1
|
Wolf SM, Green RC. Return of Results in Genomic Research Using Large-Scale or Whole Genome Sequencing: Toward a New Normal. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 2023; 24:393-414. [PMID: 36913714 PMCID: PMC10497726 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-genom-101122-103209] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/14/2023]
Abstract
Genome sequencing is increasingly used in research and integrated into clinical care. In the research domain, large-scale analyses, including whole genome sequencing with variant interpretation and curation, virtually guarantee identification of variants that are pathogenic or likely pathogenic and actionable. Multiple guidelines recommend that findings associated with actionable conditions be offered to research participants in order to demonstrate respect for autonomy, reciprocity, and participant interests in health and privacy. Some recommendations go further and support offering a wider range of findings, including those that are not immediately actionable. In addition, entities covered by the US Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) may be required to provide a participant's raw genomic data on request. Despite these widely endorsed guidelines and requirements, the implementation of return of genomic results and data by researchers remains uneven. This article analyzes the ethical and legal foundations for researcher duties to offer adult participants their interpreted results and raw data as the new normal in genomic research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan M Wolf
- Law School and Medical School, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA;
| | - Robert C Green
- Genomes2People Research Program, Harvard Medical School, Mass General Brigham, Broad Institute, and Ariadne Labs, Boston, Massachusetts, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Clayton EW, Smith ME, Anderson KC, Chung WK, Connolly JJ, Fullerton SM, McGowan ML, Peterson JF, Prows CA, Sabatello M, Holm IA. Studying the impact of translational genomic research: Lessons from eMERGE. Am J Hum Genet 2023; 110:1021-1033. [PMID: 37343562 PMCID: PMC10357472 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2023.05.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2023] [Revised: 05/22/2023] [Accepted: 05/23/2023] [Indexed: 06/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Two major goals of the Electronic Medical Record and Genomics (eMERGE) Network are to learn how best to return research results to patient/participants and the clinicians who care for them and also to assess the impact of placing these results in clinical care. Yet since its inception, the Network has confronted a host of challenges in achieving these goals, many of which had ethical, legal, or social implications (ELSIs) that required consideration. Here, we share impediments we encountered in recruiting participants, returning results, and assessing their impact, all of which affected our ability to achieve the goals of eMERGE, as well as the steps we took to attempt to address these obstacles. We divide the domains in which we experienced challenges into four broad categories: (1) study design, including recruitment of more diverse groups; (2) consent; (3) returning results to participants and their health care providers (HCPs); and (4) assessment of follow-up care of participants and measuring the impact of research on participants and their families. Since most phases of eMERGE have included children as well as adults, we also address the particular ELSI posed by including pediatric populations in this research. We make specific suggestions for improving translational genomic research to ensure that future projects can effectively return results and assess their impact on patient/participants and providers if the goals of genomic-informed medicine are to be achieved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ellen Wright Clayton
- Center for Biomedical Ethics and Society, Departments of Pediatrics and Health Policy, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37203, USA.
| | - Maureen E Smith
- Department of Medicine, Center for Genetic Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
| | - Katherine C Anderson
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232, USA
| | - Wendy K Chung
- Departments of Pediatrics and Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - John J Connolly
- Center for Applied Genomics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Stephanie M Fullerton
- Department of Bioethics & Humanities, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Michelle L McGowan
- Biomedical Ethics Research Program, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; Department of Women's, Gender, and Sexuality Studies, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45221, USA
| | - Josh F Peterson
- Center for Precision Medicine, Department of Biomedical Informatics, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37203, USA
| | - Cynthia A Prows
- Divisions of Human Genetics and Patient Services, Cincinnati Children's Hospital, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA
| | - Maya Sabatello
- Center for Precision Medicine & Genomics, Department of Medicine, and Division of Ethics, Department of Medical Humanities & Ethics Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, NY, NY 10032, USA
| | - Ingrid A Holm
- Division of Genetics and Genomics, Boston Children's Hospital; Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gammal RS, Pirmohamed M, Somogyi AA, Morris SA, Formea CM, Elchynski AL, Oshikoya KA, McLeod HL, Haidar CE, Whirl-Carrillo M, Klein TE, Caudle KE, Relling MV. Expanded Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium Guideline for Medication Use in the Context of G6PD Genotype. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2023; 113:973-985. [PMID: 36049896 PMCID: PMC10281211 DOI: 10.1002/cpt.2735] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2022] [Accepted: 08/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency is associated with development of acute hemolytic anemia in the setting of oxidative stress, which can be caused by medication exposure. Regulatory agencies worldwide warn against the use of certain medications in persons with G6PD deficiency, but in many cases, this information is conflicting, and the clinical evidence is sparse. This guideline provides information on using G6PD genotype as part of the diagnosis of G6PD deficiency and classifies medications that have been previously implicated as unsafe in individuals with G6PD deficiency by one or more sources. We classify these medications as high, medium, or low to no risk based on a systematic review of the published evidence of the gene-drug associations and regulatory warnings. In patients with G6PD deficiency, high-risk medications should be avoided, medium-risk medications should be used with caution, and low-to-no risk medications can be used with standard precautions, without regard to G6PD phenotype. This new document replaces the prior Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium guideline for rasburicase therapy in the context of G6PD genotype (updates at: www.cpicpgx.org).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roseann S. Gammal
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Massachusetts College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Munir Pirmohamed
- MRC Centre for Drug Safety Science, Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Andrew A. Somogyi
- Discipline of Pharmacology, School of Biomedicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Sarah A. Morris
- Department of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
- Department of Cancer Pharmacology and Pharmacogenomics, Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - Christine M. Formea
- Department of Pharmacy and Intermountain Precision Genomics, Intermountain Healthcare, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | | | - Kazeem A. Oshikoya
- Department of Pharmacology, Therapeutics and Toxicology, College of Medicine, Lagos State University, Ikeja, Lagos, Nigeria
| | - Howard L. McLeod
- Intermountain Precision Genomics, Intermountain Healthcare, St George, UT, USA
| | - Cyrine E. Haidar
- Department of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | | | - Teri E. Klein
- Department of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Kelly E. Caudle
- Department of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Mary V. Relling
- Department of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Noohi F, Ross LF. Clarifying the Blurry Boundaries between Research and Clinical Care. THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS : AJOB 2022; 22:96-98. [PMID: 36170083 DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2022.2110977] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
|
5
|
Korngiebel DM, West KM. Patient Recommendations for the Content and Design of Electronic Returns of Genetic Test Results: Interview Study Among Patients Who Accessed Their Genetic Test Results via the Internet. JMIRX MED 2022; 3:e29706. [PMID: 37725563 PMCID: PMC10414314 DOI: 10.2196/29706] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2021] [Revised: 05/26/2021] [Accepted: 01/29/2022] [Indexed: 09/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Genetic test results will be increasingly made available electronically as more patient-facing tools are developed; however, little research has been done that collects data on patient preferences for content and design before creating results templates. OBJECTIVE This study identifies patient preferences for the electronic return of genetic test results, including what considerations should be prioritized for content and design. METHODS Following user-centered design methods, 59 interviews were conducted by using semistructured protocols. The interviews explored the content and design issues of patient portals that facilitated the return of test results to patients. We interviewed patients who received electronic results for specific types of genetics tests (pharmacogenetic tests, hereditary blood disorder tests, and tests for the risk of heritable cancers) or electronically received any type of genetic or nongenetic test results. RESULTS In general, many of participants felt that there always needed to be some clinician involvement in electronic result returns and that electronic coversheets with simple summaries would be helpful for facilitating this. Coversheet summaries could accompany, but not replace, the more detailed report. Participants had specific suggestions for such results summaries, such as only reporting the information that was the most important for patients to understand, including next steps, and doing so by using clear language that is free of medical jargon. Electronic result returns should also include explicit encouragement for patients to contact health care providers about questions. Finally, many participants preferred to manage their care by using their smartphones, particularly in instances when they needed to access health information on the go. CONCLUSIONS Participants recommended that a patient-friendly front section should accompany the more detailed report and made suggestions for organization, content, and wording. Many used their smartphones regularly to access test results; therefore, health systems and patient portal software vendors should accommodate smartphone app design and web portal design concomitantly when developing platforms for returning results.
Collapse
|
6
|
Johnson LM, Mandrell BN, Li C, Lu Z, Gattuso J, Harrison LW, Mori M, Ouma AA, Pritchard M, Sharp KMH, Nichols KE. Managing Pandora's Box: Familial Expectations around the Return of (Future) Germline Results. AJOB Empir Bioeth 2022; 13:152-165. [PMID: 35471132 DOI: 10.1080/23294515.2022.2063994] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pediatric oncology patients are increasingly being offered germline testing to diagnose underlying cancer predispositions. Meanwhile, as understanding of variant pathogenicity evolves, planned reanalysis of genomic results has been suggested. Little is known regarding the types of genomic information that parents and their adolescent children with cancer prefer to receive at the time of testing or their expectations around the future return of genomic results. METHODS Parents and adolescent children with cancer eligible for genomic testing for cancer predisposition were surveyed regarding their attitudes and expectations for receiving current and future germline results (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02530658). RESULTS All parents (100%) desired to learn about results for treatable or preventable conditions, with 92.4% wanting results even when there is no treatment or prevention. Parents expressed less interest in receiving uncertain results for themselves (88.3%) than for their children (95.3%). Most parents (95.9%) and adolescents (87.9%) believed that providers have a responsibility to share new or updated germline results indefinitely or at any point during follow-up care. Fewer parents (67.5%) indicated that they would want results if their child was deceased: 10.3% would not want to be contacted, 19.3% were uncertain. CONCLUSIONS Expectations for return of new or updated genomic results are high among pediatric oncology families, although up to one third of parents have reservations about receiving such information in the event of their child's death. These results underscore the importance of high-quality pre-and post-test counseling, conducted by individuals trained in consenting around genomic testing to elicit family preferences and align expectations around the return of germline results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liza-Marie Johnson
- Department of Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Belinda N Mandrell
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Nursing Research, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Chen Li
- Department of Biostatistics, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Zhaohua Lu
- Department of Biostatistics, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Jami Gattuso
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Nursing Research, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Lynn W Harrison
- Department of Oncology, Division of Cancer Predisposition, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Motomi Mori
- Department of Biostatistics, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Annastasia A Ouma
- Department of Oncology, Division of Cancer Predisposition, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Michele Pritchard
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Nursing Research, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | | | - Kim E Nichols
- Department of Oncology, Division of Cancer Predisposition, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Oerlemans AJM, Barendregt DMH, Kooijman SC, Bunnik EM. Impact of incidental findings on young adult participants in brain imaging research: an interview study. Eur Radiol 2022; 32:3839-3845. [DOI: 10.1007/s00330-021-08474-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2021] [Revised: 10/25/2021] [Accepted: 11/19/2021] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
|
8
|
Abicht A, Schön U, Laner A, Holinski-Feder E, Diebold I. Actionable secondary findings in arrhythmogenic right ventricle cardiomyopathy genes: impact and challenge of genetic counseling. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther 2021; 11:637-649. [PMID: 33968641 DOI: 10.21037/cdt-20-585] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Background Comprehensive genetic analysis yields in a higher diagnostic rate but also in a higher number of secondary findings (SF). American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) published a list of 59 actionable genes for which disease causing sequence variants are recommended to be reported as SF including 27 genes linked to inherited cardiovascular disease (CVD) such as arrhythmia syndromes, cardiomyopathies and vascular and connective tissue disorders. One of the selected conditions represented in the actionable gene list is the arrhythmogenic right ventricle cardiomyopathy (ARVC), an inherited heart muscle disease with a particularly high risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD). Since clinical symptoms are frequently absent before SCD, a genetic finding is a promising option for early diagnosis and possible intervention. However, the variant interpretation and the decision to return a SF is still challenging. Methods To determine the frequency of medically actionable SF linked to CVD we analyzed data of 6,605 individuals who underwent high throughput sequencing for noncardiac diagnostic requests. In particular, we critically assessed and classified the variants in the ARVC genes: DSC2, DSG2, DSP, PKP2 and TMEM43 and compared our findings with the population-based genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD) and ARVC-afflicted individuals listed in ClinVar and ARVC database. Results 1% (69/6,605) of tested individuals carried pathogenic SF in one of the 27 genes linked to CVD, of them 13 individuals (0.2%) carried a pathogenic SF in a ARVC gene. Overall, 582 rare variants were identified in all five ARVC genes, 96% of the variants were missense variants and 4% putative LoF variants (pLoF): frameshift, start/stop-gain/loss, splice-site. Finally, we selected 13 of the 24 pLoF variants as pathogenic SF by careful data interpretation. Conclusions Since SF in actionable ARVC genes can allow early detection and prevention of disease and SCD, detected variant must undergo rigorous clinical and laboratory evaluation before it can be described as pathogenic and returned to patients. Returning a SF to a patient should be interdisciplinary, it needs genetic counselling and clinicians experienced in inherited heart disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela Abicht
- Medical Genetics Center, Munich, Germany.,Department of Neurology, Friedrich-Baur-Institute, Klinikum der Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Isabel Diebold
- Medical Genetics Center, Munich, Germany.,Department of Pediatrics, Technical University of Munich School of Medicine, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Andrews SM, Raspa M, Edwards A, Moultrie R, Turner-Brown L, Wagner L, Alvarez Rivas A, Frisch MK, Wheeler AC. "Just tell me what's going on": The views of parents of children with genetic conditions regarding the research use of their child's electronic health record. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2021; 27:429-436. [PMID: 31913479 DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocz208] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2019] [Revised: 10/17/2019] [Accepted: 11/25/2019] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to understand the ethical, legal, and social issues described by parents of children with known or suspected genetic conditions that cause intellectual and developmental disabilities regarding research use of their child's electronic health record (EHR). MATERIALS AND METHODS We conducted 4 focus groups with parents of children with a known (n = 12) or suspected (n = 11) genetic condition, as well as 2 comparison groups with parents who had a child with no known genetic condition (n = 15). Focus group transcripts were coded and analyzed using directed content analysis. RESULTS After weighing the risks and benefits, parents of children with known or suspected genetic conditions were willing to share their child's EHR for research studies under certain conditions. Preferences were for studies conducted by universities or nonprofits that might benefit their child or others with the same condition. Parents also valued return of research results. DISCUSSION Trust, transparency, altruism, and concerns about privacy emerged as factors that affect parents' willingness to allow research use of their child's EHR. CONCLUSION Researchers should consider how to build trust with parents by increasing transparency of the research process and explaining specifically how they will ensure the confidentiality of EHR data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara M Andrews
- Center for Newborn Screening, Ethics, and Disability Studies, RTI International, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Melissa Raspa
- Center for Newborn Screening, Ethics, and Disability Studies, RTI International, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Anne Edwards
- Center for Newborn Screening, Ethics, and Disability Studies, RTI International, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | | | - Lauren Turner-Brown
- TEACCH Autism Program, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Laura Wagner
- Center for Communication Science, RTI International, Durham, NC
| | | | - Mary Katherine Frisch
- TEACCH Autism Program, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Anne C Wheeler
- Center for Newborn Screening, Ethics, and Disability Studies, RTI International, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Love-Nichols J, Uhlmann WR, Arscott P, Willer C, Hornsby W, Roberts JS. A survey of aortic disease biorepository participants' preferences for return of research genetic results. J Genet Couns 2020; 30:645-655. [PMID: 33319384 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1341] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2019] [Revised: 09/02/2020] [Accepted: 09/08/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
There is ongoing debate on whether and what research genetic results to return to study participants. To date, no study in this area has focused on aortopathy populations despite known genes that are clinically actionable. Participants (n = 225, 79% male, mean age = 61 years) with an aortopathy were surveyed to assess preferences for receiving research genetic results. Participants were 'very' or 'extremely likely' to want results for pathogenic variants in aortopathy genes with implications for family members (81%) or that would change medical management (76%). Similarly, participants were 'very' or 'extremely likely' to want actionable secondary findings related to cancer (75%) or other cardiac diseases (70%). Significantly lower interest was observed for non-actionable findings-pathogenic variants in aortopathy genes that would not change medical management (51%) and variants of uncertain significance (38%) (p < .0001). Higher health and genomic literacy were positively associated with interest in actionable findings. Most participants (>63%) were accepting of any means of return; however, a substantial minority (18%-38%) deemed certain technological means unacceptable (e.g., patient portal). Over 90% of participants reported that a range of health professionals, including cardiovascular specialists, genetics specialists, and primary care providers, were acceptable to return results. Participants with aortopathies are highly interested in research genetic results perceived to be medically actionable for themselves or family members. Participants are accepting of a variety of means for returning results. Findings suggest that research participants should be asked what results are preferred at time of informed consent and that genetic counseling may clarify implications of results that are not personally medically actionable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Wendy R Uhlmann
- Department of Human Genetics, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.,Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.,Center for Bioethics and Social Sciences in Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Patricia Arscott
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Cristen Willer
- Department of Human Genetics, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.,Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.,Department of Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Whitney Hornsby
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - J Scott Roberts
- Center for Bioethics and Social Sciences in Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.,Department of Health Behavior and Health Education, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Stein R, Beuren T, Cela LR, Ferrari F. Farmacogenômica e Doença Cardiovascular: Onde Estamos e Para Onde Vamos. Arq Bras Cardiol 2020; 115:690-700. [PMID: 33111871 PMCID: PMC8386961 DOI: 10.36660/abc.20200151] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2020] [Accepted: 06/10/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
A farmacogenômica (FGx) investiga a interação entre genes e medicamentos. Através da análise de regiões específicas do DNA, informações sobre o perfil de metabolização do paciente para um determinado fármaco podem ser descritas, assim como o perfil esperado de resposta ao tratamento. Objetivamente, esse tipo de teste pode ter impacto no tratamento de pacientes que não estão respondendo adequadamente a um determinado medicamento, seja pela ausência dos efeitos esperados ou em virtude do aparecimento de efeitos adversos. Neste cenário, o objetivo desta revisão é o de informar o cardiologista clínico sobre esta importante área do conhecimento e atualizá-lo sobre o tema, procurando preencher as lacunas no que diz respeito à relação custo-benefício da aplicação da FGx nas doenças cardiovasculares, além de fornecer informações para a implementação da terapia guiada pela FGx na prática clínica.
Collapse
|
12
|
Frequency of genomic secondary findings among 21,915 eMERGE network participants. Genet Med 2020; 22:1470-1477. [PMID: 32546831 PMCID: PMC7713503 DOI: 10.1038/s41436-020-0810-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2019] [Revised: 02/24/2020] [Accepted: 04/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Discovering an incidental finding (IF) or secondary finding (SF) is a potential result of genomic testing, but few data exist describing types and frequencies of SFs likely to appear in broader clinical populations. METHODS The Electronic Medical Records and Genomics Network Phase III (eMERGE III) developed a CLIA-compliant sequencing panel of 109 genes and 1551 variants of clinical relevance or research interest and deployed this panel at ten clinical sites. We evaluated medically actionable SFs across 67 genes and 14 single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) in a diverse cohort of 21,915 participants drawn from a variety of settings (e.g., primary care, biobanks, specialty clinics). RESULTS Correcting for testing indication, we found a 3.02% overall frequency of SFs; 2.54% from 59 genes the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics recommends for SF return, and 0.48% in other genes, primarily HFE and PALB2. SFs associated with cancer susceptibility were most frequent (1.38%), followed by cardiovascular diseases (0.87%), and lipid disorders (0.50%). After removing HFE, the frequency of SFs and proportion of pathogenic versus likely pathogenic SFs did not differ in those self-identifying as White versus others. CONCLUSION Here we present frequencies and types of medically actionable secondary findings to support informed decision making by patients, participants, and practitioners engaged in genomic medicine.
Collapse
|
13
|
Raspa M, Moultrie R, Wagner L, Edwards A, Andrews S, Frisch MK, Turner-Brown L, Wheeler A. Ethical, Legal, and Social Issues Related to the Inclusion of Individuals With Intellectual Disabilities in Electronic Health Record Research: Scoping Review. J Med Internet Res 2020; 22:e16734. [PMID: 32436848 PMCID: PMC7273235 DOI: 10.2196/16734] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2019] [Revised: 01/17/2020] [Accepted: 02/22/2020] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Data from electronic health records (EHRs) are increasingly used in the field of genetic research to further precision medicine initiatives. However, many of these efforts exclude individuals with intellectual disabilities, which often stem from genetic conditions. To include this important subpopulation in EHR research, important ethical, legal, and social issues should be considered. Objective The goal of this study was to review prior research to better understand what ethical, legal, and social issues may need further investigation when considering the research use of EHRs for individuals with genetic conditions that may result in intellectual disability. This information will be valuable in developing methods and best practices for involving this group in research given they are considered a vulnerable population that may need special research protections. Methods We conducted a scoping review to examine issues related to the use of EHRs for research purposes and those more broadly associated with genetic research. The initial search yielded a total of 460 unique citations. We used an evaluative coding process to determine relevancy for inclusion. Results This approach resulted in 59 articles in the following areas: informed consent, privacy and security, return of results, and vulnerable populations. The review included several models of garnering informed consent in EHR or genetic research, including tiered or categorical, blanket or general, open, and opt-out models. Second, studies reported on patients’ concerns regarding the privacy and security of EHR or genetic data, such as who has access, type of data use in research, identifiability, and risks associated with privacy breach. The literature on return of research results using biospecimens examined the dissension in the field, particularly when sharing individualized genetic results. Finally, work involving vulnerable populations highlighted special considerations when conducting EHR or genetic research. Conclusions The results frame important questions for researchers to consider when designing EHR studies, which include individuals with intellectual disabilities, including appropriate safeguards and protections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa Raspa
- RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, United States
| | | | - Laura Wagner
- RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, United States
| | - Anne Edwards
- RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, United States
| | - Sara Andrews
- RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, United States
| | - Mary Katherine Frisch
- The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, TEACCH Autism Program, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Lauren Turner-Brown
- The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, TEACCH Autism Program, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Anne Wheeler
- RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, United States
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Mandl KD, Glauser T, Krantz ID, Avillach P, Bartels A, Beggs AH, Biswas S, Bourgeois FT, Corsmo J, Dauber A, Devkota B, Fleisher GR, Heath AP, Helbig I, Hirschhorn JN, Kilbourn J, Kong SW, Kornetsky S, Majzoub JA, Marsolo K, Martin LJ, Nix J, Schwarzhoff A, Stedman J, Strauss A, Sund KL, Taylor DM, White PS, Marsh E, Grimberg A, Hawkes C. The Genomics Research and Innovation Network: creating an interoperable, federated, genomics learning system. Genet Med 2020; 22:371-380. [PMID: 31481752 PMCID: PMC7000325 DOI: 10.1038/s41436-019-0646-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2019] [Accepted: 08/20/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Clinicians and researchers must contextualize a patient's genetic variants against population-based references with detailed phenotyping. We sought to establish globally scalable technology, policy, and procedures for sharing biosamples and associated genomic and phenotypic data on broadly consented cohorts, across sites of care. METHODS Three of the nation's leading children's hospitals launched the Genomic Research and Innovation Network (GRIN), with federated information technology infrastructure, harmonized biobanking protocols, and material transfer agreements. Pilot studies in epilepsy and short stature were completed to design and test the collaboration model. RESULTS Harmonized, broadly consented institutional review board (IRB) protocols were approved and used for biobank enrollment, creating ever-expanding, compatible biobanks. An open source federated query infrastructure was established over genotype-phenotype databases at the three hospitals. Investigators securely access the GRIN platform for prep to research queries, receiving aggregate counts of patients with particular phenotypes or genotypes in each biobank. With proper approvals, de-identified data is exported to a shared analytic workspace. Investigators at all sites enthusiastically collaborated on the pilot studies, resulting in multiple publications. Investigators have also begun to successfully utilize the infrastructure for grant applications. CONCLUSIONS The GRIN collaboration establishes the technology, policy, and procedures for a scalable genomic research network.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenneth D Mandl
- Computational Health Informatics Program, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
- Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Tracy Glauser
- Division of Neurology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Ian D Krantz
- Division of Human Genetics at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Paul Avillach
- Computational Health Informatics Program, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Anna Bartels
- Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Alan H Beggs
- Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- The Manton Center for Orphan Disease Research, Division of Genetics and Genomics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Sawona Biswas
- Division of Human Genetics at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Florence T Bourgeois
- Computational Health Informatics Program, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jeremy Corsmo
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
- Office of Research Compliance and Regulatory Affairs, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Andrew Dauber
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
- Division of Endocrinology, Children's National Health System, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Batsal Devkota
- Center for Data-Driven Discovery in Biomedicine, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Gary R Fleisher
- Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Allison P Heath
- Center for Data-Driven Discovery in Biomedicine, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Ingo Helbig
- Department of Pediatrics, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Biomedical and Health Informatics, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Division of Neurology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Joel N Hirschhorn
- Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Division of Endocrinology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Judson Kilbourn
- Computational Health Informatics Program, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Sek Won Kong
- Computational Health Informatics Program, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Susan Kornetsky
- Research Administration, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Joseph A Majzoub
- Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Division of Endocrinology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Keith Marsolo
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Lisa J Martin
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
- Division of Human Genetics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Jeremy Nix
- Division of Biomedical Informatics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | | | - Jason Stedman
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Arnold Strauss
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
- Division of Cardiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Kristen L Sund
- Division of Human Genetics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Deanne M Taylor
- Department of Pediatrics, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Biomedical and Health Informatics, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Peter S White
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
- Division of Biomedical Informatics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Eric Marsh
- Division of Neurology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, The Perelman School of Medicine at The University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Adda Grimberg
- Division of Endocrinology and Diabetes, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, The Perelman School of Medicine at The University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Colin Hawkes
- Division of Endocrinology and Diabetes, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, The Perelman School of Medicine at The University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Sun R, Zheng H, Liu J, Du X, Guizani M. Placement delivery array design for the coded caching scheme in medical data sharing. Neural Comput Appl 2020. [DOI: 10.1007/s00521-019-04042-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
16
|
Rates of Actionable Genetic Findings in Individuals with Colorectal Cancer or Polyps Ascertained from a Community Medical Setting. Am J Hum Genet 2019; 105:526-533. [PMID: 31422818 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2019.07.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2018] [Accepted: 07/18/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
As clinical testing for Mendelian causes of colorectal cancer (CRC) is largely driven by recognition of family history and early age of onset, the rates of such findings among individuals with prevalent CRC not recognized to have these features is largely unknown. We evaluated actionable genomic findings in community-based participants ascertained by three phenotypes: (1) CRC, (2) one or more adenomatous colon polyps, and (3) control participants over age 59 years without CRC or colon polyps. These participants underwent sequencing for a panel of genes that included colorectal cancer/polyp (CRC/P)-associated and actionable incidental findings genes. Those with CRC had a 3.8% rate of positive results (pathogenic or likely pathogenic) for a CRC-associated gene variant, despite generally being older at CRC onset (mean 72 years). Those ascertained for polyps had a 0.8% positive rate and those with no CRC/P had a positive rate of 0.2%. Though incidental finding rates unrelated to colon cancer were similar for all groups, our positive rate for cardiovascular findings exceeds disease prevalence, suggesting that variant interpretation challenges or low penetrance in these genes. The rate of HFE c.845G>A (p.Cys282Tyr) homozygotes in the CRC group reinforces a previously reported, but relatively unexplored, association between hemochromatosis and CRC. These results in a general clinical population suggest that current testing strategies could be improved in order to better detect Mendelian CRC-associated conditions. These data also underscore the need for additional functional and familial evidence to clarify the pathogenicity and penetrance of variants deemed pathogenic or likely pathogenic, particularly among the actionable genes associated with cardiovascular disease.
Collapse
|
17
|
Manolio TA, Rowley R, Williams MS, Roden D, Ginsburg GS, Bult C, Chisholm RL, Deverka PA, McLeod HL, Mensah GA, Relling MV, Rodriguez LL, Tamburro C, Green ED. Opportunities, resources, and techniques for implementing genomics in clinical care. Lancet 2019; 394:511-520. [PMID: 31395439 PMCID: PMC6699751 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(19)31140-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2018] [Revised: 04/09/2019] [Accepted: 05/03/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Advances in technologies for assessing genomic variation and an increasing understanding of the effects of genomic variants on health and disease are driving the transition of genomics from the research laboratory into clinical care. Genomic medicine, or the use of an individual's genomic information as part of their clinical care, is increasingly gaining acceptance in routine practice, including in assessing disease risk in individuals and their families, diagnosing rare and undiagnosed diseases, and improving drug safety and efficacy. We describe the major types and measurement tools of genomic variation that are currently of clinical importance, review approaches to interpreting genomic sequence variants, identify publicly available tools and resources for genomic test interpretation, and discuss several key barriers in using genomic information in routine clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Teri A Manolio
- National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
| | - Robb Rowley
- National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | | | - Dan Roden
- Department of Medicine, Department of Pharmacology, and Department of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Geoffrey S Ginsburg
- Duke Center for Applied Genomic and Precision Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Carol Bult
- The Jackson Laboratory for Mammalian Genetics, Bar Harbor, ME, USA
| | - Rex L Chisholm
- Center for Genetic Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | - Howard L McLeod
- DeBartolo Family Personalized Medicine Institute, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - George A Mensah
- Center for Translation Research and Implementation Science, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Mary V Relling
- Pharmaceutical Sciences Department, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Laura Lyman Rodriguez
- National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Cecelia Tamburro
- National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Eric D Green
- National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Isidor B, Julia S, Saugier-Veber P, Weil-Dubuc PL, Bézieau S, Bieth E, Bonnefont JP, Munnich A, Bourdeaut F, Bourgain C, Chassaing N, Corradini N, Haye D, Plaisancie J, Dupin-Deguine D, Calvas P, Mignot C, Cogné B, Manouvrier S, Pasquier L, Héron D, Boycott KM, Turrini M, Vears DF, Nizon M, Vincent M. Searching for secondary findings: considering actionability and preserving the right not to know. Eur J Hum Genet 2019; 27:1481-1484. [PMID: 31186543 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-019-0438-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2019] [Revised: 05/04/2019] [Accepted: 05/21/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Bertrand Isidor
- Service de génétique médicale, CHU Nantes, 9 quai Moncousu, 44093, Nantes, France.
| | - Sophie Julia
- Service de génétique médicale, Hôpital Purpan, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, 31059, Toulouse, France
| | - Pascale Saugier-Veber
- Normandie Univ, UNIROUEN, Inserm U1245, Normandy Centre for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, 76000, Rouen, France.,Department of Genetics, Rouen University Hospital, Normandy Centre for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, 76000, Rouen, France
| | - Paul-Loup Weil-Dubuc
- Espace éthique Ile-de-France, Laboratoire d'excellence Distalz, Université Paris-Sud, Paris-Saclay, France
| | - Stéphane Bézieau
- Service de génétique médicale, CHU Nantes, 9 quai Moncousu, 44093, Nantes, France
| | - Eric Bieth
- Service de génétique médicale, Hôpital Purpan, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, 31059, Toulouse, France
| | - Jean-Paul Bonnefont
- Service de génétique médicale, Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - Arnold Munnich
- Service de génétique médicale, Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | | | - Catherine Bourgain
- Cermes3 (Centre de recherche médecine, sciences, santé, santé mentale, société), Inserm U988, site CNRS, 7 rue Guy Môquet, 94801, Villejuif, France
| | - Nicolas Chassaing
- Service de génétique médicale, Hôpital Purpan, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, 31059, Toulouse, France
| | - Nadège Corradini
- Institut d'hémato-oncologie pédiatrique, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - Damien Haye
- APHP, Département de Génétique, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | - Julie Plaisancie
- Service de génétique médicale, Hôpital Purpan, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, 31059, Toulouse, France
| | - Delphine Dupin-Deguine
- Service de génétique médicale, Hôpital Purpan, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, 31059, Toulouse, France.,Service d'otoneurologie et ORL pédiatrique, Hôpital Purpan, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, 31059, Toulouse, France
| | - Patrick Calvas
- Service de génétique médicale, Hôpital Purpan, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, 31059, Toulouse, France
| | - Cyril Mignot
- APHP, Département de Génétique, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | - Benjamin Cogné
- Service de génétique médicale, CHU Nantes, 9 quai Moncousu, 44093, Nantes, France
| | - Sylvie Manouvrier
- Clinique de génétique, CHU de Lille, 59000, Lille, France.,EA7364 Faculté de Médecine Université de Lille, 59000, Lille, France
| | - Laurent Pasquier
- CHU Rennes, Service de Génétique Clinique, 16 Boulevard de Bulgarie, 35203, Rennes, France
| | - Delphine Héron
- APHP, Département de Génétique, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | - Kym M Boycott
- Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Mauro Turrini
- DCS- Droit et Changement Social Université de Nantes, Nantes, France
| | - Danya F Vears
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Center for Biomedical Ethics and Law, KU Leuven, Belgium.,Leuven Institute for Human Genetics and Society, Leuven, Belgium.,Melbourne Law School, University of Melbourne, Carlton, Australia.,Murdoch Children's Research Institute, The Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Australia
| | - Mathilde Nizon
- Service de génétique médicale, CHU Nantes, 9 quai Moncousu, 44093, Nantes, France
| | - Marie Vincent
- Service de génétique médicale, CHU Nantes, 9 quai Moncousu, 44093, Nantes, France.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Eckstein L, Otlowski M. Strategies to Guide the Return of Genomic Research Findings: An Australian Perspective. JOURNAL OF BIOETHICAL INQUIRY 2018; 15:403-415. [PMID: 29767375 DOI: 10.1007/s11673-018-9856-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2017] [Accepted: 01/17/2018] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
In Australia, along with many other countries, limited guidance or other support strategies are currently available to researchers, institutional research ethics committees, and others responsible for making decisions about whether to return genomic findings with potential value to participants or their blood relatives. This lack of guidance results in onerous decision-making burdens-traversing technical, interpretative, and ethical dimensions-as well as uncertainty and inconsistencies for research participants. This article draws on a recent targeted consultation conducted by the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council to put forward strategies for supporting return of finding decision-making. In particular, we propose a pyramid of decision-making support: decision-making guidelines, technical and interpretative assistance, and ethical assistance for intractable "tough" cases. Each step of the pyramid involves an increasing level of regulatory involvement and applies to a smaller subsection of genomic research findings. Implementation of such strategies would facilitate a growing evidence base for return of finding decisions, thereby easing the financial, time, and moral burdens currently placed on researchers and other relevant decision-makers while also improving the quality of such decisions and, consequently, participant outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Eckstein
- Faculty of Law, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 89, Hobart, Tasmania, 7001, Australia.
| | - Margaret Otlowski
- Faculty of Law, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 89, Hobart, Tasmania, 7001, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Abstract
Considerable interindividual variability in response to cardiovascular pharmacotherapy exists with drug responses varying from being efficacious to inadequate to induce severe adverse events. Fueled by advancements and multidisciplinary collaboration across disciplines such as genetics, bioinformatics, and basic research, the vision of personalized medicine, rather than a one-size-fits-all approach, may be within reach. Pharmacogenetics offers the potential to optimize the benefit-risk profile of drugs by tailoring diagnostic and treatment strategies according to the individual patient. To date, a multitude of studies has tried to delineate the effects of gene-drug interactions for drugs commonly used to treat cardiovascular-related disease. The focus of this review is on how genetic variability may modify drug responsiveness and patient outcomes following therapy with commonly used cardiovascular drugs including clopidogrel, warfarin, statins, and β-blockers. Also included are examples of how genetic studies can be used to guide drug discovery and examples of how genetic information may be deployed in clinical decision making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter E Weeke
- Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Abstract
As genetic sequencing capabilities become more powerful and costs decline, the reach of genomics is expanding beyond research laboratories to the wards, outpatient clinics, and, with the marketing of direct-to-consumer testing services, patients’ homes. Increasingly, patients receiving various diagnoses—from cancer to cardiomyopathy—can reasonably expect to have conversations with their providers about indications for genetic testing. In this dynamic context, a grasp of the ethical principles and history underlying clinical genetics will provide clinicians with the tools to guide their practice and help patients navigate complex medical-psychosocial terrain. This article provides an overview of the salient ethical concerns pertaining to clinical genetics. The subject is approached with an emphasis on clinical practice, but consideration is also given to research. The review is organized around the temporal and informational sequence of issues commonly arising during the course of pretesting, testing, and posttesting phases of patient care. Drawing from medical, legal, and historical perspectives, this review covers the following topics: (1) informed consent, (2) return of results, and (3) privacy and confidentiality, and intends to equip readers with an appropriate foundation to apply ethical principles to genetic testing paradigms with an understanding of the contextual landscape against which these situations occur.
Collapse
|
22
|
Bradbury AR, Patrick-Miller L, Egleston BL, Maxwell KN, DiGiovanni L, Brower J, Fetzer D, Bennett Gaieski J, Brandt A, McKenna D, Long J, Powers J, Stopfer JE, Nathanson KL, Domchek SM. Returning Individual Genetic Research Results to Research Participants: Uptake and Outcomes Among Patients With Breast Cancer. JCO Precis Oncol 2018; 2. [PMID: 32095738 DOI: 10.1200/po.17.00250] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Understanding the outcomes of returning individual genetic research results to participants is critical because some genetic variants are found to be associated with health outcomes and have become available for clinical testing. Materials and Methods BRCA1/2-negative women with early-onset breast cancer, multiple primary cancers, or a family history of breast cancer who participated in a gene discovery cancer registry were offered the opportunity to learn their individual genetic research results of 24 breast cancer susceptibility genes with a genetic counselor after predisclosure genetic counseling. Outcomes included uptake of research results, knowledge, informed choice, psychosocial adjustment, uncertainty, satisfaction, and uptake of clinical confirmation testing. Results Four hundred two potential participants were contacted. One hundred ninety-four participants (48%) did not respond despite multiple attempts, and 85 participants (21%) actively or passively declined. One hundred seven participants (27%) elected for predisclosure counseling and were more likely to be younger, married, and white. Ninety percent of participants who had predisclosure counseling elected to receive their genetic research results, and 89% made an informed choice. Knowledge increased significantly after predisclosure counseling, and anxiety, intrusive cancer-specific distress, uncertainty, and depression declined significantly after receipt of results. General anxiety and intrusive cancer-specific distress declined significantly for both participants with a positive result and those with a negative result. Sixty-four percent of participants had clinical confirmation testing when recommended, including all participants with a mutation in a high-penetrance gene. Conclusion Uptake of genetic research results may be lower than anticipated by hypothetical reports and small select studies. Participants who elected to receive research results with genetic providers did not experience increases in distress or uncertainty, but not all patients return for confirmation testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela R Bradbury
- Angela R. Bradbury, Kara N. Maxwell, Laura DiGiovanni, Jamie Brower, Dominique Fetzer, Jill Bennett Gaieski, Amanda Brandt, Danielle McKenna, Jessica Long, Jacquelyn Powers, Jill E. Stopfer, Katherine L. Nathanson, and Susan M. Domchek, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania; Brian L. Egleston, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University Health System, Philadelphia, PA; and Linda Patrick-Miller, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Linda Patrick-Miller
- Angela R. Bradbury, Kara N. Maxwell, Laura DiGiovanni, Jamie Brower, Dominique Fetzer, Jill Bennett Gaieski, Amanda Brandt, Danielle McKenna, Jessica Long, Jacquelyn Powers, Jill E. Stopfer, Katherine L. Nathanson, and Susan M. Domchek, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania; Brian L. Egleston, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University Health System, Philadelphia, PA; and Linda Patrick-Miller, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Brian L Egleston
- Angela R. Bradbury, Kara N. Maxwell, Laura DiGiovanni, Jamie Brower, Dominique Fetzer, Jill Bennett Gaieski, Amanda Brandt, Danielle McKenna, Jessica Long, Jacquelyn Powers, Jill E. Stopfer, Katherine L. Nathanson, and Susan M. Domchek, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania; Brian L. Egleston, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University Health System, Philadelphia, PA; and Linda Patrick-Miller, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Kara N Maxwell
- Angela R. Bradbury, Kara N. Maxwell, Laura DiGiovanni, Jamie Brower, Dominique Fetzer, Jill Bennett Gaieski, Amanda Brandt, Danielle McKenna, Jessica Long, Jacquelyn Powers, Jill E. Stopfer, Katherine L. Nathanson, and Susan M. Domchek, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania; Brian L. Egleston, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University Health System, Philadelphia, PA; and Linda Patrick-Miller, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Laura DiGiovanni
- Angela R. Bradbury, Kara N. Maxwell, Laura DiGiovanni, Jamie Brower, Dominique Fetzer, Jill Bennett Gaieski, Amanda Brandt, Danielle McKenna, Jessica Long, Jacquelyn Powers, Jill E. Stopfer, Katherine L. Nathanson, and Susan M. Domchek, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania; Brian L. Egleston, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University Health System, Philadelphia, PA; and Linda Patrick-Miller, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Jamie Brower
- Angela R. Bradbury, Kara N. Maxwell, Laura DiGiovanni, Jamie Brower, Dominique Fetzer, Jill Bennett Gaieski, Amanda Brandt, Danielle McKenna, Jessica Long, Jacquelyn Powers, Jill E. Stopfer, Katherine L. Nathanson, and Susan M. Domchek, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania; Brian L. Egleston, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University Health System, Philadelphia, PA; and Linda Patrick-Miller, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Dominique Fetzer
- Angela R. Bradbury, Kara N. Maxwell, Laura DiGiovanni, Jamie Brower, Dominique Fetzer, Jill Bennett Gaieski, Amanda Brandt, Danielle McKenna, Jessica Long, Jacquelyn Powers, Jill E. Stopfer, Katherine L. Nathanson, and Susan M. Domchek, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania; Brian L. Egleston, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University Health System, Philadelphia, PA; and Linda Patrick-Miller, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Jill Bennett Gaieski
- Angela R. Bradbury, Kara N. Maxwell, Laura DiGiovanni, Jamie Brower, Dominique Fetzer, Jill Bennett Gaieski, Amanda Brandt, Danielle McKenna, Jessica Long, Jacquelyn Powers, Jill E. Stopfer, Katherine L. Nathanson, and Susan M. Domchek, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania; Brian L. Egleston, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University Health System, Philadelphia, PA; and Linda Patrick-Miller, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Amanda Brandt
- Angela R. Bradbury, Kara N. Maxwell, Laura DiGiovanni, Jamie Brower, Dominique Fetzer, Jill Bennett Gaieski, Amanda Brandt, Danielle McKenna, Jessica Long, Jacquelyn Powers, Jill E. Stopfer, Katherine L. Nathanson, and Susan M. Domchek, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania; Brian L. Egleston, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University Health System, Philadelphia, PA; and Linda Patrick-Miller, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Danielle McKenna
- Angela R. Bradbury, Kara N. Maxwell, Laura DiGiovanni, Jamie Brower, Dominique Fetzer, Jill Bennett Gaieski, Amanda Brandt, Danielle McKenna, Jessica Long, Jacquelyn Powers, Jill E. Stopfer, Katherine L. Nathanson, and Susan M. Domchek, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania; Brian L. Egleston, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University Health System, Philadelphia, PA; and Linda Patrick-Miller, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Jessica Long
- Angela R. Bradbury, Kara N. Maxwell, Laura DiGiovanni, Jamie Brower, Dominique Fetzer, Jill Bennett Gaieski, Amanda Brandt, Danielle McKenna, Jessica Long, Jacquelyn Powers, Jill E. Stopfer, Katherine L. Nathanson, and Susan M. Domchek, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania; Brian L. Egleston, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University Health System, Philadelphia, PA; and Linda Patrick-Miller, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Jacquelyn Powers
- Angela R. Bradbury, Kara N. Maxwell, Laura DiGiovanni, Jamie Brower, Dominique Fetzer, Jill Bennett Gaieski, Amanda Brandt, Danielle McKenna, Jessica Long, Jacquelyn Powers, Jill E. Stopfer, Katherine L. Nathanson, and Susan M. Domchek, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania; Brian L. Egleston, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University Health System, Philadelphia, PA; and Linda Patrick-Miller, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Jill E Stopfer
- Angela R. Bradbury, Kara N. Maxwell, Laura DiGiovanni, Jamie Brower, Dominique Fetzer, Jill Bennett Gaieski, Amanda Brandt, Danielle McKenna, Jessica Long, Jacquelyn Powers, Jill E. Stopfer, Katherine L. Nathanson, and Susan M. Domchek, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania; Brian L. Egleston, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University Health System, Philadelphia, PA; and Linda Patrick-Miller, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Katherine L Nathanson
- Angela R. Bradbury, Kara N. Maxwell, Laura DiGiovanni, Jamie Brower, Dominique Fetzer, Jill Bennett Gaieski, Amanda Brandt, Danielle McKenna, Jessica Long, Jacquelyn Powers, Jill E. Stopfer, Katherine L. Nathanson, and Susan M. Domchek, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania; Brian L. Egleston, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University Health System, Philadelphia, PA; and Linda Patrick-Miller, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Susan M Domchek
- Angela R. Bradbury, Kara N. Maxwell, Laura DiGiovanni, Jamie Brower, Dominique Fetzer, Jill Bennett Gaieski, Amanda Brandt, Danielle McKenna, Jessica Long, Jacquelyn Powers, Jill E. Stopfer, Katherine L. Nathanson, and Susan M. Domchek, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania; Brian L. Egleston, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University Health System, Philadelphia, PA; and Linda Patrick-Miller, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Grosse SD, Gurrin LC, Bertalli NA, Allen KJ. Clinical penetrance in hereditary hemochromatosis: estimates of the cumulative incidence of severe liver disease among HFE C282Y homozygotes. Genet Med 2018; 20:383-389. [PMID: 28771247 PMCID: PMC5797490 DOI: 10.1038/gim.2017.121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2017] [Accepted: 06/07/2017] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Iron overload (hemochromatosis) can cause serious, symptomatic disease that is preventable if detected early and managed appropriately. The leading cause of hemochromatosis in populations of predominantly European ancestry is homozygosity of the C282Y variant in the HFE gene. Screening of adults for iron overload or associated genotypes is controversial, largely because of a belief that severe phenotypes are uncommon, although cascade testing of first-degree relatives of patients is widely endorsed. We contend that severe liver disease (cirrhosis or hepatocellular cancer) is not at all uncommon among older males with hereditary hemochromatosis. Our review of the published data from a variety of empirical sources indicates that roughly 1 in 10 male HFE C282Y homozygotes is likely to develop severe liver disease during his lifetime unless iron overload is detected early and treated. New evidence from a randomized controlled trial of treatment allows for evidence-based management of presymptomatic patients. Although population screening for HFE C282Y homozygosity faces multiple barriers, a potentially effective strategy for increasing the early detection and prevention of clinical iron overload and severe disease is to include HFE C282Y homozygosity in lists of medically actionable gene variants when reporting the results of genome or exome sequencing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Scott D. Grosse
- National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Lyle C. Gurrin
- Department of Gut and Liver, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Centre for Molecular, Environmental, Genetic and Analytic Epidemiology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Nadine A. Bertalli
- Department of Gut and Liver, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Centre for Molecular, Environmental, Genetic and Analytic Epidemiology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Katrina J. Allen
- Department of Gut and Liver, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Children’s Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Kraft SA, Cho MK, Gillespie K, Halley M, Varsava N, Ormond KE, Luft HS, Wilfond BS, Soo-Jin Lee S. Beyond Consent: Building Trusting Relationships With Diverse Populations in Precision Medicine Research. THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS : AJOB 2018; 18:3-20. [PMID: 29621457 PMCID: PMC6173191 DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2018.1431322] [Citation(s) in RCA: 128] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/20/2023]
Abstract
With the growth of precision medicine research on health data and biospecimens, research institutions will need to build and maintain long-term, trusting relationships with patient-participants. While trust is important for all research relationships, the longitudinal nature of precision medicine research raises particular challenges for facilitating trust when the specifics of future studies are unknown. Based on focus groups with racially and ethnically diverse patients, we describe several factors that influence patient trust and potential institutional approaches to building trustworthiness. Drawing on these findings, we suggest several considerations for research institutions seeking to cultivate long-term, trusting relationships with patients: (1) Address the role of history and experience on trust, (2) engage concerns about potential group harm, (3) address cultural values and communication barriers, and (4) integrate patient values and expectations into oversight and governance structures.
Collapse
|
25
|
Lázaro-Muñoz G, Farrell MS, Crowley JJ, Filmyer DM, Shaughnessy RA, Josiassen RC, Sullivan PF. Improved ethical guidance for the return of results from psychiatric genomics research. Mol Psychiatry 2018; 23:15-23. [PMID: 29158581 PMCID: PMC5752587 DOI: 10.1038/mp.2017.228] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2017] [Revised: 09/27/2017] [Accepted: 10/02/2017] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
There is an emerging consensus that genomic researchers should, at a minimum, offer to return to individual participants clinically valid, medically important and medically actionable genomic findings (for example, pathogenic variants in BRCA1) identified in the course of research. However, this is not a common practice in psychiatric genetics research. Furthermore, psychiatry researchers often generate findings that do not meet all of these criteria, yet there may be ethically compelling arguments to offer selected results. Here, we review the return of results debate in genomics research and propose that, as for genomic studies of other medical conditions, psychiatric genomics researchers should offer findings that meet the minimum criteria stated above. Additionally, if resources allow, psychiatry researchers could consider offering to return pre-specified 'clinically valuable' findings even if not medically actionable-for instance, findings that help corroborate a psychiatric diagnosis, and findings that indicate important health risks. Similarly, we propose offering 'likely clinically valuable' findings, specifically, variants of uncertain significance potentially related to a participant's symptoms. The goal of this Perspective is to initiate a discussion that can help identify optimal ways of managing the return of results from psychiatric genomics research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Lázaro-Muñoz
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - M S Farrell
- Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - J J Crowley
- Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweeden
| | - D M Filmyer
- Translational Neuroscience LLC, Conshohocken, PA, USA
| | - R A Shaughnessy
- Translational Neuroscience LLC, Conshohocken, PA, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - R C Josiassen
- Translational Neuroscience LLC, Conshohocken, PA, USA
| | - P F Sullivan
- Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Clinician-Stakeholders' Perspectives on Using Patient Portals to Return Lynch Syndrome Screening Results. J Genet Couns 2017; 27:349-357. [PMID: 29159545 DOI: 10.1007/s10897-017-0179-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2017] [Accepted: 11/14/2017] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Test results for genetic conditions, such as Lynch Syndrome (LS), have traditionally been returned by genetic counselors or other providers who can explain results implications and provide psychosocial support. Returning genetic results through an Electronic Health Record's patient portal may increase the efficiency of returning results and could activate patient follow-up; however, stakeholder input is necessary to determine acceptability and appropriate implementation for LS. Twenty interviews were conducted with clinicians from six specialties involved in LS screening that represent a range of settings. Data were analyzed using directed content analysis and thematic analysis across content categories. Participants felt that patient portals could supplement personal calls, but the potential sensitive nature of LS screening results indicated the need for caution. Others felt that LS results could be returned through portals if there were clear explanations of the result, reputable additional information available within the portal, urging follow up confirmatory testing, and a referral to a genetics specialist. Patient portals were seen as helpful for prompting patient follow-up and providing resources to notify at-risk family members. There is potential for patient portals to return LS screening and other genetic results, however we raise several issues to resolve before implementation is warranted.
Collapse
|
27
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Pharmacogenetics is an important component of precision medicine. Even within the genomic era, several challenges lie ahead in the road towards clinical implementation of pharmacogenetics in the clinic. This review will summarize the current state of knowledge regarding pharmacogenetics of cardiovascular drugs, focusing on those with the most evidence supporting clinical implementation- clopidogrel, warfarin and simvastatin. RECENT FINDINGS There is limited translation of pharmacogenetics into clinical practice primarily due to the absence of outcomes data from prospective, randomized, genotype-directed clinical trials. There are several ongoing randomized controlled trials that will provide some answers as to the clinical utility of genotype-directed strategies. Several academic medical centers have pushed towards clinical implementation where the clinical validity data are strong. Their experiences will inform operational requirements of a clinical pharmacogenetics testing including the timing of testing, incorporation of test results into the electronic health record, reimbursement and ethical issues. SUMMARY Pharmacogenetics of clopidogrel, warfarin and simvastatin are three examples where pharmacogenetics testing may provide added clinical value. Continued accumulation of evidence surrounding clinical utility of pharmacogenetics markers is imperative as this will inform reimbursement policy and drive adoption of pharamcogenetics into routine care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sony Tuteja
- Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine
| | - Nita Limdi
- Department of Neurology, University of Alabama at Birmingham
- Hugh Kaul Personalized Medicine Institute
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Recommending inclusion of HFE C282Y homozygotes in the ACMG actionable gene list: cop-out or stealth move toward population screening? Genet Med 2017; 20:400-402. [PMID: 29048418 DOI: 10.1038/gim.2017.161] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2017] [Accepted: 08/16/2017] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
|
29
|
Nestor JG, Groopman EE, Gharavi AG. Towards precision nephrology: the opportunities and challenges of genomic medicine. J Nephrol 2017; 31:47-60. [PMID: 29043570 DOI: 10.1007/s40620-017-0448-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2017] [Accepted: 10/10/2017] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
The expansion of genomic medicine is furthering our understanding of many human diseases. This is well illustrated in the field of nephrology, through the characterization, discovery, and growing insight into various renal diseases through use of Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) technologies. This review will provide an overview of the diagnostic opportunities of using genetic testing in the clinical setting by describing notable discoveries regarding inherited forms of renal disease that have advanced the field and by highlighting some of the potential benefits of establishing a molecular diagnosis in a clinical practice. In addition, it will discuss some of the challenges associated with the expansion of genetic testing into the clinical setting, including clinical variant interpretation and return of genetic results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jordan G Nestor
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, 1150 St. Nicholas Ave, Room 413, New York, NY, 10032, USA
| | - Emily E Groopman
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, 1150 St. Nicholas Ave, Room 413, New York, NY, 10032, USA
| | - Ali G Gharavi
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, 1150 St. Nicholas Ave, Room 413, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Informed consent for next-generation nucleotide sequencing studies: Aiding communication between participants and investigators. J Clin Transl Sci 2017. [PMID: 28649453 PMCID: PMC5471895 DOI: 10.1017/cts.2016.21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Obtaining informed consent from prospective participants for research studies that include next-generation nucleotide sequencing (NGS) presents significant challenges because of the need to explain all the potential implications of participating, including the possible return of "incidental" findings, in easy-to-understand language. METHODS AND RESULTS After reviewing the consent processes at other institutions, we decided to supplement the protocol-specific informed consent form with the following: (1) a short pamphlet for the prospective participant that includes a series of questions that she or he is encouraged to ask the investigator, and (2) a more detailed companion guide for investigators to help them develop simple-language answers to the questions. Both documents are available to use or modify. CONCLUSIONS We propose an approach to obtaining informed consent for NGS studies that encourages discussion of key issues without creating a complex, comprehensive document for participants; it also maximizes investigator flexibility. We also suggest mechanisms to return restricted information to participants.
Collapse
|
31
|
Lázaro-Muñoz G, Conley JM, Davis AM, Prince AER, Cadigan RJ. Which Results to Return: Subjective Judgments in Selecting Medically Actionable Genes. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers 2017; 21:184-194. [PMID: 28146641 DOI: 10.1089/gtmb.2016.0397] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Advances in genomics have led to calls for returning information about medically actionable genes (MAGs) to patients, research subjects, biobank participants, and through screening programs, the general adult population. Which MAGs are returned affects the harms and benefits of every genetic testing endeavor. Despite published recommendations of selection criteria for MAGs to return, scant data exist regarding how decision makers actually apply such criteria. METHODS The process and criteria used by researchers when selecting MAGs for a preventive genomic sequencing program targeting the general adult population were examined. The authors observed and audio-recorded the gene selection meetings, and analyzed meeting transcripts, gene scoring sheets, and meeting handouts. RESULTS To select MAGs, the committee imported, from a preexisting project, "a semiquantitative metric" that scores genes on five criteria. Numerous subjective judgments and conceptual challenges in defining and applying the five criteria complicated the selection process. Criteria-related challenges also included the limited evidence available about facts fundamental to the scoring decisions and the emergence and application of criteria that were not part of the original metric. CONCLUSIONS When identifying MAGs appropriate for screening and return, decision makers must expect and prepare to address such issues as the inevitability of subjective judgments, limited evidence about fundamental decision-making elements, the conceptual complexity of defining criteria, and the emergence of unplanned criteria during the gene selection process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriel Lázaro-Muñoz
- 1 Center for Genomics and Society, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill , Chapel Hill, North Carolina.,2 Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy , Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - John M Conley
- 1 Center for Genomics and Society, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill , Chapel Hill, North Carolina.,3 School of Law, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill , Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Arlene M Davis
- 1 Center for Genomics and Society, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill , Chapel Hill, North Carolina.,4 Department of Social Medicine, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill , Chapel Hill, North Carolina.,5 Center for Bioethics, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill , Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Anya E R Prince
- 1 Center for Genomics and Society, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill , Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - R Jean Cadigan
- 1 Center for Genomics and Society, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill , Chapel Hill, North Carolina.,4 Department of Social Medicine, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill , Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Kesserwan C, Friedman Ross L, Bradbury AR, Nichols KE. The Advantages and Challenges of Testing Children for Heritable Predisposition to Cancer. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2017; 35:251-69. [PMID: 27249705 DOI: 10.1200/edbk_160621] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
The increased application of germline genetic testing is expanding our understanding of the risk factors associated with childhood cancer development, and, in some cases, such testing is also informing clinical management. Nonetheless, the incorporation of genetic testing into the pediatric oncology setting is complex and associated with many ethical and practical challenges. The decision as to whether to pursue clinical genetic testing for hereditary cancer predisposition for children should always be guided by the best interest of the child. Despite this fundamental ethical principle, patients, parents, and health care providers may differ in their opinions. Clinical genetic testing to detect the presence of predisposition syndromes associated with childhood-onset cancers, particularly those for which surveillance and preventive measures have proven to enhance outcome, is currently well accepted. On the other hand, clinical genetic testing of children for syndromes associated with adult-onset cancers has raised many concerns about the potential for psychological harm and disrespect of patient autonomy. As a consequence, such testing is not encouraged. The challenges surrounding germline genetic testing are further complicated when testing is done in the research setting and/or when it involves whole-exome or whole-genome sequencing approaches, which can uncover genetic variants that may or may not be associated with the disease under study. Accordingly, there is great debate around these processes and the most appropriate approaches regarding the return of test results. Future research is needed to enhance knowledge about how best to incorporate genomic information into clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chimene Kesserwan
- From the Department of Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN; Departments of Pediatrics, Medicine, and Surgery, MacLean Center for Clinical Medical Ethics, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Department of Medicine, Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Lainie Friedman Ross
- From the Department of Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN; Departments of Pediatrics, Medicine, and Surgery, MacLean Center for Clinical Medical Ethics, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Department of Medicine, Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Angela R Bradbury
- From the Department of Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN; Departments of Pediatrics, Medicine, and Surgery, MacLean Center for Clinical Medical Ethics, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Department of Medicine, Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Kim E Nichols
- From the Department of Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN; Departments of Pediatrics, Medicine, and Surgery, MacLean Center for Clinical Medical Ethics, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Department of Medicine, Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Kaphingst KA, Ivanovich J, Elrick A, Dresser R, Matsen C, Goodman MS. How, who, and when: preferences for delivery of genome sequencing results among women diagnosed with breast cancer at a young age. Mol Genet Genomic Med 2016; 4:684-695. [PMID: 27896289 PMCID: PMC5118211 DOI: 10.1002/mgg3.254] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2016] [Revised: 09/28/2016] [Accepted: 10/02/2016] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The increasing use of genome sequencing with patients raises a critical communication challenge: return of secondary findings. While the issue of what sequencing results should be returned to patients has been examined, much less attention has been paid to developing strategies to return these results in ways that meet patients' needs and preferences. To address this, we investigated delivery preferences (i.e., who, how, when) for individual genome sequencing results among women diagnosed with breast cancer at age 40 or younger. Methods We conducted 60 semistructured, in‐person individual interviews to examine preferences for the return of different types of genome sequencing results and the reasons underlying these preferences. Two coders independently coded interview transcripts; analysis was conducted using NVivo 10. Results The major findings from the study were that: (1) many participants wanted sequencing results as soon as possible, even at the time of breast cancer diagnosis; (2) participants wanted an opportunity for an in‐person discussion of results; and (3) they put less emphasis on the type of person delivering results than on the knowledge and communicative skills of that person. Participants also emphasized the importance of a results return process tailored to a patient's individual circumstances and one that she has a voice in determining. Conclusions A critical goal for future transdisciplinary research including clinicians, patients, and communication researchers may be to develop decision‐making processes to help patients make decisions about how they would like various sequencing results returned. While the issue of what genome sequencing results should be returned to patients has been examined, much less attention has been paid to developing strategies to return these results in ways that meet patients' needs and preferences. To address this, we investigated delivery preferences (i.e., who, how, when) for individual genome sequencing results among women diagnosed with breast cancer at age 40 or younger. The major findings from the study were that: (1) many participants wanted sequencing results as soon as possible, even at the time of breast cancer diagnosis; (2) participants wanted an opportunity for an in‐person discussion of results; and (3) they put less emphasis on the type of person delivering results than on the knowledge and communicative skills of that person.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kimberly A Kaphingst
- Department of CommunicationUniversity of UtahSalt Lake CityUtah; Huntsman Cancer InstituteUniversity of UtahSalt Lake CityUtah
| | - Jennifer Ivanovich
- Division of Public Health Sciences Washington University School of Medicine St. Louis Missouri
| | - Ashley Elrick
- Department of Communication University of Utah Salt Lake City Utah
| | | | - Cindy Matsen
- Huntsman Cancer InstituteUniversity of UtahSalt Lake CityUtah; Department of SurgeryUniversity of UtahSalt Lake CityUtah
| | - Melody S Goodman
- Division of Public Health Sciences Washington University School of Medicine St. Louis Missouri
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Brothers KB, Goldenberg AJ. Ethical and legal considerations for pediatric biobank consent: current and future perspectives. Per Med 2016; 13:597-607. [PMID: 29754545 DOI: 10.2217/pme-2016-0028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
Innovations in laboratory and information technologies continue to drive the expansion of pediatric biorepository research, with collections of biosamples and data continuing to grow in scale and scope. In this review, we examine the trajectory of recent developments in ethical and legal scholarship on consent to pediatric biorepository research. We focus, in particular, on issues that are likely to grow in importance in coming years, either because significant controversies remain or because they represent trends that are likely to continue into the future. Of particular interest is the evolving conception of consent as a process, the trend toward increased participant engagement and other challenges likely to raise thorny new issues in this field in the decade ahead.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyle B Brothers
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY, USA
| | - Aaron J Goldenberg
- Department of Bioethics, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Eliciting preferences on secondary findings: the Preferences Instrument for Genomic Secondary Results. Genet Med 2016; 19:337-344. [PMID: 27561086 PMCID: PMC5326612 DOI: 10.1038/gim.2016.110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2016] [Accepted: 06/07/2016] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Eliciting and understanding patient and research participant preferences regarding return of secondary test results are key aspects of genomic medicine. A valid instrument should be easily understood without extensive pretest counseling while still faithfully eliciting patients' preferences. METHODS We conducted focus groups with 110 adults to understand patient perspectives on secondary genomic findings and the role that preferences should play. We then developed and refined a draft instrument and used it to elicit preferences from parents participating in a genomic sequencing study in children with intellectual disabilities. RESULTS Patients preferred filtering of secondary genomic results to avoid information overload and to avoid learning what the future holds, among other reasons. Patients preferred to make autonomous choices about which categories of results to receive and to have their choices applied automatically before results are returned to them and their clinicians. The Preferences Instrument for Genomic Secondary Results (PIGSR) is designed to be completed by patients or research participants without assistance and to guide bioinformatic analysis of genomic raw data. Most participants wanted to receive all secondary results, but a significant minority indicated other preferences. CONCLUSIONS Our novel instrument-PIGSR-should be useful in a wide variety of clinical and research settings.Genet Med 19 3, 337-344.
Collapse
|
36
|
Budin-Ljøsne I, Mascalzoni D, Soini S, Machado H, Kaye J, Bentzen HB, Rial-Sebbag E, D'Abramo F, Witt M, Schamps G, Katić V, Krajnovic D, Harris JR. Feedback of Individual Genetic Results to Research Participants: Is It Feasible in Europe? Biopreserv Biobank 2016; 14:241-8. [PMID: 27082461 PMCID: PMC4913503 DOI: 10.1089/bio.2015.0115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is growing consensus that individual genetic research results that are scientifically robust, analytically valid, and clinically actionable should be offered to research participants. However, the general practice in European research projects is that results are usually not provided to research participants for many reasons. This article reports on the views of European experts and scholars who are members of the European COST Action CHIP ME IS1303 (Citizen's Health through public-private Initiatives: Public health, Market and Ethical perspectives) regarding challenges to the feedback of individual genetic results to research participants in Europe and potential strategies to address these challenges. MATERIALS AND METHODS A consultation of the COST Action members was conducted through an email survey and a workshop. The results from the consultation were analyzed following a conventional content analysis approach. RESULTS Legal frameworks, professional guidelines, and financial, organizational, and human resources to support the feedback of results are largely missing in Europe. Necessary steps to facilitate the feedback process include clarifying legal requirements to the feedback of results, developing harmonized European best practices, promoting interdisciplinary and cross-institutional collaboration, designing educational programs and cost-efficient IT-based platforms, involving research ethics committees, and documenting the health benefits and risks of the feedback process. CONCLUSIONS Coordinated efforts at pan-European level are needed to enable equitable, scientifically sound, and socially robust feedback of results to research participants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabelle Budin-Ljøsne
- Centre for Medical Ethics, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Norwegian Cancer Genomics Consortium, Kreftgenomikk.no, Oslo, Norway
| | - Deborah Mascalzoni
- Center for Research Ethics and Bioethics, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
- Center for Biomedicine, EURAC, Bolzano, Italy
| | - Sirpa Soini
- Helsinki Biobank, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Helena Machado
- Centre for Social Studies, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Jane Kaye
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, Centre for Health, Law and Emerging Technologies (HeLEX), University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Heidi Beate Bentzen
- Centre for Medical Ethics, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Norwegian Cancer Genomics Consortium, Kreftgenomikk.no, Oslo, Norway
- Norwegian Research Center for Computers and Law, Faculty of Law, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | | | | | - Michał Witt
- Institute of Human Genetics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Poznań, Poland
| | - Geneviève Schamps
- Centre for Medical and Biomedical Law, Université Catholique de Louvain, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Višnja Katić
- School of Medicine, University of Rijeka, Rijeka, Croatia
| | | | - Jennifer R. Harris
- Department of Genetics and Bioinformatics, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Bush WS, Crosslin DR, Owusu‐Obeng A, Wallace J, Almoguera B, Basford MA, Bielinski SJ, Carrell DS, Connolly JJ, Crawford D, Doheny KF, Gallego CJ, Gordon AS, Keating B, Kirby J, Kitchner T, Manzi S, Mejia AR, Pan V, Perry CL, Peterson JF, Prows CA, Ralston J, Scott SA, Scrol A, Smith M, Stallings SC, Veldhuizen T, Wolf W, Volpi S, Wiley K, Li R, Manolio T, Bottinger E, Brilliant MH, Carey D, Chisholm RL, Chute CG, Haines JL, Hakonarson H, Harley JB, Holm IA, Kullo IJ, Jarvik GP, Larson EB, McCarty CA, Williams MS, Denny JC, Rasmussen‐Torvik LJ, Roden DM, Ritchie MD. Genetic variation among 82 pharmacogenes: The PGRNseq data from the eMERGE network. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2016; 100:160-9. [PMID: 26857349 PMCID: PMC5010878 DOI: 10.1002/cpt.350] [Citation(s) in RCA: 138] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2015] [Revised: 01/12/2016] [Accepted: 02/04/2016] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Genetic variation can affect drug response in multiple ways, although it remains unclear how rare genetic variants affect drug response. The electronic Medical Records and Genomics (eMERGE) Network, collaborating with the Pharmacogenomics Research Network, began eMERGE‐PGx, a targeted sequencing study to assess genetic variation in 82 pharmacogenes critical for implementation of “precision medicine.” The February 2015 eMERGE‐PGx data release includes sequence‐derived data from ∼5,000 clinical subjects. We present the variant frequency spectrum categorized by variant type, ancestry, and predicted function. We found 95.12% of genes have variants with a scaled Combined Annotation‐Dependent Depletion score above 20, and 96.19% of all samples had one or more Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium Level A actionable variants. These data highlight the distribution and scope of genetic variation in relevant pharmacogenes, identifying challenges associated with implementing clinical sequencing for drug treatment at a broader level, underscoring the importance for multifaceted research in the execution of precision medicine.
Collapse
|
38
|
Unravelling the human genome-phenome relationship using phenome-wide association studies. Nat Rev Genet 2016; 17:129-45. [PMID: 26875678 DOI: 10.1038/nrg.2015.36] [Citation(s) in RCA: 168] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Advances in genotyping technology have, over the past decade, enabled the focused search for common genetic variation associated with human diseases and traits. With the recently increased availability of detailed phenotypic data from electronic health records and epidemiological studies, the impact of one or more genetic variants on the phenome is starting to be characterized both in clinical and population-based settings using phenome-wide association studies (PheWAS). These studies reveal a number of challenges that will need to be overcome to unlock the full potential of PheWAS for the characterization of the complex human genome-phenome relationship.
Collapse
|
39
|
Nelson SC, Crouch JM, Bamshad MJ, Tabor HK, Yu JH. Use of metaphors about exome and whole genome sequencing. Am J Med Genet A 2016; 170A:1127-33. [PMID: 26822973 DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.37571] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2015] [Accepted: 01/14/2016] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
Clinical and research uses of exome and whole genome sequencing (ES/WGS) are growing rapidly. An enhanced understanding of how individuals conceptualize and communicate about sequencing results is needed to ensure effective, mutual exchange of information between care providers and patients and between researchers and participants. Focus groups and interviews participants were recruited to discuss their attitudes and preferences for receiving hypothetical results from ES/WGS. African Americans were intentionally oversampled. We qualitatively analyzed participants' speech to identify unsolicited metaphorical language pertaining to genes and health, and grouped these occurrences into metaphorical concepts. Participants compared genetic information to physical objects including tools, weapons, contents of boxes, and formal documents or reports. These metaphorical concepts centered on several key themes, including locus of control; containment versus release of information; and desirability, usability, interpretability, and ownership of genetic results. Metaphorical language is often used intentionally or unintentionally in discussions about receiving results from ES/WGS in both clinical and research settings. Awareness of the use of metaphorical language and attention to its varied meanings facilitates effective communication about return of ES/WGS results. In turn, both should foster shared and informed decision-making and improve the translation of genetic information by clinicians and researchers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah C Nelson
- Institute for Public Health Genetics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Julia M Crouch
- Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Washington
| | - Michael J Bamshad
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.,Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Holly K Tabor
- Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Washington.,Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Joon-Ho Yu
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Herr TM, Bielinski SJ, Bottinger E, Brautbar A, Brilliant M, Chute CG, Cobb BL, Denny JC, Hakonarson H, Hartzler AL, Hripcsak G, Kannry J, Kohane IS, Kullo IJ, Lin S, Manzi S, Marsolo K, Overby CL, Pathak J, Peissig P, Pulley J, Ralston J, Rasmussen L, Roden DM, Tromp G, Uphoff T, Weng C, Wolf W, Williams MS, Starren J. Practical considerations in genomic decision support: The eMERGE experience. J Pathol Inform 2015; 6:50. [PMID: 26605115 PMCID: PMC4629307 DOI: 10.4103/2153-3539.165999] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2015] [Accepted: 07/23/2015] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Genomic medicine has the potential to improve care by tailoring treatments to the individual. There is consensus in the literature that pharmacogenomics (PGx) may be an ideal starting point for real-world implementation, due to the presence of well-characterized drug-gene interactions. Clinical Decision Support (CDS) is an ideal avenue by which to implement PGx at the bedside. Previous literature has established theoretical models for PGx CDS implementation and discussed a number of anticipated real-world challenges. However, work detailing actual PGx CDS implementation experiences has been limited. Anticipated challenges include data storage and management, system integration, physician acceptance, and more. METHODS In this study, we analyzed the experiences of ten members of the Electronic Medical Records and Genomics (eMERGE) Network, and one affiliate, in their attempts to implement PGx CDS. We examined the resulting PGx CDS system characteristics and conducted a survey to understand the unanticipated implementation challenges sites encountered. RESULTS Ten sites have successfully implemented at least one PGx CDS rule in the clinical setting. The majority of sites elected to create an Omic Ancillary System (OAS) to manage genetic and genomic data. All sites were able to adapt their existing CDS tools for PGx knowledge. The most common and impactful delays were not PGx-specific issues. Instead, they were general IT implementation problems, with top challenges including team coordination/communication and staffing. The challenges encountered caused a median total delay in system go-live of approximately two months. CONCLUSIONS These results suggest that barriers to PGx CDS implementations are generally surmountable. Moreover, PGx CDS implementation may not be any more difficult than other healthcare IT projects of similar scope, as the most significant delays encountered were not unique to genomic medicine. These are encouraging results for any institution considering implementing a PGx CDS tool, and for the advancement of genomic medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy M Herr
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Division of Health and Biomedical Informatics, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | | | - Erwin Bottinger
- The Charles Bronfman Institute for Personalized Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine, Mount Sinai, New York, USA
| | - Ariel Brautbar
- Division of Genetics and Endocrinology, Cook Children's Medical Center, Fort Worth, Texas, USA
| | - Murray Brilliant
- Center for Human Genetics, Marshfield Clinic Research Foundation, Marshfield, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Christopher G Chute
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Beth L Cobb
- Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Joshua C Denny
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Hakon Hakonarson
- Department of Pediatrics, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, The Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| | | | - George Hripcsak
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, USA
| | - Joseph Kannry
- Icahn School of Medicine, Mount Sinai, New York, USA
| | - Isaac S Kohane
- Center for Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Iftikhar J Kullo
- Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Simon Lin
- Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Shannon Manzi
- Department of Pharmacy, Division of Genetics and Genomics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Keith Marsolo
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Division of Biomedical Informatics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | | | - Jyotishman Pathak
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Peggy Peissig
- Biomedical Informatics Research Center, Marshfield Clinic Research Foundation, Marshfield, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Jill Pulley
- Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - James Ralston
- Group Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Luke Rasmussen
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Division of Health and Biomedical Informatics, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Dan M Roden
- Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Gerard Tromp
- Weis Center for Research, Geisinger Clinic, Danville, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Timothy Uphoff
- Molecular Pathology, Mashfield Labs, Marshfield, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Chunhua Weng
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, USA
| | - Wendy Wolf
- Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Division of Genetics and Genomics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Marc S Williams
- Genomic Medicine Institute, Geisinger Health System, Danville, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Justin Starren
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Division of Health and Biomedical Informatics, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Milner LC, Garrison NA, Cho MK, Altman RB, Hudgins L, Galli SJ, Lowe HJ, Schrijver I, Magnus DC. Genomics in the clinic: ethical and policy challenges in clinical next-generation sequencing programs at early adopter USA institutions. Per Med 2015; 12:269-282. [PMID: 29771644 DOI: 10.2217/pme.14.88] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
Next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies are poised to revolutionize clinical diagnosis and treatment, but raise significant ethical and policy challenges. This review examines NGS program challenges through a synthesis of published literature, website and conference presentation content, and interviews at early-adopting institutions in the USA. Institutions are proactively addressing policy challenges related to the management and technical aspects of program development. However, ethical challenges related to patient-related aspects have not been fully addressed. These complex challenges present opportunities to develop comprehensive and standardized regulations across programs. Understanding the strengths, weaknesses and current practices of evolving NGS program approaches are important considerations for institutions developing NGS services, policymakers regulating or funding NGS programs and physicians and patients considering NGS services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren C Milner
- Stanford Center for Biomedical Ethics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Nanibaa' A Garrison
- Stanford Center for Biomedical Ethics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.,Center for Biomedical Ethics & Society, Departments of Pediatrics & Anthropology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Mildred K Cho
- Stanford Center for Biomedical Ethics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.,Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Russ B Altman
- Department of Bioengineering, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.,Department of Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.,Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Louanne Hudgins
- Division of Medical Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Stephen J Galli
- Stanford Center for Genomics & Personalized Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.,Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.,Department of Microbiology & Immunology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Henry J Lowe
- Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Iris Schrijver
- Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.,Stanford Center for Genomics & Personalized Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - David C Magnus
- Stanford Center for Biomedical Ethics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.,Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Hu S, Lübberstedt T. Getting the 'MOST' out of crop improvement. TRENDS IN PLANT SCIENCE 2015; 20:372-379. [PMID: 25899781 DOI: 10.1016/j.tplants.2015.03.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2014] [Revised: 02/26/2015] [Accepted: 03/03/2015] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
Unraveling the function of genes affecting agronomic traits is accelerating due to progress in DNA sequencing and other high-throughput genomic approaches. Characterized genes can be exploited by plant breeders by using either marker-aided selection (MAS) or transgenic procedures. Here, we propose a third 'outlet', 'molecular strengthening' (MOST), as alternative option for exploiting detailed molecular understanding of trait expression, which is comparable to the pharmaceutical treatment of human diseases. MOST treatments can be used to enhance yield stability. Alternatively, they can be used to control traits temporally, such as flowering time to facilitate crosses for plant breeders. We also discuss the essence for developing MOST treatments, their prospects, and limitations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Songlin Hu
- Department of Agronomy, Iowa State University, 100 Osborn Drive, Ames, IA 50011, USA
| | - Thomas Lübberstedt
- Department of Agronomy, Iowa State University, 100 Osborn Drive, Ames, IA 50011, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Kaphingst KA, Ivanovich J, Biesecker BB, Dresser R, Seo J, Dressler LG, Goodfellow PJ, Goodman MS. Preferences for return of incidental findings from genome sequencing among women diagnosed with breast cancer at a young age. Clin Genet 2015; 89:378-84. [PMID: 25871653 DOI: 10.1111/cge.12597] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2014] [Revised: 04/07/2015] [Accepted: 04/09/2015] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
While experts have made recommendations, information is needed regarding what genome sequencing results patients would want returned. We investigated what results women diagnosed with breast cancer at a young age would want returned and why. We conducted 60 semi-structured, in-person individual interviews with women diagnosed with breast cancer at age 40 or younger. We examined interest in six types of incidental findings and reasons for interest or disinterest in each type. Two coders independently coded interview transcripts; analysis was conducted using NVivo 10. Most participants were at least somewhat interested in all six result types, but strongest interest was in actionable results (i.e. variants affecting risk of a preventable or treatable disease and treatment response). Reasons for interest varied between different result types. Some participants were not interested or ambivalent about results not seen as currently actionable. Participants wanted to be able to choose what results are returned. Participants distinguished between types of individual genome sequencing results, with different reasons for wanting different types of information. The findings suggest that a focus on actionable results can be a common ground for all stakeholders in developing a policy for returning individual genome sequencing results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K A Kaphingst
- Department of Communication, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.,Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - J Ivanovich
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - B B Biesecker
- Social and Behavioral Research Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - R Dresser
- School of Law, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - J Seo
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | | | - P J Goodfellow
- College of Medicine, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - M S Goodman
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Clift KE, Halverson CM, Fiksdal AS, Kumbamu A, Sharp RR, McCormick JB. Patients' views on incidental findings from clinical exome sequencing. Appl Transl Genom 2015; 4:38-43. [PMID: 26937348 PMCID: PMC4745397 DOI: 10.1016/j.atg.2015.02.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
This article characterizes the opinions of patients and family members of patients undergoing clinical genomic-based testing regarding the return of incidental findings from these tests. Over sixteen months, we conducted 55 in-depth interviews with individuals to explore their preferences regarding which types of results they would like returned to them. Responses indicate a diversity of attitudes toward the return of incidental findings and a diversity of justifications for those attitudes. The majority of participants also described an imperative to include the patient in deciding which results to return rather than having universal, predetermined rules governing results disclosure. The results demonstrate the importance of a patient centered-approach to returning incidental findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Colin M.E. Halverson
- Mayo Clinic, Biomedical Ethics Program, Rochester, MN, USA
- University of Chicago, Department of Anthropology, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | - Ashok Kumbamu
- Mayo Clinic, Biomedical Ethics Program, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Richard R. Sharp
- Mayo Clinic, Biomedical Ethics Program, Rochester, MN, USA
- Division of Health Care Research and Policy
- Division of General Internal Medicine
| | - Jennifer B. McCormick
- Mayo Clinic, Biomedical Ethics Program, Rochester, MN, USA
- Division of Health Care Research and Policy
- Division of General Internal Medicine
- Corresponding author at: 200 First Street SW, Plummer 3-30-40 Bioethics, Rochester, MN 55905, USA. Tel.: + 1 507 284 1494; fax: + 1 507 538 0850.
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Prucka SK, Arnold LJ, Brandt JE, Gilardi S, Harty LC, Hong F, Malia J, Pulford DJ. An update to returning genetic research results to individuals: perspectives of the industry pharmacogenomics working group. BIOETHICS 2015; 29:82-90. [PMID: 24471556 PMCID: PMC4305195 DOI: 10.1111/bioe.12073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Abstract
The ease with which genotyping technologies generate tremendous amounts of data on research participants has been well chronicled, a feat that continues to become both faster and cheaper to perform. In parallel to these advances come additional ethical considerations and debates, one of which centers on providing individual research results and incidental findings back to research participants taking part in genetic research efforts. In 2006 the Industry Pharmacogenomics Working Group (I-PWG) offered some 'Points-to-Consider' on this topic within the context of the drug development process from those who are affiliated to pharmaceutical companies. Today many of these points remain applicable to the discussion but will be expanded upon in this updated viewpoint from the I-PWG. The exploratory nature of pharmacogenomic work in the pharmaceutical industry is discussed to provide context for why these results typically are not best suited for return. Operational challenges unique to this industry which cause barriers to returning this information are also explained.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandra K Prucka
- Address for correspondence: Sandra K. Prucka, Eli Lilly and Company Tailored Therapeutics Genetics, Corporate Center, DC1522, Indianapolis, IN 46285-0001, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Garrett SB, Koenig BA, Brown A, Hult JR, Boyd EA, Dry S, Dohan D. EngageUC: Developing an Efficient and Ethical Approach to Biobanking Research at the University of California. Clin Transl Sci 2015; 8:362-6. [PMID: 25581047 DOI: 10.1111/cts.12259] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Biorepositories, or biobanks, provide researchers with access to biological samples and associated data in support of translational research. Efficient operation and ethical stewardship of biobanks involves coordinated efforts among multiple stakeholders including researchers who manage and use the repository, institutional officials charged with its oversight, and patients and volunteers who contribute samples and data. As advancements in translational research increasingly involve more data derived from larger numbers of diverse samples, the size and governance challenges facing biorepositories have grown. We describe an approach to developing efficient and ethical biobank governance that includes all major stakeholders. This model provides a pathway for addressing the technical and ethical challenges that must be resolved to ensure biorepositories continue to support translational research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah B Garrett
- Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Barbara A Koenig
- Departments of Social and Behavioral Sciences and Anthropology, History, and Social Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Arleen Brown
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Jen R Hult
- Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.,Clinical and Translational Science Institute, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Elizabeth A Boyd
- Department of Medicine and Office of Research and Economic Development, University of California, Riverside, California, USA
| | - Sarah Dry
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Daniel Dohan
- Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Prince AER, Conley JM, Davis AM, Lázaro-Muñoz G, Cadigan RJ. Automatic Placement of Genomic Research Results in Medical Records: Do Researchers Have a Duty? Should Participants Have a Choice? THE JOURNAL OF LAW, MEDICINE & ETHICS : A JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF LAW, MEDICINE & ETHICS 2015; 43:827-42. [PMID: 26711421 PMCID: PMC4780406 DOI: 10.1111/jlme.12323] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/05/2023]
Abstract
In genomics research, it is becoming common practice to return individualized primary and incidental findings to participants and several ongoing major studies have begun to automatically transfer these results to a participant's clinical medical record. This paper explores who should decide whether to place genomic research findings into a clinical medical record. Should participants make this decision, or does a researcher's duty to place this information in a medical record override the participant's autonomy? We argue that there are no clear ethical, legal, professional, or regulatory duties that mandate placement without the consent of the participant. We conclude that informing participants of results, together with a clear explanation, relevant recommendations and referral sources, and the option to consent to placement in the medical records will best discharge researchers' ethical and legal duties towards participants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anya E R Prince
- Postdoctoral Research Associate at the Center for Genomics and Society at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine. Ms. Prince received her Juris Doctor and Masters of Public Policy from Georgetown University in Washington, D.C
| | - John M Conley
- William Rand Kenan, Jr. Professor of Law at the University of North Carolina, and an investigator in the university's Center for Genomics and Society. He received his A.B. from Harvard University in Cambridge, MA, and J.D. and Ph.D. (Anthropology) from Duke University in Durham, NC
| | - Arlene M Davis
- Research Associate Professor in the Department of Social Medicine at the University of North Carolina, core faculty in its Center for Bioethics, and Adjunct Associate Professor at the University of North Carolina School of Law. She received her Juris Doctor from the University of Washington School of Law, Seattle
| | - Gabriel Lázaro-Muñoz
- Postdoctoral Research Associate at the Center for Genomics and Society at the University of North Carolina School of Medicine. Dr. Lázaro-Muñoz received his Ph.D. in Neuroscience from New York University; his J.D. from the University of Pennsylvania School of Law; his Master of Bioethics degree from the Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania; and his B.A. from the University of Puerto Rico, Río Piedras
| | - R Jean Cadigan
- Research Assistant Professor in the Department of Social Medicine at the University of North Carolina. She received her Ph.D. in anthropology from the University of California, Los Angeles
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Kimball BC, Nowakowski KE, Maschke KJ, McCormick JB. Genomic data in the electronic medical record: perspectives from a biobank community advisory board. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 2014; 9:16-24. [PMID: 25747687 DOI: 10.1177/1556264614553922] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
A proof of principle pharmacogenomic translational study was used as a case example to explore Biobank Community Advisory Board (CAB) member views about placing genomic information into the medical record and to establish how CAB input could affect research design. CAB members expressed enthusiasm for the potential benefit of the research discussed, yet voiced concerns regarding the recruitment and consent materials. They discussed the value of genomic research and its clinical utility; the risk of genetic discrimination; and personal ownership of genomic data. Members distinguished between indirect benefits to future generations and individual risk to research participants. Feedback was used to revise the recruitment and consent materials. Results highlight tensions reported between the public's support for genomic research and concerns with genomic information in the medical record and its use in medical decision-making.
Collapse
|
49
|
Ananthakrishnan AN, Cagan A, Gainer VS, Cheng SC, Cai T, Szolovits P, Shaw SY, Churchill S, Karlson EW, Murphy SN, Kohane I, Liao KP. Mortality and extraintestinal cancers in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis and inflammatory bowel disease. J Crohns Colitis 2014; 8:956-63. [PMID: 24559536 PMCID: PMC4136996 DOI: 10.1016/j.crohns.2014.01.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2013] [Revised: 01/20/2014] [Accepted: 01/24/2014] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) frequently co-occur. PSC is associated with increased risk for colorectal cancer (CRC). However, whether PSC is associated with increased risk of extraintestinal cancers or affects mortality in an IBD cohort has not been examined previously. METHODS In a multi-institutional IBD cohort of IBD, we established a diagnosis of PSC using a novel algorithm incorporating narrative and codified data with high positive and negative predictive value. Our primary outcome was occurrence of extraintestinal and digestive tract cancers. Mortality was determined through monthly linkage to the social security master death index. RESULTS In our cohort of 5506 patients with CD and 5522 patients with UC, a diagnosis of PSC was established in 224 patients (2%). Patients with IBD-PSC were younger and more likely to be male compared to IBD patients without PSC; three-quarters had UC. IBD-PSC patients had significantly increased overall risk of cancers compared to patients without PSC (OR 4.36, 95% CI 2.99-6.37). Analysis of specific cancer types revealed that a statistically significant excess risk for digestive tract cancer (OR 10.40, 95% CI 6.86-15.76), pancreatic cancer (OR 11.22, 95% CI 4.11-30.62), colorectal cancer (OR 5.00, 95% CI 2.80-8.95), and cholangiocarcinoma (OR 55.31, 95% CI 22.20-137.80) but not for other solid organ or hematologic malignancies. CONCLUSIONS PSC is associated with increased risk of colorectal and pancreatobiliary cancer but not with excess risk of other solid organ cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashwin N. Ananthakrishnan
- Division of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Andrew Cagan
- Research IS and Computing, Partners HealthCare, Charlestown, MA
| | | | - Su-Chun Cheng
- Department of Biostatistics, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA
| | - Tianxi Cai
- Department of Biostatistics, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA
| | | | - Stanley Y Shaw
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, Center for Systems Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Susanne Churchill
- i2b2 National Center for Biomedical Computing, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Elizabeth W. Karlson
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, Division of Rheumatology, Allergy and Immunology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Shawn N. Murphy
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, Research IS and Computing, Partners HealthCare, Charlestown, MA., Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Isaac Kohane
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, Children’s Hospital Boston, Boston, MA, i2b2 National Center for Biomedical Computing, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Katherine P. Liao
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, Division of Rheumatology, Allergy and Immunology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Krishnamoorthy P, Gupta D, Chatterjee S, Huston J, Ryan JJ. A review of the role of electronic health record in genomic research. J Cardiovasc Transl Res 2014; 7:692-700. [PMID: 25119857 DOI: 10.1007/s12265-014-9586-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2014] [Accepted: 08/05/2014] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Electronic health record (EHR)-driven genomic research is a recent strategy used to answer research questions using EHR data linked to DNA samples. In models using EHR, after the subject's DNA is collected, a linkage between the DNA sample and the EHR data is maintained. This makes the EHR the paramount source of phenotypic information. The National Human Genome Research Institute sponsored Electronic Medical Records and Genomics (eMERGE) network began in five sites in 2007 and was expanded to nine sites in 2012. This network has developed the methods and best practices for utilizing EHR as a tool for genomic research. Therefore, it is vital to understand the configuration of EHR used to capture data in clinical practice and feasibility of integration with clinical genetic test results. We present a detailed review of the role and importance of EHR in the field of genomic research.
Collapse
|