1
|
Judson SD, Dowdy DW. Modeling zoonotic and vector-borne viruses. Curr Opin Virol 2024; 67:101428. [PMID: 39047313 PMCID: PMC11292992 DOI: 10.1016/j.coviro.2024.101428] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2024] [Accepted: 07/06/2024] [Indexed: 07/27/2024]
Abstract
The 2013-2016 Ebola virus disease epidemic and the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic galvanized tremendous growth in models for emerging zoonotic and vector-borne viruses. Therefore, we have reviewed the main goals and methods of models to guide scientists and decision-makers. The elements of models for emerging viruses vary across spectrums: from understanding the past to forecasting the future, using data across space and time, and using statistical versus mechanistic methods. Hybrid/ensemble models and artificial intelligence offer new opportunities for modeling. Despite this progress, challenges remain in translating models into actionable decisions, particularly in areas at highest risk for viral disease outbreaks. To address this issue, we must identify gaps in models for specific viruses, strengthen validation, and involve policymakers in model development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seth D Judson
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
| | - David W Dowdy
- Division of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Earn DJD, Park SW, Bolker BM. Fitting Epidemic Models to Data: A Tutorial in Memory of Fred Brauer. Bull Math Biol 2024; 86:109. [PMID: 39052140 DOI: 10.1007/s11538-024-01326-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2024] [Accepted: 06/04/2024] [Indexed: 07/27/2024]
Abstract
Fred Brauer was an eminent mathematician who studied dynamical systems, especially differential equations. He made many contributions to mathematical epidemiology, a field that is strongly connected to data, but he always chose to avoid data analysis. Nevertheless, he recognized that fitting models to data is usually necessary when attempting to apply infectious disease transmission models to real public health problems. He was curious to know how one goes about fitting dynamical models to data, and why it can be hard. Initially in response to Fred's questions, we developed a user-friendly R package, fitode, that facilitates fitting ordinary differential equations to observed time series. Here, we use this package to provide a brief tutorial introduction to fitting compartmental epidemic models to a single observed time series. We assume that, like Fred, the reader is familiar with dynamical systems from a mathematical perspective, but has limited experience with statistical methodology or optimization techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David J D Earn
- Department of Mathematics and Statistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1, Canada.
| | - Sang Woo Park
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, 08544, USA
| | - Benjamin M Bolker
- Department of Mathematics and Statistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1, Canada
- Department of Biology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Porebski P, Venkatramanan S, Adiga A, Klahn B, Hurt B, Wilson ML, Chen J, Vullikanti A, Marathe M, Lewis B. Data-driven mechanistic framework with stratified immunity and effective transmissibility for COVID-19 scenario projections. Epidemics 2024; 47:100761. [PMID: 38555667 PMCID: PMC11205267 DOI: 10.1016/j.epidem.2024.100761] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2023] [Revised: 01/30/2024] [Accepted: 03/07/2024] [Indexed: 04/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Scenario-based modeling frameworks have been widely used to support policy-making at state and federal levels in the United States during the COVID-19 response. While custom-built models can be used to support one-off studies, sustained updates to projections under changing pandemic conditions requires a robust, integrated, and adaptive framework. In this paper, we describe one such framework, UVA-adaptive, that was built to support the CDC-aligned Scenario Modeling Hub (SMH) across multiple rounds, as well as weekly/biweekly projections to Virginia Department of Health (VDH) and US Department of Defense during the COVID-19 response. Building upon an existing metapopulation framework, PatchSim, UVA-adaptive uses a calibration mechanism relying on adjustable effective transmissibility as a basis for scenario definition while also incorporating real-time datasets on case incidence, seroprevalence, variant characteristics, and vaccine uptake. Through the pandemic, our framework evolved by incorporating available data sources and was extended to capture complexities of multiple strains and heterogeneous immunity of the population. Here we present the version of the model that was used for the recent projections for SMH and VDH, describe the calibration and projection framework, and demonstrate that the calibrated transmissibility correlates with the evolution of the pathogen as well as associated societal dynamics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Przemyslaw Porebski
- Biocomplexity Institute & Initiative, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, 22911, VA, USA.
| | | | - Aniruddha Adiga
- Biocomplexity Institute & Initiative, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, 22911, VA, USA
| | - Brian Klahn
- Biocomplexity Institute & Initiative, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, 22911, VA, USA
| | - Benjamin Hurt
- Biocomplexity Institute & Initiative, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, 22911, VA, USA
| | - Mandy L Wilson
- Biocomplexity Institute & Initiative, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, 22911, VA, USA
| | - Jiangzhuo Chen
- Biocomplexity Institute & Initiative, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, 22911, VA, USA
| | - Anil Vullikanti
- Biocomplexity Institute & Initiative, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, 22911, VA, USA; Department of Computer Science, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, 22904, VA, USA
| | - Madhav Marathe
- Biocomplexity Institute & Initiative, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, 22911, VA, USA; Department of Computer Science, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, 22904, VA, USA
| | - Bryan Lewis
- Biocomplexity Institute & Initiative, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, 22911, VA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Spinks B, Williams D, Williams D, Lewis R, Bull F, Ogbonna U, Edwards A. Mitigating COVID-19 Burden in People Experiencing Incarceration: A Systematic Review. JOURNAL OF CORRECTIONAL HEALTH CARE 2024; 30:172-197. [PMID: 38579144 DOI: 10.1089/jchc.23.10.0090] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/07/2024]
Abstract
People experiencing incarceration (PEI) have poorer COVID-19 clinical outcomes compared with the general population. Many interventions were implemented in incarceration facilities to mitigate the burden of COVID-19. This systematic review seeks to analyze the effectiveness of these interventions. Twenty-two studies were included. Reduction of the incarcerated population/interfacility transfers, cohorting of new and infectious incarcerated people, mass asymptomatic testing (despite often low uptake), hygiene measures, and prioritization of PEI in vaccine policy had some evidence of effectiveness at reducing transmission and risk of COVID-19 in incarceration facilities. Visitation suspension had conflicting evidence of effectiveness. Studies were of low or medium quality. Inadequate control of confounding variables limited the reliability and validity of conclusions drawn. Many studies relied on retrospective, third-party data. Higher quality research is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bethany Spinks
- Division of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - Darius Williams
- Division of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
- Health and Care Research Wales Evidence Centre, Division of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - Denitza Williams
- Division of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
- Health and Care Research Wales Evidence Centre, Division of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - Ruth Lewis
- Health and Care Research Wales Evidence Centre, Division of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
- North Wales Centre for Primary Care Research, School of Medical and Health Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, United Kingdom
| | - Francesca Bull
- Division of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - Uju Ogbonna
- Division of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - Adrian Edwards
- Division of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
- Health and Care Research Wales Evidence Centre, Division of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hamilton A, Haghpanah F, Tulchinsky A, Kipshidze N, Poleon S, Lin G, Du H, Gardner L, Klein E. Incorporating endogenous human behavior in models of COVID-19 transmission: A systematic scoping review. DIALOGUES IN HEALTH 2024; 4:100179. [PMID: 38813579 PMCID: PMC11134564 DOI: 10.1016/j.dialog.2024.100179] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2024] [Revised: 05/04/2024] [Accepted: 05/05/2024] [Indexed: 05/31/2024]
Abstract
Background During the COVID-19 pandemic there was a plethora of dynamical forecasting models created, but their ability to effectively describe future trajectories of disease was mixed. A major challenge in evaluating future case trends was forecasting the behavior of individuals. When behavior was incorporated into models, it was primarily incorporated exogenously (e.g., fitting to cellphone mobility data). Fewer models incorporated behavior endogenously (e.g., dynamically changing a model parameter throughout the simulation). Methods This review aimed to qualitatively characterize models that included an adaptive (endogenous) behavioral element in the context of COVID-19 transmission. We categorized studies into three approaches: 1) feedback loops, 2) game theory/utility theory, and 3) information/opinion spread. Findings Of the 92 included studies, 72% employed a feedback loop, 27% used game/utility theory, and 9% used a model if information/opinion spread. Among all studies, 89% used a compartmental model alone or in combination with other model types. Similarly, 15% used a network model, 11% used an agent-based model, 7% used a system dynamics model, and 1% used a Markov chain model. Descriptors of behavior change included mask-wearing, social distancing, vaccination, and others. Sixty-eight percent of studies calibrated their model to observed data and 25% compared simulated forecasts to observed data. Forty-one percent of studies compared versions of their model with and without endogenous behavior. Models with endogenous behavior tended to show a smaller and delayed initial peak with subsequent periodic waves. Interpretation While many COVID-19 models incorporated behavior exogenously, these approaches may fail to capture future adaptations in human behavior, resulting in under- or overestimates of disease burden. By incorporating behavior endogenously, the next generation of infectious disease models could more effectively predict outcomes so that decision makers can better prepare for and respond to epidemics. Funding This study was funded in-part by Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) MInD-Healthcare Program (1U01CK000536), the National Science Foundation (NSF) Modeling Dynamic Disease-Behavior Feedbacks for Improved Epidemic Prediction and Response grant (2229996), and the NSF PIPP Phase I: Evaluating the Effectiveness of Messaging and Modeling during Pandemics grant (2200256).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alisa Hamilton
- One Health Trust, 5636 Connecticut Avenue NW, PO Box 4235, Washington, DC 20015, USA
- Department of Civil & Systems Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, 3400 North Charles St, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA
| | - Fardad Haghpanah
- One Health Trust, 5636 Connecticut Avenue NW, PO Box 4235, Washington, DC 20015, USA
| | - Alexander Tulchinsky
- One Health Trust, 5636 Connecticut Avenue NW, PO Box 4235, Washington, DC 20015, USA
| | - Nodar Kipshidze
- One Health Trust, 5636 Connecticut Avenue NW, PO Box 4235, Washington, DC 20015, USA
| | - Suprena Poleon
- One Health Trust, 5636 Connecticut Avenue NW, PO Box 4235, Washington, DC 20015, USA
| | - Gary Lin
- One Health Trust, 5636 Connecticut Avenue NW, PO Box 4235, Washington, DC 20015, USA
- Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory, 1110 Johns Hopkins Rd, Laurel, MD 20723, USA
| | - Hongru Du
- Department of Civil & Systems Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, 3400 North Charles St, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA
| | - Lauren Gardner
- Department of Civil & Systems Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, 3400 North Charles St, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA
| | - Eili Klein
- One Health Trust, 5636 Connecticut Avenue NW, PO Box 4235, Washington, DC 20015, USA
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21209, USA
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Duval D, Evans B, Sanders A, Hill J, Simbo A, Kavoi T, Lyell I, Simmons Z, Qureshi M, Pearce-Smith N, Arevalo CR, Beck CR, Bindra R, Oliver I. Non-pharmaceutical interventions to reduce COVID-19 transmission in the UK: a rapid mapping review and interactive evidence gap map. J Public Health (Oxf) 2024; 46:e279-e293. [PMID: 38426578 PMCID: PMC11141784 DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdae025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2023] [Revised: 01/15/2024] [Accepted: 01/23/2024] [Indexed: 03/02/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) were crucial in the response to the COVID-19 pandemic, although uncertainties about their effectiveness remain. This work aimed to better understand the evidence generated during the pandemic on the effectiveness of NPIs implemented in the UK. METHODS We conducted a rapid mapping review (search date: 1 March 2023) to identify primary studies reporting on the effectiveness of NPIs to reduce COVID-19 transmission. Included studies were displayed in an interactive evidence gap map. RESULTS After removal of duplicates, 11 752 records were screened. Of these, 151 were included, including 100 modelling studies but only 2 randomized controlled trials and 10 longitudinal observational studies.Most studies reported on NPIs to identify and isolate those who are or may become infectious, and on NPIs to reduce the number of contacts. There was an evidence gap for hand and respiratory hygiene, ventilation and cleaning. CONCLUSIONS Our findings show that despite the large number of studies published, there is still a lack of robust evaluations of the NPIs implemented in the UK. There is a need to build evaluation into the design and implementation of public health interventions and policies from the start of any future pandemic or other public health emergency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Duval
- Research, Evidence and Knowledge Division, UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA), London E14 5EA, UK
| | - B Evans
- Research, Evidence and Knowledge Division, UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA), London E14 5EA, UK
| | - A Sanders
- Research, Evidence and Knowledge Division, UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA), London E14 5EA, UK
| | - J Hill
- Clinical and Public Health Response Division, UKHSA, London E14 5EA, UK
| | - A Simbo
- Evaluation and Epidemiological Science Division, UKHSA, Colindale NW9 5EQ, UK
| | - T Kavoi
- Cheshire and Merseyside Health Protection Team, UKHSA, Liverpool L3 1DS, UK
| | - I Lyell
- Greater Manchester Health Protection Team, UKHSA, Manchester M1 3BN, UK
| | - Z Simmons
- Research, Evidence and Knowledge Division, UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA), London E14 5EA, UK
| | - M Qureshi
- Clinical and Public Health Response Division, UKHSA, London E14 5EA, UK
| | - N Pearce-Smith
- Research, Evidence and Knowledge Division, UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA), London E14 5EA, UK
| | - C R Arevalo
- Research, Evidence and Knowledge Division, UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA), London E14 5EA, UK
| | - C R Beck
- Evaluation and Epidemiological Science Division, UKHSA, Salisbury SP4 0JG, UK
| | - R Bindra
- Clinical and Public Health Response Division, UKHSA, London E14 5EA, UK
| | - I Oliver
- Director General Science and Research and Chief Scientific Officer, UKHSA, London E14 5EA, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Lopez VK, Cramer EY, Pagano R, Drake JM, O’Dea EB, Adee M, Ayer T, Chhatwal J, Dalgic OO, Ladd MA, Linas BP, Mueller PP, Xiao J, Bracher J, Castro Rivadeneira AJ, Gerding A, Gneiting T, Huang Y, Jayawardena D, Kanji AH, Le K, Mühlemann A, Niemi J, Ray EL, Stark A, Wang Y, Wattanachit N, Zorn MW, Pei S, Shaman J, Yamana TK, Tarasewicz SR, Wilson DJ, Baccam S, Gurung H, Stage S, Suchoski B, Gao L, Gu Z, Kim M, Li X, Wang G, Wang L, Wang Y, Yu S, Gardner L, Jindal S, Marshall M, Nixon K, Dent J, Hill AL, Kaminsky J, Lee EC, Lemaitre JC, Lessler J, Smith CP, Truelove S, Kinsey M, Mullany LC, Rainwater-Lovett K, Shin L, Tallaksen K, Wilson S, Karlen D, Castro L, Fairchild G, Michaud I, Osthus D, Bian J, Cao W, Gao Z, Lavista Ferres J, Li C, Liu TY, Xie X, Zhang S, Zheng S, Chinazzi M, Davis JT, Mu K, Pastore y Piontti A, Vespignani A, Xiong X, Walraven R, Chen J, Gu Q, Wang L, Xu P, Zhang W, Zou D, Gibson GC, Sheldon D, Srivastava A, Adiga A, Hurt B, Kaur G, Lewis B, Marathe M, Peddireddy AS, Porebski P, Venkatramanan S, Wang L, Prasad PV, Walker JW, Webber AE, Slayton RB, Biggerstaff M, Reich NG, Johansson MA. Challenges of COVID-19 Case Forecasting in the US, 2020-2021. PLoS Comput Biol 2024; 20:e1011200. [PMID: 38709852 PMCID: PMC11098513 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2023] [Revised: 05/16/2024] [Accepted: 04/01/2024] [Indexed: 05/08/2024] Open
Abstract
During the COVID-19 pandemic, forecasting COVID-19 trends to support planning and response was a priority for scientists and decision makers alike. In the United States, COVID-19 forecasting was coordinated by a large group of universities, companies, and government entities led by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the US COVID-19 Forecast Hub (https://covid19forecasthub.org). We evaluated approximately 9.7 million forecasts of weekly state-level COVID-19 cases for predictions 1-4 weeks into the future submitted by 24 teams from August 2020 to December 2021. We assessed coverage of central prediction intervals and weighted interval scores (WIS), adjusting for missing forecasts relative to a baseline forecast, and used a Gaussian generalized estimating equation (GEE) model to evaluate differences in skill across epidemic phases that were defined by the effective reproduction number. Overall, we found high variation in skill across individual models, with ensemble-based forecasts outperforming other approaches. Forecast skill relative to the baseline was generally higher for larger jurisdictions (e.g., states compared to counties). Over time, forecasts generally performed worst in periods of rapid changes in reported cases (either in increasing or decreasing epidemic phases) with 95% prediction interval coverage dropping below 50% during the growth phases of the winter 2020, Delta, and Omicron waves. Ideally, case forecasts could serve as a leading indicator of changes in transmission dynamics. However, while most COVID-19 case forecasts outperformed a naïve baseline model, even the most accurate case forecasts were unreliable in key phases. Further research could improve forecasts of leading indicators, like COVID-19 cases, by leveraging additional real-time data, addressing performance across phases, improving the characterization of forecast confidence, and ensuring that forecasts were coherent across spatial scales. In the meantime, it is critical for forecast users to appreciate current limitations and use a broad set of indicators to inform pandemic-related decision making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Velma K. Lopez
- COVID-19 Response, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America
| | - Estee Y. Cramer
- University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Amherst, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Robert Pagano
- Unaffiliated, Tucson, Arizona, United States of America
| | - John M. Drake
- University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, United States of America
| | - Eamon B. O’Dea
- University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, United States of America
| | - Madeline Adee
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Turgay Ayer
- Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America
| | - Jagpreet Chhatwal
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Ozden O. Dalgic
- Value Analytics Labs, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Mary A. Ladd
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Benjamin P. Linas
- Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Peter P. Mueller
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Jade Xiao
- Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America
| | - Johannes Bracher
- Chair of Econometrics and Statistics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany
| | | | - Aaron Gerding
- University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Amherst, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Tilmann Gneiting
- Heidelberg Institute for Theoretical Studies, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Yuxin Huang
- University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Amherst, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Dasuni Jayawardena
- University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Amherst, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Abdul H. Kanji
- University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Amherst, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Khoa Le
- University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Amherst, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Anja Mühlemann
- Institute of Mathematical Statistics and Actuarial Science, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Jarad Niemi
- Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, United States of America
| | - Evan L. Ray
- University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Amherst, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Ariane Stark
- University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Amherst, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Yijin Wang
- University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Amherst, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Nutcha Wattanachit
- University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Amherst, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Martha W. Zorn
- University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Amherst, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Sen Pei
- Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York, United States of America
| | - Jeffrey Shaman
- Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York, United States of America
| | - Teresa K. Yamana
- Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York, United States of America
| | - Samuel R. Tarasewicz
- Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America
| | - Daniel J. Wilson
- Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America
| | - Sid Baccam
- IEM, Bel Air, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Heidi Gurung
- IEM, Bel Air, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Steve Stage
- IEM, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, United States of America
| | | | - Lei Gao
- George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia, United States of America
| | - Zhiling Gu
- Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, United States of America
| | - Myungjin Kim
- Kyungpook National University, Bukgu, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Xinyi Li
- Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina, United States of America
| | - Guannan Wang
- College of William & Mary, Williamsburg, Virginia, United States of America
| | - Lily Wang
- George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia, United States of America
| | - Yueying Wang
- Amazon, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Shan Yu
- University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, United States of America
| | - Lauren Gardner
- Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Sonia Jindal
- Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
| | | | - Kristen Nixon
- Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Juan Dent
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Alison L. Hill
- Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Joshua Kaminsky
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Elizabeth C. Lee
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
| | | | - Justin Lessler
- Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Claire P. Smith
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Shaun Truelove
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Matt Kinsey
- Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Lab, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Luke C. Mullany
- Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Lab, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
| | | | - Lauren Shin
- Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Lab, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Katharine Tallaksen
- Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Lab, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Shelby Wilson
- Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Lab, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Dean Karlen
- University of Victoria and TRIUMF, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Lauren Castro
- Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, United States of America
| | - Geoffrey Fairchild
- Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, United States of America
| | - Isaac Michaud
- Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, United States of America
| | - Dave Osthus
- Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, United States of America
| | - Jiang Bian
- Microsoft, Redmond, Washington, United States of America
| | - Wei Cao
- Microsoft, Redmond, Washington, United States of America
| | - Zhifeng Gao
- Microsoft, Redmond, Washington, United States of America
| | | | - Chaozhuo Li
- Microsoft, Redmond, Washington, United States of America
| | - Tie-Yan Liu
- Microsoft, Redmond, Washington, United States of America
| | - Xing Xie
- Microsoft, Redmond, Washington, United States of America
| | - Shun Zhang
- Microsoft, Redmond, Washington, United States of America
| | - Shun Zheng
- Microsoft, Redmond, Washington, United States of America
| | - Matteo Chinazzi
- Laboratory for the Modeling of Biological and Socio-technical Systems, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Jessica T. Davis
- Laboratory for the Modeling of Biological and Socio-technical Systems, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Kunpeng Mu
- Laboratory for the Modeling of Biological and Socio-technical Systems, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Ana Pastore y Piontti
- Laboratory for the Modeling of Biological and Socio-technical Systems, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Alessandro Vespignani
- Laboratory for the Modeling of Biological and Socio-technical Systems, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Xinyue Xiong
- Laboratory for the Modeling of Biological and Socio-technical Systems, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | | | - Jinghui Chen
- University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
| | - Quanquan Gu
- University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
| | - Lingxiao Wang
- University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
| | - Pan Xu
- University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
| | - Weitong Zhang
- University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
| | - Difan Zou
- University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
| | - Graham Casey Gibson
- Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, United States of America
| | - Daniel Sheldon
- University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Amherst, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Ajitesh Srivastava
- University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
| | - Aniruddha Adiga
- University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, United States of America
| | - Benjamin Hurt
- University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, United States of America
| | - Gursharn Kaur
- University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, United States of America
| | - Bryan Lewis
- University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, United States of America
| | - Madhav Marathe
- University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, United States of America
| | | | | | | | - Lijing Wang
- New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, New Jersey, United States of America
| | - Pragati V. Prasad
- COVID-19 Response, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America
| | - Jo W. Walker
- COVID-19 Response, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America
| | - Alexander E. Webber
- COVID-19 Response, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America
| | - Rachel B. Slayton
- COVID-19 Response, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America
| | - Matthew Biggerstaff
- COVID-19 Response, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America
| | - Nicholas G. Reich
- University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Amherst, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Michael A. Johansson
- COVID-19 Response, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Sooknanan J, Seemungal TAR. Lest we forget, all models are flawed but useful: the example of the COVID-19 pandemic. Public Health 2024; 230:e3-e4. [PMID: 38519288 DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2024.02.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2024] [Revised: 02/12/2024] [Accepted: 02/20/2024] [Indexed: 03/24/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- J Sooknanan
- Department of Mathematics and Statistics, The University of the West Indies, St. Augustine Campus, St. Augustine, Trinidad and Tobago.
| | - T A R Seemungal
- Faculty of Medical Sciences, The University of the West Indies, St. Augustine Campus, Trinidad and Tobago
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ma Z, Rennert L. An epidemiological modeling framework to inform institutional-level response to infectious disease outbreaks: a Covid-19 case study. Sci Rep 2024; 14:7221. [PMID: 38538693 PMCID: PMC10973339 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-57488-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2023] [Accepted: 03/19/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024] Open
Abstract
Institutions have an enhanced ability to implement tailored mitigation measures during infectious disease outbreaks. However, macro-level predictive models are inefficient for guiding institutional decision-making due to uncertainty in local-level model input parameters. We present an institutional-level modeling toolkit used to inform prediction, resource procurement and allocation, and policy implementation at Clemson University throughout the Covid-19 pandemic. Through incorporating real-time estimation of disease surveillance and epidemiological measures based on institutional data, we argue this approach helps minimize uncertainties in input parameters presented in the broader literature and increases prediction accuracy. We demonstrate this through case studies at Clemson and other university settings during the Omicron BA.1 and BA.4/BA.5 variant surges. The input parameters of our toolkit are easily adaptable to other institutional settings during future health emergencies. This methodological approach has potential to improve public health response through increasing the capability of institutions to make data-informed decisions that better prioritize the health and safety of their communities while minimizing operational disruptions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zichen Ma
- Department of Mathematics, Colgate University, Hamilton, NY, USA
- Center for Public Health Modeling and Response, Department of Public Health Sciences, Clemson University, 517 Edwards Hall, Clemson, SC, 29634, USA
| | - Lior Rennert
- Center for Public Health Modeling and Response, Department of Public Health Sciences, Clemson University, 517 Edwards Hall, Clemson, SC, 29634, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Sen A, Stevens NT, Tran NK, Agarwal RR, Zhang Q, Dubin JA. Forecasting daily COVID-19 cases with gradient boosted regression trees and other methods: evidence from U.S. cities. Front Public Health 2023; 11:1259410. [PMID: 38146480 PMCID: PMC10749509 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1259410] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2023] [Accepted: 11/13/2023] [Indexed: 12/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction There is a vast literature on the performance of different short-term forecasting models for country specific COVID-19 cases, but much less research with respect to city level cases. This paper employs daily case counts for 25 Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) in the U.S. to evaluate the efficacy of a variety of statistical forecasting models with respect to 7 and 28-day ahead predictions. Methods This study employed Gradient Boosted Regression Trees (GBRT), Linear Mixed Effects (LME), Susceptible, Infectious, or Recovered (SIR), and Seasonal Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (SARIMA) models to generate daily forecasts of COVID-19 cases from November 2020 to March 2021. Results Consistent with other research that have employed Machine Learning (ML) based methods, we find that Median Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) values for both 7-day ahead and 28-day ahead predictions from GBRTs are lower than corresponding values from SIR, Linear Mixed Effects (LME), and Seasonal Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (SARIMA) specifications for the majority of MSAs during November-December 2020 and January 2021. GBRT and SARIMA models do not offer high-quality predictions for February 2021. However, SARIMA generated MAPE values for 28-day ahead predictions are slightly lower than corresponding GBRT estimates for March 2021. Discussion The results of this research demonstrate that basic ML models can lead to relatively accurate forecasts at the local level, which is important for resource allocation decisions and epidemiological surveillance by policymakers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anindya Sen
- Department of Economics, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada
| | - Nathaniel T. Stevens
- Department of Statistics and Actuarial Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada
| | - N. Ken Tran
- School of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada
| | - Rishav R. Agarwal
- Cheriton School of Computer Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada
| | - Qihuang Zhang
- Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill College, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Joel A. Dubin
- Department of Statistics and Actuarial Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada
- School of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Yang W, Shaman J. Development of Accurate Long-lead COVID-19 Forecast. PLoS Comput Biol 2023; 19:e1011278. [PMID: 37459374 PMCID: PMC10374152 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011278] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2022] [Accepted: 06/16/2023] [Indexed: 07/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) will likely remain a major public health burden; accurate forecast of COVID-19 epidemic outcomes several months into the future is needed to support more proactive planning. Here, we propose strategies to address three major forecast challenges, i.e., error growth, the emergence of new variants, and infection seasonality. Using these strategies in combination we generate retrospective predictions of COVID-19 cases and deaths 6 months in the future for 10 representative US states. Tallied over >25,000 retrospective predictions through September 2022, the forecast approach using all three strategies consistently outperformed a baseline forecast approach without these strategies across different variant waves and locations, for all forecast targets. Overall, probabilistic forecast accuracy improved by 64% and 38% and point prediction accuracy by 133% and 87% for cases and deaths, respectively. Real-time 6-month lead predictions made in early October 2022 suggested large attack rates in most states but a lower burden of deaths than previous waves during October 2022 -March 2023; these predictions are in general accurate compared to reported data. The superior skill of the forecast methods developed here demonstrate means for generating more accurate long-lead forecast of COVID-19 and possibly other infectious diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wan Yang
- Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York, United States of America
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, United States of America
| | - Jeffrey Shaman
- Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York, United States of America
- Columbia Climate School, Columbia University, New York, New York, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Rennert L, Ma Z. An epidemiological modeling framework to inform institutional-level response to infectious disease outbreaks: A Covid-19 case study. RESEARCH SQUARE 2023:rs.3.rs-3116880. [PMID: 37503237 PMCID: PMC10371141 DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3116880/v1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/29/2023]
Abstract
Institutions have an enhanced ability to implement tailored mitigation measures during infectious disease outbreaks. However, macro-level predictive models are inefficient for guiding institutional decision-making due to uncertainty in local-level model input parameters. We present an institutional-level modeling toolkit used to inform prediction, resource procurement and allocation, and policy implementation at Clemson University throughout the Covid-19 pandemic. Through incorporating real-time estimation of disease surveillance and epidemiological measures based on institutional data, we argue this approach helps minimize uncertainties in input parameters presented in the broader literature and increases prediction accuracy. We demonstrate this through case studies at Clemson and other university settings during the Omicron BA.1 and BA.4/BA.5 variant surges. The input parameters of our toolkit are easily adaptable to other institutional settings during future health emergencies. This methodological approach has potential to improve public health response through increasing the capability of institutions to make data-informed decisions that better prioritize the health and safety of their communities while minimizing operational disruptions.
Collapse
|
13
|
Yang W, Shaman J. Development of Accurate Long-lead COVID-19 Forecast. MEDRXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR HEALTH SCIENCES 2023:2022.11.14.22282323. [PMID: 36415461 PMCID: PMC9681046 DOI: 10.1101/2022.11.14.22282323] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
UNLABELLED Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) will likely remain a major public health burden; accurate forecast of COVID-19 epidemic outcomes several months into the future is needed to support more proactive planning. Here, we propose strategies to address three major forecast challenges, i.e., error growth, the emergence of new variants, and infection seasonality. Using these strategies in combination we generate retrospective predictions of COVID-19 cases and deaths 6 months in the future for 10 representative US states. Tallied over >25,000 retrospective predictions through September 2022, the forecast approach using all three strategies consistently outperformed a baseline forecast approach without these strategies across different variant waves and locations, for all forecast targets. Overall, probabilistic forecast accuracy improved by 64% and 38% and point prediction accuracy by 133% and 87% for cases and deaths, respectively. Real-time 6-month lead predictions made in early October 2022 suggested large attack rates in most states but a lower burden of deaths than previous waves during October 2022 - March 2023; these predictions are in general accurate compared to reported data. The superior skill of the forecast methods developed here demonstrate means for generating more accurate long-lead forecast of COVID-19 and possibly other infectious diseases. AUTHOR SUMMARY Infectious disease forecast aims to reliably predict the most likely future outcomes during an epidemic. To date, reliable COVID-19 forecast remains elusive and is needed to support more proactive planning. Here, we pinpoint the major challenges facing COVID-19 forecast and propose three strategies. Comprehensive testing shows the forecast approach using all three strategies consistently outperforms a baseline approach without these strategies across different variant waves and locations in the United States for all forecast targets, improving the probabilistic forecast accuracy by ∼50% and point prediction accuracy by ∼100%. The superior skills of the forecast methods developed here demonstrate means for generating more accurate long-lead COVID-19 forecasts. The methods may be also applicable to other infectious diseases. ONE SENTENCE SUMMARY To support more proactive planning, we develop COVID-19 forecast methods that substantially improve accuracy with lead time up to 6 months.
Collapse
|
14
|
Odagaki T. New compartment model for COVID-19. Sci Rep 2023; 13:5409. [PMID: 37012332 PMCID: PMC10068699 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-32159-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2022] [Accepted: 03/23/2023] [Indexed: 04/05/2023] Open
Abstract
The SIR or susceptible-infected-recovered model is the standard compartment model for understanding epidemics and has been used all over the world for COVID-19. While the SIR model assumes that infected patients are identical to symptomatic and infectious patients, it is now known that in COVID-19 pre-symptomatic patients are infectious and there are significant number of asymptomatic patients who are infectious. In this paper, population is separated into five compartments for COVID-19; susceptible individuals (S), pre-symptomatic patients (P), asymptomatic patients (A), quarantined patients (Q) and recovered and/or dead patients (R). The time evolution of population in each compartment is described by a set of ordinary differential equations. Numerical solution to the set of differential equations shows that quarantining pre-symptomatic and asymptomatic patients is effective in controlling the pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takashi Odagaki
- Kyushu University, Fukuoka, 819-0395, Japan.
- Research Institute for Science Education, Inc., Kyoto, 603-8346, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Tzamali E, Sakkalis V, Tzedakis G, Spanakis EG, Tzanakis N. Mathematical Modeling Evaluates How Vaccinations Affected the Course of COVID-19 Disease Progression. Vaccines (Basel) 2023; 11:vaccines11040722. [PMID: 37112635 PMCID: PMC10142609 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11040722] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2023] [Revised: 03/17/2023] [Accepted: 03/20/2023] [Indexed: 04/29/2023] Open
Abstract
The regulation policies implemented, the characteristics of vaccines, and the evolution of the virus continue to play a significant role in the progression of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Numerous research articles have proposed using mathematical models to predict the outcomes of different scenarios, with the aim of improving awareness and informing policy-making. In this work, we propose an expansion to the classical SEIR epidemiological model that is designed to fit the complex epidemiological data of COVID-19. The model includes compartments for vaccinated, asymptomatic, hospitalized, and deceased individuals, splitting the population into two branches based on the severity of progression. In order to investigate the impact of the vaccination program on the spread of COVID-19 in Greece, this study takes into account the realistic vaccination program implemented in Greece, which includes various vaccination rates, different dosages, and the administration of booster shots. It also examines for the first time policy scenarios at crucial time-intervention points for Greece. In particular, we explore how alterations in the vaccination rate, immunity loss, and relaxation of measures regarding the vaccinated individuals affect the dynamics of COVID-19 spread. The modeling parameters revealed an alarming increase in the death rate during the dominance of the delta variant and before the initiation of the booster shot program in Greece. The existing probability of vaccinated people becoming infected and transmitting the virus sets them as catalytic players in COVID-19 progression. Overall, the modeling observations showcase how the criticism of different intervention measures, the vaccination program, and the virus evolution has been present throughout the various stages of the pandemic. As long as immunity declines, new variants emerge, and vaccine protection in reducing transmission remains incompetent; monitoring the complex vaccine and virus evolution is critical to respond proactively in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eleftheria Tzamali
- Computational Biomedicine Laboratory, Institute of Computer Science, Foundation for Research and Technology-Hellas (FORTH), 70013 Heraklion, Greece
| | - Vangelis Sakkalis
- Computational Biomedicine Laboratory, Institute of Computer Science, Foundation for Research and Technology-Hellas (FORTH), 70013 Heraklion, Greece
| | - Georgios Tzedakis
- Computational Biomedicine Laboratory, Institute of Computer Science, Foundation for Research and Technology-Hellas (FORTH), 70013 Heraklion, Greece
| | - Emmanouil G Spanakis
- Computational Biomedicine Laboratory, Institute of Computer Science, Foundation for Research and Technology-Hellas (FORTH), 70013 Heraklion, Greece
| | - Nikos Tzanakis
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, University Hospital of Heraklion, Medical School, University of Crete, 71003 Heraklion, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Du H, Dong E, Badr HS, Petrone ME, Grubaugh ND, Gardner LM. Incorporating variant frequencies data into short-term forecasting for COVID-19 cases and deaths in the USA: a deep learning approach. EBioMedicine 2023; 89:104482. [PMID: 36821889 PMCID: PMC9943054 DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2023.104482] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2022] [Revised: 01/30/2023] [Accepted: 02/02/2023] [Indexed: 02/24/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Since the US reported its first COVID-19 case on January 21, 2020, the science community has been applying various techniques to forecast incident cases and deaths. To date, providing an accurate and robust forecast at a high spatial resolution has proved challenging, even in the short term. METHOD Here we present a novel multi-stage deep learning model to forecast the number of COVID-19 cases and deaths for each US state at a weekly level for a forecast horizon of 1-4 weeks. The model is heavily data driven, and relies on epidemiological, mobility, survey, climate, demographic, and SARS-CoV-2 variant frequencies data. We implement a rigorous and robust evaluation of our model-specifically we report on weekly performance over a one-year period based on multiple error metrics, and explicitly assess how our model performance varies over space, chronological time, and different outbreak phases. FINDINGS The proposed model is shown to consistently outperform the CDC ensemble model for all evaluation metrics in multiple spatiotemporal settings, especially for the longer-term (3 and 4 weeks ahead) forecast horizon. Our case study also highlights the potential value of variant frequencies data for use in short-term forecasting to identify forthcoming surges driven by new variants. INTERPRETATION Based on our findings, the proposed forecasting framework improves upon the available state-of-the-art forecasting tools currently used to support public health decision making with respect to COVID-19 risk. FUNDING This work was funded the NSF Rapid Response Research (RAPID) grant Award ID 2108526 and the CDC Contract #75D30120C09570.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hongru Du
- Center for Systems Science and Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21218, USA; Department of Civil and Systems Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21218, USA
| | - Ensheng Dong
- Center for Systems Science and Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21218, USA; Department of Civil and Systems Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21218, USA
| | - Hamada S Badr
- Center for Systems Science and Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21218, USA; Department of Civil and Systems Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21218, USA; Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21218, USA
| | - Mary E Petrone
- Department of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, 06510, USA
| | - Nathan D Grubaugh
- Department of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, 06510, USA; Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, 06510, USA
| | - Lauren M Gardner
- Center for Systems Science and Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21218, USA; Department of Civil and Systems Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21218, USA; Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
| |
Collapse
|