1
|
Haas CB, Su YR, Petersen P, Wang X, Bien SA, Lin Y, Albanes D, Weinstein SJ, Jenkins MA, Figueiredo JC, Newcomb PA, Casey G, Le Marchand L, Campbell PT, Moreno V, Potter JD, Sakoda LC, Slattery ML, Chan AT, Li L, Giles GG, Milne RL, Gruber SB, Rennert G, Woods MO, Gallinger SJ, Berndt S, Hayes RB, Huang WY, Wolk A, White E, Nan H, Nassir R, Lindor NM, Lewinger JP, Kim AE, Conti D, Gauderman WJ, Buchanan DD, Peters U, Hsu L. Interactions between folate intake and genetic predictors of gene expression levels associated with colorectal cancer risk. Sci Rep 2022; 12:18852. [PMID: 36344807 PMCID: PMC9640550 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-23451-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2021] [Accepted: 10/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Observational studies have shown higher folate consumption to be associated with lower risk of colorectal cancer (CRC). Understanding whether and how genetic risk factors interact with folate could further elucidate the underlying mechanism. Aggregating functionally relevant genetic variants in set-based variant testing has higher power to detect gene-environment (G × E) interactions and may provide information on the underlying biological pathway. We investigated interactions between folate consumption and predicted gene expression on colorectal cancer risk across the genome. We used variant weights from the PrediXcan models of colon tissue-specific gene expression as a priori variant information for a set-based G × E approach. We harmonized total folate intake (mcg/day) based on dietary intake and supplemental use across cohort and case-control studies and calculated sex and study specific quantiles. Analyses were performed using a mixed effects score tests for interactions between folate and genetically predicted expression of 4839 genes with available genetically predicted expression. We pooled results across 23 studies for a total of 13,498 cases with colorectal tumors and 13,918 controls of European ancestry. We used a false discovery rate of 0.2 to identify genes with suggestive evidence of an interaction. We found suggestive evidence of interaction with folate intake on CRC risk for genes including glutathione S-Transferase Alpha 1 (GSTA1; p = 4.3E-4), Tonsuko Like, DNA Repair Protein (TONSL; p = 4.3E-4), and Aspartylglucosaminidase (AGA: p = 4.5E-4). We identified three genes involved in preventing or repairing DNA damage that may interact with folate consumption to alter CRC risk. Glutathione is an antioxidant, preventing cellular damage and is a downstream metabolite of homocysteine and metabolized by GSTA1. TONSL is part of a complex that functions in the recovery of double strand breaks and AGA plays a role in lysosomal breakdown of glycoprotein.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cameron B. Haas
- grid.34477.330000000122986657Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA USA ,grid.270240.30000 0001 2180 1622Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA USA
| | - Yu-Ru Su
- grid.270240.30000 0001 2180 1622Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA USA
| | - Paneen Petersen
- grid.270240.30000 0001 2180 1622Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA USA
| | - Xiaoliang Wang
- grid.270240.30000 0001 2180 1622Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA USA
| | - Stephanie A. Bien
- grid.270240.30000 0001 2180 1622Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA USA
| | - Yi Lin
- grid.270240.30000 0001 2180 1622Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA USA
| | - Demetrius Albanes
- grid.48336.3a0000 0004 1936 8075Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD USA
| | - Stephanie J. Weinstein
- grid.48336.3a0000 0004 1936 8075Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD USA
| | - Mark A. Jenkins
- grid.1008.90000 0001 2179 088XCentre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC Australia
| | - Jane C. Figueiredo
- grid.50956.3f0000 0001 2152 9905Department of Medicine, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA USA ,grid.42505.360000 0001 2156 6853Department of Preventive Medicine and USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA USA
| | - Polly A. Newcomb
- grid.270240.30000 0001 2180 1622Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA USA ,grid.34477.330000000122986657School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA USA
| | - Graham Casey
- grid.27755.320000 0000 9136 933XCenter for Public Health Genomics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA USA
| | - Loic Le Marchand
- grid.410445.00000 0001 2188 0957University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, HI USA
| | - Peter T. Campbell
- grid.422418.90000 0004 0371 6485Behavioral and Epidemiology Research Group, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA USA
| | - Victor Moreno
- grid.418701.b0000 0001 2097 8389Oncology Data Analytics Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology-IDIBELL, L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain ,grid.466571.70000 0004 1756 6246CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain ,grid.5841.80000 0004 1937 0247Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain ,grid.418284.30000 0004 0427 2257ONCOBEL Program, Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - John D. Potter
- grid.270240.30000 0001 2180 1622Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA USA ,grid.148374.d0000 0001 0696 9806Center for Public Health Research, Massey University, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Lori C. Sakoda
- grid.270240.30000 0001 2180 1622Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA USA ,grid.280062.e0000 0000 9957 7758Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA USA
| | - Martha L. Slattery
- grid.223827.e0000 0001 2193 0096Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT USA
| | - Andrew T. Chan
- grid.38142.3c000000041936754XDivision of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA USA ,grid.38142.3c000000041936754XChanning Division of Network Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA USA ,grid.38142.3c000000041936754XClinical and Translational Epidemiology Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA USA ,grid.66859.340000 0004 0546 1623Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, MA USA
| | - Li Li
- grid.27755.320000 0000 9136 933XDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA USA
| | - Graham G. Giles
- grid.1008.90000 0001 2179 088XCentre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC Australia ,grid.3263.40000 0001 1482 3639Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, VIC Australia ,grid.1002.30000 0004 1936 7857Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, VIC Australia
| | - Roger L. Milne
- grid.1008.90000 0001 2179 088XCentre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC Australia ,grid.3263.40000 0001 1482 3639Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, VIC Australia ,grid.1002.30000 0004 1936 7857Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, VIC Australia
| | - Stephen B. Gruber
- grid.42505.360000 0001 2156 6853Department of Preventive Medicine and USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA USA
| | - Gad Rennert
- grid.413469.dDepartment of Community Medicine and Epidemiology, Lady Davis Carmel Medical Center, Haifa, Israel ,grid.6451.60000000121102151Ruth and Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel ,grid.413469.dClalit National Cancer Control Center, Haifa, Israel
| | - Michael O. Woods
- grid.25055.370000 0000 9130 6822Memorial University of Newfoundland, Discipline of Genetics, St. John’s, Canada
| | - Steven J. Gallinger
- grid.17063.330000 0001 2157 2938Lunenfeld Tanenbaum Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON Canada
| | - Sonja Berndt
- grid.48336.3a0000 0004 1936 8075Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD USA
| | - Richard B. Hayes
- grid.137628.90000 0004 1936 8753Division of Epidemiology, Department of Population Health, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY USA
| | - Wen-Yi Huang
- grid.48336.3a0000 0004 1936 8075Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD USA
| | - Alicja Wolk
- grid.4714.60000 0004 1937 0626Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Emily White
- grid.34477.330000000122986657Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA USA ,grid.270240.30000 0001 2180 1622Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA USA
| | - Hongmei Nan
- grid.257413.60000 0001 2287 3919IU Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN USA
| | - Rami Nassir
- Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, Umm Al-Qura’a University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Noralane M. Lindor
- grid.417468.80000 0000 8875 6339Department of Health Science Research, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ USA
| | - Juan P. Lewinger
- grid.42505.360000 0001 2156 6853Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA USA
| | - Andre E. Kim
- grid.42505.360000 0001 2156 6853Department of Preventive Medicine and USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA USA
| | - David Conti
- grid.42505.360000 0001 2156 6853Department of Preventive Medicine and USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA USA
| | - W. James Gauderman
- grid.42505.360000 0001 2156 6853Department of Preventive Medicine and USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA USA
| | - Daniel D. Buchanan
- grid.1008.90000 0001 2179 088XColorectal Oncogenomics Group, Department of Clinical Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010 Australia ,grid.1008.90000 0001 2179 088XUniversity of Melbourne Centre for Cancer Research, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Parkville, VIC 3010 Australia
| | - Ulrike Peters
- grid.34477.330000000122986657Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA USA ,grid.270240.30000 0001 2180 1622Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA USA
| | - Li Hsu
- grid.270240.30000 0001 2180 1622Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA USA ,grid.34477.330000000122986657Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Nakhostin L, Stadler A, Stute P. Impact of menopausal hormone therapy on colorectal cancer risk-A systematic review. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2021; 95:390-397. [PMID: 33752259 DOI: 10.1111/cen.14469] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2020] [Revised: 03/14/2021] [Accepted: 03/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most frequently diagnosed cancer in females worldwide. Menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) has been proposed as a potential protective factor for the development of CRC. Yet, the available evidence is controversial. Thus, we aimed at summarizing the current evidence on the effect of MHT on CRC through a systematic review. A systematic literature search identified 1001 potentially relevant articles, out of which 57 original studies and nine meta-analyses were deemed eligible for the final synthesis. The evidence synthesis showed the following: (1) MHT showed a heterogeneity in findings for CRC risk with a slight tendency to a neutral or protective effect; (2) MHT effect was either neutral or protective on colorectal adenoma; (3) MHT had no impact on tumour grade, subsite and histologic types; (4) MHT was not associated with CRC mortality; and (5) MHT showed heterogeneous effects on CRC stage and invasiveness, respectively. In summary, despite some evidence pointing towards a protective effect of MHT on CRC, MHT is currently not recommended for primary CRC prevention by international guidelines due to several important, potentially harmful effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Livia Nakhostin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Clinic Inselspital Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Aurelia Stadler
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Clinic Inselspital Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Petra Stute
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Clinic Inselspital Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Labadie JD, Harrison TA, Banbury B, Amtay EL, Bernd S, Brenner H, Buchanan DD, Campbell PT, Cao Y, Chan AT, Chang-Claude J, English D, Figueiredo JC, Gallinger SJ, Giles GG, Gunter MJ, Hoffmeister M, Hsu L, Jenkins MA, Lin Y, Milne RL, Moreno V, Murphy N, Ogino S, Phipps AI, Sakoda LC, Slattery ML, Southey MC, Sun W, Thibodeau SN, Van Guelpen B, Zaidi SH, Peters U, Newcomb PA. Postmenopausal Hormone Therapy and Colorectal Cancer Risk by Molecularly Defined Subtypes and Tumor Location. JNCI Cancer Spectr 2020; 4:pkaa042. [PMID: 32923935 PMCID: PMC7477374 DOI: 10.1093/jncics/pkaa042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2020] [Revised: 04/20/2020] [Accepted: 05/12/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Postmenopausal hormone therapy (HT) is associated with a decreased colorectal cancer (CRC) risk. As CRC is a heterogeneous disease, we evaluated whether the association of HT and CRC differs across etiologically relevant, molecularly defined tumor subtypes and tumor location. METHODS We pooled data on tumor subtypes (microsatellite instability status, CpG island methylator phenotype status, BRAF and KRAS mutations, pathway: adenoma-carcinoma, alternate, serrated), tumor location (proximal colon, distal colon, rectum), and HT use among 8220 postmenopausal women (3898 CRC cases and 4322 controls) from 8 observational studies. We used multinomial logistic regression to estimate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association of ever vs never HT use with each tumor subtype compared with controls. Models were adjusted for study, age, body mass index, smoking status, and CRC family history. All statistical tests were 2-sided. RESULTS Among postmenopausal women, ever HT use was associated with a 38% reduction in overall CRC risk (OR =0.62, 95% CI = 0.56 to 0.69). This association was similar according to microsatellite instability, CpG island methylator phenotype and BRAF or KRAS status. However, the association was attenuated for tumors arising through the serrated pathway (OR = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.66 to 1.01) compared with the adenoma-carcinoma pathway (OR = 0.63, 95% CI = 0.55 to 0.73; P het =.04) and alternate pathway (OR = 0.61, 95% CI = 0.51 to 0.72). Additionally, proximal colon tumors had a weaker association (OR = 0.71, 95% CI = 0.62 to 0.80) compared with rectal (OR = 0.54, 95% CI = 0.46 to 0.63) and distal colon (OR = 0.57, 95% CI = 0.49 to 0.66; P het =.01) tumors. CONCLUSIONS We observed a strong inverse association between HT use and overall CRC risk, which may predominantly reflect a benefit of HT use for tumors arising through the adenoma-carcinoma and alternate pathways as well as distal colon and rectal tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia D Labadie
- Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Tabitha A Harrison
- Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Barbara Banbury
- Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Efrat L Amtay
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sonja Bernd
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Hermann Brenner
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Division of Preventive Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Daniel D Buchanan
- Colorectal Oncogenomics Group, Department of Clinical Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Peter T Campbell
- Behavioral and Epidemiology Research Group, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Yin Cao
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA
- Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA
| | - Andrew T Chan
- Division of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Clinical and Translational Epidemiology Unit, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jenny Chang-Claude
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, University Cancer Centre Hamburg (UCCH), Hamburg, Germany
| | - Dallas English
- Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jane C Figueiredo
- Department of Medicine, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Steven J Gallinger
- Lunenfeld Tanenbaum Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Graham G Giles
- Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Marc J Gunter
- Nutrition and Metabolism Section, International Agency for Research on Cancer, World Health Organization, Lyon, France
| | - Michael Hoffmeister
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Li Hsu
- Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Mark A Jenkins
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Yi Lin
- Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Roger L Milne
- Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Victor Moreno
- Oncology Data Analytics Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology-IDIBELL, L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Neil Murphy
- Nutrition and Metabolism Section, International Agency for Research on Cancer, World Health Organization, Lyon, France
| | - Shuji Ogino
- Program in MPE Molecular Pathological Epidemiology, Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Amanda I Phipps
- Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Lori C Sakoda
- Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, USA
| | - Martha L Slattery
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Melissa C Southey
- Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
- Genetic Epidemiology Laboratory, Department of Clinical Pathology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Wei Sun
- Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Stephen N Thibodeau
- Division of Laboratory Genetics, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Bethany Van Guelpen
- Department of Radiation Sciences, Oncology Unit, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden; Wallenberg Centre for Molecular Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Syed H Zaidi
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ulrike Peters
- Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Polly A Newcomb
- Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Neumeyer S, Popanda O, Butterbach K, Edelmann D, Bläker H, Toth C, Roth W, Herpel E, Jäkel C, Schmezer P, Benner A, Burwinkel B, Hoffmeister M, Brenner H, Chang-Claude J. DNA methylation profiling to explore colorectal tumor differences according to menopausal hormone therapy use in women. Epigenomics 2019; 11:1765-1778. [PMID: 31755748 DOI: 10.2217/epi-2019-0051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim: Use of menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) has been associated with a reduced risk for colorectal cancer, but mechanisms underlying this relationship are not well understood. In the colon, MHT appears to act through estrogen receptor β (ERβ) which may influence DNA methylation by binding to DNA. Using genome-wide methylation profiling data, we aimed to identify genes that may be differentially methylated according to MHT use. Materials & methods: DNA methylation was measured using Illumina HumanMethylation450k arrays in two independent tumor sample sets of colorectal cancer patients. Differential methylation was determined using R/limma. Results: In the discovery analysis, two CpG sites showed differential DNA methylation according to MHT use, both were not replicated. In stratified analyses, 342 CpG sites were associated with current MHT use only in ERβ-positive tumors. Conclusion: The suggestive findings of differential methylation according to current MHT use in ERβ-positive tumors warrant further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sonja Neumeyer
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center, Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.,Medical Faculty Heidelberg, Heidelberg University, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Odilia Popanda
- Division of Epigenomics & Cancer Risk Factors, German Cancer Research Center, Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Katja Butterbach
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center, Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.,Division of Clinical Epidemiology & Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center, Im Neuenheimer Feld 581, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Dominic Edelmann
- Division of Biostatistics, German Cancer Research Center, Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Hendrik Bläker
- Institute of Pathology, Charité University Medicine, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Csaba Toth
- Institute of Pathology, Heidelberg University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 224, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Wilfried Roth
- Institute of Pathology, Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Esther Herpel
- Institute of Pathology, Heidelberg University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 224, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.,NCT Tissue Bank, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Im Neuenheimer Feld 224, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Cornelia Jäkel
- Division of Epigenomics & Cancer Risk Factors, German Cancer Research Center, Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Peter Schmezer
- Division of Epigenomics & Cancer Risk Factors, German Cancer Research Center, Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Axel Benner
- Division of Biostatistics, German Cancer Research Center, Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Barbara Burwinkel
- Division of Molecular Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Gynecology & Obstetrics, Molecular Biology of Breast Cancer, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 440, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Michael Hoffmeister
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology & Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center, Im Neuenheimer Feld 581, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Hermann Brenner
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology & Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center, Im Neuenheimer Feld 581, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.,Division of Preventive Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) & National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Im Neuenheimer Feld 460, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jenny Chang-Claude
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center, Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.,Genetic Tumour Epidemiology Group, University Cancer Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 54, 20251 Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ye SB, Cheng YK, Zhang L, Wang XP, Wang L, Lan P. Prognostic value of estrogen receptor-α and progesterone receptor in curatively resected colorectal cancer: a retrospective analysis with independent validations. BMC Cancer 2019; 19:933. [PMID: 31590647 PMCID: PMC6781392 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-019-5918-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2018] [Accepted: 07/10/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Prognostic assessment is crucial for optimal treatment. The aim of our study was to investigate the potential impact of estrogen receptor-α (ER-α) and progesterone receptor (PR) on the prognosis of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients who received curative resection. Methods Retrospective evaluation of two independent cohorts of CRC patients maintained prospectively in 2009–2010 (training set) (n = 148) and 2007–2009 (internal validation set) (n = 485). Furthermore, we used an external independent CRC cohort from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) (n = 511) for further validation. ER-α and PR expression as well as other potential prognostic factors were retrospectively evaluated in training set with respect to overall survival (OS), local relapse free survival (LRFS) and distant metastasis free survival (DMFS). The prognostic factors found in training set will be validated in two validation cohorts. Results On univariate analysis for the training set, OS, LRFS and DMFS were not associated with PR expression. While patients with ER-αexpression were found to have poor prognosis. In addition, multivariate analysis showed that ER-αexpression maintained significance with respect to OS (HR, 5.06; p = 0.002), LRFS (HR, 8.81; p = 0.002) and DMFS (HR, 8.07; p = 0.004). Similarly, ER-α expression showed prognostic significance with respect to OS with hazard ratios (HRs) of 1.572 (95% CI: 1.001–2.467, p = 0.049) and 1.624 (95% CI: 1.047–2.520, p = 0.031) for the internal and external validation cohort, respectively. Conclusion ER-α expression was a biomarker of poor prognosis and it might inform treatment decision for high risk CRC patients. However, PR expression was not associated with survival outcomes. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-019-5918-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shu-Biao Ye
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.,Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China
| | - Yi-Kan Cheng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510655, People's Republic of China
| | - Lin Zhang
- Department of Clinical Laboratory, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China.,Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China
| | - Xue-Ping Wang
- Department of Clinical Laboratory, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China.,Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China
| | - Lei Wang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.,Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China
| | - Ping Lan
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China. .,Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Neumeyer S, Banbury BL, Arndt V, Berndt SI, Bezieau S, Bien SA, Buchanan DD, Butterbach K, Caan BJ, Campbell PT, Casey G, Chan AT, Chanock SJ, Dai JY, Gallinger S, Giovannucci EL, Giles GG, Grady WM, Hampe J, Hoffmeister M, Hopper JL, Hsu L, Jenkins MA, Joshi A, Larsson SC, Le Marchand L, Lindblom A, Moreno V, Lemire M, Li L, Lin Y, Offit K, Newcomb PA, Pharaoh PD, Potter JD, Qi L, Rennert G, Schafmayer C, Schoen RE, Slattery ML, Song M, Ulrich CM, Win AK, White E, Wolk A, Woods MO, Wu AH, Gruber SB, Brenner H, Peters U, Chang-Claude J. Mendelian randomisation study of age at menarche and age at menopause and the risk of colorectal cancer. Br J Cancer 2018; 118:1639-1647. [PMID: 29795306 PMCID: PMC6008474 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-018-0108-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2017] [Revised: 04/09/2018] [Accepted: 04/11/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Substantial evidence supports an association between use of menopausal hormone therapy and decreased colorectal cancer (CRC) risk, indicating a role of exogenous sex hormones in CRC development. However, findings on endogenous oestrogen exposure and CRC are inconsistent. Methods We used a Mendelian randomisation approach to test for a causal effect of age at menarche and age at menopause as surrogates for endogenous oestrogen exposure on CRC risk. Weighted genetic risk scores based on 358 single-nucleotide polymorphisms associated with age at menarche and 51 single-nucleotide polymorphisms associated with age at menopause were used to estimate the association with CRC risk using logistic regression in 12,944 women diagnosed with CRC and 10,741 women without CRC from three consortia. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to address pleiotropy and possible confounding by body mass index. Results Genetic risk scores for age at menarche (odds ratio per year 0.98, 95% confidence interval: 0.95–1.02) and age at menopause (odds ratio 0.98, 95% confidence interval: 0.94–1.01) were not significantly associated with CRC risk. The sensitivity analyses yielded similar results. Conclusions Our study does not support a causal relationship between genetic risk scores for age at menarche and age at menopause and CRC risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sonja Neumeyer
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Barbara L Banbury
- Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, 98124, USA
| | - Volker Arndt
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sonja I Berndt
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 20892-9776, USA
| | - Stephane Bezieau
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU), Nantes Service de Génétique Médicale, 44093, Nantes, France
| | - Stephanie A Bien
- Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, 98124, USA
| | - Dan D Buchanan
- Colorectal Oncogenomics Group, Genetic Epidemiology Laboratory, Department of Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, 3010, Australia.,Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia
| | - Katja Butterbach
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Bette J Caan
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Medical Care Program of Northern California, Oakland, 94612, CA, USA
| | - Peter T Campbell
- Epidemiology Research Program, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA, 30329-4251, USA
| | - Graham Casey
- Center for Public Health Genomics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, 22908, USA
| | - Andrew T Chan
- Clinical and Translational Epidemiology Unit and Division of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.,Channing Division of Network Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.,Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Stephen J Chanock
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 20892-9776, USA
| | - James Y Dai
- Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, 98124, USA
| | - Steven Gallinger
- Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, M5G 1 X 5, Canada
| | - Edward L Giovannucci
- Channing Division of Network Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.,Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.,Department of Nutrition, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.,Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Graham G Giles
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia.,Cancer Epidemiology & Intelligence Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, VIC, 3010, Australia
| | - William M Grady
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.,Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, 98109, USA
| | - Jochen Hampe
- Medical Department 1, University Hospital Dresden, TU Dresden, 01307, Dresden, Germany
| | - Michael Hoffmeister
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - John L Hopper
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia
| | - Li Hsu
- Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, 98124, USA
| | - Mark A Jenkins
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia
| | - Amit Joshi
- Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.,Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Susanna C Larsson
- Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet Solna, SE-171 77, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Loic Le Marchand
- Epidemiology Program, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, 96822, HI, USA
| | - Annika Lindblom
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Karolinska University Hospital Solna, SE-171 77, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet Solna, SE-171 77, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Victor Moreno
- Catalan Institute of Oncology, Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), 08028, Barcelona, Spain.,CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), 28029 Madrid, Spain and University of Barcelona, Barcelona, 08007, Spain
| | - Mathieu Lemire
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, M5G 0A3, Canada
| | - Li Li
- Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA
| | - Yi Lin
- Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, 98124, USA
| | - Kenneth Offit
- Department of Medicine, Clinical Genetics Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Polly A Newcomb
- Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, 98124, USA
| | - Paul D Pharaoh
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health & Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 8AR, UK
| | - John D Potter
- Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, 98124, USA
| | - Lihong Qi
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA, 95817, USA
| | - Gad Rennert
- Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.,Clalit Health Services National Israeli Cancer Control Center, Haifa, 34361, Israel.,Department of Community Medicine and Epidemiology, Carmel Medical Center, Haifa, 34361, Israel
| | - Clemens Schafmayer
- Department of General and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, 24118, Kiel, Germany
| | - Robert E Schoen
- Department of Medicine and Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA
| | - Martha L Slattery
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA
| | - Mingyang Song
- Clinical and Translational Epidemiology Unit and Division of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.,Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.,Department of Nutrition, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Cornelia M Ulrich
- Huntsman Cancer Institute and Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA
| | - Aung K Win
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia.,Genetic Medicine and Familial Cancer Centre, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC, 3050, Australia
| | - Emily White
- Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, 98124, USA
| | - Alicja Wolk
- Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet Solna, SE-171 77, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, SE-171 77, Sweden
| | - Michael O Woods
- Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NL, A1C 5S7, Canada
| | - Anna H Wu
- Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA
| | - Stephen B Gruber
- Department of Medicine, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA
| | - Hermann Brenner
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,Division of Preventive Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ulrike Peters
- Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, 98124, USA
| | - Jenny Chang-Claude
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120, Heidelberg, Germany. .,Genetic Tumour Epidemiology Group, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, University Cancer Center Hamburg, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Garcia-Albeniz X, Rudolph A, Hutter C, White E, Lin Y, Rosse SA, Figueiredo JC, Harrison TA, Jiao S, Brenner H, Casey G, Hudson TJ, Thornquist M, Le Marchand L, Potter J, Slattery ML, Zanke B, Baron JA, Caan BJ, Chanock SJ, Berndt SI, Stelling D, Fuchs CS, Hoffmeister M, Butterbach K, Du M, James Gauderman W, Gunter MJ, Lemire M, Ogino S, Lin J, Hayes RB, Haile RW, Schoen RE, Warnick GS, Jenkins MA, Thibodeau SN, Schumacher FR, Lindor NM, Kolonel LN, Hopper JL, Gong J, Seminara D, Pflugeisen BM, Ulrich CM, Qu C, Duggan D, Cotterchio M, Campbell PT, Carlson CS, Newcomb PA, Giovannucci E, Hsu L, Chan AT, Peters U, Chang-Claude J. CYP24A1 variant modifies the association between use of oestrogen plus progestogen therapy and colorectal cancer risk. Br J Cancer 2016; 114:221-9. [PMID: 26766742 PMCID: PMC4815813 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2015.443] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2015] [Revised: 11/26/2015] [Accepted: 11/30/2015] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) use has been consistently associated with a decreased risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) in women. Our aim was to use a genome-wide gene-environment interaction analysis to identify genetic modifiers of CRC risk associated with use of MHT. METHODS We included 10 835 postmenopausal women (5419 cases and 5416 controls) from 10 studies. We evaluated use of any MHT, oestrogen-only (E-only) and combined oestrogen-progestogen (E+P) hormone preparations. To test for multiplicative interactions, we applied the empirical Bayes (EB) test as well as the Wald test in conventional case-control logistic regression as primary tests. The Cocktail test was used as secondary test. RESULTS The EB test identified a significant interaction between rs964293 at 20q13.2/CYP24A1 and E+P (interaction OR (95% CIs)=0.61 (0.52-0.72), P=4.8 × 10(-9)). The secondary analysis also identified this interaction (Cocktail test OR=0.64 (0.52-0.78), P=1.2 × 10(-5) (alpha threshold=3.1 × 10(-4)). The ORs for association between E+P and CRC risk by rs964293 genotype were as follows: C/C, 0.96 (0.61-1.50); A/C, 0.61 (0.39-0.95) and A/A, 0.40 (0.22-0.73), respectively. CONCLUSIONS Our results indicate that rs964293 modifies the association between E+P and CRC risk. The variant is located near CYP24A1, which encodes an enzyme involved in vitamin D metabolism. This novel finding offers additional insight into downstream pathways of CRC etiopathogenesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xabier Garcia-Albeniz
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H., Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA
- Channing Division of Network Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Anja Rudolph
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Carolyn Hutter
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Emily White
- Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA 98109-1024, USA
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10017, USA
| | - Yi Lin
- Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA 98109-1024, USA
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10017, USA
| | - Stephanie A Rosse
- Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA 98109-1024, USA
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10017, USA
| | - Jane C Figueiredo
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA
| | - Tabitha A Harrison
- Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA 98109-1024, USA
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10017, USA
| | - Shuo Jiao
- Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA 98109-1024, USA
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10017, USA
| | - Hermann Brenner
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Division of Preventive Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Graham Casey
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA
| | - Thomas J Hudson
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON M5G 0A3, Canada
| | - Mark Thornquist
- Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA 98109-1024, USA
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10017, USA
| | - Loic Le Marchand
- Epidemiology Program, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, HI 96813, USA
| | - John Potter
- Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA 98109-1024, USA
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10017, USA
| | - Martha L Slattery
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, USA
| | - Brent Zanke
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON K1Y 4E9, Canada
| | - John A Baron
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7080, USA
| | - Bette J Caan
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Medical Care Program, Oakland, CA 94612, USA
| | - Stephen J Chanock
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-4608, USA
| | - Sonja I Berndt
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-4608, USA
| | - Deanna Stelling
- Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA 98109-1024, USA
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10017, USA
| | - Charles S Fuchs
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H., Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Michael Hoffmeister
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Katja Butterbach
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Mengmeng Du
- Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA 98109-1024, USA
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10017, USA
| | - W James Gauderman
- Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA
| | - Marc J Gunter
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London W2 1PG, UK
| | - Mathieu Lemire
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON M5G 0A3, Canada
| | - Shuji Ogino
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H., Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Jennifer Lin
- Channing Division of Network Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Richard B Hayes
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Population Health, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - Robert W Haile
- Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94304, USA
| | - Robert E Schoen
- Department of Medicine and Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA 15213-2582, USA
| | - Greg S Warnick
- Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA 98109-1024, USA
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10017, USA
| | - Mark A Jenkins
- Melbourne School of Population Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia
| | - Stephen N Thibodeau
- Departments of Laboratory Medicine, Pathology and Laboratory Genetics, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ 85259, USA
| | - Fredrick R Schumacher
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA
| | - Noralane M Lindor
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ 85259, USA
| | - Laurence N Kolonel
- Epidemiology Program, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, HI 96813, USA
| | - John L Hopper
- Melbourne School of Population Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia
| | - Jian Gong
- Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA 98109-1024, USA
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10017, USA
| | - Daniela Seminara
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Bethann M Pflugeisen
- Department of Cancer Prevention, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA 98109-1024, USA
| | - Cornelia M Ulrich
- Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA 98109-1024, USA
- Division of Preventive Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Population Sciences, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA
| | - Conghui Qu
- Department of Cancer Prevention, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA 98109-1024, USA
| | - David Duggan
- Translational Genomics Research Institute (Tgen), Phoenix, AZ 85004, USA
| | - Michelle Cotterchio
- Prevention and Cancer Control, Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, ON M5G 2L7, Canada
| | - Peter T Campbell
- Epidemiology Research Program, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA
| | - Christopher S Carlson
- Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA 98109-1024, USA
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10017, USA
| | - Polly A Newcomb
- Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA 98109-1024, USA
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10017, USA
| | - Edward Giovannucci
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H., Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA
- Channing Division of Network Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Li Hsu
- Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA 98109-1024, USA
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10017, USA
| | - Andrew T Chan
- Channing Division of Network Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA
- Division of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Ulrike Peters
- Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA 98109-1024, USA
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10017, USA
| | - Jenny Chang-Claude
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- University Cancer Center Hamburg (UCCH), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Mørch LS, Lidegaard Ø, Keiding N, Løkkegaard E, Kjær SK. The influence of hormone therapies on colon and rectal cancer. Eur J Epidemiol 2016; 31:481-9. [PMID: 26758900 DOI: 10.1007/s10654-016-0116-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2015] [Accepted: 01/02/2016] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Exogenous sex hormones seem to play a role in colorectal carcinogenesis. Little is known about the influence of different types or durations of postmenopausal hormone therapy (HT) on colorectal cancer risk. A nationwide cohort of women 50-79 years old without previous cancer (n = 1,006,219) were followed 1995-2009. Information on HT exposures was from the National Prescription Register and updated daily, while information on colon (n = 8377) and rectal cancers (n = 4742) were from the National Cancer Registry. Potential confounders were obtained from other national registers. Poisson regression analyses with 5-year age bands included hormone exposures as time-dependent covariates. Use of estrogen-only therapy and combined therapy were associated with decreased risks of colon cancer (adjusted incidence rate ratio 0.77, 95 % confidence interval 0.68-0.86 and 0.88, 0.80-0.96) and rectal cancer (0.83, 0.72-0.96 and 0.89, 0.80-1.00), compared to never users. Transdermal estrogen-only therapy implied more protection than oral administration, while no significant influence was found of regimen, progestin type, nor of tibolone. The benefit of HT was stronger for long-term hormone users; and hormone users were at lower risk of advanced stage of colorectal cancer, which seems supportive for a causal association between hormone therapy and colorectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lina Steinrud Mørch
- Gynecological Clinic, The Juliane Marie Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
- Unit of Virus, Lifestyle and Genes, Danish Cancer Society Research Centre, Copenhagen, Denmark.
| | - Øjvind Lidegaard
- Gynecological Clinic, The Juliane Marie Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Niels Keiding
- Department of Biostatistics, Institute of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Ellen Løkkegaard
- Gynecological-Obstetrical Department, North Zealand Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Hillerød, Denmark
| | - Susanne Krüger Kjær
- Gynecological Clinic, The Juliane Marie Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Unit of Virus, Lifestyle and Genes, Danish Cancer Society Research Centre, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Lavasani S, Chlebowski RT, Prentice RL, Kato I, Wactawski-Wende J, Johnson KC, Young A, Rodabough R, Hubbell FA, Mahinbakht A, Simon MS. Estrogen and colorectal cancer incidence and mortality. Cancer 2015; 121:3261-71. [DOI: 10.1002/cncr.29464] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2015] [Revised: 02/26/2015] [Accepted: 04/03/2015] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Sayeh Lavasani
- Karmanos Cancer Institute; Department of Oncology; Wayne State University; Detroit Michigan
- Population Studies and Prevention Program; Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University; Detroit Michigan
| | - Rowan T. Chlebowski
- Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute; Harbor-UCLA Medical Center; Torrance California
| | - Ross L. Prentice
- Division of Public Health Sciences; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center; Seattle Washington
| | - Ikuko Kato
- Population Studies and Prevention Program; Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University; Detroit Michigan
- Department of Pathology; Wayne State University; Detroit Michigan
| | - Jean Wactawski-Wende
- Department of Social and Preventive Medicine; University at Buffalo; Buffalo New York
| | - Karen C. Johnson
- Department of Preventive Medicine; University of Tennessee Health Science Center; Memphis Tennessee
| | - Alicia Young
- Division of Public Health Sciences; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center; Seattle Washington
| | - Rebecca Rodabough
- Division of Public Health Sciences; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center; Seattle Washington
| | - F. Allan Hubbell
- Department of Medicine; University of California Irvine; Irvine California
| | | | - Michael S. Simon
- Karmanos Cancer Institute; Department of Oncology; Wayne State University; Detroit Michigan
- Population Studies and Prevention Program; Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University; Detroit Michigan
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Walter V, Jansen L, Hoffmeister M, Ulrich A, Chang-Claude J, Brenner H. Smoking and survival of colorectal cancer patients: population-based study from Germany. Int J Cancer 2015; 137:1433-45. [PMID: 25758762 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.29511] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2014] [Revised: 02/09/2015] [Accepted: 02/26/2015] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
Current evidence on the association between smoking and colorectal cancer (CRC) prognosis after diagnosis is heterogeneous and few have investigated dose-response effects or outcomes other than overall survival. Therefore, the association of smoking status and intensity with several prognostic outcomes was evaluated in a large population-based cohort of CRC patients; 3,130 patients with incident CRC, diagnosed between 2003 and 2010, were interviewed on sociodemographic factors, smoking behavior, medication and comorbidities. Tumor characteristics were collected from medical records. Vital status, recurrence and cause of death were documented for a median follow-up time of 4.9 years. Using Cox proportional hazards regression, associations between smoking characteristics and overall, CRC-specific, non-CRC related, recurrence-free and disease-free survival were evaluated. Among stage I-III patients, being a smoker at diagnosis and smoking ≥15 cigarettes/day were associated with lower recurrence-free (adjusted hazard ratios (aHR): 1.29; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.93-1.79 and aHR: 1.31; 95%-CI: 0.92-1.87) and disease-free survival (aHR: 1.26; 95%-CI: 0.95-1.67 and aHR: 1.29; 95%-CI: 0.94-1.77). Smoking was associated with decreased survival in stage I-III smokers with pack years ≥20 (Overall survival: aHR: 1.40; 95%-CI: 1.01-1.95), in colon cancer cases (Overall survival: aHR: 1.51; 95%-CI: 1.05-2.17) and men (Recurrence-free survival: aHR: 1.51; 95%-CI: 1.09-2.10; disease-free survival: aHR: 1.49; 95%-CI: 1.12-1.97), whereas no associations were seen among women, stage IV or rectal cancer patients. The observed patterns support the existence of adverse effects of smoking on CRC prognosis among nonmetastatic CRC patients. The potential to enhance prognosis of CRC patients by promotion of smoking cessation, embedded in tertiary prevention programs warrants careful evaluation in future investigations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Viola Walter
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Lina Jansen
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Michael Hoffmeister
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Alexis Ulrich
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jenny Chang-Claude
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Hermann Brenner
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Division of Preventive Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Rudolph A, Shi H, Försti A, Hoffmeister M, Sainz J, Jansen L, Hemminki K, Brenner H, Chang-Claude J. Repeat polymorphisms in ESR2 and AR and colorectal cancer risk and prognosis: results from a German population-based case-control study. BMC Cancer 2014; 14:817. [PMID: 25376484 PMCID: PMC4232639 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-14-817] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2014] [Accepted: 10/27/2014] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Evidence has accumulated which suggests that sex steroids influence colorectal cancer development and progression. We therefore assessed the association of repeat polymorphisms in the estrogen receptor β gene (ESR2) and the androgen receptor gene (AR) with colorectal cancer risk and prognosis. Methods The ESR2 CA and AR CAG repeat polymorphisms were genotyped in 1798 cases (746 female, 1052 male) and 1810 controls (732 female, 1078 male), matched for sex, age and county of residence. Colorectal cancer risk associations overall and specific for gender were evaluated using multivariate logistic regression models adjusted for sex, county of residence and age. Associations with overall and disease-specific survival were evaluated using Cox proportional hazard models adjusted for established prognostic factors (diagnosis of other cancer after colorectal cancer diagnosis, detection by screening, treatment with adjuvant chemotherapy, tumour extent, nodal status, distant metastasis, body mass index, age at diagnosis and year of diagnosis) and stratified for grade of differentiation. Heterogeneity in gender specific associations was assessed by comparing models with and without a multiplicative interaction term by means of a likelihood ratio test. Results The average number of ESR2 CA repeats was associated with a small 5% increase in colorectal cancer risk (OR = 1.05, 95% CI 1.01-1.10) without significant heterogeneity according to gender or tumoural ESR2 expression. We found no indication for an association between the AR CAG repeat polymorphisms and risk of colorectal cancer. The ESR2 CA and AR CAG repeat polymorphisms were not associated with overall survival or disease specific survival after colorectal cancer diagnosis. Conclusions Higher numbers of ESR2 CA repeats are potentially associated with a small increase in colorectal cancer risk. Our study does not support an association between colorectal cancer prognosis and the investigated repeat polymorphisms. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1471-2407-14-817) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anja Rudolph
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 581, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Bläker H, Hildebrandt B, Riess H, von Winterfeld M, Ingold-Heppner B, Roth W, Kloor M, Schirmacher P, Dietel M, Tao S, Jansen L, Chang-Claude J, Ulrich A, Brenner H, Hoffmeister M. Lymph node count and prognosis in colorectal cancer: the influence of examination quality. Int J Cancer 2014; 136:1957-66. [PMID: 25231924 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.29221] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2014] [Revised: 08/27/2014] [Accepted: 09/03/2014] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Colorectal cancer guidelines recommend adjuvant chemotherapy in stage II disease when less than 12 lymph nodes are assessed. The recommendation bases on previous studies showing an association of a low lymph node count and adverse outcome. Compared to current standards, however, the quality of lymph node examination in the studies was low. We, therefore, investigated the prognostic role of <12 lymph nodes in cancers diagnosed adherent to current quality measures. Stage I-IV colorectal cancers from 1,899 patients enrolled into a population-based cohort study were investigated for the prognostic impact of a lymph node count <12. The stage specific share of patients diagnosed with ≥12 nodes (stage I-IV: 62, 85, 85, 78%, respectively) was used to compare lymph node examination quality to other studies. We found no impact of a lymph node count <12 on overall, cancer-specific or recurrence-free survival for any tumour stage. Compared to studies reporting an adverse prognostic impact of a low lymph node count in stages II and III the stage-specific shares of patients with ≥12 nodes were markedly higher in this study (85% vs. 24-58% in previous analyses) and this correlated with increased rates of stage III compared to stage II cancers. In conclusion our data indicate, that the previously reported effect of a low lymph node count on the patients' outcomes is eliminated by improved lymph node examination quality and thus question the general applicability of a 12 lymph node cut off for adjuvant chemotherapy decision making in stage II disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hendrik Bläker
- Department of General Pathology, Institute of Pathology, Charite University Medicine Hospital, Charitéplatz 1, Berlin, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Genome-wide diet-gene interaction analyses for risk of colorectal cancer. PLoS Genet 2014; 10:e1004228. [PMID: 24743840 PMCID: PMC3990510 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004228] [Citation(s) in RCA: 73] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2013] [Accepted: 01/20/2014] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Dietary factors, including meat, fruits, vegetables and fiber, are associated with colorectal cancer; however, there is limited information as to whether these dietary factors interact with genetic variants to modify risk of colorectal cancer. We tested interactions between these dietary factors and approximately 2.7 million genetic variants for colorectal cancer risk among 9,287 cases and 9,117 controls from ten studies. We used logistic regression to investigate multiplicative gene-diet interactions, as well as our recently developed Cocktail method that involves a screening step based on marginal associations and gene-diet correlations and a testing step for multiplicative interactions, while correcting for multiple testing using weighted hypothesis testing. Per quartile increment in the intake of red and processed meat were associated with statistically significant increased risks of colorectal cancer and vegetable, fruit and fiber intake with lower risks. From the case-control analysis, we detected a significant interaction between rs4143094 (10p14/near GATA3) and processed meat consumption (OR = 1.17; p = 8.7E-09), which was consistently observed across studies (p heterogeneity = 0.78). The risk of colorectal cancer associated with processed meat was increased among individuals with the rs4143094-TG and -TT genotypes (OR = 1.20 and OR = 1.39, respectively) and null among those with the GG genotype (OR = 1.03). Our results identify a novel gene-diet interaction with processed meat for colorectal cancer, highlighting that diet may modify the effect of genetic variants on disease risk, which may have important implications for prevention.
Collapse
|
14
|
Sainz J, Frank B, da Silva Filho MI, Hoffmeister M, Rudolph A, Butterbach K, Chang-Claude J, Brenner H, Hemminki K, Försti A. GWAS-identified common variants for obesity are not associated with the risk of developing colorectal cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2014; 23:1125-8. [PMID: 24663336 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-13-1354] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Observational studies have consistently associated obesity with colorectal cancer risk. Because both traits are genetically determined and share some metabolic biomarkers, we hypothesized that obesity-related polymorphisms could also influence the risk of developing colorectal cancer. METHODS We conducted a comprehensive population-based case-control study in 1,792 German colorectal cancer cases and 1,805 controls to explore associations between 28 obesogenic variants identified through genome-wide association studies (GWAS) and colorectal cancer risk. We also evaluated interactions between polymorphisms and body mass index (BMI), type II diabetes (T2D), and gender. RESULTS No evidence of association between obesogenic variants and colorectal cancer risk was observed after correction for multiple testing. There was only a remarkable interaction between the LTArs1041981 polymorphism and gender, which modified the risk of colorectal cancer [Pinteraction = 0.002; males: odds ratio (OR), 1.14; 95% confidence intervals (CI), 1.00-1.30 vs. females: OR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.71-0.97]. CONCLUSIONS Our findings showed that obesogenic variants are not a major pathogenetic risk factor for colorectal cancer. IMPACT This comprehensive population-based case-control study does not provide evidence of a shared genetic component between obesity and colorectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan Sainz
- Authors' Affiliations: Division of Molecular Genetic Epidemiology, Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany; and Center for Primary Health Care Research, Clinical Research Center, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Bernd Frank
- Authors' Affiliations: Division of Molecular Genetic Epidemiology, Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany; and Center for Primary Health Care Research, Clinical Research Center, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Miguel I da Silva Filho
- Authors' Affiliations: Division of Molecular Genetic Epidemiology, Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany; and Center for Primary Health Care Research, Clinical Research Center, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Michael Hoffmeister
- Authors' Affiliations: Division of Molecular Genetic Epidemiology, Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany; and Center for Primary Health Care Research, Clinical Research Center, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Anja Rudolph
- Authors' Affiliations: Division of Molecular Genetic Epidemiology, Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany; and Center for Primary Health Care Research, Clinical Research Center, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Katja Butterbach
- Authors' Affiliations: Division of Molecular Genetic Epidemiology, Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany; and Center for Primary Health Care Research, Clinical Research Center, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Jenny Chang-Claude
- Authors' Affiliations: Division of Molecular Genetic Epidemiology, Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany; and Center for Primary Health Care Research, Clinical Research Center, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Hermann Brenner
- Authors' Affiliations: Division of Molecular Genetic Epidemiology, Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany; and Center for Primary Health Care Research, Clinical Research Center, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Kari Hemminki
- Authors' Affiliations: Division of Molecular Genetic Epidemiology, Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany; and Center for Primary Health Care Research, Clinical Research Center, Lund University, Malmö, SwedenAuthors' Affiliations: Division of Molecular Genetic Epidemiology, Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany; and Center for Primary Health Care Research, Clinical Research Center, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Asta Försti
- Authors' Affiliations: Division of Molecular Genetic Epidemiology, Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany; and Center for Primary Health Care Research, Clinical Research Center, Lund University, Malmö, SwedenAuthors' Affiliations: Division of Molecular Genetic Epidemiology, Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany; and Center for Primary Health Care Research, Clinical Research Center, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Jiao S, Peters U, Berndt S, Brenner H, Butterbach K, Caan BJ, Carlson CS, Chan AT, Chang-Claude J, Chanock S, Curtis KR, Duggan D, Gong J, Harrison TA, Hayes RB, Henderson BE, Hoffmeister M, Kolonel LN, Le Marchand L, Potter JD, Rudolph A, Schoen RE, Seminara D, Slattery ML, White E, Hsu L. Estimating the heritability of colorectal cancer. Hum Mol Genet 2014; 23:3898-905. [PMID: 24562164 DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddu087] [Citation(s) in RCA: 97] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
A sizable fraction of colorectal cancer (CRC) is expected to be explained by heritable factors, with heritability estimates ranging from 12 to 35% twin and family studies. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have successfully identified a number of common single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with CRC risk. Although it has been shown that these CRC susceptibility SNPs only explain a small proportion of the genetic risk, it is not clear how much of the heritability these SNPs explain and how much is left to be detected by other, yet to be identified, common SNPs. Therefore, we estimated the heritability of CRC under different scenarios using Genome-Wide Complex Trait Analysis in the Genetics and Epidemiology of Colorectal Cancer Consortium including 8025 cases and 10 814 controls. We estimated that the heritability explained by known common CRC SNPs identified in GWAS was 0.65% (95% CI:0.3-1%; P = 1.11 × 10-16), whereas the heritability explained by all common SNPs was at least 7.42% (95% CI: 4.71-10.12%; P = 8.13 × 10(-8)), suggesting that many common variants associated with CRC risk remain to be detected. Comparing the heritability explained by the common variants with that from twin and family studies, a fraction of the heritability may be explained by other genetic variants, such as rare variants. In addition, our analysis showed that the gene × smoking interaction explained a significant proportion of the CRC variance (P = 1.26 × 10(-2)). In summary, our results suggest that known CRC SNPs only explain a small proportion of the heritability and more common SNPs have yet to be identified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuo Jiao
- Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Ulrike Peters
- Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Sonja Berndt
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics and
| | - Hermann Brenner
- Department of Medicine and Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA and
| | - Katja Butterbach
- Department of Medicine and Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA and
| | - Bette J Caan
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Christopher S Carlson
- Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA Division of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Andrew T Chan
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research and Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jenny Chang-Claude
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Medical Care Program, Broadway, Oakland, CA, USA
| | | | - Keith R Curtis
- Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - David Duggan
- School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Jian Gong
- Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Tabitha A Harrison
- Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Richard B Hayes
- Channing Division of Network Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Michael Hoffmeister
- Department of Medicine and Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA and
| | - Laurence N Kolonel
- Division of Epidemiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Loic Le Marchand
- Epidemiology Program, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, HI, USA
| | - John D Potter
- Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA Division of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA Centre for Public Health Research, Massey University, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Anja Rudolph
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Robert E Schoen
- Department of Medicine and Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA and
| | - Daniela Seminara
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Martha L Slattery
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Emily White
- Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Li Hsu
- Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Hoffmeister M, Bläker H, Kloor M, Roth W, Toth C, Herpel E, Frank B, Schirmacher P, Chang-Claude J, Brenner H. Body mass index and microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer: a population-based study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2013; 22:2303-11. [PMID: 24127414 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-13-0239] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Previous studies reported a positive association of body mass index (BMI) with microsatellite-stable (MSS) but not with microsatellite-instable (MSI-high) colorectal cancer. However, information from population-based studies conducted in representative age groups is so far limited. METHODS We conducted a population-based case-control study (DACHS) in Southern Germany, including 1,215 patients with incident colorectal cancer and 1,891 matched controls with no upper age limit. Information on risk factors of colorectal cancer was obtained in standardized interviews. Microsatellite instability was analyzed using a mononucleotide marker panel. RESULTS Median age among cases was 69 years, and 115 cases were classified MSI-high (9.5%). In multivariate analyses, BMI was positively associated with both risk of MSI-high colorectal cancer [per 5 kg/m(2): OR, 1.71; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.35-2.17] and risk of MSS colorectal cancer (OR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.07-1.33). The association with MSI-high colorectal cancer was limited to women (OR, 2.04; 95% CI, 1.50-2.77; P interaction = 0.02) and most pronounced among ever users of postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy (OR, 4.68; 95% CI, 2.36-9.30; P interaction = 0.01). In case-only analyses, BMI was more strongly associated with MSI-high colorectal cancer than with MSS colorectal cancer among women (OR, 1.84; 95% CI, 1.13-1.82; P interaction = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS This population-based study confirms previous findings of increased risk of MSS colorectal cancer with obesity between both sexes and suggests that overweight and obesity may also be associated with increased risk of MSI-high colorectal cancer among women. IMPACT These findings extend available data on the association of BMI and microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer and may suggest a link between overweight and obesity with sporadic MSI-high colorectal cancer in women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Hoffmeister
- Authors' Affiliations: Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research; Unit of Genetic Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ); Department of Pathology, Institute of Pathology; Department of Applied Tumor Biology, Institute of Pathology, Heidelberg University Hospital; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Tissue Bank, Heidelberg; and Institute of Pathology, Charité University Medicine, Berlin, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Armstrong CM, Billimek AR, Allred KF, Sturino JM, Weeks BR, Allred CD. A novel shift in estrogen receptor expression occurs as estradiol suppresses inflammation-associated colon tumor formation. Endocr Relat Cancer 2013; 20:515-25. [PMID: 23702470 DOI: 10.1530/erc-12-0308] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Postmenopausal women on estrogen replacement therapy (ERT) have a reduced risk of developing colon cancer compared with postmenopausal women not on ERT, suggesting a role for estradiol (E2) in protection against this disease. To determine whether E2 protects against inflammation-associated colon cancer when administered following the initiation of colonic DNA damage, in this study, we implanted E2-containing pellets into mice after co-treatment with azoxymethane and two rounds of dextran sulfate sodium (DSS). Wild-type (WT) E2-treated mice had reduced numbers and average area of adenocarcinomas compared with the control mice. These effects were lost in estrogen receptor-β (Erβ (Esr2)) knockout mice. Surprisingly, apoptosis was reduced and cell proliferation was increased in sections from tumors of the WT E2 mice compared with the WT control mice. These findings are probably due, in part, to a reduction in ERβ expression in colonic epithelial cells as the cells progressed from a non-malignant to a cancerous state as enhanced apoptosis was observed in normal colonocytes expressing higher levels of ERβ. Furthermore, epithelial cells within the tumors had dramatically increased ERα mRNA and protein expression compared with the non-diseased mice. We conclude that while E2 treatment resulted in an overall suppression of colonic adenocarcinoma formation, reduced ERβ expression accompanied by enhanced ERα expression caused an altered colonocyte response to E2 treatment compared with the earlier stages of colon cancer development. These data are the first examples of decreased ERβ expression concurrent with increased ERα expression as a disease develops and highlight the importance of understanding the timing of E2 exposure with regard to the prevention of inflammation-associated colon cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cameron M Armstrong
- Departments of Nutrition and Food Science Veterinary Pathobiology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Rudolph A, Toth C, Hoffmeister M, Roth W, Herpel E, Schirmacher P, Brenner H, Chang-Claude J. Colorectal cancer risk associated with hormone use varies by expression of estrogen receptor-β. Cancer Res 2013; 73:3306-15. [PMID: 23585455 DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-12-4051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
The risk of colorectal cancer is reduced among users of oral contraceptives or menopausal hormone therapy, but associations with reproductive characteristics that are markers of a woman's endogenous hormone milieu have not been consistently observed. To help understand possible mechanisms through which exogenous and endogenous hormonal exposures are involved in colorectal cancer, we assessed the risk of these malignancies according to tumor expression of estrogen receptor-β (ESR2). In a population-based study of postmenopausal women (503 cases and 721 controls matched for sex and age), immunohistochemical expression of ESR2 was determined in 445 cases of incident colorectal cancer. Unconditional logistic regression was used in case-case analyses to assess heterogeneity between risk associations according to ESR2 status and in case-control analyses to estimate associations separately for ESR2-negative and ESR2-positive tumors. For ESR2-positive tumors but not ESR2-negative tumors, colorectal cancer risk significantly decreased with duration of oral contraceptive use [per five-year increments OR ESR2-positive, 0.87, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.77-0.99; OR ESR2-negative, 1.02, 95% CI, 0.91-1.15; Pheterogeneity = 0.07] and with duration of menopausal hormone therapy use (per five-year increments OR ESR2-positive, 0.84, 95% CI, 0.74-0.95; OR ESR2-negative, 0.94, 95% CI 0.84-1.05; Pheterogeneity = 0.06). Significant heterogeneity according to ESR2 expression was found for the association with current use of menopausal hormone therapy (<0.5 years ago; Pheterogeneity = 0.023) but not for associations with reproductive factors. In conclusion, our results suggest that hormone use decreases risk for ESR2-positive but not ESR2-negative colorectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anja Rudolph
- Divisions of Cancer Epidemiology, Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, and Molecular Tumor Pathology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Meta-analyses of colorectal cancer risk factors. Cancer Causes Control 2013; 24:1207-22. [PMID: 23563998 DOI: 10.1007/s10552-013-0201-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 496] [Impact Index Per Article: 41.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2012] [Accepted: 03/26/2013] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Demographic, behavioral, and environmental factors have been associated with increased risk of colorectal cancer (CRC). We reviewed the published evidence and explored associations between risk factors and CRC incidence. METHODS We identified 12 established non-screening CRC risk factors and performed a comprehensive review and meta-analyses to quantify each factor's impact on CRC risk. We used random-effects models of the logarithms of risks across studies: inverse-variance weighted averages for dichotomous factors and generalized least squares for dose-response for multi-level factors. RESULTS Significant risk factors include inflammatory bowel disease (RR = 2.93, 95 % CI 1.79-4.81); CRC history in first-degree relative (RR = 1.80, 95 % CI 1.61-2.02); body mass index (BMI) to overall population (RR = 1.10 per 8 kg/m(2) increase, 95 % CI 1.08-1.12); physical activity (RR = 0.88, 95 % CI 0.86-0.91 for 2 standard deviations increased physical activity score); cigarette smoking (RR = 1.06, 95 % CI 1.03-1.08 for 5 pack-years); and consumption of red meat (RR = 1.13, 95 % CI 1.09-1.16 for 5 servings/week), fruit (RR = 0.85, 95 % CI 0.75-0.96 for 3 servings/day), and vegetables (RR = 0.86, 95 % CI 0.78-0.94 for 5 servings/day). CONCLUSIONS We developed a comprehensive risk modeling strategy that incorporates multiple effects to predict an individual's risk of developing CRC. Inflammatory bowel disease and history of CRC in first-degree relatives are associated with much higher risk of CRC. Increased BMI, red meat intake, cigarette smoking, low physical activity, low vegetable consumption, and low fruit consumption were associated with moderately increased risk of CRC.
Collapse
|
20
|
Lin JH, Zhang SM, Rexrode KM, Manson JE, Chan AT, Wu K, Tworoger SS, Hankinson SE, Fuchs C, Gaziano JM, Buring JE, Giovannucci E. Association between sex hormones and colorectal cancer risk in men and women. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2013; 11. [PMID: 23200979 PMCID: PMC3594467 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2012.11.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 112] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS There is observational and clinical evidence that indicates that sex hormones affect development of colorectal cancer in men and women. However, the relationship between endogenous sex hormone levels and colorectal cancer is unclear. METHODS We collected data on lifestyle, medical history, and diet (through 2008), along with blood samples, from the Nurses' Health Study, the Women's Health Study, the Health Professional Follow-up Study, and the Physicians' Health Study II. We measured plasma levels of estrone, estradiol, testosterone, sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG), and C-peptide among 730 women (293 cases of colorectal cancer and 437 healthy individuals as controls) and 1158 men (439 colorectal cancer cases and 719 controls) and used unconditional logistic regression to estimate relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals. All statistical tests were 2-sided. RESULTS Total testosterone, SHBG, and the ratio of estradiol to testosterone were associated with colorectal cancer in men after adjustments for matching and risk factors for colorectal cancer, including body mass index and plasma levels of C-peptide. The RRs in the highest relative to the lowest quartile were 0.62 for testosterone (95% confidence interval, 0.40-0.96), 0.65 for SHBG (95% confidence interval, 0.42-0.99), and 2.63 for the ratio (95% confidence interval, 1.58-4.36) (P values for trend ≤ .02). However, in women, only the ratio of estradiol to testosterone was (inversely) associated with colorectal cancer after adjustments for all factors (RR, 0.43; 95% confidence interval, 0.22-0.84; P value for trend = .03). CONCLUSIONS On the basis of combined data from 4 population studies, there appears to be an association between levels of sex hormones and colorectal cancer risk in men. There also appears to be an inverse association between the ratio of estradiol to testosterone and colorectal cancer in postmenopausal women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer H. Lin
- Division of Preventive Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Shumin M. Zhang
- Division of Preventive Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Kathryn M. Rexrode
- Division of Preventive Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - JoAnn E. Manson
- Division of Preventive Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA
| | - Andrew T. Chan
- Channing Laboratory, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Gastrointestinal Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Kana Wu
- Department of Nutrition, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA
| | - Shelley S. Tworoger
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA
- Channing Laboratory, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Susan E. Hankinson
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA
- Channing Laboratory, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Division of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, School of Public Health and Health Science, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA
| | - Charles Fuchs
- Channing Laboratory, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - J. Michael Gaziano
- Division of Preventive Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Division of Aging, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- The Massachusetts Veterans Epidemiology Research and Information Center, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA
| | - Julie E. Buring
- Division of Preventive Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA
| | - Edward Giovannucci
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA
- Channing Laboratory, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Department of Nutrition, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Savić MP, Djurendić EA, Petri ET, Ćelić A, Klisurić OR, Sakač MN, Jakimov DS, Kojić VV, Gaši KMP. Synthesis, structural analysis and antiproliferative activity of some novel D-homo lactone androstane derivatives. RSC Adv 2013. [DOI: 10.1039/c3ra41336e] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
|
22
|
Risk factors for colon cancer in 150,912 postmenopausal women. Cancer Causes Control 2012; 23:1599-605. [DOI: 10.1007/s10552-012-0037-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2012] [Accepted: 07/18/2012] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
|
23
|
Rudolph A, Toth C, Hoffmeister M, Roth W, Herpel E, Jansen L, Marx A, Brenner H, Chang-Claude J. Expression of oestrogen receptor β and prognosis of colorectal cancer. Br J Cancer 2012; 107:831-9. [PMID: 22828608 PMCID: PMC3425967 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2012.323] [Citation(s) in RCA: 85] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Previous studies suggest that sex steroids influence colorectal cancer (CRC) carcinogenesis. The oestrogen receptor β (ERβ) is the predominantly expressed ER in the colon and loss of ERβ in CRC has been associated with advanced cancer stages. METHODS Information on vital status by the end of 2009 was obtained for 1262 CRC patients recruited between 2003 and 2007. The ERβ expression was immunohistochemically measured and associations of ERβ scores with overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were evaluated using Cox proportional hazard models adjusted for prognostic factors, such as tumour stage and second primary tumours. RESULTS Of the 1101 tumour samples with successful measurement, 535 were ERβ negative (48.6%), 381 (34.6%) showed moderate and 185 (16.8%) showed high ERβ expression. Compared with high ERβ expression, lack of ERβ was associated with higher cancer stages as well as greater tumour extent. In multivariate analyses, ERβ negativity was associated with an increased hazard ratio for death (HR=1.61, 95% CI 1.09-2.40, P=0.02), death attributed to CRC (HR=1.54, 95% CI 0.99-2.39, P=0.06) as well as a poorer DFS (DFS HR=1.64, 95% CI 1.23-3.36, P=0.04). The associations were stronger in stage I-III patients (OS HR=2.20, 95% CI 1.28-4.06, P=0.007, DSS HR=2.38, 95% CI 1.20-5.39, P=0.02, respectively). CONCLUSIONS Lack of ERβ expression is associated with advanced cancer stages and independently associated with poor survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Rudolph
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center, Im Neuenheimer Feld 581, Heidelberg 69120, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Menopausal hormone therapy and risks of colorectal adenomas and cancers in the French E3N prospective cohort: true associations or bias? Eur J Epidemiol 2012; 27:439-52. [DOI: 10.1007/s10654-012-9694-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2011] [Accepted: 05/16/2012] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
|
25
|
Rudolph A, Hein R, Hoffmeister M, Försti A, Hemminki K, Risch A, Brenner H, Chang-Claude J. Copy number variations of GSTT1 and GSTM1, colorectal cancer risk and possible effect modification of cigarette smoking and menopausal hormone therapy. Int J Cancer 2012; 131:E841-8. [DOI: 10.1002/ijc.27428] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2011] [Accepted: 12/30/2011] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
|
26
|
Jansen L, Below J, Chang-Claude J, Brenner H, Hoffmeister M. Beta blocker use and colorectal cancer risk. Cancer 2012; 118:3911-9. [DOI: 10.1002/cncr.26727] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2011] [Revised: 10/11/2011] [Accepted: 11/07/2011] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
|
27
|
Krämer HU, Müller H, Stegmaier C, Rothenbacher D, Raum E, Brenner H. Type 2 diabetes mellitus and gender-specific risk for colorectal neoplasia. Eur J Epidemiol 2012; 27:341-7. [PMID: 22527209 DOI: 10.1007/s10654-012-9686-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2011] [Accepted: 04/05/2012] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Although a positive association between type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and colorectal cancer is well established, uncertainty exists about risk differences in diabetic men and women when considering colorectal neoplasia (CN). The main objective was to examine gender-specific associations of T2DM with CN in a population-based cohort study of adults in Germany. This analysis is based on participants of the ESTHER-study, a population-based cohort study. Participants were 50-74 years old at baseline and underwent colonoscopy during 5 year follow-up. CN detected at colonoscopy were validated by medical records review. Total and gender-specific associations of T2DM at baseline and CN were estimated using log-binomial regression. Overall, 55 cases of CN were detected in 166 participants with T2DM and 328 cases in 1,360 participants without T2DM. In women, CN was found in 32 % of participants with T2DM and in 18 % without T2DM (adjusted prevalence ratio (PR): 1.66 95 % CI 1.04-2.64). In men, prevalence for CN was 35 % for those with T2DM and 33 % for those without T2DM (adjusted PR = 1.01; 95 % CI 0.71-1.43). T2DM might have a stronger impact on CN among women than among men. Further research should examine possible reasons for these differences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heike Ursula Krämer
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center, INF 581, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Lin JH, Morikawa T, Chan AT, Kuchiba A, Shima K, Nosho K, Kirkner G, Zhang SM, Manson JE, Giovannucci E, Fuchs CS, Ogino S. Postmenopausal hormone therapy is associated with a reduced risk of colorectal cancer lacking CDKN1A expression. Cancer Res 2012; 72:3020-8. [PMID: 22511578 DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-11-2619] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
Experimental studies have shown that estrogen- or progesterone-activated signaling leads to growth inhibition effects on colon cancer cells through the upregulation of several cell-cycle regulators. However, epidemiologic studies evaluating hormone therapy use and colorectal cancer risk by the status of cell-cycle regulators are lacking. In this study, we used data from the prospective Nurses' Health Study to evaluate whether the association between hormone therapy use and colorectal cancer risk differs by the molecular pathologic status of microsatellite instability (MSI) and expression of cell-cycle-related tumor biomarkers, including CDKN1A (p21, CIP1), CDKN1B (p27, KIP1), and TP53 (p53) by immunohistochemistry. Duplication Cox regression analysis was used to determine an association between hormone therapy use, cancer risk, and specific tumor biomarkers in 581 incident colon and rectal cancer cases that occurred during 26 years of follow-up among 105,520 postmenopausal women. We found a difference between hormone therapy use and colorectal cancer risk according to CDKN1A expression (P(heterogeneity) = 0.01). Current hormone therapy use was associated with a reduced risk for CDKN1A-nonexpressed [multivariate relative risk (RR), 0.61; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.46-0.82] but not for CDKN1A-expressed (RR, 1.32; 95% CI, 0.76-2.31) tumors. The lower risk for CDKN1A-nonexpressed but not for CDKN1A-expressed cancers was also present among current users of estrogen-alone therapy. We found no significant difference in the relations between hormone therapy use and cancer risk according to MSI, CDKN1B, or TP53 status. Together, our molecular pathological epidemiology findings suggest a preventive effect of hormone therapy against colorectal carcinogenesis that depends, in part, on loss of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor CDKN1A.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer H Lin
- Division of Preventive Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Hutter CM, Chang-Claude J, Slattery ML, Pflugeisen BM, Lin Y, Duggan D, Nan H, Lemire M, Rangrej J, Figueiredo JC, Jiao S, Harrison TA, Liu Y, Chen LS, Stelling DL, Warnick GS, Hoffmeister M, Küry S, Fuchs CS, Giovannucci E, Hazra A, Kraft P, Hunter DJ, Gallinger S, Zanke BW, Brenner H, Frank B, Ma J, Ulrich CM, White E, Newcomb PA, Kooperberg C, LaCroix AZ, Prentice RL, Jackson RD, Schoen RE, Chanock SJ, Berndt SI, Hayes RB, Caan BJ, Potter JD, Hsu L, Bézieau S, Chan AT, Hudson TJ, Peters U. Characterization of gene-environment interactions for colorectal cancer susceptibility loci. Cancer Res 2012; 72:2036-44. [PMID: 22367214 PMCID: PMC3374720 DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-11-4067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 137] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified more than a dozen loci associated with colorectal cancer (CRC) risk. Here, we examined potential effect-modification between single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) at 10 of these loci and probable or established environmental risk factors for CRC in 7,016 CRC cases and 9,723 controls from nine cohort and case-control studies. We used meta-analysis of an efficient empirical-Bayes estimator to detect potential multiplicative interactions between each of the SNPs [rs16892766 at 8q23.3 (EIF3H/UTP23), rs6983267 at 8q24 (MYC), rs10795668 at 10p14 (FLJ3802842), rs3802842 at 11q23 (LOC120376), rs4444235 at 14q22.2 (BMP4), rs4779584 at 15q13 (GREM1), rs9929218 at 16q22.1 (CDH1), rs4939827 at 18q21 (SMAD7), rs10411210 at 19q13.1 (RHPN2), and rs961253 at 20p12.3 (BMP2)] and select major CRC risk factors (sex, body mass index, height, smoking status, aspirin/nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use, alcohol use, and dietary intake of calcium, folate, red meat, processed meat, vegetables, fruit, and fiber). The strongest statistical evidence for a gene-environment interaction across studies was for vegetable consumption and rs16892766, located on chromosome 8q23.3, near the EIF3H and UTP23 genes (nominal P(interaction) = 1.3 × 10(-4); adjusted P = 0.02). The magnitude of the main effect of the SNP increased with increasing levels of vegetable consumption. No other interactions were statistically significant after adjusting for multiple comparisons. Overall, the association of most CRC susceptibility loci identified in initial GWAS seems to be invariant to the other risk factors considered; however, our results suggest potential modification of the rs16892766 effect by vegetable consumption.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carolyn M Hutter
- Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Weige CC, Allred KF, Armstrong CM, Allred CD. P53 mediates estradiol induced activation of apoptosis and DNA repair in non-malignant colonocytes. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 2012; 128:113-20. [PMID: 22100717 DOI: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2011.10.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2011] [Revised: 10/28/2011] [Accepted: 10/30/2011] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Clinical and animal studies have shown a strong link between estrogen status in women and decreased risk of colon cancer. However, little research has been done into the mechanism of protection that estrogen provides. Our laboratory has demonstrated that estradiol (E₂) inhibits the development of pre-neoplastic lesions through an estrogen receptor β (ERβ) mediated mechanism in mice. Our data also suggest that the primary protective role of E₂ treatment is increased apoptosis in non-malignant colonocytes that are damaged and at risk of becoming cancerous. The p53 protein plays a crucial role in the cellular response to stress by inducing cell cycle arrest, DNA repair mechanisms, and/or apoptosis. Due to the observed induction of apoptosis in response to E₂, we are investigating the role of p53 in this chemo-protective mechanism. E₂ suppressed growth of young adult mouse colonocytes (YAMCs) by inducing apoptosis and these physiological responses were completely lost in YAMCs lacking a functional p53 protein. Western blot analysis demonstrated increases in p53 protein levels in YAMCs after treatment with E₂ likely due to protein stabilization. E₂ was shown to enhance the transcriptional activity of p53, resulting in up-regulation of pro-apoptotic p53 target genes (Bax, Noxa, and PUMA). Finally, repair of DNA double stranded breaks was shown to be increased by E₂ treatment. Collectively, these data are the first to demonstrate that p53 is a primary mediator of the protective actions of E₂ in the colon.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charles C Weige
- Genetics Interdisciplinary Program, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, United States
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
|
32
|
Jansen L, Hoffmeister M, Chang-Claude J, Koch M, Brenner H, Arndt V. Age-specific administration of chemotherapy and long-term quality of life in stage II and III colorectal cancer patients: a population-based prospective cohort. Oncologist 2011; 16:1741-51. [PMID: 22101506 DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2011-0124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the age-specific pattern of administration of chemotherapy and its association with long-term survival and quality of life (QoL) in stage II and III colorectal cancer patients. METHODS Chemotherapy allocation according to disease and patient characteristics was investigated in a population-based cohort of 562 stage II and III colorectal cancer patients. Five years after diagnosis, survival was determined and QoL was assessed using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 Items and a tumor specific module. The association among chemotherapy, survival, and QoL was examined while controlling for potential confounders. RESULTS Chemotherapy was administered in 71% of patients aged <60 years and in only 20% of patients aged ≥80 years. A significant association between chemotherapy and longer survival time was found for stage III cancer only. Chemotherapy was associated with higher symptom levels for trouble with taste, anxiety, and hair loss. In age-specific analyses, younger survivors (<70 years at time of follow-up) with a history of chemotherapy reported significantly lower physical, role, and cognitive functioning and higher pain, appetite loss, hair loss, and trouble with taste symptom levels. In contrast, for older survivors (≥70 years), only two (hair loss and dry mouth) out of 38 QoL scores were significantly associated with chemotherapy. DISCUSSION Chemotherapy is associated with lower long-term QoL, especially in younger survivors. In cases of uncertain survival benefits of chemotherapy, consideration of its long-term effects on QoL should be incorporated into final decisions on treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lina Jansen
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (dkfz), Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Naishadham D, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, Siegel R, Cokkinides V, Jemal A. State disparities in colorectal cancer mortality patterns in the United States. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2011; 20:1296-302. [PMID: 21737410 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-11-0250] [Citation(s) in RCA: 73] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer (CRC) mortality rates have been decreasing for many decades in the United States, with the decrease accelerating in the most recent time period. The extent to which this decrease varies across states and its influence on the geographic patterns of rates is unknown. METHODS We analyzed the temporal trend in age-standardized CRC death rates for each state from 1990 to 2007 using joinpoint regression. We also examined the change in death rates between 1990-1994 and 2003-2007 using rate ratios with 95% confidence intervals and illustrated the change in pattern using maps. The relationship between the change in mortality rates and CRC screening rates for 2004 by state was examined using Pearson's correlation. RESULTS CRC mortality rates significantly decreased in all states except Mississippi between 1990 and 2007 based on the joinpoint model. The decrease in death rates between 1990-1994 and 2003-2007 ranged from 9% in Alabama to greater than 33% in Massachusetts, Rhode Island, New York, and Alaska; Mississippi and Wyoming showed no significant decrease. Generally, the northeastern states showed the largest decreases, whereas southern states showed the smallest decreases. The highest CRC mortality rates shifted from the northeastern states during 1990 to 1994 to the southern states along the Appalachian corridor during 2003 to 2007. The decrease in CRC mortality rates by state correlated strongly with uptake of screening (r = -0.65, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS Progress in reducing CRC mortality varies across states, with the Northeast showing the most progress and the South showing the least progress. IMPACT These findings highlight the need for wider dissemination of CRC screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deepa Naishadham
- Surveillance Research, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Armstrong CM, Allred KF, Allred CD. Dietary fish oil reduces DNA adduct formation while estradiol upregulates apoptosis in response to DNA damage in the rat colon. Dig Dis Sci 2011; 56:2585-94. [PMID: 21409371 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-011-1667-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2010] [Accepted: 03/01/2011] [Indexed: 12/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Dietary fish oil is associated with a decrease in colon cancer incidence: in part through a reduction in DNA adduct formation and an induction of colonocyte apoptosis. Estradiol (E(2)) has also been demonstrated to be protective against colon cancer incidence. Studies evaluating fish oil diets and DNA adduct formation in the colon have been conducted in male models without regard to possible interactions with E(2). AIMS The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of E(2) and fish oil both together and separately in female rats at the point of DNA damage. METHODS Ovariectomized female Sprague-Dawley rats were fed either a corn oil or fish oil diet in the presence or absence of E(2) for two weeks prior to being sacrificed at four time points following injection with azoxymethane. O(6)-methyldeoxyguanosine (O(6)-MedG) DNA adducts and apoptosis were examined using immunohistochemistry. RESULTS Dietary fish oil reduced DNA adduct formation independent of the presence of E(2) at both 9 and 12 h post carcinogen. E(2) itself did not suppress adduct formation. E(2) significantly induced apoptosis 12 h after carcinogen independent of diet, primarily in the luminal third of the crypts. Fish oil was not associated with increased colonocyte apoptosis. CONCLUSIONS These data demonstrate that fish oil is protective against DNA damage in the colon regardless of gender through reduction of O(6)-MedG adduct formation. Additionally, E(2) is capable of inducing apoptosis directly at the point of DNA damage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cameron M Armstrong
- Department of Nutrition and Food Science, Texas A&M University, 373 Olsen Blvd, 2253 TAMU, College Station, TX 77843, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Jansen L, Hoffmeister M, Chang-Claude J, Brenner H, Arndt V. Benefit finding and post-traumatic growth in long-term colorectal cancer survivors: prevalence, determinants, and associations with quality of life. Br J Cancer 2011; 105:1158-65. [PMID: 21878935 PMCID: PMC3208486 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2011.335] [Citation(s) in RCA: 111] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND As research on quality of life of colorectal cancer (CRC) survivors has mainly focused on downsides of cancer survivorship, the aim of this study is to investigate benefit finding (BF) and post-traumatic growth (PTG) in long-term CRC survivors. METHODS Benefit finding, PTG, and quality of life were assessed 5 years after diagnosis in a population-based cohort of 483 CRC patients using the benefit finding scale, the post-traumatic growth inventory, and the EORTC QLQ-C30. Prevalence of BF and PTG, determinants of moderate-to-high BF and PTG, and the association between BF, PTG, and quality of life were investigated. RESULTS Moderate to high levels of BF and PTG were experienced by 64% and 46% of the survivors, respectively. Survivors with the highest level of education and with higher depression scores reported less BF and PTG. The PTG increased with increasing stage and self-reported burden of diagnosis. Quality of life only correlated weakly with PTG (Pearson's r=0.1180, P=0.0112) and not with BF (r=0.0537, P=0.2456). CONCLUSION Many long-term CRC survivors experience BF and PTG. As these constructs were not strongly correlated with quality of life, focusing solely on quality of life after cancer misses an important aspect of survivorship.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Jansen
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), POB 10 19 49, 69009 Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Green J, Czanner G, Reeves G, Watson J, Wise L, Roddam A, Beral V. Menopausal hormone therapy and risk of gastrointestinal cancer: nested case-control study within a prospective cohort, and meta-analysis. Int J Cancer 2011; 130:2387-96. [PMID: 21671473 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.26236] [Citation(s) in RCA: 80] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2011] [Accepted: 05/24/2011] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Use of menopausal hormone therapy (HT) has been associated with reduced risk of colorectal cancer; evidence for its effect on other gastrointestinal cancers is limited. We conducted a nested case-control study within a UK cohort, and meta-analyses combining our results with those from published studies. Our study included women aged 50+ in the UK General Practice Research Database (GPRD): 1,054 with oesophageal, 750 with gastric and 4,708 with colorectal cancer, and 5 age- and practice-matched controls per case. Relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for cancer in relation to prospectively-recorded HT prescriptions were estimated by conditional logistic regression. Women prescribed HT had a reduced risk of oesophageal cancer (adjusted RR for 1+ vs. no HT prescriptions, 0.68, 95% CI 0.53-0.88; p = 0.004), gastric cancer (0.75, 0.54-1.05; p = 0.1) and colorectal cancer (0.81, 0.73-0.90; p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in cancer risk by HT type, estimated duration of HT use or between past and current users. In meta-analyses, risks for ever vs. never use of HT were significantly reduced for all three cancers (summary RR for oesophageal cancer, 0.68, 0.55-0.84, p < 0.001; for gastric cancer, 0.78, 0.65-0.94, p = 0.008; for colorectal cancer, 0.84, 0.81-0.88, p < 0.001). In high-income countries, estimated incidence over 5 years of these three cancers combined in women aged 50-64 was 2.9/1,000 in HT users and 3.6/1,000 in never users. The absolute reduction in risk of these cancers in HT users is small compared to the HT-associated increased risk of breast cancer.
Collapse
|
37
|
Lin KJ, Cheung WY, Lai JYC, Giovannucci EL. The effect of estrogen vs. combined estrogen-progestogen therapy on the risk of colorectal cancer. Int J Cancer 2011; 130:419-30. [PMID: 21365647 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.26026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 122] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2010] [Accepted: 02/02/2011] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Studies suggest that estrogen therapy (ET) and combined estrogen-progestogen therapy (EPT) may have different associations with colorectal cancer (CRC) risk, but data are conflicting. Prior meta-analyses did not distinguish between ET and EPT. We conducted a meta-analysis to summarize the relative risks (RR) of CRC due to ET versus EPT among peri- or postmenopausal women. From a total of 2,661 articles, four randomized controlled trials, eight cohort and eight case-control studies were included. Variables assessed included study characteristics, duration and recency of menopausal hormone therapy (HT) use, method of assessment of HT use, outcome definition and its ascertainment method. RRs were synthesized by random-effects models. We found that EPT ever use was associated with a decreased risk of CRC (RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.68-0.81), and so was ET ever use (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.69-0.91). While current use of ET was associated with a significantly reduced risk of CRC (RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.57-0.85), former use was not (RR 0.86, 95%CI 0.67-1.11). Recency did not significantly modify the association between EPT and CRC risk. EPT former use was associated with a lower RR of CRC compared to ET former use (p = 0.008) but no such difference was observed between EPT and ET current use (p = 0.12). Overall, we found consistent evidence supporting the association between EPT and CRC risk reduction, regardless of recency. While literature for the association between ET and CRC risk is heterogeneous, our analyses suggest only current use of ET is associated with a decreased CRC risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kueiyu Joshua Lin
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Tsilidis KK, Allen NE, Key TJ, Sanjoaquin MA, Bakken K, Berrino F, Fournier A, Lund E, Overvad K, Olsen A, Tjønneland A, Byrnes G, Chajes V, Rinaldi S, Boutron-Ruault MC, Clavel-Chapelon F, Chang-Claude J, Kaaks R, Bergmann M, Boeing H, Koumantaki Y, Palli D, Pala V, Panico S, Tumino R, Vineis P, Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita H, van Duijnhoven FJB, van Gils CH, Peeters PHM, Rodríguez L, González CA, Sánchez MJ, Chirlaque MD, Barricarte A, Dorronsoro M, Khaw KT, Rodwell SA, Norat T, Romaguera D, Riboli E. Menopausal hormone therapy and risk of colorectal cancer in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition. Int J Cancer 2011; 128:1881-9. [PMID: 20533550 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.25504] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Menopausal hormone therapy (HT) may influence colorectal cancer risk. A total of 136,275 postmenopausal women from the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition were followed for an average of 9 years, during which time 1,186 colorectal cancers were diagnosed. Hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated using Cox proportional hazards models stratified by center and age, and adjusted for body mass index, smoking, diabetes, physical activity and alcohol consumption. Compared to never use of HT at study enrollment, current use of estrogen-only (HR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.79-1.31) or estrogen plus progestin (HR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.77-1.14) was not significantly associated with the risk of colorectal cancer, and these associations did not vary by recency, duration, route of administration, regimen or specific constituent of HT. Our results show no significant association of estrogen-only or estrogen plus progestin therapy with colorectal cancer risk.
Collapse
|
39
|
Sanchez-Mete L, Venturo I, Papaldo P, Sperduti I, Stigliano V. Colorectal cancer after breast cancer: A case-control study. Cancer Epidemiol 2011; 35:44-7. [DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2010.09.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2009] [Revised: 09/03/2010] [Accepted: 09/06/2010] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
|
40
|
Fournier A. Should transdermal rather than oral estrogens be used in menopausal hormone therapy? A review. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2010; 16:23-32. [PMID: 20424283 DOI: 10.1258/mi.2010.010009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
The current evaluation of the benefit/risk ratio associated with menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) use is largely based on clinical trials which investigated the effects of oral treatments. Would MHT with transdermal estrogens be associated with a more favourable benefit/risk ratio? We reviewed the available epidemiologic evidence on that question. Epidemiologic studies were considered if they provided risk estimates of conditions which carry an important weight among menopausal women, and for which epidemiologic evidence of a possible link with MHT use is convincing: cardiovascular diseases, breast cancer, diabetes, colorectal cancer and hip fracture. We did not include studies with only surrogate measures. We found that the available information on the potential impact of the route of administration of MHT on the risk of our selected outcomes is limited. To date, epidemiologic data suggest that it has no impact on the risk of breast cancer and hip fracture. Results on the risk of coronary heart disease and colorectal cancer are inconsistent. Studies on stroke and diabetes risk are too few to allow meaningful conclusions. There is a suggestion that transdermal MHT may be less deleterious than oral MHT regarding venous thromboembolism which needs to be confirmed. The issue of the route of administration of MHT should remain an active area of research as part of an attempt to identify treatment modalities that would have the least potential for exerting adverse effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Agnès Fournier
- Inserm U1018, Institut Gustave Roussy, 39 rue Camille Desmoulins, F-94805 Villejuif, France.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Weige CC, Allred KF, Allred CD. Estradiol alters cell growth in nonmalignant colonocytes and reduces the formation of preneoplastic lesions in the colon. Cancer Res 2009; 69:9118-24. [PMID: 19903848 DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-09-2348] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Numerous clinical and animal studies show that hormone replacement therapy reduces the risk of colon tumor formation. However, the majority of experiments have shown that estradiol (E(2)) does not inhibit the growth of malignantly transformed colon epithelia. As such, the presented studies focused on evaluating the effects of E(2) in noncancerous colonocytes. E(2) treatments (0-10 nmol/L) reduced cell growth and increased apoptotic activity in young adult mouse colonocytes (YAMC), a nonmalignant cell line, in a dose-responsive manner. These effects were lost in the YAMC-Ras cells, an isogenic cell line with a single malignant transformation. Cotreatment with an estrogen receptor (ER) antagonist inhibited the physiologic effects of E(2) in YAMC cells, suggesting that the response is ER mediated. To further study the effect of E(2) on colonic epithelia, we evaluated the development of preneoplastic lesions in ovariectomized wild-type (WT) and ERbeta knockout (ERbetaKO) mice treated with either vehicle or E(2). WT E(2)-treated animals exhibited significantly fewer aberrant crypt foci and increased apoptotic activity in colonic epithelia when compared with WT control mice or ERbetaKO animals receiving either treatment. For the first time, we showed that E(2) alters the growth of nontransformed colonocytes in vitro and that, through an ERbeta-mediated mechanism, E(2) influences the physiology of noncancerous colonocytes, resulting in fewer preneoplastic lesions. Collectively, these data show that the protective actions of E(2) occur primarily during the initiation/promotion stages of disease development and identify the hormone as an important chemoprotective agent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charles C Weige
- Genetics Interdisciplinary Program, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|