American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics guideline for the clinical evaluation and etiologic diagnosis of hearing loss

Hearing restoration by gene replacement therapy for a multisite-expressed gene in a mouse model of human DFNB111 deafness

Gene therapy has made significant progress in the treatment of hereditary hearing loss. However, most research has focused on deafness-related genes that are primarily expressed in hair cells with less attention given to multisite-expressed deafness genes. MPZL2, the second leading cause of mild-to-moderate hereditary deafness, is widely expressed in different inner ear cells. We generated a mouse model with a deletion in the Mpzl2 gene, which displayed moderate and slowly progressive hearing loss, mimicking the phenotype of individuals with DFNB111. We developed a gene replacement therapy system mediated by AAV-ie for efficient transduction in various types of cochlear cells. AAV-ie-Mpzl2 administration significantly lowered the auditory brainstem response and distortion product otoacoustic emission thresholds of Mpzl2-/- mice for at least seven months. AAV-ie-Mpzl2 delivery restored the structural integrity in both outer hair cells and Deiters cells. This study suggests the potential of gene therapy for MPZL2-related deafness and provides a proof of concept for gene therapy targeting other deafness-related genes that are expressed in different cell populations in the cochlea.

GPRASP2 deficiency contributes to apoptosis in the spiral ganglion cells via the AMPK/DRP1 signaling pathway

G protein-coupled receptor-associated sorting protein 2 (GPRASP2) deficiency has been implicated in immunological inflammation, cancers, and neurological disorders. Our previous work revealed that the pathogenic mutation in GPRASP2 was responsible for X-linked recessive syndromic hearing loss (SHL). Given the specific high expression of GPRASP2 in the spiral ganglion, GPRASP2 likely contributes to the maintenance and functionality of neurons, potentially playing a role in synaptic transmission. The impact of GPRASP2 deficiency on spiral ganglion cells (SGCs) and their underlying pathogenic mechanisms will be investigated in this study. The primary culture of SGCs obtained from mouse cochleae was treated with Gprasp2-targeting short hairpin RNA (Gprasp2-shRNA) via lentivirus infection. The results showed that GPRASP2 deficiency enhanced SGCs apoptosis and decreased cell viability. Meanwhile, a significant abnormality of mitochondrial morphology and decreased membrane potential were observed in GPRASP2-deficient SGCs. These effects could be mitigated by treatment with the mitochondrial division inhibitor 1 (Mdivi-1). In addition to enhancing SGCs apoptosis and decreasing cell viability, GPRASP2 deficiency also inhibited the development of SGCs in mouse cochlear explant culture. Our study further revealed that this deficiency resulted in increased phosphorylation of AMPK and activation of the AMPK/DRP1 pathway, promoting SGCs apoptosis. These findings provide insight into the pathogenic mechanisms by which GPRASP2 deficiency is implicated in auditory dysfunction.

ABCC1 deficiency potentiated noise-induced hearing loss in mice by impairing cochlear antioxidant capacity

The ABCC1 gene belongs to the ATP-binding cassette membrane transporter superfamily, which plays a crucial role in the efflux of various endogenous and exogenous substances. Mutations in ABCC1 can result in autosomal dominant hearing loss. However, the specific roles of ABCC1 in auditory function are not fully understood. Through immunofluorescence, we found that ABCC1 was expressed in microvascular endothelial cells (ECs) of the stria vascularis (StV) in the murine cochlea. Then, an Abcc1 knockout mouse model was established by using CRISPR/Cas9 technology to elucidate the role of ABCC1 in the inner ear. The ABR threshold did not significantly differ between WT and Abcc1-/- mice at any age studied. After noise exposure, the ABR thresholds of the WT and Abcc1-/- mice were significantly elevated. Interestingly, after 14 days of noise exposure, ABR thresholds largely returned to pre-exposure levels in WT mice but not in Abcc1-/- mice. Our subsequent experiments showed that microvascular integrity in the StV was compromised and that the number of outer hair cells and the number of ribbons were significantly decreased in the cochleae of Abcc1-/- mice post-exposure. Besides, the production of ROS and the accumulation of 4-HNE significantly increased. Furthermore, StV microvascular ECs were cultured to elucidate the role of ABCC1 in these cells under glucose oxidase challenge. Notably, 30 U/L glucose oxidase (GO) induced severe oxidative stress damage in Abcc1-/- cells. Compared with WT cells, the ROS and 4-HNE levels and the apoptotic rate were significantly elevated in Abcc1-/- cells. In addition, the reduced GSH/GSSG ratio was significantly decreased in Abcc1-/- cells after GO treatment. Taken together, Abcc1-/- mice are more susceptible to noise-induced hearing loss, possibly because ABCC1 knockdown compromises the GSH antioxidant system of StV ECs. The exogenous antioxidant N-acetylcysteine (NAC) may protect against oxidative damage in Abcc1-/- murine cochleae and ECs.

Rare germline disorders implicate long non-coding RNAs disrupted by chromosomal structural rearrangements

In recent years, there has been increased focus on exploring the role the non-protein-coding genome plays in Mendelian disorders. One class of particular interest is long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), which has recently been implicated in the regulation of diverse molecular processes. However, because lncRNAs do not encode protein, there is uncertainty regarding what constitutes a pathogenic lncRNA variant, and thus annotating such elements is challenging. The Developmental Genome Anatomy Project (DGAP) and similar projects recruit individuals with apparently balanced chromosomal abnormalities (BCAs) that disrupt or dysregulate genes in order to annotate the human genome. We hypothesized that rearrangements disrupting lncRNAs could be the underlying genetic etiology for the phenotypes of a subset of these individuals. Thus, we assessed 279 cases with BCAs and selected 191 cases with simple BCAs (breakpoints at only two genomic locations) for further analysis of lncRNA disruptions. From these, we identified 66 cases in which the chromosomal rearrangements directly disrupt lncRNAs. Strikingly, the lncRNAs MEF2C-AS1 and ENSG00000257522 are each disrupted in two unrelated cases. Furthermore, in 30 cases, no genes of any other class aside from lncRNAs are directly disrupted, consistent with the hypothesis that lncRNA disruptions could underly the phenotypes of these individuals. To showcase the power of this genomic approach for annotating lncRNAs, here we focus on clinical reports and genetic analysis of two individuals with BCAs and additionally highlight six individuals with likely developmental etiologies due to lncRNA disruptions.

Genetic diagnosis of childhood sensorineural hearing loss

INTRODUCTION

Congenital/early-onset sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) is one of the most common hereditary disorders in our environment. There is increasing awareness of the importance of an etiologic diagnosis, and genetic testing with next-generation sequencing (NGS) has the highest diagnostic yield. Our study shows the genetic results obtained in a cohort of patients with bilateral congenital/early-onset SNHL.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We included 105 children with bilateral SNHL that received genetic testing between 2019 and 2022. Genetic tests were performed with whole exome sequencing, analyzing genes related to hearing loss (virtual panel with 244 genes).

RESULTS

48% (50/105) of patients were genetically diagnosed. We identified pathogenic and likely pathogenic variants in 26 different genes, and the most frequently mutated genes were GJB2, USH2A and STRC. 52% (26/50) of variants identified produced non-syndromic hearing loss, 40% (20/50) produced syndromic hearing loss, and the resting 8% (4/50) could produce both non-syndromic and syndromic hearing loss.

CONCLUSIONS

Genetic testing plays a vital role in the etiologic diagnosis of bilateral SNHL. Our cohort shows that genetic testing with NGS has a high diagnostic yield and can provide useful information for the clinical workup of patients.

Genetics evaluation outcomes of patients with pediatric hearing loss: 2008-2022 retrospective study

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to explore how genetics evaluation and testing for patients with pediatric onset hearing loss affects their diagnosis and management.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review was completed for patients with pediatric hearing loss that were evaluated by a genetic counselor from 2008 to 2022 with data entry into a REDCap database. Descriptive statistical analysis was completed.

RESULTS

Four hundred twenty-nine patients with pediatric onset hearing loss were evaluated by genetics. Majority of patients presented with bilateral (67 %) and sensorineural (83 %) hearing loss. Genetic testing was recommended for 76 % of patients with pediatric hearing loss evaluated by a genetic counselor with 70 % completing some or all recommended tests. Overall genetic testing diagnostic rate was 34 %, with 41 % of diagnoses syndromic. Yearly trends noted an increasing number of patients evaluated, tests ordered, and subsequently an increased number of diagnoses overtime. For diagnostic results, management recommendations were made for 45 % of patients (35/78) and for 92 % of family members (72/78). This compared to total management recommendations for all patients (82/429, 19 %) and family members (110/429, 26 %).

CONCLUSION

This study identified a genetic testing diagnostic rate for pediatric hearing loss of 34 % over 14 years. This study notes the beneficial outcomes of patients with hearing loss and their families meeting with a genetic counselor and the importance of collaboration with hearing loss management colleagues. It highlights the value a genetic counselor consult can add to a patient's diagnostic journey, in addition to how genetic testing impacts management for patients and their families.

The genetic basis and the diagnostic yield of genetic testing related to nonsyndromic hearing loss in Qatar

Hearing loss is the most predominant sensory defect occurring in pediatrics, of which, 66% cases are attributed to genetic factors. The prevalence of hereditary hearing loss increases in consanguineous populations, and the prevalence of hearing loss in Qatar is 5.2%. We aimed to investigate the genetic basis of nonsyndromic hearing loss (NSHL) in Qatar and to evaluate the diagnostic yield of different genetic tests available. A retrospective chart review was conducted for 59 pediatric patients with NSHL referred to the Department of Adult and Pediatric Medical Genetics at Hamad Medical Corporation in Qatar, and who underwent at least one genetic test. Out of the 59 patients, 39 were solved cases due to 19 variants in 11 genes and two copy number variants that explained the NSHL phenotype. Of them 2 cases were initially uncertain and were reclassified using familial segregation. Around 36.8% of the single variants were in GJB2 gene and c.35delG was the most common recurrent variant seen in solved cases. We detected the c.283C > T variant in FGF3 that was seen in a Qatari patient and found to be associated with NSHL for the first time. The overall diagnostic yield was 30.7%, and the diagnostic yield was significantly associated with genetic testing using GJB2 sequencing and using the hearing loss (HL) gene panel. The diagnostic yield for targeted familial testing was 60% (n = 3 patients) and for gene panel was 50% (n = 5). Thus, we recommend using GJB2 gene sequencing as a first-tier genetic test and HL gene panel as a second-tier genetic test for NSHL. Our work provided new insights into the genetic pool of NSHL among Arabs and highlights its unique diversity, this is believed to help further in the diagnostic and management options for NSHL Arab patients.

Hereditary deafness carrier screening in 9,993 Chinese individuals

Background: Preconception or prenatal carrier screening plays an important role in reproductive decision-making, but current research on hereditary deafness is limited. This study aimed to investigate the carrier frequencies of common deafness genes in the Chinese population who underwent carrier screening and to follow up on pregnancy outcomes in high-chance couples. Methods: Individual females or couples in preconception or early pregnancy were recruited from two hospitals in China. Carrier screening for common deafness genes in the Chinese population, including the GJB2 and SLC26A4 genes, was performed using next-generation sequencing technology. Genetic counseling was provided to subjects before and after testing. Results: Of the 9,993 subjects screened, the carrier rate was 2.86% for the GJB2 gene and 2.63% for the SLC26A4 gene. The variant with the highest carrier frequency in GJB2 was c.235delC (1.89%), and c.919-2A>G (1.08%) in SLC26A4. Of the six high-chance couples, four made alternative reproductive decisions (three with prenatal diagnosis and one with preimplantation genetic testing), with consequent termination of the birth of two affected fetuses. Conclusion: These findings confirmed the clinical utility of preconception or prenatal carrier screening for hereditary deafness.

Co-Occurrence of Sensorineural Hearing Loss and Congenital Heart Disease: Etiologies and Management

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

The co-occurrence of sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) and congenital heart disease (CHD) is a rare condition with complex etiologies. The purpose of this study is to assess the etiologies, clinical features, and outcomes of cochlear implant (CI) in this patient population.

STUDY DESIGN

Case series and literature review.

METHODS

Clinical data of children who were diagnosed with SNHL and CHD and received CIs at a tertiary hospital from 2016 to 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. A literature review was performed to identify patients with SNHL and CHD.

FINDINGS

Of the 382 children who underwent cochlear implantation at our center, eight (2.1%) were diagnosed with SNHL and CHD. A literature review identified 1525 patients from 254 studies; the database therefore consisted of 1533 patients. The most common genetic etiologies of co-occurring SNHL and CHD were CHARGE syndrome (36.3%), Turner syndrome (8.4%), 22q11.2 deletion (3.0%), Noonan syndrome (2.9%), and Down syndrome (2.5%), whereas the most common non-genetic etiologies were congenital rubella syndrome (22.9%) and SNHL after early cardiac surgery (5.5%). Most of the patients presented with congenital, bilateral, severe-profound SNHL requiring early rehabilitation. Of the 126 children who received CIs at a median age of 2.5 years, half showed delayed speech development at last follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Co-occurring SNHL and CHD is a rare condition with complex etiologies. Timely hearing intervention with long-term follow-up and proper timing of heart surgery is essential for these children.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4, case series Laryngoscope, 134:400-409, 2024.

Novel, pathogenic insertion variant of GSDME associates with autosomal dominant hearing loss in a large Chinese pedigree

Nonsyndromic hearing loss (NSHL) is a genetically diverse, highly heterogeneous condition characterised by deafness, and Gasdermin E (GSDME) variants have been identified as directly inducing autosomal dominant NSHL. While many NSHL cases associated with GSDME involve the skipping of exon 8, there is another, less understood pathogenic insertion variant specifically found in Chinese pedigrees that causes deafness, known as autosomal dominant 5 (DFNA5) hearing loss. In this study, we recruited a large Chinese pedigree, conducted whole-exome and Sanger sequencing to serve as a comprehensive clinical examination, and extracted genomic DNA samples for co-segregation analysis of the members. Conservation and expression analyses for GSDME were also conducted. Our clinical examinations revealed an autosomal dominant phenotype of hearing loss in the family. Genetic analysis identified a novel insertion variant in GSDME exon 8 (GSDME: NM_004403.3: c.1113_1114insGGGGTGCAGCTTACAGGGTGGGTGT: p. P372fs*36). This variant is segregated with the deafness phenotype of this pedigree. The GSDME gene was highly conserved in the different species we analysed, and its mRNA expression was ubiquitously low in different human tissues. In conclusion, we have successfully identified a novel pathogenic insertion variant of GSDME in a Chinese pedigree that causes deafness, shedding light on the genetic basis of hearing loss within this specific family. Our findings expand the spectrum of known variants associated with GSDME-related deafness and may further support both the underlying gain-of-function mechanism and functional associations of GSDME hearing loss variants.

Gene Therapy for Inherited Hearing Loss: Updates and Remaining Challenges

Hearing loss stands as the most prevalent sensory deficit among humans, posing a significant global health challenge. Projections indicate that by 2050, approximately 10% of the world's population will grapple with disabling hearing impairment. While approximately half of congenital hearing loss cases have a genetic etiology, traditional interventions such as hearing aids and cochlear implants do not completely restore normal hearing. The absence of biological treatment has prompted significant efforts in recent years, with a strong focus on gene therapy to address hereditary hearing loss. Although several studies have exhibited promising recovery from common forms of genetic deafness in mouse models, existing challenges must be overcome to make gene therapy applicable in the near future. Herein, we summarize the primary gene therapy strategies employed over past years, provide an overview of the recent achievements in preclinical studies for genetic hearing loss, and outline the current key obstacles to cochlear gene therapy.

Hereditary Hearing Loss: A Systematic Review of Potential Treatments and Interventions

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to systematically review the research literature with regards to treatments and intervention methods for hereditary hearing loss. Our goal was to provide reference guidelines for the rational use of medication and gene-targeted therapy for patients with hereditary hearing loss and discuss the future development of research in this area.

METHOD

We searched two core databases, PubMed and Web of Science, for relevant literature relating to potential treatments and interventional methods for hereditary hearing loss. Then, we used Microsoft Excel to perform basic statistical analysis of the data, the R language to perform bibliometric analyses, and VOSviewer and CiteSpace to visualize data. In addition, we clustered and descriptively analyzed the data and identified the relative importance of each approach with regard to precise patient outcomes.

RESULTS

In this study, we followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) standardized screening process and identified a total of 103 research articles. The average annual growth rate of publications in this area was 12.73%. The country with the highest number of publications and citations was the United States; 80 of these publications (associated with 76.92% of funding) were supported by grants from 16 countries. Potential treatments and interventions were clustered according to the stage of research and showed that 8.74% remain in the research design stage, 59.22% are in the clinical validation stage, and 32.04% are being applied in the clinic. The main research focus in this field is cochlear implants and gene therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Hereditary hearing loss is in a critical period of transition from preventive to therapeutic research. Gene-targeted interventions represent one of the most promising and effective treatments.

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL

https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.24309193.

Neonatal bacterial meningitis: hearing screening and audiological monitoring outcomes

OBJECTIVE

This study reviewed the outcomes of universal newborn hearing screening (UNHS) and ongoing hearing monitoring in children following recovery from neonatal bacterial meningitis to determine (a) whether screening may be a suitable alternative to diagnostic audiology for detecting permanent childhood hearing loss (PCHL) and (b) whether infants who pass UNHS should be monitored throughout childhood.

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of a UNHS database.

STUDY SAMPLE

Data were extracted from the state-wide UNHS database for all children born in Queensland Australia between 1 September 2004 and 30 June 2020 with the risk factor of bacterial meningitis (in isolation or in combination with other risk factors) identified at the time of the UNHS. This cohort included 231 children.

RESULTS

Results showed that all post-meningitic infants diagnosed with PCHL had a refer result on the UNHS or were medically excluded from screening. Additionally, no cases of PCHL were identified through the targeted surveillance program following a pass result on UNHS.

CONCLUSIONS

UNHS may be sufficient to detect PCHL in post-meningitic neonates and routine audiological monitoring may not be required for children who pass the screen.

Hearing loss and vestibular schwannoma: new insights into Schwann cells implication

Hearing loss (HL) is the most common and heterogeneous disorder of the sensory system, with a large morbidity in the worldwide population. Among cells of the acoustic nerve (VIII cranial nerve), in the cochlea are present the hair cells, the spiral ganglion neurons, the glia-like supporting cells, and the Schwann cells (SCs), which alterations have been considered cause of HL. Notably, a benign SC-derived tumor of the acoustic nerve, named vestibular schwannoma (VS), has been indicated as cause of HL. Importantly, SCs are the main glial cells ensheathing axons and forming myelin in the peripheral nerves. Following an injury, the SCs reprogram, expressing some stemness features. Despite the mechanisms and factors controlling their biological processes (i.e., proliferation, migration, differentiation, and myelination) have been largely unveiled, their role in VS and HL was poorly investigated. In this review, we enlighten some of the mechanisms at the base of SCs transformation, VS development, and progression, likely leading to HL, and we pose great attention on the environmental factors that, in principle, could contribute to HL onset or progression. Combining the biomolecular bench-side approach to the clinical bedside practice may be helpful for the diagnosis, prediction, and therapeutic approach in otology.

The qualitative experiences of otolaryngologists with genetic services in pediatric hearing loss evaluation

Genetic testing is one of the most high-yield diagnostic tests in the evaluation of pediatric sensorineural (SNHL) hearing loss, leading to a genetic diagnosis in 40-65% of patients. Previous research has focused on the utility of genetic testing in pediatric SNHL and otolaryngologists' general understanding of genetics. This qualitative study examines otolaryngologists' perceptions about facilitators and barriers when ordering genetic testing in the workup of pediatric hearing loss. Potential solutions for overcoming barriers are also explored. Eleven (N = 11) semi-structured interviews were conducted with otolaryngologists in the USA. Most participants were currently practicing in a southern, academic, urban setting and had completed a pediatric otolaryngology fellowship. Insurance was one of the main barriers to testing, and increased genetics provider accessibility was the most frequently cited solution to increase utilization of genetic services. Difficulty acquiring insurance coverage and unfamiliarity with the genetic testing process were the most common reasons otolaryngologists referred patients to genetics clinics for genetic testing, as opposed to ordering testing themselves. This study suggests that otolaryngologists recognize the importance and utility of genetic testing, but a lack of genetics-specific skills, knowledge, and resources makes it difficult for them to facilitate testing. Multidisciplinary hearing loss clinics that include genetics providers may increase the overall accessibility of genetic services.

Precision Medicine as a New Frontier in Speech-Language Pathology: How Applying Insights From Behavior Genomics Can Improve Outcomes in Communication Disorders

PURPOSE

Precision medicine is an emerging intervention paradigm that leverages knowledge of risk factors such as genotypes, lifestyle, and environment toward proactive and personalized interventions. Regarding genetic risk factors, examples of interventions informed by the field of medical genomics are pharmacological interventions tailored to an individual's genotype and anticipatory guidance for children whose hearing impairment is predicted to be progressive. Here, we show how principles of precision medicine and insights from behavior genomics have relevance for novel management strategies of behaviorally expressed disorders, especially disorders of spoken language.

METHOD

This tutorial presents an overview of precision medicine, medical genomics, and behavior genomics; case examples of improved outcomes; and strategic goals toward enhancing clinical practice.

RESULTS

Speech-language pathologists (SLPs) see individuals with various communication disorders due to genetic variants. Ways of using insights from behavior genomics and implementing principles of precision medicine include recognizing early signs of undiagnosed genetic disorders in an individual's communication patterns, making appropriate referrals to genetics professionals, and incorporating genetic findings into management plans. Patients benefit from a genetics diagnosis by gaining a deeper and more prognostic understanding of their condition, obtaining more precisely targeted interventions, and learning about their recurrence risks.

CONCLUSIONS

SLPs can achieve improved outcomes by expanding their purview to include genetics. To drive this new interdisciplinary framework forward, goals should include systematic training in clinical genetics for SLPs, enhanced understanding of genotype-phenotype associations, leveraging insights from animal models, optimizing interprofessional team efforts, and developing novel proactive and personalized interventions.

The Prevalence and Features of Medications With Actionable Pharmacogenomic Biomarkers Prescribed to Kidney Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

Genetic variants are associated with pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic changes, leading to variability in drug effects and safety profiles in the clinical response. The role of genetic variants in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) has not been extensively studied. Here, we explored the potential of incorporating pharmacogenomic (PGx) gene biomarkers into prescription practices for KTRs.

METHODS

This study analyzed 490 KTRs participating in the Taiwan Precision Medicine Initiative program and used medications with actionable PGx biomarkers. The analysis included prescriptions issued between January 2000 and December 2021 with 206 CPIC-recommended level A or B gene-drug pairs, encompassing 363 single or combination drug products.

RESULTS

All KTRs had the potential to receive at least one prescription that could be adjusted based on their genetic profiles after the day of surgery. The top 5 medications prescribed within the first 3 months after transplantation were mycophenolic acid, tacrolimus, pantoprazole, labetalol, and tramadol. These findings highlight the significant potential of PGx-guided prescriptions for KTRs. Additionally, some drug-gene pairs, such as tramadol/CYP2D6, pantoprazole/CYP2C19, and atorvastatin/SLCO1B1, were considered high-quality evidence by the Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium and were included in the Food and Drug Administration's drug labels, indicating that they have the potential for clinical application.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, this study demonstrated the potential of incorporating PGx gene biomarkers into prescribing practices for KTRs, which could improve personalized pharmacotherapy for these patients.

Advances in gene therapy hold promise for treating hereditary hearing loss

Gene therapy focuses on genetic modification to produce therapeutic effects or treat diseases by repairing or reconstructing genetic material, thus being expected to be the most promising therapeutic strategy for genetic disorders. Due to the growing attention to hearing impairment, an increasing amount of research is attempting to utilize gene therapy for hereditary hearing loss (HHL), an important monogenic disease and the most common type of congenital deafness. Several gene therapy clinical trials for HHL have recently been approved, and, additionally, CRISPR-Cas tools have been attempted for HHL treatment. Therefore, in order to further advance the development of inner ear gene therapy and promote its broad application in other forms of genetic disease, it is imperative to review the progress of gene therapy for HHL. Herein, we address three main gene therapy strategies (gene replacement, gene suppression, and gene editing), summarizing the strategy that is most appropriate for particular monogenic diseases based on different pathogenic mechanisms, and then focusing on their successful applications for HHL in preclinical trials. Finally, we elaborate on the challenges and outlooks of gene therapy for HHL.

Calcium signaling and genetic rare diseases: An auditory perspective

Deafness is a highly heterogeneous disorder which stems, for 50%, from genetic origins. Sensory transduction relies mainly on sensory hair cells of the cochlea, in the inner ear. Calcium is key for the function of these cells and acts as a fundamental signal transduction. Its homeostasis depends on three factors: the calcium influx, through the mechanotransduction channel at the apical pole of the hair cell as well as the voltage-gated calcium channel at the base of the cells; the calcium buffering via Ca²⁺-binding proteins in the cytoplasm, but also in organelles such as mitochondria and the reticulum endoplasmic mitochondria-associated membranes with specialized proteins; and the calcium extrusion through the Ca-ATPase pump, located all over the plasma membrane. In addition, the synaptic transmission to the central nervous system is also controlled by calcium. Genetic studies of inherited deafness have tremendously helped understand the underlying molecular pathways of calcium signaling. In this review, we discuss these different factors in light of the associated genetic diseases (syndromic and non-syndromic deafness) and the causative genes.

Aminoglycoside induced ototoxicity risk in the cystic fibrosis population: The utility of large-scale screening

BACKGROUND

MT-RNR1 variants are a well-known cause of aminoglycoside-induced hearing loss (AIHL). Individuals with cystic fibrosis (CF) routinely receive aminoglycosides and are at high risk of AIHL. However, genetic testing before treatment is not routinely performed due to perceived rarity of risk, and cost ineffectiveness with traditional technologies.

AIM

Assess the utility of large-scale screening for AIHL risk in the CF population, using digital droplet polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR), a novel and scalable low-cost molecular technique.

METHODS

Using a clinically validated ddPCR assay, we performed retrospective testing on 122 and prospective testing on 32 individuals with CF for the two most common pathogenic variants associated with AIHL, MT-RNR1 m.1555 A > G and m.1494 C > T. Our study screened the largest known cohort of pediatric cases of CF (94/154) for these specific alterations.

RESULTS

We identified two individuals positive for MT-RNR1 m.1555 A > G and no positives for m.1494 C > T. Of 32 prospective cases, 17 had aminoglycoside exposure. The positive case in our prospective group recently began inhaled tobramycin and denied hearing issues. The clinician adjusted to care for both the patient and sibling with CF (not included in cohort) who is presumed positive for m.1555 A > G due to the nature of mitochondrial inheritance.

CONCLUSION

Our findings demonstrate the utility of pretreatment screening in the cystic fibrosis population for AIHL risk using ddPCR, a scalable and robust testing methodology at a fraction of the cost as compared to other sequencing-based methods. Therefore, the use of large-scale screening for AIHL risk in the cystic fibrosis community should be re-visited.

Assessing Variants of Uncertain Significance Implicated in Hearing Loss Using a Comprehensive Deafness Proteome

Hearing loss is the leading sensory deficit, affecting ~ 5% of the population. It exhibits remarkable heterogeneity across 223 genes with 6,328 pathogenic missense variants, making deafness-specific expertise a prerequisite for ascribing phenotypic consequences to genetic variants. Deafness-implicated variants are curated in the Deafness Variation Database (DVD) after classification by a genetic hearing loss expert panel and thorough informatics pipeline. However, seventy percent of the 128,167 missense variants in the DVD are "variants of uncertain significance" (VUS) due to insufficient evidence for classification. Here, we use the deep learning protein prediction algorithm, AlphaFold2, to curate structures for all DVD genes. We refine these structures with global optimization and the AMOEBA force field and use DDGun3D to predict folding free energy differences (∆∆G Fold ) for all DVD missense variants. We find that 5,772 VUSs have a large, destabilizing ∆∆G Fold that is consistent with pathogenic variants. When also filtered for CADD scores (> 25.7), we determine 3,456 VUSs are likely pathogenic at a probability of 99.0%. These VUSs affect 119 patients (~ 3% of cases) sequenced by the OtoSCOPE targeted panel. Approximately half of these patients previously received an inconclusive report, and reclassification of these VUSs as pathogenic provides a new genetic diagnosis for six patients.

[Hereditary hearing loss]

Understanding the genetic basis of hearing loss is becoming increasingly relevant, as 50-70% of congenital hearing loss is hereditary and postlingual hearing loss is also often of hereditary origin. To date, more than 220 genes for hearing loss have been identified and more than 600 syndromes with hearing loss described. This review article explains the classification of genetic hearing loss into syndromic versus non-syndromic forms and the modes of inheritance involved. Some of the most common syndromes (Usher, Pendred, Jervell-Lange-Nielsen, Waardenburg, branchiootorenal, and Alport syndrome) are introductorily described. New sequencing technologies have significantly expanded the diagnostic options for genetic hearing loss and made them more accessible. This text aims to encourage initiation of genetic diagnosis in hearing-impaired patients with suspected hereditary genesis in order to provide the best possible counseling for affected individuals and their families.

Single Versus Multigene Testing for Hereditary Hearing Loss: Use and Costs in a Commercially Insured Cohort

OBJECTIVE

The objectives of this study were to describe trends in single-gene GJB2/6 (connexin 26/30) and multigene hearing loss panel (HLP) testing for hereditary hearing loss using real-world evidence.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study using insurance claims data.

SETTING

Optum Data Mart database from 2015 to 2020.

METHODS

Rates of overall and hearing-specific genetic testing and costs to insurers and patients were reported. Linear regression models were used to assess the proportion of single-gene GJB2/6 testing over time. Additional linear regression models were used to assess changes in costs over time.

RESULTS

From 2015 to 2020, 91,986 children received genetic testing for any indication, of which 601 (0.65%) received hearing-specific tests. The proportion of single-gene GJB2/6 testing remained similar over time (mean difference [MD]: -1.3% per year; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -4.3%, 1.7%), while multigene HLP use increased over time (MD: 4.0% per year; 95% CI: 0.4%, 7.5%). The median charge for single-gene GJB2/6 testing remained constant during the study period (MD: -$34; 95% CI: -$86, $18), while the median charge for multigene HLP decreased during the study period (MD: -$145 per year; 95% CI: -$278, -$12).

CONCLUSION

Compared to molecular testing for GJB2/6, HLPs are becoming more common for hereditary hearing loss. The comprehensiveness of HLP and decreasing costs provide justification for its more widespread adoption moving forward.

Negative Molecular Diagnostics in Non-Syndromic Hearing Loss: What Next?

Congenital hearing loss has an impact on almost every facet of life. In more than 50% of cases, a genetic cause can be identified. Currently, extensive genetic testing is available, although the etiology of some patients with obvious familial hearing loss remains unknown. We selected a cohort of mutation-negative patients to optimize the diagnostic yield for genetic hearing impairment. In this retrospective study, 21 patients (17 families) with negative molecular diagnostics for non-syndromic hearing loss (gene panel analysis) were included based on a positive family history with a similar type of hearing loss. Additional genetic testing was performed using a whole exome sequencing panel (WESHL panel v2.0) in four families with the strongest likelihood of genetic hearing impairment. In this cohort (n = 21), the severity of hearing loss was most commonly moderate (52%). Additional genetic testing revealed pathogenic copy number variants in the STRC gene in two families. In summary, regular re-evaluation of hearing loss patients with presumably genetic etiology after negative molecular diagnostics is recommended, as we might miss newly discovered deafness genes. The switch from gene panel analysis to whole exome sequencing or whole genome sequencing for the testing of congenital hearing loss seems promising.

Increased diagnostic yield in a cohort of hearing loss families using a comprehensive stepwise strategy of molecular testing

Hearing loss is one of the most common sensory disorders in humans. This study proposes a stepwise strategy of deafness gene detection using multiplex PCR combined with high-throughput sequencing, Sanger sequencing, multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA), and whole-exome sequencing (WES) to explore its application in molecular diagnosis of hearing loss families. A total of 152 families with hearing loss were included in this study, the highest overall diagnosis rate was 73% (111/152). The diagnosis rate of multiplex PCR combined with high-throughput sequencing was 52.6% (80/152). One families was diagnosed by Sanger sequencing of GJB2 exon 1. Two families were diagnosed by MLPA analysis of the STRC gene. The diagnosis rate with additional contribution from WES was 18.4% (28/152). We identified 21 novel variants from 15 deafness genes by WES. Combining WES and deep clinical phenotyping, we diagnosed 11 patients with syndromic hearing loss (SHL). This study demonstrated improved diagnostic yield in a cohort of hearing loss families and confirmed the advantages of a stepwise strategy in the molecular diagnosis of hearing loss.

Clinical Impact of Genetic Diagnosis of Sensorineural Hearing Loss in Adults

HYPOTHESIS

Adult genetic sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) may be underestimated.

BACKGROUND

The diagnosis of genetic hearing loss is challenging, given its extreme genetic and phenotypic heterogeneity, particularly in adulthood. This study evaluated the utility of next-generation sequencing (NGS) in the etiological diagnosis of adult-onset SNHL.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Adults (>16 yr old) with SNHL were recruited at the Otolaryngology Department at Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital (Spain). Environmental factors, acoustic trauma, endolymphatic hydrops, and age-related hearing loss were excluding criteria. An NGS gene panel was used, including 196 genes (OTOgenics v3) or 229 genes (OTOgenics v4) related to syndromic and nonsyndromic hearing loss.

RESULTS

Sixty-five patients were included in the study (average age at the onset of SNHL, 41 yr). Fifteen pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants considered to be causative were found in 15 patients (23% diagnostic yield) in TECTA (4), KCNQ4 (3), GJB2 (2), ACTG1 (1), COL2A1 (1), COCH (1), COCH/COL2A1 (1), STRC (1), and ABHD12 (1). Three patients had syndromic associations (20% of patients with genetic diagnosis) that had not been previously diagnosed (two Stickler type I and one polyneuropathy, hearing loss, ataxia, retinitis pigmentosa, cataract syndrome). Seven variants of unknown significance were found in COL11A1 (1), GSMDE (2), DNTM1 (1), SOX10 (1), EYA4 (1), and TECTA (1).

CONCLUSION

NGS gene panels can provide diagnostic yields greater than 20% for adult SNHL, with a significant proportion of variant of unknown significance that could potentially contribute to increasing diagnostic output. Identifying a genetic cause enables genetic counseling, provides prognostic information and can reveal unrecognized syndromes contributing to an accurate management of their associated manifestations.

Task force Guideline of Brazilian Society of Otology ‒ hearing loss in children - Part I ‒ Evaluation

OBJECTIVES

To provide an overview of the main evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis of hearing loss in children and adolescents aged 0 to 18 years.

METHODS

Task force members were educated on knowledge synthesis methods, including electronic database search, review and selection of relevant citations, and critical appraisal of selected studies. Articles written in English or Portuguese on childhood hearing loss were eligible for inclusion. The American College of Physicians' guideline grading system and the American Thyroid Association's guideline criteria were used for critical appraisal of evidence and recommendations for therapeutic interventions.

RESULTS

The evaluation and diagnosis of hearing loss: universal newborn hearing screening, laboratory testing, congenital infections (especially cytomegalovirus), genetic testing and main syndromes, radiologic imaging studies, vestibular assessment of children with hearing loss, auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder, autism spectrum disorder, and noise-induced hearing loss.

CONCLUSIONS

Every child with suspected hearing loss has the right to diagnosis and appropriate treatment if necessary. This task force considers 5 essential rights: (1) Otolaryngologist consultation; (2) Speech assessment and therapy; (3) Diagnostic tests; (4) Treatment; (5) Ophthalmologist consultation.

Next-generation sequencing facilitates genetic diagnosis and improves the management of patients with hearing loss in clinical practice

BACKGROUND

Hearing loss (HL) is a prevalent sensorineural disorder, and is among the most etiologically heterogeneous disorders. With the advent of next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies, hundreds of candidate genes can be analyzed simultaneously in a cost-effective manner.

METHODS

Ninety-four patients from 87 families diagnosed with non-syndromic or syndromic HL were enrolled. A custom-designed HL panel and clinical exome sequencing (CES) were applied to explore molecular etiology in the cohort, and the efficacy of the two panels was examined.

RESULTS

The etiologic diagnosis for HL has been identified for 36 out of 87 probands (41.4%), 28 with an autosomal recessive (AR) inheritance pattern and 8 with an autosomal dominant (AD) pattern. Candidate variants in 18 different genes were identified in the study cohort, 10 with AR inheritance pattern and 8 with AD pattern. Fourteen of the variants identified in the study were novel.

CONCLUSIONS

The custom-designed HL panel covers almost all known HL-associated genes, and can be used as an effective clinical diagnostic platform; CES evaluates all exons related to clinical symptoms, and is also suitable for clinical diagnosis of HL. Next-generation sequencing facilitates genetic diagnosis and improves the management of patients with HL in the clinical practice.

Molecular diagnose of a large hearing loss population from China by targeted genome sequencing

Hereditary hearing loss is genetically heterogeneous, with diverse clinical manifestations. Here we performed targeted genome sequencing of 227 hearing loss related genes in 1027 patients with bilateral hearing loss and 520 healthy volunteers with normal hearing to comprehensively identify the molecular etiology of hereditary hearing loss in a large cohort from China. We obtained a diagnostic rate of 57.25% (588/1027) for the patients, while 4.67% (48/1027) of the patients were identified with uncertain diagnoses. Of the implicated 35 hearing loss genes, three common genes, including SLC26A4(278/588), GJB2(207/588), MT-RNR1(19/588), accounted for 85.54% (503/588) of the diagnosed cases, while 32 uncommon hearing loss genes, including MYO15A, MITF, OTOF, POU3F4, PTPN11, etc. accounted for the remaining diagnostic rate of 14.46% (85/588). Apart from Pendred syndrome, other eight types of syndromic hearing loss were also identified. Of the 64 uncertain significant variants and 244 pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants identified in the patients, 129 novel variants were also detected. Thus, the molecular etiology presented with high heterogeneity with the leading causes to be SLC26A4 and GJB2 genes in the Chinese hearing loss population. It’s urgent to develop a database of the ethnicity-matched healthy population as well as to perform functional studies for further classification of uncertain significant variants.

Full etiologic spectrum of pediatric severe to profound hearing loss of consecutive 119 cases

Determining the etiology of severe-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss (SP-SNHL) in pediatric subjects is particularly important in aiding the decision for auditory rehabilitation. We aimed to update the etiologic spectrum of pediatric SP-SNHL by combining internal auditory canal (IAC)-MRI with comprehensive and state-of-the-art genetic testings. From May 2013 to September 2020, 119 cochlear implantees under the age of 15 years with SP-SNHL were all prospectively recruited. They were subjected to genetic tests, including exome sequencing, and IAC-MRI for etiologic diagnosis. Strict interpretation of results were made based on ACMG/AMP guidelines and by an experienced neuroradiologist. The etiology was determined in of 65.5% (78/119) of our cohort. If only one of the two tests was done, the etiologic diagnostic rate would be reduced by at least 21.8%. Notably, cochlear nerve deficiency (n = 20) detected by IAC-MRI topped the etiology list of our cohort, followed by DFNB4 (n = 18), DFNB1 (n = 10), DFNB9 (n = 10) and periventricular leukomalacia associated with congenital CMV infection (n = 8). Simultaneous application of state-of-the-art genetic tests and IAC-MRI is essential for etiologic diagnosis, and if lesions of the auditory nerve or central nerve system are carefully examined on an MRI, we can identify the cause of deafness in more than 65% of pediatric SP-SNHL cases.

Clinical evaluation and etiologic diagnosis of hearing loss: A clinical practice resource of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG)

Hearing loss is a common and complex condition that can occur at any age, can be inherited or acquired, and is associated with a remarkably wide array of etiologies. The diverse causes of hearing loss, combined with the highly variable and often overlapping presentations of different forms of hearing loss, challenge the ability of traditional clinical evaluations to arrive at an etiologic diagnosis for many deaf and hard-of-hearing individuals. However, identifying the etiology of hearing loss may affect clinical management, improve prognostic accuracy, and refine genetic counseling and assessment of the likelihood of recurrence for relatives of deaf and hard-of-hearing individuals. Linguistic and cultural identities associated with being deaf or hard-of-hearing can complicate access to and the effectiveness of clinical care. These concerns can be minimized when genetic and other health care services are provided in a linguistically and culturally sensitive manner. This clinical practice resource offers information about the frequency, causes, and presentations of hearing loss and suggests approaches to the clinical and genetic evaluation of deaf and hard-of-hearing individuals aimed at identifying an etiologic diagnosis and providing informative and effective patient education and genetic counseling.

Hearing loss drug discovery and medicinal chemistry: Current status, challenges, and opportunities

Hearing loss is a severe high unmet need condition affecting more than 1.5 billion people globally. There are no licensed medicines for the prevention, treatment or restoration of hearing. Prosthetic devices, such as hearing aids and cochlear implants, do not restore natural hearing and users struggle with speech in the presence of background noise. Hearing loss drug discovery is immature, and small molecule approaches include repurposing existing drugs, combination therapeutics, late-stage discovery optimisation of known chemotypes for identified molecular targets of interest, phenotypic tissue screening and high-throughput cell-based screening. Hearing loss drug discovery requires the integration of specialist therapeutic area biology and otology clinical expertise. Small molecule drug discovery projects in the global clinical portfolio for hearing loss are here collated and reviewed. An overview is provided of human hearing, inner ear anatomy, inner ear delivery, types of hearing loss and hearing measurement. Small molecule experimental drugs in clinical development for hearing loss are reviewed, including their underpinning biology, discovery strategy and activities, medicinal chemistry, calculated physicochemical properties, pharmacokinetics and clinical trial status. SwissADME BOILED-Egg permeability modelling is applied to the molecules reviewed, and these results are considered. Non-small molecule hearing loss assets in clinical development are briefly noted in this review. Future opportunities in hearing loss drug discovery for human genomics and targeted protein degradation are highlighted.

Mutations in MINAR2 encoding membrane integral NOTCH2-associated receptor 2 cause deafness in humans and mice

Discovery of deafness genes and elucidating their functions have substantially contributed to our understanding of hearing physiology and its pathologies. Here we report on DNA variants in MINAR2, encoding membrane integral NOTCH2-associated receptor 2, in four families underlying autosomal recessive nonsyndromic deafness. Neurologic evaluation of affected individuals at ages ranging from 4 to 80 y old does not show additional abnormalities. MINAR2 is a recently annotated gene with limited functional understanding. We detected three MINAR2 variants, c.144G > A (p.Trp48*), c.412_419delCGGTTTTG (p.Arg138Valfs*10), and c.393G > T, in 13 individuals with congenital- or prelingual-onset severe-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss (HL). The c.393G > T variant is shown to disrupt a splice donor site. We show that Minar2 is expressed in the mouse inner ear, with the protein localizing mainly in the hair cells, spiral ganglia, the spiral limbus, and the stria vascularis. Mice with loss of function of the Minar2 protein (Minar2^tm1b/tm1b) present with rapidly progressive sensorineural HL associated with a reduction in outer hair cell stereocilia in the shortest row and degeneration of hair cells at a later age. We conclude that MINAR2 is essential for hearing in humans and mice and its disruption leads to sensorineural HL. Progressive HL observed in mice and in some affected individuals and as well as relative preservation of hair cells provides an opportunity to interfere with HL using genetic therapies.

Comprehensive genetic testing improves the clinical diagnosis and medical management of pediatric patients with isolated hearing loss

Purpose

Genetic testing is widely used in diagnosing genetic hearing loss in patients. Other than providing genetic etiology, the benefits of genetic testing in pediatric patients with hearing loss are less investigated.

Methods

From 2018–2020, pediatric patients who initially presented isolated hearing loss were enrolled. Comprehensive genetic testing, including GJB2/SLC26A4 multiplex amplicon sequencing, STRC/OTOA copy number variation analysis, and exome sequencing, were hierarchically offered. Clinical follow-up and examinations were performed.

Results

A total of 80 pediatric patients who initially presented isolated hearing loss were considered as nonsyndromic hearing loss and enrolled in this study. The definitive diagnosis yield was 66% (53/80) and the likely diagnosis yield was 8% (6/80) through comprehensive genetic testing. With the aid of genetic testing and further clinical follow-up and examinations, the clinical diagnoses and medical management were altered in eleven patients (19%, 11/59); five were syndromic hearing loss; six were nonsyndromic hearing loss mimics.

Conclusion

Syndromic hearing loss and nonsyndromic hearing loss mimics are common in pediatric patients who initially present with isolated hearing loss. The comprehensive genetic testing provides not only a high diagnostic yield but also valuable information for clinicians to uncover subclinical or pre-symptomatic phenotypes, which allows early diagnosis of SHL, and leads to precise genetic counseling and changes the medical management.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12920-022-01293-x.

Analysis of TMIE gene mutations including the first large deletion of exon 1 with autosomal recessive non-syndromic deafness

Background

Transmembrane inner ear (TMIE) protein is an essential component of the mechanotransduction complex. In collaboration with other components, TMIE aids the maintenance and function of the sensory hair cells. Autosomal recessive deafness-6 (DFNB6) is caused by mutated TMIE, a gene in the high genetic heterogeneity spectrum of deafness. Hearing loss has a significant impact on the global economy and the quality of life of affected persons, their families, and society. Here, three unrelated families with TMIE variants are presented. All three cases were found while studying the genetic causes of an Iranian cohort of subjects with cochlear implants.

Methods

Whole exome sequencing was performed to find possible genetic etiology in probands of families after a comprehensive medical evaluation for hearing loss. Co-segregation analysis in probands and other family members was performed by Sanger sequencing. The variants were interpreted per the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics guidelines.

Results

Three different variants associated with TMIE were confirmed as reasons for autosomal recessive non-syndromic deafness. The first novel ~ 10-kb deletion surrounding exon 1 of TMIE along with two previously reported variants co-segregated with families including a frameshift variant c.122_125dup (p.Pro43fs) and a missense variant c.250 C > T; p.(Arg84Trp) in exons 2, and 3, respectively.

Conclusion

This study increases the mutational spectrum of the TMIE gene and highlights the importance of the large deletion of this gene as a reason for hearing loss. Moreover, an efficient and simple multiplex PCR assay was developed to determine the exact breakpoints of the TMIE deletion.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12920-022-01287-9.

Approach and solutions to congenital hearing impairment in Cameroon: perspective of hearing professionals

OBJECTIVES

To bring out the diagnostic attitude of hearing professionals in Cameroon towards congenital hearing impairment (CHI), assess availability of tests, neonatal screening, and create a national map of availability of treatment opportunities.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional online-based survey from June to December 2021, concerning ear-nose-throat (ENT) specialists, hearing care professionals, speech therapists and ENT nurses. A Google Forms online questionnaire was used to collect data, filled by eligible professionals involved in hearing care in Cameroon.

RESULTS

A total of 93 professionals working in 31 different health facilities participated. A cumulative percentage of 79.9% of ENTs were found in just two out of 10 regions. Specialists sought by ENTs for assessment of patients with CHI included neurologists/neuro-pediatricians (96.8%), pediatricians (47.6%), other ENTs (34.9%), and psychologists (3.2%). Investigations requested included auditory-evoked brainstem response (ABR; 87.3%), otoacoustic emissions recording (OAE; 71.4%), and tympanometry (66.7%). There were eight OAE and nine ABR machines in the country. Twenty-five (88.6%) out of 31 facilities with otolaryngologists did not carry out systematic neonatal screening. Reasons included unavailability of equipment (21; 84%), and administrative delays (14; 56%). Sixteen (51.6%) facilities had ENTs with additional training in otologic surgery and 11 (35.5%) were equipped to perform ear surgery. Three centers (9.7%) specialized in hearing aid provision and maintenance services. Three hospitals (9.7%) had performed cochlear implantation.

CONCLUSION

Our results show scarcity and overt unevenness in distribution of specialists, equipment and solutions to CHI in Cameroon. A serious negative health care consequence of this shortage is the unavailability of universal newborn hearing screening and implementation programs.

Novel heterozygous mutations in the otogelin-like (OTOGL) gene in a child with bilateral mild nonsyndromic sensorineural hearing loss

Hearing loss is a common disease, of which genetic factors are the main cause. The incidence of mild or moderate postlingual deafness in children is not high, and the impact on life and learning is not as severe as that of prelingual deafness. This leads to insufficient attention to the disorder in the clinic. To date, only a few disease-causing genes have been reported. This report describe a case of novel heterozygous mutations in OTOGL that causes nonsyndromic mild sensorineural hearing loss. Basic information, imaging examinations, audiological examination, and vestibular function tests of the proband were collected. Blood samples of the proband's family were collected and analyzed by whole exome sequencing and Sanger sequencing. A pedigree diagram was drawn and the genetic patterns were analyzed. The proband is a 16-year-old female student with mild sensorineural hearing loss. High-resolution CT of the inner ear and vestibular function tests showed no abnormalities. The age of onset was approximately 4 years old. Except for hearing loss, no lesions were seen in other organs. The parents of the proband were not close relatives and had normal hearing. Two novel heterozygous mutations were found in the OTOGL gene. The c.5038del (p.D1680Ifs*6) variant was inherited from the father, and the c.2770C > T (p.R924X) variant from the mother. They enriched the mutation spectrum of OTOGL, which provides the basis for gene function research and genetic consultation.

The global hearing therapeutic pipeline: 2021

Hearing loss is a serious condition affecting more than 1.5 billion people globally. Many affected people benefit from the use of devices, such as hearing aids, but these do not restore natural hearing, and many users still struggle to follow speech in the presence of background noise. Consequently, there is rapid growth in work to discover therapeutics to address this need. Our analysis of the therapeutic pipeline for inner ear and central processing disorders identified 23 assets in clinical trials and 56 in preclinical development, of which 25% have entered the pipeline in the past three years. The innovative potential of this pipeline is encouraging, but there are translational hurdles to be overcome. We highlight challenges for the pipeline and comment on opportunities to support and strengthen it.

Diagnostic Yield of Targeted Hearing Loss Gene Panel Sequencing in a Large German Cohort With a Balanced Age Distribution from a Single Diagnostic Center: An Eight-year Study

Objectives:

Hereditary hearing loss exhibits high degrees of genetic and clinical heterogeneity. To elucidate the population-specific and age-related genetic and clinical spectra of hereditary hearing loss, we investigated the sequencing data of causally associated hearing loss genes in a large cohort of hearing-impaired probands with a balanced age distribution from a single center in Southwest Germany.

Design:

Genetic testing was applied to 305 hearing-impaired probands/families with a suspected genetic hearing loss etiology and a balanced age distribution over a period of 8 years (2011–2018). These individuals were representative of the regional population according to age and sex distributions. The genetic testing workflow consisted of single-gene screening (n = 21) and custom-designed hearing loss gene panel sequencing (n = 284) targeting known nonsyndromic and syndromic hearing loss genes in a diagnostic setup. Retrospective reanalysis of sequencing data was conducted by applying the current American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics/Association for Molecular Pathology guidelines.

Results:

A genetic diagnosis was established for 75 (25%) of the probands that involved 75 causal variants in 35 genes, including 16 novel causal variants and 9 medically significant variant reclassifications. Nearly half of the solved cases (47%; n = 35) were related to variants in the five most frequently affected genes: GJB2 (25%), MYO15A, WFS1, SLC26A4, and COL11A1 (all 5%). Nearly one-quarter of the cases (23%; n = 17) were associated with variants in seven additional genes (TMPRSS3, COL4A3, LOXHD1, EDNRB, MYO6, TECTA, and USH2A). The remaining one-third of single cases (33%; n = 25) were linked to variants in 25 distinct genes. Diagnostic rates and gene distribution were highly dependent on phenotypic characteristics. A positive family history of autosomal-recessive inheritance in combination with early onset and higher grades of hearing loss significantly increased the solve rate up to 60%, while late onset and lower grades of hearing loss yielded significantly fewer diagnoses. Regarding genetic diagnoses, autosomal-dominant genes accounted for 37%, autosomal-recessive genes for 60%, and X-linked genes for 3% of the solved cases. Syndromic/nonsyndromic hearing loss mimic genes were affected in 27% of the genetic diagnoses.

Conclusions:

The genetic epidemiology of the largest German cohort subjected to comprehensive targeted sequencing for hereditary hearing loss to date revealed broad causal gene and variant spectra in this population. Targeted hearing loss gene panel analysis proved to be an effective tool for ensuring an appropriate diagnostic yield in a routine clinical setting including the identification of novel variants and medically significant reclassifications. Solve rates were highly sensitive to phenotypic characteristics. The unique population-adapted and balanced age distribution of the cohort favoring late hearing loss onset uncovered a markedly large contribution of autosomal-dominant genes to the diagnoses which may be a representative for other age balanced cohorts in other populations.

Disease-specific ACMG/AMP guidelines improve sequence variant interpretation for hearing loss

PURPOSE

The ClinGen Variant Curation Expert Panels (VCEPs) provide disease-specific rules for accurate variant interpretation. Using the hearing loss-specific American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics/Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG/AMP) guidelines, the Hearing Loss VCEP (HL VCEP) illustrates the utility of expert specifications in variant interpretation.

METHODS

A total of 157 variants across nine HL genes, previously submitted to ClinVar, were curated by the HL VCEP. The curation process involved collecting published and unpublished data for each variant by biocurators, followed by bimonthly meetings of an expert curation subgroup that reviewed all evidence and applied the HL-specific ACMG/AMP guidelines to reach a final classification.

RESULTS

Before expert curation, 75% (117/157) of variants had single or multiple variants of uncertain significance (VUS) submissions (17/157) or had conflicting interpretations in ClinVar (100/157). After applying the HL-specific ACMG/AMP guidelines, 24% (4/17) of VUS and 69% (69/100) of discordant variants were resolved into benign (B), likely benign (LB), likely pathogenic (LP), or pathogenic (P). Overall, 70% (109/157) variants had unambiguous classifications (B, LB, LP, P). We quantify the contribution of the HL-specified ACMG/AMP codes to variant classification.

CONCLUSION

Expert specification and application of the HL-specific ACMG/AMP guidelines effectively resolved discordant interpretations in ClinVar. This study highlights the utility of ClinGen VCEPs in supporting more consistent clinical variant interpretation.

Comprehensive medical evaluation of pediatric bilateral sensorineural hearing loss

Children with bilateral sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) should undergo a comprehensive medical evaluation to determine the underlying etiology and help guide treatment and counseling. In this article, we review the indications and rationale for medical evaluation of pediatric bilateral SNHL, including history and physical examination, imaging, genetic testing, specialist referrals, cytomegalovirus (CMV) testing, and other laboratory tests. Workup begins with a history and physical examination, which can provide clues to the etiology of SNHL, particularly with syndromic causes. If SNHL is diagnosed within the first 3 weeks of life, CMV testing should be performed to identify patients that may benefit from antiviral treatment. If SNHL is diagnosed after 3 weeks, testing can be done using dried blood spots samples, if testing capability is available. Genetic testing is oftentimes successful in identifying causes of hearing loss as a result of recent technological advances in testing and an ever-increasing number of identified genes and genetic mutations. Therefore, where available, genetic testing should be performed, ideally with next generation sequencing techniques. Ophthalmological evaluation must be done on all children with SNHL. Imaging (high-resolution computed tomography and/or magnetic resonance imaging) should be performed to assess for anatomic causes of hearing loss and to determine candidacy for cochlear implantation when indicated. Laboratory testing is indicated for certain etiologies, but should not be ordered indiscriminately since the yield overall is low.

Molecular and genetic characterization of a large Brazilian cohort presenting hearing loss

Hearing loss is one of the most common sensory defects, affecting 5.5% of the worldwide population and significantly impacting health and social life. It is mainly attributed to genetic causes, but their relative contribution reflects the geographical region's socio-economic development. Extreme genetic heterogeneity with hundreds of deafness genes involved poses challenges for molecular diagnosis. Here we report the investigation of 542 hearing-impaired subjects from all Brazilian regions to search for genetic causes. Biallelic GJB2/GJB6 causative variants were identified in 12.9% (the lowest frequency was found in the Northern region, 7.7%), 0.4% carried GJB2 dominant variants, and 0.6% had the m.1555A > G variant (one aminoglycoside-related). In addition, other genetic screenings, employed in selected probands according to clinical presentation and presumptive inheritance patterns, identified causative variants in 2.4%. Ear malformations and auditory neuropathy were diagnosed in 10.8% and 3.5% of probands, respectively. In 3.8% of prelingual/perilingual cases, Waardenburg syndrome was clinically diagnosed, and in 71.4%, these diagnoses were confirmed with pathogenic variants revealed; seven out of them were novel, including one CNV. All these genetic screening strategies revealed causative variants in 16.2% of the cases. Based on causative variants in the molecular diagnosis and genealogy analyses, a probable genetic etiology was found in ~ 50% of the cases. The present study highlights the relevance of GJB2/GJB6 as a cause of hearing loss in all Brazilian regions and the importance of screening unselected samples for estimating frequencies. Moreover, when a comprehensive screening is not available, molecular diagnosis can be enhanced by selecting probands for specific screenings.

New-born Hearing Screening Programmes in 2020: CODEPEH Recommendations

Programmes for early detection of congenital hearing loss have been successfully implemented mainly in developed countries, after overcoming some conceptual errors argued against their implementation and some criticism of their efficacy. However, some difficulties and weaknesses are still identified in these programmes: the detection of late-onset hearing loss and the percentage of children who did not pass the screening and did not complete the process of diagnosis and treatment, these being cases that are lost in the process. The purpose of this Document is to analyse these problems to determine areas for improvement and to emphasize one of the basic principles for the success of the programmes: continuous training for the interdisciplinary team. The result of the review process carried out by CODEPEH has been drafted as Recommendations for updating the Programmes with the evidence of the last decade, including advances in screening technology, the impact of the present knowledge on congenital infection by cytomegalovirus, genetic hearing loss research and control systems of lost to follow-up cases, treatment and follow up.

Pediatric Hearing Loss Guidelines and Consensus Statements-Where Do We Stand?

A large number of guidelines and position statements have been published with the aim of improving outcomes for children with hearing loss. The purpose of this article is to review the current state of clinical practice guidelines as they relate to screening, diagnosis, and management of hearing loss in children. This summary is intended for the practicing otolaryngologist.

Genetic and Non Genetic Hearing Loss and Associated Disabilities: An Epidemiological Survey in Emilia-Romagna Region

Hearing loss is one of the most common congenital sensory disorders. It can be associated with several comorbidities, in particular developmental disabilities (DD). In Emilia-Romagna (ER), a region in Northern Italy, Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS) provide the diagnostic framework and treatment for these conditions. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the prevalence of hearing loss, both isolated or in association with comorbidities, in the juvenile population. The study draws its data from the ER Childhood and Adolescent Neuropsychiatry Information System (SINPIAER), an Administrative Healthcare Database collecting the clinical data of all those who have attended CAMHS since 2010. The most frequent type of hearing loss was bilateral sensorineural hearing loss, which was present in 69–72% of the cases, while bilateral conductive hearing loss was the second most common type, ranging from 8 to 10%. Among DD, congenital malformations, mental retardation, visual impairment, and cerebral palsy were the most common. In particular, autism spectrum disorders show increasing incidence and prevalence among CAMHS users in ER region. In-depth knowledge of hearing loss epidemiology and related conditions, such as developmental disabilities, in the juvenile population is crucial for disease prevention, health planning, and resource allocation.

Diversity of developing peripheral glia revealed by single-cell RNA sequencing

The peripheral nervous system responds to a wide variety of sensory stimuli, a process that requires great neuronal diversity. These diverse neurons are closely associated with glial cells originating from the neural crest. However, the molecular nature and diversity among peripheral glia are not understood. Here, we used single-cell RNA sequencing to profile developing and mature glia from somatosensory dorsal root ganglia and auditory spiral ganglia. We found that glial precursors (GPs) in these two systems differ in their transcriptional profiles. Despite their unique features, somatosensory and auditory GPs undergo convergent differentiation to generate molecularly uniform myelinating and non-myelinating Schwann cells. By contrast, somatosensory and auditory satellite glial cells retain system-specific features. Lastly, we identified a glial signature gene set, providing new insights into commonalities among glia across the nervous system. This survey of gene expression in peripheral glia constitutes a resource for understanding functions of glia across different sensory modalities.