Patterns of adherence to diabetes vision care guidelines: baseline findings from the Diabetic Retinopathy Awareness Program

Follow-up in a point-of-care diabetic retinopathy program in Pittsburgh: a non-concurrent retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

The Point-of-Care Diabetic Retinopathy Examination Program (POCDREP) was initiated in 2015 at the University of Pittsburgh/UPMC in response to low diabetic retinopathy (DR) examination rates, a condition affecting a quarter of people with diabetes mellitus (PwDM) and leading to blindness. Early detection and treatment are critical with DR prevalence projected to triple by 2050. Approximately, half of PwDM in the U.S. undergo yearly examinations, and there are reported varying follow-up rates with eye care professionals, with limited data on the factors influencing these trends. POCDREP aimed to address screening and follow-up gap, partnering with diverse healthcare entities, including primary care sites, free clinics, and federally qualified health centers.

METHODS

A non-concurrent retrospective cohort study spanning 2015-2018 examined data using electronic health records of patients who underwent retinal imaging. Imaging was performed using 31 cameras across various settings, with results interpreted by ophthalmologists. Follow-up recommendations were made for cases with vision-threatening DR (VTDR), incidental findings, or indeterminate results. Factors influencing follow-up were analyzed, including demographic, clinical, and imaging-related variables. We assessed the findings at follow-up of patients with indeterminate results.

RESULTS

Out of 7,733 examinations (6,242 patients), 32.25% were recommended for follow-up. Among these, 5.57% were classified as having VTDR, 14.34% had other ocular findings such as suspected glaucoma and age-related macular degeneration (AMD), and 12.13% were indeterminate. Of those recommended for follow-up, only 30.87% were assessed by eye care within six months. Older age, marriage, and severe DR were associated with higher odds of following up. Almost two thirds (64.35%) of the patients with indeterminate exams were found with a vision-threatening disease at follow-up.

CONCLUSION

The six-month follow-up rate was found to be suboptimal. Influential factors for follow-up included age, marital status, and the severity of diabetic retinopathy (DR). While the program successfully identified a range of ocular conditions, screening initiatives must extend beyond mere disease detection. Ensuring patient follow-up is crucial to DR preventing programs mission. Recommended strategies to improve follow-up adherence include education, incentives, and personalized interventions. Additional research is necessary to pinpoint modifiable factors that impact adherence and to develop targeted interventions.

Disparities Between Teleretinal Imaging Findings and Patient-Reported Diabetic Retinopathy Status and Follow-up Eye Care Interval: A 10-Year Prospective Study

OBJECTIVE

To assess self-reported awareness of diabetic retinopathy (DR) and concordance of eye examination follow-up compared with findings from concurrent retinal images.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

We conducted a prospective observational 10-year study of 26,876 consecutive patients with diabetes who underwent retinal imaging during an endocrinology visit. Awareness and concordance were evaluated using questionnaires and retinal imaging.

RESULTS

Awareness information and gradable images were available in 25,360 patients (94.3%). Severity of DR by imaging was as follows: no DR (n = 14,317; 56.5%), mild DR (n = 6,805; 26.8%), or vision-threatening DR (vtDR; n = 4,238; 16.7%). In the no, mild, and vtDR groups, 96.7%, 88.5%, and 54.9% of patients, respectively, reported being unaware of any prior DR. When DR was present, reporting no prior DR was associated with shorter diabetes duration, milder DR, last eye examination >1 year before, no dilation, no scheduled appointment, and less specialized provider (all P < 0.001). Among patients with vtDR, 41.2%, 58.1%, and 64.2% did not report being aware of any DR and follow-up was concordant with current DR severity in 66.7%, 41.3%, and 25.4% (P < 0.001) of patients when prior examination was performed by a retinal specialist, nonretinal ophthalmologist, or optometrist (P < 0.001), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Substantial discrepancies exist between DR presence, patient awareness, and concordance of follow-up across all DR severity levels. These discrepancies are present across all eye care provider types, with the magnitude influenced by provider type. Therefore, patient self-report should not be relied upon to reflect DR status. Modification of medical care and education models may be necessary to enhance retention of ophthalmic knowledge in patients with diabetes and ensure accurate communication between all health care providers.

Systemic and ocular outcomes in patients with young-onset type 2 diabetes

PURPOSE

To analyze the systemic and ocular outcomes in patients with young-onset type 2 diabetes (YO-DM2) based on grade of presenting diabetic retinopathy (DR).

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study analysis of empaneled patients with type 2 diabetes <40 years old with retinopathy screening within the Los Angeles Department of Health Services between 01/01/2017-07/01/2021 were included. Patients were stratified based on presenting severity of DR determined on fundus photographs or clinical examination. Patient's systemic co-morbidities and ocular outcomes were then compared across each group. Procedural (e.g. intravitreal injections) and surgical interventions (e.g. pars plana vitrectomy) were documented as performed by the treating physician.

RESULTS

2795 patients were screened from 12,456 patients diagnosed with diabetes younger than age 40 (22.4 %). Of these, 1496 patients were diagnosed with type 2 DM. 1084 (72.4 %) of patients presented without DR, 307 (20.5 %) presented with non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR), and 105 (7.0 %) of patients presented with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). Increasing presenting diabetic retinopathy severity was associated with longer duration of diabetes, greater systemic comorbidities (e.g. diabetic foot disease, neuropathy, chronic kidney or end stage renal disease), worse baseline and final visual acuity, and required more procedural and surgical interventions.

CONCLUSIONS

Worse presenting DR severity in patients young-onset type 2 diabetes was associated with greater comorbid systemic and ocular disease with worse visual acuity outcomes. <1 % of patients without diabetic retinopathy or with mild NPDR were likely to progress to PDR. Diabetic kidney disease was an independent risk factor for developing neovascular glaucoma and retinal detachments. Prompt evaluation and intervention in patients with YO-DM2 may help reduce the associated systemic and ocular morbidity.

Adherence to Eye Examination Guidelines Among Individuals With Diabetes in Saudi Arabia

BACKGROUND

Individuals with diabetes are at risk of developing diabetic retinopathy, a vision-threatening complication. Regular eye examinations are crucial for early detection and management. Ensuring adherence to eye examination guidelines is essential to prevent visual impairment and blindness in this at-risk population.

METHODS

This was cross-sectional study, and a validated questionnaire was physically administered among adult individuals with diabetes (both males and females) in Saudi Arabia. The data were gathered and analyzed using Statistical Product and Service Solutions (SPSS, version 26.0) software (IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Armonk, NY). This study took approximately three months from the period August 2023 to November 2023.

RESULTS

This study found that most participants had type 1 diabetes (46.1%, n=83) and had been diagnosed for more than 10 years (49.4%, n=89). The most used management strategy (48.9%, n=88) was lifestyle changes and anti-diabetic medications. Most of the participants (93.3%, n=168) were fully aware of the severe eye complications of diabetes, as well as diabetic retinopathy and its complications (48.9%, n=88). The most common source of information about the importance of eye exams was healthcare professionals (56.7%, n=102). Most of the participants had annual eye exams (58.3%, n=105) and within the previous year, specifically related to their diabetes (62.8%, n=113). Adherence to eye examination guidelines was higher in those who had diabetes for more than 10 years (p=0.009), those who were on lifestyle changes and insulin therapy or anti-diabetic medications (p=0.030), those who were fully aware of severe eye complications and diabetic retinopathy (p=0.017 and p=0.020, respectively), and those with type 2 diabetes (p=0.001). In addition, participants who understood the importance of eye examinations had better glucose control (p=0.017), had eye examinations within the previous year (p=0.001), and had heard about the importance of eye examinations from healthcare professionals (p=0.020). The findings revealed the most common reasons for not getting an eye exam were a lack of awareness (37.8%) and distance from the hospital.

CONCLUSION

To summarize, many people with diabetes do not get regular eye exams often because they are unaware of how important these exams are. Long-term diabetics who are aware of the dangers of diabetic retinopathy are more likely to heed this advice. However, adherence was linked to more frequent eye exams and better glucose control. Adherence and wide awareness must be created to improve retinopathy outcomes.

Effect of Accessible Nonmydriatic Retinal Imaging on Diabetic Retinopathy Surveillance Rates

Purpose: To evaluate the impact on surveillance rates for diabetic retinopathy (DR) by providing nonmydriatic retinal imaging as part of comprehensive diabetes care at no cost to patients or insurers. Methods: A retrospective comparative cohort study was designed. Patients were imaged from April 1, 2016 to March 31, 2017 at a tertiary diabetes-specific academic medical center. Retinal imaging was provided without additional cost beginning October 16, 2016. Images were evaluated for DR and diabetic macular edema using standard protocol at a centralized reading center. Diabetes surveillance rates before and after no-cost imaging were compared. Results: A total of 759 and 2,080 patients respectively were imaged before and after offering no-cost retinal imaging. The difference represents a 274% increase in the number of patients screened. Furthermore, there was a 292% and 261% increase in the number of eyes with mild DR and referable DR, respectively. In the comparative 6-month period, 92 additional cases of proliferative DR were identified, estimated to prevent 6.7 cases of severe visual loss with annual cost savings of $180,230 (estimated yearly cost of severe vision loss per person: $26,900). In patients with referable DR, self-awareness was low, with no significant difference in the before and after groups (39.4% vs. 43.8%, p = 0.3725). Conclusions: Providing retinal imaging as part of comprehensive diabetes care substantially increased the number of patients identified by nearly threefold. The data suggest that the removal of out-of-pocket costs substantially increased patient surveillance rates, which may translate to improved long-term patient outcomes.

Perspectives of Latinx Patients with Diabetes on Teleophthalmology, Artificial Intelligence-Based Image Interpretation, and Virtual Care: A Qualitative Study

Background

Latinx populations in the United States bear a disproportionate burden of diabetic eye disease. Teleophthalmology with and without artificial intelligence (AI)-based image interpretation are validated methods for diabetic eye screening, but limited literature exists on patient perspectives. This study aimed at understanding the perspectives of Latinx patients with diabetes on teleophthalmology, AI-based image interpretation, and general virtual care to prevent avoidable blindness in this population.

Methods

We conducted semi-structured, individual interviews with 20 Latinx patients with diabetes at an urban, federally qualified health center in Madison, WI. Interviews were transcribed verbatim, professionally translated from Spanish to English, and analyzed using both inductive open coding and deductive coding.

Results

Most participants had no prior experience with teleophthalmology but did have experience with virtual care. Participants expressed a preference for teleophthalmology compared with traditional in-person dilated eye exams but were willing to obtain whichever method of screening was recommended by their primary care clinician. They also strongly preferred having human physician oversight in image review compared with having images interpreted solely using AI. Many participants preferred in-person clinic visits to virtual health care due to the ability to have a more thorough physical exam, as well as for improved non-verbal communication with their clinician.

Discussion

Leveraging primary care providers' recommendations, human oversight of AI-based image interpretation, and improving communication may enhance acceptance and utilization of teleophthalmology, AI, and virtual care by Latinx patients.

Conclusions

Understanding Latinx patient perspectives may contribute toward the development of more effective telemedicine interventions to enhance health equity in Latinx communities.

Barriers and Facilitators to Ophthalmology Visit Adherence in an Urban Hospital Setting

Purpose

To explore barriers and facilitators to completing scheduled outpatient appointments at an urban academic hospital-based ophthalmology department.

Methods

Potential participants were stratified by neighborhood Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) (range, 0-1.0, higher scores indicate greater vulnerability), and semistructured interviews were conducted with individuals 18 years and older with an SVI of greater than 0.61 (n = 17) and providers delivering care in the General Eye Clinic of the University of Illinois Chicago (n = 8). Qualitative analysis informed by human-centered design methods was conducted to classify barriers and facilitators into three domains of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research: outer setting, inner setting, and characteristics of individuals.

Results

There were four main themes-transportation, time burden, social support, and economic situation-all of which were within the outer setting of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research; transportation was most salient. Although providers perceived health literacy as a barrier affecting motivation, patients expressed a high motivation to attend visits and felt well-educated about their condition.

Conclusions

A lack of resources outside of the health system presents significant barriers for patients from neighborhoods with high SVI. Future efforts to improve adherence should focus on resource-related interventions in the outer setting. Improving access to eye care will require community-level interventions, particularly transportation.

Translational Relevance

Understanding the barriers and facilitators within the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research provides useful guidance for future interventions, specifically to focus future efforts to improve adherence on resource-related interventions.

Geographic variation in diabetic retinopathy screening within the Veterans Health Administration

AIMS

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) remains the leading cause of vision impairment among working-age adults in the United States. The Veterans Health Administration (VA) supplemented its DR screening efforts with teleretinal imaging in 2006. Despite its scale and longevity, no national data on the VA's screening program exists since 1998. Our objective was to determine the influence of geography on diabetic retinopathy screening adherence.

METHODS

Setting: VA national electronic medical records.

STUDY POPULATION

A national cohort of 940,654 veterans with diabetes (defined as two or more diabetes ICD-9 codes (250.xx)) without a history of DR.

EXPOSURES

125 VA Medical Center catchment areas, demographics, comorbidity burden, mean HbA1c levels, medication use and adherence, as well as utilization and access metrics.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Screening for diabetic retinopathy within the VA medical system within a 2-year period.

RESULTS

Within a 2-year time frame 74 % of veterans without a history of DR received retinal screenings within the VA system. After adjustment for age, gender, race-ethnic group, service-connected disability, marital status, and the van Walraven Elixhauser comorbidity score, the prevalence of DR screening varied by VA catchment area with values ranging from 27 % to 86 %. These differences persisted after further adjusting for mean HbA1c level, medication use and adherence as well as utilization and access metrics.

CONCLUSIONS

The wide variability in DR screening across 125 VA catchment areas indicates the presence of unmeasured determinants of DR screening. These results are relevant to clinical decision making in DR screening resource allocation.

Disparities in Eye Care Access and Utilization: A Narrative Review

This narrative review summarizes the literature on factors related to eye care access and utilization in the United States. Using the Healthy People 2030 framework, this review investigates social determinants of health associated with general and follow-up engagement, screenings, diagnostic visits, treatment, technology, and teleophthalmology. We provide hypotheses for these documented eye care disparities, featuring qualitative, patient-centered research. Lastly, we provide recommendations in the hopes of appropriately eliminating these disparities and reimagining eye care.

Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice Regarding Diabetic Retinopathy Screening and Eye Management Among Diabetics in Saudi Arabia

Background Globally, one of the leading causes of blindness is diabetic retinopathy (DR). However, many patients do not participate in DR screening because of a lack of awareness. This study aims to assess the knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) level regarding DR screening and eye management among diabetic patients in Saudi Arabia. Methodology This cross-sectional study was conducted among diabetic patients aged 18 years or older in Saudi Arabia between October 2022 and February 2023. A validated online KAP-36 questionnaire collected information on sociodemographic data, diabetes profile, diabetes-related complications, and KAP regarding DR screening and management. Results Of the 1,391 diabetic patients, 736 (52.9%) had good knowledge about DR screening and care, while 655 (47.1%) had poor knowledge. A positive attitude toward eye examination for the early detection of DR was noticed among 1,124 (80.8%) participants. Regarding the participants' practice of regular fundus examination, 1,000 (71.9%) participants had good practice. Significant relationships were found between education level (p = 0.017), diabetes mellitus (DM) type and duration (p= 0.01, 0.02), type of treatment (p = 0.001), and a high degree of knowledge. Significant determinants of patients' favorable attitudes included their type of diabetes (p = 0.003), region of residence (p = 0.038), and work or education outside the medical field (p = 0.001). Age (p = 0.001), location of residence (p = 0.015), educational attainment (p= 0.041), and type of diabetes (p = 0.045) were the factors that determined good practice. Conclusions Many diabetic patients supported DR screening and engaged in it regularly. Unfortunately, only around half of the participants had a good understanding of DR. Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), a longer history of DM, and being highly educated were factors associated with a diabetic patient's higher level of knowledge. Positive attitudes were significantly higher among those living in the central Saudi region, employed outside of the medical field, and those with T2DM. Finally, regarding the practice of eye screening and management among diabetic patients, elderly patients living in the southern Saudi region and those with T2DM were adherent to their regular eye examinations. Consequently, the key to ensuring adequate adherence to DR screening may be intervention techniques and focused education to increase patients' knowledge of DR.

Willingness to pay for diabetic retinopathy screening in Qujiang District, rural Guangdong, southern China: a cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVE

To determine willingness to pay for a diabetic retinopathy screening, and its determinants, among people with diabetes mellitus in Qujiang District of Shaoguan City, rural Guangdong, southern China.

DESIGN

This cross-sectional study was conducted through a large-scale screening programme in 2019. We randomly selected 575 (21.5%) among 2677 people over 18 years old with known diabetes who attended the screening. Participants elected to pay nothing or RMB10-RMB120 (US$1.6-US$18.8), in RMB10 intervals, displayed on printed cards. One trained interviewer collected all the data.

SETTING

Ten primary health centres in Qujiang District of Shaoguan City, Guangdong.

PARTICIPANTS

545 from the 575 randomly selected people (94.8%) agreed to participate in the study.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Proportion of participants willing to pay anything for screening, mean amount they were willing to pay and determinants of these figures.

RESULTS

Among 545 participants (mean age 64.6 years (SD±10.4), 40.7% men), 327 (60.0%) were willing to pay something for screening, of whom 273 (83.5%) would pay RMB10-RMB30 (US$1.6-US$4.7). People living in rural areas and those from lower-income families were more likely to be willing to pay anything, while men, urban residents and those covered by employer-linked insurance were willing to pay larger sums (p<0.05 for all).

CONCLUSION

Nearly two-thirds of participants were willing to pay for screening in this screening programme organised at the primary care level in rural China. This finding offers the potential that such activities can be sustained and scaled up through user fees.

Patient and health care provider knowledge of diabetes and diabetic microvascular complications: a comprehensive literature review

Diabetic retinopathy, neuropathy, and nephropathy occur in more than 50% of people with diabetes, contributing substantially to morbidity and mortality. Patient understanding of these microvascular complications is essential to ensure early recognition and treatment of these sequalae as well as associated symptoms, yet little is known about patient knowledge of microvascular sequalae. In this comprehensive literature review, we provide an overview of existing knowledge regarding patient knowledge of diabetes, retinopathy, neuropathy, and nephropathy. We also discuss health care provider's knowledge of these sequalae given that patients and providers must work together to achieve optimal care. We evaluated 281 articles on patient and provider knowledge of diabetic retinopathy, neuropathy, and nephropathy as well as predictors of improved knowledge and screening practices. Results demonstrated that patient and provider knowledge of microvascular sequalae varied widely between studies, which may reflect sociocultural or methodologic differences. Knowledge assessment instruments varied between studies with limited validation data and few studies controlled for confounding. Generally, improved patient knowledge was associated with greater formal education, longer diabetes duration, and higher socioeconomic status. Fewer studies examined provider knowledge of sequalae, yet these studies identified multiple misconceptions regarding appropriate screening practices for microvascular complications and the need to screen patients who are asymptomatic. Further investigations are needed that use well validated measures, control for confounding, and include diverse populations. Such studies will allow identification of patients and providers who would benefit from interventions to improve knowledge of microvascular complications and, ultimately, improve patient outcomes.

Diabetic retinopathy screenings in West Virginia: an assessment of teleophthalmology implementation

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of diabetes in the state of West Virginia (WV) is amongst the highest in the United States, making diabetic retinopathy (DR) and diabetic macular edema (DME) a major epidemiological concern within the state. Several challenges exist regarding access to eye care specialists for DR screening in this rural population. A statewide teleophthalmology program has been implemented. We analyzed real-world data acquired via these systems to explore the concordance between image findings and subsequent comprehensive eye exams and explore the impact of age on image gradeability and patient distance from the West Virginia University (WVU) Eye Institute on follow-up.

METHODS

Nonmydriatic fundus images of diabetic eyes acquired at primary care clinics throughout WV were reviewed by retina specialists at the WVU Eye Institute. Analysis included the concordance between image interpretations and dilated examination findings, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels and DR presence, image gradeability and patient age, and distance from the WVU Eye Institute and follow-up compliance.

RESULTS

From the 5,512 fundus images attempted, we found that 4,267 (77.41%) were deemed gradable.  Out of the 289 patients whose image results suggested DR, 152 patients (52.6%) followed up with comprehensive eye exams-finding 101 of these patients to truly have DR/DME and allowing us to determine a positive predictive value of 66.4%. Patients within the HbA1c range of 9.1-14.0% demonstrated significantly greater prevalence of DR/DME (p < 0.01).  We also found a statistically significant decrease in image gradeability with increased age.  When considering distance from the WVU Eye Institute, it was found that patients who resided within 25 miles demonstrated significantly greater compliance to follow-up (60% versus 43%, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The statewide implementation of a telemedicine program intended to tackle the growing burden of DR in WV appears to successfully bring concerning patient cases to the forefront of provider attention.  Teleophthalmology addresses the unique rural challenges of WV, but there is suboptimal compliance to essential follow-up with comprehensive eye exams. Obstacles remain to be addressed if these systems are to effectively improve outcomes in DR/DME patients and diabetic patients at risk of developing these sight-threatening pathologies.

Artificial Intelligence Software for Diabetic Eye Screening: Diagnostic Performance and Impact of Stratification

AIM

To evaluate the MONA.health artificial intelligence screening software for detecting referable diabetic retinopathy (DR) and diabetic macular edema (DME), including subgroup analysis.

METHODS

The algorithm's threshold value was fixed at the 90% sensitivity operating point on the receiver operating curve to perform the disease classification. Diagnostic performance was appraised on a private test set and publicly available datasets. Stratification analysis was executed on the private test set considering age, ethnicity, sex, insulin dependency, year of examination, camera type, image quality, and dilatation status.

RESULTS

The software displayed an area under the curve (AUC) of 97.28% for DR and 98.08% for DME on the private test set. The specificity and sensitivity for combined DR and DME predictions were 94.24 and 90.91%, respectively. The AUC ranged from 96.91 to 97.99% on the publicly available datasets for DR. AUC values were above 95% in all subgroups, with lower predictive values found for individuals above the age of 65 (82.51% sensitivity) and Caucasians (84.03% sensitivity).

CONCLUSION

We report good overall performance of the MONA.health screening software for DR and DME. The software performance remains stable with no significant deterioration of the deep learning models in any studied strata.

The Effect on Patients' Visual Acuity and Grade, Secondary to Non-Attendance at Treatment Centers, Post Referral from Diabetic RetinaScreen Ireland

Background

Patient non-attendance following referral to hospital is a significant challenge, in particular, for persons with diabetes.

Aim

We sought to determine the impact on both visual acuity and the subsequent follow-up retinopathy grade of patients when they fail to attend Diabetic Retinopathy Treatment (DRT) Centers following referral from Diabetic RetinaScreen (DRS).

Methods

A retrospective analysis of patients discharged from DRT due to multiple consecutive missed appointments between January 2016 and June 2021. Patients discharged for non-attendance were compared with patients discharged from completed treatment.

Results

Of the 24,945 NEC patients referred to DRT, 5900 (24%) and 9345 (37%) were discharged back to DRS due to non-attendance and completed treatment, respectively. Those discharged for non-attendance were younger (60.7 v 63.4, p < 0.001) and had higher proportions of males (67% v 63%, p < 0.001) and people with type 1 diabetes (27% v 18%, p < 0.001). After attending rescreening after discharge, those discharged for non-attendance were significantly more likely to have a worsening of DR grade (26% v 8%, p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Despite being notified that further investigation (with possible treatment) was required post DRS, many diabetic patients failed to attend for further management of their eye care in DRT. These patients had worse visual outcomes compared to those that attended. Improved patient education and communication are required to mitigate against the consequences of non-attendance.

Awareness and knowledge of glaucoma among visitors of main public hospitals in Damascus, Syria: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

The main way to prevent blindness from Glaucoma is by early detection and diagnosis; and to do so the awareness must be raised among people where Glaucoma is defined as an acquired chronic optic neuropathy characterized by optic disk cupping and visual field loss. Lack of knowledge about this disease is one of the most important reasons that made it develop to advanced stages. Based on that, we conducted scientific research to assess peoples' awareness and knowledge about Glaucoma. After reviewing the literature, it was found that this study is the first in Syria.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional study in May 2022. The study included participants, who are above 20 years old, from visitors of Al-Mouwasat University Hospital in Damascus, Syria. During one week, Data was gathered according to the questionnaire, which was presented through face-to-face interviews with participants. We have allocated one point (1) to each question. Three levels of knowledge were adopted, namely; weak level from (0) to (3), average level from (4) to (7) and good level from (8) to (11). Associations between participants' demographic and other details were tested using Chi-square test and other tests, and a p-value of < 0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

A total of 500 participants were interviewed. For awareness of Glaucoma, 33.6% of the participants (n = 168) had heard of Glaucoma, and 66.4% hadn't (n = 332). Mean test results for the knowledge of Glaucoma was 1.62 out of 11, and only 8% of participants (n = 40) had a good knowledge of Glaucoma. Education Level, governorate, and department of hospital that the patient came for significantly affected the knowledge of Glaucoma. Moreover, hospital, Ophthalmologists' Clinics, and health staff (M = 5.45) were the better Resource for information than family, relatives, and friends (M = 3.16). Finally, social media and the Internet group had the lowest mean test results (M = 1.23). These test results were significant, with a p-value < 0.001.

CONCLUSION

The percentage of knowledge and awareness was significantly low. Organized community awareness methods must disseminate more ability to increase the general public's understanding to avoid injury and late diagnosis of Glaucoma.

Health literacy and ophthalmology: A scoping review

As of 2020, it is estimated that 43.3 million people are blind, and an additional 553 million have mild to severe vision impairment.50 At least 1 billion worldwide have a vision impairment that could have been prevented or has yet to be addressed.54 Poor health literacy may be a significant contributor to the prevalence of eye disease. With implications on disease burden, progression, and health outcomes, a greater understanding of the role health literacy plays in ophthalmology is needed. This is the first scoping review to assess the impact of health literacy on eye health outcomes and blindness, including ocular screening rates and/or follow-up rates, treatment adherence, and self-care practices. PubMed, Embase, and CINAHL databases were searched systematically through November 12, 2021, and we evaluated the association between health literacy and ophthalmic outcomes in 4 domains: clinical outcomes, treatment adherence rates, screening and/or follow-up rates, and self-care practices. There is evidence to suggest that health literacy is associated with ophthalmic outcomes in all these domains. To better understand how health literacy impacts eye health, further longitudinal studies examining the effect of health literacy (using standardized health literacy measures) on ophthalmic outcomes are needed. We believe a specific ophthalmic health literacy survey could help achieve this goal and help target interventions to ultimately improve outcomes among ophthalmology patients.

Single-Field Fundus Photography for Screening of Diabetic Retinopathy: The Prevalence and Associated Factors in a Population-Based Study

INTRODUCTION

We aimed to determine the prevalence and risk factors for diabetic retinopathy (DR) in a multi-primary healthcare facilities-based DR screening project by analyzing single-field fundus photographs among patients with diabetes in Rafsanjan City, Iran, based on the Rafsanjan Cohort Study, as a part of the prospective epidemiological research studies in IrAN (PERSIAN).

METHODS

Of all participants in the Rafsanjan Cohort Study (performed in four primary healthcare facilities across Rafsanjan City from August 2015 to December 2017), patients with diabetes were recruited in this study. All participants underwent a standardized interview and clinical and paraclinical examinations for demographic characteristics, and medical conditions according to the PERSIAN's protocols. In addition, digital fovea-centered and single-field fundus photography was performed for DR identification and grading. For assessment of agreement, a subgroup of participants underwent fundus examination, randomly. DR was graded as nonproliferative (NPDR) or proliferative (PDR).

RESULTS

Of 8414 screened participants, 1889 had diabetes. The total prevalence of DR was 6.93% [131 individuals including 110 (5.82%) with NPDR, and 21 (1.11%) with PDR] based on single-field fundus photographs, with almost perfect agreement with fundus examinations (κ = 0.82). On adjusted multivariate analysis, duration of diabetes (OR 1.16, 95% CI 1.13-1.19), positive family history for diabetes (OR 1.73, 95% CI 1.09-2.75), fasting plasma glucose (FPG) ≥ 126 mg/dL (OR 1.98, 95% CI 1.16-3.39), and serum creatinine level (OR 1.79, 95% CI 1.08-2.98) were associated with DR. Factors including age, education level, physical activity, body mass index, hypertension, and cardiovascular and renal diseases did not have association with DR on adjusted multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Single-field fundus photography can be used for screening of DR in primary healthcare facilities. In individuals with diabetes, duration of diabetes, positive family history for diabetes, FPG ≥ 126 mg/dL, and serum creatinine level may be associated with DR.

Reasons for the Late Presentation of Diabetic Retinopathy in Saudi Arabia: A Survey of Patients Who Presented with Advanced Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy to a Tertiary Eye Hospital

Purpose

This study aimed to understand the barriers that contribute to diagnostic and therapeutic delays in patients with advanced proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR).

Patients and Methods

This cross-sectional study targeted patients with advanced PDR who never received any ocular intervention at King Khaled Eye Specialist Hospital in Saudi Arabia. An Arabic-language questionnaire was used to interview the participants over a period of 6 months. The questionnaire comprised sociodemographic questions followed by several sections to assess the causes of delay in diagnosis and management. Variables were analyzed descriptively and reported as numbers and percentages using SPSS 22.

Results

A total of 338 patients were included in the study. Most patients were older than 50 years (60.4%), and decreased vision was the main complaint at presentation (81%). Vitreous hemorrhage was the most common diagnosis (46%). Patients' lack of knowledge about the importance of DR screening programs and problems with healthcare system screenings were the most frequent causes of delay in diabetic retinopathy (DR) diagnosis and management.

Conclusion

DR is still a major cause of permanent blindness that is treatable with regular follow-up and timely management. Even though DR screening and treatment in Saudi Arabia have improved drastically over the last years, socioeconomic and health system factors remain barriers to the improvement of outcomes of DR.

Adherence to Annual Fundus Exams among Chinese Population with Diagnosed Diabetes

Adherence to annual fundus examinations in the Chinese population with diabetes and its correlates have not been investigated. The present study obtained data for the first nationally representative survey in China, China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Survey (CHARLS), which collected a wide range of data every 2 years, including demographic, socioeconomic, medical and lifestyle-related information. The adherence rates to annual fundus exams across four waves (2011−2018) were assessed. Univariate and multivariable logistic regressions were used to determine factors associated with adherence. The adherence rates to annual fundus examinations of ou study population were 23.6% in 2011, 15.3% in 2013, 17.5% in 2015 and 21.5% in 2018, respectively. Consistent results over four waves showed that non-adherent patients had a relatively lower educational level, insufficient diabetes medication use, fewer non-medication treatments and irregular physical examination compared to those who were adherent to the annual fundus exam (all p values < 0.05). These variables were further identified as factors associated with adherence according to univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses (all p values < 0.05). The present study provides explicit evidence that the adherence rate to annual fundus examinations among Chinese population with diabetes is worryingly low. Insufficient educational attainment, especially specific diabetes education, has a negative impact on patients’ adherence to clinical guideline for eye health.

Recent achievements in nano-based technologies for ocular disease diagnosis and treatment, review and update

Ocular drug delivery is one of the most challenging endeavors among the various available drug delivery systems. Despite having suitable drugs for the treatment of ophthalmic disease, we have not yet succeeded in achieving a proper drug delivery approach with the least adverse effects. Nanotechnology offers great opportunities to overwhelm the restrictions of common ocular delivery systems, including low therapeutic effects and adverse effects because of invasive surgery or systemic exposure. The present review is dedicated to highlighting and updating the recent achievements of nano-based technologies for ocular disease diagnosis and treatment. While further effort remains, the progress illustrated here might pave the way to new and very useful ocular nanomedicines.

Comparison of Widefield Laser Ophthalmoscopy and ETDRS Retinal Area for Diabetic Retinopathy

Purpose

To evaluate agreement of nonmydriatic confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (SLO; EIDON [CenterVue]) and the 7-standard field ETDRS area on ultrawide-field (UWF) SLO imaging for identification of diabetic retinopathy (DR) severity.

Design

Single-site, prospective, comparative, instrument validation study.

Participants

One hundred ten eyes of 55 patients with diabetes mellitus were evaluated.

Methods

Each patient underwent nonmydriatic, nonsimultaneous stereoscopic imaging using the EIDON camera and 4 fields of 60° × 55° were acquired (macula centered, disc centered, temporal macula, superotemporal). Mydriatic UWF retinal images were acquired using a nonsimultaneous stereographic protocol with UWF imaging (California; Optos plc). Before grading, a standardized ETDRS 7-field image mask was applied to all UWF retinal images. Images from each device were graded independently by 2 masked graders using the ETDRS clinical DR classification. Any discrepancy in DR grading between the devices was adjudicated by a third grader.

Main Outcome Measures

κ Levels of agreement, sensitivity, and specificity for DR thresholds.

Results

Severity by ETDRS grading was as follows: no DR, 10.9%; mild nonproliferative DR (NPDR), 45.5%; moderate NPDR, 16.5%; severe NPDR, 11.8%; proliferative DR, 12.7%; high-risk proliferative DR, 2.7%; and ungradable, 0%. After adjudication, the level of DR identified on EIDON images agreed exactly with that of UWF ETDRS imaging in 87% of eyes (n = 96) and was within 1 step in 99.1% of eyes (n = 109) with a simple κ value of 0.8244 ± 0.0439 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.7385-0.9104) and weighted (linear) κ value of 0.9041 ± 0.0257 (95% CI, 0.8537-0.9545). Sensitivity and specificity compared with ETDRS field grading for any DR were 0.96 and 0.75, for moderate NPDR or worse were 0.96 and 0.97, and for severe NPDR or worse were 0.91 and 1.00, respectively.

Conclusions

Nonmydriatic 4-field stereoscopic widefield imaging using the EIDON device was comparable with the DR severity identified within the ETDRS 7-standard field area of UWF images. Future studies will need to evaluate the applicability of this device as a clinical and research tool and the impact of different widefield coverage areas.

Screening Referable Diabetic Retinopathy Using a Semi-automated Deep Learning Algorithm Assisted Approach

Purpose: To assess the accuracy and efficacy of a semi-automated deep learning algorithm (DLA) assisted approach to detect vision-threatening diabetic retinopathy (DR).

Methods: We developed a two-step semi-automated DLA-assisted approach to grade fundus photographs for vision-threatening referable DR. Study images were obtained from the Lingtou Cohort Study, and captured at participant enrollment in 2009–2010 (“baseline images”) and annual follow-up between 2011 and 2017. To begin, a validated DLA automatically graded baseline images for referable DR and classified them as positive, negative, or ungradable. Following, each positive image, all other available images from patients who had a positive image, and a 5% random sample of all negative images were selected and regraded by trained human graders. A reference standard diagnosis was assigned once all graders achieved consistent grading outcomes or with a senior ophthalmologist's final diagnosis. The semi-automated DLA assisted approach combined initial DLA screening and subsequent human grading for images identified as high-risk. This approach was further validated within the follow-up image datasets and its time and economic costs evaluated against fully human grading.

Results: For evaluation of baseline images, a total of 33,115 images were included and automatically graded by the DLA. 2,604 images (480 positive results, 624 available other images from participants with a positive result, and 1500 random negative samples) were selected and regraded by graders. The DLA achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 0.953, 0.970, 0.879, and 88.6%, respectively. In further validation within the follow-up image datasets, a total of 88,363 images were graded using this semi-automated approach and human grading was performed on 8975 selected images. The DLA achieved an AUC, sensitivity, and specificity of 0.914, 0.852, 0.853, respectively. Compared against fully human grading, the semi-automated DLA-assisted approach achieved an estimated 75.6% time and 90.1% economic cost saving.

Conclusions: The DLA described in this study was able to achieve high accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity in grading fundus images for referable DR. Validated against long-term follow-up datasets, a semi-automated DLA-assisted approach was able to accurately identify suspect cases, and minimize misdiagnosis whilst balancing safety, time, and economic cost.

Artificial intelligence for diabetic retinopathy

ABSTRACT

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is an important cause of blindness globally, and its prevalence is increasing. Early detection and intervention can help change the outcomes of the disease. The rapid development of artificial intelligence (AI) in recent years has led to new possibilities for the screening and diagnosis of DR. An AI-based diagnostic system for the detection of DR has significant advantages, such as high efficiency, high accuracy, and lower demand for human resources. At the same time, there are shortcomings, such as the lack of standards for development and evaluation and the limited scope of application. This article demonstrates the current applications of AI in the field of DR, existing problems, and possible future development directions.

Awareness, knowledge, and practice regarding to diabetic retinopathy among KKU students besides medical students in Abha, Saudi Arabia

Background:

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a global public health problem. Global prevalence of diabetes is 8.5% in adult population. The prevalence of diabetic retinopathy (DR) is increasing day by day, the number of persons with diabetes will double by 2030. It is a serious cause of irreversible blindness and is the most common complication of diabetes. Annual fundus examination for diabetics aids in the prevention of blindness and allows intervening at a timely manner. This study's intent to estimate and improve level of awareness (A), knowledge (K), and practice (P) among all King Khalid University (KKU) students besides medical students in Abha, Saudi Arabia.

Methods and Materials:

This is a cross-sectional survey that targets all KKU students besides medical students in Abha, Saudi Arabia. The researchers will use closed-end questions for awareness (A), knowledge (K), and practice (P). The data and the questionnaires will be sent to the sample by social media. The data will be analyzed by statistical package for the social sciences program (SPSS).

Results:

A total of 635 KKU students completed the questionnaire. Female students were more than male students, 334 (52.6%) for females and 301 (47.4%) for males, respectively. Ages ranged from 18 to 24 years with a mean 23 ± 2 years. There was a good awareness for some of the factors related to the DR which is noted in the results. Awareness of smoking and pregnancy rate is extremely low compared to the rest of the factors related to the DR.

Conclusion:

There was high awareness regarding DR and its risk factors among KKU students but low awareness regarding smoking and pregnancy relationship with DR. Improvement is required for smoking and pregnancy with the progression DR.

Selfie fundus imaging for diabetic retinopathy screening

Background

Regular screening for retinopathy and timely intervention reduces blindness from diabetes by 90%. Screening is currently dependent on the interpretation of images captured by trained technicians. Inherent barriers of accessibility and affordability with this approach impede widespread success of retinopathy screening programs. Herein, we report our observations on the potential of a novel approach, Selfie Fundus Imaging (SFI), to enhance diabetic retinopathy screening.

Methods

The study was undertaken over a two-month period during COVID 19 lockdown. 60 diabetic patients participated in the study. Retinal images were captured using three different approaches, handheld smartphone-based photographs captured by patients themselves after a short video-assisted training session (SFI group), and smartphone-based photographs captured by a trained technician and photographs taken on desktop conventional digital fundus camera (Gold standard). Sensitivity and kappa statistics was determined for retinopathy and macular oedema grading.

Findings

Mean age of the study participants was 52.4 years ± 9.8 years and 78% were men. Of 120 images captured using SFI, 90% were centred-gradable, 8% were decentred-gradable and 2% were ungradable. 82% patients captured the image within a minute (majority by 31–45 s). The sensitivity of SFI to detect diabetic retinopathy was 88.39%. Agreement between SFI grading and standard fundus photograph grading was 85.86% with substantial kappa (0.77). For the detection of diabetic macular oedema, the agreement between SFI images and standard images was 93.67, with almost perfect kappa (0.91).

Conclusion

Fundus images were captured by patients using SFI without major difficulty and were comparable to images taken by trained specialist. With greater penetrance, advances, and availability of mobile photographic technology, we believe that SFI would positively impact the success of diabetic retinopathy screening programs by breaking the barriers of availability, accessibility, and affordability. SFI could ensure continuation of screening schedules for diabetic retinopathy, even in the face a highly contagious pandemic.

The Impact of COVID-19 on Diabetic Retinopathy Monitoring and Treatment

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is one of the leading causes of vision loss worldwide. Although screening and early treatment guidelines for DR have significantly reduced the disease burden, restrictions related to the COVID-19 pandemic have changed real-world practice patterns in the management of DR. This review summarizes evolving guidelines and outcomes of the treatment of DR in the setting of the pandemic.

RECENT FINDINGS

Intravitreal injections for DR have decreased significantly globally during the pandemic, ranging from approximately 30 to nearly 100% reduction, compared to corresponding timepoints in 2019. Most studies on functional outcomes show a decrease in visual acuity on delayed follow-up. Changing practice patterns in the management of DR has led to fewer intravitreal injections and overall reduction in visual acuity on follow-up. As COVID variants emerge, it will be necessary to continue evaluating practice guidelines.

Current Status and Associated Factors of Annual Eye Examination Among People with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Using the 7th National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey

PURPOSE

To evaluate the level of annual eye examination (AEE) and identify the associated factors among people with diabetes mellitus (DM).

METHODS

A secondary data analysis was conducted using data from the Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2016-2018). A total of 1,465 people with DM (726 men and 739 women) aged ≥ 40 years were included. The data were analyzed using a complex sample analysis considering a combined sampling weight of 3 years.

RESULTS

In total, 29.5% and 12.0% of men and 36.3% and 24.1% of women underwent AEE, and EE at the time of diagnosis of DM, respectively. The AEE rate in men was significantly higher in those who were high school graduates and above (OR = 1.98), current non-smokers (OR = 1.82), had ≥ 10-year duration of DM (OR = 1.75,), and insulin use (OR = 2.81), and those with a normal body mass index (OR = 1.68). For women, the AEE rate was significantly higher in those aged 40-64 years (OR = 1.76) and with ≥ 10-years duration of DM (OR = 1.91).

CONCLUSION

The AEE rate among people with DM is unsatisfactory and needs to be improved. Health education on the importance of AEE, and the application of a reminder or alarm system should be designed to promote AEE to the high-risk population showing lower levels of AEE, including those with a longer duration of DM.

COVID-19 Launches Retinal Telemedicine into the Next Frontier

INTRODUCTION

Telemedicine in ophthalmology, and specifically in retinal diseases, has made significant advancements in recent years. The COVID-19 pandemic has launched telehealth into a new era by creating demand from patients and physicians alike, while breaking down previous insurance, reimbursement, access and educational barriers.

METHODS

This paper reviews mulitple studies demonstrating the use of telemedicine in managing various retinal conditions before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.

CONCLUSION

Moving forward, promising new devices and models of care ensure that tele-retinal care will continue to expand and become a vital part of how we screen, diagnose and monitor retinal diseases.

Screening for Diabetic Retinopathy with Extended Intervals, Safe and Without Compromising Adherence: A Retrospective Cohort Study

INTRODUCTION

Screening for diabetic retinopathy (DR) prevents blindness through the early detection of sight-threatening retinal microvascular lesions that respond to timely local treatment. However, the provision of easy and regular access to DR screening programs is currently being challenged by the increasing prevalence of diabetes. One proposed solution is to extend the screening interval for patients at low risk for progression of retinopathy. To date, most providers of screening programs have hesitated to implement a strategy of extended intervals due to the lack of data on whether adherence and safety are compromised when retinal examinations occur less frequently. In the study reported here, we investigated adherence to the screening program and progression of retinopathy in patients with type 2 diabetes participating in a DR screening program with extended intervals.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study that included 1000 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who attended a screening program for DR. The patients were consecutively placed into a low-risk patient cohort with no retinopathy or into an intermediate-risk patient cohort with mild retinopathy (each cohort n = 500). Screening intervals were 36 months for the low-risk cohort and 18 months for the intermediate-risk cohort.

RESULTS

The 1000 subjects enrolled in the study had a median age of 68 (interquartile range 12) years and 60.4% were men. At the follow-up screening visit, data on 102 subjects were not included in the analysis of adherence rate due to death, severe systemic illness, other concurrent eye disease or migration. Among the 898 remaining subjects, adherence to the screening program was 93.7% (413/443) in the 36-month group and 98.3% (449/455) in the 18-month group (p < 0.0001). Non-adherence decreased with increasing age (odds ratio 0.92, 95% confidence interval 0.888-0.954, p = 0.0005). At follow-up, 65 subjects showed progression of retinopathy; none had worse than moderate retinopathy. Risk factors for DR and treatment for hyperglycemia, hypertension and hyperlipidemia were compared among subjects in the low-risk cohort: non-adherent subjects did not differ from their adherent counterparts without progression of DR, but the former had a shorter duration of diabetes and higher diastolic blood pressure than adherent subjects with progression of DR (4.5 vs. 7.5 years, p = 0.007; and 80 vs. 75 mmHg, p = 0.02, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The results suggest that screening DR at extended intervals can be achieved with high adherence rates without compromising patient safety. However, younger subjects and those at higher risk of progression may require extra attention.

Cocoa olein glycerolysis with lipase

In this paper we present the valorization of cocoa olein obtained from the acid fat-splitting of soapstocks. The aim is to develop a solvent free process (enzymatically catalyzed) to maximize the production of a final product with high content of monoglycerides (MAG) and diglycerides (DAG). The effect of the enzyme dose, glycerol content, reaction times as well as the modification of the raw material and pressure were studied. The yield of the reaction increased up to 90-95% when using a vacuum of 2-3 mbar at 65 °C, enough to evaporate the water which is generated as a by-product, an enzyme dose of 1% and molar ratio oil:glycerol of 1:2. The highest yield in terms of MAG and DAG production was obtained by starting from a raw material which was rich in free acidity (FFA), rendering oil with 33.4 and 44.2% MAG and DAG, respectively. Short reaction times (6-8 h) were observed compared to previously reported results (24 h).

Effectiveness of Flow Sheet Implementation on Diabetes Progression Screening at a Student-Run Free Clinic

Introduction

Diabetes mellitus (DM) disproportionately affects people with low socioeconomic status (SES). Student-run free clinics (SRFC) aim to care for low SES populations and experience high clinician turnover. Flow sheets have been used to improve care for those with diabetes, yet no research has assessed the use of such a flow sheet in a SRFC. The aim of this project was to determine if use of a flow sheet improved care for people with DM in an SRFC.

Methods

Charts from all patients receiving care for DM at one SRFC in the year before (n = 53) and after (n = 56) implementation of the flow sheet were reviewed. Pre- and post-group comparisons and post subgroup comparisons were made for glycosylated-hemoglobin (HgbA1c), microalbumin, and foot and eye exams.

Results

During a one-year period, a larger proportion of patients who received care post flow sheet introduction received at least two HgbA1c tests (53%), a microalbumin test (46%), and a foot-exam (46%) compared to those receiving care before the flow sheet (28%, 2%, and 25%, respectively). There was no difference in proportions of patients undergoing eye exams. In post subgroup analysis, flow sheets were used for 50% of patients, and patients who received care with the flow sheet were more likely to receive at least two HgbA1c tests and a foot exam per year.

Conclusion

Flow sheets may improve the process of care for patients with diabetes in a SRFC, but the effect must be studied further. Regardless, a systematic integration of the flow sheet is being implemented in the SRFC evaluated in this study.

Association between community outpatient clinic care accessibility and the uptake of diabetic retinopathy screening: A multi-level analysis

AIMS

To investigate the uptake rate variance of fundus examination for diabetes-related complications among demographically and geographically diverse communities and examine determinants that influence this rate focusing on outpatient eye care clinic accessibility at community level.

METHODS

Data of 20,904 participants with diabetes from 228 communities in 2015 were collected from the nationwide Community Health Survey and Statistics Korea. Outpatient eye care clinic accessibility was measured by the number of eye clinics per 1000 population. Multilevel analysis was conducted to assess the fundus examination uptake rate across communities and examine the association of individual- and community-level determinants with this rate.

RESULTS

The uptake rate among patients with diabetes was 34.8% and varied across communities. At the individual level, determinants related to knowledge and awareness were significantly positively associated with fundus examination uptake. At the community level, increases in the number of eye clinics were associated with significant increases in fundus examination uptake (OR 1.21; 95% CI 1.03-1.43).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the result that outpatient eye care clinic accessibility was significantly associated with the uptake rate across communities, improving accessibility may be an important factor and should be considered when developing interventions for promoting regular diabetic retinopathy screening. This will lead to earlier detection of complications and minimize diabetes-related visual impairment.

Validation of a New Diabetic Retinopathy Knowledge and Attitudes Questionnaire in People with Diabetic Retinopathy and Diabetic Macular Edema

Purpose

A validated questionnaire assessing diabetic retinopathy (DR)- and diabetic macular edema (DME)-related knowledge (K) and attitudes (A) is lacking. We developed and validated the Diabetic Retinopathy Knowledge and Attitudes (DRKA) questionnaire and explored the association between K and A and the self-reported difficulty accessing DR-related information (hereafter referred to as Access).

Methods

In this mixed-methods study, eight focus groups with 36 people with DR or DME (mean age, 60.1 ± 8.0 years; 53% male) were conducted to develop content (phase 1). In phase 2, we conducted 10 cognitive interviews to refine item phrasing. In phase 3, we administered 28-item K and nine-item A pilot questionnaires to 200 purposively recruited DR/DME patients (mean age, 59.0 ± 10.6 years; 59% male). The psychometric properties of DRKA were assessed using Rasch and classical methods. The association between K and A and DR-related Access was assessed using univariable linear regression of mean K/A scores against Access.

Results

Following Rasch-guided amendments, the final 22-item K and nine-item A scales demonstrated adequate psychometric properties, although precision remained borderline. The scales displayed excellent discriminant validity, with K/A scores increasing as education level increased. Compared to those with low scores, those with high K/A scores were more likely to report better access to DR-related information, with K scores of 0.99 ± 0.86 for no difficulty; 0.79 ± 1.05 for a little difficulty; and 0.24 ± 0.85 for moderate or worse difficulty (P < 0.001).

Conclusions

The psychometrically robust 31-item DRKA questionnaire can measure DR- and DME-related knowledge and attitudes.

Translational Relevance

The DRKA questionnaire may be useful for interventions to improve DR-related knowledge and attitudes and, in turn, optimize health behaviors and health literacy.

Nanoformulations for Ocular Delivery of Drugs - A Patent Perspective

Efficient delivery of ocular therapeutics with improved efficacy, enhanced bioavailability, and acceptable patient compliance presents unique challenges. This can be attributed to the presence of protective mechanisms, physicobiological barriers, and structural obstacles in the eye. Nanotherapeutic interventions have been explored extensively over the past few years to overcome these limitations. The present review focusses on the nanoformulations developed for the diagnosis and treatment of various ocular diseases besides providing an in-depth insight into the patents reported for the same.

SCREENING FOR DIABETIC RETINOPATHY - A TWELVE-MONTH REVIEW

The purpose is to provide a twelve-month database review of screening for diabetic retinopathy (DR). A total of 1428 diabetes mellitus (DM) patients screened in 2017 were analyzed in a retrospective study. Retinal photographs were reviewed by an ophthalmologist for the presence and stage of DR, as well as for additional nondiabetic findings. The following grading categories of DR were used: without DR, mild non-proliferative DR (NPDR), moderate NPDR, severe non-proliferative NPDR, proliferative DR (PDR), clinically significant macular edema (CSME) and ungradable finding. Severe NPDR, PDR and CSME were classified as vision-threatening DR. Out of 1428 DM patients, 27 were diagnosed with type 1 DM and 1401 with type 2 DM, 353 of them had newly diagnosed type 2 DM. Without DR category was recorded in 85.2% of all eyes screened, 2.8% were ungradable, and 12% showed varying stages of DR. Vision-threatening DR was found in 2.8% and additional nondiabetic findings in 5.2% of all screened eyes. In the group of newly diagnosed type 2 DM, 92.5% of screened eyes were without DR, 3.1% were ungradable and 4.3% showed varying stages of DR. In the group of newly diagnosed type 2 DM, vision-threatening DR was recorded in 0.1% and additional nondiabetic finding in 5.7% of the eyes screened. In conclusion, a small proportion of screened DM patients with detected DR had vision-threatening DR.

Awareness of diabetic retinopathy among Saudis with diabetes type 2 in Riyadh city

Objective:

To assess awareness of diabetic retinopathy (DR) for Saudis with diabetes mellitus (DM) type 2 in Riyadh City.

Methods:

A cross-sectional study that used self-administered questionnaires conducted in primary healthcare centers in Riyadh City between October and December 2019.

Results:

There were 267 Saudi participants with diabetes mellitus type 2 visiting primary healthcare clinics. (52.4%) were aged 40 years or above at time of diagnosis with diabetes. (73%) had diabetes for at least 5 years. Most of the participants have a good blood glucose control and they do home measurements. In regard to DR, (64.4%) of participants had no subjective or objective indicators of retinopathy, and (70%) had visited ophthalmology clinics. Majority of the participants were advised about DR or referred to an ophthalmologist by their primary physician, with the percentages being (64.8%) and (59.6%), respectively. Regarding other risk factors of DR, (19.5%) had a family history of DR, (23.2%) of participant are smokers and (41.6%) were hypertensives. Majority of the participants were aware about all the aspects of DR, its consequences, and appropriate management except the laser therapy. In terms of area of living and education respondents, who lived in the center of Riyadh City and the secondary level or less educated participants had the lowest level of education.

Conclusions:

Awareness of DR is acceptable but should not lead this information to reduced awareness and educational programs. Outreach researchers' efforts should cover other directions instead awareness of DR.

Impact of Socioeconomic Disadvantage and Diabetic Retinopathy Severity on Poor Ophthalmic Follow-Up in a Rural Vermont and New York Population

Objective

To investigate the impact of socioeconomic disadvantage and diabetic retinopathy severity on follow-up for vision care among people with diabetes mellitus (DM) residing in rural Vermont and northern New York State.

Methods

A retrospective chart review of people with DM who visited our academic eye clinic at least once between October 1, 2015, and March 31, 2016, was done. Of 1,466 unique patient visits, 500 were chosen for full chart review by simple random sampling. DM follow-up within 1 year was recommended for 331 adults. Data about prescribed and actual follow-up intervals were extracted. Regression models were used to identify factors associated with poor attendance at follow-up appointments.

Results

Sixty-eight [20.5%] patients had poor follow-up, defined as no ophthalmology visit within double the prescribed interval. Of these, 57 were not seen in follow-up by the end of study observation. Poor follow-up was greatest among socioeconomically disadvantaged patients, as defined by Medicaid enrollment (odds ratio [OR], 1.95; 95% CI, 1.07–3.56) in comparison to non-disadvantaged patients. Follow-up was better among those with moderate or worse diabetic retinopathy (OR, 0.38 95% CI, 0.20–0.70), and those with macular edema (OR, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.057–0.62).

Conclusion

Medicaid insurance and better diabetic retinopathy status were associated with worse follow-up among our predominantly rural population of patients. Patients who did not follow-up within double the recommended interval were unlikely to follow-up at all. Interventions are needed to target those at highest risk for poor follow-up.

Predictors of Lost to Follow-Up in Patients Being Treated for Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy

PURPOSE

To identify risk factors for patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) who are lost to follow-up (LTFU) while undergoing intravitreal injections of anti-VEGF (IVIs) and/or panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) at an urban institution.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

METHODS

A chart review was performed in a total of 418 adult patients with PDR who received IVI and/or PRP between January 1, 2014, and June 1, 2018, at the authors' institution. Rates of LTFU, risk factors associated with LTFU, and vision outcomes were assessed.

RESULTS

Of a total of 418 patients, 256 patients (61%) were LTFU. Risk factors positively associated with LTFU on multivariate analysis included non-English as the primary language (odds ratio [OR], 1.83; P = .006); age 56-65 years old (OR, 1.86; P = .014); age older than 65 years (OR, 1.94; P = .027) compared to age 55 years or younger; living 20 miles or less from the institution (OR, 2.68; P = .009); having greater than 5 comorbidities (OR, 2.38; P = .034); seeing 20 or more distinct departments (OR, 4.66; P = .007); missing more than 10% of non-eye care appointments (OR, 1.61; P = .038); and receiving only PRP compared to only IVIs (OR, 1.93; P = .031).

CONCLUSIONS

A high percentage of patients treated for PDR at the authors' institution were LTFU over a 4-year time span. Identifying patients at high risk for being LTFU may help in choosing treatment modality and appropriate patient counseling.

Diabetic Retinopathy Screening with Automated Retinal Image Analysis in a Primary Care Setting Improves Adherence to Ophthalmic Care

PURPOSE

Retinal screening examinations can prevent vision loss resulting from diabetes but are costly and highly underused. We hypothesized that artificial intelligence-assisted nonmydriatic point-of-care screening administered during primary care visits would increase the adherence to recommendations for follow-up eye care in patients with diabetes.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

PARTICIPANTS

Adults 18 years of age or older with a clinical diagnosis of diabetes being cared for in a metropolitan primary care practice for low-income patients.

METHODS

All participants underwent nonmydriatic fundus photography followed by automated retinal image analysis with human supervision. Patients with positive or inconclusive screening results were referred for comprehensive ophthalmic evaluation. Adherence to referral recommendations was recorded and compared with the historical adherence rate from the same clinic.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Rate of adherence to eye screening recommendations.

RESULTS

By automated screening, 8.3% of the 180 study participants had referable diabetic eye disease, 13.3% had vision-threatening disease, and 29.4% showed inconclusive results. The remaining 48.9% showed negative screening results, confirmed by human overread, and were not referred for follow-up ophthalmic evaluation. Overall, the automated platform showed a sensitivity of 100% (confidence interval, 92.3%-100%) in detecting an abnormal screening results, whereas its specificity was 65.7% (confidence interval, 57.0%-73.7%). Among patients referred for follow-up ophthalmic evaluation, the adherence rate was 55.4% at 1 year compared with the historical adherence rate of 18.7% (P < 0.0001, Fisher exact test).

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of an automated diabetic retinopathy screening system in a primary care clinic serving a low-income metropolitan patient population improved adherence to follow-up eye care recommendations while reducing referrals for patients with low-risk features.

Cost-effectiveness of diabetic retinopathy screening programs using telemedicine: a systematic review

Background

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a significant global public health and economic burden. DR accounts for approximately 15–17% of all cases of total blindness in the USA and Europe. Telemedicine is a new intervention for DR screening, however, there is not enough evidence to support its cost-effectiveness. The aim of this study is to review the most recent published literature on economic evaluations of telemedicine in DR screening and summarize the evidence on the cost-effectiveness of this technology.

Methods

A systematic search of PubMed, Embase and Google Scholar for relevant articles published between January 2010 and January 2020. Studies were included if they met the following criteria: (1) recruited subjects with either type 1, type 2 diabetes (2) evaluated telemedicine technology (3) patients underwent primary screening for DR (4) compared a telemedicine-based intervention with standard care (5) performed an economic evaluation or provided sufficient data for evaluating the cost-effectiveness of the technology used.

Results

Of 2238 articles screened, seven studies were included. Four of the studies were conducted in developed countries: The United States, Singapore and two studies in Canada. Three studies were conducted in developing countries: India, Brazil and South Africa. The patient populations in all studies were diabetic patients over the age of 18, previously not screened for DR. All seven studies used a telemedicine program which included capturing a retinal image and subsequently transmitting it to an ocular imaging center to assess the severity of DR. All studies compared telemedicine to a standard screening method for DR, including the option of no screening as standard of care. Although telemedicine requires initial and maintenance costs, it has the potential to provide significant cost savings by increasing patients’ working ability, increasing independent living ability, increasing quality of life and reducing travel costs.

Conclusions

Diabetic retinopathy telemedicine technology has the potential to provide significant cost savings, especially in low-income populations and rural patients with high transportation costs.

Patients' perspectives on the barriers to referral after telescreening for diabetic retinopathy in communities

OBJECTIVE

To understand the referral completion and explore the associated barriers to the referral after telescreening for diabetic retinopathy (DR) among people with vision-threatening DR (VTDR).

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

All participants with VTDR after DR telescreening in the communities completed the self-reported questionnaires to assess referral completion and their perspectives on referral barriers. Sociodemographic characteristics and perceived barriers related to incomplete referrals were identified by conducting univariate analysis and multiple logistic regression model. The final model was then built to predict incomplete referral.

RESULTS

Of the 3362 participants, 46.1% had incomplete referral. Old age and lower education level showed significant association with incomplete referral. Almost all participants had at least one barrier during the referral process. Knowledge-related and attitude-related barriers, including 'Too old to want any more treatment', 'Difficulty in getting time to referral', 'No serious illness requiring treatment at present', 'My eyes are okay', 'Distrust the recommended hospital' and 'Have not been diagnosed or treated before', and logistics-related barrier 'Mobility or transportation difficulties' showed significant association with incomplete referral.

CONCLUSIONS

The issue of incomplete referral after DR telescreening is serious among individuals with VTDR, particularly in the elder and low education level population. The negativity of knowledge-related and attitude-related factors might be more prominent than logistic barriers in predicting incomplete referral. Therefore, new strategies to improve the compliance with referral assist in optimizing the referral accessibility, and the ongoing educational support to improve the awareness of disease and increase the effectiveness of physician-patient communication.

Implementation and challenges unique to teleretinal diabetic retinal screening (TDRS) in a private practice setting in the United States

PURPOSE

Adherence rates to published guidelines for diabetic retinopathy (DR) screening is between 35 and 60%. We evaluate a teleretinal DR screening (TDRS) program in a private practice vertically integrated system to increase compliance with retinal screening.

METHODS

A retrospective pre-post intervention longitudinal study was conducted in a private endocrinology practice using TDRS as the primary intervention. Compliance rates for diabetic retinal screening were compared between December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2018.

RESULTS

A total population of 3479 patients were evaluated. Retinal screening compliance improved from 56.5% of patients (1964) pre-intervention to 59.3% of patients (2064) post intervention. The McNemar test was used for statistical analysis and found the change significant (p = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

TDRS as an adjunct tool in a private practice endocrinology office significantly improved screening rates and can increase access to recommended diabetic eye care. However, the improvement in screening rates was smaller than other types of practice settings. We explore some of the unique challenges to implementation of TDRS in private practice settings.

Estimates of the Percentage of US Adults With Diabetes Who Could Be Screened for Diabetic Retinopathy in Primary Care Settings

Importance

Prior studies found that screening for diabetic retinopathy (DR) in primary care settings using telemedicine increased screening rates among individuals with diabetes. This finding has led to interest in expanding the use of primary care-based screening for DR.

Objective

To estimate the percentages of US adults with diabetes and high-risk US adults with diabetes who have regular contact with primary care physicians and therefore could potentially receive timely screening for DR in primary care settings.

Design, Setting, and Participants

The empirical analyses used data from the cross-sectional population-based 2016 National Health Interview Survey on US adults 18 years or older with self-reported diabetes (n = 3229). Based on previous research, individuals who had lower income, lower educational levels, or type 2 diabetes; who were African American or Hispanic, uninsured, or not using insulin or oral medication for diabetes; or who did not have DR were defined as being at high risk of missing recommended eye examinations. Data were collected throughout 2016 and analyzed from July 17 through November 5, 2018.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Outcomes were whether an individual visited a primary care physician and whether an individual missed having a dilated eye examination in the past year.

Results

The survey sample included 3229 participants. Using weighted percentages of the full sample, 15.3% (95% CI, 13.8%-17.0%) had lower income, 19.7% (95% CI, 17.8%-21.6%) had lower educational levels, 15.4% (95% CI, 13.5%-17.4%) were African American, 16.0% (95% CI, 13.7%-18.6%) were Hispanic, 6.1% (95% CI, 4.9%-7.5%) were uninsured, and 50.1% (95% CI, 47.7%-52.4%) were female; the mean age was 60.1 years (95% CI, 59.4-60.8 years). In addition, 87.7% (95% CI, 85.9%-89.3%) visited a primary care physician in the past year. Of those who did not receive a dilated eye examination in the past year, 82.2% (95% CI, 78.4%-85.4%) visited a primary care physician during the year. Except for the uninsured subgroup, more than 78% of each high-risk subgroup had visited a primary care physician in the past year.

Conclusions and Relevance

Screening for DR in primary care settings has the potential to provide timely screening to a large portion of US adults with diabetes because most US adults with diabetes, including those at high-risk of missing recommended eye examinations, have regular contact with primary care physicians.

Pediatric diabetic retinopathy telescreening

PURPOSE

To describe the role of telemedicine screening for pediatric diabetic retinopathy (DR) and to identify risk factors for pediatric DR.

METHODS

The medical records of a telemedicine program at a tertiary, academic medical center over 17 months were reviewed retrospectively. Patients visiting an academic pediatric endocrinology clinic who met guidelines underwent telescreening. Presence of pediatric DR and risk factors for retinopathy were evaluated.

RESULTS

The fundus photographs of 852 patients 10-23 years of age were reviewed. Diabetic retinopathy was noted in 51 (6%). Patients with an abnormal screening photograph were compared to patients with diabetes who had normal screening photographs (n = 64). Older age, longer diabetes duration, type 1 diabetes, and higher average glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) from the year prior to the photograph were associated with increased risk of retinopathy. Of these, longer duration (P = 0.003) and higher average A1c (P = 0.02) were significant after adjusting for sex, race, and age.

CONCLUSIONS

Our telemedicine program found a higher percentage of diabetic retinopathy screening non-mydriatic photographs than prior studies found through standard ophthalmic examinations. In this relatively small sample size, longer duration of disease and higher average A1c were associated with increased risk of having diabetic retinopathy in our study.