In vivo B-cell depletion with rituximab for alternative donor hemopoietic SCT

Efficacy and safety of outpatient fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab based allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in adults with severe aplastic anemia

The age effect in severe aplastic anemia (SAA) following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) favors the use of reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens in older adults. We implemented a non-myeloablative regimen consisting of fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab (FCR) to improve HCT outcomes in SAA. Patients who underwent first HCT for SAA utilizing an FCR regimen between January 2016 and May 2022 were included. Outcomes analyzed included time to engraftment, incidence of graft failure, GVHD, viral reactivation, disease recurrence, and GVHD-free, relapse-free survival (GRFS). Among 24 patients included, median age was 43.5 years (22-62) and a variety of donor types and stem cell sources were represented. At median follow-up of 26.9 months (2.4-72.7), no cases of grade III-IV acute (aGVHD) or severe chronic GVHD (cGVHD) were recorded. Viral reactivation was minimal, and there were no cases of graft failure or PTLD, with 100% disease-free and overall survival at last follow up. The estimate of 1-year GRFS was 86.3% (95% CI: 72.8-100%), with moderate cGVHD accounting for all events. The FCR regimen in SAA was well tolerated, even in older adults, with 100% disease-free survival with low GVHD and infection rates. These encouraging findings should be validated in larger prospective trials.

EBV Reactivation and Disease in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant (HSCT) Recipients and Its Impact on HSCT Outcomes

The acquisition or reactivation of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) after allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant (HSCT) can be associated with complications including the development of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD), which is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. A number of risk factors for PTLD have been defined, including T-cell depletion, and approaches to monitoring EBV, especially in high-risk patients, with the use of preemptive therapy upon viral activation have been described. Newer therapies for the preemption or treatment of PTLD, such as EBV-specific cytotoxic T-cells, hold promise. Further studies to help define risks, diagnosis, and treatment of EBV-related complications are needed in this at-risk population.

Impact of prophylaxis with rituximab on EBV-related complications after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in children

Background

Children undergoing allo-HCT are at high risk of EBV-related complications. The objective of the study was to analyze the impact of prophylactic post-transplant rituximab on EBV infection and EBV-PTLD in children after allo-HCT, to determine the risk factors for the development of EBV infection and EBV-PTLD and to determine their outcomes. Additionally, the impact of EBV-driven complications on transplant outcomes was analyzed.

Methods

Single center retrospective analysis of EBV-related complications in pediatric population undergoing allo-HCT, based on strategy of prophylaxis with rituximab. Overall 276 consecutive children, including 122 on prophylaxis, were analyzed for EBV-driven complications and transplant outcomes.

Results

Prophylaxis with rituximab resulted in significant reduction of EBV infection (from 35.1% to 20.5%; HR=2.7; p<0.0001), and EBV-PTLD (from 13.0% to 3.3%; HR=0.23; p=0.0045). A trend for improved survival was also observed (HR=0.66; p=0.068), while non-relapse mortality was comparable in both cohorts. The peak value of viral load was a risk factor in the development of EBV-PTLD: 10-fold higher peak viral load in comparison to the baseline 104 copies/mL, caused a 3-fold (HR=3.36; p<0.001) increase in the risk of EBV-PTLD. Rituximab treatment was effective as a preemptive therapy in 91.1%, and in 70.9% in EBV-PTLD. Patients who developed PTLD had dismal 5-year overall survival (29% vs 60%; p<0.001), and an increased risk of relapse (72% vs 35%; p=0.024).

Conclusions

Rituximab for prophylaxis of EBV infection and EBV-PTLD was highly effective in pediatric population. Treatment of EBV-PTLD was successful in 70%, however the occurrence of EBV-PTLD was associated with an increased risk of relapse of primary malignant disease.

Advances and prospect in herpesviruses infections after haematopoietic cell transplantation: closer to the finish line?

BACKGROUND

Herpesviruses represent common and significant infectious complications after allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). In the last decade, major advances in the prevention and treatment of these infections were accomplished.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this paper is to review the recent advances in the prophylaxis and treatment of herpesvirus infections after allogeneic HCT, to assess the persisting challenges, and to offer future directions for the prevention and management of these infections.

SOURCES

We searched PubMed for relevant literature regarding specific herpesviruses complicating allogeneic HCT through March 2024.

CONTENT

The largest advances in this past decade were witnessed for cytomegalovirus (CMV) with the advent of letermovir for primary prophylaxis and the development of maribavir as an option for refractory and/or resistant CMV infections in transplant recipients. For varicella zoster virus, prevention of reactivation with the recombinant zoster vaccine offers an additional prophylactic intervention. Pritelivir is being explored for the treatment of drug-resistant or refractory Herpes simplex virus infections. Although rituximab is now an established option for preemptive therapy for Epstein-Barr virus, Human Herpesvirus-6 remains the most elusive virus of the herpesvirus family, with a lack of evidence supporting the benefit of any agent for prophylaxis or for optimal preemptive therapy.

IMPLICATIONS

Although considerable advances have been achieved for the treatment and prevention of herpes virus infections, most notably with CMV, the coming years should hold additional opportunities to tame the beast in these herpesviruses postallogeneic HCT, with the advent of new antivirals, cell-mediated immunity testing, and cytotoxic T lymphocytes infusions.

Rituximab for posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder - therapeutic, preemptive, or prophylactic?

To minimize mortality due to posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD), the following strategies have been used: (1) Therapy without EBV Monitoring, i.e., administration of rituximab after PTLD diagnosis, usually by biopsy, in the absence of routine Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNAemia monitoring, (2) Prompt Therapy, i.e., monitoring EBV DNAemia, searching for PTLD by imaging when the DNAemia has exceeded a pre-specified threshold, and administration of rituximab if the imaging is consistent with PTLD, (3) Preemptive Therapy, i.e., monitoring EBV DNAemia and administration of rituximab when the DNAemia has exceeded a pre-specified threshold, and (4) Prophylaxis, i.e., administration of rituximab to all transplant recipients. The superiority of one of these strategies over the other strategies has not been established. Here we review the pros and cons of each strategy. Preemptive therapy or prophylaxis may currently be preferred for patients who are at a high risk of dying due to PTLD. However, Therapy without EBV Monitoring may be used for both high- and low-risk patients in the future, if effective and relatively non-toxic therapies for rituximab-refractory PTLD (e.g., EBV-specific T cells) have become easily available.

Prevention of Oncogenic Gammaherpesvirinae (EBV and HHV8) Associated Disease in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients

Long-term risk for malignancy is higher among solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients compared to the general population. Four non-hepatitis viruses have been recognized as oncogenic in SOT recipients-EBV, cause of EBV-associated lymphoproliferative diseases; human herpes virus 8 (HHV8), cause of Kaposi sarcoma, primary effusion lymphoma and multicentric Castleman disease; human papilloma virus, cause of squamous cell skin cancers, and Merkel cell polyomavirus, cause of Merkel cell carcinoma. Two of these viruses (EBV and HHV8) belong to the human herpes virus family. In this review, we will discuss key aspects regarding the clinical presentation, diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of diseases in SOT recipients associated with the two herpesviruses.

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and the noncytomegalovirus herpesviruses

Although hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and other cellular therapies have significantly improved outcomes in the management of multiple hematological and nonhematological malignancies, the resulting impairment in humoral and cellular response increases the risk for opportunistic infection as an undesirable side effect. With their ability to establish latent infection and reactivate when the host immune system is at its weakest point, the Herpesviridae family constitutes a significant proportion of these opportunistic pathogens. Despite recent advancements in preventing and managing herpesvirus infections, they continue to be a common cause of significant morbidity and mortality in transplanted patients. Herein, we aim to provide and update on herpesvirus other than cytomegalovirus (CMV) affecting recipients of HSCT and other cellular therapies.

Who is the patient at risk for EBV reactivation and disease: expert opinion focused on post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

INTRODUCTION

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLD) represent a diverse group of diseases. They develop as a consequence of uncontrolled proliferation of lymphoid or plasmacytic cells resulting from T-cell immunosuppression after transplantation of either hematopoietic cells (HCT) or solid organs (SOT), caused mainly by latent Epstein-Barr virus (EBV). The risk for EBV recurrence is dependent on the level of incompetency of the immune system, presented as an impairment of T-cell immunity.

AREAS COVERED

This review summarizes the data on incidence and risk factors of EBV infection in patients after HCT. The median rate of EBV infection in HCT recipients was estimated at 30% after allogeneic and<1% after autologous transplant; 5% in non-transplant hematological malignancies; 30% in SOT recipients. The median rate of PTLD after HCT is estimated at 3%. The most frequently reported risk factors for EBV infection and disease include: donor EBV-seropositivity, use of T-cell depletion, especially with ATG; reduced-intensity conditioning; mismatched family or unrelated donor transplants; and acute or chronic graft-versus-host-disease.

EXPERT OPINION

The major risk factors for EBV infection and EBV-PTLD can be easily identified: EBV-seropositive donor, depletion of T-cells, and the use of immunosuppressive therapy. Strategies for avoiding risk factors include elimination EBV from the graft and improving T-cell function.

Pre-Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Rituximab for Epstein-Barr Virus and Post-Lymphoproliferative Disorder Prophylaxis in Alemtuzumab Recipients

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) reactivation and EBV-related post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) are often fatal complications after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). The risk of EBV reactivation may be mitigated by depletion of B cells with rituximab. Starting in January 2020, allo-HSCT recipients undergoing T-cell depletion with alemtuzumab received 1 dose of rituximab before transplantation. The objective of this study was to evaluate the cumulative incidence of EBV reactivation and EBV-PTLD in recipients of allo-HSCT and in vivo T-cell depletion with alemtuzumab who received pre-HSCT rituximab compared to patients who did not. This was a single-center retrospective analysis of adult patients who consecutively received an HLA-identical allo-HSCT between January 2019 and May 2021 and in vivo T-cell depletion with alemtuzumab. Patients were included in the rituximab cohort if they received rituximab within 6 months before their transplantation. The primary endpoint was incidence of EBV reactivation at day 180 among those receiving pre-HSCT rituximab versus those not receiving rituximab. Secondary endpoints included cumulative incidence of EBV-PTLD at 1 year, time to engraftment, immune reconstitution, and incidence of infections and acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) at day 180. Eighty-six consecutive patients who received an allo-HSCT with alemtuzumab T-cell depletion were reviewed; 43 patients who received pre-HSCT rituximab after our protocol modification were compared to 43 patients who did not receive pre-HSCT rituximab before this change. Median age was 57 (interquartile range [IQR] 40-69) years, and the majority of patients had acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome. Baseline characteristics were similar between the cohorts. EBV reactivation at day 180 occurred in 23 (53%) patients without prior rituximab exposure versus 0 patients with pre-HSCT rituximab exposure (P < .0001). Similarly, 6 patients without prior rituximab exposure developed PTLD at 1 year compared to no cases of PTLD among patients receiving pre-HSCT rituximab. There was no difference in neutrophil engraftment, incidence of infections, or aGVHD at day 180 between the 2 cohorts. There was a delay in time to platelet engraftment in the rituximab cohort (median 16 [IQR 15-20] days versus 15 [IQR 14-17] days; P = .04). Administration of pre-HSCT rituximab before allo-HSCT in patients receiving T-cell depletion with alemtuzumab was associated with a significant decrease in the risk for EBV reactivation and EBV-PTLD, without increasing aGVHD or infection rates.

Reduced-dose post-transplant cyclophosphamide plus low-dose post-transplant anti-thymocyte globulin as graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis with fludarabine-busulfan-cytarabine conditioning in haploidentical peripheral blood stem cell transplantation: A multicentre, randomized controlled clinical trial

Anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) or post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy)-based regimens are widely used for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis in haploidentical haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT). To improve the effectiveness of GVHD prophylaxis in haploidentical peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (haplo-PBSCT), we conducted a multicentre, randomized clinical trial to determine the efficacy of reduced-dose PTCy (40 mg/kg/d on days 3 and 4) combined with low-dose post-transplant ATG (2.5 mg/kg on day 8)-based GVHD prophylaxis (reduced-dose PTCy/ATG) with fludarabine-busulfan-cytarabine (FBA) conditioning for patients with haematological malignancies. From 2018 to 2022, 122 patients from four institutions were randomly assigned 1:1 to either a reduced-dose PTCy/ATG or a standard-dose ATG group ('Beijing Protocol', ATG: 10 mg/kg). All patients achieved myeloid engraftment. Cumulative incidences of grade II-IV (11.5% vs 39.3%, p = 0.001) and grade III-IV (6.6% vs 24.6%, p = 0.014) acute GVHD at day 100 were significantly reduced in the reduced-dose PTCy/ATG group. Furthermore, two-year overall survival, disease-free survival and GVHD-free/relapse-free survival were significantly improved in the reduced-dose PTCy/ATG group (75.4% vs 54.1%, p = 0.021; 72.7% vs 55.0%, p = 0.044; 61.3% vs 42.3%, p = 0.022 respectively). Our results demonstrate that the addition of low-dose ATG to reduced-dose PTCy with FBA conditioning is a promising strategy in haplo-PBSCT.

Machine learning algorithm as a prognostic tool for Epstein-Barr virus reactivation after haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) reactivation is one of the most important infections after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) using haplo-identical related donors (HID). We aimed to establish a comprehensive model with machine learning, which could predict EBV reactivation after HID HSCT with anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis. We enrolled 470 consecutive acute leukemia patients, 60% of them (n = 282) randomly selected as a training cohort, the remaining 40% (n = 188) as a validation cohort. The equation was as follows: Probability (EBV reactivation) =   1 1       +       e x p ( - Y ) , where Y = 0.0250 × (age) - 0.3614 × (gender) + 0.0668 × (underlying disease) - 0.6297 × (disease status before HSCT) - 0.0726 × (disease risk index) - 0.0118 × (hematopoietic cell transplantation-specific comorbidity index [HCT-CI] score) + 1.2037 × (human leukocyte antigen disparity) + 0.5347 × (EBV serostatus) + 0.1605 × (conditioning regimen) - 0.2270 × (donor/recipient gender matched) + 0.2304 × (donor/recipient relation) - 0.0170 × (mononuclear cell counts in graft) + 0.0395 × (CD34+ cell count in graft) - 2.4510. The threshold of probability was 0.4623, which separated patients into low- and high-risk groups. The 1-year cumulative incidence of EBV reactivation in the low- and high-risk groups was 11.0% versus 24.5% (P < .001), 10.7% versus 19.3% (P = .046), and 11.4% versus 31.6% (P = .001), respectively, in total, training and validation cohorts. The model could also predict relapse and survival after HID HSCT. We established a comprehensive model that could predict EBV reactivation in HID HSCT recipients using ATG for GVHD prophylaxis.

The impact of Rituximab administered before transplantation in patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: A real-world study

Rituximab is used to eliminate B cells as a chimeric monoclonal antibody directed against CD20, a B-cell antigen expressed on B cells. To explore the impact of rituximab administered before transplantation, we implemented a retrospective, monocentric study and utilized real-world data collected at our center between January 2018 and December 2020, and then followed until December 2021. Based on whether a dose of 375mg/m2 rituximab was used at least once within two weeks before transplantation, patients undergoing allo-HSCT were classified into two groups: rituximab (N=176) and non-rituximab (N=344) group. Amongst all the patients, the application of rituximab decreased EBV reactivation (P&lt;0.01) and rituximab was an independent factor in the prevention of EBV reactivation by both univariate and multivariate analyses (HR 0.56, 95%CI 0.33-0.97, P=0.04). In AML patients, there were significant differences in the cumulative incidence of aGVHD between the two groups (P=0.04). Our data showed that rituximab was association with a decreased incidence of aGVHD in AML patients according to both univariate and multivariate analyses. There was no difference between the two groups in other sets of populations. Thus, our study indicated that rituximab administered before transplantation may help prevent EBV reactivation in all allo-HSCT patients, as well as prevent aGVHD in AML patients after allo-HSCT.

Low-dose post-transplant cyclophosphamide with low-dose antithymocyte globulin for prevention of graft-versus-host disease in first complete remission undergoing 10/10 HLA-matched unrelated donor peripheral blood stem cell transplants: a multicentre, randomized controlled trial

The most widely used regimens of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis in HLA-matched unrelated donor peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (MUD-PBSCT) are based on anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) or post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy). To improve the efficiency of GVHD prophylaxis, a novel regimen, composed of low-dose PTCy (20 mg/kg on day +3 and +4) and low-dose ATG (6 mg/kg), was evaluted in patients with hematological malignancies ungoing 10/10 HLA MUD-PBSCT in first remission (CR1). In our prospective, multicenter study, 104 patients were randomly assigned one-to-one to low-dose PTCy-ATG (n = 53) or standard-dose ATG (10 mg/kg, n = 51). Both the cumulative incidences (CIs) of grade II-IV acute GVHD (aGVHD) and chronic GVHD (cGVHD) at 2 years in low-dose PTCy-ATG cohort were significantly reduced (24.5% vs. 47.1%; P = 0.017; 14.1% vs. 33.3%; P = 0.013). The CI of non-relapse-mortality (NRM) was much lower (13.2% vs. 34.5%; P = 0.049) and GVHD-free, relapse-free survival (GRFS) was significantly improved at 2 years in low-dose PTCy-ATG arm (67.3% vs 42.3%; P = 0.032). The low-dose PTCy-ATG based GVHD prophylaxis is a promising strategy for patients in CR1 after 10/10 HLA MUD-PBSCT.

Impact of HLA Epitope Matching on Outcomes After Unrelated Bone Marrow Transplantation

The significance of antibody-identified epitopes stimulating humoral alloimmunity is not well understood in the identification of non-permissive human leukocyte antigen (HLA) mismatching patterns in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). This was a retrospective study in a cohort of 9,991 patients who underwent their first HSCT for hematologic malignancies from unrelated bone marrow donors in the Transplant Registry Unified Management Program (TRUMP). HLA eplet mismatches (EMM) were quantified using HLAMatchmaker (HLAMM). The median age of patients was 48 years (range, 16 to 77). The number of EMM in recipient-donor pairs in our study population ranged from 0 to 37 in HLA class I (median, 0) and 0 to 60 in HLA class II (median, 1). In addition to the known high-risk mismatch patterns in the Japanese cohort, HLA-C EMM in the GVH direction was associated with a significantly higher risk for grade III-IV aGVHD, leading to a higher risk of non-relapse mortality and lower overall survival (compared with HLA-C matched patients, HR 1.67, 95% CI 1.44–1.95; HR 1.39, 95% CI 1.25–1.54; HR 1.20, 95% CI 1.10–1.30, respectively). HLAMM-based epitope matching might be useful for identifying patients who are at high risk for serious complications after HSCT from HLA mismatched unrelated donors.

Epstein-Barr virus posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder: update on management and outcomes

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Management of Epstein-Barr virus posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (EBV PTLD) is complex, involving risk stratification, prevention and/or preemptive measures involving monitoring EBV DNAemia and balancing treatment options, using a combination of reduction of immune suppression, anti-B cell therapy, and cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs).

RECENT FINDINGS

The highest risk factor for the development of EBV PTLD in hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) remains T cell depletion, with increasing use of antithymocyte globulin (ATG) or alemtuzumab in conditioning. In solid organ transplantation (SOT), the incidence of PTLD is highest among EBV seronegative recipients who are at risk for primary EBV infection following transplant in the first 12 months. Prevention is a critical component of the management of EBV PTLD. Although preemptive therapy remains standard of care, there continues to be heterogenicity and debate over the optimal choice of EBV DNA quantification and the threshold to use. Novel therapies such as donor-derived multipathogen and EBV specific CTLs for the prevention and third party CTLs for the treatment of EBV PTLD are promising, with rapidly expanding evidence, including large scale Phase III trials currently underway.

SUMMARY

With an increasing number of risk groups for developing EBV PTLD in HCT and SOT, management strategies using prophylaxis or preemptive therapy remain standard of care, however the use of prophylactic or preemptive EBV specific or multipathogen CTLs show promising results and safety profiles.

Association of antiviral prophylaxis and rituximab use with posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLDs): A nationwide cohort study

Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) is a serious complication of solid organ transplantation (SOT). Most PTLD cases are associated with Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection. The role of antiviral prophylaxis or rituximab therapy for prevention of PTLD in SOT recipients is controversial. In a nationwide cohort, we assessed the incidence, presentation, and outcome of histologically proven PTLD. We included 4765 patients with a follow-up duration of 23 807 person-years (py). Fifty-seven PTLD cases were identified; 39 (68%) were EBV positive (EBV+ PTLD). Incidence rates for EBV+ PTLD at 1, 2, and 3 years posttransplant were 3.51, 2.24, and 1.75/1000 py and 0.44, 0.25, and 0.29/1000 py for EBV- PTLD. We did not find an effect of antiviral prophylaxis on early and late EBV+ PTLD occurrence (early EBV+ PTLD: SHR 0.535 [95% CI 0.199-1.436], p = .264; late EBV+ PTLD: SHR 2.213, [95% CI 0.751-6.521], p = .150). However, none of the patients (0/191) who received a rituximab-containing induction treatment experienced PTLD, but 57 of 4574 patients without rituximab induction developed PTLD. In an adjusted restricted mean survival time model, PTLD-free survival was significantly longer (0.104 years [95% CI 0.077-0.131]) in patients receiving rituximab as induction treatment. This study provides novel data on the association of rituximab induction and reduced risk for PTLD.

P2X7 receptor antagonism increases regulatory T cells and reduces clinical and histological graft-versus-host disease in a humanised mouse model

Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a severe inflammatory response arising from allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Previous studies revealed that antagonism of the P2X7 receptor with Brilliant Blue G (BBG) reduced liver GVHD but did not alter clinical GVHD in a humanised mouse model. Therefore, the present study aimed to trial a modified injection regime using more frequent dosing of BBG to improve outcomes in this model of GVHD. NOD-scid IL2Rγnull (NSG) mice were injected intraperitoneally (i.p.) with 10 × 106 human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (hPBMCs) (day 0), then daily with BBG (50 mg/kg) or saline (days 0-10). BBG significantly reduced clinical score, mortality and histological GVHD compared with saline treatment (endpoint). BBG significantly increased proportions of human regulatory T cells (Tregs) and human B cells and reduced serum human interferon-γ compared with saline treatment prior to development of clinical GVHD (day 21). To confirm the therapeutic benefit of P2X7 antagonism, NSG mice were injected i.p. with 10 × 106 hPBMCs (day 0), then daily with pyridoxalphosphate-6-azophenyl-2',4'-disulfonic acid (PPADS) (300 mg/kg) or saline (days 0-10). PPADS increased human Treg proportions compared with saline treatment (day 21), but potential clinical benefits were confounded by increased weight loss with this antagonist. To investigate the role of P2X7 antagonism on Treg survival, hPBMCs were cultured in reduced serum conditions to promote cell death. BBG increased proportions of Tregs (and B cells) compared with saline under these conditions. In conclusion, P2X7 antagonism reduces clinical and histological GVHD in a humanised mouse model corresponding to an increase in human Tregs.

Post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorder after haematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) is a severe complication of haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), occurring in a setting of immune suppression and dysregulation. The disease is in most cases driven by the reactivation of the Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), which induces B cell proliferation through different pathomechanisms. Beyond EBV, many factors, variably dependent on HSCT-related immunosuppression, contribute to the disease development. PTLDs share several features with primary lymphomas, though clinical manifestations may be different, frequently depending on extranodal involvement. According to the WHO classification, histologic examination is required for diagnosis, allowing also to distinguish among PTLD subtypes. However, in cases of severe and abrupt presentation, a diagnosis based on a combination of imaging studies and EBV-load determination is accepted. Therapies include prophylactic and pre-emptive interventions, aimed at eradicating EBV proliferation before symptoms onset, and targeted treatments. Among them, rituximab has emerged as first-line option, possibly combined with a reduction of immunosuppression, while EBV-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes are effective and safe alternatives. Though prognosis remains poor, survival has markedly improved following the adoption of the aforementioned treatments. The validation of innovative, combined approaches is the future challenge.

Feasibility of reduced-dose posttransplant cyclophosphamide and cotransplantation of peripheral blood stem cells and umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells for SAA

Posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) as graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis is an effective strategie for patients receiving matched sibling donor hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (MSD-HSCT) and haploidentical HSCT (haplo-HSCT). We evaluated the effectiveness and safety of reduced-dose cyclophosphamide, 20 mg/kg for 13 patients in MSD-HSCT cohort and 25 mg/kg for 22 patients in haplo-HSCT cohort, on days + 3, + 4 combined with cotransplantation of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) and human umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells (UC-MSCs) for severe aplastic anemia (SAA). In MSD-PTCy cohort, the times to neutrophil and platelet engraftment were significantly shorter than those in the MSD-control cohort (P < 0.05). The cumulative incidence of acute GVHD (aGVHD) at day + 100 (15.4%) was lower than that in the MSD-control cohort (P = 0.050). No patient developed chronic GVHD (cGVHD). The 1-year overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) rates were 100% and 92.3%. In haplo-PTCy cohort, the times to neutrophil and platelet engraftment were significantly shorter than those in the haplo-control cohort (P < 0.05). The cumulative incidences of aGVHD at day + 100 and 1-year cGVHD were 31.8% and 18.2%, and the 1-year OS and EFS rates were 81.8% and 66.9%. Reduced-dose PTCy and cotransplantation of PBSCs and UC-MSCs is an acceptable alternative to patients with SAA.

Reducing infectious complications after allogeneic stem cell transplant

INTRODUCTION

Infections remain a significant problem, in patients undergoing an allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplant (HSCT) and efforts have been made over the years, to reduce the incidence, morbidity and mortality of infectious complications.

AREAS COVERED

This manuscript is focused on the epidemiology, risk factors and prevention of infections after allogeneic HSCT. A systematic literature review was performed using the PubMed database, between November 2019 and January 2020, with the following MeSH terms: stem-cell transplantation, infection, fungal, bacterial, viral, prophylaxis, vaccines, prevention. The authors reviewed all the publications, and following a common revision, a summary report was made and results were divided in three sections: bacterial, fungal and viral infections.

EXPERT OPINION

Different infections occur in the early, intermediate and late post-transplant period, due to distinct risk factors. Improved diagnostic techniques, pre-emtive therapy and better prophylaxis of immunologic complications, have reduced the morbidity and mortality of infections. The role of the gut microbiota is under careful scrutiny and may further help us to identify high-risk patients.

Management of PTLD After Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: Immunological Perspectives

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLDs) are life-threatening complications of iatrogenic immune impairment after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). In the pediatric setting, the majority of PTLDs are related to the Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection, and present as B-cell lymphoproliferations. Although considered rare events, PTLDs have been increasingly observed with the widening application of HSCT from alternative sources, including cord blood and HLA-haploidentical stem cell grafts, and the use of novel agents for the prevention and treatment of rejection and graft-vs.-host disease. The higher frequency initially paralleled a poor outcome, due to limited therapeutic options, and scarcity of controlled trials in a rare disease context. In the last 2 decades, insight into the relationship between EBV and the immune system, and advances in early diagnosis, monitoring and treatment have changed the approach to the management of PTLDs after HSCT, and significantly ameliorated the prognosis. In this review, we summarize literature on the impact of combined viro-immunologic assessment on PTLD management, describe the various strategies for PTLD prevention and preemptive/curative treatment, and discuss the potential of novel immune-based therapies in the containment of this malignant complication.

Rabbit ATG/ATLG in preventing graft-versus-host disease after allogeneic stem cell transplantation: consensus-based recommendations by an international expert panel

This collaborative initiative aimed to provide recommendations on the use of polyclonal antithymocyte globulin (ATG) or anti-T lymphocyte globulin (ATLG) for the prevention of graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). A comprehensive review of articles released up to October, 2018 was performed as a source of scientific evidence. Fourteen clinically relevant key questions to the domains indication, administration, and post-transplant management were developed and recommendations were produced using the Delphi technique involving a Panel of 14 experts. ATG/ATLG was strongly recommended as part of myeloablative conditioning regimen prior to matched or mismatched unrelated bone marrow or peripheral blood allogeneic HSCT in malignant diseases to prevent severe acute and chronic GvHD. ATG/ATLG was also recommended prior to HLA-identical sibling peripheral HSCT with good but lesser bulk of evidence. In reduced intensity or nonmyeloablative conditioning regimens, ATG/ATLG was deemed appropriate to reduce the incidence of acute and chronic GvHD, but a higher risk of relapse should be taken into account. Recommendations regarding dose, application, and premedication were also provided as well as post-transplant infectious prophylaxis and vaccination. Overall, these recommendations can be used for a proper and safe application of polyclonal ATG/ATLG to prevent GvHD after allogeneic HSCT.

Management of Epstein-Barr virus-related post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Epstein–Barr virus-related post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (EBV-PTLD) is a rare but life-threatening complication after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). T-cell immunodeficiency after transplantation and EBV primary infection/reactivation play major roles in the pathogenesis. Unspecific clinical manifestations make the diagnosis difficult and time consuming. Moreover, this fatal disease usually progresses rapidly, and leads to multiple organ dysfunction or death if not treated promptly. Early diagnosis of EBV-DNAemia or EBV-PTLD generally increases the chances of successful treatment by focusing on regular monitoring of EBV-DNA and detection of symptomatic patients as early as possible. Rituximab ± reduction of immunosuppression (RI) is currently the first-line choice in preemptive intervention and targeted treatment. Unless patients are suffering from severe graft versus host disease (GvHD), it is better to combine rituximab with RI. Once a probable diagnosis is made, the first-line treatment should be initiated rapidly, along with, or ahead of, biopsy, although histopathologic confirmation is requisite. In addition, EBV-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes (EBV-CTLs) or donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) has shown promise in cases of suboptimal response. Chemotherapy ± rituximab might lend more opportunities to refractory/relapsed patients, who might also benefit from ongoing clinical trials. Herein, we discuss our clinical experience in detail based on the current literature and our five cases.

Epstein-Barr virus related post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder prevention strategies in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Epstein-Barr virus associated post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders (EBV PTLD) are recognized as a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT). The number of patients at risk of developing EBV PTLD is increasing, partly as a result of highly immunosuppressive regimens, including the use of anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG). Importantly, there is heterogeneity in PTLD management strategies between alloHSCT centers worldwide. This review summarizes the different EBV PTLD prevention strategies being utilized including the alloHSCT and T-cell depletion regimes and the risk they confer; monitoring programs, including the timing and analytes used for EBV virus detection, as well as pre-emptive thresholds and therapy with rituximab. In the absence of an institution-specific policy, it is suggested that the optimal pre-emptive strategy in HSCT recipients with T-cell depleting treatments, acute graft vs host disease (GVHD) and a mismatched donor for PTLD prevention is (a) monitoring of EBV DNA post-transplant weekly using plasma or WB as analyte and (b) pre-emptively reducing immune suppression (if possible) at an EBV DNA threshold of >1000 copies/mL (plasma or WB), and treating with rituximab at a threshold of >1000 copies/mL (plasma) or >5000 copies/mL (WB). There is emerging evidence for prophylactic rituximab as a feasible and safe strategy for PTLD, particularly if pre-emptive monitoring is problematic. Future management strategies such as prophylactic EBV specific CTLs have shown promising results and as this procedure becomes less expensive and more accessible, it may become the strategy of choice for EBV PTLD prevention.

Low incidence of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder after allogeneic stem cell transplantation in patients with lymphoma treated with rituximab

Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) is a serious complication after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Several studies of risk factors for PTLD have been reported; however, the probability of, and risk factors for, PTLD in patients with lymphoma is unknown. Japanese nationwide transplant registry data from 5270 patients with lymphoma after allogeneic HSCT were analyzed. Mature B-cell, T/NK-cell, and T-cell lymphoblastic subtypes accounted for 49%, 26%, and 9.6% of lymphoma cases, respectively. Rituximab was used in 1678 lymphoma patients, most of whom (89%) received HSCT for mature B-cell lymphoma. Thirty-one patients with lymphoma developed PTLD, representing a probability of 0.77% at 2 years post-HSCT, which did not differ significantly from that in patients with other diseases (P = .98). Year of HSCT after 2010 (hazard ratio [HR] = 5.6, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.48-21.3), antithymocyte globulin (ATG) use in the conditioning regimen (HR = 4.5, 95% CI, 1.61-12.5), and no rituximab use before HSCT (HR = 3.2, 95% CI, 1.26-7.90) were identified as risk factors for PTLD. Probabilities of PTLD at 1 year post-HSCT according to rituximab and ATG use were 0.23% (rituximab+, ATG-), 0.75% (rituximab-, ATG-), 1.25% (rituximab+, ATG+), and 3.53% (rituximab-, ATG+). Regarding lymphoma subtypes, patients with mature B-cell lymphoma had the lowest incidence of PTLD (0.35% at 2 years). Among high-risk patients receiving ATG, the mortality rate due to infection was elevated in those previously treated with rituximab (22%) relative to those without (14%); however, the difference was not significant (P = .10). Rituximab use before HSCT significantly reduces the risk of PTLD. Adding rituximab to the conditioning regimen is potentially a good strategy to prevent the development of PTLD in high-risk patients.

Control of graft-versus-host disease with rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin, rituximab, and bortezomib in TCRαβ/CD19-depleted graft transplantation for leukemia in children: a single-center retrospective analysis of two GVHD-prophylaxis regimens

Both acute GVHD and chronic GVHD remain the leading cause of morbidity and death after allogeneic HSCT. We conducted a retrospective analysis comparing two GVHD-prophylaxis regimens: 35 patients received "Regimen 1" (horse ATG, tacrolimus, and methotrexate) and 46 "Regimen 2" (rabbit ATG, rituximab, and peritransplant bortezomib). All 81 patients with a median age of 9 (0.6-23) years with ALL (n = 31) or AML (n = 50) in complete remission received TCRαβ/CD19-depleted transplants between May 2012 and October 2016, from 40 HLA-matched unrelated and 41 haploidentical donors. After a median follow-up of 3.9 years, the CI of acute GVHD II-IV was 15% (95% CI: 7-30) in the "Regimen 2" group and 34% (95% CI: -54) in the "Regimen 1" group, P = .05. "Regimen 2" was also more effective in the prevention of chronic GVHD; the CI at 1 year after HSCT was 7% (95% CI: 2-19) vs 31% (95% CI: 19-51), P = .005. The CI of relapse at 3 years adjusted for the GVHD-prophylaxis regimen groups 31% (95% CI: 19-51) for the "Regimen 1" vs 21% (95% CI: 11-37) for the "Regimen 2", P = .3. The retrospective observation suggests that the use of the rATG, rituximab, and bortezomib was associated with significantly lower rate of GVHD without the loss of anti-leukemic activity.

Epstein-Barr Virus-Associated Post-Transplant Lymphoproliferative Disorders after Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: Pathogenesis, Risk Factors and Clinical Outcomes

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is a ubiquitous virus belonging to the human γ-herpes virus subfamily. After primary infection, EBV maintains a life-long latent infection. A major concern is that EBV can cause a diverse range of neoplasms and autoimmune diseases. In addition, patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation or solid organ transplantation can experience post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLDs) due to dysfunction or suppression of host’s immune system, or uncontrolled proliferation of EBV-infected cells. In recent years, the number of EBV-associated PTLD cases has increased. This review focuses on the current understandings of EBV-associated PTLD pathogenesis, as well as the risk factors and clinical outcomes for patients after allogeneic stem cell transplantation.

Partial T Cell-Depleted Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation from HLA-Identical Sibling Donors for Patients with Severe Aplastic Anemia

We analyzed the outcomes of 26 consecutive patients with acquired severe aplastic anemia (SAA) undergoing peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT) with partial ex vivo T cell depletion with a targeted T cell dose from HLA-identical sibling donors. The median patient age was 37 years (range, 3 to 63 years). Four patients with uncontrolled pneumonia at the time of transplantation died, on days +1, +2, +21, and +26. All evaluable patients engrafted, with a median time to neutrophil recovery of 11 days (range, 10 to 14 days) and a median time to platelet recovery of 19 days (range, 8 to 53 days). Two patients had transient grade I acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) with skin involvement, but no patients developed grade II-IV acute GVHD. Two patients had mild skin chronic GVHD, and 1 patient had moderate chronic GVHD with ocular involvement. No relapse was observed after a median follow-up of 114 months (range, 4 to 233 months). The overall cumulative incidence of TRM at 10 years was 19%, whereas it was 5% for those with a Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) score >60 at the time of transplantation. Disease-free survival, overall survival, and GVHD and relapse-free survival at 10 years were 81%, 81%, and 80%, respectively, for all patients and 95%, 95%, and 90%, respectively, for patients with a KPS score >60 at transplantation. Our data indicate that PBSCT with partial ex vivo T cell-depleted targeted cell dose grafts from an HLA-identical sibling donor is a feasible, safe, and effective approach to reduce GVHD and cure patients with SAA.

Successful nivolumab therapy in an allogeneic stem cell transplant child with post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder

Primary CNS PTLD is an extremely rare complication after allogeneic HSCT. At our centre, an 11-year-old patient developed nausea, vomiting, and diplopy on day +82 following HSCT. On brain MRI, multiple white matter lesions were seen. Histology showed a diffuse large B-cell lymphoma with high load of EBV in tissue. Despite stopping immunosuppression, treatment with EBV-specific cytotoxic T cells, systemic rituximab, HD-MTX, and intrathecal chemotherapy, progression was observed. With a combination of HD-MTX and cytarabine, only a partial response could be achieved. Having all conventional modalities not only failed but resulted in significant toxicity, a salvage monotherapy with biweekly nivolumab has been instituted. The starting dose was 1.1 mg/kg, later escalated to 2.2 mg/kg. After 8 months of nivolumab therapy, PET-CT showed complete metabolic remission. Subsequently, the patient has been switched to a maintenance dosage of 1.1 mg/kg. No cytopenias, graft failure, GvHD, or any other alloimmune complications were seen during nivolumab therapy. In conclusion, nivolumab may be considered as an effective and safe option for CNS PTLD therapy when all other modalities have failed.

Alternative donor transplants for severe aplastic anemia

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation remains the only curative treatment for patients with acquired severe aplastic anemia (SAA). When a matched sibling is not available, one can search for a matched unrelated donor or a cord blood unit (CB) in the international registries or, more recently, for an HLA haploidentical (HAPLO) family member. International guidelines call for a course of antithymocyte globulin (ATG) and cyclosporine before a patient with SAA receives a transplant from a donor other than an HLA identical sibling, but whether this is necessary for patients age <20 years is less clear. Here I will examine the rapid increase in HAPLO transplantations for SAA, showing encouraging early results both in children and young adults. Graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis remains of primary importance in patients with SAA, and in vivo T-cell depletion with either ATG or alemtuzumab offers a significant survival advantage. Finally, I will discuss the strong age effect, which is particularly evident at >40 and 50 years of age for reasons not entirely clear and which should be taken into account when designing a treatment strategy for a given patient.

Efficacy of lamivudine prophylaxis in preventing hepatitis B virus reactivation in patients with resolved infection undergoing allogeneic SCT and receiving rituximab

PURPOSE

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation during immunosuppressive therapy is common in patients with hematological malignancies, even in case of resolved infection. Prophylaxis of HBV reactivation is universally recommended in stem cell transplant (SCT) recipients and patients treated with anti-CD20 agents (i.e., rituximab). Despite its well-established favorable safety profile, lamivudine (LAM) use in prophylaxis has been debated because of the possible emergence of resistant viral strains. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of LAM in preventing HBV reactivation in allogeneic SCT recipients with a resolved HBV infection.

METHODS

Patients who received first allogeneic SCT in years 2009-2016 were evaluated. Sixty-three patients with resolved infection received LAM prophylaxis and were included in the study. Baseline and post-SCT characteristics were recorded, including rituximab exposure, length of LAM prophylaxis, and time from transplant to the last clinical and virological follow-up.

RESULTS

Overall, 39 patients (62%) were male, 39 (62%) had acute myeloid leukemia, 38 (60%) received transplant from haploidentical donor, 29 (53%) received myeloablative conditioning, and 15 (24%) received rituximab post-transplant. Median clinical follow-up was 24 months after SCT (range 0.3-97); median virological follow-up 16 months (range 0.3-78), and median length of LAM prophylaxis of 14.5 months (range 0.3-78). No patient experienced HBV reactivation while on LAM prophylaxis. One patient experienced reactivation 8 months after discontinuing prophylaxis.

CONCLUSIONS

In this high-risk population, LAM prophylaxis was effective in preventing HBV reactivation in patients with resolved infection. It should be considered a reasonable first-line prophylactic agent to be administered in this setting.

Unrelated cord blood transplantation in patients with idiopathic refractory severe aplastic anemia: a nationwide phase 2 study

Outcomes remain poor for refractory severe aplastic anemia (SAA) patients. Alternative donor transplantation may be considered, but results from previous studies are not encouraging. We conducted a prospective nationwide phase 2 study to assess unrelated cord blood (CB) transplantation (CBT) efficacy and safety in refractory SAA patients (Aplastic Anemia and Cord Blood Transplantation protocol). To demonstrate a significant difference in 1-year survival from 20% (null hypothesis) to 50% (alternative hypothesis), we needed to include 25 transplanted patients and therefore included 26 (median age, 16 years). Eligibility criteria required 1 or 2 unrelated CB units, containing separately or together >4 × 10⁷ frozen nucleated cells (NCs) per kilogram of recipient body weight. Conditioning regimen comprised fludarabine (FLU), cyclophosphamide (CY), antithymocyte globulin (ATG), and 2-Gy total body irradiation (TBI). With a median follow-up of 38.8 months, engraftment occurred in 23 patients (88%); cumulative incidences of grade II-IV acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease were 45.8% and 36%, respectively. Twenty-three patients were alive at 1 year, with an 88.5% overall survival (OS) rate, differing significantly from the expected 20% (P < .0001; 84% OS at 2 years). CBT with units containing ≥4 × 10⁷ frozen NCs per kilogram is therefore a valuable curative option for young adults with refractory SAA and no available matched unrelated donors. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01343953.

[How to manage EBV reactivation and EBV-PTLD, CMV and human herpesvirus 6 reactivation and infection after allogeneic stem cell transplantation: A report of the SFGM-TC (update)]

The French society of bone marrow transplantation and cell therapy (SFGM-TC) organizes annually workshops in the attempt to harmonize clinical practices between different francophone transplantation center. Here, we report our recommendations regarding the management of Epstein Barr virus reactivation and lymphoproliferative disorders, cytomegalovirus (CMV) and human herpes virus 6 (HHV6) after allogeneic stem cell transplantation.

Pre-emptive rituximab for Epstein-Barr virus reactivation after haplo-hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

BACKGROUND

Epstein-Barr virus-related post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disease (EBV-PTLD) is a serious complication in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) recipients.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study to investigate the incidence and potential risk factors for EBV reactivation and to assess the efficacy of the management of EBV reactivation with pre-emptive rituximab in children who had T-cell-replete haploidentical HSCT (TCR-haplo-SCT) with low-dose anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG). EBV-DNA level in peripheral blood (PB) was measured when suspected EBV reactivation were observed. When the EBV-DNA level in PB increased to >1,000 copies/10⁶ peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC), patients were pre-emptively treated with rituximab (375 mg/m² /dose).

RESULTS

A total of 19 (50%) of 38 patients received rituximab infusion at a median time of 56 days after HSCT (range, 17-270 days). The median viral load at initiation of therapy was 2,900 copies/10⁶ PBMC (range, 1,000-650 000). Pre-emptive therapy was started after a median of 2 days (range, 0-7 days). The median number of weekly treatment cycles was 2 (range, 1-3). None of the patients developed PTLD or other EBV-associated diseases.

CONCLUSION

Pre-emptive rituximab therapy could be a useful strategy for EBV-PTLD in TCR-haplo-SCT recipients with low-dose ATG.

Pre-Engraftment Bloodstream Infections after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: Impact of T Cell-Replete Transplantation from a Haploidentical Donor

Bloodstream infections (BSIs) are frequent and important infectious complications after hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). The aim of this study was to analyze the incidence, risk factors, and outcome of pre-engraftment BSIs after allogeneic HCT. We retrospectively analyzed data from 553 consecutive patients who underwent HCT between 2010 and 2016. Sixty percent of the patients received T cell-replete unmanipulated haploidentical bone marrow with high-dose post-transplantation cyclophosphamide. The BSI rate was 30%; among isolated 213 pathogens, 54% were Gram-positive, 43% were Gram-negative, and 3% were fungi. Independent risk factors for pre-engraftment BSI were transplantation from a haploidentical donor or from cord blood (P < .001), active disease (P = .002), age (P = .04), and myeloproliferative disorders or aplastic anemia (P < .001). Transplantation from a haploidentical donor was an independent risk factor for both Gram-positive and Gram-negative BSI. The 7-day mortality after any BSI was 5% (9 of 178), and in multivariate analysis, BSI etiology was the sole risk factor, with increased mortality in carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative BSI (P < .001). Nonrelapse mortality at day +60 after HCT was 3.8% (21 of 553); independent predictors were active disease (P = .045), year of HCT (P = .027), nonengraftment (P = .001), and pre-engraftment BSI (P < .001), with significantly higher risk in BSI due to Gram-negative pathogens compared with Gram-positive pathogens, and BSI due to carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogens compared with susceptible pathogens. Pre-engraftment BSI is a frequent complication after HCT from a haploidentical donor or cord blood. Because the negative impact of pre-engraftment BSI on 60-day nonrelapse mortality was caused mainly by carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogens, particular attention should be given to appropriate empiric therapy and management of patients at high risk for Gram-negative BSI.

Management of Epstein-Barr Virus infections and post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders in patients after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: Sixth European Conference on Infections in Leukemia (ECIL-6) guidelines

Epstein-Barr virus-related post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders are recognized as a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. To better define current understanding of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders in stem cell transplant patients, and to improve its diagnosis and management, a working group of the Sixth European Conference on Infections in Leukemia 2015 reviewed the literature, graded the available quality of evidence, and developed evidence-based recommendations for diagnosis, prevention, prophylaxis and therapy of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders exclusively in the stem cell transplant setting. The key elements in diagnosis include non-invasive and invasive methods. The former are based on quantitative viral load measurement and imaging with positron emission tomography; the latter with tissue biopsy for histopathology and detection of Epstein-Barr virus. The diagnosis of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder can be established on a proven or probable level. Therapeutic strategies include prophylaxis, preemptive therapy and targeted therapy. Rituximab, reduction of immunosuppression and Epstein-Barr virus-specific cytotoxic T-cell therapy are recommended as first-line therapy, whilst unselected donor lymphocyte infusions or chemotherapy are options as second-line therapy; other methods including antiviral drugs are discouraged.

Alternative Donor Graft Sources for Adults with Hematologic Malignancies: A Donor for All Patients in 2017!

Hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) is potentially curative for a wide variety of malignant diseases, including acute and leukemias, lymphoma, and myelodysplasia. Choice of a stem cell donor is dependent on donor availability, donor compatibility and health, recipient disease type, and recipient condition. Current sources of stem cell donation for HSCT are matched sibling donors (MSDs), matched unrelated donors (MUDs), 1-antigen mismatched unrelated donors (MMUDs), haploidentical donors (haplo), and umbilical cord blood (UCB) units. Historically, preferred donors for HSCT have been human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched sibling donors; however, only about 30% of U.S. patients will have a MSD available. The majority of patients referred for HSCT will require an alternative donor graft: MUD, MMUD, UCB, or haplo. The likelihood of finding a MUD varies depending on the ethnicity of the recipient. White Caucasians of European descent have the greatest chance of finding a MUD. Chances of finding a MUD are significantly less for African-American or Hispanic recipients due to HLA polymorphisms. Therefore, MMUD, UCB, and haplo donor graft sources expand the donor pool for recipients who do not have a MSD or MUD available. Given the variety of different donor stem cell sources available today, nearly every patient who needs an allogeneic HSCT has a potential donor in 2017. All transplant-eligible patients with hematologic malignancies should be evaluated by a transplant center to determine if HSCT is a viable treatment option for their underlying disease process.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

The goal of this review is to increase the awareness of oncology practitioners to the availability of alternative donor stem cell transplants for patients with hematologic malignancies. Despite new agents, stem cell transplant remains the only curative therapy for many patients with acute and chronic leukemia, myelodysplasia, and lymphoma. Given the variety of different donor stem cell sources available today, nearly every patient who needs an allogeneic stem cell transplant will have a donor.

Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation for Relapsed/Refractory B Cell Lymphomas: Results of a Multicenter Phase II Prospective Trial including Rituximab in the Reduced-Intensity Conditioning Regimen

The treatment of patients with refractory/relapsed B cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) is evolving because of the availability of novel drugs. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) can be curative, but its morbidity and mortality remain a matter of concern. We conducted a multicenter prospective phase II trial to evaluate the benefit of including only 1 dose of rituximab in the conditioning regimen before alloSCT. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival. The study enrolled 121 patients with relapsed/refractory B cell lymphomas. The conditioning regimen consisted of thiotepa, cyclophosphamide, fludarabine, and rituximab (500 mg/m²). Rabbit antithymocyte globulin was administered only in case of unrelated donors. Sixty-seven (55%) and 54 (45%) patients received grafts from related and unrelated donors, respectively. The crude cumulative incidence (CCI) of nonrelapse mortality (NRM) was 21% at 3 years. The CCIs of chronic graft-verus-host disease (GVHD) at 3 years were 54% and 31% in recipients of matched sibling and unrelated grafts, respectively. At a median follow-up of 41 months, the estimated 3-year progression-free and overall survival were 50% and 61%, respectively. Long-term outcome was also evaluated with the composite endpoint of GVHD-free and relapse-free survival (GRFS). This is the first work evaluating the GRFS in a prospective trial of lymphoma patients: the 1-year and 3-year GRFS were 40% and 34%, respectively. AlloSCT can cure a fraction of patients with rather low NRM and an encouraging PFS and GRFS.

ATG in allogeneic stem cell transplantation: standard of care in 2017? Point

Publisher's Note: This article has a companion Counterpoint by Kekre and Antin. Publisher's Note: Join in the discussion of these articles at Blood Advances Community Conversations.

Protective Effect of Rituximab in Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease Occurrence in Allogeneic Transplant patients with Epstein Barr Virus Viremia

B cells are involved in chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) pathogenesis, and Rituximab may have a therapeutic effect on cGVHD in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) patients. Herein, we retrospectively evaluated the prophylactic effect of Rituximab on cGVHD in a group of Chinese allo-HSCT patients. A total of 102 patients, who suffered Epstein Barr virus (EBV) viremia within 100 days after allo-HSCT, were included in this study. Fifty patients received Rituximab (375 mg/m² weekly) for EBV viremia, while fifty-two patients did not receive Rituximab. A competing risk model was adopted to compare cumulative incidence of cGVHD, cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) and transplantation-related mortality (TRM) between two groups. Cumulative incidence of cGVHD in the Rituximab group was lower than in controls (P = 0.0579). Multivariate analyses confirmed that Rituximab was an independent factor for the reduction of cumulative cGVHD incidence (P = 0.0069). No significant difference was observed in CIR (P = 0.39) or TRM (P = 0.48) between two groups and 2-year OS and DFS were comparable (OS, P = 0.667; DFS, P = 0.571). Administration of Rituximab in the early post-transplantation phase may protect against cGVHD in allo-HSCT patients without increasing CIR or TRM.

How I treat acquired aplastic anemia

Acquired severe aplastic anemia (SAA) is a rare hematologic disease associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Immune destruction of hemopoietic stem cells plays an important role in pathogenesis, as shown by successful treatment with immunosuppressive agents, leading to transfusion independence or complete recovery of peripheral blood counts in a proportion of patients. Growth factors can be combined with immunosuppressive therapy (IST) and may improve response rates, as recently shown with thrombopoietin analogs. Anabolic steroids may still play a role in combination with IST. The problem with IST is failure to respond and the development of late clonal disorders. Bone marrow transplantation (BMT) is the other therapeutic option: a matched sibling donor remains the best choice. For patients lacking a matched family donor, unrelated donors can be readily found, although mostly for patients of Caucasian origin. Other BMT options include unrelated cord blood or mismatched family donors. Acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease remain important complications of BMT. Patient age is a strong predictor of outcome for both IST and BMT, and must be considered when designing therapeutic strategies. Early diagnosis and treatment, as well as long-term monitoring, remain crucial steps for successful treatment of SAA.