Critical ethical issues in clinical trials with xenotransplants

Practical ethical concerns in allocation of pig kidneys to humans

The fundamental ethical question of whether pig organs should be transplanted into humans has been settled, as recent surgeries demonstrating proof of concept demonstrate. Other issues need to be considered and reconciled before xenotransplantation of pig kidneys becomes a solution to the organ shortage for people waiting for a kidney transplant or as a viable alternative to the deceased donor or living donor human kidneys. Human trials will be needed beyond brain-dead individuals to show that xenotransplantation is safe from immunologic and infectious standpoints. Transplant centers will need to show that xenotransplantation provides a long-term benefit to recipients and is financially viable. If trials are successful and receive regulatory approval, pig xenotransplants may become another option for people waiting for a kidney. Before patients are discharged with a functioning xenograft, practical issues with ethical implications remain.

Informed Consent for Potential Recipients of Pig Kidney Xenotransplantation in the United States

Clinical trials of kidney xenotransplantation are being considered in the United States. Before this novel procedure can take place, investigators will have to obtain approval from the institutional review board. The consent form that will be used for such a trial and that will receive approval from the institutional review board will be complex. Informed consent-the process by which a research participant provides his/her permission to participate in a clinical trial-is a staple of the research process and most commonly is in the form of a physical document. In the case of a novel procedure with uncertain benefits and risks and a participant population in acute need of a transplant, the consent process is crucial. These complexities may raise several ethical considerations for the initial pig kidney xenotransplantation recipients in the United States that will require adaptations of the required elements of the informed consent process by the US Department of Human and Health Services. The ethical issues include (1) a subject's ability to withdraw from the trial, (2) restrictions on their reproductive rights, and (3) the possibility of the need for quarantine if there is a perceived risk of xenozoonosis. This article aims to discuss ethical considerations that may challenge the general required elements of the informed consent form stipulated by the 45 Code of Federal Regulations 46 of the US Department of Health and Human Services and to suggest recommendations for deliberation.

Xenotransplantation: The Challenge to Current Psychosocial Attitudes

Because of the limited availability of transplantable human organs, xenotransplantation, the use of animal organs as an alternative source, has received considerable attention in recent years. Xenotransplantation would provide an unlimited supply of organs, and these organs would be available whenever required. Although the pig is considered the best source for organs, significant immunologic barriers currently prohibit the implementation of a clinical trial of organ transplantation. However, as medical research gains more insight into the mechanisms underlying rejection of pig organs in primates, therapeutic xenotransplantation is becoming more feasible. Clinical trials of porcine cell transplants are currently underway. Although xenotransplantation will minimize the waiting period for an organ and obviate the feelings of guilt or indebtedness commonly experienced by recipients of human organs, several psychosocial issues may hinder the reintegration of patients into society. For example, concerns that infectious pathogens could be transferred to recipients of pig organs will necessitate life-long monitoring and perhaps even temporary isolation of patients. The possible risk of the spread of a xenozoonosis from the patient to other members of the community may inspire public controversy and even fear, which may have an adverse impact on the patient's emotional state. Additionally, some patients may be psychologically disturbed by the need to incorporate pig organs into their body. This article addresses these and other psychosocial issues that may be associated with clinical xenotransplantation.

Assessing the remedy: the case for contracts in clinical trials

Current orthodoxy in research ethics assumes that subjects of clinical trials reserve rights to withdraw at any time and without giving any reason. This view sees the right to withdraw as a simple extension of the right to refuse to participate all together. In this paper, however, I suggest that subjects should assume some responsibilities for the internal validity of the trial at consent and that these responsibilities should be captured by contract. This would allow the researcher to impose a penalty on the subject if he were to withdraw without good reason and on a whim. This proposal still leaves open the possibility of withdrawing without penalty when it is in the subject's best interests to do so. Giving researchers recourse to legal remedy may now be necessary to protect the science, as existing methods used to increase retention are inadequate for one reason or another.

Animal organs for human transplantation: how close are we?

Solid organ transplantation has been, by most measures, a phenomenal success. Nonetheless, the field is plagued by extreme shortages of available organs from a very limited number of donors. One potential solution to this organ availability crisis is the use of animals as organ donors for humans (xenotransplantation). Though the concept remains theoretical, significant advances are being made in the field of genetics and in our understanding of the immunological barriers to xenotransplantation. With these advances also comes increased knowledge about the potential risks of xenotransplants, especially disease transmission. The eventual clinical application of animal-to-human transplants will require a careful, balanced appraisal of these issues.

Face value: challenges of transplant technology

What is the value of a human face? It is a vexing question with no simple answer. The question, however, is no longer fanciful given the trajectory of biomedical science that simultaneously captures our imagination and challenges our essence. Essential to each of us and to the whole of humanity, the face is primal in its individuated image and identity. It is intrinsically connected with us in a way that defied question—until now, given the highly anticipated next step in transplant science and technology, facial transplantation. This Article examines the value of the face in this context, along with a range of related issues.

The human face has rich significance. It is intrinsic and instrumental to the ontology of a person. A portal for emotions and expressions, the face reveals an inner-self essential to identity and is inscribed with an inherent dignity of human life.

Outline of a Risk Assessment: The Welfare of Future Xeno-Donor Pigs

The welfare of transgenic animals is often not considered prior to their generation. However, we demonstrate here how a welfare risk assessment can be carried out before transgenic animals are created. We describe a risk assessment identifying potential welfare problems in transgenic pigs generated for future xeno-donation of organs. This assessment is based on currently available information concerning transgenic animal models in which one or more transgenes relevant to future xeno-donation have been inserted. The welfare risk assessment reveals that future xeno-donor pigs may have an increased tendency toward septicaemias, reduced fertility and/or impaired vision. The transgenic animal models used in generating hypotheses about the welfare of xeno-donor pigs can also assist in the testing of these hypotheses. To ensure high levels of welfare of transgenic animals, analogous risk assessments can be used to identify potential welfare problems during the early stages of the generation of new transgenic animals. Such assessments may form part of the basis on which licenses to generate new transgenic animals are granted to research groups.

The pig as a source of cardiac xenografts

The inadequate availability of human donor hearts and other organs has inspired interest in the field of xenotransplantation. Historically, ten attempts to transplant animal hearts into human recipients have been reported. Those who received hearts from nonhuman primates (i.e., baboons and chimpanzees) survived rather longer than did those who received hearts from nonprimates (i.e., sheep and pigs). Nevertheless, current opinion is that the pig is the best candidate as a source of hearts for humans despite the considerable immunologic disparity between the two species. Pigs are available in large numbers and can be bred easily and rapidly. They grow to appropriate sizes and their cardiovascular system is similar to that of humans. Substantial knowledge has been accumulated regarding both genetic engineering and tolerance induction in pigs, two strategies that may help to overcome the existing immunologic barriers. Concern has been raised, however, with regard to the potential for the transfer of a porcine infection with the pig organ to the human recipient. This brief review addresses these and other aspects of the use of the pig as a source of hearts for patients with end-stage cardiac disease.

Xenografts: are the risks so great that we should not proceed?

Animal organs could save patients needing transplants, but further research is necessary to resolve remaining problems with organ rejection. Furthermore, xenotransplantation risks transmitting animal pathogens to patients and to the general population. It would be unethical to proceed with clinical trials before principles and procedures for dealing with this risk are in place.

Liver transplantation: current status and novel approaches to liver replacement

The major challenge currently facing liver transplantation is the performance of a greater number of liver transplants, which has been fueled by the large and growing disparity between the increasing number of qualified patients listed for transplantation and the relatively static number of available cadaver donor organs. In the past 2 years, approximately 4500 liver transplants have been performed annually, with 1-year survival rates in the 85%-90% range, while the waiting list has expanded as of November 2000 to more than 16,000 patients, resulting in an increasing death rate among listed patients. In the short term, there will continue to be a major focus on more effective use of available cadaver donor organs to balance the competing principles of justice (patients with most urgent need for transplant and lower probability of posttransplant survival) and medical utility (patients with less urgent need for transplant and higher odds of postoperative survival). Over the long term, there will be an increasing application of novel approaches to liver replacement including cadaver split liver transplantation and adult living donor liver transplantation and possibly, in the more distant future, xenotransplantation and hepatocyte transplantation. The treatment, and ideally the prevention, of recurrent disease after liver transplantation, particularly chronic hepatitis C-the most common indication for transplantation-is a major priority to optimize the use of liver grafts. Finally, improved immunosuppressive strategies, including movement toward minimal immunosuppression and steroid withdrawal and the development of safer and more effective drugs, is another important factor that has the potential to increase the success of liver transplantation.

Xenotransplantation: the challenge to current psychosocial attitudes

Because of the limited availability of transplantable human organs, xenotransplantation, the use of animal organs as an alternative source, has received considerable attention in recent years. Xenotransplantation would provide an unlimited supply of organs, and these organs would be available whenever required. Although the pig is considered the best source for organs, significant immunologic barriers currently prohibit the implementation of a clinical trial of organ transplantation. However, as medical research gains more insight into the mechanisms underlying rejection of pig organs in primates, therapeutic xenotransplantation is becoming more feasible. Clinical trials of porcine cell transplants are currently underway. Although xenotransplantation will minimize the waiting period for an organ and obviate the feelings of guilt or indebtedness commonly experienced by recipients of human organs, several psychosocial issues may hinder the reintegration of patients into society. For example, concerns that infectious pathogens could be transferred to recipients of pig organs will necessitate life-long monitoring and perhaps even temporary isolation of patients. The possible risk of the spread of a xenozoonosis from the patient to other members of the community may inspire public controversy and even fear, which may have an adverse impact on the patient's emotional state. Additionally, some patients may be psychologically disturbed by the need to incorporate pig organs into their body. This article addresses these and other psychosocial issues that may be associated with clinical xenotransplantation.

Report of the Xenotransplantation Advisory Committee of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: the present status of xenotransplantation and its potential role in the treatment of end-stage cardiac and pulmonary diseases

An urgent and steadily increasing need exists world-wide for a greater supply of donor thoracic organs. Xenotransplantation offers the possibility of an unlimited supply of hearts and lungs that could be available electively when required. However, anti-body- mediated mechanisms cause the rejection of pig organs transplanted into non-human primates, and these mechanisms provide major immunologic barriers that have not yet been overcome. Having reviewed the literature on xenotransplantation, we present a number of conclusions on its present status with regard to thoracic organs, and we make a number of recommendations relating to eventual clinical trials. Although pig hearts have functioned in heterotopic sites in non-human primates for periods of several weeks, median survival of orthotopically transplanted hearts is currently ,1 month. No transplanted pig lung has functioned for even 24 hours. Current experimental results indicate that a clinical trial would be premature. A potential risk exists, hitherto undetermined, of transferring infectious organisms along with the donor pig organ to the recipient, and possibly to other members of the community. A clinical trial of xeno-transplantation should not be undertaken until experts in microbiology and the relevant regulatory authorities consider this risk to be minimal. A clinical trial should be considered when approximately 60% survival of life-supporting pig organs in non-human primates has been achieved for a minimum of 3 months, with at least 10 animals surviving for this minimum period. Furthermore, evidence should suggest that longer survival (.6 months) can be achieved. These results should be achieved in the absence of life-threatening complications caused by the immunosuppressive regimen used. The relationship between the presence of anti-HLA antibody and anti-pig antibody and their cross-reactivity, and the outcome of pig-organ xenotransplantation in recipients previously sensitized to HLA antigens require further investigation. We recommend that the patients who initially enter into a clinical trial of cardiac xenotransplantation be unacceptable for allotransplantation, or acceptable for allotransplantation but unlikely to survive until a human cadaveric organ becomes available, and in whom mechanical assist-device bridging is not possible. National bodies that have wide-reaching government-backed control over all aspects of the trials should regulate the initial clinical trial and all subsequent clinical xenotransplantation procedures for the foreseeable future. We recommend coordination and monitoring of these trials through an international body, such as the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation, and setting up a registry to record and widely disperse the results of these trials. Xenotransplantation has the potential to solve the problem of donor-organ supply, and therefore research in this field should be actively encouraged and supported.

Liver transplantation at the millennium. Past, present, and future

During the past 3 decades, liver transplantation has achieved such acceptance that more than 12,000 qualified recipients are listed for liver transplantation in the United States, but unfortunately just over 4000 cadaver donor organs are available each year. Thus, given the increasing disparity between the number of potential recipients and available cadaver organs, the current challenge in liver transplantation is to optimize the outcome of liver transplantation from this limited resource. Currently under way is re-evaluation of selection criteria to use these 4000 cadaver liver grafts most effectively by striking the proper balance between medical urgency and utility. In parallel with this re-evaluation, there is ongoing expansion of cadaver split-liver transplantation and adult living related and unrelated liver transplantation. Hoped-for but as yet unachieved developments in liver transplantation are xenotransplantation, hepatocyte transplantation, and liver-directed gene therapy. Liver transplantation has come a long way from the initial, unsuccessful human transplantations in 1963, but many challenges remain.

Xenotransplantation and public health: identifying the legal issues

The debate over the acceptability of clinical trials for xenotransplantation has focussed primarily on analyses of: 1) the medical benefits that might accrue to individual patients in need of organ replacement therapy; 2) the risk of introducing new infectious disease(s) into the population; and 3) the ability of public safety measures to minimize that risk. It is now generally accepted that if we are to proceed with xenobiotechnology, sufficient public safety measures must first be adopted. Despite the growing consensus as to the indispensability of scientific safeguards, few authors have questioned the ability of current or novel legal frameworks to sustain and enforce such safeguards. A legal analysis of the public health concerns must be incorporated into the debate if we are to ensure a thorough and responsible decision-making process.

Issues surrounding xenotransplantation

Currently there is a shortage of cadaver organs that can be transplanted from one human being to another. In response to this shortage, scientists and medical researchers have developed techniques for transplanting animal organs into humans, a procedure known as xenotransplantation. This may address the shortage of organs for patients in need; however, it raises other concerns related to cross-species disease transmission, consent issues, ethical issues of sacrificing animals for their organs, psychological issues of receiving organs from an animal, religious concerns, and economic factors. These medical, ethical, and philosophical issues need to be thoroughly addressed before xenotransplantation becomes a reality.