1
|
Leitao MM, Iasonos A, Tomberlin M, Moukarzel LA, Price H, Bennetti G, Ramesh B, Chi DS, Long Roche K, Sonoda Y, Al-Niami A, Mueller JJ, Gardner GJ, Broach V, Jewell EL, Kim S, Feinberg J, Abu-Rustum NR, Zivanovic O. ARIA II: a randomized controlled trial of near-infrared Angiography during RectosIgmoid resection and Anastomosis in women with ovarian cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2024; 34:1098-1101. [PMID: 38514101 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2024-005395] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/23/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ovarian cancer with extensive metastatic disease involving pelvic structures often requires rectosigmoid resection for complete gross resection; however, it is associated with increased surgical morbidity. There are limited data, and none in ovarian cancer, on near-infrared assessment of perfusion in rectosigmoid resections with anastomosis. PRIMARY OBJECTIVE To compare the rate of pelvic complications (pelvic abscesses, anastomotic leaks, and infections) within 30 days of surgery with and without near-infrared assessment of perfusion at time of rectosigmoid resection and re-anastomosis in patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery for ovarian cancer. STUDY HYPOTHESIS We hypothesize the use of near-infrared technology (intravenous indocyanine green and endoscopic near-infrared fluorescence imaging), compared with standard intra-operative assessment, to evaluate anastomotic perfusion at time of rectosigmoid resection and re-anastomosis will result in lower rates of post-operative pelvic complications. TRIAL DESIGN This is a planned multicenter randomized controlled trial. Patients who undergo rectosigmoid resection as part of their ovarian cytoreductive surgery will be randomized 1:1 to standard assessment of anastomosis with the surgeon's usual technique (control arm) or assessment with near-infrared angiography using indocyanine green and endoscopic fluorescence imaging (experimental arm). Randomization will occur after rectosigmoid resection has been completed and the surgeon declares their plan to create a diverting ostomy. Randomization will be stratified by plan for diverting ostomy. MAJOR INCLUSION/EXCLUSION CRITERIA Main inclusion criteria include patients with primary or recurrent ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer who are scheduled for cytoreductive surgery with suspected need for low-anterior rectosigmoid resection. PRIMARY ENDPOINT Rate of 30-day post-operative pelvic complications. SAMPLE SIZE 310 (155 per arm) ESTIMATED DATES FOR COMPLETING ACCRUAL AND PRESENTING RESULTS: Q2 2027 and Q4 2027, respectively. TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT04878094.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mario M Leitao
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
- Department of OB/GYN, Weill Cornell Medical College of Cornell University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Alexia Iasonos
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Morgan Tomberlin
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Lea A Moukarzel
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Hannah Price
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Gabrielle Bennetti
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Bhavani Ramesh
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Dennis S Chi
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
- Department of OB/GYN, Weill Cornell Medical College of Cornell University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Kara Long Roche
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
- Department of OB/GYN, Weill Cornell Medical College of Cornell University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Yukio Sonoda
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
- Department of OB/GYN, Weill Cornell Medical College of Cornell University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Ahmed Al-Niami
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
- Department of OB/GYN, Weill Cornell Medical College of Cornell University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jennifer J Mueller
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
- Department of OB/GYN, Weill Cornell Medical College of Cornell University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Ginger J Gardner
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
- Department of OB/GYN, Weill Cornell Medical College of Cornell University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Vance Broach
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
- Department of OB/GYN, Weill Cornell Medical College of Cornell University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Elizabeth L Jewell
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
- Department of OB/GYN, Weill Cornell Medical College of Cornell University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Sarah Kim
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
- Department of OB/GYN, Weill Cornell Medical College of Cornell University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jacqueline Feinberg
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
- Department of OB/GYN, Weill Cornell Medical College of Cornell University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Nadeem R Abu-Rustum
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
- Department of OB/GYN, Weill Cornell Medical College of Cornell University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Oliver Zivanovic
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
- Department of OB/GYN, Weill Cornell Medical College of Cornell University, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Jiang R, Feng Y, Chen Y, Cheng X, Shi T, Gao W, Jia H, Jiang S, Guo Y, Huang X, Tu D, Zhang Y, Yang H, Zhang P, Liu J, Zhu J, Zang R. Surgery versus no surgery in platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer: final overall survival analysis of the SOC-1 randomized phase 3 trial. Nat Med 2024:10.1038/s41591-024-02981-0. [PMID: 38824243 DOI: 10.1038/s41591-024-02981-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2024] [Accepted: 04/09/2024] [Indexed: 06/03/2024]
Abstract
Surgery for platinum-sensitive, relapsed ovarian cancer (PSROC) is widely practiced but had contradictory survival outcomes in previous studies. In this multicenter, open-label, phase 3 trial, women with PSROC, and having had one previous therapy and no platinum-based chemotherapy (platinum-free interval) of 6 months or more, were randomly assigned to either the surgery group (182 patients) or the no-surgery group (control) (175 patients). Patients with resectable diseases were eligible according to the international model (iMODEL), combined with a positron emission tomography-computed tomography imaging. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival were coprimary endpoints in hierarchical testing, and a significantly longer progression-free survival with surgery was previously reported. Final analysis of OS was planned at data maturity of 59%. Between 19 July 2012 and 3 June 2019, 357 patients were enrolled. Median follow-up was 82.5 months. Median OS was 58.1 months with surgery and 52.1 months for control (hazard ratio (HR) 0.80, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.61-1.05, P = 0.11). The predefined threshold for statistical significance was not met, but prespecified sensitivity analysis was performed. Overall, 61 of 175 (35%) patients in control had crossed over to surgery following subsequent relapse, and adjusted HR for death in the surgery group compared with control was 0.76, 95% CI 0.58-0.99. In subgroup analysis of relapse sites by imaging, median survival was not estimable in the surgery group and was 69.5 months in control in patients with <20 sites (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.46-1.03). Patients with a complete resection had the most favorable outcome, with a median OS of 73.0 months. Twenty-four of 182 (13.2%) patients remained relapse free and alive >60 months in the surgery group as compared with five of 175 (2.9%) patients in the control group. In patients with PSROC, surgery did not increase OS in the intention-to-treat population but resulted in a prolongation of survival following adjustment of crossover.ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT01611766 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rong Jiang
- Institute for Ovarian Cancer, Fudan University & Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Cancer Center, Fudan University Zhongshan Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Yanling Feng
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yulian Chen
- Institute for Ovarian Cancer, Fudan University & Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Cancer Center, Fudan University Zhongshan Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Xi Cheng
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Fudan University Cancer Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Tingyan Shi
- Institute for Ovarian Cancer, Fudan University & Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Cancer Center, Fudan University Zhongshan Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Wen Gao
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Hangzhou, China
| | - Huixun Jia
- Clinical Statistics Centre, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Shiyang Jiang
- Institute for Ovarian Cancer, Fudan University & Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Cancer Center, Fudan University Zhongshan Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Yi Guo
- Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiao Huang
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Fudan University Cancer Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Dongsheng Tu
- Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Yuqin Zhang
- Institute for Ovarian Cancer, Fudan University & Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Cancer Center, Fudan University Zhongshan Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Huijuan Yang
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Fudan University Cancer Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Ping Zhang
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Hangzhou, China
| | - Jihong Liu
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jianqing Zhu
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Hangzhou, China
| | - Rongyu Zang
- Institute for Ovarian Cancer, Fudan University & Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Cancer Center, Fudan University Zhongshan Hospital, Shanghai, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kobayashi Y, Shimada M, Tamate M, Cho HW, Zhu J, Chou HH, Kajiyama H, Okamoto A, Aoki D, Kang S, Lee JW, Kim JW, Kim JH, Lin Z, Liu J, Wu X, Lai HC, Chang TC, Lai CH, Kim YM, Enomoto T. Current treatment strategies for ovarian cancer in the East Asian Gynecologic Oncology Trial Group (EAGOT). J Gynecol Oncol 2024; 35:e87. [PMID: 38606827 PMCID: PMC11107282 DOI: 10.3802/jgo.2024.35.e87] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2024] [Accepted: 03/24/2024] [Indexed: 04/13/2024] Open
Abstract
Ovarian cancer, notable for its severe prognosis among gynecologic cancers, has seen substantial progress in treatment approaches recently. Enhanced protocols in chemotherapy and the introduction of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors for maintenance therapy have markedly improved outcomes for patients with specific genetic profiles, such as those positive for BRCA mutations or exhibiting homologous recombination deficiency (HRD). Additionally, the method of intraperitoneal chemotherapy administration has emerged as a valuable alternative to traditional transvenous routes, showing promise for wider clinical adoption. The field of surgery has also evolved, with increasing exploration into the benefits and feasibility of laparoscopic methods over more invasive traditional surgeries, aiming for complete tumor removal but with reduced patient impact. The hereditary nature of ovarian cancer underscores the importance of genetic testing, which has become integral in tailoring treatment strategies, particularly in determining suitability for PARP inhibitors. The formation of the East Asian Gynecologic Oncology Trial Group (EAGOT) aims to optimize treatment across Japan, Korea, China, and Taiwan. The ovarian cancer committee of EAGOT shared the current policies, focusing on 5 topics: 1) strategies for maintenance therapy after initial surgery and chemotherapy, 2) drug regimens for platinum-sensitive and platinum-resistant recurrence, 3) intraperitoneal chemotherapy, 4) laparoscopic surgery as an alternative to laparotomy, and 5) current status of genetic testing (BRCA, HRD, and panel tests) for ovarian cancer and its prospects. EAGOT's multi-national trials aim to harmonize these evolving treatment strategies, ensuring that the latest and most effective protocols are accessible across the region, thereby significantly impacting patient outcomes in East Asia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yusuke Kobayashi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Muneaki Shimada
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Miyagi, Japan.
| | - Masato Tamate
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sapporo Medical University, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Hyun Woong Cho
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jun Zhu
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Cancer Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Hung-Hsueh Chou
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Branch, Taoyuan, Taiwan
- National Tsing Hua University, School of Medicine, Hsinchu, Taiwan
| | - Hiroaki Kajiyama
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Aikou Okamoto
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Daisuke Aoki
- International University of Health and Welfare Graduate School, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Sokbom Kang
- Center for Gynecologic Oncology, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Jeong-Won Lee
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jae-Weon Kim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jae-Hoon Kim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Zhongqiu Lin
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jihong Liu
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xiaohua Wu
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Hung-Cheng Lai
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, New Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Ting-Chang Chang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Branch, Taoyuan, Taiwan
- Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | | | - Yong Man Kim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Takayuki Enomoto
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Fotopoulou C, Eriksson AG, Yagel I, Chang SJ, Lim MC. Surgery for Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Cancer. Curr Oncol Rep 2024; 26:46-54. [PMID: 38091202 PMCID: PMC10858815 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-023-01480-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/22/2023] [Indexed: 02/12/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW To review evidence around the value and challenges of surgery for recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer (ROC). Both cytoreductive and palliative aspects will be addressed RECENT FINDINGS: Prospective and retrospective evidence demonstrates a significantly longer remission derived from the combination of surgical and systemic modalities as opposed to systemic treatment alone in carefully selected ROC-patients who have relapsed more than 6 months from the end of their 1st line platinum-based chemotherapy. Nevertheless, this benefit appears to be limited when total macroscopic tumor clearance is not achieved. Selection algorithms to identify optimal surgical candidates are of paramount importance to prevent surgical morbidity without the equivalent oncological benefit. In the palliative setting, the risks and benefits of salvage surgery need to be counterbalanced with the advances of conservative techniques for optimal care. Well-defined selection algorithms to identify those who will benefit from surgery in the relapsed setting appear to be the key to oncologic and surgical success.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina Fotopoulou
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
| | - Ane Gerda Eriksson
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Itai Yagel
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Shiba Medical Centre, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Suk-Joon Chang
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea
| | - Myong Cheol Lim
- Center for Gynecologic Cancer and Center for Clinical Trials, National Cancer Center, Goyang, South Korea
- Rare & Pediatric Cancer Branch and Immuno-Oncology Branch, Division of Rare and Refractory Cancer, Research Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, South Korea
- Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Center, Goyang, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Climent MT, Serra A, Llueca M, Llueca A. Surgery in Recurrent Ovarian Cancer: A Meta-Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:3470. [PMID: 37444580 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15133470] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2023] [Revised: 06/16/2023] [Accepted: 06/30/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: The second cytoreductive surgery performed for a patient who has recurrent ovarian cancer remains controversial. Our study analyzes overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) for cytoreductive surgery in addition to chemotherapy in recurrent ovarian cancer instead of chemotherapy alone. Methods: A meta-analysis was conducted using PubMed and the Cochrane database of systematic reviews to select randomized controlled studies. In total, three randomized studies were used, employing a total of 1249 patients. Results: The results of our meta-analysis of these randomized controlled trials identified significant differences in OS (HR = 0.83, IC 95% 0.70-0.99, p < 0.04) and DFS (HR = 0.63, IC 95% 0.55-0.72, p < 0.000001). A subgroup analysis comparing complete cytoreductive surgery and surgery with residual tumor achieved better results for both OS (HR = 0.65, IC 95% 0.49-0.86, p = 0.002) and DFS (HR = 0.67, IC 95% 0.53-0.82, p = 0.0008), with statistical significance. Conclusions: A complete secondary cytoreductive surgery (SCS) in recurrent ovarian cancer (ROC) demonstrates an improvement in the OS and DFS, and this benefit is most evident in cases where complete cytoreductive surgery is achieved. The challenge is the correct patient selection for secondary cytoreductive surgery to improve the results of this approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Teresa Climent
- Multidisciplinary Unit of Abdominopelvic Oncology Surgery (MUAPOS), Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University General Hospital of Castellon, 12004 Castellon, Spain
- Oncological Surgery Research Group (OSRG), Department of Medicine, University Jaume I (UJI), 12004 Castellon, Spain
| | - Anna Serra
- Multidisciplinary Unit of Abdominopelvic Oncology Surgery (MUAPOS), Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University General Hospital of Castellon, 12004 Castellon, Spain
- Oncological Surgery Research Group (OSRG), Department of Medicine, University Jaume I (UJI), 12004 Castellon, Spain
| | - Maria Llueca
- Department of Medicine, University CEU-Cardenal Herrera, 12006 Castellon, Spain
| | - Antoni Llueca
- Multidisciplinary Unit of Abdominopelvic Oncology Surgery (MUAPOS), Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University General Hospital of Castellon, 12004 Castellon, Spain
- Oncological Surgery Research Group (OSRG), Department of Medicine, University Jaume I (UJI), 12004 Castellon, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Elashwah A, Alsuhaibani A, Alzahrani A, Azzam AZ, Moftah B, Breakeit M, Hussain M, Mahmood R, ALramahi S, Hassan Z, Amin TM. The Use of Intraoperative Radiation Therapy (IORT) in Multimodality Management of Cancer Patients: a Single Institution Experience. J Gastrointest Cancer 2023; 54:433-441. [PMID: 35290599 DOI: 10.1007/s12029-021-00786-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/06/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) is a highly conformal type of radiation therapy given at time of surgery aiming for better tumor local control. It increases the tumor radiation dose without exceeding normal tissues tolerance doses. PURPOSE To assess the feasibility of IORT and short-term toxicities in patients with different cancer sites treated with multidisciplinary protocol including IORT. PATIENTS AND METHODS Medical records of cancer patients who received IORT as a part of their multidisciplinary treatment at King Faisal Specialized Hospital and Research center (KFSH&RC), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, from January 2013 until December 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS A total of 188 patients with 210 IORT applications were analyzed. Twenty-two patients had two applications at the same time. One hundred sixteen patients were males. Median age at time of diagnosis was 49.5 years (19-77). One hundred thirty-four patients had primary, while 54 cases had recurrent disease. Gastroesophageal cancer and soft tissue sarcoma were the most frequent diagnosis in 49 patients followed by colorectal cancer in 35 patients. Major surgeries with curative intent done in 183 patients (97.3%). Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) was performed in 118 (62.8%) patients. The 30-day postoperative mortality rate was 3.2%. Fifty-four (28.7%) patients develop grades III-IV complications according to Clavien-Dindo grading system. CONCLUSION The data presented discusses using of IORT treatment for different malignant tumors as a part of multimodality treatment. IORT seems safe and feasible; however, a longer follow-up period is needed for proper evaluation and to define the role of IORT in a tailored multimodality approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmed Elashwah
- Section of Radiation Oncology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
- Kasr Al-Eini Center of Clinical Oncology (NEMROCK), Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
| | | | - Ali Alzahrani
- Department of Surgical Oncology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Ayman Zaki Azzam
- Department of Surgical Oncology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- Department of General Surgery, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt
| | - Belal Moftah
- King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, Department of medical physics, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Mohammad Breakeit
- Department of Surgical Oncology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Muhammad Hussain
- King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, Department of medical physics, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Rana Mahmood
- Section of Radiation Oncology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Shada ALramahi
- King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, Department of medical physics, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Zeinab Hassan
- King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, Department of medical physics, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Tarek Mahmoud Amin
- Department of Surgical Oncology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Debray TPA, Collins GS, Riley RD, Snell KIE, Van Calster B, Reitsma JB, Moons KGM. Transparent reporting of multivariable prediction models developed or validated using clustered data (TRIPOD-Cluster): explanation and elaboration. BMJ 2023; 380:e071058. [PMID: 36750236 PMCID: PMC9903176 DOI: 10.1136/bmj-2022-071058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/07/2022] [Indexed: 02/09/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas P A Debray
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
- Cochrane Netherlands, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Gary S Collins
- Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Botnar Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- National Institute for Health and Care Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - Richard D Riley
- Centre for Prognosis Research, School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - Kym I E Snell
- Centre for Prognosis Research, School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - Ben Van Calster
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- EPI-centre, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Johannes B Reitsma
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
- Cochrane Netherlands, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Karel G M Moons
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
- Cochrane Netherlands, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Nunes RL, Teixeira FR, Diniz TP, Faloppa CC, Mantoan H, da Costa AABA, Baiocchi G. The value of PET/CT for cytoreductive surgery selection in recurrent ovarian carcinoma. J Gynecol Oncol 2023; 34:e31. [PMID: 36731894 PMCID: PMC10157340 DOI: 10.3802/jgo.2023.34.e31] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2022] [Revised: 12/07/2022] [Accepted: 12/28/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the value of positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in predicting no residual disease (NRD) after secondary cytoreductive surgery (SCS) compared with MSK criteria, the iMODEL, and the AGO score. METHODS We analyzed 112 patients with platinum-sensitive ovarian carcinoma who underwent SCS. We excluded patients for whom PET/CT was not performed, those without sufficient data, and who received chemotherapy before SCS. Ultimately, 69 patients were included. RESULTS Variables that correlated with NRD were peritoneal carcinomatosis index (odds ratio [OR]=0.91; 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.83-0.99; p=0.044), European Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG) 0 (OR=8.0; 95% CI=1.34-47.5; p=0.022), and ≤2 lesions by PET/CT (OR=4.36; 95% CI=1.07-17.7; p=0.039). Of the patients with ≤2 lesions by PET/CT, 48 (92.3%) underwent complete SCS. The sensitivity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of PET/CT for NRD were 85.7%, 92.3%, 33.3%, and 81.2%, respectively. NRD was achieved after fulfilling the MSK criteria, iMODEL and AGO Score in 89.1%, 88.1% and 85.9%, respectively. The accuracy of the MSK criteria, iMODEL, and AGO score in predicting NRD was 87%, 83.3%, and 77.3%, respectively. The PET/CT findings agreed well with the AGO score and iMODEL. The addition of PET/CT to these models increased the NRD rates (92.2%, 91.8%, and 89.4% for MSK+PET/CT, iMODEL+PET/CT, and AGO+PET/CT, respectively), but lowered their accuracy. CONCLUSION We observed NRD in 92.3% of patients with ≤2 lesions by PET/CT, with an accuracy of 81.2%. PET/CT did not increase the accuracy of the MSK criteria, iMODEL, or AGO score models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rafael Leite Nunes
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, AC Camargo Cancer Center, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | | | | | | | - Henrique Mantoan
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, AC Camargo Cancer Center, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | | | - Glauco Baiocchi
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, AC Camargo Cancer Center, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Upper-Abdominal Cytoreduction for Advanced Ovarian Cancer—Therapeutic Rationale, Surgical Anatomy and Techniques of Cytoreduction. SURGICAL TECHNIQUES DEVELOPMENT 2022. [DOI: 10.3390/std12010001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) is the cornerstone of treating advanced ovarian cancer. Approximately 60–70% of patients with advanced ovarian cancer will have involvement in the upper abdomen or the supracolic compartment of the abdominal cavity. Though the involvement of this region results in poorer survival compared, complete cytoreduction benefits overall survival, making upper-abdominal cytoreduction an essential component of CRS for advanced ovarian cancer. The upper abdomen constitutes several vital organs and large blood vessels draped with the parietal or visceral peritoneum, common sites of disease in ovarian cancer. A surgeon treating advanced ovarian cancer should be well versed in upper-abdominal cytoreduction techniques, including diaphragmatic peritonectomy and diaphragm resection, lesser omentectomy, splenectomy with or without distal pancreatectomy, liver resection, cholecystectomy, and suprarenal retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy. Other procedures such as clearance of the periportal region, Glisson’s capsulectomy, clearance of the superior recess of the lesser sac, and Morrison’s pouch are essential as these regions are often involved in ovarian cancer. This manuscript covers the surgical anatomy of the upper abdomen, the techniques and therapeutic rationale of upper-abdominal cytoreduction, and specific measures for perioperative management of these patients. The main focus is the description of various peritonectomies and regional lymphadenectomies.
Collapse
|
10
|
de Bree E, Michelakis D, Anagnostopoulou E. The current role of secondary cytoreductive surgery for recurrent ovarian cancer. Front Oncol 2022; 12:1029976. [PMID: 36338689 PMCID: PMC9633943 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1029976] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2022] [Accepted: 10/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Ovarian cancer represents worldwide the second most frequent and the most fatal gynecological malignancy, with approximately two thirds of the patients presenting with advanced disease. Cytoreductive surgery, primary or after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy is the standard of care for these patients. Despite the improvement in quality of cytoreductive surgery as well as development of novel drugs and chemotherapy regimens, still most women with ovarian cancer will ultimately develop recurrent disease and die of their disease. In contrast to the management of primary disease, the standard treatment of patients with recurrent ovarian cancer remains a topic of debate. While platinum-based or second line systemic chemotherapy, depending on the time after last platinum treatment, is standard of care, the role of secondary cytoreductive surgery has been a controversial issue for the last decades. Potential outcome benefit must be also weighed against the risk of severe surgical morbidity, impairment of quality of life and costs. In platinum-resistant recurrent disease, i.e., relapse after less than 6 months from the last platinum-based chemotherapy for primary disease, secondary cytoreduction seems generally not to be indicated due to its aggressive biological behavior and the absence of effective systemic treatment. In this comprehensive review, the current role of cytoreductive surgery in platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer is discussed thoroughly in view of the results of most recent randomized trials and a meta-analysis. There seems to be definitely a role for secondary cytoreductive surgery in selected patients with ovarian cancer recurrence in whom complete resection of macroscopic disease is feasible. However, its role should be continuously reviewed due to the changing systemic treatment of patients with ovarian cancer recurrence over time.
Collapse
|
11
|
Wen H, Feng Z, Ma Y, Liu R, Ou Q, Guo Q, Shen Y, Wu X, Shao Y, Bao H, Wu X. Homologous recombination deficiency in diverse cancer types and its correlation with platinum chemotherapy efficiency in ovarian cancer. BMC Cancer 2022; 22:550. [PMID: 35578198 PMCID: PMC9109318 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-022-09602-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2021] [Accepted: 04/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) is a molecular biomarker for administrating PARP inhibitor (PARPi) or platinum-based (Pt) chemotherapy. The most well-studied mechanism of causing HRD is pathogenic BRCA1/2 mutations, while HRD phenotype is also present in patients without BRCA1/2 alterations, suggesting other unknown factors. METHODS The targeted next-generation sequencing (GeneseeqPrime® HRD) was used to evaluate the HRD scores of 199 patients (Cohort I). In Cohort II, a total of 85 Pt-chemotherapy-treated high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) patients were included for investigating the role of HRD score in predicting treatment efficacy. The concurrent genomic features analyzed along HRD score evaluation were studied in a third cohort with 416 solid tumor patients (Cohort III). RESULTS An HRD score ≥ 38 was predefined as HRD-positive by analyzing Cohort I (range: 0-107). Over 95% of the BRCA1/2-deficient cases of Cohort I were HRD-positive under this threshold. In Cohort II, Pt-sensitive patients have significantly higher HRD scores than Pt-resistant patients (median: 54 vs. 34, p = 0.031) and a significantly longer PFS was observed in HRD-positive patients (median: 548 vs. 343 days, p = 0.003). Furthermore, TP53, NCOR1, and PTK2 alterations were enriched in HRD-positive patients. In Cohort III, impaired homologous recombination repair pathway was more frequently observed in HRD-positive patients without BRCA1/2 pathogenic mutations. The alteration enrichment of TP53, NCOR1, and PTK2 observed in Cohort II was also validated by the ovarian subgroup in Cohort III. CONCLUSIONS Using an in-house HRD evaluation method, our findings show that overall HRR gene mutations account for a significant part of HRD in the absence of BRCA1/2 aberrations, and suggest that HRD positive status might be a predictive biomarker of Pt-chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hao Wen
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 270 Dongan Road, Shanghai, 200032, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, 130 Dongan Road, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Zheng Feng
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 270 Dongan Road, Shanghai, 200032, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, 130 Dongan Road, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Yutong Ma
- Geneseeq Research Institute, Nanjing Geneseeq Technology Inc, No. 128 Huakang Road, Pukou District, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210000, China
| | - Rui Liu
- Geneseeq Research Institute, Nanjing Geneseeq Technology Inc, No. 128 Huakang Road, Pukou District, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210000, China
| | - Qiuxiang Ou
- Geneseeq Research Institute, Nanjing Geneseeq Technology Inc, No. 128 Huakang Road, Pukou District, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210000, China
| | - Qinhao Guo
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 270 Dongan Road, Shanghai, 200032, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, 130 Dongan Road, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Yi Shen
- R&D, Nanjing Geneseeq Technology Inc, No. 128 Huakang Road, Pukou District, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210000, China
| | - Xue Wu
- Geneseeq Research Institute, Nanjing Geneseeq Technology Inc, No. 128 Huakang Road, Pukou District, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210000, China
| | - Yang Shao
- Geneseeq Research Institute, Nanjing Geneseeq Technology Inc, No. 128 Huakang Road, Pukou District, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210000, China.,School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Jiangning District, 101 Longmian Avenue, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 211166, China
| | - Hua Bao
- Geneseeq Research Institute, Nanjing Geneseeq Technology Inc, No. 128 Huakang Road, Pukou District, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210000, China.
| | - Xiaohua Wu
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 270 Dongan Road, Shanghai, 200032, China. .,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, 130 Dongan Road, Shanghai, 200032, China.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Thomas QD, Quesada S, D’Hondt V, Belaroussi I, Laas E, Classe JM, Fabbro M, Colombo PE, Fiteni F. Combinaison de la chirurgie et du traitement médical du cancer de l’ovaire : y a-t-il une stratégie optimale ? Bull Cancer 2022; 109:197-215. [DOI: 10.1016/j.bulcan.2021.11.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2021] [Revised: 11/18/2021] [Accepted: 11/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
|
13
|
Affiliation(s)
- Ginger J Gardner
- From the Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Dennis S Chi
- From the Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Jiang C, Li Z. Prediction Models for Complete Resection in Secondary Cytoreductive Surgery of Patients With Recurrent Ovarian Cancer. Front Oncol 2021; 11:674637. [PMID: 34631517 PMCID: PMC8496933 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.674637] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2021] [Accepted: 09/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The most advanced epithelial ovarian cancer develops recurrent disease despite maximal surgical cytoreduction and adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy. Treatment with secondary cytoreductive surgery (SCS) combined with chemotherapy or with chemotherapy alone for patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer (ROC) is currently under heated discussion. Encouragingly, the results of the AGO DESKTOP III Study and the SOC1/SGOG-OV2 trial, which have been published recently, showed a striking advantage in terms of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of ROC patients undergoing SCS compared to chemotherapy alone; moreover, a benefit of SCS exclusively for patients with complete gross resection (CGR) was particularly highlighted. CGR is considered the ultimate goal of SCS, on condition that the balance between maximal survival gain and minimal operative morbidity is maintained. Several models have been proposed to predict the rate of CGR, such as the MSK criteria, the AGO score, and the Tian model, over the last 15 years. This summary is mainly about the several previously published prediction models for CGR in SCS of ROC patients and discusses the effectiveness and limitations of these prediction models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caixia Jiang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children, Ministry of Education, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Zhengyu Li
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children, Ministry of Education, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Adamopoulou K, Gkamprana AM, Patsouras K, Halkia E. Addressing hepatic metastases in ovarian cancer: Recent advances in treatment algorithms and the need for a multidisciplinary approach. World J Hepatol 2021; 13:1122-1131. [PMID: 34630879 PMCID: PMC8473491 DOI: 10.4254/wjh.v13.i9.1122] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2021] [Revised: 07/21/2021] [Accepted: 08/11/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The lifetime risk for ovarian cancer incidence is 1.39% and the lifetime risk of death is 1.04%. Most ovarian cancer patients are diagnosed at advanced stages (III, IV) because there were no specific symptoms or existing screening tests. Liver metastases have been found in up to 50% of patients dying of advanced ovarian cancer. Recent studies indicate the need for a multidisciplinary approach from initial diagnosis to oncologic surgery and chemotherapy treatment, mandating the involvement of gynecologic oncologists, surgical oncologist, medical oncologists, hepatobiliary surgeons, and interventional radiologists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Athanasia M Gkamprana
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tzaneio General Hospital, Pireaus 18536, Greece
| | - Konstantinos Patsouras
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tzaneio General Hospital, Pireaus 18536, Greece
| | - Evgenia Halkia
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tzaneio General Hospital, Pireaus 18536, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Shi T, Yin S, Zhu J, Zhang P, Liu J, Zhu Y, Wu S, Chen X, Wang X, Teng Y, Zhu T, Yu A, Zhang Y, Feng Y, Huang H, Bao W, Li Y, Jiang W, Zhang P, Li J, Ai Z, Zhang W, Jia H, Zhang Y, Jiang R, Zhang J, Gao W, Luan Y, Zang R. A phase II trial of cytoreductive surgery combined with niraparib maintenance in platinum-sensitive, secondary recurrent ovarian cancer: SGOG SOC-3 study. J Gynecol Oncol 2021; 31:e61. [PMID: 32319233 PMCID: PMC7189080 DOI: 10.3802/jgo.2020.31.e61] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2020] [Revised: 03/25/2020] [Accepted: 04/06/2020] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Background In China, secondary cytoreductive surgery (SCR) has been widely used in ovarian cancer (OC) over the past two decades. Although Gynecologic Oncology Group-0213 trial did not show its overall survival benefit in first relapsed patients, the questions on patient selection and effect of subsequent targeting therapy are still open. The preliminary data from our pre-SOC1 phase II study showed that selected patients with second relapse who never received SCR at recurrence may still benefit from surgery. Moreover, poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) maintenance now has been a standard care for platinum sensitive relapsed OC. To our knowledge, no published or ongoing trial is trying to answer the question if patient can benefit from a potentially complete resection combined with PARPi maintenance in OC patients with secondary recurrence. Methods SOC-3 is a multi-center, open, randomized, controlled, phase II trial of SCR followed by chemotherapy and niraparib maintenance vs chemotherapy and niraparib maintenance in patients with platinum-sensitive second relapsed OC who never received SCR at recurrence. To guarantee surgical quality, if the sites had no experience of participating in any OC-related surgical trials, the number of recurrent lesions evaluated by central-reviewed positron emission tomography–computed tomography image shouldn't be more than 3. Eligible patients are randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either SCR followed by 6 cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy and niraparib maintenance or 6 cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy and niraparib maintenance alone. Patients who undergo at least 4 cycles of chemotherapy and must be, in the opinion of the investigator, without disease progression, will be assigned niraparib maintenance. Major inclusion criteria are secondary relapsed OC with a platinum-free interval of no less than 6 months and a possibly complete resection. Major exclusion criteria are borderline tumors and non-epithelial ovarian malignancies, received debulking surgery at recurrence and impossible to complete resection. The sample size is 96 patients. Primary endpoint is 12-month non-progression rate. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03983226
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tingyan Shi
- Ovarian Cancer Program, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
| | - Sheng Yin
- Ovarian Cancer Program, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jianqing Zhu
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, China
| | - Ping Zhang
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, China
| | - Jihong Liu
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yaping Zhu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Sufang Wu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiaojun Chen
- Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xipeng Wang
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Yincheng Teng
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Tao Zhu
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, China
| | - Aijun Yu
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, China
| | - Yingli Zhang
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, China
| | - Yanling Feng
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - He Huang
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Wei Bao
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Yanli Li
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Wei Jiang
- Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Ping Zhang
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Jiarui Li
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhihong Ai
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Wei Zhang
- Department of Biostatistics, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Huixun Jia
- Clinical Statistics Center, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Yuqin Zhang
- Ovarian Cancer Program, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Rong Jiang
- Ovarian Cancer Program, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jiejie Zhang
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, China
| | - Wen Gao
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, China
| | - Yuting Luan
- Ovarian Cancer Program, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Rongyu Zang
- Ovarian Cancer Program, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Tozzi R, Soleymani Majd H, Campanile RG, Ferrari F. Feasibility of laparoscopic diaphragmatic peritonectomy during Visceral-Peritoneal Debulking (VPD) in patients with stage IIIC-IV ovarian cancer. J Gynecol Oncol 2021; 31:e71. [PMID: 32808498 PMCID: PMC7440979 DOI: 10.3802/jgo.2020.31.e71] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2020] [Revised: 04/24/2020] [Accepted: 05/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe the surgical technique and evaluate the safety, feasibility and efficacy of laparoscopic diaphragmatic peritonectomy during Visceral-Peritoneal Debulking (VPD) in patients with stage IIIC-IV ovarian cancer (OC). METHODS This report is part of a Service Evaluation Protocol (Trust number 3267) on laparoscopy in patients with OC following neo-adjuvant chemotherapy. Between April 2015 and November 2017, all patients underwent to exploratory laparoscopy and a selected court was offered laparoscopic VPD. Laparoscopic diaphragmatic surgery was considered if there was no full thickness involvement. Primary endpoints of this part of the study were the safety, feasibility and efficacy of laparoscopic diaphragmatic peritonectomy. We report the surgical technique and outcomes. RESULTS Ninety-six patients underwent diaphragmatic surgery during the study period. Fifty patients (52.1%) had intra-operative exclusion criteria and/or full thickness diaphragmatic resection, 46 (47.9%) had peritonectomy and were included in the study. Laparoscopic diaphragmatic peritonectomy was performed in 21 patients (45.4%, group 1), while in 25 patients (54.6%, group 2) laparotomy was necessary. Extent of disease and complexity of surgery were similar. Reasons for conversions were disease coalescing the liver to the diaphragm preventing safe mobilization (22 patients) and accidental pleural opening (3 patients). Overall, intra- and post-operative morbidity was lower in group 1 and pulmonary specific morbidity was very low. CONCLUSION Diaphragmatic peritonectomy can be safely accomplished by laparoscopy in almost half of the patients with OC whose disease is limited to the diaphragmatic peritoneum.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberto Tozzi
- Department of Women's and Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Old Road, Headington, Oxford, UK.
| | - Hooman Soleymani Majd
- Department of Women's and Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Old Road, Headington, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Federico Ferrari
- Department of Women's and Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Old Road, Headington, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Shi T, Zhu J, Feng Y, Tu D, Zhang Y, Zhang P, Jia H, Huang X, Cai Y, Yin S, Jiang R, Tian W, Gao W, Liu J, Yang H, Cheng X, Zang R. Secondary cytoreduction followed by chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer (SOC-1): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2021; 22:439-449. [PMID: 33705695 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(21)00006-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 106] [Impact Index Per Article: 35.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2020] [Revised: 12/15/2020] [Accepted: 12/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The benefits of secondary cytoreduction for platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer are still widely debated. We aimed to assess the efficacy of secondary cytoreduction plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in this patient population. METHODS This multicentre, open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial (SOC-1), was done in four primarily academic centres in China (two in Shanghai, one in Hangzhou, and one in Guangzhou). Eligible patients were women aged 18 years and older with platinum-sensitive relapsed epithelial ovarian cancer with a platinum-free interval of at least 6 months after the end of first-line platinum-based chemotherapy and were predicted to have potentially resectable disease according to the international model (iMODEL) score and PET-CT imaging. iMODEL score was calculated using six variables: International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage, residual disease after primary surgery, platinum-free interval, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, serum level of cancer antigen 125 at recurrence, and presence of ascites at recurrence. An iMODEL score of 4·7 or lower predicted a potentially complete resection. As per a protocol amendment, patients with an iMODEL score of more than 4·7 could only be included if the serum level of cancer antigen 125 was more than 105 U/mL, but the principal investigators assessed the disease to be resectable by PET-CT. Eligible participants were randomly assigned (1:1) via a permuted block design (block size of six) and stratified by study centre, iMODEL score, residual disease at primary surgery, and enrolment in the Shanghai Gynecologic Oncology Group SUNNY trial, to undergo secondary cytoreductive surgery followed by intravenous chemotherapy (six 3-weekly cycles of intravenous paclitaxel [175 mg/m2] or docetaxel [75 mg/m2] combined with intravenous carboplatin [area under the curve of 5 mg/mL per min]; surgery group) or intravenous chemotherapy alone (no surgery group). Primary endpoints were progression-free survival and overall survival, analysed in all participants randomly assigned to treatment, regardless of treatment received (intention-to-treat [ITT] population). Here, we report the final analysis of progression-free survival and the prespecified interim analysis of overall survival. Safety was assessed in all participants who received their assigned treatment and had available adverse event data. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01611766, and is ongoing but closed to accrual. FINDINGS Between July 19, 2012, and June 3, 2019, 357 patients were recruited and randomly assigned to the surgery group (182) or the no surgery group (175; ITT population). Median follow-up was 36·0 months (IQR 18·1-58·3). In the no surgery group, 11 (6%) of 175 participants had secondary cytoreduction during second-line therapy while 48 (37%) of 130 participants who had disease progression crossed-over and had surgery at a subsequent recurrence. Median progression-free survival was 17·4 months (95% CI 15·0-19·8) in the surgery group and 11·9 months (10·0-13·8) in the no surgery group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·58; 95% CI 0·45-0·74; p<0·0001). At the interim overall survival analysis, median overall survival was 58·1 months (95% CI not estimable to not estimable) in the surgery group and 53·9 months (42·2-65·5) in the no surgery group (HR 0·82, 95% CI 0·57-1·19). In the safety population, nine (5%) of 172 patients in the surgery group had grade 3-4 surgical morbidity at 30 days, and no patients in either group had died at 60 days after receiving assigned treatment. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events during chemotherapy were neutropenia (29 [17%] of 166 patients in the surgery group vs 19 [12%] of 156 patients in the no surgery group), leucopenia (14 [8%] vs eight [5%]), and anaemia (ten [6%] vs nine [6%]). Four serious adverse events occurred, all in the surgery group. No treatment-related deaths occurred in either group. INTERPRETATION Secondary cytoreduction followed by chemotherapy was associated with significantly longer progression-free survival than was chemotherapy alone in patients with platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer, and patients should be counselled about the option of secondary cytoreduction in specialised centres. Long-term survival outcomes will be assessed using mature data on overall survival. FUNDING Zhongshan Development Program. TRANSLATION For the Chinese translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tingyan Shi
- Ovarian Cancer Program, Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jianqing Zhu
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Hangzhou, China
| | - Yanling Feng
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre, Guangzhou, China
| | - Dongsheng Tu
- Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Yuqin Zhang
- Ovarian Cancer Program, Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Ping Zhang
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Hangzhou, China
| | - Huixun Jia
- Clinical Statistics Centre, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiao Huang
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Fudan University Cancer Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Yunlang Cai
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Zhongda Hospital Southeast University, Nanjing, China
| | - Sheng Yin
- Ovarian Cancer Program, Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Rong Jiang
- Ovarian Cancer Program, Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Wenjuan Tian
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Fudan University Cancer Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Wen Gao
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Hangzhou, China
| | - Jihong Liu
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Centre for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre, Guangzhou, China
| | - Huijuan Yang
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Fudan University Cancer Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Xi Cheng
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Fudan University Cancer Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Rongyu Zang
- Ovarian Cancer Program, Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Abstract
A type of evolutionarily conserved, noncoding, small, endogenous, single-stranded RNA, miRNAs are widely distributed in eukaryotes, where they participate in various biological processes as critical regulatory molecules. miR-1299 has mainly been investigated in cancers. miR-1299 is a tumor suppressor that regulates the expression of its target genes, activating or inhibiting the transcription of genes regulating biological activities including cell proliferation, migration, survival and programmed cell death. miR-1299 has become a hotspot in research of disease mechanisms and biomarkers; elucidation of the regulatory roles of miR-1299 in tumorigenesis, proliferation, apoptosis, invasion, migration and angiogenesis may provide a new perspective for understanding its biological functions as a tumor suppressor. As key regulatory molecules, microRNAs participate in various biological processes and have become a widespread research focus. This article discusses how the microRNA miR-1299 plays a role as a tumor suppressor and participates in the regulation of tumor pathogenesis. We provide an overview of the role of miR-1299 in tumor diseases and discuss the pathogenesis and regulation mechanisms of miR-1299 in different specific cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deng Kaiyuan
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, 150086, China
| | - Huang Lijuan
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, 150086, China
| | - Sun Xueyuan
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, 150086, China
| | - Zang Yunhui
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, 150086, China
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Conte C, Fagotti A, Avesani G, Trombadori C, Federico A, D'Indinosante M, Giudice MT, Pelligra S, Lodoli C, Marchetti C, Ferrandina G, Scambia G, Gallotta V. Update on the secondary cytoreduction in platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer: a narrative review. ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE 2021; 9:510. [PMID: 33850907 PMCID: PMC8039681 DOI: 10.21037/atm-20-4690] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
The ovarian cancer recurrence occurs in 75% of patients with advanced FIGO stage, and its treatment is a challenge for the oncologist in gynecology. The standard treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer (ROC) usually includes intravenous chemotherapy according to platinum sensitivity. Furthermore, maintenance treatment with target therapies [e.g., anti-angiogenic drug or PARP inhibitors (PARPi)], should be provided if not precedently administrated. In this scenario, secondary cytoreductive surgery (SCS) remains a practical but controversial option for platinum-sensitive ROC (PSROC). So far, several retrospective series and a Cochrane meta-analysis had concluded that SCS could determine better survival outcomes in ROC with favorable prognostic characteristics, such as the presence of a single anatomical site of recurrence, or when patients are accurately selected for surgery based on complete resection’s predictive models. Recently, three randomized clinical trials (RCTs) investigated the role of SCS in PSROC patients selected with different criteria. All the three RCTs showed a significant statistical advantage in progression-free survival (PFS) in the SCS group, with an even more significant difference in patients with complete cytoreduction (about 7-month PFS increased). Data on overall survival (OS) are different in the two completed trials. The GOG213 study has documented a longer OS of PSROC patients who received chemotherapy alone compared to surgery plus chemotherapy. Contrarily, the DESKTOP III trial showed 7.7 months of increased OS in the surgery group vs. chemotherapy alone, with a more difference in the complete tumor cytoreduction (CTC) group (12 months). These RCTs thereby suggest that undergoing complete cytoreduction may not be the only key and that the disease biology may also matter. Few recent retrospective series investigated the role of SCS according to BRCA mutation status and the effect of SCS in patients receiving emerging PARPi. A consequence of the developments in SCS and knowledge of different molecular pathways influencing the recurrent disease is that the future research objective should be to individualize and personalize the surgical approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carmine Conte
- Department of Woman, Child and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.,Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Anna Fagotti
- Department of Woman, Child and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.,Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Giacomo Avesani
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Radiation Therapy and Haematology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Charlotte Trombadori
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Radiation Therapy and Haematology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Alex Federico
- Department of Woman, Child and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Marco D'Indinosante
- Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Maria Teresa Giudice
- Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Silvia Pelligra
- Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Claudio Lodoli
- Department of General Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Claudia Marchetti
- Department of Woman, Child and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Gabriella Ferrandina
- Department of Woman, Child and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.,Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Giovanni Scambia
- Department of Woman, Child and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.,Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Valerio Gallotta
- Department of Woman, Child and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Abstract
This article addresses the role of surgery in the management of gynecologic cancers with liver metastases. The authors review the short-term and long-term outcomes of aggressive resection through retrospective and randomized studies. Although the data supporting aggressive resection of liver metastasis are largely retrospective and case based, the randomized control data to address neoadjuvant versus chemotherapy have been widely criticized. Residual disease remains an important predictor for survival in ovarian cancer. If a patient cannot achieve near optimal cytoreduction, radical cytoreductive procedures, such as hepatic resection, should be considered for palliation only.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kiran H Clair
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of California, 333 City Boulevard West, Suite 1400, Orange, CA 92868, USA.
| | - Juliet Wolford
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of California, 333 City Boulevard West, Suite 1400, Orange, CA 92868, USA
| | - Jason A Zell
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California, 333 City Boulevard West, Suite 1400, Orange, CA 92868, USA
| | - Robert E Bristow
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California, 333 City Boulevard West, Suite 1400, Orange, CA 92868, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
O’Dwyer J, O’Cearbhaill RE, Wylie R, O’Mahony S, O’Dwyer M, Duffy GP, Dolan EB. Enhancing delivery of small molecule and cell-based therapies for ovarian cancer using advanced delivery strategies. ADVANCED THERAPEUTICS 2020; 3:2000144. [PMID: 33709016 PMCID: PMC7942751 DOI: 10.1002/adtp.202000144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Ovarian cancer is the most lethal gynecological malignancy with a global five-year survival rate of 30-50%. First-line treatment involves cytoreductive surgery and administration of platinum-based small molecules and paclitaxel. These therapies were traditionally administered via intravenous infusion, although intraperitoneal delivery has also been investigated. Initial clinical trials of intraperitoneal administration for ovarian cancer indicated significant improvements in overall survival compared to intravenous delivery, but this result is not consistent across all studies performed. Recently cell-based immunotherapy has been of interest for ovarian cancer. Direct intraperitoneal delivery of cell-based immunotherapies might prompt local immunoregulatory mechanisms to act synergistically with the delivered immunotherapy. Based on this theory, pre-clinical in vivo studies have delivered these cell-based immunotherapies via the intraperitoneal route, with promising results. However, successful intraperitoneal delivery of cell-based immunotherapy and clinical adoption of this technique will depend on overcoming challenges of intraperitoneal delivery and finding the optimal combinations of dose, therapeutic and delivery route. We review the potential advantages and disadvantages of intraperitoneal delivery of cell-based immunotherapy for ovarian cancer and the pre-clinical and clinical work performed so far. Potential advanced delivery strategies, which might improve the efficacy and adoption of intraperitoneal delivery of therapy for ovarian cancer, are also outlined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanne O’Dwyer
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Engineering, College of Science and Engineering, National University of Ireland Galway, Ireland; Anatomy & Regenerative Medicine Institute, School of Medicine, College of Medicine Nursing and Health Sciences, National University of Ireland Galway, Ireland
| | - Roisin E. O’Cearbhaill
- Anatomy & Regenerative Medicine Institute, School of Medicine, College of Medicine Nursing and Health Sciences, National University of Ireland Galway, Ireland; Department of Medical Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, New York, USA
| | - Robert Wylie
- Anatomy & Regenerative Medicine Institute, School of Medicine, College of Medicine Nursing and Health Sciences, National University of Ireland Galway, Ireland
| | - Saoirse O’Mahony
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Engineering, College of Science and Engineering, National University of Ireland Galway, Ireland
| | - Michael O’Dwyer
- Apoptosis Research Centre, National University of Ireland Galway, Ireland
| | - Garry P. Duffy
- Anatomy & Regenerative Medicine Institute, School of Medicine, College of Medicine Nursing and Health Sciences, National University of Ireland Galway, Ireland
| | - Eimear B. Dolan
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Engineering, College of Science and Engineering, National University of Ireland Galway, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Capozzi VA, Rosati A, Turco LC, Sozzi G, Riccò M, Chiofalo B, Vizzielli G. Surgery vs. chemotherapy for ovarian cancer recurrence: what is the best treatment option. Gland Surg 2020; 9:1112-1117. [PMID: 32953626 DOI: 10.21037/gs-20-326] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
Nowadays, the best treatment option for ovarian cancer recurrence is often subjective, can vary in the different centers and depend on personal experience. Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynaekologische Onkologie (AGO)-DESKTOP studies have identified a population of patients who could benefit from secondary surgery. The results of the Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG)-0213 study were recently published, which showed no advantage in terms of overall survival (OS) in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent epithelial ovarian undergoing secondary cytoreductive surgery (SCS) compared to chemotherapy alone. Aim of this narrative review is to summarize the best aspects that can make ovarian cancer recurrence patients suitable for SCS. A narrative review analyzing all the literature of the past 30 years has been performed. PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and Ovid MEDLINE were used for research. All non-English-language articles have been excluded. The following keywords were searched: 'recurrent ovarian cancer', 'secondary surgery', 'secondary cytoreductive surgery', 'platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer', 'platinum-resistant ovarian cancer'. We divided eligible patients for secondary cytoreduction in relation to the following factors: platinum-sensitivity, AGO-score or Tian model, unresectable lesions, surgical generic contraindication, woman's personal choice. The selection of truly suitable patients for surgery seems an essential requirement for the patient's best therapeutic choice. In case of absent post-surgical residual tumor, good performance status, single recurrence, and platinum-sensitive ovarian recurrence, surgery could be performed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Andrea Rosati
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS-Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Luigi Carlo Turco
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS-Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Giulio Sozzi
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Matteo Riccò
- AUSL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia-Department of Public Health, Service for Occupational Health and Safety on the Workplaces, Parma, Italy
| | - Benito Chiofalo
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Vizzielli
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS-Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Lucksom PG, Mathai S, Bhaumik J, Ghosh A. Evaluation of CA-125 as an Indicator of Imaging During Follow-up of Carcinoma Ovary: Original Research. J Obstet Gynaecol India 2020; 70:289-294. [PMID: 32764850 DOI: 10.1007/s13224-020-01321-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2019] [Accepted: 04/21/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Women with response to primary treatment for advanced ovarian cancer are said to have progression if CA125 increases more than double the upper normal limit (70 IU/L) on follow-up. It was, however, noted that large section of women with CA125 > 35 IU/L had disease on imaging. Objective To compare values of CA125 rise at which radiological recurrence can be detected. Methods This is a retrospective observational study where women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer who underwent interval debulking surgery and completed treatment at Tata Medical Center, Kolkata, India, from 2012 to 2016, and were followed up with Ca125. If CA125 doubled or exceeded 35 IU/L or increased to ≥ 70 IU/L, women were subjected to imaging. Results Among 142 women who underwent treatment, 64 women with response to primary treatment had recurrence. Recurrence was noted in two (3%) patients with doubling of Ca125 but ≤ 35 IU/, 18 (24%) patients with CA125 > 35 IU/L and 41 (64%) patients when CA125 was ≥ 70 IU/L. Three patients (5%) with normal CA125 had recurrence. Among the recurrence group, 45 women had R0 during surgery of which 27 (60%) had CA125 ≥ 70 IU/L and 14 (31%) had CA125 > 35 IU/L during recurrence. Sensitivity and specificity of value > 35 IU/L were 30.51% and 33.33%, respectively, with accuracy of 32.03%, while sensitivity and specificity at > 70 IU/L were 69.49% and 66.67%, respectively, with accuracy of 67.97%. Conclusion CA125 value of ≥ 70 IU/L is a better predictor of recurrence; however, imaging done when value rises > 35 IU/L would be able to detect significant recurrences early thus allowing early treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pesona Grace Lucksom
- Sikkim Manipal Institute of Medical Sciences, 5th Mile Tadong, East Sikkim, 737102 India.,Tata Medical Center, 14 MAR New Town, Rajarhat, Kolkata, 700156 India
| | - Sonia Mathai
- Tata Medical Center, 14 MAR New Town, Rajarhat, Kolkata, 700156 India
| | - Jaydip Bhaumik
- Tata Medical Center, 14 MAR New Town, Rajarhat, Kolkata, 700156 India
| | - Anik Ghosh
- Tata Medical Center, 14 MAR New Town, Rajarhat, Kolkata, 700156 India
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Cianci S, Riemma G, Ronsini C, De Franciscis P, Torella M, Schiattarella A, La Verde M, Colacurci N. Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for ovarian cancer recurrence: systematic review and meta-analysis. Gland Surg 2020; 9:1140-1148. [PMID: 32953629 DOI: 10.21037/gs-20-335] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
Background Ovarian cancer is the first cause of death among gynecological malignancies with a high incidence of recurrence. Different treatment options are suitable to prolong the survival rate of these patients. Over the last years, one of the most intriguing methods, adopted in different oncologic centers worldwide, is the hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Methods A meta-analysis was performed to value the role of HIPEC for ovarian cancer recurrence. Search strategy was conducted with a combination of the following keywords: "ovarian recurrence, ovarian cancer recurrence, peritoneal cancer recurrence, ovarian recurrence AND HIPEC, secondary cytoreduction HIPEC". Seven studies were selected for analysis. Results In women with recurrent ovarian cancer (ROC), the use of HIPEC in addition to cytoreductive surgery and chemotherapy significantly improved 1-year overall survival (OS) when compared to protocols without HIPEC (OR 2.42; 95% CI, 1.06-5.56; P=0.04; I2=4%). The improvement in OS was maintained significant also after 2, 3 and 5 years respectively (OR 3.33; 95% CI, 1.81-6.10; P<0.01; I2=0%), (OR 4.22; 95% CI, 2.07-8.60; P<0.01; I2=52%), (OR 5.17; 95% CI, 1.40-19.09; P=0.01; I2=82%). Conclusions HIPEC seems to have an effective role to prolong survival in patients affected by ROC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefano Cianci
- Department of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy
| | - Gaetano Riemma
- Department of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy
| | - Carlo Ronsini
- Gynecologic and Obstetrics Unit, Università "G. d'Annunzio", Chieti, Italy
| | - Pasquale De Franciscis
- Department of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy
| | - Marco Torella
- Department of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy
| | - Antonio Schiattarella
- Department of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy
| | - Marco La Verde
- Department of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy
| | - Nicola Colacurci
- Department of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Pei Y, Li K, Lou X, Wu Y, Dong X, Wang W, Li N, Zhang D, Cui W. miR‑1299/NOTCH3/TUG1 feedback loop contributes to the malignant proliferation of ovarian cancer. Oncol Rep 2020; 44:438-448. [PMID: 32468036 PMCID: PMC7336509 DOI: 10.3892/or.2020.7623] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2019] [Accepted: 04/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Recent studies have revealed the oncogenic role of notch reporter 3 (NOTCH3) in ovarian cancer (OC). However, the possible regulators and mechanisms underlying notch receptor 3 (NOTCH3)‑mediated behaviors in OC remain to be completely investigated. In the present study, we aimed to identify regulators of NOTCH3 and their interactions underlying the pathogenesis of OC. Bioinformatics analysis and luciferase reporter assay were used to identify potential regulatory miRNAs and lncRNAs of NOTCH3 in OC. Several in vivo and in vitro assays were performed to evaluate their effects on the proliferative ability mediated by NOTCH3. We identified microRNA‑1299 (miR‑1299) as a novel negative regulator of NOTCH3. miR‑1299 was downregulated in OC and was found to be considerably correlated with tumor differentiation. Upregulation of miR‑1299 inhibited cell proliferation, colony formation, and 5‑ethynyl‑2'‑deoxyuridine (EdU) incorporation, as well as induced cell cycle arrest in the G0G1 phase in OC cells. Overexpression of miR‑1299 in xenograft mouse models suppressed tumor growth in vivo. The lncRNA taurine upregulated gene 1 (TUG1), acting as a sponge of miR‑1299, was found to upregulate NOTCH3 expression and promote cell proliferation in OC through the competing endogenous RNA mechanism. In addition, TUG1 was found to be a potential downstream target of NOTCH3, forming a miR‑1299/NOTCH3/TUG1 feedback loop in the development of OC. Collectively, our findings improve the understanding of NOTCH3‑mediated regulation in OC pathogenesis and facilitate the development of miRNA‑ and lncRNA‑directed diagnostics and therapeutics against this disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuqing Pei
- State Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Department of Clinical Laboratory, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, P.R. China
| | - Kexin Li
- State Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Department of Clinical Laboratory, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, P.R. China
| | - Xiaoying Lou
- State Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Department of Clinical Laboratory, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, P.R. China
| | - Yue Wu
- State Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Department of Clinical Laboratory, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, P.R. China
| | - Xin Dong
- State Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Department of Clinical Laboratory, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, P.R. China
| | - Wenpeng Wang
- Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin 300060, P.R. China
| | - Ning Li
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, P.R. China
| | - Donghong Zhang
- Center for Molecular and Translational Medicine, Research Science Center, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA
| | - Wei Cui
- State Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Department of Clinical Laboratory, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, P.R. China
- Correspondence to: Professor Wei Cui, State Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Department of Clinical Laboratory, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, 17 Panjiayuannanli Road, Chaoyang, Beijing 100021, P.R. China, E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
So M, Miyamoto T, Murakami R, Abiko K, Hamanishi J, Baba T, Mandai M. The efficacy of secondary cytoreductive surgery for recurrent ovarian, tubal, or peritoneal cancer in Tian-model low-risk patients. J Gynecol Oncol 2020; 30:e100. [PMID: 31576692 PMCID: PMC6779625 DOI: 10.3802/jgo.2019.30.e100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2019] [Revised: 04/30/2019] [Accepted: 05/27/2019] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective In patients with recurrent ovarian cancer (ROC) in whom surgery is likely to render them disease-free, it is unclear whether secondary cytoreductive surgery (SCS) combined with chemotherapy is superior to chemotherapy alone. The aim of this study was to evaluate the 2 treatment options in Tian-model low-risk patients. Methods We retrospectively reviewed 118 ROC cases treated in our hospital between 2004 and 2016. Of these, 52 platinum-sensitive cases were classified as low-risk (complete resection anticipated) using the Tian model. Prognostic factors were assessed with univariate and multivariate analysis using Cox's regression model. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared in patients treated with SCS plus chemotherapy (SCS group) and those treated with chemotherapy alone (chemotherapy group), using a propensity-score-based matching method. Results By multivariate analysis, the only factor associated with better OS was SCS. PFS and OS were significantly longer in the SCS group compared to the chemotherapy group in the matched cohort (median PFS: 21.7 vs. 15.1 months, p=0.027 and median OS: 91.4 vs. 33.4 months, p=0.008, respectively). In cases with multiple-site recurrence, the SCS group also showed significantly longer OS than the chemotherapy group (median 91.4 vs. 34.8 months, p=0.022). In almost all SCS cases, cooperation was required from other departments, and operation time was lengthy (median 323 minutes); however, no serious complications occurred. Conclusion SCS combined with chemotherapy results in better PFS and OS than chemotherapy alone in first platinum-sensitive ROC patients categorized as low-risk by Tian's model.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Makiko So
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Taito Miyamoto
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
| | - Ryusuke Murakami
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Kaoru Abiko
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Junzo Hamanishi
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Tsukasa Baba
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Iwate Medical University Faculty of Medicine, Morioka, Japan
| | - Masaki Mandai
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Bhatt A, Bakrin N, Gertych W, Kammar P, Parikh L, Sheth S, Shaikh S, Devouassoux-Shisheboran M, Glehen O. Extent and distribution of peritoneal disease in patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery for first platinum sensitive recurrence in ovarian cancer and its potential therapeutic implications. Eur J Surg Oncol 2020; 46:2276-2282. [PMID: 32600895 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.05.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2020] [Revised: 05/22/2020] [Accepted: 05/29/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Selected patients with platinum sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer may benefit from cytoreductive surgery (CRS). The aim was to study the pattern of peritoneal involvement in these patients that has not been done before. METHODS A comparison was made between the surgical and pathological findings in 60 patients undergoing salvage CRS from July 2018 to December 2019. The sites of residual disease, correlation with surgical and pathological peritoneal cancer index (PCI), small bowel involvement and regional lymph node involvement were studied. RESULTS Fifty-eight (96.6%) had serous carcinoma and 2 (3.4%) clear cell carcinoma. The median surgical PCI (sPCI) was 7 [range 0-27] and median pathological PCI (pPCI) 4 [range 0-21]. CC-0 resection was performed in 81.6%. The upper regions (region 1,2,3) were the commonest sites of residual disease (63.3%) followed by lower regions (region 5,6,7) in 55.0%, middle regions (regions 0,4,8) in 53.3% and small bowel regions (regions 9-12) in 26.6%. Small bowel involvement was associated with a higher sPCI and pPCI (p < 0.001 for both). Regional nodes were involved in 46.6%. A pathological complete response was seen in 8 (13.3%) patients of which 2 had residual disease in regional nodes. Microscopic disease in 'normal appearing' peritoneum was seen in 21%. CONCLUSIONS The parietal peritoneum was the commonest site of recurrence. Small bowel involvement occurred late and was associated with more extensive disease. Regional lymph node involvement was seen nearly 50% and was a common site for occult disease. The role of more extensive parietal peritoneal resection for recurrent disease should be evaluated prospectively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aditi Bhatt
- Dept. of Surgical Oncology, Zydus Hospital, Ahmedabad, India
| | - Naoual Bakrin
- Dept. of Surgical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Lyon-Sud, Lyon, France
| | - Witold Gertych
- Dept. of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Centre Hospitalier Lyon-Sud, Lyon, France
| | | | - Loma Parikh
- Dept. of Pathology, Zydus Hospital, Ahmedabad, India
| | - Sandeep Sheth
- Dept. of Pathology, Zydus Hospital, Ahmedabad, India
| | - Sakina Shaikh
- Dept. of Surgical Oncology, Zydus Hospital, Ahmedabad, India
| | | | - Olivier Glehen
- Dept. of Surgical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Lyon-Sud, Lyon, France.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Gu H, Zhou R, Ni J, Xu X, Cheng X, Li Y, Chen X. The value of secondary neoadjuvant chemotherapy in platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer: a case-control study post GOG-0213 trial. J Ovarian Res 2020; 13:70. [PMID: 32546257 PMCID: PMC7298741 DOI: 10.1186/s13048-020-00673-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2019] [Accepted: 06/08/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The prognostic value and optimal resection outcome related factors of the secondary cytoreduction surgery (SCR) in Platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer (PSOC) patients were still in doubt. The present retrospective study aims to determine the relationship between the objective response of secondary neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (SNAC) and the resection outcome of SCR. METHODS Data were reviewed from 142 type II PSOCs who underwent SCR in Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research between 1996 and 2016. Among them, 55 cases received preliminary Platinum based SNAC before SCR. Logistic regression analysis was used to explore optimal SCR related factors. Cox proportional hazards model and log-rank test were used to assess the associations between the survival durations and covariates. RESULTS Optimal initial CRS (p = 0.02), disappearance of ascites after SNAC (p = 0.04) recurrent status (p = 0.02) and longer Platinum-free interval (p = 0.01) were the independent indicators of optimal SCR. Optimal SCR was associated with time to progression (TTP) but not overall survival (OS) (p = 0.04 and p = 0.41). The TTP and OS of PSOCs underwent SNAC were similar to those patients underwent SCR (p = 0.71, and p = 0.77, respectively) directly. CONCLUSIONS SNAC might be another choice for PSOCs were not suitable for directly SCR. Optimal SCR had survival benefit in PSOCs whenever underwent SNAC or not.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hongyuan Gu
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital, Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research, Nanjing, 210009, Jiangsu, P.R. China.,Nanjing Gaochun People's Hospital, Nanjing, 211300, Jiangsu, P.R. China
| | - Rui Zhou
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital, Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research, Nanjing, 210009, Jiangsu, P.R. China
| | - Jing Ni
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital, Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research, Nanjing, 210009, Jiangsu, P.R. China
| | - Xia Xu
- Department of Chemotherapy, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital, Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research, Nanjing, 210009, Jiangsu, P.R. China
| | - Xianzhong Cheng
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital, Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research, Nanjing, 210009, Jiangsu, P.R. China
| | - Yan Li
- The Medical College of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, P.R. China
| | - Xiaoxiang Chen
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital, Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research, Nanjing, 210009, Jiangsu, P.R. China.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Høgdall E, Høgdall C, Vo T, Zhou W, Huang L, Marton M, Keefe SM, Busch-Sørensen M, Sørensen SM, Georgsen J, Mejlgaard E, Nedergaard L, Steiniche T. Impact of PD-L1 and T-cell inflamed gene expression profile on survival in advanced ovarian cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2020; 30:1034-1042. [PMID: 32527769 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2019-001109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2019] [Revised: 04/16/2020] [Accepted: 04/23/2020] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression affects tumor evasion of immune surveillance. The prognostic value and relationship of PD-L1 expression to T-cell-inflamed immune signatures in ovarian cancer are unclear. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of PD-L1 on overall survival and its correlation with an immune-mediated gene expression profile in patients with advanced ovarian cancer. METHODS PD-L1 expression in tumor and immune cells was assessed by immunohistochemistry, and PD-L1-positive expression was defined as a combined positive score ≥1; a T-cell-inflamed gene expression profile containing interferon γ response genes was evaluated using extracted RNA from surgical samples. Associations between PD-L1 expression, gene expression profile status, and overall survival were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test, and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression models. RESULTS A total of 376 patients with advanced epithelial ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer treated by cytoreductive surgery and platinum-based therapy were included. PD-L1-positive expression was observed in 50.5% of patients and associated with more advanced stage (p=0.047), more aggressive histologic subtype (p=0.001), and platinum sensitivity defined by increasing treatment-free interval from first platinum-based chemotherapy to next systemic treatment (p=0.027). PD-L1-positive expression was associated with longer overall survival in multivariate analyses (adjusted HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.56 to 0.93). In subgroup analyses, this association was most pronounced in patients with partially platinum-sensitive disease (treatment-free interval ≥6 to <12 months). T-cell-inflamed gene expression profile status correlated with PD-L1 expression (Spearman, ρ=0.712) but was not an independent predictor of overall survival. CONCLUSION PD-L1 expression is associated with longer overall survival among advanced ovarian cancer patients. PD-L1 expression may be an independent prognostic biomarker.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Estrid Høgdall
- Department of Pathology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Claus Høgdall
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Thao Vo
- Merck & Co., Inc, Kenilworth, New Jersey, USA
| | - Wei Zhou
- Merck & Co., Inc, Kenilworth, New Jersey, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Sarah M Sørensen
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Jeanette Georgsen
- Department of Pathology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Else Mejlgaard
- Department of Pathology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Lotte Nedergaard
- Department of Pathology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Torben Steiniche
- Department of Pathology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Zang R, Zhu J. Which patients benefit from secondary cytoreductive surgery in recurrent ovarian cancer? J Gynecol Oncol 2019; 30:e116. [PMID: 31576701 PMCID: PMC6779624 DOI: 10.3802/jgo.2019.30.e116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2019] [Accepted: 08/30/2019] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Rongyu Zang
- Ovarian Cancer Program, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fudan University Zhongshan Hospital, Shanghai, China.
| | - Jianqing Zhu
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, University Cancer Hospital of Chinese Science Academy, Hangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Gockley A, Melamed A, Cronin A, Bookman MA, Burger RA, Cristae MC, Griggs JJ, Mantia-Smaldone G, Matulonis UA, Meyer LA, Niland J, O'Malley DM, Wright AA. Outcomes of secondary cytoreductive surgery for patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2019; 221:625.e1-625.e14. [PMID: 31207237 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.06.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2019] [Revised: 06/06/2019] [Accepted: 06/10/2019] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Most women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer develop recurrent disease, despite maximal surgical cytoreduction and adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy. In observational studies, secondary cytoreductive surgery has been associated with improved survival; however its use is controversial, because there are concerns that the improved outcomes may reflect selection bias rather than the superiority of secondary surgery. OBJECTIVE To compare the overall survival of women with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer treated at National Cancer Institute-designated cancer centers who receive secondary surgery vs chemotherapy. STUDY DESIGN This retrospective cohort study included women from 6 National Cancer Institute-designated cancer centers diagnosed with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer between January 1, 2004, and December 31, 2011. The primary outcome was overall survival. Propensity score matching was used to compare similar women who received secondary surgery vs chemotherapy. Additional analyses examined how these findings may be influenced by the prevalence of unobserved confounders at the time of recurrence. RESULTS Among 626 women, 146 (23%) received secondary surgery and 480 (77%) received chemotherapy. In adjusted analyses, patients who received secondary surgery were younger (P = 0.001), had earlier-stage disease at diagnosis (P = 0.002), and had longer disease-free intervals (P < 0.001) compared with those receiving chemotherapy. In the propensity score-matched groups (n = 244 patients), the median overall survival was 54 months in patients who received secondary surgery and 33 months in those treated with chemotherapy (P < 0.001). Among patients who received secondary surgery, 102 (70%) achieved optimal secondary cytoreduction. There were no significant differences in complication rates between the 2 groups. In sensitivity analyses, the survival advantage associated with secondary surgery could be explained by the presence of more multifocal recurrences (if 4.3 times more common), ascites (if 2.7 times more common), or carcinomatosis (if 2.1 times more common) among patients who received chemotherapy instead of secondary surgery. CONCLUSION Patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer who received secondary surgery had favorable surgical characteristics and were likely to have minimal residual disease following secondary surgery. These patients had a superior median overall survival compared with patients who received chemotherapy, although unmeasured confounders may explain this observed difference.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allison Gockley
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.
| | - Alexander Melamed
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Angel Cronin
- Division of Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Michael A Bookman
- Division of Medical Oncology, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, San Francisco, CA
| | - Robert A Burger
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | - Jennifer J Griggs
- Department of Health Management and Policy, Division of Internal Medicine, Hematology and Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Gina Mantia-Smaldone
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Ursula A Matulonis
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Susan F. Smith Center for Women's Cancers, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Larissa A Meyer
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, Division of Surgery, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Joyce Niland
- City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA
| | - David M O'Malley
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH
| | - Alexi A Wright
- Division of Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Susan F. Smith Center for Women's Cancers, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
The Role of Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Gynecological Malignancies. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2019; 43:825-834. [PMID: 31453978 DOI: 10.1097/rct.0000000000000918] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Accurate oncological staging for early detection is of utmost importance in patient care and increasing the overall patient survival outcome. Hybrid imaging in the form of positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography has been successfully implemented in oncological imaging and, where available, has been used consistently in patients with gynecologic malignancies. The implementation of PET/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) enables high-quality assessment of gynecological malignancies by combining the diagnostic advantages of metabolic information of PET along with the high-resolution anatomical and functional information from the MRI to provide precise information about staging, recurrence, and metastases. This article will review the various applications of PET/MRI in gynecological cancer.
Collapse
|
34
|
Jennifer A, Iptissem N, Aurélie R, Philippe K, Marc AJ. The place of secondary complete cytoreductive surgery in advanced ovarian cancer. Horm Mol Biol Clin Investig 2019; 41:hmbci-2019-0030. [PMID: 31782948 DOI: 10.1515/hmbci-2019-0030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2019] [Accepted: 08/15/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Despite optimal treatment, three-quarters of the patients with advanced ovarian cancer, experiment relapse and its treatment has become a public health issue. Initially debated, surgery is gaining legitimacy in the treatment of late relapse patients, compared to chemotherapy alone. Secondary complete cytoreduction should be proposed only to a highly selected population. The type of surgery depends on the recurrence localization and the relapse extension in the pelvis and to other organs. Innovating techniques of surgery have become widespread including heated intra peritoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), laparoscopy and robotic surgery. These specialized treatments should only be carried out in reference centers by oncological surgeons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Asmar Jennifer
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Foch Hospital, 40 Rue Worth, 92150 Suresnes, France
| | - Naoura Iptissem
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Foch Hospital, 40 Rue Worth, 92150 Suresnes, France
| | - Revaux Aurélie
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Foch Hospital, 40 Rue Worth, 92150 Suresnes, France
| | - Kadhel Philippe
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Foch Hospital, 40 Rue Worth, 92150 Suresnes, France.,CHU de Pointe-à-Pitre, Univ Antilles, Univ Rennes, Inserm, EHESP, Irset (Institut de Recherche en Santé, Environnement et Travail) - UMR_S 1085, Pointe-à-Pitre, France
| | - Ayoubi Jean Marc
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Foch Hospital, 40 Rue Worth, 92150 Suresnes, France
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Spiliotis JD, Iavazzo C, Kopanakis ND, Christopoulou A. Secondary debulking for ovarian carcinoma relapse: The R-R dilemma – is the prognosis different for residual or recurrent disease? J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc 2019; 20:213-217. [PMID: 31362486 PMCID: PMC6883755 DOI: 10.4274/jtgga.galenos.2019.2018.0165] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To analyze the kind of ovarian cancer relapse by separating residual from recurrent disease and correlating them with patient survival. MATERIAL AND METHODS This was a retrospective study of 200 women with ovarian carcinoma relapse between 2005 and 2017. RESULTS The main sites of residual disease included the great omentum, epiploic appendices, liver round ligament, gallbladder, and cervical/vaginal stump. The median survival for women with residual disease treated with cytoreductive surgery (CRS) + hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) + systemic chemotherapy was 38 months compared with the control group, which reached 23.8 months. The morbidity rates were 18% vs 7%, respectively, and the mortality rates were 2.5% vs 1.3%. The main sites of recurrent disease included the mesenterium, pelvic floor, diaphragm, and Glisson’s capsule. Women with recurrent disease treated with CRS + HIPEC + systemic chemotherapy had median survival rates of 26 months vs 16 months in the control group. The morbidity rates were 22% vs 15%, respectively, and the mortality rates were 3.3% vs 0%. CONCLUSION Patients undergoing secondary debulking plus HIPEC for ovarian carcinoma relapse have a different prognosis when compared with patients with residual and recurrent disease. A different prognosis is presented in women undergoing secondary debulking plus HIPEC for ovarian carcinoma relapse when comparing patients with residual and recurrent disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John D. Spiliotis
- Department of Surgical Oncology and HIPEC, Athens Medical Centre, Athens, Greece
- Department of Surgical Oncology and HIPEC, European Interbalkan Medical Centre, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Christos Iavazzo
- Clinic of Gynecological Oncology, Metaxa Cancer Hospital, Piraeus, Greece
- * Address for Correspondence: E-mail:
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Coleman RL, Spirtos NM, Enserro D, Herzog TJ, Sabbatini P, Armstrong DK, Kim JW, Park SY, Kim BG, Nam JH, Fujiwara K, Walker JL, Casey AC, Alvarez Secord A, Rubin S, Chan JK, DiSilvestro P, Davidson SA, Cohn DE, Tewari KS, Basen-Engquist K, Huang HQ, Brady MF, Mannel RS. Secondary Surgical Cytoreduction for Recurrent Ovarian Cancer. N Engl J Med 2019; 381:1929-1939. [PMID: 31722153 PMCID: PMC6941470 DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa1902626] [Citation(s) in RCA: 186] [Impact Index Per Article: 37.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Secondary surgical cytoreduction in women with platinum-sensitive, recurrent epithelial ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopian-tube ("ovarian") cancer is widely practiced but has not been evaluated in phase 3 investigation. METHODS We randomly assigned patients with recurrent ovarian cancer who had received one previous therapy, had an interval during which no platinum-based chemotherapy was used (platinum-free interval) of 6 months or more, and had investigator-determined resectable disease (to no macroscopic residual disease) to undergo secondary surgical cytoreduction and then receive platinum-based chemotherapy or to receive platinum-based chemotherapy alone. Adjuvant chemotherapy (paclitaxel-carboplatin or gemcitabine-carboplatin) and use of bevacizumab were at the discretion of the investigator. The primary end point was overall survival. RESULTS A total of 485 patients underwent randomization, 240 to secondary cytoreduction before chemotherapy and 245 to chemotherapy alone. The median follow-up was 48.1 months. Complete gross resection was achieved in 67% of the patients assigned to surgery who underwent the procedure. Platinum-based chemotherapy with bevacizumab followed by bevacizumab maintenance was administered to 84% of the patients overall and was equally distributed between the two groups. The hazard ratio for death (surgery vs. no surgery) was 1.29 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.97 to 1.72; P = 0.08), which corresponded to a median overall survival of 50.6 months and 64.7 months, respectively. Adjustment for platinum-free interval and chemotherapy choice did not alter the effect. The hazard ratio for disease progression or death (surgery vs. no surgery) was 0.82 (95% CI, 0.66 to 1.01; median progression-free survival, 18.9 months and 16.2 months, respectively). Surgical morbidity at 30 days was 9%; 1 patient (0.4%) died from postoperative complications. Patient-reported quality of life decreased significantly after surgery but did not differ significantly between the two groups after recovery. CONCLUSIONS In this trial involving patients with platinum-sensitive, recurrent ovarian cancer, secondary surgical cytoreduction followed by chemotherapy did not result in longer overall survival than chemotherapy alone. (Funded by the National Cancer Institute and others; GOG-0213 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00565851.).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert L Coleman
- From the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (R.L.C., K.B.-E.); Women's Cancer Center of Nevada, Las Vegas (N.M.S.); NRG Oncology Statistical and Data Management Center, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo (D.E., H.Q.H., M.F.B.), and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York (P.S.) - both in New York; the University of Cincinnati, University of Cincinnati Cancer Institute, Cincinnati (T.J.H.); the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore (D.K.A.); Seoul National University College of Medicine (J.-W.K.), Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine (B.-G.K.), and Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine (J.-H.N.), Seoul, and the Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang (S.-Y.P.) - all in South Korea; Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Hidaka, Japan (K.F.); the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City (J.L.W., R.S.M.); National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project/NRG Oncology, U.S. Oncology Research, and Metro-Minnesota Community Oncology Research Consortium, Minneapolis (A.C.C.); Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (A.A.S.); Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (S.R.); Gynecologic Cancer Program, California Pacific-Palo Alto Medical Foundation, Sutter Research Institute, San Francisco (J.K.C.); Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI (P.D.); the University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, and Denver Health Medical Center, Denver (S.A.D.); Ohio State University, Columbus (D.E.C.); and the University of California, Irvine, Orange (K.S.T.)
| | - Nick M Spirtos
- From the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (R.L.C., K.B.-E.); Women's Cancer Center of Nevada, Las Vegas (N.M.S.); NRG Oncology Statistical and Data Management Center, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo (D.E., H.Q.H., M.F.B.), and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York (P.S.) - both in New York; the University of Cincinnati, University of Cincinnati Cancer Institute, Cincinnati (T.J.H.); the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore (D.K.A.); Seoul National University College of Medicine (J.-W.K.), Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine (B.-G.K.), and Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine (J.-H.N.), Seoul, and the Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang (S.-Y.P.) - all in South Korea; Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Hidaka, Japan (K.F.); the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City (J.L.W., R.S.M.); National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project/NRG Oncology, U.S. Oncology Research, and Metro-Minnesota Community Oncology Research Consortium, Minneapolis (A.C.C.); Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (A.A.S.); Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (S.R.); Gynecologic Cancer Program, California Pacific-Palo Alto Medical Foundation, Sutter Research Institute, San Francisco (J.K.C.); Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI (P.D.); the University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, and Denver Health Medical Center, Denver (S.A.D.); Ohio State University, Columbus (D.E.C.); and the University of California, Irvine, Orange (K.S.T.)
| | - Danielle Enserro
- From the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (R.L.C., K.B.-E.); Women's Cancer Center of Nevada, Las Vegas (N.M.S.); NRG Oncology Statistical and Data Management Center, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo (D.E., H.Q.H., M.F.B.), and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York (P.S.) - both in New York; the University of Cincinnati, University of Cincinnati Cancer Institute, Cincinnati (T.J.H.); the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore (D.K.A.); Seoul National University College of Medicine (J.-W.K.), Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine (B.-G.K.), and Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine (J.-H.N.), Seoul, and the Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang (S.-Y.P.) - all in South Korea; Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Hidaka, Japan (K.F.); the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City (J.L.W., R.S.M.); National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project/NRG Oncology, U.S. Oncology Research, and Metro-Minnesota Community Oncology Research Consortium, Minneapolis (A.C.C.); Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (A.A.S.); Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (S.R.); Gynecologic Cancer Program, California Pacific-Palo Alto Medical Foundation, Sutter Research Institute, San Francisco (J.K.C.); Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI (P.D.); the University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, and Denver Health Medical Center, Denver (S.A.D.); Ohio State University, Columbus (D.E.C.); and the University of California, Irvine, Orange (K.S.T.)
| | - Thomas J Herzog
- From the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (R.L.C., K.B.-E.); Women's Cancer Center of Nevada, Las Vegas (N.M.S.); NRG Oncology Statistical and Data Management Center, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo (D.E., H.Q.H., M.F.B.), and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York (P.S.) - both in New York; the University of Cincinnati, University of Cincinnati Cancer Institute, Cincinnati (T.J.H.); the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore (D.K.A.); Seoul National University College of Medicine (J.-W.K.), Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine (B.-G.K.), and Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine (J.-H.N.), Seoul, and the Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang (S.-Y.P.) - all in South Korea; Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Hidaka, Japan (K.F.); the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City (J.L.W., R.S.M.); National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project/NRG Oncology, U.S. Oncology Research, and Metro-Minnesota Community Oncology Research Consortium, Minneapolis (A.C.C.); Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (A.A.S.); Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (S.R.); Gynecologic Cancer Program, California Pacific-Palo Alto Medical Foundation, Sutter Research Institute, San Francisco (J.K.C.); Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI (P.D.); the University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, and Denver Health Medical Center, Denver (S.A.D.); Ohio State University, Columbus (D.E.C.); and the University of California, Irvine, Orange (K.S.T.)
| | - Paul Sabbatini
- From the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (R.L.C., K.B.-E.); Women's Cancer Center of Nevada, Las Vegas (N.M.S.); NRG Oncology Statistical and Data Management Center, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo (D.E., H.Q.H., M.F.B.), and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York (P.S.) - both in New York; the University of Cincinnati, University of Cincinnati Cancer Institute, Cincinnati (T.J.H.); the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore (D.K.A.); Seoul National University College of Medicine (J.-W.K.), Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine (B.-G.K.), and Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine (J.-H.N.), Seoul, and the Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang (S.-Y.P.) - all in South Korea; Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Hidaka, Japan (K.F.); the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City (J.L.W., R.S.M.); National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project/NRG Oncology, U.S. Oncology Research, and Metro-Minnesota Community Oncology Research Consortium, Minneapolis (A.C.C.); Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (A.A.S.); Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (S.R.); Gynecologic Cancer Program, California Pacific-Palo Alto Medical Foundation, Sutter Research Institute, San Francisco (J.K.C.); Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI (P.D.); the University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, and Denver Health Medical Center, Denver (S.A.D.); Ohio State University, Columbus (D.E.C.); and the University of California, Irvine, Orange (K.S.T.)
| | - Deborah K Armstrong
- From the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (R.L.C., K.B.-E.); Women's Cancer Center of Nevada, Las Vegas (N.M.S.); NRG Oncology Statistical and Data Management Center, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo (D.E., H.Q.H., M.F.B.), and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York (P.S.) - both in New York; the University of Cincinnati, University of Cincinnati Cancer Institute, Cincinnati (T.J.H.); the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore (D.K.A.); Seoul National University College of Medicine (J.-W.K.), Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine (B.-G.K.), and Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine (J.-H.N.), Seoul, and the Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang (S.-Y.P.) - all in South Korea; Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Hidaka, Japan (K.F.); the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City (J.L.W., R.S.M.); National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project/NRG Oncology, U.S. Oncology Research, and Metro-Minnesota Community Oncology Research Consortium, Minneapolis (A.C.C.); Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (A.A.S.); Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (S.R.); Gynecologic Cancer Program, California Pacific-Palo Alto Medical Foundation, Sutter Research Institute, San Francisco (J.K.C.); Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI (P.D.); the University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, and Denver Health Medical Center, Denver (S.A.D.); Ohio State University, Columbus (D.E.C.); and the University of California, Irvine, Orange (K.S.T.)
| | - Jae-Weon Kim
- From the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (R.L.C., K.B.-E.); Women's Cancer Center of Nevada, Las Vegas (N.M.S.); NRG Oncology Statistical and Data Management Center, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo (D.E., H.Q.H., M.F.B.), and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York (P.S.) - both in New York; the University of Cincinnati, University of Cincinnati Cancer Institute, Cincinnati (T.J.H.); the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore (D.K.A.); Seoul National University College of Medicine (J.-W.K.), Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine (B.-G.K.), and Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine (J.-H.N.), Seoul, and the Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang (S.-Y.P.) - all in South Korea; Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Hidaka, Japan (K.F.); the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City (J.L.W., R.S.M.); National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project/NRG Oncology, U.S. Oncology Research, and Metro-Minnesota Community Oncology Research Consortium, Minneapolis (A.C.C.); Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (A.A.S.); Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (S.R.); Gynecologic Cancer Program, California Pacific-Palo Alto Medical Foundation, Sutter Research Institute, San Francisco (J.K.C.); Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI (P.D.); the University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, and Denver Health Medical Center, Denver (S.A.D.); Ohio State University, Columbus (D.E.C.); and the University of California, Irvine, Orange (K.S.T.)
| | - Sang-Yoon Park
- From the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (R.L.C., K.B.-E.); Women's Cancer Center of Nevada, Las Vegas (N.M.S.); NRG Oncology Statistical and Data Management Center, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo (D.E., H.Q.H., M.F.B.), and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York (P.S.) - both in New York; the University of Cincinnati, University of Cincinnati Cancer Institute, Cincinnati (T.J.H.); the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore (D.K.A.); Seoul National University College of Medicine (J.-W.K.), Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine (B.-G.K.), and Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine (J.-H.N.), Seoul, and the Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang (S.-Y.P.) - all in South Korea; Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Hidaka, Japan (K.F.); the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City (J.L.W., R.S.M.); National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project/NRG Oncology, U.S. Oncology Research, and Metro-Minnesota Community Oncology Research Consortium, Minneapolis (A.C.C.); Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (A.A.S.); Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (S.R.); Gynecologic Cancer Program, California Pacific-Palo Alto Medical Foundation, Sutter Research Institute, San Francisco (J.K.C.); Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI (P.D.); the University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, and Denver Health Medical Center, Denver (S.A.D.); Ohio State University, Columbus (D.E.C.); and the University of California, Irvine, Orange (K.S.T.)
| | - Byoung-Gie Kim
- From the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (R.L.C., K.B.-E.); Women's Cancer Center of Nevada, Las Vegas (N.M.S.); NRG Oncology Statistical and Data Management Center, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo (D.E., H.Q.H., M.F.B.), and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York (P.S.) - both in New York; the University of Cincinnati, University of Cincinnati Cancer Institute, Cincinnati (T.J.H.); the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore (D.K.A.); Seoul National University College of Medicine (J.-W.K.), Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine (B.-G.K.), and Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine (J.-H.N.), Seoul, and the Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang (S.-Y.P.) - all in South Korea; Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Hidaka, Japan (K.F.); the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City (J.L.W., R.S.M.); National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project/NRG Oncology, U.S. Oncology Research, and Metro-Minnesota Community Oncology Research Consortium, Minneapolis (A.C.C.); Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (A.A.S.); Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (S.R.); Gynecologic Cancer Program, California Pacific-Palo Alto Medical Foundation, Sutter Research Institute, San Francisco (J.K.C.); Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI (P.D.); the University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, and Denver Health Medical Center, Denver (S.A.D.); Ohio State University, Columbus (D.E.C.); and the University of California, Irvine, Orange (K.S.T.)
| | - Joo-Hyun Nam
- From the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (R.L.C., K.B.-E.); Women's Cancer Center of Nevada, Las Vegas (N.M.S.); NRG Oncology Statistical and Data Management Center, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo (D.E., H.Q.H., M.F.B.), and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York (P.S.) - both in New York; the University of Cincinnati, University of Cincinnati Cancer Institute, Cincinnati (T.J.H.); the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore (D.K.A.); Seoul National University College of Medicine (J.-W.K.), Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine (B.-G.K.), and Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine (J.-H.N.), Seoul, and the Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang (S.-Y.P.) - all in South Korea; Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Hidaka, Japan (K.F.); the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City (J.L.W., R.S.M.); National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project/NRG Oncology, U.S. Oncology Research, and Metro-Minnesota Community Oncology Research Consortium, Minneapolis (A.C.C.); Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (A.A.S.); Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (S.R.); Gynecologic Cancer Program, California Pacific-Palo Alto Medical Foundation, Sutter Research Institute, San Francisco (J.K.C.); Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI (P.D.); the University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, and Denver Health Medical Center, Denver (S.A.D.); Ohio State University, Columbus (D.E.C.); and the University of California, Irvine, Orange (K.S.T.)
| | - Keiichi Fujiwara
- From the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (R.L.C., K.B.-E.); Women's Cancer Center of Nevada, Las Vegas (N.M.S.); NRG Oncology Statistical and Data Management Center, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo (D.E., H.Q.H., M.F.B.), and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York (P.S.) - both in New York; the University of Cincinnati, University of Cincinnati Cancer Institute, Cincinnati (T.J.H.); the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore (D.K.A.); Seoul National University College of Medicine (J.-W.K.), Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine (B.-G.K.), and Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine (J.-H.N.), Seoul, and the Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang (S.-Y.P.) - all in South Korea; Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Hidaka, Japan (K.F.); the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City (J.L.W., R.S.M.); National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project/NRG Oncology, U.S. Oncology Research, and Metro-Minnesota Community Oncology Research Consortium, Minneapolis (A.C.C.); Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (A.A.S.); Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (S.R.); Gynecologic Cancer Program, California Pacific-Palo Alto Medical Foundation, Sutter Research Institute, San Francisco (J.K.C.); Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI (P.D.); the University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, and Denver Health Medical Center, Denver (S.A.D.); Ohio State University, Columbus (D.E.C.); and the University of California, Irvine, Orange (K.S.T.)
| | - Joan L Walker
- From the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (R.L.C., K.B.-E.); Women's Cancer Center of Nevada, Las Vegas (N.M.S.); NRG Oncology Statistical and Data Management Center, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo (D.E., H.Q.H., M.F.B.), and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York (P.S.) - both in New York; the University of Cincinnati, University of Cincinnati Cancer Institute, Cincinnati (T.J.H.); the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore (D.K.A.); Seoul National University College of Medicine (J.-W.K.), Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine (B.-G.K.), and Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine (J.-H.N.), Seoul, and the Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang (S.-Y.P.) - all in South Korea; Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Hidaka, Japan (K.F.); the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City (J.L.W., R.S.M.); National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project/NRG Oncology, U.S. Oncology Research, and Metro-Minnesota Community Oncology Research Consortium, Minneapolis (A.C.C.); Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (A.A.S.); Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (S.R.); Gynecologic Cancer Program, California Pacific-Palo Alto Medical Foundation, Sutter Research Institute, San Francisco (J.K.C.); Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI (P.D.); the University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, and Denver Health Medical Center, Denver (S.A.D.); Ohio State University, Columbus (D.E.C.); and the University of California, Irvine, Orange (K.S.T.)
| | - Ann C Casey
- From the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (R.L.C., K.B.-E.); Women's Cancer Center of Nevada, Las Vegas (N.M.S.); NRG Oncology Statistical and Data Management Center, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo (D.E., H.Q.H., M.F.B.), and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York (P.S.) - both in New York; the University of Cincinnati, University of Cincinnati Cancer Institute, Cincinnati (T.J.H.); the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore (D.K.A.); Seoul National University College of Medicine (J.-W.K.), Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine (B.-G.K.), and Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine (J.-H.N.), Seoul, and the Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang (S.-Y.P.) - all in South Korea; Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Hidaka, Japan (K.F.); the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City (J.L.W., R.S.M.); National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project/NRG Oncology, U.S. Oncology Research, and Metro-Minnesota Community Oncology Research Consortium, Minneapolis (A.C.C.); Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (A.A.S.); Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (S.R.); Gynecologic Cancer Program, California Pacific-Palo Alto Medical Foundation, Sutter Research Institute, San Francisco (J.K.C.); Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI (P.D.); the University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, and Denver Health Medical Center, Denver (S.A.D.); Ohio State University, Columbus (D.E.C.); and the University of California, Irvine, Orange (K.S.T.)
| | - Angeles Alvarez Secord
- From the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (R.L.C., K.B.-E.); Women's Cancer Center of Nevada, Las Vegas (N.M.S.); NRG Oncology Statistical and Data Management Center, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo (D.E., H.Q.H., M.F.B.), and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York (P.S.) - both in New York; the University of Cincinnati, University of Cincinnati Cancer Institute, Cincinnati (T.J.H.); the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore (D.K.A.); Seoul National University College of Medicine (J.-W.K.), Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine (B.-G.K.), and Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine (J.-H.N.), Seoul, and the Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang (S.-Y.P.) - all in South Korea; Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Hidaka, Japan (K.F.); the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City (J.L.W., R.S.M.); National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project/NRG Oncology, U.S. Oncology Research, and Metro-Minnesota Community Oncology Research Consortium, Minneapolis (A.C.C.); Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (A.A.S.); Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (S.R.); Gynecologic Cancer Program, California Pacific-Palo Alto Medical Foundation, Sutter Research Institute, San Francisco (J.K.C.); Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI (P.D.); the University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, and Denver Health Medical Center, Denver (S.A.D.); Ohio State University, Columbus (D.E.C.); and the University of California, Irvine, Orange (K.S.T.)
| | - Steve Rubin
- From the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (R.L.C., K.B.-E.); Women's Cancer Center of Nevada, Las Vegas (N.M.S.); NRG Oncology Statistical and Data Management Center, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo (D.E., H.Q.H., M.F.B.), and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York (P.S.) - both in New York; the University of Cincinnati, University of Cincinnati Cancer Institute, Cincinnati (T.J.H.); the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore (D.K.A.); Seoul National University College of Medicine (J.-W.K.), Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine (B.-G.K.), and Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine (J.-H.N.), Seoul, and the Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang (S.-Y.P.) - all in South Korea; Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Hidaka, Japan (K.F.); the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City (J.L.W., R.S.M.); National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project/NRG Oncology, U.S. Oncology Research, and Metro-Minnesota Community Oncology Research Consortium, Minneapolis (A.C.C.); Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (A.A.S.); Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (S.R.); Gynecologic Cancer Program, California Pacific-Palo Alto Medical Foundation, Sutter Research Institute, San Francisco (J.K.C.); Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI (P.D.); the University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, and Denver Health Medical Center, Denver (S.A.D.); Ohio State University, Columbus (D.E.C.); and the University of California, Irvine, Orange (K.S.T.)
| | - John K Chan
- From the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (R.L.C., K.B.-E.); Women's Cancer Center of Nevada, Las Vegas (N.M.S.); NRG Oncology Statistical and Data Management Center, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo (D.E., H.Q.H., M.F.B.), and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York (P.S.) - both in New York; the University of Cincinnati, University of Cincinnati Cancer Institute, Cincinnati (T.J.H.); the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore (D.K.A.); Seoul National University College of Medicine (J.-W.K.), Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine (B.-G.K.), and Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine (J.-H.N.), Seoul, and the Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang (S.-Y.P.) - all in South Korea; Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Hidaka, Japan (K.F.); the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City (J.L.W., R.S.M.); National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project/NRG Oncology, U.S. Oncology Research, and Metro-Minnesota Community Oncology Research Consortium, Minneapolis (A.C.C.); Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (A.A.S.); Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (S.R.); Gynecologic Cancer Program, California Pacific-Palo Alto Medical Foundation, Sutter Research Institute, San Francisco (J.K.C.); Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI (P.D.); the University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, and Denver Health Medical Center, Denver (S.A.D.); Ohio State University, Columbus (D.E.C.); and the University of California, Irvine, Orange (K.S.T.)
| | - Paul DiSilvestro
- From the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (R.L.C., K.B.-E.); Women's Cancer Center of Nevada, Las Vegas (N.M.S.); NRG Oncology Statistical and Data Management Center, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo (D.E., H.Q.H., M.F.B.), and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York (P.S.) - both in New York; the University of Cincinnati, University of Cincinnati Cancer Institute, Cincinnati (T.J.H.); the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore (D.K.A.); Seoul National University College of Medicine (J.-W.K.), Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine (B.-G.K.), and Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine (J.-H.N.), Seoul, and the Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang (S.-Y.P.) - all in South Korea; Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Hidaka, Japan (K.F.); the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City (J.L.W., R.S.M.); National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project/NRG Oncology, U.S. Oncology Research, and Metro-Minnesota Community Oncology Research Consortium, Minneapolis (A.C.C.); Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (A.A.S.); Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (S.R.); Gynecologic Cancer Program, California Pacific-Palo Alto Medical Foundation, Sutter Research Institute, San Francisco (J.K.C.); Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI (P.D.); the University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, and Denver Health Medical Center, Denver (S.A.D.); Ohio State University, Columbus (D.E.C.); and the University of California, Irvine, Orange (K.S.T.)
| | - Susan A Davidson
- From the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (R.L.C., K.B.-E.); Women's Cancer Center of Nevada, Las Vegas (N.M.S.); NRG Oncology Statistical and Data Management Center, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo (D.E., H.Q.H., M.F.B.), and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York (P.S.) - both in New York; the University of Cincinnati, University of Cincinnati Cancer Institute, Cincinnati (T.J.H.); the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore (D.K.A.); Seoul National University College of Medicine (J.-W.K.), Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine (B.-G.K.), and Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine (J.-H.N.), Seoul, and the Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang (S.-Y.P.) - all in South Korea; Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Hidaka, Japan (K.F.); the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City (J.L.W., R.S.M.); National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project/NRG Oncology, U.S. Oncology Research, and Metro-Minnesota Community Oncology Research Consortium, Minneapolis (A.C.C.); Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (A.A.S.); Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (S.R.); Gynecologic Cancer Program, California Pacific-Palo Alto Medical Foundation, Sutter Research Institute, San Francisco (J.K.C.); Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI (P.D.); the University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, and Denver Health Medical Center, Denver (S.A.D.); Ohio State University, Columbus (D.E.C.); and the University of California, Irvine, Orange (K.S.T.)
| | - David E Cohn
- From the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (R.L.C., K.B.-E.); Women's Cancer Center of Nevada, Las Vegas (N.M.S.); NRG Oncology Statistical and Data Management Center, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo (D.E., H.Q.H., M.F.B.), and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York (P.S.) - both in New York; the University of Cincinnati, University of Cincinnati Cancer Institute, Cincinnati (T.J.H.); the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore (D.K.A.); Seoul National University College of Medicine (J.-W.K.), Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine (B.-G.K.), and Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine (J.-H.N.), Seoul, and the Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang (S.-Y.P.) - all in South Korea; Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Hidaka, Japan (K.F.); the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City (J.L.W., R.S.M.); National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project/NRG Oncology, U.S. Oncology Research, and Metro-Minnesota Community Oncology Research Consortium, Minneapolis (A.C.C.); Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (A.A.S.); Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (S.R.); Gynecologic Cancer Program, California Pacific-Palo Alto Medical Foundation, Sutter Research Institute, San Francisco (J.K.C.); Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI (P.D.); the University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, and Denver Health Medical Center, Denver (S.A.D.); Ohio State University, Columbus (D.E.C.); and the University of California, Irvine, Orange (K.S.T.)
| | - Krishnansu S Tewari
- From the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (R.L.C., K.B.-E.); Women's Cancer Center of Nevada, Las Vegas (N.M.S.); NRG Oncology Statistical and Data Management Center, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo (D.E., H.Q.H., M.F.B.), and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York (P.S.) - both in New York; the University of Cincinnati, University of Cincinnati Cancer Institute, Cincinnati (T.J.H.); the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore (D.K.A.); Seoul National University College of Medicine (J.-W.K.), Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine (B.-G.K.), and Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine (J.-H.N.), Seoul, and the Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang (S.-Y.P.) - all in South Korea; Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Hidaka, Japan (K.F.); the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City (J.L.W., R.S.M.); National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project/NRG Oncology, U.S. Oncology Research, and Metro-Minnesota Community Oncology Research Consortium, Minneapolis (A.C.C.); Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (A.A.S.); Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (S.R.); Gynecologic Cancer Program, California Pacific-Palo Alto Medical Foundation, Sutter Research Institute, San Francisco (J.K.C.); Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI (P.D.); the University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, and Denver Health Medical Center, Denver (S.A.D.); Ohio State University, Columbus (D.E.C.); and the University of California, Irvine, Orange (K.S.T.)
| | - Karen Basen-Engquist
- From the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (R.L.C., K.B.-E.); Women's Cancer Center of Nevada, Las Vegas (N.M.S.); NRG Oncology Statistical and Data Management Center, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo (D.E., H.Q.H., M.F.B.), and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York (P.S.) - both in New York; the University of Cincinnati, University of Cincinnati Cancer Institute, Cincinnati (T.J.H.); the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore (D.K.A.); Seoul National University College of Medicine (J.-W.K.), Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine (B.-G.K.), and Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine (J.-H.N.), Seoul, and the Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang (S.-Y.P.) - all in South Korea; Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Hidaka, Japan (K.F.); the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City (J.L.W., R.S.M.); National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project/NRG Oncology, U.S. Oncology Research, and Metro-Minnesota Community Oncology Research Consortium, Minneapolis (A.C.C.); Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (A.A.S.); Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (S.R.); Gynecologic Cancer Program, California Pacific-Palo Alto Medical Foundation, Sutter Research Institute, San Francisco (J.K.C.); Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI (P.D.); the University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, and Denver Health Medical Center, Denver (S.A.D.); Ohio State University, Columbus (D.E.C.); and the University of California, Irvine, Orange (K.S.T.)
| | - Helen Q Huang
- From the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (R.L.C., K.B.-E.); Women's Cancer Center of Nevada, Las Vegas (N.M.S.); NRG Oncology Statistical and Data Management Center, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo (D.E., H.Q.H., M.F.B.), and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York (P.S.) - both in New York; the University of Cincinnati, University of Cincinnati Cancer Institute, Cincinnati (T.J.H.); the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore (D.K.A.); Seoul National University College of Medicine (J.-W.K.), Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine (B.-G.K.), and Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine (J.-H.N.), Seoul, and the Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang (S.-Y.P.) - all in South Korea; Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Hidaka, Japan (K.F.); the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City (J.L.W., R.S.M.); National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project/NRG Oncology, U.S. Oncology Research, and Metro-Minnesota Community Oncology Research Consortium, Minneapolis (A.C.C.); Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (A.A.S.); Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (S.R.); Gynecologic Cancer Program, California Pacific-Palo Alto Medical Foundation, Sutter Research Institute, San Francisco (J.K.C.); Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI (P.D.); the University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, and Denver Health Medical Center, Denver (S.A.D.); Ohio State University, Columbus (D.E.C.); and the University of California, Irvine, Orange (K.S.T.)
| | - Mark F Brady
- From the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (R.L.C., K.B.-E.); Women's Cancer Center of Nevada, Las Vegas (N.M.S.); NRG Oncology Statistical and Data Management Center, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo (D.E., H.Q.H., M.F.B.), and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York (P.S.) - both in New York; the University of Cincinnati, University of Cincinnati Cancer Institute, Cincinnati (T.J.H.); the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore (D.K.A.); Seoul National University College of Medicine (J.-W.K.), Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine (B.-G.K.), and Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine (J.-H.N.), Seoul, and the Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang (S.-Y.P.) - all in South Korea; Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Hidaka, Japan (K.F.); the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City (J.L.W., R.S.M.); National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project/NRG Oncology, U.S. Oncology Research, and Metro-Minnesota Community Oncology Research Consortium, Minneapolis (A.C.C.); Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (A.A.S.); Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (S.R.); Gynecologic Cancer Program, California Pacific-Palo Alto Medical Foundation, Sutter Research Institute, San Francisco (J.K.C.); Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI (P.D.); the University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, and Denver Health Medical Center, Denver (S.A.D.); Ohio State University, Columbus (D.E.C.); and the University of California, Irvine, Orange (K.S.T.)
| | - Robert S Mannel
- From the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (R.L.C., K.B.-E.); Women's Cancer Center of Nevada, Las Vegas (N.M.S.); NRG Oncology Statistical and Data Management Center, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo (D.E., H.Q.H., M.F.B.), and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York (P.S.) - both in New York; the University of Cincinnati, University of Cincinnati Cancer Institute, Cincinnati (T.J.H.); the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore (D.K.A.); Seoul National University College of Medicine (J.-W.K.), Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine (B.-G.K.), and Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine (J.-H.N.), Seoul, and the Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang (S.-Y.P.) - all in South Korea; Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Hidaka, Japan (K.F.); the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City (J.L.W., R.S.M.); National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project/NRG Oncology, U.S. Oncology Research, and Metro-Minnesota Community Oncology Research Consortium, Minneapolis (A.C.C.); Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (A.A.S.); Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (S.R.); Gynecologic Cancer Program, California Pacific-Palo Alto Medical Foundation, Sutter Research Institute, San Francisco (J.K.C.); Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI (P.D.); the University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, and Denver Health Medical Center, Denver (S.A.D.); Ohio State University, Columbus (D.E.C.); and the University of California, Irvine, Orange (K.S.T.)
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
|
38
|
Gómez-Ruiz ÁJ, González-Gil A, Gil J, Navarro-Barrios Á, Alconchel F, Gil E, Martínez J, Nieto A, Barceló F, Cascales-Campos PA. Peritoneal Surface Disease Severity Score (PSDSS), AGO-score and TIAN model in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer treated by cytoreductive surgery plus HIPEC. Clin Exp Metastasis 2019; 36:433-439. [PMID: 31270731 DOI: 10.1007/s10585-019-09982-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2019] [Accepted: 06/24/2019] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
In patients with platinum sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer selected for a secondary cytoreduction, the use of prognostic scores allows predicting the possibilities of a new complete cytoreduction. The aim of this work is to evaluate the usefulness of PSDSSov, the AGO-score and the TIAN-model as prognostic tools in these patients. Sixty four patients with recurrent platinum sensitive ovarian cancer treated by cytoreduction and HIPEC were analyzed between January 2008 and December 2016. Since 2012, the data needed to calculate the PSDSS, AGO-score and TIAN model were collected prospectively. Fifty patients (78%) received systemic chemotherapy before cytoreduction and HIPEC. In 57 patients (89%) a CC-0 was achieved. Patients with PSDSSov I-II and TIAN model of "low risk" had a DFS at 1 and 5 years of 71% and 57%, respectively, without reaching the median of DFS. PSDSSov is a useful prognostic tool and can be used in decision making in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis due to recurrent platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer. Its combination with the Tian model makes it possible to identify patients with an especially favorable prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Álvaro Jesús Gómez-Ruiz
- Peritoneal Carcinomatosis Unit, Department of Surgery, Hospital Universitario Virgen De La Arrixaca, Carretera del Palmar S/N, El Palmar, 30123, Murcia, Spain.
| | - Alida González-Gil
- Peritoneal Carcinomatosis Unit, Department of Surgery, Hospital Universitario Virgen De La Arrixaca, Carretera del Palmar S/N, El Palmar, 30123, Murcia, Spain
| | - José Gil
- Peritoneal Carcinomatosis Unit, Department of Surgery, Hospital Universitario Virgen De La Arrixaca, Carretera del Palmar S/N, El Palmar, 30123, Murcia, Spain
| | - Álvaro Navarro-Barrios
- Peritoneal Carcinomatosis Unit, Department of Surgery, Hospital Universitario Virgen De La Arrixaca, Carretera del Palmar S/N, El Palmar, 30123, Murcia, Spain
| | - Felipe Alconchel
- Peritoneal Carcinomatosis Unit, Department of Surgery, Hospital Universitario Virgen De La Arrixaca, Carretera del Palmar S/N, El Palmar, 30123, Murcia, Spain
| | - Elena Gil
- Peritoneal Carcinomatosis Unit, Department of Surgery, Hospital Universitario Virgen De La Arrixaca, Carretera del Palmar S/N, El Palmar, 30123, Murcia, Spain
| | - Jerónimo Martínez
- Department of Ginecology, Hospital Universitario Virgen De La Arrixaca, Murcia, Spain
| | - Aníbal Nieto
- Department of Ginecology, Hospital Universitario Virgen De La Arrixaca, Murcia, Spain
| | - Francisco Barceló
- Department of Ginecology, Hospital Universitario Virgen De La Arrixaca, Murcia, Spain
| | - Pedro Antonio Cascales-Campos
- Peritoneal Carcinomatosis Unit, Department of Surgery, Hospital Universitario Virgen De La Arrixaca, Carretera del Palmar S/N, El Palmar, 30123, Murcia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Long-Term Survival After Surgery and Radiotherapy for Recurrent or Persistent Ovarian and Tubal Cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2019; 28:1090-1100. [PMID: 29846300 DOI: 10.1097/igc.0000000000001294] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study examines the factors associated with long-term disease-specific survival (DSS) and complications after radiotherapy (RT) for recurrent or persistent ovarian and tubal cancer. METHODS/MATERIALS Between 1980 and 2015, 65 women with ovarian (57), tubal (3), or co-existent ovarian/endometrial carcinoma (5) received RT (>45 Gy) with curative intent for recurrent (45) or persistent cancer (20) found at second-look surgery. Surgery to debulk (± restage) was integrated into the management of all but 7 cases. RESULTS Twenty-two women had no evidence of disease at last contact after a median of 15.6 years (range = 1.0-35.8 years). Of the 53 patients treated more than 10 years ago, 18 (34%) are in this long-term no evidence of disease group. Univariate analysis showed that the following factors were significantly associated with longer DSS (P < 0.05): initial stage I, II (vs III, IV); endometrioid histology (vs serous and other); no or 1 previous chemotherapy (vs ≥2); no macroscopic tumor before RT (vs macroscopic); localized tumor encompassed by a limited-volume RT field (vs more widespread tumor), and chemotherapy and RT (vs RT only). Multivariate analysis showed that endometrioid (vs other histology HR = 4.37, P = 0.017) and localized tumor (vs more widespread tumor, HR = 2.43, P = 0.017) were significantly associated with longer DSS.After RT to the pelvis and/or abdomen, 13 (21.7%) of 60 patients developed G3 or 4 bowel complications requiring surgery. In 10, these occurred in the presence of tumor, RT changes, and adhesions, and in 3, there was no sign of cancer. Six patients (9.2%) developed a subsequent malignancy. CONCLUSIONS We conclude that there is a role for the use of RT in selected cases of localized recurrent or persistent ovarian cancer and may confer long-term survival. Surgery is useful to debulk and define the extent of tumor to be irradiated but may confer an increased risk of severe bowel complications.
Collapse
|
40
|
Buechel M, Herzog TJ, Westin SN, Coleman RL, Monk BJ, Moore KN. Treatment of patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer for whom platinum is still an option. Ann Oncol 2019; 30:721-732. [PMID: 30887020 PMCID: PMC8887593 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdz104] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ovarian cancer remains the most deadly gynecologic cancer with the majority of patients relapsing within 3 years of diagnosis. Traditional treatment paradigms linked to platinum sensitivity or resistance are currently being questioned in the setting of new diagnostic methods and treatment options. DESIGN Authors carried out review of the literature on key topics in treatment of recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) when platinum is still an option; including secondary surgical cytoreduction, chemotherapy, novel treatment options, and maintenance therapy. A treatment algorithm is proposed. RESULTS Molecular characterization of EOC is critical to help guide treatment decisions. The role of secondary cytoreductive surgery is currently being evaluated with results from Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) 213 and anticipated results from DESKTOP III clinical trials. Chemotherapy backbone has remained relatively unchanged but utilizing non-platinum-based regimens is under investigation. In addition, maintenance therapy with anti-angiogenic therapy and Poly (ADP-ribose) Polymerase (PARP) inhibitors has emerged as the standard of care. Novel combinations, including immunotherapy and anti-angiogenesis agents, may further change the current landscape. CONCLUSIONS The treatment of recurrent EOC is rapidly changing. Clinical trial design will need to continue to evolve as many novel therapies move to the upfront setting. Ultimately, the treatment of patients with recurrent EOC must incorporate individual patient and tumor factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Buechel
- Section of Gynecologic Oncology, Stephenson Cancer Center, The University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City.
| | - T J Herzog
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Cincinnati Cancer Institute, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati
| | - S N Westin
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - R L Coleman
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - B J Monk
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Arizona Oncology, Phoenix, USA
| | - K N Moore
- Section of Gynecologic Oncology, Stephenson Cancer Center, The University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Yao T, DeJong SR, McGree ME, Weaver AL, Cliby WA, Kumar A. Frailty in ovarian cancer identified the need for increased postoperative care requirements following cytoreductive surgery. Gynecol Oncol 2019; 153:68-73. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.12.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2018] [Revised: 12/20/2018] [Accepted: 12/27/2018] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
|
42
|
Komura N, Mabuchi S, Isohashi F, Yokoi E, Shimura K, Matsumoto Y, Kodama M, Tomimatsu T, Ogawa K, Kimura T. Radiotherapy for isolated recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer: A single institutional experience. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2019; 45:1173-1182. [PMID: 30843318 DOI: 10.1111/jog.13947] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2018] [Accepted: 02/11/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
AIM To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of external beam radiotherapy (RT) for isolated recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). METHODS Twenty-four isolated recurrent EOC patients treated with RT at Osaka University Hospital between January 2000 and January 2017 were included in the current study. Data regarding the primary or recurrent diseases, follow-up findings, and efficacy or toxicities of RT were collected and retrospectively analyzed. Survival rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. RESULTS Their median age was 59 years. Most patients had International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage III-IV diseases at the initial diagnosis. Histologically, serous adenocarcinoma was predominant, followed by clear cell adenocarcinoma. All patients had received at least one regimen of platinum-based chemotherapy; 8 were platinum-sensitive relapse and the others were platinum-resistant. Lymph nodes were the most common sites of recurrence, and the median tumor size was 25.5 mm. The median total dose of RT administered was 54 Gy, with a median daily dose of 2 Gy. RT was well-tolerated, and no patients experienced Grade 3/4 toxicities. The in-field overall response rate was 58.3% (14/24), the median regression rate was -40.2% (range: -100 to 0) and the median survival period after RT was 17 months. The 1-year survival and local progression-free survival rates after RT were 66.7% and 45.8%, respectively. CONCLUSION RT showed significant antitumor effect against isolated recurrent EOC without causing severe toxicities. Prospective studies with sufficient statistical power are warranted to further evaluate the role of RT in this patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naoko Komura
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Seiji Mabuchi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Fumiaki Isohashi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Eriko Yokoi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Kotaro Shimura
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Yuri Matsumoto
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Michiko Kodama
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Takuji Tomimatsu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Kazuhiko Ogawa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Tadashi Kimura
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Armbruster S, Coleman RL, Rauh-Hain JA. Management and Treatment of Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Cancer. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 2019; 32:965-982. [PMID: 30390768 DOI: 10.1016/j.hoc.2018.07.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
Most women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer will experience many episodes of recurrent disease with progressively shorter disease-free intervals. For women whose disease continues to respond to platinum-based drugs, the disease can often be controlled for 5 years or more. Enormous progress has been made in the management of this disease, and new targeted treatments such as antiangiogenic drugs, poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase inhibitors, and immune checkpoint inhibitors offer potential for improved survival. A variety of combination strategies are being evaluated to leverage these agents. The role of secondary cytoreduction remains a topic of active investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shannon Armbruster
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1155 Herman Pressler, Unit 1362, Houston, TX 77030-1362, USA
| | - Robert L Coleman
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1155 Herman Pressler, Unit 1362, Houston, TX 77030-1362, USA
| | - Jose Alejandro Rauh-Hain
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1155 Herman Pressler, Unit 1362, Houston, TX 77030-1362, USA; Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Unit 1444, P.O. Box 301402, Houston, TX 77230-1402, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Diagnostic value of 18F-FDG PET/MRI in recurrent pelvis malignancies of female patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Nucl Med Commun 2018; 39:479-485. [PMID: 29634659 DOI: 10.1097/mnm.0000000000000839] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic performance of fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (F-FDG) PET/MRI for suspected recurrence of pelvis malignancies of female patients using a meta-analysis. We performed a systematical literature search for relevant studies in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, and several Chinese databases. Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) was used to assess the quality of all included studies. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio were calculated per patient and per lesion. Summary receiver operating characteristic curves were also constructed. All procedures involving human participants in this study were performed in conformity with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments. Finally, seven articles comprising 257 patients and 695 lesions were included in this meta-analysis. On patient-based analysis, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio of F-FDG PET/MRI in detecting recurrence of pelvis malignancies were 0.96 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.93-0.99], 0.95 (95% CI: 0.87-0.99), 9.85 (95% CI: 4.62-21.00), 0.07 (95% CI: 0.04-0.13), and 201.41 (95% CI: 62.89-645.03), respectively. On lesion-based analysis, the corresponding estimates were 0.99 (95% CI: 0.97-1.00), 0.94 (95% CI: 0.89-0.97), 17.11 (95% CI: 4.46-65.60), 0.02 (95% CI: 0.01-0.05), and 1125.24 (95% CI: 211.46-5987.79), respectively. The results of our meta-analysis indicate that F-FDG PET/MRI has excellent diagnostic performance in restaging female patients with suspected recurrence of gynecological pelvic malignancies.
Collapse
|
45
|
Shi T, Jiang R, Yu J, Yang H, Tu D, Dai Z, Shen Y, Zhang Y, Cheng X, Jia H, Tu R, Wang H, Tang J, Luan Y, Cai S, Zang R. Addition of intraperitoneal cisplatin and etoposide to first-line chemotherapy for advanced ovarian cancer: a randomised, phase 2 trial. Br J Cancer 2018; 119:12-18. [PMID: 29899395 PMCID: PMC6035193 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-018-0036-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2017] [Revised: 01/22/2018] [Accepted: 01/26/2018] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We assessed the efficacy of adding intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy to standard first-line intravenous (IV) chemotherapy in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) patients. METHODS Patients with stage IIIC-IV EOC who underwent optimal debulking surgery were randomly assigned to four cycles of weekly IP chemotherapy with cisplatin (50 mg/m2) and etoposide (100 mg/m2) followed by six cycles of IV chemotherapy every 3 weeks (IP/IV arm), or were administered IV chemotherapy alone (IV arm). The primary endpoint for this study was the 12-month non-progression rate (NPR). RESULTS Between 4/2009 and 9/2015, 218 patients were randomised, of whom 215 initiated treatment. In the IP/IV arm, 90.6% of patients completed 4 cycles of IP chemotherapy. The 12-month NPRs were 81.9% and 64.2% in the IP/IV and IV groups, respectively (HR 0.48 (95% CI 0.27-0.82)). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was increased in the IP/IV arm compared with that in the IV arm (22.4 vs. 16.8 months; HR 0.66 (0.48-0.91)) and in a subgroup with no gross cytoreduction (31.1 vs. 16.8 months; HR 0.46 (0.26-0.82)). Similar findings were detected with regard to time to first subsequent anticancer therapy (TFST) (25.9 vs. 18.0 months; P = 0.009) and time to second subsequent anticancer therapy (TSST) (40.8 vs. 30.1 months; P = 0.042). Grade 3/4 leukopenia, anaemia and gastrointestinal events were more common in the IP/IV arm, but the treatment burden was considered acceptable. CONCLUSIONS IP chemotherapy prior to IV chemotherapy was associated with an increased 12-month NPR and a longer TSST than IV alone in patients with EOC, albeit with acceptable toxic effects. Long-term follow-up is warranted to identify the effects of IP therapy on overall survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tingyan Shi
- Ovarian Cancer Program, Division of Gynecology Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Rong Jiang
- Ovarian Cancer Program, Division of Gynecology Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Fudan University Cancer Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Jinjin Yu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wuxi Cancer Hospital, Wuxi, China
| | - Huijuan Yang
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Fudan University Cancer Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Dongsheng Tu
- Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Zhiyuan Dai
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Suzhou Municipal Hospital, Suzhou, China
| | - Yang Shen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Zhongda Hospital Southeast University, Nanjing, China
| | - Yuqin Zhang
- Ovarian Cancer Program, Division of Gynecology Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Fudan University Cancer Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Xi Cheng
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Fudan University Cancer Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Huixun Jia
- Clinical Statistics Center, Fudan University Cancer Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Ruiqin Tu
- Ovarian Cancer Program, Division of Gynecology Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Huaying Wang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wuxi Cancer Hospital, Wuxi, China
| | - Jie Tang
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Fudan University Cancer Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Yuting Luan
- Ovarian Cancer Program, Division of Gynecology Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Shumo Cai
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Fudan University Cancer Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Rongyu Zang
- Ovarian Cancer Program, Division of Gynecology Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
| | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Szczesny W, Langseth H, Myklebust TÅ, Kaern J, Tropé C, Paulsen T. Survival after secondary cytoreductive surgery and chemotherapy compared with chemotherapy alone for first recurrence in patients with platinum-sensitive epithelial ovarian cancer and no residuals after primary treatment. A registry-based study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2018; 97:956-965. [PMID: 29790149 DOI: 10.1111/aogs.13361] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2017] [Accepted: 04/16/2018] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The aim of this study was to investigate whether secondary cytoreductive surgery and platinum-based chemotherapy improved survival among patients with recurrent, platinum-sensitive epithelial ovarian cancer compared with those who received platinum-based chemotherapy alone, and to identify possible predictors for selection to secondary cytoreductive surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS We included 397 patients who had a primary diagnosis of FIGO stage I-IV epithelial ovarian cancer recorded in the Cancer Registry of Norway between 1 January 2002 and 31 December 2012, received primary surgery with no residuals followed by platinum-based chemotherapy, had first recurrence six or more months after completion of primary platinum-based chemotherapy, and received secondary treatment with either secondary cytoreductive surgery and platinum-based chemotherapy (secondary cytoreductive surgery+platinum-based chemotherapy group) or platinum-based chemotherapy alone (platinum-based chemotherapy group). Outcomes were progression-free survival to second recurrence or death and overall survival. Hazard ratios were estimated using multivariable Cox regression. RESULTS There were 75 patients in the secondary cytoreductive surgery+platinum-based chemotherapy group in whom complete resection was achieved for 60 (80%), and 322 patients in the platinum-based chemotherapy group. Both progression-free survival (hazard ratio 0.45, 95% confidence interval 0.32-0.62) and overall survival (hazard ratio 0.50, 95% confidence interval 0.32-0.70) were improved in the secondary cytoreductive surgery+platinum-based chemotherapy compared with the platinum-based chemotherapy group. A survival benefit was only seen in patients with no residuals at secondary cytoreductive surgery. CONCLUSIONS In selected epithelial ovarian cancer patients with no residuals after primary surgery and a recurrent, platinum-sensitive tumor, the complete resection of recurrent tumor at secondary cytoreductive surgery improves progression-free survival and overall survival. Our results suggest that a long treatment-free interval and non-disseminated lesions (three or fewer lesions) on radiological images could be useful predictors for complete resection at secondary cytoreductive surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Witold Szczesny
- Department of Research, Innlandet Hospital Trust, Brumunddal, Norway.,Cancer Registry of Norway, Institute of Population-based Cancer Research, Oslo, Norway
| | - Hilde Langseth
- Cancer Registry of Norway, Institute of Population-based Cancer Research, Oslo, Norway
| | - Tor Å Myklebust
- Cancer Registry of Norway, Institute of Population-based Cancer Research, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Research, Møre and Romsdal Hospital Trust, Ålesund, Norway
| | - Janne Kaern
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Radiumhospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | - Claes Tropé
- Faculty of Medicine, Department Group of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Torbjørn Paulsen
- Cancer Registry of Norway, Institute of Population-based Cancer Research, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Gynecological Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Radiumhospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Pignata S, C Cecere S, Du Bois A, Harter P, Heitz F. Treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer. Ann Oncol 2018; 28:viii51-viii56. [PMID: 29232464 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx441] [Citation(s) in RCA: 180] [Impact Index Per Article: 30.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Despite optimal surgery and appropriate first-line chemotherapy, ∼70%-80% of patients with epithelial ovarian cancer will develop disease relapse. The same modalities as used primarily are available for treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer (ROC). The rationale for repetitive surgery in ROC was based on a stable body of retrospective data; however, prospective data were missing. Now, preliminary data from the prospective AGO-DESKTOP III give evidence that surgery for ROC seems to be of benefit for selected patients with platinum-sensitive relapse undergoing complete resection. With respect to systemic therapy, tumor histology, BRCA status, the platinum-free interval (PFI) and previous treatment with bevacizumab (anti-VEGF monoclonal antibody) are considered the most important features that influence treatment choice in ROC. In patients with resistant or refractory relapse (PFI < 6 months), monotherapy with a non-platinum drug or participation in clinical trials is indicated. The association of non-platinum monotherapy with bevacizumab, followed by maintenance has been approved in this setting in some European countries due to PFS benefit. In patients with partially sensitive relapse (PFI between 6 and 12 months), two options are available: platinum doublets or non-platinum therapy (single agent or combination). The pegylated liposomal doxorubicin/trabectedin combination represents a viable alternative in patients that cannot receive platinum. In platinum-sensitive patients, treatment with platinum-based combinations is associated with PFS advantage compared with single agents or non-platinum combinations. The presence of germline or somatic BRCA mutations allows platinum-responsive patients to optimize chemotherapy efficacy and prolonging PFS by the use of olaparib (PARP inhibitor) given as maintenance therapy until progression. In patients not pretreated with bevacizumab in first line, the carboplatin/gemcitabine/bevacizumab combination, followed by maintenance is a viable alternative in platinum-sensitive patients (PFI> 6 months). The integration of surgery, with a 'personalized' approach by the use of antiangiogenic agent and of PARP inhibitors is affecting survival of patients with recurrent disease and will help epithelial ovarian cancer to become a chronic disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Pignata
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Uro-Gynaecological Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale," Naples, Italy
| | - S C Cecere
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Uro-Gynaecological Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale," Naples, Italy
| | - A Du Bois
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | - P Harter
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | - F Heitz
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Sawicki LM, Kirchner J, Grueneisen J, Ruhlmann V, Aktas B, Schaarschmidt BM, Forsting M, Herrmann K, Antoch G, Umutlu L. Comparison of 18F–FDG PET/MRI and MRI alone for whole-body staging and potential impact on therapeutic management of women with suspected recurrent pelvic cancer: a follow-up study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2017; 45:622-629. [DOI: 10.1007/s00259-017-3881-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2017] [Accepted: 11/07/2017] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
|
49
|
Gallotta V, Conte C, Giudice MT, Nero C, Vizzielli G, Gueli Alletti S, Cianci S, Lodoli C, Di Giorgio A, De Rose AM, Fagotti A, Scambia G, Ferrandina G. Secondary Laparoscopic Cytoreduction in Recurrent Ovarian Cancer: A Large, Single-Institution Experience. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2017; 25:644-650. [PMID: 29081384 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.10.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2017] [Revised: 10/18/2017] [Accepted: 10/18/2017] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE To analyze the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic secondary cytoreductive surgery in a retrospective series of patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer. DESIGN Retrospective cohort study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2). SETTING Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy. PATIENTS Between October 2010 and October 2016, 58 patients with recurrent ovarian cancer were selected for a retrospective analysis of data. INTERVENTIONS All patients underwent a laparoscopic secondary cytoreduction with single or multiple procedures. RESULTS The most frequent pattern of recurrence was peritoneal (48.3%); 6 patients (10.3%) experienced parenchymal disease (spleen, n = 5; liver, n = 1), and 24 patients (41.4%) had lymph node recurrence. Complete debulking was achieved in all patients. The median operative time was 204 minutes (range, 55-448 minutes), median estimated blood loss was 70 mL (range, 20-300 mL), and the median length of hospital stay was 4 days (range, 1-21 days). Four patients (6.8%) experienced intraoperative complications. Early postoperative complications were documented in 6 patients (10.3%), but only 1 G3 complication was noted. The median duration of follow-up since secondary cytoreduction was 24 months (range, 9-71 months). Twenty-one patients (36.2%) experienced a second disease relapse. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 28 months, and the 2-year PFS was 58.7%. Five patients died (8.6%); the 2-year overall survival was 90.7%. CONCLUSIONS For selected patients, laparoscopy is a feasible and safe approach to optimal cytoreduction for patients with recurrent ovarian cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valerio Gallotta
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy.
| | - Carmine Conte
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Maria Teresa Giudice
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Camilla Nero
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Vizzielli
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Stefano Cianci
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Claudio Lodoli
- Division of Surgery, Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic, Rome, Italy
| | - Andrea Di Giorgio
- Division of Surgery, Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Anna Fagotti
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Giovanni Scambia
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Gabriella Ferrandina
- Department of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Molise, Campobasso, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Son JH, Kong TW, Paek J, Song KH, Chang SJ, Ryu HS. Clinical characteristics and prognostic inflection points among long-term survivors of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2017; 139:352-357. [DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.12315] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2017] [Revised: 07/21/2017] [Accepted: 08/30/2017] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Joo-Hyuk Son
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology; Ajou University School of Medicine; Suwon South Korea
| | - Tae-Wook Kong
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology; Ajou University School of Medicine; Suwon South Korea
| | - Jiheum Paek
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology; Ajou University School of Medicine; Suwon South Korea
| | - Kwan-Heup Song
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology; Ajou University School of Medicine; Suwon South Korea
| | - Suk-Joon Chang
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology; Ajou University School of Medicine; Suwon South Korea
| | - Hee-Sug Ryu
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology; Ajou University School of Medicine; Suwon South Korea
| |
Collapse
|