Association of Hepatitis B Core-Related Antigen With Hepatitis B Virus Reactivation in Occult Viral Carriers Undergoing High-Risk Immunosuppressive Therapy

Two Concepts of Hepatitis B Core-Related Antigen Assay: A Highly Sensitive and Rapid Assay or an Effective Tool for Widespread Screening

Hepatitis B core-related antigen (HBcrAg) reflects the activity of intrahepatic covalently closed circular DNA. HBcrAg can be detected even in chronic hepatitis B patients in whom serum HBV DNA or hepatitis B surface antigen is undetectable. The HBcrAg measurement system was developed based on two concepts. One is a fully-automated and highly-sensitive HBcrAg assay (iTACT-HBcrAg) and the other is a point-of-care testing (POCT) that can be used in in resource-limited areas. iTACT-HBcrAg is an alternative to HBV DNA for monitoring HBV reactivation and predicting the development of hepatocellular carcinoma. This validated biomarker is available in routine clinical practice in Japan. Currently, international guidelines for the prevention of mother-to-child transmission recommend anti-HBV prophylaxis for pregnant women with high viral loads. However, over 95% of HBV-infected individuals live in countries where HBV DNA quantification is widely unavailable. Given this situation, a rapid and simple HBcrAg assay for POCT would be highly effective. Long-term anti-HBV therapy may have potential side effects and appropriate treatment should be provided to eligible patients. Therefore, a simple method of determining the indication for anti-HBV treatment would be ideal. This review provides up-to-date information regarding the clinical value of HBcrAg in HBV management, based on iTACT-HBcrAg or POCT.

Quantitative Measurement of Serum HBcrAg Can Be Used to Assess the Feasibility of Safe Discontinuation of Antiviral Therapy for Chronic Hepatitis B

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is a serious global health problem, and chronic HBV infection significantly increases the risk of liver fibrosis, cirrhosis, and even hepatocellular carcinoma in patients. Current first-line therapeutics such as nucleos(t)ide analogues and interferons are unable to completely clear cccDNA, so the vast majority of patients need to take long-term or even lifelong medication. However, long-term virological and biochemical responses can be achieved in some patients after drug withdrawal. Successfully screening these patients with drug withdrawal advantages is difficult. Hepatitis-B-core-related antigen (HBcrAg) is a new HBV serological marker that which can reflect the level and transcription activity of cccDNA in hepatocytes. Therefore, HBcrAg has potential value in guiding patients in drug withdrawal. This review summarizes previous reports on HBcrAg and evaluates the application value of HBcrAg in safe drug discontinuation.

Epstein-Barr virus reactivation correlates with worse outcomes for patients exposed to hepatitis B virus after haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Hepatitis B virus (HBV)has a high, chronic infection rate in Asian populations, but only few studies have analyzed the effect of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) or Cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation in patients exposed to HBV after haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT). This study aimed to assess the clinical outcomes of these patients. We conducted a retrospective research including 61 patients exposed to HBV after undergoing haplo-HSCT. The patients were classified into two groups: the CMV reactivation group and no CMV reactivation group. The results were compared between the two groups using the K-W test for continuous variables, Pearson's chi-square test for categorical variables, Kaplan-Meier curves to estimate overall survival (OS) and leukemia-free survival (LFS), and a Cox proportional hazards model to analyze multivariable influences. The 3-year cumulative HBV reactivation rate was 8.2%. The median duration of HBV reactivation was 16 months (16-22 months) after haplo-HSCT. The CMV reactivation group had a higher cumulative incidence of HBV reactivation than the group without CMV reactivation. The EBV reactivation was substantially higher in the CMV reactivation group compared to that in the no CMV reactivation group (37.0% vs.5.9% respectively; P = 0.002). Furthermore, EBV reactivation was a risk factor for 1-year LFS and 1-year OS. Based on our data, EBV reactivation was related to worse outcomes in patients exposed to HBV after haplo-HSCT, whereas CMV reactivation was not.

Human immunodeficiency virus coinfection differentially impacts hepatitis B virus viral markers based on hepatitis Be antigen status in patients with suppressed viremia

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) RNA and hepatitis B core-related antigen (HBcrAg), reflecting transcriptional activity of covalently closed circular DNA, are gaining traction as important markers to assess viral activity. Whether their expression differs under viral suppression by HIV co-infection status is unknown. Among adults with chronic HBV on antiviral therapy, we sought to determine if the expression of HBV markers (specialized and well-established) differs between HBV-HIV co-infection vs. HBV mono-infection. We compared HBV marker levels among 105 participants in the Hepatitis B Research Network (HBRN) HBV-HIV Ancillary Study and 105 participants in the HBRN mono-infected Cohort Study, matched for HBeAg status and HBV DNA suppression on therapy. Among HBeAg+ participants (N = 58 per group), after adjusting for age, sex, race, ALT and HBV DNA, viral markers were higher (p < .05) in the HBV-HIV versus the HBV-only sample (HBeAg: 1.05 vs. 0.51 log10 IU/mL; HBsAg: 3.85 vs. 3.17 log10 IU/mL; HBV RNA: 5.60 vs. 3.70 log10 U/mL; HBcrAg: 6.59 vs. 5.51 log10 U/mL). Conversely, among HBeAg(-) participants (N = 47 per group), HBsAg (2.00 vs. 3.04 log10 IU/mL) and HBV RNA (1.87 vs. 2.66 log10 U/mL) were lower (p < .05) in HBV-HIV vs. HBV-only; HBcrAg levels were similar (4.14 vs. 3.64 log10 U/mL; p = .27). Among adults with chronic HBV with suppressed viremia on antiviral therapy, viral markers tracked with HIV co-infection status and associations differed inversely by HBeAg status. The greater sensitivity and specificity of HBV RNA compared to HBcrAg allows for better discrimination of transcriptional activity regardless of HBeAg status.

A longitudinal study to detect hepatitis B surface and core-related antigens in chronic hepatitis B patients with hepatitis B surface antigen seroclearance using highly sensitive assays

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the usefulness of two novel assays, namely the iTACT-hepatitis B surface antigen (iTACT-HBsAg) and iTACT-hepatitis B core-related antigen (iTACT-HBcrAg) assays, in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients with HBsAg seroclearance (SC) documented by standard assays.

METHODS

HBsAg and HBcrAg were measured by the two iTACT-assays in 556 serial sera collected from 96 CHB patients at 7 different time points spanning from 5 years before to 10 years after SC and 120 HBsAg-negative, anti-HBc-positive individuals. As controls, 60 seronegative individuals, who were negative for HBsAg, anti-HBc and anti-HBs, were tested.

RESULTS

Using the iTACT-assays, HBsAg was detectable in 154/418 (36.8%) samples collected after SC. HBcrAg was detectable in 78.3% and 65.9% of samples collected before and after SC, respectively. The detectability rates of both HBsAg and HBcrAg progressively decreased over time after SC. At 10 years after SC, 20.4% and 64.5% of the patients still had detectable HBsAg and HBcrAg, respectively. 66 (71%) patients had detectable HBsAg and/or HBcrAg. Among the 120 HBsAg-negative, anti-HBc-positive individuals, 11 (9.2%) and 4 (3.3%) had detectable HBsAg and HBcrAg respectively. Both HBsAg and HBcrAg were undetectable in the controls.

CONCLUSION

The iTACT assays detected a low level of HBsAg and/or HBcrAg in >70% of patients even at 10 years after SC, suggesting that CHB patients with SC still harbour a low level of HBV protein expression. The clinical significance of detectable viral proteins after SC with regard to disease progression and HBV reactivation deserves further investigations.

Hepatitis B virus pre-genomic RNA and hepatitis B core-related antigen reductions at week 4 predict favourable hepatitis B surface antigen response upon long-term nucleos(t)ide analogue in chronic hepatitis B

BACKGROUND/AIMS

We investigated the dynamics of serum HBV pre-genomic RNA (pgRNA) and hepatitis B core-related antigen (HBcrAg) in patients receiving nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs) and their predictability for favourable suppression of serum hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg).

METHODS

Serum viral biomarkers were measured at baseline, weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 48 of treatment. Patients were followed up thereafter and serum HBsAg level was measured at end of follow-up (EOFU). Favourable HBsAg response (FHR) was defined as ≤100 IU/mL or HBsAg seroclearance upon EOFU.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive and 36 HBeAg-negative patients (median, 38.2 years old; 71.9% male) were recruited with median follow-up duration of 17.1 years (interquartile range, 12.8-18.2). For the entire cohort, 22/64 (34.4%) achieved FHR. For HBeAg-positive patients, serum HBV pgRNA decline at week 4 was significantly greater for patients with FHR compared to non-FHR (5.49 vs. 4.32 log copies/mL, respectively; P=0.016). The area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve (AUROC) for week 4 HBV pgRNA reduction to predict FHR in HBeAg-positive patients was 0.825 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.661-0.989). For HBeAg-negative patients, instead of increase in serum HBcrAg in non-FHR patients, FHR patients had median reduction in HBcrAg at week 4 (increment of 1.75 vs. reduction of 2.98 log U/mL; P=0.023). The AUROC for week 4 change of HBcrAg to predict FHR in HBeAg-negative patients was 0.789 (95% CI, 0.596-0.982).

CONCLUSION

Early on-treatment changes of serum HBV pgRNA and HBcrAg at 4 weeks predict HBsAg seroclearance or ≤100 IU/mL in NA-treated CHB patients upon long-term FU.

Review article: novel biomarkers in hepatitis B infection

BACKGROUND

Chronic hepatitis B remains a global health problem with an estimated 296 million people affected worldwide. Individuals are at risk of serious complications such as cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma and accurately predicting these clinical endpoints has proven difficult. However, several viral biomarkers have recently been developed, including quantitative HBV surface antigen (qHBsAg), hepatitis B RNA (HBV RNA) and core-related antigen (HBcrAg), and shown promise in a range of clinical settings.

AIMS

To critically appraise these novel biomarkers, exploring their potential uses, availability of assays and areas for future development.

METHODS

We performed a literature search of PubMed, identifying articles published in the field of hepatitis B biomarkers between 2010 and 2022.

RESULTS

Novel biomarkers such as HBcrAg, HBV RNA and qHBsAg may be useful in predicting treatment outcomes, stratifying the risk of future complications and estimating off-treatment viral reactivation. Furthermore, HBV RNA and HBcrAg titres may accurately reflect cccDNA transcriptional activity, and this is particularly informative in the context of nucleoside analogue therapy. On a cautionary note, most studies have been performed in Caucasian or Asian populations, and methods for detecting HBV RNA lack standardisation.

CONCLUSION

Novel viral biomarkers have the potential to provide additional insights into the natural history of infection and allow a more bespoke, cost-effective framework of care. However, access remains limited, and further efforts are needed to validate their use in ethnically diverse populations, confirm predictive cut-off values, and establish their role in the era of novel antiviral therapies.

Clinical usefulness of a novel high-sensitivity hepatitis B core-related antigen assay to determine the initiation of treatment for HBV reactivation

BACKGROUNDS

A fully automated, novel, high-sensitivity hepatitis B core-related antigen assay (iTACT-HBcrAg) has been developing. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of measuring HBcrAg, using that assay, to diagnose HBV reactivation in a multi-center setting, compared with ultra-high-sensitivity HBsAg (iTACT-HBsAg) and HBV DNA assays.

METHODS

Forty-four patients with HBV reactivation from 2008 to 2020 were enrolled in four hospitals. Serial serum specimens from the patients were assessed retrospectively for their HBcrAg levels by iTACT-HBcrAg (lower limit of detection; 2.0 log U/mL) and HBsAg levels by iTACT-HBsAg (lower limit of detection; 0.0005 IU/mL); these were compared to the HBV DNA levels. HBV reactivation was defined as detection of serum HBV DNA, including unquantifiable detection.

RESULTS

At HBV reactivation and/or thereafter, HBV DNA levels were quantified (≥ 1.3 log IU/mL) in the sera of 27 patients, and were below the level of quantification (< 1.3 log IU/mL) in the sera of 17 patients. Of the 27 patients with HBV reactivation and whose serum HBV DNA was quantified, the sera of 26 and 24 patients (96.3% and 88.9%) were positive by iTACT-HBcrAg and iTACT-HBsAg, respectively. HBcrAg was detectable by iTACT-HBcrAg before HBV DNA was quantifiable in 15 of the 27 patients. Of the 11 patients with HBV reactivation and undetectable HBcrAg by iTACT-HBcrAg at HBV reactivation and/or thereafter, 10 had unquantifiable HBV DNA and none developed HBV reactivation-related hepatitis.

CONCLUSIONS

The iTACT-HBcrAg assay is useful for monitoring HBV reactivation to determine the initiation of treatment with nucleos(t)ide analogues.

Hepatitis B Virus Reactivation Associated With Therapeutic Interventions

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation associated with various therapeutic interventions is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with current or resolved HBV infection. Because no curative treatment for HBV infection is yet available, there are many individuals at risk for HBV reactivation in the general population. Populations at risk for HBV reactivation include patients who are currently infected with HBV or who have been exposed to HBV in the past. HBV reactivation and its potential consequences is a concern when these populations are exposed to anti-cancer chemotherapy, immunosuppressive or immunomodulatory therapies for the management of various malignancies, rheumatologic diseases, inflammatory bowel disease, or solid-organ or hematologic stem cell transplantation. Accordingly, it has become important to understand the basics of HBV reactivation and the mechanisms by which certain therapies are more susceptible to HBV reactivation. This review aims to raise the awareness of HBV reactivation and to understand the mechanisms and the risks of HBV reactivation in various clinical settings.

Detection of the hepatitis B surface antigen in patients with occult hepatitis B using an assay with enhanced sensitivity

Patients with occult hepatitis B infection (OBI) have undetectable hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) by conventional assays but detectable hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA in blood/liver. We evaluated the key performance characteristics of a sensitive HBsAg assay (ARCHITECT HBsAg Next Qualitative Assay, referred as NEXT) with respect to HBsAg detection. Assay precision, sample carryover and seroconversion sensitivity of NEXT were evaluated. HBsAg was measured by NEXT in 1,138 individuals, including 1,038 patients who attended liver clinics in a tertiary hospital (200 HBV DNA-positive blood donors whose HBsAg was undetectable by conventional assays, and 38 patients receiving immunosuppressive therapy, 800 chronic hepatitis B patients with HBsAg seroclearance) and 100 HBsAg-negative subjects recruited from a community project. The within-run and within-laboratory coefficients of variation were <6% for the positive sample pools. In 9 seroconversion panels tested, NEXT allowed an earlier HBsAg detection than conventional assays. NEXT detected HBsAg in 10/200 (5%) HBsAg-negative blood donors, 1/20 (5%) and 0/18 HBsAg-negative patients with and without HBV reactivation respectively, and 59/800 (7.3%) patients with HBsAg seroclearance. HBsAg was detectable by NEXT in 27.8%, 8.2%, 6.9%, 3.8% and 1.9% samples at <3, 3-5, >5-8, >8-11, and >11 years after HBsAg seroclearance, respectively. Seven out of 100 HBsAg-negative community identified subjects was tested positive by NEXT. Comparing with conventional HBsAg assays, NEXT demonstrated a higher sensitivity and conferred an increment of 5-7% detection rate in patients with OBI, thereby helping in identifying HBV carriers and prevention of OBI-associated HBV transmission and reactivation.

Hepatitis B Virus Reactivation upon Immunosuppression: Is There a Role for Hepatitis B Core-Related Antigen in Patients with Immune-Escape Mutants? A Case Report

The reactivation of hepatitis B virus (HBVr) in patients undergoing pharmacological immunosuppression is a potentially fatal clinical event that may occur in patients with overt or occult HBV infection. The risk of HBVr is mainly determined by the type of immunosuppressive therapy and the HBV serologic profile, with a higher risk in patients positive for the hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), and a lower risk in HBsAg-negative/antibodies to core antigen-positive subjects. Notably, a considerable proportion of patients experiencing HBVr showed a high degree of variability of the HBV S gene, possibly leading to immune escape mutants. These mutations, usually in the “a-determinant” of the HBsAg, can cause diagnostic problems and consequently hamper the appropriate management strategy of patients at risk of HBVr. Here, we describe a case of HBVr in a patient with a diagnosis of chronic myeloid leukemia and a previous history of kidney transplant, providing evidence of the potential usefulness of hepatitis B core-related antigen measurement in patients with HBV immune-escape mutants at risk of viral reactivation.

Hepatitis B Core-Related Antigen and New Therapies for Hepatitis B

The hepatitis B core-related antigen (HBcrAg) is an unprecedented novel HBV biomarker that plays an essential role in reflecting covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA) in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) because its levels correlate with intrahepatic cccDNA and serum HBV DNA. In this review, we describe the clinical application of serum HBcrAg in CHB patients, with a particular focus on new therapies targeting intrahepatic HBV replication. (1) HBcrAg can be detected in clinical cases where serum HBV DNA is undetectable during anti-HBV therapy. (2) A highly sensitive HBcrAg assay (iTACT-HBcrAg) may be useful for monitoring HBV reactivation, as an alternative to HBV DNA. (3) Decreased HBcrAg levels have been significantly associated with promising outcomes in CHB patients, reducing the risk of progression or recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma. Additionally, we focus on and discuss several drugs in development that target HBV replication, and monitoring HBcrAg may be useful for determining the therapeutic efficacies of such novel drugs. In conclusion, HBcrAg, especially when measured by the recently developed iTACT-HBcrAg assay, may be the most appropriate surrogate marker, over other HBV biomarkers, to predict disease progression and treatment response in CHB patients.

Clinical efficacy of a novel, high-sensitivity HBcrAg assay in the management of chronic hepatitis B and HBV reactivation

BACKGROUND & AIMS

A fully automated, novel high-sensitivity hepatitis B core-related antigen assay (iTACT-HBcrAg) has been developed. We demonstrate the clinical utility of iTACT-HBcrAg for monitoring chronic hepatitis B (CHB) and for the early detection of HBV reactivation.

METHODS

After fundamental assessments, the clinical performance of iTACT-HBcrAg was compared with other HBV markers. i) Serial sera, available from 161 HBeAg-negative patients with CHB and persistently undetectable HBV DNA, were measured by iTACT-HBcrAg and a conventional HBcrAg assay (G-HBcrAg). ii) Serial sera from 13 HBV-reactivated patients were measured by iTACT-HBcrAg and an ultra-high-sensitivity HBsAg immune complex transfer-chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay (lower limit of detection; 0.0005 IU/ml, ICT-CLEIA) to compare HBV DNA detection. iii) To elucidate the various HBcrAg components detected by iTACT-HBcrAg, OptiPrep density gradient centrifugation analysis was performed on sera obtained before and after HBV reactivation.

RESULTS

The analytical performance of iTACT-HBcrAg was satisfactory. The sensitivity of iTACT-HBcrAg (2.1 Log U/ml) was approximately 10-fold greater than that of G-HBcrAg (2.8 Log U/ml). i) HBcrAg was detectable in the sera of 97.5% (157/161) of patients with CHB by iTACT-HBcrAg, of whom 75.2% (121/161) had ≥2.8 Log U/ml HBcrAg and 22.4% (36/161) had 2.1-2.8 Log U/ml HBcrAg, which was undetectable by G-HBcrAg. ii) 9 and 2 of 13 HBV-reactivated patients were HBcrAg-positive by iTACT-HBcrAg before and at HBV DNA positivity, respectively; 7 and 4 were HBcrAg-positive by iTACT-HBcrAg before and at HBsAg-positivity by ICT-CLEIA, respectively. iii) The HBcrAg detected by iTACT-HBcrAg before HBV reactivation was contained in empty particles (22 KDa precore protein).

CONCLUSIONS

iTACT-HBcrAg could be used to better monitor responses to anti-HBV treatments in HBeAg-negative patients and for the early detection of HBV reactivation.

LAY SUMMARY

A fully automated, novel high-sensitivity hepatitis B core-related antigen assay (iTACT-HBcrAg) has been developed. iTACT-HBcrAg can be used to monitor HBeAg-negative patients with chronic hepatitis B, as well as for the early detection of HBV reactivation. iTACT-HBcrAg could be used as a general marker of disease progression and treatment response.

Long-Term Safety of Rituximab (Risks of Viral and Opportunistic Infections)

Purpose of Review

We reviewed the current data on infections associated with rituximab use published over the last 5 years.

Recent Findings

New literature was available on rates of serious infections, Hepatitis B reactivation and screening, and infection with Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2.

Summary

Rates of infection varied by study and population, however, higher risk of infection in patients with underlying rheumatologic diseases was seen in those who required a therapy switch, had a smoking history, and those undergoing retreatment who had a serious infection with their first course of therapy. With regards to HBV, the proportion of patients screened continues to be inadequate. Despite the upfront cost, HBV screening and prophylaxis were found to be cost effective. There is still limited data regarding COVID-19 severity in the setting of rituximab, however, rituximab, especially in combination with steroids, may lead to more severe disease and higher mortality.

Advances in treatment and prevention of hepatitis B

Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) continues to contribute to worldwide morbidity and mortality significantly. Scientists, clinicians, pharmaceutical companies, and health organizations have dedicated substantial Intellectual and monetary resources to finding a cure, increasing immunization rates, and reducing the global burden of CHB. National and international health-related organizations including the center for disease control, the national institute of health, the American Association for the study of liver disease (AASLD), The European association for the study of the Liver (EASL), The Asia Pacific association for the study of the Liver (APASL) and the world health organization release periodic recommendations for disease prevention and treatment. Our review of the most recent guidelines by EASL, AASLD, APASL, and Taiwan Association for the Study of the Liver revealed that an overwhelming majority of cited studies were published before 2018. We reviewed Hepatitis B-related literature published 2018 onwards to identify recent developments and current barriers that will likely direct future efforts towards eradicating hepatitis B. The breakthrough in our understanding of the hepatitis B virus life cycle and resulting drug development is encouraging with significant room for further progress. Data from high-risk populations, most vulnerable to the devastating effects of hepatitis B infection and reactivation remain sparse. Utilization of systems approach, optimization of experimental models, identification and validation of next-generation biomarkers, and precise modulation of the human immune response will be critical for future innovation. Within the foreseeable future, new treatments will likely complement conventional therapies rather than replace them. Most Importantly, pragmatic management of CHB related population health challenges must be prioritized to produce real-world results.

HBV RNA Profiles in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis B Under Different Disease Phases and Antiviral Therapy

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Large-scale comprehensive studies on HBV RNA in chronic hepatitis B are lacking. We aimed to study the HBV RNA profile and its correlation with other viral markers in patients with chronic hepatitis B who are treatment-naïve and patients receiving nucleos(t)ide analogues (NA).

APPROACH AND RESULTS

Biomarkers, including HBV RNA and hepatitis B core-related antigen (HBcrAg), were measured in 388 patients. Of these, 246 were treatment-naïve and were categorized into HBeAg-positive chronic infection (n = 41), HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis (n = 81), HBeAg-negative chronic infection (n = 39), HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis (n = 66), and HBsAg seroclearance (n = 19). These biomarkers were also measured in 142 patients who were NA-treated receiving tenofovir or entecavir at baseline, week 48, and week 96. The pattern of serum HBV RNA levels mirrored HBV DNA (1-2 logs higher than HBV RNA) and HBcrAg in patients who were treatment-naïve. HBV RNA correlated best with HBcrAg (r = 0.84) and to a lesser extent with HBV DNA (r = 0.737) (both P < 0.001). In patients with HBsAg seroclearance, 15.8% and 15.8% had detectable serum HBV RNA and HBcrAg, respectively. NA treatment reduced serum HBV RNA by 1.46 logs and 1.77 logs at weeks 48 and 96, respectively. At week 96 of NA therapy, only 19.1% patients who were tenofovir-treated and 25.7% patients who were entecavir-treated had unquantifiable HBV RNA (P > 0.05). In patients who were treated and had undetectable HBV DNA, 77.5% and 30% had quantifiable HBV RNA and HBcrAg, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

HBV RNA showed distinct and corresponding profiles in patients with HBV in different disease phases. HBV RNA and HBcrAg could be used to monitor residual transcriptional activities in patients with HBsAg seroclearance. NA led to reduction of serum HBV RNA. Monitoring of viral activities can still be achieved in patients with undetectable HBV DNA by serum HBV RNA.

Statins associate with better clinical outcomes in chronic hepatitis B patients with HBsAg seroclearance

INTRODUCTION

We aimed to describe long-term clinical outcomes in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients after HBsAg seroclearance, and identify factors that modify disease outcomes.

METHODS

CHB patients with HBsAg seroclearance occurring between 1986 and 2017 were recruited. Primary outcome was cirrhosis/hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and secondary outcomes were hepatic decompensation, liver-related death/transplantation, and all-cause mortality. Multivariable Cox model included demographics, prior antivirals, comorbidities, drugs (statins, metformin, proton-pump inhibitors, non-selective beta-blockers), and laboratory parameters (platelet, liver function test, prothrombin time, alpha-fetoprotein [AFP], anti-HBs). Statin users were propensity score matched (PSM) with non-users (1:2 ratio) for survival analysis of all outcomes.

RESULTS

Of 913 patients with HBsAg seroclearance (male: 613 [67.1%]; median age: 53.4 years [18.5-87.0]), 129 (14.1%) were statin users. During median follow-up of 7.7 years (up to 29.1 years), 64/833 (7.7%) developed cirrhosis, 25/905 (2.8%) developed HCC, 3/913 (0.3%) underwent transplantation, and 76/913 (8.3%) died. Statins were associated with lower cirrhosis/HCC risk (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 0.44; 95% CI 0.20-0.96; aHR for every 1-year increase in use: 0.85; 95% CI 0.75-0.97). Statin users had no hepatic decompensation or liver-related death/transplantation (vs 18/778 [2.3%] and 18/784 [2.3%] cases in statin non-users, respectively). Statins were also associated with lower all-cause mortality risk (aHR: 0.21; 95% CI 0.08-0.53). PSM yields consistent results for beneficial effects of statins (log-rank p < 0.05 for all outcomes). Other factors for cirrhosis/HCC included increasing age (aHR: 1.06), diabetes (aHR: 2.03), higher creatinine (aHR: 1.008), GGT > 50U/L (aHR: 3.25), and AFP > 9 ng/mL (aHR: 10.14).

CONCLUSION

Patients with HBsAg seroclearance have favorable long-term survival. However, liver-related adverse outcomes still develop, necessitating further investigations on beneficial effects of statins.

Hepatitis B Core-Related Antigen: From Virology to Clinical Application

Hepatitis B core-related antigen (HBcrAg) is a composite measure of the serum levels of hepatitis B e antigen, hepatitis B core antigen, and a 22-kDa precore protein. It has been shown to reflect the level and transcriptional activity of covalently closed circular DNA in the liver. Longitudinal cohort studies have improved our understanding of the role of this novel viral marker in the natural history of chronic hepatitis B. HBcrAg kinetics reflect the response to peginterferon, and its role in defining guidelines for stopping peginterferon therapy has been evaluated. HBcrAg is a marker of intrahepatic viral activity, which may influence the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma. In this article, we review the virology and role of HBcrAg in defining phases of chronic hepatitis B. Furthermore, the function of HBcrAg in predicting treatment outcomes and its role in monitoring response to novel antiviral agents will be discussed.

Hepatitis B core-related antigen reflects viral replication and protein production in chronic hepatitis B patients

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis B core-related antigen (HBcrAg) is a promising disease-monitoring marker for chronic hepatitis B (CHB). We investigated correlations between HBcrAg with antiviral efficacy and virological and histological variables.

METHODS

One hundred and forty-five CHB patients from the mainland of China between August 2013 and September 2016 who underwent liver biopsy received entecavir therapy and had paired liver biopsy at 78 weeks. We analyzed correlations between HBcrAg and virological and histological variables in hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive and HBeAg-negative patients. We also explored the predictors of HBeAg loss after 78 weeks of antiviral therapy. Pearson correlation analysis and logistic forward stepwise regression were the main statistic methods.

RESULTS

HBeAg-positive patients (n = 93) had higher baseline HBcrAg (median 7.4 vs. 5.3 log10 U/mL P < 0.001) and greater HBcrAg declines (median 1.6 vs. 0.9 log10 U/mL P = 0.007) than HBeAg-negative patients after 78 weeks of therapy. At baseline, HBcrAg correlated with hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA in both HBeAg-positive (r = 0.641, P < 0.001) and -negative patients (r = 0.616, P < 0.001), with hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) in HBeAg-positive patients (r = 0.495, P < 0.001), but not with anti-hepatitis B virus core antibody (anti-HBc). Weak correlations existed between HBcrAg, histology activity index (HAI; r = 0.232, P = 0.025), and Ishak fibrosis score (r = -0.292, P = 0.005) in HBeAg-positive patients. At 78 weeks, significant correlations existed only between HBcrAg and anti-HBc in HBeAg-positive (r = -0.263, P = 0.014) and HBeAg-negative patients (r = -0.291, P = 0.045). Decreased HBcrAg significantly correlated with reduced HBV DNA (r = 0.366, P = 0.001; r = 0.626, P < 0.001) and HBsAg (r = 0.526, P = 0.001; r = 0.289, P = 0.044) in HBeAg-positive and -negative patients, respectively, and with reduced HAI in HBeAg-positive patients (r = 0.329, P = 0.001). Patients with HBeAg loss (n = 29) showed a larger reduction in HBcrAg than those without (median 2.3 vs. 1.3 log10 U/mL, P = 0.001). In multivariate analysis, decreased HBcrAg was an independent predictor of HBeAg loss (P = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

HBcrAg reflects viral replication and protein production. Decreased HBcrAg could predict HBeAg loss after antiviral therapy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinical Trials.gov: NCT01962155; https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01962155?term=NCT01962155&draw=2&rank=1.

Hepatitis B Virus Reactivation 55 Months Following Chemotherapy Including Rituximab and Autologous Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation for Malignant Lymphoma

A 54-year-old woman underwent chemotherapy including rituximab and autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (auto-PBSCT) for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Before the treatment, she exhibited a resolved hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. She was diagnosed with HBV reactivation based on positive serum HBV-DNA test results, 55 months after her last treatment. Subsequently, he was treated with tenofovir alafenamide fumarate (TAF) therapy and her liver function improved. Patients undergoing chemotherapy including rituximab and auto-PBSCT are at a high risk of HBV reactivation. In such cases, careful and long-term observations may be required to detect HBV reactivation.

Recent Advances in Understanding, Diagnosing, and Treating Hepatitis B Virus Infection

Chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection affects 292 million people worldwide and is associated with a broad range of clinical manifestations including cirrhosis, liver failure, and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Despite the availability of an effective vaccine HBV still causes nearly 900,000 deaths every year. Current treatment options keep HBV under control, but they do not offer a cure as they cannot completely clear HBV from infected hepatocytes. The recent development of reliable cell culture systems allowed for a better understanding of the host and viral mechanisms affecting HBV replication and persistence. Recent advances into the understanding of HBV biology, new potential diagnostic markers of hepatitis B infection, as well as novel antivirals targeting different steps in the HBV replication cycle are summarized in this review article.

Ultra-high sensitivity HBsAg assay can diagnose HBV reactivation following rituximab-based therapy in patients with lymphoma

BACKGROUND & AIMS

HBV reactivation is a risk in patients receiving anti-CD20 antibodies for the treatment of lymphoma. The purpose of this post hoc analysis was to evaluate the efficacy of an ultra-high sensitivity HBsAg assay to guide preemptive antiviral treatment in patients with lymphoma and resolved HBV infections using prospectively stored samples from an HBV DNA monitoring study.

METHODS

HBV reactivation (defined as HBV DNA levels of ≥11 IU/ml) was confirmed in 22 of 252 patients. A conventional HBsAg assay (ARCHITECT, cut-off value: 0.05 IU/ml) and an ultra-high sensitivity HBsAg assay employing a semi-automated immune complex transfer chemiluminescence enzyme technique (ICT-CLEIA, cut-off value: 0.0005 IU/ml) were performed at baseline, at confirmed HBV reactivation and monitored after HBV reactivation.

RESULTS

Baseline HBsAg was detected using ICT-CLEIA in 4 patients; in all of whom precore mutants with high replication capacity were reactivated. Of the 6 patients with HBV DNA detected below the level of quantification at baseline, 5 showed HBV reactivation and 3 of the 5 had precore mutations. Sensitivity for detection by ARCHITECT and ICT-CLEIA HBsAg assays at HBV reactivation or the next sampling after HBV reactivation was 18.2% (4 of 22) and 77.3% (17 of 22), respectively. Of the 5 patients undetectable by ICT-CLEIA, HBV reactivation resolved spontaneously in 2 patients. All 6 patients reactivated with precore mutations including preS deletion could be diagnosed by ICT-CLEIA HBsAg assay at an early stage of HBV reactivation. Multivariate analysis showed that an anti-HBs titer of less than 10 mIU/ml, HBV DNA detected but below the level of quantification, and HBsAg detected by ICT-CLEIA at baseline were independent risk factors for HBV reactivation (adjusted hazard ratios, 15.4, 31.2 and 8.7, respectively; p <0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

A novel ICT-CLEIA HBsAg assay is an alternative method to diagnose HBV reactivation.

CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER

UMIN000001299.

LAY SUMMARY

Hepatitis B virus can be reactivated in lymphoma patients receiving anti-CD20 antibodies such as rituximab. Currently, reactivation requires the monitoring of HBV DNA, but monitoring of the surface antigen (HBsAg) could provide a relatively inexpensive, quick and easy alternative. We assessed the performance of an ultra-high sensitivity HBsAg assay and showed that it could be effective for the diagnosis and monitoring of HBV reactivation.

Hepatitis B reactivation: diagnosis and management

INTRODUCTION

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation can be induced by treatments that attenuate the immunological control over HBV, leading to increased morbidity and mortality. The risk of HBV reactivation is determined by host immunity, viral factors, and the type and dose of treatments. Nevertheless, the risk of HBV reactivation for a growing number of novel therapies remains uncertain and needs to be carefully examined. Identification of patients at risk and administration of prophylactic antiviral agents are critical to prevent HBV reactivation. Early diagnosis and initiation of antiviral treatment are the keys to avoid devastating outcomes.

AREA COVERED

We summarized the latest evidence and recommendations for risk stratification, early diagnosis, prophylaxis, and management of HBV reactivation.

EXPERT OPINION

Universal screening, adequate prophylaxis, and close monitoring are essential for the prevention of HBV reactivation. Risk stratification of patients at risk with appropriate antiviral prophylaxis can prevent HBV reactivation effectively. Several emerging biomarkers have been proved to help determine the risk precisely. Early detection and timely administration of antiviral agents are crucial for management. Further studies on the precision of risk stratification as well as the optimal duration of prophylaxis and treatment are needed to establish an individualized strategy.

Novel biomarkers for the management of chronic hepatitis B

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) cannot be eliminated completely from infected hepatocytes because of the presence of intrahepatic covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA). As chronic hepatitis B (CHB) can progress to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), it is important to manage CHB to prevent HCC development in high-risk patients with high viral replicative activity or advanced fibrosis. Serum biomarkers are noninvasive and valuable for the management of CHB. Hepatitis B core-related antigen (HBcrAg) correlates with serum HBV DNA and intrahepatic cccDNA. In CHB patients with undetectable serum HBV DNA or loss of HBsAg, HBcrAg still can be detected and the decrease in HBcrAg levels is significantly associated with hopeful outcomes. Therefore, HBcrAg can predict HCC occurrence or recurrence. Measurement of the Mac-2 binding protein glycosylation isomer (M2BPGi) has been introduced for the evaluation of liver fibrosis. Because elevated M2BPGi in CHB is related to liver fibrosis and the prediction of HCC development, monitoring its progression is essential. Because alpha fetoprotein (AFP) has insufficient sensitivity and specificity for early-stage HCC, a combination of AFP plus protein induced by vitamin K absence factor II, or AFP plus Lens culinaris agglutinin-reactive fraction of alpha-fetoprotein might improve the diagnosis of HCC development. Additionally, Dickkopf-1 and circulating immunoglobulin G antibodies are the novel markers to diagnose HCC or assess HCC prognosis. This review provides an overview of novel HBV biomarkers used for the management of intrahepatic viral replicative activity, liver fibrosis, and HCC development.

New Biomarkers of Chronic Hepatitis B

Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) infection leads to clinically heterogeneous disease outcomes. Different viral markers are utilized to monitor treatment effects and predict risk of complications in patients with CHB. Hepatitis B core-related antigen (HBcrAg) is a novel serum composite viral protein whose performance has been proven to be superior to that of existing viral markers. It showed good correlation with intrahepatic covalently closed-circular DNA. Its profile differs drastically in patients in different disease phases, and the level declines with antiviral therapies. HBcrAg may be helpful for predicting hepatocellular carcinoma development and hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation in immunosuppressed patients. Another emerging measurable serum marker, HBV RNA, exists in the form of pregenomic RNA-containing virions. Its profile differs between patients in different disease phases in a similar manner to that of HBcrAg. HBV RNA is present in serum at lower levels than HBV DNA in treatment-naïve patients by 1–2 logs. In contrast, its level is higher than HBV DNA in patients receiving nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs). A significant decline in serum RNA was observed in patients receiving novel antiviral therapies, including core protein allosteric modulators and RIG-1/NOD2 agonists. Both HBcrAg and HBV RNA may be helpful for predicting off-therapy sustained virological control in patients who stop long-term NA treatment.

Insights for clinical diagnostic indicators of virus and host in chronic hepatitis B infection

Covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA), which is stably present in the nucleus of hepatocytes, is an important indicator for evaluating antiviral efficacy. Since cccDNA quantification requires an invasive procedure, serum biological markers that can effectively reflect the transcriptional activity of intrahepatic virus and the efficacy of treatment are required. Here, from the aspects of virus and host, we outline the focus of clinical research of HBV in recent years, including HBV RNA, empty virus, hepatitis B core-related antigen and changes in the immune response. We briefly discuss their significance in predicting disease activity and monitoring treatment response in chronic hepatitis B. On this basis, some issues worthy of attention in laboratory diagnosis are proposed.

The role of hepatitis B core-related antigen in predicting hepatitis B virus recurrence after liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis B core-related antigen (HBcrAg) is a viral marker for the development of cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB). However, the relationship between HBcrAg and HBV recurrence after liver transplantation (LT) is unclear.

AIM

To investigate the correlation of serum HBcrAg level with HBV recurrence post-LT to evaluate the prognostic role of the pre-LT HBcrAg level.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study enrolled 357 CHB patients who received LT for a median of 36.6 months. Univariate and multivariate analyses and time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for markers associated with HBV recurrence were analysed.

RESULTS

48 patients (13.4%) had HBV recurrence after LT. HBcrAg, detectable HBV DNA, HCC and HCC recurrence were associated with HBV recurrence. In a multivariate analysis, HBcrAg level was independently associated with HBV recurrence, and the relationship between HBcrAg level and incident HBV recurrence was significant and graded (HR: 3.17 per unit; 95% CI: 1.97-5.11; P for trend < .001). Additionally, HBcrAg level was superior to HBV DNA level in predicting HBV recurrence by time-dependent ROC analysis. Patients with an HBcrAg ≥ 5.0 log U/mL had a significantly higher 5-year cumulative recurrence rate than those with an HBcrAg < 5.0 log U/mL (37.6% vs 6%, P < .001); the adjusted hazard ratio was 5.27 (95% CI 2.47-11.25, P < .001).

CONCLUSION

An elevated serum HBcrAg level was independently associated with the risk of HBV recurrence in patients with CHB after LT.

Hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus infection in immunocompromised patients

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To provide an update on recent studies of hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections in cancer patients with an emphasis on viral reactivation after cancer treatment, new antiviral therapies, and safety concerns.

RECENT FINDINGS

The diagnostic criteria for HBV reactivation in patients receiving cancer therapy were revised in 2018. HBV reactivation in these patients is preventable, even with the use of new cancer therapies. HCV reactivation also has been reported in cancer patients, particularly those with hematologic malignancies, and is not a virologic condition usually associated with poor outcome. Prophylaxis to prevent HCV reactivation is not recommended because therapy with direct-acting antivirals eradicates the infection in the majority of cancer patients.

SUMMARY

Cancer patients with HBV or HCV infection are at risk for viral reactivation, with many similarities between these two infections. Patients at high risk for reactivation will benefit significantly from taking oral antivirals, which will reduce the risk of HBV reactivation or prevent development of HCV reactivation following its virologic cure.

New Markers in Monitoring the Reactivation of Hepatitis B Virus Infection in Immunocompromised Hosts

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) persistence is at the basis of HBV reactivation as a consequence of chemotherapy and immunosuppressive treatments. The identification of early viral replication indicators and markers of effective HBV immunological control would be useful in monitoring patients who are at risk of potential viral reactivation during the course of immunosuppressive treatment. Currently, international guidelines have shared some criteria to identify patients with a low, medium or high risk of HBV reactivation; however, permanently placing a patient in a definitive category is not always easy. More often, patients move from one category to another during the course of their immunosuppressive treatment; therefore, in many cases, there are no precise indicators or tools for monitoring possible reactivation and establishing the duration and suspension of antiviral prophylaxis. Historically, the sequence of HBV antigens and antibodies and HBV DNA levels has been used to evaluate the different stages of the acute and chronic phases of an HBV infection. In the last few years, new biomarkers, such as anti-HBs and anti-HBc titres, HBV core-related antigen (HBcrAg), ultra-sensitive HBsAg evaluation and HBV RNA, have been used in patients with an HBV infection to evaluate their diagnostic and prognostic potential. The aim of this review is to evaluate the published results on the use of new infection markers in the diagnosis and monitoring of HBV reactivation over the course of immunosuppressive treatments. Moreover, the importance of viral genotypic studies was emphasized, given the diagnostic and therapeutic implications of the mutational profiles of HBsAg during the HBV reactivation phase.

Prediction and clinical implications of HBV reactivation in lymphoma patients with resolved HBV infection: focus on anti-HBs and anti-HBc antibody titers

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation (HBV-R) and hepatitis related to HBV-R are well-recognized complications that occur in patients who have undergone cytotoxic chemotherapy or immunosuppressive therapy. The degree of HBV-R in this population varies from self-limited or asymptomatic hepatitis to acute liver failure, which may lead to life-threatening events. However, no established treatment or standard surveillance method exists for monitoring patients to predict the development of HBV-R during or after chemotherapy or immunosuppressive therapy, particularly regarding resolved HBV infection. Prophylactic antiviral agents and regular monitoring of HBV-DNA levels are known to be useful methods for preventing HBV-R; however, these methods require considerable financial resources, and such resources are limited in the endemic areas of HBV infection. Most patients with resolved HBV infection do not develop a hepatitis flare or self-limited HBV-R with only an increase in HBV DNA. However, some patients may develop HBV-R even 1 year or more after the last chemotherapy treatment. Therefore, predicting the development of HBV-R and its timing is difficult, and exploring markers that could help predict whether or when HBV reactivation occurs is necessary. In this review, we address the predictive risk factors for HBV-R in patients with resolved HBV infection, focusing on the ability of anti-HBs and anti-HBc to predict HBV-R. We conclude that the combination of anti-HBc and anti-HBs titers may be a reliable and useful predictor for managing HBV-R.

Non-invasive biomarkers for chronic hepatitis B virus infection management

Chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection remains a major health burden with over 250 million cases worldwide. This complex infection can lead to chronic hepatitis, liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Complete recovery is seldom achieved due to the persistence in infected hepatocytes of covalently closed circular (ccc)DNA, which is not targeted by current antiviral therapies. Routine circulating biomarkers used for clinical monitoring of patients do not accurately reflect the cccDNA pool and transcriptional activity. New biomarkers, such as serum HB core-related Ag and circulating HBV RNAs, are under development. In this review, we discuss surrogate non-invasive biomarkers for evaluating intrahepatic cccDNA abundance and transcriptional activity. We also present their relevance for improving the classification of patients with regards to their natural history and for evaluating novel compounds to assess target engagement and to define new virological endpoints.

A snapshot of virological presentation and outcome of immunosuppression-driven HBV reactivation from real clinical practice: Evidence of a relevant risk of death and evolution from silent to chronic infection

The study was undertaken in order to provide a snapshot from real clinical practice of virological presentation and outcome of patients developing immunosuppression-driven HBV reactivation. Seventy patients with HBV reactivation were included (66.2% treated with rituximab, 10% with corticosteroids and 23.8% with other immunosuppressive drugs). Following HBV reactivation, patients received anti-HBV treatment for a median (IQR) follow-up of 31(13-47) months. At baseline-screening, 72.9% of patients were HBsAg-negative and 27.1% HBsAg-positive. About 71.4% had a diagnosis of biochemical reactivation [median (IQR) HBV DNA and ALT: 6.9 (5.4-7.8) log IU/mL and 359 (102-775) U/L]. Moreover, 10% of patients died from hepatic failure. Antiviral prophylaxis was documented in 57.9% and 15.7% of HBsAg-positive and HBsAg-negative patients at baseline-screening (median [IQR] prophylaxis duration: 24[15-33] and 25[17-36] months, respectively). Notably, HBV reactivation occurred 2-24 months after completing the recommended course of anti-HBV prophylaxis in 35.3% of patients. By analysing treatment outcome, the cumulative probability of ALT normalization and of virological suppression was 97% and 69%, respectively. Nevertheless, in patients negative to HBsAg at baseline-screening, only 27% returned to HBsAg-negative status during prolonged follow-up, suggesting the establishment of chronic infection. In conclusion, most patients received a diagnosis of HBV reactivation accompanied by high ALT and 10% died for hepatic failure, supporting the importance of strict monitoring for an early HBV reactivation diagnosis. Furthermore, HBV reactivation correlates with high risk of HBV chronicity in patients negative for HBsAg at baseline-screening, converting a silent into a chronic infection, requiring long-term antiviral treatment. Finally, a relevant proportion of patients experienced HBV reactivation after completing the recommended course of anti-HBV prophylaxis, suggesting the need to reconsider proper duration of prophylaxis particularly in profound immunosuppression.

Hepatitis B reactivation in patients with hepatitis B core antibody positive and surface antigen negative on immunosuppressants

Hepatitis B viral (HBV) reactivation in the immunosuppressed is a significant problem even in patients who have achieved serological clearance due to the persistence of HBV as cccDNA. HBV reactivation will continue to pose a significant healthcare burden given the high prevalence of HBV and increasing use of immunosuppressants. Screening of hepatitis B surface antigen, antibody to Hepatitis B core antigen antibody and HBV DNA levels should be done routinely in all patients planned for significant immunosuppressant use. We aimed to examine the factors affecting reactivation risk. This depended on HBV disease status, the underlying disease requiring immunosuppression, and the specific immunosuppressive regime. While antiviral prophylaxis can prevent reactivation, it increases cost and still has risk of delayed reactivation after stopping antivirals and close follow-up and on-demand treatment is a good alternative for patients at risk of reactivation.

The Role of Hepatitis B Core-Related Antigen

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) cannot be completely eliminated from infected hepatocytes due to the existence of intrahepatic covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA). Serological biomarkers reflect intrahepatic viral replicative activity as non-invasive alternatives to liver biopsy. Hepatitis B core-related antigen (HBcrAg) is a novel biomarker that has an important role in chronic hepatitis B (CHB), because it correlates with serum HBV DNA and intrahepatic cccDNA. In clinical cases with undetectable serum HBV DNA or loss of HBsAg, HBcrAg still can be detected and the decrease in HBcrAg levels is significantly associated with promising outcomes for CHB patients. HBcrAg can predict spontaneous or treatment-induced hepatitis B envelope antigen (HBeAg) seroconversion, persistent responses before and after cessation of nucleos(t)ide analogues, potential HBV reactivation, HBV reinfection after liver transplantation, and risk of hepatocellular carcinoma progression or recurrence. In this review, the clinical applications of HBcrAg in CHB patients based on its virological features are described. Furthermore, new potential therapeutic anti-HBV agents that affect intrahepatic cccDNA are under development, and the monitoring of HBcrAg might be useful to judge therapeutic effects. In conclusion, HBcrAg might be a suitable surrogate marker beyond other HBV markers to predict the disease progression and treatment responses of CHB patients.

Zika Virus Potentiates the Development of Neurological Defects and Microcephaly: Challenges and Control Strategies

Since the beginning of the Zika Virus (ZIKV) epidemic, thousands of cases presenting ZIKV symptoms were recorded in Brazil, Colombia (South America), French Polynesia and other countries of Central and North America. In Brazil, during ZIKV outbreak thousands of microcephaly cases occurred that caused a state of urgency among scientists and researchers to confirm the suspected association between ZIKV infection and microcephaly. In this review article we comprehensively studied scientific literature to analyze ZIKV relationship with microcephaly, recent experimental studies, challenge and shortcomings in previously published reports to know about the current status of this association. The evidences supporting the association of ZIKV infection with congenital microcephaly and fetal brain tissue damage is rapidly increasing, and supplying recent information about pathology, clinical medicine, epidemiology, mechanism and experimental studies. However, serious attention is required toward ZIKV vaccine development, standardization of anthropometric techniques, centralization of data, and advance research to clearly understand the mechanism of ZIKV infection causing microcephaly.

Correlation of HBcrAg with Intrahepatic Hepatitis B Virus Total DNA and Covalently Closed Circular DNA in HBeAg-Positive Chronic Hepatitis B Patients

The purpose of this study was to explore the correlations of serum hepatitis B core-related antigen (HBcrAg) with intrahepatic Hepatitis B virus (HBV) covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA) and HBV total DNA in hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients. Serum HBcrAg and other parameters, including HBV DNA, HBV RNA, HBeAg, hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), hepatitis B core antibody (anti-HBc), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) were quantitatively measured at baseline and follow-up time points. Intrahepatic HBV cccDNA and total DNA were quantitatively detected at baseline and 96 weeks. Grading of liver necroinflammation and staging of hepatic fibrosis were assessed at baseline and 96 weeks. Correlations between serum HBcrAg and other parameters were analyzed by Pearson's correlation analysis. The results showed that pretreatment HBcrAg correlated significantly with HBV total DNA levels (r = 0.328, P  = 0.003) in 82 CHB patients, and, after removing three outliers, with intrahepatic HBV cccDNA (r = 0.323, P  = 0.004; n = 79). Serum HBcrAg correlated better with HBV cccDNA in patients with lower levels of serum HBV DNA (stratified by 7 log IU/ml of HBV DNA; r = 0.656, P  = 0.003 versus r = -0.02, P = 0.866). Significant inverse correlations were found between HBcrAg and grade of liver necroinflammation (r = -0.245, P  = 0.037), stage of hepatic fibrosis (r = -0.360, P  = 0.002) at baseline. Serum HBcrAg presented significant correlation with intrahepatic HBV cccDNA in patients with HBeAg seroconversion at 96 weeks (r = 0.622, P  = 0.006). The decrease in HBcrAg showed significant correlation with the decrease in HBV cccDNA after 96-week NA therapy (r = 0.282, P  = 0.043). Serum HBcrAg also correlated significantly with other serum markers at baseline and 96 weeks of NA therapy. In conclusion, baseline HBcrAg and its decreased value were significantly correlated with the corresponding intrahepatic HBV cccDNA.

New viral biomarkers for Hepatitis B: Are we able to change practice?

The management of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is challenged by its varying natural course and its stealthy nature. Not all HBV-infected patients will develop complications of infection; however, it is of utmost importance to identify patients who are at risk and require antiviral treatment and/or close surveillance. Hepatic inflammation and quantification of HBV DNA have guided treatment decisions in the last decade, and these guided interventions have been shown to reduce liver-related complications and death. Data on the quantification of additional HBV markers such as hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), hepatitis B core-related antigen (HBcrAg) and hepatitis B virus RNA (HBV RNA) have accumulated in recent years. Here, we review the current evidence of how to use these markers and discuss open issues that require additional research.

Quantification of HBV core antibodies may help predict HBV reactivation in patients with lymphoma and resolved HBV infection

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Absence or low anti-HBV surface antibody (anti-HBs) is associated with an increased risk of HBV reactivation in patients with lymphoma and resolved HBV infection receiving rituximab-containing chemotherapy. Quantification of anti-HBV core antibody (anti-HBc) is a new marker associated with the natural history and treatment response of chronic HBV infection. This study investigated whether baseline anti-HBc and anti-HBs levels may better predict HBV reactivation.

METHODS

We prospectively measured the HBV DNA levels of patients with lymphoma and resolved HBV infection receiving rituximab-cyclophosphamide, hydroxydaunorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone-based chemotherapy and started an antiviral therapy upon HBV reactivation, defined as a greater than 10-fold increase in HBV DNA compared with previous nadir levels. Anti-HBs and anti-HBc were quantified by a double-sandwich assay. Receiver-operating-characteristic-curve analysis was used to determine the optimal baseline anti-HBc/anti-HBs levels for predicting HBV reactivation.

RESULTS

HBV reactivation occurred in 24 of the 197 patients enrolled, with an incidence of 11.6/100 person-years. For the 192 patients with enough serum samples for analysis, low anti-HBs (<56.48 mIU/ml) and high anti-HBc (≥6.41 IU/ml) at baseline were significantly associated with high risk of HBV reactivation (hazard ratio [HR] 8.48 and 4.52, respectively; p <0.01). The multivariate analysis indicated that (1) patients with both high anti-HBc and low anti-HBs at baseline (36 of 192 patients) had an HR of 17.29 for HBV reactivation (95% CI 3.92-76.30; p <0.001), and (2) HBV reactivation may be associated with inferior overall survival (HR 2.41; 95% CI 1.15-5.05; p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Baseline anti-HBc/anti-HBs levels may predict HBV reactivation in these patients with lymphoma and help optimize prophylactic antiviral therapy for high-risk patients.

LAY SUMMARY

In this study, we identified a subgroup of patients with lymphoma and resolved hepatitis B virus infection that had a high risk of hepatitis B virus reactivation after receiving rituximab-containing chemotherapy. These findings will help optimize a preventive strategy, especially in hepatitis B virus endemic regions with limited healthcare resources. Clinical trial number: NCT 00931229.

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation-The potential role of direct-acting agents for hepatitis C virus (HCV)

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is known to inhibit hepatitis B virus (HBV) replication in patients with HBV/HCV coinfection. Reactivation of HBV in patients treated for HCV with direct-acting agents (DAAs) has emerged recently as an important clinical consideration. A growing number of case reports and case series support the association between new HCV treatments and HBV reactivation. Yet, very little is known about the specific viral characteristics that facilitate reactivation as functional characterization of the reactivated HBV has been conducted only rarely. This review provides the most recent data on HBV reactivation in the context of DAA initiation and highlights the existing viral genomic data from reactivating viruses. Current functional studies of HBV reactivation are largely limited by the retrospective identification of cases, no standardization of genomic regions that are studied with respect to HBV reactivation, and the lack of inclusion of nonreactivating controls to establish specific viral mutations that are associated with HBV reactivation. Importantly, none of these sequencing studies included cases of HBV reactivation after initiation of DAAs. While new HCV treatments have revolutionized care for HCV infected patients, HBV reactivation will likely increase in frequency, as DAAs are more commonly prescribed. Pretreatment determination of HBV status and thoughtful management of HBV coinfections will be necessary and lead to improved patient safety and yield optimal treatment results.

Hepatitis B virus reactivation in patients treated with immunosuppressive drugs: a practical guide for clinicians

Hepatitis B virus reactivation (HBVr) is emerging as an important clinical entity, with the advent of highly potent immunosuppression licensed for use as the treatment of a widening range of clinical indications. HBVr can lead to severe acute liver failure and death. Risk can be minimised through appropriate screening, monitoring and antiviral prophylaxis. Screening for serological markers at the -earliest opportunity is recommended. Risk stratification should then be performed on the basis of characteristics of the -underlying disease, markers of viral activity and the potency of proposed immunosuppression. In this review, we summarise the most recent recommendations from the relevant international societies. We also provide suggestions on how a robust multidisciplinary service can be delivered to prevent HBVr in UK clinical practice through optimisation of resources and introduction of checkpoints to prevent the inappropriate administration of immunosuppression to those at significant risk of HBVr.

Current and future directions of management of hepatitis B: steps toward a cure

Universal hepatitis B virus vaccination has been effective in reducing incident chronic hepatitis B but will not have the requisite effect on the prevalence of end-stage liver disease in chronically infected persons. The natural history and immunological stages of hepatitis B virus infection are still being defined. Over three decades, current therapies have reduced morbidity from chronic hepatitis B. The majority require nucleoside analog maintenance therapy. The preferential preservation of covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA), and capsid reverse transcriptase–cccDNA interactions currently precludes cure in most. A functional cure in  the host may require several synergistic antiviral and immunological intercessions. The correct sequencing and combinations of treatment with either host or viral targeting agents have yet to be determined. Proven surrogates for cccDNA for clinical trials are required. Different strategies may become apparent for patients at different stages of the disease. Curative therapies will require affordability. This review focuses on steps toward a cure.

Review article: hepatitis B core-related antigen (HBcrAg): an emerging marker for chronic hepatitis B virus infection

BACKGROUND

Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) cannot be completely eradicated due to the presence of covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA) in the nuclei of infected hepatocytes. While quantification of intrahepatic cccDNA requires liver biopsies, serological markers can be non-invasive alternatives to reflect intrahepatic viral replicative activity. Recently, hepatitis B core-related antigen (HBcrAg) has been advocated as a novel serum marker for disease monitoring and prognostication of CHB.

AIM

To examine the virological aspect and clinical application of HBcrAg with respect to the natural history and treatment of CHB.

METHODS

We reviewed all papers published in the PubMed journal list and abstracts from major international meetings that included the keyword "HBcrAg" or "hepatitis B core-related antigen" until March 2017. Selected studies were compared and summarised on the basis of existing theories, as well as the authors' experience.

RESULTS

HBcrAg exhibited good correlation with intrahepatic (ih) cccDNA, ih total hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA, serum HBV DNA and to a lesser extent HBV surface antigen (HBsAg). In situations where serum HBV DNA levels become undetectable or HBsAg loss is achieved, HBcrAg can still be detectable. This marker is helpful in differentiation of HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis from HBeAg-negative chronic infection, predicting spontaneous or treatment-induced HBeAg seroconversion, sustained response to nucleos(t)ide analogue (NA), risk of HBV reactivation in occult HBV infection under immunosuppressive therapies, and risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) development as well as post-operative HCC recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

HBcrAg is a potential surrogate marker of cccDNA. It may soon become a useful marker for disease monitoring, predicting treatment response and disease outcome of chronic hepatitis B.

Isolated anti-HBc: The Relevance of Hepatitis B Core Antibody-A Review of New Issues

Hepatitis B core antibody (anti-HBc) is considered the most sensitive serological marker for history of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. In a subset of anti-HBc carriers, anti-HBc is present in the absence of hepatitis B surface antigen and hepatitis B surface antibody-a serological pattern known as "isolated anti-HBc" (IAHBc). IAHBc has been of clinical interest over the past several years, with growing data to suggest its role as a serological marker for occult HBV infection (OBI). This article reviews the clinical significance and association of IAHBc with hepatitis C virus (HCV) co-infection, risk of HBV reactivation during direct-acting antiviral therapy for HCV as well as immune suppression, and development of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Hepatitis B core-related antigen is also highlighted as an emerging laboratory assay that may identify OBI and predict HCC development in non-cirrhotic patients receiving nucleoside/nucleotide analog therapy.

Current advances in the elimination of hepatitis B in China by 2030

With its 78 million chronic carriers, hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is still one of the leading public health challenges in China. Over the last two decades, China has made great progress on the prevention of HBV transmission through national vaccination programs. Zero transmission from mother to infant has been proposed as the current goal. Available anti-HBV therapy is efficacious in suppressing HBV replication; however, it fails to completely cure patients with chronic hepatitis B and even requires lifelong treatment. To reduce the costs and improve the efficacy, several trials have been recently conducted in China to optimize the current anti-HBV managements. Novel biomarkers were identified to predict treatment outcomes, and new promising treatment strategies were developed. Reports also indicate that coinfections of HBV with other hepatotropic viruses and human immunodeficiency virus are common in China and cause severe liver diseases, which should be recognized early and treated properly. Work is still needed to eliminate hepatitis B in China by 2030.

Unmet Needs in Clinical and Basic Hepatitis B Virus Research

Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) has become a treatable and controllable disease. The current nucleos(t)ide analogue (NUC) and pegylated interferon therapies effectively help slow disease progression and reduce the risk of cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and CHB-associated mortality. Long-term viral suppression is easily achievable by NUC therapy, with limited adverse reactions. However, several unmet requirements still exist, including safety and risk-stratified HCC surveillance among patients who received long-term NUC therapy. Criteria for determining which patients should receive finite-duration NUC therapy and which should receive combination therapy with both NUC and pegylated interferon remain unsettled. The management of hepatitis B virus (HBV) e antigen-positive viremic patients with normal liver function and the incorporation of new biomarkers to help manage CHB require further exploration. To achieve functional cure (ie, HBV surface antigen seroclearance) and complete cure (ie, eradication of covalently closed circular DNA) of CHB, several challenges in basic research must be addressed, including the development of an efficient cell culture system and animal models for HBV investigation, development of treatment to eradicate covalently closed circular HBV DNA, and development of immunotherapy for CHB. This brief review focuses on unmet needs in both clinical and basic HBV research.

Ocrelizumab and Other CD20+ B-Cell-Depleting Therapies in Multiple Sclerosis

Selective depletion of CD20+ B cells by anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies as monotherapy in multiple sclerosis (MS) profoundly suppresses acute inflammatory disease activity and signifies an important advance in the treatment of relapsing-remitting MS. Ocrelizumab, a humanized anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, is also the first proven therapy to lessen disability progression in primary progressive MS-a breakthrough for patients with a disease that had no proven therapy. Ocrelizumab is generally well tolerated, with the most common adverse events experienced being infusion reactions and infections. In ocrelizumab trials in MS a numerical imbalance in the risk of malignancies was observed. In this article, we review advances in anti-CD20 B-cell-depleting biological therapies for MS, including ocrelizumab, rituximab, and ofatumumab.