Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty for treatment of class 1 and 2 obesity (MERIT): a prospective, multicentre, randomised trial

Comparative effectiveness of balloons, adjustable balloons, and endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty: a network meta-analysis of randomized trials

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Individual randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and pairwise meta-analyses do not compare all commercially available endoscopic bariatric therapies (EBTs) head-to-head. Therefore, the choice among them is currently made by inference or indirect data. We therefore assessed the comparative efficacy and safety of EBTs through a network meta-analysis.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL from inception for intragastric balloons (IGBs) and from 2013 for endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG) until May 2023. Only RCTs comparing any of the currently commercially available EBTs with controls were considered eligible. Outcomes included percentage of total weight loss (%TWL), serious adverse events (SAEs), and intolerability.

RESULTS

We identified 821 citations, of which 10 and 8 were eligible for the qualitative and quantitative analysis, respectively. Considering %TWL at the time of IGB removal, all EBTs were associated with statistically higher %TWL than controls. There were no significant differences among EBTs. However, considering the %TWL at the follow-up closest to 12 months, both ESG and the Spatz3 gastric balloon (Spatz Medical, Fort Lauderdale, Fla, USA) were more effective than the Orbera gastric balloon (Apollo Endosurgery, Austin, Tex, USA), with no statistical difference between ESG and Spatz3. For both outcomes, P score and ranking score suggested that ESG was probably associated with a greater weight loss (.889272 and .899469, respectively), followed by Spatz3 (.822894 and .842773, respectively), and Orbera (.536968 and .507165, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

All currently available EBTs approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration are more effective than both diet plus lifestyle intervention and sham procedures with an acceptable safety profile. ESG seems the most effective and may be prioritized for patients fit for both ESG and IGBs. Direct controlled trials between EBTs are warranted to confirm these findings.

Endoscopic Weight Loss Options

Endoscopic therapies for obesity have emerged as safe, effective, and minimally-invasive alternatives to traditional approaches, including lifestyle modification, anti-obesity medications, and bariatric surgery. Currently, in the United States, 2 types of endoscopic weight loss therapies are Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved and are commercially available-intragastric balloons and endoscopic gastric remodeling. These devices and procedures are associated with approximately 10% to 20% total weight loss at 1 year and have distinct technical features, benefits, and risks that providers should be familiar with. This article will focus on the primary FDA-approved endoscopic treatments for obesity and also cover those in development.

Strategies to Manage Obesity: Endoscopic Bariatric and Metabolic Therapies

Over the past two decades, numerous endoscopic bariatric and metabolic therapies (EBMTs) have been developed with the goal of providing additional effective and safe tools for the treatment of obesity. These treatments are an ultra-minimally invasive option for patients with class I, class II, and class III obesity. Many of these EBMTs can be utilized as primary therapies for treatment-naïve patients or as a treatment for weight regain after bariatric surgery. While the role of EBMTs is not to compete with bariatric surgery, which provides the most effective treatment of obesity, they provide greater weight loss than lifestyle modifications and pharmacotherapy; additionally, when combined with pharmacotherapy, they may help achieve surgical weight loss without the risk of invasive surgery. This review summarizes the most currently available EBMTs, including intragastric balloons (IGBs), endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG), and endoscopic surgical revision procedures for treating obesity.

Obesity and cardiovascular disease: an ESC clinical consensus statement

The global prevalence of obesity has more than doubled over the past four decades, currently affecting more than a billion individuals. Beyond its recognition as a high-risk condition that is causally linked to many chronic illnesses, obesity has been declared a disease per se that results in impaired quality of life and reduced life expectancy. Notably, two-thirds of obesity-related excess mortality is attributable to cardiovascular disease. Despite the increasingly appreciated link between obesity and a broad range of cardiovascular disease manifestations including atherosclerotic disease, heart failure, thromboembolic disease, arrhythmias, and sudden cardiac death, obesity has been underrecognized and sub-optimally addressed compared with other modifiable cardiovascular risk factors. In the view of major repercussions of the obesity epidemic on public health, attention has focused on population-based and personalized approaches to prevent excess weight gain and maintain a healthy body weight from early childhood and throughout adult life, as well as on comprehensive weight loss interventions for persons with established obesity. This clinical consensus statement by the European Society of Cardiology discusses current evidence on the epidemiology and aetiology of obesity; the interplay between obesity, cardiovascular risk factors and cardiac conditions; the clinical management of patients with cardiac disease and obesity; and weight loss strategies including lifestyle changes, interventional procedures, and anti-obesity medications with particular focus on their impact on cardiometabolic risk and cardiac outcomes. The document aims to raise awareness on obesity as a major risk factor and provide guidance for implementing evidence-based practices for its prevention and optimal management within the context of primary and secondary cardiovascular disease prevention.

Surgical Strategies for the Management of Obesity

Obesity is one of the most difficult medical conditions to treat in the United States (US) and requires multidisciplinary treatment. Bariatric surgery is one of the most effective treatment options for morbid obesity. In this review, we describe the most up-to-date information regarding the impact of obesity on cardiovascular disease and other comorbidities as well as the various surgical approaches for treatment.

Advances in Metabolic Bariatric Surgeries and Endoscopic Therapies: A Comprehensive Narrative Review of Diabetes Remission Outcomes

Background and Objectives: Type 2 diabetes (T2D), closely associated with obesity, contributes to increased morbidity and mortality due to complications such as cardiometabolic disease. This review aims to evaluate the effectiveness of metabolic and bariatric surgeries (MBS) and endoscopic bariatric therapies (EBTs) in achieving diabetes remission and to examine key predictors influencing remission outcomes. Materials and Methods: This review synthesizes data from studies on MBS and EBT outcomes, focusing on predictors for diabetes remission such as preoperative insulin use, diabetes duration, HbA1c, and C-peptide levels. Additionally, predictive scoring systems, including the Individualized Metabolic Surgery (IMS), DiaRem, Advanced-DiaRem, ABCD, and Robert et al. scores, were analyzed for their utility in forecasting remission likelihood. Results: Key predictors of T2D remission include shorter diabetes duration, lower HbA1c, and higher C-peptide levels, while prolonged insulin use, and higher insulin doses are associated with lower remission rates. Scoring models like IMS and DiaRem demonstrate that lower scores correlate with a higher likelihood of remission, especially for procedures such as Roux-En-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). RYGB generally shows higher remission rates compared to sleeve gastrectomy (SG), particularly among patients with mild disease severity, while EBTs like ESG and IGBs contribute 5-20% total weight loss (TWL) and moderate glycemic control improvements. Conclusions: Both MBS and EBTs are effective for T2D management, with predictive scoring models aiding in individualized patient selection to optimize remission outcomes. Further research to validate these predictive tools across diverse populations could enhance treatment planning for both surgical and endoscopic interventions.

Current State of Endoscopic Bariatric Therapies

The obesity epidemic poses a significant global health challenge. Despite proven efficacy, accessibility to bariatric surgery is limited. Endoscopic bariatric therapies offer less invasive alternatives. Reversible space-occupying devices like intragastric balloons are suitable for both primary obesity treatment and bridging to surgery. Restrictive therapies that reduce gastric volume like the primary obesity surgery endoluminal and endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty have shown promising short-term results. Diverting devices such as intestinal liners/barriers or magnet-assisted anastomoses aim to replicate surgical effects with lower risks, though efficacy varies. Finally, endoscopic revisional procedures like transoral outlet reduction address weight regain post-bariatric surgery.

Efficacy of Revisional Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy

BACKGROUND

Recurrent weight gain after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is common. Revisional endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (r-ESG) has been shown to be a promising endoscopic bariatric therapy (EBT) to treat weight recurrence after LSG. However, to date, weight loss outcomes beyond 1-year follow-up are unknown. Our study aims as follows: (1) examine 1 year, 18-month, and 24-month weight loss outcomes post-r-ESG and (2) determine if weight loss outcomes post-LSG predict clinical outcomes post-r-ESG.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort data of patients who completed r-ESG from December 2020 to November 2023. The primary outcome was percentage of total body weight loss (TBWL) at 1-year post-r-ESG. Secondary outcomes included TBWL at 18- and 24-month post-r-ESG. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to determine predictors of weight loss ≥ 5% at 12 months.

RESULTS

A total of 55 patients completed r-ESG. TBWL post-r-ESG at 12 months was 8.6% (n = 37), at 18 months was 10.7% (n = 31), and at 24 months was 12.6% (n = 18) (Table 2). There were no statistically significant variables associated with weight loss ≥ 5% at 12 months (Table 3).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrates that r-ESG is an effective and durable EBT for post-LSG weight recurrence. Further research is needed to determine optimal timing of r-ESG for weight recurrence as well as the adjunctive role of anti-obesity medications.

Position statement and guidelines about Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty (ESG) also known as "Endo-sleeve"

IS ESG EFFECTIVE IN THE TREATMENT OF OBESITY AND ASSOCIATEDCOMORBIDITIES?: Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty (ESG) is more effective than lifestyle modifications alone for weight loss and improving obesity-related comorbidities. While it has less effect on weight loss compared to Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy (LSG) in the short to medium term, it offers similar comorbidities resolution to LSG. IS ESG A SAFE PROCEDURE, AND WHAT ARE ITS RISKS?: The safety profile of ESG is consistently supported in the literature. Surgical complications after ESG, ranging from 1.5 to 2.3%, such as bleeding, perforation, fistula, or upper bowel obstruction, are rare and typically managed endoscopically. The incidence of new-onset gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) is deemed negligible and occurs less frequently after ESG compared to SG. WHAT ARE THE INDICATIONS AND MANAGEMENT METHODS?: Multidisciplinary care for patients undergoing ESG should be provided in an accredited center authorized to perform bariatric and metabolic surgery, with validation through a multidisciplinary consultation meeting (RCP). Perioperative management should be personalized and ideally modeled after the protocols already in place for bariatric and metabolic surgery to ensure satisfactory and lasting weight and metabolic outcomes. Adherence to follow-up visits is a significant predictor of successful weight loss outcomes after ESG. Additionally, all endoscopic surgical procedures should be documented in a registry affiliated with a recognized scientific society, as is standard for other bariatric surgical procedures. WHICH HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONALS CAN PERFORM ESG?: ESG must be performed by a practitioner trained in endoscopy and obesity management, capable of ensuring thorough preoperative care and comprehensive postoperative follow-up, supported by an experienced multidisciplinary team. In France, Notice No. 2021.0040/AC/SEAP of June 10, 2021, issued by the Haute Autorité de santé (HAS) college, specifies that "the technology of ESG via the trans-oral approach, involving wide plication of the greater gastric curvature […] with an endoscopic suture placement device, enables a gastroenterologist or a visceral and digestive surgeon to perform gastric plication through digestive endoscopy by placing sutures in the stomach". Ideally, this should take place in an accredited center authorized to perform bariatric and metabolic surgery, such as those approved by the Agence régionale de santé (ARS), in accordance with Article R6123-212 of December 2022 of the French Public Health Code. WHAT ARE THE RECOMMENDATIONS AND VIEWS OF OTHER INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFICSOCIETIES?: ESG is an integral part of the therapeutic arsenal available to bariatric and metabolic surgeons, offering an effective and valuable treatment option for obesity in specific patient populations. The International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity (IFSO) Bariatric Endoscopy Committee, following a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis, endorsed ESG as an effective and valuable treatment for obesity. ESG is particularly beneficial for patients with class I and II obesity, as well as for those with class III obesity who are not suitable candidates for metabolic bariatric surgery. Additionally, it can be proposed as an addition to lifestyle interventions in adolescent patients with class II obesity. The SOFFCOMM endorses endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG) as an effective and valuable treatment for obesity and highlights the importance of appropriate patient selection, coupled with rigorous evaluation of long-term outcomes, to refine its indications further.

Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty versus lifestyle modifications for class II obesity patients: a French cost-effectiveness analysis

INTRODUCTION

Obesity is a worldwide epidemic, with up to 17% of French population affected. European guidelines recommend surgical management at specific weight and comorbidity level; however, less than 2% of eligible patients undergo surgical bariatric interventions. To extend the benefits of bariatric interventions to the untreated population with obesity, endoscopic techniques such as endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG) have been developed. Analysis of costs and long-term benefits of ESG across stakeholders is needed. This work aimed to assess the healthcare economic and outcomes for ESG in the French healthcare system.

METHODS

A cost-utility analysis study was conducted to evaluate class II obesity patients, stratified into ESG and lifestyle modifications or lifestyle modifications alone groups. Health benefits were measured as quality-adjusted life years (QALY) and costs benefits expressed as incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). A 6-state Markov model was used and base case scenario analysis was used to assess ESG benefits against lifestyle modifications only. One-way sensitivity analysis (OWSA) and probabilistic sensitivity analysis were performed to evaluate uncertainty on health care interventions and worse case scenarios, respectively.

RESULTS

ESG population from the France center included 59 patients, lifestyle modification group was drawn from the MERIT cohort. The base case scenario showed higher costs for ESG procedure compared to lifestyle modifications alone; however, gain in terms of QALY (+ 1,3) is observed maintaining ICER below the set threshold. Also OWSA and probabilistic analysis confirmed ESG cost-effectiveness. OWSA allowed identification of ICER-influencing factors; probabilistic sensitivity analysis confirmed ESG to be cost-effective in 99.29% of iterations.

CONCLUSION

ESG is cost-effective in the French healthcare system. Its potential to reach an untreated portion of the population living with obesity should prompt its uptake into clinical practice. The results of this study should sustain ESG implementation throughout France and possible integration of its reimbursement by the public healthcare system.

Endoscopic bariatric surgery for adults with overweight and obesity: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic bariatric surgery (EBS) is a new treatment for obesity. We compared the efficacy, safety, and probability of metabolic complications of different EBSs with laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG).

METHODS

This systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) included searches of PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library from January 1, 2017, to December 27, 2022, to find comparative trials of EBS procedures and EBS with LSG. We performed a frequentist model NMA to summarize the evidence and ranked the interventions according to SUCRA scores.

RESULTS

The search for this NMA yielded 14,160 articles, of which 18 eligible trials recruited 766,135 participants for procedures including LSG, endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG), nonadjustable intragastric balloon (NIB), BioEnterics Intragastric Balloon (BIB), and adjustable intragastric balloon (AIB). Definitive evidence suggests that LSG is most effective for weight reduction. Compared with LSG, NIB, SMD = -0.49 [95% CI -0.79, -0.18]; AIB, SMD = -0.41 [95% CI -0.76, -0.06] and ESG, SMD = -0.31 [95% CI -0.33, -0.29] in the index of percentage total weight loss under six months. In terms of safety outcomes, ESG had the lowest incidence of adverse events; the order of the observed incidence of adverse events from small to large was ESG, NIB, AIB, LSG, and BIB.

CONCLUSIONS

ESG is an effective and safe minimally invasive surgical method for people with overweight and obesity. Its 12-month effect is better than that of NIB, and its influence on lipid metabolism makes it more protective of the cardiovascular system and liver.

PROSPERO

CRD42022375343.

Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG): indications and results-a systematic review

Obesity is a major global health problem and at the same time a financial burden for social security systems. For a long time, conventional lifestyle interventions have tried unsuccessfully to find a solution. It has been proven that only interventions that ultimately address the central control centers of hunger, appetite and satiety will lead to sustained weight loss. As a result, metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) has become the gold standard in the treatment of obesity and has been shown to be effective and safe in both the short and long term. Processed via the gut-brain axis, MBS not only leads to weight loss, but also-and, in addition, independently through the modification of the intestinal tract in bypass surgery-to a significant remission rate of type 2 diabetes mellitus, the typical co-morbidity of obesity. However, MBS is not suitable for all patients. Some patients are ineligible due to a high-risk profile or do not wish to undergo surgery, whilst others do not meet the criteria for MBS but still suffer from obesity. This treatment gap has been a driving force behind the development of endoscopic solutions such as endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG). ESG offers a less invasive, endoluminal and anatomy-sparing alternative that reduces gastric volume by suturing tissue folds along the greater curvature. Such a reduction in gastric volume, which is also one principle of action of MBS, can induce earlier satiety and lead to weight loss. The evidence behind this procedure, in particular its efficacy and safety, should be objectified through this review.

Prospective, single-arm multicenter, international, observational postmarket study to assess the safety and efficacy of a triangulation platform for treating patients requiring endoscopic gastroplasty

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Gastric restriction techniques have recently emerged as minimally invasive bariatric procedures. Endoscopic sutured gastroplasty (ESG) with the Endomina (Endo Tools Therapeutics, Gosselies, Belgium) triangulation platform proved to be safe and effective for the treatment of class I and II obesity in prospective studies. In this registry, we aimed to further assess on a larger scale the safety and efficacy of the procedure in routine practice with a dedicated device.

METHODS

This was a multicenter, observational, prospective post-market study including patients with obesity undergoing Endomina ESG. The primary safety outcome was the occurrence of serious adverse device effects (SADEs) at 12 months. The primary efficacy outcome was the technical success defined by completing the procedure without premature abortion owing to technical issues. The rates of procedure-related adverse events, weight loss outcomes, and quality of life changes were collected.

RESULTS

A total of 142 patients underwent ESG in 3 centers from July 2020 to March 2023. Of these, 67 (mean body mass index, 38.5 ± 6.3 kg/m2) reached at least 12 months of follow-up up to October 2022. Technical success was 100%. No SADEs occurred. Seven mild procedure-related adverse events were reported overall. Mean percentage of excess weight loss and total body weight loss at 12 months' follow-up were 48.5% ± 38.6 and 15.3% ± 10.6, respectively (n = 67). Improved quality of life was observed following ESG.

CONCLUSIONS

ESG is safe and effective, thus offering a satisfactory therapeutic option for a wide range of obese patients on a large scale.

Decoding Obesity Management Medications and the Journey to Informed Treatment Choices for Patients

Incretin-based obesity management medications (OMMs) fill a treatment gap in a stepped-care model between lifestyle change alone and metabolic bariatric surgery, resulting in weight loss of 15% to 20% of body weight. Public interest in and demand for OMMs has recently increased dramatically. Unfortunately, cost and access to OMMs remain a significant barrier for many patients. Although these medications have the potential to produce large weight loss outcomes, many unanswered questions remain regarding informed choice and optimization of obesity care protocols, especially for patients with a body mass index of 35 kg/m2 or higher who may be considering various intervention options such as lifestyle changes, OMMs, endoscopic weight loss procedures, and/or metabolic bariatric surgery. When considering strategies to aid patients in decision making about obesity treatment, several considerations warrant discussion because patients may have unrealistic perceptions about risk vs efficacy and may hold numerous misconceptions about long-term behavior change and outcomes. This article outlines considerations for informed obesity treatment decision making and reviews aspects of obesity treatment specific to OMMs, including adverse effects, patient expectations for treatment outcome, equitable access to care, the impact of weight bias on patient care, the risk of weight recurrence, and the need for long-term multicomponent treatment to achieve weight loss and weight maintenance.

Finding of situs inversus in endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty: Case report

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE

Situs inversus is an anatomical rare condition in which visceral organs are not located in its normal position, with a reversal anatomical orientation.

CASE PRESENTATION

We present a case of an 27-year-old male with a Body Mass Index (BMI) of 36.02 Kg/m2, who was programed for a Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty (ESG), in which Situs inversus was documented.

CLINICAL DISCUSSION

Situs inversus is an uncommon anatomical condition that complicates identifying surgical landmarks and performing procedures like ESG. Preoperative imaging, such as abdominal ultrasound or computed tomography, is critical for confirming the diagnosis and planning the intervention. In this case, ESG was successfully executed using standard techniques, emphasizing the importance of expertise and careful planning. The reversed anatomy required adjustments in endoscopic navigation but did not necessitate major deviations from established protocols. This case highlights that, under the care of experienced endoscopists, ESG remains a safe and effective option for patients with situs inversus.

CONCLUSION

Situs inversus is rare anatomical variation that can represent a challenge in bariatric endoscopic procedures such as ESG. Nevertheless, ESG can be safely performed under an experienced endoscopic bariatric surgeon.

IFSO Bariatric Endoscopy Committee Evidence-Based Review and Position Statement on Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty for Obesity Management

BACKGROUND

Obesity is a significant global health issue. Metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) is the gold standard in the treatment of obesity due to its proven effectiveness and safety in the short and long term. However, MBS is not suitable for all patients. Some individuals are at high surgical risk or refuse surgical treatment, while others do not meet the criteria for MBS despite having obesity-related comorbidities. This gap has driven the development of endoscopic solutions like endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG), which offers a less invasive alternative that preserves organ function and reduces risks. A recent IFSO International Delphi consensus study highlighted that multidisciplinary experts agree on the utility of ESG for managing obesity in patients with class I and II obesity and for those with class III obesity who do not wish to pursue or qualify for MBS. This IFSO Bariatric Endoscopy Committee position statement aims to augment these consensus statements by providing a comprehensive systematic review of the evidence and delivering an evidence-based position on the value of ESG within the spectrum of obesity management.

METHODS

A comprehensive systematic review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) and Cochrane guidelines.

RESULTS

Systematic Review: The systematic review included 44 articles encompassing 15,714 patients receiving ESG. The studies varied from large case series to cohort studies and a randomized controlled trial (RCT). The mean baseline BMI was 37.56 kg/m2. The review focused on weight loss outcomes and safety data.

META-ANALYSIS

Time point Mean %EWL Mean %TBWL 6 months 48.04 15.66 12 months 53.09 17.56 18 months 57.98 16.25 24 months 46.57 15.2 36 months 53.18 14.07 60 months 45.3 15.9 These results demonstrate significant weight loss following ESG.

SAFETY

The pooled serious adverse event (SAE) rate was 1.25%. This low rate of SAEs indicates that ESG is a relatively safe procedure.

QUALITY OF EVIDENCE

The quality of evidence from the included observational studies was assessed as very low, primarily due to the inherent limitations associated with observational study designs, such as potential biases and lack of randomization. In contrast, the quality of evidence from the single randomized controlled trial was rated as MODERATE, reflecting a more robust study design that provides a higher level of evidence despite some limitations.

CONCLUSIONS

The IFSO Bariatric Endoscopy Committee, after conducting a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis, endorses endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG) as an effective and valuable treatment for obesity. ESG is particularly beneficial for patients with class I and II obesity, as well as for those with class III obesity who are not suitable candidates for metabolic bariatric surgery. ESG provides significant weight loss outcomes and demonstrates a favorable safety profile with a low rate of serious adverse events. Despite the limitations of the included observational studies, the randomized controlled trial included in the analysis reinforces the efficacy and safety of ESG and provides an evidence-based foundation for the position statement. Thus, the IFSO position statement supports and provides an evidence base for the role of ESG within the broader spectrum of obesity management.

Preliminary validation of the virtual bariatric endoscopic simulator

Background and Aims

Obesity is a global health concern. Bariatric surgery offers reliably effective and durable weight loss and improvements of other comorbid conditions. However, the accessibility of bariatric surgery remains limited. Minimally invasive techniques, including endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG), have emerged to bridge this gap. To effectively complete the ESG procedure, one requires skill in multiple complex interventional endoscopic maneuvers. This requisite expertise poses challenges for training in this burgeoning field.

Methods

We designed the virtual bariatric endoscopic (ViBE) simulator software to mimic the ESG procedure accurately. The ViBE simulator features a detailed simulation of an endoscope equipped with an endoscopic suturing system and a high-resolution stomach, enhancing the visualization of procedural details. Furthermore, the simulator incorporates performance metrics using a reverse scoring system to evaluate users' proficiency in tasks such as argon plasma coagulation (APC) marking, suturing, and cinching. To validate the simulator, we conducted a study involving experts and novices at the Indiana University School of Medicine, where participants engaged with the simulation environment in a series of training tasks.

Results

Twelve participants, comprising 5 experts and 7 novices, were asked to complete a post-training questionnaire featuring 7 items, rating each on a Likert scale. The APC task realism received the highest score, averaging 3.83. The usefulness of improving endoscopic technical skills averaged 3.08, with the realism of cinching the knot and suturing tasks receiving scores of 3.17 and 3.25, respectively, suggesting a generally positive reception. Automated performance metrics indicated that, on average, experts outperformed novices by 10.83 points.

Conclusions

The ViBE simulation strives to replicate the steps of the ESG within a virtual environment. Our primary objective in developing this simulator was to enhance the learning curve for endoscopic suturing and ESG techniques, thereby safely extending these skills to a broader patient base.

Advances in Endoscopic Bariatric and Metabolic Therapies

This article presents an overview of endoscopic bariatric and metabolic therapies (EBMTs) as emerging minimally invasive interventions for obesity and its related comorbidities. It explores various gastric and small-bowel endoscopic procedures, including their mechanisms, clinical outcomes, and safety profiles.

Endoscopic management of obesity and metabolic diseases

Obesity has become a global pandemic that is associated with a range of metabolic disorders. Traditional treatment options, such as lifestyle modification and anti-obesity medications, often exhibit limited efficacy and can lead to long-term weight gain, especially upon discontinuation of the medication. Although bariatric surgery is effective, its accessibility is constrained, and only a small percentage of eligible patients receive this intervention. Over the past two decades, endoscopic bariatric and metabolic therapies (EBMTs) have emerged as minimally invasive and effective alternatives for managing obesity and its related comorbidities. This article reviews primary gastric and small bowel EBMTs, their mechanisms of action, key supporting literature, and the metabolic outcomes associated with each device and procedure.

A Guideline-Directed Approach to Obesity Treatment

This article summarizes and compares 18 sets of guidelines for adult obesity treatment, highlighting key recommendations for patient evaluation, lifestyle intervention, anti-obesity medications (AOMs), and metabolic and bariatric surgery. Guidelines are consistent in many regards, although there is divergence regarding preferred AOMs. Metabolic and bariatric surgery is still recognized as the most durable form of obesity treatment, and newer guidelines suggest these procedures at lower BMI thresholds for people with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes. Overall, guidelines for obesity treatment show a high degree of agreement, although updates are needed to incorporate new treatment innovations.

Mechanism of action and selection of endoscopic bariatric therapies for treatment of obesity

Endoscopic bariatric therapies (EBTs) are minimally invasive and safe procedures with favorable weight loss outcomes in obesity treatment. We aimed to present the weight loss mechanism of action of EBTs and an individualized selection method for patients with obesity. We searched PubMed, Medline, Scopus, Embase, and Google Scholar databases for studies on the topic from databases inception to July 1, 2023, written in English. We focused on EBTs potential mechanism of action to induce weight loss. We also present an expert opinion on a novel selection of EBTs based on their mechanism of action. EBTs can result in weight loss through variable mechanisms of action. They can induce earlier satiation, delay gastric emptying, restrict the accommodative response of the stomach, decrease caloric absorption, and alter the secretion of gastrointestinal hormones. Selecting EBTs may be guided through their mechanism of action by which patients with abnormal satiation may benefit more from tissue apposition devices and aspiration therapy while patients with fast gastric emptying may be better candidates for intragastric devices, endoscopic anastomosis devices, and duodenal mucosal resurfacing. Consequently, the selection of EBTs should be guided by the mechanism of action which is specific to each type of therapy.

Safety and efficacy of sleeve gastrectomy in non-diabetic individuals with class I vs. class II obesity: a matched controlled experiment from Tehran Obesity Treatment Study (TOTS)

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the 3-year outcomes of sleeve gastrectomy in non-diabetic individuals with class I obesity.

METHODS

A total of 78 participants with class I obesity and 78 participants with class II obesity, matched in terms of age, sex (93.6% female), and the rates of dyslipidemia and hypertension, were included in this prospective cohort study. Follow-up data, including metabolic features, body composition, nutritional characteristics, and surgery complications, were gathered at the baseline and 6, 12, 24, and 36 months post-bariatric surgery. Micronutrient deficiencies and comorbidities (hypertension and dyslipidemia) were evaluated in both groups using conditional logistic regression analysis, and Clavien-Dindo classification was used to compare surgical complications.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics of the participants in both groups were similar (n = 78, mean age: 36.4 ± 8.5). The two groups were also comparable in terms of weight loss, cardiovascular risk factors, and remission of obesity-related comorbidities 3 years following sleeve gastrectomy. Overall values of Δ total weight loss (TWL)%, Δ excess weight loss (EWL)%, and β (95% CI) were - 1.86 (1.19), and - 2.56 (4.5) with a P value of 0.118 and 0.568, respectively. The occurrence of surgical complications and undesirable outcomes were also similar between the two study groups.

CONCLUSION

Bariatric surgery is an effective and safe method to achieve weight loss and alleviate cardiovascular risk factors and obesity-related comorbidities in non-diabetic individuals with class I and class II obesity.

Therapeutic endoscopy: Recent updates and future directions

The landscape of therapeutic endoscopy has undergone a remarkable evolution over the past few decades, carving out a niche that merges innovative technology with advanced clinical practice. As we venture further into the 21st century, the horizon of this field continues to expand, driven by rapid advancements in technology and a deeper understanding of gastrointestinal pathology. This review article aims to shed light on the recent advances and future trajectories of therapeutic endoscopy, focusing on pivotal areas such as third space endoscopy, endoscopic resection techniques, artificial endoscopy, endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), the integration of artificial intelligence (AI), and endoscopic anti-reflux therapies.

The evolution and current state of bariatric endoscopy in Western countries

With the alarmingly increasing prevalence of obesity in the Western world, it has become necessary to provide more acceptable treatment options for patients with obesity. Minimally invasive endoscopic techniques are continuously evolving. Currently, metabolic and bariatric endoscopies encompass several different techniques that can offer significant weight loss and improvement in comorbidities with a favorable safety profile. Restrictive bariatric procedures include the use of intragastric balloons and gastric remodeling techniques with different suturing devices. Several studies have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of these techniques that are widely used in clinical practice. Small intestine-targeted metabolic endoscopy is an intriguing and rapidly evolving field of research, although it is not widespread in routine practice. These techniques include duodenal-jejunal bypass liners, duodenal mucosal resurfacing, and incisionless anastomoses. The aim of this review article is to provide a detailed update on the currently available bariatric endoscopy techniques in Western countries.

SICOB Italian clinical practice guidelines for the surgical treatment of obesity and associated diseases using GRADE methodology on bariatric and metabolic surgery

Obesity is a chronic disease associated with increased morbidity and mortality and reduced quality of life. Pharmacotherapy can be associated with life style changes in increasing and maintaining weight loss and ameliorating obesity-related complications and comorbidities. In patients affected by obesity and uncontrolled obesity-associated complications or high degrees of BMI (> 40 Kg/m2), metabolic bariatric surgery can be a valid therapeutic option. Many different types of surgical procedures have been developed in last decades, mainly performed via laparoscopic approaches. However, clinical indications for metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) and the choice of the most appropriate type of procedure have not been clarified so far.The Italian Society of Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery for Obesity (Società Italiana di Chirurgia dell'Obesità e delle Malattie Metaboliche-SICOB) decided to design and develop the updated version of the Italian guidelines aimed at assisting healthcare professionals in the choice of the surgical option for the treatment of obesity and related conditions. Between June and October 2022, a panel of 24 experts and an evidence review team (ERT, 10 members), participated in the definition of clinical questions, outcomes, and recommendations and collected and analyzed all the available evidence on the basis of pre-specified search strategies. GRADE methodology and PICO (Patient, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome) conceptual framework have been adopted for the development of the present guidelines. Aim of the present guideline is to verify indications to surgery with respect to the presence of comorbid conditions, evaluate the different types of surgical approaches and endoscopic bariatric procedure and revise indication to revision surgery and postoperative procedures.

Obesity and cardiovascular disease: an ESC clinical consensus statement

The global prevalence of obesity has more than doubled over the past four decades, currently affecting more than a billion individuals. Beyond its recognition as a high-risk condition that is causally linked to many chronic illnesses, obesity has been declared a disease per se that results in impaired quality of life and reduced life expectancy. Notably, two-thirds of obesity-related excess mortality is attributable to cardiovascular disease. Despite the increasingly appreciated link between obesity and a broad range of cardiovascular disease manifestations including atherosclerotic disease, heart failure, thromboembolic disease, arrhythmias, and sudden cardiac death, obesity has been underrecognized and sub-optimally addressed compared with other modifiable cardiovascular risk factors. In the view of major repercussions of the obesity epidemic on public health, attention has focused on population-based and personalized approaches to prevent excess weight gain and maintain a healthy body weight from early childhood and throughout adult life, as well as on comprehensive weight loss interventions for persons with established obesity. This clinical consensus statement by the European Society of Cardiology discusses current evidence on the epidemiology and aetiology of obesity; the interplay between obesity, cardiovascular risk factors and cardiac conditions; the clinical management of patients with cardiac disease and obesity; and weight loss strategies including lifestyle changes, interventional procedures, and anti-obesity medications with particular focus on their impact on cardiometabolic risk and cardiac outcomes. The document aims to raise awareness on obesity as a major risk factor and provide guidance for implementing evidence-based practices for its prevention and optimal management within the context of primary and secondary cardiovascular disease prevention.

Endobariatric systems: Strategic integration of endoscopic therapies in the management of obesity

The escalating obesity pandemic and its comorbidities necessitate adaptable and versatile treatment strategies. Endobariatric and metabolic therapies (EBMTs) can be strategically employed in a multipronged approach to obesity management, analogous to the way chess systems are employed to seize opportunities and thwart threats. In this review, we explore the spectrum of established and developing EBMTs, examining their efficacy in weight loss and metabolic improvement and their importance for a tailored, patient-centric approach. The complexity of obesity management mirrors the intricate nature of a chess game, with an array of tactics and strategies available to address the opponent's moves. Similarly, the bariatric endoscopist employs a range of EBMTs to alter the gastrointestinal tract landscape, targeting critical anatomical regions to modify physiological reactions to food consumption and nutrient assimilation. Gastric-focused EBMTs aim to reduce stomach capacity and induce satiety. Intestinal-focused EBMTs target hormonal regulation and nutrient absorption to improve metabolic profiles. EBMTs offer unique advantages of reversibility, adjustability and minimal invasiveness, allowing them to be used as primary treatments, adjuncts to pharmacotherapy or tools to address post-bariatric surgery weight recidivism. However, sub-optimal adoption of EBMTs due to lack of awareness, perceived costs and limited training opportunities hinders their integration into standard obesity management practices. By strategically integrating EBMTs into the broader landscape of obesity care, leveraging their unique advantages to enhance outcomes, clinicians can offer a more dynamic and personalized treatment paradigm. This approach, akin to employing chess systems to adapt to evolving challenges, allows for a comprehensive, patient-centric management of obesity as a chronic, complex and relapsing disease.

Bariatric endoscopic antral myotomy: a pilot study assessing technical feasibility, physiologic changes, and preliminary efficacy

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Gastric balloons and endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty appear to work by delaying gastric emptying. We hypothesized that pylorus-sparing antral myotomy would inhibit the antral pump, inducing gastric retention and similarly resulting in weight loss.

METHODS

In this single-center pilot study, we assessed bariatric endoscopic antral myotomy (BEAM) using submucosal tunneling. The primary outcomes were feasibility, safety, and efficacy at 6 and 12 months, whereas the secondary outcomes were changes in the gastric-emptying rate and gastroparesis cardinal symptom index (GCSI) score.

RESULTS

Six subjects underwent successful BEAM. One required needle decompression, and another developed pulmonary embolism, treated without sequela. At 6 and 12 months, patients achieved 9.1% ± 8.9% and 12.2% ± 7.1% total weight loss (P < .0005). The gastric-emptying rate was delayed by 36.6% in those with ≥10% total weight loss. The GCSI score increased significantly at 12 months, particularly regarding early satiety.

CONCLUSIONS

This pilot study suggests BEAM is feasible and appears to induce delayed gastric emptying that is associated with significant weight loss, without symptoms of gastroparesis.

Novel Devices for Endoscopic Suturing: Past, Present, and Future

Endoscopic suturing has been described in many applications, including the approximation of tissue defects, anchoring stents, hemostasis, and primary and secondary bariatric interventions. Primary endobariatric procedures use endoscopic suturing for gastric remodeling with the intention of weight loss. Currently, the only commercially available device in the United States is the OverStitch endoscopic suturing system (Apollo Endosurgery). We describe devices of potential that are currently in design and/or trials as devices for weight loss by gastric remodeling, including USGI incisionless operating platform used for the primary obesity surgery endoluminal 2.0 procedure, Endomina used for the Endomina endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty, and EndoZip.

Approach to the Treatment of Children and Adolescents with Obesity

Pediatric obesity continues to be an omnipresent disease; 1 in 5 children and adolescents have obesity in the United States. The comorbidities associated with youth-onset obesity tend to have a more severe disease progression in youth compared to their adult counterparts with the same obesity-related condition. A comorbidity of focus in this study is metabolism-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), which has rapidly evolved into the most common liver disease seen in the pediatric population. A direct association exists between the treatment of MASLD and the treatment of pediatric obesity. The current evidence supports that obesity treatment is safe and effective.

How to Build an Endobariatric Practice: Set Up, Branding, and Marketing

In the last decade there has been significant development of novel devices and techniques in the field of endoscopic bariatric and metabolic therapies (EBMTs). Bariatric endoscopy fulfills an unmet need within the current paradigm of obesity management. The expansion of this field is an important step in offering complete care to patients with obesity and metabolic disease. Nevertheless, information, mentorship and guidance through starting a practice in EBMTs are limited. We discuss important considerations when beginning a practice in obesity care with a focus on endobariatrics in a variety of practice settings.

Comparable improvement and resolution of obesity-related comorbidities in endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty vs laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: single-center study

BACKGROUND

Despite excellent surgical outcomes, a minority of qualified patients undergo weight loss surgery. Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty (ESG), an incisionless procedure, has proven to be effective in achieving weight loss and comorbidity improvement. We aim to compare outcomes of ESG to those of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy (LSG).

METHOD

A retrospective review of a prospective database of patients who underwent ESG and LSG at NorthShore University HealthSystem from 2016 to 2023 was completed. Demographic and outcome data were analyzed. Pre- and post-surgical data were compared using chi-square and two-sample t tests. Improvement or resolution of obesity-related comorbidities were also assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 212 LSG and 68 ESG patients were reviewed. ESG patients were older (47 ± 10 vs. 43 ± 12, p = 0.006) and less obese (BMI 37.0 ± 5.5 vs. 45.8 ± 0.4, p < 0.001) than LSG patients. Median length of stay after ESG was 0 days and after LSG 1 day (p < 0.001). Severe adverse events were seen less frequent after ESG (1.47%, vs 3.77%). LSG achieved more significant %TBWL at 6 months (25.2 ± 8.9 vs 14.9 ± 7.4), 1 year (27.5 ± 10.8 vs 14.1 ± 9.8), and 2 years (25.7 ± 10.8 vs 10.5 ± 8.8, all p < 0.001) after surgery when compared to ESG. LSG achieved significantly greater %EWL compared to ESG at 6 months (57.0 ± 20.7 vs 50.4 ± 29.2, p = 0.137), 1 year (61.4 ± 24.6 vs 46.5 ± 34.0, p = 0.026), and 2 years postoperatively (59.7 ± 25.5 vs 32.6 ± 28.2, p = 0.001). There were no statistically significant differences in rates of improvement or resolution of diabetes, obstructive sleep apnea, hyperlipidemia, or hypertension.

CONCLUSION

ESG is an effective procedure for weight loss and comorbidity resolution. Obesity-related comorbidities are comparably improved and resolved following ESG vs LSG. Although the weight loss in LSG is significantly higher, patients can expect a shorter hospital length of stay and a lower rate of complications after ESG. ESG continues to show promise for long-term weight loss and improvement in health.

Recommendations on the management of severe obesity in patients with inflammatory bowel disease of the Spanish Group on Crohn's Disease and Ulcerative Colitis (GETECCU), Spanish Society of Obesity (SEEDO), Spanish Association of Surgery (AEC) and Spanish Society of Digestive Endoscopy (SEED)

Obesity is a multifactorial, chronic, progressive and recurrent disease considered a public health issue worldwide and an important determinant of disability and death. In Spain, its current prevalence in the adult population is about 24% and an estimated prevalence in 2035 of 37%. Obesity increases the probability of several diseases linked to higher mortality such as diabetes, cardiovascular disease, hyperlipidemia, arterial hypertension, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, several types of cancer, or obstructive sleep apnea. On the other hand, although the incidence of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is stabilizing in Western countries, its prevalence already exceeds 0.3%. Paralleling to general population, the current prevalence of obesity in adult patients with IBD is estimated at 15-40%. Obesity in patients with IBD could entail, in addition to its already known impact on disability and mortality, a worse evolution of the IBD itself and a worse response to treatments. The aim of this document, performed in collaboration by four scientific societies involved in the clinical care of severe obesity and IBD, is to establish clear and concise recommendations on the therapeutic possibilities of severe or typeIII obesity in patients with IBD. The document establishes general recommendations on dietary, pharmacological, endoscopic, and surgical treatment of severe obesity in patients with IBD, as well as pre- and post-treatment evaluation.

Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty for the Treatment of Obesity: A Single-Centre Experience and Literature Review

BACKGROUND

 In the world, obesity is constantly increasing, and so are the types of medical and surgical therapies. However, to cope with the increase in costs associated with surgical procedures and certain complications, such as gastroesophageal reflux disease, the number of bariatric endoscopic (BE) procedures has been increasing in recent years. Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG) is one of the most rapidly increasing BE procedures, given its benefits in terms of patient quality of life and reduced costs. In fact, it is a procedure characterised by minimal postoperative complications and is applicable to different types of bariatric patients. However, the number of studies on BE is not comparable to that on bariatric surgery.

METHODS

 We analyzed the results of 84 ESG performed in our centre and compared them with those presented in the literature. We evaluated 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) to 0, six and 13 months, signs and symptoms of patients undergoing ESG on the first and second postoperative day (POD), in terms of abdominal pain, nausea and vomiting. We found a reduction of these outcomes from POD 1 to POD 2. Finally, we measured total body weight loss percentage (TBWL%) and excess weight loss percentage (EWL%) at three, six and 12 months both in patients undergoing bariatric surgery for the first time (specifically, ESG) and in patients previously undergoing bariatric surgery and then undergoing ESG.

RESULTS

 Using the SF-36 score, we observed an improvement in the physical (mean score from 46.4 at time 0 to 53.6 at 12 months from the ESG) and mental (mean score from 37 at time 0 to 39.9 at 12 months from the ESG) status of the patients. Furthermore, we observed a 0 to 12-month increase in TBWL% and EWL% from the ESG procedure. Furthermore, we observed an increase in TBWL% and EWL% at three, six and 12 months both in patients undergoing bariatric surgery for the first time (specifically ESG) and in patients previously undergoing bariatric surgery and then undergoing ESG.

CONCLUSION

 ESG was an effective, reversible, and repeatable surgical procedure for bariatric patients.

Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty: Practical Considerations, Current Techniques, and Troubleshooting

Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG) has emerged as a safe and effective treatment for obesity over the past decade. This procedure, however, is technically challenging and requires frequent troubleshooting, even among experts. In this article the authors discuss current techniques, common pitfalls and adverse outcomes associated with ESG, how to avoid them, and how to address them if they occur.

The gut-brain axis in appetite, satiety, food intake, and eating behavior: Insights from animal models and human studies

The gut-brain axis plays a pivotal role in the finely tuned orchestration of food intake, where both homeostatic and hedonic processes collaboratively control our dietary decisions. This interplay involves the transmission of mechanical and chemical signals from the gastrointestinal tract to the appetite centers in the brain, conveying information on meal arrival, quantity, and chemical composition. These signals are processed in the brain eventually leading to the sensation of satiety and the termination of a meal. However, the regulation of food intake and appetite extends beyond the realms of pure physiological need. Hedonic mechanisms, including sensory perception (i.e., through sight, smell, and taste), habitual behaviors, and psychological factors, exert profound influences on food intake. Drawing from studies in animal models and human research, this comprehensive review summarizes the physiological mechanisms that underlie the gut-brain axis and its interplay with the reward network in the regulation of appetite and satiety. The recent advancements in neuroimaging techniques, with a focus on human studies that enable investigation of the neural mechanisms underpinning appetite regulation are discussed. Furthermore, this review explores therapeutic/pharmacological strategies that hold the potential for controlling food intake.

The Future of Endobariatrics: Bridging the Gap

With the growing global burden of obesity, the field of endobariatrics has emerged as a promising alternative, filling the void between lifestyle interventions with modest efficacy and more invasive surgical procedures. This article explores the latest advancements in endobariatric therapies, encompassing endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG), intragastric balloons (IGB), endoscopic metabolic therapies, and promising pharmacologic and surgical combination approaches that integrate multiple therapeutic modalities. It also outlines the critical factors and strategic considerations necessary for the successful integration of endobariatric interventions into clinical practice.

Combination Therapies: Anti-Obesity Medications and Endoscopic Bariatric Procedures

The obesity epidemic continues to worsen in the United States with currently 40% of adults with obesity. While lifestyle changes, pharmacologic and surgical treatments are the mainstay of therapy, they often are either inadequate to meet desired weight loss or underutilized due to patient preference. Endoscopic bariatric treatment can fill these gaps. Combination of endoscopic therapy with pharmacologic therapy can help narrow the gap between endoscopic and surgical bariatric treatment, as well as treat weight recidivism, inadequate weight loss, or further improve associated medical comorbidities in patients who have undergone or are undergoing endoscopic bariatric treatment.

Automatic endoscopic gastroplasty for the treatment of obesity: results from a prospective multicenter study (with video)

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

EndoZip (Nitinotes Ltd, Cesarea, Israel) is a fully automated, operator-independent robotic endoscopic suturing device developed for gastric volume reduction and treatment of obesity. We aim to assess the efficacy and safety of EndoZip to treat patients with obesity.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective multicenter study and recruited 45 patients with a body mass index of 30 to 40 kg/m2. Our primary outcome was to assess the percentage of total body weight loss (%TBWL) at 12 months. The secondary outcome was to determine the safety and change in quality of life using the Influence of Weight on the Quality of Life questionnaire at 1 year.

RESULTS

The mean ± standard deviation age was 44.2 ± 8.8 years, and the mean ± standard deviation body mass index was 34.5 ± 2.9 kg/m2. A majority (90.7%) of patients were female. The procedure was technically successful in all patients (100%). A median of 4 (range, 3-5) full-thickness sutures were placed, and the mean procedure time was 30.8 ± 15.8 minutes. At 12 months, the mean %TBWL was 13.21 (95% confidence interval, 10.11-16.31), and 76.6% of patients achieved ≥5% TBWL. We observed significant reduction in waist circumference, glycated hemoglobin, and alanine aminotransferase levels at 12 months (P < .001). We found a significant improvement in quality of life at 12 months (51.28 ± 16.22 vs 35.8 ± 11.9, P < .001). Serious adverse events occurred in 2 patients (4.4%). The average length of stay was 1 day.

CONCLUSIONS

Our first-in-human study showed that the EndoZip device is safe and effective in treating obesity. The weight loss led to changes in comorbidities and improvement in quality of life. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT04773795.).

Obesity in adults

Obesity has increased in prevalence worldwide and WHO has declared it a global epidemic. Population-level preventive interventions have been insufficient to slow down this trajectory. Obesity is a complex, heterogeneous, chronic, and progressive disease, which substantially affects health, quality of life, and mortality. Lifestyle and behavioural interventions are key components of obesity management; however, when used alone, they provide substantial and durable response in a minority of people. Bariatric (metabolic) surgery remains the most effective and durable treatment, with proven benefits beyond weight loss, including for cardiovascular and renal health, and decreased rates of obesity-related cancers and mortality. Considerable progress has been made in the development of pharmacological agents that approach the weight loss efficacy of metabolic surgery, and relevant outcome data related to these agents' use are accumulating. However, all treatment approaches to obesity have been vastly underutilised.

Novel Surgical Interventions for the Treatment of Obesity

Metabolic and bariatric surgery is widely recognized as the most effective and durable treatment for the disease of obesity and its associated comorbidities. In recent years, the field has seen significant advancements, introducing numerous innovative surgical options. This review aims to comprehensively examine these emerging surgical techniques, which have recently received endorsement from the American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (ASMBS). Additionally, we will explore new technologies and methodologies supported by the latest scientific evidence. Our analysis will include a critical evaluation of the efficacy, safety, and long-term outcomes of these novel approaches, providing a detailed update on the current state of metabolic and bariatric surgery, highlighting key developments and their potential implications for clinical practice.

Exercise and QUality Diet after Leukemia: A Randomized Weight Loss Trial among Adult Survivors of Childhood Leukemia in the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study

BACKGROUND

Obesity is prevalent in childhood cancer survivors and interacts with cancer treatments to potentiate risk for cardiovascular (CV) death. We tested a remote weight-loss intervention trial that was effective among adults with CV risk factors in a cohort of adult survivors of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) with overweight/obesity.

METHODS

In this phase III efficacy trial, survivors of ALL enrolled in the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study with a body mass index ≥25 kg/m2 were randomized to a remotely delivered weight-loss intervention versus self-directed weight loss, stratified by history of cranial radiotherapy. The primary endpoint was the difference in weight loss at 24 months in an intent-to-treat analysis. Analyses were performed using linear mixed-effects models.

RESULTS

Among 358 survivors (59% female; median attained age: 37 years; IQR: 33-43 years), the baseline mean (SD) weight was 98.6 kg (24.0) for the intervention group (n = 181) and 94.9 kg (20.3) for controls (n = 177). Adherence to the intervention was poor; 15% of individuals in the intervention group completed 24/30 planned coaching calls. Weight at 24 months was available for 274 (77%) participants. After controlling for cranial radiotherapy, sex, race/ethnicity, and age, the mean (SE) change in weight from baseline to 24 months was -0.4 kg (0.8) for the intervention group and 0.2 kg (0.6) for control participants (P = 0.59).

CONCLUSIONS

A remote weight-loss intervention that was successful among adults with CV conditions did not result in significant weight loss among adult survivors of childhood ALL.

IMPACT

Future interventions in this population must be tailored to the unique needs of survivors to encourage engagement and adherence. See related In the Spotlight, p. 1147.

Navigating the Predictive Landscape: DiaRem's Role in Unveiling Outcomes for Diabetes Remission following ESG

PURPOSE

Rising obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) rates can be mitigated by various strategies, with a 10% total body weight loss (TBWL) threshold often required for T2DM remission. T2DM remission rates after bariatric surgery like Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) are well established; endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG) is a less invasive option that averages 15% TBWL and allows for T2DM remission. This study explores the DiaRem (Diabetes Remission post-RYGB) score's ability to predict T2DM remission 1-year post-ESG.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study on 39 individuals with T2DM who underwent ESG. Age, utilization of diabetes medications, insulin administration, and hemoglobin A1c levels were used to calculate the DiaRem score. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was employed to evaluate the discriminative ability of DiaRem in distinguishing diabetes remission.

RESULTS

Among the 39 patients with a median hemoglobin A1c of 6.7, 12.8% required insulin, and 43.6% used diabetes medication. At 1-year post-ESG, 69.2% of patients experienced diabetes remission with a median %TWBL of 12.7. The DiaRem score's ability to detect diabetes resolution for ESG patients had a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 58.3%, at the optimal cutoff value of 10. The AUC was 0.779 (95% CI 0.546-0.959).

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrated the DiaRem score's predictive value for T2DM remission post-ESG, highlighting its utility in clinical decision-making for ESG-related outcomes. Further investigation is needed to identify alternative indicators that may enhance predictive accuracy, thus refining personalized decision-making for this patient group.