Control of V(D)J recombinational accessibility of the D beta 1 gene segment at the TCR beta locus by a germline promoter

Locus folding mechanisms determine modes of antigen receptor gene assembly

The dynamic folding of genomes regulates numerous biological processes, including antigen receptor (AgR) gene assembly. We show that, unlike other AgR loci, homotypic chromatin interactions and bidirectional chromosome looping both contribute to structuring Tcrb for efficient long-range V(D)J recombination. Inactivation of the CTCF binding element (CBE) or promoter at the most 5'Vβ segment (Trbv1) impaired loop extrusion originating locally and extending to DβJβ CBEs at the opposite end of Tcrb. Promoter or CBE mutation nearly eliminated Trbv1 contacts and decreased RAG endonuclease-mediated Trbv1 recombination. Importantly, Trbv1 rearrangement can proceed independent of substrate orientation, ruling out scanning by DβJβ-bound RAG as the sole mechanism of Vβ recombination, distinguishing it from Igh. Our data indicate that CBE-dependent generation of loops cooperates with promoter-mediated activation of chromatin to juxtapose Vβ and DβJβ segments for recombination through diffusion-based synapsis. Thus, the mechanisms that fold a genomic region can influence molecular processes occurring in that space, which may include recombination, repair, and transcriptional programming.

The C9orf72-interacting protein Smcr8 is a negative regulator of autoimmunity and lysosomal exocytosis

A mutation in C9ORF72 is the most common genetic contributor to ALS. Zhang et al. found that C9ORF72's long isoform complexes with and stabilizes SMCR8. Smcr8 loss-of-function mutant mice exhibit a loss of tolerance for many nervous system autoantigens and increased lysosomal exocytosis in mutant macrophages.

While a mutation in C9ORF72 is the most common genetic contributor to amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), much remains to be learned concerning the function of the protein normally encoded at this locus. To elaborate further on functions for C9ORF72, we used quantitative mass spectrometry-based proteomics to identify interacting proteins in motor neurons and found that its long isoform complexes with and stabilizes SMCR8, which further enables interaction with WDR41. To study the organismal and cellular functions for this tripartite complex, we generated Smcr8 loss-of-function mutant mice and found that they developed phenotypes also observed in C9orf72 loss-of-function animals, including autoimmunity. Along with a loss of tolerance for many nervous system autoantigens, we found increased lysosomal exocytosis in Smcr8 mutant macrophages. In addition to elevated surface Lamp1 (lysosome-associated membrane protein 1) expression, we also observed enhanced secretion of lysosomal components—phenotypes that we subsequently observed in C9orf72 loss-of-function macrophages. Overall, our findings demonstrate that C9ORF72 and SMCR8 have interdependent functions in suppressing autoimmunity as well as negatively regulating lysosomal exocytosis—processes of potential importance to ALS.

Mbd3/NuRD controls lymphoid cell fate and inhibits tumorigenesis by repressing a B cell transcriptional program

Differentiation of lineage-committed cells from multipotent progenitors requires the establishment of accessible chromatin at lineage-specific transcriptional enhancers and promoters, which is mediated by pioneer transcription factors that recruit activating chromatin remodeling complexes. Here we show that the Mbd3/nucleosome remodeling and deacetylation (NuRD) chromatin remodeling complex opposes this transcriptional pioneering during B cell programming of multipotent lymphoid progenitors by restricting chromatin accessibility at B cell enhancers and promoters. Mbd3/NuRD-deficient lymphoid progenitors therefore prematurely activate a B cell transcriptional program and are biased toward overproduction of pro-B cells at the expense of T cell progenitors. The striking reduction in early thymic T cell progenitors results in compensatory hyperproliferation of immature thymocytes and development of T cell lymphoma. Our results reveal that Mbd3/NuRD can regulate multilineage differentiation by constraining the activation of dormant lineage-specific enhancers and promoters. In this way, Mbd3/NuRD protects the multipotency of lymphoid progenitors, preventing B cell-programming transcription factors from prematurely enacting lineage commitment. Mbd3/NuRD therefore controls the fate of lymphoid progenitors, ensuring appropriate production of lineage-committed progeny and suppressing tumor formation.

Distinct requirement of Runx complexes for TCRβ enhancer activation at distinct developmental stages

A TCRβ enhancer, known as the Eβ enhancer, plays a critical role in V(D)J recombination and transcription of the Tcrb gene. However, the coordinated action of trans-acting factors in the activation of Eβ during T cell development remains uncharacterized. Here, we characterized the roles of Runx complexes in the regulation of the Eβ function. A single mutation at one of the two Runx binding motifs within the Eβ severely impaired Tcrb activation at the initiation phase in immature thymocytes. However, TCRβ expression level in mature thymocytes that developed under such a single Runx site mutation was similar to that of the control. In contrast, mutations at two Runx motifs eliminated Eβ activity, demonstrating that Runx complex binding is essential to initiate Eβ activation. In cells expressing Tcrb harboring rearranged V(D)J structure, Runx complexes are dispensable to maintain TCRβ expression, whereas Eβ itself is continuously required for TCRβ expression. These findings imply that Runx complexes are essential for Eβ activation at the initiation phase, but are not necessary for maintaining Eβ activity at later developmental stages. Collectively, our results indicate that the requirements of trans-acting factor for Eβ activity are differentially regulated, depending on the developmental stage and cellular activation status.

Loss-of-function mutations in the C9ORF72 mouse ortholog cause fatal autoimmune disease

C9ORF72 mutations are found in a significant fraction of patients suffering from amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and frontotemporal dementia, yet the function of the C9ORF72 gene product remains poorly understood. We show that mice harboring loss-of-function mutations in the ortholog of C9ORF72 develop splenomegaly, neutrophilia, thrombocytopenia, increased expression of inflammatory cytokines, and severe autoimmunity, ultimately leading to a high mortality rate. Transplantation of mutant mouse bone marrow into wild-type recipients was sufficient to recapitulate the phenotypes observed in the mutant animals, including autoimmunity and premature mortality. Reciprocally, transplantation of wild-type mouse bone marrow into mutant mice improved their phenotype. We conclude that C9ORF72 serves an important function within the hematopoietic system to restrict inflammation and the development of autoimmunity.

Long-Range Regulation of V(D)J Recombination

Given their essential role in adaptive immunity, antigen receptor loci have been the focus of analysis for many years and are among a handful of the most well-studied genes in the genome. Their investigation led initially to a detailed knowledge of linear structure and characterization of regulatory elements that confer control of their rearrangement and expression. However, advances in DNA FISH and imaging combined with new molecular approaches that interrogate chromosome conformation have led to a growing appreciation that linear structure is only one aspect of gene regulation and in more recent years, the focus has switched to analyzing the impact of locus conformation and nuclear organization on control of recombination. Despite decades of work and intense effort from numerous labs, we are still left with an incomplete picture of how the assembly of antigen receptor loci is regulated. This chapter summarizes our advances to date and points to areas that need further investigation.

Regulation of Tcrb Gene Assembly by Genetic, Epigenetic, and Topological Mechanisms

The adaptive immune system endows mammals with an ability to recognize nearly any foreign invader through antigen receptors that are expressed on the surface of all lymphocytes. This defense network is generated by V(D)J recombination, a set of sequentially controlled DNA cleavage and repair events that assemble antigen receptor genes from physically separated variable (V), joining (J), and sometimes diversity (D) gene segments. The recombination process itself must be stringently regulated to minimize oncogenic translocations involving chromosomes that harbor immunoglobulin and T cell receptor loci. Indeed, V(D)J recombination is controlled at several levels, including tissue-, developmental stage-, allele-, and gene segment-specificity. These levels of control are imposed by a collection of architectural and regulatory elements that are distributed throughout each antigen receptor locus. Together, the genetic elements regulate developmental changes in chromatin, transcription, and locus topology that promote or disfavor long-range recombination. This chapter focuses on the cross talk between these mechanisms at the T cell receptor beta (Tcrb) locus, and how they sculpt a diverse TCRβ repertoire while maintaining monospecificity of this antigen receptor on each mature T lymphocyte. We also discuss how insights obtained from studies of Tcrb are more generally relevant to our understanding of gene regulation strategies employed by mammals.

STAT5 Orchestrates Local Epigenetic Changes for Chromatin Accessibility and Rearrangements by Direct Binding to the TCRγ Locus

The transcription factor STAT5, which is activated by IL-7R, controls chromatin accessibility and rearrangements of the TCRγ locus. Although STAT-binding motifs are conserved in Jγ promoters and Eγ enhancers, little is known about their precise roles in rearrangements of the TCRγ locus in vivo. To address this question, we established two lines of Jγ1 promoter mutant mice: one harboring a deletion in the Jγ1 promoter, including three STAT motifs (Jγ1P(Δ/Δ)), and the other carrying point mutations in the three STAT motifs in that promoter (Jγ1P(mS/mS)). Both Jγ1P(Δ/Δ) and Jγ1P(mS/mS) mice showed impaired recruitment of STAT5 and chromatin remodeling factor BRG1 at the Jγ1 gene segment. This resulted in severe and specific reduction in germline transcription, histone H3 acetylation, and histone H4 lysine 4 methylation of the Jγ1 gene segment in adult thymus. Rearrangement and DNA cleavage of the segment were severely diminished, and Jγ1 promoter mutant mice showed profoundly decreased numbers of γδ T cells of γ1 cluster origin. Finally, compared with controls, both mutant mice showed a severe reduction in rearrangements of the Jγ1 gene segment, perturbed development of γδ T cells of γ1 cluster origin in fetal thymus, and fewer Vγ3(+) dendritic epidermal T cells. Furthermore, interaction with the Jγ1 promoter and Eγ1, a TCRγ enhancer, was dependent on STAT motifs in the Jγ1 promoter. Overall, this study strongly suggests that direct binding of STAT5 to STAT motifs in the Jγ promoter is essential for local chromatin accessibility and Jγ/Eγ chromatin interaction, triggering rearrangements of the TCRγ locus.

Transcription-dependent generation of a specialized chromatin structure at the TCRβ locus

V(D)J recombination assembles Ag receptor genes during lymphocyte development. Enhancers at AR loci are known to control V(D)J recombination at associated alleles, in part by increasing chromatin accessibility of the locus, to allow the recombination machinery to gain access to its chromosomal substrates. However, whether there is a specific mechanism to induce chromatin accessibility at AR loci is still unclear. In this article, we highlight a specialized epigenetic marking characterized by high and extended H3K4me3 levels throughout the Dβ-Jβ-Cβ gene segments. We show that extended H3K4 trimethylation at the Tcrb locus depends on RNA polymerase II (Pol II)-mediated transcription. Furthermore, we found that the genomic regions encompassing the two DJCβ clusters are highly enriched for Ser(5)-phosphorylated Pol II and short-RNA transcripts, two hallmarks of transcription initiation and early transcription. Of interest, these features are shared with few other tissue-specific genes. We propose that the entire DJCβ regions behave as transcription "initiation" platforms, therefore linking a specialized mechanism of Pol II transcription with extended H3K4 trimethylation and highly accessible Dβ and Jβ gene segments.

Lineage-specific compaction of Tcrb requires a chromatin barrier to protect the function of a long-range tethering element

Majumder et al. explore the large-scale looping architecture of the Tcrb locus early in murine thymocyte development during the generation of TCRβ diversity. They dissect novel DNA regulatory elements controlling V to D-J recombination and identify within an insulator region a distally located CTCF-containing element functioning as a tether, which facilitates looping of distal Vβ to Dβ-Jβ regions and promotes locus contraction. A second CTCF-containing element, proximal to the Dβ-Jβ region, acts as a boundary, preventing the spread of active chromatin associated with Dβ-Jβ regions. Removal of the proximal boundary element impairs the locus contraction capabilities of the tethering element.

Gene regulation relies on dynamic changes in three-dimensional chromatin conformation, which are shaped by composite regulatory and architectural elements. However, mechanisms that govern such conformational switches within chromosomal domains remain unknown. We identify a novel mechanism by which cis-elements promote long-range interactions, inducing conformational changes critical for diversification of the TCRβ antigen receptor locus (Tcrb). Association between distal Vβ gene segments and the highly expressed DβJβ clusters, termed the recombination center (RC), is independent of enhancer function and recruitment of V(D)J recombinase. Instead, we find that tissue-specific folding of Tcrb relies on two distinct architectural elements located upstream of the RC. The first, a CTCF-containing element, directly tethers distal portions of the Vβ array to the RC. The second element is a chromatin barrier that protects the tether from hyperactive RC chromatin. When the second element is removed, active RC chromatin spreads upstream, forcing the tether to serve as a new barrier. Acquisition of barrier function by the CTCF element disrupts contacts between distal Vβ gene segments and significantly alters Tcrb repertoires. Our findings reveal a separation of function for RC-flanking regions, in which anchors for long-range recombination must be cordoned off from hyperactive RC landscapes by chromatin barriers.

Epigenetics and the adaptive immune response

Cells of the adaptive immune response undergo dynamic epigenetic changes as they develop and respond to immune challenge. Plasticity is a necessary prerequisite for the chromosomal dynamics of lineage specification, development, and the immune effector function of the mature cell types. The alterations in DNA methylation and histone modification that characterize activation may be integral to the generation of immunologic memory, thereby providing an advantage on secondary exposure to pathogens. While the immune system benefits from the dynamic nature of the epigenome, such benefit comes at a cost - increased likelihood of disease-causing mutation.

Epigenetic aspects of lymphocyte antigen receptor gene rearrangement or 'when stochasticity completes randomness'

To perform their specific functional role, B and T lymphocytes, cells of the adaptive immune system of jawed vertebrates, need to express one (and, preferably, only one) form of antigen receptor, i.e. the immunoglobulin or T-cell receptor (TCR), respectively. This end goal depends initially on a series of DNA cis-rearrangement events between randomly chosen units from separate clusters of V, D (at some immunoglobulin and TCR loci) and J gene segments, a biomolecular process collectively referred to as V(D)J recombination. V(D)J recombination takes place in immature T and B cells and relies on the so-called RAG nuclease, a site-specific DNA cleavage apparatus that corresponds to the lymphoid-specific moiety of the VDJ recombinase. At the genome level, this recombinase's mission presents substantial biochemical challenges. These relate to the huge distance between (some of) the gene segments that it eventually rearranges and the need to achieve cell-lineage-restricted and developmentally ordered routines with at times, mono-allelic versus bi-allelic discrimination. The entire process must be completed without any recombination errors, instigators of chromosome instability, translocation and, potentially, tumorigenesis. As expected, such a precisely choreographed and yet potentially risky process demands sophisticated controls; epigenetics demonstrates what is possible when calling upon its many facets. In this vignette, we will recall the evidence that almost from the start appeared to link the two topics, V(D)J recombination and epigenetics, before reviewing the latest advances in our knowledge of this joint venture.

DNA double-strand breaks relieve USF-mediated repression of Dβ2 germline transcription in developing thymocytes

Activation of germline promoters is central to V(D)J recombinational accessibility, driving chromatin remodeling, nucleosome repositioning, and transcriptional read-through of associated DNA. We have previously shown that of the two TCRβ locus (Tcrb) D segments, Dβ1 is flanked by an upstream promoter that directs its transcription and recombinational accessibility. In contrast, transcription within the DJβ2 segment cluster is initially restricted to the J segments and only redirected upstream of Dβ2 after D-to-J joining. The repression of upstream promoter activity prior to Tcrb assembly correlates with evidence that suggests DJβ2 recombination is less efficient than that of DJβ1. Because inefficient DJβ2 assembly offers the potential for V-to-DJβ2 recombination to rescue frameshifted V-to-DJβ1 joints, we wished to determine how Dβ2 promoter activity is modulated upon Tcrb recombination. In this study, we show that repression of the otherwise transcriptionally primed 5'Dβ2 promoter requires binding of upstream stimulatory factor (USF)-1 to a noncanonical E-box within the Dβ2 12-recombination signal sequence spacer prior to Tcrb recombination. USF binding is lost from both rearranged and germline Dβ2 sites in DNA-dependent protein kinase, catalytic subunit-competent thymocytes. Finally, genotoxic dsDNA breaks lead to rapid loss of USF binding and gain of transcriptionally primed 5'Dβ2 promoter activity in a DNA-dependent protein kinase, catalytic subunit-dependent manner. Together, these data suggest a mechanism by which V(D)J recombination may feed back to regulate local Dβ2 recombinational accessibility during thymocyte development.

Control of V(D)J Recombination through Transcriptional Elongation and Changes in Locus Chromatin Structure and Nuclear Organization

V(D)J recombination is the assembly of gene segments at the antigen receptor loci to generate antigen receptor diversity in T and B lymphocytes. This process is regulated, according to defined developmental programs, by the action of a single specific recombinase complex formed by the recombination antigen gene (RAG-1/2) proteins that are expressed in immature lymphocytes. V(D)J recombination is strictly controlled by RAG-1/2 accessibility to specific recombination signal sequences in chromatin at several levels: cellular lineage, temporal regulation, gene segment order, and allelic exclusion. DNA cleavage by RAG-1/2 is regulated by the chromatin structure, transcriptional elongation, and three-dimensional architecture and position of the antigen receptor loci in the nucleus. Cis-elements specifically direct transcription and V(D)J recombination at these loci through interactions with transacting factors that form molecular machines that mediate a sequence of structural events. These events open chromatin to activate transcriptional elongation and to permit the access of RAG-1/2 to their recombination signal sequences to drive the juxtaposition of the V, D, and J segments and the recombination reaction itself. This chapter summarizes the advances in this area and the important role of the structure and position of antigen receptor loci within the nucleus to control this process.

Orchestrating T-cell receptor α gene assembly through changes in chromatin structure and organization

V(D)J recombination is regulated through changes in chromatin structure that allow recombinase proteins access to recombination signal sequences and through changes in three-dimensional chromatin organization that bring pairs of distant recombination signal sequences into proximity. The Tcra/Tcrd locus is complex and undergoes distinct recombination programs in double negative and double positive thymocytes that lead to the assembly of Tcrd and Tcra genes, respectively. Our studies provide insights into how locus chromatin structure is regulated and how changes in locus chromatin structure can target and then retarget the recombinase to create developmental progressions of recombination events. Our studies also reveal distinct locus conformations in double negative and double positive thymocytes and suggest how these conformations may support the distinct recombination programs in the two compartments.

Recombination centres and the orchestration of V(D)J recombination

The initiation of V(D)J recombination by the recombination activating gene 1 (RAG1) and RAG2 proteins is carefully orchestrated to ensure that antigen receptor gene assembly occurs in the appropriate cell lineage and in the proper developmental order. Here we review recent advances in our understanding of how DNA binding and cleavage by the RAG proteins are regulated by the chromatin structure and architecture of antigen receptor genes. These advances suggest novel mechanisms for both the targeting and the mistargeting of V(D)J recombination, and have implications for how these events contribute to genome instability and lymphoid malignancy.

A barrier-type insulator forms a boundary between active and inactive chromatin at the murine TCRβ locus

In CD4(-)CD8(-) double-negative thymocytes, the murine Tcrb locus is composed of alternating blocks of active and inactive chromatin containing Tcrb gene segments and trypsinogen genes, respectively. Although chromatin structure is appreciated to be critical for regulated recombination and expression of Tcrb gene segments, the molecular mechanisms that maintain the integrity of these differentially regulated Tcrb locus chromatin domains are not understood. We localized a boundary between active and inactive chromatin by mapping chromatin modifications across the interval extending from Prss2 (the most 3' trypsinogen gene) to D(β)1. This boundary, located 6 kb upstream of D(β)1, is characterized by a transition from repressive (histone H3 lysine 9 dimethylation [H3K9me2]) to active (histone H3 acetylation [H3ac]) chromatin and is marked by a peak of histone H3 lysine 4 dimethylation (H3K4me2) that colocalizes with a retroviral long terminal repeat (LTR). Histone H3 lysine 4 dimethylation is retained and histone H3 lysine 9 dimethylation fails to spread past the LTR even on alleles lacking the Tcrb enhancer (E(β)) suggesting that these features may be determined by the local DNA sequence. Notably, we found that LTR-containing DNA functions as a barrier-type insulator that can protect a transgene from negative chromosomal position effects. We propose that, in vivo, the LTR blocks the spread of heterochromatin, and thereby helps to maintain the integrity of the E(β)-regulated chromatin domain. We also identified low-abundance, E(β)-dependent transcripts that initiate at the border of the LTR and an adjacent long interspersed element. We speculate that this transcription, which extends across D(β), J(β) and C(β) gene segments, may play an additional role promoting initial opening of the E(β)-regulated chromatin domain.

Genetic and epigenetic regulation of Tcrb gene assembly

Vertebrate development requires the formation of multiple cell types from a single genetic blueprint, an extraordinary feat that is guided by the dynamic and finely tuned reprogramming of gene expression. The sophisticated orchestration of gene expression programs is driven primarily by changes in the patterns of covalent chromatin modifications. These epigenetic changes are directed by cis elements, positioned across the genome, which provide docking sites for transcription factors and associated chromatin modifiers. Epigenetic changes impact all aspects of gene regulation, governing association with the machinery that drives transcription, replication, repair and recombination, a regulatory relationship that is dramatically illustrated in developing lymphocytes. The program of somatic rearrangements that assemble antigen receptor genes in precursor B and T cells has proven to be a fertile system for elucidating relationships between the genetic and epigenetic components of gene regulation. This chapter describes our current understanding of the cross-talk between key genetic elements and epigenetic programs during recombination of the Tcrb locus in developing T cells, how each contributes to the regulation of chromatin accessibility at individual DNA targets for recombination, and potential mechanisms that coordinate their actions.

RAGs' eye view of the immunoglobulin heavy chain gene locus

The immunoglobulin heavy chain (IgH) gene locus is activated at a precise stage of B lymphocyte development to undergo gene rearrangements that assemble the functional gene. In this review we summarize our current understanding of the chromatin state of the IgH as it appears just prior to the initiation of V(D)J recombination, and the implications of this structure for regulation of recombination. We also examine the role of the intron enhancer, Eμ, in establishing the pre-rearrangement chromatin structure. The emerging picture shows that the IgH locus consists of independently regulated domains, each of which requires multiple levels of epigenetic changes to reach the fully activated state.

Regulation of antigen receptor gene assembly by genetic-epigenetic crosstalk

Many aspects of gene function are coordinated by changes in the epigenome, which include dynamic revisions of chromatin modifications, genome packaging, subnuclear localization, and chromosome conformation. All of these mechanisms are used by developing lymphocytes to regulate the assembly of functional antigen receptor genes by V(D)J recombination. This somatic rearrangement of the genome must be tightly regulated to ensure proper B and T cell development and to avoid chromosomal translocations that cause lymphoid tumors. V(D)J recombination is controlled by a complex interplay between cis-acting regulatory elements that use transcription factors as liaisons to communicate with epigenetic pathways. Genetic-epigenetic crosstalk is a key strategy employed by precursor lymphocytes to modulate chromatin configurations at Ig and Tcr loci and thereby permit or deny access to a single V(D)J recombinase complex. This article describes our current knowledge of how genetic elements orchestrate crosstalk with epigenetic mechanisms to regulate recombinase accessibility via localized, regional, or long-range changes in chromatin.

Promoters, enhancers, and transcription target RAG1 binding during V(D)J recombination

RAG1 binding to TCR gene elements is dictated by transcriptional control elements and by transcription itself; these findings provide direct confirmation of the long-held accessibility model.

V(D)J recombination assembles antigen receptor genes in a well-defined order during lymphocyte development. This sequential process has long been understood in the context of the accessibility model, which states that V(D)J recombination is regulated by controlling the ability of the recombination machinery to gain access to its chromosomal substrates. Indeed, many features of “open” chromatin correlate with V(D)J recombination, and promoters and enhancers have been strongly implicated in creating a recombinase-accessible configuration in neighboring chromatin. An important prediction of the accessibility model is that cis-elements and transcription control binding of the recombination-activating gene 1 (RAG1) and RAG2 proteins to their DNA targets. However, this prediction has not been tested directly. In this study, we use mutant Tcra and Tcrb alleles to demonstrate that enhancers control RAG1 binding globally at Jα or Dβ/Jβ gene segments, that promoters and transcription direct RAG1 binding locally, and that RAG1 binding can be targeted in the absence of RAG2. These findings reveal important features of the genetic mechanisms that regulate RAG binding and provide a direct confirmation of the accessibility model.

The center of accessibility: Dβ control of V(D)J recombination

Developmental patterning of antigen receptor gene assembly in lymphocyte precursors correlates with decondensation of the chromatin surrounding individual gene segments. Ongoing V(D)J recombination is associated with hyperacetylation of histones H3 and H4 and the expression of sterile germline transcripts across the region of recombinational accessibility. Likewise, histone acetyltransferase and SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complexes each appear to be required for recombination, and the PHD-finger of RAG-2 preferentially associates with recombination signal sequence (RSS) chromatin that contains H3 trimethylated on lysine 4. However, the regulatory mechanisms that direct chromatin alteration and rearrangement have proven elusive, due in large part to the interdependency of individual stages in gene activation, our limited understanding of functional significance of changes to the histone code, and the difficulty of modeling recombinational accessibility in existing experimental systems. Examining Tcrb assembly in developing thymocytes, we review the central roles of RSS elements and germline promoters as foci for epigenetic reorganization of recombinationally accessible gene segments in light of recent findings and persistent questions.

Mitotic chromosome condensation mediated by the retinoblastoma protein is tumor-suppressive

Condensation and segregation of mitotic chromosomes is a critical process for cellular propagation, and, in mammals, mitotic errors can contribute to the pathogenesis of cancer. In this report, we demonstrate that the retinoblastoma protein (pRB), a well-known regulator of progression through the G1 phase of the cell cycle, plays a critical role in mitotic chromosome condensation that is independent of G1-to-S-phase regulation. Using gene targeted mutant mice, we studied this aspect of pRB function in isolation, and demonstrate that it is an essential part of pRB-mediated tumor suppression. Cancer-prone Trp53(-/-) mice succumb to more aggressive forms of cancer when pRB's ability to condense chromosomes is compromised. Furthermore, we demonstrate that defective mitotic chromosome structure caused by mutant pRB accelerates loss of heterozygosity, leading to earlier tumor formation in Trp53(+/-) mice. These data reveal a new mechanism of tumor suppression, facilitated by pRB, in which genome stability is maintained by proper condensation of mitotic chromosomes.

Transcription-dependent mobilization of nucleosomes at accessible TCR gene segments in vivo

Accessibility of chromosomal recombination signal sequences to the RAG protein complex is known to be essential for V(D)J recombination at Ag receptor loci in vivo. Previous studies have addressed the roles of cis-acting regulatory elements and germline transcription in the covalent modification of nucleosomes at Ag receptor loci. However, a detailed picture of nucleosome organization at accessible and inaccessible recombination signal sequences has been lacking. In this study, we have analyzed the nucleosome organization of accessible and inaccessible Tcrb and Tcra alleles in primary murine thymocytes in vivo. We identified highly positioned arrays of nucleosomes at Dbeta, Jbeta, and Jalpha segments and obtained evidence indicating that positioning is established at least in part by the regional DNA sequence. However, we found no consistent positioning of nucleosomes with respect to recombination signal sequences, which could be nucleosomal or internucleosomal even in their inaccessible configurations. Enhancer- and promoter-dependent accessibility was characterized by diminished abundance of certain nucleosomes and repositioning of others. Moreover, some changes in nucleosome positioning and abundance at Jalpha61 were shown to be a direct consequence of germline transcription. We suggest that enhancer- and promoter-dependent transcription generates optimal recombinase substrates in which some nucleosomes are missing and others are covalently modified.

The in vivo pattern of binding of RAG1 and RAG2 to antigen receptor loci

The critical initial step in V(D)J recombination, binding of RAG1 and RAG2 to recombination signal sequences flanking antigen receptor V, D, and J gene segments, has not previously been characterized in vivo. Here, we demonstrate that RAG protein binding occurs in a highly focal manner to a small region of active chromatin encompassing Ig kappa and Tcr alpha J gene segments and Igh and Tcr beta J and J-proximal D gene segments. Formation of these small RAG-bound regions, which we refer to as recombination centers, occurs in a developmental stage- and lineage-specific manner. Each RAG protein is independently capable of specific binding within recombination centers. While RAG1 binding was detected only at regions containing recombination signal sequences, RAG2 binds at thousands of sites in the genome containing histone 3 trimethylated at lysine 4. We propose that recombination centers coordinate V(D)J recombination by providing discrete sites within which gene segments are captured for recombination.

TCR beta feedback signals inhibit the coupling of recombinationally accessible V beta 14 segments with DJ beta complexes

Ag receptor allelic exclusion is thought to occur through monoallelic initiation and subsequent feedback inhibition of recombinational accessibility. However, our previous analysis of mice containing a V(D)J recombination reporter inserted into Vbeta14 (Vbeta14(Rep)) indicated that Vbeta14 chromatin accessibility is biallelic. To determine whether Vbeta14 recombinational accessibility is subject to feedback inhibition, we analyzed TCRbeta rearrangements in Vbeta14(Rep) mice containing a preassembled in-frame transgenic Vbeta8.2Dbeta1Jbeta1.1 or an endogenous Vbeta14Dbeta1Jbeta1.4 rearrangement on the homologous chromosome. Expression of either preassembled VbetaDJbetaC beta-chain accelerated thymocyte development because of enhanced cellular selection, demonstrating that the rate-limiting step in early alphabeta T cell development is the assembly of an in-frame VbetaDJbeta rearrangement. Expression of these preassembled VbetaDJbeta rearrangements inhibited endogenous Vbeta14-to-DJbeta rearrangements as expected. However, in contrast to results predicted by the accepted model of TCRbeta feedback inhibition, we found that expression of these preassembled TCR beta-chains did not downregulate recombinational accessibility of Vbeta14 chromatin. Our findings suggest that TCRbeta-mediated feedback inhibition of Vbeta14 rearrangements depends on inherent properties of Vbeta14, Dbeta, and Jbeta recombination signal sequences.

Peripheral Thy1+ lymphocytes rearranging TCR-gammadelta genes in LAT-deficient mice

Linker for activation of T cells (LAT) is an adaptor molecule indispensable for development of alphabeta and gammadelta T lymphocytes. Surprisingly, using a new model of LAT-deficient mice we found that despite arrested thymic development, a discrete population of cells with active Lat promoter, expressing Thy1 molecules, accumulated in peripheral lymphoid organs of homozygous (Lat(Inv/Inv)) mutant mice. By measuring frequencies of TCR gene rearrangements in conjunction with a panel of cell surface Ag, we dissected two subsets of these Thy1(+) cells. Thy1(dull) cells expressed markers of NK lymphocytes and contained low frequency of TCR-gamma gene rearrangements without detectable TCR-delta rearrangements. Thy1(high) cells resembled immature CD44(+)CD25(+) thymocytes and contained high frequency of non-productive TCR-gamma and TCR-delta rearrangements, indicating that cells displaying molecular signatures of commitment toward gammadelta T-cell lineage can develop and populate lymphoid tissues of LAT-deficient mice. Phenotypically similar Thy1(high) cells were also found in lymph nodes of lymphocyte-deficient (Rag2(-/-)) mice but not in T lymphocyte proficient, heterozygous Lat(+/Inv) mice suggesting that Thy1(high) cells of LAT-deficient mice identified in this study accumulate in peripheral lymphoid organs as a result of congenital lymphopenia.

Cis-regulatory elements and epigenetic changes control genomic rearrangements of the IgH locus

Immunoglobulin variable region exons are assembled from discontinuous variable (V), diversity (D), and joining (J) segments by the process of V(D)J recombination. V(D)J rearrangements of the immunoglobulin heavy chain (IgH) locus are tightly controlled in a tissue-specific, ordered and allele-specific manner by regulating accessibility of V, D, and J segments to the recombination activating gene proteins which are the specific components of the V(D)J recombinase. In this review we discuss recent advances and established models brought forward to explain the mechanisms underlying accessibility control of V(D)J recombination, including research on germline transcripts, spatial organization, and chromatin modifications of the immunoglobulin heavy chain (IgH) locus. Furthermore, we review the functions of well-described and potential new cis-regulatory elements with regard to processes such as V(D)J recombination, allelic exclusion, and IgH class switch recombination.

Differentiation stage determines potential of hematopoietic cells for reprogramming into induced pluripotent stem cells

The reprogramming of somatic cells into induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells upon overexpression of the transcription factors Oct4, Sox2, Klf4 and cMyc is inefficient. It has been assumed that the somatic differentiation state provides a barrier for efficient reprogramming; however, direct evidence for this notion is lacking. Here, we tested the potential of mouse hematopoietic cells at different stages of differentiation to be reprogrammed into iPS cells. We show that hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells give rise to iPS cells up to 300 times more efficiently than terminally differentiated B and T cells do, yielding reprogramming efficiencies of up to 28%. Our data provide evidence that the differentiation stage of the starting cell has a critical influence on the efficiency of reprogramming into iPS cells. Moreover, we identify hematopoietic progenitors as an attractive cell type for applications of iPS cell technology in research and therapy.

Promoter activity 5' of Dbeta2 is coordinated by E47, Runx1, and GATA-3

V(D)J recombination involves the stepwise assembly of B and T cell receptor genes as lymphocytes progress through the early stages of development. While the mechanisms that restrict each step in recombination to its appropriate developmental stage are largely unknown, they share many of the components that regulate transcription. For example, enhancer-dependent modifications in histone acetylation and methylation are essential for both germline transcription and rearrangement of antigen receptor genes. Promoters positioned proximal to individual D and J gene segments in Tcra, Tcrb, Tcrd, IgH, and Igk also contribute to antigen receptor gene assembly, though their effects appear more localized than those of enhancers. Tcrb assembly initiates with D-to-J joining at each of the two D-J-C gene segment clusters in DN1/2 thymocytes. DJ joints are fused with Vbeta elements to complete Tcrb recombination in DN3 cells. We have previously shown that Dbeta2 is flanked by upstream and downstream promoters, with the 5' promoter being held inactive until D-to-J recombination deletes the NFkappaB-dependent 3' promoter. We now report that activity of the 5' promoter reflects a complex interplay among Runx1, GATA-3, and E47 transcription factors. In particular, while multiple E47 and Runx1 binding sites clustered near the Dbeta2 5'RS and overlapping inr elements define the core 5'PDbeta2, they act in concert with an array of upstream GATA-3 sites to overcome the inhibitory effects of a 110bp distal polypurine.polypyrimidine (R.Y) tract. The dependence of 5'PDbeta2 on E47 is consistent with the reported role of E proteins in post-DN1 thymocyte development and V-to-DJbeta recombination.

Genomic analysis reveals extensive gene duplication within the bovine TRB locus

Background

Diverse TR and IG repertoires are generated by V(D)J somatic recombination. Genomic studies have been pivotal in cataloguing the V, D, J and C genes present in the various TR/IG loci and describing how duplication events have expanded the number of these genes. Such studies have also provided insights into the evolution of these loci and the complex mechanisms that regulate TR/IG expression. In this study we analyze the sequence of the third bovine genome assembly to characterize the germline repertoire of bovine TRB genes and compare the organization, evolution and regulatory structure of the bovine TRB locus with that of humans and mice.

Results

The TRB locus in the third bovine genome assembly is distributed over 5 scaffolds, extending to ~730 Kb. The available sequence contains 134 TRBV genes, assigned to 24 subgroups, and 3 clusters of DJC genes, each comprising a single TRBD gene, 5–7 TRBJ genes and a single TRBC gene. Seventy-nine of the TRBV genes are predicted to be functional. Comparison with the human and murine TRB loci shows that the gene order, as well as the sequences of non-coding elements that regulate TRB expression, are highly conserved in the bovine. Dot-plot analyses demonstrate that expansion of the genomic TRBV repertoire has occurred via a complex and extensive series of duplications, predominantly involving DNA blocks containing multiple genes. These duplication events have resulted in massive expansion of several TRBV subgroups, most notably TRBV6, 9 and 21 which contain 40, 35 and 16 members respectively. Similarly, duplication has lead to the generation of a third DJC cluster. Analyses of cDNA data confirms the diversity of the TRBV genes and, in addition, identifies a substantial number of TRBV genes, predominantly from the larger subgroups, which are still absent from the genome assembly. The observed gene duplication within the bovine TRB locus has created a repertoire of phylogenetically diverse functional TRBV genes, which is substantially larger than that described for humans and mice.

Conclusion

The analyses completed in this study reveal that, although the gene content and organization of the bovine TRB locus are broadly similar to that of humans and mice, multiple duplication events have led to a marked expansion in the number of TRB genes. Similar expansions in other ruminant TR loci suggest strong evolutionary pressures in this lineage have selected for the development of enlarged sets of TR genes that can contribute to diverse TR repertoires.

Mechanics of T cell receptor gene rearrangement

The four T cell receptor genes (Tcra, Tcrb, Tcrg, Tcrd) are assembled by V(D)J recombination according to distinct programs during intrathymic T cell development. These programs depend on genetic factors, including gene segment order and recombination signal sequences. They also depend on epigenetic factors. Regulated changes in chromatin structure, directed by enhancers and promoter, can modify the availability of recombination signal sequences to the RAG recombinase. Regulated changes in locus conformation may control the synapsis of distant recombination signal sequences, and regulated changes in subnuclear positioning may influence locus recombination events by unknown mechanisms. Together these influences may explain the ordered activation and inactivation of T cell receptor locus recombination events and the phenomenon of Tcrb allelic exclusion.

Germline transcription: a key regulator of accessibility and recombination

The developmental control of V(D)J recombination is imposed at the level of chromatin accessibility of recombination signal sequences (RSSs) to the recombinase machinery. Cis-acting transcriptional regulatory elements such as promoters and enhancers play a central role in the control of accessibility in vivo. However, the molecular mechanisms by which these elements influence accessibility are still under investigation. Although accessibility for V(D)J recombination is usually accompanied by germline transcription at antigen receptor loci, the functional significance of this transcription in directing RSS accessibility has been elusive. In this chapter, we review past studies outlining the complex relationship between V(D)J recombination and transcription as well as our current understanding on how chromatin structure is regulated during gene expression. We then summarize recent work that directly addresses the functional role of transcription in V(D)J recombination.

Dynamic regulation of antigen receptor gene assembly

A hallmark feature of adaptive immunity is the production of lymphocytes bearing an enormous repertoire of receptors for foreign antigens. This repertoire is generated early in B and T-cell development by the process of V(D)J recombination, which randomly assembles functional immunoglobulin (Ig) and T-cell receptor (TCR) genes from large arrays of DNA segments. Precursor lymphocytes must target then retarget a single V(D)J recombinase enzyme to distinct regions within antigen receptor loci to guide lymphocyte development and to ensure that each mature B and T-cell expresses only a single antigen receptor specificity. Proper targeting of V(D)J recombinase is also essential to avoid chromosomal aberrations that result in lymphoid malignancies. Early studies suggested that changes in the specificity of V(D)J recombination are achieved by differentially opening or closing chromatin associated with Ig and TCR gene segments at the proper developmental time point. This accessibility model has been extended significantly in recent years and it has become clear that control mechanisms governing antigen receptor gene assembly are multifaceted and vary from locus to locus. In this chapter we review how genetic and epigenetic mechanisms as well as widespread changes in chromosomal conformation synergize to orchestrate the diversification of genes encoding B and T-cell antigen receptors.

Temporal and spatial regulation of V(D)J recombination: interactions of extrinsic factors with the RAG complex

In the course of lymphoid development, V(D)J recombination is subject to stringent locus-specific and temporal regulation. These constraints are ultimately responsible for several features peculiar to lymphoid development, including the lineage specificity of antigen receptor assembly, allelic exclusion and receptor editing. In addition, cell cycle phase-dependent regulation of V(D)J recombinase activity ensures that DNA rearrangement is completed by the appropriate mechanism of DNA repair. Regulation of V(D)J recombination involves interactions between the V(D)J recombinase--a heteromeric complex consisting of RAG-1 and RAG-2 subunits--and macromolecular assemblies extrinsic to the recombinase. This chapter will focus on those features of the recombinase itself--and in particular the RAG-2 subunit--that interact with extrinsic factors to establish patterns of temporal control and locus specificity in developing lymphocytes.

E proteins are required to activate germline transcription of the TCR Vbeta8.2 gene

Each TCR Vbeta gene is regulated by an individual Vbeta promoter, which becomes active prior to V(D) J recombination and drives germline transcription. It has been shown that Vbeta gene locus activation and recombination are dependent on the Vbeta promoter. However, transcription factors that regulate Vbeta germline transcription remain largely undefined. A major challenge in studying Vbeta gene germline transcription is the quantitative assessment of relatively low-level transcripts in T-cell progenitors. Here we used the established Vbeta8.2(CD2) knock-in mouse model to assess functions of E-protein transcription factors in Vbeta8.2 germline transcription. We show that E proteins are required for the activation but not the maintenance of the Vbeta8.2 germline transcription during thymocyte development. The activation of Vbeta8.2 germline transcription depends more on the E proteins encoded by the E2A gene than by the HEB gene. We further show that IL-7 receptor (IL-7R)-mediated signals are essential for Vbeta8.2 germline transcription. We provide evidence that IL-7R expression is only partially controlled by E2A, suggesting a role for E2A in driving Vbeta8.2 germline transcription independent of IL-7R activation.

Functional overlap in the cis-acting regulation of the V(D)J recombination at the TCRbeta locus

The second exon of lymphocyte antigen receptor genes is assembled in developing lymphocytes from component V, J and, in some cases, D gene segments through the process of V(D)J recombination. This process is initiated by an endonuclease comprised of the Rag-1 and Rag-2 proteins, collectively referred to as Rag. Rag binds to recombination signals (RSs) and catalyzes the pair-wise introduction of DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) at recombining gene segments. DNA cleavage by Rag is restricted both by intrinsic features of RSs, as well as the activity of other cis-acting elements, such as promoters and enhancers that regulate the accessibility of gene segments to Rag. In the TCRbeta locus, accessibility of the Dbeta1-Jbeta1 gene segment cluster relies on the function of an enhancer, Ebeta, and a promoter, PDbeta1. Here we demonstrate that deletion of a small genomic region containing five of the six Jbeta1 gene segments, but no known transcriptional regulatory elements, leads to a marked decrease in transcription and rearrangements involving the Dbeta1 and Jbeta1.1 gene segments. Surprisingly, point mutations in the RS of the Jbeta1.1 gene segment not only impact Rag cleavage, but also lead to diminished transcription through the Dbeta1-Jbeta1 gene segment cluster. Our findings demonstrate that cis-acting elements that regulate transcription and accessibility of the TCRbeta locus may functionally overlap with RS sequences, which are known primarily to direct Rag-mediated cleavage.

Differential activation of dual promoters alters Dbeta2 germline transcription during thymocyte development

Ag receptor genes are assembled through somatic rearrangements of V, D, and J gene segments. This process is directed in part by transcriptional enhancers and promoters positioned within each gene locus. Whereas enhancers coordinate reorganization of large chromatin stretches, promoters are predicted to facilitate the accessibility of proximal downstream gene segments. In TCR beta locus, rearrangement initiates at two D-J cassettes, each of which exhibits transcriptional activity coincident with DJ rearrangement in CD4/CD8 double-negative pro-T cells. Consistent with a model of promoter-facilitated recombination, assembly of the DJbeta1 cassette is dependent on a Dbeta1 promoter (PDbeta1) positioned immediately 5' of the D. Assembly of DJbeta2 proceeds independent from that of DJbeta1, albeit with less efficiency. To gain insight into the mechanisms that selectively alter D usage, we have defined transcriptional regulation at Dbeta2. We find that both DJbeta cassettes generate germline messages in murine CD44+CD25- double-negative 1 cells. However, transcription of unrearranged DJbeta2 initiates at multiple sites 400-550 bp downstream of the Dbeta2. Unexpectedly, loci from which germline promoter activity has been deleted by DJ rearrangement redirect transcription to sites immediately 5' of the new DJbeta2 joint. Our analyses suggest that 3'-PDbeta2 activity is largely controlled by NF-kappaB RelA, whereas 5'-PDbeta2 activity directs germline transcription of DJbeta2 joints from initiator elements 76 bp upstream of the Dbeta2 5' recombination signal sequence. The unique organization and timing of Dbeta2 promoter activity are consistent with a model in which promoter placement selectively regulates the rearrangement potential of Dbeta2 during TCR beta locus assembly.

Functional analysis of histone methyltransferase g9a in B and T lymphocytes

Lymphocyte development is controlled by dynamic repression and activation of gene expression. These developmental programs include the ordered, tissue-specific assembly of Ag receptor genes by V(D)J recombination. Changes in gene expression and the targeting of V(D)J recombination are largely controlled by patterns of epigenetic modifications imprinted on histones and DNA, which alter chromatin accessibility to nuclear factors. An important component of this epigenetic code is methylation of histone H3 at lysine 9 (H3K9me), which is catalyzed by histone methyltransferases and generally leads to gene repression. However, the function and genetic targets of H3K9 methyltransferases during lymphocyte development remain unknown. To elucidate the in vivo function of H3K9me, we generated mice lacking G9a, a major H3K9 histone methyltransferase, in lymphocytes. Surprisingly, lymphocyte development is unperturbed in G9a-deficient mice despite a significant loss of H3K9me2 in precursor B cells. G9a deficiency is manifest as modest defects in the proliferative capacity of mature B cells and their differentiation into plasma cells following stimulation with LPS and IL-4. Precursor lymphocytes from the mutant mice retain tissue- and stage-specific control over V(D)J recombination. However, G9a deficiency results in reduced usage of Iglambda L chains and a corresponding inhibition of Iglambda gene assembly in bone marrow precursors. These findings indicate that the H3K9me2 epigenetic mark affects a highly restricted set of processes during lymphocyte development and activation.

Contribution of TCR-beta locus and HLA to the shape of the mature human Vbeta repertoire

T cells that survive thymic selection express a diverse array of unique heterodimeric alphabeta TCRs that mediate peptide-MHC Ag recognition. The proportion of the total T cell repertoire that expresses a particular Vbeta protein may be determined by a variety of factors: 1) germline preference for use of particular Vbeta genes; 2) allelic effects on the expression of different Vbeta genes; and 3) HLA effects on the expression of different Vbeta genes (acting via thymic selection and/or peripheral mechanisms). In this study, we show that Vbeta usage by human CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells in neonatal and adult donors is highly correlated between unrelated individuals, suggesting that a large proportion of the observed pattern of Vbeta expression is determined by factors intrinsic to the TCR-beta locus. The presence of identical TCR alleles (within an individual) leads to a significantly better correlation between CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells with respect to Vbeta expression; these effects are, however, relatively minor. The sharing of HLA alleles between individuals also leads to an increased correlation between their Vbeta expression patterns, although this did not reach statistical significance. We therefore conclude that the correlation in Vbeta expression patterns between CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells can be explained predominantly by germline TCR-beta locus factors and not TCR-beta allelic or HLA effects.

Productive coupling of accessible Vbeta14 segments and DJbeta complexes determines the frequency of Vbeta14 rearrangement

To elucidate mechanisms that regulate Vbeta rearrangement, we generated and analyzed mice with a V(D)J recombination reporter cassette of germline Dbeta-Jbeta segments inserted into the endogenous Vbeta14 locus (Vbeta14(Rep)). As a control, we first generated and analyzed mice with the same Dbeta-Jbeta cassette targeted into the generally expressed c-myc locus (c-myc(Rep)). Substantial c-myc(Rep) recombination occurred in both T and B cells and initiated concurrently with endogenous Dbeta to Jbeta rearrangements in thymocytes. In contrast, Vbeta14(Rep) recombination was restricted to T cells and initiated after endogenous Dbeta to Jbeta rearrangements, but concurrently with endogenous Vbeta14 rearrangements. Thus, the local chromatin environment imparts lineage and developmental stage-specific accessibility upon the inserted reporter. Although Vbeta14 rearrangements occur on only 5% of endogenous TCRbeta alleles, the Vbeta14(Rep) cassette underwent rearrangement on 80-90% of alleles, supporting the suggestion that productive coupling of accessible Vbeta14 segments and DJbeta complexes influence the frequency of Vbeta14 rearrangements. Strikingly, Vbeta14(Rep) recombination also occurs on TCRbeta alleles lacking endogenous Vbeta to DJbeta rearrangements, indicating that Vbeta14 accessibility per se is not subject to allelic exclusion.

Identification of functional domains in TdIF1 and its inhibitory mechanism for TdT activity

TdT interacting factor 1 (TdIF1) was identified as a protein that binds to terminal deoxynucleotidyltransferase (TdT) to negatively regulate TdT activity. TdT is a template-independent DNA polymerase that catalyzes the incorporation of deoxynucleotides to the 3'-hydroxyl end of DNA templates to increase the junctional diversity of immunoglobulin or T-cell receptor (TcR) genes. Here, using bioinformatics analysis, we identified the TdT binding, DNA binding and dimerization regions, and nuclear localization signal (NLS) in TdIF1. TdIF1 bound to double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) through three DNA binding regions: residues 1-75, the AT-hook-like motif (ALM) and the predicted helix-turn-helix (HTH) motif. ALM in TdIF1 preferentially bound to AT-rich DNA regions. NLS was of the bipartite type and overlapped ALM. TdIF1 bound to the Pol beta-like region in TdT and blocked TdT access to DNA ends. In the presence of dsDNA, however, TdIF1 bound to dsDNA to release TdT from the TdIF1/TdT complex and to exhibit TdT activity, implying that active TdT released microenvironmentally concentrates around AT-rich DNA to synthesize DNA.

Expression of T-cell receptor genes during early T-cell development

Lymphoid cell development is an ordered process that begins in the embryo in specific sites and progresses through multiple differentiative steps to production of T- and B-cells. Lymphoid cell production is marked by the rearrangement process, which gives rise to mature cells expressing antigen-specific T-cell receptors (TCR) and immunoglobulins (Ig). While most transcripts arising from TCR or Ig loci reflect fully rearranged genes, germline transcripts have been identified, but these have always been thought to have no specific purpose. Germline transcription from either unrearranged TCR or unrearranged Ig loci was commonly associated with an open chromatin configuration during VDJ recombination. Since only early T and B cells undergo rearrangement, the association of germline transcription with the rearrangement process has served as an appropriate explanation for expression of these transcripts in early T- and B-cell progenitors. However, germline TCR-V beta 8.2 transcripts have now been identified in cells from RAG(-/-) mice, in the absence of the VDJ rearrangement event and recombinase activity. Recent data now suggest that germline TCR-V beta transcription is a developmentally regulated lymphoid cell phenomenon. Germline transcripts could also encode a protein that plays a functional role during lymphoid cell development. In the least, germline transcripts serve as markers of early lymphoid progenitors.

Antisense intergenic transcription precedes Igh D-to-J recombination and is controlled by the intronic enhancer Emu

V(D)J recombination is believed to be regulated by alterations in chromatin accessibility to the recombinase machinery, but the mechanisms responsible remain unclear. We previously proposed that antisense intergenic transcription, activated throughout the mouse Igh VH region in pro-B cells, remodels chromatin for VH-to-DJH recombination. Using RNA fluorescence in situ hybridization, we now show that antisense intergenic transcription occurs throughout the Igh DHJH region before D-to-J recombination, indicating that this is a widespread process in V(D)J recombination. Transcription initiates near the Igh intronic enhancer Emu and is abrogated in mice lacking this enhancer, indicating that Emu regulates DH antisense transcription. Emu was recently demonstrated to regulate DH-to-JH recombination of the Igh locus. Together, these data suggest that Emu controls DH-to-JH recombination by activating this form of germ line Igh transcription, thus providing a long-range, processive mechanism by which Emu can regulate chromatin accessibility throughout the DH region. In contrast, Emu deletion has no effect on VH antisense intergenic transcription, which is rarely associated with DH antisense transcription, suggesting differential regulation and separate roles for these processes at sequential stages of V(D)J recombination. These results support a directive role for antisense intergenic transcription in enabling access to the recombination machinery.

Germline transcription from T-cell receptor Vbeta gene is uncoupled from allelic exclusion

Allelic exclusion operates in B and T lymphocytes to ensure clonal expression of antigen receptors after V(D)J recombination. Germline transcription, which proceeds V(D)J recombination, has been postulated to provide an instructive signal for allelic exclusion. Here, we use a genetic marker to track germline transcription from a Vbeta gene within the TCRbeta locus. We find that developing thymocytes exhibit uniformed, bi-allelic activation of the Vbeta gene before V-DJ recombination, a process subject to allelic exclusion. We further show that V-DJ rearrangement promotes activation rather than silencing of germline transcription from the remaining Vbeta genes on either the functionally or non-functionally rearranged chromosome. Results presented here suggest that germline transcription, although necessary for V(D)J recombination, is not sufficient to instruct allelic exclusion.

Reversible contraction by looping of the Tcra and Tcrb loci in rearranging thymocytes

Reversible contraction of immunoglobulin loci juxtaposes the variable (V) genes next to the (diversity)-joining-constant ((D)JC) gene domain, thus facilitating V-(D)J recombination. Here we show that the T cell receptor beta (Tcrb) and T cell receptor alphadelta (Tcra-Tcrd) loci also underwent long-range interactions by looping in double-negative and double-positive thymocytes, respectively. Contraction of the Tcrb and Tcra loci occurred in rearranging thymocytes and was reversed at the next developmental stage. Decontraction of the Tcrb locus probably prevented further V(beta)-DJ(beta) rearrangements in double-positive thymocytes by separating the V(beta) genes from the DJC(beta) domain. In most double-negative cells, one Tcrb allele was recruited to pericentromeric heterochromatin. Such allelic positioning may facilitate asynchronous V(beta)-DJ(beta) recombination. Hence, pericentromeric recruitment and locus 'decontraction' seem to contribute to the initiation and maintenance of allelic exclusion at the Tcrb locus.

Control of thymocyte development and recombination-activating gene expression by the zinc finger protein Zfp608

The products of recombination-activating gene 1 (Rag1) and Rag2 are required for T cell receptor gene assembly and thymocyte maturation, yet their transcriptional control mechanisms remain unclear. A congenic strain (called 'ZORI' here) with defects in Rag1 and Rag2 expression, thymocyte maturation and peripheral T cell homeostasis has been developed. Here, we mapped the mutation in this strain to a chromosome 18 locus containing a single known gene encoding the zinc finger protein Zfp608. This gene (Zfp608) was highly expressed in neonatal thymus but was extinguished thereafter. In contrast to wild-type mice, ZORI mice had sustained thymocyte expression of Zfp608 throughout life. The ZORI mutation produced a thymocyte-intrinsic developmental defect. Overexpression of Zfp608 in BALB/c thymocytes substantially impaired Rag1 and Rag2 expression, indicating the underlying mechanism for the defect in ZORI thymocyte development. Thus, the normal function of Zfp608 may be to prevent Rag1 and Rag2 expression in utero.