Oral vaccination with immune stimulating complexes

Preparation and Characterization of an Oral Vaccine Formulation Using Electrosprayed Chitosan Microparticles

Chitosan particles loaded with the antigen ovalbumin (OVA) and the adjuvant Quil-A were produced by electrospray, using mixtures of water/ethanol/acetic acid as a solvent. Three different chitosans designed as HMC⁺70, HMC⁺85, and HMC⁺90 (called as 705010, 855010, and 905010) were tested and its efficacy to be used in oral vaccine delivery applications was investigated. The morphology, size, and zeta potential of the produced particles were investigated, together with the encapsulation efficiency and release of OVA from the three chitosan formulations. Moreover, the mucoadhesion and cytotoxicity of the chitosan microparticles was examined. All the three formulations with OVA and Quil-A were in the micrometer size range and had a positive zeta potential between 46 and 75 mV. Furthermore, all the three formulations displayed encapsulation efficiencies above 80% and the release of OVA over a period of 80 h was observed to be between 38 and 47%. None of the developed formulations exhibited high mucoadhesive properties, either cytotoxicity. The formulation prepared with HMC⁺70, OVA, and Quil-A had the highest stability within 2 h in buffer solution, as measured by dynamic light scattering. The electrosprayed formulation consisting of HMC⁺70 with OVA and Quil-A showed to be the most promising as an oral vaccine system.

Intranasal and oral vaccination with protein-based antigens: advantages, challenges and formulation strategies

Most pathogens initiate their infections at the human mucosal surface. Therefore, mucosal vaccination, especially through oral or intranasal administration routes, is highly desired for infectious diseases. Meanwhile, protein-based antigens provide a safer alternative to the whole pathogen or DNA based ones in vaccine development. However, the unique biopharmaceutical hurdles that intranasally or orally delivered protein vaccines need to overcome before they reach the sites of targeting, the relatively low immunogenicity, as well as the low stability of the protein antigens, require thoughtful and fine-tuned mucosal vaccine formulations, including the selection of immunostimulants, the identification of the suitable vaccine delivery system, and the determination of the exact composition and manufacturing conditions. This review aims to provide an up-to-date survey of the protein antigen-based vaccine formulation development, including the usage of immunostimulants and the optimization of vaccine delivery systems for intranasal and oral administrations.

Nanostructured self assembled lipid materials for drug delivery and tissue engineering

Every living organism comprises of lipids as basic building blocks in addition to other components. Utilizing these lipids for pharmaceutical and biomedical applications can overcome biocompatibility and biodegradability issues. A well known example is liposomes (lipids arranged in lamellar structures), but other than that there are additional unique mesophasic structures of lipids formed as a result of lipid polymorphisms, which include cubic-, hexagonal- or sponge-phase structures. These structures provide the advantages of stability and production feasibility compared with liposomes. Cubosomes, which exist in a cubic structure, have improved stability, bioadhesivity and biocompatibility. Hexagonal phases or hexosomes exhibit hexagonal arrangements and can encapsulate different drugs with high stability. Lipids also forms tube-like structures known as tubules and ribbons that are also utilized in different biomedical applications, especially in tissue engineering. Immune stimulating complexes are nanocage-like structures formed as a result of interactions of lipid, antigen and Quillaja saponin. These lipidic mesophasic structures have been utilized for gene, vaccine and drug delivery. This article addresses lipid self-assembled supramolecular nanostructures, including cubosomes, hexosomes, tubules, ribbons, cochleates, lipoplexes and immune stimulating complexes and their biomedical applications.

Mucosal vaccine adjuvants update

Mucosal vaccination, capable of inducing protective immune responses both in the mucosal and systemic immune compartments, has many advantages and is regarded as a blue ocean in the vaccine industry. Mucosal vaccines can offer lower costs, better accessability, needle-free delivery, and higher capacity of mass immunizations during pandemics. However, only very limited number of mucosal vaccines was approved for human use in the market yet. Generally, induction of immune responses following mucosal immunization requires the co-administration of appropriate adjuvants that can initiate and support the effective collaboration between innate and adaptive immunity. Classically, adjuvant researches were rather empirical than keenly scientific. However, during last several years, fundamental scientific achievements in innate immunity have been translated into the development of new mucosal adjuvants. This review focuses on recent developments in the concepts of adjuvants and innate immunity, mucosal immunity with special interest of vaccine development, and basic and applied researches in mucosal adjuvant.

Formulation design considerations for oral vaccines

Whilst oral vaccination is a potentially preferred route in terms of patient adherence and mass vaccination, the ability to formulate effective oral vaccines remains a challenge. The primary barrier to oral vaccination is effective delivery of the vaccine through the GI tract owing to the many obstacles it presents, including low pH, enzyme degradation and bile-salt solubilization, which can result in breakdown/deactivation of a vaccine. For effective immune responses after oral administration, particulates need to be taken up by the M cells however, these are few in number. To enhance M-cell uptake, particle characteristics can be optimized with particle size, surface charge, targeting groups and bioadhesive properties all being considerations. Yet improved uptake may not translate into enhanced immune responses and formulating particulates with inherent adjuvant properties can offer advantages. Within this article, we establish the options available for consideration when building effective oral particulate vaccines.

Evaluation of ISCOM vaccines for mucosal immunization against hepatitis B

Immune stimulating complexes (ISCOMs) incorporating recombinant hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) was prepared for induction of humoral, cellular and mucosal immunity by intranasal administration. Prepared ISCOMs were characterized for its size, shape, incorporation efficiency, zeta potential, and antigen integrity. Designed ISCOMs possessed negative zeta potential (-21.7 mV) and an average size of 44.1 nm with antigen incorporation efficiency approximately 39 %. Serum anti-HBsAg IgG titer after three high nasal doses of ISCOMs was comparable with titer recorded after alum-HBsAg administered subcutaneously. Similarly, modest but higher cellular response (cytokines level in spleen homogenates) and significantly higher secretory sIgA response in mucosal secretions was observed (P < 0.001) in case of HBsAg ISCOM vaccines. Whereas, alum-HBsAg vaccine did not elicit considerable cellular or mucosal response. Thus, ISCOMs produced humoral, mucosal, and cellular immune responses upon nasal administration although high and multidose administrations were required to elicit potent immune responses. These data demonstrate potential of ISCOMs in their use as a carrier adjuvant for nasal subunit vaccines against hepatitis B.

A comparison of pseudo-ternary diagrams of aqueous mixtures of Quil A, cholesterol and phospholipid prepared by lipid-film hydration and dialysis

Pseudo-ternary diagrams for Quil A, phospholipid (phosphatidylcholine (PC) or phosphatidylethanolamine (PE)) and cholesterol were established in order to identify combinations that result in the formation of immune-stimulating complex (ISCOM) matrices and other colloidal structures produced by these three components in aqueous systems following lipid-film hydration or dialysis (methods that can be used to produce ISCOMs). In addition, the effect of equilibration time (1 month at 4°C) on the structures formed by the various combinations of the three components was investigated. Depending on the ratio of Quil A, cholesterol and phospholipid, different colloidal particles, including ISCOM matrices, liposomes and ring-like micelles, were found irrespective of the preparation method used. In contrast, worm-like micelles were only observed in systems prepared by lipid-film hydration. For samples prepared by dialysis, ISCOM matrices were predominantly found near the Quil A apex of the pseudo-ternary diagram (&gt; 50% Quil A). On the other hand, for samples prepared by lipid-film hydration, ISCOM matrices were predominantly found near the phospholipid apex of the pseudo-ternary diagram (&gt; 50% phospholipid). The regions in the pseudo-ternary diagrams in which ISCOM matrices were observed increased following an extended equilibration time, particularly for samples prepared by lipid-film hydration. Differences were also observed between pseudoternary diagrams prepared using either PE or PC as phospholipids.

Oral vaccine delivery: can it protect against non-mucosal pathogens?

Vaccination is an efficient and cost-effective form of preventing infectious diseases. However, most currently available vaccines are delivered by injection, which makes mass immunization more costly and less safe, particularly in resource-poor developing countries. Oral vaccines have several attractive features compared with parenteral vaccines, but studies on their use have been limited almost exclusively to protection against mucosally transmitted pathogens. Their potential for controlling non-mucosally transmitted diseases has not yet been appreciated in general. In this article, we provide evidence that oral immunization is a feasible alternative for preventing infections transmitted through non-mucosal routes, including infections such as malaria, Japanese encephalitis and hepatitis B. Although there are still hurdles to overcome before such approaches can be deployed widely, recent progress in the oral vaccination field and the availability of a range of delivery systems offers hope for the development of a larger number of oral vaccines.

Adjuvant effects of saponins on animal immune responses

Vaccines require optimal adjuvants including immunopotentiator and delivery systems to offer long term protection from infectious diseases in animals and man. Initially it was believed that adjuvants are responsible for promoting strong and sustainable antibody responses. Now it has been shown that adjuvants influence the isotype and avidity of antibody and also affect the properties of cell-mediated immunity. Mostly oil emulsions, lipopolysaccharides, polymers, saponins, liposomes, cytokines, ISCOMs (immunostimulating complexes), Freund's complete adjuvant, Freund's incomplete adjuvant, alums, bacterial toxins etc., are common adjuvants under investigation. Saponin based adjuvants have the ability to stimulate the cell mediated immune system as well as to enhance antibody production and have the advantage that only a low dose is needed for adjuvant activity. In the present study the importance of adjuvants, their role and the effect of saponin in immune system is reviewed.

Saponin-adjuvanted particulate vaccines for clinical use

Saponins are well recognised as potent immune stimulators, but their applicability as vaccine adjuvants have been limited due to associated toxicity. Formulation of saponin adjuvant with cholesterol and phospholipid produces the particulate ISCOMATRIX adjuvant, and when antigen is also contained within the particle, an ISCOM vaccine is produced. These particulate vaccines retain the adjuvant activity of the saponin component but without toxicity. Saponin-adjuvanted particulate vaccines have significant potential as a novel strategy in vaccine development. This review discusses (i) recent methodologies which have attempted to increase the flexibility and applicability of this technology by modifying either the vaccine composition or the mode of formulation; (ii) recent evaluations of these technologies for inducing protection against infectious diseases and as cancer immunotherapeutics.

Induction of protective and mucosal immunity against diphtheria by a immune stimulating complex (ISCOMS) based vaccine

There is increasing concern over the efficacy of existing vaccines for diphtheria and there is interest in the development of a mucosally active formulation which might improve local protection. Lipophilic immune stimulating complexes (ISCOMS) containing Quil A are active by both parenteral and mucosal routes and here we have established methods for incorporating palmitified diphtheria toxoid (DT) into ISCOMS. The resulting formulation was immunogenic by the subcutaneous, oral and intranasal routes, with very low doses of DT inducing systemic humoral immune responses, as well as cell mediated immunity including both gammaIFN and IL5 production. Intranasal immunisation with DT in ISCOMS also stimulated significant local antibody production in tracheal washes, as well as cellular immunity in draining lymphoid tissues and serum neutralising antibodies. Finally, subcutaneous immunisation of guinea pigs with DT in ISCOMS primed protective immunity against challenge with diphtheria holotoxin more efficiently than the equivalent doses of DT in the conventional alum vaccine. ISCOMS based vaccines may provide a novel strategy for mucosal and systemic immunisation against diphtheria.

A new intranasal influenza vaccine based on a novel polycationic lipid—ceramide carbamoyl-spermine (CCS)

Although most pathogens use the mucosal routes for invasion, the majority of currently available vaccines are administered parenterally. Injectable vaccines induce good systemic immunity but often unsatisfactory mucosal immunity. A non-injectable mucosal vaccine, which can be self-administered intranasally, may provide both effective systemic and mucosal immunity and can be used for vaccination of large populations within a short period of time in case of a sudden epidemic. Here, we report on a new intranasal (i.n.) influenza vaccine, based on a novel polycationic sphingolipid, N-palmitoyl D-erythro-sphingosyl carbamoyl-spermine (ceramide carbamoyl-spermine = CCS), having combined carrier and adjuvant activities, which elicits, in mice, strong systemic (serum) and local (lung and nasal) humoral and cellular responses, and provides protective immunity. In a comparative study, we show that both unmodified commercial vaccine and vaccine formulated with neutral or anionic liposomes were poorly immunogenic upon i.n. administration. Of five vaccine formulations based on well-established monocationic lipids in the form of unsized liposomes, three (DC-Chol, DDAB, and DSTAP-based) resulted in low serum and local responses, while two others (DMTAP and DOTAP-based vaccines) induced both systemic and local vigorous Th1+Th2 immune responses. However, only the vaccine formulated with CCS was equivalent or superior to the commercial vaccine co-administered with cholera toxin as an adjuvant. Furthermore, the CCS-based influenza vaccine was highly efficacious following a single or a repeated (x2) i.n. or a single i.m. administration, without an added adjuvant, in both young (2 months) and old (18 months) mice. It elicited high titers of strain cross-reactive hemagglutination inhibition (HI) antibodies, and the high antibody titers and protective immunity persisted for at least 9 months. No systemic adverse effects, and only a mild local inflammatory response, were observed in mice and rabbits vaccinated i.n. with the CCS vaccine formulation. A similar approach may prove efficacious for i.n. vaccination against other pathogens.

Mucosal delivery of vaccines in domestic animals

Mucosal vaccination is proving to be one of the greatest challenges in modern vaccine development. Although highly beneficial for achieving protective immunity, the induction of mucosal immunity, especially in the gastro-intestinal tract, still remains a difficult task. As a result, only very few mucosal vaccines are commercially available for domestic animals. Here, we critically review various strategies for mucosal delivery of vaccines in domestic animals. This includes live bacterial and viral vectors, particulate delivery-systems such as polymers, alginate, polyphosphazenes, immune stimulating complex and liposomes, and receptor mediated-targeting strategies to the mucosal tissues. The most commonly used routes of immunization, strategies for delivering the antigen to the mucosal surfaces, and future prospects in the development of mucosal vaccines are discussed.

Dendritic cells and immune responses to orally administered antigens

The intestinal immune system discriminates between invasive pathogens and antigens that are harmless, such as food proteins and commensal bacteria. The latter groups of antigens normally induce tolerance and the nature of the intestinal immune response depends on how antigen is presented to CD4+ T cells by dendritic cells (DC). Expanding the numbers of DC in vivo using the cytokine flt3 ligand (flt3L) enhances the susceptibility of mice to the induction of oral tolerance. The relevant DC may be in Peyer's patches (PP), mesenteric lymph node (MLN) or the lamina propria (LP)of the villus mucosa. All these tissues contain a number of distinctive DC subsets, including some that can preferentially induce the differentiation of regulatory T cells. However, we find that the largest proportion of orally administered protein is taken up by DC in the lamina propria. Intestinal DC are not inherently tolerogenic. Under physiological conditions they are "quiescent", capable of presenting antigen and inducing tolerance, but being sufficiently responsive to inflammatory stimuli to allow T cell priming and protective immunity when necessary. Targeting local DC may be a useful means of inducing either tolerance or active immunity. We have achieved this using immune stimulating complexes (ISCOMS) containing Quil A, which are highly immunogenic by the oral route and appear to act by targeting DC preferentially. ISCOMS or saponins such as Quil A may prove useful adjuvants to incorporate in plant derived, mucosally active vaccines.

Application of Quillaja saponaria extracts as oral adjuvants for plant-made vaccines

Extracts from the Quillaja saponaria tree are known to provide immune potentiating responses and, hence, can be useful as adjuvants. Partial purification from the crude (food-grade) extract results in Quil A, which is contained in several veterinary vaccines. Further purification can provide concentrated saponin fractions such as QS-21, which is currently under investigation as a potential adjuvant for use in humans. Purified saponins have proven safe and effective when injected and have significantly enhanced the efficacy of some oral vaccines under clinical investigation. Toxicity of the food-grade extract from Quillaja saponaria has limited its use as a parenteral adjuvant; however, this toxicity seems to be abated when delivered orally. It is commonly used within the food and beverage industries and has no documented toxicity in humans at the present levels of consumption. Use of transgenic plants has been proposed as an alternative system for oral vaccine production and administration, and it is likely that an oral adjuvant will be required in most cases. Food-grade saponins have significant advantages for use with plant-made vaccines and are likely to provide a broad adjuvant effect due to the multiple saponin components. A review of the origin, production, biological activity, toxicity and use in the food industry is provided for Quillaja saponaria extract. Previous evaluation of this adjuvant in preclinical studies with plant made vaccines is discussed and a proposed level of experimental use in humans is provided.

Orally delivered malaria vaccines: not too hard to swallow

Vaccines offer efficient and cost-effective protection against a wide range of infectious diseases. Unfortunately, no effective vaccine is yet available against malaria, and this infection remains one of the most important causes of human morbidity and mortality in the developing world. Over the past two decades a number of candidate proteins for inclusion in a subunit vaccine have been identified. Malariologists believe that an effective malaria vaccine will need to include multiple proteins that induce protective immune responses against different stages of the Plasmodium life cycle. The construction of such multivalent vaccines is beset by considerable logistical difficulties, not least of which is how to deliver them to a population living in endemic areas. Compared with other routes of vaccine administration, oral delivery has several advantages that make it an attractive strategy for vaccine development. This review summarises the progress towards an oral vaccine delivery system for malaria and discusses the feasibility of this approach.

ISCOM based vaccines for cancer immunotherapy

Immunostimulating complex (ISCOM) vaccines are particulate antigen delivery vehicles composed of saponin, cholesterol, phospholipid and immunogen. Here we illustrate that ISCOM-based vaccines represent an attractive modality for the development of anti-cancer vaccines. Using murine models and a model cancer antigen, ISCOM vaccines were shown to induce potent CD8 T cell responses, to mediate protection in three different tumor models, to promote Th1-biased immunity, and to induce CD8 T cell responses in the absence of CD4+ T cell help. The former three activities were also found to be substantially improved when the vaccine antigen was associated with the ISCOM structure. Furthermore, the presence in vivo of pre-existing antibodies against the vaccine antigen did not inhibit CD8 T cell induction by the ISCOM vaccine. Although vaccination was effective against challenge with vaccine-antigen expressing tumors, no activity against neighboring vaccine-antigen negative tumor cells was observed, indicating that determinant spreading or bystander activity does not lead to significant anti-cancer activity.

Incorporation of ovalbumin into ISCOMs and related colloidal particles prepared by the lipid film hydration method

The aim of this study was to investigate the incorporation of a model antigen, fluorescently labelled ovalbumin (FITC-OVA), into various colloidal particles including immune stimulating complexes (ISCOMs), liposomes, ring and worm-like micelles, lamellae and lipidic/layered structures that are formed from various combinations of the triterpene saponin Quil A, cholesterol and phosphatidylethanolamine (PE) following hydration of PE/cholesterol lipid films with aqueous solutions of Quil A. Colloidal dispersions of these three components were also prepared by the dialysis method for comparison. FITC-OVA was conjugated with palmitic acid (P) and PE to produce P-FITC-OVA and PE-FITC-OVA, respectively. Both P-FITC-OVA and PE-FITC-OVA could be incorporated in all colloidal structures whereas FITC-OVA was incorporated only into liposomes. The incorporation of PE-FITC-OVA into all colloidal structures was significantly higher than P-FITC-OVA (P < 0.05). The degree of incorporation of protein was in the order: ring and worm-like micelles < liposomes and lipidic/layered structures < ISCOMs and lamellae. The incorporation of protein into the various particles prepared by the lipid film hydration method was similar to those for colloidal particles prepared by the dialysis method (provided both methods lead to the formation of the same colloidal structures). In the case of different colloidal structures arising due to the preparation method, differences in encapsulation efficiency were found (P < 0.05) for formulations with the same polar lipid composition. This study demonstrates that the various colloidal particles formed as a result of hydrating PE/cholesterol lipid films with different amounts of Quil A are capable of incorporating antigen, provided it is amphipathic. Some of these colloidal particles may be used as effective vaccine delivery systems.

Current status and potential application of ISCOMs in veterinary medicine

The immune stimulating complex (ISCOM) is a 40 nm nanoparticle used as a delivery system for vaccine antigens, targeting the immune system both after parenteral and mucosal administration. The ISCOM is made up of saponin, lipids and antigen usually held together by hydrophobic interaction between these three components. The compulsory elements to form the ISCOM structure are cholesterol and saponin. When the antigen is omitted the ISCOM-MATRIX is formed. There are a number of saponins that can form ISCOMs, and many other substances (including antigens, targeting and immuno-modulating molecules) can be incorporated into the ISCOM provided they are hydrophobic or rendered to be hydrophobic. Thus, it is possible to create ISCOM particles with different properties. After parenteral immunisation of the ISCOM, the T cell response is first detected in the draining lymph node. Subsequently, the T cell response is localised to the spleen, while the B cell response is first found both in the draining lymph nodes and in the spleen. Up to 50 days later, the majority of the antibody producing cells is found in the bone marrow (BM). In contrast, antigens that have been adjuvanted in an oil emulsion, limit the T cell response to the draining lymph nodes while the B cell response is found in the draining lymph nodes and spleen, but not in the BM. The ISCOM efficiently evokes CD8+, MHC class 1 restricted T cell response. The deposit of antigens both to the endosomal vesicles and to the cytosol of antigen presenting cells (APCs) explains why both T helper cells (vesicles) and cytotoxic T lymphocytes (cytosol) are efficiently induced by ISCOMs. The T helper (Th) cell response is balanced in the sense that both Th1 and Th2 cells are induced. Prominent IL-12 production by cells in the innate system is a characteristic reaction induced by ISCOMs, promoting the development of a strong Th1 response. After mucosal administration by the intranasal or the intestinal routes, the ISCOM induces strong specific mucosal IgA responses in local and remote mucosal surfaces. Also T cell responses are evoked by the mucosal administration. A large number of experimental ISCOM vaccines have been tested and protection has been induced against a number of pathogens in various species including chronic and persistent infections exemplified by human immune deficiency virus 1 (HIV-1), and 2 (HIV-2) and simian immune deficiency virus (SIV) in primates, and various herpes virus infections in several species. In contrast to a conventional rabies virus vaccine the ISCOM rabies formulation protected mice after exposure to the virulent virus. Recently, experimental ISCOM vaccines were shown to efficiently induce immune response in newborns of murine and bovine species in the presence of maternal antibodies, while conventional vaccines have failed. ISCOM vaccines are on the market for horses and cattle and several other ISCOM vaccines are under development. Since the ISCOM and the ISCOM-MATRIX can be blended with live attenuated vaccine antigens without hampering the proliferation of the live vaccine antigens, it opens the possibility to use the ISCOM adjuvant system in a mixture of live and killed vaccine antigens.

From toxin to adjuvant: the rational design of a vaccine adjuvant vector, CTA1-DD/ISCOM

Mucosally active vaccine adjuvants which will prime a full range of local and systemic immune responses against defined antigenic epitopes are much needed. Cholera toxin (CT) and lipophilic immune stimulating complexes (ISCOMs) containing Quil A can both act as adjuvants for orally administered antigens, but through separate pathways, as evidenced by the dependence on IL-12 for the effect of ISCOMs, whereas CT is independent of this cytokine. Unfortunately the toxicity of CT and recent findings of accumulation of CT in the olfactory nerve and bulb after intranasal administration precludes the clinical use of CT. However, we have been successful in separating the adjuvant and toxic effects of CT, by constructing a gene fusion protein, CTA1-DD, that combines the enzymatically active CTA1-subunit with a B cell targeting moiety, D, derived from Staphylococcus aureus protein A. The present review gives a background to mucosal immunization and the use of -adjuvants in general, followed by a description of a strategy to rationally design a vaccine adjuvant vector that fulfils the criteria of targeting and immunomodulating innate immunity in order to boost a strong adaptive immune response. We have combined CTA1-DD and ISCOMs into a new highly promising vaccine adjuvant vector, CTA1-DD/ISCOMs. The combined vector is immunogenic when given by the subcutaneous, oral or nasal routes, inducing strong cell--mediated and humoral immune responses, including local mucosal IgA. It requires the ADP ribosylating property of the CTA1-enzyme and the effect of the combined vector greatly exceeded the effect of either ISCOMs or CT used alone. Antigens could be incorporated into or just admixed with the new vector. Thus, we have demonstrated that rationally designed vectors consisting of CTA1-DD and ISCOMS may provide a novel strategy for the generation of potent and safe mucosal vaccines.

New generation of mucosal adjuvants for the induction of protective immunity

Invasion of infectious agents through mucosal surfaces can be prevented by use of the common mucosal immune system (CMIS), which interconnects inductive tissues, including Peyer's patches (PPs) and nasopharyngeal-associated lymphoreticular tissue (NALT), and effector tissues of the intestinal and respiratory tracts. In order for the CMIS to induce maximal protective mucosal immunity, co-administration of mucosal adjuvant has been shown to be essential. When vaccine antigen is administered together with mucosal adjuvant, antigen-specific T-helper (Th) 1 and Th2 cells, cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) and IgA B cell responses are effectively induced by oral or nasal routes via the CMIS. In the early stages of induction of mucosal immune response, the uptake of orally or nasally administered antigens is achieved through a unique set of antigen-sampling cells, M cells located in follicle-associated epithelium (FAE) of inductive sites. After successful uptake, the antigens are immediately processed and presented by the underlying dendritic cells (DCs). Elucidation of the molecular/cellular characteristics of M cells and mucosal DCs will greatly facilitate the design of a new generation of effective mucosal adjuvants and of a vaccine delivery vehicle that maximises the use of the CMIS. Our recent efforts at mucosal vaccine development have focused on nasal administration of vaccine antigen together with nontoxic mutant-based or cytokine-/chemokine-based adjuvant for the induction of the protective immunity. To this end, a chimeric form of a nontoxic adjuvant combining the merits of mutant cholera toxin A subunit (mCT-A) and heat labile toxin B subunit (LT-B) was created as the second generation of detoxified toxin-based mucosal adjuvant. When a vaccine antigen was coexpressed together with an immune stimulatory/delivery molecule in crop seed, this edible vaccine is not only effective but also extremely practical in that it can be produced in huge quantities and preserved and shipped over long distances at room temperature without altering the quality of the vaccine. Because such qualities would greatly facilitate global vaccination, this new generation edible vaccines with a built-in adjuvant and/or M cell-targeted edible vaccine promises to be a powerful weapon for combating infectious diseases and bioterrorism.

N/A

N/A

Improvement of the systemic prime/oral boost strategy for systemic and local responses

This paper describes oral boost immunisations of primed animals as an alternative oral vaccination strategy. Mice were primed orally (PO), intranasally (IN), subcutaneously (SC), or intraperitoneally (IP) with ovalbumin (OVA) with or without adjuvant. Boost immunisations were given orally with or without cholera toxin (CT) as adjuvant. Prime immunisations induced variable IgA and IgG(1) titres in serum depending on the route. A subsequent oral boost increased these titres. Use of an adjuvant in the priming significantly increased serum IgA and, to a lesser extend, IgG(1). Oral boost immunisation induced significantly higher serum IgA titres in animals primed via the SC, IP and the IN route compared to the PO route. This was independent of the use of CT. Three oral boosts with OVA plus 5 microg CT given in 5 days to primed mice revealed higher IgA titres compared to single oral boosts and anti-OVA IgA titres in faeces were also detected. Finally, we put together our findings and propose a systemic priming/oral boost strategy in which mice were primed via the SC route with 100 microg OVA plus 50 microg Butyl16-p(AA), and subsequently orally boosted with three doses of 300 microg OVA plus 5 microg CT each. We concluded that oral immunisation is more effective in IN, SC, or IP primed mice than in PO primed mice, and that the IgA antibody response in serum and faeces can be improved by increasing the immunisation frequency and the use of appropriate adjuvants in primary and boost immunisation. The here-formulated strategy improves the probability of success of oral vaccination. The results are discussed in the light of the development of edible vaccines.

The biological action of saponins in animal systems: a review

Saponins are steroid or triterpenoid glycosides, common in a large number of plants and plant products that are important in human and animal nutrition. Several biological effects have been ascribed to saponins. Extensive research has been carried out into the membrane-permeabilising, immunostimulant, hypocholesterolaemic and anticarcinogenic properties of saponins and they have also been found to significantly affect growth, feed intake and reproduction in animals. These structurally diverse compounds have also been observed to kill protozoans and molluscs, to be antioxidants, to impair the digestion of protein and the uptake of vitamins and minerals in the gut, to cause hypoglycaemia, and to act as antifungal and antiviral agents. These compounds can thus affect animals in a host of different ways both positive and negative.

Lipopeptide vaccines--yesterday, today, and tomorrow

Peptide-based vaccines offer several potential advantages over the conventional whole proteins (or whole gene, in the case of genetic immunisation) in terms of purity and a high specificity in eliciting immune responses. However, concerns about toxic adjuvants, which are critical for immunogenicity of synthetic peptides, still remain. Lipopeptides, a form of peptide vaccine, discovered more then a decade ago, are currently under intensive investigation because they can generate comprehensive immune responses, without the use of adjuvants. In this review, we address the past of lipopeptide vaccines, highlight the progress made toward their optimisation, and stress future challenges and issues related to their synthesis, formulation, and delivery. In particular, the recent development of mucosal application of lipopeptide vaccines may present an ideal strategy against many pathogens that infect mucosal surfaces.

Local immune responses to influenza antigen are synergistically enhanced by the adjuvant ISCOMATRIX

The peripheral (draining) lymph node, as the primary site of immune induction, determines the course of systemic responses to an injected antigen. Lymphatic duct cannulation procedures in sheep were used to investigate local immunoreactivity to human influenza virus antigen (Flu ag) admixed with the adjuvant ISCOMATRIX (IMX). Compared to Flu ag or IMX alone, the co-administration of Flu ag and IMX (Flu ag+IMX) synergistically enhanced a number of immunological responses (lymphocyte and blast migration from the node, antigen-specific antibody levels and IL6 output in efferent lymph, and antigen-induced proliferation in cultured efferent lymph cells). Together, these results demonstrate that IMX is an immune modulator, and that lymphatic duct cannulation procedures may be used to evaluate antigen/adjuvant combinations for vaccine development.

IgA responses in the intestinal mucosa against pathogenic and non-pathogenic microorganisms

IgA is the most abundant immunoglobulin produced in mammals; most is secreted as a dimer across mucous membranes. This review discusses the different mechanisms of induction of IgA, and its role in protecting mucosal surfaces against pathogenic and non-pathogenic microorganisms.

Immunostimulating complexes (ISCOMs) for nasal vaccination

The immunostimulating complex (ISCOM) is documented as a strong adjuvant and delivery system for parenteral immunization. Its effectiveness for mucosal immunization has also been proven with various incorporated antigens. Lövgren et al. were the first to demonstrate the capacity of influenza virus ISCOMs to induce mucosal immune response and protection after one comparatively low nasal dose. Further studies show that similar to Cholera toxin (CT) and Escherichia coli heat-labile toxin (LT), ISCOMs break immunological tolerance and exert strong mucosal adjuvant activity, resulting in secretory IgA and systemic immune responses. Striking is the capacity of ISCOMs to induce CTL response also after nasal administration. In contrast to CT, ISCOMs initiate mucosal as well as systemic immune responses in an IL-12 dependent manner but independently of IL-4. The recombinant B subunit of cholera toxin (rCTB) was incorporated in the same ISCOM particle to explore symbiotic effects. The IgA response to rCTB in lungs was increased 100-fold when rCTB was administered nasally in ISCOMs and more than 10-fold in the remote mucosa of the genital tract. An enhanced IgA response to a passenger antigen OVA was recorded in the remote genital tract. After i.n. administration of the envelope proteins of respiratory syncytial virus in ISCOMs, high serum antibodies were induced, almost at the same levels as those following parenteral immunization and potent IgA responses were also evoked both at the local respiratory mucosa, and in the cases tested at the distant mucosae of the genital and intestinal tracts. Similar results have also been recorded with ISCOMs containing envelope proteins from Herpes simplex virus, Influenza virus and Mycoplasma mycoides. The mucosal targeting property of envelope proteins of RSV was utilized in an HIV-gp120 RSV ISCOM formulation. After nasal administration an enhanced mucosal IgA response to gp120 was observed in the female reproductive tract. In general, antigens derived from envelope viruses or cell membranes incorporated into ISCOMs retain their biological activity and conformation, encompassing the mucosal targeting and virus neutralizing properties.

Exogenous antigens and the stimulation of MHC class I restricted cell-mediated cytotoxicity: possible strategies for fish vaccines

An MHC class I restricted cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) activity assay has recently been established for rainbow trout. MHC class I restricted cytotoxicity probably plays a critical role in immunity to most viral diseases in mammals and may play a similar role in fish. Therefore, it is very important to investigate what types of vaccines can stimulate this immune response. Although logical candidates for vaccine components that can stimulate an MHC class I restricted response are live attenuated viruses and DNA vaccines, these materials are generally not allowed in fish for commercial vaccine use due to potential safety issues. In mammals, however, a number of interesting vaccination strategies based on exogenous antigens that stimulate MHC class I restricted cytotoxicity have been described. Several of these strategies are discussed in this review in the context of fish vaccination.

The B cell targeted adjuvant, CTA1-DD, exhibits potent mucosal immunoenhancing activity despite pre-existing anti-toxin immunity

We recently developed a novel immunomodulating gene fusion protein, CTA1-DD, that combines the ADP-ribosylating ability of cholera toxin (CT) with a dimer of an Ig-binding fragment, D, of Staphylococcus aureus protein A. The CTA1-DD adjuvant was found to be non-toxic and greatly augmented T cell dependent and independent responses. Following injection it binds to both naïve and memory B cells and up-regulates co-stimulatory molecules as well as prevents apoptosis of activated B cells. Here we show that CTA1-DD is a potent mucosal adjuvant administered intranasally. A dose-response analysis revealed that the adjuvant effect of CTA1-DD given intranasally was equally strong to that observed after systemic immunizations. The adjuvant effect was independent of any possible contamination with endotoxin as indicated by the similar enhancing effects of CTA1-DD in C3H/HeN and the LPS-insensitive C3H/HeJ mice. Contrary to many other adjuvants CTA1-DD induces an immune response to itself. However, despite the presence of high serum titers of pre-existing anti-CTA1 antibodies we observed no reduction of the adjuvant function of CTA1-DD when given either intranasally or systemically. These results support the notion that the CTA1-DD adjuvant can repeatedly be used in the clinic without loss of efficacy even when pre-existing anti-CTA1 antibody levels are high.

Modulation of immune responses following antigen administration by mucosal route

Most microbial infections are either restricted to the mucosal membranes or the etiologic agents needed to transit the mucosa. Thus, it is desirable to stimulate a mucosal response following vaccination, to block both infection and disease development. Attenuated vaccine carriers mimic natural infections, triggering also mucosal responses. Similar results can be achieved by administering antigens with appropriate adjuvants. However, the delivery of antigens per se is not sufficient to engender a protective response. A successful immunization requires the elicitation of an appropriate type of immune response (e.g. antibodies vs. cell-mediated immunity, Th1 vs. Th2 helper pattern). Therefore, a successful vaccination strategy demands the choice of adequate antigens, and their appropriate delivery and/or formulation to promote the required quality of immune response. Different strategies to optimize the immune responses elicited following vaccine administration by the mucosal route are discussed.

Abrogation of oral tolerance by feeding encapsulated antigen

Results from previous studies have indicated that suppression of immune responses cannot be abrogated once oral tolerance has been established. Using a new methodology, OVA was encapsulated and fed to tolerized BDF1 mice. Results from these studies indicated that although IgG2a titers remained low, total IgG and IgG1 antibody titers were no longer suppressed compared to controls. Furthermore, in vitro splenocyte proliferation was not significantly suppressed in tolerized mice fed encapsulated OVA. To determine whether oral tolerance could be abrogated in other strains of mice, BALB/c mice were tolerized and fed encapsulated OVA. Results from these studies indicated that IgG2a as well as IgG1 and total anti-OVA antibody titers were no longer suppressed. Although splenocyte proliferation did remain significantly suppressed in these mice, IFN-gamma and IL-4 levels were no longer decreased. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time that abrogation of an established oral tolerance has been demonstrated.

The mucosal adjuvant effects of cholera toxin and immune-stimulating complexes differ in their requirement for IL-12, indicating different pathways of action

Adjuvants that can improve mucosal vaccine efficacy are much warranted. In this comparative study between cholera toxin (CT) and immune-stimulating complexes (ISCOM) we found that, contrary to CT, ovalbumin (OVA)-ISCOM were poor inducers of mucosal anti-OVA IgA responses, but induced similar or better systemic immunity following oral immunizations. The addition of CT to the oral OVA-ISCOM protocol did not stimulate local anti-OVA IgA immunity, nor did it change the quality or magnitude of the systemic responses. Both vectors recruited strong innate immunity, but only OVA-ISCOM could directly induce IL-12, demonstrable at the protein and mRNA levels. CT had no inhibitory effects on lipopolysaccharide/IFN-gamma-induced IL-12 mRNA expression or IL-12 production. Furthermore, adjuvanticity of CT was unaffected in IL-12-deficient mice, while OVA-ISCOM showed partly impaired adjuvant effects by the lack of IL-12. CT abrogated the induction of oral tolerance stimulated by antigen feeding in these mice. In addition, CT did not alter TGF-beta levels, suggesting that the immunomodulating effect of CT was independent of IL-12 as well as TGF-beta production. Taken together, these findings indicate that mucosal adjuvanticity of CT and ISCOM are differently dependent on IL-12, suggesting that separate and distinct antigen-processing pathways are involved.