Timing of radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy (RADICALS-RT): a randomised, controlled phase 3 trial

Impact of positive surgical margin location after radical prostatectomy: a network meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To perform a network meta-analysis comparing the impact of different positive surgical margin locations (Comparisons and intervention) on biochemical recurrence (Outcome) in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy (Population).

METHODS

According to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines, a protocol was registered (PROSPERO: CRD42022119025) and a search across four databases was conducted (the MEDLINE, Scopus, Embase and Cochrane). The primary outcome was biochemical recurrence (BCR). A network meta-analysis was conducted. Further subgroup analysis was performed to evaluate studies exploring robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RALP).

RESULTS

Our search yielded 1249 unique results; 22 studies were analysed. Anterior margins had the highest risk of BCR (HR 2.46, 95%CI 1.67-3.61, I2 = 76%) followed by posterior (HR 2.29, 95%CI 1.43-3.66, I2 = 0%), bladder base (HR 2.06, 95%CI 1.61-2.64, I2 = 69%), apical (HR 1.88, 95%CI 1.51-2.35, I2 = 59%), and posterolateral margins (HR 1.70, 95%CI 1.14-2.25, I2 = 60%). Given significant heterogeneity, subgroup analysis was performed. In the RALP subgroup, anterior margins also demonstrated the highest recurrence risk (HR 3.74, 95%CI 2.47-5.66, I2 = 0%), followed by apical (HR 2.43, 95%CI 1.97-8.00, I2 = 0%), posterior (HR 2.23, 95%CI 1.47-3.38), base (HR 1.65, 95%CI 1.29-2.11, I2 = 0%), and posterolateral margin (HR 1.54, 95%CI 1.07-2.22).

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of BCR after radical prostatectomy varies by PSM location, with the highest recurrence risk observed at anterior margins.

Dose Recommendations for Prostrate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography (PSMA PET) Guided Boost Irradiation to Lymphatic Tissue in Prostate Adenocarcinoma

AIMS

Prostrate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET) imaging has led to an increase in identifiable small volume metastatic disease in prostate adenocarcinoma. There is clinical equipoise in how to treat these using radiotherapy regimens. The aim of this study is to determine an adequate dosing regimen for small volume lymphatic metastases in prostate adenocarcinoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The authors first estimated the cell count of small volume metastases in prostate adenocarcinoma and then used a Poisson distribution-based estimation of the tumour control probability distribution, the required doses for 95% and 99% probabilities of tumour sterilisation were calculated using the linear quadratic formula.

RESULTS

Lymph node metastases of 3, 5, and 10 mm diameter were estimated to harbour 1.4, 6.5, and 52.3 million clonogens, respectively. When attempting for a 95% tumour control probability, estimated BEDs of 116.5, 127.0, and 141.1Gy were required. This translated to doses of 26.0, 27.3, and 29.0Gy in 5 fraction regimens. When attempting for a 99% tumour control probability, estimated biological effective doses (BEDs) of 127.6, 138.1, and 152.2 Gy were required. This translated to doses of 27.4, 28.6, and 30.2 Gy in 5 fraction regimens.

CONCLUSION

In prostate cancers with small-volume metastatic disease, doses can be adjusted according to tumour size without likely to compromise tumour control. This would have positive implications on radiotherapy planning and possibly lead to decreased risks of toxicity in scenarios where planning difficulty is encountered. Clinical evaluation of efficacy and safety for these dose regimens is warranted.

Management of Patients with Advanced Prostate Cancer. Report from the 2024 Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference (APCCC)

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Innovations have improved outcomes in advanced prostate cancer (PC). Nonetheless, we continue to lack high-level evidence on a variety of topics that greatly impact daily practice. The 2024 Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference (APCCC) surveyed experts on key questions in clinical management in order to supplement evidence-based guidelines. Here we present voting results for questions from APCCC 2024.

METHODS

Before the conference, a panel of 120 international PC experts used a modified Delphi process to develop 183 multiple-choice consensus questions on eight different topics. Before the conference, these questions were administered via a web-based survey to the voting panel members ("panellists").

KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS

Consensus was a priori defined as ≥75% agreement, with strong consensus defined as ≥90% agreement. The voting results show varying degrees of consensus, as discussed in this article and detailed in the Supplementary material. These findings do not include a formal literature review or meta-analysis.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

The voting results can help physicians and patients navigate controversial areas of clinical management for which high-level evidence is scant or conflicting. The findings can also help funders and policymakers in prioritising areas for future research. Diagnostic and treatment decisions should always be individualised on the basis of patient and cancer characteristics, and should incorporate current and emerging clinical evidence, guidelines, and logistic and economic factors. Enrolment in clinical trials is always strongly encouraged. Importantly, APCCC 2024 once again identified important gaps (areas of nonconsensus) that merit evaluation in specifically designed trials.

Impact of Gene Expression Classifier Testing on Adjuvant Treatment Following Radical Prostatectomy: The G-MINOR Prospective Randomized Cluster-crossover Trial

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Decipher is a tissue-based genomic classifier (GC) developed and validated in the post-radical prostatectomy (RP) setting as a predictor of metastasis. We conducted a prospective randomized controlled cluster-crossover trial assessing the use of Decipher to determine its impact on adjuvant treatment after RP.

METHODS

Eligible patients had undergone RP within 9 mo of enrollment, had pT3-4 disease and/or positive surgical margins, and prostate-specific antigen <0.1 ng/ml. Centers were randomized to a sequence of 3-mo periods of either GC-informed care or usual care (UC). Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment Postsurgical (CAPRA-S) recurrence risk scores were provided to treating physicians and patients in all periods.

KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS

Impact of GC test results on adjuvant treatment were compared with UC alone. Longitudinal patient-reported urinary and sexual function was assessed. A total of 175 patients were enrolled in 27 periods with GC and 163 in 28 periods with UC. At 18 mo after RP, an average patient in the GC arm received adjuvant treatment 9.7% of the time compared with 8.7% for an average individual in the UC arm (0.99% mean difference, 95% confidence interval [CI] -7.6%, 9.6%, p = 0.8). While controlling for CAPRA-S score, higher GC scores tended to result in an increased likelihood of adjuvant treatment that was not statistically significant (odds ratio [OR] = 1.35 per 0.1 increase in GC score, 95% CI 0.98-1.85, p = 0.066). Using the GC risk groups, reflecting clinical use, a high GC risk was associated with significantly higher odds of receiving adjuvant treatment (OR = 6.9, 95% CI 1.8, 26, p = 0.005) compared with a low GC score, adjusted for CAPRA-S score. There were no differences in patient-reported urinary and sexual function between the study arms. As oncologic outcomes are immature, the present data cannot address whether GC testing provides any cancer control benefit.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

GC testing impacts adjuvant therapy administration when viewed through the risk categories presented in the patient report; however, these data do not provide specific support for GC testing in the adjuvant treatment setting.

SABR tolerance after prostatectomy: pushing the boundaries of ultrahypofractionation

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the feasibility and tolerance of ultra-hypofractionated SABR (stereotactic ablative radiation therapy) protocol following radical prostatectomy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We included patients undergoing adjuvant or salvage SABR between April 2019 and April 2023 targeting the surgical bed and pelvic lymph nodes up to a total dose of 36.25 Gy (7.25 Gy/fraction) and 26 Gy (5.2 Gy/fraction), respectively, in 5 fractions on alternate days with an urethra sparing protocol. Acute and late adverse effects were assessed using the CTCAE v5.0. Pearson's chi-square test for categorical variables was used to compare characteristics and possible associations among different subgroups.

RESULTS

Adjuvant radiation therapy (ART) was administered to 40 high-risk patients (detectable post-surgery PSA, Grade Group 4/5, nodal involvement, R1/R2 resection margin), while salvage radiotherapy (SRT) was delivered to 60 patients with rising PSA levels post-undetectable values. Elective nodal irradiation was performed in 57 patients, with 11 additional patients receiving a simultaneous integrated boost (total dose: 40 Gy in 5 fractions) for macroscopic nodal disease. Twenty-four high-risk patients underwent 24-months androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Treatment was well-tolerated with minimal toxicity. The maximum grade of SABR-related toxicity observed was grade 3. Acute gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity included seven cases of grade 2 and one of grade 3, while acute genitourinary (GU) events were limited to grade 2 in eight patients. Early-late toxicity included two cases of grade 3 and seven of grade 2 for GI, and 11 cases of grade 2 for GU. No toxicity above grade 3 was reported. With a median follow-up of 24 months (6-60 months), 14 patients experienced disease recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Ultra-hypofractionated adjuvant/salvage SABR appears feasible and safe. Longer follow-up is needed to validate observed outcomes.

IL-1β in Neoplastic Disease and the Role of Its Tumor-Derived Form in the Progression and Treatment of Metastatic Prostate Cancer

Since its discovery, IL-1β has taken center stage as a key mediator of a very broad spectrum of diseases revolving around immuno-mediated and inflammatory events. Predictably, the pleiotropic nature of this cytokine in human pathology has led to the development of targeted therapeutics with multiple treatment indications in the clinic. Following the accumulated findings of IL-1β's central modulatory role in the immune system and the implication of inflammatory pathways in cancer, the use of IL-1β antagonists was first proposed and then also pursued for oncology disorders. However, this approach has consistently relied on the perceived need of interfering with IL-1β synthesized and secreted by immune cells. Herein, we discuss the importance of IL-1β derived from cancer cells which impacts primary tumors, particularly metastatic lesions, separately from and in addition to its more recognized role in immune-mediated inflammatory events. To this end, we focus on the instrumental contribution of IL-1β in the establishment and progression of advanced prostate adenocarcinoma. Special emphasis is placed on the potential role that the standard-of-care treatment strategies for prostate cancer patients have in unleashing IL-1β expression and production at metastatic sites. We conclude by reviewing the therapeutics currently used for blocking IL-1β signaling and propose a rationale for their concomitant use with standard-of-care treatments to improve the clinical outcomes of advanced prostate cancer.

Artificial Urinary Sphincter Placement Before or After Radiation Therapy: Does Timing of Radiation Impact Surgical Complications and Continence?

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of radiation timing on artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) outcomes. AUS is the gold standard treatment for post-prostatectomy incontinence. Radiation history has been associated with worse outcomes, including higher rates of erosion and infection. The impact of radiation timing-before versus after AUS placement-has been less well studied.

METHODS

Patients undergoing AUS placement over a 5-year period were retrospectively reviewed. Salvage prostatectomy patients were excluded. Patients were stratified by radiation timing: radiation prior to AUS placement (pre-AUS) versus after AUS placement (post-AUS). Outcomes included continence rate, improvement in pads per day, complications, and need for further surgery.

RESULTS

Of 315 post-prostatectomy AUS patients, 181 underwent radiation treatment. Excluding 42 patients for salvage prostatectomy, 123 patients underwent radiation pre-AUS and 16 post-AUS. Patients were slightly younger in the post-AUS group (P=.020); demographics were otherwise similar. Mean cuff size was similar in both groups. Continence rates were not significantly different (P=.509), nor was difference in pad per day improvement (-3.0 ppd for pre-AUS and -3.8 ppd in the post-AUS group (P=.379)). Over a median follow-up of 27.7 months, 1/16 (6.6%) patients experienced device erosion in the post-AUS group, compared to 15/123 (12.2%) pre-AUS (median follow-up 15.6 months). No patients in the post-AUS group experienced device infection, compared to 6/123 patients in the pre-AUS group. Revision rates were similar between the 2 groups (18.8% vs 25.2%, P=.761).

CONCLUSION

Patients undergoing AUS placement prior to radiation experienced similar continence improvements and similar complication rates to those who underwent radiation following AUS.

Controversies in the use of next-generation imaging for evaluation and treatment decision-making in patients with prostate cancer after biochemical recurrence: views from a Spanish expert panel

INTRODUCTION

Diagnosing and managing biochemical recurrence (BCR) of prostate cancer (PCa) following primary radical treatment remain a challenge. Implementing next-generation imaging (NGI) techniques has improved metastases detection. However, access to these techniques is heterogeneous, and controversies surround their use and subsequent treatment decisions. In November 2023, a multidisciplinary expert meeting was organized to discuss these aspects. This information was further reviewed in November 2024.

AREAS COVERED

NGI-specific tracers' selection, evidence supporting patient selection for NGI after BRC, current treatment strategies in patients with BRC, and the role of NGIs in current and future therapeutic approaches.

EXPERT OPINION

Despite improved detection performance compared to conventional imaging techniques, the application of NGIs to treatment decision-making and the impact on patient outcomes are yet to be proven. Given the lack of guidance, opinions and recommendations from multidisciplinary expert panels are valuable for diagnosing and adequately treating patients with BRC after radical treatment.

Impact of Centralisation of Radical Prostatectomy Driven by the Introduction of Robotic Systems on Positive Surgical Margin and Biochemical Recurrence in pT2 Prostate Cancer

BACKGROUND

To assess how centralisation of cancer services via robotic surgery influenced positive surgical margin (PSM) occurrence and its associated risk of biochemical recurrence (BCR) in cases of pT2 prostate cancer (PC).

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of all radical prostatectomy (RP) cases performed in the West of Scotland during the period from January 2013 to June 2022. Primary outcomes were PSM and BCR. The secondary outcomes compared the impact of centralisation and surgical approach on PSM and BCR; and margin length and location on BCR. Propensity score matching and Cox regression models were performed using R.

RESULTS

A total of, 907 patients were included; 662 robot assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP), 245 open RP. PSM rate was 17.7% (161/907), similar in RARP and open cohorts. Patients with PSM had higher rates of BCR; 26.7%, compared to 8.7% in patients with no PSM. Patients with margins of ≥ 1 mm had higher risk of developing BCR. Patients who underwent open RP had increased incidence of PSM ≥ 1 mm; 40/43 (93%) compared to 83/117 (71%) in robotic approach (p = 0.003). Limitations include the study being retrospective, introduction of centralisation and robot concurrently, and evolution of practice.

DISCUSSION

PSMs in pT2 PC are associated with higher rates of BCR. Introduction of centralisation via the robot had no impact on PSM occurrence or BCR, although did demonstrate a reduction in PSM length.

No impairment of quality of life after radiotherapy for prostate cancer

There are concerns that radiotherapy for prostate cancer influences health-related quality of life in the long term. Furthermore, it is unclear whether postoperative radiotherapy is associated with a different quality of life due to a higher treatment burden compared to patients having received definitive radiotherapy for prostate cancer. This study enrolled 247 patients with localized or locally advanced prostate cancer who received external radiotherapy between 2011 and 2021. Health-related quality of life was assessed at a median of 63.6 months after radiotherapy using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality of life questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) with 145 patients returning questionnaires (response rate, 58.7%). Four patients treated with adjuvant radiotherapy were excluded due to the small number, resulting in 141 participants who received salvage radiotherapy (70 men) or definitive radiotherapy (71 men). The study compared the quality of life with age- and sex-matched German normative data. Patients completed the questionnaires after a median time of 60.3 and 65.2 months after salvage and definitive radiotherapy. The median patient age was higher in the definitive than in the salvage radiotherapy group (at radiotherapy, 72 vs. 69 years; at the survey, 79 vs. 75 years). Global health status, functional scales (physical, role, emotional, cognitive, and social), and symptom scales were not different between cancer patients of the same age group treated with salvage and definitive radiotherapy. The comparison with age- and sex-matched normative data revealed that salvage and definitive radiotherapy did not impair the global health status in patients of any age group. Physical functioning in patients < 70 years was significantly better in salvage and definitive radiotherapy groups compared to normative data while showing clinical relevance. Yet, social functioning was significantly lower in patients ≥ 70 years of the salvage radiotherapy group compared to normative data, while this difference lacked clinical significance. Regardless of the type of radiotherapy applied, cancer patients had no statistically or clinically relevant higher symptom burden compared to normative data. Quality of life was not clinically relevant influenced by radiotherapy, regardless of whether patients received salvage or definitive radiotherapy. Yet, longitudinal measurements of quality of life after radiotherapy are required to detect fluctuations in quality of life.

Patterns of Recurrence Following Radiation and ADT for Pathologic Lymph Node-Positive Prostate Cancer: A Multi-institutional Study

PURPOSE

We evaluate prognostic factors and patterns of recurrence in patients who received RT ± androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for pathologic node-positive (pN1) prostate cancer (PCa) in a multi-institutional cohort.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Data from patients with pN1 PCa and received RT with short-term (ST, ≤6 mo) or long-term (LT, >6 mo) ADT were obtained from 4 academic institutions. Biochemical progression-free survival (bPFS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) were evaluated.

RESULTS

Two hundred seventy patients were included, with a median follow-up of 48 months. Two hundred fifty-six (95%) patients had extracapsular extension, 70% had seminal vesicle invasion, 59% had positive surgical margins, 49% had grade group 5, and 64% had a detectable (>0.1 ng/mL) postoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA). ADT was ST (20%) or LT (68%, median 24 months), whereas 26 (10%) received no ADT. Biochemical failure (bF) was observed in 29%, with 5% having pelvic nodal failure and 11% having distant metastases. The 4-year bPFS was 72% overall, and was 83% for a pre-RT PSA of <0.1 ng/mL, 76% for PSA 0.1 to <0.5 ng/mL, 60% for PSA 0.5 to 2 ng/mL, and 35% for PSA > 2 ng/mL (P < .0001). On multivariable analysis, pre-RT PSA > 0.5 (0.5-2.0 vs <0.1 hazard ratio (HR), 2.97; >2.0 vs <0.1 HR, 7.63), use of LT ADT versus no ADT (HR, 0.43) and use of LT ADT compared to ST ADT (HR, 0.34), Grade group 4 versus 2 (HR, 4.11), and positive surgical margins (HR, 1.773) were significantly associated with bPFS.

CONCLUSIONS

Postprostatectomy RT at PSA < 0.5 ng/mL is associated with favorable bPFS in pN1 PCa.

Evidences on the Use of Hypofractionation in Postoperative/Salvage Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer: Systematic Review of the Literature and Recent Developments

BACKGROUND

Radical prostatectomy (RP) is one possible curative treatment for localized prostate cancer. Despite that, up to 40% of patients will later relapse. Currently, post-operative radiotherapy (PORT) courses deliver 1.8-2 Gy daily to reach a total dose ranging between 64 and 74 Gy, completed in 7-8 weeks. Several articles reported encouraging data in terms of the effectiveness and the related toxicities using hypofractionation schedules. The objective of the present systematic review was to evaluate the clinical outcomes and toxicity of the use of hypofractionation in adjuvant/salvage prostate cancer treatments.

METHODS

Medline was searched via PubMed and Scopus from inception to July 2024 to retrieve studies on hypofractionation in adjuvant/salvage prostate cancer treatments. This study was conducted under PRISMA guidelines.

RESULTS

A total of 139 articles were identified from the initial search. Subsequently, the 139 studies were reviewed by title and abstract. Ninety-five studies were excluded due to being either abstracts or articles not available in English. In the second step, the full texts of 44 studies were reviewed. Eleven studies were excluded for being reviews, study protocols, or focused on SBRT treatments. Finally, 33 studies were included in our analysis, with a total number of 4269 patients. Of the 33 selected studies, 20 were retrospective trials and 11 were phase I/II prospective trials, while 2 studies were prospective phase III trials. The follow-up ranged from 18 to 217 months. Failure-free survival, for those with the longer follow-up, ranged between 85% and 91% at 3 years, 47 and 78.6% at 5 years and 51.5% at 10 years. Genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal acute toxicity was mild to moderate with similar rates across the normofractionated and hypofractionated groups. Acute grade-3 GU toxicity events were unusual, occurring in less than 4% of the cases overall.

CONCLUSION

The present study is the first systematic review of the literature that includes the first two randomized phase III studies published in the literature. Hypofractionated treatment has been shown to be safe, effective, with moderate toxicity and not inferior to conventional RT, with good biochemical control rates.

Post-prostatectomy Magnetic Resonance-guided Radiotherapy on a 1.5 Tesla Magnetic Resonance Integrated Linear Accelerator: Feasibility, Toxicity, and Preliminary Clinical Outcomes

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to prospectively investigate magnetic resonance (MR)-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) for post-prostatectomy prostate cancer and report preliminary clinical outcomes.

METHODS

All included patients underwent salvage or adjuvant adaptive MRgRT on a 1.5T MR integrated linear accelerator (MR-LINAC). Gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxicities were assessed. The primary endpoint was the progression-free survival (PFS) rate estimated by Kaplan-Meier (KM) survival analysis. A progression event was defined as the first occurrence of biochemical failure, radiological progression, or death. Secondary endpoints were biochemical failure-free survival (bFFS) rate, radiological PFS (rPFS) rate, and ≥G2 adverse events.

RESULTS

Thirty post-prostatectomy patients were enrolled and followed (median follow-up: 32.0 months; 3.0-48.1 months). Three patients had biochemical failure during follow-up. One patient developed pelvic node metastases. All patients were alive. The estimated PFS rates were 96.4% (95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 89.8%-100.0%) at 2 years and 78.8% (95%CI: 61.3%-100%) at 3 years. The estimated bFFS rates were 96.4% (95%CI: 89.8%-100%) /86.6%(95%CI: 73.4%-100%) at 2/3 years, respectively. The corresponding rPFS rates were 100% at 2 years and 92.3% (95%CI: 78.9%-100%) at 3 years, respectively. There was only one acute G2 GI adverse event (1/30, 3.33%) of abdominal pain occurred. Two late G2 events (one rectal bleeding and one urinary frequency) were scored (2/30, 6.67%). No ≥G3 events were observed.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest the feasibility, excellent patient tolerance, and encouraging efficacy of post-prostatectomy MRgRT, extending our knowledge of the clinical outcomes of MRgRT and serving as a benchmark for future investigation.

Association of Genomic Prostate Score at positive margin with recurrence after radical prostatectomy

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the utility of the 17-gene Genomic Prostate Score® (GPS; MDxHealth, Irvine, CA, USA) performed on prostate cancer at the positive margin of the radical prostatectomy (RP) for its association with risk of subsequent biochemical recurrence (BCR).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We designed a case-cohort for the outcome of BCR, selecting 223 from a cohort of 813 RP patients treated at Johns Hopkins from 2008 to 2017 with positive margins and available clinical data; of these, 213 had available tissue and clinical data. RNA was isolated from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumour tissue adjacent to the positive surgical margin and the GPS was evaluable in 203 of these patients with a score ranging from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating higher risk. All patients underwent RP with or without adjuvant radiation therapy (ART). The statistical analysis employed Cox proportional hazards regression models for outcome of BCR weighted for case-cohort design.

RESULTS

In univariable analysis, every 20-unit increase in the GPS was associated with a nearly threefold increase in risk of BCR (hazard ratio [HR] per 20 units 2.82, P < 0.001). In a multivariable Cox model adjusted for age, race, Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment Postsurgical score, Grade Group at the positive margin, and ART, the GPS was significantly associated with BCR (HR 1.56 per 20 units; 95% confidence interval 1.11-2.19; P = 0.011). The study is limited by its retrospective and single institution design.

CONCLUSIONS

The GPS at the positive surgical margin could help stratify prognosis and inform clinical decision-making regarding adjuvant therapy after RP.

PTEN Loss Is Associated with Adverse Outcomes in the Setting of Salvage Radiation Therapy

BACKGROUND

Salvage radiation therapy (SRT) is a mainstay of treatment for biochemical relapse following radical prostatectomy; however, few studies have examined genomic biomarkers in this context.

OBJECTIVE

We characterized the prognostic impact of previously identified deleterious molecular phenotypes-loss of PTEN, ERG expression, and TP53 mutation-for patients undergoing SRT.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

We leveraged an institutional database of 320 SRT patients with available tissue and follow-up. Tissue microarrays were used for genetically validated immunohistochemistry assays.

INTERVENTION

All men underwent SRT with or without androgen deprivation therapy OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Univariable and multivariable Cox-proportional hazard models assessed the association of molecular phenotypes with biochemical recurrence-free (bRFS) and metastasis-free (MFS) survival after SRT.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

Loss of PTEN (n = 123, 43%) and ERG expression (n = 118, 39%) were common in this cohort, while p53 overexpression (signifying TP53 missense mutation) was infrequent (n = 21, 7%). In univariable analyses, any loss of PTEN portended worse bRFS (hazard ratio [HR] 1.86; 95% confidence interval 1.36-2.57) and MFS (HR 1.89; 1.21-2.94), with homogeneous PTEN loss being associated with the highest risk of MFS (HR 2.47; 1.54-3.95). Similarly, p53 overexpression predicted worse bRFS (HR 1.95; 1.14-3.32) and MFS (HR 2.79; 1.50-5.19). ERG expression was associated with worse MFS only (HR 1.6; 1.03-2.48). On the multivariable analysis adjusting for known prognostic features, homogeneous PTEN loss remained predictive of adverse bRFS (HR 1.82; 1.12-2.96) and MFS (HR 2.08; 1.06-4.86). The study is limited by its retrospective and single-institution design.

CONCLUSIONS

PTEN loss by immunohistochemistry is an independent adverse prognostic factor for bRFS and MFS in prostate cancer patients treated with SRT. Future trials will determine the optimal approach to treating SRT patients with adverse molecular prognostic features.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Loss of the PTEN tumor suppressor protein is associated with worse outcomes after salvage radiotherapy, independent of other clinical or pathologic patient characteristics.

Time-dependent personalized prognostic analysis by machine learning in biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

For biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer, treatments such as radiation therapy and androgen deprivation therapy are administered. To diagnose postoperative recurrence as early as possible and to intervene with treatment at the appropriate time, it is essential to accurately predict recurrence after radical prostatectomy. However, postoperative recurrence involves numerous patient-related factors, making its prediction challenging. The purpose of this study is to accurately predict the timing of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy and to analyze the risk factors for follow-up of high-risk patients and early detection of recurrence.

METHODS

We utilized the machine learning survival analysis model called the Random Survival Forest utilizing the 58 clinical factors from 548 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy at Chiba University Hospital. To visualize prognostic factors and assess accuracy of the time course probability, we employed SurvSHAP(t) and time-dependent Area Under Cureve(AUC).

RESULTS

The time-dependent AUC of RSF was 0.785, which outperformed the Cox proportional hazards model (0.704), the Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment (CAPRA) score (0.710), and the D'Amico score (0.658). The key prognostic factors for early recurrence were Gleason score(GS), Seminal vesicle invasion(SV), and PSA. The contribution of PSA to recurrence decreases after the first year, while SV and GS increase over time.

CONCLUSION

Our prognostic model analyzed the time-dependent relationship between the timing of recurrence and prognostic factors. Our study achieved personalized prognosis analysis and its rationale after radical prostatectomy by employing machine learning prognostic model. This prognostic model contributes to the early detection of recurrence by enabling clinicians to conduct appropriate follow-ups for high-risk patients.

The accuracy of ultrasensitive PSA in predicting disease progression after radical prostatectomy

Objectives

To assess the role of ultrasensitive PSA values (usPSA) after radical prostatectomy in predicting the subsequent biochemical recurrence (BCR).

Material and methods

The study included 1836 patients who underwent open or robot-assisted RP at Turku University Hospital between 2003 and 2018. Exclusion criteria involved patients with adjuvant treatments and those who did not reach a PSA nadir <0.1 ng/ml, resulting in a final cohort of 1313 patients. The prognostic impact of the optimal usPSA nadir cut-off value 6 months after RP was investigated to predict subsequent BCR for the whole cohort (N = 1313). The optimal usPSA cut-off value was determined for patients at 3-5 years post-surgery (N = 806) and beyond 5 years (N = 493) of follow-up. We used the area under the curve (AUC) calculation and the Kaplan-Meier method.

Results

In a cohort with a median age of 64, primarily featuring Gleason score 7 prostate cancer. uPSA nadir of 0.01 ng/ml (AUC = 0.80) at the first monitoring post-surgery emerged as the optimal cut-off for identifying subjects at low (80%) or high (20%) risk of BCR within the first 3 years. Beyond this period, uPSA values during the first 3 [(AUC = 0.89; 3-5 years post-surgery) and (AUC = 0.81; beyond 5 years)] and 5 post-surgery years (AUC = 0.85) outperformed uPSA nadir in predicting subsequent BCR. Notably, EAU-defined high-risk patients with low uPSA nadir maintained substantial BCR-free survival.

Conclusion

In conclusion, a low usPSA predicts minimal BCR risk over the next 2-3 years post-measurement. Patients with low usPSA can benefit from reduced post-surgery PSA monitoring at 2- to 3-year intervals without compromising outcomes. This strategic approach optimizes resource allocation in busy urological outpatient clinics, especially valuable in publicly reimbursed healthcare systems like Finland.

French AFU Cancer Committee Guidelines - Update 2024-2026: Prostate cancer - Management of metastatic disease and castration resistance

PURPOSE OF THIS DOCUMENT

The Oncology Committee of the French Urology Association is proposing updated recommendations for the management of recurrent and/or metastatic prostate cancer (PCa).

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature from 2022 to 2024 was conducted by the CCAFU on the therapeutic management of recurrent PCa following local or metastatic treatment, assessing the references based on their level of evidence.

RESULTS

Molecular imaging is the standard approach for assessing recurrence after local treatment and should not delay early salvage treatment. Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is the primary treatment option for metastatic PCa. Intensification of ADT, now cononsidered standard care for metastatic PCa, involves incorporating at least one new-generation hormone therapy (ARPI). For patients with high-volume metastatic disease at diagnosis, adding docetaxel to ADT+ARPI may be considered for eligible patients. In castration-resistant PCa (CRPC) patients, poly(ADP) ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors and PSMA radioligand therapy are new treatment options. The combination and sequencing of treatmentsare influenced by several factors, including patient and disease characteristics, prior therapies, genomic status, and molecular imaging findings.

CONCLUSION

This update of French recommendations should help to improve the management recurrent or metastatic PCa patients.

Randomised Trial of No, Short-term, or Long-term Androgen Deprivation Therapy with Postoperative Radiotherapy After Radical Prostatectomy: Results from the Three-way Comparison of RADICALS-HD (NCT00541047)

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The use and duration of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) with postoperative radiotherapy (RT) have been uncertain. RADICALS-HD compared adding no ("None"), 6-months ("Short"), or 24-mo ("Long") ADT to study efficacy in the long term.

METHODS

Participants with prostate cancer were indicated for postoperative RT and agreed randomisation between all durations. ADT was allocated for 0, 6, or 24 mo. The primary outcome measure (OM) was metastasis-free survival (MFS). The secondary OMs included freedom from distant metastasis, overall survival, and initiation of nonprotocol ADT. Sample size was determined by two-way comparisons. Analyses followed standard time-to-event approaches and intention-to-treat principles.

KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS

Between 2007 and 2015, 492 participants were randomised one of three groups: 166 None, 164 Short, and 162 Long. The median age at randomisation was 66 yr; Gleason scores at surgery were as follows: <7 = 64 (13%), 3+4 = 229 (47%), 4+3 = 127 (26%), and 8+ = 72 (15%); T3b was 112 (23%); and T4 was 5 (1%). The median follow-up was 9.0 yr and, with MFS events reported for 89 participants (32 None, 31 Short, and 26 Long), there was no evidence of difference in MFS overall (logrank p = 0.98), and, for Long versus None, hazard ratio = 0.948 (95% confidence interval 0.54-1.68). After 10 yr, 80% None, 77% Short, and 81% Long patients were alive without metastatic disease. The three-way randomisation was not powered to conventional levels for assessment, yet provides a fair comparison.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Long-term outcomes after radical prostatectomy are usually favourable. In those indicated for postoperative RT and considered suitable for no, short-term, or long-term ADT, there was no evidence of improvement with addition of ADT. Future research should focus on patients at a higher risk of metastases in whom improvements are required more urgently.

Size and SUVmax define the contribution of nodal metastases to PSA in oligorecurrent prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

To evaluate how prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels decrease after removal of isolated prostate cancer (PCa) nodal metastases in relation to their diameter/volume ("PSA-density of PCa-metastases") and maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax).

METHODS

A total of 83 consecutive patients with solitary nodal recurrence after radical prostatectomy who underwent prostate-specific membrane antigen-radioguided salvage surgery were retrospectively analyzed. Using multivariable linear regression models, the PSA-decrease after removal of each PCa-metastases (=PSA-contribution of each PCa-metastases) was correlated with the long axis diameter/estimated volume and the SUVmax of each removed metastasis. Sizes were measured by imaging and histopathologic examination.

RESULTS

A total of 83 patients were included with a median (interquartile range [IQR]) PSA-decrease of 0.56 [0.22, 1.31] ng/mL after salvage surgery. The median [IQR] long axis diameters in imaging and histopathological examination were 8.0 [6.0, 11.0] mm and 8.4 [5.5, 11.1] mm, respectively. The median [IQR] estimated volumes were 0.13 [0.05, 0.32] cc (imaging) and 0.05 [0.02, 0.17] cc (pathology). In multivariable linear regression analyses, the estimated PSA-contribution ([95% confidence interval [CI]) of each millimeter of long axis diameter was 0.09 [0.03, 0.14] ng/mL (imaging) or 0.08 [0.03, 0.12] ng/mL (histology). The minimum diameter for biochemical recurrence (PSA ≥ 0.2 ng/mL) was >2.2 mm (imaging) or >2.5 mm (histology). The estimated PSA-contribution [95% CI] of each cc cancer volume was 1.23 [0.51, 1.94] ng/mL (imaging) or 1.46 [0.40, 2.52] ng/mL (histology). SUVmax as surrogate parameter for tissue composition was associated with increased PSA-contribution of PCa-metastases (+0.03-0.05 ng/mL per unit increase).

CONCLUSIONS

The diameter/volume and SUVmax of metastatic tissue correlate with its contribution to PSA levels. Therefore, very small metastases may produce too little PSA for biochemical recurrence.

A simple risk stratification model for prostate cancer using histopathologic findings of radical prostatectomy

OBJECTIVES

To develop a simple postoperative risk stratification based on histopathologic findings from radical prostatectomy specimens.

METHODS

This study included 3 cohorts of patients with a preoperative diagnosis of clinically localized prostate cancer: 1 derivation cohort (n = 432) and 2 validation cohorts (n = 506 and n = 720). First, a postoperative risk stratification model was developed in the derivation cohort using the factors extraprostatic extension, surgical margin status, seminal vesicle invasion, and lymph node involvement. Each of the first 3 factors was assigned 0 or 1 point for negative or positive results, respectively, and the sum of the points, ranging from 0 to 3, was scored. pN1 was not scored but was analyzed separately. Validation cohorts were then used to evaluate the predictive accuracy of the model. Additionally, we compared the model with the Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment (CAPRA) score.

RESULTS

Because the log-rank test showed no statistically significant differences between scores 1 vs 2 or score 3 vs pN1 in the derivation cohort, the following 3-level risk stratification was created: low risk (score 0), intermediate risk (score 1-2), and high risk (score 3 or pN1). There were statistically significant differences in recurrence-free survival between any of 2 groups of 3-level risk stratification. This model similarly worked in both validation cohorts. The C indexes for the model were higher than those for the CAPRA score.

CONCLUSIONS

This simple postoperative risk stratification model, based on radical prostatectomy findings, has a prognostic impact that has been validated in a multicenter population.

Impact of frozen section on long-term outcomes in robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy

OBJECTIVES

To compare 1-year functional and 5-year oncological outcomes of men undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) with neurovascular structure-adjacent frozen-section examination (NeuroSAFE) with those in men undergoing RALP without NeuroSAFE (standard of care [SOC]).

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Men undergoing RALP in our centre between 1 January 2009 and 30 June 2018 were enrolled from a prospectively maintained database. Patients were excluded if they had undergone preoperative therapy or postoperative adjuvant therapy or were enrolled in clinical trials. Patients were grouped based on use of NeuroSAFE. Follow-up was censored at 5 years. The primary outcome was difference in time to biochemical recurrence (BCR) on multivariable analysis, defined as prostate-specific antigen (PSA) >0.2 ng/L on two consecutive measurements. Secondary outcomes were difference in 1-year erectile dysfunction and incontinence.

RESULTS

In the enrolment period, 1199 consecutive men underwent RALP, of whom 1140 were eligible, including 317 with NeuroSAFE and 823 with SOC. The median PSA follow-up was 60 months in both groups. Rates of 5-year BCR were similar on Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis (11% vs 11%; P = 0.9), as was time to BCR on multivariable Cox proportional hazards modelling (hazard ratio 1.2; P = 0.6). Compared with the SOC group at 1 year, the NeuroSAFE group had similar unadjusted rates of incontinence (5.1% vs 7.7%) and lower unadjusted impotence (57% vs 80%). On multivariable analysis, NeuroSAFE patients had equivalent risk of incontinence (odds ratio [OR] 0.59, 95% CI 0.17-1.6; P = 0.4) but significantly reduced risk of erectile dysfunction (OR 0.37, 95% CI 0.22-0.60; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

For men undergoing RALP, compared with SOC, NeuroSAFE patients had equivalent time to BCR and risk of 1-year incontinence, and significantly lower risk of 1-year erectile dysfunction.

A randomised trial of short- vs long-term androgen deprivation with salvage radiotherapy for biochemical failure following radical prostatectomy: URONCOR 06-24

BACKGROUND

Salvage radiotherapy (SRT) and androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) are widely used in routine clinical practice to treat patients with prostate cancer who develop biochemical recurrence (BCR) after radical prostatectomy (RP). However, there is no standard-of-care consensus on optimal duration ADT. Investigators propose three distinct risk groups in patients with prostate cancer treated with SRT in order to better define the indications and duration of ADT combined with SRT.

STUDY DESIGN

The URONCOR 06-24 trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT05781217) is a prospective, multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase III, clinical trial. The aim of the trial is to determine the impact of short-term (6 months) vs long-term (24 months) ADT in combination with SRT on distant metastasis-free survival (MFS) in patients with prostate cancer with BCR after RP (intermediate and high risk).

ENDPOINTS

The primary endpoint is 5-year MFS rates in patients with prostate cancer treated with long- vs short-term ADT in combination with SRT. Secondary objectives are biochemical-relapse free interval, pelvic progression-free survival, time to start of systemic treatment, time to castration resistance, cancer-specific survival, overall survival, acute and late toxicity, and quality of life.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Total of 534 patients will be randomised 1:1 to ADT 6 months or ADT 24 months with a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogue in combination with SRT, stratified by risk group and pathological lymph node status.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study is conducted under the guiding principles of the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki. The results will be disseminated at research conferences and in peer-reviewed journals.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

EudraCT number 2021-006975-41.

Postprostatectomy Radiotherapy Timing and Long-Term Health-Related Quality of Life

Importance

The association between radiotherapy (RT) timing after radical prostatectomy and long-term patient-reported health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in men with prostate cancer is unknown.

Objective

To measure long-term HRQOL in men with prostate cancer up to 15 years after prostatectomy with or without RT and examine whether early vs late postprostatectomy RT is associated with differences in sexual, urinary, and bowel HRQOL.

Design, Setting, and Participants

A prospective, multicenter, longitudinal cohort analysis using HRQOL data from the PROST-QA (2003-2006) and RP2 consortium (2010-2013) studies was conducted. Men with localized prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy were included. Data were analyzed between May 8, 2023, and March 1, 2024. The study was conducted in 12 high-volume academic medical centers in the US.

Exposures

Men were stratified based on receipt and timing of postprostatectomy RT: prostatectomy only, early RT (<12 months), and late RT (≥12 months).

Main Outcomes and Measures

Longitudinal sexual, incontinence, urinary irritation, bowel, and hormonal/vitality HRQOL were measured via the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite at baseline; months 2, 6, and 12; and annually thereafter. Treatment groups were compared using multivariable linear mixed-effects models of change in longitudinal domain scores. Pad use for incontinence was measured longitudinally among men receiving postprostatectomy RT.

Results

A total of 1203 men were included in the study: prostatectomy only (n = 1082), early RT (n = 57), and late RT (n = 64). Median age for the entire cohort was 60.5 (range, 38.8-79.7) years, and 1075 men (92.0%) were White. Median follow-up was 85.6 (IQR, 35.8-117.2) months. Compared with men receiving prostatectomy alone, those receiving postprostatectomy RT had significantly greater decreases in sexual, incontinence, and urinary irritation HRQOL. However, timing of postprostatectomy RT, specifically early vs late, was not associated with a long-term decrease in any HRQOL domain. There was evidence of improved recovery of sexual, continence, and urinary irritation scores among men receiving early RT compared with those receiving late RT after prostatectomy. Before the start of postprostatectomy RT, 39.3% of men in the early RT cohort and 73.4% of men in the late RT cohort were pad-free. By the sixth visit post-RT, 67.4% in the early RT cohort and 47.6% in the late RT cohort were pad-free.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this multicenter, prospective analysis, postprostatectomy RT appeared to be negatively associated with long-term HRQOL across all domains. However, receipt of early vs late postprostatectomy RT may result in similar long-term HRQOL outcomes.

Clinical factors predicting the outcome of salvage radiotherapy for patients with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy

BACKGROUND

It remains unclear which patients with biochemical recurrence after prostatectomy are most suitable for salvage radiotherapy. We evaluated the parameters related to outcomes.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated patients who underwent salvage therapy for biochemical recurrence after prostatectomy between 2005 and 2019. This study aimed to evaluate biochemical recurrence-free survival (bRFS) after salvage radiotherapy and elucidate the parameters associated with bRFS. The bRFS rate was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the parameters associated with bRFS were evaluated using Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

This study included 67 patients treated with salvage radiotherapy with a median age of 67 years at salvage radiotherapy. The median follow-up period after salvage radiotherapy was 7.3 years. The 5-year bRFS rate following salvage radiotherapy was 47.1%. Univariate analysis showed that PSA doubling time < 6 months, positive surgical margin, and pathological Gleason score ≥ 8 were significantly associated with shorter bRFS (p < 0.001, p = 0.036, p = 0.047, respectively). Multivariable analysis showed that a PSA doubling time < 6 months and positive surgical margins were significantly associated with shorter bRFS (p = 0.001 and p = 0.018, respectively). No serious adverse events were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

In our hospital, approximately half of the patients are under long-term control with salvage radiotherapy. A PSA doubling time of < 6 months and positive surgical margins were suggested to be associated with poor outcomes of salvage radiotherapy.

Socioeconomic Barriers to Receiving Early Salvage Radiotherapy for Locally Advanced Prostate Adenocarcinoma: A Retrospective Single-Center Study

Purpose This study aimed to identify factors associated with delays in initiating early salvage radiation therapy in prostate cancer patients with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) failure after prostatectomy. Methods We conducted a single-institution, retrospective study of patients receiving salvage radiation therapy after radical prostatectomy from 2011 to 2022. Patient demographics and clinical data were examined to identify factors that may have influenced the time to start of radiation therapy after surgery. Utilizing a PSA cut off of 0.25 ng/ml or less, we classified patients as receiving either early "PSA low" or late "PSA high" salvage therapy depending on their PSA at the time of initiating treatment. Results Of the 81 patients evaluated, the median age was 61.9 years (IQR 57.9 - 66.5), with most presenting with pT3 (65.4%), Grade Group 2 disease (35.8%), and positive margins 55%). Median PSA at salvage radiation therapy commencement was 0.30 ng/mL (0.18 - 0.48). 40 patients completed early salvage and 41 patients completed late salvage in the overall cohort. A significant association was found between patient insurance carrier and pre-radiation PSA levels. Patients with HMO (Health Maintenance Organization) or PPO (Preferred Provider Organization) insurance were more likely to complete late salvage radiation compared to non-managed Medicare patients (HMO OR 4.0, p <0.05 & PPO OR 3.3 p <0.05 vs non-managed Medicare). All uninsured patients in the cohort received late salvage radiation. Conclusions Insurance type was significantly associated with the timing of salvage radiation therapy post-prostatectomy, suggesting a relationship with providers requiring prior authorization (HMO and PPO coverage). This study supports proper PSA surveillance, in particular for those with HMO or PPO coverage.

Postoperative Management of Prostate Cancer-Optimizing Prostate Cancer Care

This Viewpoint discusses the end point analyses and results of the RACICALS-RT study.

Risk Stratification of Patients with Recurrence After Primary Treatment for Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Biochemical recurrence (BCR) after primary definitive treatment for prostate cancer (PCa) is a heterogeneous disease state. While BCR is associated with worse oncologic outcomes, risk factors that impact outcomes can vary significantly, necessitating avenues for risk stratification. We sought to identify prognostic risk factors at the time of recurrence after primary radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy, and prior to salvage treatment(s), associated with adverse oncologic outcomes.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of prospective studies in EMBASE, MEDLINE, and ClinicalTrials.gov (from January 1, 2000 to October 16, 2023) according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines (CRD42023466330). We reviewed the factors associated with oncologic outcomes among patients with BCR after primary definitive treatment.

KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS

A total of 37 studies were included (total n = 10 632), 25 after prostatectomy (total n = 9010) and 12 after radiotherapy (total n = 1622). Following recurrence after prostatectomy, factors associated with adverse outcomes include higher pathologic T stage and grade group, negative surgical margins, shorter prostate-specific antigen doubling time (PSADT), higher prostate-specific antigen (PSA) prior to salvage treatment, shorter time to recurrence, the 22-gene tumor RNA signature, and recurrence location on molecular imaging. After recurrence following radiotherapy, factors associated with adverse outcomes include a shorter time to recurrence, and shorter PSADT or higher PSA velocity. Grade group, T stage, and prior short-term hormone therapy (4-6 mo) were not clearly associated with adverse outcomes, although sample size and follow-up were generally limited compared with postprostatectomy data.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

This work highlights the recommendations and level of evidence for risk stratifying patients with PCa recurrence, and can be used as a benchmark for personalizing salvage treatment based on prognostics.

Prognostic significance of a negative PSMA PET/CT in biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) is becoming standard of care for men with biochemical recurrence (BCR) of prostate cancer. The implications of a negative PSMA PET/CT scan in this population remain unclear. This study aims to assess the outcome of patients with BCR post radical prostatectomy (RP) who have negative [18F]DCFPyL PET/CT scan at relapse.

METHODS

This is a post-hoc subgroup analysis of a prospective non randomized clinical trial. One hundred and one patients (median age, 75 years) with BCR after RP, who tested negative on [18F]DCFPyL PET/CT and subsequently either underwent salvage radiotherapy (sRT) with or without androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) or were followed without active treatment, were included. Freedom from progression (FFP) after negative PSMA PET/CT was determined based on follow-up imaging selected as per clinical practice. Uni- and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to examine the association of patients' characteristics, tumor-specific variables, and treatment with clinical progression at the last follow-up. FFP at 1-, 2-, and 3-year were reported using Kaplan Meier analysis.

RESULTS

The median PSA level at PET/CT was 0.56 ng/mL (range, 0.4-11.3). Sixty five (64%) patients were followed without receiving further treatment, and 36 (36%) received sRT (18% to the prostate bed only and 18% to the prostate bed and pelvic lymph nodes) within 3 months of the PSMA PET. Seventeen of the sRT patients (17 of 36, 47%) received concomitant androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Median follow-up was 39 months. Subsequent clinical progression was detected in 21 patients (21%), with 52% in pelvic lymph nodes, 52% in the prostatic fossa, 19% in distant lymph nodes, 14% in lungs, and 10% in bones. The FFP was 95% (95% CI: 91%-99%) at 12 months, 87% (95% CI: 81%-94%) at 24 months, and 79% (95% CI: 71%-88%) at 36 months. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that an initial International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade 5 was significantly associated with clinical progression at the last follow-up (hazard ratio, 5.1, P value, 0.04). Furthermore, the receipt of sRT correlated significantly with lower clinical progression at the last follow-up (hazard ratio, 0.2, P value, 0.03), whereas other clinical and tumor-specific parameters did not. Following surveillance-only and sRT, 29% (19 of 65) and 6% (2 of 36) of patients, respectively, showed clinical progression. In the sRT group, no significant difference was observed in FFP between patients who underwent sRT to the prostatic fossa versus those who received sRT to the prostatic fossa and pelvic lymph nodes, although the numbers in these groups were small.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that salvage radiotherapy is associated with a decreased or delayed clinical progression in patients with biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy who have negative PSMA PET/CT scan results. The analysis also underscores the prognostic significance of the initial ISUP grade, with ISUP grade 5 being associated with worse outcomes.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Registered September 14, 2016; NCT02899312 .

Usefulness of Tissue Biomarkers versus Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen-Positron Emission Tomography for Prostate Cancer Biochemical Recurrence after Radical Prostatectomy

Despite curative-intent local therapy, approximately 27% to 53% of prostate cancer (PCa) patients experience prostate-specific antigen (PSA) recurrence, known as biochemical recurrence (BCR). BCR significantly raises the risk of PCa-related morbidity and mortality, yet there is no consensus on optimal management. Prostate-specific membrane antigen-positron emission tomography (PSMA PET) has emerged as highly sensitive imaging, distinguishing local recurrences from distant metastases, crucially influencing treatment decisions. Genomic biomarkers such as Decipher, Prolaris, and Oncotype DX contribute to refining recurrence risk profiles, guiding decisions on intensifying adjuvant therapies, like radiotherapy and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). This review assesses PSMA PET and biomarker utility in post-radical prostatectomy BCR scenarios, highlighting their impact on clinical decision-making. Despite their promising roles, the routine integration of biomarkers is limited by availability and cost, requiring further evidence. PSMA PET remains indispensable for restaging and treatment evaluation in these patients. Integrating biomarkers and PSMA PET promises to optimize personalized management strategies for BCR, though more comprehensive consensus-building studies are needed to define their standardized utility in clinical practice.

Delayed definitive management of localized prostate cancer: what do we know?

Delays in the work-up and definitive management of patients with prostate cancer are common, with logistics of additional work-up after initial prostate biopsy, specialist referrals, and psychological reasons being the most common causes of delays. During the COVID-19 pandemic and the subsequent surges, timing of definitive care delivery with surgery or radiotherapy has become a topic of significant concern for patients with prostate cancer and their providers alike. In response, recommendations for the timing of definitive management of prostate cancer with radiotherapy and radical prostatectomy were published but without a detailed rationale for these recommendations. While the COVID-19 pandemic is behind us, patients are always asking the question: "When should I start radiation or undergo surgery?" In the absence of level I evidence specifically addressing this question, we will hereby present a narrative review to summarize the available data on the effect of treatment delays on oncologic outcomes for patients with localized prostate cancer from prospective and retrospective studies.

EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-ISUP-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer. Part II-2024 Update: Treatment of Relapsing and Metastatic Prostate Cancer

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The European Association of Urology (EAU)-European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM)-European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO)-European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR)-International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP)-International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG) guidelines on the treatment of relapsing, metastatic, and castration-resistant prostate cancer (PCa) have been updated. Here we provide a summary of the 2024 guidelines.

METHODS

The panel performed a literature review of new data, covering the time frame between 2020 and 2023. The guidelines were updated and a strength rating for each recommendation was added on the basis of a systematic review of the evidence.

KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS

Risk stratification for relapsing PCa after primary therapy may guide salvage therapy decisions. New treatment options, such as androgen receptor-targeted agents (ARTAs), ARTA + chemotherapy combinations, PARP inhibitors and their combinations, and prostate-specific membrane antigen-based therapy have become available for men with metastatic PCa.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Evidence for relapsing, metastatic, and castration-resistant PCa is evolving rapidly. These guidelines reflect the multidisciplinary nature of PCa management. The full version is available online (http://uroweb.org/guideline/ prostate-cancer/).

PATIENT SUMMARY

This article summarises the 2024 guidelines for the treatment of relapsing, metastatic, and castration-resistant prostate cancer. These guidelines are based on evidence and guide doctors in discussing treatment decisions with their patients. The guidelines are updated every year.

Pragmatic clinical trials for localized prostate cancer: lessons learned and "three sins"

In "Explanatory and Pragmatic Attitudes in Therapeutic Trials", Schwatrz and Lelouch describe two approaches to the design of trials, "… the first "explanatory", the second "pragmatic". They explained "… the biologist may be interested to know whether the drugs differ in their effects … the explanatory approach". Biologically endpoints might determine whether it was better to give androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) before or after external beam radiation (EBRT) (i.e., does the sequence of treatments matter). Alternatively, if the arms focus on a clinical endpoint, this is considered … "the pragmatic approach". An example of a clinically relevant endpoint is overall survival (OS). A real-world example of this are the two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the role of prophylactic whole pelvic radiotherapy (WPRT) conducted by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG). RTOG 9413 evaluated possible interactions between the sequence of drugs and volume irradiated, while RTOG/NRG 0924 focuses on OS. There appears to be a common pattern of "what not to do", or "design errors" made by a number of investigators, that I call the "three sins". I posit that the prospects for a well-designed pragmatic RCT are likely to be high if these "three sins" are avoided/minimized. The "three sins" alluded to are: 1. You can't prove something doesn't work by treating people who don't need the treatment. 2. You can't prove something does not work if the treatment is not done properly. 3. You can't prove something does not work with an underpowered study.

Image-Guided Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy on Detectable Prostate Bed Recurrence after Prostatectomy in RT-Naïve Patients

Purpose or Objective-The aim of the study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of SBRT on detectable prostate bed recurrence in RT-naïve prostate cancer patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eighty-six patients who underwent SBRT for macroscopic bed recurrence after prostatectomy were retrospectively included. Patients were treated based on mpMRI or choline/PSMA PET.

RESULTS

The median time to biochemical relapse (BCR) after RP was 46 months, with a median PSA at restaging of 1.04 ng/mL. Forty-six patients were staged with mpMRI and choline/PSMA PET, while ten and thirty were treated based on PET and MRI only, respectively. Only one late G ≥ 2 GI toxicity was observed. With a median BCR follow-up of 14 months, twenty-nine patients experienced a BCR with a median PSA at recurrence of 1.66 ng/mL and a median survival free from the event of 40.1 months. The median time to BCR was 17.9 months. Twenty-seven patients had clinical relapse (CR), with a median CR follow-up of 16.27 months and a median time to CR of 23.0 months. Biochemical recurrence-free survival at one and two years was 88% and 66%, respectively, while clinical recurrence-free survival at one and two years was 92% and 82%, respectively. Regarding local relapses, seven were in the field of treatment, while eight of them were outside the field of treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Data showed that SBRT targeting only the macroscopic bed recurrence instead of the whole prostate bed is safe and effective. Additional data and longer follow-ups will provide a clearer indication of the appropriate treatment and staging methodology for these patients.

Prognosis based on postoperative PSA levels and treatment in prostate cancer with lymph node involvement

BACKGROUND

The therapeutic role of pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) during radical prostatectomy (RP) for prostate cancer is not established. In clinical practice, PLND is primarily performed in cases of high-risk prostate cancer. The detection of lymph node metastasis plays a crucial role in determining the need for subsequent treatments. This study aims to evaluate the prognosis of prostate cancer patients with lymph node involvement (LNI) by stratifying them based on postoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels to identify biomarkers that can guide postoperative treatment strategies.

METHODS

Analysis was conducted on 383 patients, selected from 572 initially eligible, who underwent RP with LNI across 33 Japanese Urological Oncology Group institutions from 2006 to 2019. Patients were grouped according to postoperative PSA levels and salvage treatments received. Follow-up focused on castration resistance-free survival (CRFS), metastasis-free survival (MFS), and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

In the persistent PSA group (PSA ≥ 0.1 ng/mL), CRFS and MFS were significantly shorter compared to the non-persistent PSA group (PSA < 0.1 ng/mL), and there was a tendency for shorter OS. In the persistent PSA group, patients with postoperative PSA values above the median (PSA ≥ 0.52 ng/mL) showed shorter CRFS and MFS. Furthermore, in the PSA ≥ 0.52 group, androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) plus radiotherapy (RT) combination had prolonged CRFS and MFS compared with ADT alone.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides valuable insights into stratifying patients based on postoperative PSA levels to tailor postoperative treatment strategies, potentially improving the prognosis of prostate cancer patients with LNI.

Treatment and Staging Intensification Strategies Associated with Radical Prostatectomy for High-Risk Prostate Cancer: Efficacy Evaluation and Exploration of Novel Approaches

The management of high-risk prostate cancer (PCa) presents a significant clinical challenge, often necessitating treatment intensification due to the potential presence of micrometastases. While radical prostatectomy (RP) constitutes one of the primary treatment modalities, the integration of neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies suggests a paradigm shift towards more aggressive treatment strategies, also guided by new imaging modalities like positron emission tomography using prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA-PET). Despite the benefits, treatment intensification raises concerns regarding increased side effects. This review synthesizes the latest evidence on perioperative treatment intensification and de-escalation for high-risk localized and locally advanced PCa patients eligible for surgery. Through a non-systematic literature review conducted via PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov, we explored various dimensions of perioperative treatments, including neoadjuvant systemic therapies, adjuvant therapies, and the role of novel diagnostic technologies. Emerging evidence provides more support for neoadjuvant systemic therapies. Preliminary results from studies suggest the potential for treatments traditionally reserved for metastatic PCa to show apparent benefit in a non-metastatic setting. The role of adjuvant treatments remains debated, particularly the use of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and adjuvant radiotherapy in patients at higher risk of biochemical recurrence. The potential role of radio-guided PSMA lymph node dissection emerges as a cutting-edge approach, offering a targeted method for eradicating disease with greater precision. Innovations such as artificial intelligence and machine learning are potential game-changers, offering new avenues for personalized treatment and improved prognostication. The intensification of surgical treatment in high-risk PCa patients is a dynamic and evolving field, underscored by the integration of traditional and novel therapeutic approaches. As evidence continues to emerge, these strategies will refine patient selection, enhance treatment efficacy, and mitigate the risk of progression, although with an attentive consideration of the associated side effects.

Timing of radiotherapy (RT) after radical prostatectomy (RP): long-term outcomes in the RADICALS-RT trial (NCT00541047)

BACKGROUND

The optimal timing of radiotherapy (RT) after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer has been uncertain. RADICALS-RT compared efficacy and safety of adjuvant RT versus an observation policy with salvage RT for prostate-specific antigen (PSA) failure.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

RADICALS-RT was a randomised controlled trial enrolling patients with ≥1 risk factor (pT3/4, Gleason 7-10, positive margins, preoperative PSA≥10 ng/ml) for recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Patients were randomised 1:1 to adjuvant RT ('Adjuvant-RT') or an observation policy with salvage RT for PSA failure ('Salvage-RT') defined as PSA≥0.1 ng/ml or three consecutive rises. Stratification factors were Gleason score, margin status, planned RT schedule (52.5 Gy/20 fractions or 66 Gy/33 fractions) and treatment centre. The primary outcome measure was freedom-from-distant-metastasis (FFDM), designed with 80% power to detect an improvement from 90% with Salvage-RT (control) to 95% at 10 years with Adjuvant-RT. Secondary outcome measures were biochemical progression-free survival, freedom from non-protocol hormone therapy, safety and patient-reported outcomes. Standard survival analysis methods were used; hazard ratio (HR)<1 favours Adjuvant-RT.

RESULTS

Between October 2007 and December 2016, 1396 participants from UK, Denmark, Canada and Ireland were randomised: 699 Salvage-RT, 697 Adjuvant-RT. Allocated groups were balanced with a median age of 65 years. Ninety-three percent (649/697) Adjuvant-RT reported RT within 6 months after randomisation; 39% (270/699) Salvage-RT reported RT during follow-up. Median follow-up was 7.8 years. With 80 distant metastasis events, 10-year FFDM was 93% for Adjuvant-RT and 90% for Salvage-RT: HR=0.68 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.43-1.07, P=0.095]. Of 109 deaths, 17 were due to prostate cancer. Overall survival was not improved (HR=0.980, 95% CI 0.667-1.440, P=0.917). Adjuvant-RT reported worse urinary and faecal incontinence 1 year after randomisation (P=0.001); faecal incontinence remained significant after 10 years (P=0.017).

CONCLUSION

Long-term results from RADICALS-RT confirm adjuvant RT after radical prostatectomy increases the risk of urinary and bowel morbidity, but does not meaningfully improve disease control. An observation policy with salvage RT for PSA failure should be the current standard after radical prostatectomy.

TRIAL IDENTIFICATION

RADICALS, RADICALS-RT, ISRCTN40814031, NCT00541047.

Erectile function preservation after salvage radiation therapy for biochemically recurrent prostate cancer after prostatectomy: Five-year results of the SAKK 09/10 randomized phase 3 trial

Objectives

To evaluate effects of dose intensified salvage radiotherapy (sRT) on erectile function in biochemically recurrent prostate cancer (PC) after radical prostatectomy (RP).

Materials and methods

Eligible patients had evidence of biochemical failure after RP and a PSA at randomization of ≤ 2 ng/ml. Erectile dysfunction (ED) was investigated as secondary endpoint within the multicentre randomized trial (February 2011 to April 2014) in patients receiving either 64 Gy or 70 Gy sRT. ED and quality of life (QoL) were assessed using CTCAE v4.0 and the EORTC QoL questionnaires C30 and PR25 at baseline and up to 5 years after sRT.

Results

344 patients were evaluable. After RP 197 (57.3 %) patients had G0-2 ED while G3 ED was recorded in 147 (42.7 %) patients. Subsequently, sexual activity and functioning was impaired. 5 years after sRT, 101 (29.4 %) patients noted G0-2 ED. During follow-up, 44.2 % of patients with baseline G3 ED showed any improvement and 61.4 % of patients with baseline G0-2 ED showed worsening. Shorter time interval between RP and start of sRT (p = 0.007) and older age at randomization (p = 0.005) were significant predictors to more baseline ED and low sexual activity in the long-term. Age (p = 0.010) and RT technique (p = 0.031) had a significant impact on occurrence of long-term ED grade 3 and worse sexual functioning. During follow-up, no differences were found in erectile function, sexual activity, and sexual functioning between the 64 Gy and 70 Gy arm.

Conclusion

ED after RP is a known long-term side effect with significant impact on patients' QoL. ED was further affected by sRT, but dose intensification of sRT showed no significant impact on erectile function recovery or prevalence of de novo ED after sRT. Age, tumor stage, prostatectomy and RT-techniques, nerve-sparing and observation time were associated with long-term erectile function outcome.ClinicalTrials.gov. Identifier: NCT01272050.

Management of the Devastated Bladder Outlet after Prostate CANCER Treatment

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Devastating complications of the bladder outlet resulting from prostate cancer treatments are relatively uncommon. However, the combination of the high incidence of prostate cancer and patient longevity after treatment have raised awareness of adverse outcomes deteriorating patients' quality of life. This narrative review discusses the diagnostic work-up and management options for bladder outlet obstruction resulting from prostate cancer treatments, including those that require urinary diversion.

RECENT FINDINGS

The devastated bladder outlet can be a consequence of the treatment of benign conditions, but more frequently from complications of pelvic cancer treatments. Regardless of etiology, the initial treatment ladder involves endoluminal options such as dilation and direct vision internal urethrotomy, with or without intralesional injection of anti-fibrotic agents. If these conservative strategies fail, surgical reconstruction should be considered. Although surgical reconstruction provides the best prospect of durable success, reconstructive procedures are also associated with serious complications. In the worst circumstances, such as prior radiotherapy, failed reconstruction, devastated bladder outlet with end-stage bladders, or patient's severe comorbidities, reconstruction may neither be realistic nor justified. Urinary diversion with or without cystectomy may be the best option for these patients. Thorough patient counseling before treatment selection is of utmost importance. Outcomes and repercussions on quality of life vary extensively with management options. Meticulous preoperative diagnostic evaluation is paramount in selecting the right treatment strategy for each individual patient. The risk of bladder outlet obstruction, and its severest form, devastated bladder outlet, after treatment of prostate cancer is not negligible, especially following radiation. Management includes endoluminal treatment, open or robot-assisted laparoscopic reconstruction, and urinary diversion in the worst circumstances, with varying success rates.

Neurovascular Structure-Adjacent Frozen-Section Examination (NeuroSAFE) Technique of Nerve-Sparing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy (RARP) in Indian Scenario: Technique, Feasibility, and Early Outcomes

Potency and urinary continence are adversely affected post-prostatectomy. The primary objective is oncological safety by ensuring negative surgical margins (NSM) and best functional recovery through nerve preservation in appropriate patients. NeuroSAFE technique of intra-operative frozen-section (IFS) analysis was devised for comprehensive assessment of surgical margins adjacent to the neurovascular tissue surface of the prostate. We analyzed our initial experience with this technique. Five NS-RARPs were performed utilizing the NeuroSAFE technique between October 2021 and February 2022. Patient demographics, disease stage, operative console time, post-operative complications, final histopathology, biochemical recurrence (BCR), erectile function, and urinary continence were recorded. The mean age of patients was 59.2 ± 1.3 years. All had clinically organ-confined disease with ISUP grade ≤ 3. The mean operative time of NS-RARP with NeuroSAFE was 240 ± 21 min and average NeuroSAFE time was 45 ± 3.8 min. All patients had NSM on IFS. No patient had Clavien-Dindo grade > 1 complications. Margins were negative on final histopathology. No patient had BCR at 6 and 12 weeks. Three patients were able to have sexual intercourse and only one patient required single precaution pad at 12 weeks. NeuroSAFE is feasible and can ensure intra-operative oncological safety of the NS procedure. Moreover, it gives the opportunity to convert positive surgical margin to prognostically favorable NSM by secondary resection. Our initial experience which is the first in India is encouraging with favorable functional outcomes. Large prospective studies and longer follow-up are required specially to evaluate the oncological benefit.

Impact of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT on radiation treatment planning of prostate cancer patients

AIM

This study aimed to assess the impact of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT on radiation treatment (RT) planning in prostate cancer patients with salvage (sRT) or definitive (dRT) radiotherapy.

METHODS

38 patients (27 sRT, median PSA 0.79 ng/ml (range 0.06-12.1); 11 dRT, median PSA 4.35 ng/ml (range 1.55-55.5) underwent 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT before RT. Influence of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT on the extent of planning target volume (PTV) and addition of PET-based boosts were assessed. Median follow up was 12 months (range 3-24).

RESULTS

68Ga-PSMA PET/CT showed positive findings in 23/38 patients (8/23: local recurrence (LR), 11/23: nodal metastasis, 1/23: LR and nodal, 2/23: solitary bone metastasis, 1/23: oligometastatic nodal/ bone metastases). In sRT primary PTV was changed in 16/27 patients extending the PTV to the lymphatic drainage (10/16), PSMA-positive LR (3/16), bone metastases (2/16) and both nodal/bone metastases (1/16). PET-based increase of primary PTV was 116%. PET-based boosts were administered in 19/27 patients (8/19: local, 10/19: nodal, 1/19: both), median boost volume was 31.3 cm3 (range 17.2-80.2) (local) and 19.7 cm3 (range 3.0-109.3) (nodal). PTV was changed in 1/11 (9%) of dRT patients (extension of primary PTV to the lymphatic drainage (RT volume of 644.5 cm3), additional nodal boost (volume of 2.7 cm3, 23.1 Gy)). All patients showed biochemical response (mean PSA decrease 88.8 +/- 14.0%). Nadir PSA was reached 10 months (range 1-17) after end of RT (median 0.07 ng/ml, range 0.002-3.96). Within a median 12 months follow-up (range 3-22/8-24 in sRT/dRT), median PSA was 0.05 ng/ml (range 0.002-8.5) (sRT) and 0.26 ng/ml (range 0.02-2.68) (dRT).

CONCLUSIONS

68Ga-PSMA PET/CT influenced sRT planning in almost 63% and dRT in 9% of patients by change of PTV and additional boosts.

Association between preradiation therapy prostate-specific antigen levels and radiation therapy failure after prostatectomy: a propensity score matched analysis

Purpose

We sought to determine the association between the pre-radiation therapy prostate-specific antigen (pre-RT PSA) 0.5 and RT failure in post-radical prostatectomy (post-RP) patients. Our study also investigated the prognostic factors for the failure of RT given concurrently with hormone therapy (HT) after RP.

Materials and methods

We retrospectively reviewed our institutional RP data from July 2004 to November 2021. Patients without concurrent hormone therapy were excluded. Propensity score matching was performed. Kaplan-Meier (KM) curve analysis was employed for RT failure-free survival, overall survival (OS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS). Cox regression analysis was used for the RT failure hazard ratio (HR).

Results

After propensity score matching, 193 patients were assigned to the pre-RT PSA ≥0.5 (high-P) arm, and 193 patients were assigned to the pre-RT PSA <0.5 (low-P) arm. There were no significant differences between the two arms after propensity score matching in terms of baseline characteristics and pathologic outcomes. High-P was associated with RT failure-free survival (P = 0.004), OS (P = 0.046), and CSS (P = 0.027). In a multi-variable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, seminal vesicle invasion, lymph node invasion, the absence of prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN), and high-P were identified as significant risk factors for RT failure.

Conclusion

High-P was significantly unfavorable with RT failure-free survival, OS, and CSS in patients who underwent RT after radical prostatectomy with concurrent HT. Seminal vesicle invasion, lymph node invasion, and the absence of PIN were identified as significant prognostic factors for RT failure.

Biochemical recurrence in patients with prostate cancer after primary definitive therapy: treatment based on risk stratification

BACKGROUND

Nearly one-third of patients with prostate cancer (PCa) experience biochemical recurrence (BCR) after primary definitive treatment. BCR increases the risk of distant metastasis and mortality in patients with prognostically unfavorable features. These patients are best managed with a tailored treatment strategy incorporating risk stratification using clinicopathological factors, next-generation imaging, and genomic testing.

OBJECTIVE

This narrative review examines the utility of risk stratification for the management of patients with BCR in the context of clinical trial data, referencing the latest recommendations by European and US medical societies.

METHODS

PubMed was searched for relevant studies published through May 21 2023 on treatment of patients with BCR after radical prostatectomy (RP) or external beam radiotherapy (EBRT).

RESULTS

European and US guidelines support the risk-stratified management of BCR. Post-RP, salvage EBRT (with or without androgen deprivation therapy [ADT]) is an accepted treatment option for patients with BCR. Post-EBRT, local salvage therapies (RP, cryotherapy, high-intensity focused ultrasound, stereotactic body radiotherapy, and low-dose-rate and high-dose-rate brachytherapy) have demonstrated comparable relapse-free survival rates but differing adverse event profiles, short and long term. Local salvage therapies should be used for local-only relapses while ADT should be considered for regional or distant relapses. In practice, patients often receive ADT, with varying guidance for intermittent ADT vs. continuous ADT, due to consideration of quality-of-life effects.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite a lack of consensus for BCR treatment among guideline associations and medical societies, risk stratification of patients is essential for personalized treatment approaches, as it allows for an informed selection of therapeutic strategies and estimation of adverse events. In lower-risk disease, observation is recommended while in higher-risk disease, after failed repeat local therapy, ADT and/or clinical trial enrollment may be appropriate. Results from ongoing clinical studies of patients with BCR should provide consensus for management.

Adding 6 months of androgen deprivation therapy to postoperative radiotherapy for prostate cancer: a comparison of short-course versus no androgen deprivation therapy in the RADICALS-HD randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Previous evidence indicates that adjuvant, short-course androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) improves metastasis-free survival when given with primary radiotherapy for intermediate-risk and high-risk localised prostate cancer. However, the value of ADT with postoperative radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy is unclear.

METHODS

RADICALS-HD was an international randomised controlled trial to test the efficacy of ADT used in combination with postoperative radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Key eligibility criteria were indication for radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer, prostate-specific antigen less than 5 ng/mL, absence of metastatic disease, and written consent. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to radiotherapy alone (no ADT) or radiotherapy with 6 months of ADT (short-course ADT), using monthly subcutaneous gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue injections, daily oral bicalutamide monotherapy 150 mg, or monthly subcutaneous degarelix. Randomisation was done centrally through minimisation with a random element, stratified by Gleason score, positive margins, radiotherapy timing, planned radiotherapy schedule, and planned type of ADT, in a computerised system. The allocated treatment was not masked. The primary outcome measure was metastasis-free survival, defined as distant metastasis arising from prostate cancer or death from any cause. Standard survival analysis methods were used, accounting for randomisation stratification factors. The trial had 80% power with two-sided α of 5% to detect an absolute increase in 10-year metastasis-free survival from 80% to 86% (hazard ratio [HR] 0·67). Analyses followed the intention-to-treat principle. The trial is registered with the ISRCTN registry, ISRCTN40814031, and ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00541047.

FINDINGS

Between Nov 22, 2007, and June 29, 2015, 1480 patients (median age 66 years [IQR 61-69]) were randomly assigned to receive no ADT (n=737) or short-course ADT (n=743) in addition to postoperative radiotherapy at 121 centres in Canada, Denmark, Ireland, and the UK. With a median follow-up of 9·0 years (IQR 7·1-10·1), metastasis-free survival events were reported for 268 participants (142 in the no ADT group and 126 in the short-course ADT group; HR 0·886 [95% CI 0·688-1·140], p=0·35). 10-year metastasis-free survival was 79·2% (95% CI 75·4-82·5) in the no ADT group and 80·4% (76·6-83·6) in the short-course ADT group. Toxicity of grade 3 or higher was reported for 121 (17%) of 737 participants in the no ADT group and 100 (14%) of 743 in the short-course ADT group (p=0·15), with no treatment-related deaths.

INTERPRETATION

Metastatic disease is uncommon following postoperative bed radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy. Adding 6 months of ADT to this radiotherapy did not improve metastasis-free survival compared with no ADT. These findings do not support the use of short-course ADT with postoperative radiotherapy in this patient population.

FUNDING

Cancer Research UK, UK Research and Innovation (formerly Medical Research Council), and Canadian Cancer Society.

Duration of androgen deprivation therapy with postoperative radiotherapy for prostate cancer: a comparison of long-course versus short-course androgen deprivation therapy in the RADICALS-HD randomised trial

BACKGROUND

Previous evidence supports androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) with primary radiotherapy as initial treatment for intermediate-risk and high-risk localised prostate cancer. However, the use and optimal duration of ADT with postoperative radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy remains uncertain.

METHODS

RADICALS-HD was a randomised controlled trial of ADT duration within the RADICALS protocol. Here, we report on the comparison of short-course versus long-course ADT. Key eligibility criteria were indication for radiotherapy after previous radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer, prostate-specific antigen less than 5 ng/mL, absence of metastatic disease, and written consent. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to add 6 months of ADT (short-course ADT) or 24 months of ADT (long-course ADT) to radiotherapy, using subcutaneous gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogue (monthly in the short-course ADT group and 3-monthly in the long-course ADT group), daily oral bicalutamide monotherapy 150 mg, or monthly subcutaneous degarelix. Randomisation was done centrally through minimisation with a random element, stratified by Gleason score, positive margins, radiotherapy timing, planned radiotherapy schedule, and planned type of ADT, in a computerised system. The allocated treatment was not masked. The primary outcome measure was metastasis-free survival, defined as metastasis arising from prostate cancer or death from any cause. The comparison had more than 80% power with two-sided α of 5% to detect an absolute increase in 10-year metastasis-free survival from 75% to 81% (hazard ratio [HR] 0·72). Standard time-to-event analyses were used. Analyses followed intention-to-treat principle. The trial is registered with the ISRCTN registry, ISRCTN40814031, and ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00541047.

FINDINGS

Between Jan 30, 2008, and July 7, 2015, 1523 patients (median age 65 years, IQR 60-69) were randomly assigned to receive short-course ADT (n=761) or long-course ADT (n=762) in addition to postoperative radiotherapy at 138 centres in Canada, Denmark, Ireland, and the UK. With a median follow-up of 8·9 years (7·0-10·0), 313 metastasis-free survival events were reported overall (174 in the short-course ADT group and 139 in the long-course ADT group; HR 0·773 [95% CI 0·612-0·975]; p=0·029). 10-year metastasis-free survival was 71·9% (95% CI 67·6-75·7) in the short-course ADT group and 78·1% (74·2-81·5) in the long-course ADT group. Toxicity of grade 3 or higher was reported for 105 (14%) of 753 participants in the short-course ADT group and 142 (19%) of 757 participants in the long-course ADT group (p=0·025), with no treatment-related deaths.

INTERPRETATION

Compared with adding 6 months of ADT, adding 24 months of ADT improved metastasis-free survival in people receiving postoperative radiotherapy. For individuals who can accept the additional duration of adverse effects, long-course ADT should be offered with postoperative radiotherapy.

FUNDING

Cancer Research UK, UK Research and Innovation (formerly Medical Research Council), and Canadian Cancer Society.

Biochemical Response of <0.1 ng/ml Predicts Therapy-free Survival of Prostate Cancer Patients following Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen-targeted Salvage Surgery

BACKGROUND

In a subset of patients with oligorecurrent prostate cancer (PCa), salvage surgery with prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) radioguided surgery (PSMA-RGS) seems to be of value.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether a lower level of postoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA; <0.1 ng/ml) is predictive of therapy-free survival (TFS) following salvage PSMA-RGS.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This cohort study evaluated patients with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy and oligorecurrent PCa on PSMA positron emission tomography treated with PSMA-RGS in three tertiary care centers (2014-2022).

INTERVENTION

PSMA-RGS.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Postsalvage surgery PSA response was categorized as <0.1, 0.1-<0.2, or >0.2 ng/ml. Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox regression models evaluated TFS according to PSA response.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

Among 553 patients assessed, 522 (94%) had metastatic soft tissue lesions removed during PSMA-RGS. At 2-16 wk after PSMA-RGS, 192, 62, and 190 patients achieved PSA levels of <0.1, 0.1-<0.2, and >0.2 ng/ml, respectively. At 2 yr of follow-up, TFS rate was 81.1% versus 56.1% versus 43.1% (p < 0.001) for patients with PSA <0.1 versus 0.1-<0.2 versus >0.2 ng/ml. In multivariable analyses, PSA levels of 0.1-0.2 ng/ml (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.9, confidence interval [CI]: 1.1-3.1) and ≥0.2 ng/ml (HR: 3.2, CI: 2.2-4.6, p < 0.001) independently predicted the need for additional therapy after PSMA-RGS. The main limitation is the lack of a control group.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients after salvage PSMA-RGS, a lower biochemical response (PSA <0.1 ng/ml) seems to predict longer TFS. This insight may help in counseling patients postoperatively as well as guiding the timely selection of additional therapy.

PATIENT SUMMARY

We studied what happened to prostate cancer patients in three European centers who had salvage surgery using a special method called prostate-specific membrane antigen-targeted radioguidance. We found that patients who had low prostate-specific antigen levels soon after surgery were less likely to need further treatment for a longer time.

Noninferiority of Hypofractionated vs Conventional Postprostatectomy Radiotherapy for Genitourinary and Gastrointestinal Symptoms: The NRG-GU003 Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

No prior trial has compared hypofractionated postprostatectomy radiotherapy (HYPORT) to conventionally fractionated postprostatectomy (COPORT) in patients primarily treated with prostatectomy.

Objective

To determine if HYPORT is noninferior to COPORT for patient-reported genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms at 2 years.

Design, Setting, and Participants

In this phase 3 randomized clinical trial, patients with a detectable prostate-specific antigen (PSA; ≥0.1 ng/mL) postprostatectomy with pT2/3pNX/0 disease or an undetectable PSA (<0.1 ng/mL) with either pT3 disease or pT2 disease with a positive surgical margin were recruited from 93 academic, community-based, and tertiary medical sites in the US and Canada. Between June 2017 and July 2018, a total of 296 patients were randomized. Data were analyzed in December 2020, with additional analyses occurring after as needed.

Intervention

Patients were randomized to receive 62.5 Gy in 25 fractions (HYPORT) or 66.6 Gy in 37 fractions (COPORT).

Main Outcomes and Measures

The coprimary end points were the 2-year change in score from baseline for the bowel and urinary domains of the Expanded Prostate Cancer Composite Index questionnaire. Secondary objectives were to compare between arms freedom from biochemical failure, time to progression, local failure, regional failure, salvage therapy, distant metastasis, prostate cancer-specific survival, overall survival, and adverse events.

Results

Of the 296 patients randomized (median [range] age, 65 [44-81] years; 100% male), 144 received HYPORT and 152 received COPORT. At the end of RT, the mean GU change scores among those in the HYPORT and COPORT arms were neither clinically significant nor different in statistical significance and remained so at 6 and 12 months. The mean (SD) GI change scores for HYPORT and COPORT were both clinically significant and different in statistical significance at the end of RT (-15.52 [18.43] and -7.06 [12.78], respectively; P < .001). However, the clinically and statistically significant differences in HYPORT and COPORT mean GI change scores were resolved at 6 and 12 months. The 24-month differences in mean GU and GI change scores for HYPORT were noninferior to COPORT using noninferiority margins of -5 and -6, respectively, rejecting the null hypothesis of inferiority (mean [SD] GU score: HYPORT, -5.01 [15.10] and COPORT, -4.07 [14.67]; P = .005; mean [SD] GI score: HYPORT, -4.17 [10.97] and COPORT, -1.41 [8.32]; P = .02). With a median follow-up for censored patients of 2.1 years, there was no difference between HYPORT vs COPORT for biochemical failure, defined as a PSA of 0.4 ng/mL or higher and rising (2-year rate, 12% vs 8%; P = .28).

Conclusions and Relevance

In this randomized clinical trial, HYPORT was associated with greater patient-reported GI toxic effects compared with COPORT at the completion of RT, but both groups recovered to baseline levels within 6 months. At 2 years, HYPORT was noninferior to COPORT in terms of patient-reported GU or GI toxic effects. HYPORT is a new acceptable practice standard for patients receiving postprostatectomy radiotherapy.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03274687.