1
|
Jones LR, Zwart MJW, de Graaf N, Wei K, Qu L, Jiabin J, Ningzhen F, Wang SE, Kim H, Kauffmann EF, de Wilde RF, Molenaar IQ, Chao YJ, Moraldi L, Saint-Marc O, Nickel F, Peng CM, Kang CM, Machado M, Luyer MDP, Lips DJ, Bonsing BA, Hackert T, Shan YS, Groot Koerkamp B, Shyr YM, Shen B, Boggi U, Liu R, Jang JY, Besselink MG, Abu Hilal M. Learning curve stratified outcomes after robotic pancreatoduodenectomy: International multicenter experience. Surgery 2024:S0039-6060(24)00375-1. [PMID: 39164152 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2024.05.044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2023] [Revised: 01/30/2024] [Accepted: 05/21/2024] [Indexed: 08/22/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Robotic pancreatoduodenectomy is increasingly being implemented worldwide, with good results reported from individual expert centers. However, it is unclear to what extent outcomes will continue to improve during the learning curve, as large international studies are lacking. METHODS An international retrospective multicenter case series, including consecutive patients after robotic pancreatoduodenectomy from 18 centers in 8 countries in Europe, Asia, and South America until December 31, 2019, was conducted. A cumulative sum analysis was performed to determine the inflection points for the feasibility (operative time and blood loss) and proficiency (postoperative pancreatic fistula grade B/C and major morbidity) learning curves. Outcomes were compared in 3 groups on the basis of the learning curve inflection points. RESULTS Overall, 2,186 patients after robotic pancreatoduodenectomy were included. The feasibility learning curve was reached after 30-45 robotic pancreatoduodenectomy procedures and the proficiency learning curve after 90 robotic pancreatoduodenectomy procedures. These inflection points created 3 phases, which were associated with major morbidity (24.7%, 23.4%, and 12.3%, P < .001) but not 30-day mortality (2.1%, 2.0%, and 1.5%, P = .670). Other outcomes mostly continued to improve, including median operative time 432, 390, and 300 minutes (P < .0001), conversion 6.0%, 4.7%, and 2.7% (P = .002), bile leakage 7.2%, 4.1%, and 2.4% (P < .001), postpancreatectomy hemorrhage 6.5%, 6.1%, and 1.8% (n = 21) but not R0 resection (pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma only) 78.5%, 73.9%, and 82.8% (P = .35), and 90-day mortality rate 3.1%, 3.5%, and 2.1% (P = .191). Centers performing >20 robotic pancreatoduodenectomies annually had lower rates of conversion, reoperation, and shorter median operative time as compared with centers performing 10-20 robotic pancreatoduodenectomies annually. CONCLUSION This international multicenter study demonstrates that most outcomes of robotic pancreatoduodenectomy continued to improve during 3 learning curve phases without a negative effect on 90-day mortality. Randomized studies are needed in high-volume centers that have surpassed the first learning curves, to compare these outcomes with the open approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leia R Jones
- Department of General Surgery, Istituto Ospedaliero Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy; Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Maurice J W Zwart
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Nine de Graaf
- Department of General Surgery, Istituto Ospedaliero Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy; Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Kongyuan Wei
- Department of Surgery, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Liu Qu
- Department of Surgery, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Jin Jiabin
- Department of Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, China
| | - Fu Ningzhen
- Department of Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, China
| | - Shin-E Wang
- Department of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan
| | - Hongbeom Kim
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, South Korea
| | - Emanuele F Kauffmann
- Division of General and Transplant Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy
| | | | - I Quintus Molenaar
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Ying Jui Chao
- Department of Surgery, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - Luca Moraldi
- Department of Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | | | - Felix Nickel
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Cheng-Ming Peng
- Department of Surgery, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Chang Moo Kang
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University Severance Hospital, Sinchon-dong, South Korea
| | - Marcel Machado
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Misha D P Luyer
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Daan J Lips
- Department of Surgery, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
| | - Bert A Bonsing
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands
| | - Thilo Hackert
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Yan-Shen Shan
- Department of Surgery, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, Tainan, Taiwan
| | | | - Yi-Ming Shyr
- Department of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan
| | - Baiyong Shen
- Department of Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, China
| | - Ugo Boggi
- Division of General and Transplant Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy
| | - Rong Liu
- Department of Surgery, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Jin-Young Jang
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, South Korea
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Mohammad Abu Hilal
- Department of General Surgery, Istituto Ospedaliero Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy; Department of Surgery, University Hospital Southampton NHS, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ju JW, Jang HS, Lee M, Lee HJ, Kwon W, Jang JY. Early postoperative fever as a predictor of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a single-center retrospective observational study. BMC Surg 2024; 24:229. [PMID: 39134979 PMCID: PMC11318233 DOI: 10.1186/s12893-024-02521-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2024] [Accepted: 07/30/2024] [Indexed: 08/15/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The connection between early postoperative fever and clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) after pancreaticoduodenectomy remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate this association and assess the predictive value of early postoperative fever for CR-POPF. METHODS This retrospective observational study included adult patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy at a tertiary teaching hospital between 2007 and 2019. Patients were categorized into those with early postoperative fever (≥ 38 °C in the first 48 h after surgery) and those without early postoperative fever groups. Weighted logistic regression analysis using stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting (sIPTW) and multivariable logistic analysis were performed. The c-statistics of the receiver operating characteristic curves were calculated to evaluate the impact on the predictive power of adding early postoperative fever to previously identified predictors of CR-POPF. RESULTS Of the 1997 patients analyzed, 909 (45.1%) developed early postoperative fever. The overall incidence of CR-POPF among all the patients was 14.3%, with an incidence of 19.5% in the early postoperative fever group and 9.9% in the group without early postoperative fever. Early postoperative fever was significantly associated with a higher risk of CR-POPF after sIPTW (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.73; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.34-2.22; P < 0.001) and multivariable logistic regression analysis (adjusted OR, 1.88; 95% CI, 1.42-2.49; P < 0.001). The c-statistics for the models with and without early postoperative fever were 0.76 (95% CI, 0.73-0.79) and 0.75 (95% CI, 0.72-0.78), respectively, showing a significant difference between the two (difference, 0.02; 95% CI, 0.00-0.03; DeLong's test, P = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS Early postoperative fever is a significant but not highly discriminative predictor of CR-POPF after pancreaticoduodenectomy. However, its widespread occurrence limits its applicability as a predictive marker.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jae-Woo Ju
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Hwan Suk Jang
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea
| | - Mirang Lee
- Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Ho-Jin Lee
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea.
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| | - Wooil Kwon
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jin-Young Jang
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Stoop TF, Augustinus S, Björnsson B, Tingstedt B, Andersson B, Wolfgang CL, Werner J, Johansen K, Stommel MWJ, Katz MHG, Ghadimi M, House MG, Ghorbani P, Molenaar IQ, de Wilde RF, Mieog JSD, Keck T, Wellner UF, Uhl W, Besselink MG, Pitt HA, Del Chiaro M. Surgical Outcome After Distal Pancreatectomy With and Without Portomesenteric Venous Resection in Patients with Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: A Transatlantic Evaluation of Patients in North America, Germany, Sweden, and The Netherlands (GAPASURG). Ann Surg Oncol 2024:10.1245/s10434-024-15932-3. [PMID: 39120839 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-15932-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2024] [Accepted: 07/16/2024] [Indexed: 08/10/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pancreatic adenocarcinoma located in the pancreatic body might require a portomesenteric venous resection (PVR), but data regarding surgical risks after distal pancreatectomy (DP) with PVR are sparse. Insight into additional surgical risks of DP-PVR could support preoperative counseling and intraoperative decision making. This study aimed to provide insight into the surgical outcome of DP-PVR, including its potential risk elevation over standard DP. METHODS We conducted a retrospective, multicenter study including all patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma who underwent DP ± PVR (2018-2020), registered in four audits for pancreatic surgery from North America, Germany, Sweden, and The Netherlands. Patients who underwent concomitant arterial and/or multivisceral resection(s) were excluded. Predictors for in-hospital/30-day major morbidity and mortality were investigated by logistic regression, correcting for each audit. RESULTS Overall, 2924 patients after DP were included, of whom 241 patients (8.2%) underwent DP-PVR. Rates of major morbidity (24% vs. 18%; p = 0.024) and post-pancreatectomy hemorrhage grade B/C (10% vs. 3%; p = 0.041) were higher after DP-PVR compared with standard DP. Mortality after DP-PVR and standard DP did not differ significantly (2% vs. 1%; p = 0.542). Predictors for major morbidity were PVR (odds ratio [OR] 1.500, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.086-2.071) and conversion from minimally invasive to open surgery (OR 1.420, 95% CI 1.032-1.970). Predictors for mortality were higher age (OR 1.087, 95% CI 1.045-1.132), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR 4.167, 95% CI 1.852-9.374), and conversion from minimally invasive to open surgery (OR 2.919, 95% CI 1.197-7.118), whereas concomitant PVR was not associated with mortality. CONCLUSIONS PVR during DP for pancreatic adenocarcinoma in the pancreatic body is associated with increased morbidity, but can be performed safely in terms of mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas F Stoop
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.
- Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet at Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - Simone Augustinus
- Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bergthor Björnsson
- Department of Surgery in Linköping and Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Bobby Tingstedt
- Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Bodil Andersson
- Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Christopher L Wolfgang
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, New York University Medical Center, New York City, NY, USA
| | - Jens Werner
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Karin Johansen
- Department of Surgery in Linköping and Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Martijn W J Stommel
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Matthew H G Katz
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Michael Ghadimi
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Michael G House
- Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Poya Ghorbani
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet at Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - I Quintus Molenaar
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, University Medical Center Utrecht/St. Antonius Ziekenhuis Nieuwegein, Utrecht & Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Roeland F de Wilde
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J Sven D Mieog
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Tobias Keck
- DGAV StuDoQ|Pancreas and Clinic of Surgery, UKSH Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Ulrich F Wellner
- DGAV StuDoQ|Pancreas and Clinic of Surgery, UKSH Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Waldemar Uhl
- Department of Surgery, St. Josef Hospital, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Henry A Pitt
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
| | - Marco Del Chiaro
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hickner BT, Portuondo JI, Mehl SC, Shah SR, Raval MV, Massarweh NN. Complication Timing, Failure to Rescue, and Readmission After Inpatient Pediatric Surgery. J Surg Res 2024; 302:263-273. [PMID: 39116825 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2024.07.052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2023] [Revised: 05/15/2024] [Accepted: 07/10/2024] [Indexed: 08/10/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Complications are associated with postoperative mortality and readmission. However, the timing of complications relative to discharge and the extent to which timing is associated with failure to rescue (FTR) and readmission after pediatric surgery is unknown. Our goal was to describe the timing of complications relative to discharge after inpatient pediatric surgery and determine the association between complication timing, FTR, and unplanned readmission. MATERIALS AND METHODS National cohort study of patients within the NSQIP-Pediatric database who underwent inpatient surgery (2012-2019). Complications were categorized based on when they occurred relative to discharge: only pre-discharge, only post-discharge, both. The association between perioperative outcomes and the timing of postoperative complications was evaluated with multivariable hierarchical regression. RESULTS Among 378,551 patients, 30,213 (8.0%) had at least one postoperative complication. Relative to patients with pre-discharge complications, post-discharge complications were associated with significantly decreased odds of FTR (odds ratio 0.21, 95% confidence interval [0.15-0.28]) and significantly increased odds of readmission (odds ratio 19.37 [17.93-20.92]). Odds of FTR and readmission in patients with complications occurring both before and after discharge were similar to that of patients with only post-discharge complications. CONCLUSIONS FTR and readmission are associated with complications occurring at different times relative to discharge (FTR primarily pre-discharge; readmission primarily post-discharge). This suggests a 'one size fits all' approach to surgical quality improvement may not be effective and different approaches are needed to address different quality indicators.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian T Hickner
- Michael E DeBakey Department of Surgery at Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
| | - Jorge I Portuondo
- Michael E DeBakey Department of Surgery at Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas; Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness, and Safety, Michael E DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Steven C Mehl
- Michael E DeBakey Department of Surgery at Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas; Texas Children's Hospital Department of Surgery, Houston, Texas
| | | | - Mehul V Raval
- Surgical Outcomes and Quality Improvement Center, Center for Healthcare Studies, Institute for Public Health and Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois; Division of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Nader N Massarweh
- Surgical and Perioperative Care, Atlanta VA Health Care System, Decatur, Georgia; Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia; Department of Surgery, Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Herzberg J, Strate T, Acs M, Piso P, Guraya SY, Honarpisheh H. Reduction of Postoperative Complications in Pancreatic Surgery by Standardizing Perioperative Management: An Observational Cohort Study. Visc Med 2024; 40:184-193. [PMID: 39157727 PMCID: PMC11326765 DOI: 10.1159/000539688] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2024] [Accepted: 06/04/2024] [Indexed: 08/20/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Resection for pancreatic malignancy remains the gold standard for cure. Postoperative morbidity continues to be high even after technical innovations. This study evaluates the effectiveness of a standard perioperative pancreatic oncological surgery step-by-step protocol in reducing organ-specific complications. Methods In this observational cohort study, we analyzed the outcomes of oncologic pancreatic head resections from 2015 to 2022 after the implementation of a standard perioperative fail-safe protocol and compared these data with a historical cohort (2013-2014). In the study group, all patients were treated with preoperative limited mechanical bowel preparation, administration of a somatostatin analog, and a "pancreatic duct tube" in pancreatoduodenectomy. The primary outcome measure was the occurrence of postoperative organ-specific complications. Results A total of 151 patients were included in this study. The rate of postoperative pancreatic fistula (grade B and C) in the fail-safe group was 4.2%. Other organ-specific complications as postoperative hemorrhage (2.5%) and delayed gastric emptying (9.2%) also occurred less frequent than before implementation of the fail-safe protocol. Conclusion The use of this standardized fail-safe protocol for oncologic pancreatoduodenectomy can lead to a low postoperative morbidity with improved surgical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonas Herzberg
- Department of Surgery, Krankenhaus Reinbek St. Adolf-Stift, Reinbek, Germany
| | - Tim Strate
- Department of Surgery, Krankenhaus Reinbek St. Adolf-Stift, Reinbek, Germany
| | - Miklos Acs
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Hospital Barmherzige Brüder, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Pompiliu Piso
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Hospital Barmherzige Brüder, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Salman Yousuf Guraya
- Clinical Sciences Department, College of Medicine, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates
| | - Human Honarpisheh
- Department of Surgery, Krankenhaus Reinbek St. Adolf-Stift, Reinbek, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Henry AC, Salaheddine Y, Holster JJ, Daamen LA, Bruno MJ, Derksen WJM, van Driel LMJW, van Eijck CH, van Lienden KP, Molenaar IQ, van Santvoort HC, Vleggaar FP, Groot Koerkamp B, Verdonk RC. Late cholangitis after pancreatoduodenectomy: A common complication with or without anatomical biliary obstruction. Surgery 2024:S0039-6060(24)00467-7. [PMID: 39054185 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2024.06.044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2023] [Revised: 06/10/2024] [Accepted: 06/30/2024] [Indexed: 07/27/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Postoperative cholangitis is a common complication after pancreatoduodenectomy that can occur with or without anatomical biliary obstruction. This study aimed to investigate the incidence, diagnosis, treatment, and risk factors of cholangitis after pancreatoduodenectomy. METHODS We performed a retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy in 2 Dutch tertiary pancreatic centers (2010-2019). Primary outcome was postoperative cholangitis, defined as systemic inflammation with abnormal liver tests without another focus of infection, at least 1 month after resection. Diagnostic and therapeutic strategies were evaluated. Two types of postoperative cholangitis were distinguished; obstructive cholangitis (benign stenosis of the hepaticojejunostomy) and nonobstructive cholangitis. Potential risk factors were identified using logistic regression analysis. RESULTS Postoperative cholangitis occurred in 93 of 900 patients (10.3%). Median time to first episode of cholangitis was 8 months (interquartile range 4-16) after pancreatoduodenectomy. Multiple episodes of cholangitis occurred in 44 patients (47.3%) and readmission was necessary in 83 patients (89.2%). No cholangitis-related mortality was observed. Obstructive cholangitis was seen in 37 patients (39.8%) and nonobstructive cholangitis in 56 patients (60.2%). Surgery was performed for cholangitis in 7 patients (7.5%) and consisted of revision of the hepaticojejunostomy or elongation of the biliary limb. Postoperative biliary leakage (odds ratio 2.56; 95% confidence interval 1.42-4.62; P = .0018) was independently associated with postoperative cholangitis. CONCLUSION Postoperative cholangitis unrelated to cancer recurrence was seen in 10% of patients after pancreatoduodenectomy. Nonobstructive cholangitis was more common than obstructive cholangitis. Postoperative biliary leakage was an independent risk factor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Claire Henry
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Youcef Salaheddine
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Jessica J Holster
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lois A Daamen
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Marco J Bruno
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Wouter J M Derksen
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Lydi M J W van Driel
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Casper H van Eijck
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Krijn P van Lienden
- Department of Radiology, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - I Quintus Molenaar
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Hjalmar C van Santvoort
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Frank P Vleggaar
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Bas Groot Koerkamp
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Robert C Verdonk
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bloomfield GC, Shoucair S, Nigam A, Park BU, Fishbein TM, Radkani P, Winslow ER. The utility of axial imaging among selected patients in the early postoperative period after pancreatectomy. Surgery 2024:S0039-6060(24)00475-6. [PMID: 39048330 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2024.06.051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2024] [Revised: 05/24/2024] [Accepted: 06/30/2024] [Indexed: 07/27/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Postoperative computed tomography imaging has been shown to play an important role in avoiding failure-to-rescue. We sought to examine the impact of the timing of such imaging studies on outcomes after pancreatectomy. METHODS Patients who underwent pancreatic resection at our institution from 2017 to 2022 were reviewed retrospectively to identify those undergoing computed tomography for any indication before discharge. Patients were subdivided by the postoperative day that the first computed tomography scan was obtained: immediate (postoperative day <3), early (postoperative day 3-7), and delayed (postoperative day >7). RESULTS Of 370 patients, 110 (30%) had a computed tomography during the initial surgical stay. The 3 timing groups were similar in age, comorbidities, pathology, operative time, and number of scans. When comparing the early with the delayed group, we found that antibiotic usage, percutaneous drainage, and overall invasive interventions during surgical stay were all similar. However, those patients who were scanned in the early period had significantly shorter length of stay (17.05 vs 22.82, P = .0008) and fewer composite days hospitalized (20.1 vs 24.9, P = .01) relative to the delayed group. Importantly, early computed tomography imaging was found to be the only independent predictor of a postoperative length of stay ≤15 days on multivariate analysis. Surgical stay mortality rates were significantly lower in the early compared with delayed group (0% vs 11%, P = .02). A change in treatment was observed in 59% after computed tomography, with 15% undergoing invasive interventions, 27% treated medically, and 16% with expectant management. CONCLUSION In our cohort, patients imaged early after pancreatectomy experienced shorter hospital stays and lower inpatient mortality relative to those scanned after the first postoperative week.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Aradhya Nigam
- Department of Surgery, Medstar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC
| | - Byoung Uk Park
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | | | - Emily R Winslow
- University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Johansen KU, Augustinus S, Wellner UF, Andersson B, Beane JD, Björnsson B, Busch OR, Davis CH, Ghadimi M, Gleeson EM, de Graaf N, Koerkamp BG, Pitt HA, van Santvoort HC, Tingstedt B, Uhl W, Werner J, Williamsson C, Besselink MG, Keck T. International differences in the selection and outcome of minimally invasive and open distal pancreatectomy: A transatlantic analysis. Surgery 2024:S0039-6060(24)00451-3. [PMID: 39019733 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2024.06.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2023] [Revised: 05/02/2024] [Accepted: 06/13/2024] [Indexed: 07/19/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The efficacy and safety of minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy have been confirmed by randomized trials, but current patient selection and outcome of minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy in large international cohorts is unknown. This study aimed to compare the use and outcome of minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy in North America, the Netherlands, Germany, and Sweden. METHODS All patients in the 4 Global Audits on Pancreatic Surgery Group (GAPASURG) registries who underwent minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy or open distal pancreatectomy during 2014-2020 were included. RESULTS Overall, 20,158 distal pancreatectomies were included, of which 7,316 (36%) were minimally invasive distal pancreatectomies. Use of minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy varied from 29% to 54% among registries, of which 13% to 35% were performed robotically. Both the use of minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy and robotic surgery were the highest in the Netherlands. Patients undergoing minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy tended to have a younger age (Germany and Sweden), female sex (North America, Germany), higher body mass index (North America, the Netherlands, Germany), lower comorbidity classification (North America, Germany, Sweden), lower performance status (Germany), and lower rate of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (all). The minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy group had fewer vascular resections (all) and lower rates of severe complications and mortality (North America, Germany). In the multivariable regression analysis, country was associated with severe complications but not with 30-day mortality. Minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy was associated with a lower risk of 30-day mortality compared with open distal pancreatectomy (odds ratio 1.633, 95% CI 1.159-2.300, P = .005). CONCLUSIONS Considerable disparities were seen in the use of minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy among 4 transatlantic registries of pancreatic surgery. Overall, minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy was associated with decreased mortality as compared with open distal pancreatectomy. Differences in patient selection among countries could imply that countries are in different stages of the learning curve.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karin U Johansen
- Department of Surgery in Linköping and Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Sweden
| | - Simone Augustinus
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ulrich F Wellner
- DGAV StuDoQ|Pancreas Registry and Clinic of Surgery, UKSH Campus Lübeck, Germany
| | - Bodil Andersson
- Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Surgery, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Joal D Beane
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, USA
| | - Bergthor Björnsson
- Department of Surgery in Linköping and Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Sweden
| | - Olivier R Busch
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Michael Ghadimi
- Department of General, Visceral, and Paediatric Surgery, University Medical Centre Göttingen, Germany
| | | | - Nine de Graaf
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Bas Groot Koerkamp
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Henry A Pitt
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, USA
| | - Hjalmar C van Santvoort
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, University Medical Center Utrecht and St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | - Bobby Tingstedt
- Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Surgery, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Waldemar Uhl
- Klinik für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie, St. Josef-Hospital Bochum, Klinik der Ruhr-Universität, Bochum
| | - Jens Werner
- Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, München
| | - Caroline Williamsson
- Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Surgery, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Tobias Keck
- DGAV StuDoQ|Pancreas Registry and Clinic of Surgery, UKSH Campus Lübeck, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Armstrong M, Wei AC. Failure to scan? Standardization of post pancreatectomy care to reduce rates of failure to rescue. Am J Surg 2024:115839. [PMID: 38991912 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.115839] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2024] [Revised: 07/06/2024] [Accepted: 07/08/2024] [Indexed: 07/13/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Misha Armstrong
- Department of Surgery, New York-Presbyterian, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York City, NY, USA
| | - Alice C Wei
- Department of Surgery, New York-Presbyterian, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York City, NY, USA; Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Levenson G, Coutrot M, Voron T, Gronnier C, Cattan P, Hobeika C, D'Journo XB, Bergeat D, Glehen O, Mathonnet M, Piessen G, Goéré D. Root cause analysis of mortality after esophagectomy for cancer: a multicenter cohort study from the FREGAT database. Surgery 2024; 176:82-92. [PMID: 38641545 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2024.03.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2023] [Revised: 01/17/2024] [Accepted: 03/10/2024] [Indexed: 04/21/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Esophagectomy is associated with significant mortality. A better understanding of the causes leading to death may help to reduce mortality. A root cause analysis of mortality after esophagectomy was performed. METHODS Root cause analysis was retrospectively applied by an independent expert panel of 4 upper gastrointestinal surgeons and 1 anesthesiologist-intensivist to patients included in the French national multicenter prospective cohort FREGAT between August 2014 and September 2019 who underwent an esophagectomy for cancer and died within 90 days of surgery. A cause-and-effect diagram was used to determine the root causes related to death. Death was classified as potentially preventable or non-preventable. RESULTS Among the 1,040 patients included in the FREGAT cohort, 70 (6.7%) patients (male: 81%, median age 68 [62-72] years) from 17 centers were included. Death was potentially preventable in 37 patients (53%). Root causes independently associated with preventable death were inappropriate indication (odds ratio 35.16 [2.50-494.39]; P = .008), patient characteristics (odds ratio 5.15 [1.19-22.35]; P = .029), unexpected intraoperative findings (odds ratio 18.99 [1.07-335.55]; P = .045), and delay in diagnosis of a complication (odds ratio 98.10 [6.24-1,541.04]; P = .001). Delay in treatment of a complication was found only in preventable deaths (28 [76%] vs 0; P < .001). National guidelines were less frequently followed (16 [43%] vs 22 [67%]; P = .050) in preventable deaths. The only independent risk factor of preventable death was center volume <26 esophagectomies per year (odds ratio 4.71 [1.55-14.33]; P = .006). CONCLUSIONS More than one-half of deaths after esophagectomy were potentially preventable. Better patient selection, early diagnosis, and adequate management of complications through centralization could reduce mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guillaume Levenson
- Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Service de Chirurgie Viscérale, Cancérologique et Endocrinienne, Paris, France; Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.
| | - Maxime Coutrot
- Université Paris Cité, Paris, France; Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Département d'anesthésie réanimation et centre de traitement des brûlés, Paris, France
| | - Thibault Voron
- Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Service de Chirurgie Générale et Digestive, Paris, France; Sorbonne Université, Paris, France. https://www.twitter.com/ThibaultVORON
| | - Caroline Gronnier
- Unité de Chirurgie Œsogastrique et Endocrinienne, Service de Chirurgie Digestive et Endocrinienne, Centre Médico-Chirurgical Magellan, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Bordeaux, Pessac, France; Faculté de Médecine, Université Bordeaux-Segalen, Bordeaux, France
| | - Pierre Cattan
- Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Service de Chirurgie Viscérale, Cancérologique et Endocrinienne, Paris, France; Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Christian Hobeika
- Department of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Beaujon Hospital, APHP, Clichy, Paris-Cité University, Paris, France; UMR Inserm 1275 CAP Paris-Tech, Lariboisière Hospital, Paris, Paris-Cité University, Paris, France
| | - Xavier Benoît D'Journo
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Aix-Marseille University, North Hospital, Marseille, France
| | - Damien Bergeat
- Service de Chirurgie Hépatobiliaire et Digestive, Hôpital Pontchaillou, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU Rennes), Université de Rennes 1 Centre, Rennes, France
| | - Olivier Glehen
- Department of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Lyon-Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pierre-Bénite, France; EMR 3738 Lyon Sud Charles Mérieux Faculty, Claude Bernard University Lyon 1, Oullins, France
| | - Muriel Mathonnet
- Service de Chirurgie Digestive, Endocrinienne et Générale, CHU de Limoges, Avenue Martin Luther King, Limoges Cedex, France
| | - Guillaume Piessen
- Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire Lille, Service de Chirurgie Digestive et Oncologique, Lille, France; University Lille, CNRS, Inserm, CHU Lille, UMR9020-U1277 - CANTHER - Cancer, Heterogeneity Plasticity and Resistance to Therapies, Lille, France. https://www.twitter.com/PiessenG
| | - Diane Goéré
- Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Service de Chirurgie Viscérale, Cancérologique et Endocrinienne, Paris, France; Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Balzano G, Reni M, Di Bartolomeo M, Scorsetti M, Caraceni A, Rivizzigno P, Amorosi A, Scardoni A, Abu Hilal M, Ferrari G, Labianca R, Venturini M, Doglioni C, Riva L, Caccialanza R, Carrara S. Translating knowledge into policy: Organizational model and minimum requirements for the implementation of a regional pancreas unit network. Dig Liver Dis 2024:S1590-8658(24)00776-X. [PMID: 38851973 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2024.05.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2024] [Revised: 05/14/2024] [Accepted: 05/16/2024] [Indexed: 06/10/2024]
Abstract
Pancreatic and periampullary cancers pose significant challenges in oncological care due to their complexity and diagnostic difficulties. Global experiences underscore the crucial role of multidisciplinary collaboration and centralized care in improving patient outcomes in this context. Recognizing these challenges, Lombardy, Italy's most populous region, embarked on establishing pancreas units across its territory to enhance clinical outcomes and organizational efficiency. This initiative, driven by a multistakeholder approach involving the Lombardy Welfare Directorate, clinicians, and a patient association, emphasizes the centralization of complex care in high-volume hospitals, adopting a hub-and-spoke model and a multidisciplinary approach. This article outlines the process and criteria set forth for pancreas unit implementation, aiming to provide a structured framework for enhancing pancreatic cancer care. Central to this initiative is the establishment of structured criteria and minimal requirements, not only for surgery but also for other essential components of care, ensuring a comprehensive approach to pancreatic cancer management. The Lombardy model offers a structured framework for enhancing pancreatic cancer care, with potential applicability to other regions and countries seeking to improve their cancer care infrastructure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gianpaolo Balzano
- Division of Pancreatic Surgery, Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy.
| | - Michele Reni
- Department of Medical Oncology, Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute University, Via Olgettina 60, 20123, Milan, Italy
| | - Maria Di Bartolomeo
- Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Via Giacomo Venezian, 1, 20133, Milan, Italy
| | - Marta Scorsetti
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, Rozzano 20089, Italy; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, Pieve Emanuele, 20072 Milan, Italy
| | - Augusto Caraceni
- Dipartimento di Scienze Cliniche e di Comunità, Università degli Studi di Milano Via della Commenda 19 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Piero Rivizzigno
- Codice Viola, Pancreatic Cancer Advocacy Group, 20855, Lesmo (MB), Italy
| | - Alessandro Amorosi
- Welfare General Directorate, Regione Lombardia; Palazzo Lombardia, Piazza Città di Lombardia, 1, 20124 Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandro Scardoni
- Welfare General Directorate, Regione Lombardia; Palazzo Lombardia, Piazza Città di Lombardia, 1, 20124 Milan, Italy
| | - Mohammad Abu Hilal
- Department of Surgery, Fondazione Poliambulanza, Via Bissolati 57, Brescia 25124, Italy
| | - Giovanni Ferrari
- Division of Minimally-Invasive Oncologic Surgery ASST GOM Niguarda Nigurda Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Massimo Venturini
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Circolo Hospital, ASST Sette Laghi, 21100, Varese, Italy; Department of Medicine and Technological Innovation (DIMIT), Insubria University, Varese, Italy
| | - Claudio Doglioni
- Department of Anatomic Pathology, University Vita-Salute San Raffaele, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Luca Riva
- Frailty Department, Local Network of Palliative Care, ASST, Lecco, Italy
| | - Riccardo Caccialanza
- Clinical Nutrition and Dietetics Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinco San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - Silvia Carrara
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital - Endoscopic Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, Via Manzoni 56, 20089 Rozzano (Milan), Italy
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Maino C, Cereda M, Franco PN, Boraschi P, Cannella R, Gianotti LV, Zamboni G, Vernuccio F, Ippolito D. Cross-sectional imaging after pancreatic surgery: The dialogue between the radiologist and the surgeon. Eur J Radiol Open 2024; 12:100544. [PMID: 38304573 PMCID: PMC10831502 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejro.2023.100544] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2023] [Revised: 12/29/2023] [Accepted: 12/29/2023] [Indexed: 02/03/2024] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic surgery is nowadays considered one of the most complex surgical approaches and not unscathed from complications. After the surgical procedure, cross-sectional imaging is considered the non-invasive reference standard to detect early and late compilations, and consequently to address patients to the best management possible. Contras-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) should be considered the most important and useful imaging technique to evaluate the surgical site. Thanks to its speed, contrast, and spatial resolution, it can help reach the final diagnosis with high accuracy. On the other hand, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) should be considered as a second-line imaging approach, especially for the evaluation of biliary findings and late complications. In both cases, the radiologist should be aware of protocols and what to look at, to create a robust dialogue with the surgeon and outline a fitted treatment for each patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cesare Maino
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, 20900 Monza, MB, Italy
| | - Marco Cereda
- Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, 20900 Monza, MB, Italy
| | - Paolo Niccolò Franco
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, 20900 Monza, MB, Italy
| | - Piero Boraschi
- Radiology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, 56124 Pisa, Italy
| | - Roberto Cannella
- Department of Biomedicine, Neuroscience and Advanced Diagnostics (BiND), University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy
| | - Luca Vittorio Gianotti
- Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, 20900 Monza, MB, Italy
- School of Medicine, Università Milano-Bicocca, Piazza dell’Ateneo Nuovo, 1, 20100 Milano, Italy
| | - Giulia Zamboni
- Institute of Radiology, Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, University and Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Federica Vernuccio
- University Hospital of Padova, Institute of Radiology, 35128 Padova, Italy
| | - Davide Ippolito
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, 20900 Monza, MB, Italy
- School of Medicine, Università Milano-Bicocca, Piazza dell’Ateneo Nuovo, 1, 20100 Milano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Schouten TJ, Henry AC, Smits FJ, Daamen LA, Molenaar IQ, van Santvoort HC. Response to: Comment on "Risk Models for Developing Pancreatic Fistula After Pancreatoduodenectomy: Validation in a Nationwide Prospective Cohort". ANNALS OF SURGERY OPEN 2024; 5:e413. [PMID: 38911630 PMCID: PMC11191937 DOI: 10.1097/as9.0000000000000413] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2024] [Accepted: 03/11/2024] [Indexed: 06/25/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Thijs J. Schouten
- From the Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Anne Claire Henry
- From the Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Francina J. Smits
- From the Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Lois A. Daamen
- From the Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht, Netherlands
- Division of Imaging, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - I. Quintus Molenaar
- From the Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Hjalmar C. van Santvoort
- From the Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Boyev A, Azimuddin A, Prakash LR, Newhook TE, Maxwell JE, Bruno ML, Arvide EM, Dewhurst WL, Kim MP, Ikoma N, Lee JE, Snyder RA, Katz MHG, Tzeng CWD. Classification of Post-pancreatectomy Readmissions and Opportunities for Targeted Mitigation Strategies. Ann Surg 2024; 279:1046-1053. [PMID: 37791481 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000006112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/05/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Within a learning health system paradigm, this study sought to evaluate reasons for readmission to identify opportunities for improvement. BACKGROUND Post-pancreatectomy readmission rates have remained constant despite improved index hospitalization metrics. METHODS We performed a single-institution case-control study of consecutive patients with pancreatectomy (October 2016 to April 2022). Complications were prospectively graded in biweekly faculty and advanced practice provider meetings. We analyzed risk factors during index hospitalization and categorized indications for 90-day readmissions. RESULTS A total of 835 patients, median age 65 years and 51% (427/835) males, underwent 64% (534/835) pancreatoduodenectomies, 34% (280/835) distal pancreatectomies, and 3% (21/835) other resections. Twenty-four percent (204/835) of patients were readmitted. The primary indication for readmission was technical in 51% (105/204), infectious in 17% (35/204), and medical/metabolic in 31% (64/204) of patients. Procedures were required in 77% (81/105) and 60% (21/35) of technical and infectious readmissions, respectively, while 66% (42/64) of medical/metabolic readmissions were managed noninvasively. During the index hospitalization, benign pathology [odds ratio (OR): 1.8, P =0.049], biochemical pancreatic leak (OR: 2.3, P =0.001), bile/gastric/chyle leak (OR: 6.4, P =0.001), organ-space infection (OR: 3.4, P =0.007), undrained fluid on imaging (OR: 2.4, P =0.045), and increasing white blood cell count (OR: 1.7, P =0.045) were independently associated with odds of readmission. CONCLUSIONS Most readmissions following pancreatectomy were technical in origin. Patients with complications during the index hospitalization, increasing white blood cell count, or undrained fluid before discharge were at the highest risk for readmission. Predischarge risk stratification of readmission risk factors and augmentation of in-clinic resources may be strategies to reduce readmission rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Artem Boyev
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
de Graaff MR, Klaase JM, Dulk MD, Buis CI, Derksen WJM, Hagendoorn J, Leclercq WKG, Liem MSL, Hartgrink HH, Swijnenburg RJ, Vermaas M, Belt EJT, Bosscha K, Verhoef C, Olde Damink S, Kuhlmann K, Marsman HM, Ayez N, van Duijvendijk P, van den Boezem P, Manusama ER, Grünhagen DJ, Kok NFM. Outcomes of liver surgery: A decade of mandatory nationwide auditing in the Netherlands. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2024; 50:108264. [PMID: 38537366 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2024.108264] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2024] [Revised: 03/06/2024] [Accepted: 03/08/2024] [Indexed: 05/26/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In 2013, the nationwide Dutch Hepato Biliary Audit (DHBA) was initiated. The aim of this study was to evaluate changes in indications for and outcomes of liver surgery in the last decade. METHODS This nationwide study included all patients who underwent liver surgery for four indications, including colorectal liver metastases (CRLM), hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and intrahepatic- and perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA - pCCA) between 2014 and 2022. Trends in postoperative outcomes were evaluated separately for each indication using multilevel multivariable logistic regression analyses. RESULTS This study included 8057 procedures for CRLM, 838 for HCC, 290 for iCCA, and 300 for pCCA. Over time, these patients had higher risk profiles (more ASA-III patients and more comorbidities). Adjusted mortality decreased over time for CRLM, HCC and iCCA, respectively aOR 0.83, 95%CI 0.75-0.92, P < 0.001; aOR 0.86, 95%CI 0.75-0.99, P = 0.045; aOR 0.40, 95%CI 0.20-0.73, P < 0.001. Failure to rescue (FTR) also decreased for these groups, respectively aOR 0.84, 95%CI 0.76-0.93, P = 0.001; aOR 0.81, 95%CI 0.68-0.97, P = 0.024; aOR 0.29, 95%CI 0.08-0.84, P = 0.021). For iCCA severe complications (aOR 0.65 95%CI 0.43-0.99, P = 0.043) also decreased. No significant outcome differences were observed in pCCA. The number of centres performing liver resections decreased from 26 to 22 between 2014 and 2022, while median annual volumes did not change (40-49, P = 0.66). CONCLUSION Over time, postoperative mortality and FTR decreased after liver surgery, despite treating higher-risk patients. The DHBA continues its focus on providing feedback and benchmark results to further enhance outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle R de Graaff
- Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, Scientific Bureau, Leiden, the Netherlands; Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
| | - Joost M Klaase
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Marcel den Dulk
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands; NUTRIM-School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - C I Buis
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Wouter J M Derksen
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Surgery, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | - Jeroen Hagendoorn
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Surgery, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | | | - Mike S L Liem
- Department of Surgery, Medical Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
| | - Henk H Hartgrink
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Rutger-Jan Swijnenburg
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M Vermaas
- Department of Surgery, Ijsselland Hospital, Capelle aan de Ijssel, the Netherlands
| | - Eric J Th Belt
- Department of Surgery, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Koop Bosscha
- Department of Surgery, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands
| | - Cees Verhoef
- Department of Surgery, Ijsselland Hospital, Capelle aan de Ijssel, the Netherlands; Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Steven Olde Damink
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands; NUTRIM-School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Koert Kuhlmann
- Department of Surgery, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek - Dutch Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - H M Marsman
- Department of Surgery, OLVG, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ninos Ayez
- Department of Surgery, Amphia Medical Centre, Breda, the Netherlands
| | - Peter van Duijvendijk
- Department of Surgery, Isala, Zwolle, the Netherlands; Department of Surgery, Gelre Ziekenhuizen, Apeldoorn en Zutphen, the Netherlands
| | | | - Eric R Manusama
- Department of Surgery, Medical Centre Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, the Netherlands
| | - Dirk J Grünhagen
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Niels F M Kok
- Department of Surgery, OLVG, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Wismans LV, Suurmeijer JA, van Dongen JC, Bonsing BA, Van Santvoort HC, Wilmink JW, van Tienhoven G, de Hingh IH, Lips DJ, van der Harst E, de Meijer VE, Patijn GA, Bosscha K, Stommel MW, Festen S, den Dulk M, Nuyttens JJ, Intven MPW, de Vos-Geelen J, Molenaar IQ, Busch OR, Koerkamp BG, Besselink MG, van Eijck CHJ. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy but not chemotherapy is associated with reduced risk of postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a nationwide analysis. Surgery 2024; 175:1580-1586. [PMID: 38448277 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2024.01.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2023] [Revised: 12/01/2023] [Accepted: 01/21/2024] [Indexed: 03/08/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Postoperative pancreatic fistula remains the leading cause of significant morbidity after pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy has been described to reduce the risk of postoperative pancreatic fistula, but randomized trials on neoadjuvant treatment in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma focus increasingly on preoperative chemotherapy rather than preoperative chemoradiotherapy. This study aimed to investigate the impact of preoperative chemotherapy and preoperative chemoradiotherapy on postoperative pancreatic fistula and other pancreatic-specific surgery related complications on a nationwide level. METHODS All patients after pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma were included in the mandatory nationwide prospective Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Audit (2014-2020). Baseline and treatment characteristics were compared between immediate surgery, preoperative chemotherapy, and preoperative chemoradiotherapy. The relationship between preoperative chemotherapy, chemoradiotherapy, and clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery grade B/C) was investigated using multivariable logistic regression analyses. RESULTS Overall, 2,019 patients after pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma were included, of whom 1,678 underwent immediate surgery (83.1%), 192 (9.5%) received preoperative chemotherapy, and 149 (7.4%) received preoperative chemoradiotherapy. Postoperative pancreatic fistula occurred in 8.3% of patients after immediate surgery, 4.2% after preoperative chemotherapy, and 2.0% after preoperative chemoradiotherapy (P = .004). In multivariable analysis, the use of preoperative chemoradiotherapy was associated with reduced risk of postoperative pancreatic fistula (odds ratio, 0.21; 95% confidence interval, 0.03-0.69; P = .033) compared with immediate surgery, whereas preoperative chemotherapy was not (odds ratio, 0.59; 95% confidence interval, 0.25-1.25; P = .199). Intraoperatively hard, or fibrotic pancreatic texture was most frequently observed after preoperative chemoradiotherapy (53% immediate surgery, 62% preoperative chemotherapy, 77% preoperative chemoradiotherapy, P < .001). CONCLUSION This nationwide analysis demonstrated that in patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, only preoperative chemoradiotherapy, but not preoperative chemotherapy, was associated with a reduced risk of postoperative pancreatic fistula.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leonoor V Wismans
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J Annelie Suurmeijer
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jelle C van Dongen
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Bert A Bonsing
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands
| | - Hjalmar C Van Santvoort
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | - Johanna W Wilmink
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Geertjan van Tienhoven
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ignace H de Hingh
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Daan J Lips
- Department of Surgery, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
| | | | - Vincent E de Meijer
- Department of Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Gijs A Patijn
- Department of Surgery, Isala Clinics, Zwolle, the Netherlands
| | - Koop Bosscha
- Department of Surgery, Jeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis, Den Bosch, the Netherlands
| | - Martijn W Stommel
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | | | - Marcel den Dulk
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, the Netherlands
| | - Joost J Nuyttens
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Martijn P W Intven
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Judith de Vos-Geelen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Center, the Netherlands
| | - I Quintus Molenaar
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | - Olivier R Busch
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Bas Groot Koerkamp
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands. http://www.twitter.com/MarcBesselink
| | - Casper H J van Eijck
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Bloomfield GC, Radkani P, Nigam A, Namgoong J, Chou J, Park BU, Fishbein TM, Winslow ER. Approach to postpancreatectomy care Impacts outcomes: Retrospective Validation of the PORSCH trial. Am J Surg 2024:S0002-9610(24)00273-3. [PMID: 38782685 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.05.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2024] [Revised: 04/21/2024] [Accepted: 05/15/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the recent PORSCH trial, a three-part postpancreatectomy care algorithm was employed with a near 50 % reduction in mortality. We hypothesized that clinical care congruent with this protocol would correlate with better outcomes in our patients. METHODS Real-world postoperative care was compared to the pathway described by the PORSCH trial and patients were assigned into groups based on congruence with its recommendations. The primary composite outcome (PCO) consisted of 90-day mortality, organ failure, and interventions for bleeding. RESULTS Of 289 patients, care of 12 % was entirely congruent with the PORSCH algorithm. The PCO was recorded in 9 % of the PORSCH care group, 8 % of the Partial-PORSCH care group, and 19 % of the Non-PORSCH care group (p = 0.044). Adverse outcomes were highest when pancreaticoduodenectomy patients received care incongruent with the algorithm's CT imaging recommendations. CONCLUSIONS These results add external validity to the principles of clinical care underlying the PORSCH algorithm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Pejman Radkani
- Department of Transplant Surgery, Medstar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Aradhya Nigam
- Department of Surgery, Medstar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Jean Namgoong
- Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Jiling Chou
- MedStar Health Research Institute Department of Biostatistics & Biomedical Informatics, Hyattsville, MD, USA
| | - Byoung Uk Park
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Thomas M Fishbein
- Department of Transplant Surgery, Medstar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Emily R Winslow
- University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
van Bodegraven EA, Balduzzi A, van Ramshorst TME, Malleo G, Vissers FL, van Hilst J, Festen S, Abu Hilal M, Asbun HJ, Michiels N, Koerkamp BG, Busch ORC, Daams F, Luyer MDP, Ramera M, Marchegiani G, Klaase JM, Molenaar IQ, de Pastena M, Lionetto G, Vacca PG, van Santvoort HC, Stommel MWJ, Lips DJ, Coolsen MME, Mieog JSD, Salvia R, van Eijck CHJ, Besselink MG. Prophylactic abdominal drainage after distal pancreatectomy (PANDORINA): an international, multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2024; 9:438-447. [PMID: 38499019 DOI: 10.1016/s2468-1253(24)00037-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2023] [Revised: 02/01/2024] [Accepted: 02/05/2024] [Indexed: 03/20/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prophylactic passive abdominal drainage is standard practice after distal pancreatectomy. This approach aims to mitigate the consequences of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) but its added value, especially in patients at low risk of POPF, is currently being debated. We aimed to assess the non-inferiority of a no-drain policy in patients after distal pancreatectomy. METHODS In this international, multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled, non-inferiority trial, we recruited patients aged 18 years or older undergoing open or minimally invasive elective distal pancreatectomy for all indications in 12 centres in the Netherlands and Italy. We excluded patients with an American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) physical status of 4-5 or WHO performance status of 3-4, added by amendment following the death of a patient with ASA 4 due to a pre-existing cardiac condition. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) intraoperatively by permuted blocks (size four to eight) to either no drain or prophylactic passive drain placement, stratified by annual centre volume (<40 or ≥40 distal pancreatectomies) and low risk or high risk of grade B or C POPF. High-risk was defined as a pancreatic duct of more than 3 mm in diameter, a pancreatic thickness at the neck of more than 19 mm, or both, based on the Distal Pancreatectomy Fistula Risk Score. Other patients were considered low-risk. The primary outcome was the rate of major morbidity (Clavien-Dindo score ≥III), and the most relevant secondary outcome was grade B or C POPF, grading per the International Study Group for Pancreatic Surgery. Outcomes were assessed up to 90 days postoperatively and analysed in the intention-to-treat population and per-protocol population, which only included patients who received the allocated treatment. A prespecified non-inferiority margin of 8% was compared with the upper limit of the two-sided 95% CI (Wald) of unadjusted risk difference to assess non-inferiority. This trial is closed and registered in the Netherlands Trial Registry, NL9116. FINDINGS Between Oct 3, 2020, and April 28, 2023, 376 patients were screened for eligibility and 282 patients were randomly assigned to the no-drain group (n=138; 75 [54%] women and 63 [46%] men) or the drain group (n=144; 73 [51%] women and 71 [49%] men). Seven patients in the no-drain group received a drain intraoperatively; consequently, the per-protocol population included 131 patients in the no-drain group and 144 patients in the drain group. The rate of major morbidity was non-inferior in the no-drain group compared with the drain group in the intention-to-treat analysis (21 [15%] vs 29 [20%]; risk difference -4·9 percentage points [95% CI -13·8 to 4·0]; pnon-inferiority=0·0022) and the per-protocol analysis (21 [16%] vs 29 [20%]; risk difference -4·1 percentage points [-13·2 to 5·0]; pnon-inferiority=0·0045). Grade B or C POPF was observed in 16 (12%) patients in the no-drain group and in 39 (27%) patients in the drain group (risk difference -15·5 percentage points [95% CI -24·5 to -6·5]; pnon-inferiority<0·0001) in the intention-to-treat analysis. Three patients in the no-drain group died within 90 days; the cause of death in two was not considered related to the trial. The third death was a patient with an ASA score of 4 who died after sepsis and a watershed cerebral infarction at second admission, leading to multiple organ failure. No patients in the drain group died within 90 days. INTERPRETATION A no-drain policy is safe in terms of major morbidity and reduced the detection of grade B or C POPF, and should be the new standard approach in eligible patients undergoing distal pancreatectomy. FUNDING Ethicon UK (Johnson & Johnson Medical, Edinburgh, UK).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eduard A van Bodegraven
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Alberto Balduzzi
- Department of Surgery, Pancreas Institute, Verona University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Tess M E van Ramshorst
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Department of Surgery, Poliambulanza Hospital Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Malleo
- Department of Surgery, Pancreas Institute, Verona University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Frederique L Vissers
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Jony van Hilst
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Department of Surgery, OLVG, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Mohammad Abu Hilal
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK; Department of Surgery, Poliambulanza Hospital Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Horacio J Asbun
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery, Miami Cancer Institute, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Nynke Michiels
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Bas Groot Koerkamp
- Department of Surgery and Pulmonology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Olivier R C Busch
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Freek Daams
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Misha D P Luyer
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, Netherlands
| | - Marco Ramera
- Department of Surgery, Poliambulanza Hospital Brescia, Brescia, Italy; Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Giovanni Marchegiani
- Department of Surgery, Pancreas Institute, Verona University Hospital, Verona, Italy; Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, Department of Surgical, Oncological, and Gastroenterological Sciences, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Joost M Klaase
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - I Quintus Molenaar
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Matteo de Pastena
- Department of Surgery, Pancreas Institute, Verona University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Gabriella Lionetto
- Department of Surgery, Pancreas Institute, Verona University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Pier Giuseppe Vacca
- Department of Surgery, Pancreas Institute, Verona University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Hjalmar C van Santvoort
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | | | - Daan J Lips
- Department of Surgery, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, Netherlands
| | - Mariëlle M E Coolsen
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht Universitair Medisch Centrum, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - J Sven D Mieog
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Roberto Salvia
- Department of Surgery, Pancreas Institute, Verona University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Casper H J van Eijck
- Department of Surgery and Pulmonology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Varghese C, Harrison EM, O'Grady G, Topol EJ. Artificial intelligence in surgery. Nat Med 2024; 30:1257-1268. [PMID: 38740998 DOI: 10.1038/s41591-024-02970-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2024] [Accepted: 04/03/2024] [Indexed: 05/16/2024]
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly emerging in healthcare, yet applications in surgery remain relatively nascent. Here we review the integration of AI in the field of surgery, centering our discussion on multifaceted improvements in surgical care in the preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative space. The emergence of foundation model architectures, wearable technologies and improving surgical data infrastructures is enabling rapid advances in AI interventions and utility. We discuss how maturing AI methods hold the potential to improve patient outcomes, facilitate surgical education and optimize surgical care. We review the current applications of deep learning approaches and outline a vision for future advances through multimodal foundation models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chris Varghese
- Department of Surgery, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Ewen M Harrison
- Centre for Medical Informatics, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Greg O'Grady
- Department of Surgery, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
- Auckland Bioengineering Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Eric J Topol
- Scripps Research Translational Institute, La Jolla, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Emmen AM, de Graaf N, Khatkov I, Busch O, Dokmak S, Boggi U, Groot Koerkamp B, Ferrari G, Molenaar I, Saint-Marc O, Ramera M, Lips DJ, Mieog J, Luyer MD, Keck T, D’Hondt M, Souche F, Edwin B, Hackert T, Liem M, Iben-Khayat A, van Santvoort H, Mazzola M, de Wilde RF, Kauffmann E, Aussilhou B, Festen S, Izrailov R, Tyutyunnik P, Besselink M, Abu Hilal M. Implementation and outcome of minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy in Europe: a registry-based retrospective study - a critical appraisal of the first 3 years of the E-MIPS registry. Int J Surg 2024; 110:2226-2233. [PMID: 38265434 PMCID: PMC11019999 DOI: 10.1097/js9.0000000000001121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2023] [Accepted: 01/09/2024] [Indexed: 01/25/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND International multicenter audit-based studies focusing on the outcome of minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy (MIPD) are lacking. The European Registry for Minimally Invasive Pancreatic Surgery (E-MIPS) is the E-AHPBA endorsed registry aimed to monitor and safeguard the introduction of MIPD in Europe. MATERIALS AND METHODS A planned analysis of outcomes among consecutive patients after MIPD from 45 centers in 14 European countries in the E-MIPS registry (2019-2021). The main outcomes of interest were major morbidity (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥3) and 30-day/in-hospital mortality. RESULTS Overall, 1336 patients after MIPD were included [835 robot-assisted (R-MIPD) and 501 laparoscopic MIPD (L-MIPD)]. Overall, 20 centers performed R-MIPD, 15 centers L-MIPD, and 10 centers both. Between 2019 and 2021, the rate of centers performing L-MIPD decreased from 46.9 to 25%, whereas for R-MIPD this increased from 46.9 to 65.6%. Overall, the rate of major morbidity was 41.2%, 30-day/in-hospital mortality 4.5%, conversion rate 9.7%, postoperative pancreatic fistula grade B/C 22.7%, and postpancreatectomy hemorrhage grade B/C 10.8%. Median length of hospital stay was 12 days (IQR 8-21). A lower rate of major morbidity, postoperative pancreatic fistula grade B/C, postpancreatectomy hemorrhage grade B/C, delayed gastric emptying grade B/C, percutaneous drainage, and readmission was found after L-MIPD. The number of centers meeting the Miami Guidelines volume cut-off of ≥20 MIPDs annually increased from 9 (28.1%) in 2019 to 12 (37.5%) in 2021 ( P =0.424). Rates of conversion (7.4 vs. 14.8% P <0.001) and reoperation (8.9 vs. 15.1% P <0.001) were lower in centers, which fulfilled the Miami volume cut-off. CONCLUSION During the first 3 years of the pan-European E-MIPS registry, morbidity and mortality rates after MIPD were acceptable. A shift is ongoing from L-MIPD to R-MIPD. Variations in outcomes between the two minimally invasive approaches and the impact of the volume cut-off should be further evaluated over a longer time period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anouk M.L.H. Emmen
- Department of General Surgery, Istituto Ospedaliero Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam
- Cancer Center Amsterdam
| | - Nine de Graaf
- Department of General Surgery, Istituto Ospedaliero Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam
- Cancer Center Amsterdam
| | - I.E. Khatkov
- Department of Surgery, Moscow Clinical Scientific Center, Moscow, Russia
| | - O.R. Busch
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam
- Cancer Center Amsterdam
| | - S. Dokmak
- Department of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Beaujon Hospital, University Paris Cité, Clichy
| | - Ugo Boggi
- Division of General and Transplant Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa
| | | | - Giovanni Ferrari
- Department of Oncological and Minimally Invasive Surgery, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - I.Q. Molenaar
- Department of Surgery, AZ Groeninge Hospital, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Olivier Saint-Marc
- Service de Chirurgie Digestive, Endocrinienne et Thoracique, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Orleans, Orleans
| | - Marco Ramera
- Department of General Surgery, Istituto Ospedaliero Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia
| | - Daan J. Lips
- Department of Surgery, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede
| | - J.S.D. Mieog
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden
| | | | - Tobias Keck
- Clinic for Surgery, University of Schleswig-Holstein Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Mathieu D’Hondt
- Department of Surgery, AZ Groeninge Hospital, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - F.R. Souche
- Département de Chirurgie Digestive (A), Mini-invasive et Oncologique, Hôpital Saint-Eloi, Montpellier, France
| | - Bjørn Edwin
- The Intervention Centre and Department of HPB Surgery, Oslo University Hospital and Institute for Clinical Medicine, Oslo, Norway
| | - Thilo Hackert
- Department of General, Visceral, and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg
| | - M.S.L. Liem
- Department of Surgery, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede
| | - Abdallah Iben-Khayat
- Service de Chirurgie Digestive, Endocrinienne et Thoracique, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Orleans, Orleans
| | | | - Michele Mazzola
- Department of Oncological and Minimally Invasive Surgery, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | | | - E.F. Kauffmann
- Division of General and Transplant Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa
| | - Beatrice Aussilhou
- Department of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Beaujon Hospital, University Paris Cité, Clichy
| | | | - R. Izrailov
- Department of Surgery, Moscow Clinical Scientific Center, Moscow, Russia
| | - P. Tyutyunnik
- Department of Surgery, Moscow Clinical Scientific Center, Moscow, Russia
| | - M.G. Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam
- Cancer Center Amsterdam
| | - Mohammad Abu Hilal
- Department of General Surgery, Istituto Ospedaliero Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Mackay TM, Latenstein AEJ, Augustinus S, van der Geest LG, Bogte A, Bonsing BA, Cirkel GA, Hol L, Busch OR, den Dulk M, van Driel LMJ, Festen S, de Groot DJA, de Groot JWB, Groot Koerkamp B, Haj Mohammad N, Haver JT, van der Harst E, de Hingh IH, Homs MYV, Los M, Luelmo SAC, de Meijer VE, Mekenkamp L, Molenaar IQ, Patijn GA, Quispel R, Römkens TEH, van Santvoort HC, Stommel MW, Venneman NG, Verdonk RC, van Vilsteren FGI, de Vos-Geelen J, van Werkhoven CH, van Hooft JE, van Eijck CHJ, Wilmink JW, van Laarhoven HWM, Besselink MG. Implementation of Best Practices in Pancreatic Cancer Care in the Netherlands: A Stepped-Wedge Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Surg 2024; 159:429-437. [PMID: 38353966 PMCID: PMC10867778 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2023.7872] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2023] [Accepted: 10/26/2023] [Indexed: 02/17/2024]
Abstract
Importance Implementation of new cancer treatment strategies as recommended by evidence-based guidelines is often slow and suboptimal. Objective To improve the implementation of guideline-based best practices in the Netherlands in pancreatic cancer care and assess the impact on survival. Design, setting, and participants This multicenter, stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial compared enhanced implementation of best practices with usual care in consecutive patients with all stages of pancreatic cancer. It took place from May 22, 2018 through July 9, 2020. Data were analyzed from April 1, 2022, through February 1, 2023. It included all patients in the Netherlands with pathologically or clinically diagnosed pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. This study reports 1-year follow-up (or shorter in case of deceased patients). Intervention The 5 best practices included optimal use of perioperative chemotherapy, palliative chemotherapy, pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy (PERT), referral to a dietician, and use of metal stents in patients with biliary obstruction. A 6-week implementation period was completed, in a randomized order, in all 17 Dutch networks for pancreatic cancer care. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was 1-year survival. Secondary outcomes included adherence to best practices and quality of life (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer [EORTC] global health score). Results Overall, 5887 patients with pancreatic cancer (median age, 72.0 [IQR, 64.0-79.0] years; 50% female) were enrolled, 2641 before and 2939 after implementation of best practices (307 during wash-in period). One-year survival was 24% vs 23% (hazard ratio, 0.98, 95% CI, 0.88-1.08). There was no difference in the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (11% vs 11%), adjuvant chemotherapy (48% vs 51%), and referral to a dietician (59% vs 63%), while the use of palliative chemotherapy (24% vs 30%; odds ratio [OR], 1.38; 95% CI, 1.10-1.74), PERT (34% vs 45%; OR, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.28-2.11), and metal biliary stents increased (74% vs 83%; OR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.13-2.80). The EORTC global health score did not improve (area under the curve, 43.9 vs 42.8; median difference, -1.09, 95% CI, -3.05 to 0.94). Conclusions and Relevance In this randomized clinical trial, implementation of 5 best practices in pancreatic cancer care did not improve 1-year survival and quality of life. The finding that most patients received no tumor-directed treatment paired with the poor survival highlights the need for more personalized treatment options. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03513705.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tara M. Mackay
- Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Anouk E. J. Latenstein
- Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Simone Augustinus
- Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Lydia G. van der Geest
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Auke Bogte
- Department of Gastroenterology, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, University Medical Center Utrecht & St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | - Bert A. Bonsing
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Geert A. Cirkel
- Department of Medical Oncology, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, University Medical Center Utrecht & St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | - Lieke Hol
- Department of Gastroenterology, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Olivier R. Busch
- Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marcel den Dulk
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht UMC+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- NUTRIM-School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Aachen, Germany, the Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Nadia Haj Mohammad
- Department of Medical Oncology, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, University Medical Center Utrecht & St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | - Joyce T. Haver
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of nutrition and dietetics, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - Maartje Los
- Department of Medical Oncology, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, University Medical Center Utrecht & St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | | | - Vincent E. de Meijer
- Department of Surgery, University of Groningen and University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Leonie Mekenkamp
- Department of Medical Oncology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
| | - I. Quintus Molenaar
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, University Medical Center Utrecht & St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | | | - Rutger Quispel
- Department of Gastroenterology, Reinier de Graaf Hospital, Delft, the Netherlands
| | - Tessa E. H. Römkens
- Department of Gastroenterology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, Den Bosch, the Netherlands
| | - Hjalmar C. van Santvoort
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, University Medical Center Utrecht & St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | | | - Niels G. Venneman
- Department of Gastroenterology, Reinier de Graaf Hospital, Delft, the Netherlands
| | - Robert C. Verdonk
- Department of Gastroenterology, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, University Medical Center Utrecht & St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | | | - Judith de Vos-Geelen
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and primary care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, the Netherlands
| | - C. Henri van Werkhoven
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and primary care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, the Netherlands
| | - Jeanin E. van Hooft
- Department of Gastroenterology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | | | - Johanna W. Wilmink
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Hanneke W. M. van Laarhoven
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marc G. Besselink
- Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Şişik A, Dalkılıç MS, Gençtürk M, Yılmaz M, Erdem H. Individualized Bariatric Surgery Utilizing Artificial Intelligence: A Call to Colleagues and New Year's Aspiration. Obes Surg 2024; 34:1380-1381. [PMID: 38206563 DOI: 10.1007/s11695-024-07060-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2023] [Revised: 01/01/2024] [Accepted: 01/07/2024] [Indexed: 01/12/2024]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Muhammed Said Dalkılıç
- Department of General Surgery, School of Medicine, Marmara University, Fevzi Çakmak Mahallesi Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:10 Pendik, Istanbul, Turkey.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Marchese U, Desbiens JF, Lenne X, Naveendran G, Tzedakis S, Gaillard M, Bruandet A, Theis D, Boyer L, Truant S, Fuks D, El Amrani M. Study of Risk Factors for Readmission After Pancreatectomy for Cancer: Analysis of Nationwide Cohort. Ann Surg 2024; 279:486-492. [PMID: 37254769 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000005929] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To identify the factors associated with readmission after pancreatectomy for cancer and to assess their impact on the 1-year mortality in a French multicentric population. BACKGROUND Pancreatectomy is a complex procedure with high morbidity that increases the length of hospital stay and jeopardizes survival. Hospital readmissions lead to increased health system costs, making this a topic of great interest. METHODS Data collected from patients who underwent pancreatectomy for cancer between 2011 and 2019 were extracted from a French national medico-administrative database. A descriptive analysis was conducted to evaluate the association of baseline variables, including age, sex, liver-related comorbidities, Charlson Comorbidity Index, tumor localization, and use of neoadjuvant therapy, along with hospital type and volume, with readmission status. Centers were divided into low and high volumes according to the cutoff of 26 cases/year. Logistic regression models were developed to determine whether the identified bivariate associations persisted after adjusting for the patient characteristics. The mortality rates during readmission and at 1 year postoperatively were also determined. RESULTS Of 22,935 patients who underwent pancreatectomy, 9129 (39.3%) were readmitted within 6 months. Readmission rates by year did not vary over the study period, and mean readmissions occurred within 20 days after discharge. Multivariate analysis showed that male sex [odds ratio (OR) = 1.12], age >70 years (OR = 1.16), comorbidities (OR = 1.21), distal pancreatectomy (OR = 1.11), and major postoperative complications (OR = 1.37) were predictors of readmission. Interestingly, readmission and surgery in low-volume centers increased the risk of death at 1 year by a factor of 2.15 [(2.01-2.31), P < 0.001] and 1.31 [(1.17-1.47), P < 0.001], respectively. CONCLUSIONS Readmission after pancreatectomy for cancer is high with an increased rate of 1-year mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ugo Marchese
- Department of Digestive, HPB and Endocrine Surgery, Cochin Hospital, AP-HP Centre, Paris
- Paris University - 15 rue de l'école de médecine, Paris
| | - Jean-François Desbiens
- Department of digestive surgery and Transplantation, CHRU de Lille, Lille
- Lille university, Lille
| | - Xavier Lenne
- Lille university, Lille
- Department of Medical Information, CHRU de Lille, Lille
| | - Gaanan Naveendran
- Department of Digestive, HPB and Endocrine Surgery, Cochin Hospital, AP-HP Centre, Paris
- Paris University - 15 rue de l'école de médecine, Paris
| | - Stylianos Tzedakis
- Department of Digestive, HPB and Endocrine Surgery, Cochin Hospital, AP-HP Centre, Paris
- Paris University - 15 rue de l'école de médecine, Paris
| | - Martin Gaillard
- Department of Digestive, HPB and Endocrine Surgery, Cochin Hospital, AP-HP Centre, Paris
- Paris University - 15 rue de l'école de médecine, Paris
| | - Amelie Bruandet
- Lille university, Lille
- Department of Medical Information, CHRU de Lille, Lille
| | - Didier Theis
- Lille university, Lille
- Department of Medical Information, CHRU de Lille, Lille
| | - Laurent Boyer
- Department of Medical Information La Timone Hospital, Marseille
- Aix-Marseille University, Jardin du Pharo, Marseille
| | - Stephanie Truant
- Department of digestive surgery and Transplantation, CHRU de Lille, Lille
- Lille university, Lille
| | - David Fuks
- Department of Digestive, HPB and Endocrine Surgery, Cochin Hospital, AP-HP Centre, Paris
- Paris University - 15 rue de l'école de médecine, Paris
| | - Mehdi El Amrani
- Department of digestive surgery and Transplantation, CHRU de Lille, Lille
- Lille university, Lille
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Duclos C, Durin T, Marchese U, Sauvanet A, Laurent C, Ayav A, Turrini O, Sulpice L, Addeo P, Souche FR, Perinel J, Birnbaum DJ, Facy O, Gagnière J, Gaujoux S, Schwarz L, Regenet N, Iannelli A, Regimbeau JM, Piessen G, Lenne X, El Amrani M, Heyd B, Doussot A. Management and outcomes of hemorrhage after distal pancreatectomy: a multicenter study at high volume centers. HPB (Oxford) 2024; 26:234-240. [PMID: 37951805 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2023.10.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2023] [Revised: 10/05/2023] [Accepted: 10/07/2023] [Indexed: 11/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Data on clinically relevant post-pancreatectomy hemorrhage (CR-PPH) are derived from series mostly focused on pancreatoduodenectomy, and data after distal pancreatectomy (DP) are scarce. METHODS All non-extended DP performed from 2014 to 2018 were included. CR-PPH encompassed grade B and C PPH. Risk factors, management, and outcomes of CR-PPH were evaluated. RESULTS Overall, 1188 patients were included, of which 561 (47.2 %) were operated on minimally invasively. Spleen-preserving DP was performed in 574 patients (48.4 %). Ninety-day mortality, severe morbidity and CR-POPF rates were 1.1 % (n = 13), 17.4 % (n = 196) and 15.5 % (n = 115), respectively. After a median interval of 8 days (range, 0-37), 65 patients (5.5 %) developed CR-PPH, including 28 grade B and 37 grade C. Reintervention was required in 57 patients (87.7 %). CR-PPH was associated with a significant increase of 90-day mortality, morbidity and hospital stay (p < 0.001). Upon multivariable analysis, prolonged operative time and co-existing POPF were independently associated with CR-PPH (p < 0.005) while a chronic use of antithrombotic agent trended towards an increase of CR-PPH (p = 0.081). As compared to CR-POPF, the failure-to-rescue rate in patients who developed CR-PPH was significantly higher (13.8 % vs. 1.3 %, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION CR-PPH after DP remains rare but significantly associated with an increased risk of 90-day mortality and failure-to-rescue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Côme Duclos
- Department of Digestive Surgical Oncology, Liver Transplantation Unit. CHU Besançon, Besançon, France
| | - Thibault Durin
- Department of Digestive Surgery and Transplantation, Lille University Hospital, Lille, France
| | - Ugo Marchese
- Department of Digestive, Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Cochin Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - Alain Sauvanet
- Department of HPB Surgery, Hôpital Beaujon, University of Paris, Clichy, France
| | - Christophe Laurent
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Centre Magellan - CHU Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - Ahmet Ayav
- Department of HPB Surgery, Nancy University Hospital, Nancy, France
| | - Olivier Turrini
- Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille University, Department of Oncological Surgery, Marseille, France
| | - Laurent Sulpice
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Digestive Surgery, University Hospital, Rennes 1 University, Rennes, France
| | - Pietro Addeo
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Pôle des Pathologies Digestives, Hépatiques et de la Transplantation, Hôpital de Hautepierre-Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Université de Strasbourg, France
| | | | - Julie Perinel
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Hopital Edouard Herriot, Lyon, France
| | - David J Birnbaum
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Hôpital Nord, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, Aix-Marseille University, Chemin des Bourrely, 13015, Marseille, France
| | - Olivier Facy
- Department of Digestive and Surgical Oncology, University Hospital, Dijon, France
| | - Johan Gagnière
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary Surgery - Liver Transplantation, University Hospital Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Sébastien Gaujoux
- Department of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation, AP-HP, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Lilian Schwarz
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Rouen University Hospital and Université de Rouen Normandie, F-76100, Rouen, France
| | - Nicolas Regenet
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Nantes Hospital, Nantes, France
| | - Antonio Iannelli
- Digestive Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University Hospital of Nice, Nice, France
| | - Jean M Regimbeau
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Amiens University Medical Center and Jules Verne University of Picardie, Amiens, France
| | - Guillaume Piessen
- Department of Digestive and Oncological Surgery, CHU Lille, Claude Huriez University Hospital, F-59000, Lille, France
| | - Xavier Lenne
- Medical Information Department, Lille University Hospital, Lille, France
| | - Mehdi El Amrani
- Department of Digestive Surgery and Transplantation, Lille University Hospital, Lille, France
| | - Bruno Heyd
- Department of Digestive Surgical Oncology, Liver Transplantation Unit. CHU Besançon, Besançon, France
| | - Alexandre Doussot
- Department of Digestive Surgical Oncology, Liver Transplantation Unit. CHU Besançon, Besançon, France.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Korrel M, van Hilst J, Bosscha K, Busch ORC, Daams F, van Dam R, van Eijck CHJ, Festen S, Groot Koerkamp B, van der Harst E, Lips DJ, Luyer MD, de Meijer VE, Mieog JSD, Molenaar IQ, Patijn GA, van Santvoort HC, van der Schelling GP, Stommel MWJ, Besselink MG. Nationwide use and Outcome of Minimally Invasive Distal Pancreatectomy in IDEAL Stage IV following a Training Program and Randomized Trial. Ann Surg 2024; 279:323-330. [PMID: 37139822 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000005900] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/05/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the nationwide long-term uptake and outcomes of minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (MIDP) after a nationwide training program and randomized trial. BACKGROUND Two randomized trials demonstrated the superiority of MIDP over open distal pancreatectomy (ODP) in terms of functional recovery and hospital stay. Data on implementation of MIDP on a nationwide level are lacking. METHODS Nationwide audit-based study including consecutive patients after MIDP and ODP in 16 centers in the Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Audit (2014 to 2021). The cohort was divided into three periods: early implementation, during the LEOPARD randomized trial, and late implementation. Primary endpoints were MIDP implementation rate and textbook outcome. RESULTS Overall, 1496 patients were included with 848 MIDP (56.5%) and 648 ODP (43.5%). From the early to the late implementation period, the use of MIDP increased from 48.6% to 63.0% and of robotic MIDP from 5.5% to 29.7% ( P <0.001). The overall use of MIDP (45% to 75%) and robotic MIDP (1% to 84%) varied widely between centers ( P <0.001). In the late implementation period, 5/16 centers performed >75% of procedures as MIDP. After MIDP, in-hospital mortality and textbook outcome remained stable over time. In the late implementation period, ODP was more often performed in ASA score III-IV (24.9% vs. 35.7%, P =0.001), pancreatic cancer (24.2% vs. 45.9%, P <0.001), vascular involvement (4.6% vs. 21.9%, P <0.001), and multivisceral involvement (10.5% vs. 25.3%, P <0.001). After MIDP, shorter hospital stay (median 7 vs. 8 d, P <0.001) and less blood loss (median 150 vs. 500 mL, P <0.001), but more grade B/C postoperative pancreatic fistula (24.4% vs. 17.2%, P =0.008) occurred as compared to ODP. CONCLUSION A sustained nationwide implementation of MIDP after a successful training program and randomized trial was obtained with satisfactory outcomes. Future studies should assess the considerable variation in the use of MIDP between centers and, especially, robotic MIDP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maarten Korrel
- Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam
- Cancer Center Amsterdam
| | - Jony van Hilst
- Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam
- Department of Surgery, OLVG Oost, Amsterdam
| | - Koop Bosscha
- Department of Surgery, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, Den Bosch
| | - Olivier R C Busch
- Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam
- Cancer Center Amsterdam
| | - Freek Daams
- Cancer Center Amsterdam
- Amsterdam UMC, location Vrije Universiteit, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam
| | - Ronald van Dam
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht
| | | | | | | | | | - Daan J Lips
- Department of Surgery, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede
| | - Misha D Luyer
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven
| | - Vincent E de Meijer
- Department of Surgery, University of Groningen and University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen
| | - J Sven D Mieog
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden
| | - I Quintus Molenaar
- Department of Surgery, UMC Utrecht Cancer Centre, St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein; Regional Academic Cancer Centre Utrecht, Utrecht
| | | | - Hjalmar C van Santvoort
- Department of Surgery, UMC Utrecht Cancer Centre, St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein; Regional Academic Cancer Centre Utrecht, Utrecht
| | | | - Martijn W J Stommel
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam
- Cancer Center Amsterdam
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Mehl SC, Portuondo JI, Tian Y, Raval MV, Shah SR, Vogel AM, Wesson D, Massarweh NN. Utility of Hospital Failure to Rescue for Analyzing Variation in Pediatric Postoperative Mortality. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2024; 25:e64-e72. [PMID: 37695135 DOI: 10.1097/pcc.0000000000003363] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate the association between pediatric hospital performances in terms of failure to rescue (FTR), defined as postoperative mortality after a surgical complication, and mortality among patients without a surgical complication. DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. SETTING Forty-eight academic, pediatric hospitals; data obtained from Pediatric Health Information System database (Child Health Corporation of America, Shawnee Mission, KS) (2012-2020). PATIENTS Children who underwent at least one of 57 high-risk operations associated with significant postoperative mortality. EXPOSURES Hospitals were stratified into quintiles of reliability adjusted FTR (lower than average FTR in quintile 1 [Q1], higher than average FTR in quintile 5 [Q5]). Multivariable hierarchical regression was used to evaluate the association between hospital FTR performance and mortality among patients who did not have a surgical complication. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS Among 203,242 children treated across 48 academic hospitals, the complication and overall postoperative mortality rates were 8.8% and 2.3%, respectively. Among patients who had a complication, the FTR rate was 8.8%. Among patients who did not have a complication, the mortality rate was 1.7%. There was a 6.5-fold increase in reliability adjusted FTR between the lowest and highest performing hospitals (lowest FTR hospital-2.7%; 95% CI [1.6-3.9]; highest FTR hospital-17.8% [16.8-18.8]). Complex chronic conditions were highly prevalent across hospitals (Q1, 72.7%; Q2, 73.8%; Q3, 72.2%; Q4, 74.0%; Q5, 74.8%; trend test p < 0.01). Relative to Q1 hospitals, the odds of mortality in the absence of a postoperative complication significantly increased by 33% at Q5 hospitals (odds ratio 1.33; 95% CI [1.07-1.66]). This association was consistent when limited to patients with a complex chronic condition and neonates. CONCLUSION FTR may be a useful and valid surgical quality measure for pediatric surgery, even when considering patients without a postoperative complication. These findings suggest practices and processes for preventing FTR at high performing pediatric hospitals might help mitigate the risk of postoperative mortality even in the absence of a postoperative complication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven C Mehl
- Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
- Division of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, TX
| | - Jorge I Portuondo
- Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | - Yao Tian
- Surgical Outcomes and Quality Improvement Center, Center for Health Services and Outcomes Research, Institute for Public Health and Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
- Division of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Mehul V Raval
- Surgical Outcomes and Quality Improvement Center, Center for Health Services and Outcomes Research, Institute for Public Health and Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
- Division of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Sohail R Shah
- Pediatrix Surgery of Houston, Department of Surgery, Houston, TX
| | - Adam M Vogel
- Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
- Division of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, TX
| | - David Wesson
- Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
- Division of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, TX
| | - Nader N Massarweh
- Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
- Division of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, TX
- Surgical Outcomes and Quality Improvement Center, Center for Health Services and Outcomes Research, Institute for Public Health and Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
- Division of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL
- Pediatrix Surgery of Houston, Department of Surgery, Houston, TX
- Surgical and Perioperative Care, Atlanta VA Health Care System, Decatur, GA
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
- Department of Surgery, Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Linder S, Holmberg M, Agopian-Dahlenmark L, Zhao H, Åkerström JH, Sparrelid E, Ghorbani P. Endoscopic main duct stenting in refractory postoperative pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy - a friend or a foe? BMC Surg 2024; 24:33. [PMID: 38267861 PMCID: PMC10809585 DOI: 10.1186/s12893-023-02233-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2023] [Accepted: 10/16/2023] [Indexed: 01/26/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clinically relevant (CR) postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) after distal pancreatectomy (DP) are common. Endoscopic treatment (ET) has only scarcely been explored. The aim of this study was to evaluate risk factors for CR POPF after DP and the efficacy of ET in adjunct to standard therapy. METHODS Consecutive patients without previous pancreatic surgery who underwent DP between 2011 and 2020 were evaluated, analyzing risk factors for CR POPF. The choice and performance of ET, main pancreatic duct (MPD) stenting, was not standardized. Healing time and complications after ET were registered. RESULTS 406 patients underwent DP, CR POPF occurred in 29.6%. ET was performed in 17 patients 27 days (median) after index surgery. Risk for CR POPF was increased in ASA-PS 1-2 patients, MPD ≤ 3 mm, procedure time ≥ 3 h, and CRP ≥ 180 on postoperative day 3. POPF resolved with standard treatment after 32 days and 59 days in the ET group (p < 0.001). There was one mortality in the ET-group (not procedure related). Mild post-ERCP pancreatitis occurred in three patients. CONCLUSIONS CR POPF is common after DP. Long operating time, a narrow MPD, low ASA score, and high postoperative CRP were risk factors for CR POPF. ET was not beneficial but proper evaluation was not possible due to few patients and non-standardized treatment. Complications after ET appeared mild.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefan Linder
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
- Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - Marcus Holmberg
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Surgery, Capio St Görans Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | - Helena Zhao
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Johan Hardvik Åkerström
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
- Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Molecular medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ernesto Sparrelid
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Poya Ghorbani
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Ikuta S, Fujikawa M, Nakajima T, Kasai M, Aihara T, Yamanaka N. Machine learning approach to predict postpancreatectomy hemorrhage following pancreaticoduodenectomy: a retrospective study. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2024; 409:29. [PMID: 38183456 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-023-03223-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2023] [Accepted: 12/29/2023] [Indexed: 01/08/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH) is a rare yet dreaded complication following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). This retrospective study aimed to explore a machine learning (ML) model for predicting PPH in PD patients. METHODS A total of 284 patients who underwent open PD at our institute were included in the analysis. To address the issue of imbalanced data, the adaptive synthetic sampling (ADASYN) technique was employed. The best-performing ML model was selected using the PyCaret library in Python and evaluated based on recall, precision, and F1 score metrics. In addition to assessing the model's performance on the test data, bootstrap validation (n = 1000) with the original dataset was conducted. RESULTS PPH occurred in 11 patients (3.9%), with a median onset time of 22 days postoperatively. These minority cases were oversampled to 85 using ADASYN. The extra trees classifier demonstrated superior performance with recall, precision, and F1 score of 0.967, 0.914, and 0.937, respectively. Both validation using the test data and bootstrap resampling consistently demonstrated recall, precision, and F1 score exceeding 0.9. The model identified the peak value of C-reactive protein during the first 7 postoperative days as the most significant feature, followed by the preoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio. CONCLUSIONS This study highlights the potential of the ML approach to predict PPH occurrence following PD. Vigilance and early interventions guided by such model predictions could positively impact outcomes for high-risk patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shinichi Ikuta
- Department of Surgery, Meiwa Hospital, 4-31 Agenaruo, Nishinomiya, Hyogo, 663-8186, Japan.
| | - Masataka Fujikawa
- Department of Surgery, Meiwa Hospital, 4-31 Agenaruo, Nishinomiya, Hyogo, 663-8186, Japan
| | - Takayoshi Nakajima
- Department of Surgery, Meiwa Hospital, 4-31 Agenaruo, Nishinomiya, Hyogo, 663-8186, Japan
| | - Meidai Kasai
- Department of Surgery, Meiwa Hospital, 4-31 Agenaruo, Nishinomiya, Hyogo, 663-8186, Japan
| | - Tsukasa Aihara
- Department of Surgery, Meiwa Hospital, 4-31 Agenaruo, Nishinomiya, Hyogo, 663-8186, Japan
| | - Naoki Yamanaka
- Department of Surgery, Meiwa Hospital, 4-31 Agenaruo, Nishinomiya, Hyogo, 663-8186, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Nelleke Seghers PAL, Hamaker ME, O'Hanlon S, Portielje JEA, Wildiers H, Soubeyran P, Coolbrandt A, Rostoft S. Self-reported electronic symptom monitoring in older patients with multimorbidity treated for cancer: Development of a core dataset based on expert consensus, literature review, and quality of life questionnaires. J Geriatr Oncol 2024; 15:101643. [PMID: 37979368 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2023.101643] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2022] [Revised: 05/18/2023] [Accepted: 10/02/2023] [Indexed: 11/20/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In cancer care, symptom monitoring during treatment results in improved clinical outcomes such as improved quality of life, longer survival, and fewer hospital admissions. However, as the majority of patients with cancer are older and have multimorbidity, they may benefit from monitoring of additional symptoms. The aim of this study was to identify a core set of symptoms to monitor in older patients with multimorbidity treated for cancer, including symptoms caused by treatment side effects, destabilization of comorbidities, and functional decline. MATERIALS AND METHODS During a scoping literature search, 17 quality of life questionnaires were used to select 53 possible symptoms to monitor. An expert panel of cancer and geriatrics specialists was asked to participate in multiple online surveys to indicate whether these symptoms were not relevant to monitor, only relevant to monitor in a specific patient group, or relevant to monitor in all patients. In a subsequent round the list was reduced and the panel indicated how frequently these symptoms should be monitored during cancer treatment and after cancer treatment completion. Finally, a digital consensus meeting was organised to decide when symptoms had to trigger a recommendation to the patient to get in touch with their medical team. RESULTS In total, 30 healthcare professionals participated in the online surveys. After two rounds, a dataset of 19 symptoms related to cancer, cancer treatment, functional decline, and destabilization of comorbidities was agreed upon for monitoring. Five symptoms were selected for daily monitoring during treatment, seven for weekly, and seven for monthly. After treatment completion, the panel agreed upon less frequent reporting. Additionally, nine symptoms to be monitored only in patients with specific cancer types or treatment types were chosen, such as "cough up blood" in lung cancer. DISCUSSION This study is the first to identify a core set of symptoms to monitor in older patients with multimorbidity treated for cancer. Future research is needed to investigate whether the monitoring of these symptoms is feasible and improves clinical outcomes in older patients with multimorbidity treated for cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P A L Nelleke Seghers
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Diakonessenhuis, 3582, KE, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| | - Marije E Hamaker
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Diakonessenhuis, 3582, KE, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| | - Shane O'Hanlon
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, St Vincent's University Hospital, D04 T6F4 Dublin, Ireland; Department of Geriatric Medicine, University College Dublin, D04 V1W8 Dublin, Ireland.
| | - Johanneke E A Portielje
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center-LUMC, 2333, ZA, Leiden, the Netherlands.
| | - Hans Wildiers
- Department of General Medical Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Pierre Soubeyran
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Inserm U1312, SIRIC BRIO, Université de Bordeaux, 33076 Bordeaux, France.
| | - Annemarie Coolbrandt
- Department of Oncology Nursing, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Academic Centre for Nursing and Midwifery, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Siri Rostoft
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, 0424 Oslo, Norway; Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, 0318 Oslo, Norway.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Schouten TJ, Henry AC, Smits FJ, Besselink MG, Bonsing BA, Bosscha K, Busch OR, van Dam RM, van Eijck CH, Festen S, Groot Koerkamp B, van der Harst E, de Hingh IHJT, Kazemier G, Liem MSL, de Meijer VE, Patijn GA, Roos D, Schreinemakers JMJ, Stommel MWJ, Wit F, Daamen LA, Molenaar IQ, van Santvoort HC. Risk Models for Developing Pancreatic Fistula After Pancreatoduodenectomy: Validation in a Nationwide Prospective Cohort. Ann Surg 2023; 278:1001-1008. [PMID: 36804843 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000005824] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/22/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the performance of published fistula risk models by external validation, and to identify independent risk factors for postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF). BACKGROUND Multiple risk models have been developed to predict POPF after pancreatoduodenectomy. External validation in high-quality prospective cohorts is, however, lacking or only performed for individual models. METHODS A post hoc analysis of data from the stepped-wedge cluster cluster-randomized Care After Pancreatic Resection According to an Algorithm for Early Detection and Minimally Invasive Management of Pancreatic Fistula versus Current Practice (PORSCH) trial was performed. Included were all patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy in the Netherlands (January 2018-November 2019). Risk models on POPF were identified by a systematic literature search. Model performance was evaluated by calculating the area under the receiver operating curves (AUC) and calibration plots. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify independent risk factors associated with clinically relevant POPF. RESULTS Overall, 1358 patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy were included, of whom 341 patients (25%) developed clinically relevant POPF. Fourteen risk models for POPF were evaluated, with AUCs ranging from 0.62 to 0.70. The updated alternative fistula risk score had an AUC of 0.70 (95% confidence intervals [CI]: 0.69-0.72). The alternative fistula risk score demonstrated an AUC of 0.70 (95% CI: 0.689-0.71), whilst an AUC of 0.70 (95% CI: 0.699-0.71) was also found for the model by Petrova and colleagues. Soft pancreatic texture, pathology other than pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma or chronic pancreatitis, small pancreatic duct diameter, higher body mass index, minimally invasive resection and male sex were identified as independent predictors of POPF. CONCLUSION Published risk models predicting clinically relevant POPF after pancreatoduodenectomy have a moderate predictive accuracy. Their clinical applicability to identify high-risk patients and guide treatment strategies is therefore questionable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thijs J Schouten
- Departments of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Anne Claire Henry
- Departments of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Francina J Smits
- Departments of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bert A Bonsing
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Koop Bosscha
- Department of Surgery, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, Den Bosch, The Netherlands
| | - Olivier R Busch
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ronald M van Dam
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht UMC+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Casper H van Eijck
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sebastiaan Festen
- Department of Surgery, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bas Groot Koerkamp
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Ignace H J T de Hingh
- GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Geert Kazemier
- Cancer Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mike S L Liem
- Department of Surgery, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Vincent E de Meijer
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Gijs A Patijn
- Department of Surgery, Isala, Zwolle, The Netherlands
| | - Daphne Roos
- Department of Surgery, Reinier de Graaf Hospital, Delft, The Netherlands
| | | | - Martijn W J Stommel
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Fennie Wit
- Department of Surgery, Tjongerschans, Heerenveen, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Medical Center Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands
| | - Lois A Daamen
- Departments of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Imaging Division, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Izaak Q Molenaar
- Departments of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Hjalmar C van Santvoort
- Departments of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Nicolson NG, He J. Seeking the Real Benefits of Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. JAMA Surg 2023; 158:1253-1254. [PMID: 37878281 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2023.5219] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Norman G Nicolson
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Jin He
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Schwarzkopf SC, Distler M, Welsch T, Krause-Jüttler G, Weitz J, Kolbinger FR. Case-Based Serious Gaming for Complication Management in Colorectal and Pancreatic Surgery: Prospective Observational Study. JMIR Serious Games 2023; 11:e44708. [PMID: 37943588 PMCID: PMC10667978 DOI: 10.2196/44708] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2022] [Revised: 07/13/2023] [Accepted: 09/06/2023] [Indexed: 11/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The potential risk and subsequent impact of serious complications after pancreatic and colorectal surgery can be significantly reduced through early recognition, correct assessment, and timely initiation of appropriate therapy. Serious gaming (SG) is an innovative teaching method that combines play with knowledge acquisition, increased concentration, and quick decision-making and could therefore be used for clinically oriented education. OBJECTIVE This study aims to develop a case-based SG platform for complication management in pancreatic and colorectal surgery, validate the application by comparing game courses of various professional groups in the health care sector, and test the acceptance of the developed platform in the context of clinical education by measuring levels of usability and applicability within the framework of a validity and usefulness analysis. METHODS In this observational trial, a novel SG for management of postoperative complications was developed and prospectively validated in a cohort of 131 human caregivers with varying experience in abdominal surgery. A total of 6 realistic patient cases were implemented, representing common complications after pancreatic and colorectal surgery. Cases were developed and illustrated using anonymized images, data, and histories of postoperative patients. In the prospective section of this study, following a brief case presentation, participants were asked to triage the virtual patient, make an initial suspected diagnosis, and design a 3-step management plan, throughout which the results of selected diagnostic and therapeutic actions were presented. Participants' proposed case management was compared to ideal case management according to clinical guidelines. Usability, applicability, validity, and acceptance of the application were assessed using the Trier Teaching Evaluation Inventory as part of a noncomparative analysis. In addition, a comparative analysis of conventional teaching and learning formats was carried out. RESULTS A total of 131 cases were answered. Physicians selected more appropriate therapeutic measures than nonphysicians. In the Trier Teaching Evaluation Inventory, design, structure, relevance, timeliness, and interest promotion were predominantly rated positively. Most participants perceived the application to be superior to conventional lecture-based formats (training courses, lectures, and seminars) in terms of problem-solving skills (102/131, 77.9%), self-reflection (102/131, 77.9%), and usability and applicability (104/131, 79.4%). CONCLUSIONS Case-based SG has educational potential for complication management in surgery and could thereby contribute to improvements in postoperative patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie-Caroline Schwarzkopf
- Department of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany
| | - Marius Distler
- Department of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT/UCC), Dresden, Germany; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany; Helmholtz-Zen, Dresden, Germany
| | - Thilo Welsch
- Department of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany
- Department of General, Visceral, and Thoracic Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Grit Krause-Jüttler
- Department of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany
- Centre for Tactile Internet with Human-in-the-Loop (CeTI), TUD Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany
| | - Jürgen Weitz
- Department of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT/UCC), Dresden, Germany; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany; Helmholtz-Zen, Dresden, Germany
| | - Fiona R Kolbinger
- Department of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT/UCC), Dresden, Germany; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany; Helmholtz-Zen, Dresden, Germany
- Centre for Tactile Internet with Human-in-the-Loop (CeTI), TUD Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Augustinus S, Mackay TM, Andersson B, Beane JD, Busch OR, Gleeson EM, Koerkamp BG, Keck T, van Santvoort HC, Tingstedt B, Wellner UF, Williamsson C, Besselink MG, Pitt HA. Ideal Outcome After Pancreatoduodenectomy: A Transatlantic Evaluation of a Harmonized Composite Outcome Measure. Ann Surg 2023; 278:740-747. [PMID: 37476990 PMCID: PMC10549886 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000006037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/22/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study is to define and assess Ideal Outcome in the national or multicenter registries of North America, Germany, the Netherlands, and Sweden. BACKGROUND Assessing outcomes after pancreatoduodenectomy among centers and countries requires a broad evaluation that cannot be captured by a single parameter. Previously, 2 composite outcome measures (textbook outcome and optimal pancreatic surgery) for pancreatoduodenectomy have been described from Europe and the United States. These composites were harmonized into ideal outcome (IO). METHODS This analysis is a transatlantic retrospective study (2018-2020) of patients after pancreatoduodenectomy within the registries from North America, Germany, The Netherlands, and Sweden. After 3 consensus meetings, IO for pancreatoduodenectomy was defined as the absence of all 6 parameters: (1) in-hospital mortality, (2) severe complications-Clavien-Dindo ≥3, (3) postoperative pancreatic fistula-International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) grade B/C, (4) reoperation, (5) hospital stay >75th percentile, and (6) readmission. Outcomes were evaluated using relative largest difference (RLD) and absolute largest difference (ALD), and multivariate regression models. RESULTS Overall, 21,036 patients after pancreatoduodenectomy were included, of whom 11,194 (54%) reached IO. The rate of IO varied between 55% in North America, 53% in Germany, 52% in The Netherlands, and 54% in Sweden (RLD: 1.1, ALD: 3%, P <0.001). Individual components varied with an ALD of 2% length of stay, 4% for in-hospital mortality, 12% severe complications, 10% postoperative pancreatic fistula, 11% reoperation, and 9% readmission. Age, sex, absence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, body mass index, performance status, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, biliary drainage, absence of vascular resection, and histologic diagnosis were associated with IO. In the subgroup of patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma, country, and neoadjuvant chemotherapy also was associated with improved IO. CONCLUSIONS The newly developed composite outcome measure "Ideal Outcome" can be used for auditing and comparing outcomes after pancreatoduodenectomy. The observed differences can be used to guide collaborative initiatives to further improve the outcomes of pancreatic surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simone Augustinus
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Tara M. Mackay
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bodil Andersson
- Department of Surgery, Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Joal D. Beane
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
| | - Olivier R. Busch
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Bas G. Koerkamp
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Tobias Keck
- DGAV StuDoQ|Pancreas and Clinic of Surgery, UKSH Campus, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Hjalmar C. van Santvoort
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, University Medical Center Utrecht and St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Bobby Tingstedt
- Department of Surgery, Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Ulrich F. Wellner
- DGAV StuDoQ|Pancreas and Clinic of Surgery, UKSH Campus, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Caroline Williamsson
- Department of Surgery, Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Marc G. Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Henry A. Pitt
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Yang F, Xu Y, Jin C, Windsor JA, Fu D. Predicting pancreatic fistula after central pancreatectomy using current fistula risk scores for pancreaticoduodenectomy and distal pancreatectomy. Pancreatology 2023; 23:843-851. [PMID: 37739874 DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2023.09.079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2023] [Revised: 08/08/2023] [Accepted: 09/09/2023] [Indexed: 09/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The incidence of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) after central pancreatectomy (CP) is high, yet an effective predictive method is currently lacking. This study aimed to predict CR-POPF after CP by utilizing existing fistula risk scores (FRSs) for pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) and distal pancreatectomy (DP). METHODS A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients undergoing CP at our institution between January 2010 and July 2022. The primary outcome was CR-POPF (grade B/C) according to the 2016 International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery definition. To establish predictive models for CR-POPF after CP, we combined the FRSs for PD and DP using a calculation formula that considers the probability of the union of two events. As a result, we obtained twelve central FRS (C-FRS) models. The performance of each C-FRS was assessed using the area under the curves (AUC) and calibration plots. RESULTS A total of 115 patients undergoing CP were included. Among them, 38 (33%) were male, with a median age of 53 years. CR-POPF occurred in 35 (30.4%) patients, specifically 33 (28.7%) with grade B and 2 (1.7%) with grade C. Multivariate analysis showed that body mass index (BMI) [odds ratio (OR) 1.260, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.039-1.528, P = 0.019), pancreatic thickness at the cephalic transection site (OR 1.228, 95% CI 1.074-1.405, P = 0.003), cephalic main pancreatic duct (MPD) size (OR 41.872, 95%CI 7.614-230.265, P < 0.001), and distal MPD size (OR 0.142, 95% CI 0.036-0.561, P = 0.005) were independent predictive factors for CR-POPF. Discrimination was generally acceptable for all C-FRS models, with an AUC ranging from 0.748 (DISPAIR-a-FRS: 95% CI, 0.659-0.824) to 0.847 (Intraop-D-a-FRS: 95% CI, 0.768-0.907). The models were calibrated with adequate Brier scores ranging from 0.157 to 0.183. The performance in all subgroups was similar as that of the entire cohort. Three preoperative risk groups (low, intermediate, and high) were identified based on the clinical applicability of the Preop-D-Roberts-FRS, with corresponding incidences of CR-POPF as 0% (0/24), 30% (21/70), and 66.7% (14/21), respectively. CONCLUSION The derived C-FRS models show potential for accurately predicting the development of CR-POPF after CP. However, further validation studies are required to determine the most effective model. In the meantime, the Preop-D-Roberts-FRS is recommended for clinical practice due to its ease of use and preoperative predictability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Feng Yang
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Huashan Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200040, China.
| | - Yecheng Xu
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Huashan Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200040, China
| | - Chen Jin
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Huashan Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200040, China
| | - John A Windsor
- Surgical and Translational Research Centre, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, 1142, New Zealand
| | - Deliang Fu
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Huashan Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200040, China.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Ricci C, Serbassi F, Alberici L, Ingaldi C, Eusebi LH, De Raffele E, Pironi L, Sasdelli AS, Mosconi C, Vicennati V, Casadei R. Value of immunonutrition in patients undergoing pancreatic resection: a trial sequential meta-analysis. HPB (Oxford) 2023; 25:1151-1160. [PMID: 37328364 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2023.03.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2022] [Revised: 01/19/2023] [Accepted: 03/23/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The benefits of immunonutrition (IM) in patients who underwent pancreatic surgery are unclear. METHODS A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing IM with standard nutrition (SN) in pancreatic surgery was carried out. A random-effects trial sequential meta-analysis was made, reporting Risk Ratio (RR), mean difference (MD), and required information size (RIS). If RIS was reached, false negative (type II error) and positive results (type I error) could be excluded. The endpoints were morbidity, mortality, infectious complication, postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) rates, and length of stay (LOS). RESULTS The meta-analysis includes 6 RCTs and 477 patients. Morbidity (RR 0.77; 0.26 to 2.25), mortality (RR 0.90; 0.76 to 1.07), and POPF rates were similar. The RISs were 17,316, 7,417, and 464,006, suggesting a type II error. Infectious complications were lower in the IM group, with a RR of 0.54 (0.36-0.79; 95 CI). The LOS was shorter in IM (MD -0.3 days; -0.6 to -0.1). For both, the RISs were reached, excluding type I error. CONCLUSION The IM can reduce infectious complications and LOS The small differences in mortality, morbidity, and POPF make it impossible to exclude type II error due to large RISs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudio Ricci
- Division of Pancreatic Surgery, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Di Bologna, Via Albertoni 15, Italy; Department of Internal Medicine and Surgery (DIMEC), Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Italy.
| | - Francesco Serbassi
- Grad Student in Biology of the Health Faculty, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Italy
| | - Laura Alberici
- Division of Pancreatic Surgery, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Di Bologna, Via Albertoni 15, Italy
| | - Carlo Ingaldi
- Division of Pancreatic Surgery, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Di Bologna, Via Albertoni 15, Italy
| | - Leonardo H Eusebi
- Division of Pancreatic Surgery, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Di Bologna, Via Albertoni 15, Italy; Division of Gastroenterology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Di Bologna, Via Albertoni 15, Italy
| | - Emilio De Raffele
- Division of Pancreatic Surgery, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Di Bologna, Via Albertoni 15, Italy
| | - Loris Pironi
- Department of Internal Medicine and Surgery (DIMEC), Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Italy; Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism Unit - Centre for Chronic Intestinal Failure, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Di Bologna, Via Albertoni 15, Italy
| | - Anna S Sasdelli
- Department of Internal Medicine and Surgery (DIMEC), Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Italy; Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism Unit - Centre for Chronic Intestinal Failure, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Di Bologna, Via Albertoni 15, Italy
| | - Cristina Mosconi
- Division of Interventional Radiology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Di Bologna, Via Albertoni 15, Italy
| | - Valentina Vicennati
- Division of Endocrinology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Di Bologna, Via Albertoni 15, Italy; Department of Internal Medicine and Surgery (DIMEC), Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Italy
| | - Riccardo Casadei
- Division of Pancreatic Surgery, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Di Bologna, Via Albertoni 15, Italy; Department of Internal Medicine and Surgery (DIMEC), Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
van Bodegraven EA, Francken MFG, Verkoulen KCHA, Abu Hilal M, Dijkgraaf MGW, Besselink MG. Costs of complications following distal pancreatectomy: a systematic review. HPB (Oxford) 2023; 25:1145-1150. [PMID: 37391314 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2023.03.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2022] [Revised: 03/01/2023] [Accepted: 03/06/2023] [Indexed: 07/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Postoperative complications following distal pancreatectomy (DP) are common, especially postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF). In order to design adequate prophylactic strategies, it is of relevance to determine the costs of these complications. An overview of the literature on the costs of complications following DP is lacking. METHODS A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library (inception until 1 August 2022). The primary outcome was the costs (i.e. cost differential) of major morbidity, individual complications and prolonged hospital stay. Quality of non-RCTs were assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Costs were compared with the use of Purchasing Power parity. This systematic review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021223019). RESULTS Overall, seven studies were included with 854 patients after DP. The rate POPF grade B/C varied between 13% and 27% (based on five studies) with a corresponding cost differential of EUR 18,389 (based on two studies). The rate of severe morbidity varied between 13% and 38% (based on five studies) with a corresponding cost differential of EUR 19,281 (based on five studies). CONCLUSION This systematic review reported considerable costs for POPF grade B/C and severe morbidity after DP. Prospective databases and studies should report on all complications in a uniform matter to better display the economic burden of complications of DP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eduard A van Bodegraven
- Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Michiel F G Francken
- Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Koen C H A Verkoulen
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht Universitair Medisch Centrum, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Mohammad Abu Hilal
- Department of General Surgery, Istituto Ospedaliero Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy
| | - Marcel G W Dijkgraaf
- Department of General Surgery, Istituto Ospedaliero Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy; Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Stoop TF, Bergquist E, Theijse RT, Hempel S, van Dieren S, Sparrelid E, Distler M, Hackert T, Besselink MG, Del Chiaro M, Ghorbani P. Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Role of Total Pancreatectomy as an Alternative to Pancreatoduodenectomy in Patients at High Risk for Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula: Is it a Justifiable Indication? Ann Surg 2023; 278:e702-e711. [PMID: 37161977 PMCID: PMC10481933 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000005895] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Examine the potential benefit of total pancreatectomy (TP) as an alternative to pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) in patients at high risk for postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF). SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA TP is mentioned as an alternative to PD in patients at high risk for POPF, but a systematic review is lacking. METHODS Systematic review and meta-analyses using Pubmed, Embase (Ovid), and Cochrane Library to identify studies published up to October 2022, comparing elective single-stage TP for any indication versus PD in patients at high risk for POPF. The primary endpoint was short-term mortality. Secondary endpoints were major morbidity (i.e., Clavien-Dindo grade ≥IIIa) on the short-term and quality of life. RESULTS After screening 1212 unique records, five studies with 707 patients (334 TP and 373 high-risk PD) met the eligibility criteria, comprising one randomized controlled trial and four observational studies. The 90-day mortality after TP and PD did not differ (6.3% vs. 6.2%; RR=1.04 [95%CI 0.56-1.93]). Major morbidity rate was lower after TP compared to PD (26.7% vs. 38.3%; RR=0.65 [95%CI 0.48-0.89]), but no significance was seen in matched/randomized studies (29.0% vs. 36.9%; RR = 0.73 [95%CI 0.48-1.10]). Two studies investigated quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30) at a median of 30-52 months, demonstrating comparable global health status after TP and PD (77% [±15] vs. 76% [±20]; P =0.857). CONCLUSIONS This systematic review and meta-analysis found no reduction in short-term mortality and major morbidity after TP as compared to PD in patients at high risk for POPF. However, if TP is used as a bail-out procedure, the comparable long-term quality of life is reassuring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas F. Stoop
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet at Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
- Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO
| | - Erik Bergquist
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet at Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Rutger T. Theijse
- Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sebastian Hempel
- Department of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Susan van Dieren
- Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery
| | - Ernesto Sparrelid
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet at Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Marius Distler
- Department of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Thilo Hackert
- Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany
| | - Marc G. Besselink
- Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marco Del Chiaro
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO
| | - Poya Ghorbani
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet at Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Pronk AJM, Roelofs A, Flum DR, Bonjer HJ, Abu Hilal M, Dijkgraaf MGW, Besselink MG, Ahmed Ali U. Two decades of surgical randomized controlled trials: worldwide trends in volume and methodological quality. Br J Surg 2023; 110:1300-1308. [PMID: 37379487 PMCID: PMC10480038 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znad160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2022] [Revised: 03/07/2023] [Accepted: 05/04/2023] [Indexed: 06/30/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND RCTs are essential in guiding clinical decision-making but are difficult to perform, especially in surgery. This review assessed the trend in volume and methodological quality of published surgical RCTs over two decades. METHODS PubMed was searched systematically for surgical RCTs published in 1999, 2009, and 2019. The primary outcomes were volume of trials and RCTs with a low risk of bias. Secondary outcomes were clinical, geographical, and funding characteristics. RESULTS Some 1188 surgical RCTs were identified, of which 300 were published in 1999, 450 in 2009, and 438 in 2019. The most common subspecialty in 2019 was gastrointestinal surgery (50.7 per cent). The volume of surgical RCTs increased mostly in Asia (61, 159, and 199 trials), especially in China (7, 40, and 81). In 2019, countries with the highest relative volume of published surgical RCTs were Finland and the Netherlands. Between 2009 and 2019, the proportion of RCTs with a low risk of bias increased from 14.7 to 22.1 per cent (P = 0.004). In 2019, the proportion of trials with a low risk of bias was highest in Europe (30.5 per cent), with the UK and the Netherlands as leaders in this respect. CONCLUSION The volume of published surgical RCTs worldwide remained stable in the past decade but their methodological quality improved. Considerable geographical shifts were observed, with Asia and especially China leading in terms of volume. Individual European countries are leading in their relative volume and methodological quality of surgical RCTs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aagje J M Pronk
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Anne Roelofs
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - David R Flum
- Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - H Jaap Bonjer
- Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, location Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Mohammed Abu Hilal
- Department of Surgery, Fondazione Poliambulanza Hospital, Brescia, Italy
| | - Marcel G W Dijkgraaf
- Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Usama Ahmed Ali
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Ingwersen EW, Stam WT, Meijs BJV, Roor J, Besselink MG, Groot Koerkamp B, de Hingh IHJT, van Santvoort HC, Stommel MWJ, Daams F. Machine learning versus logistic regression for the prediction of complications after pancreatoduodenectomy. Surgery 2023; 174:435-440. [PMID: 37150712 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2023.03.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2022] [Revised: 03/02/2023] [Accepted: 03/20/2023] [Indexed: 05/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Machine learning is increasingly advocated to develop prediction models for postoperative complications. It is, however, unclear if machine learning is superior to logistic regression when using structured clinical data. Postoperative pancreatic fistula and delayed gastric emptying are the two most common complications with the biggest impact on patient condition and length of hospital stay after pancreatoduodenectomy. This study aimed to compare the performance of machine learning and logistic regression in predicting pancreatic fistula and delayed gastric emptying after pancreatoduodenectomy. METHODS This retrospective observational study used nationwide data from 16 centers in the Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Audit between January 2014 and January 2021. The area under the curve of a machine learning and logistic regression model for clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula and delayed gastric emptying were compared. RESULTS Overall, 799 (16.3%) patients developed a postoperative pancreatic fistula, and 943 developed (19.2%) delayed gastric emptying. For postoperative pancreatic fistula, the area under the curve of the machine learning model was 0.74, and the area under the curve of the logistic regression model was 0.73. For delayed gastric emptying, the area under the curve of the machine learning model and logistic regression was 0.59. CONCLUSION Machine learning did not outperform logistic regression modeling in predicting postoperative complications after pancreatoduodenectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erik W Ingwersen
- Amsterdam UMC, location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology and Metabolism, the Netherlands
| | - Wessel T Stam
- Amsterdam UMC, location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology and Metabolism, the Netherlands
| | - Bono J V Meijs
- Amsterdam UMC, location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology and Metabolism, the Netherlands
| | - Joran Roor
- SAS institute B.V., Huizen, the Netherlands
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology and Metabolism, the Netherlands; Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | - Freek Daams
- Amsterdam UMC, location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Droogh DHM, van Dam JL, Groen JV, de Boer MGJ, van Prehn J, van Eijck CHJ, Bonsing BA, Vahrmeijer AL, Groot Koerkamp B, Mieog JSD. Prolonged antibiotics after pancreatoduodenectomy reduce abdominal infections in patients with positive bile cultures: a dual-center cohort study. HPB (Oxford) 2023; 25:1056-1064. [PMID: 37268503 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2023.05.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2023] [Revised: 04/07/2023] [Accepted: 05/15/2023] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Abdominal infections account for substantial morbidity after pancreatoduodenectomy. Contaminated bile is the presumed main risk factor, and prolonged antibiotic prophylaxis might prevent these complications. This study compared organ/space infection (OSIs) rates in patients receiving perioperative versus prolonged antibiotic prophylaxis after pancreatoduodenectomy. METHODS Patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy in two Dutch centers between 2016 and 2019 were included. Perioperative prophylaxis was compared prolonged prophylaxis (cefuroxime and metronidazole for five days). The primary outcome was an isolated OSI: an abdominal infection without concurrent anastomotic leakage. Odds ratios (OR) were adjusted for surgical approach and pancreatic duct diameter. RESULTS OSIs occurred in 137 out of 362 patients (37.8%): 93 patients with perioperative and 44 patients with prolonged prophylaxis (42.5% versus 30.8%, P = 0.025). Isolated OSIs occurred in 38 patients (10.5%): 28 patients with perioperative and 10 patients with prolonged prophylaxis (12.8% versus 7.0%, P = 0.079). Bile cultures were obtained in 198 patients (54.7%). Patients with positive bile cultures showed higher isolated OSI rates with perioperative compared to prolonged prophylaxis (18.2% versus 6.6%, OR 5.7, 95% CI: 1.3-23.9). CONCLUSION Prolonged antibiotics after pancreatoduodenectomy are associated with fewer isolated OSIs in patients with contaminated bile and warrant confirmation in a randomised controlled trial (Clinicaltrials.gov NCT0578431).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daphne H M Droogh
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
| | - Jacob L van Dam
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jesse V Groen
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Mark G J de Boer
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Joffrey van Prehn
- Department of Medical Microbiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | | | - Bert A Bonsing
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Alexander L Vahrmeijer
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Bas Groot Koerkamp
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J Sven D Mieog
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Thobie A, Bouvier AM, Bouvier V, Jooste V, Queneherve L, Nousbaum JB, Alves A, Dejardin O. Survival variability across hospitals after resection for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: A multilevel survival analysis on a high-resolution population-based study. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2023; 49:1450-1456. [PMID: 37055280 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2023.03.228] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2022] [Revised: 01/23/2023] [Accepted: 03/24/2023] [Indexed: 04/15/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Resection is the cornerstone of curative management for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Hospital surgical volume influence post-operative mortality. Few is known about impact on survival. METHODS Population included 763 patients resected for PDAC within the 4 French digestive tumor registries between 2000 and 2014. Spline method was used to determine annual surgical volume thresholds influencing survival. A multilevel survival regression model was used to study center effect. RESULTS Population was divided into three groups: low-volume (LVC) (<41 hepatobiliary/pancreatic procedures/year), medium-volume (MVC) (41-233) and high-volume centers (HVC) (>233). Patients in LVC were older (p = 0.02), had a lower rate of disease-free margins (76.7% vs. 77.2% and 69.5%, p = 0.028) and a higher post-operative mortality than in MVC and HVC (12.5% and 7.5% vs. 2.2%; p = 0.004). Median survival was higher in HVC than in other centers (25 vs. 15.2 months, p < 0.0001). Survival variance attributable to center effect accounted for 3.7% of total variance. In multilevel survival analysis, surgical volume explained the inter-hospital survival heterogeneity (non-significant variance after adding the volume to the model p = 0.3). Patients resected in HVC had a better survival than in LVC (HR 0.64 [0.50-0.82], p < 0.0001). There was no difference between MVC and HVC. CONCLUSION Regarding center effect, individual characteristics had little impact on survival variability across hospitals. Hospital volume was a major contributor to the center effect. Given the difficulty of centralizing pancreatic surgery, it would be wise to determine which factors would indicate management in a HVC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandre Thobie
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Hospital of Avranches-Granville, Avranches, France; UMR INSERM 1086 'ANTICIPE', Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France.
| | - Anne-Marie Bouvier
- Registre des cancers digestifs de Bourgogne, University Hospital of Dijon, Dijon, France; INSERM UMR 1231, University of Burgundy, Dijon, France
| | - Véronique Bouvier
- UMR INSERM 1086 'ANTICIPE', Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France; Registre des cancers digestifs du Calvados, University Hospital of Caen, Caen, France; Department of Research, Epidemiology Research and Evaluation Unit, University Hospital of Caen, Caen, France
| | - Valérie Jooste
- Registre des cancers digestifs de Bourgogne, University Hospital of Dijon, Dijon, France; INSERM UMR 1231, University of Burgundy, Dijon, France
| | - Lucille Queneherve
- Registre des cancers digestifs du Finistère, University Hospital of Brest, Brest, France; EA7479 SPURBO, University of Western Brittany, Brest, France
| | - Jean-Baptiste Nousbaum
- Registre des cancers digestifs du Finistère, University Hospital of Brest, Brest, France; EA7479 SPURBO, University of Western Brittany, Brest, France
| | - Arnaud Alves
- UMR INSERM 1086 'ANTICIPE', Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France; Registre des cancers digestifs du Calvados, University Hospital of Caen, Caen, France; Department of Digestive Surgery, University Hospital of Caen, Caen, France
| | - Olivier Dejardin
- UMR INSERM 1086 'ANTICIPE', Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France; Department of Research, Epidemiology Research and Evaluation Unit, University Hospital of Caen, Caen, France
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Ayabe RI, Prakash LR, Bruno ML, Newhook TE, Maxwell JE, Arvide EM, Dewhurst WL, Kim MP, Ikoma N, Snyder RA, Lee JE, Katz MHG, Tzeng CWD. Differential Gains in Surgical Outcomes for High-Risk vs Low-Risk Pancreaticoduodenectomy with Successive Refinements of Risk-Stratified Care Pathways. J Am Coll Surg 2023; 237:4-12. [PMID: 36786469 DOI: 10.1097/xcs.0000000000000652] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The use of risk-stratified pancreatectomy care pathways (RSPCPs) is associated with reduced length of stay (LOS). This study sought to evaluate the impact of successive pathway revisions with the hypothesis that high-risk patients require iterative pathway revisions to optimize outcomes. STUDY DESIGN A prospectively maintained database (October 2016 to December 2021) was evaluated for pancreaticoduodenectomy patients managed with RSPCPs preoperatively assigned based on postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) risk. Launched in October 2016 (version [V] 1), RSPCPs were optimized in February 2019 (V2) and November 2020 (V3). Targeted pathway components included earlier nasogastric tube removal, diet advancement, reduced intravenous fluids and opioids, institution-specific drain fluid amylase cutoffs for early day 3 removal, and patient education. Primary outcome was LOS. Secondary outcomes included major complication (Accordion grade 3+), POPF (International Study Group for Pancreatic Surgery Grade B/C), and delayed gastric emptying (DGE). RESULTS Of 481 patients, 234 were managed by V1 (83 high-risk), 141 by V2 (43 high-risk), and 106 by V3 (43 high-risk). Median LOS reduction was greatest in high-risk patients with a 7-day reduction (pre-RSPCP, 12 days; V1, 9 days; V2, 7 days; V3, 5 days), compared with low-risk patients (pre-pathway, 10 days; V1, 6 days; V2, 5 days; V3, 4 days). Complications decreased significantly among high-risk patients (V1, 45%; V2, 33%; V3, 19%; p < 0.001), approaching rates in low-risk patients (V1, 21%; V2, 20%; V3, 14%). POPF (V1, 33%; V2, 23%; V3, 16%; p < 0.001) and DGE (V1, 23%; V2, 22%; V3, 14%; p < 0.001) improved among high-risk patients. CONCLUSIONS Risk-stratified pancreatectomy care pathways are associated with reduced LOS, major complication, Grade B/C fistula, and DGE. The easiest gains in surgical outcomes are generated from the immediate improvement in the patients most likely to be fast-tracked, but high-risk patients benefit from successive application of the learning health system model.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reed I Ayabe
- From the Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Bhasker N, Kolbinger FR, Skorobohach N, Zwanenburg A, Löck S, Weitz J, Hoffmann RT, Distler M, Speidel S, Leger S, Kühn JP. Prediction of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula using radiomic features and preoperative data. Sci Rep 2023; 13:7506. [PMID: 37161007 PMCID: PMC10169866 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-34168-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2022] [Accepted: 04/25/2023] [Indexed: 05/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) can significantly affect the treatment course and outcome in pancreatic cancer patients. Preoperative prediction of CR-POPF can aid the surgical decision-making process and lead to better perioperative management of patients. In this retrospective study of 108 pancreatic head resection patients, we present risk models for the prediction of CR-POPF that use combinations of preoperative computed tomography (CT)-based radiomic features, mesh-based volumes of annotated intra- and peripancreatic structures and preoperative clinical data. The risk signatures were evaluated and analysed in detail by visualising feature expression maps and by comparing significant features to the established CR-POPF risk measures. Out of the risk models that were developed in this study, the combined radiomic and clinical signature performed best with an average area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.86 and a balanced accuracy score of 0.76 on validation data. The following pre-operative features showed significant correlation with outcome in this signature ([Formula: see text]) - texture and morphology of the healthy pancreatic segment, intensity volume histogram-based feature of the pancreatic duct segment, morphology of the combined segment, and BMI. The predictions of this pre-operative signature showed strong correlation (Spearman correlation co-efficient, [Formula: see text]) with the intraoperative updated alternative fistula risk score (ua-FRS), which is the clinical gold standard for intraoperative CR-POPF risk stratification. These results indicate that the proposed combined radiomic and clinical signature developed solely based on preoperatively available clinical and routine imaging data can perform on par with the current state-of-the-art intraoperative models for CR-POPF risk stratification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nithya Bhasker
- Division of Translational Surgical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT/UCC) Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
| | - Fiona R Kolbinger
- Department of Visceral-, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
- Else Kröner Fresenius Center for Digital Health, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
| | - Nadiia Skorobohach
- Institute and Polyclinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus Dresden, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Alex Zwanenburg
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT/UCC) Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Steffen Löck
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Jürgen Weitz
- Department of Visceral-, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- Else Kröner Fresenius Center for Digital Health, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Ralf-Thorsten Hoffmann
- Institute and Polyclinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus Dresden, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Marius Distler
- Department of Visceral-, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Stefanie Speidel
- Division of Translational Surgical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT/UCC) Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- Else Kröner Fresenius Center for Digital Health, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Stefan Leger
- Division of Translational Surgical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT/UCC) Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Jens-Peter Kühn
- Institute and Polyclinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus Dresden, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Ubels S, Matthée E, Verstegen M, Klarenbeek B, Bouwense S, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Daams F, Dekker JWT, van Det MJ, van Esser S, Griffiths EA, Haveman JW, Nieuwenhuijzen G, Siersema PD, Wijnhoven B, Hannink G, van Workum F, Rosman C, Heisterkamp J, Polat F, Schouten J, Singh P, Eshuis WJ, Kalff MC, Feenstra ML, van der Peet DL, Stam WT, Van Etten B, Poelmann F, Vuurberg N, Willem van den Berg J, Martijnse IS, Matthijsen RM, Luyer M, Curvers W, Nieuwenhuijzen T, Taselaar AE, Kouwenhoven EA, Lubbers M, Sosef M, Lecot F, Geraedts TC, van den Wildenberg F, Kelder W, Lubbers M, Baas PC, de Haas JW, Hartgrink HH, Bahadoer RR, van Sandick JW, Hartemink KJ, Veenhof X, Stockmann H, Gorgec B, Weeder P, Wiezer MJ, Genders CM, Belt E, Blomberg B, van Duijvendijk P, Claassen L, Reetz D, Steenvoorde P, Mastboom W, Klein Ganseij HJ, van Dalsen AD, Joldersma A, Zwakman M, Groenendijk RP, Montazeri M, Mercer S, Knight B, van Boxel G, McGregor RJ, Skipworth RJ, Frattini C, Bradley A, Nilsson M, Hayami M, Huang B, Bundred J, Evans R, Grimminger PP, van der Sluis PC, Eren U, Saunders J, Theophilidou E, Khanzada Z, Elliott JA, Ponten J, King S, Reynolds JV, Sgromo B, Akbari K, Shalaby S, Gutschow CA, Schmidt H, Vetter D, Moorthy K, Ibrahim MA, Christodoulidis G, Räsänen JV, Kauppi J, Söderström H, Koshy R, Manatakis DK, Korkolis DP, Balalis D, Rompu A, Alkhaffaf B, Alasmar M, Arebi M, Piessen G, Nuytens F, Degisors S, Ahmed A, Boddy A, Gandhi S, Fashina O, Van Daele E, Pattyn P, Robb WB, Arumugasamy M, Al Azzawi M, Whooley J, Colak E, Aybar E, Sari AC, Uyanik MS, Ciftci AB, Sayyed R, Ayub B, Murtaza G, Saeed A, Ramesh P, Charalabopoulos A, Liakakos T, Schizas D, Baili E, Kapelouzou A, Valmasoni M, Pierobon ES, Capovilla G, Merigliano S, Constantinoiu S, Birla R, Achim F, Rosianu CG, Hoara P, Castro RG, Salcedo AF, Negoi I, Negoita VM, Ciubotaru C, Stoica B, Hostiuc S, Colucci N, Mönig SP, Wassmer CH, Meyer J, Takeda FR, Aissar Sallum RA, Ribeiro U, Cecconello I, Toledo E, Trugeda MS, Fernández MJ, Gil C, Castanedo S, Isik A, Kurnaz E, Videira JF, Peyroteo M, Canotilho R, Weindelmayer J, Giacopuzzi S, De Pasqual CA, Bruna M, Mingol F, Vaque J, Pérez C, Phillips AW, Chmelo J, Brown J, Koshy R, Han LE, Gossage JA, Davies AR, Baker CR, Kelly M, Saad M, Bernardi D, Bonavina L, Asti E, Riva C, Scaramuzzo R, Elhadi M, Ahmed HA, Elhadi A, Elnagar FA, Msherghi AA, Wills V, Campbell C, Cerdeira MP, Whiting S, Merrett N, Das A, Apostolou C, Lorenzo A, Sousa F, Barbosa JA, Devezas V, Barbosa E, Fernandes C, Smith G, Li EY, Bhimani N, Chan P, Kotecha K, Hii MW, Ward SM, Johnson M, Read M, Chong L, Hollands MJ, Allaway M, Richardson A, Johnston E, Chen AZ, Kanhere H, Prasad S, McQuillan P, Surman T, Trochsler M, Schofield W, Ahmed SK, Reid JL, Harris MC, Gananadha S, Farrant J, Rodrigues N, Fergusson J, Hindmarsh A, Afzal Z, Safranek P, Sujendran V, Rooney S, Loureiro C, Fernández SL, Díez del Val I, Jaunoo S, Kennedy L, Hussain A, Theodorou D, Triantafyllou T, Theodoropoulos C, Palyvou T, Elhadi M, Ben Taher FA, Ekheel M, Msherghi AA. Practice variation in anastomotic leak after esophagectomy: Unravelling differences in failure to rescue. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2023; 49:974-982. [PMID: 36732207 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2023.01.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2022] [Revised: 12/20/2022] [Accepted: 01/11/2023] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Failure to rescue (FTR) is an important outcome measure after esophagectomy and reflects mortality after postoperative complications. Differences in FTR have been associated with hospital resection volume. However, insight into how centers manage complications and achieve their outcomes is lacking. Anastomotic leak (AL) is a main contributor to FTR. This study aimed to assess differences in FTR after AL between centers, and to identify factors that explain these differences. METHODS TENTACLE - Esophagus is a multicenter, retrospective cohort study, which included 1509 patients with AL after esophagectomy. Differences in FTR were assessed between low-volume (<20 resections), middle-volume (20-60 resections) and high-volume centers (≥60 resections). Mediation analysis was performed using logistic regression, including possible mediators for FTR: case-mix, hospital resources, leak severity and treatment. RESULTS FTR after AL was 11.7%. After adjustment for confounders, FTR was lower in high-volume vs. low-volume (OR 0.44, 95%CI 0.2-0.8), but not versus middle-volume centers (OR 0.67, 95%CI 0.5-1.0). After mediation analysis, differences in FTR were found to be explained by lower leak severity, lower secondary ICU readmission rate and higher availability of therapeutic modalities in high-volume centers. No statistically significant direct effect of hospital volume was found: high-volume vs. low-volume 0.86 (95%CI 0.4-1.7), high-volume vs. middle-volume OR 0.86 (95%CI 0.5-1.4). CONCLUSION Lower FTR in high-volume compared with low-volume centers was explained by lower leak severity, less secondary ICU readmissions and higher availability of therapeutic modalities. To reduce FTR after AL, future studies should investigate effective strategies to reduce leak severity and prevent secondary ICU readmission.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sander Ubels
- Department of Surgery, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
| | - Eric Matthée
- Department of Surgery, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Department of Surgery, Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Moniek Verstegen
- Department of Surgery, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Bastiaan Klarenbeek
- Department of Surgery, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Stefan Bouwense
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Mark I van Berge Henegouwen
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Freek Daams
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Marc J van Det
- Department of Surgery, ZGT Hospital Group, Almelo, the Netherlands
| | - Stijn van Esser
- Department of Surgery, Reinier de Graaf Gasthuis, Delft, the Netherlands
| | - Ewen A Griffiths
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Jan Willem Haveman
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | | | - Peter D Siersema
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Bas Wijnhoven
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Gerjon Hannink
- Department of Operating Rooms, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Frans van Workum
- Department of Surgery, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Department of Surgery, Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Camiel Rosman
- Department of Surgery, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - Fatih Polat
- Canisius-Wilhelmina Ziekenhuis, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Jeroen Schouten
- Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Pritam Singh
- Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Siiki A, Ahola R, Vaalavuo Y, Antila A, Laukkarinen J. Initial management of suspected biliary injury after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. World J Gastrointest Surg 2023; 15:592-599. [PMID: 37206082 PMCID: PMC10190719 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i4.592] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2022] [Revised: 01/26/2023] [Accepted: 03/16/2023] [Indexed: 04/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Although rare, iatrogenic bile duct injury (BDI) after laparoscopic cholecystectomy may be devastating to the patient. The cornerstones for the initial management of BDI are early recognition, followed by modern imaging and evaluation of injury severity. Tertiary hepato-biliary centre care with a multi-disciplinary approach is crucial. The diagnostics of BDI commences with a multi-phase abdominal computed tomography scan, and when the biloma is drained or a surgical drain is put in place, the diagnosis is set with the help of bile drain output. To visualize the leak site and biliary anatomy, the diagnostics is supplemented with contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. The location and severity of the bile duct lesion and concomitant injuries to the hepatic vascular system are evaluated. Most often, a combination of percutaneous and endoscopic methods is used for control of contamination and bile leak. Generally, the next step is endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) for downstream control of the bile leak. ERC with insertion of a stent is the treatment of choice in most mild bile leaks. The surgical option of re-operation and its timing should be discussed in cases where an endoscopic and percutaneous approach is not sufficient. The patient's failure to recover properly in the first days after laparoscopic cholecystectomy should immediately raise suspicion of BDI and this merits immediate investigation. Early consultation and referral to a dedicated hepato-biliary unit are essential for the best outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antti Siiki
- Department of Gastroenterology and Alimentary Tract Surgery, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere 33521, Finland
| | - Reea Ahola
- Department of Gastroenterology and Alimentary Tract Surgery, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere 33521, Finland
| | - Yrjö Vaalavuo
- Department of Gastroenterology and Alimentary Tract Surgery, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere 33521, Finland
| | - Anne Antila
- Department of Gastroenterology and Alimentary Tract Surgery, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere 33521, Finland
| | - Johanna Laukkarinen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Alimentary Tract Surgery, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere 33521, Finland
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, University of Tampere, Tampere 33521, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Giuliani T, Perri G, Kang R, Marchegiani G. Current Perioperative Care in Pancreatoduodenectomy: A Step-by-Step Surgical Roadmap from First Visit to Discharge. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15092499. [PMID: 37173964 PMCID: PMC10177600 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15092499] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2023] [Revised: 04/23/2023] [Accepted: 04/23/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is a mainstay in the management of periampullary tumors. Treatment algorithms increasingly employ a multimodal strategy, which includes neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies. However, the successful treatment of a patient is contingent on the execution of a complex operation, whereby minimizing postoperative complications and optimizing a fast and complete recovery are crucial to the overall success. In this setting, risk reduction and benchmarking the quality of care are essential frameworks through which modern perioperative PD care must be delivered. The postoperative course is primarily influenced by pancreatic fistulas, but other patient- and hospital-associated factors, such as frailty and the ability to rescue from complications, also affect the outcomes. A comprehensive understanding of the factors influencing surgical outcomes allows the clinician to risk stratify the patient, thereby facilitating a frank discussion of the morbidity and mortality of PD. Further, such an understanding allows the clinician to practice based on the most up-to-date evidence. This review intends to provide clinicians with a roadmap to the perioperative PD pathway. We review key considerations in the pre-, intra-, and post-operative periods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Ravinder Kang
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Giovanni Marchegiani
- Verona University Hospital, 37134 Verona, Italy
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences (DiSCOG), University of Padua, 35122 Padua, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
van der Storm SL, Bektaş M, Barsom EZ, Schijven MP. Mobile applications in gastrointestinal surgery: a systematic review. Surg Endosc 2023:10.1007/s00464-023-10007-y. [PMID: 37016081 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10007-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2022] [Accepted: 03/09/2023] [Indexed: 04/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mobile applications can facilitate or improve gastrointestinal surgical care by benefiting patients, healthcare providers, or both. The extent to which applications are currently in use in gastrointestinal surgical care is largely unknown, as reported in literature. This systematic review was conducted to provide an overview of the available gastrointestinal surgical applications and evaluate their prospects for surgical care provision. METHODS The PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane databases were searched for articles up to October 6th 2022. Articles were considered eligible if they assessed or described mobile applications used in a gastrointestinal surgery setting for healthcare purposes. Two authors independently evaluated selected studies and extracted data for analysis. Descriptive data analysis was conducted. The revised Cochrane risk of bias (RoB-2) tool and ROBINS-I assessment tool were used to determine the methodological quality of studies. RESULTS Thirty-eight articles describing twenty-nine applications were included. The applications were classified into seven categories: monitoring, weight loss, postoperative recovery, education, communication, prognosis, and clinical decision-making. Most applications were reported for colorectal surgery, half of which focused on monitoring. Overall, a low-quality evidence was found. Most applications have only been evaluated on their usability or feasibility but not on the proposed clinical benefits. Studies with high quality evidence were identified in the areas of colorectal (2), hepatopancreatobiliary (1) and bariatric surgery (1), reporting significantly positive outcomes in terms of postoperative recovery, complications and weight loss. CONCLUSIONS The interest for applications and their use in gastrointestinal surgery is increasing. From our study, it appears that most studies using applications fail to report adequate clinical evaluation, and do not provide evidence on the effectiveness or safety of applications. Clinical evaluation of objective outcomes is much needed to evaluate the efficacy, quality and safety of applications being used as a medical device across user groups and settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastiaan L van der Storm
- Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Surgery, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health, Digital Health, Box 22660, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mustafa Bektaş
- Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Surgery, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health, Digital Health, Box 22660, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Esther Z Barsom
- Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Surgery, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health, Digital Health, Box 22660, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marlies P Schijven
- Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Surgery, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Amsterdam Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Amsterdam Public Health, Digital Health, Box 22660, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Codjia T, Roussel E, Papet E, Pinson J, Monge M, Tortajada P, Tuech JJ, Schwarz L. Can the Realization of an External Wirsungostomy be an Option for High-Risk Pancreatic Anastomosis After Pancreaticoduodenectomy? World J Surg 2023; 47:1533-1539. [PMID: 36884081 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-023-06927-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/15/2023] [Indexed: 03/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) occurs in 15-20% of patients after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) and reintervention in the setting of Grade C POPF remains associated with a mortality rate of up to 25%. In patients at high risk of POPF, PD with external wirsungostomy (EW) could be a safe alternative that avoids pancreatico-enteric anastomosis while preserving the remnant pancreas. METHODS Of the 155 consecutive patients who underwent PD from November 2015 to December 2020, 10 patients were managed using an EW, all with a fistula risk score (FRS) ≥ 7 and BMI ≥30 kg/m2, and/or major associated abdominal surgery. The pancreatic duct was cannulated with a polyethylene tube to allow good external drainage of the pancreatic fluid. We retrospectively analyzed postoperative complications and endocrine and exocrine insufficiencies. RESULTS The median alternative FRS was 36.9% [22.1-45.2]. There was no postoperative death. The 90-day overall severe complication (grade ≥3) rate was 30% (n = 3 patients), no patient required reoperation, and 2 hospital readmissions occurred. 3 patients experienced Grade B POPF (30%), managed using image-guided drainage for 2 patients. The external pancreatic drain was removed after a median drainage time of 75 days [63-80]. Two patients presented with late symptoms (> 6 months) warranting interventional management (pancreaticojejunostomy and transgastric drainage). Six patients experienced significant weight loss (> 2 kg) 3 months after surgery. One year after surgery, 4 patients still complained of diarrhea and were treated with transit-delaying drugs. One patient presented new-onset diabetes one year after surgery, and 1 of the 4 patients with preexisting diabetes experienced worsening disease. CONCLUSION EW after PD might be a solution to reduce post-operative mortality following PD in high-risk patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tatiana Codjia
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Rouen University Hospital, 1 rue de Germont, 76000, Rouen, France
| | - Edouard Roussel
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Rouen University Hospital, 1 rue de Germont, 76000, Rouen, France
| | - Eloise Papet
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Rouen University Hospital, 1 rue de Germont, 76000, Rouen, France
| | - Jean Pinson
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Rouen University Hospital, 1 rue de Germont, 76000, Rouen, France
| | - Matthieu Monge
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Rouen University Hospital, 1 rue de Germont, 76000, Rouen, France
| | - Pauline Tortajada
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Rouen University Hospital, 1 rue de Germont, 76000, Rouen, France
| | - Jean-Jacques Tuech
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Rouen University Hospital, 1 rue de Germont, 76000, Rouen, France
- Department of Genomic and Personalized Medicine in Cancer and Neurological Disorders, Rouen University Hospital, UNIROUEN, UMR 1245 INSERM, Normandie ROUEN University, 76000, Rouen, France
| | - Lilian Schwarz
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Rouen University Hospital, 1 rue de Germont, 76000, Rouen, France.
- Department of Genomic and Personalized Medicine in Cancer and Neurological Disorders, Rouen University Hospital, UNIROUEN, UMR 1245 INSERM, Normandie ROUEN University, 76000, Rouen, France.
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Stoop TF, Ghorbani P, Theijse RT, van Veldhuisen CL, DeVries JH, Groot Koerkamp B, van Santvoort HC, Molenaar IQ, Busch OR, Del Chiaro M, Besselink MG. Comment on: Pancreatectomy With Islet-Autotransplantation As Alternative for Pancreatoduodenectomy in Patients With a High-Risk for Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula: The Jury Is Still Out. ANNALS OF SURGERY OPEN 2023; 4:e247. [PMID: 37600874 PMCID: PMC10431243 DOI: 10.1097/as9.0000000000000247] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2022] [Accepted: 11/04/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas F. Stoop
- From the Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet at Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Poya Ghorbani
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet at Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Rutger T. Theijse
- From the Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Charlotte L. van Veldhuisen
- From the Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J. Hans DeVries
- Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Internal Medicine, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bas Groot Koerkamp
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hjalmar C. van Santvoort
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, University Medical Center Utrecht/St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht/Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - I. Quintus Molenaar
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, University Medical Center Utrecht/St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht/Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Olivier R. Busch
- From the Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marco Del Chiaro
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Denver Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - Marc G. Besselink
- From the Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Masuda H, Kotecha K, Maitra R, Maher R, Mittal A, Samra JS. The role of repeated imaging in detecting complications in the post-operative period following pancreaticoduodenectomy: Serial CT imaging post-pancreaticoduodenectomy. ANZ J Surg 2023; 93:1314-1321. [PMID: 36782399 DOI: 10.1111/ans.18327] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2022] [Revised: 01/31/2023] [Accepted: 02/01/2023] [Indexed: 02/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Post-pancreaticoduodenectomy haemorrhage is a potentially life-threatening complication. Delay in the detection and subsequent management of complications contribute significantly to post-operative mortality and morbidity associated with pancreaticoduodenectomy. METHODS All patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy at an Australian-based tertiary referral center between 2017 and 2022 were reviewed retrospectively. We identified those patients who suffered a post-pancreaticoduodenectomy haemorrhage and further analysed those patients who had their post-pancreaticoduodenectomy haemorrhage identified on repeated CT imaging performed within 24 h of their previous CT scan. RESULTS A total of 232 pancreaticoduodenectomies were identified for analysis during the study period, of which 23 patients (9.9%) suffered a post-pancreaticoduodenectomy haemorrhage. We present four patients who had their post-pancreaticoduodenectomy haemorrhage identified on repeat CT scan in the setting of a recent (within 24 h) CT scan which showed no evidence of active haemorrhage or pseudoaneurysm formation. All patients received prompt and definitive endovascular management through stent insertion or coil embolization resulting in successful cessation of bleeding. Three patients made an uncomplicated recovery thereafter. Unfortunately, one patient died as a complication of the bleed despite early and definitive endovascular intervention. CONCLUSION Our study highlights the importance of having a low threshold for repeated CT imaging in the post-pancreaticoduodenectomy setting, particularly when there remains a high index of suspicion clinically for a post-operative complication, even in the context of previous benign imaging. Given the complexity of pancreaticoduodenectomy, we believe early detection with liberal imaging allows the best chance at successfully managing the morbidity and mortality associated in the post-pancreaticoduodenectomy setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiro Masuda
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Krishna Kotecha
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Rudra Maitra
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Richard Maher
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Royal North Shore Hospital and North Shore Private Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Anubhav Mittal
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Northern Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,School of Medicine, University of Notre Dame, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jaswinder S Samra
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Northern Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|