Dehydropolymerization of H3B·NMeH2 Using a [Rh(DPEphos)]+ Catalyst: The Promoting Effect of NMeH2

Selective dehydrogenation of ammonia borane to polycondensated BN rings catalysed by ruthenium olefin complexes

Dehydrogenation of ammonia borane to well-defined products is an important but challenging reaction. A dinuclear ruthenium complex with a Ru-Ru bond bearing a diazadiene (dad) unit and olefins as non-innocent ligands catalyzes the highly selective formation of conjugated polycondensed borazine oligomers (BxNxHy), predominantly B21N21H18, the BN analogue of superbenzene.

Catalyst-Free Transfer Hydrogenation from Amine-Borane Small Oligomers

Amine-borane dimers and oligomers with varied steric and electronic profiles were prepared via capping agent-controlled AA/BB polycondensations. They were used for transfer hydrogenations to aldehydes, ketones, imines as well as electron-poor alkene/alkyne moieties. The amine-borane Lewis-paired oligomers and the congested bis(amine-borane)s provided the highest yields. This was likely helped by facilitated dissociation (oligomers) or H-bond assistance. In the case of the oligomers, the second equivalent of H2 present was also engaged in the reaction. Solid-state NMR characterization provides evidence that the boron-containing materials obtained after transfer dehydrogenation are highly similar to those obtained from thermal dehydrogenation. The oligomers bridge the gap between simple amine-borane molecular reductants and the poly-amine-boranes and provide a full picture of the reactivity changes at the different scales.

Dehydropolymerization of Amine-Boranes using Bis(imino)pyridine Rhodium Pre-Catalysis: σ-Amine-Borane Complexes, Nanoparticles, and Low Residual-Metal BN-Polymers that can be Chemically Repurposed

The sigma amine-borane complexes [Rh(L1)(η2 :η2 -H3 B⋅NRH2 )][OTf] (L1=2,6-bis-[1-(2,6-diisopropylphenylimino)ethyl]pyridine, R=Me, Et, n Pr) are described, alongside [Rh(L1)(NMeH2 )][OTf]. Using R=Me as a pre-catalyst (1 mol %) the dehydropolymerization of H3 B ⋅ NMeH2 gives [H2 BNMeH]n selectively. Added NMeH2 , or the direct use of [Rh(L1)(NMeH2 )][OTf], is required for initiation of catalysis, which is suggested to operate through the formation of a neutral hydride complex, Rh(L1)H. The formation of small (1-5 nm) nanoparticles is observed at the end of catalysis, but studies are ambiguous as to whether the catalysis is solely nanoparticle promoted or if there is a molecular homogeneous component. [Rh(L1)(NMeH2 )][OTf] is shown to operate at 0.025 mol % loadings on a 2 g scale of H3 B ⋅ NMeH2 to give polyaminoborane [H2 BNMeH]n [Mn =30,900 g/mol, Ð=1.8] that can be purified to a low residual [Rh] (6 μg/g). Addition of Na[N(SiMe3 )2 ] to [H2 BNMeH]n results in selective depolymerization to form the eee-isomer of N,N,N-trimethylcyclotriborazane [H2 BNMeH]3 : the chemical repurposing of a main-group polymer.

Competition between N,C,N-Pincer and N,N-Chelate Ligands in Platinum(II)

Replacement of the chloride ligand of PtCl{κ3-N,C,N-[py-C6HR2-py]} (R = H (1), Me (2)) and PtCl{κ3-N,C,N-[py-O-C6H3-O-py]} (3) by hydroxido gives Pt(OH){κ3-N,C,N-[py-C6HR2-py]} (R = H (4), Me (5)) and Pt(OH){κ3-N,C,N-[py-O-C6H3-O-py]} (6). These compounds promote deprotonation of 3-(2-pyridyl)pyrazole, 3-(2-pyridyl)-5-methylpyrazole, 3-(2-pyridyl)-5-trifluoromethylpyrazole, and 2-(2-pyridyl)-3,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)pyrrole. The coordination of the anions generates square-planar derivatives, which in solution exist as a unique species or equilibria between isomers. Reactions of 4 and 5 with 3-(2-pyridyl)pyrazole and 3-(2-pyridyl)-5-methylpyrazole provide Pt{κ3-N,C,N-[py-C6HR2-py]}{κ1-N1-[R'pz-py]} (R = H; R' = H (7), Me (8). R = Me; R' = H (9), Me (10)), displaying κ1-N1-pyridylpyrazolate coordination. A 5-trifluoromethyl substituent causes N1-to-N2 slide. Thus, 3-(2-pyridyl)-5-trifluoromethylpyrazole affords equilibria between Pt{κ3-N,C,N-[py-C6HR2-py]}{κ1-N1-[CF3pz-py]} (R = H (11a), Me (12a)) and Pt{κ3-N,C,N-[py-C6HR2-py]}{κ1-N2-[CF3pz-py]} (R = H (11b), Me (12b)). 1,3-Bis(2-pyridyloxy)phenyl allows the chelating coordination of the incoming anions. Deprotonations of 3-(2-pyridyl)pyrazole and its substituted 5-methyl counterpart promoted by 6 lead to equilibria between Pt{κ3-N,C,N-[pyO-C6H3-Opy]}{κ1-N1-[R'pz-py]} (R' = H (13a), Me (14a)) with a κ-N1-pyridylpyrazolate anion, keeping the pincer coordination of the di(pyridyloxy)aryl ligand, and Pt{κ2-N,C-[pyO-C6H3(Opy)]}{κ2-N,N-[R'pz-py]} (R' = H (13c), Me (14c)) with two chelates. Under the same conditions, 3-(2-pyridyl)-5-trifluoromethylpyrazole generates the three possible isomers: Pt{κ3-N,C,N-[pyO-C6H3-Opy]}{κ1-N1-[CF3pz-py]} (15a), Pt{κ3-N,C,N-[pyO-C6H3-Opy]}{κ1-N2-[CF3pz-py]} (15b), and Pt{κ2-N,C-[pyO-C6H3(Opy)]}{κ2-N,N-[CF3pz-py]} (15c). The N1-pyrazolate atom produces a remote stabilizing effect on the chelating form, pyridylpyrazolates being better chelate ligands than pyridylpyrrolates. Accordingly, reactions of 4-6 with 2-(2-pyridyl)-3,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)pyrrole yield Pt{κ3-N,C,N-[py-C6HR2-py]}{κ1-N1-[(CF3)2C4(py)HN]} (R = H (16), Me (17)) or Pt{κ3-N,C,N-[pyO-C6H3-Opy]}{κ1-N1-[(CF3)2C4(py)HN]} (18), displaying κ1-N1-pyrrolate coordination. Complexes 7-10 are efficient green phosphorescent emitters (488-576 nm). In poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) films and in dichloromethane, they experience self-quenching, due to molecular stacking. Aggregation occurs through aromatic π-π interactions, reinforced by weak platinum-platinum interactions.

Mechanistic insights into H3B·NMeH2 dehydrogenation by Co-based complexes: a DFT perspective

Mechanistic insights into Co-catalyzed H3B·NMeH2 dehydrogenation and polyaminoborane formation are carefully investigated using density functional theory.

Dehydropolymerization of H3B·NMeH2 Mediated by Cationic Iridium(III) Precatalysts Bearing κ3-iPr-PNRP Pincer Ligands (R = H, Me): An Unexpected Inner-Sphere Mechanism

The dehydropolymerization of H₃B·NMeH₂ to form N-methylpolyaminoborane using neutral and cationic catalysts based on the {Ir(ⁱPr-PN^HP)} fragment [ⁱPr-PN^HP = κ³-(CH₂CH₂PⁱPr₂)₂NH] is reported. Neutral Ir(ⁱPr-PN^HP)H₃ or Ir(ⁱPr-PN^HP)H₂Cl precatalysts show no, or poor and unselective, activity respectively at 298 K in 1,2-F₂C₆H₄ solution. In contrast, addition of [NMeH₃][BAr^F₄] (Ar^F = 3,5-(CF₃)₂C₆H₃) to Ir(ⁱPr-PN^HP)H₃ immediately starts catalysis, suggesting that a cationic catalytic manifold operates. Consistent with this, independently synthesized cationic precatalysts are active (tested between 0.5 and 2.0 mol % loading) producing poly(N-methylaminoborane) with M_n ∼ 40,000 g/mol, Đ ∼1.5, i.e., dihydrogen/dihydride, [Ir(ⁱPr-PN^HP)(H)₂(H₂)][BAr^F₄]; σ-amine-borane [Ir(ⁱPr-PN^HP)(H)₂(H₃B·NMe₃)][BAr^F₄]; and [Ir(ⁱPr-PN^HP)(H)₂(NMeH₂)][BAr^F₄]. Density functional theory (DFT) calculations probe hydride exchange processes in two of these complexes and also show that the barrier to amine-borane dehydrogenation is lower (22.5 kcal/mol) for the cationic system compared with the neutral system (24.3 kcal/mol). The calculations show that the dehydrogenation proceeds via an inner-sphere process without metal–ligand cooperativity, and this is supported experimentally by N–Me substituted [Ir(ⁱPr-PN^MeP)(H)₂(H₃B·NMe₃)][BAr^F₄] being an active catalyst. Key to the lower barrier calculated for the cationic system is the outer-sphere coordination of an additional H₃B·NMeH₂ with the N–H group of the ligand. Experimentally, kinetic studies indicate a complex reaction manifold that shows pronounced deceleratory temporal profiles. As supported by speciation and DFT studies, a key observation is that deprotonation of [Ir(ⁱPr-N^HP)(H)₂(H₂)][BAr^F₄], formed upon amine-borane dehydrogenation, by the slow in situ formation of NMeH₂ (via B–N bond cleavage), results in the formation of essentially inactive Ir(ⁱPr-PN^HP)H₃, with a coproduct of [NMeH₃]⁺/[H₂B(NMeH₂)₂]⁺. While reprotonation of Ir(ⁱPr-PN^HP)H₃ results in a return to the cationic cycle, it is proposed, supported by doping experiments, that reprotonation is attenuated by entrainment of the [NMeH₃]⁺/[H₂B(NMeH₂)₂]⁺/catalyst in insoluble polyaminoborane. The role of [NMeH₃]⁺/[H₂B(NMeH₂)]⁺ as chain control agents is also noted.

Hydrogen Tunneling in Catalytic Hydrolysis and Alcoholysis of Silanes

An unprecedented quantum tunneling effect has been observed in catalytic Si−H bond activations at room temperature. The cationic hydrido‐silyl‐iridium(III) complex, {Ir[SiMe(o‐C₆H₄SMe)₂](H)(PPh₃)(THF)}[BAr^F₄], has proven to be a highly efficient catalyst for the hydrolysis and the alcoholysis of organosilanes. When triethylsilane was used as a substrate, the system revealed the largest kinetic isotopic effect (KIE_{Si−H/Si−D}=346±4) ever reported for this type of reaction. This unexpectedly high KIE, measured at room temperature, together with the calculated Arrhenius preexponential factor ratio (A_H/A_D=0.0004) and difference in the observed activation energy [(EaD −EaH )=34.07 kJ mol⁻¹] are consistent with the participation of quantum tunneling in the catalytic process. DFT calculations have been used to unravel the reaction pathway and identify the rate‐determining step. Aditionally, isotopic effects were considered by different methods, and tunneling effects have been calculated to be crucial in the process.

Redox-Switchable Complexes Based on Nanographene-NHCs

A series of rhodium and iridium complexes with a N‐heterocyclic carbene (NHC) ligand decorated with a perylene‐diimide‐pyrene moiety are described. Electrochemical studies reveal that the complexes can undergo two successive one‐electron reduction events, associated to the reduction of the PDI moiety attached to the NHC ligand. The reduction of the ligand produces a significant increase on its electron‐donating character, as observed from the infrared spectroelectrochemical studies. The rhodium complex was tested in the [3+2] cycloaddition of diphenylcyclopropenone and methylphenylacetylene, where it displayed a redox‐switchable behavior. The neutral complex showed moderate activity, which was suppressed when the catalyst was reduced.

Silyl-Osmium(IV)-Trihydride Complexes Stabilized by a Pincer Ether-Diphosphine: Formation and Reactions with Alkynes

Complex OsH₄{κ³-P,O,P-[xant(PⁱPr₂)₂]} (1) activates the Si-H bond of triethylsilane, triphenylsilane, and 1,1,1,3,5,5,5-heptamethyltrisiloxane to give the silyl-osmium(IV)-trihydride derivatives OsH₃(SiR₃){κ³-P,O,P-[xant(PⁱPr₂)₂]} [SiR₃ = SiEt₃ (2), SiPh₃ (3), SiMe(OSiMe₃)₂ (4)] and H₂. The activation takes place via an unsaturated tetrahydride intermediate, resulting from the dissociation of the oxygen atom of the pincer ligand 9,9-dimethyl-4,5-bis(diisopropylphosphino)xanthene (xant(PⁱPr₂)₂). This intermediate, which has been trapped to form OsH₄{κ²-P,P-[xant(PⁱPr₂)₂]}(PⁱPr₃) (5), coordinates the Si-H bond of the silanes to subsequently undergo a homolytic cleavage. Kinetics of the reaction along with the observed primary isotope effect demonstrates that the Si-H rupture is the rate-determining step of the activation. Complex 2 reacts with 1,1-diphenyl-2-propyn-1-ol and 1-phenyl-1-propyne. The reaction with the former affords Os{C≡CC(OH)Ph₂}₂{=C=CHC(OH)Ph₂}{κ³-P,O,P-[xant(PⁱPr₂)₂]} (6), which catalyzes the conversion of the propargylic alcohol into (E)-2-(5,5-diphenylfuran-2(5H)-ylidene)-1,1-diphenylethan-1-ol, via (Z)-enynediol. In methanol, the hydroxyvinylidene ligand of 6 dehydrates to allenylidene, generating Os{C≡CC(OH)Ph₂}₂{=C=C=CPh₂}{κ³-P,O,P-[xant(PⁱPr₂)₂]} (7). The reaction of 2 with 1-phenyl-1-propyne leads to OsH{κ¹-C,η²-[C₆H₄CH₂CH=CH₂]}{κ³-P,O,P-[xant(PⁱPr₂)₂]} (8) and PhCH₂CH=CH(SiEt₃).

C–Cl Oxidative Addition and C–C Reductive Elimination Reactions in the Context of the Rhodium-Promoted Direct Arylation

A cycle of stoichiometric elemental reactions defining the direct arylation promoted by a redox-pair Rh(I)–Rh(III) is reported. Starting from the rhodium(I)-aryl complex RhPh{κ³-P,O,P-[xant(PⁱPr₂)₂]} (xant(PⁱPr₂)₂ = 9,9-dimethyl-4,5-bis(diisopropylphosphino)xanthene), the reactions include C–Cl oxidative addition of organic chlorides, halide abstraction from the resulting six-coordinate rhodium(III) derivatives, C–C reductive coupling between the initial aryl ligand and the added organic group, oxidative addition of a C–H bond of a new arene, and deprotonation of the generated hydride-rhodium(III)-aryl species to form a new rhodium(I)-aryl derivative. In this context, the kinetics of the oxidative additions of 2-chloropyridine, chlorobenzene, benzyl chloride, and dichloromethane to RhPh{κ³-P,O,P-[xant(PⁱPr₂)₂]} and the C–C reductive eliminations of biphenyl and benzylbenzene from [RhPh₂{κ³-P,O,P-[xant(PⁱPr₂)₂]}]BF₄ and [RhPh(CH₂Ph){κ³-P,O,P-[xant(PⁱPr₂)₂]}]BF₄, respectively, have been studied. The oxidative additions generally involve the cis addition of the C–Cl bond of the organic chloride to the rhodium(I) complex, being kinetically controlled by the C–Cl bond dissociation energy; the weakest C–Cl bond is faster added. The C–C reductive elimination is kinetically governed by the dissociation energy of the formed bond. The C(sp³)–C(sp²) coupling to give benzylbenzene is faster than the C(sp²)–C(sp²) bond formation to afford biphenyl. In spite of that a most demanding orientation requirement is needed for the C(sp³)–C(sp²) coupling than for the C(sp²)–C(sp²) bond formation, the energetic effort for the pregeneration of the C(sp³)–C(sp²) bond is lower. As a result, the weakest C–C bond is formed faster.

Activation of Si–H and B–H bonds by Lewis acidic transition metals and p-block elements: same, but different

In this Perspective we discuss the ability of transition metal complexes to activate and cleave the Si–H and B–H bonds of hydrosilanes and hydroboranes (tri- and tetra-coordinated) in an electrophilic manner, avoiding the need for the metal centre to undergo two-electron processes (oxidative addition/reductive elimination). A formal polarization of E–H bonds (E = Si, B) upon their coordination to the metal centre to form σ-EH complexes (with coordination modes η¹ or η²) favors this type of bond activation that can lead to reactivities involving the formation of transient silylium and borenium/boronium cations similar to those proposed in silylation and borylation processes catalysed by boron and aluminium Lewis acids. We compare the reactivity of transition metal complexes and boron/aluminium Lewis acids through a series of catalytic reactions in which pieces of evidence suggest mechanisms involving electrophilic reaction pathways.

In this Perspective we compare the ability of transition metals and p-block Lewis acids to activate electrophilically hydrosilanes and hydroboranes. The mechanistic similarities and dissimilarities in different catalytic transformations are analyzed.

Controlled Synthesis of Well-Defined Polyaminoboranes on Scale Using a Robust and Efficient Catalyst

The air tolerant precatalyst, [Rh(L)(NBD)]Cl ([1]Cl) [L = κ³-(ⁱPr₂PCH₂CH₂)₂NH, NBD = norbornadiene], mediates the selective synthesis of N-methylpolyaminoborane, (H₂BNMeH)_n, by dehydropolymerization of H₃B·NMeH₂. Kinetic, speciation, and DFT studies show an induction period in which the active catalyst, Rh(L)H₃ (3), forms, which sits as an outer-sphere adduct 3·H₃BNMeH₂ as the resting state. At the end of catalysis, dormant Rh(L)H₂Cl (2) is formed. Reaction of 2 with H₃B·NMeH₂ returns 3, alongside the proposed formation of boronium [H₂B(NMeH₂)₂]Cl. Aided by isotopic labeling, Eyring analysis, and DFT calculations, a mechanism is proposed in which the cooperative "PNHP" ligand templates dehydrogenation, releasing H₂B═NMeH (ΔG^‡_calc = 19.6 kcal mol^-1). H₂B═NMeH is proposed to undergo rapid, low barrier, head-to-tail chain propagation for which 3 is the catalyst/initiator. A high molecular weight polymer is formed that is relatively insensitive to catalyst loading (M_n ∼71 000 g mol^-1; Đ, of ∼ 1.6). The molecular weight can be controlled using [H₂B(NMe₂H)₂]Cl as a chain transfer agent, M_n = 37 900-78 100 g mol^-1. This polymerization is suggested to arise from an ensemble of processes (catalyst speciation, dehydrogenation, propagation, chain transfer) that are geared around the concentration of H₃B·NMeH₂. TGA and DSC thermal analysis of polymer produced on scale (10 g, 0.01 mol % [1]Cl) show a processing window that allows for melt extrusion of polyaminoborane strands, as well as hot pressing, drop casting, and electrospray deposition. By variation of conditions in the latter, smooth or porous microstructured films or spherical polyaminoboranes beads (∼100 nm) result.

Ortho-aryl substituted DPEphos ligands: rhodium complexes featuring C-H anagostic interactions and B-H agostic bonds

The synthesis of new Schrock–Osborn Rh(i) pre-catalysts with ortho-substituted DPEphos ligands, [Rh(DPEphos-R)(NBD)][BAr^F₄] [R = Me, OMe, ⁱPr; Ar^F = 3,5-(CF₃)₂C₆H₃], is described. Along with the previously reported R = H variant, variable temperature ¹H NMR spectroscopic and single-crystal X-ray diffraction studies show that these all have axial (C–H)⋯Rh anagostic interactions relative to the d⁸ pseudo square planar metal centres, that also result in corresponding downfield chemical shifts. Analysis by NBO, QTAIM and NCI methods shows these to be only very weak C–H⋯Rh bonding interactions, the magnitudes of which do not correlate with the observed chemical shifts. Instead, as informed by Scherer's approach, it is the topological positioning of the C–H bond with regard to the metal centre that is important. For [Rh(DPEphos–ⁱPr)(NBD)][BAr^F₄] addition of H₂ results in a Rh(iii) ⁱPr–C–H activated product, [Rh(κ³,σ-P,O,P-DPEphos-ⁱPr′)(H)][BAr^F₄]. This undergoes H/D exchange with D₂ at the ⁱPr groups, reacts with CO or NBD to return Rh(i) products, and reaction with H₃B·NMe₃/tert-butylethene results in a dehydrogenative borylation to form a complex that shows both a non-classical B–H⋯Rh 3c-2e agostic bond and a C–H⋯Rh anagostic interaction at the same metal centre.

Rh(i) complexes of ortho-substituted DPEphos-R (R = H, Me, OMe, ⁱPr) ligands show anagostic interactions; for R =ⁱPr C–H activation/dehydrogenative borylation forms a product exhibiting both B–H/Rh 3c-2e agostic and C–H/Rh anagostic motifs.

Facile Synthetic Method of Na[BH3(NH2BH2)2H] Based on the Reactions of Sodium Amidoborane (NaNH2BH3) with NiBr2 or CoCl2

The reactions of sodium amidoborane (NaNH₂BH₃) with NiBr₂ have been investigated, and the results showed that black precipitate 1 including the NiBNH_x composites could be obtained. From the aqueous solution of the precipitate 1, the hydrolysis product Ni-B (2) was isolated and characterized. Both the in situ formed precipitate 1 and the hydrolysis product 2 can catalyze the formation of Na[BH₃(NH₂BH₂)₂H]. CoCl₂ showed comparable performance with NiBr₂. Based on these results, a facile method for the synthesis of Na[BH₃(NH₂BH₂)₂H] has been developed. This work provides insights into studying experimental methods for the synthesis of long B/N chain complexes and developing boron and nitrogen chemistry.

Repercussion of a 1,3-Hydrogen Shift in a Hydride-Osmium-Allenylidene Complex

An unusual 1,3-hydrogen shift from the metal center to the C_β atom of the C₃-chain of the allenylidene ligand in a hydride-osmium(II)-allenylidene complex is the beginning of several interesting transformations in the cumulene. The hydride-osmium(II)-allenylidene complex was prepared in two steps, starting from the tetrahydride dimer [(Os(H···H){κ³-P,O,P-[xant(PⁱPr₂)₂]})₂(μ-Cl)₂][BF₄]₂ (1). Complex 1 reacts with 1,1-diphenyl-2-propyn-1-ol to give the hydride-osmium(II)-alkenylcarbyne [OsHCl(≡CCH=CPh₂){κ³-P,O,P-[xant(PⁱPr₂)₂]}]BF₄ (2), which yields OsHCl(=C=C=CPh₂){κ³-P,O,P-[xant(PⁱPr₂)₂]} (3) by selective abstraction of the C_β–H hydrogen atom of the alkenylcarbyne ligand with K^tBuO. Complex 3 is metastable. According to results of DFT calculations, the migration of the hydride ligand to the C_β atom of the cumulene has an activation energy too high to occur in a concerted manner. However, the migration can be catalyzed by water, alcohols, and aldehydes. The resulting alkenylcarbyne-osmium(0) intermediate is unstable and evolves into a 7:3 mixture of the hydride-osmium(II)-indenylidene OsHCl(=C_IndPh){κ³-P,O,P-[xant(PⁱPr₂)₂]} (4) and the osmanaphthalene OsCl(C₉H₆Ph){κ³-P,O,P-[xant(PⁱPr₂)₂]} (5). Protonation of 4 with HBF₄ leads to the elongated dihydrogen complex [OsCl(η²-H₂)(=C_IndPh){κ³-P,O,P-[xant(PⁱPr₂)₂]}]BF₄ (6), while the protonation of 5 regenerates 2. In contrast to 4, complex 6 evolves to a half-sandwich indenyl derivative, [Os(η⁵-IndPh)H{κ³-P,O,P-[xant(PⁱPr₂)₂]}][BF₄]Cl (7). Phenylacetylene also provokes the 1,3-hydrogen shift in 3. However, it does not participate in the migration. In contrast to water, alcohols, and aldehydes, it stabilizes the resulting alkenylcarbyne to afford [Os(≡CCH=CPh₂)(η²-HC≡CPh){κ³-P,O,P-[xant(PⁱPr₂)₂]}]Cl (8).

Mechanistic insights into dehydrocoupling of amine boranes using dinuclear zirconocene complexes

Catalytic dehydrocoupling of H₃B·NMe₂H using Cp₂Zr(Cl)(μ-Me₃SiC₃SiMe₃)Zr(Cl)Cp₂ (1)/MeLi was studied. Spectroscopic monitoring and stoichiometric experiments show the formation and interconversion of several catalytically active Zr species.

Dehydropolymerisation of methylamine borane using highly active rhodium(iii) bis(thiophosphinite) pincer complexes: catalytic and mechanistic insights

The bis(thiophosphinite) pincer complexes [(^RPSCSP^R)Rh(py)(H)(Cl)] (^RPSCSP^R = C₆H₄–2,6-(SPR₂)₂ with R = ⁱPr, 2a and R = Ph, 2b) are highly active precatalysts for the dehydropolymerisation of methylamine borane.

Direct C-H Borylation of Arenes Catalyzed by Saturated Hydride-Boryl-Iridium-POP Complexes: Kinetic Analysis of the Elemental Steps

The saturated trihydride IrH₃ {κ³ -P,O,P-[xant(PiPr₂ )₂ ]} (1; xant(PiPr₂ )₂ =9,9-dimethyl-4,5-bis(diisopropylphosphino)xanthene) activates the B-H bond of two molecules of pinacolborane (HBpin) to give H₂ , the hydride-boryl derivatives IrH₂ (Bpin){κ³ -P,O,P-[xant(PiPr₂ )₂ ]} (2) and IrH(Bpin)₂ {κ³ -P,O,P-[xant(PiPr₂ )₂ ]} (3) in a sequential manner. Complex 3 activates a C-H bond of two molecules of benzene to form PhBpin and regenerates 2 and 1, also in a sequential manner. Thus, complexes 1, 2, and 3 define two cycles for the catalytic direct C-H borylation of arenes with HBpin, which have dihydride 2 as a common intermediate. C-H bond activation of the arenes is the rate-determining step of both cycles, as the C-H oxidative addition to 3 is faster than to 2. The results from a kinetic study of the reactions of 1 and 2 with HBpin support a cooperative function of the hydride ligands in the B-H bond activation. The addition of the boron atom of the borane to a hydride facilitates the coordination of the B-H bond through the formation of κ¹ - and κ² -dihydrideborate intermediates.

Dehydropolymerisation of Methylamine Borane and an N-Substituted Primary Amine Borane Using a PNP Fe Catalyst

Dehydropolymerisation of methylamine borane (H3 B⋅NMeH2 ) using the well-known iron amido complex [(PNP)Fe(H)(CO)] (PNP=N(CH2 CH2 PiPr2 )2 ) (1) gives poly(aminoborane)s by a chain-growth mechanism. In toluene, rapid dehydrogenation of H3 B⋅NMeH2 following first-order behaviour as a limiting case of a more general underlying Michaelis-Menten kinetics is observed, forming aminoborane H2 B=NMeH, which selectively couples to give high-molecular-weight poly(aminoborane)s (H2 BNMeH)n and only traces of borazine (HBNMe)3 by depolymerisation after full conversion. Based on a series of comparative experiments using structurally related Fe catalysts and dimethylamine borane (H3 B⋅NMe2 H) polymer formation is proposed to occur by nucleophilic chain growth as reported earlier computationally and experimentally. A silyl functionalised primary borane H3 B⋅N(CH2 SiMe3 )H2 was studied in homo- and co-dehydropolymerisation reactions to give the first examples for Si containing poly(aminoborane)s.

A simple cobalt-based catalyst system for the controlled dehydropolymerisation of H3B·NMeH2 on the gram-scale

A simple Co-based catalyst system promotes the efficient and controlled dehydropolymerisation of amine–boranes on scale.

The role of neutral Rh(PONOP)H, free NMe2H, boronium and ammonium salts in the dehydrocoupling of dimethylamine-borane using the cationic pincer [Rh(PONOP)(η2-H2)]+ catalyst

The σ-amine-borane pincer complex [Rh(PONOP)(η1-H3B·NMe3)][BArF4] [2, PONOP = κ3-NC5H3-2,6-(OPtBu2)2] is prepared by addition of H3B·NMe3 to the dihydrogen precursor [Rh(PONOP)(η2-H2)][BArF4], 1. In a similar way the related H3B·NMe2H complex [Rh(PONOP)(η1-H3B·NMe2H)][BArF4], 3, can be made in situ, but this undergoes dehydrocoupling to reform 1 and give the aminoborane dimer [H2BNMe2]2. NMR studies on this system reveal an intermediate neutral hydride forms, Rh(PONOP)H, 4, that has been prepared independently. 1 is a competent catalyst (2 mol%, ∼30 min) for the dehydrocoupling of H3B·Me2H. Kinetic, mechanistic and computational studies point to the role of NMe2H in both forming the neutral hydride, via deprotonation of a σ-amine-borane complex and formation of aminoborane, and closing the catalytic cycle by reprotonation of the hydride by the thus-formed dimethyl ammonium [NMe2H2]+. Competitive processes involving the generation of boronium [H2B(NMe2H)2]+ are also discussed, but shown to be higher in energy. Off-cycle adducts between [NMe2H2]+ or [H2B(NMe2H)2]+ and amine-boranes are also discussed that act to modify the kinetics of dehydrocoupling.

Activation, Deactivation and Reversibility Phenomena in Homogeneous Catalysis: A Showcase based on the Chemistry of Rhodium/Phosphine Catalysts

In the present work, the rich chemistry of rhodium/phosphine complexes, which are applied as homogeneous catalysts to promote a wide range of chemical transformations, has been used to showcase how the in situ generation of precatalysts, the conversion of precatalysts into the actually active species, as well as the reaction of the catalyst itself with other components in the reaction medium (substrates, solvents, additives) can lead to a number of deactivation phenomena and thus impact the efficiency of a catalytic process. Such phenomena may go unnoticed or may be overlooked, thus preventing the full understanding of the catalytic process which is a prerequisite for its optimization. Based on recent findings both from others and the authors’ laboratory concerning the chemistry of rhodium/diphosphine complexes, some guidelines are provided for the optimal generation of the catalytic active species from a suitable rhodium precursor and the diphosphine of interest; for the choice of the best solvent to prevent aggregation of coordinatively unsaturated metal fragments and sequestration of the active metal through too strong metal–solvent interactions; for preventing catalyst poisoning due to irreversible reaction with the product of the catalytic process or impurities present in the substrate.