Emergence of resistance to acyclovir and penciclovir in varicella-zoster virus and genetic analysis of acyclovir-resistant variants

Antiviral therapy for COVID-19: Derivation of optimal strategy based on past antiviral and favipiravir experiences

Favipiravir, a broad-spectrum RNA-dependent RNA polymerase inhibitor, inhibits the replication of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) at significantly lower concentrations than the plasma trough levels achieved by the dosage adopted for influenza treatment and exhibits efficacy against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia. Although high doses of favipiravir are required due to the molecule being a purine analog, its conversion into the active form in infected cells with active viral RNA synthesis enhances the antiviral specificity and selectivity as a chain terminator with lethal mutagenesis. Another characteristic feature is the lack of generation of favipiravir-resistant virus. COVID-19 pneumonia is caused by strong cell-mediated immunity against virus-infected cells, and the inflammatory response induced by adaptive immunity continues to peak for 3 to 5 days despite antiviral treatment. This has also been observed in herpes zoster (HZ) and cytomegalovirus (CMV) pneumonia. Inflammation due to an immune response may mask the effectiveness of favipiravir against COVID-19 pneumonia. Favipiravir significantly shortened the recovery time in patients with mild COVID-19 pneumonia by 3 days with the start of treatment by the 5th day of symptom onset. Since both CMV and COVID-19 pneumonia are caused by adaptive immunity and prevention of cytomegalovirus pneumonia is the standard treatment due to difficulties in treating refractory CMV pneumonia, COVID-19 pneumonia should be prevented with early treatment as well. In the present study, we have comprehensively reviewed the optimal antiviral therapy for COVID-19 based on clinical trials of favipiravir for the treatment of COVID-19 pneumonia and the concurrently established therapies for other viral infections, particularly HZ and CMV pneumonia. Optimally, antivirals should be administered immediately after COVID-19 diagnosis, similar to that after influenza diagnosis, to prevent COVID-19 pneumonia and complications resulting from microangiopathy.

Safety, tolerability of ES16001, a novel varicella zoster virus reactivation inhibitor, in healthy adults

Purpose

Herpes zoster (HZ), or shingles, is a clinical syndrome resulting from the reactivation of latent varicella zoster virus (VZV) within the sensory ganglia. We evaluated the safety and tolerability of ES16001 (ethanol extract of Elaeocarpus sylvestris var. ellipticus), a novel inhibitor of varicella zoster virus reactivation in healthy adults.

Method

Single-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single and multiple ascending dose (SAD and MAD, respectively) studies were conducted in 20- to 45-year-old healthy adults without chronic disease. In the SAD study (n = 32), subjects randomly received a single oral dose of 240, 480, 960, or 1440 mg ES16001 or a placebo. In the MAD study (n = 16), subjects randomly received once daily doses of 480 or 960 mg ES16001 or a placebo for 5 days. The safety and tolerability of the drug were evaluated by monitoring participants’ treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and vital signs, electrocardiograms (ECGs), physical examinations, and clinical laboratory tests.

Results

In the SAD study, 11 adverse reactions were seen in 5 subjects, and in the MAD study, 8 adverse reactions were seen in 6 subjects. All adverse reactions were mild, and no serious adverse reactions occurred. The most common adverse reaction was an increase in alanine aminotransferase (ALT), but all test values were in the clinically non-significant range, and their clinical significance was judged to be small considering the fact that most of the test values returned to normal immediately after the end of drug administration.

Conclusion

ES16001 has good safety and tolerability when administered both once and repeatedly to healthy subjects. Further research is needed to identify any possible drug-induced hepatotoxicity, which appears infrequently. Our findings provide a rationale for further clinical investigations of ES16001 for the prevention of HZ.

Trial registration: CRIS, KCT0006066. Registered 7 April 2021—Retrospectively registered, https://cris.nih.go.kr/cris/search/detailSearch.do/19071).

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40001-021-00565-z.

Emergence of varicella-zoster virus resistance to acyclovir: epidemiology, prevention, and treatment

Introduction: Acyclovir has led to the development of successful systemic therapy for herpes simplex virus and varicella-zoster virus (VZV) infection, and the use of valacyclovir and famciclovir has improved treatment. Additionally, the use of a helicase-primase (HP) inhibitor (HPI), amenamevir, is changing the treatment of herpes zoster (HZ).Area covered: VZV infection is prevented by vaccines and is treated with antiviral agents. Acyclovir and penciclovir are phosphorylated by viral thymidine kinase and work as chain terminators. Improvements in the management of immunocompromised patients have reduced severe and prolonged immunosuppression and chronic VZV infection with acyclovir-resistant mutants has become rarer. The HP is involved in the initial step of DNA synthesis and amenamevir has novel mechanisms of action, efficacy to acyclovir-resistant mutants, and pharmacokinetic characteristics. The literature search for PUBMED was conducted on 10 April 2020 and updated on 4 November 2020.Expert opinion: Amenamevir has been used to treat HZ in Japan. Although the number of patients with VZV infection will decrease owing to the use of vaccines, the addition of HPI will improve treatment and treatment options for resistant viruses. The clinical use of HPIs in addition to current nucleoside analogs opens a new era of antiherpes therapy.

Advances and Perspectives in the Management of Varicella-Zoster Virus Infections

Varicella-zoster virus (VZV), a common and ubiquitous human-restricted pathogen, causes a primary infection (varicella or chickenpox) followed by establishment of latency in sensory ganglia. The virus can reactivate, causing herpes zoster (HZ, shingles) and leading to significant morbidity but rarely mortality, although in immunocompromised hosts, VZV can cause severe disseminated and occasionally fatal disease. We discuss VZV diseases and the decrease in their incidence due to the introduction of live-attenuated vaccines to prevent varicella or HZ. We also focus on acyclovir, valacyclovir, and famciclovir (FDA approved drugs to treat VZV infections), brivudine (used in some European countries) and amenamevir (a helicase-primase inhibitor, approved in Japan) that augur the beginning of a new era of anti-VZV therapy. Valnivudine hydrochloride (FV-100) and valomaciclovir stearate (in advanced stage of development) and several new molecules potentially good as anti-VZV candidates described during the last year are examined. We reflect on the role of antiviral agents in the treatment of VZV-associated diseases, as a large percentage of the at-risk population is not immunized, and on the limitations of currently FDA-approved anti-VZV drugs. Their low efficacy in controlling HZ pain and post-herpetic neuralgia development, and the need of multiple dosing regimens requiring daily dose adaptation for patients with renal failure urges the development of novel anti-VZV drugs.

Successful treatment with famciclovir for varicella zoster virus infection resistant to acyclovir

Varicella zoster virus (VZV) reactivates more frequently in immunocompromised patients than immunocompetent subjects and is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. Acyclovir is frequently used for treatment against VZV reactivation. However, long-term use of acyclovir can result in the emergence of VZV strain resistant to acyclovir. Here, we report a 67-year-old man with adult T-cell leukemia who suffered from herpes zoster with acyclovir-resistant VZV after long-term prophylaxis. The isolated viruses from his skin lesions were a mixture of acyclovir-resistant and acyclovir-susceptible strains. Sequence analysis showed the presence of thymidine kinase (TK) mutations in the resistant clones. Interestingly, oral administration of famciclovir, a prodrug form of penciclovir, resulted in resolution of his herpes zoster, although most acyclovir-resistant strains of VZV were reported to be resistant to penciclovir. This implied that a certain amount of susceptible VZV with wild-type viral TK gene was present in vivo, and that famciclovir could be phosphorylated intracellularly by the intact viral kinases. As famciclovir is more potent and longer-acting than acyclovir, the susceptible strains might have suppressed the generation and proliferation of the resistant in vivo. Even when VZV is developing resistance to acyclovir, famciclovir might be effective at least in the early resistant phase.

Viral ribonucleotide reductase attenuates the anti-herpes activity of acyclovir in contrast to amenamevir

Amenamevir is a helicase-primase inhibitor of herpes simplex virus (HSV) and varicella-zoster virus (VZV) and is used for the treatment of herpes zoster in Japan. The half maximal effective concentrations (EC₅₀s) of acyclovir and sorivudine for VZV increased as the time of treatment was delayed from 6 to 18 h after infection, while those of amenamevir and foscarnet were not affected. Susceptibility of infected cells at 0 and 18 h after infection was examined with four anti-herpes drugs, and the fold increases in EC₅₀ for acyclovir, sorivudine, amenamevir, and foscarnet were 13.1, 6.3, 1.3, and 1.0, respectively. The increase in the EC₅₀s for acyclovir in the late phase of infection in VZV and HSV was abolished by hydroxyurea, a ribonucleotide reductase (RR) inhibitor. The common mechanism affecting antiviral activities of acyclovir to HSV and VZV was examined in HSV-infected cells. The amount of HSV DNA in cells treated with amenamevir at 10 x EC₅₀ was similar at 0 and 12 h but less than that in cells treated with acyclovir at 10 x EC₅₀. dGTP, produced through viral RR, peaked at 4 h and decreased thereafter as it was consumed by viral DNA synthesis. Because acyclovir and amenamevir inhibited viral DNA synthesis, thus making dGTP unnecessary, dGTP was significantly more abundant in the presence of acyclovir and amenamevir than in untreated, infected cells. Abundant dGTP supplied by RR may compete with acyclovir triphosphate and attenuate its antiviral activity. In contrast, abundant dGTP did not influence the inhibitory action of amenamevir on viral helicase-primase activity. ATP was significantly decreased at 12 h after infection and significantly more abundant in untreated infected cells compared to cells treated with acyclovir and amenamevir. The anti-herpetic activity of amenamevir was not affected by the replication cycle of VZV and HSV, indicating the suitability of amenamevir for the treatment of herpes zoster and suppressive therapy for genital herpes.

Favipiravir, an anti-influenza drug against life-threatening RNA virus infections

Favipiravir has been developed as an anti-influenza drug and licensed as an anti-influenza drug in Japan. Additionally, favipiravir is being stockpiled for 2 million people as a countermeasure for novel influenza strains. This drug functions as a chain terminator at the site of incorporation of the viral RNA and reduces the viral load. Favipiravir cures all mice in a lethal influenza infection model, while oseltamivir fails to cure the animals. Thus, favipiravir contributes to curing animals with lethal infection. In addition to influenza, favipiravir has a broad spectrum of anti-RNA virus activities in vitro and efficacies in animal models with lethal RNA viruses and has been used for treatment of human infection with life-threatening Ebola virus, Lassa virus, rabies, and severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome. The best feature of favipiravir as an antiviral agent is the apparent lack of generation of favipiravir-resistant viruses. Favipiravir alone maintains its therapeutic efficacy from the first to the last patient in an influenza pandemic or an epidemic lethal RNA virus infection. Favipiravir is expected to be an important therapeutic agent for severe influenza, the next pandemic influenza strain, and other severe RNA virus infections for which standard treatments are not available.

Anti-varicella-zoster virus activity of cephalotaxine esters in vitro

Harringtonine (HT) and homoharringtonine (HHT), alkaloid esters isolated from the genus Cephalotaxus, exhibit antitumor activity. A semisynthetic HHT has been approved for treatment of chronic myelogenous leukemia. In addition to antileukemic activity, HT and HHT are reported to possess potent antiviral activity. In this study, we investigated the effects of HT and HHT on replication of varicella-zoster virus (VZV) in vitro. HT and HHT, but not their biologically inactive parental alkaloid cephalotaxine (CET), significantly inhibited replication of recombinant VZV-pOka luciferase. Furthermore, HT and HHT, but not CET, strongly induced down-regulation of VZV lytic genes and exerted potent antiviral effects against a VZV clinical isolate. The collective data support the utility of HT and HHT as effective antiviral candidates for treatment of VZV-associated diseases.

Antiviral Drugs Against Alphaherpesvirus

The discovery of acyclovir and penciclovir has led to the development of a successful systemic therapy for treating herpes simplex virus infection and varicella-zoster virus infection, and the orally available prodrugs, valacyclovir and famciclovir, have improved antiviral treatment compliance. Acyclovir and penciclovir are phosphorylated by viral thymidine kinase and are incorporated into the DNA chain by viral DNA polymerase, resulting in chain termination. Helicase-primase plays an initial step in DNA synthesis to separate the double strand into two single strands (replication fork) and is a new target of antiviral therapy. The helicase-primase inhibitors (HPIs) pritelivir and amenamevir have novel mechanisms of action, drug resistance properties, pharmacokinetic characteristics, and clinical efficacy for treating genital herpes. The clinical study of amenamevir in herpes zoster has been completed, and amenamevir has been submitted for approval for treating herpes zoster in Japan. The clinical use of HPIs will be the beginning of a new era of anti-herpes therapy.

1,2,3,4,6-Penta-O-galloyl-ß-D-glucose, a bioactive compound in Elaeocarpus sylvestris extract, inhibits varicella-zoster virus replication

The aim of this study was to establish the effect of a 70% ethanol extract of Elaeocarpus sylvestris (ESE) on varicella-zoster virus (VZV) replication and identify the specific bioactive component(s) underlying its activity. ESE induced a significant reduction in replication of the clinical strain of VZV. Activity-guided fractionation indicated that the ethyl acetate (EtOAc) fraction of ESE contains the active compound(s) inhibiting VZV replication. High-Performance Liquid Chromatography coupled to Electrospray Ionization Quadrupole Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry (HPLC-Q-TOF-MS/MS) analysis of the EtOAc fraction of ESE facilitated the identification of 13 chemical components. Among these, 1,2,3,4,6-penta-O-galloyl-ß-D-glucose (PGG) markedly suppressed VZV-induced c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) activation, expression of viral immediate-early 62 (IE62) protein and VZV replication. Our results collectively support the utility of PGG as a potential candidate anti-viral drug to treat VZV-associated diseases.

Acyclovir-resistant herpes simplex virus 1 infection early after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with T-cell depletion

We previously reported that oral low-dose acyclovir (200 mg/day) for the prevention of herpes simplex virus (HSV) infections after allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is effective without the emergence of acyclovir-resistant HSV infections. However, HSV infections are of significant concern because the number of allogeneic HSCT with T-cell depletion, which is a risk factor of the emergence of drug-resistant HSV infections, has been increasing. We experienced a 25-year-old female who received allogenic HSCT from an unrelated donor with 1-antigen mismatch using anti-thymocyte globulin. Despite acyclovir prophylaxis (200 mg/day), she developed the right palatal ulcer that was positive for HSV-1 specific antigen by fluorescent antibody on day 20 and developed new hypoglossal and tongue ulcers on day 33. Replacement of acyclovir with foscarnet improved her ulcers. We isolated 2 acyclovir-resistant and foscarnet-sensitive strains from the right palatal and hypoglossal ulcers, which had the same frame shift mutation in the thymidine kinase genes. The rate of proliferation of the isolate from the hypoglossal ulcer was faster than that from the right palatal ulcer in the plaque reduction assay. HSV strains that acquired acyclovir-resistant mutations at the right palatal ulcer with larger plaque might spread to the hypoglossal ulcer as the secondary site of infection because of better growth property. Second-line antiviral agents should be considered when we suspect treatment failure of HSV infection, especially in HSCT with T-cell depletion. Further studies are required whether low-dose acyclovir prophylaxis leads to the emergence of virological resistance.

Subclinical generation of acyclovir-resistant herpes simplex virus with mutation of homopolymeric guanosine strings during acyclovir therapy

BACKGROUND

Suppressive therapy in patients with genital herpes has been used in Japan since 2006. Susceptibility and resistance of herpes simplex virus (HSV)-2 to acyclovir were examined in genital isolates from patients receiving suppressive therapy and compared with those from those naïve to acyclovir and receiving episodic treatment with acyclovir.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to analyze the effect of acyclovir use on the susceptibility to acyclovir and analysis of the thymidine kinase gene by acyclovir treatment.

METHODS

Genital HSV isolates were obtained from three patients groups. Susceptibility to acyclovir, the frequency of acyclovir-resistant clones and mutations in the thymidine kinase gene of acyclovir-resistant clones were determined.

RESULTS

Susceptibility to ACV was significantly higher in isolates from patients receiving suppressive therapy than those naïve to acyclovir and receiving episodic treatment, but the frequencies of resistant clones were similar among the three groups. Mutation in guanosine homopolymeric strings (G-string mutation) was significantly more frequent in clones during episodic treatment and suppressive therapy than clones from patients naïve to ACV. The frequency of G-string mutation was significantly less frequent in isolates from patients naïve to ACV than those experienced ACV therapy.

CONCLUSION

The frequency of acyclovir-resistant mutants was not increased by episodic and suppressive therapy, but exposure to acyclovir significantly generated G-string mutations, possibly induced by acyclovir. Acyclovir therapy had no substantial effects on the susceptibility of HSV-2 or frequency of resistant virus but did generate subclinical G-string mutants in patients' HSV-2.

Identification of ribonucleotide reductase mutation causing temperature‐sensitivity of herpes simplex virus isolates from whitlow by deep sequencing

Herpes simplex virus 2 caused a genital ulcer, and a secondary herpetic whitlow appeared during acyclovir therapy. The secondary and recurrent whitlow isolates were acyclovir-resistant and temperature-sensitive in contrast to a genital isolate. We identified the ribonucleotide reductase mutation responsible for temperature-sensitivity by deep-sequencing analysis.

Clinical features and risk factors for developing varicella zoster virus dissemination following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

BACKGROUND

We retrospectively analyzed 80 instances of varicella zoster virus (VZV) disease in 72 patients who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and examined the clinical differences between localized and disseminated disease. Risk factors for developing VZV dissemination were also evaluated.

RESULTS

Of the 80 instances, 54 instances were localized diseases and 26 were disseminated diseases. Patient characteristics did not differ significantly between the 2 groups, except for the first-line therapy and the duration from symptom onset to treatment. In the disseminated group, intravenous acyclovir was used as the first-line therapy more frequently, and more time elapsed before beginning antiviral therapy compared with the localized group. In multivariate analyses, the duration from symptom onset to treatment was identified as an independent risk factor that significantly affected the development of VZV dissemination. Gender, total body irradiation, and chronic graft-versus-host disease, of which the latter 2 factors were reported as risk factors for the development of VZV disease after HSCT, did not affect the development of VZV dissemination.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that VZV infection or reactivation may easily progress to viremia with delayed use of antiviral agents and may result in VZV dissemination in immunocompromised patients.

Prevention of shingles by varicella zoster virus vaccination

Herpes zoster is caused by reactivation from previous varicella zoster virus (VZV) infection, and affects millions of people worldwide. It primarily affects older adults and those with immune system dysfunction, most likely as a result of reduced or lost VZV-specific cell-mediated immunity. Complications include post-herpetic neuralgia, a potentially debilitating and chronic pain syndrome. Current treatment of herpes zoster and post-herpetic neuralgia involves antiviral agents and analgesics, and is associated with significant economic cost. Results from several clinical trials have determined that a live, attenuated VZV vaccine using the Oka/Merck strain (Zostavax) is safe, elevates VZV-specific cell-mediated immunity, and significantly reduces the incidence of herpes zoster and post-herpetic neuralgia in people over 60 years of age. Regulatory approval has recently been obtained and once launched, it is expected that this vaccine will significantly reduce the morbidity and financial costs associated with herpes zoster. Durability of vaccine response and possible booster vaccination will still need to be determined.

Recent developments in anti-herpesvirus drugs

Background Herpesviruses notably establish lifelong infections, with latency and reactivation. Many of the known human herpesviruses infect large proportions of the population worldwide. Treatment or prevention of herpes infections and recurrent disease still pose a challenge in the 21st century. Sources of data Original papers and review articles, meeting abstracts, a book (Clinical Virology; DD Richman, RJ Whitley & FG Hayden eds) and company web sites. Areas of agreement For herpes simplex types 1 and 2 and for varicella zoster, acyclovir (ACV; now increasingly replaced by its prodrug valacyclovir, VACV) and famciclovir (FCV) have greatly reduced the burden of disease and have established a remarkable safety record. Drug-resistance, in the otherwise healthy population, has remained below 0.5% after more that 20 years of antiviral use. In immunocompromised patients, drug resistance is more common and alternative drugs with good safety profiles are desirable. For human cytomegalovirus disease, which occurs in immunocompromised patients, ganciclovir and increasingly its prodrug valganciclovir are the drugs of choice. However, alternative drugs, with better safety, are much needed. Areas of controversy Various questions are highlighted. Should the new 1-day therapies for recurrent herpes labialis and genital herpes replace the current standard multi-day therapies? The marked differences between VACV and FCV (e.g. triphosphate stability, effect on latency) may not yet be fully exploited? Do current antivirals reduce post-herpetic neuralgia (PHN)? For immunocompromised patients with varicella zoster virus (VZV) disease, should the first-line treatment be FCV, not ACV or VACV? Should there be more support to explore new avenues for current antivirals, for example in possibly reducing herpes latency or Alzheimer's disease (AD)? Should primary Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) disease in adolescents be treated with antivirals? How can new compounds be progressed when the perceived market need is small but the medical need is great. FCV was reclassified from prescription-only to pharmacist-controlled for herpes labialis in New Zealand in 2010; should this be repeated more widely? This article reviews new drugs in clinical trials and highlights some of the problems hindering their progress.

Advances in the treatment of varicella-zoster virus infections

Varicella-zoster virus (VZV) causes two distinct diseases, varicella (chickenpox) and shingles (herpes zoster). Chickenpox occurs subsequent to primary infection, while herpes zoster (usually associated with aging and immunosuppression) appears as a consequence of reactivation of latent virus. The major complication of shingles is postherpetic neuralgia. Vaccination strategies to prevent varicella or shingles and the current status of antivirals against VZV will be discussed in this chapter. Varivax®, a live-attenuated vaccine, is available for pediatric varicella. Zostavax® is used to boost VZV-specific cell-mediated immunity in adults older than 50 years, which results in a decrease in the burden of herpes zoster and pain related to postherpetic neuralgia. Regardless of the availability of a vaccine, new antiviral agents are necessary for treatment of VZV infections. Current drugs approved for therapy of VZV infections include nucleoside analogues that target the viral DNA polymerase and depend on the viral thymidine kinase for their activation. Novel anti-VZV drugs have recently been evaluated in clinical trials, including the bicyclic nucleoside analogue FV-100, the helicase-primase inhibitor ASP2151, and valomaciclovir (prodrug of the acyclic guanosine derivative H2G). Different candidate VZV drugs have been described in recent years. New anti-VZV drugs should be as safe as and more effective than current gold standards for the treatment of VZV, that is, acyclovir and its prodrug valacyclovir.

Role of famciclovir in the management of acute retinal necrosis in developing countries

PURPOSE

To evaluate clinical presentations, management strategies, and results in patients with acute retinal necrosis (ARN) who received famciclovir.

METHODS

In a retrospective, noncomparative, interventional case series, we reviewed case records of patients with ARN from the computerized database between January 2007 and December 2009. Data collected included demographic details of the patient, relevant history, examination findings, drugs administered, clinical response, and final visual acuity. The main outcome measures were visual acuity and clinical response.

RESULTS

Famciclovir was administered in three cases of ARN. In these three immunocompetent patients, there was complete resolution of ARN with improvement in visual acuity and absence of other eye involvement or recurrence in the primary eye.

CONCLUSION

One may consider treating ARN with oral famciclovir in immunocompetent patients in developing countries when intravenous acyclovir treatment is not affordable to the patient or when there is clinical resistance to acyclovir.

In vitro-selected drug-resistant varicella-zoster virus mutants in the thymidine kinase and DNA polymerase genes yield novel phenotype-genotype associations and highlight differences between antiherpesvirus drugs

Varicella zoster virus (VZV) is usually associated with mild to moderate illness in immunocompetent patients. However, older age and immune deficiency are the most important risk factors linked with virus reactivation and severe complications. Treatment of VZV infections is based on nucleoside analogues, such as acyclovir (ACV) and its valyl prodrug valacyclovir, penciclovir (PCV) as its prodrug famciclovir, and bromovinyldeoxyuridine (BVDU; brivudin) in some areas. The use of the pyrophosphate analogue foscarnet (PFA) is restricted to ACV-resistant (ACV(r)) VZV infections. Since antiviral drug resistance is an emerging problem, we attempt to describe the contributions of specific mutations in the viral thymidine kinase (TK) gene identified following selection with ACV, BVDU and its derivative BVaraU (sorivudine), and the bicyclic pyrimidine nucleoside analogues (BCNAs), a new class of potent and specific anti-VZV agents. The string of 6 Cs at nucleotides 493 to 498 of the VZV TK gene appeared to function as a hot spot for nucleotide insertions or deletions. Novel amino acid substitutions (G24R and T86A) in VZV TK were also linked to drug resistance. Six mutations were identified in the "palm domain" of VZV DNA polymerase in viruses selected for resistance to PFA, PCV, and the 2-phophonylmethoxyethyl (PME) purine derivatives. The investigation of the contributions of specific mutations in VZV TK or DNA polymerase to antiviral drug resistance and their impacts on the structures of the viral proteins indicated specific patterns of cross-resistance and highlighted important differences, not only between distinct classes of antivirals, but also between ACV and PCV.

Emerging drugs for varicella-zoster virus infections

INTRODUCTION

Varicella-zoster virus (VZV) is the etiological agent of two distinct diseases, varicella (chickenpox) and shingles (herpes zoster). Chickenpox occurs following primary infection, while herpes zoster (usually associated with ageing and immunosuppression) is the consequence of reactivation of the latent virus. Post-herpetic neuralgia is the major complication of shingles.

AREAS COVERED

This review will discuss vaccination strategies and the current status of antivirals against VZV. A live attenuated vaccine, Varivax, is available for pediatric varicella while Zostavax was developed to boost VZV-specific cell-mediated immunity in adults older than 60 years and, via this mechanism, to decrease the burden of herpes zoster and pain associated with post-herpetic neuralgia. Despite the availability of a vaccine, there is a need for new antiviral agents. Current drugs approved for the treatment of VZV infections include nucleoside analogs that target the viral DNA polymerase and depend on the viral thymidine kinase. Novel anti-VZV drugs have recently been evaluated in clinical trials, including the bicyclic nucleoside analog FV-100, the helicase-primase inhibitor ASP2151 and valomaciclovir (prodrug of the acyclic guanosine derivative H2G).

EXPERT OPINION

New anti-VZV drugs should be as safe as and more effective than acyclovir and its prodrug valacyclovir (current gold standard for the treatment of VZV).

Case report: persistent cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection after haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation using in vivo alemtuzumab: emergence of resistant CMV due to mutations in the UL97 and UL54 genes

Addition of in vivo alemtuzumab to the conditioning regimen enabled 2- or 3-locus-mismatched hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with an acceptable incidence of graft-versus-host-disease. However, the procedure was associated with a high incidence of cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation. Although preemptive therapy with ganciclovir prevented successfully severe CMV diseases and CMV-related mortality, a patient developed persistent positive CMV antigenemia for more than 1 year after transplantation and CMV disease, despite the use of ganciclovir and foscarnet. The in vitro susceptibility assay showed that the clinical isolate was resistant to foscarnet, moderately resistant to ganciclovir, but sensitive to cidofovir. Therefore, cidofovir was administered. CMV antigenemia became negative within 2 weeks and never developed again. Nucleotide sequence of the UL54 and UL97 of the clinical isolate showed 4 amino acid substitutions (V11L, Q578H, S655L, and G874R) in UL54 and 2 mutations (A140V and A594V) in UL97 compared with the Towne and AD169 strains. Ganciclovir resistance was suspected to be caused by both A594V of UL97 and Q578H of UL54, whereas foscarnet resistance was due mainly to Q578H of UL54. In conclusion, the in vitro susceptibility assay as well as nucleotide sequence of clinical isolate is important to choose appropriate antiviral agents for patients who have persistent CMV reactivation after stem cell transplantation.

Genital herpes due to acyclovir-sensitive herpes simplex virus caused secondary and recurrent herpetic whitlows due to thymidine kinase-deficient/temperature-sensitive virus

Herpes simplex virus (HSV)-2 caused a genital ulcer in a 40-year-old allogenic stem cell recipient, and a secondary herpetic whitlow appeared during 2 months of acyclovir (ACV) therapy. Both genital ulcer, and whitlow were cured 3 months later, but 6 months after recovery the whitlow alone recurred. DNA of the genital, first, and recurrent whitlow isolates showed similar endonuclease digestion fragment profiles. The genital virus was ACV-sensitive, and the two whitlow isolates were ACV-resistant/thymidine kinase (TK)-deficient. The TK gene of the whitlow isolates had the same frame shift from the 274th amino acid and termination at the 347th amino acid due to the deletion of a cytosine at the 819th nucleotide. Because the temperature of the thumb is 33/34 degrees C or lower, the temperature sensitivity of the isolates were compared, and both whitlow isolates were significantly more temperature-sensitive (ts) at 39 degrees C than the genital isolate. The two whitlow isolates showed cutaneous pathogenicity in mouse ear pinna but not midflank, while the genital isolate was pathogenic at both sites, suggesting that temperature adaptation was an important element of pathogenicity in the whitlow. The virus populations of isolates of the genital, and first whitlow were examined by 31, and 82 clones, respectively, and the clones from genital, and whitlow isolates were ACV-sensitive, and -resistant, respectively, showing their homogeneity. The acyclovir-sensitive genital lesion had spread as a TK-deficient/ts herpetic whitlow during ACV treatment, and an apparently TK-deficient virus adapted to the local temperature might have caused the whitlow recurrence.

In vitro selection of drug-resistant varicella-zoster virus (VZV) mutants (OKA strain): differences between acyclovir and penciclovir?

Varicella-zoster virus (VZV) mutants were isolated under the pressure of different classes of antiviral compounds: (i) drugs that depend on the viral thymidine kinase (TK) for their activation, i.e. acyclovir (ACV), brivudin (BVDU), penciclovir (PCV) and sorivudine (BVaraU); (ii) drugs that are independent of the viral TK for their activation, i.e. 2-phosphonylmethoxyethyl (PME) derivatives of adenine (PMEA, adefovir) and 2,6-diaminopurine (PMEDAP); and (iii) drugs that do not require any metabolism to inhibit the viral DNA polymerase, i.e. foscarnet (PFA). Drug-resistant virus strains were obtained by serial passage of the OKA strain in human embryonic lung (HEL) fibroblasts and the different drug-resistant mutants were subsequently evaluated for their in vitro susceptibility to a broad range of antiviral drugs. Virus strains emerging under the pressure of ACV, BVDU and BVaraU were cross-resistant to all drugs that depend on the viral TK for activation, but remained susceptible to the acyclic nucleoside phosphonates (i.e. PMEA, PMEDAP and the 3-hydroxy-2-phosphonylmethoxypropyl derivatives of adenine (HPMPA) and cytosine (HPMPC, cidofovir)) and PFA. In contrast, the virus strains selected under pressure of PCV were resistant to PCV, ACV, PMEA and PFA; but not BVDU, BVaraU, GCV, HPMPC or HPMPA. Similar patterns of drug susceptibility were noted for the virus strains selected under the pressure of PMEA or PFA, pointing to an alteration in the viral DNA polymerase as basis for the resistant phenotype selected by PCV, as well as PMEA and PFA. In contrast, the resistant phenotype selected by ACV as well as BVDU and BVaraU may be attributed primarily to mutations in the viral TK gene. Our data thus indicate that ACV and PCV select in vitro for different drug-resistant VZV phenotypes; whether this is also the situation in vivo remains to be investigated.

Identification of small molecule compounds that selectively inhibit varicella-zoster virus replication

A series of nonnucleoside, N-alpha-methylbenzyl-N'-arylthiourea analogs were identified which demonstrated selective activity against varicella-zoster virus (VZV) but were inactive against other human herpesviruses, including herpes simplex virus. Representative compounds had potent activity against VZV early-passage clinical isolates and an acyclovir-resistant isolate. Resistant viruses generated against one inhibitor were also resistant to other compounds in the series, suggesting that this group of related small molecules was acting on the same virus-specific target. Sequencing of the VZV ORF54 gene from two independently derived resistant viruses revealed mutations in ORF54 compared to the parental VZV strain Ellen sequence. Recombinant VZV in which the wild-type ORF54 sequence was replaced with the ORF54 gene from either of the resistant viruses became resistant to the series of inhibitor compounds. Treatment of VZV-infected cells with the inhibitor impaired morphogenesis of capsids. Inhibitor-treated cells lacked DNA-containing dense-core capsids in the nucleus, and only incomplete virions were present on the cell surface. These data suggest that the VZV-specific thiourea inhibitor series block virus replication by interfering with the function of the ORF54 protein and/or other proteins that interact with the ORF54 protein.

Suppression of generation and replication of acyclovir-resistant herpes simplex virus by a sensitive virus

The role of acyclovir-sensitive herpes simplex virus (HSV) was analyzed in the process of its replacement by a resistant virus in vitro and in vivo in the aspect of acyclovir therapy. The mode of replacement of acyclovir-sensitive HSV with acyclovir-resistant HSV was examined by the passages of acyclovir-sensitive wild type HSV in Vero cells under acyclovir-treatment. The development of resistance was monitored more adequately by counting the number of acyclovir-resistant viruses in 10,000 plaque forming units than by the conventional susceptibility assay. The resistance increased with the proportion of thymidine kinase-deficient (TK(-)) viruses, when the susceptibilities of acyclovir-treated HSV population to 5'-iodo-2'deoxyuridine and phosphonoacetic acid were examined. The increased resistance was due to the increased proportion of acyclovir-resistant virus but not intermediately resistant virus. Infection with mixtures of TK(-) and acyclovir-sensitive strains rendered TK(-) sensitive to acyclovir, and virus yields were reduced to the levels of acyclovir-sensitive virus in Vero cells. Their yield reduction depended on the proportion of acyclovir-sensitive viruses and induction of TK activity. This reduction in virus yields of the mixture of TK(-) and acyclovir-sensitive strains was confirmed by acyclovir treatment in the skin of mice with cutaneous infection. Acyclovir treatment combined with superinfection of acyclovir-sensitive virus delayed the development of herpetic skin lesions due to acyclovir-resistant virus and reduced virus yields in the infected skin. Acyclovir-sensitive virus plays an important role in suppressing the generation and replication of acyclovir-resistant virus during acyclovir therapy.

Characterization of the DNA polymerase gene of varicella-zoster viruses resistant to acyclovir

The nucleotide changes of the DNA polymerase gene and the susceptibility of acyclovir (ACV)-resistant varicella-zoster virus (VZV) mutants to anti-herpetic drugs were determined and compared to those of herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) mutants. The seven ACV-resistant VZV mutants were classified into three groups, N(779)S, G(805)C and V(855)M, according to the sequences of their DNA polymerase genes. The amino acid substitutions N(779)S and G(805)C were identical in position to the N(815)S and G(814)C mutations in the HSV-1 DNA polymerase mutants, respectively, and the V(855)M amino acid substitution was similar to the HSV-1 V(892)M mutation. All three groups of VZV mutants were susceptible to ACV, phosphonoacetic acid, vidarabine and aphidicolin, at levels similar to those seen with the respective HSV-1 mutants, except for subtle differences that were due possibly to the non-conserved regions in their sequences. Although both the HSV-1 and the VZV DNA polymerase genes show 53% sequence similarity, both viruses essentially show a similar biochemical behaviour.

Construction of Oka varicella vaccine expressing human immunodeficiency virus env antigen

Oka varicella vaccine has been used to confer active immunity to varicella-zoster virus (VZV) in healthy and immunocompromised hosts. Based on its attenuated nature, Oka varicella vaccine expressing human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) env antigen was constructed by inserting the HIVenv gene into the viral genome and its immunogenicity was assessed in guinea pigs. The HIVenv gene encoding 296-463 amino acids was inserted between the sequences of the hepatitis B surface antigen and the thymidine kinase gene of the cloned plasmid and the recombinant virus was isolated by cotransfection of the chimeric plasmid with viral DNA. Insertion of the HIVenv gene into the viral genome was confirmed by PCR and sequencing of the viral genome of the recombinant virus. The recombinant virus expressed 30k HIVenv fusion protein in its infected cells. In guinea pigs, immunization with the recombinant virus induced an antibody response to both the HIV antigen and the V3 peptide of gp120 as well as VZV gE:gI. Cell-mediated immunity to the HIV antigen and gE:gI was assessed by the cutaneous reaction representing delayed type hypersensitivity. Immunized guinea pigs responded well to both the HIV antigen and gE:gI. Thus the recombinant Oka varicella vaccine expressing the HIVenv antigen induced both a humoral and cell-mediated immunity to the HIV antigen similar to VZV as Oka varicella vaccine induces humoral and cell-mediated immunity to VZV in the vaccinees. This recombinant Oka varicella vaccine expressing the HIVenv antigen may be evaluated for its immunogenicity as one of the AIDS vaccine candidates.

Characterization of herpes simplex viruses selected in culture for resistance to penciclovir or acyclovir

Penciclovir (PCV), an antiherpesvirus agent in the same class as acyclovir (ACV), is phosphorylated in herpes simplex virus (HSV)-infected cells by the viral thymidine kinase (TK). Resistance to ACV has been mapped to mutations within either the TK or the DNA polymerase gene. An identical activation pathway, the similarity in mode of action, and the invariant cross-resistance of TK-negative mutants argue that the mechanisms of resistance to PCV and ACV are likely to be analogous. A total of 48 HSV type 1 (HSV-1) and HSV-2 isolates were selected after passage in the presence of increasing concentrations of PCV or ACV in MRC-5 cells. Phenotypic analysis suggested these isolates were deficient in TK activity. Moreover, sequencing of the TK genes from ACV-selected mutants identified two homopolymeric G-C nucleotide stretches as putative hot spots, thereby confirming previous reports examining Acv(r) clinical isolates. Surprisingly, mutations identified in PCV-selected mutants were generally not in these regions but distributed throughout the TK gene and at similar frequencies of occurrence within A-T or G-C nucleotides, regardless of virus type. Furthermore, HSV-1 isolates selected in the presence of ACV commonly included frameshift mutations, while PCV-selected HSV-1 mutants contained mostly nonconservative amino acid changes. Data from this panel of laboratory isolates show that Pcv(r) mutants share cross-resistance and only limited sequence similarity with HSV mutants identified following ACV selection. Subtle differences between PCV and ACV in the interaction with viral TK or polymerase may account for the different spectra of genotypes observed for the two sets of mutants.

Novel agents for the therapy of varicella-zoster virus infections

Varicella-zoster virus (VZV), a member of the herpesvirus family, is responsible for both primary (varicella or chickenpox) as well as recurrent (zoster or shingles) infections. Acyclovir has been the mainstay for treating VZV infections in both immunocompetent and immunocompromised patients. Recently, newer anti-VZV drugs, i.e., valaciclovir (the oral prodrug form of acyclovir) and famciclovir (the oral prodrug form of penciclovir) have been developed and have enlarged the therapeutic options to treat VZV infections. Both acyclovir and penciclovir are dependent on the virus-encoded thymidine kinase (TK) for their intracellular activation. Although emergence of drug-resistant strains does not occur in immunocompetent patients, several reports have documented the isolation of drug-resistant VZV strains following long-term acyclovir therapy in immunocompromised patients. Mutations at the level of the TK are responsible for development of resistance to drugs that depend on the viral TK for their phosphorylation (i.e., acyclovir and penciclovir). Foscarnet, a direct inhibitor of the viral DNA polymerase, which does not require activation by the viral TK, is the drug of choice for the treatment of TK-deficient VZV mutants emerging under acyclovir therapy. Recently, emergence of foscarnet-resistant strains has also been reported. Both TK-deficient strains and foscarnet-resistant mutants are sensitive to the acyclic nucleoside phosphonate cidofovir, CDV, HPMPC, (S)-1-(3-hydroxy-2-phosphonylmethoxypropyl)cytosine. This agent does not depend on the virus-encoded TK, but on cellular enzymes for its conversion to the diphosphoryl derivative, which then inhibits the viral DNA polymerase.

Valaciclovir: a review of its use in the management of herpes zoster

Varicella zoster virus (VZV), the pathogen responsible for herpes zoster, belongs to the herpesvirus family and is sensitive to the antiviral drug aciclovir. However, the low oral bioavailability of aciclovir has to some extent limited its efficacy in the treatment of herpes zoster and has prompted the development of the more readily absorbed oral prodrug valaciclovir. In a large comparative study valaciclovir, (1000 mg 3 times daily for 7 days) was at least as effective as aciclovir (800 mg 5 times daily for 7 days) in controlling the symptoms of acute herpes zoster. Importantly, valaciclovir alleviated zoster-associated pain and postherpetic neuralgia significantly faster than aciclovir. A 14-day regimen of valaciclovir showed no significant advantage over the 7-day regimen. A smaller trial in Japanese patients focusing primarily on the cutaneous (rash) signs of herpes zoster confirmed the similar efficacy of valaciclovir and aciclovir in the 7-day regimen. This study did not follow all patients for a formal analysis of postherpetic neuralgia. Valaciclovir and aciclovir demonstrated similar efficacy for the control of cutaneous lesions and ocular complications in patients with zoster ophthalmicus. Preliminary results of a large controlled trial indicate that valaciclovir 1000 mg 3 times daily and famciclovir (the prodrug of penciclovir) 500 mg 3 times daily are of similar efficacy in speeding resolution of acute herpes zoster rash and shortening the duration of postherpetic neuralgia. Starting treatment later than 72 hours after rash onset did not significantly reduce the beneficial effect of valaciclovir on duration of zoster-associated pain (a continuum of pain that encompasses both acute pain and postherpetic neuralgia) in a large observational study, suggesting that valaciclovir might be effective when given later than previously thought. However, valaciclovir should ideally be given as soon as possible after symptoms appear. With the recommended regimen for the treatment of herpes zoster (1000 mg 3 times daily for 7 days) valaciclovir was well tolerated, with nausea and headache being the most commonly reported adverse events. The adverse events profile of the agent was similar to that seen with aciclovir or famciclovir.

CONCLUSION

The efficacy of valaciclovir for the treatment of herpes zoster has been confirmed and extended by follow-up studies in herpes zoster ophthalmicus, in Japanese patients, and in the wider primary care setting. Valaciclovir is at least equivalent to, and better in certain parameters than, aciclovir and appears to have similar efficacy to famciclovir 500 mg 3 times daily. Valaciclovir is a well tolerated first-line therapy with an established place in the treatment of immunocompetent patients with herpes zoster.