Rucaparib in relapsed, platinum-sensitive high-grade ovarian carcinoma (ARIEL2 Part 1): an international, multicentre, open-label, phase 2 trial

Germline variants analysis of Chinese breast cancer patients reveals numerous alterations in homologous recombination genes

PURPOSE

We aimed to identify the pathogenic variants of homologous recombination (HR) genes and analyze the correlation between the pathogenic variants and clinical characteristics in Chinese breast cancer patients.

METHODS

A cohort of 178 breast cancer patients participated in this study. We assessed genomic alterations using a 23-gene panel, which includes most of the HR-related genes and DNA mismatch repair (MMR) gene, through next-generation sequencing. The pathogenicity of variants was determined based on the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics standards and guidelines. The correlation between these pathogenic variants and the clinical characteristics of the patients was investigated.

RESULTS

26 pathogenic variants, including one novel suspected pathogenic variant, were detected in 28 (15.7%) patients. These variants occurred in 7 HR-related genes: BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, RAD51D, RAD50, BRIP1, and ATM. The frequency of BRCA1 variants was higher in the younger group (8.9%) compared to the older group (2.6%), while the trend was reversed for BRCA2 (3.0% vs. 7.8%). All three patients with the pathogenic variant (p.Lys91fs) in RAD51D were diagnosed with triple-negative breast cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

HR-gene testing in breast cancer could help to find new suspected pathogenic variants and increase the clinical benefit of multi-gene testing for breast cancer.

Pan-cancer analysis of homologous recombination deficiency and homologous recombination repair-associated gene alterations in solid tumors from a large Asian cohort

BACKGROUND

Homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) is associated with sensitivity to platinum-based chemotherapy and PARP inhibitors in BRCA-associated cancers, including ovarian, breast, prostate, and pancreatic cancers. This study explores HRD and homologous recombination repair (HRR) gene alterations in a pan-cancer cohort to guide precision oncology.

METHODS

Clinical and genomic data from 9,262 patients with 17 solid tumor types were analyzed using the OncoScreenTM Plus kit. HRD scores, biallelic HRR and tumor suppressor gene alterations, and their clinical correlations were evaluated.

RESULTS

HRD scores varied across cancer types, all showing a long tail in distribution. The prevalence of pathogenic alterations in pan-cancer HRR was 21.3%, with 13.7% of the cases having an HRD score ≥42. HRD-related events (LOH, LST, and TAI) exhibited similarities and cancer-specific patterns at the chromosomal arm level. Biallelic loss of HRR genes, especially BRCA1, BRCA2, RAD51D, RAD51 C, and PPP2R2 A was linked to higher HRD scores in BRCA-associated cancers, while BARD1, RAD51D, RAD54L, BRCA1, and MRE11 were associated with elevated HRD scores in in other cancer types (non-BRCA cancers). TP53 biallelic alterations, with or without HRR alterations, were linked to increased HRD scores. Higher HRD scores were associated with late-stage, older, metastatic, PD-L1 positive, non-MSI-H/non-POLE samples were correlated with genomic instability indexes, such as structural chromosomal instability (SCIN), weighted genome instability index (WGII), and whole-genome doubling (WGD).

CONCLUSIONS

This is the largest pan-cancer HRD study in an Asian population, providing insights for future HRD testing and targeted therapy.

Antitumor activity of rucaparib plus PLX038A in serous endometrial carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Serous endometrial cancer (SEC) is a genomically and morphologically distinct endometrial cancer (EC) subtype with a poor progression-free and overall survival. The development of novel therapies is needed to improve outcomes.

METHODS

We used serous and serous-like EC patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) to test a novel drug combination in vitro and in vivo: rucaparib and pegylated SN-38 (PLX038A). Sensitivity to treatment was correlated with indicators of homologous recombination (HR) deficiency. Efficacy in fresh primary patient tumors was also tested ex vivo.

RESULTS

Five of eight PDXs had genomic instability scores ≥ 42, but only one of these five had evidence of HR deficiency in assays of irradiation-induced RAD51 foci formation. Moreover, PARP inhibitor (PARPi) monotherapy failed to induce regressions in any of the five SEC models treated with rucaparib in vivo, suggesting limited clinical activity of PARPi in SEC. In further studies, we assessed the response of these models to the sustained release topoisomerase 1 inhibitor, PLX038A, as monotherapy and in combination with rucaparib ex vivo and in vivo. Results of these studies showed that PLX038A had limited monotherapy activity, but combination therapy induced significant regressions in two of five SEC PDXs and markedly slowed tumor growth in the other three regardless of underlying homologous recombination repair deficiency. In addition, 11 of 20 (55%) primary tumors showed synergy with rucaparib + SN-38.

CONCLUSIONS

Collectively, these studies identify a set of genomically characterized PDX models for preclinical testing of potential SEC therapies and a therapeutic combination that warrants further preclinical investigation.

A family of E3 ligases extend K11 polyubiquitin on sites of MARUbylation

Ubiquitin (Ub) cooperation with other post-translational modifications provides a tiered opportunity for protein regulation. Small modifications to Ub such as phosphorylation, acetylation, or ADP-ribosylation have varying impacts on signaling. The Deltex family of E3 ligases was previously implicated in the ubiquitylation of ADP-ribose (ADPr) and ADPr-containing macromolecules. Our previous work found ester-linked mono-ADPr ubiquitylation (MARUbylation) on PARP7 and PARP10 in cells and that this mark is extended with K11 polyUb. We previously screened for E3 ligases that interact with PARP7 through three different approaches and identified six candidates, including the Deltex family member DTX2. One of these hits, RNF114, interacts with various other PARPs, leading us to hypothesize that RNF114 binds to sites of MARUbylation and extends K11 polyUb. Here, we show that DTX2 generates the initial MARUbe on PARP7 in cells, which depends on PARP7 catalytic activity. The MARUbe on PARP7 is extended with K11 polyUb by RNF114. To investigate the mechanism of RNF114 reader/writer function, we developed a click chemistry-inspired chemoenzymatic approach to create a novel fluorescent Ub-ADPr probe for studying its interaction with RNF114. Strikingly, we found that RNF114 has a weak affinity for ADPr and Ub separately but explicitly recognizes the linkage between Ub and ADPr present in MARUbylated species. We used AlphaFold3 modeling to examine the mechanisms of Ub-ADPr recognition and K11-linked polyUb extension by RNF114. We identified a tandem Di19-UIM module in RNF114 as a M AR U be- b inding d omain (MUBD), thus providing a reader function that interfaces with K11-specific writer activity. Finally, we described a small family of MUBD-containing E3 ligases that demonstrate preference for Ub-ADPr, which we call M ARUbe- T argeted L igases (MUTLs).

Radiation-guided nanoparticles enhance the efficacy of PARP inhibitors in primary and metastatic BRCA1-deficient tumors via immunotherapy

Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) have revolutionized the treatment landscape for patients suffering from BRCA1-mutated breast and ovarian cancers. However, responses are not durable. We demonstrate that treatment with PARPi, niraparib, increases programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in BRCA1-deficient cancer cells, contributing to immune evasion. To circumvent this, we developed P-selectin-targeted poly (lactic-co-glycolic) acid (PLGA)-poly (ethylene glycol) (PEG)-based nanoparticles (NPs) encapsulating PARP and PD-L1 inhibitors at a synergistic ratio. To further enhance tumor targeting, we leveraged radiation-induced P-selectin upregulation in BRCA1-deficient cancer cells and their associated angiogenic endothelial cells, improving NP accumulation in the primary tumors and hard-to-target metastatic sites, including brain metastasis. Using a combination of traditional 2-dimensional (2D) cell cultures, advanced 3-dimensional (3D) spheroids, tumor-on-a-chip platforms, and in vivo models, we demonstrate the enhanced accumulation and efficacy of the radiation-guided P-selectin-targeted NPs in primary and brain-metastatic BRCA1-deficient tumors.

Phase II Study of Niraparib in Patients With Advanced Melanoma With Homologous Recombination Pathway Gene Mutations

PURPOSE

Patients with metastatic melanoma who progress on checkpoint inhibitors and BRAF-targeting drugs have limited therapeutic options. Up to one third of melanomas harbor at least one molecular aberration in the homologous recombination (HR) pathway, leading to HR deficiency.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this single-arm trial, we assessed the overall response rate to niraparib in patients with metastatic melanoma, harboring a genetic alteration in the HR pathway (ARID1A/B, ARID2, ATM, ATR, ATRX, BARD1, BRCA1/2, BAP1, BRIP1, CHEK2, FANCD2, MRE11A, RAD50, RAD51, RAD54B, or PALB2) who had disease progression after PD-1 blockade or BRAF/MEK inhibition if BRAF-mutant. Niraparib was administered orally at 300 mg or 200 mg daily, based on body weight and platelet count.

RESULTS

Fourteen patients were accrued to the trial, which was discontinued because of slow accrual. The median age was 71 years. Nine patients had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 1. Eleven patients had elevated lactate dehydrogenase levels. Ten patients had nonuveal melanoma and four had uveal melanoma. Two (14%) had a partial response and seven (50%) had stable disease, with a disease control rate of 64%. The median progression-free survival was 16 weeks. Among the patients with nonuveal melanoma, two (20%) achieved partial response with a time to progression of 32 and 24 weeks, while five (50%) had stable disease lasting 16-98 weeks. None of the four patients with uveal melanoma responded. There were no unexpected adverse events related to niraparib treatment. Notably, one responder with an ARID1A mutation had detectable circulating tumor DNA at baseline, which became undetectable during treatment.

CONCLUSION

Despite the small sample size, our results indicate a promising signal for single agent niraparib in patients with pretreated nonuveal metastatic melanoma with HR gene mutations.

Multi-omics analysis identifies diagnostic circulating biomarkers and potential therapeutic targets, revealing IQGAP1 as an oncogene in gastric cancer

This study employed a multi-omics integration approach to identify circulating biomarkers for gastric cancer (GC). We analyzed plasma and tumor tissue single-cell RNA sequencing data, along with gene and protein quantitative trait loci analyses. Leveraging data from UK Biobank and FinnGen, we investigated genetic associations with GC. Through colocalization, Mendelian Randomization, and various filtering analyses, we identified four genes (IQGAP1, KRTCAP2, PARP1, MLF2) and four proteins (EGFL9 [DLK2], ECM1, PDIA5, TIMP4) as potential GC biomarkers. These were selected based on significant genetic colocation probabilities and significant associations with GC. Seven of these biomarkers demonstrated predictive capability for GC occurrence, with AUC ranging from 0.61 to 0.99. Drug prediction analysis identified seven protein biomarkers as potential targets for immunotherapy, targeted therapies, and tumor chemotherapy. Further scRNA-seq analysis revealed significant expression differences between gastric tumor and normal tissues, particularly the upregulation of IQGAP1, which highlights its role in tumor growth.

Ovarian Carcinomas: Clinicopathologic and Molecular Features With Comments on 2014 FIGO Staging

According to histopathology and molecular genetics, there are 5 major subtypes of ovarian carcinomas: high-grade serous (70%), endometrioid (10%), clear cell (10%), mucinous (3% to 4%), and low-grade serous (<5%) carcinomas. These tumors, which constitute over 95% of cases, represent distinct diseases with different prognoses and therapy. This review outlines contemporary advances in molecular pathology, which have expanded our knowledge of the biology of epithelial ovarian cancer and are also important to patient management. We also comment on some controversial points of the FIGO staging classification that we proposed in 2014.

Exploring the Prognostic and Predictive Impact of Genomic Loss of Heterozygosity and Homologous Recombination Deficiency Alterations in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

PURPOSE

Genomic loss-of-heterozygosity (gLOH) consists in the loss of chromosomal regions and is associated with homologous recombination repair (HRR) system deficiency. We explored the role of gLOH and HRR-related gene alterations in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

METHODS

FoundationOne CDx assay was used to determine the percentage of gLOH and the presence of alterations in 27 HRR-related genes in archival chemo-naïve tumor tissues of patients with mCRC treated with first-line oxaliplatin- or irinotecan-based doublets and triplet ± anti-PD-L1.

RESULTS

Overall, 243 samples were analyzed. None of the nine deficient mismatch repair/microsatellite instability high tumors were gLOH-high, while 16 (7%) of 234 proficient mismatch repair/microsatellite stable (pMMR/MSS) tumors were gLOH-high. In the pMMR/MSS population, six (3%) and 18 (8%) had at least a biallelic or monoallelic HRR-related gene alteration, respectively. Among patients receiving FOLFOXIRI alone (n = 68) or with an anti-PD-L1 (N = 90), higher benefit from the addition of the immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) was observed in the gLOH-high subgroup (n = 12), in terms of both progression-free survival (PFS; Pint = .02) and overall survival (OS; Pint = .03). No differences in PFS or OS were reported between patients treated with first-line oxaliplatin- (n = 40) versus irinotecan-based doublets (n = 25) or with the triplet FOLFOXIRI (n = 68) versus doublets (n = 65), according to the gLOH status. Among patients not receiving an anti-PD-L1, longer PFS was observed in the gLOH-low group (n = 138) versus the gLOH-high (n = 6) group (5.1 v 12.1 months; hazard ratio, 8.73 [95% CI, 3.64 to 20.9]; P < .001), and this was confirmed in the multivariate analysis (P < .001). No prognostic impact of monoallelic or biallelic HRR-related gene alterations was shown.

CONCLUSION

In pMMR/MSS mCRC, gLOH-high was associated with worse prognosis and higher benefit from the addition of anti-PD-L1 agents to chemotherapy. If confirmed in larger series, these results may inform the design of clinical trials.

Deciphering the mechanisms of PARP inhibitor resistance in prostate cancer: Implications for precision medicine

Prostate cancer is a leading malignancy among men. While early-stage prostate cancer can be effectively managed, metastatic prostate cancer remains incurable, with a median survival of 3-5 years. The primary treatment for advanced prostate cancer is androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), but resistance to ADT often leads to castrationresistant prostate cancer (CRPC), presenting a significant therapeutic challenge. The advent of precision medicine has introduced promising new treatments, including PARP inhibitors (PARPi), which target defects in DNA repair mechanisms in cancer cells. PARPi have shown efficacy in treating advanced prostate cancer, especially in patients with metastatic CRPC (mCRPC) harboring homologous recombination (HR)-associated gene mutations. Despite these advancements, resistance to PARPi remains a critical issue. Here, we explored the primary mechanisms of PARPi resistance in prostate cancer. Key resistance mechanisms include homologous recombination recovery through reverse mutations in BRCA genes, BRCA promoter demethylation, and non-degradation of mutated BRCA proteins. The tumor microenvironment and overactivation of the base excision repair pathway also play significant roles in bypassing PARPi-induced synthetic lethality. In addition, we explored the clinical implications and therapeutic strategies to overcome resistance,emphasizing the need for precision medicine approaches. Our findings highlight the need for comprehensive strategies to improve PARPi sensitivity and effectiveness,ultimately aiming to extend patient survival and improve the quality of life for those with advanced prostate cancer. As our understanding of PARPi resistance evolves, more diverse and effective individualized treatment regimens will emerge.

A large-scale method to measure the absolute stoichiometries of protein Poly-ADP-Ribosylation

Poly-ADP-ribosylation (PARylation) is a reversible posttranslational modification that occurs in higher eukaryotes. While thousands of PARylated substrates have been identified, the specific biological functions of most PARylated proteins remain elusive. PARylation stoichiometry is a critical parameter to assess the potential functions of a PARylated protein. Here, we developed a large-scale strategy to measure the absolute stoichiometries of protein PARylation. By integrating mild cell lysis, boronate enrichment and carefully designed titration experiments, we were able to determine the PARylation stoichiometries for a total of 235 proteins. This approach enables the capture of all PARylation events on various amino acid acceptors. We revealed that PARylation occupancy spans over three orders of magnitude. However, most PARylation events occur at low stoichiometric values (median 0.578%). Notably, we observed that high stoichiometry PARylation (>1%) predominantly targets proteins involved in transcription regulation and chromatin remodeling. Thus, our study provides a systems-scale, quantitative view of PARylation stoichiometries under genotoxic conditions, which serves as invaluable resources for future functional studies of this important protein posttranslational modification.

Next-generation sequencing for guiding matched targeted therapies in people with relapsed or metastatic cancer

BACKGROUND

Matched targeted therapies (MTT) given alone or in combination with systemic anti-cancer therapies have delivered proven survival benefit for many people with newly diagnosed cancer. However, there is little evidence of their effectiveness in the recurrent or late-stage setting. With this uncertainty, alongside the perception that late-stage cancers are too genetically heterogenous or too mutationally diverse to benefit from matched targeted therapies, next-generation sequencing (NGS) of tumours in people with refractory cancer remains a low priority. As a result, next-generation sequencing testing of recurrent or late-stage disease is discouraged. We lack evidence to support the utility of next generation sequencing in guiding matched targeted therapies in this setting.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the benefits and harms of matched targeted therapies in people with advanced cancers in randomised controlled trials.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the World Health Organisation International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (WHO-ICTRP) search portal up to 30th October 2024. We also screened reference lists of included studies and also the publications that cited these studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that had enroled participants with advanced/refractory solid or haematological cancers who had progressed through at least one line of standard anti-cancer systemic therapy. To be eligible, all participants should have received matched targeted therapy based on next-generation sequencing carried out on their tumour (tumour tissue, blood or bone marrow).

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We systematically searched medical databases (e.g. MEDLINE, Embase) and trial registers for randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Outcomes of interest were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), overall response rates (ORR), serious (grade 3 or 4) adverse events (AEs) and quality of life (QOL). We used a random-effects model to pool outcomes across studies and compared predefined subgroups using interaction tests. Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) assessment of certainty was used to evaluate the quality of evidence.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified a total of 37 studies, out of which 35 studies (including 9819 participants) were included in the meta-analysis. All included studies compared a matched targeted therapy intervention to standard-of-care treatment, non-matched targeted therapies or no treatment (best supportive care): Matched targeted therapy versus standard-of-care treatment Matched targeted therapy (MTT) compared with standard systematic therapy probably reduces the risk of disease progression by 34% (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.66, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.59 to 0.74; 14 studies, 3848 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). However, MTT might have little to no difference in risk of death (HR = 0.85, 95% CI 0.75 to 0.97; 14 studies, 3848 participants; low-certainty evidence) and may increase overall response rates (low-certainty evidence). There was no clear evidence of a difference in severe (grade 3/4) adverse events between matched targeted therapy and standard-of-care treatment (low-certainty evidence). There was limited evidence of a difference in quality of life between groups (very low-certainty of evidence). Matched targeted therapy in combination with standard-of-care treatment versus standard-of-care treatment alone Matched targeted therapy in combination with standard-of-care treatment compared with standard-of-care treatment alone probably reduces the risk of disease progression by 39% (HR = 0.61, 95% CI 0.53-0.70, 14 studies, 2,637 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) and risk of death by 21% (HR = 0.79, 95% CI 0.70 to 0.89; 11 studies, 2575 participants, moderate-certainty evidence). The combination of MTT and standard-of-care treatment may also increase overall response rates (low-certainty evidence). There was limited evidence of a difference in the incidence of severe adverse events (very low-certainty evidence) and quality of life between the groups (very low-certainty of evidence). Matched targeted therapy versus non-matched targeted therapy Matched targeted therapy compared with non-matched targeted therapy probably reduces the risk of disease progression by 24% (HR = 0.76, 95% CI 0.64 to 0.89; 3 studies, 1568 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) and may reduce the risk of death by 25% (HR = 0.75, 95% CI 0.65 to 0.86, 1307 participants; low-certainty evidence). There was little to no effect on overall response rates between MTT and non-MTT. There was no clear evidence of a difference in overall response rates (low-certainty evidence) and severe adverse events between MTT and non-MTT (low-certainty evidence). None of the studies comparing MTT and non-MTT reported quality of life. Matched targeted therapy versus best supportive care Matched targeted therapy compared with the best supportive care (BSC) i.e. no active treatment probably reduces the risk of disease progression by 63% (HR 0.37, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.50; 4 studies, 858 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). There was no clear evidence of a difference in overall survival between groups (HR = 0.88, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.06, 3 studies, 783 participants; low-certainty evidence). There was no clear evidence of a difference in overall response rates (very low-certainty of evidence) and incidence of severe adverse events (very low-certainty of evidence) between the groups. Quality of life was reported in a single study but did not provide composite scores. Risk of bias The overall risk of bias was judged low for eight studies, unclear for two studies, and the remaining 27 studies were high risk.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Matched targeted therapies guided by next-generation sequencing in people with advanced cancer prolongs the time before cancer progresses compared to standard therapies. However, there is limited evidence to suggest that it prolongs overall survival, improves the quality of life or increases adverse events. Importantly, this review supports equitable access to next-generation sequencing technology for all people with advanced cancer and offers them the opportunity to access genotype-matched targeted therapies.

Predictive biomarkers for the efficacy of PARP inhibitors in ovarian cancer: an updated systematic review

BACKGROUND

PARP inhibitors are effective in treating ovarian cancer, especially for BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant carriers and those with HRD (homologous recombination deficiency). Concerns over toxicity and costs have led to the search for predictive biomarkers. We present an updated systematic review, expanding on a previous ESMO review on PARP inhibitor biomarkers.

METHODS

Following ESMO's 2020 review protocol, we extended our search to March 31, 2023, including PubMed and clinical trial data. We also reviewed the reference lists of review articles. We conducted a meta-analysis using a random-effects model to evaluate hazard ratios and assess the predictive potential of biomarkers and the effectiveness of PARP inhibitors in survival.

RESULTS

We found 375 articles, 103 of which were included after screening (62 primary research, 41 reviews). HRD remained the primary biomarker (95%), particularly BRCA1/2 variants (77%). In the non-HRD category, six articles (10%) introduced innovative biomarkers, including ADP-ribosylation, HOXA9 promoter methylation, patient-derived organoids, KELIM, and SLFN11.

DISCUSSION

Prospective assessment of real-time homologous recombination repair via nuclear RAD51 levels shows promise but needs validation. Emerging biomarkers like ADP-ribosylation, HOXA9 promoter methylation, patient-derived organoids, KELIM, and SLFN11 offer potential but require large-scale validation.

Semi-mechanistic efficacy model for PARP + ATR inhibitors-application to rucaparib and talazoparib in combination with gartisertib in breast cancer PDXs

BACKGROUND

Promising cancer treatments, such as DDR inhibitors, are often challenged by the heterogeneity of responses in clinical trials. The present work aimed to build a computational framework to address those challenges.

METHODS

A semi-mechanistic pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model of tumour growth inhibition was developed to investigate the efficacy of PARP and ATR inhibitors as monotherapies, and in combination. Key features of the DNA damage response were incorporated into the model to allow the emergence of synthetic lethality, including redundant DNA repair pathways that may be impaired due to genetic mutations, and due to PARP and ATR inhibition. Model parameters were calibrated using preclinical in vivo data for PARP inhibitors rucaparib and talazoparib and the ATR inhibitor gartisertib.

RESULTS

The model successfully captured the monotherapy efficacies of rucaparib and talazoparib, as well as the combination efficacy with gartisertib. The model was evaluated against multiple tumour xenografts with diverse genetic backgrounds and was able to capture the observed heterogeneity of response profiles.

CONCLUSIONS

By enabling simulation of in vivo tumour growth inhibition with PARP and ATR inhibitors for specific tumour types, the model provides a rational approach to support the optimisation of dosing regimens to stratified populations.

Homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) testing landscape: clinical applications and technical validation for routine diagnostics

The use of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) revolutionized the treatment of BRCA-mutated cancers. Identifying patients exhibiting homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) has been proved useful to predict PARPi efficacy. However, obtaining HRD status remains an arduous task due to its evolution over the time. This causes HRD status to become obsolete when obtained from genomic scars, rendering PARPi ineffective for these patients. Only two HRD tests are currently FDA-approved, both based on genomic scars detection and BRCA mutations testing. Nevertheless, new technologies for obtaining an increasingly reliable HRD status continue to evolve. Application of these tests in clinical practice is an additional challenge due to the need for lower costs and shorter time to results delay.In this review, we describe the currently available methods for HRD testing, including the methodologies and corresponding tests for assessing HRD status, and discuss the clinical routine application of these tests and their technical validation.

Potential promising of synthetic lethality in cancer research and treatment

Cancer is a complex disease driven by multiple genetic changes, including mutations in oncogenes, tumor suppressor genes, DNA repair genes, and genes involved in cancer metabolism. Synthetic lethality (SL) is a promising approach in cancer research and treatment, where the simultaneous dysfunction of specific genes or pathways causes cell death. By targeting vulnerabilities created by these dysfunctions, SL therapies selectively kill cancer cells while sparing normal cells. SL therapies, such as PARP inhibitors, WEE1 inhibitors, ATR and ATM inhibitors, and DNA-PK inhibitors, offer a distinct approach to cancer treatment compared to conventional targeted therapies. Instead of directly inhibiting specific molecules or pathways, SL therapies exploit genetic or molecular vulnerabilities in cancer cells to induce selective cell death, offering benefits such as targeted therapy, enhanced treatment efficacy, and minimized harm to healthy tissues. SL therapies can be personalized based on each patient's unique genetic profile and combined with other treatment modalities to potentially achieve synergistic effects. They also broaden the effectiveness of treatment across different cancer types, potentially overcoming drug resistance and improving patient outcomes. This review offers an overview of the current understanding of SL mechanisms, advancements, and challenges, as well as the preclinical and clinical development of SL. It also discusses new directions and opportunities for utilizing SL in targeted therapy for anticancer treatment.

Rucaparib versus chemotherapy for treatment of relapsed ovarian cancer with deleterious BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation (ARIEL4): final results of an international, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND

In the ARIEL4 trial of rucaparib versus standard-of-care chemotherapy in patients with relapsed BRCA-mutated ovarian carcinoma, the primary endpoint was met, showing improved investigator-assessed progression-free survival with rucaparib. Here, we present the final overall survival analysis of the trial and other post-progression outcomes.

METHODS

This open-label, randomised, controlled phase 3 trial was done at 64 hospitals and cancer centres in 12 countries, including Brazil, Canada, Czech Republic, Hungary, Israel, Italy, Poland, Russia, Spain, Ukraine, the UK, and the USA. Eligible patients were women aged 18 or older with BRCA1 or BRCA2-mutated ovarian carcinoma and had received at least two previous chemotherapy regimens. Patients had to have evaluable disease as per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST; version 1.1) criteria and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) using an interactive response technology and block randomisation (block size of six) and stratified by progression-free interval after the most recent platinum-containing therapy to receive oral rucaparib (600 mg twice daily administered in 28-day cycles) or chemotherapy on the basis of platinum-sensitivity status. In the chemotherapy group, patients with platinum-resistant disease (progression-free interval ≥1 to <6 months) or partially platinum-sensitive disease (progression-free interval ≥6 to <12 months) received weekly paclitaxel (starting dose 60-80 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15). Patients with fully platinum-sensitive disease (progression-free interval ≥12 months) received the investigator's choice of platinum-based chemotherapy (single-agent cisplatin or carboplatin, or platinum-doublet chemotherapy), in 21-day or 28-day cycles. The primary endpoint (previously reported) was investigator-assessed progression-free survival, assessed in the efficacy population (all randomly assigned patients with deleterious BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations without reversion mutations) and in the intention-to-treat population (all randomly assigned patients). Overall survival was a prespecified secondary endpoint and was analysed in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of assigned study treatment. The cutoff date was April 10, 2022. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02855944; enrolment is complete and the study is closed.

FINDINGS

Between March 1, 2017, and Sept 24, 2020, 349 eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive rucaparib (n=233) or chemotherapy (n=116). 332 (95%) of 349 patients were white and 17 (5%) patients were other or of unknown race. In the chemotherapy group, 80 (69%) of 116 patients crossed over to receive rucaparib. Median follow-up was 41·2 months (IQR 37·8-44·6). At data cutoff for this final analysis (April 10, 2022), 244 (70%) of 349 patients had died: 167 (72%) of 233 in the rucaparib group and 77 (66%) of 116 in the rucaparib group. Median overall survival was 19·4 months (95% CI 15·2-23·6) in the rucaparib group versus 25·4 months (21·4-27·6) in the chemotherapy group (hazard ratio 1·3 [95% CI 1·0-1·7], p=0·047). No new safety signals were observed, including during crossover to rucaparib. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events across treatment groups included anaemia or decreased haemoglobin (reported in 59 [25%] of 232 patients in the rucaparib group and seven [6%] of 113 in the chemotherapy group), and neutropenia or decreased neutrophil count (in 26 [11%] of 232 in the rucaparib group and 16 [14%] of 113 patients in the chemotherapy group). Serious adverse events were reported in 66 (28%) of 232 patients in the rucaparib group and 14 (12%) of 113 patients in the chemotherapy group. Ten treatment-related deaths were reported in the rucaparib group, two of which were linked to judged to be related to rucaparib (cardiac disorder and myelodysplastic syndrome), and one death related to treatment was reported in the chemotherapy group, with no specific cause linked to the treatment.

INTERPRETATION

These data highlight the need for a better understanding of the most appropriate treatment for patients who have progressed on a poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor, and the optimal sequencing of chemotherapy and PARP inhibitors in advanced ovarian cancer.

FUNDING

Clovis Oncology.

Whole exome sequencing-based homologous recombination deficiency test for epithelial ovarian cancer

BACKGROUND

The homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) test is an important tool for identifying patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) benefit from the treatment with poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase inhibitor (PARPi). Using whole exome sequencing (WES)-based platform can provide information of gene mutations and HRD score; however, the clinical value of WES-based HRD test was less validated in EOC.

METHODS

We enrolled 40 patients with EOC in the training cohort and 23 in the validation cohort. The WES-based HRD score was calculated using the scarHRD software. We first evaluated the concordance of the HRD status defined by the Myriad MyChoice CDx and then assessed the value of HRD on clinical prognosis in patients with EOC.

RESULTS

The HRD score defined by the WES-based test was positively correlated with that of the Myriad MyChoice® CDx test (r = 0.82, p < 0.01) in the training cohort. In compared to HRD status of Myriad test, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the WES-based HRD test were 93.5% (29/31), 77.8% (7/9), 93.5% (29/31), and 77.8% (7/9), respectively. Patients with positive HRD status defined by WES-based scarHRD test and Myriad MyChoice® CDx test were both highly associated with platinum sensitive response (both Fisher's exact test, p = 0.002) as well as the superior progression-free survival (both log-rank p = 0.002). The multi-variate Cox regression model incorporated with optimal debulking surgery showed that the recurrence risk was decreased in the patients with positive HRD status, either defined by Myriad MyChoice® CDx test (Hazard ratio (HR) 0.33, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.14-0.79, p = 0.013) or WES-based test Myriad MyChoice® CDx test (HR 0.34, 95% CI 0.14-0.80, p = 0.014). Nine patients had mutations in the genes involved in HR DNA repair, and all of them were positive for HRD. In the validation group, 23 patients were defined as positive HRD by WES-based testing. Six positive HRD patients and 5 negative HRD patients received maintenance PARPi. The median responsive interval of PARPi was 17 months in positive HRD patients and 3 months in negative HRD patients.

CONCLUSION

The WES-based test is a potential option for determining the HRD status in EOC patients, and desires for further validation in large-scale cohorts.

Morphologic Correlations With Homologous Recombination Deficiency in High-grade Serous Carcinomas

High-grade serous carcinomas (HGSCs) with homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) respond favorably to platinum therapy and poly ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors. Mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 commonly cause HRD and have been associated with Solid, pseudoEndometrioid, and Transitional-like (SET-like) histology. Mutations in other homologous recombination repair (HRR) genes as well as epigenetic changes can also result in HRD; however, morphologic correlates have not been well-explored in these cases. We hypothesized that HGSCs with HRD, regardless of the etiology, are associated with specific morphologic features. Forty-three cases of HGSC with genomic profiling, which included HRR gene mutation analysis and HRD score, were evaluated. The morphologic patterns, degree of nuclear atypia, necrosis, mitotic index, and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) were determined. The results showed that HRD-high status was significantly associated with the presence of BRCA1/2 mutation, SET-like morphology, geographic necrosis, and severe nuclear atypia. Additional HRR pathway genes with oncogenic mutations identified included ATM, BRIP1, BLM, FANCC, CDK12, CHEK2, RAD51C, and RAD51D. Almost one-third of HRD-high tumors did not have mutations in any HRR pathway genes identified. In conclusion, HGSC with HRD, regardless of BRCA1/2-status, was associated with SET-like morphology and more severe nuclear atypia. Identifying and reporting these patterns of tumor morphology can prompt genomic profiling with prognostic, therapeutic, and genetic counseling implications.

Opportunities for predictive proteogenomic biomarkers of drug treatment sensitivity in epithelial ovarian cancer

Genomic analysis has played a significant role in the identification of driver mutations that are linked to disease progression and response to drug treatment in ovarian cancer. A prominent example is the stratification of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) patients with homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) characterized by mutations in DNA damage repair genes such as BRCA1/2 for treatment with PARP inhibitors. However, recent studies have shown that some epithelial ovarian tumors respond to PARP inhibitors irrespective of their HRD or BRCA mutation status. An exclusive focus on the genome overlooks the significant insight that can be gained from other biological analytes, including proteins, which carry out cellular functions. Proteogenomics is the integration of genomics, transcriptomics, epigenomics and proteomics data. This review paper provides novel insight into the role of proteogenomics as an analytical approach to identify predictive biomarkers of drug treatment response in epithelial ovarian cancer. Proteogenomic analysis can facilitate the identification of predictive biomarkers of drug treatment response, consequently greatly improving the stratification of patients with EOC for treatment towards a goal of personalized medicine.

Unraveling the complexity of HRD assessment in ovarian cancer by combining genomic and functional approaches: translational analyses of MITO16-MaNGO-OV-2 trial

BACKGROUND

Ovarian cancer (OvC) constitutes significant management challenges primarily due to its late-stage diagnosis and the development of resistance to chemotherapy. The standard treatment regimen typically includes carboplatin and paclitaxel, with the addition of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors for patients with high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) harboring BRCA1/2 mutations. However, the variability in treatment responses suggests the need to investigate factors beyond BRCA1/2 mutations, such as DNA repair mechanisms and epigenetic alterations. Notably, homologous recombination repair deficiency (HRD) is observed in an additional 20% of HGSOC cases, indicating a broader spectrum of DNA repair defects. Existing commercial HRD assays have certain limitations, prompting a global effort to develop new genomic and functional tests through academic research.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study investigates, in the 187 high-grade serous and endometrioid tumors from the MITO16/MaNGO-OV-2 trial, academic HRD genomic tests in conjunction with a RAD51 immunofluorescence assay to assess functional activation of HRD. Additionally, the study incorporates analysis of microRNA-506 (miR-506) expression as a putative epigenetic effector.

RESULTS

The RAD51 test identified HRD in 73% of the samples and genomic HRD testing in 57%, with HRD identified in 45% of samples by both tests. The significant discrepancy between the two assays emphasizes the need to refine tumor classification for HRD. A three-group genomic classification unveiled superior progression-free survival (PFS) in high- and mild-HRD tumors compared with negative-HRD tumors. High concordance between RAD51 and genomic testing in high-HRD tumors suggests a subset of 'super-HRD' tumors exhibiting superior PFS. High expression of miR-506 may be used to further refine HRD status.

CONCLUSIONS

The study underscores the complexities of HRD assessment and advocates for a combined genomic and functional approach to enhance predictive accuracy in OvC treatment responses.

BRCA1 & BRCA2 methylation as a prognostic and predictive biomarker in cancer: Implementation in liquid biopsy in the era of precision medicine

BACKGROUND

BReast CAncer gene 1 (BRCA1) and BReast CAncer gene 2 (BRCA2) encode for tumor suppressor proteins which are critical regulators of the Homologous Recombination (HR) pathway, the most precise and important DNA damage response mechanism. Dysfunctional HR proteins cannot repair double-stranded DNA breaks in mammalian cells, a situation called HR deficiency. Since their identification, pathogenic variants and other alterations of BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes have been associated with an increased risk of developing mainly breast and ovarian cancer. Interestingly, HR deficiency is also detected in tumors not carrying BRCA1/2 mutations, a condition termed "BRCAness".

MAIN TEXT

One of the main mechanisms causing the BRCAness phenotype is the methylation of the BRCA1/2 promoters, and this epigenetic modification is associated with carcinogenesis and poor prognosis mainly among patients with breast and ovarian cancer. BRCA1 promoter methylation has been suggested as an emerging biomarker of great predictive significance, especially concerning Poly (ADP-ribose) Polymerase inhibitors (PARP inhibitor-PARPi) responsiveness, along with or beyond BRCA1/2 mutations. However, as its clinical exploitation is still insufficient, the impact of BRCA1/2 promoter methylation status needs to be further evaluated. The current review aims to gather the latest findings about the mechanisms that underline BRCA1/2 function as well as the molecular characteristics of tumors associated with BRCA1/2 defects, by focusing on DNA methylation. Furthermore, we critically analyze their translational meaning and the validity of BRCA methylation biomarkers in predicting treatment response.

CONCLUSIONS

We believe that BRCA1/2 methylation alone or combined with other biomarkers in a clinical setting is expected to change the scenery in prognosis and predicting treatment response in multiple cancer types and is worthy of further attention. The quantitative BRCA1 promoter methylation assessment might predict treatment response in PARPi and analysis of BRCA1/2 methylation in liquid biopsy might define patient subgroups at different time points that may benefit from PARPi. Finally, we suggest a pipeline that could be implemented in liquid biopsy to aid precision pharmacotherapy in BRCA-associated tumors.

[18F]Fluorthanatrace PET in Ovarian Cancer: Comparison with [18F]FDG PET, Lesion Location, Tumor Grade, and Breast Cancer Gene Mutation Status

Poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase-1 (PARP1) inhibitors have improved ovarian cancer treatment outcomes. However, clinical response remains heterogeneous. Existing biomarkers, mainly breast cancer susceptibility genes 1 and 2 (BRCA1/2), are suboptimal. New tools are needed to guide patient selection. In this study, [18F]fluorthanatrace ([18F]FTT), a PET radiotracer for imaging PARP1, was compared with [18F]FDG and tumor features commonly assessed in ovarian cancer. Methods: Subjects with epithelial ovarian cancer underwent both [18F]FTT and [18F]FDG PET before new oncologic treatment. The SUVmax of [18F]FTT and [18F]FDG was compared between lesions. [18F]FTT SUVmax was compared with tumor location, tumor grade, and germline or somatic BRCA1/2 status. Linear mixed models were fitted to identify subject-level differences. Results: Fifty-five lesions were identified in 14 subjects. No correlation was found between [18F]FTT SUVmax and [18F]FDG SUVmax per lesion, supporting distinct molecular targets. [18F]FTT uptake varied widely across lesions, with no significant differences between mean SUVmax and tumor location, grade, or BRCA1/2 status. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that [18F]FTT PET may provide unique information on ovarian cancer distinct from [18F]FDG PET and commonly assessed tumor features. Our results imply a wide range of PARP1 expression in the studied ovarian tumors not explained by [18F]FDG PET, location, grade, or mutational status.

Advances in the study of the role of high-frequency mutant subunits of the SWI/SNF complex in tumors

SWI/SNF (Switch/Sucrose non-fermentable, switch/sucrose non-fermentable) chromatin remodeling complex is a macromolecular complex composed of multiple subunits. It can use the energy generated by the hydrolysis of ATP (Adenosine triphosphate) to destroy the connection between DNA and histones, achieve the breakdown of nucleosomes, and regulate gene expression. SWI/SNF complex is essential for cell proliferation and differentiation, and the abnormal function of its subunits is closely related to tumorigenesis. Among them, ARID1A, an essential non-catalytic subunit of the SWI/SNF complex, can regulate the targeting of the complex through DNA or protein interactions. Moreover, the abnormal function of ARID1A significantly reduces the targeting of SWI/SNF complex to genes and participates in critical intracellular activities such as gene transcription and DNA synthesis. As a catalytic subunit of the SWI/SNF complex, SMARCA4 has ATPase activity that catalyzes the hydrolysis of ATP to produce energy and power the chromatin remodeling complex, which is critical to the function of the SWI/SNF complex. The study data indicate that approximately 25% of cancers have one or more SWI/SNF subunit genetic abnormalities, and at least nine different SWI/SNF subunits have been identified as having repeated mutations multiple times in various cancers, suggesting that mutations affecting SWI/SNF subunits may introduce vulnerabilities to these cancers. Here, we review the mechanism of action of ARID1A and SMARCA4, the two subunits with the highest mutation frequency in the SWI/SNF complex, and the research progress of their targeted therapy in tumors to provide a new direction for precise targeted therapy of clinical tumors.

Pan-Cancer Analysis of Homologous Recombination Deficiency in Cell Lines

SIGNIFICANCE

HRD is common in cancer and can be exploited therapeutically, as it sensitizes cells to DNA-damaging agents. Here, we scored more than 1,300 cancer cell lines for HRD using two different bioinformatic approaches, thereby enabling large-scale analyses that provide insights into the etiology and features of HRD.

Genetic Implications for Cancer Management: The Changing Landscape of Poly (ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitor Indications in the Treatment of Ovarian Cancer

Between December 2014 and May 2020, the United States Food and Drug Administration approved 9 indications for poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor use in ovarian cancer. Between June 2022 and September 2022, all 3 indications for PARP inhibitor treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer were withdrawn. Between November 2022 and September 2023, all 3 indications for PARP inhibitor maintenance therapy in recurrent ovarian cancer were restricted. The 3 indications for PARP inhibitor maintenance therapy in newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer are unchanged. This article reviews the timelines and data leading to regulatory changes for PARP inhibitor use in ovarian cancer in the United States.

A phase II study evaluating safety and efficacy of niraparib in patients with previously treated homologous recombination defective metastatic esophageal/gastroesophageal junction/proximal gastric adenocarcinoma

Introduction

Esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) remains a devastating disease and second line treatment options in the metastatic space are limited. Homologous recombination (HR) defects have been described in EAC in up to 40% of patients. Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP)1 and PARP2 inhibitors have shown efficacy in HR defective prostate and ovarian cancers. Here, we describe the activity of the PARP inhibitor niraparib in metastatic EAC with HR defects.

Methods

In this single arm Simon two-stage Phase II study, we assessed the safety and efficacy of niraparib in patients with metastatic EAC previously treated with platinum containing chemotherapy harboring defective HR. Defective HR was defined as deleterious alterations in the following HR genes: BRCA1/2, PALB2, ATM, BARD1, BRIP1, CDK12, CHEK2, FANCA, RAD51, RAD51B, RAD51C, RAD51D, RAD54L, NBN, ARID1A and GEN1.

Results

14 patients were enrolled in this study. The trial was stopped early due to slow accrual. 3 patients did not have post-treatment scans because of rapid clinical decline. The overall response rate (ORR) (95% exact CI) was 0/11 = 0% (0%, 28.49%). The disease control rate (DCR) (95% exact CI) was 2/11 = 18.2% (2.3%, 51.8%). The median PFS was 1.8 months (95% CI = 1.0-3.7). The median OS for evaluable patients was 6.6 months (95% CI =2.7-11.4) and 5.7 months for all patients (95% CI =2.7-10.1). The most common adverse events seen were anemia, fatigue, and thrombocytopenia.

Conclusion

In patients with metastatic EAC, single agent niraparib as second line therapy is not an effective option.

Polθ: emerging synthetic lethal partner in homologous recombination-deficient tumors

The most remarkable finding in synthetic lethality (SL) is the hypersensitivity to PARP inhibitors (PARPis) of the tumors harboring defects in genes involved in homologous repair (HR) such as BRCA1/2. Despite initial responsiveness to PARPi, the penetrance of the synthetic lethal interactions between BRCA1/2 genes and PARPi is incomplete. Thus, a significant proportion of HR-defective tumors experience intrinsic or acquired resistance, representing a key challenge of clinical research. An expanded concept of SL is opening new ways and includes novel forms of genetic interactions, investigating not only traditional SL of pairs genes but also SL between biological pathways that regulate the same essential survival cell function. In this context, recent research showed that HR and theta-mediated end-joining (TMEJ) pathways exhibit SL. DNA polymerase theta (Polθ) is encoded by the POLQ gene and is a key component of the TMEJ, an essential backup pathway, intrinsically mutagenic, to repair resected double-strand breaks (DSBs) when the non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) and HR are impaired. Polθ is broadly expressed in normal tissues, overexpressed in several cancers, and typically associated with poor outcomes and shorter relapse-free survival. Notably, HR-deficient tumor cells present the characteristic mutational signatures of the error-prone TMEJ pathway. According to this observation, the loss of HR proteins, such as BRCA1 or BRCA2, contributes to increasing the TMEJ-specific genomic profile, suggesting synthetic lethal interactions between loss of the POLQ and HR genes, and resulting in the emerging interest for Polθ as a potential therapeutic target in BRCA1/2-associated tumors.This review summarizes the converging roles of the POLQ and HR genes in DNA DSB repair, the early-stage clinical trials using Polθ inhibitor to treat HR-defective tumors and to overcome BRCA-reversion mutations responsible for therapeutic resistance, and the novel pleiotropic effects of Polθ, paving the way for the development of unexplored synthetic lethality strategies.

Poly (adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase inhibitors in the treatment of triple-negative breast cancer with homologous repair deficiency

Breast cancer (BC) is a highly heterogeneous disease, and the presence of germline breast cancer gene mutation (gBRCAm) is associated with a poor prognosis. Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a BC subtype, characterized by the absence of hormone and growth factor receptor expression, making therapeutic decisions difficult. Defects in the DNA damage response pathway due to mutation in breast cancer genes (BRCA 1/2) lead to homologous recombination deficiency (HRD). However, in HRD conditions, poly (adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase (PARP) proteins repair DNA damage and lead to tumor cell survival. Biological understanding of HRD leads to the development of PARP inhibitors (PARPi), which trap PARP proteins and cause genomic instability and tumor cell lysis. HRD assessment can be an important biomarker in identifying gBRCAm patients with BC who could benefit from PARPi therapy. HRD can be identified by homologous recombination repair (HRR) gene-based assays, genomic-scarring assays and mutational signatures, transcription and protein expression profiles, and functional assays. However, gold standard methodologies that are robust and reliable to assess HRD are not available currently. Hence, there is a pressing need to develop accurate biomarkers identifying HRD tumors to guide targeted therapies such as PARPi in patients with BC. HRD assessment has shown fruitful outcomes in chemotherapy studies and preliminary evidence on PARPi intervention as monotherapy and combination therapy in HRD-stratified patients. Furthermore, ongoing trials are exploring the potential of PARPi in BC and clinically complex TNBC settings, where HRD testing is used as an adjunct to stratify patients based on BRCA mutations.

Targeting DNA damage response in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: A review of preclinical and clinical evidence

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is associated with one of the most unfavorable prognoses across all malignancies. In this review, we investigate the role of inhibitors targeting crucial regulators of DNA damage response (DDR) pathways, either as single treatments or in combination with chemotherapeutic agents and targeted therapies in PDAC. The most prominent clinical benefit of PARP inhibitors' monotherapy is related to the principle of synthetic lethality in individuals harboring BRCA1/2 and other DDR gene mutations as predictive biomarkers. Moreover, induction of BRCAness with inhibitors of RTKs, including VEGFR and c-MET and their downstream signaling pathways, RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK and PI3K/AKT/mTOR in order to expand the application of PARP inhibitors in patients without DDR mutations, has also been addressed. Other DDR-targeting agents beyond PARP inhibitors, including inhibitors of ATM, ATR, CHEK1/2, and WEE1 have also demonstrated their potential in preclinical models of PDAC and may hold promise in future studies.

The VALTIVE1 study protocol: a study for the validation of Tie2 as the first tumour vascular response biomarker for VEGF inhibitors

BACKGROUND

Anti-angiogenic, VEGF inhibitors (VEGFi) increase progression-free survival (PFS) and, in some cases, overall survival in many solid tumours. However, their use has been compromised by a lack of informative biomarkers. We have shown that plasma Tie2 is the first tumour vascular response biomarker for VEGFi in ovarian, colorectal and gall bladder cancer: If plasma Tie2 concentrations do not change after 9 weeks of treatment with a VEGFi, the patient does not benefit, whereas a confirmed reduction of at least 10% plasma Tie2 defines a vascular response with a hazard ratio (HR) for PFS of 0.56. The aim of the VALTIVE1 study is to validate the utility of plasma Tie2 as a vascular response biomarker and to optimise the Tie2-definition of vascular response so that the subsequent randomised discontinuation VALTIVE2 study can be powered optimally.

METHODS

VALTIVE1 is a multi-centre, single arm, non-interventional biomarker study, with a sample size of 205 participants (176 bevacizumab-treated participants + 29 participants receiving bevacizumab and olaparib/PARPi), who are 16 years or older, have FIGO stage IIIc/IV ovarian cancer on treatment with first-line platinum-based chemotherapy and bevacizumab. Their blood plasma samples will be collected before, during, and after treatment and the concentration of Tie2 will be determined. The primary objective is to define the PFS difference between Tie2-defined vascular responders and Tie2-defined vascular non-responders in patients receiving bevacizumab for high-risk Ovarian Cancer. Secondary objectives include defining the relationship between Tie2-defined vascular progression and disease progression assessed according to RECIST 1.1 criteria and assessing the impact of PARPi on the plasma concentration of Tie2 and, therefore, the decision-making utility of Tie2 as a vascular response biomarker for bevacizumab during combined bevacizumab-PARPi maintenance.

DISCUSSION

There is an urgent need to establish a test that tells patients and their doctors when VEGFi are working and when they stop working. The data generated from this study will be used to design a second trial aiming to prove conclusively the value of the Tie2 test.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04523116. Registered on 21 Aug 2020.

Effectiveness of PARP Inhibitor Maintenance Therapy in Ovarian Cancer by BRCA1/2 and a Scar-Based HRD Signature in Real-World Practice

PURPOSE

The purpose of the study was to compare the effectiveness of PARP inhibitor maintenance therapy (mPARPi) in real-world practice by biomarker status [BRCA1/2 alterations (BRCAalt) and a homologous recombination deficiency signature (HRDsig)] in advanced ovarian cancer.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Patients with ovarian cancer receiving first-line platinum-based chemotherapy and either mPARPi or no maintenance were included. Patient data were obtained by a US-based de-identified ovarian cancer Clinico-Genomic Database, from ∼280 US cancer clinics (01/2015-03/2023). Real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) and overall survival (rwOS) were compared by biomarker status using Cox models, weighted by propensity scores.

RESULTS

Of 673 patients, 160 received mPARPi [31.2% BRCAalt and 51.9% HRDsig(+)] and 513 no maintenance [15.6% BRCAalt and 34.1% HRDsig(+)]. BRCAalt patients receiving mPARPi versus no maintenance had favorable rwPFS [HR, 0.48; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.26-0.87; P = 0.0154], as did BRCA wild-type (WT; HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.57-1.01; P = 0.0595). Favorable rwOS was not observed with mPARPi for BRCAalt or BRCA-WT. HRDsig(+) patients receiving mPARPi versus no maintenance had favorable rwPFS (HR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.24-0.55; P < 0.001) and numerically favorable rwOS (HR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.21-1.02; P = 0.0561). No differences were observed for HRDsig(-). mPARPi treatment interaction was observed for HRDsig(+) versus HRDsig(-) (rwPFS P < 0.001/rwOS P = 0.016) but not for BRCAalt versus BRCA-WT. Patients with BRCA-WT/HRDsig(+) receiving mPARPi had favorable rwPFS (HR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.22-0.72; P = 0.003), whereas no difference was observed for BRCA-WT/HRDsig(-).

CONCLUSIONS

HRDsig predicted benefit of mPARPi better than BRCAalt. Patients with HRDsig(+) status experienced favorable outcomes, even if they had BRCA-WT status. In contrast, patients with HRDsig(-) status did not show significant benefit from mPARPi treatment. HRDsig might predict benefit from mPARPi regardless of BRCAalt status.

Unlocking the potential of immunotherapy in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer: rationale, challenges, and novel strategies

Ovarian cancer is a significant global health challenge, with cytoreductive surgery and platinum-based chemotherapy serving as established primary treatments. Unfortunately, most patients relapse and ultimately become platinum-resistant, at which point there are limited effective treatment options. Given the success of immunotherapy in inducing durable treatment responses in several other cancers, its potential in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (PROC) is currently being investigated. However, in unselected advanced ovarian cancer populations, researchers have reported low response rates to immune checkpoint inhibition, and thus far, no validated biomarkers are predictive of response. Understanding the intricate interplay between platinum resistance, immune recognition, and the tumour microenvironment (TME) is crucial. In this review, we examine the research challenges encountered thus far, the biological rationale for immunotherapy, the underlying mechanisms of immune resistance, and new strategies to overcome resistance.

Predictive value of homologous recombination deficiency status for survival outcomes in primary tubo-ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma

OBJECTIVES

This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (prognosis). The objectives are as follows: To evaluate the predictive value of the prognostic factor HRD status, as determined by various clinically validated HRD assays at the time of staging laparotomy, compared to BRCA1/2 mutation status for progression-free survival and overall survival in patients with tubo-ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma treated in the first-line setting with a combination of surgery and platinum-based chemotherapy and/or maintenance with PARP inhibitors.

Advancing cancer therapy: new frontiers in targeting DNA damage response

Genomic instability is a core characteristic of cancer, often stemming from defects in DNA damage response (DDR) or increased replication stress. DDR defects can lead to significant genetic alterations, including changes in gene copy numbers, gene rearrangements, and mutations, which accumulate over time and drive the clonal evolution of cancer cells. However, these vulnerabilities also present opportunities for targeted therapies that exploit DDR deficiencies, potentially improving treatment efficacy and patient outcomes. The development of PARP inhibitors like Olaparib has significantly improved the treatment of cancers with DDR defects (e.g., BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations) based on synthetic lethality. This achievement has spurred further research into identifying additional therapeutic targets within the DDR pathway. Recent progress includes the development of inhibitors targeting other key DDR components such as DNA-PK, ATM, ATR, Chk1, Chk2, and Wee1 kinases. Current research is focused on optimizing these therapies by developing predictive biomarkers for treatment response, analyzing mechanisms of resistance (both intrinsic and acquired), and exploring the potential for combining DDR-targeted therapies with chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and immunotherapy. This article provides an overview of the latest advancements in targeted anti-tumor therapies based on DDR and their implications for future cancer treatment strategies.

The intersection of homologous recombination (HR) and mismatch repair (MMR) pathways in DNA repair-defective tumors

Homologous recombination (HR) and mismatch repair (MMR) defects are driver mutational imprints and actionable biomarkers in DNA repair-defective tumors. Although usually thought as mutually exclusive pathways, recent preclinical and clinical research provide preliminary evidence of a functional crosslink and crosstalk between HRR and MMR. Shared core proteins are identified as key players in both pathways, broadening the concept of DNA repair mechanism exclusivity in specific tumor types. These observations may result in unexplored forms of synthetic lethality or hypermutable tumor phenotypes, potentially impacting the cancer risk management, and considerably expanding in the future the therapeutic window for DNA repair-defective tumors.

British Gynaecological Cancer Society/British Association of Gynaecological Pathology consensus for genetic testing in epithelial ovarian cancer in the United Kingdom

Standard of care genetic testing has undergone significant changes in recent years. The British Gynecological Cancer Society and the British Association of Gynecological Pathologists (BGCS/BAGP) has re-assembled a multidisciplinary expert consensus group to update the previous guidance with the latest standard of care for germline and tumor testing in patients with ovarian cancer. For the first time, the BGCS/BAGP guideline group has incorporated a patient advisor at the initial consensus group meeting. We have used patient focused groups to inform discussions related to reflex tumor testing - a key change in this updated guidance. This report summarizes recommendations from our consensus group deliberations and audit standards to support continual quality improvement in routine clinical settings.

Efficacy and safety of rucaparib in patients with recurrent high-grade ovarian carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Ovarian cancer stands as the third most prevalent gynecological malignancy. The advent of PARP inhibitors, particularly rucaparib, has revolutionized the landscape of advanced ovarian cancer treatment, demonstrating notable efficacy with minimal toxicity, especially in patients not previously exposed to PARP inhibitors. Rucaparib's precision-driven approach, targeting specific genetic mutations, disrupts DNA repair mechanisms, resulting in cytotoxic effects on neoplastic cells. This comprehensive review delves into the clinical efficacy and safety profile of rucaparib in recurrent ovarian cancer, showcasing its promising therapeutic approach. A systematic search of studies reporting rucaparib efficacy and safety, up to September 2023, was conducted across various reputable databases and sources. The meta-analysis of seven articles revealed a pooled objective response rate (ORR) of 0.331 (95% CI, 0.221-0.449; I2 = 92.4%), underscoring rucaparib's efficacy, particularly evident in the BRCA-mutated cohort. Rucaparib consistently outperformed controls in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Safety evaluations indicated that 98.7% of patients experienced treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), with 61% being grade ≥3. Notable TEAEs included nausea (69.0%), fatigue (66.8%), vomiting (37.3%), and constipation (32.1%). Hematological concerns comprised anemia (47.9%), thrombocytopenia, elevated AST/ALT (37.3%), and serum creatinine levels (19.7%). Despite favourable outcomes, the rucaparib group recorded higher event rates across various metrics than controls. The findings underscore the need for meticulous monitoring and dose adjustments to optimize therapeutic outcomes and mitigate the increased risks associated with adverse events. International Prospective Register of Systematic Review Identifier: CRD42023459646.

Neoadjuvant talazoparib in patients with germline BRCA1/2 mutation-positive, early-stage triple-negative breast cancer: exploration of tumor BRCA mutational status

BACKGROUND

Talazoparib monotherapy in patients with germline BRCA-mutated, early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) showed activity in the neoadjuvant setting in the phase II NEOTALA study (NCT03499353). These biomarker analyses further assessed the mutational landscape of the patients enrolled in the NEOTALA study.

METHODS

Baseline tumor tissue from the NEOTALA study was tested retrospectively using FoundationOne®CDx. To further hypothesis-driven correlative analyses, agnostic heat-map visualizations of the FoundationOne®CDx tumor dataset were used to assess overall mutational landscape and identify additional candidate predictive biomarkers of response.

RESULTS

All patients enrolled (N = 61) had TNBC. In the biomarker analysis population, 75.0% (39/52) and 25.0% (13/52) of patients exhibited BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations, respectively. Strong concordance (97.8%) was observed between tumor BRCA and germline BRCA mutations, and 90.5% (38/42) of patients with tumor BRCA mutations evaluable for somatic-germline-zygosity were predicted to exhibit BRCA loss of heterozygosity (LOH). No patients had non-BRCA germline DNA damage response (DDR) gene variants with known/likely pathogenicity, based on a panel of 14 non-BRCA DDR genes. Ninety-eight percent of patients had TP53 mutations. Genomic LOH, assessed continuously or categorically, was not associated with response.

CONCLUSION

The results from this exploratory biomarker analysis support the central role of BRCA and TP53 mutations in tumor pathobiology. Furthermore, these data support assessing germline BRCA mutational status for molecular eligibility for talazoparib in patients with TNBC.

Germline RAD51C and RAD51D Mutations in High-Risk Chinese Breast and/or Ovarian Cancer Patients and Families

BACKGROUND

RAD51C and RAD51D are crucial in homologous recombination (HR) DNA repair. The prevalence of the RAD51C and RAD51D mutations in breast cancer varies across ethnic groups. Associations of RAD51C and RAD51D germline pathogenic variants (GPVs) with breast and ovarian cancer predisposition have been recently reported and are of interest.

METHODS

We performed multi-gene panel sequencing to study the prevalence of RAD51C and RAD51D germline mutations among 3728 patients with hereditary breast and/or ovarian cancer (HBOC).

RESULTS

We identified 18 pathogenic RAD51C and RAD51D mutation carriers, with a mutation frequency of 0.13% (5/3728) and 0.35% (13/3728), respectively. The most common recurrent mutation was RAD51D c.270_271dupTA; p.(Lys91Ilefs*13), with a mutation frequency of 0.30% (11/3728), which was also commonly identified in Asians. Only four out of six cases (66.7%) of this common mutation tested positive for homologous recombination deficiency (HRD).

CONCLUSIONS

Taking the family studies in our registry and tumor molecular pathology together, we concluded that this relatively common RAD51D variant showed incomplete penetrance in our local Chinese community. Personalized genetic counseling emphasizing family history for families with this variant, as suggested at the UK Cancer Genetics Group (UKCGG) Consensus meeting, would also be appropriate in Chinese families.

Current HRD assays in ovarian cancer: differences, pitfalls, limitations, and novel approaches

Ovarian carcinoma (OC) still represents an insidious and fatal malignancy, and few significant results have been obtained in the last two decades to improve patient survival. Novel targeted therapies such as poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) have been successfully introduced in the clinical management of OC, but not all patients will benefit, and drug resistance almost inevitably occurs. The identification of patients who are likely to respond to PARPi-based therapies relies on homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) tests, as this condition is associated with response to these treatments. This review summarizes the genomic and functional HRD assays currently used in clinical practice and those under evaluation, the clinical implications of HRD testing in OC, and their current pitfalls and limitations. Special emphasis will be placed on the functional HRD assays under development and the use of machine learning and artificial intelligence technologies as novel strategies to overcome the current limitations of HRD tests for a better-personalized treatment to improve patient outcomes.

Deleterious alterations in homologous recombination repair genes and efficacy of platinum-based chemotherapy in biliary tract cancers

BACKGROUND

Platinum-based chemotherapy represents the standard first-line treatment for biliary tract cancers (BTC). Deficits in genes involved in the homologous recombination (HR) and DNA damage response (DDR) may confer higher sensitivity to platinum agents.

METHODS

We retrospectively included patients affected by BTC from 2 Italian institutions. Inclusion criteria consist of the receipt of platinum-based chemotherapy in the metastatic setting and the availability of comprehensive genomic profiling using next-generation sequencing (NGS). Patients were included in the HRD-like group if demonstrated oncogenic or likely oncogenic alterations in HR-/DDR-genes. Clinical endpoints were compared between the HRD-like group and the non-HRD-like group.

RESULTS

Seventy-four patients were included, of whom 25 (33%) in the HRD-like group and 49 (66%) in the non-HRD group. With a median follow-up of 26.04 months (interquartile-range [IQR] 9.41-29.27) in the HRD-like group and of 22.48 months (IQR 16.86-40.53) in the non-HRD group, no PFS difference emerged, with a mPFS of 5.18 months in the HRD-like group compared to 6.04 months in the non-HRD group (hazard ratio [HR], 1.017, 95% CI 0.58-1.78; P = .95). No differences were observed in DCR (64% [95 CI 45%-83%] vs 73% [95 CI 61%-86%]; P = .4), and CBR (45% [95% CI 28%-73%] vs 50% [95% CI, 37%-68%]; P = .9) between the HRD-like group and non-HRD groups, respectively. Median OS did not statistically differ between the HRD-like group and non-HRD group (26.7 vs 18.0 months, respectively; HR, 0.670, 0.33 to 1.37, P = .27).

CONCLUSION

HR-/DDR-genes, when assessed with regular tumor-only NGS panels, provide limited clinical validity to identify patients with BTC more likely to benefit from platinum-based chemotherapy.

Combined strategies with PARP inhibitors for the treatment of BRCA wide type cancer

Genomic instability stands out as a pivotal hallmark of cancer, and PARP inhibitors (PARPi) emerging as a groundbreaking class of targeted therapy drugs meticulously crafted to inhibit the repair of DNA single-strand breaks(SSB) in tumor cells. Currently, PARPi have been approved for the treatment of ovarian cancer, pancreatic cancer, breast cancer, and prostate cancer characterized by homologous recombination(HR) repair deficiencies due to mutations in BRCA1/2 or other DNA repair associated genes and acquiring the designation of breakthrough therapy. Nonetheless, PARPi exhibit limited efficacy in the majority of HR-proficient BRCA1/2 wild-type cancers. At present, the synergistic approach of combining PARPi with agents that induce HR defects, or with chemotherapy and radiotherapy to induce substantial DNA damage, significantly enhances the efficacy of PARPi in BRCA wild-type or HR-proficient patients, supporting extension the use of PARPi in HR proficient patients. Therefore, we have summarized the effects and mechanisms of the combined use of drugs with PARPi, including the combination of PARPi with HR defect-inducing drugs such as ATRi, CHKi, HR indirectly inducing drugs like VEGFRi, CDKi, immune checkpoint inhibitors and drugs instigating DNA damage such as chemotherapy or radiotherapy. In addition, this review discusses several ongoing clinical trials aimed at analyzing the clinical application potential of these combined treatment strategies.

Targeted therapy in high grade serous ovarian Cancer: A literature review

Ovarian cancer continues to have a high mortality rate despite therapeutic advances. Traditionally, treatment has focused on surgery followed by systemic platinum- based chemotherapy. Unfortunately, most patients develop resistance to platinum agents, highlighting the need for targeted therapies. PARP inhibitors and anti-angiogenic agents, such as bevacizumab, have more recently changed upfront therapy. Unfortunately, other targeted therapies including immunotherapy have not seen the same success. Emerging therapeutic targets and modalities such as small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors, lipid metabolism targeting agents, gene therapy, ribosome targeted drugs as well as several other therapeutic classes have been and are currently under investigation. In this review, we discuss targeted therapies in high grade serous ovarian cancer from preclinical studies to phase III clinical trials.

Trends in estimated PARP inhibitor eligibility and benefit among US epithelial ovarian cancer patients

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the annual percentage of patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) who could be eligible for and benefit from PARP inhibitor therapy amidst changing US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved indications.

METHODS

This is a simulated retrospective observational study using publicly available data on patients with advanced-stage EOC. PARPi eligibility is based on FDA approvals and withdrawals from 2014 through 2023, along with published demographic and genomic data. Clinical trial data is used to estimate treatment benefit. PARPi including olaparib, niraparib, and rucaparib are analyzed in aggregate with sub-analyses by molecular classification and treatment timing. Results are reported as the percentage of EOC patients appropriate for any cancer-directed therapy.

RESULTS

PARPi were approved for 9 different indications in EOC between 2014 and 2021; reduced to 6 indications by 2023. Eligibility increased from 2.0% (95% CI,1.3%-1.6%) in 2014 to a maximum of 93.4% (95% CI,90.1%-94.6%) in 2021. The maximum percentage of patients with 2-year PFS benefit was 22.0% (95% CI, 17.2%-26.8%) in 2021, projected to decrease to 13.0% (95% CI, 9.9%-15.9%) in 2024. Most of this decrease was seen in the homologous recombination deficient, BRCA wild-type population (8.4% to 4.0%).

CONCLUSIONS

PARPi eligibility increased at a greater rate than benefit resulting in a low population-level benefit-to-eligibility ratio until 2021. Recent FDA withdrawals improved this ratio with an accompanied decrease in the absolute number of patients benefiting. To further optimize population-level benefit-to-eligibility ratio of targeted therapies in ovarian cancer, we need to identify better biomarkers, treatment combinations, and novel therapeutic targets.

A phase 2 trial exploring the significance of homologous recombination status in patients with platinum sensitive or platinum resistant relapsed ovarian cancer receiving combination cediranib and olaparib

OBJECTIVE

Combination cediranib/olaparib has reported activity in relapsed ovarian cancer. This phase 2 trial investigated the activity of cediranib/olaparib in relapsed ovarian cancer and its association with homologous recombination deficiency (HRD).

METHODS

Seventy patients were enrolled to cohorts of either platinum-sensitive or platinum-resistant ovarian cancer and received olaparib tablets 200 mg twice daily and cediranib tablets 30 mg once daily under a continuous dosing schedule. HRD testing was performed on pre-treatment, on-treatment and archival biopsies by sequencing key homologous recombination repair (HRR) genes and by genomic LOH analysis. The primary objective for the platinum-sensitive cohort was the association of HRD, defined as presence of HRR gene mutation, with progression-free survival (PFS). The primary objective for the platinum-resistant cohort was objective response rate (ORR), with a key secondary endpoint evaluating the association of HRD status with activity.

RESULTS

In platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer (N = 35), ORR was 77.1% (95% CI 59.9-89.6%) and median PFS was 16.4 months (95% CI 13.2-18.6). Median PFS in platinum-sensitive HRR-HRD cancers (N = 22) was 16.8 months (95% CI 11.3-18.6), and 16.4 months (95% CI 9.4-NA) in HRR-HR proficient cancers (N = 13; p = 0.57). In platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (N = 35), ORR was 22.9% (95% CI 10.4-40.1%) with median PFS 6.8 months (95% CI 4.2-9.1). Median PFS in platinum-resistant HRR-HRD cancers (N = 7) was 10.5 months (95% CI 3.6-NA) and 5.6 months (95% CI 3.6-7.6) in HRR-HR proficient cancers (N = 18; p = 0.23).

CONCLUSIONS

Cediranib/olaparib had clinical activity in both platinum-sensitive and -resistant ovarian cancer. Presence of HRR gene mutations was not associated with cediranib/olaparib activity in either setting.

Ocoxin Oral Solution Triggers DNA Damage and Cell Death in Ovarian Cancer

Ovarian cancer is the most fatal of all the reproductive cancers within the female population, mainly due to its late diagnosis that limits surgery and medical treatment. Classically, ovarian cancer therapy has included conventional chemotherapy, and other therapeutic approaches are now being used to treat these patients, but the outcomes of the disease are still poor. Therefore, new strategies are needed to improve life expectancy and life quality of ovarian cancer patients. Considering that, we investigated the effect of the nutritional supplement Ocoxin Oral Solution (OOS) in ovarian cancer models. OOS contains several nutritional supplements, some of them with demonstrated antitumoral action. In vitro studies showed that OOS inhibited the proliferation of several ovarian cancer cell lines, especially of those representative of the endometrioid subtype, in a time- and dose-dependent manner. A fast cell death induction after OOS treatment was observed, and when the molecular mechanisms leading to this effect were investigated, an activation of the DNA damage checkpoint was detected, as shown by activation (phosphorylation) of CHK1 and CHK2 kinases that was followed by the phosphorylation of the target protein histone H2AX. When tested in animal models of ovarian cancer, OOS reduced tumor growth without any observed secondary effects. Moreover, such reduction in tumor proliferation was caused by the induction of DNA damage as corroborated by the in vivo phosphorylation of CHK2 and Histone H2AX. Finally, OOS potentiated the action of carboplatin or olaparib, the standard of care treatments used in ovarian clinics, opening the possibility of including OOS in combination with those standard of care agents in patients with ovarian cancer.

Molecular consequences of acute versus chronic CDK12 loss in prostate carcinoma nominates distinct therapeutic strategies

Genomic loss of the transcriptional kinase CDK12 occurs in ~6% of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancers (mCRPC) and correlates with poor patient outcomes. Prior studies demonstrate that acute CDK12 loss confers a homologous recombination (HR) deficiency (HRd) phenotype via premature intronic polyadenylation (IPA) of key HR pathway genes, including ATM. However, mCRPC patients have not demonstrated benefit from therapies that exploit HRd such as inhibitors of polyADP ribose polymerase (PARP). Based on this discordance, we sought to test the hypothesis that an HRd phenotype is primarily a consequence of acute CDK12 loss and the effect is greatly diminished in prostate cancers adapted to CDK12 loss. Analyses of whole genome sequences (WGS) and RNA sequences (RNAseq) of human mCRPCs determined that tumors with biallelic CDK12 alterations (CDK12 BAL ) lack genomic scar signatures indicative of HRd, despite carrying bi-allelic loss and the appearance of the hallmark tandem-duplicator phenotype (TDP). Experiments confirmed that acute CDK12 inhibition resulted in aberrant polyadenylation and downregulation of long genes (including BRCA1 and BRCA2) but such effects were modest or absent in tumors adapted to chronic CDK12 BAL . One key exception was ATM, which did retain transcript shortening and reduced protein expression in the adapted CDK12 BAL models. However, CDK12 BAL cells demonstrated intact HR as measured by RAD51 foci formation following irradiation. CDK12 BAL cells showed a vulnerability to targeting of CDK13 by sgRNA or CDK12/13 inhibitors and in vivo treatment of prostate cancer xenograft lines showed that tumors with CDK12 BAL responded to the CDK12/13 inhibitor SR4835, while CDK12-intact lines did not. Collectively, these studies show that aberrant polyadenylation and long HR gene downregulation is primarily a consequence of acute CDK12 deficiency, which is largely compensated for in cells that have adapted to CDK12 loss. These results provide an explanation for why PARPi monotherapy has thus far failed to consistently benefit patients with CDK12 alterations, though alternate therapies that target CDK13 or transcription are candidates for future research and testing.

Prevalence of homologous recombination biomarkers in multiple tumor types: an observational study

Aim: To determine the prevalence of deleterious mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 and in 13 genes involved in homologous recombination repair (HRR), the prevalence of genomic loss of heterozygosity and the allelic and hereditary status of BRCA1, BRCA2 and other HRR gene mutations in multiple solid tumor types.Patients & methods: This was a retrospective observational study of patients with an advanced/metastatic diagnosis in one of 15 solid tumor types, who were identified in a real-world clinico-genomic database.Results: Tumor tissue samples from 9457 patients were analyzed, among which 4.7% had known or suspected deleterious BRCA1/2 mutations. The prevalence (range) of mutations in HRR genes was 13.6% (2.4%-26.0%) and genomic loss of heterozygosity ≥16% was 20.6% (2.6-34.4%) across all tumor types.Conclusion: The prevalence of mutations varied significantly depending on the type of tumor.

BRCAness, DNA gaps, and gain and loss of PARP inhibitor-induced synthetic lethality

Mutations in the tumor-suppressor genes BRCA1 and BRCA2 resulting in BRCA1/2 deficiency are frequently identified in breast, ovarian, prostate, pancreatic, and other cancers. Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (PARPis) selectively kill BRCA1/2-deficient cancer cells by inducing synthetic lethality, providing an effective biomarker-guided strategy for targeted cancer therapy. However, a substantial fraction of cancer patients carrying BRCA1/2 mutations do not respond to PARPis, and most patients develop resistance to PARPis over time, highlighting a major obstacle to PARPi therapy in the clinic. Recent studies have revealed that changes of specific functional defects of BRCA1/2-deficient cells, particularly their defects in suppressing and protecting single-stranded DNA gaps, contribute to the gain or loss of PARPi-induced synthetic lethality. These findings not only shed light on the mechanism of action of PARPis, but also lead to revised models that explain how PARPis selectively kill BRCA-deficient cancer cells. Furthermore, new mechanistic principles of PARPi sensitivity and resistance have emerged from these studies, generating potentially useful guidelines for predicting the PARPi response and design therapies for overcoming PARPi resistance. In this Review, we will discuss these recent studies and put them in context with the classic views of PARPi-induced synthetic lethality, aiming to stimulate the development of new therapeutic strategies to overcome PARPi resistance and improve PARPi therapy.