Losartan and perindopril effects on plasma plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 and fibrinogen in hypertensive type 2 diabetic patients

The effect of bedtime versus morning dosing of antihypertensive drugs on the cardiovascular outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Antihypertensive drugs are one of the most effective strategies to prevent disability and mortality; however, there have been contradictory findings about the best dosing time for antihypertensive drugs. Therefore, we aim to evaluate the effect of bedtime versus morning dosing of antihypertensive drugs on cardiovascular outcomes.

METHODS

We synthesized randomized controlled studies (RCTs) from the Web of Science, SCOPUS, EMBASE, PubMed, and CENTRAL until 13 October 2022. The risk ratio (RR) for dichotomous outcomes with the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) was used. The study protocol was registered in PROSPERO with ID: CRD42022368612.

RESULTS

Five RCTs with 59 200 participants were included. Bedtime dosing was significantly associated with less incidence of myocardial infarction (MI) [RR: 0.80 with 95% CI (0.70-0.91), P = 0.0007] compared with morning dosing; however, there was no statistically significant difference between bedtime and morning dosing, regarding all-cause mortality [RR: 0.77 with 95% CI (0.51-1.16), P = 0.21], cardiovascular mortality [RR: 0.65 with 95% CI (0.35-1.21), P = 0.17], major adverse cardiac events (MACE) [RR: 0.79 with 95% CI (0.56-1.10), P = 0.16], heart failure [RR: 0.68 with 95% CI (0.42-1.09), P = 0.11], cerebrovascular accidents [RR: 0.80 with 95% CI (0.53-1.22), P = 0.30], coronary revascularization [RR: 0.79 with 95% CI (0.50-1.24), P = 0.30}, and angina [RR: 0.91 with 95% CI (0.55-1.50), P = 0.70].

CONCLUSION

Evidence about the comparative efficacy of bedtime versus morning dosing of antihypertensives is still uncertain. However, bedtime dosing significantly reduced MI, which warrants more robust RCTs to validate.

Management of Diabetes and Hypertension within the Gulf Region: Updates on Treatment Practices and Therapies

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a leading cause of death globally, driven by the high rates of risk factors, such as diabetes and hypertension. As the prevalence of these risk factors is particularly high in the Gulf region, better diagnosis and management of type 2 diabetes (T2D) and hypertension has the potential to dramatically reduce adverse cardiovascular outcomes for individuals in that part of the world. This article provides a summary of presentations made during the EVIDENT summit, a virtual symposium on Evidence in Diabetes and Hypertension, held in September 2021, including a review of the various guidelines for both T2D and hypertension, as well as recent findings relevant to the safety and efficacy for therapies relating to these conditions. Of relevance to the Gulf region, the risk of hypoglycaemia with sulfonylureas during Ramadan was reviewed. For the management of T2D, sulfonylureas have been a long-standing medication used to achieve glycaemic control; however, differences have emerged between early and later generations, with recent studies suggesting improvements in the safety profiles of late-generation sulfonylureas. For patients with hypertension, incremental therapy changes are recommended to reduce the risk of cardiovascular complications that are associated with increasing blood pressure. For first-line therapy, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi), such as perindopril, have been demonstrated to reduce the risk of cardiovascular and all-cause mortality. The addition of calcium channel blockers and diuretics to ACEi has been shown to be effective in patients with poorly controlled hypertension. The different renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors are reviewed, and the benefit of combination therapies, including amlodipine and indapamide in patients with difficult-to-control hypertension, is investigated. The benefits of lifestyle modifications for these patients are also discussed, with important clinical considerations that are expected to inform patient management in daily clinical practice.

Improvements of symptoms of Alzheimer`s disease by inhibition of the angiotensin system

With ageing of the global society, the frequency of ageing-related neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer`s disease (AD) is on the rise worldwide. Currently, there is no cure for AD, and the four drugs approved for AD only have very small effects on AD symptoms. Consequently, there are enormous efforts worldwide to identify new targets for treatment of AD. Approaches that interfere with classical neuropathologic features of AD, such as extracellular senile plaques formed of aggregated amyloid-beta (Abeta), and intracellular neurofibrillary tangles of hyperphosphorylated tau have not been successful so far. In search for a treatment approach of AD, we found that inhibition of the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) by a centrally acting ACE inhibitor retards symptoms of neurodegeneration, Abeta plaque formation and tau hyperphosphorylation in experimental models of AD. Our approach is currently being investigated in a clinical setting. Initial evidence with AD patients shows that a brain-penetrating ACE inhibitor counteracts the process of neurodegeneration and dementia. Moreover, centrally acting ACE inhibitors given in addition to the standard therapy, cholinesterase inhibition, can improve cognitive function of AD patients for several months. This is one of the most promising results for AD treatment since more than a decade.

Potential Protective Role of Blood Pressure-Lowering Drugs on the Balance between Hemostasis and Fibrinolysis in Hypertensive Patients at Rest and During Exercise

In patients with hypertension, the triad represented by endothelial dysfunction, platelet hyperactivity, and altered fibrinolytic function disturbs the equilibrium between hemostasis and fibrinolysis and translates into a hypercoagulable state, which underlies the risk of thrombotic complications. This article reviews the scientific evidence regarding some biological effects of antihypertensive drugs, which can protect patients from the adverse consequences of hypertensive disease, improving endothelial function, enhancing antioxidant activity, and restoring equilibrium between hemostatic and fibrinolytic factors. These protective effects appear not to be mediated through blood pressure reduction and are not shared by all molecules of the same pharmacological class.

A systematic review and network meta-analysis of the comparative efficacy of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers in hypertension

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers are drugs commonly used for the treatment of hypertension. However, studies on their comparative efficacy have not been extensively investigated. The current systematic review and network meta-analysis studied the comparative efficacy of the two antihypertensive treatment categories in reducing blood pressure, mortality, and morbidity in essential hypertension patients. A literature search was carried out in Medline and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for placebo- and active-controlled, double-blind randomized clinical trials, which had reported blood pressure effects, mortality, and/or morbidity. Blood pressure results were found in 30 studies with 7370 participants and 8 studies with 25,158 participants with mortality/morbidity results included in the analysis. The two drug classes had similar effectiveness in lowering systolic (weighted mean difference (WMD): 0.59, 95% CI: -0.21 to 1.38) and diastolic blood pressure (WMD: 0.62, 95% CI: -0.06 to 1.30), all-cause mortality (risk ratio (RR)): 0.96, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.14), cardiovascular mortality (RR: 0.87, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.14), fatal and non-fatal myocardial infarction (RR: 1.02, 95% CI 0.75 to 1.37) and stroke (RR: 1.13, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.46). Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors were more helpful in the prevention and/or the hospitalization for heart failure than angiotensin receptor blockers (RR: 0.71, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.93). Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers were similarly effective in decreasing blood pressure, mortality, and morbidity in essential hypertension. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors were more protective in the advancement and/or hospitalization of the hypertensive patient for heart failure than angiotensin receptor blockers.

Effects of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors and Angiotensin Receptor Blockers on Prothrombotic Processes and Myocardial Infarction Risk

Acute ischemic events occur most frequently at dawn and in the early hours of the morning. The development of these severe clinical events exhibits a temporal relationship with changes in various hemodynamic, prothrombotic, and hormonal processes. The authors highlight not only these relationships but also the potential protective effect of increased bradykinin levels and the inhibition of different angiotensin II (AT-II) receptors (AT2, AT4) against unfavorable prothrombotic influences, which—based on studies to date—decreases the risk of acute cardiovascular events. Comparisons are presented between the different effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers on factors that influence thrombus formation and myocardial infarction risk.

Unraveling the Pivotal Role of Bradykinin in ACE Inhibitor Activity

Historically, the first described effect of an angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor was an increased activity of bradykinin, one of the substrates of ACE. However, in the subsequent years, molecular models describing the mechanism of action of ACE inhibitors in decreasing blood pressure and cardiovascular risk have focused mostly on the renin-angiotensin system. Nonetheless, over the last 20 years, the importance of bradykinin in regulating vasodilation, natriuresis, oxidative stress, fibrinolysis, inflammation, and apoptosis has become clearer. The affinity of ACE appears to be higher for bradykinin than for angiotensin I, thereby suggesting that ACE inhibitors may be more effective inhibitors of bradykinin degradation than of angiotensin II production. Data describing the effect of ACE inhibition on bradykinin signaling support the hypothesis that the most cardioprotective benefits attributed to ACE inhibition may be due to increased bradykinin signaling rather than to decreased angiotensin II signaling, especially when high dosages of ACE inhibitors are considered. In particular, modulation of bradykinin in the endothelium appears to be a major target of ACE inhibition. These new mechanistic concepts may lead to further development of strategies enhancing the bradykinin signaling.

Review: Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and coronary heart disease prevention

A number of large randomised controlled trials have shown that angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, compared with placebo or other blood pressure-lowering drugs, improve coronary heart disease outcomes (fatal and non-fatal myocardial infarction, and coronary revascularisation) in diverse patient groups, e.g. in primary and secondary prevention, those with and without left ventricular dysfunction, and among hypertensive and non-hypertensive subjects. An updated meta-regression analysis which included five major trials in patients with established coronary artery disease (CAD) (EUROPA, INVEST, ACTION, PEACE and CAMELOT) concluded that ACE inhibitor (ACE-I) therapy has clear benefits in secondary prevention, but there are important and unexplained differences between trials in clinical outcome, baseline cardiovascular risk, blood pressure changes and trial design which deserve further discussion of the underlying mechanisms and clinical interpretation. For example, in placebo-controlled trials the biggest (20—22%) reductions in primary end points (including mortality) have been observed with perindopril and ramipril, whereas trials using trandolapril and quinapril had no effect on survival or recurrent CAD events. This review summarises and compares the major findings of these recent trials, and provides further analysis of the underlying mechanisms and clinical significance of secondary CAD prevention with ACE-I therapy.

Therapeutic angiogenesis improves fibrinolytic imbalance in patients with critical limb ischemia

The mechanisms of fibrinolysis have been suggested to be linked to the pathogenesis of peripheral artery disease. The impact of therapeutic angiogenesis on the parameters of fibrinolysis was studied in critical limb ischemia (CLI). CLI patients (N = 29) and blood donors as controls (N = 29) were enrolled. Bone marrow (600 ± 50 ml) was centrifuged (3200g, 20 min, 22°C), bone marrow-derived mononuclear cells (100-120 ml) were separated by Optipress I and implanted into the ischemic limb using intramuscular injections. ELISA was employed for the assessment of plasma tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) levels. Patients were followed-up prior to the procedure and after 1, 3 and 6 months. All stage-IV patients (N = 22) had ischemic lesions. The lesions resolved in 10 patients. Five patients underwent major amputation; they all were stage-IV. Ischemic lesions persisted in seven patients beyond 6 months. The t-PA levels were higher in patients compared with the healthy controls both at baseline (P < 0.01) and after 6 months (P < 0.05). No significant changes were observed in the t-PA levels during the follow-up. PAI-1 was higher in patients than in the healthy individuals at baseline (P < 0.001) and at month 1 (P < 0.05). However, no difference in PAI-1 levels between the patients and the healthy individuals was found after 3 and 6 months. The PAI-1 levels were significantly downregulated during the follow-up compared with the baseline (P < 0.0001). Therapeutic angiogenesis for the CLI downregulates PAI-1 levels, thus having a systemic effect on fibrinolysis.

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition in cardiovascular disease: evidence with perindopril

Perindopril is a long-acting, once-daily lipophilic angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor with high tissue angiotensin-converting enzyme affinity, lowering angiotensin II and potentiating bradykinin. Its efficacy, safety and tolerability are well established in the treatment of hypertension and heart failure. Moreover, large morbidity-mortality trials, such as the EUropean trial on Reduction Of cardiac events with Perindopril in stable coronary Artery disease (EUROPA) and Perindopril pROtection aGainst REcurrent Stroke Study (PROGRESS), have shown that antihypertensive treatment with perindopril reduces and prevents cardiovascular disease in a large range of patients with vascular diseases, whether hypertensive or not. Thus, the outcome of these and other trials support the concept of cardiovascular protective properties of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition with perindopril in addition to the obvious blood-pressure-lowering effect. Considering its properties and the gathered clinical evidence on efficacy and tolerability, perindopril fulfils the criteria of the latest guidelines for hypertension and cardiovascular disease management and should therefore be considered as a first-line antihypertensive agent, forming a consistent part of the comprehensive strategy against hypertension and related cardiovascular complications.

Angiotensin and Alzheimer´s disease: therapeutic prospects

This review describes the features of Alzheimer's disease and discusses the evidence that antihypertensive therapies may be beneficial in its treatment and prevention. Drugs acting via the renin-angiotensin system are considered and it is suggested that these drugs may produce their effects via mechanisms other than by their antihypertensive actions. Using evidence from animal studies, the role of angiotensin as a neurotransmitter and its involvement in the control of normal cognitive function is described. Studies of angiotensin and human cognition are reviewed along with studies investigating the possible link between disorders of the system, either inherited or acquired, and the symptoms of Alzheimer's disease. The therapeutic potential of screening for markers of renin-angiotensin abnormality for the prediction of Alzheimer's disease is considered, as is the potential use of agents known to influence the renin-angiotensin system in the treatment or prevention of the disease.

Updated report on comparative effectiveness of ACE inhibitors, ARBs, and direct renin inhibitors for patients with essential hypertension: much more data, little new information

OBJECTIVES

A 2007 systematic review compared angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) in patients with hypertension. Direct renin inhibitors (DRIs) have since been introduced, and significant new research has been published. We sought to update and expand the 2007 review.

DATA SOURCES

We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE (through December 2010) and selected other sources for relevant English-language trials.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA, PARTICIPANTS, AND INTERVENTIONS

We included studies that directly compared ACE inhibitors, ARBs, and/or DRIs in at least 20 total adults with essential hypertension; had at least 12 weeks of follow-up; and reported at least one outcome of interest. Ninety-seven (97) studies (36 new since 2007) directly comparing ACE inhibitors versus ARBs and three studies directly comparing DRIs to ACE inhibitor inhibitors or ARBs were included.

STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS

A standard protocol was used to extract data on study design, interventions, population characteristics, and outcomes; evaluate study quality; and summarize the evidence.

RESULTS

In spite of substantial new evidence, none of the conclusions from the 2007 review changed. The level of evidence remains high for equivalence between ACE inhibitors and ARBs for blood pressure lowering and use as single antihypertensive agents, as well as for superiority of ARBs for short-term adverse events (primarily cough). However, the new evidence was insufficient on long-term cardiovascular outcomes, quality of life, progression of renal disease, medication adherence or persistence, rates of angioedema, and differences in key patient subgroups.

LIMITATIONS

Included studies were limited by follow-up duration, protocol heterogeneity, and infrequent reporting on patient subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS OF KEY FINDINGS

Evidence does not support a meaningful difference between ACE inhibitors and ARBs for any outcome except medication side effects. Few, if any, of the questions that were not answered in the 2007 report have been addressed by the 36 new studies. Future research in this area should consider areas of uncertainty and be prioritized accordingly.

Role of angiotensin II in plasma PAI-1 changes induced by imidapril or candesartan in hypertensive patients with metabolic syndrome

To evaluate the relationship between plasma plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) and angiotensin II (Ang II) changes during treatment with imidapril and candesartan in hypertensive patients with metabolic syndrome. A total of 84 hypertensive patients with metabolic syndrome were randomized to imidapril 10 mg or candesartan 16 mg for 16 weeks. At weeks 4 and 8, there was a dose titration to imidapril 20 mg and candesartan 32 mg in nonresponders (systolic blood pressure (SBP) >140 and/or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) >90 mm Hg). We evaluated, at baseline and after 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16 weeks, clinic blood pressure, Ang II and PAI-1 antigen. Both imidapril and candesartan induced a similar SBP/DBP reduction (-19.4/16.8 and -19.5/16.3 mm Hg, respectively, P<0.001 vs. baseline). Both drugs decreased PAI-1 antigen after 4 weeks of treatment, but only the PAI-1 lowering effect of imidapril was sustained throughout the 16 weeks (-9.3 ng ml(-1), P<0.01 vs. baseline), whereas candesartan increased PAI-1 (+6.5 ng ml(-1), P<0.05 vs. baseline and P<0.01 vs. imidapril). Imidapril significantly decreased Ang II levels (-14.6 pg ml(-1) at week 16, P<0.05 vs. baseline), whereas candesartan increased them (+24.2 pg ml(-1), P<0.01 vs. baseline and vs. imidapril). In both groups there was a positive correlation between Ang II and PAI-1 changes (r=0.61, P<0.001 at week 16 for imidapril, and r=0.37, P<0.005 at week 16 for candesartan). Imidapril reduced plasma PAI-1 and Ang II levels, whereas candesartan increased them. This suggests that the different effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and Ang II blockers on Ang II production has a role in their different influence on fibrinolysis.

Coagulation and fibrinolysis in diabetes

Atherothrombotic complications are the main cause of mortality in subjects with diabetes. Premature atherosclerosis, increased platelet reactivity and activation of coagulation factors with associated hypofibrinolysis all contribute to increased cardiovascular risk in this population. Blood clot formation represents the last step in the atherothrombotic process, and the structure of the fibrin network has a role in determining predisposition to cardiovascular disease. In this review, we discuss alterations in coagulation factor plasma levels and/or activity in diabetes and clarify their role in predisposition to cardiovascular events. The effect of diabetes on fibrin network structure/fibrinolysis is reviewed and potential mechanisms that modify clot properties are discussed. Finally, modulation of clotting potential by the various therapeutic agents used in diabetes is examined. Understanding the mechanisms by which diabetes influences the coagulation pathway will help to develop more effective treatment strategies to reduce thrombotic events in subjects with this condition.

The ADVANCE trial: clarifying the role of perindopril/indapamide fixed-dose combination in the reduction of cardiovascular and renal events in patients with diabetes mellitus

Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus exhibit a marked increase in cardiovascular and renal risk. A number of interventional trials have shown that these patients benefit greatly from aggressive BP lowering, especially when the drug regimen comprises an inhibitor of the renin-angiotensin system. The results of the placebo-controlled ADVANCE (Action in Diabetes and Vascular disease: PreterAx and DiamicroN MR Controlled Evaluation) trial, conducted in patients with type 2 diabetes, are exemplary in this respect. The systematic use of a fixed-dose combination containing the ACE inhibitor perindopril and the diuretic indapamide afforded substantial protection against cardiovascular mortality and myocardial infarction, while providing important renoprotection, reducing the development of micro- and macroalbuminuria, and allowing regression of nephropathy. The beneficial effects were obtained regardless of baseline BP and whether or not the patients were receiving antihypertensive therapy.

Effect on the atherogenic marker plasminogen activator inhibitor type-1 of addition of the ACE inhibitor imidapril to angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonist therapy in hypertensive patients with abnormal glucose metabolism: a prospective cohort study in primary care

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors, such as angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonists (angiotensin receptor blockers [ARBs]), are recommended by the American Diabetes Association for blood pressure control and prevention or management of cardiovascular disease in patients with diabetes mellitus. However, some investigators have suggested that ARBs may increase the risk of myocardial infarction in hypertensive patients. Activation of the RAS is associated with an increased risk of ischaemic events. Angiotensin II stimulates the production of plasminogen activator inhibitor type-1 (PAI-1), a powerful predictor of cardiovascular disease. ACE inhibitors are reported to reduce PAI-1 levels and activity, while ARBs do not reduce or may even elevate levels of this atherogenic marker. The objective of this study was to determine whether the ACE inhibitor imidapril reduces PAI-1 levels in hypertensive patients already being treated with an ARB.

METHODS

This was a prospective cohort study carried out in primary care with a follow-up period of 6 months. Estimating the alpha error (p-value) at 0.05, the power of the test as 80%, and the difference in PAI-1 levels as 10 + or - 15 ng/mL, the required sample size was calculated to be 40. Participants were hypertensive patients taking ARBs for more than 8 weeks, and having dyslipidaemia, obesity or abnormal glucose metabolism. Imidapril 5-10 mg/day was prescribed for 6 months to reduce blood pressure to <130/80 mmHg. The main outcome measure, PAI-1 level, was measured before and 6 months after the addition of imidapril to ARBs in 21 subjects (13 men, eight women), all with abnormal glucose metabolism, nine with dyslipidaemia, and six who were obese. Bodyweight, body mass index, blood pressure, homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance, glycosylated haemoglobin, creatinine, potassium, high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), and high molecular weight adiponectin levels were measured as secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

PAI-1 level was not significantly changed overall. Hs-CRP level was also not significantly changed; however, the high molecular weight adiponectin level was significantly increased (p = 0.044), especially in men (p = 0.026). There were no significant changes in the other outcomes measured.

CONCLUSION

The current study showed that imidapril added to ARBs did not decrease PAI-1 levels in hypertensive patients with abnormal glucose metabolism; however, this combination therapy significantly increased high molecular weight adiponectin levels in men.

Optimizing the treatment of hypertension and stable coronary artery disease: clinical evidence for fixed-combination perindopril/amlodipine

BACKGROUND

Optimized management of hypertension and coronary artery disease (CAD) improves cardiovascular risk and outcomes, and prevents complications. This article reviews evidence for the fixed combination of the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor perindopril and the calcium channel blocker amlodipine.

METHODS

A literature search was performed in PubMed/MEDLINE to identify articles published in English between 1988 and March 2008 describing clinical trials, particularly outcome trials, or mechanisms of therapeutic action relevant to the use of combination therapy in patients with hypertension or stable coronary artery disease with an ACE inhibitor (perindopril) and a calcium channel blocker (amlodipine).

FINDINGS

Clinical trials indicate that this combination may have a positive impact on cardiovascular mortality and morbidity in hypertensive individuals. The two complementary mechanisms of action appear to work in synergy, leading to more efficient blood pressure lowering, improved fibrinolytic function, and reduction of secondary effects. This also represents a simplified management strategy for stable CAD. Perindopril has proven efficacy in the prevention of cardiovascular events and mortality in CAD patients, while amlodipine is widely used in the symptomatic management of CAD. Both aspects of guideline-recommended management of CAD are therefore addressed in a single tablet.

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical evidence for fixed-combination perindopril/amlodipine indicates it as a credible option for the optimization of the management of hypertension and CAD.

Cardiovascular disease and heritability of the prothrombotic state

Atherothrombotic disease remains a major cause of mortality worldwide, and family clustering suggests an important contribution of genetic factors to disease pathogenesis. Thrombus formation represents the final step in atherothrombosis, a process influenced by genetic and environmental factors. A major difficulty of investigating the genetic regulation of thrombotic conditions is the complexity of the phenotype and the relatively modest effects of individual genetic variations. We address in this review genetic aspects involved in regulating thrombosis potential and their impact on the development of atherothrombotic disease. The effects of common genetic polymorphisms in clotting factors are discussed and examples of complex gene-gene and gene-environment interactions are highlighted. Understanding the effects of genetic factors on predisposition to thrombotic disease and unravelling the complex gene-environment interactions will help to better understand the pathophysiology of this complex condition, which will enable the development of new preventative and treatment strategies.

Perindopril: beyond lowering blood pressure

Perindopril, a prodrug ester of perindoprilat, is an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor that lowers angiotensin II and potentiates bradykinin. This agent has proven efficacy in a wide range of cardiovascular diseases. Its efficacy, safety and tolerability are well established in the treatment of hypertension. Beyond pharmacodynamic effects shown in lowering blood pressure, perindopril was also involved in the improvement of endothelial function and the normalization of vascular and cardiac structure and function. Large morbidity-mortality trials, such as the European Trial on Reduction of Cardiac Events with Perindopril in Patients with Stable Coronary Artery Disease (EUROPA), Perindopril Protection Against Recurrent Stroke Study (PROGRESS) and Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial-Blood Pressure Lowering Arm (ASCOT-BPLA), have shown that treatment with perindopril reduces and prevents cardiovascular disease in a large range of patients with vascular diseases (including stable coronary disease), whether or not they are hypertensive.

Effects of perindopril in hypertensive patients with or without type 2 diabetes mellitus, and with altered insulin sensitivity

Impaired insulin sensitivity and hypertension are risk factors for atherosclerosis, which in turn leads to a variety of cardiovascular diseases. In both conditions, the risks of morbidity and mortality appear to be further increased. Impaired insulin sensitivity is also a precursor for diabetes. The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) is implicated in the development of both hypertension and insulin resistance. Antihypertensive agents that act by blocking the RAAS, such as angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, may improve insulin sensitivity and therefore prevent the deleterious consequences of insulin resistance, including type 2 diabetes. ACE inhibitors appear to improve insulin sensitivity in patients with hypertension and insulin resistance, including diabetes. This review assesses the literature surrounding the use of the ACE inhibitor perindopril in patients with hypertension and varying degrees of insulin resistance, including the effects of perindopril in preventing the development of diabetes and subsequent cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.

Chronic pretreatment of ACEI reduces no-reflow in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with primary angioplasty

BACKGROUND

In animal models, pretreatment with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) can reduce no-reflow. In the present study, we investigated whether pretreatment with ACEI may prevent no-reflow in patients who underwent primary coronary intervention for AMI.

METHOD AND RESULTS

A total of 259 consecutive patients who underwent primary angioplasty for a first AMI were studied. No-reflow was defined as a TIMI flow grade < 3. The no-reflow phenomenon was found in 33 of 259 patients. There were no significant differences in clinical characteristics between the patients with and without ACEI pretreatment. However, the 47 patients receiving chronic ACEI treatment before admission had lower incidence of the no-reflow than those without it (4.2 and 14.6%, p<0.05). Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that absence of ACEI pretreatment was a significant predictor of the no-reflow along with absence of preinfarction angina, complete occlusion of the culprit lesion, high-burden thrombus, ejection fraction on admission, number of Q-waves, absence of statin pretreatment, and anterior AMI.

CONCLUSION

Pretreatment with ACEI could preserve the microvascular integrity after acute myocardial infarction in humans.

Systemic inhibition of the angiotensin-converting enzyme limits lipopolysaccharide-induced lung neutrophil recruitment through both bradykinin and angiotensin II-regulated pathways

Recruitment of neutrophils to the lung is a sentinel event in acute lung inflammation. Identifying mechanisms that regulate neutrophil recruitment to the lung may result in strategies to limit lung damage and improve clinical outcomes. Recently, the renin angiotensin system (RAS) has been shown to regulate neutrophil influx in acute inflammatory models of cardiac, neurologic, and gastrointestinal disease. As a role for the RAS in LPS-induced acute lung inflammation has not been described, we undertook this study to examine the possibility that the RAS regulates neutrophil recruitment to the lung after LPS exposure. Pretreatment of mice with the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor enalapril, but not the anti-hypertensive hydralazine, decreased pulmonary neutrophil recruitment after exposure to LPS. We hypothesize that inhibition of LPS-induced neutrophil accumulation to the lung with enalapril occurred through both an increase in bradykinin, and a decrease in angiotensin II (ATII), mediated signaling. Bradykinin receptor blockade reversed the inhibitory effect of enalapril on neutrophil recruitment. Similarly, pretreatment with bradykinin receptor agonists inhibited IL-8-induced neutrophil chemotaxis and LPS-induced neutrophil recruitment to the lung. Inhibition of ATII-mediated signaling, with the ATII receptor 1a inhibitor losartan, decreased LPS-induced pulmonary neutrophil recruitment, and this was suggested to occur through decreased PAI-1 levels. LPS-induced PAI-1 levels were diminished in animals pretreated with losartan and in those deficient for the ATII receptor 1a. Taken together, these results suggest that ACE regulates LPS-induced pulmonary neutrophil recruitment via modulation of both bradykinin- and ATII-mediated pathways, each regulating neutrophil recruitment by separate, but distinct, mechanisms.

Coagulation and atherothrombotic disease

Atherothrombotic disease arises secondary to a complex gene-environment interaction. In the initial stages, the condition is clinically silent but with more advanced disease, an occlusive thrombus is formed resulting in the classical clinical manifestations. Both environmental factors and genetic variations in elements of the clotting cascade influence thrombosis risk by inducing quantitative and qualitative changes in the mature protein, which may affect the final structure of the clot and determine its resistance to lysis. Understanding the fine details of gene-environment interactions in relation to thrombus formation will help to shed more light on disease pathogenesis. Consequently, this will allow the development of more efficacious treatment strategies and will also help to identify subjects at risk, thereby enabling the introduction of early preventative measures.

Vascular and metabolic effects of candesartan: insights from therapeutic interventions

BACKGROUND

Effects of angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockers (ARBs) to improve endothelial dysfunction may be due to mechanisms in addition to the reduction of high blood pressure per se. Endothelial dysfunction is characterized by vascular inflammation that contributes to clinically significant atherosclerosis and by an increased tendency for thrombus formation. Hypertensive patients have impaired endothelial functions that have positive predictive power with respect to future cardiovascular events.

OBJECTIVES

The present review will focus on multiple mechanisms underlying vascular and metabolic effects of ARBs that may synergize to prevent or regress atherosclerosis, onset of diabetes, and coronary heart disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Angiotensin II accelerates the development of atherosclerosis by activating angiotensin II type 1 receptors that then promote superoxide anion generation and oxidative stress, leading to activation of nuclear transcription factor and endothelial dysfunction. Activation of angiotensin II type 1 receptors also stimulates increased expression of plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1 and tissue factor. Endothelial dysfunction associated with the metabolic syndrome and other insulin-resistant states is characterized by impaired insulin-stimulated production of nitric oxide from the endothelium and decreased blood flow to skeletal muscle. Increasing insulin sensitivity therefore improves endothelial function, and this may be an additional mechanism whereby ARBs decrease the incidence of coronary heart disease and the onset of diabetes. Adiponectin serves to link obesity with insulin resistance. In addition, adiponectin has anti-atherogenic properties.

New risk factors for atherosclerosis in hypertension: focus on the prothrombotic state and lipoprotein(a)

Although adequate control of blood pressure is of basic importance in cardiovascular prevention in hypertensive patients, correction of additional risk factors is an integral part of their management. In addition to classical risk factors, epidemiological research has identified a number of other conditions that might significantly contribute to cardiovascular risk in the general population and might achieve specific relevance in patients with high blood pressure. In fact, more than 20% of patients with premature cardiovascular events do not have any of the traditional risk factors and, although effective intervention on blood pressure and additional risk factors has significantly reduced cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, the contribution to stroke, coronary artery disease and renal failure is still unacceptably high. Evaluation of new risk factors may further expand our capacity to predict atherothrombotic events when these factors are included along with the traditional ones in the assessment of global cardiovascular risk in hypertensive patients. Because it could be anticipated that the role of these novel factors will become increasingly evident in the future, researchers with an interest in hypertension and physicians dealing with problems related to cardiovascular prevention should give them appropriate consideration. This review summarizes the basic biology and clinical evidence of two emerging risk factors that are reciprocally related and contribute to the development and progression of organ damage in hypertension: the prothrombotic state and lipoprotein(a).

Effect of antihypertensive treatment on plasma fibrinogen and serum HDL levels in patients with essential hypertension

The influence of hypertension, and its treatment, on circulating lipid and fibrinogen (Fib) concentrations in patients with essential hypertension was investigated. The lipid profile and Fib levels were measured in 353 patients (131 men) with essential hypertension. Their median age was 60 years (range: 18-85 years). All patients had normal results from liver, renal, and thyroid function tests. There were 162 patients (45.9%) who were not receiving antihypertensive treatment. Of the remaining patients, 117 were taking 'lipid-hostile' beta-blockers, thiazide diuretics) antihypertensives and 74 were taking 'lipid-neutral' (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, calcium channel blockers, angiotensin-II receptor blockers) agents. Patients who were taking 'lipid-hostile' antihypertensive drugs had significantly higher plasma Fib concentrations when compared with those taking 'lipid-neutral' antihypertensives or those not receiving antihypertensive treatment. These differences were not attributable to established factors that influence plasma Fib levels, since when smokers and patients with diabetes mellitus and/or vascular disease were excluded, the difference remained significant. In addition, in these more homogeneous groups, patients receiving 'lipid-neutral' treatment had significantly higher serum high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels when compared with both those taking 'lipid-hostile' antihypertensives and untreated ones. There were no significant differences in the other lipid variables, independently of the presence/absence or the type of antihypertensives. These results suggest that antihypertensive drugs have additional effects, beyond lowering blood pressure, on other vascular risk factors, like Fib and HDL. These effects may depend on the type of drug used.

The effect of perindopril on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in patients with diabetes in the EUROPA study: results from the PERSUADE substudy

AIMS

The aim of this study was to assess the effect of the angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor perindopril on cardiovascular events in diabetic patients with coronary artery disease.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 1502 diabetic patients with known coronary artery disease and without heart failure of 12 218 overall in the EUropean trial on Reduction Of cardiac events with Perindopril in stable coronary Artery (EUROPA) disease were randomized in a double-blinded manner to perindopril 8 mg once daily or placebo. Follow-up was for a median of 4.3 years. The primary end point was cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and resuscitated cardiac arrest. Perindopril treatment was associated with a non-significant reduction in the primary endpoint in the diabetic population, 12.6 vs. 15.5%, relative risk reduction 19% [(95% CI, -7 to 38%), P=0.13]. This was of similar relative magnitude to the 20% risk reduction observed in the main EUROPA population.

CONCLUSION

Perindopril tends to reduce major cardiovascular events in diabetic patients with coronary disease in addition to other preventive treatments and the trend towards reduction was of a similar relative magnitude to that observed the general population with coronary artery disease.

Is the effect of antihypertensive drugs on platelet aggregability and fibrinolysis clinically relevant?

Hypertension is associated with decreased fibrinolytic potential, mainly expressed as elevated plasma plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1 (PAI-1) levels, and increased platelet aggregability, which may account in part for the increased risk of atherosclerosis and its clinical complications in hypertensive patients. The effects of antihypertensive drugs on this prothrombotic state have been investigated and controversial findings have been reported, possibly because of differences in study designs, patients selected, and methodology used. Scarce and conflicting data exist about the effects of diuretics and beta-adrenoceptor antagonists on the fibrinolytic system, whereas ACE inhibitors have generally been reported to improve the fibrinolytic balance by decreasing plasma PAI-1 levels, calcium channel antagonists have been shown to increase tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) activity, and angiotensin II type 1 (AT(1)) receptor antagonists seem to exert neutral effects. beta-Adrenoceptor antagonists, calcium channel antagonists, and AT(1)-receptor antagonists have been reported to exert anti-aggregatory effects on platelets, while contrasting data exist about the influence of ACE inhibitors. Clinical implications of the changes induced by antihypertensive drugs on the fibrinolytic balance and platelet function are still debated. In particular, the question of whether these changes may translate into different degrees of cardiovascular protection in hypertensive patients remains unanswered. While awaiting more information from clinical trials, the choice of antihypertensive drugs, particularly in high-risk patients, should take into account effects beyond their BP-lowering efficacy. Selected agents should have a favorable, or at least neutral, impact on fibrinolytic function and platelet activity.

Effects of losartan and simvastatin on monocyte-derived microparticles in hypertensive patients with and without type 2 diabetes mellitus

Monocyte-derived microparticles play an important role in the pathogenesis of diabetic vasculopathy, and angiotensin II receptor blocker and statin have been shown to have a beneficial effect on the angiopathies of hypertension and hyperglycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. However, the interaction between angiotensin II receptor blocker and statin, and monocyte-derived microparticles in atherosclerosis is poorly understood. The effects of losartan and simvastatin on circulating concentrations of monocyte-derived microparticles, chemokines, and soluble adhesion markers were studied in hypertensive patients with or without type 2 diabetes mellitus. Monocyte-derived microparticles were measured by flow cytometry, and levels of serum chemokines (MCP-1 and RANTES) and soluble adhesion markers (sP-selectin and sVCAM-1) were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Losartan decreased both the systolic and diastolic blood pressure in hypertensive patients with and without type 2 diabetes mellitus. The concentrations of monocyte-derived microparticles, chemokines, and soluble adhesion molecules were higher in hypertensive patients who also had type 2 diabetes mellitus vs. those who did not. The administration of angiotensin II receptor blocker decreased the circulating concentration of all these markers. In addition, all markers were decreased by combination therapy, and monocyte-derived microparticles were decreased more with combination therapy with losartan and simvastatin than monotherapy with losartan. The administration of angiotensin II receptor blocker inhibited monocyte-derived microparticle generation and suggests that angiotensin II is intimately related to vascular changes that occur in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Combination therapy with a statin and angiotensin II receptor blocker might be valuable as anti-atherosclerotic therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and nephropathy.

Provision of cardiovascular protection by ACE inhibitors: a review of recent trials

This paper reports the rationale for the cardiovascular protective effects of ACE inhibitors (ACEI) and reviews the overall results of recent randomized clinical trials. ACEI improve the vasoconstrictive/vasodilatory balance by blocking the formation of angiotensin II and preventing the degradation of bradykinin. In vitro, animal and human experimental studies have shown that ACEI have several properties: They promote vasodilation, limit neurohormonal activation and vasoconstriction during ischemia, improve endothelial function by reducing oxidative stress, slow down the development of atherosclerosis; improve fibrinolytic balance, inhibit platelet activation and reverse negative vascular remodelling. Previous trials have shown that ACEI reduced cardiovascular events in patients with heart failure or ventricular dysfunction. These findings have recently been extended to trials using lipophilic ACEI with high affinity for tissue ACE i.e. those most likely to have high antiatherosclerotic efficacy. In PROGRESS (n = 6105), a perindopril-based regimen reduced recurrent stroke by 28% and substantially reduced cardiac outcomes among individuals with cerebrovascular disease. In HOPE (n = 9297), ramipril reduced the composite outcome (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction and cerebrovascular accident) by 22% in patients with high cardiovascular risk. EUROPA (n = 12 218) showed that perindopril reduced cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction and cardiac arrest by 20% in coronary artery disease patients whatever their level of risk. The central role of long-acting lipophilic ACEI for cardiovascular protection has been clearly established and they should now be considered as a routine treatment for secondary prevention as aspirin, beta blockers and statins.

Prevention of obesity and insulin resistance in mice lacking plasminogen activator inhibitor 1

Increased plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 (PAI-1) has been linked to not only thrombosis and fibrosis but also to obesity and insulin resistance. Increased PAI-1 levels have been presumed to be consequent to obesity. We investigated the interrelationships of PAI-1, obesity, and insulin resistance in a high-fat/high-carbohydrate (HF) diet-induced obesity model in wild-type (WT) and PAI-1-deficient mice (PAI-1(-/-)). Obesity and insulin resistance developing in WT mice on an HF diet were completely prevented in mice lacking PAI-1. PAI-1(-/-) mice on an HF diet had increased resting metabolic rates and total energy expenditure compared with WT mice, along with a marked increase in uncoupling protein 3 mRNA expression in skeletal muscle, likely mechanisms contributing to the prevention of obesity. In addition, insulin sensitivity was enhanced significantly in PAI-1(-/-) mice on an HF diet, as shown by euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp studies. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)-gamma and adiponectin mRNA, key control molecules in lipid metabolism and insulin sensitivity, were maintained in response to an HF diet in white adipose tissue in PAI-1(-/-) mice, contrasting with downregulation in WT mice. This maintenance of PPAR-gamma and adiponectin may also contribute to the observed maintenance of body weight and insulin sensitivity in PAI-1(-/-) mice. Treatment in WT mice on an HF diet with the angiotensin type 1 receptor antagonist to downregulate PAI-1 indeed inhibited PAI-1 increases and ameliorated diet-induced obesity, hyperglycemia, and hyperinsulinemia. PAI-1 deficiency also enhanced basal and insulin-stimulated glucose uptake in adipose cells in vitro. Our data suggest that PAI-1 may not merely increase in response to obesity and insulin resistance, but may have a direct causal role in obesity and insulin resistance. Inhibition of PAI-1 might provide a novel anti-obesity and anti-insulin resistance treatment.

MEK1,2 response element mediates angiotensin II-stimulated plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 promoter activation

The MEK1,2 (MAPK/ERK kinase 1 and 2) pathway mediates the up-regulation of plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) expression in vascular smooth muscle cells by a variety of hormones, including angiotensin II. Transfection of constitutively active MEKK-1, an upstream activator of the mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase pathways, was used to isolate an enhancer element located between -89 and -50 bp in PAI-1 promoter that was activated by MEKK-1 and selectively blocked by the MEK1,2 inhibitor PD98059. Mutational analysis revealed that the MEKK-1 response element (MRE) contained 2 cis-acting Sp1- and AP-1-like sequences, located between -75 to -70 and -63 to -52 bp, respectively. Overexpression of Sp1 enhanced MEKK-1-induced MRE promoter activity and a dominant-negative c-Fos blocked this Sp1 response. The combination of Sp1 and c-Jun or c-Fos was required to activate this MRE. Angiotensin II (Ang II) stimulation increased c-Fos, c-Jun, and Sp1 binding to the MRE by 100-, 4.9-, and 1.9-fold, respectively, and these responses were inhibited by PD98059 and AT1 receptor antagonist candesartan. Intravenous Ang II infusion in rats increased aortic c-Fos binding to the MRE. This MRE sequence mediated a 4-fold increase of MEK1,2-dependent PAI-1/luciferase mRNA expression by angiotensin II stimulation. This report identifies the MEK1,2 response element that mediates angiotensin II-stimulated PAI-1 promoter activation and shows that activation of this element requires Sp1 and AP-1 co-activation.

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition alters the fibrinolytic response to cardiopulmonary bypass

BACKGROUND

Increased plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) concentrations after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) are associated with increased risk of vein graft occlusion. Because angiotensin II stimulates PAI-1 expression, we tested the hypothesis that preoperative angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition decreases PAI-1 expression after CABG.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We measured the effects of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) on PAI-1 antigen and tissue-type plasminogen activator (tPA) antigen and activity in 31 patients taking an ACE inhibitor (ACEI) who were randomized to continue ACEI until the morning of surgery (ACEI group, n=19) or to discontinue it 48 hours before surgery (No-ACEI group, n=12). Arterial blood samples were taken at baseline before CPB, twice during CPB, after separation from CPB, and on postoperative day 1 (POD1). CPB caused an early decrease in PAI-1 antigen, followed by an increase in PAI-1 antigen on POD1 (P<0.001 for effect of time). ACE inhibition attenuated the increase in PAI-1 antigen such that both PAI-1 antigen on POD1 (P=0.013) and the change in PAI-1 antigen from baseline to POD1 (P=0.009) were higher in the No-ACEI group (from 17.0+/-5.0 to 48.7+/-8.8 ng/mL) versus the ACEI group (from 19.9+/-3.4 to 33.1+/-6.2 ng/mL). There was no significant difference between the 2 groups in intraoperative tPA activity (P=0.259); however, the increase in tPA activity was significantly greater in the ACEI group than in the No-ACEI group (P=0.030).

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative ACEI attenuates the increase in PAI-1 after CABG, suggesting a role for ACE inhibition in reducing the risk of acute graft thrombosis.

Pleiotropic effects of angiotensin II receptor blocker in hypertensive patients

OBJECTIVES

We investigated the vascular effects of candesartan in hypertensive patients.

BACKGROUND

The renin-angiotensin system may contribute to atherogenesis through the promotion of endothelial dysfunction. The plausible mechanisms are that angiotensin II promotes superoxide anion generation, endothelial dysfunction, inflammation, and impaired fibrinolysis. The effects of candesartan on these conditions have not been clearly observed.

METHODS

We administered placebo or candesartan 16 mg daily during two months to 45 patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension. This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study in design.

RESULTS

Candesartan did not significantly change lipoprotein levels. However, compared with placebo, candesartan significantly reduced plasma levels of malondialdehyde from 1.50 +/- 0.07 to 1.29 +/- 0.09 microM (p = 0.009); improved the percent flow-mediated dilator response to hyperemia from 5.17 +/- 0.24 to 6.22 +/- 0.26% (p < 0.001); and, furthermore, reduced plasma levels of monocyte chemoattractant protein (MCP-1) from 213 +/- 8 to 190 +/- 7 pg/ml (p = 0.003), tumor necrosis factor-alpha from 2.93 to 2.22 pg/ml (p = 0.026), and plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1 from 74 +/- 4 to 53 +/- 4 ng/ml (p < 0.001) but not C-reactive protein (CRP), matrix metalloproteinase protein, and fibrinogen. There were no significant correlations between these changes and reduction of systolic blood pressure (BP) (-0.247 < or = r < or = 0.195) and between these changes and reduction of diastolic BP (-0.262 < or = r < or = 0.197). There were no significant correlations between markers of inflammation and flow-mediated dilation percent or reduction of oxidant stress (-0.119 < or = r < or = 0.127). Furthermore, we observed no significant correlations between CRP and MCP-1 levels (r = -0.162).

CONCLUSIONS

Inhibition of the angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptor in hypertensive patients reverses endothelial dysfunction, measured as an improvement in flow-mediated dilation and fibrinolysis and reduction of oxidant stress and inflammatory cytokines, suggesting that AT1 receptor blocker therapy has antiatherogenic effects.

A randomized, double-blind, controlled, parallel-group comparison of perindopril and candesartan in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

BACKGROUND

When choosing an antihypertensive drug for patients with hypertension and diabetes mellitus (DM), the metabolic side effects, possibility of improving some metabolic parameters, and need for adequate blood pressure control must all be considered.

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this study was to compare the impacts of perindopril and candesartan on blood pressure, glucose metabolism, serum lipid profile, and metabolic parameters in patients with mild hypertension and type 2 DM during therapy and after a 1-month washout period.

METHODS

Type 2 DM patients with mild hypertension and good glucose control who were not taking hypercholesterolemic drugs were enrolled. Perindopril 4 mg QD or candesartan 16 mg QD was administered for 12 months in this randomized, double-blind, controlled, parallel-group clinical trial. Fasting plasma glucose (FPG), fasting plasma insulin (FPI), glycosylated hemoglobin, homeostasis model assessment (HOMA) index, systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides, lipoprotein(a) (Lp[a]), plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 (PAI-1), homocysteine, body mass index (BMI), and albumin excretion rate (AER) were assessed.

RESULTS

Ninety-six patients (49 women and 47 men; mean [SD] ages, 53 [10] years [perindopril] and 55 [9] years [candesartan]) were enrolled. Mean (SD) body weight, height, and BMI were 78.2 (9.4) kg, 1.69 (0.05) m, and 27.2 (2.0) kg/m(2) in the perindopril group and 77.5 (8.6) kg, 1.70 (0.06) m, and 26.8 (2.5) kg/m(2) in the candesartan group. A significant change occurred from baseline to month 12 during treatment with perindopril in SBP and DBP (both P < 0.01), FPG (P < 0.05), FPI (P < 0.05), TC (P < 0.05), LDL-C (P < 0.05), Lp(a) (P < 0.05), PAM (P < 0.05), and AER (P < 0.05). Significant changes from baseline to month 12 occurred with candesartan in SBP and DBP (both P < 0.01) and AER (P < 0.05). The HOMA index was significantly lower at month 12 in the perindopril group than in the candesartan group (P < 0.05). When we interrupted perindopril and candesartan therapy for a 1-month washout period, changes in SBP and DBP values were significant compared with month 12 in both groups (all P < 0.05). Changes in TC and LDL-C from month 12 to the end of washout were significant only in the perindopril group (both P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Perindopril and candesartan both effectively lowered blood pressure in this group of patients with mild hypertension and type 2 DM. Perindopril showed an improvement on some metabolic parameters compared with candesartan. However, the inclusion/exclusion criteria could limit the ability to extrapolate the results to a general population.

Minireview: adiposity, inflammation, and atherogenesis

Adipose tissue is a dynamic endocrine organ that secretes a number of factors that are increasingly recognized to contribute to systemic and vascular inflammation. Several of these factors, collectively referred to as adipokines, have now been shown regulate, directly or indirectly, a number of the processes that contribute to the development of atherosclerosis, including hypertension, endothelial dysfunction, insulin resistance, and vascular remodeling. Several adipokines are preferentially expressed in visceral adipose tissue, and the secretion of proinflammatory adipokines is elevated with increasing adiposity. Not surprisingly, approaches that reduce adipose tissue depots, including surgical fat removal, exercise, and reduced caloric intake, improve proinflammatory adipokine levels and reduce the severity of their resultant pathologies. Systemic adipokine levels can also be favorably altered by treatment with several of the existing drug classes used to treat insulin resistance, hypertension, and hypercholesterolemia. Greater understanding of adipokine regulation, however, should result in the design of improved treatment strategies to control disease states associated with increase adiposity, an important outcome in view of the growing worldwide epidemic of obesity.

Combining renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blockade with diuretic therapy for treatment of hypertension

The rationale for using angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-I) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) in combination with thiazide diuretic therapy has centred formerly around antihypertensive synergy and counter-balancing adverse metabolic effects, particularly on potassium homeostasis. However, two recent landmark clinical trials that included high-risk hypertensive patients have now provided an evidence base for this form of combination therapy by demonstrating the efficacy of perindopril/indapamide and losartan/ hydrochlorothiazide in reducing vascular morbidity and mortality, a proportion of the benefit being unaccounted for by blood pressure reduction alone. Several unresolved issues remain concerning class effects versus specific drug effects, optimal dosing, potential differences in efficacy between ACE-I and ARBs, whether elderly mild hypertensives benefit from this form of combination therapy, and the possibility that the optimal regimen may be a triple combination of ACE-I, ARB and thiazide diuretic. These issues will be resolved by ongoing and future major endpoint trials in hypertension.