At the same time, many studies have dealt with allergic cross-reactions between aeroallergens and foods. In this context, there is clear evidence now on the existence of significant clinical association between latex and fruit allergies. Therefore, a latex-fruit syndrome has been postulated.Several studies have demonstrated that from 20% to 60% of latex-allergic patients show IgE-mediated reactions to a wide variety of foods, mainly fruits. Although implicated foods vary among the studies, banana, avocado, chestnut and kiwi are the most frequently involved. Clinical manifestations of these reactions may vary from oral allergy syndrome to severe anaphylactic reactions, which are not uncommon, thus remarking the clinical relevance of this syndrome.The diagnosis of food hypersensitivities associated to latex allergy is based on the clinical history of immediate adverse reactions, suggestive of an IgE-mediated sensitivity. Prick by prick test with the fresh foods implicated in the reactions shows an 80% concordance with the clinical diagnosis, and therefore it seems to be the best diagnostic test available nowadays in order to confirm the suspicion of latex-fruit allergy. Once the diagnosis is achieved, a diet free of the offending fruits is mandatory.Recently, some of the common allergens responsible for the cross-reactions among latex and the fruits most commonly implicated in the syndrome have been identified. Class I chitinases, with an N-terminal hevein like domain, which cross-react with the major latex allergen hevein, seem to be the panallergens responsible for the latex-fruit syndrome.

Latex allergy: prevalence, risk factors, and cross-reactivity

There are few little exact epidemiological data on the prevalence and incidence of latex allergy, partly because the diagnostic tools are unsatisfactory and partly because the epidemiological study planning often does not fulfill criteria of good praxis. On the basis of present data, latex allergy in normal population is low, under 1%. Known risk groups such as health care workers, atopic subjects, people with hand dermatitis, and especially spina bifida patients show higher prevalence numbers. The common serological cross-reactivity between latex and a great number of different fruits and vegetables is bound to common plant pathogenesis-related proteins and storage proteins. Despite positive serological tests, only about half of NRL-allergic subjects have clinical symptoms after eating cross-reacting foods.

Latex allergy: towards immunotherapy for health care workers

Latex allergy is an important allergic disease for which safe and readily available immunotherapy is currently lacking. Despite advances in latex glove technology and reduction in allergen content, there remains a core of severely allergic health care workers (HCW), particularly with concominant food allergy, for whom allergen avoidance is insufficient. Current experience with immunotherapy using crude latex extracts has shown an unacceptable level of local and systemic side-effects. Latex allergens are extremely potent with a heightened capacity to cross-link effector cell-bound IgE and induce anaphylaxis. The predominant pattern of allergen reactivity among HCW is different from that among children with spina bifida, perhaps due to exposure to latex glove proteins, particularly via inhalation, rather than particle bound latex proteins present in urinary catheters. Recent studies using purified skin testing reagents have indicated that the most clinically important latex allergens amongst HCW are Hev b 5, 6 and 7. Elucidation of the molecular and cellular mechanisms of the immune response to these allergens is pivotal to facilitate the search for safer immunotherapy of latex allergy among HCW.

Latex allergy: historical perspective

The widespread use of powdered latex gloves, following the institution of universal precautions in 1987, increased the occurrence of a host of adverse reactions to natural rubber latex (NRL). Although the most common reactions are irritant or allergic dermatitis reactions to manufacturing chemicals, a spectrum of type I IgE-mediated reactions to NRL proteins are of great concern. IgE-mediated reactions range from contact urticaria to occupational asthma and anaphylaxis, resulting in significant morbidity and potential mortality. At-risk populations include highly exposed groups like health care workers and certain patient groups requiring extensive medical treatment. A significant complicating factor is the association with clinically significant adverse reactions to certain foods because of allergen cross-reactivity. Institution of policies to use only low-protein, powder-free gloves, has resulted in a dramatic reduction of visits to occupational health departments and workmen's compensation claims due to occupational asthma.

What is the role of the hevein-like domain of fruit class I chitinases in their allergenic capacity?

BACKGROUND

Class I chitinases are the major panallergens in fruits associated with the latex-fruit syndrome. These enzymes contain an N-terminal hevein-like domain homologous to latex hevein, and a larger catalytic domain. The role of these domains in their allergenic capacity is still controversial.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to evaluate the role of both domains of class I chitinases in their IgE-binding properties, using Cas s 5, the major allergen from chestnut, as a model.

METHODS

Recombinant Cas s 5 and its deleted form, lacking the hevein-like domain, designated rCat, were expressed in Pichia pastoris using the pPIC 9 vector. Both recombinant products were purified from the supernatants of transformed yeast cultures by gel-filtration and cation-exchange chromatography. The isolated proteins were characterized by N-terminal sequencing, enzymatic activity and N-glycosylation tests, anti-chitinase and specific IgE immunodetection. Immunoblot, RAST and CAP inhibition assays were also performed.

RESULTS

Both purified rCas s 5 and rCat showed the expected N-terminal amino acid sequences and an enzymatic activity similar to that of their natural counterparts isolated from chestnut seeds, and were strongly recognized by anti-chitinase antibodies. In contrast, only rCas s 5, but not rCat, bound specific IgE from sera of patients suffering from the latex-fruit syndrome, and fully inhibited IgE-binding to natural Cas s 5 in immunoblot inhibition assays. Latex hevein also exerted a strong immunoblot inhibition of IgE-binding to chestnut Cas s 5. RAST and CAP inhibition using whole chestnut extract on the solid phase, rendered inhibition levels around 70-90% for rCas s 5 and 60% for rCat, in contrast to the immunoblotting results.

CONCLUSIONS

Recombinant Cas s 5 behaves like natural Cas s 5 in IgE-binding assays in vitro. The hevein-like domain of allergenic class I chitinases seems to include all their main IgE-binding epitopes when tested by immunodetection and immunoblot inhibition experiments. RAST and CAP inhibition assays, on the contrary, suggest that relevant epitopes are also harboured in the catalytic domain of these allergens.

Pathogenesis-related proteins of plants as allergens

OBJECTIVE

Many pathogenesis-related (PR) proteins from plants are allergenic. We review the evidence that PR proteins represent an increasingly important group of plant-derived allergens.

DATA SOURCES

A detailed literature search was conducted through PubMed and GenBank databases.

STUDY SELECTION

All reports in PubMed and GenBank related to PR protein allergens for which at least partial amino acid sequence is known were included.

RESULTS

Production of PR proteins by plants is induced in plants by stress. Members of PR-protein groups 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 10, and 14 have demonstrated allergenicity. PR2-, 3-, 4-, and 8-homologous allergens are represented by the latex allergens. Cross-reactivity of PR3 latex allergen, Hev b 6.02, with some fruit allergens may be a reflection of the representation of homologous PR proteins among varied plants. The expression of one of the representative PR5-homologous cedar pollen allergens, Jun a 3, is highly variable across years and geographic areas, possibly because of variable induction of this PR protein by environmental factors. PR10-homologous birch pollen allergen, Bet v 1, is structurally similar to and cross-reacts with PR10 proteins from fruits (eg, Mal d 1) which cause oral allergy syndrome. PR14 allergens (eg, Zea m 14) consist of lipid transfer proteins found in grains and fruits and are inducers of anaphylaxis.

CONCLUSIONS

PR-homologous allergens are pervasive in nature. Similarity in the amino acid sequences among members of PR proteins may be responsible for cross-reactivity among allergens from diverse plants. Induced expression of PR-homologous allergens by environmental factors may explain varying degrees of allergenicity. Man-made environmental pollutants may also alter the expression of some PR protein allergens.

Hevein, an allergenic lectin from rubber latex, activates human neutrophils' oxidative burst

Hevein is an N-acetyl-D-glucosamine (GlcNAc) specific lectin that has been hypothesized to participate in the IgE-mediated allergic reactions in patients with latex allergy. In this work we assessed the specificity and biological effect of hevein purified from rubber latex on human leukocytes, using epifluorescence microscopy and flow cytometry. Purified human granulocytes were stimulated in vitro with hevein, and production of oxidative radicals was measured by reduction of nitroblue tetrazolium formazan. Histochemical staining and flow cytometry showed that hevein recognizes specifically monocytes (CD14+) and neutrophils (CD16+), but not lymphoid cells. Hevein induced oxidative response in purified granulocytes; this effect was 1.3-1.5-fold higher than the effect observed with the lectin WGA (wheat germ agglutinin), or other lectins with different sugar specificity. The induced reactions and cellular recognition by hevein were inhibited with GlcNAc and its oligomers; as well as by glycoproteins containing tri-and tetra-antennary N-glycosydically linked glycans. Our findings suggest that neutrophils are the main target for latex hevein; this lectin induces production of oxidative radicals, which seem to play an important role in tissue damage during latex allergy.

Natural rubber latex allergy in children: a follow-up study

BACKGROUND

Natural rubber latex (NRL) allergy occurs frequently in children with spina bifida and other children with disorders requiring multiple operations. Also atopic children who have not undergone surgery can be sensitized to NRL, but the outcome of these children has not been studied.

OBJECTIVE

To study how NRL-allergic children manage at home and whether their skin prick test (SPT) reactivity, latex RAST or IgE antibody levels to NRL allergens change during the follow-up.

METHODS

Twenty-four NRL-allergic children who had not undergone surgery and eight children with histories of multiple operations were followed up for a mean of 2.8 years. Clinical symptoms were recorded and all children were re-examined with SPT, latex RAST and ELISA for IgE antibodies to prohevein (Hev b 6.01), hevein (Hev b 6.02) and rubber elongation factor (REF, Hev b 1).

RESULTS

Nineteen of the 24 NRL-allergic children (79%) who had not undergone surgery had occasionally contacts to balloons and other NRL products at home, and 10 of them experienced symptoms ranging from contact urticaria to systemic reactions. Three of the eight NRL-allergic children with a history of multiple operations had contacts to rubber balloons without any symptoms, and five children underwent 1-8 uneventful operations in a latex-free environment. SPT reactivity to NRL allergens, latex-RAST or IgE antibody levels to prohevein or hevein did not change in either group of NRL-allergic children during the follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Occurrence of clinical symptoms and no decrease in SPT reactivity or IgE levels to NRL allergens in the course of the present follow-up study imply that more attention should be paid to the protection of NRL-allergic children from rubber contacts in the home environment.