Mechanisms of disease: new mechanisms of antiarrhythmic actions

Cardiomyocyte electrophysiology and its modulation: current views and future prospects

Normal and abnormal cardiac rhythms are of key physiological and clinical interest. This introductory article begins from Sylvio Weidmann's key historic 1950s microelectrode measurements of cardiac electrophysiological activity and Singh & Vaughan Williams's classification of cardiotropic targets. It then proceeds to introduce the insights into cardiomyocyte function and its regulation that subsequently emerged and their therapeutic implications. We recapitulate the resulting view that surface membrane electrophysiological events underlying cardiac excitation and its initiation, conduction and recovery constitute the final common path for the cellular mechanisms that impinge upon this normal or abnormal cardiac electrophysiological activity. We then consider progress in the more recently characterized successive regulatory hierarchies involving Ca2+ homeostasis, excitation-contraction coupling and autonomic G-protein signalling and their often reciprocal interactions with the surface membrane events, and their circadian rhythms. Then follow accounts of longer-term upstream modulation processes involving altered channel expression, cardiomyocyte energetics and hypertrophic and fibrotic cardiac remodelling. Consideration of these developments introduces each of the articles in this Phil. Trans. B theme issue. The findings contained in these articles translate naturally into recent classifications of cardiac electrophysiological targets and drug actions, thereby encouraging future iterations of experimental cardiac electrophysiological discovery, and testing directed towards clinical management. This article is part of the theme issue 'The heartbeat: its molecular basis and physiological mechanisms'.

Update on antiarrhythmic drug pharmacology

Cardiac arrhythmias constitute a major public health problem. Pharmacological intervention remains mainstay to their clinical management. This, in turn, depends upon systematic drug classification schemes relating their molecular, cellular, and systems effects to clinical indications and therapeutic actions. This approach was first pioneered in the 1960s Vaughan-Williams classification. Subsequent progress in cardiac electrophysiological understanding led to a lag between the fundamental science and its clinical translation, partly addressed by The working group of the European Society of Cardiology (1991), which, however, did not emerge with formal classifications. We here utilize the recent Revised Oxford Classification Scheme to review antiarrhythmic drug pharmacology. We survey drugs and therapeutic targets offered by the more recently characterized ion channels, transporters, receptors, intracellular Ca²⁺ handling, and cell signaling molecules. These are organized into their strategic roles in cardiac electrophysiological function. Following analysis of the arrhythmic process itself, we consider (a) pharmacological agents directly targeting membrane function, particularly the Na⁺ and K⁺ ion channels underlying depolarizing and repolarizing events in the cardiac action potential. (b) We also consider agents that modify autonomic activity that, in turn, affects both the membrane and (c) the Ca²⁺ homeostatic and excitation-contraction coupling processes linking membrane excitation to contractile activation. Finally, we consider (d) drugs acting on more upstream energetic and structural remodeling processes currently the subject of clinical trials. Such systematic correlations of drug actions and arrhythmic mechanisms at different molecular to systems levels of cardiac function will facilitate current and future antiarrhythmic therapy.

Atrial Fibrillation: The Science behind Its Defiance

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most prevalent arrhythmia in the world, due both to its tenacious treatment resistance, and to the tremendous number of risk factors that set the stage for the atria to fibrillate. Cardiopulmonary, behavioral, and psychological risk factors generate electrical and structural alterations of the atria that promote reentry and wavebreak. These culminate in fibrillation once atrial ectopic beats set the arrhythmia process in motion. There is growing evidence that chronic stress can physically alter the emotion centers of the limbic system, changing their input to the hypothalamic-limbic-autonomic network that regulates autonomic outflow. This leads to imbalance of the parasympathetic and sympathetic nervous systems, most often in favor of sympathetic overactivation. Autonomic imbalance acts as a driving force behind the atrial ectopy and reentry that promote AF. Careful study of AF pathophysiology can illuminate the means that enable AF to elude both pharmacological control and surgical cure, by revealing ways in which antiarrhythmic drugs and surgical and ablation procedures may paradoxically promote fibrillation. Understanding AF pathophysiology can also help clarify the mechanisms by which emerging modalities aiming to correct autonomic imbalance, such as renal sympathetic denervation, may offer potential to better control this arrhythmia. Finally, growing evidence supports lifestyle modification approaches as adjuncts to improve AF control.

Do we need pharmacological therapy for atrial fibrillation in the ablation era?

Management of atrial fibrillation (AF) remains one of the most difficult problems of modern cardiology. Pharmacological antiarrhythmic therapy is used both for termination of episodes of AF and for prevention of AF recurrences. Recently, major trials have compared the strategy of maintenance of sinus rhythm, called rhythm control, with the strategy of heart rate control during AF and found that the rhythm control strategy was not superior to rate control in terms of mortality. Although subsequent analysis identified rhythm control as a factor of improved survival, these large trials have markedly influenced the management of AF. One of the hypotheses explaining the non-superiority of the rhythm control strategy was that the benefit of sinus rhythm was offset by the side effects of antiarrhythmic agents. As a consequence, attention was directed to non-pharmacological therapies, particularly to catheter ablation of the trigger or/and the atrial substrate using radiofrequency current or cryothermia. However, despite the reported good results of various types of interventions in the hands of highly qualified teams, catheter ablation cannot be applied to all patients with AF or to all types of AF. Furthermore, catheter ablation of AF requires sophisticated electrophysiologic laboratories equipped with expensive imaging techniques and a well-trained staff that cannot be available in sufficient number to cover the growing epidemic of AF with acceptable efficacy and safety even in rich countries. Therefore, there is still a need for pharmacological therapy aimed at the prevention of AF recurrences for the majority of AF patients. So far, attempts to provide the physician with efficient antiarrhythmic agents having a good safety profile have not been successful. However, recent research resulted in promising new approaches including prevention of AF using converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin 2 receptor blockers, new antiarrhythmic agents with multichannel effects such as dronedarone and tedisamil and atrial specific agents that theoretically should have no ventricular proarrhythmic effect as they target specific atrial channels such as I(KAch) and I(Kur) which are absent at the ventricular level. Other possible mechanisms of AF that represent potential targets, such as modification of stretch-activated ion channels, intervention of altered connexin expression and altered gap-junctional conductance, are currently investigated.

Altered Na+ channels promote pause-induced spontaneous diastolic activity in long QT syndrome type 3 myocytes

Long QT syndrome (LQTS) type 3 (LQT3), typified by the DeltaKPQ mutation (LQT3 mutation in which amino acid residues 1505 to 1507 [KPQ] are deleted), is caused by increased sodium entry during the action potential plateau resulting from mutation-altered inactivation of the Na(v)1.5 channel. Although rare, LQT3 is the most lethal of common LQTS variants. Here we tested the hypothesis that cellular electrical dysfunction, caused not only by action potential prolongation but also by mutation-altered Na(+) entry, distinguishes LQT3 from other LQTS variants and may contribute to its distinct lethality. We compared cellular electrical activity in myocytes isolated from mice heterozygous for the DeltaKPQ mutation (DeltaKPQ) and myocytes from wild-type littermates. Current-clamp pause protocols induced rate-dependent spontaneous diastolic activity (delayed after depolarizations) in 6 of 7 DeltaKPQ, but no wild-type, myocytes (n=11) tested. Voltage-clamp pause protocols that independently control depolarization duration and interpulse interval identified a distinct contribution of both depolarization duration and mutant Na(+) channel activity to the generation of Ca(i)(2+)-dependent diastolic transient inward current. This was found at rates and depolarization durations relevant both to the mouse model and to LQT3 patients. Flecainide, which preferentially inhibits mutation-altered late Na(+) current and is used to treat LQT3 patients, suppresses transient inward current formation in voltage-clamped DeltaKPQ myocytes. Our results demonstrate a marked contribution of mutation-altered Na(+) entry to the incidence of pause-dependent spontaneous diastolic activity in DeltaKPQ myocytes and suggest that altered Na(+) entry may contribute to the elevated lethality of LQT3 versus other LQTS variants.