1
|
Barron JO, Blackstone EH, Rice TW, Lowry AM, Tasnim S, Toth AJ, Murthy SC, Raja S. Thoracoabdominal Esophagectomy: Then and Now. Ann Thorac Surg 2024; 118:402-411. [PMID: 38290595 DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2023.12.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2023] [Revised: 12/08/2023] [Accepted: 12/19/2023] [Indexed: 02/01/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Open approaches for esophagectomy are often still useful; of these, left thoracoabdominal esophagectomy (TAE) is poorly understood and often criticized. Hence, we examined TAE's worldwide utilization, survival, and present-day use and outcomes at our institution compared with contemporary national averages. METHODS The Worldwide Esophageal Cancer Collaboration database includes 8854 patients who underwent esophagectomy for cancer between 2005 and 2014, a period when TAE was our center's most common approach. Two propensity score-matched models were constructed: worldwide TAE vs worldwide non-TAE (751 matched pairs); and our high-volume center TAE vs worldwide non-TAE (273 matched pairs). All-cause mortality was compared between matched groups. Institutional TAE data from 2017 to 2021 were assessed for present-day use and outcomes. RESULTS Worldwide, propensity score-matched patients undergoing TAE had a median of 20 lymph nodes resected vs 17 after non-TAE (P < .0001). Five-year survival was 34% for worldwide TAE vs 42% for worldwide non-TAE groups (P = .04). Three-year matched survival was 52% for high-volume TAE compared with 54% for worldwide non-TAE groups (P = .1). From 2017 to 2021 at our institution, 90 (26%) of 346 esophagectomies were performed by TAE. Pneumonia developed in 5 patients (5.6%), with 88 patients (98%) alive at 30 days, comparable to contemporary averages of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. CONCLUSIONS When it is performed as the primary approach in high volumes, TAE can have comparable outcomes to non-TAE with low morbidity. At present, we find that TAE is most useful in patients with truncal obesity, prior abdominal operations, and locally advanced cardia tumors with potential for variable extent of resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John O Barron
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Heart, Vascular, and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Eugene H Blackstone
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Heart, Vascular, and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio; Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Thomas W Rice
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Heart, Vascular, and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Ashley M Lowry
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Sadia Tasnim
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Heart, Vascular, and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Andrew J Toth
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Sudish C Murthy
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Heart, Vascular, and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Siva Raja
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Heart, Vascular, and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Henckens SP, Schuring N, Elliott JA, Johar A, Markar SR, Gantxegi A, Lagergren P, Hanna GB, Pera M, Reynolds JV, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Gisbertz SS. Recurrence and Survival After Minimally Invasive and Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Post Hoc Analysis of the Ensure Study. Ann Surg 2024; 280:267-273. [PMID: 38577796 PMCID: PMC11224562 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000006280] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/06/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the impact of operative approach [open (OE), hybrid minimally invasive (HMIE), and total minimally invasive (TMIE) esophagectomy] on operative and oncologic outcomes for patients treated with curative intent for esophageal and junctional cancer. BACKGROUND The optimum oncologic surgical approach to esophageal and junctional cancer is unclear. METHODS This secondary analysis of the European multicenter ENSURE study includes patients undergoing curative-intent esophagectomy for cancer between 2009 and 2015 across 20 high-volume centers. Primary endpoints were disease-free survival (DFS) and the incidence and location of disease recurrence. Secondary endpoints included among others R0 resection rate, lymph node yield, and overall survival (OS). RESULTS In total, 3199 patients were included. Of these, 55% underwent OE, 17% HMIE, and 29% TMIE. DFS was independently increased post-TMIE [hazard ratio (HR): 0.86 (95% CI: 0.76-0.98), P = 0.022] compared with OE. Multivariable regression demonstrated no difference in absolute locoregional recurrence risk according to the operative approach [HMIE vs OE, odds ratio (OR): 0.79, P = 0.257; TMIE vs OE, OR: 0.84, P = 0.243]. The probability of systemic recurrence was independently increased post-HMIE (OR: 2.07, P = 0.031), but not TMIE (OR: 0.86, P = 0.508). R0 resection rates ( P = 0.005) and nodal yield ( P < 0.001) were independently increased after TMIE, but not HMIE ( P = 0.424; P = 0.512) compared with OE. OS was independently improved following both HMIE (HR: 0.79, P = 0.009) and TMIE (HR: 0.82, P = 0.003) as compared with OE. CONCLUSION In this European multicenter study, TMIE was associated with improved surgical quality and DFS, whereas both TMIE and HMIE were associated with improved OS as compared with OE for esophageal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sofie P.G. Henckens
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Department of Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Meibergdreef, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Nannet Schuring
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Department of Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Meibergdreef, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jessie A. Elliott
- Department of Surgery, Trinity Centre for Health Sciences, St. James's Hospital and Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Asif Johar
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Sheraz R. Markar
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, Surgical Intervention Trials Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Amaia Gantxegi
- Department of Surgery, Vall d’Hebron University Hospital, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Pernilla Lagergren
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Surgery, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | | | - Manuel Pera
- Department of Surgery, Section of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Hospital del Mar, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute (IMIM), Barcelona, Spain
| | - John V. Reynolds
- Department of Surgery, Trinity Centre for Health Sciences, St. James's Hospital and Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Mark I. van Berge Henegouwen
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Department of Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Meibergdreef, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Suzanne S. Gisbertz
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Department of Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Meibergdreef, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sahm E, Olutola O, Ata A, Fabian T, Marthy A, Deroo A, Edwards K, Tafen M. When Is Intensive Care Unit Admission Needed After an Esophagectomy? J Surg Res 2024; 300:109-116. [PMID: 38810525 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2024.04.067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2023] [Revised: 04/24/2024] [Accepted: 04/29/2024] [Indexed: 05/31/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Due to the high morbidity associated with esophagectomies, patients are often directly admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) for postoperative monitoring. However, critical complications can arise after this initial ICU stay. We hypothesized that the timing of ICU stay was not optimal for the care of patients after esophagectomy and aimed to determine when patients are at risk for developing critical complications. METHODS We searched the National Safety and Quality Improvement Program for patients who underwent an esophagectomy between 2016 and 2021. The outcome of interest was the interval between surgery and first critical complication. A critical complication was defined as one likely to require intensive care, including respiratory failure, septic shock, etc. Multivariate regression was performed to identify the risks of complications. RESULTS This study included 6813 patients from more than 70 institutions. Within the first 30 d postesophagectomy, 21.59% of patients experienced at least one critical complication. Half of first critical complications occurred after postoperative day 5, and 85.05% of them occurred after postoperative day 2. Risk factors for critical complications included age greater than 60 y, preoperative comorbidities, and open surgical approach. Malignancies were associated with a significantly lower incidence of critical complications. CONCLUSIONS Critical complications occurred beyond the immediate postesophagectomy period. Therefore, low-risk patients undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomies can be safely monitored outside the ICU, allowing for better patient care and resource utilization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erin Sahm
- Albany Medical College, Albany, New York.
| | - Olatoye Olutola
- Division of Trauma, Critical Care, and Acute Care Surgery, Case Western Reserve, Cleveland, Ohio; Division of Trauma Surgery and Critical Care Medicine, Albany Medical Center, Albany, New York
| | - Ashar Ata
- Department of Surgery, Albany Medical Center, Albany, New York
| | - Thomas Fabian
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Albany Medical Center, Albany, New York
| | - Andrew Marthy
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Albany Medical Center, Albany, New York
| | - Andrew Deroo
- Division of Trauma Surgery and Critical Care Medicine, Albany Medical Center, Albany, New York
| | - Kurt Edwards
- Division of Trauma Surgery and Critical Care Medicine, Albany Medical Center, Albany, New York
| | - Marcel Tafen
- Division of Trauma Surgery and Critical Care Medicine, Albany Medical Center, Albany, New York
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Moletta L, Pierobon ES, Capovilla G, Zuin IS, Carrillo Lizarazo JL, Nezi G, Lonardi S, Murgioni S, Galuppo S, Zanchettin G, Salvador R, Provenzano L, Valmasoni M. Short- and Long-Term Outcomes in Elderly Patients with Resectable Esophageal Cancer: Upfront Esophagectomy Compared to Surgery after Neoadjuvant Treatments. J Clin Med 2024; 13:4271. [PMID: 39064311 PMCID: PMC11277732 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13144271] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2024] [Revised: 07/08/2024] [Accepted: 07/16/2024] [Indexed: 07/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Despite the increased incidence of esophageal cancer (EC) in elderly people, there are no clear guidelines for its treatment in these patients. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of patients ≥ 75 years with resectable EC, receiving either upfront esophagectomy or neoadjuvant treatment. Methods: We retrospectively identified 127 patients with resectable EC ≥ 75 years who underwent esophagectomy between January 2000 and December 2022 at our Clinic in the University Hospital of Padova. The included patients were stratified into two groups: patients undergoing upfront esophagectomy (SURG group) and patients receiving neoadjuvant treatment (NAT group). Results: There were no statistically significant differences in OS (p = 0.7708), DFS (p = 0.7827) and cancer-related survival (p = 0.0827) between the SURG and the NAT group, except for the OS of EAC with stage III-IV, where the NAT group experienced a significant benefit in OS (p = 0.0263). When comparing the two groups, patients receiving neoadjuvant treatment experienced a significantly higher rate of postoperative complications (p = 0.0266). At univariate analysis, neoadjuvant therapy was the only variable strongly associated with postoperative morbidity (p = 0.026). Conclusions: Considering the unique characteristics of elderly patients, the choice of a multimodal approach should be tailored to each case in a multidisciplinary setting and balanced with a potential higher risk of postoperative complications, as well as potential toxicity related to chemoradiation and reduced life expectancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucia Moletta
- 1st Surgical Clinic, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy
| | - Elisa Sefora Pierobon
- 1st Surgical Clinic, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy
| | - Giovanni Capovilla
- 1st Surgical Clinic, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy
| | - Irene Sole Zuin
- 1st Surgical Clinic, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy
| | - Jose Luis Carrillo Lizarazo
- 1st Surgical Clinic, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy
| | - Giulia Nezi
- 1st Surgical Clinic, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy
| | - Sara Lonardi
- Department of Oncology, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV—IRCCS, 35128 Padova, Italy
| | - Sabina Murgioni
- Department of Oncology, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV—IRCCS, 35128 Padova, Italy
| | - Sara Galuppo
- Radiotherapy Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV—IRCCS, 35128 Padova, Italy
| | - Gianpietro Zanchettin
- 1st Surgical Clinic, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy
| | - Renato Salvador
- 1st Surgical Clinic, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy
| | - Luca Provenzano
- 1st Surgical Clinic, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy
| | - Michele Valmasoni
- 1st Surgical Clinic, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Huang S, Huang X, Liu Z, Yao C, Liu J, He M, Xu X, Zhang T, Wang J, Jiang L, Chen HJ, Xie X. Advances in Multifunctional Electronic Catheters for Precise and Intelligent Diagnosis and Therapy in Minimally Invasive Surgery. ACS NANO 2024; 18:18129-18150. [PMID: 38954632 DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.4c03871] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/04/2024]
Abstract
The advent of catheter-based minimally invasive surgical instruments has provided an effective means of diagnosing and treating human disease. However, conventional medical catheter devices are limited in functionalities, hindering their ability to gather tissue information or perform precise treatment during surgery. Recently, electronic catheters have integrated various sensing and therapeutic technologies through micro/nanoelectronics, expanding their capabilities. As micro/nanoelectronic devices become more miniaturized, flexible, and stable, electronic surgical catheters are evolving from simple tools to multiplexed sensing and theranostics for surgical applications. The review on multifunctional electronic surgical catheters is lacking and thus is not conducive to the reader's comprehensive understanding of the development trend in this field. This review covers the advances in multifunctional electronic catheters for precise and intelligent diagnosis and therapy in minimally invasive surgery. It starts with the summary of clinical minimally invasive surgical instruments, followed by the background of current clinical catheter devices for sensing and therapeutic applications. Next, intelligent electronic catheters with integrated electronic components are reviewed in terms of electronic catheters for diagnosis, therapy, and multifunctional applications. It highlights the present status and development potential of catheter-based minimally invasive surgical devices, while also illustrating several significant challenges that remain to be overcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuang Huang
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Sensor Technology and Biomedical Instrument, School of Biomedical Engineering, Sun Yat-Sen University, Shenzhen 518107, China
- State Key Laboratory of Optoelectronic Materials and Technologies, Guangdong Province Key Laboratory of Display Material and Technology, School of Electronics and Information Technology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510006, China
| | - Xinshuo Huang
- State Key Laboratory of Optoelectronic Materials and Technologies, Guangdong Province Key Laboratory of Display Material and Technology, School of Electronics and Information Technology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510006, China
| | - Zhengjie Liu
- State Key Laboratory of Optoelectronic Materials and Technologies, Guangdong Province Key Laboratory of Display Material and Technology, School of Electronics and Information Technology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510006, China
| | - Chuanjie Yao
- State Key Laboratory of Optoelectronic Materials and Technologies, Guangdong Province Key Laboratory of Display Material and Technology, School of Electronics and Information Technology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510006, China
| | - Jing Liu
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China
| | - Mengyi He
- State Key Laboratory of Optoelectronic Materials and Technologies, Guangdong Province Key Laboratory of Display Material and Technology, School of Electronics and Information Technology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510006, China
| | - Xingyuan Xu
- State Key Laboratory of Optoelectronic Materials and Technologies, Guangdong Province Key Laboratory of Display Material and Technology, School of Electronics and Information Technology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510006, China
| | - Tao Zhang
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Sensor Technology and Biomedical Instrument, School of Biomedical Engineering, Sun Yat-Sen University, Shenzhen 518107, China
- State Key Laboratory of Optoelectronic Materials and Technologies, Guangdong Province Key Laboratory of Display Material and Technology, School of Electronics and Information Technology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510006, China
| | - Ji Wang
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China
| | - Lelun Jiang
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Sensor Technology and Biomedical Instrument, School of Biomedical Engineering, Sun Yat-Sen University, Shenzhen 518107, China
| | - Hui-Jiuan Chen
- State Key Laboratory of Optoelectronic Materials and Technologies, Guangdong Province Key Laboratory of Display Material and Technology, School of Electronics and Information Technology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510006, China
| | - Xi Xie
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Sensor Technology and Biomedical Instrument, School of Biomedical Engineering, Sun Yat-Sen University, Shenzhen 518107, China
- State Key Laboratory of Optoelectronic Materials and Technologies, Guangdong Province Key Laboratory of Display Material and Technology, School of Electronics and Information Technology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510006, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Okamoto K, Takamura H, Nagayama T, Sannomiya Y, Hashimoto A, Nishiki H, Kaida D, Miyata T, Tsuji T, Fujita H, Kinami S, Ninomiya I, Inaki N. Usefulness of Perioperative Nutritional Therapy with the Glutamine/Arginine/Calcium β-Hydroxy-β-Methylbutyrate Product in Esophageal Cancer Surgery: A Single-Center Retrospective Study. Nutrients 2024; 16:2126. [PMID: 38999874 PMCID: PMC11243618 DOI: 10.3390/nu16132126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2024] [Revised: 06/27/2024] [Accepted: 06/28/2024] [Indexed: 07/14/2024] Open
Abstract
A useful perioperative nutritional therapy for highly invasive esophageal cancer surgical cases needs to be developed. We clarified the usefulness of amino-acid-enriched nutritional therapy using glutamine (Gln)/arginine (Arg)/calcium β-hydroxy-β-methylbutyrate (HMB) products on the short-term postoperative outcomes of minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Altogether, 114 patients (Gln/Arg/HMB group) received perioperative nutritional therapy with Gln/Arg/HMB products, and we retrospectively investigated the change in nutritional parameters including skeletal muscle mass, occurrence of postoperative complications, and short-term postoperative outcomes in this group. The results were compared between the Gln/Arg/HMB and control groups (79 patients not receiving the Gln/Arg/HMB products). The incidence of all postoperative complications, sputum expectoration disorder, and pleural effusion of grade ≥ III was significantly lower in the Gln/Arg/HMB group (62.0% vs. 38.6%, p = 0.001; 44.3% vs. 28.1%, p = 0.020; 27.8% vs. 13.2%, p = 0.011, respectively). The psoas muscle area and postoperative body weight were significantly higher at 1 month and 1 year after surgery in the Gln/Arg/HMB group than in the control group (93.5% vs. 99.9%, p < 0.001; 92.0% vs. 95.4%, p = 0.006). Perioperative amino-acid-enriched nutritional therapy may improve the short-term postoperative outcomes, nutritional status, and skeletal muscle mass of esophageal cancer surgical patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Koichi Okamoto
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Kanazawa Medical University Hospital, 1-1 Daigaku, Uchinadamachi, Kahoku 920-0293, Ishikawa, Japan; (H.T.); (T.N.); (Y.S.); (A.H.); (H.N.); (D.K.); (T.M.); (H.F.)
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Kanazawa University, 13-1 Takara-Machi, Kanazawa 920-8641, Ishikawa, Japan; (T.T.); (N.I.)
| | - Hiroyuki Takamura
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Kanazawa Medical University Hospital, 1-1 Daigaku, Uchinadamachi, Kahoku 920-0293, Ishikawa, Japan; (H.T.); (T.N.); (Y.S.); (A.H.); (H.N.); (D.K.); (T.M.); (H.F.)
| | - Taigo Nagayama
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Kanazawa Medical University Hospital, 1-1 Daigaku, Uchinadamachi, Kahoku 920-0293, Ishikawa, Japan; (H.T.); (T.N.); (Y.S.); (A.H.); (H.N.); (D.K.); (T.M.); (H.F.)
| | - Yuta Sannomiya
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Kanazawa Medical University Hospital, 1-1 Daigaku, Uchinadamachi, Kahoku 920-0293, Ishikawa, Japan; (H.T.); (T.N.); (Y.S.); (A.H.); (H.N.); (D.K.); (T.M.); (H.F.)
| | - Akifumi Hashimoto
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Kanazawa Medical University Hospital, 1-1 Daigaku, Uchinadamachi, Kahoku 920-0293, Ishikawa, Japan; (H.T.); (T.N.); (Y.S.); (A.H.); (H.N.); (D.K.); (T.M.); (H.F.)
| | - Hisashi Nishiki
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Kanazawa Medical University Hospital, 1-1 Daigaku, Uchinadamachi, Kahoku 920-0293, Ishikawa, Japan; (H.T.); (T.N.); (Y.S.); (A.H.); (H.N.); (D.K.); (T.M.); (H.F.)
| | - Daisuke Kaida
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Kanazawa Medical University Hospital, 1-1 Daigaku, Uchinadamachi, Kahoku 920-0293, Ishikawa, Japan; (H.T.); (T.N.); (Y.S.); (A.H.); (H.N.); (D.K.); (T.M.); (H.F.)
| | - Takashi Miyata
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Kanazawa Medical University Hospital, 1-1 Daigaku, Uchinadamachi, Kahoku 920-0293, Ishikawa, Japan; (H.T.); (T.N.); (Y.S.); (A.H.); (H.N.); (D.K.); (T.M.); (H.F.)
| | - Toshikatsu Tsuji
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Kanazawa University, 13-1 Takara-Machi, Kanazawa 920-8641, Ishikawa, Japan; (T.T.); (N.I.)
| | - Hideto Fujita
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Kanazawa Medical University Hospital, 1-1 Daigaku, Uchinadamachi, Kahoku 920-0293, Ishikawa, Japan; (H.T.); (T.N.); (Y.S.); (A.H.); (H.N.); (D.K.); (T.M.); (H.F.)
| | - Shinichi Kinami
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Kanazawa Medical University Himi Municipal Hospital, Himi, Toyama 935-8531, Japan;
| | - Itasu Ninomiya
- Department of Surgery, Fukui Prefectural Hospital, 2-8-1 Yotsui, Fukui 910-0846, Japan;
| | - Noriyuki Inaki
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Kanazawa University, 13-1 Takara-Machi, Kanazawa 920-8641, Ishikawa, Japan; (T.T.); (N.I.)
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Stock C, Watkins A, Moffatt-Bruce S, Servais E. Robotic-Assisted Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 2024; 33:519-527. [PMID: 38789194 DOI: 10.1016/j.soc.2023.12.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/26/2024]
Abstract
Robotic-assisted surgery is a safe and effective approach to minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. Outcomes are optimized when surgeons are familiar with the fundamentals of minimally invasive surgery of the esophagus and after gaining sufficient experience with robotic surgical techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cameron Stock
- Thoracic Surgery, Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, MA, USA
| | - Ammara Watkins
- Thoracic Surgery, Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, MA, USA
| | - Susan Moffatt-Bruce
- Thoracic Surgery, Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, MA, USA
| | - Elliot Servais
- Thoracic Surgery, Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Koterazawa Y, Goto H, Saiga H, Kato T, Sawada R, Harada H, Urakawa N, Hasegawa H, Kanaji S, Yamashita K, Matsuda T, Oshikiri T, Kakeji Y. The number of resected lymph nodes from the upper mediastinal area predicts long-term outcomes of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after minimally invasive esophagectomy. Surg Endosc 2024; 38:3625-3635. [PMID: 38767690 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-10853-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2023] [Accepted: 04/10/2024] [Indexed: 05/22/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The total number of resected lymph nodes (LNs) is an important determinant of longer survival after esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). However, the resected LN counts from areas that affect long-term outcomes remain unclear. METHODS This study included 406 patients who underwent minimally invasive esophagectomies (MIEs) at Kobe University Hospital. Resected LN counts were evaluated in the following areas: upper mediastinal (UM), middle mediastinal (MM), lower mediastinal (LM), and abdominal (Abd). Cut-off values for LN counts from each area were determined using receiver operating characteristics analysis of the survival status. Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were performed to identify prognostic factors. RESULTS The cut-off values for large or small numbers of resected LN counts in the UM, MM, LM, and Abd areas were 4, 8, 5, and 18, respectively, in patients with upper and middle thoracic (Ut/Mt) ESCC and 7, 6, 5, and 24, respectively, in patients with lower thoracic (Lt) ESCC. Multivariate analysis in patients with Ut/Mt ESCC revealed that tumor invasion depth, LN metastasis, and the resected LN count from the UM area were independent risk factors for overall survival [hazard ratio (HR), 7.04; 95% confidence interval (CI) 4.47-11.1; HR, 4.01; 95% CI 1.96-8.21; HR, 2.18; 95% CI 1.24-3.82, respectively]. In patients with Lt ESCC, tumor invasion depth, LN metastasis, and pulmonary complications were independent risk factors for overall survival (HR, 4.23; 95% CI 2.14-8.35; HR, 3.83; 95% CI 1.75-8.38; HR, 2.80; 95% CI 1.38-5.65, respectively). Resected LN counts from no areas were prognostic factors. CONCLUSION The number of resected LNs from the UM area influenced the survival outcomes of patients with Ut/Mt ESCC after MIE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yasufumi Koterazawa
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 7-5-2, Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku, Kobe, Hyogo, 650-0017, Japan.
| | - Hironobu Goto
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 7-5-2, Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku, Kobe, Hyogo, 650-0017, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Saiga
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 7-5-2, Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku, Kobe, Hyogo, 650-0017, Japan
| | - Takashi Kato
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 7-5-2, Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku, Kobe, Hyogo, 650-0017, Japan
| | - Ryuichiro Sawada
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 7-5-2, Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku, Kobe, Hyogo, 650-0017, Japan
| | - Hitoshi Harada
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 7-5-2, Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku, Kobe, Hyogo, 650-0017, Japan
| | - Naoki Urakawa
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 7-5-2, Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku, Kobe, Hyogo, 650-0017, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Hasegawa
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 7-5-2, Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku, Kobe, Hyogo, 650-0017, Japan
| | - Shingo Kanaji
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 7-5-2, Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku, Kobe, Hyogo, 650-0017, Japan
| | - Kimihiro Yamashita
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 7-5-2, Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku, Kobe, Hyogo, 650-0017, Japan
| | - Takeru Matsuda
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 7-5-2, Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku, Kobe, Hyogo, 650-0017, Japan
| | - Taro Oshikiri
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Ehime University, Ehime, Japan
| | - Yoshihiro Kakeji
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 7-5-2, Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku, Kobe, Hyogo, 650-0017, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Sabatelle RC, Colson YL, Sachdeva U, Grinstaff MW. Drug Delivery Opportunities in Esophageal Cancer: Current Treatments and Future Prospects. Mol Pharm 2024; 21:3103-3120. [PMID: 38888089 DOI: 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.4c00246] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/20/2024]
Abstract
With one of the highest mortality rates of all malignancies, the 5-year survival rate for esophageal cancer is under 20%. Depending on the stage and extent of the disease, the current standard of care treatment paradigm includes chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy followed by surgical esophagogastrectomy, with consideration for adjuvant immunotherapy for residual disease. This regimen has high morbidity, due to anatomic changes inherent in surgery, the acuity of surgical complications, and off-target effects of systemic chemotherapy and immunotherapy. We begin with a review of current treatments, then discuss new and emerging targets for therapies and advanced drug delivery systems. Recent and ongoing preclinical and early clinical studies are evaluating traditional tumor targets (e.g., human epidermal growth factor receptor 2), as well as promising new targets such as Yes-associated protein 1 or mammalian target of rapamycin to develop new treatments for this disease. Due the function and location of the esophagus, opportunities also exist to pair these treatments with a drug delivery strategy to increase tumor targeting, bioavailability, and intratumor concentrations, with the two most common delivery platforms being stents and nanoparticles. Finally, early results with antibody drug conjugates and chimeric antigenic receptor T cells show promise as upcoming therapies. This review discusses these innovations in therapeutics and drug delivery in the context of their successes and failures, with the goal of identifying those solutions that demonstrate the most promise to shift the paradigm in treating this deadly disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert C Sabatelle
- Departments of Biomedical Engineering and Chemistry, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, United States
| | - Yolonda L Colson
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02114, United States
| | - Uma Sachdeva
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02114, United States
| | - Mark W Grinstaff
- Departments of Biomedical Engineering and Chemistry, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, United States
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Gray KD, Molena D. Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 2024; 33:529-538. [PMID: 38789195 DOI: 10.1016/j.soc.2023.12.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/26/2024]
Abstract
Minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy is a technically demanding operation that requires an experienced surgeon, assistant, and anesthesiologist. The preoperative workup should focus on the extent of disease and extent of resection required, as well as the cardiopulmonary fitness of the patient. Surgical outcomes show decreased postoperative pain, decreased morbidity largely due to a reduction in respiratory complications, and decreased length of stay. Quality metrics and 5-year overall survival are equivalent to traditional open esophagectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine D Gray
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Daniela Molena
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Patel NM, Patel PH, Yeung KTD, Monk D, Mohammadi B, Mughal M, Bhogal RH, Allum W, Abbassi-Ghadi N, Kumar S. Is Robotic Surgery the Future for Resectable Esophageal Cancer?: A Systematic Literature Review of Oncological and Clinical Outcomes. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:4281-4297. [PMID: 38480565 PMCID: PMC11164768 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-15148-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2023] [Accepted: 02/19/2024] [Indexed: 06/13/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radical esophagectomy for resectable esophageal cancer is a major surgical intervention, associated with considerable postoperative morbidity. The introduction of robotic surgical platforms in esophagectomy may enhance advantages of minimally invasive surgery enabled by laparoscopy and thoracoscopy, including reduced postoperative pain and pulmonary complications. This systematic review aims to assess the clinical and oncological benefits of robot-assisted esophagectomy. METHODS A systematic literature search of the MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase and Cochrane databases was performed for studies published up to 1 August 2023. This review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) protocols and was registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD42022370983). Clinical and oncological outcomes data were extracted following full-text review of eligible studies. RESULTS A total of 113 studies (n = 14,701 patients, n = 2455 female) were included. The majority of the studies were retrospective in nature (n = 89, 79%), and cohort studies were the most common type of study design (n = 88, 79%). The median number of patients per study was 54. Sixty-three studies reported using a robotic surgical platform for both the abdominal and thoracic phases of the procedure. The weighted mean incidence of postoperative pneumonia was 11%, anastomotic leak 10%, total length of hospitalisation 15.2 days, and a resection margin clear of the tumour was achieved in 95% of cases. CONCLUSIONS There are numerous reported advantages of robot-assisted surgery for resectable esophageal cancer. A correlation between procedural volume and improvements in outcomes with robotic esophagectomy has also been identified. Multicentre comparative clinical studies are essential to identify the true objective benefit on outcomes compared with conventional surgical approaches before robotic surgery is accepted as standard of practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikhil Manish Patel
- Department of Upper GI Surgery, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- The Upper Gastrointestinal Surgical Oncology Research Group, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Pranav Harshad Patel
- Department of Upper GI Surgery, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- The Upper Gastrointestinal Surgical Oncology Research Group, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Kai Tai Derek Yeung
- Department of Upper GI Surgery, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - David Monk
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic London Hospital, London, UK
| | - Borzoueh Mohammadi
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic London Hospital, London, UK
| | - Muntzer Mughal
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic London Hospital, London, UK
| | - Ricky Harminder Bhogal
- Department of Upper GI Surgery, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- The Upper Gastrointestinal Surgical Oncology Research Group, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - William Allum
- Department of Upper GI Surgery, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Nima Abbassi-Ghadi
- Department of Upper GI Surgery, Royal Surrey NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, Surrey, UK
| | - Sacheen Kumar
- Department of Upper GI Surgery, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
- The Upper Gastrointestinal Surgical Oncology Research Group, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic London Hospital, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Velotta JB, Seder CW, Bonnell LN, Hayanga JA, Kidane B, Inra M, Shahian DM, Habib RH. 2024 Update of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Short-term Esophagectomy Risk Model: More Inclusive and Improved Calibration. Ann Thorac Surg 2024:S0003-4975(24)00535-6. [PMID: 38950724 DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2024.05.044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2024] [Revised: 04/19/2024] [Accepted: 05/06/2024] [Indexed: 07/03/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Database (STS-GTSD) previously reported short-term risk models for esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. We sought to update existing models using more inclusive contemporary cohorts, with consideration of additional risk factors based on clinical evidence. METHODS The study population consisted of adult patients in the STS-GTSD who underwent esophagectomy for esophageal cancer between January 2015 and December 2022. Separate esophagectomy risk models were derived for 3 primary end points: operative mortality, major morbidity, and composite morbidity or mortality. Logistic regression with backward selection was used, with predictors retained in models if P < .10. All derived models were validated using 9-fold cross-validation. Model discrimination and calibration were assessed for the overall cohort and specified subgroups. RESULTS A total of 18,503 patients from 254 centers underwent esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Operative mortality, morbidity, and composite morbidity or mortality rates were 3.4%, 30.5%, and 30.9%, respectively. Novel predictors of short-term outcomes in the updated models included body surface area and insurance payor type. Overall discrimination was similar or superior to previous STS-GTSD models for operative mortality (C statistic = 0.72) and for composite morbidity or mortality (C statistic = 0.62), Model discrimination was comparable across procedure- and demographic-specific subcohorts. Model calibration was excellent in all patient subgroups. CONCLUSIONS The newly derived esophagectomy risk models showed similar or superior performance compared with previous models, with broader applicability and clinical face validity. These models provide robust preoperative risk estimation and can be used for shared decision making, assessment of provider performance, and quality improvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey B Velotta
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Kaiser Permanente Oakland Medical Center, Oakland, California.
| | - Christopher W Seder
- Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Rush University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Levi N Bonnell
- STS Research and Analytic Center, The Society of Thoracic Surgeons, Chicago, Illinois
| | - J Awori Hayanga
- Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia
| | - Biniam Kidane
- Department of Surgery, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Matthew Inra
- Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Northwell Health, New York, New York
| | - David M Shahian
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Robert H Habib
- STS Research and Analytic Center, The Society of Thoracic Surgeons, Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Terayama M, Okamura A, Kanamori J, Watanabe M. ASO Author Reflections: Highlighted Advantages of Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Over Open Esophagectomy in Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2024:10.1245/s10434-024-15671-5. [PMID: 38916701 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-15671-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2024] [Accepted: 06/10/2024] [Indexed: 06/26/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Masayoshi Terayama
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Gastroenterological Center, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Akihiko Okamura
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Gastroenterological Center, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Jun Kanamori
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Gastroenterological Center, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masayuki Watanabe
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Gastroenterological Center, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Terayama M, Okamura A, Kuriyama K, Takahashi N, Tamura M, Kanamori J, Imamura Y, Watanabe M. Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Provides Better Short- and Long-Term Outcomes Than Open Esophagectomy in Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2024:10.1245/s10434-024-15596-z. [PMID: 38896227 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-15596-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2024] [Accepted: 05/26/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) has been increasingly performed for locally advanced esophageal cancer in place of open transthoracic esophagectomy (OE). This study explored the significance of MIE for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), focusing mainly on the depth of primary esophageal tumors. METHODS This study retrospectively assessed short- and long-term outcomes of patients who underwent esophagectomy for ESCC from 2005 through 2021. The inverse probability of the treatment-weighting (IPTW) method was used to compare the outcomes between OE and MIE. The outcomes also were evaluated in the subgroups stratified by cT category. RESULTS Among 1117 patients, 447 (40%) underwent OE and 670 (60%) underwent MIE. After IPTW adjustment, the incidence of any postoperative complications was significantly higher in the OE group than in the MIE group (60.8% vs 53.7%; p = 0.032), whereas the R0 resection rate was significantly higher in the MIE group (98.6% vs 92.7%; p < 0.001). The MIE group showed better 3 year overall and cancer-specific survival than the OE group (p < 0.001). The incidence of locoregional recurrence within the surgical field was significantly more frequent in the OE group (p < 0.001). In the subgroup analysis stratified by cT category, the R0 resection rate was significantly higher and the incidence of locoregional recurrence was lower in the MIE group among the patients with cT3-4 tumors. In the patients with cT1-2 tumors, MIE showed no significant benefit over OE. CONCLUSIONS For the patients with cT3-4 tumors, MIE showed fewer postoperative complications, better locoregional control, and better prognosis than OE. Compared with OE, MIE is beneficial, especially for locally advanced ESCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masayoshi Terayama
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Gastroenterological Center, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Akihiko Okamura
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Gastroenterological Center, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Kengo Kuriyama
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Gastroenterological Center, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Naoki Takahashi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Gastroenterological Center, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masahiro Tamura
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Gastroenterological Center, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Jun Kanamori
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Gastroenterological Center, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yu Imamura
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Gastroenterological Center, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masayuki Watanabe
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Gastroenterological Center, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Mallick S, Chervu NL, Balian J, Charland N, Valenzuela AR, Sakowitz S, Benharash P. Association of hospital volume and operative approach with clinical and financial outcomes of elective esophagectomy in the United States. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0303586. [PMID: 38875301 PMCID: PMC11178205 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303586] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2023] [Accepted: 04/16/2024] [Indexed: 06/16/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Literature regarding the impact of esophagectomy approach on hospitalizations costs and short-term outcomes is limited. Moreover, few have examined how institutional MIS experience affects costs. We thus examined utilization trends, costs, and short-term outcomes of open and minimally invasive (MIS) esophagectomy as well as assessing the relationship between institutional MIS volume and hospitalization costs. METHODS All adults undergoing elective esophagectomy were identified from the 2016-2020 Nationwide Readmissions Database. Multiple regression models were used to assess approach with costs, in-hospital mortality, and major complications. Additionally, annual hospital MIS esophagectomy volume was modeled as a restricted cubic spline against costs. Institutions performing > 16 cases/year corresponding with the inflection point were categorized as high-volume hospitals (HVH). We subsequently examined the association of HVH status with costs, in-hospital mortality, and major complications in patients undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomy. RESULTS Of an estimated 29,116 patients meeting inclusion, 10,876 (37.4%) underwent MIS esophagectomy. MIS approaches were associated with $10,600 in increased incremental costs (95% CI 8,800-12,500), but lower odds of in-hospital mortality (AOR 0.76; 95% CI 0.61-0.96) or major complications (AOR 0.68; 95% CI 0.60, 0.77). Moreover, HVH status was associated with decreased adjusted costs, as well as lower odds of postoperative complications for patients undergoing MIS operations. CONCLUSION In this nationwide study, MIS esophagectomy was associated with increased hospitalization costs, but improved short-term outcomes. In MIS operations, cost differences were mitigated by volume, as HVH status was linked with decreased costs in the setting of decreased odds of complications. Centralization of care to HVH centers should be considered as MIS approaches are increasingly utilized.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saad Mallick
- Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Laboratories (CORELAB), David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America
| | - Nikhil L Chervu
- Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Laboratories (CORELAB), David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America
- Department of Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America
| | - Jeffrey Balian
- Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Laboratories (CORELAB), David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America
| | - Nicole Charland
- Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Laboratories (CORELAB), David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America
| | - Alberto R Valenzuela
- Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Laboratories (CORELAB), David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America
| | - Sara Sakowitz
- Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Laboratories (CORELAB), David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America
| | - Peyman Benharash
- Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Laboratories (CORELAB), David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America
- Department of Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Deboever N, Jones CM, Yamashita K, Ajani JA, Hofstetter WL. Advances in diagnosis and management of cancer of the esophagus. BMJ 2024; 385:e074962. [PMID: 38830686 DOI: 10.1136/bmj-2023-074962] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/05/2024]
Abstract
Esophageal cancer is the seventh most common malignancy worldwide, with over 470 000 new cases diagnosed each year. Two distinct histological subtypes predominate, and should be considered biologically separate disease entities.1 These subtypes are esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Outcomes remain poor regardless of subtype, with most patients presenting with late stage disease.2 Novel strategies to improve early detection of the respective precursor lesions, squamous dysplasia, and Barrett's esophagus offer the potential to improve outcomes. The introduction of a limited number of biologic agents, as well as immune checkpoint inhibitors, is resulting in improvements in the systemic treatment of locally advanced and metastatic esophageal cancer. These developments, coupled with improvements in minimally invasive surgical and endoscopic treatment approaches, as well as adaptive and precision radiotherapy technologies, offer the potential to improve outcomes still further. This review summarizes the latest advances in the diagnosis and management of esophageal cancer, and the developments in understanding of the biology of this disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathaniel Deboever
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Christopher M Jones
- Early Cancer Institute, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Kohei Yamashita
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jaffer A Ajani
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Wayne L Hofstetter
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Dellaportas D, Margaris I, Latsonas P, Pikouli A, Vlachos I, Papakonstantinou D, Pararas N, Nastos C, Myoteri D, Pikoulis E. Contemporary Role of Open Left Thoracoabdominal Approach in Esophageal Malignancy Treatment. Cureus 2024; 16:e62922. [PMID: 39040781 PMCID: PMC11262707 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.62922] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/22/2024] [Indexed: 07/24/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Despite the widespread use of minimally invasive techniques, open left thoracoabdominal esophagectomy (LTE) can offer excellent visualization and adaptability. The current study aimed to present and evaluate the outcomes related to an open LTE in esophageal malignancy treatment. METHODS A retrospective cohort analysis of data collected from two institutions was performed, including patients with distal esophageal or junctional tumors who underwent open LTE between November 2018 and December 2023. RESULTS Twenty-two patients were included (16 males; mean age 62.8 years). Postoperative complications occurred in eight patients (36%), with pulmonary complications being the most prevalent (seven patients; 32%). One patient experienced a clinical anastomotic leak. No reoperations or escalation to a higher level of care were required. In-hospital and 30-day mortality were zero. Tumor cells were found at the surgical margins in six patients (27%). The mean lymph node yield was 27. During the follow-up period, there were nine deaths and 11 cases of disease recurrence. Isolated locoregional recurrence was seen in five patients (23%). The one-year and two-year overall survival rates were 79% and 47%, respectively. CONCLUSION In selected cases, open LTE remains a valid and safe operation with acceptable morbidity and oncological efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dionysios Dellaportas
- 3rd Department of Surgery, Attikon University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, GRC
| | - Ioannis Margaris
- 4th Department of Surgery, Attikon University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, GRC
| | - Panagiotis Latsonas
- 3rd Department of Surgery, Attikon University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, GRC
| | - Anastasia Pikouli
- 3rd Department of Surgery, Attikon University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, GRC
| | - Iakovos Vlachos
- Department of Pathology, Aretaieion University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, GRC
| | - Dimitrios Papakonstantinou
- 3rd Department of Surgery, Attikon University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, GRC
| | - Nikolaos Pararas
- 3rd Department of Surgery, Attikon University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, GRC
| | - Constantinos Nastos
- 3rd Department of Surgery, Attikon University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, GRC
| | - Despoina Myoteri
- Department of Pathology, Aretaieion University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, GRC
| | - Emmanuel Pikoulis
- 3rd Department of Surgery, Attikon University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, GRC
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Sihag S. Advances in the Surgical Management of Esophageal Cancer. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 2024; 38:559-568. [PMID: 38582720 DOI: 10.1016/j.hoc.2024.03.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/08/2024]
Abstract
Radical esophagectomy with two or three-field lymphadenectomy remains the mainstay of curative treatment for localized esophageal cancer, often in combination with systemic chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. In this article, we describe notable advances in the surgical management of esophageal cancer over the past decade that have led to an improvement in both surgical and oncologic outcomes. In addition, we discuss new approaches to surgical management currently under investigation that have the potential to offer further benefits to appropriately selected patients. These incremental breakthroughs primarily include advances in endoscopic and minimally invasive techniques, perioperative management protocols, as well as the application of local therapies, including surgery, to oligometastatic disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Smita Sihag
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, C-881, New York, NY 10065, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Griffiths EA. Predictors of anastomotic leak and conduit necrosis after oesophagectomy: Results from the oesophago-gastric anastomosis audit (OGAA). EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2024; 50:107983. [PMID: 38613995 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2024.107983] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2023] [Revised: 01/09/2024] [Accepted: 01/23/2024] [Indexed: 04/15/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Both anastomotic leak (AL) and conduit necrosis (CN) after oesophagectomy are associated with high morbidity and mortality. Therefore, the identification of preoperative, modifiable risk factors is desirable. The aim of this study was to generate a risk scoring model for AL and CN after oesophagectomy. METHODS Patients undergoing curative resection for oesophageal cancer were identified from the international Oesophagogastric Anastomosis Audit (OGAA) from April 2018-December 2018. Definitions for AL and CN were those set out by the Oesophageal Complications Consensus Group. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify risk factors for both AL and CN. A risk score was then produced for both AL and CN using the derivation set, then internally validated using the validation set. RESULTS This study included 2247 oesophagectomies across 137 hospitals in 41 countries. The AL rate was 14.2% and CN rate was 2.7%. Preoperative factors that were independent predictors of AL were cardiovascular comorbidity and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The risk scoring model showed insufficient predictive ability in internal validation (area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve [AUROC] = 0.618). Preoperative factors that were independent predictors of CN were: body mass index, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, previous myocardial infarction and smoking history. These were converted into a risk-scoring model and internally validated using the validation set with an AUROC of 0.775. CONCLUSION Despite a large dataset, AL proves difficult to predict using preoperative factors. The risk-scoring model for CN provides an internally validated tool to estimate a patient's risk preoperatively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ewen A Griffiths
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Wu Z, Wu C, Zhao J, Wu C, Peng H, Wang Q, Bai R, Fang X, He H, Shen H, Wu M. Camrelizumab, chemotherapy and apatinib in the neoadjuvant treatment of resectable oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a single-arm phase 2 trial. EClinicalMedicine 2024; 71:102579. [PMID: 38618203 PMCID: PMC11015339 DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102579] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2023] [Revised: 03/13/2024] [Accepted: 03/18/2024] [Indexed: 04/16/2024] Open
Abstract
Background In resectable oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), the efficacy of camrelizumab combined with chemotherapy and apatinib followed by minimally invasive oesophagectomy is not clear. We aimed to fill this knowledge gap. Methods This investigator-initiated, single-arm, prospective, phase 2 trial was performed at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University, China. Patients (aged 18-75 years) who were histologically or cytologically diagnosed with ESCC were deemed suitable to participate in this trial. Patients received 2-3 cycles of neoadjuvant therapy with camrelizumab, nedaplatin, albumin paclitaxel, and apatinib; each cycle was repeated every 14 days. Surgery occurred 4-6 weeks after the last neoadjuvant treatment cycle. The primary outcome was the pathological complete response (PCR) rate of the tumour and lymph nodes. The changes in the peripheral blood immunoprofile among patients without PCR (ie, non-PCR [NPCR]) and with PCR were assessed by mass cytometry. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04666090. Findings 42 patients were enrolled between November 23, 2020 and December 31, 2022. The disease control rate was 100.0% (95% CI, 91.6-100%), and the objective response rate was 83.3% (95% CI, 68.6-93.0%). Six (14.3%) patients experienced grade 3 adverse events. The most common were white blood cell count decrease (31.0%), alopecia (81.0%), asthenia (38.1%), and reactive cutaneous capillary endothelial proliferation (35.7%). 41 patients received minimally invasive oesophagectomy; all 41patients achieved R0 resection, and 18 (43.9%, 95% CI, 28.5-60.3%) patients achieved PCR. The median follow-up was 23 months and the 2-year survival rate was 85.9%. T-cell subsets in both the PCR and NPCR groups exhibited consistency in response to neoadjuvant therapy. In contrast, some of natural killer (NK) cells (NK-C03, NK-C11), B cells (B-C06) and monocytes (M-C05), exhibited significant differences between the PCR and NPCR groups before neoadjuvant therapy. M-C06 had a significant difference in the PCR group and NPCR group after neoadjuvant therapy. NK-C12 and B-C15 showed significant differences both before and after neoadjuvant therapy. Interpretation The application of camrelizumab, chemotherapy and apatinib in the neoadjuvant setting for locally advanced ESCC has shown promising antitumour activity and an acceptable safety profile in this single-arm study. In the neoadjuvant setting, NK cell, B cell, and monocyte subsets exhibited greater predictive power for immunotherapy responsiveness than T-cell subsets. Longer follow-up to assess survival outcomes and a phase 3 randomised trial are needed to further evaluate the proposed treatment. Funding The China Anti-Cancer Association and the "Leading Goose" Research and Development Project of Zhejiang Province.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zixiang Wu
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Chuanqiang Wu
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Jing Zhao
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Cong Wu
- Department of Medical Quality Management, The Women's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Haixian Peng
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Qi Wang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Rui Bai
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Xuefeng Fang
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Hong He
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Hong Shen
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Ming Wu
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Sohail AH, Martinez KA, Flesner SL, Martinez C, Nguyen H, Jreisat BH, Ye IB, Goyal A, Rohail A, Pacheco TBS, Williams CE, Askeri A, Levine J. Operative Experience of Esophageal Surgery among General Surgery Residents in the United States: An Analysis of ACGME Operative Case Logs. JOURNAL OF SURGICAL EDUCATION 2024; 81:639-646. [PMID: 38556439 DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2024.01.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2023] [Revised: 01/16/2024] [Accepted: 01/25/2024] [Indexed: 04/02/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Esophageal surgery is an essential component of general surgery training and encompasses several types of cases that are logged by general surgery residents. There is a scarcity of data on the quality and volume of esophageal surgery experience during surgical residency in the United States. We analyzed trends for 9 different esophageal procedure categories logged by residents in the United States, with the aim to identify areas for improvement in training. METHODS We conducted a retrospective analysis of operative case logs of all general surgery residents graduating from programs accredited by the ACGME over a fourteen-year period from 2009 to 2023. Data on mean esophageal cases reported by graduates, including mean in each procedure subcategory were retrieved. Cases were categorized as either surgeon chief or surgeon junior for each procedure category. Mann-Kendall trend test was used to obtain tau statistics and p-value for trends in mean operative surgical volume for the total number of cases in each operative category over the study period. Trends in surgeon chief and surgeon junior cases were also investigated for each operative category. RESULTS The mean number of all esophageal procedures performed per resident during their training increased significantly from 10.5 in 2009 to 16 in 2022 (τ = 0.833, p < 0.001). This trend observed among all esophageal procedures during this 14-year study can be largely attributed to the steady increase in the number and proportion of laparoscopic esophageal antireflux procedures performed (τ = 0.950, p < 0.001). Additionally, esophagectomy procedures had a statistically significant, but modest, increase during the study period (τ = 0.505, p = 0.023), from a mean of 1 case during training in 2009 to a peak of 1.3 in 2020. Although the general trend of esophagus procedures increased during the study period, most categories (7 out of 9) either decreased or did not significantly change. Esophagogastrectomy volume decreased significantly by 30%, from 1 per resident during their training in 2009 to 0.7 in 2022 (τ = -0.510, p = 0.018), esophageal diverticulectomy procedures decreased by 50% from 0.2 to 0.1 (τ = -0.609, p = 0.009), and operations for esophageal stenosis decreased by 75% from 0.4 to 0.1 (τ = -0.734, p = 0.001). Mean number of esophageal bypasses (τ = -0.128, p = 0.584), repair of perforated esophageal disease (τ = -0.333, p = 0.156), and other major esophagus procedures (τ = 0.416, p = 0.063) did not significantly change. CONCLUSION The operative volume of esophageal surgery that general surgery residents in the United States are exposed to has significantly risen over the past 14 years, largely driven by the increase in laparoscopic antireflux procedures. However, given the recent advances and the resultant heterogeneity in both esophageal surgery, the increase in resident operative volume is still inadequate to ensure the training of safe and adept esophageal surgeons, necessitating postresidency specialized training for trainees interested in esophageal surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amir Humza Sohail
- University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, New Mexico
| | - Kevin A Martinez
- University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, New Mexico.
| | - Samuel L Flesner
- University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, New Mexico
| | - Christian Martinez
- University of New Mexico, College of Arts and Sciences, Albuquerque, New Mexico
| | - Hoang Nguyen
- University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, New Mexico
| | | | - Ivan B Ye
- Department of Surgery, NYU Langone Health, Long Island School of Medicine, Mineola, NY
| | - Aman Goyal
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | - Amal Rohail
- Midwestern University, Chicago College of Osteopathic Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Tulio B S Pacheco
- Department of Surgery, NYU Langone Health, Long Island School of Medicine, Mineola, NY
| | | | - Aysha Askeri
- Shimoga Institute of Medical Science, Shivamogga, India
| | - Jun Levine
- Department of Surgery, NYU Langone Health, Long Island School of Medicine, Mineola, NY
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Kitagawa Y, Matsuda S, Gotoda T, Kato K, Wijnhoven B, Lordick F, Bhandari P, Kawakubo H, Kodera Y, Terashima M, Muro K, Takeuchi H, Mansfield PF, Kurokawa Y, So J, Mönig SP, Shitara K, Rha SY, Janjigian Y, Takahari D, Chau I, Sharma P, Ji J, de Manzoni G, Nilsson M, Kassab P, Hofstetter WL, Smyth EC, Lorenzen S, Doki Y, Law S, Oh DY, Ho KY, Koike T, Shen L, van Hillegersberg R, Kawakami H, Xu RH, Wainberg Z, Yahagi N, Lee YY, Singh R, Ryu MH, Ishihara R, Xiao Z, Kusano C, Grabsch HI, Hara H, Mukaisho KI, Makino T, Kanda M, Booka E, Suzuki S, Hatta W, Kato M, Maekawa A, Kawazoe A, Yamamoto S, Nakayama I, Narita Y, Yang HK, Yoshida M, Sano T. Clinical practice guidelines for esophagogastric junction cancer: Upper GI Oncology Summit 2023. Gastric Cancer 2024; 27:401-425. [PMID: 38386238 PMCID: PMC11016517 DOI: 10.1007/s10120-023-01457-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2023] [Accepted: 12/09/2023] [Indexed: 02/23/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Yuko Kitagawa
- Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-Ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan.
| | - Satoru Matsuda
- Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-Ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan
| | - Takuji Gotoda
- Department of Gastroenterology, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ken Kato
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Head and Neck, Esophageal Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Bas Wijnhoven
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Florian Lordick
- Department of Oncology and University Cancer Center Leipzig, Leipzig University Medical Center, Comprehensive Cancer Center Central, Leipzig, Jena, Germany
| | - Pradeep Bhandari
- Department of Gastroenterology, Portsmouth University Hospital NHS Trust, Portsmouth, UK
| | - Hirofumi Kawakubo
- Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-Ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan
| | - Yasuhiro Kodera
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | | | - Kei Muro
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Hiroya Takeuchi
- Department of Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan
| | - Paul F Mansfield
- Surgical Oncology, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - Yukinori Kurokawa
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Japan
| | - Jimmy So
- Department of Surgery, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Stefan Paul Mönig
- Upper-GI-Surgery University Hospital of Geneva, Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil 4, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Kohei Shitara
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
| | - Sun Young Rha
- Medical Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Yelena Janjigian
- Department of Medicine, Solid Tumor Gastrointestinal Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - Daisuke Takahari
- Gastroenterological Chemotherapy, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ian Chau
- Department of Medicine, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | - Prateek Sharma
- Division of Gastroenterology, School of Medicine and VA Medical Center, University of Kansas, Kansas, USA
| | - Jiafu Ji
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Peking University Cancer Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Giovanni de Manzoni
- Department of Surgery, Dentistry, Maternity and Infant, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Magnus Nilsson
- Division of Surgery and Oncology, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Department of Upper Abdominal Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Paulo Kassab
- Gastroesophageal Surgery, Santa Casa of Sao Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Wayne L Hofstetter
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | | | - Sylvie Lorenzen
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Klinikum Rechts Der Isar Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Yuichiro Doki
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Japan
| | - Simon Law
- Department of Surgery, School of Clinical Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Do-Youn Oh
- Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Integrated Major in Innovative Medical Science, Seoul National University Graduate School, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Khek Yu Ho
- National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Tomoyuki Koike
- Division of Gastroenterology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Lin Shen
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Richard van Hillegersberg
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Hisato Kawakami
- Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Kindai University, Higashiosaka, Japan
| | - Rui-Hua Xu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun YAT-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zev Wainberg
- Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Naohisa Yahagi
- Cancer Center, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yeong Yeh Lee
- School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia
| | - Rajvinder Singh
- Department of Gastroenterology, Lyell McEwin Hospital, Elizabeth Vale, Australia
| | - Min-Hee Ryu
- Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Ulsan, South Korea
| | - Ryu Ishihara
- Gastrointestinal Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | - Zili Xiao
- Digestive Endoscopic Unit, Huadong Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Chika Kusano
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Japan
| | - Heike Irmgard Grabsch
- Department of Pathology, GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Pathology & Data Analytics, Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St. James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Hiroki Hara
- Gastroenterology, Saitama Cancer Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - Ken-Ichi Mukaisho
- Education Center for Medicine and Nursing, Shiga University of Medical Science, Otsu, Japan
| | - Tomoki Makino
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Japan
| | - Mitsuro Kanda
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Eisuke Booka
- Department of Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan
| | - Sho Suzuki
- Department of Gastroenterology, International University of Health and Welfare Ichikawa Hospital, Ichikawa, Japan
| | - Waku Hatta
- Division of Gastroenterology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Motohiko Kato
- Center for Diagnostic and Therapeutic Endoscopy, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Akira Maekawa
- Department of Gastroenterology, Osaka Police Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Akihito Kawazoe
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
| | - Shun Yamamoto
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Head and Neck, Esophageal Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Izuma Nakayama
- Gastroenterological Chemotherapy, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yukiya Narita
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Han-Kwang Yang
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Masahiro Yoshida
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic and Gastrointestinal Surgery, School of Medicine, International University of Health and Welfare, Otawara, Japan
| | - Takeshi Sano
- Gastroenterological Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Ferrari D, Violante T, Novelli M, Starlinger PP, Smoot RL, Reisenauer JS, Larson DW. The death of laparoscopy. Surg Endosc 2024; 38:2677-2688. [PMID: 38519609 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-10774-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2023] [Accepted: 02/24/2024] [Indexed: 03/25/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The introduction of laparoscopy in 1989 revolutionized surgical practices, reducing post-operative complications, and enhancing outcomes. Despite its benefits, limitations in laparoscopic tools have led to continued use of open surgery. Robotic-assisted surgery emerged to address these limitations, but its adoption trends and potential impact on open and laparoscopic surgery require analysis. METHODS A retrospective analysis used the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) databases from 2012 to 2021. The study encompassed various abdominal procedures, employing Vector Autoregressive (VAR) models to analyze the dynamic relationships between surgical techniques. The models predicted future trends in open, laparoscopic, and robotic surgery until Q2 of 2025. RESULTS The analysis included 360,171 patients across diverse procedures. In urology, robotic surgery dominated prostatectomies (83.1% in 2021) and nephrectomies (55.1% in 2021), while the open approach remained the predominant surgical technique for cystectomies (72.5% in 2021). In general surgery, robotic colectomies were forecasted to surpass laparoscopy, becoming the primary approach by 2024 (45.7% in 2025). Proctectomies also showed a shift towards robotic surgery, predicted to surpass laparoscopy and open surgery by 2025 (32.3%). Pancreatectomies witnessed a steady growth in robotic surgery, surpassing laparoscopy in 2021, with forecasts indicating further increase. While hepatectomies remained predominantly open (70.0% in 2025), esophagectomies saw a rise in robotic surgery, predicted to become the primary approach by 2025 (52.3%). CONCLUSIONS The study suggests a transformative shift towards robotic-assisted surgery, poised to dominate various minimally invasive procedures. The forecasts indicate that robotic surgery may surpass laparoscopy and open surgery in colectomies, proctectomies, pancreatectomies, and esophagectomies by 2025. This anticipated change emphasizes the need for proactive adjustments in surgical training programs to align with evolving surgical practices. The findings have substantial implications for future healthcare practices, necessitating a balance between traditional laparoscopy and the burgeoning role of robotic-assisted surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Davide Ferrari
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St. Southwest, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
- General Surgery Residency Program, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Tommaso Violante
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St. Southwest, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
- School of General Surgery, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Marco Novelli
- Department of Statistics, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Patrick P Starlinger
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Rory L Smoot
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Janani S Reisenauer
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - David W Larson
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St. Southwest, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Ramjit S, Davey MG, Loo C, Moran B, Ryan EJ, Arumugasamy M, Robb WB, Donlon NE. Evaluating analgesia strategies in patients who have undergone oesophagectomy-a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials. Dis Esophagus 2024; 37:doad074. [PMID: 38221857 DOI: 10.1093/dote/doad074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2023] [Revised: 11/20/2023] [Accepted: 12/08/2023] [Indexed: 01/16/2024]
Abstract
Optimal pain control following esophagectomy remains a topic of contention. The aim was to perform a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) evaluating the analgesia strategies post-esophagectomy. A NMA was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)-NMA guidelines. Statistical analysis was performed using Shiny and R. Fourteen RCTs which included 565 patients and assessed nine analgesia techniques were included. Relative to systemic opioids, thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) significantly reduced static pain scores at 24 hours post-operatively (mean difference (MD): -13.73, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): -27.01-0.45) (n = 424, 12 RCTs). Intrapleural analgesia (IPA) demonstrated the best efficacy for static (MD: -36.2, 95% CI: -61.44-10.96) (n = 569, 15 RCTs) and dynamic (MD: -42.90, 95% CI: -68.42-17.38) (n = 444, 11 RCTs) pain scores at 48 hours. TEA also significantly reduced static (MD: -13.05, 95% CI: -22.74-3.36) and dynamic (MD: -18.08, 95% CI: -31.70-4.40) pain scores at 48 hours post-operatively, as well as reducing opioid consumption at 24 hours (MD: -33.20, 95% CI: -60.57-5.83) and 48 hours (MD: -42.66, 95% CI: -59.45-25.88). Moreover, TEA significantly shortened intensive care unit (ICU) stays (MD: -5.00, 95% CI: -6.82-3.18) and time to extubation (MD: -4.40, 95% CI: -5.91-2.89) while increased post-operative forced vital capacity (MD: 9.89, 95% CI: 0.91-18.87) and forced expiratory volume (MD: 13.87, 95% CI: 0.87-26.87). TEA provides optimal pain control and improved post-operative respiratory function in patients post-esophagectomy, reducing ICU stays, one of the benchmarks of improved post-operative recovery. IPA demonstrates promising results for potential implementation in the future following esophagectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sinead Ramjit
- Department of Surgery, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Matthew G Davey
- Department of Surgery, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Caitlyn Loo
- Department of Surgery, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Brendan Moran
- Department of Surgery, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Eanna J Ryan
- Department of Surgery, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | - William B Robb
- Department of Surgery, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Noel E Donlon
- Department of Surgery, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
- Department of Surgery, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Visser MR, van Berge Henegouwen MI, van Hillegersberg R. Centralization and Quality Control in Esophageal Cancer Surgery: a Way Forward in Europe. Dis Esophagus 2024:doae035. [PMID: 38670808 DOI: 10.1093/dote/doae035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2024] [Accepted: 04/08/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Maurits R Visser
- Scientific Bureau, Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing (DUCA), Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Mark I van Berge Henegouwen
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Richard van Hillegersberg
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Bondzi-Simpson A, Ribeiro T, Grant A, Ko M, Coburn N, Hallet J, Kulkarni GS, Kidane B. Patients with complete clinical response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced esophageal cancer: A Markov decision analysis of esophagectomy versus active surveillance. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2024:S0022-5223(24)00364-7. [PMID: 38649112 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2024.04.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2023] [Revised: 03/07/2024] [Accepted: 04/12/2024] [Indexed: 04/25/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Chemoradiation followed by esophagectomy is a standard treatment option for patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer (LAEC). Esophagectomy is a high-risk procedure, and recent evidence suggests select patients may benefit from omitting or delaying surgery. This study aims to compare surgery versus active surveillance for LAEC patients with complete clinical response (cCR) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT). METHODS Decision analysis with Markov modeling was used. The base case was a 60-year-old man with T3N0M0 esophageal cancer with cCR after nCRT. The decision was modeled for a 5-year time horizon. Primary outcomes were life-years and quality-adjusted life-years (QALY). Probabilities and utilities were derived through the literature. Deterministic sensitivity analyses were performed using ranges from the literature with consideration for clinical plausibility. RESULTS Surgery was favored for survival with an expected life-years of 2.89 versus 2.64. After incorporating quality of life, active surveillance was favored, with an expected QALY of 1.70 versus 1.56. The model was sensitive to probability of recurrence on active surveillance (threshold value 0.598), probability of recurrence being resectable (0.318), and disutility of previous esophagectomy (-0.091). The model was not sensitive to perioperative morbidity and mortality. CONCLUSIONS Our study finds that surgery increases life expectancy but decreases QALY. Although the incremental change in QALY for either modality is insufficient to make broad clinical recommendations, our study demonstrates that either approach is acceptable. As probabilities of key factors are further defined in the literature, treatment decisions for patients with LAEC and a cCR after nCRT should consider histology, patient values, and quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adom Bondzi-Simpson
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Tiago Ribeiro
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Angelo Grant
- Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Michael Ko
- Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, St Joseph's Health Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Natalie Coburn
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Surgical Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre-Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Julie Hallet
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Surgical Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre-Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Girish S Kulkarni
- Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Urology, Departments of Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Biniam Kidane
- Section of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada; Cancer Care Manitoba Research Institute, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada; Department of Physiology & Pathophysiology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada; Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Schuring N, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Gisbertz SS. History and evidence for state of the art of lymphadenectomy in esophageal cancer surgery. Dis Esophagus 2024; 37:doad065. [PMID: 38048446 PMCID: PMC10987971 DOI: 10.1093/dote/doad065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2023] [Revised: 10/29/2023] [Accepted: 11/07/2023] [Indexed: 12/06/2023]
Abstract
The current curative multimodal treatment of advanced esophageal cancers consists of neoadjuvant or perioperative chemo(radio)therapy followed by a radical surgical resection of the primary tumor and a 2- or 3-field lymphadenectomy. One of the most important predictors of long-term survival of esophageal cancer patients is lymph node involvement. The distribution pattern of lymph node metastases in esophageal cancer is unpredictable and depends on the primary tumor location, histology, T-stage and application of neoadjuvant or perioperative treatment. The optimal extent of the lymphadenectomy remains controversial; there is no global consensus on this topic yet. Some surgeons advocate an aggressive and extended lymph node dissection to remove occult metastatic disease, to optimize oncological outcomes. Others promote a more restricted lymphadenectomy, since the benefit of an extended lymphadenectomy, especially after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, has not been clearly demonstrated, and morbidity may be reduced. In this review, we describe the development of lymphadenectomy, followed by a summary of current evidence for lymphadenectomy in esophageal cancer treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nannet Schuring
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mark I van Berge Henegouwen
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Suzanne S Gisbertz
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Uzun E, d'Amore A, Berlth F, Mann C, Tagkalos E, Hadzijusufovic E, Lang H, Grimminger PP. Anterior gastric wall anastomosis may lead to lower rate of delayed gastric emptying after minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy: a retrospective cohort study. Surg Endosc 2024; 38:1950-1957. [PMID: 38334779 PMCID: PMC10978725 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-10696-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2023] [Accepted: 01/08/2024] [Indexed: 02/10/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In minimally invasive esophagectomy, a circular stapled anastomosis is common, but no evidence exists investigating the role of the specific localization of the anastomosis. The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of an esophagogastrostomy on the anterior or posterior wall of the gastric conduit on the postoperative outcomes. MATERIAL AND METHODS All oncologic minimally invasive Ivor Lewis procedures, performed between 2017 and 2022, were included in this study. The cohort was divided in two groups: a) intrathoracic esophagogastrostomy on the anterior gastric wall of the conduit (ANT, n = 285, 65%) and b) on the posterior gastric wall (POST, n = 154, 35%). Clinicopathological parameters and short-term outcomes were compared between both groups by retrieving data from the prospective database. RESULTS Overall, 439 patients were included, baseline characteristics were similar in both groups, there was a higher proportion of squamous cell carcinoma in ANT (22.8% vs. 16.2%, P = 0.043). A higher rate of robotic-assisted procedures was observed in ANT (71.2% vs. 49.4%). Anastomotic leakage rate was similar in both groups (ANT 10.4% vs. POST 9.8%, P = 0.851). Overall complication rate and Clavien-Dindo > 3 complication rates were higher in POST compared to ANT: 53.2% vs. 40% (P = 0.008) and 36.9% vs. 25.7% (P = 0.014), respectively. The rate of delayed gastric emptying (20.1% vs. 7.4%, P < 0.001) and nosocomial pneumonia (22.1% vs. 14.8%, P = 0.05) was significantly higher in POST. CONCLUSION Patients undergoing minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy with an intrathoracic circular stapled anastomosis may benefit from esophagogastrostomy on the anterior wall of the gastric conduit, in terms of lower rate of delayed gastric emptying.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eren Uzun
- Department of General-, Visceral- and Transplant Surgery, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany
| | - Alberto d'Amore
- Department of General-, Visceral- and Transplant Surgery, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany
| | - Felix Berlth
- Department of General-, Visceral- and Transplant Surgery, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany
| | - Carolina Mann
- Department of General-, Visceral- and Transplant Surgery, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany
| | - Evangelos Tagkalos
- Department of General-, Visceral- and Transplant Surgery, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany
| | - Edin Hadzijusufovic
- Department of General-, Visceral- and Transplant Surgery, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany
| | - Hauke Lang
- Department of General-, Visceral- and Transplant Surgery, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany
| | - Peter Philipp Grimminger
- Department of General-, Visceral- and Transplant Surgery, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Challine A, Kirouani M, Markar SR, Tzedakis S, Jaquet R, Piessen G, Dabakoyo-Yonli TS, Lefèvre JH, Lazzati A, Voron T. MIRO study: Do the results of a randomized controlled trial apply in a real population? Surgery 2024; 175:1055-1062. [PMID: 38490752 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2023.11.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2023] [Revised: 10/04/2023] [Accepted: 11/26/2023] [Indexed: 03/17/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of our study was to evaluate the external validity of the MIRO randomized controlled trial findings in a similar nationwide setting "real life" population, especially the benefit of a hybrid approach in esophageal resection for pulmonary complication. The external validity of randomized controlled trial findings to the general population with the same condition remains problematic because of the inherent selection bias and rigid inclusion criteria. METHODS This study was a cohort study from a National Health Database (Programme de Medicalisation des Systemes d'Informations) between 2010 and 2022. All adult patients operated on using Ivor Lewis resection for esophageal cancer were included. We first validated the detection algorithm of postoperative complications in the health database. Then, we assessed the primary outcome, which was the comparison of postoperative severe pulmonary complications, leak rate, and 30-day mortality between the 2 surgical approaches (hybrid versus open) over a decade. RESULTS Between 2010 and 2012, 162 of 205 patients in the MIRO trial were anonymously identified in the health care database. No difference between randomized controlled trials and healthcare database measurements was found within severe respiratory complications (24% vs 22%, respectively) nor within leak rate (10% vs 9%, respectively). After application of selection criteria according to the MIRO trial, 3,852 patients were included between 2013 and 2022. The hybrid approach was a protective factor against respiratory complications after adjustment for confounding variables (odds ratio = 0.83; 95% confidence interval = 0.71-0.98, P = .025). No significant difference in the 30-day mortality rate or 30-day leakage rate between the types of approach was reported. CONCLUSION This national cohort study demonstrates the external validity of the MIRO randomized controlled trial findings in a real-life population within France.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandre Challine
- Sorbonne Université, Department of Digestive Surgery, AP-HP, Hôpital Saint Antoine, Paris, France; HeKA, Inria, Paris, France; Service de Chirurgie Viscérale, Cancérologique et Endocrinienne, Hôpital Saint Louis, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Université de Paris, Paris, France.
| | - Mehdi Kirouani
- Service de Chirurgie Viscérale, Cancérologique et Endocrinienne, Hôpital Saint Louis, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Sheraz R Markar
- Nuffield Department of Surgery, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Guillaume Piessen
- CHU Lille, Department of Digestive and Oncological Surgery, F-59000 Lille, France; Univ. Lille, CNRS, Inserm, CHU Lille, UMR9020-U1277 - CANTHER - Cancer Heterogeneity Plasticity and Resistance to Therapies, F-59000 Lille, France
| | | | - Jérémie H Lefèvre
- Sorbonne Université, Department of Digestive Surgery, AP-HP, Hôpital Saint Antoine, Paris, France
| | - Andrea Lazzati
- HeKA, Inria, Paris, France; Service de chirurgie digestive et bariatrique, Centre intercommunal de Créteil, Créteil, France
| | - Thibault Voron
- Sorbonne Université, Department of Digestive Surgery, AP-HP, Hôpital Saint Antoine, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Masuda Y, Leong EKF, So JBY, Shabbir A, Lam Jia Wei T, Chia DKA, Kim G. A systematic review and meta-analysis of mediastinoscopy-assisted transhiatal esophagectomy (MATHE). Surg Oncol 2024; 53:102042. [PMID: 38330804 DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2024.102042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2023] [Revised: 01/23/2024] [Accepted: 01/31/2024] [Indexed: 02/10/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Transhiatal esophagectomy (THE) avoids thoracotomy but sacrifices mediastinal lymphadenectomy. Mediastinoscopy-assisted transhiatal esophagectomy (MATHE) allows for visualisation and en-bloc dissection of mediastinal lymph nodes while retaining the benefits of THE. However, given its novel inception, there is a paucity of literature. This study aimed to conduct the first meta-analysis to explore the efficacy of MATHE and clarify its role in the future of esophagectomy. METHODS Four databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and Cochrane Library) were searched from inception to May 1, 2023. Studies were included if they reported outcomes for patients with esophageal cancer who underwent MATHE. Meta-analyses of proportions and pooled means were performed for the outcomes of intraoperative blood loss, lymph node (LN) harvest, mean hospital length of stay (LOS), mean operative time, R0 resection, conversion rates, 30-day mortality rate, 5-year OS, and surgical complications (anastomotic leak, cardiovascular [CVS] and pulmonary complications, chyle leak and recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy [RLN]). Sensitivity analyses were performed for outcomes with substantial statistical heterogeneity. RESULTS The search yielded 223 articles; 28 studies and 1128 patients were included in our analysis. Meta-analyses of proportions yielded proportion rates: 30-day mortality (0 %, 95 %CI 0-0), 5-year OS (60.5 %, 95 %CI 47.6-72.7), R0 resection (100 %, 95 %CI 99.3-100), conversion rate (0.1 %, 95 %CI 0-1.2). Among surgical complications, RLN palsy (14.6 %, 95 %CI 9.5-20.4) were most observed, followed by pulmonary complications (11.3 %, 95 %CI 7-16.2), anastomotic leak (9.7 %, 95 %CI 6.8-12.8), CVS complications (2.3 %, 95 %CI 0.9-4.1) and chyle leak (0.02 %, 95 %CI 0-0.8). Meta-analysis of pooled means yielded means: LN harvest (18.6, 95 %CI 14.3-22.9), intraoperative blood loss (247.1 ml, 95 %CI 173.6-320.6), hospital LOS (18.1 days, 95 %CI 14.4-21.8), and operative time (301.5 min, 95 %CI 238.4-364.6). There was moderate-to-high statistical heterogeneity. Findings were robust to sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSION MATHE is associated with encouraging post-operative mortality and complication rates, while allowing for radical mediastinal lymphadenectomy with reasonable lymph node harvest.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoshio Masuda
- Ministry of Health Holdings Singapore, Singapore; Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | | | - Jimmy Bok Yan So
- Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, National University Hospital, Singapore; Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Asim Shabbir
- Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, National University Hospital, Singapore; Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | | | - Daryl Kai Ann Chia
- Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, National University Hospital, Singapore.
| | - Guowei Kim
- Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, National University Hospital, Singapore; Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Nienhüser H, Schmidt T. [Evidence for Minimal Invasive Oesophageal Resection]. Zentralbl Chir 2024; 149:163-168. [PMID: 38316414 DOI: 10.1055/a-2241-0439] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2024]
Abstract
In the course of the last 20 years, minimally invasive therapy has become much more important in all areas. In particular, surgical procedures have been established in oncological surgery, even without generating the necessary evidence to assure that the quality is equal to that achieved with open procedures. For this purpose, it has only been in recent years that appropriate randomised controlled studies followed by meta-analyses have been carried out. In this article, we summarise the evidence for minimally invasive resection of the oesophagus and review current literature for each procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Henrik Nienhüser
- Klinik für Allgemein, Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Deutschland
| | - Thomas Schmidt
- Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral-, Tumor- und Transplantationschirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Köln, Köln, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Nevins EJ, Chmelo J, Prasad P, Brown J, Phillips AW. Long-term survival is not affected by severity of complications following esophagectomy. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2024; 50:108232. [PMID: 38430703 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2024.108232] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2023] [Revised: 01/09/2024] [Accepted: 02/25/2024] [Indexed: 03/05/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Outcomes following esophagectomy for esophageal cancer have continued to improve over the last 30 years. Post-operative complications impact upon peri-operative and short-term survival but the effect on long-term survival remains debated. This study aims to investigate the effect of post-operative complications on long-term survival following esophagectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS All patients who underwent an esophagectomy between January 2010 and January 2019 were included from a single high-volume center. Data was collected contemporaneously. Patients were separated into three groups; those who experienced no, or very minor complications (Clavien-Dindo 0 or 1), minor complications (Clavien-Dindo 2), and major complications (Clavien-Dindo 3-4), at 30 days. To correct for short-term mortality effects, those who died during the index hospital admission were excluded. Overall survival was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier and log rank testing. RESULTS The study cohort comprised 721 patients. There were 42.4% (306/721), 29.5% (213/721) and 25.7% (185/721) in the Clavien-Dindo 0-1, Clavien-Dindo 2, and Clavien-Dindo 3-4 group respectively. Seventeen patients (2.4%) died during their index hospital admission and were therefore excluded. There was no significant difference between median survival across the 3 groups (50, 57 and 52 months). Across all 3 groups, overall long-term survival rates were equivalent at 1 (87.5%, 84.9%, 83.2%), 3 (59.7%, 59.6%, 54.2%), and 5 years (43.9%, 48.9%, 45.7%) (p = 0.806). The only factors independently associated with survival in this cohort, were male gender, Charlson comorbidity index, and overall pathological stage of disease. CONCLUSION Long-term survival is not affected by peri-operative complications, irrespective of severity, following esophagectomy. Further study into the long-term quality of life is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward J Nevins
- Northern Oesophagogastric Unit, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle Upon Tyne NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - Jakub Chmelo
- Northern Oesophagogastric Unit, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle Upon Tyne NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - Pooja Prasad
- Northern Oesophagogastric Unit, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle Upon Tyne NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - Joshua Brown
- Northern Oesophagogastric Unit, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle Upon Tyne NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - Alexander W Phillips
- Northern Oesophagogastric Unit, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle Upon Tyne NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK; School of Medical Education, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Milone M, Bianchi PP, Cianchi F, Coratti A, D'Amore A, De Manzoni G, De Pasqual CA, Formisano G, Jovine E, Morelli L, Offi M, Peri A, Pietrabissa A, Staderini F, Tribuzi A, Giacopuzzi S. Fashioning esophagogastric anastomosis in robotic Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy: a multicenter experience. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2024; 409:103. [PMID: 38517543 PMCID: PMC10959816 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-024-03290-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2023] [Accepted: 03/15/2024] [Indexed: 03/24/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of the present study is to compare outcomes of the robotic hand-sewn, linear- and circular-stapled techniques performed to create an intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis in patients who underwent Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy. METHODS Patients who underwent a planned Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy were retrospectively analysed from prospectively maintained databases. Only patients who underwent a robotic thoracic approach with the creation of an intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis were included in the study. Patients were divided into three groups: hand-sewn-, circular stapled-, and linear-stapled anastomosis group. Demographic information and surgery-related data were extracted. The primary outcome was the rate of anastomotic leakages (AL) in the three groups. Moreover, the rate of grade A, B and C anastomotic leakage were evaluated. In addition, patients of each group were divided in subgroups according to the characteristics of anastomotic fashioning technique. RESULTS Two hundred and thirty patients were enrolled in the study. No significant differences were found between the three groups about AL rate (p = 0.137). Considering the management of the AL for each of the three groups, no significant differences were found. Evaluating the correlation between AL rate and the characteristics of anastomotic fashioning technique, no significant differences were found. CONCLUSIONS No standardized anastomotic fashioning technique has yet been generally accepted. This study could be considered a call to perform ad hoc high-quality studies involving high-volume centers for upper gastrointestinal surgery to evaluate what is the most advantageous anastomotic technique.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Milone
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, ″Federico II″ University of Naples, Via Sergio Pansini, 5, 80131, Naples, Italy
| | | | - Fabio Cianchi
- Chirurgia Dell'Apparato Digerente Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | | | - Anna D'Amore
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, ″Federico II″ University of Naples, Via Sergio Pansini, 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
| | - Giovanni De Manzoni
- General and Upper GI Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Carlo Alberto De Pasqual
- General and Upper GI Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | | | - Elio Jovine
- Department of General Surgery, IRCCS, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Di Bologna, Maggiore Hospital, 40133, Bologna, Italy
| | - Luca Morelli
- General Surgery Unit, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Mariafortuna Offi
- Department of General Surgery, IRCCS, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Di Bologna, Maggiore Hospital, 40133, Bologna, Italy
| | - Andrea Peri
- Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
- Department of Surgery, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | | | - Fabio Staderini
- Chirurgia Dell'Apparato Digerente Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | | | - Simone Giacopuzzi
- General and Upper GI Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Miao Y, Nie X, He WW, Luo CY, Xia Y, Zhou AR, Wei SR, Wang CH, Fang Q, Peng L, Leng XF, Han YT, Luo L, Xie Q. Longitudinal patient-reported outcomes after minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy for patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Support Care Cancer 2024; 32:237. [PMID: 38509239 PMCID: PMC10954946 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-024-08428-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2023] [Accepted: 03/08/2024] [Indexed: 03/22/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Surgery for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is characterized by a poor prognosis and high complication rate, resulting in a heavy symptom burden and poor health-related quality of life (QOL). We evaluated longitudinal patient-reported outcomes (PROs) to analyze the correlations between symptoms and QOL and their changing characteristics during postoperative rehabilitation. METHODS We investigated patients with ESCC who underwent minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy at Sichuan Cancer Hospital between April 2019 and December 2019. Longitudinal data of the clinical characteristics and PROs were collected. The MD Anderson Symptom Inventory and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QOL questionnaires were used to assess symptoms and QOL and compare the trajectories of PROs during the investigation. RESULTS A total of 244 patients with ESCC were enrolled in this study. Regarding QOL, role and emotional functions returned to baseline at 1 month after surgery, and cognitive and social functions returned to baseline at 3 months after surgery. However, physical function and global QOL did not return to baseline at 1 year after surgery. At 7 days and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery, the main symptoms of the patients were negatively correlated with physical, role, emotional, cognitive, and social functions and the overall health status (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION Patients with ESCC experience reduced health-related QOL and persisting symptoms after minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy, but a recovery trend was observed within 1 month. The long-term QOL after esophagectomy is acceptable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yan Miao
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Sichuan Cancer Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital and Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, People's Republic of China
| | - Xin Nie
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Sichuan Cancer Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital and Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, People's Republic of China
| | - Wen-Wu He
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Sichuan Cancer Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital and Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, People's Republic of China
| | - Chun-Yan Luo
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Sichuan Cancer Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital and Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, People's Republic of China
| | - Yan Xia
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Sichuan Cancer Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital and Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, People's Republic of China
| | - Ao-Ru Zhou
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Sichuan Cancer Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital and Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, People's Republic of China
| | - Si-Rui Wei
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Sichuan Cancer Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital and Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, People's Republic of China
| | - Cheng-Hao Wang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Sichuan Cancer Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital and Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, People's Republic of China
| | - Qiang Fang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Sichuan Cancer Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital and Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, People's Republic of China
| | - Lin Peng
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Sichuan Cancer Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital and Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, People's Republic of China
| | - Xue-Feng Leng
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Sichuan Cancer Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital and Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, People's Republic of China
| | - Yong-Tao Han
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Sichuan Cancer Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital and Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, People's Republic of China
| | - Lei Luo
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Sichuan Cancer Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital and Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, People's Republic of China.
| | - Qin Xie
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Sichuan Cancer Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital and Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Kim T, Jeon YJ, Lee H, Kim TH, Park SY, Kang D, Hong YS, Lee G, Lee J, Shin S, Cho JH, Choi YS, Kim J, Cho J, Zo JI, Shim YM, Kim HK, Park HY. Preoperative DLco and FEV 1 are correlated with postoperative pulmonary complications in patients after esophagectomy. Sci Rep 2024; 14:6117. [PMID: 38480929 PMCID: PMC10937667 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-56593-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2023] [Accepted: 03/08/2024] [Indexed: 03/17/2024] Open
Abstract
Limited information is available regarding the association between preoperative lung function and postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) in patients with esophageal cancer who undergo esophagectomy. This is a retrospective cohort study. Patients were classified into low and high lung function groups by the cutoff of the lowest fifth quintile of forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) %predicted (%pred) and diffusing capacity of the carbon monoxide (DLco) %pred. The PPCs compromised of atelectasis requiring bronchoscopic intervention, pneumonia, and acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome. Modified multivariable-adjusted Poisson regression model using robust error variances and inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) were used to assess the relative risk (RR) for the PPCs. A joint effect model considered FEV1%pred and DLco %pred together for the estimation of RR for the PPCs. Of 810 patients with esophageal cancer who underwent esophagectomy, 159 (19.6%) developed PPCs. The adjusted RR for PPCs in the low FEV1 group relative to high FEV1 group was 1.48 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.09-2.00) and 1.98 (95% CI = 1.46-2.68) in the low DLco group relative to the high DLco group. A joint effect model showed adjusted RR of PPCs was highest in patients with low DLco and low FEV1 followed by low DLco and high FEV1, high DLco and low FEV1, and high DLco and high FEV1 (Reference). Results were consistent with the IPTW. Reduced preoperative lung function (FEV1 and DLco) is associated with post-esophagectomy PPCs. The risk was further strengthened when both values decreased together.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taeyun Kim
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Kosin University Gospel Hospital, Kosin University College of Medicine, Busan, South Korea
| | - Yeong Jeong Jeon
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyun Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Tae Ho Kim
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Seong Yong Park
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea
| | - Danbee Kang
- Center for Clinical Epidemiology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Yun Soo Hong
- Department of Epidemiology and Medicine, and Welch Center for Prevention, Epidemiology, and Clinical Research, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Genehee Lee
- Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Junghee Lee
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea
| | - Sumin Shin
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea
| | - Jong Ho Cho
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea
| | - Yong Soo Choi
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea
| | - Jhingook Kim
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea
| | - Juhee Cho
- Department of Epidemiology and Medicine, and Welch Center for Prevention, Epidemiology, and Clinical Research, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea
- Department of Clinical Research Design and Evaluation, SAIHST, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jae Ill Zo
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea
| | - Young Mog Shim
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea
| | - Hong Kwan Kim
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea.
| | - Hye Yun Park
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Schroeder J, Lagisetty K, Lynch W, Lin J, Chang AC, Reddy RM. Rural Women Have a Prolonged Recovery Process after Esophagectomy. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:1078. [PMID: 38539414 PMCID: PMC10968561 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16061078] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2024] [Revised: 02/26/2024] [Accepted: 03/01/2024] [Indexed: 04/15/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gender and geographic access to care play a large role in health disparities in esophageal cancer care. The aim of our study was to evaluate disparities in peri-operative outcomes for patients undergoing esophagectomy based on gender and geographic location. METHODS A retrospective cohort of prospectively collected data from patients who underwent esophagectomy from 2003 to 2022 was identified and analyzed based on gender and county, which were aggregated into existing state-level "metropolitan" versus "rural" designations. The demographics, pre-operative treatment, surgical complications, post-operative outcomes, and length of stay (LOS) of each group were analyzed using chi-squared, paired t-tests and single-factor ANOVA. RESULTS Of the 1545 patients, men (83.6%) and women (16.4%) experienced similar rates of post-operative complications, but women experienced significantly longer hospital (p = 0.002) and ICU (p = 0.03) LOSs as compared with their male counterparts, with no differences in 30-day mortality. When separated by geographic criteria, rural women were further outliers, with significantly longer hospital LOSs (p < 0.001) and higher rates of ICU admission (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Rural female patients undergoing esophagectomy were more likely to have a longer inpatient recovery process compared with their female metropolitan or male counterparts, suggesting a need for more targeted interventions in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Schroeder
- University of Michigan Medical School, 3808 Medical Science Bldg, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Kiran Lagisetty
- University of Michigan Medical School, 3808 Medical Science Bldg, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
- Michigan Medicine, Section of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, 1500 E. Medical Center Drive, TC 2120, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - William Lynch
- University of Michigan Medical School, 3808 Medical Science Bldg, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
- Michigan Medicine, Section of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, 1500 E. Medical Center Drive, TC 2120, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Jules Lin
- University of Michigan Medical School, 3808 Medical Science Bldg, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
- Michigan Medicine, Section of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, 1500 E. Medical Center Drive, TC 2120, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Andrew C. Chang
- University of Michigan Medical School, 3808 Medical Science Bldg, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
- Michigan Medicine, Section of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, 1500 E. Medical Center Drive, TC 2120, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Rishindra M. Reddy
- University of Michigan Medical School, 3808 Medical Science Bldg, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
- Michigan Medicine, Section of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, 1500 E. Medical Center Drive, TC 2120, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Akhtar K, Alkhaffaf B, Ariyarathenam A, Avery K, Barham P, Bateman A, Beard C, Berrisford R, Blazeby JM, Blencowe N, Boddy A, Bowrey D, Bracey T, Brierley RC, Briton K, Byrne J, Catton J, Chaparala R, Clark SK, Clarke T, Cooke J, Couper G, Culliford L, Dawson H, Deans C, Donovan JL, Ekblad C, Elliott J, Exon D, Falk S, Farooq N, Garfield K, Gaunt DM, Gill F, Goldin R, Gravani A, Hanna G, Hayes S, Heys R, Hindmarsh C, Hollinghurst S, Hollingworth W, Hollowood A, Houlihan R, Howes B, Howie L, Humphreys L, Hutton D, Jarvis R, Jepson M, Kandiyali R, Kaur S, Kaye P, Kelly J, King A, Kirwin J, Krysztopik R, Lamb P, Lang A, Lee V, Maitland S, Mapstone N, Melia G, Metcalfe C, Melhado R, Moure-Fernandez A, Nair B, Nicklin J, Noble F, Noble SM, O’Connell A, Palmer S, Parsons S, Pursnani K, Rea N, Reed F, Rice C, Richards C, Rogers C, Sanders G, Save V, Shaw C, Schiller M, Schranz R, Shetty V, Shirkey B, Singleton J, Skipworth R, Smith J, Streets C, Titcomb D, Turner P, Ubhi S, Underwood T, Vinod C, Vohra R, Ward EM, Warman R, Welch N, Wheatley T, White K, Wickens RA, Wilkerson P, Williams A, Williams R, Wilmshurst N, Wong NACS. Laparoscopic or open abdominal surgery with thoracotomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: ROMIO randomized clinical trial. Br J Surg 2024; 111:znae023. [PMID: 38525931 PMCID: PMC10961947 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znae023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2023] [Revised: 11/16/2023] [Accepted: 01/10/2024] [Indexed: 03/26/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study investigated if hybrid oesophagectomy with minimally invasive gastric mobilization and thoracotomy enabled faster recovery than open surgery. METHODS In eight UK centres, this pragmatic RCT recruited patients for oesophagectomy to treat localized cancer. Participants were randomly allocated to hybrid or open surgery, stratified by centre and receipt of neoadjuvant treatment. Large dressings aimed to mask patients to their allocation for six days post-surgery. The authors present the intention-to-treat analysis of outcome measures from the first 3 months post-randomization, including the primary outcome, the patient-reported physical function scale of the EORTC QLQ-C30, and cost-effectiveness. Current Controlled Trials registration: ISRCTN 59036820 (feasibility study), 10386621 (definitive study). FINDINGS There was no evidence of a difference between hybrid (n = 267) and open (n = 266) surgery in average physical function over 3 months post-randomization: difference in means 2.1, 95% c.i. -2.0 to 6.2, P = 0.3. Complication rates were similar; for example, 88 (34%) participants in the open and 82 (32%) participants in the hybrid surgery groups experienced a pulmonary infection within 30 days. There was no evidence that hybrid surgery was more cost-effective than open surgery at 3 months. CONCLUSIONS Patient-reported physical function in the 3 months post-randomization provided no evidence of a difference in recovery time between hybrid and open surgery, or a difference in cost-effectiveness. Both approaches to surgery were completed safely, with a similar risk of key complications, suggesting that surgeons who have a preference for one of the two approaches need not change their practice.
Collapse
|
38
|
Piskarev Y, Sun Y, Righi M, Boehler Q, Chautems C, Fischer C, Nelson BJ, Shintake J, Floreano D. Fast-Response Variable-Stiffness Magnetic Catheters for Minimally Invasive Surgery. ADVANCED SCIENCE (WEINHEIM, BADEN-WURTTEMBERG, GERMANY) 2024; 11:e2305537. [PMID: 38225742 DOI: 10.1002/advs.202305537] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2023] [Revised: 12/13/2023] [Indexed: 01/17/2024]
Abstract
In minimally invasive surgery, such as cardiac ablation, magnetically steered catheters made of variable-stiffness materials can enable higher dexterity and higher force application to human tissue. However, the long transition time between soft and rigid states leads to a significant increase in procedure duration. Here, a fast-response, multisegmented catheter is described for minimally invasive surgery made of variable-stiffness thread (FRVST) that encapsulates a helical cooling channel. The rapid stiffness change in the FRVST, composed of a nontoxic shape memory polymer, is achieved by an active cooling system that pumps water through the helical channel. The FRVST displays a 66 times stiffness change and a 26 times transition enhancement compare with the noncooled version. The catheter allows for selective bending of each segment up to 127° in air and up to 76° in water under an 80 mT external magnetic field. The inner working channel can be used for cooling an ablation tip during a procedure and for information exchange via the deployment of wires or surgical tools.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yegor Piskarev
- Laboratory of Intelligent Systems, Institute of Mechanical Engineering, School of Engineering, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, 1015, Switzerland
| | - Yi Sun
- Laboratory of Intelligent Systems, Institute of Mechanical Engineering, School of Engineering, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, 1015, Switzerland
| | - Matteo Righi
- Laboratory of Intelligent Systems, Institute of Mechanical Engineering, School of Engineering, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, 1015, Switzerland
| | - Quentin Boehler
- Multi-Scale Robotics Lab, Tannenstrasse 3, ETH Zurich, Zurich, 8092, Switzerland
| | - Christophe Chautems
- Multi-Scale Robotics Lab, Tannenstrasse 3, ETH Zurich, Zurich, 8092, Switzerland
| | - Cedric Fischer
- Multi-Scale Robotics Lab, Tannenstrasse 3, ETH Zurich, Zurich, 8092, Switzerland
| | - Bradley J Nelson
- Multi-Scale Robotics Lab, Tannenstrasse 3, ETH Zurich, Zurich, 8092, Switzerland
| | - Jun Shintake
- Shintake Research Group, School of Informatics and Engineering, The University of Electro-Communications, 1-5-1 Chofugaoka, Chofu, Tokyo, 182-8585, Japan
| | - Dario Floreano
- Laboratory of Intelligent Systems, Institute of Mechanical Engineering, School of Engineering, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, 1015, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Chen J, Heng J, Zheng B, Zeng T, Wang H, Wang P, Lin Y, Gao W, Chen C, Tan L, Fu J. Carbon dioxide gas-induced pneumothorax versus one-lung ventilation in minimally invasive esophagectomy: a multicenter propensity score matching cohort study. Int J Surg 2024; 110:1376-1382. [PMID: 38051934 PMCID: PMC10942216 DOI: 10.1097/js9.0000000000000968] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2023] [Accepted: 11/21/2023] [Indexed: 12/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Carbon dioxide gas-induced pneumoperitoneum might be the reason for the shorter postoperative survival of patients with malignant tumors. Whether CO 2 gas-induced pneumothorax has unfavorable impacts on the surgical and oncological outcomes of minimally invasive esophagectomy remains unclear. METHODS Between 2010 and 2016, a total of 998 patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus who received video-assisted surgery were registered from three large-volume medical centers. The overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were compared after using propensity score-matched and inverse probability-weighted methods. In addition, the tumor-relapse state was evaluated, and the relapse pattern was compared. RESULTS A total of 422 and 576 minimally invasive esophagectomies with intraoperative one-lung ventilation and CO 2 -induced pneumothorax were enrolled, respectively. The 5-year OS and DFS were similar between the CO 2 -induced pneumothorax (64.2% and 64.7%) and one-lung ventilation (65.3% and 62.4%) groups following propensity matching. The inverse probability weighting revealed similarly equal survival results in the two groups. The 5-year relapse rates were 35.1% and 30.6% in the one-lung ventilation and CO 2 -induced pneumothorax groups, respectively. Moreover, the relapse patterns were not significantly different between the two groups. CONCLUSION The results of this study suggested that the use of intraoperative one-lung ventilation and CO 2 -induced pneumothorax have similar oncological outcomes; therefore, the two methods are both viable options in esophagectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Junying Chen
- Department of Thoracic Surgery
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center
- Guangdong Esophageal Cancer Institute, Guangzhou, Guangdong
| | - Jiao Heng
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Fudan University Zhongshan Hospital, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
| | - Bin Zheng
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital
- Key Laboratory of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian Province
| | - Taidui Zeng
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital
- Key Laboratory of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian Province
| | - Hao Wang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Fudan University Zhongshan Hospital, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
| | | | - Yaobin Lin
- Department of Thoracic Surgery
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center
- Guangdong Esophageal Cancer Institute, Guangzhou, Guangdong
| | | | - Chun Chen
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital
- Key Laboratory of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian Province
| | - Lijie Tan
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Fudan University Zhongshan Hospital, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
| | - Jianhua Fu
- Department of Thoracic Surgery
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center
- Guangdong Esophageal Cancer Institute, Guangzhou, Guangdong
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
van der Aa DC, Gisbertz SS, Anderegg MCJ, Lagarde SM, Klaassen R, Meijer SL, van Dieren S, Hulshof M, Bergman J, Bennink RJ, van Laarhoven HWM, van Berge Henegouwen MI. 18F-FDG-PET/CT to Detect Pathological Complete Response After Neoadjuvant Treatment in Patients with Cancer of the Esophagus or Gastroesophageal Junction: Accuracy and Long-Term Implications. J Gastrointest Cancer 2024; 55:270-280. [PMID: 37393217 PMCID: PMC11096198 DOI: 10.1007/s12029-023-00951-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/09/2023] [Indexed: 07/03/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The curative strategy for patients with esophageal cancer without distant metastases consists of esophagectomy with preceding chemo(radio)therapy (CRT). In 10-40% of patients treated with CRT, no viable tumor is detectable in the resection specimen (pathological complete response (pCR)). This study aims to define the clinical outcomes of patients with a pCR and to assess the accuracy of post-CRT FDG-PET/CT in the detection of a pCR. METHODS Four hundred sixty-three patients with cancer of the esophagus or gastroesophageal junction who underwent esophageal resection after CRT between 1994 and 2013 were included. Patients were categorized as pathological complete responders or noncomplete responders. Standardized uptake value (SUV) ratios of 135 post-CRT FDG-PET/CTs were calculated and compared with the pathological findings in the corresponding resection specimens. RESULTS Of the 463 included patients, 85 (18.4%) patients had a pCR. During follow-up, 25 (29.4%) of these 85 patients developed recurrent disease. Both 5-year disease-free survival (5y-DFS) and 5-year overall survival (5y-OS) were significantly higher in complete responders compared to noncomplete responders (5y-DFS 69.6% vs. 44.2%; P = 0.001 and 5y-OS 66.5% vs. 43.7%; P = 0.001). Not pCR, but only pN0 was identified as an independent predictor of (disease-free) survival. CONCLUSION Patients with a pCR have a higher probability of survival compared to noncomplete responders. One third of patients with a pCR do develop recurrent disease, and pCR can therefore not be equated with cure. FDG-PET/CT was inaccurate to predict pCR and therefore cannot be used as a sole diagnostic tool to predict pCR after CRT for esophageal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D C van der Aa
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - S S Gisbertz
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - M C J Anderegg
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - S M Lagarde
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - R Klaassen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - S L Meijer
- Department of Pathology, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - S van Dieren
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - McCm Hulshof
- Department of Radiotherapy, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Jjghm Bergman
- Department of Gastroenterology, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - R J Bennink
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - H W M van Laarhoven
- Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - M I van Berge Henegouwen
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
- Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
- Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Markar SR, Visser MR, van der Veen A, Luyer MD, Nieuwenhuijzen G, Stoot JH, Tegels JJ, Wijnhoven BP, Lagarde SM, de Steur WO, Hartgrink HH, Kouwenhoven EA, Wassenaar EB, Draaisma WA, Gisbertz SS, van Berge Henehouwen MI, van der Peet DL, Ruurda JP, van Hillegersberg R. Evolution in Laparoscopic Gastrectomy From a Randomized Controlled Trial Through National Clinical Practice. Ann Surg 2024; 279:394-401. [PMID: 37991188 PMCID: PMC10829898 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000006162] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine the influence of the LOGICA RCT (randomized controlled trial) upon the practice and outcomes of laparoscopic gastrectomy within the Netherlands. BACKGROUND Following RCTs the dissemination of complex interventions has been poorly studied. The LOGICA RCT included 10 Dutch centers and compared laparoscopic to open gastrectomy. METHODS Data were obtained from the Dutch Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Audit (DUCA) on all gastrectomies performed in the Netherlands (2012-2021), and the LOGICA RCT from 2015 to 2018. Multilevel multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to assess the effect of laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy upon clinical outcomes before, during, and after the LOGICA RCT. RESULTS Two hundred eleven patients from the LOGICA RCT (105 open vs 106 laparoscopic) and 4131 patients from the DUCA data set (1884 open vs 2247 laparoscopic) were included. In 2012, laparoscopic gastrectomy was performed in 6% of patients, increasing to 82% in 2021. No significant effect of laparoscopic gastrectomy on postoperative clinical outcomes was observed within the LOGICA RCT. Nationally within DUCA, a shift toward a beneficial effect of laparoscopic gastrectomy upon complications was observed, reaching a significant reduction in overall [adjusted odds ratio (aOR):0.62; 95% CI: 0.46-0.82], severe (aOR: 0.64; 95% CI: 0.46-0.90) and cardiac complications (aOR: 0.51; 95% CI: 0.30-0.89) after the LOGICA trial. CONCLUSIONS The wider benefits of the LOGICA trial included the safe dissemination of laparoscopic gastrectomy across the Netherlands. The robust surgical quality assurance program in the design of the LOGICA RCT was crucial to facilitate the national dissemination of the technique following the trial and reducing potential patient harm during surgeons learning curve.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sheraz R. Markar
- Nuffield Department of Surgery, University of Oxford, UK
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Maurits R. Visser
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Scientific Bureau, Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Arjen van der Veen
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Misha D.P. Luyer
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | | | - Jan H.M.B. Stoot
- Department of Surgery, Zuyderland Medical Center, Heerlen and Sittard-Geleen, The Netherlands
| | - Juul J.W. Tegels
- Department of Surgery, Zuyderland Medical Center, Heerlen and Sittard-Geleen, The Netherlands
| | - Bas P.L. Wijnhoven
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sjoerd M. Lagarde
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Wobbe O. de Steur
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Henk H. Hartgrink
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Werner A. Draaisma
- Department of Surgery, Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
| | - Suzanne S. Gisbertz
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mark I. van Berge Henehouwen
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Donald L. van der Peet
- Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jelle P. Ruurda
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
van de Beld JJ, Crull D, Mikhal J, Geerdink J, Veldhuis A, Poel M, Kouwenhoven EA. Complication Prediction after Esophagectomy with Machine Learning. Diagnostics (Basel) 2024; 14:439. [PMID: 38396478 PMCID: PMC10888312 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14040439] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2023] [Revised: 12/28/2023] [Accepted: 12/29/2023] [Indexed: 02/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Esophageal cancer can be treated effectively with esophagectomy; however, the postoperative complication rate is high. In this paper, we study to what extent machine learning methods can predict anastomotic leakage and pneumonia up to two days in advance. We use a dataset with 417 patients who underwent esophagectomy between 2011 and 2021. The dataset contains multimodal temporal information, specifically, laboratory results, vital signs, thorax images, and preoperative patient characteristics. The best models scored mean test set AUROCs of 0.87 and 0.82 for leakage 1 and 2 days ahead, respectively. For pneumonia, this was 0.74 and 0.61 for 1 and 2 days ahead, respectively. We conclude that machine learning models can effectively predict anastomotic leakage and pneumonia after esophagectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jorn-Jan van de Beld
- Faculty of EEMCS, University of Twente, 7500 AE Enschede, The Netherlands
- Hospital Group Twente (ZGT), 7609 PP Almelo, The Netherlands
| | - David Crull
- Hospital Group Twente (ZGT), 7609 PP Almelo, The Netherlands
| | - Julia Mikhal
- Hospital Group Twente (ZGT), 7609 PP Almelo, The Netherlands
- Faculty of BMS, University of Twente, 7500 AE Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Jeroen Geerdink
- Hospital Group Twente (ZGT), 7609 PP Almelo, The Netherlands
| | - Anouk Veldhuis
- Hospital Group Twente (ZGT), 7609 PP Almelo, The Netherlands
| | - Mannes Poel
- Faculty of EEMCS, University of Twente, 7500 AE Enschede, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Dyas AR, Mungo B, Bronsert MR, Stuart CM, Mungo AH, Mitchell JD, Randhawa SK, David E, Stewart CL, McCarter MD, Meguid RA. National trends in technique use for esophagectomy: Does primary surgeon specialty matter? Surgery 2024; 175:353-359. [PMID: 38030524 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2023.10.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2023] [Revised: 10/04/2023] [Accepted: 10/24/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cardiothoracic surgeons and general surgeons (including surgical oncologists) perform most esophagectomies. The purpose of this study was to explore whether specialty-driven differences in surgical techniques and the use of minimally invasive surgical approaches exist and are associated with postoperative outcomes after esophagectomy. METHODS This was a retrospective review of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program esophagectomy-targeted participant user file (2016-2018). Patients who underwent esophagectomy were sorted into cardiothoracic and general surgeon cohorts based on surgeon specialty. Perioperative characteristics and postoperative outcomes were compared using the χ2 analysis or independent t test. Multivariable logistic regression controlling for perioperative variables was performed to generate risk-adjusted rates of postoperative outcomes compared by surgical specialty. RESULTS Of 3,247 patients included, 1,792 (55.2%) underwent esophagectomy by cardiothoracic surgeons and 1,455 (44.5%) by general surgeons as the primary surgeon. Cardiothoracic surgeons were more likely to use traditional minimally invasive surgical (P = .0004) or open approaches (P < .0001) and less likely to use robotic (P = .04) or a hybrid robotic and traditional approaches (P < .0001). Cardiothoracic surgeons performed more Ivor Lewis esophagectomies and fewer transhiatal and McKeown esophagectomies (P < .0001). After risk adjustment, there were no differences in rates of postesophagectomy complications, such as anastomotic leaks or positive margins, between cardiothoracic surgeons and general surgeons (all P > .05). However, cardiothoracic surgeons were more likely than general surgeons to treat anastomotic leaks with surgery rather than procedural interventions (odds ratio = 1.76; 95% confidence interval, 1.24-2.52). CONCLUSION Cardiothoracic surgeons and general surgeons use minimally invasive surgical subtypes differently when performing esophagectomy. However, there were no risk-adjusted differences in postoperative complications when compared by surgical subspecialty. Esophagectomy is being performed safely by surgeons with different specialties and training pathways.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam R Dyas
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO; Surgical Outcomes and Applied Research, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO.
| | - Benedetto Mungo
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO; Surgical Outcomes and Applied Research, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO
| | - Michael R Bronsert
- Surgical Outcomes and Applied Research, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO; Adult and Child Center for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO
| | - Christina M Stuart
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO; Surgical Outcomes and Applied Research, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO
| | - Alison H Mungo
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO
| | - John D Mitchell
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO
| | - Simran K Randhawa
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO
| | - Elizabeth David
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO
| | - Camille L Stewart
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO
| | - Martin D McCarter
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO
| | - Robert A Meguid
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO; Surgical Outcomes and Applied Research, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO; Adult and Child Center for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Mengardo V, Weindelmayer J, Ceccherini G, Wilkinson M, de Manzoni G, Allum W, Giacopuzzi S. The effect of aging on short- and long-term results after esophagectomy: an international multicenter retrospective analysis. Dis Esophagus 2024; 37:doad057. [PMID: 38300628 DOI: 10.1093/dote/doad057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2023] [Revised: 07/14/2023] [Indexed: 02/02/2024]
Abstract
The optimal treatment for esophageal cancer in elderly patients is still debated and data on postoperative results are limited. This retrospective international study aims to clarify the impact of age on clinical and oncological outcomes after esophagectomy. All patients that underwent esophagectomy for cancer between 2007 and 2016 at two European high-volume Centers have been included in the study. Patients were divided into three groups according to their age: young-age group (YAG) (18-69), middle-age group (70-74) and old-age group (>74). Primary outcome was 5-year overall survival (OS), while secondary outcomes considered were 5-year disease free survival and disease related survival, 90-day morbidity and mortality, readmission rate and radicality. A total of 575 patients were included. No differences emerged in terms of morbidity and length of stay, while mortality increased with aging from 2% in YAG to 4.8% in old-aged (P = 0.003). Old-age patients had less neoadjuvant treatment (P < 0.001), a less aggressive mediastinal lymphadenectomy and presented a more advanced pathological stage. As expected, OS decreased significantly for older patients compared with the other two age groups (P = 0.044) but, on the other hand, disease free and disease related survival were comparable between the groups. Age itself should not be considered a contraindication to esophagectomy. Although in patients older than 75 years postoperative mortality is significantly increased, esophagectomy could be still an option in selected patients, favoring the use of minimally invasive techniques and enhanced recovery protocols.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valentina Mengardo
- General and Upper G.I. Surgery Division, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Borgo Trento, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Jacopo Weindelmayer
- General and Upper G.I. Surgery Division, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Borgo Trento, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Giovanni Ceccherini
- General and Upper G.I. Surgery Division, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Borgo Trento, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Michelle Wilkinson
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | - Giovanni de Manzoni
- General and Upper G.I. Surgery Division, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Borgo Trento, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - William Allum
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | - Simone Giacopuzzi
- General and Upper G.I. Surgery Division, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Borgo Trento, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Feyisa JD, Addissie A, Kantelhardt EJ, Zingeta GT, Mideksa HS, GebreLibanos H, Mengesha T, Assefa M. Health-related quality of life assessment among patients with oesophageal cancer at Tikur Anbessa Specialised Tertiary Hospital in Ethiopia: a cross sectional study. Ecancermedicalscience 2024; 18:1656. [PMID: 38425768 PMCID: PMC10901634 DOI: 10.3332/ecancer.2024.1656] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2023] [Indexed: 03/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Background In low-income countries, oesophageal cancer often presents at an advanced stage, leaving patients with limited curative treatment options. Furthermore, palliative treatments such as oesophageal stents or brachytherapy are lacking. This has a detrimental effect on their quality of life. In this study, we investigated the health-related quality of life of patients with oesophageal cancer at a tertiary hospital in Ethiopia. Methods This cross-sectional study was conducted at Tikur Anbessa Specialised Tertiary Hospital in Ethiopia. The validated Amharic version of the questionnaire of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire Cancer 30 (EORTC QLQ C-30) and the oesophageal cancer disease-specific questionnaire QLQ-OES18 were used to assess the quality of life of each patient. Results The overall mean score for the EORTC QLQ C-30 was 35.43 (SD 18.04). The mean scores for the functional scales revealed that cognitive function was the highest, whereas role function was the lowest. The symptom scale results showed the highest score for pain and the lowest for diarrhoea. Dysphagia, choking, role functioning and financial difficulty correlated with the quality of life of patients with oesophageal cancer. Conclusion Dysphagia, choking, role functioning and financial difficulty are important factors that affect the quality of life of patients with oesophageal cancer patients. Increasing the availability of palliative treatments for dysphagia to improve the quality of life in patients with oesophageal cancer is recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jilcha Diribi Feyisa
- Department of Oncology, Saint Paul’s Hospital Millennium Medical College, Addis Ababa 1271, Ethiopia
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Applied Sciences, Dartmouth Cancer Center, Lebanon, NH 03756, USA
- https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5344-5340
| | - Adamu Addissie
- Global Health Working Group, Institute for Medical Epidemiology, Biometrics, and Informatics, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale) 53170, Germany
- Department of Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa 9086, Ethiopia
| | - Eva Johanna Kantelhardt
- Global Health Working Group, Institute for Medical Epidemiology, Biometrics, and Informatics, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale) 53170, Germany
- Institute of Medical Epidemiology, Biometrics and Informatics, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale) 53170, Germany
| | - Girum Tessema Zingeta
- Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa 9086, Ethiopia
- https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0272-8460
| | - Hiwot Saboksa Mideksa
- Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa 9086, Ethiopia
| | - Helen GebreLibanos
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Debre Birhan University, Debre Birhan 445, Ethiopia
| | - Tariku Mengesha
- Department of Research, Saint Peter’s Specialised Hospital, Addis Ababa 21494, Ethiopia
| | - Mathewos Assefa
- Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa 9086, Ethiopia
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Takahashi M, Toyama H, Takahashi K, Kaiho Y, Ejima Y, Yamauchi M. Impact of intraoperative fluid management on postoperative complications in patients undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a retrospective single-center study. BMC Anesthesiol 2024; 24:29. [PMID: 38238681 PMCID: PMC10795296 DOI: 10.1186/s12871-024-02410-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2023] [Accepted: 01/10/2024] [Indexed: 01/22/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Esophagectomy is a high-risk procedure that can involve serious postoperative complications. There has been an increase in the number of minimally invasive esophagectomies (MIEs) being performed. However, the relationship between intraoperative management and postoperative complications in MIE remains unclear. METHODS After the institutional review board approval, we enrolled 300 patients who underwent MIE at Tohoku University Hospital between April 2016 and March 2021. The relationships among patient characteristics, intraoperative and perioperative factors, and postoperative complications were retrospectively analyzed. The primary outcome was the relationship between intraoperative fluid volume and anastomotic leakage, and the secondary outcomes included the associations between other perioperative factors and postoperative complications. RESULTS Among 300 patients, 28 were excluded because of missing data; accordingly, 272 patients were included in the final analysis. The median [interquartile range] operative duration was 599 [545-682] minutes; total intraoperative infusion volume was 3,747 [3,038-4,399] mL; total infusion volume per body weight per hour was 5.48 [4.42-6.73] mL/kg/h; and fluid balance was + 2,648 [2,015-3,263] mL. The postoperative complications included anastomotic leakage in 68 (25%) patients, recurrent nerve palsy in 91 (33%) patients, pneumonia in 62 (23%) patients, cardiac arrhythmia in 13 (5%) patients, acute kidney injury in 5 (2%) patients, and heart failure in 5 (2%) patients. The Cochrane-Armitage trend test indicated significantly increased anastomotic leakage among patients with a relatively high total infusion volume (P = 0.0085). Moreover, anastomotic leakage was associated with male sex but not with peak serum lactate levels. Patients with a longer anesthesia duration or recurrent nerve palsy had a significantly higher incidence of postoperative pneumonia than those without. Further, the incidence of postoperative pneumonia was not associated with the operative duration, total infusion volume, or fluid balance. The operative duration and blood loss were related to the total infusion volume. Acute kidney injury was not associated with the total infusion volume or serum lactate levels. CONCLUSIONS Among patients who underwent MIE, the total infusion volume was positively correlated with the incidence of anastomotic leakage. Further, postoperative pneumonia was associated with recurrent nerve palsy but not total infusion volume or fluid balance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Misaki Takahashi
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, 980-8574, Japan
| | - Hiroaki Toyama
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, 980-8574, Japan.
| | - Kazuhiro Takahashi
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, 980-8574, Japan
| | - Yu Kaiho
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, 980-8574, Japan
| | - Yutaka Ejima
- Department of Surgical Center and Supply, Sterilization, Tohoku University Hospital, 1-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, 980-8574, Japan
| | - Masanori Yamauchi
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, 980-8574, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Xue M, Liu J, Lu M, Zhang H, Liu W, Tian H. Robotic assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy versus minimally invasive esophagectomy. Front Oncol 2024; 13:1293645. [PMID: 38288099 PMCID: PMC10824560 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1293645] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2023] [Accepted: 12/22/2023] [Indexed: 01/31/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Esophagectomy is the gold standard treatment for resectable esophageal cancer; however, there is insufficient evidence to indicate potential advantages over standard minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) in treating thoracic esophageal cancer. Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) bridges the gap between open and minimally invasive surgery. In this single-center retrospective review, we compare the clinical outcomes of EC patients treated with MIE and RAMIE. Method We retrospectively reviewed the clinical data of patients with esophageal cancer who underwent surgery at Qilu Hospital between August 2020 and August 2022, including 159 patients who underwent MIE and 35 patients who received RAMIE. The intraoperative, postoperative, and preoperative patient characteristics in both groups were evaluated. Results Except for height, the MIE and RAMIE groups showed no significant differences in preoperative features (P>0.05). Further, there were no significant differences in intraoperative indices, including TNM stage of the resected tumor, tumor tissue type, or ASA score, between the two groups. However, statistically significant differences were found in some factors; the RAMIE group had a shorter operative time, less intraoperative bleeding, and more lymph nodes removed compared to the MIE group. Patients in the RAMIE group reported less discomfort and greater chest drainage on the first postoperative day than patients in the MIE group; however, there were no differences in other features between the two datasets. Conclusion By comparing the clinical characteristics and outcomes of RAMIE with MIE, this study verified the feasibility and safety of RAMIE for esophageal cancer. Overall, RAMIE resulted in more complete lymph node clearance, shorter operating time, reduced surgical hemorrhage, reduced postoperative discomfort, and chest drainage alleviation in patients. To investigate the function of RAMIE in esophageal cancer, we propose undertaking a future clinical trial with long-term follow-up to analyze tumor clearance, recurrence, and survival after RAMIE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Hui Tian
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Oberoi M, Noor MS, Abdelfatah E. The Multidisciplinary Approach and Surgical Management of GE Junction Adenocarcinoma. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:288. [PMID: 38254779 PMCID: PMC10813924 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16020288] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2023] [Revised: 12/28/2023] [Accepted: 01/05/2024] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Gastroesophageal (GE) junction adenocarcinoma is an aggressive malignancy of growing incidence and is associated with public health issues such as obesity and GERD. Management has evolved over the last two decades to incorporate a multidisciplinary approach, including endoscopic intervention, neoadjuvant chemotherapy/chemoradiation, and minimally invasive or more limited surgical approaches. Surgical approaches include esophagectomy, total gastrectomy, and, more recently, proximal gastrectomy. This review analyzes the evidence for and applicability of these varied approaches in management, as well as areas of continued controversy and investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Eihab Abdelfatah
- Department of Surgery, NYU Langone Health, 120 Mineola Blvd., Suite 320h, Mineola, Long Island, NY 11501, USA; (M.O.); (M.S.N.)
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Ilgen A, Köhler H, Pfahl A, Stelzner S, Mehdorn M, Jansen-Winkeln B, Gockel I, Moulla Y. Intraoperative Laparoscopic Hyperspectral Imaging during Esophagectomy-A Pilot Study Evaluating Esophagogastric Perfusion at the Anastomotic Sites. Bioengineering (Basel) 2024; 11:69. [PMID: 38247946 PMCID: PMC10812999 DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering11010069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2023] [Revised: 12/01/2023] [Accepted: 01/04/2024] [Indexed: 01/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Hyperspectral imaging (HSI) is a non-invasive and contactless technique that enables the real-time acquisition of comprehensive information on tissue within the surgical field. In this pilot study, we investigated whether a new HSI system for minimally-invasive surgery, TIVITA® Mini (HSI-MIS), provides reliable insights into tissue perfusion of the proximal and distal esophagogastric anastomotic sites during 21 laparoscopic/thoracoscopic or robotic Ivor Lewis esophagectomies of patients with cancer to minimize the risk of dreaded anastomotic insufficiency. In this pioneering investigation, physiological tissue parameters were derived from HSI measurements of the proximal site of the anastomosis (esophageal stump) and the distal site of the anastomosis (tip of the gastric conduit) during the thoracic phase of the procedure. Tissue oxygenation (StO2), Near Infrared Perfusion Index (NIR-PI), and Tissue Water Index (TWI) showed similar median values at both anastomotic sites. Significant differences were observed only for NIR-PI (median: 76.5 vs. 63.9; p = 0.012) at the distal site (gastric conduit) compared to our previous study using an HSI system for open surgery. For all 21 patients, reliable and informative measurements were attainable, confirming the feasibility of HSI-MIS to assess anastomotic viability. Further studies on the added benefit of this new technique aiming to reduce anastomotic insufficiency are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annalena Ilgen
- Department of Visceral, Transplant, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital of Leipzig, Liebigstr. 20, 04103 Leipzig, Germany; (A.I.); (S.S.); (I.G.)
| | - Hannes Köhler
- Innovation Center Computer Assisted Surgery (ICCAS), Faculty of Medicine, Leipzig University, Semmelweisstr. 14, 04103 Leipzig, Germany; (H.K.); (A.P.)
| | - Annekatrin Pfahl
- Innovation Center Computer Assisted Surgery (ICCAS), Faculty of Medicine, Leipzig University, Semmelweisstr. 14, 04103 Leipzig, Germany; (H.K.); (A.P.)
| | - Sigmar Stelzner
- Department of Visceral, Transplant, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital of Leipzig, Liebigstr. 20, 04103 Leipzig, Germany; (A.I.); (S.S.); (I.G.)
| | - Matthias Mehdorn
- Department of Visceral, Transplant, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital of Leipzig, Liebigstr. 20, 04103 Leipzig, Germany; (A.I.); (S.S.); (I.G.)
| | - Boris Jansen-Winkeln
- Department of General, Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Klinikum St. Georg, Delitzscher Str. 141, 04129 Leipzig, Germany;
| | - Ines Gockel
- Department of Visceral, Transplant, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital of Leipzig, Liebigstr. 20, 04103 Leipzig, Germany; (A.I.); (S.S.); (I.G.)
| | - Yusef Moulla
- Department of Visceral, Transplant, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital of Leipzig, Liebigstr. 20, 04103 Leipzig, Germany; (A.I.); (S.S.); (I.G.)
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Dat TQ, Thong DQ, Nguyen DT, Hai NV, Bac NH, Long VD. Comparison of substernal and posterior mediastinal route of reconstruction after minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2024; 409:27. [PMID: 38183462 PMCID: PMC10771411 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-023-03215-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2023] [Accepted: 12/28/2023] [Indexed: 01/08/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Substernal (ST) and posterior mediastinal (PM) routes are the two most common for reconstruction after esophagectomy with cervical anastomosis. Recent evidence showed similar outcomes between the routes; thus, the superior choice remained controversial. This study aimed to compare the short-term outcomes of the ST to the PM route for reconstruction after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer (EC). METHOD This retrospective cohort study included 132 patients who underwent McKeown minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) with gastric conduit for EC between March 2015 and December 2022. Among these, 89 and 43 patients received the ST route and PM route for reconstruction, respectively. Short-term outcomes including operative characteristics, postoperative morbidity, and mortality were evaluated. RESULT There was no conversion from ST to PM route. The ST group had longer operating time (375 min vs. 341 min). Oral feeding initiation, postoperative hospital stays, and overall complication rates were comparable in the two groups. The rate and severity of anastomotic leakage were similar between the groups. The ST group had a significantly lower incidence of postoperative ICU admission and pneumonia compared to the PM group (5.6% vs. 16.3% and 19.1% vs. 37.2%, respectively). Azygos vein bleeding, obstruction at feeding jejunostomy site, and conduit-trachea fistula were severe complications that only occurred in PM route. CONCLUSION ST route was superior to PM route in term of postoperative ICU admission and pneumonia. This route may prevent severe complications that only occur in PM route. ST route can be favorable option for reconstruction after McKeown MIE for EC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tran Quang Dat
- Gastro-intestinal Surgery Department, University Medical Center, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, 215 Hong Bang, Ward 11, District 5, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
| | - Dang Quang Thong
- Gastro-intestinal Surgery Department, University Medical Center, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, 215 Hong Bang, Ward 11, District 5, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
| | - Doan Thuy Nguyen
- Gastro-intestinal Surgery Department, University Medical Center, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, 215 Hong Bang, Ward 11, District 5, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
| | - Nguyen Viet Hai
- Gastro-intestinal Surgery Department, University Medical Center, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, 215 Hong Bang, Ward 11, District 5, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
| | - Nguyen Hoang Bac
- Gastro-intestinal Surgery Department, University Medical Center, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, 215 Hong Bang, Ward 11, District 5, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
- Department of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
| | - Vo Duy Long
- Gastro-intestinal Surgery Department, University Medical Center, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, 215 Hong Bang, Ward 11, District 5, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
- Department of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
| |
Collapse
|