Adolescents and young adults with rhabdomyosarcoma treated in the European paediatric Soft tissue sarcoma Study Group (EpSSG) protocols: a cohort study

Impact of age on survival according to molecular tumor findings in children and adolescents with soft-tissue and bone sarcoma: The BIOSCA project

BACKGROUND

Adolescents (15-19 years) with sarcoma are known to have significantly worse survival than children (0-14 years). One possible reason may be that the adolescent sarcomas exhibit specific biological characteristics resulting in differences in clinical presentation and treatment resistance behaviors. The BIOSCA project aims to further explore these age-related differences in survival accounting for molecular tumor characteristic in children and adolescents with sarcoma.

METHODS

A retrospective national population-based observational study with documented somatic genetic analyses was conducted between 2011 and 2016 of all patients aged from 0 to 17 years with a diagnosis of sarcoma using the National Registry of Childhood Cancers Database.

RESULTS

A total of 1637 children (0-9years: 40%), preadolescents (10-14years: 35%) and adolescents (15-17 years: 25%) with a diagnosis of bone (N = 845) or soft-tissue (N = 792) sarcoma were included. Adolescents had significantly worse outcome for undifferentiated small round cell sarcoma (USRCS), alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma (ARMS), and epithelioid sarcoma. Five-year overall survivals were worse among CIC-rearranged USRCS cases (47% [95%CI:21-69]) as compared to other USRCS, and PAX3::FOXO1 ARMS patients (44% [95%CI:32-55]) as compared to other ARMS. Adjusting for stage and genomic-profiling status, adolescents with USRCS were 1.6-fold more likely to die than children (P = 0.05), while the difference in survival between age of ARMS patients was weaken. Indeed, the prevalence of PAX3::FOXO1 increased significantly with age.

CONCLUSION

Age was an independent prognostic factor of outcome only in patients with USRCS, while the association between age and survival of patients with ARMS could be partly explained by differences in prevalence of PAX3::FOXO1.

The survival disparity between children and adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with Ewing sarcoma in the Netherlands did not change since the 1990s despite improved survival: A population-based study

BACKGROUND

Adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with Ewing sarcoma have a worse prognosis than children. Population-based survival evaluations stratifying findings by important clinical factors are, however, limited. This Dutch population study comprehensively compared survival of children and AYAs with Ewing sarcoma over three decades considering diagnostic period, tissue of origin, tumor site, and disease stage.

METHODS

Data on all children (0-17 years, N = 463) and AYAs (18-39 years, N = 379) diagnosed with Ewing sarcoma in the Netherlands between 1990-2018 were collected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry with follow-up until February 2023. Five-year relative survival was calculated using the cohort method. Multivariable analyses were conducted through Poisson regression.

RESULTS

Children with Ewing sarcoma had a significantly higher 5-year relative survival than AYAs (65 % vs. 44 %). An increasing trend in survival was noted reaching 70 % in children and 53 % in AYAs in 2010-2018. Results were similar for Ewing bone sarcoma and extraosseous Ewing sarcoma. AYAs had a poorer prognosis than children for most tumor sites and regardless of disease stage. Survival probabilities were 60 % vs. 78 % for localized disease and 20 % vs. 33 % for metastatic disease. Multivariable-regression analysis, adjusted for follow-up time, diagnostic period, sex, disease stage, and tumor site, confirmed increased excess mortality among AYAs compared with children (excess HR: 1.7, 95 % CI: 1.3-2.1).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite survival improvements since the 1990s, AYAs with Ewing sarcoma in the Netherlands continue to fare considerably worse than children. This survival disparity was present irrespective of tissue of origin, tumor site, and disease stage.

Being diagnosed with a rhabdomyosarcoma in the era of artificial intelligence: Whom can we trust?

In the era of big data, young patients may be overwhelmed by artificial intelligence-based tools, like chatbots. Five clinical experts were asked to evaluate the performance of the most currently used chatbots in providing information on a rare cancer affecting young people, like rhabdomyosarcoma. Generally speaking, despite their high performance in giving general information about the disease, these chatbots were considered by the experts to be inadequate in providing suggestions on cancer treatments and specialized centers, and also lacking in "sensitivity." Efforts are planned by the pediatric oncology community to improve the quality of data used to train these tools.

Targeted immunotherapy and nanomedicine for rhabdomyosarcoma: The way of the future

Rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) is the most common soft tissue sarcoma of childhood. Histology separates two main subtypes: embryonal RMS (eRMS; 60%-70%) and alveolar RMS (aRMS; 20%-30%). The aggressive aRMS carry one of two characteristic chromosomal translocations that result in the expression of a PAX3::FOXO1 or PAX7::FOXO1 fusion transcription factor; therefore, aRMS are now classified as fusion-positive (FP) RMS. Embryonal RMS have a better prognosis and are clinically indistinguishable from fusion-negative (FN) RMS. Next to histology and molecular characteristics, RMS risk groupings are now available defining low risk tumors with excellent outcomes and advanced stage disease with poor prognosis, with an overall survival of about only 20% despite intensified multimodal treatment. Therefore, development of novel effective targeted strategies to increase survival and to decrease long-term side effects is urgently needed. Recently, immunotherapies and nanomedicine have been emerging for potent and effective tumor treatments with minimal side effects, raising hopes for effective and safe cures for RMS patients. This review aims to describe the most relevant preclinical and clinical studies in immunotherapy and targeted nanomedicine performed so far in RMS and to provide an insight in future developments.

Adolescents and young adults with rhabdomyosarcoma: A report from the Soft Tissue Sarcoma Committee of the Children's Oncology Group

INTRODUCTION

The impact of established prognostic factors on survival outcomes for childhood rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) have not been well described in the adolescent and young adult (AYA) RMS patient population.

METHODS

This is a retrospective analysis of patients with newly diagnosed RMS enrolled between 1997 and 2016 on seven previously reported Children's Oncology Group (COG) clinical trials. Demographics, clinical features, treatment details, and outcome data were collected. Five-year event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated for patients diagnosed at age 15-39 years and those diagnosed under age 15 years using the Kaplan-Meier method. Log-rank test was used to compare prognostic factors for EFS and OS. Factors significant in the univariable analysis were included in a Cox proportional hazards regression model. Nonsignificant covariates were removed from the multiple regression model.

RESULTS

Total 2151 patients including 402 AYAs were analyzed. AYAs were more likely to present with primary tumors ≥5 cm in size, metastatic disease, alveolar histology, and have FOXO1 fusions compared to children. Five-year EFS for the AYA cohort was 44.2% versus 67% for children (p < .001), and 5-year OS was 52% for the AYA cohort versus 78% for children (p < .001). Multivariable analysis revealed tumor site, size and invasiveness, clinical group, and histology were prognostic in AYAs.

CONCLUSION

AYAs with RMS have a poorer prognosis compared to younger children due to multiple factors. Further research focused on AYAs to better understand RMS biology and improve treatments is critical to improve survival.

Frontline and Relapsed Rhabdomyosarcoma (FAR-RMS) Clinical Trial: A Report from the European Paediatric Soft Tissue Sarcoma Study Group (EpSSG)

The Frontline and Relapsed Rhabdomyosarcoma (FaR-RMS) clinical trial is an overarching, multinational study for children and adults with rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS). The trial, developed by the European Soft Tissue Sarcoma Study Group (EpSSG), incorporates multiple different research questions within a multistage design with a focus on (i) novel regimens for poor prognostic subgroups, (ii) optimal duration of maintenance chemotherapy, and (iii) optimal use of radiotherapy for local control and widespread metastatic disease. Additional sub-studies focusing on biological risk stratification, use of imaging modalities, including [18F]FDG PET-CT and diffusion-weighted MRI imaging (DWI) as prognostic markers, and impact of therapy on quality of life are described. This paper forms part of a Special Issue on rhabdomyosarcoma and outlines the study background, rationale for randomisations and sub-studies, design, and plans for utilisation and dissemination of results.

Soft Tissue Sarcomas in Adolescents and Young Adults

Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) represent a heterogeneous group of extraskeletal mesenchymal tumors that affect individuals throughout the entire age continuum. Despite this pervasive influence, key differences exist in the presentation of these sarcomas across varying age groups that have prevented a more uniform approach to management. Notably, rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) is more common in children, while most nonrhabdomyosarcoma soft tissue sarcoma (NRSTS) subtypes are more prevalent in adults. Older patients with NRSTS appear to have more molecularly complex biology and often present with more advanced disease compared with children. Poorer outcome disparities are observed in older patients with RMS despite receiving similar treatment as younger patients. In this review, we highlight differences in epidemiology, biology, and management paradigms for pediatric and adult patients with STS and explore opportunities for a unified approach to enhance the care and outcomes within the AYA population.

BET Bromodomain Degradation Disrupts Function but Not 3D Formation of RNA Pol2 Clusters

Fusion-positive rhabdomyosarcoma (FP-RMS) is driven by a translocation that creates the chimeric transcription factor PAX3-FOXO1 (P3F), which assembles de novo super enhancers to drive high levels of transcription of other core regulatory transcription factors (CRTFs). P3F recruits co-regulatory factors to super enhancers such as BRD4, which recognizes acetylated lysines via BET bromodomains. In this study, we demonstrate that inhibition or degradation of BRD4 leads to global decreases in transcription, and selective downregulation of CRTFs. We also show that the BRD4 degrader ARV-771 halts transcription while preserving RNA Polymerase II (Pol2) loops between super enhancers and their target genes, and causes the removal of Pol2 only past the transcriptional end site of CRTF genes, suggesting a novel effect of BRD4 on Pol2 looping. We finally test the most potent molecule, inhibitor BMS-986158, in an orthotopic PDX mouse model of FP-RMS with additional high-risk mutations, and find that it is well tolerated in vivo and leads to an average decrease in tumor size. This effort represents a partnership with an FP-RMS patient and family advocates to make preclinical data rapidly accessible to the family, and to generate data to inform future patients who develop this disease.

Non-inferior efficacy of non-surgical treatment to surgical treatment in patients with nonmetastatic head and neck rhabdomyosarcoma: a SEER-based study

PURPOSE

Head and neck rhabdomyosarcoma (HNRMS) is a rare but aggressive malignant neoplasm. Given the young patient age and critical anatomy of the head and neck, performing surgery on the primary tumor still remains debatable. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of the non-surgery-based treatment versus surgery-based treatment on patients with nonmetastatic HNRMS.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with nonmetastatic HNRMS between 2004 and 2015 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database were enrolled in our study. Inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) method was employed to balance confounding factors between surgery and non-surgery groups. Kaplan-Meier methods and COX regression analyses were used to analyze survival outcomes of overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). Prognostic nomogram was established to predict survival.

RESULTS

A total of 260 eligible patients were extracted from the SEER database. Kaplan-Meier survival curves revealed that there was no significant difference in OS and CSS between the surgery and non-surgery groups both before and after IPTW (p > 0.05). Cox regression analyses and IPTW-adjusted Cox regression analyses for both OS and CSS showed similar survival between the two groups. Prognostic factors were explored and a nomogram for patients in the surgery group was constructed. Risk stratification based on the nomogram indicated that patients in surgery-high-risk group did not benefit from primary surgery. While those in surgery-low-risk group had an equal survival outcome to those in non-surgery group.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study revealed that compared to patients receiving surgery, those not receiving surgery had similar survival outcomes for nonmetastatic HNRMS. Our established nomogram may serve as a practical tool for individual prognostic evaluations.

[A 2022 inventory in oncology news]

The Cancer Bulletin continues its tradition. At the beginning of 2023, the members of the editorial committee would like to share with you their analyses of the highlights of 2022. The objective remains to highlight what will change our practices and lead to different diagnostic or therapeutic options. Our synthesis will therefore focus on published data. They have been analyzed and placed in the more general context of the management of each type of cancer to deduce the practical consequences for our patients. This synthesis exercise will concern almost all tumor pathologies, most often on the therapeutic level, and will, however, exclude the evolution of techniques, whether they are diagnostic or used for the follow-up of our patients. The final objective is to allow you to have a thoughtful, didactic and practical reading. Our goal is to provide our readers with the rational bases that can lead to a different approach for treatments in 2023.

Shedding a Light on the Challenges of Adolescents and Young Adults with Rhabdomyosarcoma

Rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) is a typical tumour of childhood but can occur at any age. Several studies have reported that adolescent and young adult (AYA) patients with RMS have poorer survival than do younger patients. This review discusses the specific challenges in AYA patients with pediatric-type RMS, exploring possible underlying factors which may influence different outcomes. Reasons for AYA survival gap are likely multifactorial, and might be related to differences in tumor biology and intrinsic aggressiveness, or differences in clinical management (that could include patient referral patterns, time to diagnosis, enrolment into clinical trials, the adequacy and intensity of treatment), as well as patient factors (including physiology and comorbidity that may influence treatment tolerability, drug pharmacokinetics and efficacy). However, improved survival has been reported in the most recent studies for AYA patients treated on pediatric RMS protocols. Different strategies may help to further improve outcome, such as supporting trans-age academic societies and national/international collaborations; developing specific clinical trials without upper age limit; defining integrated and comprehensive approach to AYA patients, including the genomic aspects; establishing multidisciplinary tumor boards with involvement of both pediatric and adult oncologists to discuss all pediatric-type RMS patients; developing dedicated projects with specific treatment recommendations and registry/database.