Alcohol consumption and risk of breast cancer: a multicentre Italian case-control study

Bewertung des Rotweinkonsums im Rahmen der mediterranen Ernährung – Eine systematische Literaturanalyse

Hintergrund Die mediterrane Ernährung (MedE) zeigte in mehreren Studien einen präventiven Effekt hinsichtlich Typ 2 Diabetes, kardiovaskulären Erkrankungen und Tumorerkrankungen. Zur MedE wird in der Regel ein mäßiger Konsum von Wein, speziell Rotwein, empfohlen, dem selbst ein kardioprotektiver Effekt zugesprochen wird. Jedoch zeigen zahlreiche Studien, dass schon kleine Mengen Alkohol das Krebsrisiko erhöhen können. In der vorliegenden Arbeit soll eine Übersicht zur aktuellen Datenlage zum Zusammenhang zwischen dem Alkoholkonsum im Rahmen einer MedE, dem Krebsrisiko sowie dem Risiko für kardiovaskuläre Erkrankungen erstellt werden.

Methoden Im Rahmen einer systematischen Literaturrecherche in den Datenbanken PubMed und Scopus wurde nach den Schlagwörtern „diet, mediterranean“ und „alcohol drinking“ gesucht. Voraussetzung war, dass Angaben zur Art und Menge des konsumierten Alkohols im Rahmen der MedE vorlagen.

Ergebnisse Die Umsetzung der MedE kann sowohl das Risiko kardiometabolischer Erkrankungen als auch das Krebsrisiko u. a. für Brustkrebs senken. Moderater Alkoholkonsum zeigt protektive Effekte auf das Herz-Kreislauf-System, ist jedoch mit einem erhöhten Risiko für diverse Krebserkrankungen assoziiert. Mehrere Studien beschreiben eine Assoziation zwischen Alkoholkonsum und Brustkrebsinzidenz, wobei die Ergebnisse zwischen den Studien nicht einheitlich waren. Dabei kommt dem täglichen Glas Rotwein mit ca. 10–15 g Ethanol als vorherrschendem alkoholischen Getränk der Mittelmeerregion eine risikosenkende Wirkung zu.

Schlussfolgerung Moderater Konsum von Rotwein hat nach der vorliegenden systematischen Literaturanalyse, anders als andere alkoholische Getränke, einen protektiven Effekt auf kardiometabolische Erkrankungen und möglicherweise auch auf genetisch bedingten Brustkrebs, während der Konsum von anderen Alkoholgetränken die schützende Wirkung einer MedE möglicherweise reduziert.

Dose-Dependent Associations between Wine Drinking and Breast Cancer Risk - Meta-Analysis Findings

PURPOSE

To investigate any potential association between wine and breast cancer risk.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We quantitatively assessed associations by conducting a meta-analysis based on evidence from observational studies. In May 2014, we performed electronic searches in PubMed, EmBase and the Cochrane Library to identify studies examining the effect of wine drinking on breast cancer incidence. The relative risk (RR) or odds ratio (OR) were used to measure any such association.

RESULTS

The analysis was further stratified by confounding factors that could influence the results. A total of twenty-six studies (eight case-control and eighteen cohort studies) involving 21,149 cases were included in our meta-analysis. Our study demonstrated that wine drinking was associated with breast cancer risk. A 36% increase in breast cancer risk was observed across overall studies based on the highest versus lowest model, with a combined RR of 1.0059 (95%CI 0.97-1.05) in dose-response analysis. However, 5 g/d ethanol from wine seemed to have protective value from our non-linear model.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings indicate that wine drinking is associated with breast cancer risk in a dose-dependent manner. High consumption of wine contributes to breast cancer risk with protection exerted by low doses. Further investigations are needed for clarification.

Recommendations on Alcohol Consumption: An International Comparison

Public health policy on alcohol is changing in many countries. This article reviews public health messages with regard to alcohol in Australia, Canada, the United Kingdom (UK) and the United States (US) and highlights the common as well as the different messages delineated. The messages from these four countries are then compared with those of certain other developed and developing countries. Some of the significant differences include definitions of moderate alcohol consumption, the consumption of alcohol by women, underage consumption, and advice to abstainers, which may reflect differences in the characteristics of consumers among countries. Central to the current debate is the concern that incomplete, inconsistent or misleading messages on alcohol consumption could lead to an increase in alcohol abuse, misuse and hence harm, or, conversely, to abstention by particular population groups.

Methodological biases in estimating the relationship between alcohol consumption and breast cancer: the role of drinker misclassification errors in meta-analytic results

BACKGROUND

While alcohol consumption has been linked to breast cancer in women, few studies have controlled for possible biases created by including former or occasional drinkers in the abstainer reference group. We explored the potential for such misclassification errors as sources of bias in estimates of the alcohol-breast cancer relationship.

METHODS

Meta-analyses of population case-control, hospital case-control, and cohort studies to examine relationships between level of alcohol use and breast cancer morbidity and/or mortality in groups of studies with and without different misclassification errors.

RESULTS

Of 60 studies identified, only 6 were free of all misclassification errors. The abstainer reference group was biased by the inclusion of former drinkers in 49 studies, occasional drinkers (<10 g ethanol [EtOH] per week) in 22 and by both these groups in 18. Occasional drinkers were also mixed with light or hazardous-level drinkers in 22 studies. Unbiased estimates of the odds ratio (OR) for breast cancer were 1.011 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.891 to 1.148) among former drinkers (n = 11) and 1.034 (95% CI: 1.003 to 1.064) among occasional drinkers (n = 17). Hazardous-level drinking (>20 g < 41 g EtOH/d) was not significantly associated with breast cancer in studies with occasional drinker bias. However, in studies free from occasional drinker bias, the OR for breast cancer was 1.085 (95% CI: 1.015 to 1.160) for low-level (<21 g/d) drinkers (n = 17), 1.374 (95% CI: 1.319 to 1.431) for hazardous-level drinkers (n = 26), and 1.336 (95% CI: 1.228 to 1.454) for harmful-level (>40 g/d) drinkers (n = 9).

CONCLUSIONS

While the great majority of studies of the alcohol-breast cancer link include misclassification errors, only misclassification of occasional drinkers was found to bias risk estimates significantly. Estimates based on error-free studies confirmed that low, hazardous and harmful levels of alcohol use each significantly increase the risk of breast cancer.

Traditional dietary pattern of South America is linked to breast cancer: an ongoing case-control study in Argentina

INTRODUCTION

Several studies have shown the effect of dietary patterns on breast cancer risk, but none has been conducted in Argentina. The aim of this study was to extract dietary patterns from Food Frequency Questioner, to estimate their effect on breast cancer occurrence while taking into account aggregation factors (family history of breast cancer) and to explore the sensitivity of the estimates to changes in the assumptions.

METHODS

A principal component exploratory factor analysis was applied to identify dietary patterns, which were then included as covariates in a multilevel logistic regression. Family history of BC was considered as a clustering variable. A multiple probabilistic sensitivity analysis was also performed.

RESULTS

The study included 100 cases and 294 controls. Four dietary patterns were identified. Traditional (fat meats, bakery products, and vegetable oil and mayonnaise) (OR III tertile vs I 3.13, 95% CI 2.58-3.78), Rural (processed meat) (OR III tertile vs I 2.02, 95% CI 1.21-3.37) and Starchy (refined grains) (OR III tertile vs I 1.82, 95 % CI 1.18-2.79) dietary patterns were positively associated with BC risk, whereas the Prudent pattern (fruit and non-starchy vegetables) (OR III tertile vs I 0.56, 95% CI 0.41-0.77) showed a protective effect. For Traditional pattern, the median bias-adjusted ORs (3.52) were higher than the conventional (2.76).

CONCLUSIONS

While the Prudent pattern was associated with a reduced risk of BC, Traditional, Rural and Starchy patterns showed a promoting effect. Despite the threats to validity, the nature of associations was not strongly affected.

Epidemiology and pathophysiology of alcohol and breast cancer: Update 2012

AIMS

To update epidemiological data on alcohol and breast cancer, with special emphasis on light alcohol consumption, and to review mechanisms of alcohol mediated mammary carcinogenesis.

METHODS

For epidemiological data, in November 2011 we performed a literature search in various bibliographic databases, and we conducted a meta-analysis of data on light alcohol drinking. Relevant mechanistic studies were also reviewed to November 2011.

RESULTS

A significant increase of the order of 4% in the risk of breast cancer is already present at intakes of up to one alcoholic drink/day. Heavy alcohol consumption, defined as three or more drinks/day, is associated with an increased risk by 40-50%. This translates into up to 5% of breast cancers attributable to alcohol in northern Europe and North America for a total of approximately 50,000 alcohol-attributable cases of breast cancer worldwide. Up to 1-2% of breast cancers in Europe and North America are attributable to light drinking alone, given its larger prevalence in most female populations when compared with heavy drinking. Alcohol increases estrogen levels, and estrogens may exert its carcinogenic effect on breast tissue either via the ER or directly. Other mechanisms may include acetaldehyde, oxidative stress, epigenetic changes due to a disturbed methyl transfer and decreased retinoic acid concentrations associated with an altered cell cycle.

CONCLUSIONS

Women should not exceed one drink/day, and women at elevated risk for breast cancer should avoid alcohol or consume alcohol occasionally only.

Alcohol and breast cancer risk defined by estrogen and progesterone receptor status: a case-control study

BACKGROUND

Alcohol consumption increases breast cancer risk. Some studies suggested that this association is stronger or limited to tumors expressing estrogen receptors (ER).

METHODS

We investigated the role of alcohol according to ER and progesterone receptor (PR) status in a case-control study on breast cancer conducted from 1991 to 1994 in three Italian areas. Cases were 989 women with incident, histologically confirmed breast cancer. Controls were 1,350 women admitted to hospitals in the same catchment areas for acute nonneoplastic diseases. A validated food-frequency questionnaire was used to collect information on dietary habits and lifetime consumption of various alcoholic beverages. Multiple logistic regression models were used to estimate odds ratios and 95% confidence interval (95% CI).

RESULTS

Alcohol drinking was associated with ER+ tumors (odds ratio, 2.16; 95% CI, 1.68-2.76 for an intake of > or =13.8 g/d as compared with nondrinkers). The odds ratio was 1.13 (95% CI, 1.07-1.20) for a 10-g increase in daily intake. For ER- tumors, the relation with alcohol consumption was not significant (odds ratio, 1.36; 95% CI, 0.93-2.01). When breast cancers were further classified according to PR, the findings for ER+PR+ cancers were similar to those for all ER+ ones, with an odds ratio of 2.34 (95% CI, 1.81-3.04) for an intake of > or =13.8 g/d. No significant association emerged for ER-PR- tumors (odds ratio, 1.25; 95% CI, 0.81-1.94).

CONCLUSION

This study supports the hypothesis that alcohol is more strongly related to ER+ than to ER- breast tumors.

Effect of obesity and other lifestyle factors on mortality in women with breast cancer

A few lifestyle characteristics before cancer diagnosis have been suggested to modify the prognosis of breast cancer. Follow-up information from 1,453 women with incident invasive breast cancer, diagnosed between 1991 and 1994 and interviewed within the framework of an Italian multicenter case-control study, was used to assess the effect of obesity and of a large spectrum of other factors on breast cancer mortality. Five hundred and three deaths, including 398 breast cancer deaths, were identified. Hazard ratios (HR) for all-cause and breast cancer mortality and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI), were calculated using Cox proportional hazards models and adjusted for age and breast cancer characteristics (stage and receptor status). Increased risk of death for breast cancer emerged for body mass index (BMI) >/= 30 kg/m(2) (HR = 1.38; 95% CI: 1.02-1.86), compared to <25, or waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) >/= 0.85 (HR = 1.27; 95% CI: 0.98-1.64), compared to <0.80, and the strongest association was observed for women with BMI >/=30 and high WHR (>/=0.85), compared to women with BMI <25 and WHR < 0.85 (HR = 1.57, 95% CI: 1.08-2.27). The unfavorable effect of high BMI was similar in women <55 and >/=55 years of age, whereas it was stronger in women with I-II stage than III-IV stage breast cancer. Low vegetable and fruit consumption and current or past smoking were also associated to marginally worse breast cancer survival. No significant relationship with survival after breast cancer emerged for several other major lifestyle factors, including physical activity, alcohol drinking, exogenous hormones use and fat intake. High BMI was the lifestyle risk factor that most consistently modified breast cancer prognosis in our study.

Alcohol Drinking and Risk of Breast Cancer

Using a case-control design, the authors studied female residents of five Massachusetts towns between 1983 and 1986. The objective was to measure the association between breast cancer occurrence and drinking alcohol. Cohort and case-control studies have often observed an association between drinking alcohol and breast cancer risk. In this study, women with any history of drinking alcohol had a risk of breast cancer 1.2-fold greater than women who never drank alcohol (95% confidence interval 0.7-1.8). The relative risk of breast cancer did not depend on the usual number of drinks per day or drinking history relative to time of diagnosis. Women who reported ever having a period of 6 months or more during which they drank more than average had an adjusted relative risk of breast cancer equal to 2.6 (95% confidence interval 1.1-5.8). The estimates of effect are consistent with the positive dose-response trends reported in a pooled analysis of large cohort studies and a meta-analysis of a broader spectrum of studies. Alcohol drinking remains one of the few risk factors for breast cancer amenable to intervention.

Nutrient dietary patterns and the risk of breast and ovarian cancers

The issue of diet and breast and ovarian cancers has been considered in terms of foods and nutrients, but rarely in terms of dietary patterns. We examined the associations between dietary patterns and breast and ovarian cancers in 2 Italian multicentric case-control studies. Cases were 2,569 breast cancers and 1,031 ovarian cancers hospitalized in 4 Italian areas between 1991 and 1999. Controls were 3,413 women from the same hospital network. Dietary habits were investigated through a validated food-frequency questionnaire. Dietary patterns were identified on a selected set of nutrients through principal component factor analysis. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for both cancers were estimated using unconditional multiple logistic regression models on quartiles of factor scores and continuous factor scores. We identified 4 major dietary patterns named Animal products, Vitamins and fiber, Unsaturated fats and Starch-rich. The animal products pattern and the unsaturated fats pattern were inversely associated with breast cancer (OR = 0.74, 95% CI: 0.61-0.91 and OR = 0.83, 95% CI: 0.68-1.00, respectively, for the highest consumption quartile), whereas the starch-rich pattern was directly associated with it (OR = 1.34, 95% CI: 1.10-1.65). The vitamins and fiber pattern was inversely associated with ovarian cancer (OR = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.61-0.98), whereas the starch-rich pattern was directly associated with it (OR = 1.85, 95% CI: 1.37-2.48). In conclusion, the starch-rich pattern is potentially an unfavorable indicator of risk for both breast and ovarian cancers, while the animal products and the vitamins and fiber patterns may be associated with a reduced risk of breast and ovarian cancers, respectively.

Dietary Calcium as a Potential Modifier of the Relationship of Lead Burden to Blood Pressure

BACKGROUND

Cumulative lead burden and low dietary calcium have been independently associated with increased risk of hypertension. There is evidence of an interaction between these factors. We tested the hypothesis that dietary calcium intake modifies the relationship between lead burden and hypertension.

METHODS

A total of 471 men from the Normative Aging Study were evaluated. Bone lead was assessed using a K-x-ray fluorescence instrument, and information on dietary calcium intake was obtained with a self-administered semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire.

RESULTS

We categorized 259 subjects (55%) as having low calcium intake (< or =800 mg/d) and 212 subjects (45%) as having higher calcium intake. In logistic regression models stratified by dietary calcium intake, tibia lead had a weak association with hypertension among subjects with low dietary calcium (odds ratio for 1-standard deviation increase in tibia lead = 1.30; 95% confidence interval = 0.97-1.74) but not in subjects with higher dietary calcium intake. Similarly, blood lead was associated with hypertension only in subjects with low calcium intake. We also found evidence of an interaction between dietary calcium intake and body mass index.

CONCLUSIONS

High bone and blood lead increased the likelihood of hypertension, particularly among subjects with low dietary calcium intake. Dietary calcium may be helpful in prevention of hypertension induced by elevated lead burden.

Alcohol intake in adolescence and mammographic density

Adolescent exposures may be important in the development of breast cancer later in life. We examined the association of adolescent alcohol consumption and adult mammographic density, a strong risk factor for breast cancer. Women within the Minnesota Breast Cancer Family Cohort with detailed mammogram and risk factor information (n = 1,893) formed our sample. Breast cancer cases were excluded. Adolescent alcohol consumption (before age 18) was solicited through a mailed questionnaire. Percent density (PD) was estimated using the computer-assisted thresholding program, Cumulus. Statistical analyses were performed using linear mixed effect models. Women who reported ever drinking alcohol before age 18 (n = 390; 21%) had a higher unadjusted PD than women who never drank during adolescence (mu(unadj) = 26.5% vs. 22.2%), but this difference disappeared with adjustment for risk factors for mammographic density (mu(adj) = 21.0% vs. 21.2%, p = 0.94). Adult PD was not associated with age at initiation, amount of alcohol consumed at one sitting or frequency of alcohol use before age 18. The lack of differences was seen across strata of menopausal status. There was suggestion of higher PD among heavy and more frequent drinkers (24.0%, 95% CI 21.1-26.8%) compared to lighter (21.3%, 95% CI 20.3-22.3%) and never drinkers (21.4%, 95% CI 20.9-21.9%) and also among regular adolescent drinkers who were daily or weekly adult drinkers (25.0%, 95% CI 23.0-27.0%) compared to less regular drinkers in these 2 time periods (23.0-23.4%). However, these associations were not statistically significant (p = 0.27 and p = 0.22, respectively). In summary, there was no evidence that adolescent alcohol use was associated with large and persistent effects on adult PD.

Dietary polyphenols and the prevention of diseases

Polyphenols are the most abundant antioxidants in the diet and are widespread constituents of fruits, vegetables, cereals, dry legumes, chocolate, and beverages, such as tea, coffee, or wine. Experimental studies on animals or cultured human cell lines support a role of polyphenols in the prevention of cardiovascular diseases, cancers, neurodegenerative diseases, diabetes, or osteoporosis. However, it is very difficult to predict from these results the effects of polyphenol intake on disease prevention in humans. One of the reasons is that these studies have often been conducted at doses or concentrations far beyond those documented in humans. The few clinical studies on biomarkers of oxidative stress, cardiovascular disease risk factors, and tumor or bone resorption biomarkers have often led to contradictory results. Epidemiological studies have repeatedly shown an inverse association between the risk of myocardial infarction and the consumption of tea and wine or the intake level of some particular flavonoids, but no clear associations have been found between cancer risk and polyphenol consumption. More human studies are needed to provide clear evidence of their health protective effects and to better evaluate the risks possibly resulting from too high a polyphenol consumption.

Correlation between nutritional biomarkers and breast cancer: a case-control study

A case-control study to explore associations between retinoids, tocopherols, total and beta-carotenes and breast cancer was conducted by analysing concentrations of these biomarkers in adipose tissue, cheek cells and plasma. A total of 414 French-Canadians in Montreal with new diagnoses of breast cancer were age-matched to 429 population-based controls. Subjects were interviewed using a questionnaire, and biological samples from 287 cases and 112 controls were collected within 3 months of the diagnosis. Mean beta carotene concentrations in cheek cells were significantly lower among controls. Odds ratios (ORs) from logistic regression analysis were used to compare higher and lower tercile concentrations. Significant positive associations were observed in adipose tissue for retinoid [OR=2.11; 95% CI (1.09-4.08)] and beta carotene [OR=3.18; 95% CI (1.70-5.93)]; in cheek cells for beta carotene [OR=2.22; 95% CI (1.21-4.50)] and for total carotenes [OR=2.94; 95% CI (1.59-5.42)] and in plasma for beta carotene [OR=1.53; 95% CI (0.80-2.93)] and total carotenes [OR=1.04; 95% CI (0.53-2.05)]. Among the control groups, significant Pearson correlations were observed between cheek cells and adipose tissue for total carotenes (r=0.27; p=0.01) and cheek cells and plasma (r=0.22; p=0.04). In contrast to previous works, this study shows that high concentrations of retinoids and carotenes in adipose tissue and cheek cells are associated with increased risk of breast cancer. However, all these studies are limited by small sample size. Although our study tested a limited number of controls, important associations were observed. These results suggest that the effect of disease on biomarkers is fundamental to the interpretation of epidemiological data. We suggest either that the high levels of these biomarkers found in cancer patients in this study may be due to the disease process that affects the pharmacokinetics of the biomarker or that the disease causes a change in dietary habits. In addition, in studies involving the application of biomarkers to cancer epidemiology it is imperative that a typical biomarker concentration is not associated with breast cancer risk before further examination of the methodological limitations of epidemiological studies investigating this relationship. Therefore, sample size, selection bias, information bias, and confounding should be considered in the design of studies investigating the aetiological relationship between biomarkers and breast cancer.

Epidemiology of Male Breast Cancer

Breast cancer in men is a rare disease, accounting for ∼1% of all breast cancer cases. Although the epidemiologic literature regarding female breast cancer is extensive, relatively little is known about the etiology of male breast cancer (MBC). This review is intended to summarize the existing body of evidence on genetic and epidemiologic risk factors for breast cancer in men. Overall, the epidemiology of MBC presents similarities with the epidemiology of female breast cancer. Major genetic factors associated with an increased risk of breast cancer for men include BRCA2 mutations, which are believed to account for the majority of inherited breast cancer in men, Klinefelter syndrome, and a positive family history. Suspected genetic factors include AR gene mutations, CYP17 polymorphism, Cowden syndrome, and CHEK2. Epidemiologic risk factors for MBC include disorders relating to hormonal imbalances, such as obesity, testicular disorders (e.g., cryptorchidism, mumps orchitis, and orchiectomy), and radiation exposure. Suspected epidemiologic risk factors include prostate cancer,prostate cancer treatment, gynecomastia, occupational exposures (e.g., electromagnetic fields, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, and high temperatures), dietary factors (e.g., meat intake and fruit and vegetable consumption), and alcohol intake.

Contribution of three components to individual cancer risk predicting breast cancer risk in Italy

We used data from a multicentre case-control study conducted in Italy between 1991 and 1994 on over 2500 cases of breast cancer and a comparable number of controls, and estimates of breast cancer incidence in Italy to compute individual breast cancer risk for Italian women. The estimated probabilities between age 50 and 80 ranged from approximately 5% (for a woman with no family history and low modifiable risk profile) to about 30% (for a woman with young family history and high modifiable risk) on the basis of various women's baseline characteristics. Expected numbers of breast cancer cases using the present model were compared with those based on the USA Gail model, and with the observed ones in the comparison group of the Italian Tamoxifen Trial. These show a closer agreement between the observed and the expected total numbers of breast cancers than the USA Gail model. Thus, the Gail model can be improved for use in other populations by using estimates of incidence and risk which are more appropriate to the target population.

Nutrition and lifestyle factors on the risk of developing breast cancer

Aspects of nutrition and lifestyle may be largely responsible for the development of common cancers in Western countries, as indicated by the large differences in breast cancer rates between countries, the striking changes in these rates among migrating populations, and the rapid changes over time within countries. The better informed and increasingly health-conscious population of the present day are intensively seeking to identify and eliminate these putative carcinogenic risk factors and to exploit the preventive effects that have been attributed to certain dietary components. Nutrition and 'lifestyle' may exert its carcinogenic effects indirectly by cell stimulations (alcohol, hormone therapy in postmenopause), inhibition of DNA-repair mechanisms (lack of vitamins), effecting estrogen metabolism (phytoestrogenes), or as promotors to enhance growth of tumours (body mass index). Some 'substances' may act as a carcinogenic itself, for example, aromatic hydrocarbons in tobacco or increased polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in well done meat. Individual differences in the effects of nutritional factors on mammary epithelia could be caused by genetic polymorphisms. In this critical review, we focus on current data regarding the effect of nutrition and lifestyle, on the risk of developing breast cancer. A health lifestyle, consisting of 'healthy diet', physical activity, renunciation of stimulants, is recommended from childhood throughout life.

Exposures in childhood, adolescence and early adulthood and breast cancer risk: a systematic review of the literature

A growing body of work indicates that exposures over the life course have important roles to play in the aetiology of breast cancer. This review synthesises the literature that has been published in the area of early life events and female breast cancer risk. The review finds some evidence, primarily from cohort studies on the relationship between birthweight and breast cancer, to suggest that in utero events are related to breast cancer risk in adulthood. Strong evidence to support a positive association between height and breast cancer exists. Postulated mechanisms for this relationship include the role of early diet in subsequent disease risk, and the influence of endogenous growth factors mediating the relationship. There is some evidence to suggest that leg length is the component of height which is generating the observed associations between height and breast cancer. There is no consistent pattern of association between relative weight in childhood or adolescence and risk of breast cancer. The evidence to suggest an association between physical activity in early life and breast cancer risk is convincing from case-control studies, but is not fully substantiated by the results of three cohort studies. There are inconsistent results regarding the association between smoking at a young age and breast cancer risk. There is little evidence for an association between passive smoking in early life and breast cancer risk. No clear association between early drinking and breast cancer risk exists. These results are discussed in relation to possible underlying mechanisms and health promotion strategies which could reduce breast cancer risk.

Alcohol, tobacco and breast cancer--collaborative reanalysis of individual data from 53 epidemiological studies, including 58,515 women with breast cancer and 95,067 women without the disease

Alcohol and tobacco consumption are closely correlated and published results on their association with breast cancer have not always allowed adequately for confounding between these exposures. Over 80% of the relevant information worldwide on alcohol and tobacco consumption and breast cancer were collated, checked and analysed centrally. Analyses included 58,515 women with invasive breast cancer and 95,067 controls from 53 studies. Relative risks of breast cancer were estimated, after stratifying by study, age, parity and, where appropriate, women's age when their first child was born and consumption of alcohol and tobacco. The average consumption of alcohol reported by controls from developed countries was 6.0 g per day, i.e. about half a unit/drink of alcohol per day, and was greater in ever-smokers than never-smokers, (8.4 g per day and 5.0 g per day, respectively). Compared with women who reported drinking no alcohol, the relative risk of breast cancer was 1.32 (1.19-1.45, P<0.00001) for an intake of 35-44 g per day alcohol, and 1.46 (1.33-1.61, P<0.00001) for >/=45 g per day alcohol. The relative risk of breast cancer increased by 7.1% (95% CI 5.5-8.7%; P<0.00001) for each additional 10 g per day intake of alcohol, i.e. for each extra unit or drink of alcohol consumed on a daily basis. This increase was the same in ever-smokers and never-smokers (7.1% per 10 g per day, P<0.00001, in each group). By contrast, the relationship between smoking and breast cancer was substantially confounded by the effect of alcohol. When analyses were restricted to 22 255 women with breast cancer and 40 832 controls who reported drinking no alcohol, smoking was not associated with breast cancer (compared to never-smokers, relative risk for ever-smokers=1.03, 95% CI 0.98-1.07, and for current smokers=0.99, 0.92-1.05). The results for alcohol and for tobacco did not vary substantially across studies, study designs, or according to 15 personal characteristics of the women; nor were the findings materially confounded by any of these factors. If the observed relationship for alcohol is causal, these results suggest that about 4% of the breast cancers in developed countries are attributable to alcohol. In developing countries, where alcohol consumption among controls averaged only 0.4 g per day, alcohol would have a negligible effect on the incidence of breast cancer. In conclusion, smoking has little or no independent effect on the risk of developing breast cancer; the effect of alcohol on breast cancer needs to be interpreted in the context of its beneficial effects, in moderation, on cardiovascular disease and its harmful effects on cirrhosis and cancers of the mouth, larynx, oesophagus and liver.

Alcohol drinking and bladder cancer

The relation between alcoholic beverage consumption and bladder cancer risk was investigated using data from a case-control study conducted between 1985 and 1992 in two areas of northern Italy. Cases were 727 patients with incident, histologically confirmed bladder cancer, and controls 1,067 patients admitted to the same network of hospitals for acute, non-neoplastic, nonurologic, or genital tract diseases. Compared to nondrinkers, the odds ratio (OR) was 0.79 (95% confidence interval, CI, 0.58-1.08) for drinkers, and 0.84 (95%CI, 0.58-1.22) for > or =6 drinks/day. The OR was 0.86 (95%CI, 0.60-1.23) for > or =5 wine drinks/day, 0.69 for beer, and 0.85 for spirits. No trend was observed with duration (OR =1.00 for > or =40 years). ORs were consistent across various strata of covariates including age, sex, and smoking habits. Our study, based on a population with high alcohol (mainly wine) intake, found no association between bladder cancer risk and alcohol intake, even at high levels of consumption.

Dietary glycemic index and glycemic load, and breast cancer risk: a case-control study

BACKGROUND

Certain types of carbohydrates increase glucose and insulin levels to a greater extent than others. In turn, insulin may raise levels of insulin-like growth factors, which may influence breast cancer risk. We analyzed the effect of type and amount of carbohydrates on breast cancer risk, using the glycemic index and the glycemic load measures in a large case-control study conducted in Italy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Cases were 2,569 women with incident, histologically-confirmed breast cancer interviewed between 1991 and 1994. Controls were 2588 women admitted to the same hospital network for a variety of acute, non-neoplastic conditions. Average daily glycemic index and glycemic load were calculated from a validated 78-item food frequency questionnaire.

RESULTS

Direct associations with breast cancer risk emerged for glycemic index (odds ratio, OR for highest vs. lowest quintile = 1.4; P for trend <0.01) and glycemic load (OR = 1.3; P < 0.01). High glycemic index foods, such as white bread, increased the risk of breast cancer (OR = 1.3) while the intake of pasta, a medium glycemic index food, seemed to have no influence (OR = 1.0). Findings were consistent across different strata of menopausal status, alcohol intake, and physical activity level.

CONCLUSIONS

This study supports the hypothesis of moderate, direct associations between glycemic index or glycemic load and breast cancer risk and, consequently, a possible role of hyperinsulinemia/insulin resistance in breast cancer development.

Breast cancer epidemiology, prevention, and early detection

Breast cancer remains a worldwide public health concern despite the fact that mortality rates have been declining in some countries as a result of improvements in adjuvant therapy and screening for breast cancer. In the prevention arena, advances in our understanding of the effects of tamoxifen have led to the investigations of newer agents that may provide extended options for breast cancer prevention in high-risk women. For women who are carriers of a mutation in the breast cancer susceptibility genes BRCA1 or BRCA2, prophylactic oophorectomy and bilateral mastectomy have emerged as preventative surgical options that can significantly impact breast cancer risk. In addition, the identification of potentially modifiable risk factors for breast cancer such as dietary folate intake, alcohol consumption, physical activity, and certain anthropometric factors provides opportunities for intervening in breast cancer prevention both among women at average and high risk. The challenge remains in overcoming the limitations of mammography and clinical breast examination by developing and evaluating new technologies for breast cancer screening such as digital mammogram and breast magnetic resonance imaging.

Investigation of an interaction of alcohol intake and family history on breast cancer risk in the Minnesota Breast Cancer Family Study

BACKGROUND

One explanation for the variability in results in studies of alcohol consumption and breast cancer could be the presence of effect modifiers, such as genetic susceptibility. The authors examined the interaction of alcohol and family history of breast cancer on breast cancer risk in a population-based family study of 426 multigenerational breast cancer families. The authors evaluated whether alcohol use was a stronger risk factor for breast cancer among sisters, daughters, nieces, and granddaughters of breast cancer probands than among women who married into these families.

METHODS

Analyses were performed on surrogate and self-reported data combined and on self-reported data alone. To evaluate the interaction of alcohol and breast cancer risk among women with a family history of breast cancer, the authors performed analyses on all 426 families and on a subset of 132 families that had 3 or more breast and/or ovarian cancers in their family.

RESULTS

A total of 9032 blood relatives and marry-ins and 558 breast cancer cases were available for analysis. In the entire 426 families, there was a suggestion of an interaction of relationship to the proband and frequency of alcohol consumption on breast cancer risk (P(interaction) = 0.14) for surrogate and self-reported information combined. Among first-degree relatives of the proband, daily drinkers had a significantly increased risk of breast cancer compared with never drinkers (RR = 2.45 [1.20, 5.02]), but this increase was less evident among second-degree relatives who reported daily alcohol intake (RR = 1.27 [0.73, 2.22]) and was not evident in marry-ins who reported daily use of alcohol (RR = 0.90 [0.42, 1.90]). The findings based on the subset of 132 high-risk families with 3 or more breast and/or ovarian cancers were similar to findings based on all 426 families (P(interaction) = 0.07). An interaction of family history with alcohol use was also suggested when the analyses were restricted to self-respondents, although the interaction test P-value was no longer of borderline significance.

CONCLUSION

An increased risk of breast cancer due to an increased frequency of alcohol consumption may be limited to women with a family history of breast cancer.

Investigation of an interaction of alcohol intake and family history on breast cancer risk in the Minnesota Breast Cancer Family Study

BACKGROUND

One explanation for the variability in results in studies of alcohol consumption and breast cancer could be the presence of effect modifiers, such as genetic susceptibility. The authors examined the interaction of alcohol and family history of breast cancer on breast cancer risk in a population-based family study of 426 multigenerational breast cancer families. The authors evaluated whether alcohol use was a stronger risk factor for breast cancer among sisters, daughters, nieces, and granddaughters of breast cancer probands than among women who married into these families.

METHODS

Analyses were performed on surrogate and self-reported data combined and on self-reported data alone. To evaluate the interaction of alcohol and breast cancer risk among women with a family history of breast cancer, the authors performed analyses on all 426 families and on a subset of 132 families that had 3 or more breast and/or ovarian cancers in their family.

RESULTS

A total of 9032 blood relatives and marry-ins and 558 breast cancer cases were available for analysis. In the entire 426 families, there was a suggestion of an interaction of relationship to the proband and frequency of alcohol consumption on breast cancer risk (P(interaction) = 0.14) for surrogate and self-reported information combined. Among first-degree relatives of the proband, daily drinkers had a significantly increased risk of breast cancer compared with never drinkers (RR = 2.45 [1.20, 5.02]), but this increase was less evident among second-degree relatives who reported daily alcohol intake (RR = 1.27 [0.73, 2.22]) and was not evident in marry-ins who reported daily use of alcohol (RR = 0.90 [0.42, 1.90]). The findings based on the subset of 132 high-risk families with 3 or more breast and/or ovarian cancers were similar to findings based on all 426 families (P(interaction) = 0.07). An interaction of family history with alcohol use was also suggested when the analyses were restricted to self-respondents, although the interaction test P-value was no longer of borderline significance.

CONCLUSION

An increased risk of breast cancer due to an increased frequency of alcohol consumption may be limited to women with a family history of breast cancer.

Lifetime alcohol consumption and breast cancer: a case-control study in Finland

OBJECTIVE

To study the association between lifetime alcohol consumption and the risk of breast cancer.

DESIGN AND SETTING

A case-control study carried out in eastern Finland. Information about alcohol consumption was obtained by two methods: a self-administered food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) including alcohol consumption during the previous 12 months, and a lifetime alcohol consumption questionnaire (AQ) which was administered by the study nurse.

SUBJECTS

The study consisted of 301 breast cancer cases (25-75 years old) and 443 population controls.

RESULTS

The subjects reported higher current alcohol consumption in the AQ compared to the FFQ. According to the AQ, premenopausal cases consumed on average 28 g and controls 24 g alcohol week(-1); in postmenopausal women the values were 15 and 14 g, respectively. About 30% of premenopausal and 60% of postmenopausal women were classified as non-drinkers. The correlation for current alcohol consumption between the FFQ and the AQ was 0.80 in premenopausal women but only 0.40 in postmenopausal women. Current alcohol consumption seemed to influence the reporting of total lifetime alcohol consumption. Current alcohol consumption was not associated with the risk of breast cancer either in premenopausal or postmenopausal women; neither were associations found between alcohol consumption at age of first use, use before the age of 30, or total lifetime alcohol consumption and the risk of breast cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

On average, one to three drinks per week did not increase the risk of breast cancer in this study. Consumption levels were, however, too low to exclude increased risk with high regular consumption. Further research is necessary on lifetime alcohol consumption.