Results at 1 year of outpatient multidisciplinary pulmonary rehabilitation: a randomised controlled trial

Effect of exercise on quality of life in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A network meta-analysis of RCTs

BACKGROUND

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is characterized by a gradual deterioration of respiratory capacity, with worsening fatigue, weakness, activity intolerance, and dyspnea, influencing the person's emotional state and quality of life (QoL).

OBJECTIVE

A network meta-analysis (NMA) was performed to determine the effects of different physical activity interventions on overall QoL in people with COPD, followed by a meta-analysis on the effect of these interventions on the different domains of the QoL scales.

METHODS

A literature search was performed from inception to December 2023. Randomized controlled trials on the effectiveness of exercise programs on QoL in people with COPD were included. We assessed the risk of bias using the Cochrane Risk of Bias (RoB 2.0) tool and used the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation tool (GRADE) to assess the quality of the evidence. Pairwise meta-analysis and NMA for direct and indirect evidence were performed.

RESULTS

A total of 54 studies were included in the NMA. The largest effects were for active mind-body movement therapy (AMBMT) programs versus control interventions (usual practice) for total QoL (effect size [ES] 0.87; 95 % CI 0.65-1.09), followed by endurance (END) vs control (ES 0.75; 95 % CI 0.27-1.24) and combined (COMB) versus control (ES 0.73; 95 % CI 0.02-1.43). The results reflected an improvement in all subdomains of the QoL scales, except for social support.

CONCLUSIONS

AMBMT should be considered the most effective strategy to improve overall QoL in people with COPD, followed by END and COMB interventions. Physical activity interventions produce a positive effect in all the QoL domains studied, except for social support.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42023393463.

Diagnosis and management of comorbid disease in COPD

COPD is one of the most common chronic respiratory conditions and is associated with high healthcare use, morbidity and mortality. Multimorbidity in COPD is common and confers a worse prognosis. Despite this, there is delayed and often under-diagnosis of comorbid diseases in COPD. Knowledge of the respiratory and non-respiratory pathologies that can coexist with COPD is essential to ensure early detection and appropriate management. This review provides an overview of the comorbidities that have been described in COPD. We discuss their pathogenesis, pitfalls in their diagnosis, and strategies for their prevention and treatment.

Kidney Beam-A Cost-Effective Digital Intervention to Improve Mental Health

Introduction

There is inequity in the provision of physical rehabilitation services for people living with chronic kidney disease (CKD). The Kidney BEAM trial evaluated the clinical value and cost effectiveness of a physical activity digital health intervention (DHI) in CKD.

Methods

In a single-blind, 11 center, randomized controlled trial, 340 adult participants with CKD were randomly assigned to either the Kidney BEAM physical activity DHI or a waitlist control. This study assessed the difference in the Kidney Disease Quality of Life Short Form 1.3 Mental Component Summary (KDQoL-SF1.3 MCS) between intervention and control groups at 6-months, and cost-effectiveness of the intervention.

Results

At 6-months, there was a significant difference in mean adjusted change in KDQoL MCS score between Kidney BEAM and waitlist control (intention-to-treat adjusted mean: 5.9 [95% confidence interval, CI: 4.4-7.5] arbitrary units [AU], P < 0.0001), and a 93% and 98% chance of the intervention being cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of £20,000 and £30,000 per quality-adjusted life year gained.

Conclusion

The Kidney BEAM physical activity DHI is a clinically valuable and cost-effective means to improve mental health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in people with CKD (trial registration no. NCT04872933).

Palliative rehabilitation and quality of life: systematic review and meta-analysis

IMPORTANCE

International guidelines recommend the integration of multidisciplinary rehabilitation into palliative care services but its impact on quality of life across disease types is not well understood.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effect of multidisciplinary palliative rehabilitation on quality of life and healthcare service outcomes for adults with an advanced, life-limiting illness.

DATA SOURCES

Electronic databases CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE and PEDro were searched from the earliest records to February 2024.

STUDY SELECTION

Randomised controlled trials examining the effect of multidisciplinary palliative rehabilitation in adults with an advanced, life-limiting illness and reported quality of life were eligible.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Study characteristics, quality of life and health service usage data were extracted, and the methodological quality was assessed using PEDro. Meta-analyses using random effects were completed, and Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation criteria were applied.

MAIN OUTCOMES

Quality of life and healthcare service outcomes.

RESULTS

27 randomised controlled trials (n=3571) were included. Palliative rehabilitation was associated with small improvements in quality of life (standardised mean difference (SMD) 0.40, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.56). These effects were significant across disease types: cancer (SMD 0.22, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.41), heart failure (SMD 0.37, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.05) and non-malignant respiratory diagnoses (SMD 0.77, 95% CI 0.29 to 1.24). Meta-analysis found low-certainty evidence, palliative rehabilitation reduced the length of stay by 1.84 readmission days.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Multidisciplinary palliative rehabilitation improves quality of life for adults with an advanced, life-limiting illness and can reduce time spent in hospital without costing more than usual care. Palliative rehabilitation should be incorporated into standard palliative care.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42022372951.

Effect of pulmonary rehabilitation on all-cause mortality in patients with chronic respiratory disease: a retrospective cohort study in an Australian teaching hospital

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is widely recommended for short-term benefits in chronic respiratory diseases, yet long-term outcomes remain uncertain. This retrospective cohort study addresses this gap, comparing 20-year mortality rates between PR participants and matched controls, and hypothesizing that the short-term benefits of PR contribute to improved long-term survival.

METHODS

The 20-year mortality of stable chronic respiratory patients who participated in an outpatient PR program was compared with a matched control group based on the type of lung disease. Demographic and clinical variables, and the dates of deaths, were extracted and compared between two groups with two sample t-test and chi-square tests. Kaplan-Meier plots and Cox regression analyses were employed to evaluate survival differences.

RESULTS

Between 2000 and 2002, 238 individuals enrolled in a pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) program (58% male, mean age ± SD: 69 ± 8 years, mean FEV1% predicted ± SD: 46 ± 21%). An equal number of people with comparable lung disease were selected as controls (88% COPD, 5% ILD). Controls had lower FEV1% predicted values (mean ± SD: 39 ± 17%, P < 0.001), smoked more (mean ± SD: 48 ± 35 pack-years, P = 0.032), and no differences in age, BMI, sex, and Index of Relative Socio-economic Advantage and Disadvantage (IRSAD). Median (IQR) follow-up time was 68 months (34-123), with 371 (78%) deaths. Univariable (HR = 1.71, p < 0.001) and multivariable (HR = 1.64, p < 0.001) Cox regression found higher mortality risk in controls. Subgroup analysis for COPD replicated these findings (HR = 1.70, P < 0.001).

DISCUSSION

Despite some methodological limitations, our study suggests that clinically stable patients with chronic respiratory disease who undertake PR may have lower mortality than matched controls.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Retrospectively registered.

2023 American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/American College of Chest Physicians (CHEST) Guideline for the Treatment of Interstitial Lung Disease in People with Systemic Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases

OBJECTIVE

We provide evidence-based recommendations regarding the treatment of interstitial lung disease (ILD) in adults with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARDs).

METHODS

We developed clinically relevant population, intervention, comparator, and outcomes questions. A systematic literature review was then performed, and the available evidence was rated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology. A panel of clinicians and patients reached consensus on the direction and strength of the recommendations.

RESULTS

Thirty-five recommendations were generated (including two strong recommendations) for first-line SARD-ILD treatment, treatment of SARD-ILD progression despite first-line ILD therapy, and treatment of rapidly progressive ILD. The strong recommendations were against using glucocorticoids in systemic sclerosis-ILD as a first-line ILD therapy and after ILD progression. Otherwise, glucocorticoids are conditionally recommended for first-line ILD treatment in all other SARDs.

CONCLUSION

This clinical practice guideline presents the first recommendations endorsed by the American College of Rheumatology and American College of Chest Physicians for the treatment of ILD in people with SARDs.

2023 American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/American College of Chest Physicians (CHEST) Guideline for the Treatment of Interstitial Lung Disease in People with Systemic Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases

OBJECTIVE

We provide evidence-based recommendations regarding the treatment of interstitial lung disease (ILD) in adults with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARDs).

METHODS

We developed clinically relevant population, intervention, comparator, and outcomes questions. A systematic literature review was then performed, and the available evidence was rated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology. A panel of clinicians and patients reached consensus on the direction and strength of the recommendations.

RESULTS

Thirty-five recommendations were generated (including two strong recommendations) for first-line SARD-ILD treatment, treatment of SARD-ILD progression despite first-line ILD therapy, and treatment of rapidly progressive ILD. The strong recommendations were against using glucocorticoids in systemic sclerosis-ILD as a first-line ILD therapy and after ILD progression. Otherwise, glucocorticoids are conditionally recommended for first-line ILD treatment in all other SARDs.

CONCLUSION

This clinical practice guideline presents the first recommendations endorsed by the American College of Rheumatology and American College of Chest Physicians for the treatment of ILD in people with SARDs.

Interventions with a clear focus on achieving behaviour change are important for maintaining training-related gains in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review

QUESTIONS

In people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) who complete an exercise training program (ETP) offered at a sufficient dose to result in training-related gains, to what extent are these gains maintained 12 months after program completion? Do variables such as the application of behaviour change techniques moderate the maintenance of these training-related gains?

DESIGN

Systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression of randomised controlled trials.

PARTICIPANTS

People with stable COPD.

INTERVENTION

Trials were included if they applied ≥ 4 weeks of a whole-body ETP and reported outcome data immediately following program completion and 12 months after initial program completion. The control group received usual care that did not include a formal exercise training component.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Exercise tolerance, health-related quality of life and dyspnoea during activities of daily living.

DATA SOURCES

EMBASE, PEDro, PubMed and the Cochrane Library.

RESULTS

Nineteen randomised trials with 2,103 participants were found, of which 12 had a sufficiently similar design to be meta-analysed. At 12 months after ETP completion, compared with the control group, the experimental group demonstrated better exercise tolerance (SMD 0.48, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.77) and quality of life (SMD 0.22, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.41) with no clear effect on dyspnoea. Meta-regression using data from all 19 trials demonstrated that the magnitude of between-group differences at the 12-month follow-up was moderated by: behaviour change being a core aim of the strategies implemented following completion of the ETP; the experimental group receiving more behaviour change techniques during the program; and the magnitude of between-group change achieved from the program.

CONCLUSION

At 12 months after completion of an ETP of ≥ 4 weeks, small gains were maintained in exercise tolerance and health-related quality of life. Applying behaviour change techniques with a clear focus on participants integrating exercise into daily life beyond initial program completion is important to maintain training-related gains.

REGISTRATION

CRD42020193833.

A virtual reality-based endurance training program for COPD patients: acceptability and user experience

PURPOSE

To investigate the acceptability and user experience of an in-hospital endurance training program based on the Virtual Park, a semi-immersive Virtual Reality (VR) system for patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD).Materials and methodsPatients performed 20 min of cycling two times/day for around ten days. The evaluation included adherence, exercise capacity, physical performance, and user experience.

RESULTS

Fourteen patients (6 F/8 M; age = 71.29 ± 6.93 years) with mild/moderate COPD participated. The adherence rate was satisfying: 85.71% of patients attended the program without adverse events; the individual attendance rate (86.85% ± 27.43) was also high. The exercise capacity assessed before and after the training significantly improved in our group (6MWT pre-post: t(11)= -5.040, p < 0.05), as happens in standard PR programs. The physical performance metrics of each session indicate that all participants could sustain the proposed training protocol over the whole period. Patients judged the VR experience positively (User Experience Questionnaire = 1.84 ± 0.22) and were highly engaged in the activity for the whole period (Short Flow State Scale pre-post: 4.61 ± 0.27/4.40 ± 0.36).

CONCLUSIONS

Our preliminary results open the possibility for further investigations on long-term motivation and clinical effectiveness of more immersive VR interventions for COPD.

Efficacy of Digital Therapeutics for Pulmonary Rehabilitation: A Multi-Center, Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of digital therapeutics (DTx), EASYBREATH, for pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) in patients with chronic respiratory diseases (CRDs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted at multiple centers. Participants were randomly allocated 1:1 to the DTx group (DTxG), provided with DTx using EASYBREATH. The DTxG underwent an 8-week PR program with evaluations conducted at baseline, four weeks, and eight weeks. The control group (CG) underwent one PR session and was advised to exercise and undergo the same evaluation. The primary outcome was the change in six-minute walking distance (6MWD) over eight weeks, and secondary outcomes included changes in scores of Modified Medical Research Council (mMRC), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease assessment test (CAT), and St. George's respiratory questionnaire (SGRQ).

RESULTS

The change in 6MWD after eight weeks demonstrated a significant difference between the DTxG and CG (57.68 m vs. 21.71 m, p = 0.0008). The change in mMRC scores (p = 0.0008), CAT scores (p < 0.0001), and total SGRQ scores (p = 0.0003) also showed a significant difference between the groups after eight weeks.

CONCLUSIONS

EASYBREATH significantly improved exercise capacity, alleviated dyspnea, and enhanced the overall quality of life at eight weeks. EASYBREATH is a highly accessible, time-efficient, and effective treatment option for CRD with high compliance.

Management of Patients With Kidney Disease Undergoing Bariatric Surgery: A Multidisciplinary Approach

Bariatric surgery is increasingly recognized as a safe and effective treatment for obesity in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), including stages 4, 5, and 5D (on dialysis). Among the available surgical methods, sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is the most commonly performed weight loss procedure and is mainly done to facilitate kidney transplantation (KT). However, many KT candidates treated with SG remain on the transplant waiting list for months to years, with some never receiving a transplant. Therefore, appropriate candidates for SG must be selected, and post-SG management should address the unique needs of this population, with a focus on sustaining the metabolic benefits of surgery while minimizing potential side effects related to rapid weight loss which may inadvertently lead to muscle and bone catabolism. Multidisciplinary post-SG care in this population may lead to overall better health on the transplant waiting list, resulting in a higher percentage of post-SG patients ultimately receiving KT. To tailor the effective treatment for these patients, clinicians should acknowledge that patients with CKD stage 4-5D have different nutritional needs and are metabolically and psychosocially distinct from the general bariatric surgery population. Sarcopenia is highly prevalent and may be exacerbated by muscle catabolism following SG if not adequately addressed. Blood pressure, glucose, and bone metabolism are all affected by the CKD stage 4-5D, and therefore require distinct diagnostic and management approaches. Long-standing chronic disease, associated comorbidities, and low adherence to medical therapies require ongoing comprehensive psychosocial assessment and support. This paper aims to review and consolidate the existing literature concerning the intersection of CKD stage 4-5D and the consequences of SG. We also suggest future clinical outcome studies examining novel treatment approaches for this medically complex population.

Feasibility of a home-designed respiratory rehabilitation program for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

BACKGROUND

According to international guidelines, respiratory rehabilitation (RR) for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a cornerstone of standard non-pharmacological treatment.

AIMS

To evaluate feasibility of a home-designed RR program and analyze its medium-term impact on respiratory parameters and quality of life.

METHODS

This was a prospective study involving 74 COPD patients enrolled in January 2019 and put on inhaled bronchodilator treatment associated with RR at home following a written protocol, for 16 weeks. The comparative statistical analysis highlights the difference before and after RR in terms of clinical and functional respiratory parameters as well as in terms of quality of life (assessed on the short form 36 (SF-36) questionnaire). The comparison involves RR-adherent patients versus non-adherent patients.

RESULTS

Mean age was 66.7 ± 8.3 years with a median of 67 years. All patients were smokers, out of which 42 patients (57%) did not quit yet. Forty-one percent of patients were frequent exacerbators. The average COPD assessment test (CAT) score in our patients was 23. The average 6-minutes walk distance (MWD) was 304 m. The BODE index in our patients was 4.11 on average. The RR program was followed by 36 patients (48%). Thirty patients (40%) applied it at least twice a week. RR-adherent patients had an average CAT score decreasing from 23 to 14.5 (P = 0.011). Their average 6-MWD was 444.6 m by the end of the study, which would be 64.2% of the calculated theoretical value. The average FEV1 increase after RR was 283 mL. The majority (69%) of RR-adherent patients were ranked as quartile 1; BODE index ≤2. The average scores of physical, psycho-social, and general dimensions assessed on the SF-36 questionnaire improved in RR-adherent patients.

CONCLUSIONS

RR is a key non-pharmacological treatment for COPD. Its interest originates from its multidisciplinary nature, hence its effectiveness in several respiratory parameters. Our study reflects the feasibility of home-designed protocols in the absence of contraindications. We highlight also the positive impact on quality of life after RR at home.

Diversity in pulmonary rehabilitation clinical trials: a systematic review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Underrepresentation of minority groups in clinical trials may hinder the potential benefits of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) programs for individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The aim of this work was to determine whether participants in PR randomized control trials (RCTs) conducted in the U.S.A., Canada, the UK, and Australia are representative of ethnicity, sex, gender, and sociodemographic characteristics.

RESEARCH DESIGN

A systematic search was performed for relevant literature from inception to December 2022. Titles and abstracts were screened before undergoing a full article review. Relevant data on reporting of age, sex, gender, ethnicity, and sociodemographic characteristics of participants was extracted.

RESULTS

Thirty-six RCTs met the inclusion criteria. Only 6% of publications reported on ethnicity, with ≥90% of participants reported as 'White.' All 36 papers reported on age, with the mean between 60 and 69 years old. Thirty-five studies reported on sex (97%), with the majority (67%) reporting more male than female participants. There was no mention of different genders in any paper. Other sociodemographic factors were reported in 7 (19%) papers.

CONCLUSIONS

Inclusivity and representation in clinical trials are essential to ensure that research findings are generalizable. Clinical trialists need to consider the demographics of today's society during recruitment.

Estimation of the health economic benefit of widening pulmonary rehabilitation uptake and completion

Objectives: Increasing uptake and completion of Pulmonary Rehabilitation in people with COPD has the potential to deliver health benefit and reduce health inequalities. We have quantified the cost-effectiveness of enhancing PR access and completion by reviewing the cost-effectiveness literature for PR in COPD. Methods: A literature review identified studies that provided cost-effectiveness evidence for PR compared to no PR. The key metrics of interest were healthcare resource use and cost savings, and quality adjusted life year (QALY) gains. Healthcare resource use data were valued using the UK NHS National Tariff 2022/23. From the literature search we identified the QALY gain resulting from completion of PR. The value of the QALY gain resulting from PR completion was calculated using the standard willingness-to-pay threshold of £20,000 considered by the UK National Institute for Health and care Excellence (NICE). Results: We estimated a QALY gain resulting from completion of PR of 0.065 and value of the QALY gain was therefore calculated to be £1300 per person completing PR. We estimated the 12 month reduction in hospitalisation following completion of PR to be 8.2% giving a total cost reduction per patient of £245. We therefore calculated that up to £1545 could be spent per person with COPD to deliver PR cost-effectively. Conclusion: Our analysis provides commissioners with the information they need to make informed decisions about planning and provision of PR. The data allows estimation of additional resources that could be deployed in addressing inequitable access to PR among disadvantaged and underserved populations whilst retaining cost effectiveness of the intervention.

A tailored psychological intervention for anxiety and depression management in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: TANDEM RCT and process evaluation

Background

People with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease have high levels of anxiety and depression, which is associated with increased morbidity and poor uptake of effective treatments, such as pulmonary rehabilitation. Cognitive-behavioural therapy improves mental health of people with long-term conditions and could potentially increase uptake of pulmonary rehabilitation, enabling synergies that could enhance the mental health of people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Aim

Our aim was to develop and evaluate the clinical effectiveness and cost effectiveness of a tailored cognitive-behavioural approach intervention, which links into, and optimises the benefits of, routine pulmonary rehabilitation.

Design

We carried out a pragmatic multicentre randomised controlled trial using a 1.25 : 1 ratio (intervention : control) with a parallel process evaluation, including assessment of fidelity.

Setting

Twelve NHS trusts and five Clinical Commissioning Groups in England were recruited into the study. The intervention was delivered in participant's own home or at a local NHS facility, and by telephone.

Participants

Between July 2017 and March 2020 we recruited adults with moderate/very severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and mild/moderate anxiety and/or depression, meeting eligibility criteria for assessment for pulmonary rehabilitation. Carers of participants were invited to participate.

Intervention

The cognitive-behavioural approach intervention (i.e. six to eight 40- to 60-minute sessions plus telephone support throughout pulmonary rehabilitation) was delivered by 31 trained respiratory healthcare professionals to participants prior to commencing pulmonary rehabilitation. Usual care included routine pulmonary rehabilitation referral.

Main outcome measures

Co-primary outcomes were Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale - anxiety and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale - depression at 6 months post randomisation. Secondary outcomes at 6 and 12 months included health-related quality of life, smoking status, uptake of pulmonary rehabilitation and healthcare use.

Results

We analysed results from 423 randomised participants (intervention, n = 242; control, n = 181). Forty-three carers participated. Follow-up at 6 and 12 months was 93% and 82%, respectively. Despite good fidelity for intervention delivery, mean between-group differences in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale at 6 months ruled out clinically important effects (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale - anxiety mean difference -0.60, 95% confidence interval -1.40 to 0.21; Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale - depression mean difference -0.66, 95% confidence interval -1.39 to 0.07), with similar results at 12 months. There were no between-group differences in any of the secondary outcomes. Sensitivity analyses did not alter these conclusions. More adverse events were reported for intervention participants than for control participants, but none related to the trial. The intervention did not generate quality-of-life improvements to justify the additional cost (adjusted mean difference £770.24, 95% confidence interval -£27.91 to £1568.39) to the NHS. The intervention was well received and many participants described positive affects on their quality of life. Facilitators highlighted the complexity of participants' lives and considered the intervention to be of potential valuable; however, the intervention would be difficult to integrate within routine clinical services. Our well-powered trial delivered a theoretically designed intervention with good fidelity. The respiratory-experienced facilitators were trained to deliver a low-intensity cognitive-behavioural approach intervention, but high-intensity cognitive-behavioural therapy might have been more effective. Our broad inclusion criteria specified objectively assessed anxiety and/or depression, but participants were likely to favour talking therapies. Randomisation was concealed and blinding of outcome assessment was breached in only 15 participants.

Conclusions

The tailored cognitive-behavioural approach intervention delivered with fidelity by trained respiratory healthcare professionals to people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease was neither clinically effective nor cost-effective. Alternative approaches that are integrated with routine long-term condition care are needed to address the unmet, complex clinical and psychosocial needs of this group of patients.

Trial registration

This trial is registered as ISRCTN59537391.

Funding

This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme (NIHR award ref: 13/146/02) and is published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 28, No. 1. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.

Tai Chi as a complementary exercise for pulmonary rehabilitation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A randomised controlled trial

OBJECTIVES

With the characteristics of mindfulness and breathing techniques, Tai Chi has been recommended with therapeutic values in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). However, its strengths as a complementary exercise for conventional pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) remain unclear.

DESIGN AND SETTING

This single-blinded randomised controlled trial recruited patients with mild to severe stable COPD. Eligible participants were randomly assigned to the group with usual care (control), total body recumbent stepper (TBRS) exercise, Tai Chi (TC), or combined TBRS exercise and Tai Chi (TBRS-TC). Patients received a two-month hospital-based supervised exercise, followed by a ten-month community- or home-based rehabilitation program.

RESULTS

A total of 120 participants were recruited, and 102 were included in the per-protocol analysis. The mean changes in St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total score from baseline to the post-hospital exercise in the control group, TBRS group, TC group, and TBRS-TC group was 2.62 (95 % CI -8.99 to 8.99), -9.28 (95 % CI -13.96 to -4.60), -10.19 (95 % CI -13.72 to -6.67), and -16.75 (95 % CI -20.25 to -13.24), respectively, with a statistically significant difference between groups in favor of the TBRS-TC exercise (P < 0.001). The remarkable effect of TBRS-TC exercise in improving the quality of life maintained until the end of the community- or home-based rehabilitation training (P < 0.001). Besides, a statistically better effect with the TBRS-TC exercise was also observed in the outcomes regarding exercise capacity, pulmonary function, symptom burden, and systemic inflammation after the whole process of 12-month integrative PR exercise programme.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the results, a novel integrated exercise modality combining Tai Chi and conventional pulmonary rehabilitation was developed. It might contribute to more positive effects in patients with stable COPD.

REGISTRATION

The study was registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR-IOR-15006874) prior to commencing recruitment.

Development of a physical activity counseling intervention for people with chronic respiratory disease based on the health action process approach

BACKGROUND

Physical activity (PA) counseling holds promise for increasing PA levels in people with chronic respiratory disease, though little long-term change has been shown to date. Here, we describe the development of a Health Action Process Approach-based PA counseling intervention that aims to promote PA and exercise in people with chronic respiratory disease who are enrolled in pulmonary rehabilitation.

METHODS

To collaborate in defining and refining the intervention, we convened a varied team of authors that included a panel of five stakeholder partners: three patients, one clinician, and one health behavior change researcher. We completed three steps in the intervention development process: (1) initial intervention creation, (2) iterative intervention refinement, and (3) assessment of intervention acceptability. In step 1, we created an initial draft of the PA counseling intervention based on the HAPA theoretical framework, previous evidence in people with chronic respiratory disease, and clinical experience. In step 2, we used qualitative methods of focus groups and interviews to further develop and refine the intervention. Fifteen meetings occurred with the five-member stakeholder partner panel (six focus groups with the three patient partners, four interviews with the clinician partner, and five interviews with the researcher partner) over 5 months to systematically elicit input and incorporate it into the intervention. In step 3, we measured the intervention acceptability using five-point Likert scale ratings.

RESULTS

Intervention materials included the eligibility screen, participant workbook, and leader guide. We identified key themes in the input from the stakeholder partners and incorporated this input into the intervention content and methods. Ratings of the intervention by the stakeholder partners (n=5) were high with mean ratings ranging 4.0-5.0 on a five-point scale.

CONCLUSIONS

This development process successfully engaged an intervention development team with diverse perspectives and resulted in a PA counseling intervention for people with chronic respiratory disease. The intervention's strong theoretical underpinning, person-centeredness, and the contributions from varied perspectives during intervention development position it well for future evaluations of feasibility, efficacy, and effectiveness.

A pulmonary rehabilitation program reduces hospitalizations in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients: A cost-effectiveness study

BACKGROUND

Although pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is recommended in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), there is a scarcity of data demonstrating the cost-effectiveness and effectiveness of PR in reducing exacerbations.

METHODS

A quasi-experimental study in 200 patients with COPD was conducted to determine the number of exacerbations 1 year before and after their participation in a PR program. Quality of life was measured using the COPD assessment test and EuroQol-5D. The costs of the program and exacerbations were assessed the year before and after participation in the PR program. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was estimated in terms of quality-adjusted life years (QALYs).

RESULTS

The number of admissions, length of hospital stay, and admissions to the emergency department decreased after participation in the PR program by 48.2%, 46.6%, and 42.5%, respectively (P < 0.001 for all). Results on quality of life tests improved significantly (P < 0.001 for the two tests). The cost of PR per patient and the cost of pre-PR and post-PR exacerbations were €1867.7 and €7895.2 and €4201.9, respectively. The PR resulted in a cost saving of €1826 (total, €365,200) per patient/year, and the gain in QALYs was+0.107. ICER was -€17,056. The total cost was <€20,000/QALY in 78% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

PR contributes to reducing the number of exacerbations in patients with COPD, thereby slowing clinical deterioration. In addition, it is cost-effective in terms of QALYs.

The efficacy and safety of systemic corticosteroids as first line treatment for granulomatous lymphocytic interstitial lung disease

BACKGROUND

Granulomatous and lymphocytic interstitial lung disease (gl-ILD) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality among patients with common variable immunodeficiency. Corticosteroids are recommended as first-line treatment for gl-ILD, but evidence for their efficacy is lacking.

OBJECTIVES

This study analyzed the effect of high-dose corticosteroids (≥0.3 mg/kg prednisone equivalent) on gl-ILD, measured by high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) scans, and pulmonary function test (PFT) results.

METHODS

Patients who had received high-dose corticosteroids but no other immunosuppressive therapy at the time (n = 56) and who underwent repeated HRCT scanning or PFT (n = 39) during the retrospective and/or prospective phase of the Study of Interstitial Lung Disease in Primary Antibody Deficiency (STILPAD) were included in the analysis. Patients without any immunosuppressive treatment were selected as controls (n = 23). HRCT scans were blinded, randomized, and scored using the Hartman score. Differences between the baseline and follow-up HRCT scans and PFT were analyzed.

RESULTS

Treatment with high-dose corticosteroids significantly improved HRCT scores and forced vital capacity. Carbon monoxide diffusion capacity significantly improved in both groups. Of 18 patients, for whom extended follow-up data was available, 13 achieved a long-term, maintenance therapy independent remission. All patients with relapse were retreated with corticosteroids, but only one-fifth of them responded. Two opportunistic infections were found in the corticosteroid treatment group, while overall infection rate was similar between cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

Induction therapy with high-dose corticosteroids improved HRCT scans and PFT results of patients with gl-ILD and achieved long-term remission in 42% of patients. It was not associated with major side effects. Low-dose maintenance therapy provided no benefit and efficacy was poor in relapsing disease.

Telerehabilitation in pulmonary diseases

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Telerehabilitation is an alternative delivery model for pulmonary rehabilitation, an evidence-based nonpharmacological intervention, in people with chronic pulmonary disease. This review synthesizes current evidence regarding the telerehabilitation model for pulmonary rehabilitation with an emphasis on its potential and implementation challenges, as well as the clinical experiences from the COVID-19 pandemic.

RECENT FINDINGS

Different models of telerehabilitation for delivering pulmonary rehabilitation exist. Current studies comparing telerehabilitation to centre-based pulmonary rehabilitation primarily focus on the evaluation in people with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, which demonstrated equivalent improvements in exercise capacity, health-related quality of life and symptoms with improved programme completion rates. Although telerehabilitation may improve access to pulmonary rehabilitation by addressing travel burden, improving schedule flexibility and geographic disparity, there are challenges of ensuring satisfaction of healthcare interactions and delivering core components of initial patient assessment and exercise prescription remotely.

SUMMARY

Further evidence is needed on the role of telerehabilitation in various chronic pulmonary diseases, as well as the effectiveness of different modalities in delivering telerehabilitation programmes. Economic and implementation evaluation of currently available and emerging models of telerehabilitation in delivering pulmonary rehabilitation are needed to ensure sustainable adoption into clinical management for people with chronic pulmonary disease.

Bibliometric Analysis of Exercise and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Background

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is the leading cause of death in the world. Pulmonary rehabilitation includes, but is not limited to, exercise training and education, which aim to improve the physical and psychological conditions of patients with chronic respiratory diseases through self-management interventions.

Objective

The aim of this study was to perform a bibliometric analysis of studies on exercise and COPD published from 2000 to 2021 using VOSviewer and CiteSpace.

Methods

All included literature was obtained from the Web of Science core collection. VOSviewer was used to analyze country or region, institution, major co-cited journals, and keywords. CiteSpace was used to analyze centrality, author and co-cited authors, journals, the strongest citation bursts of references, and keywords.

Results

A total of 1889 articles meeting the criteria were obtained. The United States has the largest number of publications. The American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine is the most influential in this field, and the most published research institution is Queen's University. Denis E. O'Donnell has made significant contributions to exercise and COPD research. Association, impact, and statement are hot spots of research in this field.

Conclusion

A bibliometric analysis of exercise interventions for COPD over the past 22 years provides direction for future research.

Occupational therapy in adults with chronic respiratory conditions: A scoping review

INTRODUCTION

Chronic respiratory diseases have a clear impact on occupational performance and engagement. Although occupational therapists have long provided services to this population, evidence regarding the unique role and true impact of occupational therapy is emerging.

AIMS/OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this scoping review was to explore the range, context, and outcomes of occupational therapy services for adults with chronic respiratory conditions.

METHODS

A scoping review guided by the methodological framework of Arksey and O'Malley was completed. To be included articles needed to be peer reviewed primary studies published in English between 2000 and September 2022 describing occupational therapy service delivery for people with chronic respiratory conditions.

RESULTS

Twenty-six articles met inclusion criteria including 12 cohort studies, seven randomised control trials, four qualitative, two case reports, and one service evaluation. Interventions were targeted at body functions and structures (n = 18), activities and participation (n = 17), and environmental factors (n = 14). Ten studies reported impacts of occupational therapy ranging from physiological responses through to quality of life.

CONCLUSION

Occupational therapy service delivery is common for this population, often occurring as part of multidisciplinary programs, and is inclusive of a range of assessments and interventions. Further details in future primary research are needed to describe the mode and unique occupational nature of service delivery.

Strategies to Improve Enrollment and Participation in Pulmonary Rehabilitation Following a Hospitalization for COPD: RESULTS OF A NATIONAL SURVEY

PURPOSE

Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) improves outcomes for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD); however, very few patients attend. We sought to describe strategies used to promote participation in PR after a hospitalization for COPD.

METHODS

A random sample of 323 United States based PR programs was surveyed. Using a positive deviance approach, a 39-item survey was developed based on interviews with clinicians at hospitals demonstrating high rates of participation in PR. Items focused on strategies used to promote participation as well as relevant contextual factors.

RESULTS

Responses were received from 209 programs (65%), of which 88% (n = 184) were hospital-based outpatient facilities. Most (91%, n = 190) programs described enrolling patients continuously, and 80% (n = 167) reported a wait time from referral to the initial PR visit of <4 wk. Organization-level strategies to increase referral to PR included active surveillance (48%, n = 100) and COPD-focused staff (49%, n = 102). Provider-level strategies included clinician education (45%, n = 94), provider outreach (43%, n = 89), order sets (45%, n = 93), and automated referrals (23%, n = 48). Patient-level strategies included bedside education (53%, n = 111), flyers (49%, n = 103), motivational interviewing (33%, n = 69), financial counseling (64%, n = 134), and transportation assistance (35%, n = 73). Fewer than one-quarter (18%, n = 38) of PR programs reported using both bedside education and automatic referral, and 42% (n = 88) programs did not use either strategy.

CONCLUSIONS

This study describes current practices in the United States, and highlights opportunities for improvement at the organization, provider, and patient level. Future research needs to demonstrate the effectiveness of these strategies, alone or in combination.

Non-pharmacological and non-invasive interventions for chronic pain in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A systematic review without meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is complicated by chronic pain. People with COPD report higher pain prevalence than the general population. Despite this, chronic pain management is not reflected in current COPD clinical guidelines and pharmacological treatments are often ineffective. We conducted a systematic review that aimed to establish the efficacy of existing non-pharmacological and non-invasive interventions on pain and identify behaviour change techniques (BCTs) associated with effective pain management.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted with reference to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review (PRISMA) [1], Systematic review without Meta analysis (SWIM) standards [2] and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) guidelines [3]. We searched 14 electronic databases for controlled trials of non-pharmacological and non-invasive interventions where the outcome measure assessed pain or contained a pain subscale.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine studies were identified involving 3,228 participants. Seven interventions reported a minimally important clinical difference in pain outcomes, although only two of these reached statistical significance (p < 0.05). A third study reported statistically significant outcomes, but this was not clinically significant (p = 0.0273). Issues with intervention reporting prevented identification of active intervention ingredients (i.e., BCTs).

CONCLUSIONS

Pain appears to be a meaningful issue for many individuals with COPD. However, intervention heterogeneity and issues with methodological quality limit certainty about the effectiveness of currently available non-pharmacological interventions. An improvement in reporting is required to enable identification of active intervention ingredients associated with effective pain management.

A Clinically Significant Difference on the COPM: A Review

Background. The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) assists occupational therapists to identify occupational performance problems using a client-centred approach. Since its first publication in 1991, there has been abundant evidence of the ability of the COPM to detect a statistically significant difference as an outcome measure. There has also been a tacit understanding that a difference of 2 points from pre-test to post-test on either Performance or Satisfaction COPM score represents a clinically significant difference. There is however, some confusion about the origins of this claim. Purpose. To ascertain empirical evidence for the claim that a clinically significant difference is a change score ≥2 points. Method. We conducted a scoping review of peer-reviewed literature (1991-2020) for intervention studies using the COPM as an outcome measure and examined intervention type and change scores. Findings. One hundred studies were identified. The COPM was used to assess effectiveness of eight types of occupational therapy interventions. The common belief, however, was not empirically supported that clinical significance can be asserted on the basis of a two-point change in COPM scores. Implications. Further research is needed to test alternative approaches to asserting clinical significance or a minimal clinically important difference.

Selective androgen receptor modulation for muscle weakness in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a randomised control trial

BACKGROUND

Selective androgen receptor modulators (SARMs) increase muscle mass via the androgen receptor. This phase 2A trial investigated the effects of a SARM, GSK2881078, in conjunction with exercise, on leg strength in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and impaired physical function.

METHODS

47 postmenopausal women and 50 men with COPD (forced expiratory volume in 1 s 30%-65% predicted; short physical performance battery score: 3-11) were enrolled into a randomised double-blind, placebo control trial. Patients were randomised 1:1 to once daily placebo or oral GSK2881078 (females: 1.0 mg; males: 2.0 mg) for 13 weeks with a concurrent home-exercise programme, involving strength training and physical activity. Primary endpoints were change from baseline in leg strength at 90 days (one-repetition maximum; absolute (kg) and relative (% change)) and multiple safety outcomes. Secondary endpoints included lean body mass, physical function and patient-reported outcomes.

RESULTS

GSK2881078 increased leg strength in men. The difference in adjusted mean change from baseline and adjusted mean percentage change from baseline between treatment and placebo were: for women, 8.0 kg (90% CI -2.5 to 18.4) and 5.2% (90% CI -4.7 to 15.0), respectively; for men, 11.8 kg (90% CI -0.5 to 24.0) and 7.0% (90% CI 0.5 to 13.6), respectively. Lean body mass increased, but no changes in patient-reported outcomes were observed. Reversible reductions in high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol and transient elevations in hepatic transaminases were the main treatment-related safety findings.

CONCLUSIONS

GSK2881078 was well tolerated and short-term treatment increased leg strength, when expressed as per cent predicted, in men with COPD more than physical training alone.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03359473.

Effects of traditional mind-body movement therapy on chronic cardiopulmonary dyspnoea: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To evaluate whether traditional mind-body movement therapy (TMBM) can be used as a complementary or alternative therapy for exercise-based cardiopulmonary rehabilitation (EBCR) on chronic cardiopulmonary dyspnoea.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science and China National Knowledge Infrastructure were searched from their inception to 2 July 2021. Randomised clinical trials evaluating the effectiveness of TMBM versus EBCR, and TMBM +EBCR versus TMBM in the treatment of chronic cardiopulmonary dyspnoea were selected. The outcomes were exercise capacity (6 min walk distance, 6MWD) and quality of life (QoL).

RESULTS

Thirty-four randomised clinical trials with 2456 patients were included. For TMBM vs EBCR alone, statistically significant improvements in the 6MWD favoured the TMBM for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (mean difference(MD)=12.22 m; 95% CI 5.94 to 18.50; I²=56%) and heart failure (HF) patients (MD=43.65 m; 95% CI 7.91 to 79.38; I²=0%). Statistically significant improvements in QoL also favoured TMBM over EBCR for patients with HF(MD=-9.19; 95% CI -11.05 to -7.32; I²=0%) but non-significant trend for COPD (standardised mean difference (SMD)=-0.31; 95% CI -0.62 to 0.01; I²=78%). Comparisons of TMBM +EBCR versus EBCR alone revealed significant improvements in the QoL for COPD (SMD=-0.52; 95% CI -0.94 to -0.10; I²=86%) and patients with HF (MD=-2.82; 95% CI -4.99 to -0.64; I²=0%). The 6MWD results favoured the TMBM +EBCR for patients with COPD (MD=16.76 m; 95% CI 10.24 to 23.29; I²=0%), but only showed a slight trend towards additional benefits of TMBM +EBCR in the HF studies (MD=13.77 m; 95% CI -1.01 to 28.54; I2=65%) .

CONCLUSIONS

TMBM has positive effects on patients' 6MWD and QoL, with similar or even better effects than EBCR. It may be beneficial to use TMBM as a supplementary or alternative strategy for EBCR in treatment plans.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42021241181.

Associations between depression and anxiety index and frequency of acute exacerbation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

BACKGROUND

Comorbidities of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) influence clinical characteristics and prognosis.

OBJECTIVES

This study compared the clinical characteristics and exacerbation rate of COPD according to the presence of depression or anxiety.

DESIGN

This study used data from The Korea COPD Subgroup Study (KOCOSS) cohort, a nationwide prospective cohort from 54 medical centers, between April 2012 and 2019.

METHODS

Depression and anxiety were diagnosed with the Beck Depression Inventory and Beck Anxiety Inventory. Negative binomial regression analysis was performed to analyze the frequency of exacerbations in depressed patients and anxiety. Differences in lung function trajectory according to presence of depression/anxiety were analyzed using a linear mixed model.

RESULTS

In all, 2147 patients were enrolled. Depressed patients or anxiety had lower lung function, higher modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) grade, St. George Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) score, and COPD assessment test score, and higher rates of exacerbation in the past year than those without depression/anxiety. Depressed patients had a higher frequency of moderate to severe exacerbations [Incidence Rate Ratio (IRR): 1.57, CI: 1.17-2.11, p = 0.002] and those with anxiety had higher frequencies of moderate to severe (IRR: 1.52, CI: 1.03-2.27, p = 0.038) and severe exacerbations (IRR: 2.13, CI: 1.09-4.15, p = 0.025) during 1-year follow-up compared to those without these comorbidities. The differences in the change in annual forced expiratory volume in 1 seconds (FEV1) over 3 years according to the presence of depression or anxiety were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

Depressed and anxious patients showed increased respiratory symptoms and exacerbation rate as well as reduced health-related quality of life, whereas there were no significant differences in changes in lung function between groups with and without depression/anxiety.

Determinants of acute care discharge in adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

CONCLUSIONS

In adults with COPD basic mobility scores on the AM-PAC "6-clicks" measure completed at discharge had the best sensitivity and specificity for predicting discharge to home and need for rehab services.

Effect of pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

OBJECTIVE

The present systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) aimed to investigate the effects of pulmonary rehabilitation in individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

METHODS

The RCTs of pulmonary rehabilitation programs published between 1999 and 2021 were retrieved from electronic databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase). Two reviewers independently assessed the topical relevance and trial quality and extracted data for meta-analysis using the Stata software version 14.0.

RESULTS

A total of 39 trials involving 2,397 participants with COPD were evaluated. We found that patients who received pulmonary rehabilitation program had significant improvement in the 6-min walk test (6MWT), St. George Respiratory Questionnaire score, and the modified British Medical Research Council score as compared to those who received usual care. Yoga and Tai Chi showed significant improvement in the forced expiratory volume (FEV1)% in 1 s predicted value. However, no significant difference was detected in the modified Borg score, forced vital capacity (FVC), and FEV1/FVC predicted value between the pulmonary rehabilitation and usual care groups.

CONCLUSION

Yoga and Tai Chi showed a significant improvement in the FEV1% predicted value. Also, pulmonary rehabilitation program improved the exercise capacity, the quality of life, and dyspnoea in patients with COPD.Key messagesA total of 39 trials involving 2,397 participants with COPD were evaluated.We found that patients who received pulmonary rehabilitation program had significant improvement in the 6MWT, St. George Respiratory Questionnaire score, and the modified British Medical Research Council score as compared to those who received usual care.Yoga and Tai Chi showed significant improvement in the FEV1% predicted value.No significant difference was detected in the modified Borg score, FVC, and FEV1/FVC predicted value between the pulmonary rehabilitation and usual care groups.

A pragmatic randomised controlled trial of tailored pulmonary rehabilitation in participants with difficult-to-control asthma and elevated body mass index

BACKGROUND

Difficult-to-control asthma associated with elevated body mass index (BMI) is challenging with limited treatment options. The effects of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) in this population are uncertain.

METHODS

This is a randomised controlled trial of an eight-week asthma-tailored PR programme versus usual care (UC) in participants with difficult-to-control asthma and BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2. PR comprised two hours of education and supervised exercise per week, with encouragement for two individual exercise sessions. Primary outcome was difference in change in Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) in PR versus UC groups between visits. Secondary outcomes included difference in change in Asthma Control Questionnaire-6 (ACQ6), and a responder analysis comparing proportion reaching minimum clinically important difference for AQLQ and ACQ6.

RESULTS

95 participants were randomised 1:1 to PR or UC. Median age was 54 years, 60% were female and median BMI was 33.8 kg/m2. Mean  (SD) AQLQ was 3.9 (+/-1.2) and median (IQR) ACQ6 2.8(1.8-3.6). 77 participants attended a second visit and had results analysed. Median (IQR) change in AQLQ was not significantly different: 0.3 (- 0.2 to 0.6) in PR and - 0.1 (- 0.5 to 0.4) in UC, p = 0.139. Mean change in ACQ6 was significantly different: - 0.4 (95% CI - 0.6 to - 0.2) in PR and 0 (- 0.3 to + 0.3) in UC, p = 0.015, but below minimum clinically important difference. In ACQ6 responder analysis, minimum clinically important difference was reached by 18 PR participants (54.5%) versus 10 UC (22.7%), p = 0.009. Dropout rate was 31% between visits in PR group, and time to completion was significantly prolonged in PR group at 94 (70-107) days versus 63 (56-73) in UC, p < 0.001.

CONCLUSIONS

PR improved asthma control and reduced perceived breathlessness in participants with difficult-to-control asthma and elevated BMI. However, this format appears to be suboptimal for this population with high drop-out rates and prolonged time to completion. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov. ID NCT03630432. Retrospectively registered, submitted May 26th 2017, posted August 14th 2018.

Efficacy of Repeating Pulmonary Rehabilitation in People with COPD: A Systematic Review

Background

Pulmonary rehabilitation is an effective intervention for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). People with COPD undertake repeat programs, but synthesis of evidence regarding such practice has not been undertaken. The aim of this systematic review was to establish the effects of repeating pulmonary rehabilitation subsequent to an initial program in people with COPD.

Methods

Studies where participants with COPD undertook >1 pulmonary rehabilitation program were included, incorporating RCT (randomized controlled trial) and non-randomized studies. Electronic database searches were undertaken. Two authors independently undertook study identification, data extraction and risk of bias assessment. The primary outcome was health-related quality of life (HRQoL); secondary outcomes were exercise capacity, hospitalizations and exacerbations, adherence, mortality and adverse events. Narrative synthesis was undertaken for clinically heterogeneous trials. Data from RCTs and non-randomized studies were not combined for analysis.

Results

Ten included studies (2 RCTs) involved 907 participants with COPD (n=653 had undertaken >1 program). The majority of studies were at high risk of bias. One RCT (n=33) reported no difference in HRQol after a repeat program vs usual care following exacerbation (Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire dyspnea domain score MD 0.4, 95% CI -0.5 to 3). In stable patients, clinically important and statistically significant improvements in HRQoL and exercise capacity were reported after repeat programs, but of a smaller magnitude than initial programs. There was evidence for reductions in exacerbations and hospitalizations, and shorter hospital length of stay for patients who repeated a program twice in 12 months compared to those who repeated once. No data for mortality or adverse events were available.

Conclusion

This systematic review provides limited evidence for benefits of repeating pulmonary rehabilitation in people with COPD, including improved HRQoL and exercise capacity, and reduced hospitalizations. However, most studies have high risk of bias, which reduces the certainty of these conclusions.

Study Registration

PROSPERO (CRD42020215093).

Non-Pharmacological Treatments of Asthma Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Overlap and Rehabilitation Programs

Non-pharmacologic treatment is a vital, yet often under-utilized aspect of care for patients with ACO. As patients with ACO are often excluded from clinical trials, management decisions should be based on patient characteristic "phenotypes," such as dyspnea or exacerbation, and considering whether COPD or asthma is more pronounced in the individual patient. Self-management interventions in asthma and COPD have an overwhelming amount of supporting evidence and should be an integral part of ACO management. Additionally, pulmonary rehabilitation has widespread benefits in patients with COPD as well as asthma and should be offered in symptomatic patients with ACO. While the COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted some shortcomings, and introduced several challenges, to the delivery of PR world-wide, it has also presented the opportunity for the development and refinement of new models to deliver PR, such as telerehabilitation. While further research and development are necessary, telerehabilitation offers a promising alternative to reach patients, such as those with ACO, who would benefit from the programming. While future research is needed, we can make a more explicit and judicious use of current best evidence in making therapeutic decisions that includes non-pharmacological interventions in patients with ACO.

Safety, feasibility and initial efficacy of an app-facilitated telerehabilitation (AFTER) programme for COVID-19 survivors: a pilot randomised study

OBJECTIVES

Determine the safety, feasibility and initial efficacy of a multicomponent telerehabilitation programme for COVID-19 survivors.

DESIGN

Pilot randomised feasibility study.

SETTING

In-home telerehabilitation.

PARTICIPANTS

44 participants (21 female, mean age 52 years) discharged home following hospitalisation with COVID-19 (with and without intensive care unit (ICU) stay).

INTERVENTIONS

Participants were block randomised 2:1 to receive 12 individual biobehaviourally informed, app-facilitated, multicomponent telerehabilitation sessions with a licenced physical therapist (n=29) or to a control group (n=15) consisting of education on exercise and COVID-19 recovery trajectory, physical activity and vitals monitoring, and weekly check-ins with study staff. Interventions were 100% remote and occurred over 12 weeks.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was feasibility, including safety and session adherence. Secondary outcomes included preliminary efficacy outcomes including tests of function and balance; patient-reported outcome measures; a cognitive assessment; and average daily step count. The 30 s chair stand test was the main secondary (efficacy) outcome.

RESULTS

No adverse events (AEs) occurred during testing or in telerehabilitation sessions; 38% (11/29) of the intervention group compared with 60% (9/15) of the control group experienced an AE (p=0.21), most of which were minor, over the course of the 12-week study. 27 of 29 participants (93%; 95% CI 77% to 99%) receiving the intervention attended ≥75% of sessions. Both groups demonstrated clinically meaningful improvement in secondary outcomes with no statistically significant differences between groups.

CONCLUSION

Fully remote telerehabilitation was safe, feasible, had high adherence for COVID-19 recovery, and may apply to other medically complex patients including those with barriers to access care. This pilot study was designed to evaluate feasibility; further efficacy evaluation is needed.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04663945.

The impact of the meta-analysis of pulmonary rehabilitation by Lacasse and colleagues: transforming pulmonary rehabilitation from “art to science”

#Pulmonaryrehab was transformed in the 1990s into the standard of care for COPD: this article focuses on the impact of the 1996 meta-analysis by Lacasse and colleagues which provided the evidence to silence the scepticshttps://bit.ly/3MIntBC

SPACE FOR COPD delivered as a maintenance programme on pulmonary rehabilitation discharge: protocol of a randomised controlled trial evaluating the long-term effects on exercise tolerance and mental well-being

INTRODUCTION

The benefits achieved during pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) are known to be sustained for 6-12 months after the initial programme. Several maintenance trials have been conducted but were heterogeneous in terms of duration, frequency and labour cost. There is no consensus on one best strategy. SPACE FOR COPD (Self-management Programme of Activity, Coping and Education for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease) is a home-based self-management programme, which has been shown previously to be effective in primary and secondary care settings and is to be tested here as a maintenance programme. The aim is to evaluate the efficacy of the SPACE FOR COPD programme (manual and group sessions), on exercise tolerance and mental well-being, compared with usual care following PR in patients with COPD.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

A prospective, multicentre, single-blinded randomised controlled trial requiring 116 participants with a clinical diagnosis of COPD who have finished PR within 4 weeks will be randomised 1:1 to either a usual care group or a SPACE FOR COPD programme group. The intervention comprises a home-based manual and 4, 2-hour group sessions adopting motivational interviewing techniques over 12 months. The primary outcome is endurance capacity measured by the Endurance Shuttle Walking Test at 12 months. Secondary outcomes are: maximal exercise capacity, health-related quality of life, mood, patient activation, physical activity, lung function and healthcare costs. The measures will be taken at baseline, 6 and 12 months. Patient interviews and staff focus groups will be conducted to explore barriers, facilitators and views about the intervention at the end of the study. A framework analysis will be used for the interpretation of qualitative data.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The trial was granted ethical approval from Health Research Authority and Health and Care Research Wales (HCRW19/EM/0267 on 10 October 2019). Results will be made available to all stakeholders through a dissemination event, conferences and peer-reviewed publications.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ISRCTN30110012.

Predictors of changes in 6-min walking distance following pulmonary rehabilitation in COPD patients: a retrospective cohort analysis

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is fundamental in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) management but not all patients may show functional benefits from PR.

AIM

The aim of this study was to identify predictors of non-response in functional capacity to PR.

DESIGN

Observational study.

SETTING

Inpatient pulmonary rehabilitation center.

POPULATION

COPD patients.

METHODS

This single center study is a retrospective analysis of data in COPD patients admitted to a PR center between January 2012 and December 2017. Post-PR change in 6-min walking distance (6MWD) was used to determine the functional response to PR. Patients characteristics and pre-PR 6-min walking test responses were analyzed to determine factors associated with post-PR changes in 6MWD.

RESULTS

Data from 835 patients were analyzed as well as a subgroup of 190 patients with additional variables available. Eighty percent of the patients showed clinically significant 6MWD improvement post-PR. The predictors of 6MWD response to PR were age, pre-PR 6MWD, pre-PR end-of-test dyspnea and long-term oxygen therapy. Older patients, longer pre-PR 6MWD, higher pre-PR end-of-test dyspnea score and the use of oxygen supplementation were associated with lesser post-PR 6MWD improvement.

CONCLUSIONS

This study identified four important clinical variables predicting a lack of 6MWD response to PR.

CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT

Patients with such clinical characteristics may require specific PR modalities to improve their functional benefit.

What should pulmonary rehabilitation look like for people living with post-tuberculosis lung disease in the Bishkek and Chui region of the Kyrgyz Republic? A qualitative exploration

OBJECTIVE

After experiencing tuberculosis (TB), many people develop post-tuberculosis lung disease (PTBLD). Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) centrally comprising of education and exercise is recommended internationally for people living with chronic respiratory diseases. However, no such service exists in Kyrgyzstan. This study investigated the opinions of healthcare professionals who would be expected to be potential future referrers to PR and adults living with PTBLD about what a PR programme could look like in Kyrgyzstan.

DESIGN

A qualitative study using interviews and focus groups. Grounded theory and thematic analysis were used for data collection and analysis.

PARTICIPANTS

63 participants; 15 referrers (12 male, 3 female; 12 pulmonolgists, 3 TB specialists) and 48 adults (26 male, 22 female) living with PTBLD.

SETTING

Participants were recruited from hospital settings in Bishkek and Chuy Region, Kygryzstan.

METHODS

Fifteen semistructured interviews were conducted with referrers and nine focus group discussions were conducted with adults living with PTBLD.

RESULTS

Five key themes were developed: (1) living with PTBLD; (2) attitude to PR, which emphasised the perceived importance and potential benefits of implemention; (3) barriers/facilitators to PR, which included time and cost, and the importance of appropriate communication in enabling participation; (4) interventional components of PR, which described culturally and demographically appropriate physical activities including rhythmic movements, dance and volleyball; and (5) psychosocial support, which demonstrated the importance of psychological support for patients coping with the effects of stigma.

CONCLUSIONS

Potential referrers and adults living with PTBLD expressed their support for the implementation of PR. The culture-specific and population-specific issues highlighted in this work demonstrate the need to address stigma and provide certain types of exercise training/education modules for this specific clinical population. In other respects the currently known attitudes/barriers to PR, identified in Western research, appear to apply. The principles of culturally adapting PR may be helpful for those looking to establish similar clinical services in other low-income and middle-income countries and in Central Asia in particular.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ISRCTN11122503.

Exercise and Quality-of-Life Outcomes of Two Versus Three Weekly Sessions of Pulmonary Rehabilitation

PURPOSE

This study aimed to assess whether there are differences in exercise or health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) outcomes following twice-weekly supervised sessions of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) compared with three times weekly over an 8-wk program in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

METHODS

We conducted a quasi-experimental, single-center observational study using 198 subjects who completed two supervised PR sessions (intervention group) compared with 208 historical controls who completed three weekly sessions. We assessed between-group differences in outcomes after balancing groups using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) of propensity scores, followed by regression adjustment.

RESULTS

Both groups achieved clinically and statistically significant improvements in exercise and HRQoL following the PR program. After IPTW and regression adjustment, the intervention group had a lower post-PR 6-min walk time by 1.2: 95% CI, -12.9 to 10.5 m (P = .84), compared with the control group. Although post-PR COPD Assessment Test (CAT) scores decreased in both groups, the intervention group had a higher post-PR CAT score by 1.5: 95% CI, 0.37 to 2.66 a.u. (P = .01), compared with the control group. All other HRQoL measures failed to reach statistical significance. None of the between-group differences reached minimal clinically important differences for COPD.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings support current international guidelines for twice-weekly supervised PR sessions combined with unsupervised home exercise sessions. We conclude there is no disadvantage in running a PR program for patients with COPD using twice-weekly supervised sessions compared with three times weekly supervised sessions.

Strategies to ensure continuity of nutritional care in patients with COVID-19 infection on discharge from hospital: A rapid review

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The risk of malnutrition in people with COVID-19 is high; prevalence is reported as 37% in general medical inpatients, 53% in elderly inpatients and 67% in ICU. Thus, nutrition is a crucial element of assessment and treatment. This rapid review aimed to evaluate what evidence is available to inform evidence-based decision making on the nutritional care of patients hospitalised with COVID-19 infection.

METHODS

Cochrane Rapid Reviews guidance was followed; the protocol was registered (CRD42020208448). Studies were selected that included patients with COVID-19, pneumonia, respiratory distress syndrome and acute respiratory failure, in hospital or the community, and which examined nutritional support. All types of studies were eligible for inclusion except non-systematic reviews, commentaries, editorials and single case studies. Six electronic databases were searched: MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, CINAHL and MedRxiv.

RESULTS

Twenty-six articles on COVID-19 were retrieved, including 11 observational studies, five guidelines and 10 opinion articles. Seven further articles on pneumonia included three RCTs, one unblinded trial, three observational studies, and one systematic review on rehabilitation post-ICU admission for respiratory illness. The evidence from these articles is presented narratively and used to guide the nutritional and dietetic care process.

CONCLUSIONS

Older patients with COVID-19 infection are at risk of malnutrition and addressing this may be important in recovery. The use of nutritional management strategies applicable to other acute conditions are recommended. However, traditional screening and implementation techniques need to be modified to ensure infection control measures can be maintained. The most effective nutritional interventions require further research and more detailed guidance on nutritional management post-discharge to support long-term recovery is needed.

Occupational therapy interventions in pulmonary rehabilitation – an update in the COVID-19 ERA

Background. As symptoms of COVID-19 infection are varying in severity and type, the long-term disability is yet to be established due to a short time-window since the pandemic started. Most survivors will have persistent pulmonary symptoms even after the infection, which raises the awareness of the importance of pulmonary rehabilitation in these patients, as they are mostly young, with severely diminished quality of life as they are unable to perform their basic activities of daily living as before. Occupational therapy is a form of rehabilitation treatment aimed at maximizing functionality and independence in performing activities of daily living, improvement of the patient’s autonomy and prevention of further functional decline. Objective. The purpose of the current work is to review the most important occupational therapy interventions applicable during a pulmonary rehabilitation program for chronic pulmonary pathologies, that can also be applied in COVID-19 survivors with persistent respiratory symptoms. Discussion. The main objectives of occupational therapy in pulmonary rehabilitation are training using breathing techniques at rest and during task performance, upper limbs training to increase exercise tolerance, programming and simplifying daily activities, informing patients of the importance of asking for help, planning the day/week, organizing the environment, educating the patient. All these objectives can be achieved in a simple way and at low-cost. Conclusions. Occupational therapy intervention during comprehensive pulmonary rehabilitation must be promoted to specifically evaluate and solve problems related to respiratory disability. Occupational tasks should be related to symptoms occurring during specific activities. Standardized protocols and definition of outcomes during occupational therapy intervention are lacking. Keywords: occupational therapy, pulmonary rehabilitation, COVID-19, activities of daily living, quality of life,

A Comparison of Physical Activity Between Home-Based and Centre-Based Pulmonary Rehabilitation: A Randomised Controlled Secondary Analysis

Background: Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is a highly effective intervention for individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Physical activity (PA) has been shown to increase after a centre-based programme, yet it is not clear if a home-based programme can offer the same benefit. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of home-based PR compared with the centre-based PR on the PA levels post 7 weeks of PR and 6 months follow-up.

Method: In this study, 51 participants with COPD, of them, 36 (71%) men completed physical activity monitoring with a SenseWear Armband, at three time points (baseline, 7 weeks, and 6 months). The participants were randomly assigned to either centre-based supervised PR (n = 25; 69 ± 6 years; FEV1 55 ± 20% predicted) or home-based PR (n = 26; 68 ± 7 years; FEV1 42 ± 19% predicted) programmes lasting 7 weeks. The home-based programme includes one hospital visit, a self-management manual, and two telephone calls. The PA was measured as step count, time in moderate PA (3–6 metabolic equivalent of tasks [METs]) in bouts of more than 10 min and sedentary time (&lt;2 METs).

Results: Home-based PR increased step count significantly more than the centre-based PR after 7 weeks (mean difference 1,463 steps: 95% CI 280–2,645, p = 0.02). There was no difference in time spent in moderate PA was observed (mean difference 62 min: 95% CI −56 to 248, p = 0.24). Sedentary behaviour was also significantly different between the centre and home-based groups. The home group spent 52 min less time sedentary compared with the centre-based (CI −106 to 2, p = 0.039). However, after 6 months, the step count and time spent in moderate PA returned to baseline in both the groups.

Conclusion: This study provides an important insight into the role of home-based PR which has the potential to be offered as an alternative to the centre-based PR. Understanding who may best respond from the centre or home-based PR warrants further exploration and how to maintain these initial benefits for the long-term.

Trial Registry: ISRCTN: No.: ISRCTN81189044; URL: isrctn.com.

Barriers to enrollment in pulmonary rehabilitation: medical knowledge analysis

OBJECTIVE

To assess clinicians' knowledge about pulmonary rehabilitation, and identify the barriers faced when referring patients with health insurance to pulmonary rehabilitation.

METHODS

This was a survey-based cross-sectional study conducted in 2019, at a private reference hospital in São Paulo, Brazil. Eligible participants were physicians registered with the following specialties: internal medicine, geriatrics, cardiology, pulmonology or thoracic surgery.

RESULTS

We collected 72 responses, and 99% of participants recognized chronic obstructive pulmonary disease as a potential indication for pulmonary rehabilitation; less often (75%), they listed interstitial lung disease, bronchiectasis and pulmonary hypertension. Most participants (67%) incorrectly associated pulmonary rehabilitation with lung function improvement, while 28% of cardiologists and 35% of internists/geriatricians failed to recognize benefits on mood disorders. Notably, 18% of participants recommended pulmonary rehabilitation only to patients on supplemental oxygen and 14% prescribed only home physical therapy, patterns more commonly seen among non-respiratory physicians. The three most perceived barriers to referral and adherence were health insurance coverage (79%), transportation to pulmonary rehabilitation center (63%) and lack of social support (29%).

CONCLUSION

Financial, logistic and social constraints pose challenges to pulmonary rehabilitation enrollment, even for patients with premium healthcare insurance. Moreover, physician knowledge gaps may be an additional barrier to pulmonary rehabilitation referral and adherence. Providing continued medical education, incorporating automatic reminders in electronic medical records, and using telerehabilitation tools may improve pulmonary rehabilitation referral, adherence, and ultimately, patient care.

[Pulmonary rehabilitation, a historical perspective from Hippocrates to tele-rehabilitation]

In ancient times Hippocrates described a disease, the 3rd phthisis, which seems to correspond to COPD and is mainly treated by walking, gradually increasing the number of steps until reaching 10,000 steps a day at the end of the initial period of treatment. The recent era began in the second half of the 20th century and ended in 2015, with an unusual Cochrane Library editorial in which it was stated that the accumulated evidence (statistically significant and clinically relevant improvements in clinical signs, tolerance to exercise, quality of life, days hospitalization…) on the effects of rehabilitation programs suffice to suspend research on the subject and to justify focus on new elements in the programs. It is essential, in fact, to establish uniform practical recommendations for the prescription of routine rehabilitation (number and duration of physical activity sessions, therapeutic education, re-training intensity…). In addition, studies should be carried out on new practices: community or home rehabilitation, long-term rehabilitation, tele-rehabilitation.

Respiratory physiotherapy interventions focused on exercise training and enhancing physical activity levels in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease are likely to be cost-effective: a systematic review

QUESTION

What is the cost-effectiveness of respiratory physiotherapy interventions for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease?

DESIGN

Systematic review of full economic evaluations alongside clinical trials published between 1997 and 2021. Reviewers independently screened studies for inclusion, extracted data and assessed methodological quality.

PARTICIPANTS

People with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

INTERVENTION

Respiratory physiotherapy interventions as defined in the respiratory physiotherapy curriculum of the European Respiratory Society.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Costs expressed in monetary units, effect sizes expressed in terms of disease-specific quality of life (QOL), quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) or monetary units.

RESULTS

This review included 11 randomised trials with 3,261 participants. The interventions were pulmonary rehabilitation, airway clearance techniques, an integrated disease-management program and an early assisted discharge program, including inpatient respiratory physiotherapy. Meta-analysis was considered irrelevant due to the extensive heterogeneity of the reported interventions. A total of 45 incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were extracted. Regardless of the economic perspectives, 67% of all QOL-related ICERs and 71% of all QALY-related ICERs were situated in the north-east or south-east quadrants of the cost-effectiveness plane. Six studies could be seen as cost-effective when compared with a specified cost-effectiveness threshold per QALY gained.

CONCLUSION

Respiratory physiotherapy interventions focusing on exercise training in combination with enhancing physical activity levels are likely to be cost-effective in terms of costs per unit QOL gained and QALYs. Some uncertainty still exists on the various estimates of cost-effectiveness due to differences in the content and intensity of the type of interventions, outcome measures and comparators.

REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42018088699.

Pulmonary rehabilitation outcomes in individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

The magnitude of response to pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is influenced by the selection of outcomes and measures.

OBJECTIVES

This systematic review aimed to review all outcomes and measures used in clinical trials of PR for individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

METHODS

The review involved a search of Scopus, Web of Knowledge, Cochrane Library, EBSCO, Science Direct and PubMed databases for studies of stable individuals with COPD undergoing PR. Frequency of reporting for each domain, outcome and measure was synthesized by using Microsoft Excel.

RESULTS

We included 267 studies (43153 individuals with COPD). A broad range of domains (n=22), outcomes (n=163) and measures (n=217) were reported. Several measures were used for the same outcome. The most reported outcomes were exercise capacity (n=218) assessed with the 6-min walk test (n=140), health-related quality of life (n=204) assessed with the Saint George's respiratory questionnaire (n=99), and symptoms (n=158) assessed with the modified Medical Research Council dyspnea scale (n=56). The least reported outcomes were comorbidities, adverse events and knowledge.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review reinforces the need for a core outcome set for PR in individuals with COPD because of high heterogeneity in reported outcomes and measures. Future studies should assess the importance of each outcome for PR involving different stakeholders.

PROSPERO ID

CRD42017079935.