1
|
Traboulsee A, Li DKB. Routine MR Imaging Protocol and Standardization in Central Nervous System Demyelinating Diseases. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 2024; 34:317-334. [PMID: 38942519 DOI: 10.1016/j.nic.2024.03.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/30/2024]
Abstract
Standardized MR imaging protocols are important for the diagnosis and monitoring of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) and the appropriate use of MR imaging in routine clinical practice. Advances in using MR imaging to establish an earlier diagnosis of MS, safety concerns regarding intravenous gadolinium-based contrast agents, and the value of spinal cord MR imaging for diagnostic, prognostic, and monitoring purposes suggest a changing role of MR imaging for the management and care of MS patients. The MR imaging protocol emphasizes 3 dimensional acquisitions for optimal comparison over time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony Traboulsee
- Department of Medicine (Neurology), University of British Columbia, University of British Columbia Hospital, 2211 Wesbrook Mall, Room S113, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 2B5, Canada.
| | - David K B Li
- Department of Radiology, University of British Columbia, University of British Columbia Hospital, 2211 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 2B5, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Jasperse B. Spinal Cord Imaging in Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 2024; 34:385-398. [PMID: 38942523 DOI: 10.1016/j.nic.2024.03.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/30/2024]
Abstract
Spinal cord MRI plays an important role in the diagnosis and prognosis of multiple sclerosis (MS) and related disorders. The ANATOMICAL, pathologic, imaging and prognostic consideriations for the spinal cord for MS and the most important other demyelinating disorders, neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein-associated disease, are reviewed. Finally, differential diagnostic considerations of spinal cord MRI in MS and related disorders are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bas Jasperse
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center, de Boelelaan 1118, Amsterdam 1081HZ, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Filippi M, Preziosa P, Margoni M, Rocca MA. Diagnostic Criteria for Multiple Sclerosis, Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorders, and Myelin Oligodendrocyte Glycoprotein-immunoglobulin G-associated Disease. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 2024; 34:293-316. [PMID: 38942518 DOI: 10.1016/j.nic.2024.03.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/30/2024]
Abstract
The diagnostic workup of multiple sclerosis (MS) has evolved considerably. The 2017 revision of the McDonald criteria shows high sensitivity and accuracy in predicting clinically definite MS in patients with a typical clinically isolated syndrome and allows an earlier MS diagnosis. Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein-immunoglobulin G-associated disease (MOGAD) are recognized as separate conditions from MS, with specific diagnostic criteria. New MR imaging markers may improve diagnostic specificity for these conditions, thus reducing the risk of misdiagnosis. This study summarizes the most recent updates regarding the application of MR imaging for the diagnosis of MS, NMOSD, and MOGAD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Massimo Filippi
- Neuroimaging Research Unit, Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Neurology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Neurorehabilitation Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Neurophysiology Service, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
| | - Paolo Preziosa
- Neuroimaging Research Unit, Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Neurology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Monica Margoni
- Neuroimaging Research Unit, Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Neurology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Neurorehabilitation Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Maria A Rocca
- Neuroimaging Research Unit, Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Neurology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Madsen MA, Považan M, Wiggermann V, Lundell H, Blinkenberg M, Romme Christensen J, Sellebjerg F, Siebner HR. Association of Cortical Lesions With Regional Glutamate, GABA, N-Acetylaspartate, and Myoinositol Levels in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis. Neurology 2024; 103:e209543. [PMID: 38870443 DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000209543] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/15/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Cortical lesions contribute to disability in multiple sclerosis (MS), but their impact on regional neurotransmitter levels remains to be clarified. We tested the hypothesis that cortical lesions are associated with regional glutamate and gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) concentrations within the affected cortical region. METHODS In this cross-sectional study, we used structural 7T MRI to segment cortical lesions and 7T proton MR-spectroscopy of the bilateral sensorimotor hand areas to quantify regional GABA, glutamate, N-acetylaspartate, and myoinositol concentrations in patients with MS (inclusion criteria: diagnosis of relapsing-remitting [RR] or secondary progressive MS [SPMS]; age 18-80 years) and age and sex-matched healthy controls. Data were collected at a single center between August 2018 and September 2020. Linear mixed-effects models were used to test for associations between metabolite concentrations and cortical lesion volumes within the same MR-spectroscopy voxel. RESULTS Forty-seven patients with MS (34 RRMS, 13 SPMS; 45.1 ± 12.5 years; 31 women) and 23 healthy controls (44.4 ± 13 years, 15 women) were studied. In patients, higher regional glutamate and lower regional GABA concentrations were associated with larger cortical lesion volume within the MR-spectroscopy voxel [glutamate: 0.61 (95% CI 0.19-1.03) log(mm3), p = 0.005, GABA: -0.71 (-1.24 to -0.18) log(mm3), p = 0.01]. In addition, lower N-acetylaspartate levels [-0.37 (-0.67 to -0.07) log(mm3), p = 0.016] and higher myoinositol levels [0.48 (0.03-0.93) log(mm3), p = 0.037] were associated with a larger regional cortical lesion volume. Furthermore, glutamate concentrations were reduced in patients with SPMS compared with healthy participants [-0.75 (-1.3 to -0.19) mM, p = 0.005] and patients with RRMS [-0.55 (-1.07 to -0.02) mM, p = 0.04]. N-acetylaspartate levels were lower in both patients with RRMS [-0.81 (-1.39 to -0.24) mM, p = 0.003] and SPMS [-1.31 (-2.07 to -0.54) mM, p < 0.001] when compared with healthy controls. Creatine-normalized N-acetylaspartate levels were associated with performance in the 9-hole peg test of the contralateral hand [-0.004 (-0.007 to -0.002) log(s), p = 0.002], and reduced mean creatine-normalized glutamate was associated with increased Expanded Disability Status Scale (R = -0.39, p = 0.02). DISCUSSION Cortical lesions are associated with local increases in glutamate and a reduction in GABA concentration within the lesional or perilesional tissue. Further studies are needed to investigate the causal relationship between cortical lesions and changes in neurotransmitter concentrations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mads A Madsen
- From the Danish Research Centre for Magnetic Resonance (M.A.M., M.P., V.W., H.L., H.R.S.), Copenhagen University Hospital - Amager and Hvidovre; Department of Health Technology (H.L.), Technical University of Denmark, Kgs. Lyngby; Danish Multiple Sclerosis Center (M.B., J.R.C., F.S.), Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Glostrup; Department of Neurology (H.R.S.), Copenhagen University Hospital - Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg; and Department of Clinical Medicine (F.S., H.R.S.), Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Michal Považan
- From the Danish Research Centre for Magnetic Resonance (M.A.M., M.P., V.W., H.L., H.R.S.), Copenhagen University Hospital - Amager and Hvidovre; Department of Health Technology (H.L.), Technical University of Denmark, Kgs. Lyngby; Danish Multiple Sclerosis Center (M.B., J.R.C., F.S.), Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Glostrup; Department of Neurology (H.R.S.), Copenhagen University Hospital - Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg; and Department of Clinical Medicine (F.S., H.R.S.), Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Vanessa Wiggermann
- From the Danish Research Centre for Magnetic Resonance (M.A.M., M.P., V.W., H.L., H.R.S.), Copenhagen University Hospital - Amager and Hvidovre; Department of Health Technology (H.L.), Technical University of Denmark, Kgs. Lyngby; Danish Multiple Sclerosis Center (M.B., J.R.C., F.S.), Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Glostrup; Department of Neurology (H.R.S.), Copenhagen University Hospital - Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg; and Department of Clinical Medicine (F.S., H.R.S.), Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Henrik Lundell
- From the Danish Research Centre for Magnetic Resonance (M.A.M., M.P., V.W., H.L., H.R.S.), Copenhagen University Hospital - Amager and Hvidovre; Department of Health Technology (H.L.), Technical University of Denmark, Kgs. Lyngby; Danish Multiple Sclerosis Center (M.B., J.R.C., F.S.), Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Glostrup; Department of Neurology (H.R.S.), Copenhagen University Hospital - Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg; and Department of Clinical Medicine (F.S., H.R.S.), Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Morten Blinkenberg
- From the Danish Research Centre for Magnetic Resonance (M.A.M., M.P., V.W., H.L., H.R.S.), Copenhagen University Hospital - Amager and Hvidovre; Department of Health Technology (H.L.), Technical University of Denmark, Kgs. Lyngby; Danish Multiple Sclerosis Center (M.B., J.R.C., F.S.), Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Glostrup; Department of Neurology (H.R.S.), Copenhagen University Hospital - Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg; and Department of Clinical Medicine (F.S., H.R.S.), Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Jeppe Romme Christensen
- From the Danish Research Centre for Magnetic Resonance (M.A.M., M.P., V.W., H.L., H.R.S.), Copenhagen University Hospital - Amager and Hvidovre; Department of Health Technology (H.L.), Technical University of Denmark, Kgs. Lyngby; Danish Multiple Sclerosis Center (M.B., J.R.C., F.S.), Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Glostrup; Department of Neurology (H.R.S.), Copenhagen University Hospital - Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg; and Department of Clinical Medicine (F.S., H.R.S.), Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Finn Sellebjerg
- From the Danish Research Centre for Magnetic Resonance (M.A.M., M.P., V.W., H.L., H.R.S.), Copenhagen University Hospital - Amager and Hvidovre; Department of Health Technology (H.L.), Technical University of Denmark, Kgs. Lyngby; Danish Multiple Sclerosis Center (M.B., J.R.C., F.S.), Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Glostrup; Department of Neurology (H.R.S.), Copenhagen University Hospital - Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg; and Department of Clinical Medicine (F.S., H.R.S.), Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Hartwig R Siebner
- From the Danish Research Centre for Magnetic Resonance (M.A.M., M.P., V.W., H.L., H.R.S.), Copenhagen University Hospital - Amager and Hvidovre; Department of Health Technology (H.L.), Technical University of Denmark, Kgs. Lyngby; Danish Multiple Sclerosis Center (M.B., J.R.C., F.S.), Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Glostrup; Department of Neurology (H.R.S.), Copenhagen University Hospital - Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg; and Department of Clinical Medicine (F.S., H.R.S.), Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Mercadante S. Palliative Care Aspects in Multiple Sclerosis. J Pain Symptom Manage 2024; 67:e425-e437. [PMID: 38219965 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2024.01.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2023] [Revised: 12/28/2023] [Accepted: 01/03/2024] [Indexed: 01/16/2024]
Abstract
CONTEXT Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an inflammatory, chronic, demyelinating, and neurodegenerative disorder of central nervous system, determined by an auto-immune dysfunction. Severe disability generally occurs in patients with progressive forms of MS that typically develop either after an earlier relapsing phase or less commonly from disease onset. Despite advances in research to slow the progression of MS, this condition remains a life-limiting disease with symptoms impacting negatively the lives of patients and caregivers. OBJECTIVES To analyze the difefrent aspects of palliative cae in patients with MS. METHODS To analyse selected literature assessing several palliative care aspects in patients with MS. RESULTS People with MS have complex symptoms and different needs. These demands include how to deal with the burden of physical disability, how to organise daily life, restructuring social roles in the family and at work, keeping self-sufficiency in personal care, and preserving personal identity and community roles. CONCLUSION An early palliative care approach aims to improve the palliative care skills and competencies of health professionals caring for the patients since the early stage of disease, including those who are actively undergoing disease-targeted therapies, rather than merely providing end-of-life care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastiano Mercadante
- Main Regional Center of Pain Relief and Supportive/Palliative Care (S.M.), La Maddalena Cancer Center, Regional Home care program, SAMOT, Palermo, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Mishra S, Bapuraj J, Srinivasan A. Multiple Sclerosis Part 2: Advanced Imaging and Emerging Techniques. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2024; 32:221-231. [PMID: 38555138 DOI: 10.1016/j.mric.2024.01.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/02/2024]
Abstract
Multiple advanced imaging methods for multiple sclerosis (MS) have been in investigation to identify new imaging biomarkers for early disease detection, predicting disease prognosis, and clinical trial endpoints. Multiple techniques probing different aspects of tissue microstructure (ie, advanced diffusion imaging, magnetization transfer, myelin water imaging, magnetic resonance spectroscopy, glymphatic imaging, and perfusion) support the notion that MS is a global disease with microstructural changes evident in normal-appearing white and gray matter. These global changes are likely better predictors of disability compared with lesion load alone. Emerging techniques in glymphatic and molecular imaging may improve understanding of pathophysiology and emerging treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shruti Mishra
- Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, 1500 East Medical Center Drive, UH B2A209, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-5030, USA.
| | - Jayapalli Bapuraj
- Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, 1500 East Medical Center Drive, UH B2A209, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-5030, USA
| | - Ashok Srinivasan
- Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, 1500 East Medical Center Drive, UH B2A209, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-5030, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Voon CC, Wiltgen T, Wiestler B, Schlaeger S, Mühlau M. Quantitative susceptibility mapping in multiple sclerosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Neuroimage Clin 2024; 42:103598. [PMID: 38582068 PMCID: PMC11002889 DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2024.103598] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2023] [Revised: 03/07/2024] [Accepted: 03/24/2024] [Indexed: 04/08/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) is a quantitative measure based on magnetic resonance imaging sensitive to iron and myelin content. This makes QSM a promising non-invasive tool for multiple sclerosis (MS) in research and clinical practice. OBJECTIVE We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis on the use of QSM in MS. METHODS Our review was prospectively registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022309563). We searched five databases for studies published between inception and 30th April 2023. We identified 83 English peer-reviewed studies that applied QSM images on MS cohorts. Fifty-five included studies had at least one of the following outcome measures: deep grey matter QSM values in MS, either compared to healthy controls (HC) (k = 13) or correlated with the score on the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) (k = 7), QSM lesion characteristics (k = 22) and their clinical correlates (k = 17), longitudinal correlates (k = 11), histological correlates (k = 7), or correlates with other imaging techniques (k = 12). Two meta-analyses on deep grey matter (DGM) susceptibility data were performed, while the remaining findings could only be analyzed descriptively. RESULTS After outlier removal, meta-analyses demonstrated a significant increase in the basal ganglia susceptibility (QSM values) in MS compared to HC, caudate (k = 9, standardized mean difference (SDM) = 0.54, 95 % CI = 0.39-0.70, I2 = 46 %), putamen (k = 9, SDM = 0.38, 95 % CI = 0.19-0.57, I2 = 59 %), and globus pallidus (k = 9, SDM = 0.48, 95 % CI = 0.28-0.67, I2 = 60 %), whereas thalamic QSM values exhibited a significant reduction (k = 12, SDM = -0.39, 95 % CI = -0.66--0.12, I2 = 84 %); these susceptibility differences in MS were independent of age. Further, putamen QSM values positively correlated with EDSS (k = 4, r = 0.36, 95 % CI = 0.16-0.53, I2 = 0 %). Regarding rim lesions, four out of seven studies, representing 73 % of all patients, reported rim lesions to be associated with more severe disability. Moreover, lesion development from initial detection to the inactive stage is paralleled by increasing, plateauing (after about two years), and gradually decreasing QSM values, respectively. Only one longitudinal study provided clinical outcome measures and found no association. Histological data suggest iron content to be the primary source of QSM values in DGM and at the edges of rim lesions; further, when also considering data from myelin water imaging, the decrease of myelin is likely to drive the increase of QSM values within WM lesions. CONCLUSIONS We could provide meta-analytic evidence for DGM susceptibility changes in MS compared to HC; basal ganglia susceptibility is increased and, in the putamen, associated with disability, while thalamic susceptibility is decreased. Beyond these findings, further investigations are necessary to establish the role of QSM in MS for research or even clinical routine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cui Ci Voon
- Dept. of Neurology, School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany; TUM-Neuroimaging Center, School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Tun Wiltgen
- Dept. of Neurology, School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany; TUM-Neuroimaging Center, School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Benedikt Wiestler
- Dept. of Neuroradiology, School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Sarah Schlaeger
- Dept. of Neuroradiology, School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Mark Mühlau
- Dept. of Neurology, School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany; TUM-Neuroimaging Center, School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Hoffmann O, Gold R, Meuth SG, Linker RA, Skripuletz T, Wiendl H, Wattjes MP. Prognostic relevance of MRI in early relapsing multiple sclerosis: ready to guide treatment decision making? Ther Adv Neurol Disord 2024; 17:17562864241229325. [PMID: 38332854 PMCID: PMC10851744 DOI: 10.1177/17562864241229325] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2023] [Accepted: 01/12/2024] [Indexed: 02/10/2024] Open
Abstract
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain and spinal cord plays a crucial role in the diagnosis and monitoring of multiple sclerosis (MS). There is conclusive evidence that brain and spinal cord MRI findings in early disease stages also provide relevant insight into individual prognosis. This includes prediction of disease activity and disease progression, the accumulation of long-term disability and the conversion to secondary progressive MS. The extent to which these MRI findings should influence treatment decisions remains a subject of ongoing discussion. The aim of this review is to present and discuss the current knowledge and scientific evidence regarding the utility of MRI at early MS disease stages for prognostic classification of individual patients. In addition, we discuss the current evidence regarding the use of MRI in order to predict treatment response. Finally, we propose a potential approach as to how MRI data may be categorized and integrated into early clinical decision making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olaf Hoffmann
- Department of Neurology, Alexianer St. Josefs-Krankenhaus Potsdam, Allee nach Sanssouci 7, 14471 Potsdam, Germany; Medizinische Hochschule Brandenburg Theodor Fontane, Neuruppin, Germany
| | - Ralf Gold
- Department of Neurology, St. Josef-Hospital, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Sven G. Meuth
- Department of Neurology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Ralf A. Linker
- Department of Neurology, Regensburg University Hospital, Regensburg, Germany
| | | | - Heinz Wiendl
- Department of Neurology with Institute of Translational Neurology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Mike P. Wattjes
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kelly BS, Mathur P, McGuinness G, Dillon H, Lee EH, Yeom KW, Lawlor A, Killeen RP. A Radiomic "Warning Sign" of Progression on Brain MRI in Individuals with MS. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2024; 45:236-243. [PMID: 38216299 DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.a8104] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2023] [Accepted: 11/08/2023] [Indexed: 01/14/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE MS is a chronic progressive, idiopathic, demyelinating disorder whose diagnosis is contingent on the interpretation of MR imaging. New MR imaging lesions are an early biomarker of disease progression. We aimed to evaluate a machine learning model based on radiomics features in predicting progression on MR imaging of the brain in individuals with MS. MATERIALS AND METHODS This retrospective cohort study with external validation on open-access data obtained full ethics approval. Longitudinal MR imaging data for patients with MS were collected and processed for machine learning. Radiomics features were extracted at the future location of a new lesion in the patients' prior MR imaging ("prelesion"). Additionally, "control" samples were obtained from the normal-appearing white matter for each participant. Machine learning models for binary classification were trained and tested and then evaluated the external data of the model. RESULTS The total number of participants was 167. Of the 147 in the training/test set, 102 were women and 45 were men. The average age was 42 (range, 21-74 years). The best-performing radiomics-based model was XGBoost, with accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score of 0.91, 0.91, 0.91, and 0.91 on the test set, and 0.74, 0.74, 0.74, and 0.70 on the external validation set. The 5 most important radiomics features to the XGBoost model were associated with the overall heterogeneity and low gray-level emphasis of the segmented regions. Probability maps were produced to illustrate potential future clinical applications. CONCLUSIONS Our machine learning model based on radiomics features successfully differentiated prelesions from normal-appearing white matter. This outcome suggests that radiomics features from normal-appearing white matter could serve as an imaging biomarker for progression of MS on MR imaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brendan S Kelly
- From the Department of Radiology (B.S.K., G.M., H.D., R.P.K.), St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
- Insight Centre for Data Analytics (B.S.K., P.M., A.L.), University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
- Wellcome Trust and Health Research Board (B.S.K.), Irish Clinical Academic Training, Dublin, Ireland
- School of Medicine (B.S.K.), University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Prateek Mathur
- Insight Centre for Data Analytics (B.S.K., P.M., A.L.), University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Gerard McGuinness
- From the Department of Radiology (B.S.K., G.M., H.D., R.P.K.), St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Henry Dillon
- From the Department of Radiology (B.S.K., G.M., H.D., R.P.K.), St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Edward H Lee
- Lucille Packard Children's Hospital at Stanford (E.H.L., K.W.Y.), Stanford, California
| | - Kristen W Yeom
- Lucille Packard Children's Hospital at Stanford (E.H.L., K.W.Y.), Stanford, California
| | - Aonghus Lawlor
- Insight Centre for Data Analytics (B.S.K., P.M., A.L.), University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Ronan P Killeen
- From the Department of Radiology (B.S.K., G.M., H.D., R.P.K.), St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Chertcoff A, Schneider R, Azevedo CJ, Sicotte N, Oh J. Recent Advances in Diagnostic, Prognostic, and Disease-Monitoring Biomarkers in Multiple Sclerosis. Neurol Clin 2024; 42:15-38. [PMID: 37980112 DOI: 10.1016/j.ncl.2023.06.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2023]
Abstract
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a highly heterogeneous disease. Currently, a combination of clinical features, MRI, and cerebrospinal fluid markers are used in clinical practice for diagnosis and treatment decisions. In recent years, there has been considerable effort to develop novel biomarkers that better reflect the pathologic substrates of the disease to aid in diagnosis and early prognosis, evaluation of ongoing inflammatory activity, detection and monitoring of disease progression, prediction of treatment response, and monitoring of disease-modifying treatment safety. In this review, the authors provide an overview of promising recent developments in diagnostic, prognostic, and disease-monitoring/treatment-response biomarkers in MS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anibal Chertcoff
- Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, 30 Bond Street, PGT 17-742, Toronto, Ontario M5B 1W8, Canada
| | - Raphael Schneider
- Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, 30 Bond Street, PGT 17-742, Toronto, Ontario M5B 1W8, Canada
| | - Christina J Azevedo
- Department of Neurology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, HCT 1520 San Pablo Street, Health Sciences Campus, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA
| | - Nancy Sicotte
- Department of Neurology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 127 S San Vicente Boulevard, 6th floor, Suite A6600, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA
| | - Jiwon Oh
- Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, 30 Bond Street, PGT 17-742, Toronto, Ontario M5B 1W8, Canada; Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kreiter D, Spee R, Merry A, Hupperts R, Gerlach O. Effect of disease-modifying treatment on spinal cord lesion formation in multiple sclerosis: A retrospective observational study. Mult Scler Relat Disord 2023; 79:104994. [PMID: 37683557 DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2023.104994] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2023] [Revised: 07/12/2023] [Accepted: 09/03/2023] [Indexed: 09/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Spinal cord lesions in multiple sclerosis (MS) are an important contributor to disability. Knowledge on the effect of disease-modifying treatment (DMT) on spinal lesion formation in MS is sparse, as cord outcome measures are seldom included in MS treatment trials. We aim to investigate whether intermediate- or high-efficacy DMTs (i/hDMT) can reduce spinal lesion formation, compared with low-efficacy DMTs (lDMT) and/or no treatment. METHODS Relapse-onset MS patients with ≥2 spinal MRIs (interval >3 months and <10 years) were retrospectively identified. The i/hDMT-group was defined as patients who were treated with i/hDMTs during ≥90% of spinal MRI follow-up time. Controls received lDMTs and/or no treatment ≥90% of follow-up duration. In a secondary analysis, only patients using lDMT for ≥90% of follow-up were considered controls. Patients were matched using propensity-scores. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the risk of new spinal lesions. RESULTS 323 patients had ≥2 spinal cord MRIs. 49 satisfied i/hDMT and 168 control group criteria. 34 i/hDMT patients were matched to 83 controls. Patients in the i/hDMT-group were significantly less likely to develop new cord lesions at follow-up (HR 0.29 [0.12-0.75], p = 0.01). When the i/hDMT-group was matched to only controls using lDMT ≥90% of follow-up time (n = 17 and n = 25, respectively), there was no statistically significant difference (HR 1.01 [0.19-5.24], p = 0.99). CONCLUSION Treatment with intermediate- or high-efficacy DMTs reduces the risk of new spinal cord lesions compared with matched patients receiving no treatment and/or lDMTs. No conclusions could be drawn on whether i/hDMTs provide a larger risk reduction compared to only lDMTs (control group receiving lDMTs ≥90% of follow-up time).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Kreiter
- Department of Neurology, Academic MS center Zuyd, Zuyderland MC, Sittard-Geleen, The Netherlands; Department of Neurology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - Romy Spee
- Faculty of Health, Medicine & Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Audrey Merry
- Zuyderland Academy, Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard-Geleen & Heerlen, The Netherlands
| | - Raymond Hupperts
- Department of Neurology, Academic MS center Zuyd, Zuyderland MC, Sittard-Geleen, The Netherlands; Department of Neurology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Oliver Gerlach
- Department of Neurology, Academic MS center Zuyd, Zuyderland MC, Sittard-Geleen, The Netherlands; Department of Neurology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Hodel J, Vernooij MW, Beyer MK, Severino M, Leclerc X, Créange A, Wahab A, Badat N, Tolédano S, van den Hauwe L, Ramos A, Castellano A, Krainik A, Yousry T, Rovira À. Multiple sclerosis imaging in clinical practice: a European-wide survey of 428 centers and conclusions by the ESNR Working Group. Eur Radiol 2023; 33:7025-7033. [PMID: 37199796 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-023-09701-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2022] [Revised: 01/23/2023] [Accepted: 03/09/2023] [Indexed: 05/19/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate compliance with the available recommendations, we assessed the current clinical practice of imaging in the evaluation of multiple sclerosis (MS). METHODS An online questionnaire was emailed to all members and affiliates. Information was gathered on applied MR imaging protocols, gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCA) use and image analysis. We compared the survey results with the Magnetic Resonance Imaging in MS (MAGNIMS) recommendations considered as the reference standard. RESULTS A total of 428 entries were received from 44 countries. Of these, 82% of responders were neuroradiologists. 55% performed more than ten scans per week for MS imaging. The systematic use of 3 T is rare (18%). Over 90% follow specific protocol recommendations with 3D FLAIR, T2-weighted and DWI being the most frequently used sequences. Over 50% use SWI at initial diagnosis and 3D gradient-echo T1-weighted imaging is the most used MRI sequence for pre- and post-contrast imaging. Mismatches with recommendations were identified including the use of only one sagittal T2-weighted sequence for spinal cord imaging, the systematic use of GBCA at follow-up (over 30% of institutions), a delay time shorter than 5 min after GBCA administration (25%) and an inadequate follow-up duration in pediatric acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (80%). There is scarce use of automated software to compare images or to assess atrophy (13% and 7%). The proportions do not differ significantly between academic and non-academic institutions. CONCLUSIONS While current practice in MS imaging is rather homogeneous across Europe, our survey suggests that recommendations are only partially followed. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT Hurdles were identified, mainly in the areas of GBCA use, spinal cord imaging, underuse of specific MRI sequences and monitoring strategies. This work will help radiologists to identify the mismatches between their own practices and the recommendations and act upon them. KEY POINTS • While current practice in MS imaging is rather homogeneous across Europe, our survey suggests that available recommendations are only partially followed. • Several hurdles have been identified through the survey that mainly lies in the areas of GBCA use, spinal cord imaging, underuse of specific MRI sequences and monitoring strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jérôme Hodel
- Department of Radiology, Groupe Hospitalier Paris-Saint Joseph, Paris, France.
| | - Meike W Vernooij
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mona K Beyer
- Division of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Xavier Leclerc
- Department of Neuroradiology, Lille University Hospital, Lille, France
| | - Alain Créange
- Department of Neurology, AP-HP, Henri Mondor University Hospital, Université Paris Est Créteil, 4391, Creteil, EA, France
| | - Abir Wahab
- Department of Neurology, AP-HP, Henri Mondor University Hospital, Université Paris Est Créteil, 4391, Creteil, EA, France
| | - Neesmah Badat
- Department of Radiology, Groupe Hospitalier Paris-Saint Joseph, Paris, France
| | - Sarah Tolédano
- Department of Radiology, Groupe Hospitalier Paris-Saint Joseph, Paris, France
| | - Luc van den Hauwe
- Department of Radiology, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Ana Ramos
- Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, University Hospital, 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - Antonella Castellano
- Neuroradiology Unit and CERMAC, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele and Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Alexandre Krainik
- Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital of Grenoble, Grenoble, France
| | - Tarek Yousry
- Lysholm Department of Neuroradiology, UCLH National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK
- Neuroradiological Academic Unit, University College London Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Àlex Rovira
- Section of Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Zhang LJ, Tian DC, Yang L, Shi K, Liu Y, Wang Y, Shi FD. White matter disease derived from vascular and demyelinating origins. Stroke Vasc Neurol 2023:svn-2023-002791. [PMID: 37699727 DOI: 10.1136/svn-2023-002791] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2023] [Accepted: 08/21/2023] [Indexed: 09/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Damage or microstructural alterations of the white matter can cause dysfunction of the intrinsic neural networks in a condition termed as white matter disease (WMD). Frequently detected on brain computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging scans, WMD is commonly presented in inflammatory demyelinating diseases like multiple sclerosis (MS) and vascular diseases such as cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD). Prevention of MS and CSVD progression requires early treatments with drastically different medications and approaches, as such, early and accurate diagnosis of WMD, derived from vascular or demyelinating etiologies, is of paramount importance. However, the clinical and imaging similarities between MS, especially during the early stage, and CSVD, pose a significant dilemma in differentiating these two conditions. In this review, we attempt to summarize and contrast the distinguishing features of MS and CSVD for aiding accurate diagnosis to ensure timely corresponding management in the early stages of MS and CSVD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lin-Jie Zhang
- Department of Neurology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, Tianjin, China
| | - De-Cai Tian
- National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases of China, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, Beijing, China
| | - Li Yang
- Department of Neurology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, Tianjin, China
| | - Kaibin Shi
- National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases of China, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, Beijing, China
| | - Yaou Liu
- National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases of China, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, Beijing, China
| | - Yilong Wang
- National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases of China, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, Beijing, China
| | - Fu-Dong Shi
- Department of Neurology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, Tianjin, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases of China, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Pogoda-Wesołowska A, Dziedzic A, Maciak K, Stȩpień A, Dziaduch M, Saluk J. Neurodegeneration and its potential markers in the diagnosing of secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. A review. Front Mol Neurosci 2023; 16:1210091. [PMID: 37781097 PMCID: PMC10535108 DOI: 10.3389/fnmol.2023.1210091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2023] [Accepted: 08/25/2023] [Indexed: 10/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Approximately 70% of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) patients will develop secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS) within 10-15 years. This progression is characterized by a gradual decline in neurological functionality and increasing limitations of daily activities. Growing evidence suggests that both inflammation and neurodegeneration are associated with various pathological processes throughout the development of MS; therefore, to delay disease progression, it is critical to initiate disease-modifying therapy as soon as it is diagnosed. Currently, a diagnosis of SPMS requires a retrospective assessment of physical disability exacerbation, usually over the previous 6-12 months, which results in a delay of up to 3 years. Hence, there is a need to identify reliable and objective biomarkers for predicting and defining SPMS conversion. This review presents current knowledge of such biomarkers in the context of neurodegeneration associated with MS, and SPMS conversion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Angela Dziedzic
- Department of General Biochemistry, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
| | - Karina Maciak
- Department of General Biochemistry, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
| | - Adam Stȩpień
- Clinic of Neurology, Military Institute of Medicine–National Research Institute, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Marta Dziaduch
- Medical Radiology Department of Military Institute of Medicine – National Research Institute, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Joanna Saluk
- Department of General Biochemistry, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Llufriu S, Agüera E, Costa-Frossard L, Galán V, Landete L, Lourido D, Meca-Lallana JE, Moral E, Bravo-Rodríguez F, Koren L, Labiano A, León A, Martín P, Monedero MD, Requeni L, Zubizarreta I, Rovira À. Recommendations for the coordination of Neurology and Neuroradiology Departments in the management of patients with multiple sclerosis. Neurologia 2023; 38:453-462. [PMID: 37120107 DOI: 10.1016/j.nrleng.2021.01.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2020] [Accepted: 01/01/2021] [Indexed: 05/01/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is widely used for the diagnosis and follow-up of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). Coordination between neurology and neuroradiology departments is crucial for performing and interpreting radiological studies as efficiently and as accurately as possible. However, improvements can be made in the communication between these departments in many Spanish hospitals. METHODS A panel of 17 neurologists and neuroradiologists from 8 Spanish hospitals held in-person and online meetings to draft a series of good practice guidelines for the coordinated management of MS. The drafting process included 4 phases: 1) establishing the scope of the guidelines and the methodology of the study; 2) literature review on good practices or recommendations on the use of MRI in MS; 3) discussion and consensus between experts; and 4) validation of the contents. RESULTS The expert panel agreed a total of 9 recommendations for improving coordination between neurology and neuroradiology departments. The recommendations revolve around 4 main pillars: 1) standardising the process for requesting and scheduling MRI studies and reports; 2) designing common protocols for MRI studies; 3) establishing multidisciplinary committees and coordination meetings; and 4) creating formal communication channels between both departments. CONCLUSIONS These consensus recommendations are intended to optimise coordination between neurologists and neuroradiologists, with the ultimate goal of improving the diagnosis and follow-up of patients with MS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Llufriu
- Servicio de Neurología, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain.
| | - E Agüera
- Servicio de Neurología, Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía, Instituto Maimónides de Investigación Biomédica de Córdoba (IMIBIC), Córdoba, Spain
| | - L Costa-Frossard
- Servicio de Neurología, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain
| | - V Galán
- Servicio de Neurología, Hospital Virgen de la Salud, Toledo, Spain
| | - L Landete
- Servicio de Neurología, Hospital Universitario Dr. Peset, Valencia, Spain
| | - D Lourido
- Sección de Neurorradiología, Servicio de Radiología, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain
| | - J E Meca-Lallana
- CSUR Esclerosis Múltiple y Unidad de Neuroinmunología Clínica, Servicio de Neurología, Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, IMIB-Arrixaca, Murcia, Spain
| | - E Moral
- Servicio de Neurología, Hospital Moisès Broggi, Sant Joan Despí, Barcelona, Spain
| | - F Bravo-Rodríguez
- Sección de Neurorradiología, Servicio de Radiología, Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía, Córdoba, Spain
| | - L Koren
- Sección de Neurorradiología, Servicio de Radiología, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - A Labiano
- Servicio de Neurología, Hospital Virgen de la Salud, Toledo, Spain
| | - A León
- Sección de Neurorradiología, Servicio de Radiología, Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, Murcia, Spain
| | - P Martín
- Sección de Neurorradiología, Servicio de Radiología, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - M D Monedero
- Sección de Neurorradiología, Servicio de Radiodiagnóstico, Hospital Universitario Dr. Peset, Valencia, Spain
| | - L Requeni
- Sección de Neurorradiología, Servicio de Radiodiagnóstico, Hospital Universitario Dr. Peset, Valencia, Spain
| | - I Zubizarreta
- Servicio de Neurología, Hospital Moisès Broggi, Sant Joan Despí, Barcelona, Spain
| | - À Rovira
- Sección de Neurorradiología, Servicio de Radiología, Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Agrawal A, Srivastava MVP, Bhatia R, Goyal V, Singh MB, Vishnu VY, Prabhakar A. A Real-World Experience of Azathioprine Versus First-Line Disease-Modifying Therapy in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis-A Prospective Cohort Study. Brain Sci 2023; 13:1249. [PMID: 37759850 PMCID: PMC10526455 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci13091249] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2023] [Revised: 08/18/2023] [Accepted: 08/19/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Azathioprine (AZA) has demonstrated efficacy in multiple randomized control trials (RCTs) for Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS). However, we still need comparative real-world data with other first-line disease-modifying therapies (DMTs). We aimed to assess AZA's effectiveness regarding relapses, disability progression, time to the first relapse, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) activity, and safety compared with other approved first-line DMTs in an Indian population in a real-world setting. We conducted a single-center prospective study of treatment-naive RRMS patients between 2017 and 2019. We evaluated the effects of AZA and other approved DMTs on clinical and radiological measures. Among 192 eligible patients (F:M ratio 2.84:1), 68 patients (35.4%) were on AZA, 68 patients (35.4%) were on dimethyl fumarate (DMF), 32 patients (16.7%) on interferon (IFN beta-1a), and 16 patients (8.3%) on teriflunomide (TFL). Four treatment groups were comparable: AZA v/s DMF v/s TFL v/s IFN beta-1a. In primary outcomes, there was no significant difference between the groups in terms of change in the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score at three months (p-value = 0.169), six months (p-value = 0.303), 12 months (p-value = 0.082), and 24 months (p-value = 0.639), the number of relapses (p-value = 0.229), and time to the first relapse (p-value > 0.05 in all groups). In the secondary outcome, there was no significant difference between the treatment groups on serial MRI parameters used according to "Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Multiple Sclerosis" (MAGNIMS) 2016 criteria (p-value > 0.05). In safety outcomes, leukopenia was significantly more common in the AZA group (p-value = 0.025), flu-like symptoms (p-value = 0.0001), and injection site reactions (p-value = 0.035) were significantly more common in the IFN beta-1a group. Our study suggests AZA is as effective as other approved DMTs and a good alternative as a first-line treatment for multiple sclerosis's clinical and radiological activity in real-world settings on short follow-up. Based on these results, more randomized controlled trials of AZA v/s DMF or other DMTs are needed for more robust outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arpit Agrawal
- Department of Neurology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi 110029, India; (A.A.); (R.B.); (V.G.); (M.B.S.); (V.Y.V.)
| | - M. V. Padma Srivastava
- Department of Neurology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi 110029, India; (A.A.); (R.B.); (V.G.); (M.B.S.); (V.Y.V.)
| | - Rohit Bhatia
- Department of Neurology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi 110029, India; (A.A.); (R.B.); (V.G.); (M.B.S.); (V.Y.V.)
| | - Vinay Goyal
- Department of Neurology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi 110029, India; (A.A.); (R.B.); (V.G.); (M.B.S.); (V.Y.V.)
| | - Mamta Bhushan Singh
- Department of Neurology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi 110029, India; (A.A.); (R.B.); (V.G.); (M.B.S.); (V.Y.V.)
| | - Venugopalan Y. Vishnu
- Department of Neurology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi 110029, India; (A.A.); (R.B.); (V.G.); (M.B.S.); (V.Y.V.)
| | - Anuj Prabhakar
- Department of Neuroradiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi 110029, India;
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
He AH, Manouchehrinia A, Glaser A, Ciccarelli O, Butzkueven H, Hillert J, McKay KA. Association between clinic-level quality of care and patient-level outcomes in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 2023; 29:1126-1135. [PMID: 37392018 PMCID: PMC10413789 DOI: 10.1177/13524585231181578] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2023] [Revised: 04/27/2023] [Accepted: 05/21/2023] [Indexed: 07/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Multiple sclerosis (MS) quality of care guidelines are consensus-based. The effectiveness of the recommendations is unknown. OBJECTIVE To determine whether clinic-level quality of care affects clinical and patient-reported outcomes. METHODS This nationwide observational cohort study included patients with adult-onset MS in the Swedish MS registry with disease onset 2005-2015. Clinic-level quality of care was measured by four indicators: visit density, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) density, mean time to commencement of disease-modifying therapy, and data completeness. Outcomes were Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) and patient-reported symptoms measured by the Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29). Analyses were adjusted for individual patient characteristics and disease-modifying therapy exposure. RESULTS In relapsing MS, all quality indicators benefitted EDSS and physical symptoms. Faster treatment, frequent visits, and higher data completeness benefitted psychological symptoms. After controlling for all indicators and individual treatment exposures, faster treatment remained independently associated with lower EDSS (-0.06, 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.01, -0.10) and more frequent visits were associated with milder physical symptoms (MSIS-29 physical score: -16.2%, 95% CI: -1.8%, -29.5%). Clinic-level quality of care did not affect any outcomes in progressive-onset disease. CONCLUSION Certain quality of care indicators correlated to disability and patient-reported outcomes in relapse-onset but not progressive-onset disease. Future guidelines should consider recommendations specific to disease course.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna H He
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden/Centre for Molecular Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ali Manouchehrinia
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden/Centre for Molecular Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Anna Glaser
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Olga Ciccarelli
- Queen Square MS Centre, Department of Neuroinflammation, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, UK
| | - Helmut Butzkueven
- Department of Neuroscience, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Jan Hillert
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Kyla Anne McKay
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden/Centre for Molecular Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Tatekawa H, Miki Y. [MR findings of the inflammatory demyelinating diseases of the central nervous system]. Rinsho Shinkeigaku 2023; 63:425-432. [PMID: 37394489 DOI: 10.5692/clinicalneurol.cn-001855] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/04/2023]
Abstract
When demyelinating disease of the central nervous system is suspected, MR examination has mainly three roles: diagnosis, imaging biomarkers, and early detection of adverse effects from therapeutic agents. Because the location, size, shape, distribution, signal intensity, and contrast pattern of the brain lesions on MRI vary depending on the demyelinating diseases, careful attentions are required to assess the differential diagnosis and activity. It is necessary to be familiar with not only typical imaging findings but also atypical findings of demyelinating disease since minor neurological findings and nonspecific brain lesions may lead to misdiagnosis of demyelinating disease. This article reviewed the characteristics of MRI findings and showed recent topics of the demyelinating diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiroyuki Tatekawa
- Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka Metropolitan University
| | - Yukio Miki
- Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka Metropolitan University
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Lv J, Roy S, Xie M, Yang X, Guo B. Contrast Agents of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Future Perspective. NANOMATERIALS (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2023; 13:2003. [PMID: 37446520 DOI: 10.3390/nano13132003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2023] [Revised: 07/01/2023] [Accepted: 07/03/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023]
Abstract
In recent times, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has emerged as a highly promising modality for diagnosing severe diseases. Its exceptional spatiotemporal resolution and ease of use have established it as an indispensable clinical diagnostic tool. Nevertheless, there are instances where MRI encounters challenges related to low contrast, necessitating the use of contrast agents (CAs). Significant efforts have been made by scientists to enhance the precision of observing diseased body parts by leveraging the synergistic potential of MRI in conjunction with other imaging techniques and thereby modifying the CAs. In this work, our focus is on elucidating the rational designing approach of CAs and optimizing their compatibility for multimodal imaging and other intelligent applications. Additionally, we emphasize the importance of incorporating various artificial intelligence tools, such as machine learning and deep learning, to explore the future prospects of disease diagnosis using MRI. We also address the limitations associated with these techniques and propose reasonable remedies, with the aim of advancing MRI as a cutting-edge diagnostic tool for the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jie Lv
- School of Computer Science and Engineering, Yulin Normal University, Yulin 537000, China
| | - Shubham Roy
- Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Flexible Printed Electronics Technology, School of Science, Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzhen 518055, China
- Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Advanced Functional Carbon Materials Research and Comprehensive Application, School of Science, Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzhen 518055, China
| | - Miao Xie
- School of Computer Science and Engineering, Yulin Normal University, Yulin 537000, China
| | - Xiulan Yang
- School of Computer Science and Engineering, Yulin Normal University, Yulin 537000, China
| | - Bing Guo
- Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Flexible Printed Electronics Technology, School of Science, Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzhen 518055, China
- Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Advanced Functional Carbon Materials Research and Comprehensive Application, School of Science, Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzhen 518055, China
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Ismail MA, Elsayed NM. Diffusion-Weighted Images and Contrast-Enhanced MRI in the Diagnosis of Different Stages of Multiple Sclerosis of the Central Nervous System. Cureus 2023; 15:e41650. [PMID: 37575819 PMCID: PMC10420334 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.41650] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/09/2023] [Indexed: 08/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Multiple sclerosis (MS) is one of the most prevalent disorders of the central nervous system (CNS), and it can be observed in the field of radiological cross-sectional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The prevalence of MS in Saudi Arabia has increased as compared to the past few years. MRI is the gold standard non-invasive modality of choice in MS diagnosis according to the National Multiple Sclerosis Society (NMSS), New York City. This study aimed to highlight the significance of using diffusion-weighted images (DWIs) and the use of contrast media in the MS protocol, as well as the importance of identifying the suitable time of imaging after contrast enhancement to detect active lesions. Methods A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted of 100 MS patients with an age range of 17 to 56 years. The data set included 41 active cases and 59 inactive cases. All patients had an MRI standard protocol of both the brain and spine in addition to DWI sequence and contrast agent (CA) injection, with images taken in early and delayed time. Results Of the patients, 71% were female and 29% were male. Active MS disease was more significant at younger ages than at older ages. Active lesions were significantly enhanced in delayed contrast images and showed high signal intensity in both the DWI and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) map, while inactive lesions showed no enhancement after contrast injection and showed an iso-signal intensity in both the DWI and ADC map. Conclusion The use of CA has developed over the years in the diagnosis of MS patients. In this study, the relationship between active lesions, DWI, and delayed contrast enhancement is very strong. In future research, we recommend adding a DWI sequence for the suspected active MS spine lesions in addition to delayed enhancement time in active MS after contrast injection to increase MRI sensitivity toward active MS lesions of the brain and spinal cord as well.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mashael A Ismail
- Radiologic Sciences, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, King Abdullah Medical Complex, Ministry of Health, Jeddah, SAU
| | - Naglaa M Elsayed
- Radiologic Sciences, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, SAU
- Diagnostic Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, EGY
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Jakimovski D, Qureshi F, Ramanathan M, Gehman V, Keshavan A, Leyden K, Dwyer MG, Bergsland N, Weinstock-Guttman B, Zivadinov R. Proteomics and relationship with axonal pathology in multiple sclerosis: 5-year diffusion tensor imaging study. Brain Commun 2023; 5:fcad183. [PMID: 37361716 PMCID: PMC10288551 DOI: 10.1093/braincomms/fcad183] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2022] [Revised: 05/08/2023] [Accepted: 06/08/2023] [Indexed: 06/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Blood-based biomarkers can be economic and easily accessible tools for monitoring and predicting disease activity in multiple sclerosis. The objective of this study was to determine the predictive value of a multivariate proteomic assay for concurrent and future microstructural/axonal brain pathology in a longitudinal study of a heterogeneous group of people with multiple sclerosis. A proteomic analysis was obtained on serum samples from 202 people with multiple sclerosis (148 relapsing-remitting and 54 progressive) at baseline and 5-year follow-up. The concentration of 21 proteins related to multiple pathways of multiple sclerosis pathophysiology was derived using Proximity Extension Assay on the Olink platform. Patients were imaged on the same 3T MRI scanner at both timepoints. Тhe rate of whole brain, white matter and grey matter atrophy over the 5-year follow-up was determined using the multi-timepoint Structural Image Evaluation, using Normalisation, of Atrophy algorithms. Lesion burden measures were also assessed. The severity of microstructural axonal brain pathology was quantified using diffusion tensor imaging. Fractional anisotropy and mean diffusivity of normal-appearing brain tissue, normal-appearing white matter, grey matter, T2 and T1 lesions were calculated. Age, sex and body mass index-adjusted step-wise regression models were used. Glial fibrillary acidic protein was the most common and highest-ranked proteomic biomarker associated with greater concurrent microstructural central nervous system alterations (P < 0.001). The rate of whole brain atrophy was associated with baseline levels of glial fibrillary acidic protein, protogenin precursor, neurofilament light chain and myelin oligodendrocyte (P < 0.009), whereas grey matter atrophy was associated with higher baseline neurofilament light chain, higher osteopontin and lower protogenin precursor levels (P < 0.016). Higher baseline glial fibrillary acidic protein level was a significant predictor of future severity of the microstructural CNS alterations as measured by normal-appearing brain tissue fractional anisotropy and mean diffusivity (standardized β = -0.397/0.327, P < 0.001), normal-appearing white matter fractional anisotropy (standardized β = -0.466, P < 0.0012), grey matter mean diffusivity (standardized β = 0.346, P < 0.011) and T2 lesion mean diffusivity (standardized β = 0.416, P < 0.001) at the 5-year follow-up. Serum levels of myelin-oligodendrocyte glycoprotein, neurofilament light chain, contactin-2 and osteopontin proteins were additionally and independently associated with worse concomitant and future axonal pathology. Higher glial fibrillary acidic protein levels were associated with future disability progression (Exp(B) = 8.65, P = 0.004). Multiple proteomic biomarkers are independently associated with greater severity of axonal brain pathology as measured by diffusion tensor imaging in multiple sclerosis. Baseline serum glial fibrillary acidic protein levels can predict future disability progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dejan Jakimovski
- Buffalo Neuroimaging Analysis Center, Department of Neurology, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY 14203, USA
| | | | - Murali Ramanathan
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY 14214, USA
| | | | | | | | - Michael G Dwyer
- Buffalo Neuroimaging Analysis Center, Department of Neurology, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY 14203, USA
| | - Niels Bergsland
- Buffalo Neuroimaging Analysis Center, Department of Neurology, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY 14203, USA
- IRCCS, Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Milan 20113, Italy
| | - Bianca Weinstock-Guttman
- Jacobs Comprehensive MS Treatment and Research Center, Department of Neurology, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY 14203, USA
| | - Robert Zivadinov
- Correspondence to: Robert Zivadinov, MD, PhD Department of Neurology, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences Buffalo Neuroimaging Analysis Center, Center for Biomedical Imaging at Clinical Translational Science Institute University at Buffalo, 100 High St., Buffalo, NY 14203, USA E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Martin A, Emorine T, Megdiche I, Créange A, Kober T, Massire A, Bapst B. Accurate Diagnosis of Cortical and Infratentorial Lesions in Multiple Sclerosis Using Accelerated Fluid and White Matter Suppression Imaging. Invest Radiol 2023; 58:337-345. [PMID: 36730698 DOI: 10.1097/rli.0000000000000939] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The precise location of multiple sclerosis (MS) cortical lesions can be very challenging at 3 T, yet distinguishing them from subcortical lesions is essential for the diagnosis and prognosis of the disease. Compressed sensing-accelerated fluid and white matter suppression imaging (CS-FLAWS) is a new magnetic resonance imaging sequence derived from magnetization-prepared 2 rapid acquisition gradient echo with promising features for the detection and classification of MS lesions. The objective of this study was to compare the diagnostic performances of CS-FLAWS (evaluated imaging) and phase sensitive inversion recovery (PSIR; reference imaging) for classification of cortical lesions (primary objective) and infratentorial lesions (secondary objective) in MS, in combination with 3-dimensional (3D) double inversion recovery (DIR). MATERIALS AND METHODS Prospective 3 T scans (MS first diagnosis or follow-up) acquired between March and August 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. All underwent 3D CS-FLAWS, axial 2D PSIR, and 3D DIR. Double-blinded reading sessions exclusively in axial plane and final consensual reading were performed to assess the number of cortical and infratentorial lesions. Wilcoxon test was used to compare the 2 imaging datasets (FLAWS + DIR and PSIR + DIR), and intraobserver and interobserver agreement was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient. RESULTS Forty-two patients were analyzed (38 with relapsing-remitting MS, 29 women, 42.7 ± 12.6 years old). Compressed sensing-accelerated FLAWS allowed the identification of 263 cortical lesions versus 251 with PSIR ( P = 0.74) and 123 infratentorial lesions versus 109 with PSIR ( P = 0.63), corresponding to a nonsignificant difference between the 2 sequences. Compressed sensing-accelerated FLAWS exhibited fewer false-negative findings than PSIR either for cortical lesions (1 vs 13; P < 0.01) or infratentorial lesions (1 vs 15; P < 0.01). No false-positive findings were found with any of the 2 sequences. Diagnostic confidence was high for each contrast. CONCLUSION Three-dimensional CS-FLAWS is as accurate as 2D PSIR imaging for classification of cortical and infratentorial MS lesions, with fewer false-negative findings, opening the way to a reliable full brain MS exploration in a clinically acceptable duration (5 minutes 15 seconds).
Collapse
|
23
|
Bouman PM, Noteboom S, Nobrega Santos FA, Beck ES, Bliault G, Castellaro M, Calabrese M, Chard DT, Eichinger P, Filippi M, Inglese M, Lapucci C, Marciniak A, Moraal B, Morales Pinzon A, Mühlau M, Preziosa P, Reich DS, Rocca MA, Schoonheim MM, Twisk JWR, Wiestler B, Jonkman LE, Guttmann CRG, Geurts JJG, Steenwijk MD. Multicenter Evaluation of AI-generated DIR and PSIR for Cortical and Juxtacortical Multiple Sclerosis Lesion Detection. Radiology 2023; 307:e221425. [PMID: 36749211 PMCID: PMC10102645 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.221425] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2022] [Revised: 11/18/2022] [Accepted: 11/28/2022] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Background Cortical multiple sclerosis lesions are clinically relevant but inconspicuous at conventional clinical MRI. Double inversion recovery (DIR) and phase-sensitive inversion recovery (PSIR) are more sensitive but often unavailable. In the past 2 years, artificial intelligence (AI) was used to generate DIR and PSIR from standard clinical sequences (eg, T1-weighted, T2-weighted, and fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery sequences), but multicenter validation is crucial for further implementation. Purpose To evaluate cortical and juxtacortical multiple sclerosis lesion detection for diagnostic and disease monitoring purposes on AI-generated DIR and PSIR images compared with MRI-acquired DIR and PSIR images in a multicenter setting. Materials and Methods Generative adversarial networks were used to generate AI-based DIR (n = 50) and PSIR (n = 43) images. The number of detected lesions between AI-generated images and MRI-acquired (reference) images was compared by randomized blinded scoring by seven readers (all with >10 years of experience in lesion assessment). Reliability was expressed as the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Differences in lesion subtype were determined using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Results MRI scans of 202 patients with multiple sclerosis (mean age, 46 years ± 11 [SD]; 127 women) were retrospectively collected from seven centers (February 2020 to January 2021). In total, 1154 lesions were detected on AI-generated DIR images versus 855 on MRI-acquired DIR images (mean difference per reader, 35.0% ± 22.8; P < .001). On AI-generated PSIR images, 803 lesions were detected versus 814 on MRI-acquired PSIR images (98.9% ± 19.4; P = .87). Reliability was good for both DIR (ICC, 0.81) and PSIR (ICC, 0.75) across centers. Regionally, more juxtacortical lesions were detected on AI-generated DIR images than on MRI-acquired DIR images (495 [42.9%] vs 338 [39.5%]; P < .001). On AI-generated PSIR images, fewer juxtacortical lesions were detected than on MRI-acquired PSIR images (232 [28.9%] vs 282 [34.6%]; P = .02). Conclusion Artificial intelligence-generated double inversion-recovery and phase-sensitive inversion-recovery images performed well compared with their MRI-acquired counterparts and can be considered reliable in a multicenter setting, with good between-reader and between-center interpretative agreement. Published under a CC BY 4.0 license. Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Zivadinov and Dwyer in this issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Piet M. Bouman
- From the MS Center Amsterdam, Anatomy & Neurosciences,
Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De
Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (P.M.B., S.N., F.A.N.S., M.M.S.,
J.J.G.G., M.D.S.); Translational Neuroradiology Section, National Institute of
Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md
(E.S.B., D.S.R.); Department of Neurology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount
Sinai, New York, NY (E.S.B.); Bio-imaging Institute, University of Bordeaux,
Bordeaux, France (G.B.); Neurology Section, Department of Neuroscience,
Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy (M.
Castellaro, M. Calabrese); Department of Information Engineering, University of
Padova, Padova, Italy (M. Castellaro); NMR Research Unit, Queen Square MS
Centre, Department of Neuroinflammation, UCL Queen Square Institute of
Neurology, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, UK
(D.T.C.); National Institute for Health Research University College London
Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK (D.T.C.); Departments of
Neuroradiology (P.E., B.W.) and Neurology (M.M.), School of Medicine, Klinikum
Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany; Neuroimaging
Research Unit, Division of Neuroscience Neurology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele
Scientific Institute Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy (M.F.,
P.P., M.A.R.); Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology,
Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, University of Genova, Genoa, Italy (M.I.,
C.L.); IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Largo Rosanna Benzi, Genoa, Italy
(M.I., C.L.); Center for Neurologic Imaging, Department of Radiology, Brigham
and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A.M., A.M.P.,
C.R.G.G.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, MS Center Amsterdam,
Amsterdam Neurosciences, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam,
the Netherlands (B.M.); Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam
University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (J.W.R.T.); Anatomy
& Neurosciences, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam,
the Netherlands (L.E.J.); and Amsterdam Neuroscience, Brain Imaging and
Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (L.E.J.)
| | - Samantha Noteboom
- From the MS Center Amsterdam, Anatomy & Neurosciences,
Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De
Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (P.M.B., S.N., F.A.N.S., M.M.S.,
J.J.G.G., M.D.S.); Translational Neuroradiology Section, National Institute of
Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md
(E.S.B., D.S.R.); Department of Neurology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount
Sinai, New York, NY (E.S.B.); Bio-imaging Institute, University of Bordeaux,
Bordeaux, France (G.B.); Neurology Section, Department of Neuroscience,
Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy (M.
Castellaro, M. Calabrese); Department of Information Engineering, University of
Padova, Padova, Italy (M. Castellaro); NMR Research Unit, Queen Square MS
Centre, Department of Neuroinflammation, UCL Queen Square Institute of
Neurology, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, UK
(D.T.C.); National Institute for Health Research University College London
Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK (D.T.C.); Departments of
Neuroradiology (P.E., B.W.) and Neurology (M.M.), School of Medicine, Klinikum
Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany; Neuroimaging
Research Unit, Division of Neuroscience Neurology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele
Scientific Institute Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy (M.F.,
P.P., M.A.R.); Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology,
Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, University of Genova, Genoa, Italy (M.I.,
C.L.); IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Largo Rosanna Benzi, Genoa, Italy
(M.I., C.L.); Center for Neurologic Imaging, Department of Radiology, Brigham
and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A.M., A.M.P.,
C.R.G.G.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, MS Center Amsterdam,
Amsterdam Neurosciences, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam,
the Netherlands (B.M.); Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam
University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (J.W.R.T.); Anatomy
& Neurosciences, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam,
the Netherlands (L.E.J.); and Amsterdam Neuroscience, Brain Imaging and
Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (L.E.J.)
| | - Fernando A. Nobrega Santos
- From the MS Center Amsterdam, Anatomy & Neurosciences,
Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De
Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (P.M.B., S.N., F.A.N.S., M.M.S.,
J.J.G.G., M.D.S.); Translational Neuroradiology Section, National Institute of
Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md
(E.S.B., D.S.R.); Department of Neurology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount
Sinai, New York, NY (E.S.B.); Bio-imaging Institute, University of Bordeaux,
Bordeaux, France (G.B.); Neurology Section, Department of Neuroscience,
Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy (M.
Castellaro, M. Calabrese); Department of Information Engineering, University of
Padova, Padova, Italy (M. Castellaro); NMR Research Unit, Queen Square MS
Centre, Department of Neuroinflammation, UCL Queen Square Institute of
Neurology, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, UK
(D.T.C.); National Institute for Health Research University College London
Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK (D.T.C.); Departments of
Neuroradiology (P.E., B.W.) and Neurology (M.M.), School of Medicine, Klinikum
Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany; Neuroimaging
Research Unit, Division of Neuroscience Neurology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele
Scientific Institute Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy (M.F.,
P.P., M.A.R.); Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology,
Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, University of Genova, Genoa, Italy (M.I.,
C.L.); IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Largo Rosanna Benzi, Genoa, Italy
(M.I., C.L.); Center for Neurologic Imaging, Department of Radiology, Brigham
and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A.M., A.M.P.,
C.R.G.G.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, MS Center Amsterdam,
Amsterdam Neurosciences, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam,
the Netherlands (B.M.); Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam
University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (J.W.R.T.); Anatomy
& Neurosciences, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam,
the Netherlands (L.E.J.); and Amsterdam Neuroscience, Brain Imaging and
Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (L.E.J.)
| | - Erin S. Beck
- From the MS Center Amsterdam, Anatomy & Neurosciences,
Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De
Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (P.M.B., S.N., F.A.N.S., M.M.S.,
J.J.G.G., M.D.S.); Translational Neuroradiology Section, National Institute of
Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md
(E.S.B., D.S.R.); Department of Neurology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount
Sinai, New York, NY (E.S.B.); Bio-imaging Institute, University of Bordeaux,
Bordeaux, France (G.B.); Neurology Section, Department of Neuroscience,
Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy (M.
Castellaro, M. Calabrese); Department of Information Engineering, University of
Padova, Padova, Italy (M. Castellaro); NMR Research Unit, Queen Square MS
Centre, Department of Neuroinflammation, UCL Queen Square Institute of
Neurology, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, UK
(D.T.C.); National Institute for Health Research University College London
Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK (D.T.C.); Departments of
Neuroradiology (P.E., B.W.) and Neurology (M.M.), School of Medicine, Klinikum
Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany; Neuroimaging
Research Unit, Division of Neuroscience Neurology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele
Scientific Institute Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy (M.F.,
P.P., M.A.R.); Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology,
Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, University of Genova, Genoa, Italy (M.I.,
C.L.); IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Largo Rosanna Benzi, Genoa, Italy
(M.I., C.L.); Center for Neurologic Imaging, Department of Radiology, Brigham
and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A.M., A.M.P.,
C.R.G.G.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, MS Center Amsterdam,
Amsterdam Neurosciences, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam,
the Netherlands (B.M.); Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam
University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (J.W.R.T.); Anatomy
& Neurosciences, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam,
the Netherlands (L.E.J.); and Amsterdam Neuroscience, Brain Imaging and
Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (L.E.J.)
| | - Gregory Bliault
- From the MS Center Amsterdam, Anatomy & Neurosciences,
Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De
Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (P.M.B., S.N., F.A.N.S., M.M.S.,
J.J.G.G., M.D.S.); Translational Neuroradiology Section, National Institute of
Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md
(E.S.B., D.S.R.); Department of Neurology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount
Sinai, New York, NY (E.S.B.); Bio-imaging Institute, University of Bordeaux,
Bordeaux, France (G.B.); Neurology Section, Department of Neuroscience,
Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy (M.
Castellaro, M. Calabrese); Department of Information Engineering, University of
Padova, Padova, Italy (M. Castellaro); NMR Research Unit, Queen Square MS
Centre, Department of Neuroinflammation, UCL Queen Square Institute of
Neurology, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, UK
(D.T.C.); National Institute for Health Research University College London
Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK (D.T.C.); Departments of
Neuroradiology (P.E., B.W.) and Neurology (M.M.), School of Medicine, Klinikum
Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany; Neuroimaging
Research Unit, Division of Neuroscience Neurology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele
Scientific Institute Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy (M.F.,
P.P., M.A.R.); Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology,
Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, University of Genova, Genoa, Italy (M.I.,
C.L.); IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Largo Rosanna Benzi, Genoa, Italy
(M.I., C.L.); Center for Neurologic Imaging, Department of Radiology, Brigham
and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A.M., A.M.P.,
C.R.G.G.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, MS Center Amsterdam,
Amsterdam Neurosciences, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam,
the Netherlands (B.M.); Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam
University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (J.W.R.T.); Anatomy
& Neurosciences, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam,
the Netherlands (L.E.J.); and Amsterdam Neuroscience, Brain Imaging and
Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (L.E.J.)
| | - Marco Castellaro
- From the MS Center Amsterdam, Anatomy & Neurosciences,
Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De
Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (P.M.B., S.N., F.A.N.S., M.M.S.,
J.J.G.G., M.D.S.); Translational Neuroradiology Section, National Institute of
Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md
(E.S.B., D.S.R.); Department of Neurology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount
Sinai, New York, NY (E.S.B.); Bio-imaging Institute, University of Bordeaux,
Bordeaux, France (G.B.); Neurology Section, Department of Neuroscience,
Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy (M.
Castellaro, M. Calabrese); Department of Information Engineering, University of
Padova, Padova, Italy (M. Castellaro); NMR Research Unit, Queen Square MS
Centre, Department of Neuroinflammation, UCL Queen Square Institute of
Neurology, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, UK
(D.T.C.); National Institute for Health Research University College London
Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK (D.T.C.); Departments of
Neuroradiology (P.E., B.W.) and Neurology (M.M.), School of Medicine, Klinikum
Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany; Neuroimaging
Research Unit, Division of Neuroscience Neurology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele
Scientific Institute Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy (M.F.,
P.P., M.A.R.); Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology,
Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, University of Genova, Genoa, Italy (M.I.,
C.L.); IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Largo Rosanna Benzi, Genoa, Italy
(M.I., C.L.); Center for Neurologic Imaging, Department of Radiology, Brigham
and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A.M., A.M.P.,
C.R.G.G.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, MS Center Amsterdam,
Amsterdam Neurosciences, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam,
the Netherlands (B.M.); Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam
University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (J.W.R.T.); Anatomy
& Neurosciences, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam,
the Netherlands (L.E.J.); and Amsterdam Neuroscience, Brain Imaging and
Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (L.E.J.)
| | - Massimiliano Calabrese
- From the MS Center Amsterdam, Anatomy & Neurosciences,
Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De
Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (P.M.B., S.N., F.A.N.S., M.M.S.,
J.J.G.G., M.D.S.); Translational Neuroradiology Section, National Institute of
Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md
(E.S.B., D.S.R.); Department of Neurology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount
Sinai, New York, NY (E.S.B.); Bio-imaging Institute, University of Bordeaux,
Bordeaux, France (G.B.); Neurology Section, Department of Neuroscience,
Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy (M.
Castellaro, M. Calabrese); Department of Information Engineering, University of
Padova, Padova, Italy (M. Castellaro); NMR Research Unit, Queen Square MS
Centre, Department of Neuroinflammation, UCL Queen Square Institute of
Neurology, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, UK
(D.T.C.); National Institute for Health Research University College London
Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK (D.T.C.); Departments of
Neuroradiology (P.E., B.W.) and Neurology (M.M.), School of Medicine, Klinikum
Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany; Neuroimaging
Research Unit, Division of Neuroscience Neurology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele
Scientific Institute Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy (M.F.,
P.P., M.A.R.); Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology,
Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, University of Genova, Genoa, Italy (M.I.,
C.L.); IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Largo Rosanna Benzi, Genoa, Italy
(M.I., C.L.); Center for Neurologic Imaging, Department of Radiology, Brigham
and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A.M., A.M.P.,
C.R.G.G.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, MS Center Amsterdam,
Amsterdam Neurosciences, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam,
the Netherlands (B.M.); Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam
University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (J.W.R.T.); Anatomy
& Neurosciences, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam,
the Netherlands (L.E.J.); and Amsterdam Neuroscience, Brain Imaging and
Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (L.E.J.)
| | - Declan T. Chard
- From the MS Center Amsterdam, Anatomy & Neurosciences,
Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De
Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (P.M.B., S.N., F.A.N.S., M.M.S.,
J.J.G.G., M.D.S.); Translational Neuroradiology Section, National Institute of
Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md
(E.S.B., D.S.R.); Department of Neurology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount
Sinai, New York, NY (E.S.B.); Bio-imaging Institute, University of Bordeaux,
Bordeaux, France (G.B.); Neurology Section, Department of Neuroscience,
Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy (M.
Castellaro, M. Calabrese); Department of Information Engineering, University of
Padova, Padova, Italy (M. Castellaro); NMR Research Unit, Queen Square MS
Centre, Department of Neuroinflammation, UCL Queen Square Institute of
Neurology, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, UK
(D.T.C.); National Institute for Health Research University College London
Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK (D.T.C.); Departments of
Neuroradiology (P.E., B.W.) and Neurology (M.M.), School of Medicine, Klinikum
Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany; Neuroimaging
Research Unit, Division of Neuroscience Neurology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele
Scientific Institute Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy (M.F.,
P.P., M.A.R.); Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology,
Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, University of Genova, Genoa, Italy (M.I.,
C.L.); IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Largo Rosanna Benzi, Genoa, Italy
(M.I., C.L.); Center for Neurologic Imaging, Department of Radiology, Brigham
and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A.M., A.M.P.,
C.R.G.G.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, MS Center Amsterdam,
Amsterdam Neurosciences, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam,
the Netherlands (B.M.); Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam
University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (J.W.R.T.); Anatomy
& Neurosciences, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam,
the Netherlands (L.E.J.); and Amsterdam Neuroscience, Brain Imaging and
Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (L.E.J.)
| | - Paul Eichinger
- From the MS Center Amsterdam, Anatomy & Neurosciences,
Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De
Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (P.M.B., S.N., F.A.N.S., M.M.S.,
J.J.G.G., M.D.S.); Translational Neuroradiology Section, National Institute of
Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md
(E.S.B., D.S.R.); Department of Neurology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount
Sinai, New York, NY (E.S.B.); Bio-imaging Institute, University of Bordeaux,
Bordeaux, France (G.B.); Neurology Section, Department of Neuroscience,
Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy (M.
Castellaro, M. Calabrese); Department of Information Engineering, University of
Padova, Padova, Italy (M. Castellaro); NMR Research Unit, Queen Square MS
Centre, Department of Neuroinflammation, UCL Queen Square Institute of
Neurology, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, UK
(D.T.C.); National Institute for Health Research University College London
Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK (D.T.C.); Departments of
Neuroradiology (P.E., B.W.) and Neurology (M.M.), School of Medicine, Klinikum
Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany; Neuroimaging
Research Unit, Division of Neuroscience Neurology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele
Scientific Institute Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy (M.F.,
P.P., M.A.R.); Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology,
Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, University of Genova, Genoa, Italy (M.I.,
C.L.); IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Largo Rosanna Benzi, Genoa, Italy
(M.I., C.L.); Center for Neurologic Imaging, Department of Radiology, Brigham
and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A.M., A.M.P.,
C.R.G.G.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, MS Center Amsterdam,
Amsterdam Neurosciences, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam,
the Netherlands (B.M.); Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam
University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (J.W.R.T.); Anatomy
& Neurosciences, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam,
the Netherlands (L.E.J.); and Amsterdam Neuroscience, Brain Imaging and
Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (L.E.J.)
| | - Massimo Filippi
- From the MS Center Amsterdam, Anatomy & Neurosciences,
Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De
Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (P.M.B., S.N., F.A.N.S., M.M.S.,
J.J.G.G., M.D.S.); Translational Neuroradiology Section, National Institute of
Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md
(E.S.B., D.S.R.); Department of Neurology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount
Sinai, New York, NY (E.S.B.); Bio-imaging Institute, University of Bordeaux,
Bordeaux, France (G.B.); Neurology Section, Department of Neuroscience,
Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy (M.
Castellaro, M. Calabrese); Department of Information Engineering, University of
Padova, Padova, Italy (M. Castellaro); NMR Research Unit, Queen Square MS
Centre, Department of Neuroinflammation, UCL Queen Square Institute of
Neurology, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, UK
(D.T.C.); National Institute for Health Research University College London
Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK (D.T.C.); Departments of
Neuroradiology (P.E., B.W.) and Neurology (M.M.), School of Medicine, Klinikum
Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany; Neuroimaging
Research Unit, Division of Neuroscience Neurology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele
Scientific Institute Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy (M.F.,
P.P., M.A.R.); Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology,
Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, University of Genova, Genoa, Italy (M.I.,
C.L.); IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Largo Rosanna Benzi, Genoa, Italy
(M.I., C.L.); Center for Neurologic Imaging, Department of Radiology, Brigham
and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A.M., A.M.P.,
C.R.G.G.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, MS Center Amsterdam,
Amsterdam Neurosciences, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam,
the Netherlands (B.M.); Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam
University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (J.W.R.T.); Anatomy
& Neurosciences, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam,
the Netherlands (L.E.J.); and Amsterdam Neuroscience, Brain Imaging and
Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (L.E.J.)
| | - Matilde Inglese
- From the MS Center Amsterdam, Anatomy & Neurosciences,
Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De
Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (P.M.B., S.N., F.A.N.S., M.M.S.,
J.J.G.G., M.D.S.); Translational Neuroradiology Section, National Institute of
Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md
(E.S.B., D.S.R.); Department of Neurology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount
Sinai, New York, NY (E.S.B.); Bio-imaging Institute, University of Bordeaux,
Bordeaux, France (G.B.); Neurology Section, Department of Neuroscience,
Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy (M.
Castellaro, M. Calabrese); Department of Information Engineering, University of
Padova, Padova, Italy (M. Castellaro); NMR Research Unit, Queen Square MS
Centre, Department of Neuroinflammation, UCL Queen Square Institute of
Neurology, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, UK
(D.T.C.); National Institute for Health Research University College London
Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK (D.T.C.); Departments of
Neuroradiology (P.E., B.W.) and Neurology (M.M.), School of Medicine, Klinikum
Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany; Neuroimaging
Research Unit, Division of Neuroscience Neurology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele
Scientific Institute Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy (M.F.,
P.P., M.A.R.); Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology,
Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, University of Genova, Genoa, Italy (M.I.,
C.L.); IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Largo Rosanna Benzi, Genoa, Italy
(M.I., C.L.); Center for Neurologic Imaging, Department of Radiology, Brigham
and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A.M., A.M.P.,
C.R.G.G.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, MS Center Amsterdam,
Amsterdam Neurosciences, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam,
the Netherlands (B.M.); Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam
University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (J.W.R.T.); Anatomy
& Neurosciences, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam,
the Netherlands (L.E.J.); and Amsterdam Neuroscience, Brain Imaging and
Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (L.E.J.)
| | - Caterina Lapucci
- From the MS Center Amsterdam, Anatomy & Neurosciences,
Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De
Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (P.M.B., S.N., F.A.N.S., M.M.S.,
J.J.G.G., M.D.S.); Translational Neuroradiology Section, National Institute of
Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md
(E.S.B., D.S.R.); Department of Neurology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount
Sinai, New York, NY (E.S.B.); Bio-imaging Institute, University of Bordeaux,
Bordeaux, France (G.B.); Neurology Section, Department of Neuroscience,
Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy (M.
Castellaro, M. Calabrese); Department of Information Engineering, University of
Padova, Padova, Italy (M. Castellaro); NMR Research Unit, Queen Square MS
Centre, Department of Neuroinflammation, UCL Queen Square Institute of
Neurology, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, UK
(D.T.C.); National Institute for Health Research University College London
Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK (D.T.C.); Departments of
Neuroradiology (P.E., B.W.) and Neurology (M.M.), School of Medicine, Klinikum
Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany; Neuroimaging
Research Unit, Division of Neuroscience Neurology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele
Scientific Institute Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy (M.F.,
P.P., M.A.R.); Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology,
Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, University of Genova, Genoa, Italy (M.I.,
C.L.); IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Largo Rosanna Benzi, Genoa, Italy
(M.I., C.L.); Center for Neurologic Imaging, Department of Radiology, Brigham
and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A.M., A.M.P.,
C.R.G.G.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, MS Center Amsterdam,
Amsterdam Neurosciences, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam,
the Netherlands (B.M.); Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam
University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (J.W.R.T.); Anatomy
& Neurosciences, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam,
the Netherlands (L.E.J.); and Amsterdam Neuroscience, Brain Imaging and
Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (L.E.J.)
| | - Andrzej Marciniak
- From the MS Center Amsterdam, Anatomy & Neurosciences,
Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De
Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (P.M.B., S.N., F.A.N.S., M.M.S.,
J.J.G.G., M.D.S.); Translational Neuroradiology Section, National Institute of
Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md
(E.S.B., D.S.R.); Department of Neurology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount
Sinai, New York, NY (E.S.B.); Bio-imaging Institute, University of Bordeaux,
Bordeaux, France (G.B.); Neurology Section, Department of Neuroscience,
Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy (M.
Castellaro, M. Calabrese); Department of Information Engineering, University of
Padova, Padova, Italy (M. Castellaro); NMR Research Unit, Queen Square MS
Centre, Department of Neuroinflammation, UCL Queen Square Institute of
Neurology, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, UK
(D.T.C.); National Institute for Health Research University College London
Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK (D.T.C.); Departments of
Neuroradiology (P.E., B.W.) and Neurology (M.M.), School of Medicine, Klinikum
Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany; Neuroimaging
Research Unit, Division of Neuroscience Neurology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele
Scientific Institute Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy (M.F.,
P.P., M.A.R.); Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology,
Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, University of Genova, Genoa, Italy (M.I.,
C.L.); IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Largo Rosanna Benzi, Genoa, Italy
(M.I., C.L.); Center for Neurologic Imaging, Department of Radiology, Brigham
and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A.M., A.M.P.,
C.R.G.G.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, MS Center Amsterdam,
Amsterdam Neurosciences, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam,
the Netherlands (B.M.); Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam
University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (J.W.R.T.); Anatomy
& Neurosciences, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam,
the Netherlands (L.E.J.); and Amsterdam Neuroscience, Brain Imaging and
Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (L.E.J.)
| | - Bastiaan Moraal
- From the MS Center Amsterdam, Anatomy & Neurosciences,
Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De
Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (P.M.B., S.N., F.A.N.S., M.M.S.,
J.J.G.G., M.D.S.); Translational Neuroradiology Section, National Institute of
Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md
(E.S.B., D.S.R.); Department of Neurology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount
Sinai, New York, NY (E.S.B.); Bio-imaging Institute, University of Bordeaux,
Bordeaux, France (G.B.); Neurology Section, Department of Neuroscience,
Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy (M.
Castellaro, M. Calabrese); Department of Information Engineering, University of
Padova, Padova, Italy (M. Castellaro); NMR Research Unit, Queen Square MS
Centre, Department of Neuroinflammation, UCL Queen Square Institute of
Neurology, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, UK
(D.T.C.); National Institute for Health Research University College London
Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK (D.T.C.); Departments of
Neuroradiology (P.E., B.W.) and Neurology (M.M.), School of Medicine, Klinikum
Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany; Neuroimaging
Research Unit, Division of Neuroscience Neurology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele
Scientific Institute Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy (M.F.,
P.P., M.A.R.); Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology,
Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, University of Genova, Genoa, Italy (M.I.,
C.L.); IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Largo Rosanna Benzi, Genoa, Italy
(M.I., C.L.); Center for Neurologic Imaging, Department of Radiology, Brigham
and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A.M., A.M.P.,
C.R.G.G.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, MS Center Amsterdam,
Amsterdam Neurosciences, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam,
the Netherlands (B.M.); Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam
University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (J.W.R.T.); Anatomy
& Neurosciences, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam,
the Netherlands (L.E.J.); and Amsterdam Neuroscience, Brain Imaging and
Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (L.E.J.)
| | - Alfredo Morales Pinzon
- From the MS Center Amsterdam, Anatomy & Neurosciences,
Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De
Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (P.M.B., S.N., F.A.N.S., M.M.S.,
J.J.G.G., M.D.S.); Translational Neuroradiology Section, National Institute of
Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md
(E.S.B., D.S.R.); Department of Neurology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount
Sinai, New York, NY (E.S.B.); Bio-imaging Institute, University of Bordeaux,
Bordeaux, France (G.B.); Neurology Section, Department of Neuroscience,
Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy (M.
Castellaro, M. Calabrese); Department of Information Engineering, University of
Padova, Padova, Italy (M. Castellaro); NMR Research Unit, Queen Square MS
Centre, Department of Neuroinflammation, UCL Queen Square Institute of
Neurology, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, UK
(D.T.C.); National Institute for Health Research University College London
Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK (D.T.C.); Departments of
Neuroradiology (P.E., B.W.) and Neurology (M.M.), School of Medicine, Klinikum
Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany; Neuroimaging
Research Unit, Division of Neuroscience Neurology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele
Scientific Institute Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy (M.F.,
P.P., M.A.R.); Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology,
Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, University of Genova, Genoa, Italy (M.I.,
C.L.); IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Largo Rosanna Benzi, Genoa, Italy
(M.I., C.L.); Center for Neurologic Imaging, Department of Radiology, Brigham
and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A.M., A.M.P.,
C.R.G.G.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, MS Center Amsterdam,
Amsterdam Neurosciences, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam,
the Netherlands (B.M.); Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam
University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (J.W.R.T.); Anatomy
& Neurosciences, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam,
the Netherlands (L.E.J.); and Amsterdam Neuroscience, Brain Imaging and
Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (L.E.J.)
| | - Mark Mühlau
- From the MS Center Amsterdam, Anatomy & Neurosciences,
Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De
Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (P.M.B., S.N., F.A.N.S., M.M.S.,
J.J.G.G., M.D.S.); Translational Neuroradiology Section, National Institute of
Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md
(E.S.B., D.S.R.); Department of Neurology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount
Sinai, New York, NY (E.S.B.); Bio-imaging Institute, University of Bordeaux,
Bordeaux, France (G.B.); Neurology Section, Department of Neuroscience,
Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy (M.
Castellaro, M. Calabrese); Department of Information Engineering, University of
Padova, Padova, Italy (M. Castellaro); NMR Research Unit, Queen Square MS
Centre, Department of Neuroinflammation, UCL Queen Square Institute of
Neurology, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, UK
(D.T.C.); National Institute for Health Research University College London
Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK (D.T.C.); Departments of
Neuroradiology (P.E., B.W.) and Neurology (M.M.), School of Medicine, Klinikum
Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany; Neuroimaging
Research Unit, Division of Neuroscience Neurology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele
Scientific Institute Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy (M.F.,
P.P., M.A.R.); Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology,
Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, University of Genova, Genoa, Italy (M.I.,
C.L.); IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Largo Rosanna Benzi, Genoa, Italy
(M.I., C.L.); Center for Neurologic Imaging, Department of Radiology, Brigham
and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A.M., A.M.P.,
C.R.G.G.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, MS Center Amsterdam,
Amsterdam Neurosciences, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam,
the Netherlands (B.M.); Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam
University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (J.W.R.T.); Anatomy
& Neurosciences, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam,
the Netherlands (L.E.J.); and Amsterdam Neuroscience, Brain Imaging and
Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (L.E.J.)
| | - Paolo Preziosa
- From the MS Center Amsterdam, Anatomy & Neurosciences,
Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De
Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (P.M.B., S.N., F.A.N.S., M.M.S.,
J.J.G.G., M.D.S.); Translational Neuroradiology Section, National Institute of
Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md
(E.S.B., D.S.R.); Department of Neurology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount
Sinai, New York, NY (E.S.B.); Bio-imaging Institute, University of Bordeaux,
Bordeaux, France (G.B.); Neurology Section, Department of Neuroscience,
Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy (M.
Castellaro, M. Calabrese); Department of Information Engineering, University of
Padova, Padova, Italy (M. Castellaro); NMR Research Unit, Queen Square MS
Centre, Department of Neuroinflammation, UCL Queen Square Institute of
Neurology, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, UK
(D.T.C.); National Institute for Health Research University College London
Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK (D.T.C.); Departments of
Neuroradiology (P.E., B.W.) and Neurology (M.M.), School of Medicine, Klinikum
Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany; Neuroimaging
Research Unit, Division of Neuroscience Neurology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele
Scientific Institute Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy (M.F.,
P.P., M.A.R.); Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology,
Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, University of Genova, Genoa, Italy (M.I.,
C.L.); IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Largo Rosanna Benzi, Genoa, Italy
(M.I., C.L.); Center for Neurologic Imaging, Department of Radiology, Brigham
and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A.M., A.M.P.,
C.R.G.G.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, MS Center Amsterdam,
Amsterdam Neurosciences, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam,
the Netherlands (B.M.); Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam
University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (J.W.R.T.); Anatomy
& Neurosciences, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam,
the Netherlands (L.E.J.); and Amsterdam Neuroscience, Brain Imaging and
Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (L.E.J.)
| | - Daniel S. Reich
- From the MS Center Amsterdam, Anatomy & Neurosciences,
Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De
Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (P.M.B., S.N., F.A.N.S., M.M.S.,
J.J.G.G., M.D.S.); Translational Neuroradiology Section, National Institute of
Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md
(E.S.B., D.S.R.); Department of Neurology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount
Sinai, New York, NY (E.S.B.); Bio-imaging Institute, University of Bordeaux,
Bordeaux, France (G.B.); Neurology Section, Department of Neuroscience,
Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy (M.
Castellaro, M. Calabrese); Department of Information Engineering, University of
Padova, Padova, Italy (M. Castellaro); NMR Research Unit, Queen Square MS
Centre, Department of Neuroinflammation, UCL Queen Square Institute of
Neurology, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, UK
(D.T.C.); National Institute for Health Research University College London
Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK (D.T.C.); Departments of
Neuroradiology (P.E., B.W.) and Neurology (M.M.), School of Medicine, Klinikum
Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany; Neuroimaging
Research Unit, Division of Neuroscience Neurology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele
Scientific Institute Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy (M.F.,
P.P., M.A.R.); Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology,
Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, University of Genova, Genoa, Italy (M.I.,
C.L.); IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Largo Rosanna Benzi, Genoa, Italy
(M.I., C.L.); Center for Neurologic Imaging, Department of Radiology, Brigham
and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A.M., A.M.P.,
C.R.G.G.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, MS Center Amsterdam,
Amsterdam Neurosciences, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam,
the Netherlands (B.M.); Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam
University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (J.W.R.T.); Anatomy
& Neurosciences, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam,
the Netherlands (L.E.J.); and Amsterdam Neuroscience, Brain Imaging and
Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (L.E.J.)
| | - Maria A. Rocca
- From the MS Center Amsterdam, Anatomy & Neurosciences,
Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De
Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (P.M.B., S.N., F.A.N.S., M.M.S.,
J.J.G.G., M.D.S.); Translational Neuroradiology Section, National Institute of
Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md
(E.S.B., D.S.R.); Department of Neurology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount
Sinai, New York, NY (E.S.B.); Bio-imaging Institute, University of Bordeaux,
Bordeaux, France (G.B.); Neurology Section, Department of Neuroscience,
Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy (M.
Castellaro, M. Calabrese); Department of Information Engineering, University of
Padova, Padova, Italy (M. Castellaro); NMR Research Unit, Queen Square MS
Centre, Department of Neuroinflammation, UCL Queen Square Institute of
Neurology, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, UK
(D.T.C.); National Institute for Health Research University College London
Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK (D.T.C.); Departments of
Neuroradiology (P.E., B.W.) and Neurology (M.M.), School of Medicine, Klinikum
Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany; Neuroimaging
Research Unit, Division of Neuroscience Neurology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele
Scientific Institute Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy (M.F.,
P.P., M.A.R.); Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology,
Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, University of Genova, Genoa, Italy (M.I.,
C.L.); IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Largo Rosanna Benzi, Genoa, Italy
(M.I., C.L.); Center for Neurologic Imaging, Department of Radiology, Brigham
and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A.M., A.M.P.,
C.R.G.G.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, MS Center Amsterdam,
Amsterdam Neurosciences, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam,
the Netherlands (B.M.); Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam
University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (J.W.R.T.); Anatomy
& Neurosciences, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam,
the Netherlands (L.E.J.); and Amsterdam Neuroscience, Brain Imaging and
Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (L.E.J.)
| | - Menno M. Schoonheim
- From the MS Center Amsterdam, Anatomy & Neurosciences,
Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De
Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (P.M.B., S.N., F.A.N.S., M.M.S.,
J.J.G.G., M.D.S.); Translational Neuroradiology Section, National Institute of
Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md
(E.S.B., D.S.R.); Department of Neurology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount
Sinai, New York, NY (E.S.B.); Bio-imaging Institute, University of Bordeaux,
Bordeaux, France (G.B.); Neurology Section, Department of Neuroscience,
Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy (M.
Castellaro, M. Calabrese); Department of Information Engineering, University of
Padova, Padova, Italy (M. Castellaro); NMR Research Unit, Queen Square MS
Centre, Department of Neuroinflammation, UCL Queen Square Institute of
Neurology, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, UK
(D.T.C.); National Institute for Health Research University College London
Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK (D.T.C.); Departments of
Neuroradiology (P.E., B.W.) and Neurology (M.M.), School of Medicine, Klinikum
Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany; Neuroimaging
Research Unit, Division of Neuroscience Neurology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele
Scientific Institute Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy (M.F.,
P.P., M.A.R.); Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology,
Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, University of Genova, Genoa, Italy (M.I.,
C.L.); IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Largo Rosanna Benzi, Genoa, Italy
(M.I., C.L.); Center for Neurologic Imaging, Department of Radiology, Brigham
and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A.M., A.M.P.,
C.R.G.G.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, MS Center Amsterdam,
Amsterdam Neurosciences, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam,
the Netherlands (B.M.); Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam
University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (J.W.R.T.); Anatomy
& Neurosciences, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam,
the Netherlands (L.E.J.); and Amsterdam Neuroscience, Brain Imaging and
Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (L.E.J.)
| | - Jos W. R. Twisk
- From the MS Center Amsterdam, Anatomy & Neurosciences,
Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De
Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (P.M.B., S.N., F.A.N.S., M.M.S.,
J.J.G.G., M.D.S.); Translational Neuroradiology Section, National Institute of
Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md
(E.S.B., D.S.R.); Department of Neurology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount
Sinai, New York, NY (E.S.B.); Bio-imaging Institute, University of Bordeaux,
Bordeaux, France (G.B.); Neurology Section, Department of Neuroscience,
Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy (M.
Castellaro, M. Calabrese); Department of Information Engineering, University of
Padova, Padova, Italy (M. Castellaro); NMR Research Unit, Queen Square MS
Centre, Department of Neuroinflammation, UCL Queen Square Institute of
Neurology, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, UK
(D.T.C.); National Institute for Health Research University College London
Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK (D.T.C.); Departments of
Neuroradiology (P.E., B.W.) and Neurology (M.M.), School of Medicine, Klinikum
Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany; Neuroimaging
Research Unit, Division of Neuroscience Neurology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele
Scientific Institute Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy (M.F.,
P.P., M.A.R.); Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology,
Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, University of Genova, Genoa, Italy (M.I.,
C.L.); IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Largo Rosanna Benzi, Genoa, Italy
(M.I., C.L.); Center for Neurologic Imaging, Department of Radiology, Brigham
and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A.M., A.M.P.,
C.R.G.G.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, MS Center Amsterdam,
Amsterdam Neurosciences, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam,
the Netherlands (B.M.); Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam
University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (J.W.R.T.); Anatomy
& Neurosciences, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam,
the Netherlands (L.E.J.); and Amsterdam Neuroscience, Brain Imaging and
Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (L.E.J.)
| | - Benedict Wiestler
- From the MS Center Amsterdam, Anatomy & Neurosciences,
Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De
Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (P.M.B., S.N., F.A.N.S., M.M.S.,
J.J.G.G., M.D.S.); Translational Neuroradiology Section, National Institute of
Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md
(E.S.B., D.S.R.); Department of Neurology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount
Sinai, New York, NY (E.S.B.); Bio-imaging Institute, University of Bordeaux,
Bordeaux, France (G.B.); Neurology Section, Department of Neuroscience,
Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy (M.
Castellaro, M. Calabrese); Department of Information Engineering, University of
Padova, Padova, Italy (M. Castellaro); NMR Research Unit, Queen Square MS
Centre, Department of Neuroinflammation, UCL Queen Square Institute of
Neurology, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, UK
(D.T.C.); National Institute for Health Research University College London
Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK (D.T.C.); Departments of
Neuroradiology (P.E., B.W.) and Neurology (M.M.), School of Medicine, Klinikum
Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany; Neuroimaging
Research Unit, Division of Neuroscience Neurology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele
Scientific Institute Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy (M.F.,
P.P., M.A.R.); Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology,
Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, University of Genova, Genoa, Italy (M.I.,
C.L.); IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Largo Rosanna Benzi, Genoa, Italy
(M.I., C.L.); Center for Neurologic Imaging, Department of Radiology, Brigham
and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A.M., A.M.P.,
C.R.G.G.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, MS Center Amsterdam,
Amsterdam Neurosciences, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam,
the Netherlands (B.M.); Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam
University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (J.W.R.T.); Anatomy
& Neurosciences, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam,
the Netherlands (L.E.J.); and Amsterdam Neuroscience, Brain Imaging and
Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (L.E.J.)
| | - Laura E. Jonkman
- From the MS Center Amsterdam, Anatomy & Neurosciences,
Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De
Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (P.M.B., S.N., F.A.N.S., M.M.S.,
J.J.G.G., M.D.S.); Translational Neuroradiology Section, National Institute of
Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md
(E.S.B., D.S.R.); Department of Neurology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount
Sinai, New York, NY (E.S.B.); Bio-imaging Institute, University of Bordeaux,
Bordeaux, France (G.B.); Neurology Section, Department of Neuroscience,
Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy (M.
Castellaro, M. Calabrese); Department of Information Engineering, University of
Padova, Padova, Italy (M. Castellaro); NMR Research Unit, Queen Square MS
Centre, Department of Neuroinflammation, UCL Queen Square Institute of
Neurology, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, UK
(D.T.C.); National Institute for Health Research University College London
Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK (D.T.C.); Departments of
Neuroradiology (P.E., B.W.) and Neurology (M.M.), School of Medicine, Klinikum
Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany; Neuroimaging
Research Unit, Division of Neuroscience Neurology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele
Scientific Institute Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy (M.F.,
P.P., M.A.R.); Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology,
Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, University of Genova, Genoa, Italy (M.I.,
C.L.); IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Largo Rosanna Benzi, Genoa, Italy
(M.I., C.L.); Center for Neurologic Imaging, Department of Radiology, Brigham
and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A.M., A.M.P.,
C.R.G.G.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, MS Center Amsterdam,
Amsterdam Neurosciences, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam,
the Netherlands (B.M.); Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam
University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (J.W.R.T.); Anatomy
& Neurosciences, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam,
the Netherlands (L.E.J.); and Amsterdam Neuroscience, Brain Imaging and
Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (L.E.J.)
| | - Charles R. G. Guttmann
- From the MS Center Amsterdam, Anatomy & Neurosciences,
Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De
Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (P.M.B., S.N., F.A.N.S., M.M.S.,
J.J.G.G., M.D.S.); Translational Neuroradiology Section, National Institute of
Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md
(E.S.B., D.S.R.); Department of Neurology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount
Sinai, New York, NY (E.S.B.); Bio-imaging Institute, University of Bordeaux,
Bordeaux, France (G.B.); Neurology Section, Department of Neuroscience,
Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy (M.
Castellaro, M. Calabrese); Department of Information Engineering, University of
Padova, Padova, Italy (M. Castellaro); NMR Research Unit, Queen Square MS
Centre, Department of Neuroinflammation, UCL Queen Square Institute of
Neurology, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, UK
(D.T.C.); National Institute for Health Research University College London
Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK (D.T.C.); Departments of
Neuroradiology (P.E., B.W.) and Neurology (M.M.), School of Medicine, Klinikum
Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany; Neuroimaging
Research Unit, Division of Neuroscience Neurology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele
Scientific Institute Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy (M.F.,
P.P., M.A.R.); Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology,
Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, University of Genova, Genoa, Italy (M.I.,
C.L.); IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Largo Rosanna Benzi, Genoa, Italy
(M.I., C.L.); Center for Neurologic Imaging, Department of Radiology, Brigham
and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A.M., A.M.P.,
C.R.G.G.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, MS Center Amsterdam,
Amsterdam Neurosciences, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam,
the Netherlands (B.M.); Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam
University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (J.W.R.T.); Anatomy
& Neurosciences, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam,
the Netherlands (L.E.J.); and Amsterdam Neuroscience, Brain Imaging and
Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (L.E.J.)
| | - Jeroen J. G. Geurts
- From the MS Center Amsterdam, Anatomy & Neurosciences,
Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De
Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (P.M.B., S.N., F.A.N.S., M.M.S.,
J.J.G.G., M.D.S.); Translational Neuroradiology Section, National Institute of
Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md
(E.S.B., D.S.R.); Department of Neurology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount
Sinai, New York, NY (E.S.B.); Bio-imaging Institute, University of Bordeaux,
Bordeaux, France (G.B.); Neurology Section, Department of Neuroscience,
Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy (M.
Castellaro, M. Calabrese); Department of Information Engineering, University of
Padova, Padova, Italy (M. Castellaro); NMR Research Unit, Queen Square MS
Centre, Department of Neuroinflammation, UCL Queen Square Institute of
Neurology, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, UK
(D.T.C.); National Institute for Health Research University College London
Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK (D.T.C.); Departments of
Neuroradiology (P.E., B.W.) and Neurology (M.M.), School of Medicine, Klinikum
Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany; Neuroimaging
Research Unit, Division of Neuroscience Neurology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele
Scientific Institute Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy (M.F.,
P.P., M.A.R.); Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology,
Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, University of Genova, Genoa, Italy (M.I.,
C.L.); IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Largo Rosanna Benzi, Genoa, Italy
(M.I., C.L.); Center for Neurologic Imaging, Department of Radiology, Brigham
and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A.M., A.M.P.,
C.R.G.G.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, MS Center Amsterdam,
Amsterdam Neurosciences, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam,
the Netherlands (B.M.); Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam
University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (J.W.R.T.); Anatomy
& Neurosciences, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam,
the Netherlands (L.E.J.); and Amsterdam Neuroscience, Brain Imaging and
Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (L.E.J.)
| | - Martijn D. Steenwijk
- From the MS Center Amsterdam, Anatomy & Neurosciences,
Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De
Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (P.M.B., S.N., F.A.N.S., M.M.S.,
J.J.G.G., M.D.S.); Translational Neuroradiology Section, National Institute of
Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md
(E.S.B., D.S.R.); Department of Neurology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount
Sinai, New York, NY (E.S.B.); Bio-imaging Institute, University of Bordeaux,
Bordeaux, France (G.B.); Neurology Section, Department of Neuroscience,
Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy (M.
Castellaro, M. Calabrese); Department of Information Engineering, University of
Padova, Padova, Italy (M. Castellaro); NMR Research Unit, Queen Square MS
Centre, Department of Neuroinflammation, UCL Queen Square Institute of
Neurology, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, UK
(D.T.C.); National Institute for Health Research University College London
Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK (D.T.C.); Departments of
Neuroradiology (P.E., B.W.) and Neurology (M.M.), School of Medicine, Klinikum
Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany; Neuroimaging
Research Unit, Division of Neuroscience Neurology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele
Scientific Institute Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy (M.F.,
P.P., M.A.R.); Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology,
Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, University of Genova, Genoa, Italy (M.I.,
C.L.); IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Largo Rosanna Benzi, Genoa, Italy
(M.I., C.L.); Center for Neurologic Imaging, Department of Radiology, Brigham
and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A.M., A.M.P.,
C.R.G.G.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, MS Center Amsterdam,
Amsterdam Neurosciences, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam,
the Netherlands (B.M.); Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam
University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (J.W.R.T.); Anatomy
& Neurosciences, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam,
the Netherlands (L.E.J.); and Amsterdam Neuroscience, Brain Imaging and
Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (L.E.J.)
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Quattrocchi CC, Parillo M, Spani F, Landi D, Cola G, Dianzani C, Perrella E, Marfia GA, Mallio CA. Skin Thickening of the Scalp and High Signal Intensity of Dentate Nucleus in Multiple Sclerosis: Association With Linear Versus Macrocyclic Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agents Administration. Invest Radiol 2023; 58:223-230. [PMID: 36729383 DOI: 10.1097/rli.0000000000000929] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to assess the presence of detectable changes of skin thickness on clinical brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans in patients with MS, history of multiple gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) administrations, and evidence of gadolinium deposition in the brain. MATERIALS AND METHODS In this observational cross-sectional study, 71 patients with MS who underwent conventional brain MRI with an imaging protocol including enhanced 3D volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination (VIBE) T1-weighted with fat saturation were assessed. Patients with bilateral isointense dentate nucleus on unenhanced T1-weighted images were assigned to group A (controls without MRI evidence of gadolinium deposition), and patients with visually hyperintense dentate nuclei were assigned to group B. Qualitative and quantitative assessment of the skin thickness were performed. RESULTS Group A included 27 patients (median age, 33 years [IQR, 27-46]; 20 women), and group B included 44 patients (median age, 42 years [IQR, 35-53]; 29 women). Qualitative and quantitative assessment of the skin revealed significant differences between group A and group B. The average skin-to-scalp thickness ratios was significantly higher in group B than in group A (mean ± standard deviation = 0.52 ± 0.02 in group B vs 0.41 ± 0.02 in group A, P < 0.0001) and showed a positive correlation with the total number of enhanced MRI scans ( r = 0.39; 95% confidence interval, 0.17-0.57, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS Brain MRI detects increased skin thickness of the scalp in patients with MS and dentate nucleus high signal intensity on unenhanced T1-weighted images and shows positive association with previous exposures to linear GBCAs rather than macrocyclic GBCAs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlo C Quattrocchi
- From the Unit of Diagnostic Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Fondazione Policlinico Campus Bio-Medico di Roma
| | - Marco Parillo
- From the Unit of Diagnostic Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Fondazione Policlinico Campus Bio-Medico di Roma
| | - Federica Spani
- From the Unit of Diagnostic Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Fondazione Policlinico Campus Bio-Medico di Roma
| | | | - Gaia Cola
- Unit of Neurology, Policlinico Tor Vergata
| | | | - Eleonora Perrella
- Pathology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Carlo A Mallio
- From the Unit of Diagnostic Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Fondazione Policlinico Campus Bio-Medico di Roma
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Straub S, El-Sanosy E, Emmerich J, Sandig FL, Ladd ME, Schlemmer HP. Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging biomarkers for cortical pathology in multiple sclerosis at 7 T. NMR IN BIOMEDICINE 2023; 36:e4847. [PMID: 36259249 DOI: 10.1002/nbm.4847] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2022] [Revised: 10/08/2022] [Accepted: 10/12/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
Substantial cortical gray matter tissue damage, which correlates with clinical disease severity, has been revealed in multiple sclerosis (MS) using advanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) methods at 3 T and the use of ultra-high field, as well as in histopathology studies. While clinical assessment mainly focuses on lesions using T 1 - and T 2 -weighted MRI, quantitative MRI (qMRI) methods are capable of uncovering subtle microstructural changes. The aim of this ultra-high field study is to extract possible future MR biomarkers for the quantitative evaluation of regional cortical pathology. Because of their sensitivity to iron, myelin, and in part specifically to cortical demyelination, T 1 , T 2 , R 2 * , and susceptibility mapping were performed including two novel susceptibility markers; in addition, cortical thickness as well as the volumes of 34 cortical regions were computed. Data were acquired in 20 patients and 16 age- and sex-matched healthy controls. In 18 cortical regions, large to very large effect sizes (Cohen's d ≥ 1) and statistically significant differences in qMRI values between patients and controls were revealed compared with only four regions when using more standard MR measures, namely, volume and cortical thickness. Moreover, a decrease in all susceptibility contrasts ( χ , χ + , χ - ) and R 2 * values indicates that the role of cortical demyelination might outweigh inflammatory processes in the form of iron accumulation in cortical MS pathology, and might also indicate iron loss. A significant association between susceptibility contrasts as well as R 2 * of the caudal middle frontal gyrus and disease duration was found (adjusted R2 : 0.602, p = 0.0011). Quantitative MRI parameters might be more sensitive towards regional cortical pathology compared with the use of conventional markers only and therefore may play a role in early detection of tissue damage in MS in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sina Straub
- Division of Medical Physics in Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Faculty of Medicine, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Edris El-Sanosy
- Division Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Julian Emmerich
- Division of Medical Physics in Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Frederik L Sandig
- Division Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Mark E Ladd
- Division of Medical Physics in Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Faculty of Medicine, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
- Faculty of Physics and Astronomy, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Tomura N, Saginoya T, Sanpei T, Konno T, Fujihara K. Contrast-enhanced double inversion recovery sequence for patients with multiple sclerosis: feasibility of subtraction images between pre- and post-contrast images. Acta Radiol 2023; 64:719-724. [PMID: 35306900 DOI: 10.1177/02841851221080831] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Few reports have examined the feasibility of a post-contrast double inversion recovery (DIR) magnetic resonance (MR) sequence in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) because of partial or complete signal loss of enhancing MS lesions. PURPOSE To compare subtracted images of DIR (pre-contrast - post-contrast DIR images) with contrast enhanced T1-weighted (CE-T1W) images in the depiction of contrast enhancement of MS lesions. MATERIAL AND METHODS In total, 27 patients were included. Two neuroradiologists interpreted both images of CE-T1W imaging and subtracted DIR, and interpretation of the images was classified into a score of 1-5 (from 5, definitely superior contrast of lesions on DIR subtraction compared to conventional CE-T1W imaging, to 1, definitely superior contrast of lesions on CE-T1W imaging. The interrater agreement (κ coefficient) was measured. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-noise-ratio (CNR) of the lesion were compared. RESULTS A significant difference (P < 0.001) in scoring was seen between conventional CE-T1W imaging (2.1 ± 1.5 with one reviewer and 2.4 ± 1.5 with the other) and DIR subtraction (4.4 ± 1.0 with one reviewer and 4.7 ± 0.8 with the other). SNR from conventional CE-T1W imaging (24.8 ± 14.7) was significantly superior to that from DIR subtraction (4.0 ± 1.0; P < 0.001). CNR in DIR subtraction (326.4 ± 250.0) was significantly superior to that in conventional CE-T1W imaging (0.8 ± 5.5; P < 0.001). For interrater agreement in the evaluation of contrast enhancement of the lesions, κ coefficients were 0.84 for conventional CE-T1W imaging and 0.72 for DIR subtraction. CONCLUSION Subtracted DIR image enables more obvious contrast enhancement of the MS lesions compared with conventional CE-T1W imaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noriaki Tomura
- Department of Neuroradiology, Radiology and Neurology, 13704Southern Tohoku Research Institute for Neuroscience, Southern Tohoku General Hospital, Koriyama, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Toshiyuki Saginoya
- Department of Neuroradiology, Radiology and Neurology, 13704Southern Tohoku Research Institute for Neuroscience, Southern Tohoku General Hospital, Koriyama, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Takashi Sanpei
- Department of Neuroradiology, Radiology and Neurology, 13704Southern Tohoku Research Institute for Neuroscience, Southern Tohoku General Hospital, Koriyama, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Takashi Konno
- Department of Neuroradiology, Radiology and Neurology, 13704Southern Tohoku Research Institute for Neuroscience, Southern Tohoku General Hospital, Koriyama, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Kazuo Fujihara
- Department of Neuroradiology, Radiology and Neurology, 13704Southern Tohoku Research Institute for Neuroscience, Southern Tohoku General Hospital, Koriyama, Fukushima, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Malte Oeschger J, Tabelow K, Mohammadi S. Axisymmetric diffusion kurtosis imaging with Rician bias correction: A simulation study. Magn Reson Med 2023; 89:787-799. [PMID: 36198046 DOI: 10.1002/mrm.29474] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2022] [Revised: 09/01/2022] [Accepted: 09/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare the estimation accuracy of axisymmetric diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) and standard DKI in combination with Rician bias correction (RBC). METHODS Axisymmetric DKI is more robust against noise-induced variation in the measured signal than standard DKI because of its reduced parameter space. However, its susceptibility to Rician noise bias at low signal-to-noise ratios (SNR) is unknown. Here, we investigate two main questions: first, does RBC improve estimation accuracy of axisymmetric DKI?; second, is estimation accuracy of axisymmetric DKI increased compared to standard DKI? Estimation accuracy was investigated on the five axisymmetric DKI tensor metrics (AxTM): the parallel and perpendicular diffusivity and kurtosis and mean of the kurtosis tensor, using a noise simulation study based on synthetic data of tissues with varying fiber alignment and in-vivo data focusing on white matter. RESULTS RBC mainly increased accuracy for the parallel AxTM in tissues with highly to moderately aligned fibers. For the perpendicular AxTM, axisymmetric DKI without RBC performed slightly better than with RBC. However, the combination of axisymmetric DKI with RBC was the overall best performing algorithm across all five AxTM in white matter and axisymmetric DKI itself substantially improved accuracy in axisymmetric tissues with low fiber alignment. CONCLUSION Combining axisymmetric DKI with RBC facilitates accurate DKI parameter estimation at unprecedented low SNRs ( ≈ 15 $$ \approx 15 $$ ) in white matter, possibly making it a valuable tool for neuroscience and clinical research studies where scan time is a limited resource. The tools used here are available in the open-source ACID toolbox for SPM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Malte Oeschger
- Institute of Systems Neuroscience, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Karsten Tabelow
- Weierstrass Institute for Applied Analysis and Stochastics, Berlin, Germany
| | - Siawoosh Mohammadi
- Institute of Systems Neuroscience, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.,Department of Neurophysics, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Clèrigues A, Valverde S, Salvi J, Oliver A, Lladó X. Minimizing the effect of white matter lesions on deep learning based tissue segmentation for brain volumetry. Comput Med Imaging Graph 2023; 103:102157. [PMID: 36535217 DOI: 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2022.102157] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2022] [Revised: 12/02/2022] [Accepted: 12/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Automated methods for segmentation-based brain volumetry may be confounded by the presence of white matter (WM) lesions, which introduce abnormal intensities that can alter the classification of not only neighboring but also distant brain tissue. These lesions are common in pathologies where brain volumetry is also an important prognostic marker, such as in multiple sclerosis (MS), and thus reducing their effects is critical for improving volumetric accuracy and reliability. In this work, we analyze the effect of WM lesions on deep learning based brain tissue segmentation methods for brain volumetry and introduce techniques to reduce the error these lesions produce on the measured volumes. We propose a 3D patch-based deep learning framework for brain tissue segmentation which is trained on the outputs of a reference classical method. To deal more robustly with pathological cases having WM lesions, we use a combination of small patches and a percentile-based input normalization. To minimize the effect of WM lesions, we also propose a multi-task double U-Net architecture performing end-to-end inpainting and segmentation, along with a training data generation procedure. In the evaluation, we first analyze the error introduced by artificial WM lesions on our framework as well as in the reference segmentation method without the use of lesion inpainting techniques. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first analysis of WM lesion effect on a deep learning based tissue segmentation approach for brain volumetry. The proposed framework shows a significantly smaller and more localized error introduced by WM lesions than the reference segmentation method, that displays much larger global differences. We also evaluated the proposed lesion effect minimization technique by comparing the measured volumes before and after introducing artificial WM lesions to healthy images. The proposed approach performing end-to-end inpainting and segmentation effectively reduces the error introduced by small and large WM lesions in the resulting volumetry, obtaining absolute volume differences of 0.01 ± 0.03% for GM and 0.02 ± 0.04% for WM. Increasing the accuracy and reliability of automated brain volumetry methods will reduce the sample size needed to establish meaningful correlations in clinical studies and allow its use in individualized assessments as a diagnostic and prognostic marker for neurodegenerative pathologies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Albert Clèrigues
- Institute of Computer Vision and Robotics, University of Girona, Spain.
| | | | - Joaquim Salvi
- Institute of Computer Vision and Robotics, University of Girona, Spain
| | - Arnau Oliver
- Institute of Computer Vision and Robotics, University of Girona, Spain
| | - Xavier Lladó
- Institute of Computer Vision and Robotics, University of Girona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Elssayed A, AlRgaiba RI, AlZalbani MK, Hassan MRJ, AlMalki KH, AlGhannam AA, AlMudayfir ZF, Mohamed HAA, Sheikh MM, AlGhamdi AA, AlMarwani SI. Review on Diagnosis and Management Approach of Multiple Sclerosis. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH AND ALLIED SCIENCES 2023. [DOI: 10.51847/gjcjdspajm] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
|
30
|
Daboul L, O'Donnell CM, Cao Q, Amin M, Rodrigues P, Derbyshire J, Azevedo C, Bar-Or A, Caverzasi E, Calabresi P, Cree BAC, Freeman L, Henry RG, Longbrake EE, Nakamura K, Oh J, Papinutto N, Pelletier D, Samudralwar RD, Suthiphosuwan S, Schindler MK, Sotirchos ES, Sicotte NL, Solomon AJ, Shinohara RT, Reich DS, Ontaneda D, Sati P. Effect of GBCA Use on Detection and Diagnostic Performance of the Central Vein Sign: Evaluation Using a 3-T FLAIR* Sequence in Patients With Suspected Multiple Sclerosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2023; 220:115-125. [PMID: 35975888 PMCID: PMC10016223 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.22.27731] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND. The central vein sign (CVS) is a proposed MRI biomarker of multiple sclerosis (MS). The impact of gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA) administration on CVS evaluation remains poorly investigated. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of GBCA use on CVS detection and on the diagnostic performance of the CVS for MS using a 3-T FLAIR* sequence. METHODS. This study was a secondary analysis of data from the pilot study for the prospective multicenter Central Vein Sign: A Diagnostic Biomarker in Multiple Sclerosis (CAVS-MS), which recruited adults with suspected MS from April 2018 to February 2020. Participants underwent 3-T brain MRI including FLAIR and precontrast and post-contrast echo-planar imaging T2*-weighted acquisitions. Postprocessing was used to generate combined FLAIR and T2*-weighted images (hereafter, FLAIR*). MS diagnoses were established using the 2017 McDonald criteria. Thirty participants (23 women, seven men; mean age, 45 years) were randomly selected from the CAVS-MS pilot study cohort. White matter lesions (WMLs) were marked using FLAIR* images. A single observer, blinded to clinical data and GBCA use, reviewed marked WMLs on FLAIR* images for the presence of the CVS. RESULTS. Thirteen of 30 participants had MS. Across participants, on precontrast FLAIR* imaging, 218 CVS-positive and 517 CVS-negative WMLs were identified; on post-contrast FLAIR* imaging, 269 CVS-positive and 459 CVS-negative WMLs were identified. The fraction of WMLs that were CVS-positive on precontrast and postcontrast images was 48% and 58% in participants with MS and 7% and 10% in participants without MS, respectively. The median patient-level CVS-positivity rate on precontrast and postcontrast images was 43% and 67% for participants with MS and 4% and 8% for participants without MS, respectively. In a binomial model adjusting for MS diagnoses, GBCA use was associated with an increased likelihood of at least one CVS-positive WML (odds ratio, 1.6; p < .001). At a 40% CVS-positivity threshold, the sensitivity of the CVS for MS increased from 62% on precontrast images to 92% on postcontrast images (p = .046). Specificity was not significantly different between precontrast (88%) and postcontrast (82%) images (p = .32). CONCLUSION. GBCA use increased CVS detection on FLAIR* images, thereby increasing the sensitivity of the CVS for MS diagnoses. CLINICAL IMPACT. The postcontrast FLAIR* sequence should be considered for CVS evaluation in future investigational trials and clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lynn Daboul
- Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115
- Translational Neuroradiology Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, NIH, Bethesda, MD
- Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland, OH
| | - Carly M O'Donnell
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, Penn Statistics in Imaging and Visualization Center, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Quy Cao
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, Penn Statistics in Imaging and Visualization Center, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Moein Amin
- Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | | | | | - Christina Azevedo
- Department of Neurology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Amit Bar-Or
- Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Eduardo Caverzasi
- Department of Neurology, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Peter Calabresi
- Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | - Bruce A C Cree
- Department of Neurology, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Leorah Freeman
- Department of Neurology, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX
| | - Roland G Henry
- Department of Neurology, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | | | - Kunio Nakamura
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Jiwon Oh
- Division of Neurology, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Nico Papinutto
- Department of Neurology, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Daniel Pelletier
- Department of Neurology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Rohini D Samudralwar
- Department of Neurology, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX
| | - Suradech Suthiphosuwan
- Department of Medical Imaging, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Matthew K Schindler
- Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | - Nancy L Sicotte
- Department of Neurology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Andrew J Solomon
- Department of Neurological Sciences, Larner College of Medicine, The University of Vermont, Burlington, VT
| | - Russell T Shinohara
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, Penn Statistics in Imaging and Visualization Center, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Daniel S Reich
- Translational Neuroradiology Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, NIH, Bethesda, MD
| | - Daniel Ontaneda
- Mellen Center for Multiple Sclerosis, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Pascal Sati
- Translational Neuroradiology Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, NIH, Bethesda, MD
- Department of Neurology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Tranfa M, Pontillo G, Petracca M, Brunetti A, Tedeschi E, Palma G, Cocozza S. Quantitative MRI in Multiple Sclerosis: From Theory to Application. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2022; 43:1688-1695. [PMID: 35680161 DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.a7536] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2022] [Accepted: 02/22/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
Quantitative MR imaging techniques allow evaluating different aspects of brain microstructure, providing meaningful information about the pathophysiology of damage in CNS disorders. In the study of patients with MS, quantitative MR imaging techniques represent an invaluable tool for studying changes in myelin and iron content occurring in the context of inflammatory and neurodegenerative processes. In the first section of this review, we summarize the physics behind quantitative MR imaging, here defined as relaxometry and quantitative susceptibility mapping, and describe the neurobiological correlates of quantitative MR imaging findings. In the second section, we focus on quantitative MR imaging application in MS, reporting the main findings in both the gray and white matter compartments, separately addressing macroscopically damaged and normal-appearing parenchyma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Tranfa
- From the Departments of Advanced Biomedical Sciences (M.T., G. Pontillo, A.B., E.T., S.C.)
| | - G Pontillo
- From the Departments of Advanced Biomedical Sciences (M.T., G. Pontillo, A.B., E.T., S.C.) .,Electrical Engineering and Information Technology (G. Pontillo), University of Naples "Federico II," Naples, Italy
| | - M Petracca
- Department of Human Neurosciences (M.P.), Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - A Brunetti
- From the Departments of Advanced Biomedical Sciences (M.T., G. Pontillo, A.B., E.T., S.C.)
| | - E Tedeschi
- From the Departments of Advanced Biomedical Sciences (M.T., G. Pontillo, A.B., E.T., S.C.)
| | - G Palma
- Institute of Nanotechnology (G. Palma), National Research Council, Lecce, Italy
| | - S Cocozza
- From the Departments of Advanced Biomedical Sciences (M.T., G. Pontillo, A.B., E.T., S.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Salem M, Ryan MA, Oliver A, Hussain KF, Lladó X. Improving the detection of new lesions in multiple sclerosis with a cascaded 3D fully convolutional neural network approach. Front Neurosci 2022; 16:1007619. [PMID: 36507318 PMCID: PMC9730806 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2022.1007619] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2022] [Accepted: 10/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has an important role in multiple sclerosis (MS) diagnosis and follow-up. Specifically, the presence of new lesions on brain MRI scans is considered a robust predictive biomarker for the disease progression. New lesions are a high-impact prognostic factor to predict evolution to MS or risk of disability accumulation over time. However, the detection of this disease activity is performed visually by comparing the follow-up and baseline scans. Due to the presence of small lesions, misregistration, and high inter-/intra-observer variability, this detection of new lesions is prone to errors. In this direction, one of the last Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention (MICCAI) challenges was dealing with this automatic new lesion quantification. The MSSEG-2: MS new lesions segmentation challenge offers an evaluation framework for this new lesion segmentation task with a large database (100 patients, each with two-time points) compiled from the OFSEP (Observatoire français de la sclérose en plaques) cohort, the French MS registry, including 3D T2-w fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (T2-FLAIR) images from different centers and scanners. Apart from a change in centers, MRI scanners, and acquisition protocols, there are more challenges that hinder the automated detection process of new lesions such as the need for large annotated datasets, which may be not easily available, or the fact that new lesions are small areas producing a class imbalance problem that could bias trained models toward the non-lesion class. In this article, we present a novel automated method for new lesion detection of MS patient images. Our approach is based on a cascade of two 3D patch-wise fully convolutional neural networks (FCNNs). The first FCNN is trained to be more sensitive revealing possible candidate new lesion voxels, while the second FCNN is trained to reduce the number of misclassified voxels coming from the first network. 3D T2-FLAIR images from the two-time points were pre-processed and linearly co-registered. Afterward, a fully CNN, where its inputs were only the baseline and follow-up images, was trained to detect new MS lesions. Our approach obtained a mean segmentation dice similarity coefficient of 0.42 with a detection F1-score of 0.5. Compared to the challenge participants, we obtained one of the highest precision scores (PPVL = 0.52), the best PPVL rate (0.53), and a lesion detection sensitivity (SensL of 0.53).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mostafa Salem
- Research Institute of Computer Vision and Robotics, University of Girona, Girona, Spain,Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Computers and Information, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt,*Correspondence: Mostafa Salem
| | - Marwa Ahmed Ryan
- Research Institute of Computer Vision and Robotics, University of Girona, Girona, Spain,Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Computers and Information, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt
| | - Arnau Oliver
- Research Institute of Computer Vision and Robotics, University of Girona, Girona, Spain
| | - Khaled Fathy Hussain
- Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Computers and Information, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt
| | - Xavier Lladó
- Research Institute of Computer Vision and Robotics, University of Girona, Girona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Baldini S, Morelli ME, Sartori A, Pasquin F, Dinoto A, Bratina A, Bosco A, Manganotti P. Microstates in multiple sclerosis: an electrophysiological signature of altered large-scale networks functioning? Brain Commun 2022; 5:fcac255. [PMID: 36601622 PMCID: PMC9806850 DOI: 10.1093/braincomms/fcac255] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2021] [Revised: 06/07/2022] [Accepted: 11/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Multiple sclerosis has a highly variable course and disabling symptoms even in absence of associated imaging data. This clinical-radiological paradox has motivated functional studies with particular attention to the resting-state networks by functional MRI. The EEG microstates analysis might offer advantages to study the spontaneous fluctuations of brain activity. This analysis investigates configurations of voltage maps that remain stable for 80-120 ms, termed microstates. The aim of our study was to investigate the temporal dynamic of microstates in patients with multiple sclerosis, without reported cognitive difficulties, and their possible correlations with clinical and neuropsychological parameters. We enrolled fifty relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients and 24 healthy subjects, matched for age and sex. Demographic and clinical data were collected. All participants underwent to high-density EEG in resting-state and analyzed 15 min free artefact segments. Microstates analysis consisted in two processes: segmentation, to identify specific templates, and back-fitting, to quantify their temporal dynamic. A neuropsychological assessment was performed by the Brief International Cognitive Assessment for Multiple Sclerosis. Repeated measures two-way ANOVA was run to compare microstates parameters of patients versus controls. To evaluate association between clinical, neuropsychological and microstates data, we performed Pearsons' correlation and stepwise multiple linear regression to estimate possible predictions. The alpha value was set to 0.05. We found six templates computed across all subjects. Significant differences were found in most of the parameters (global explained variance, time coverage, occurrence) for the microstate Class A (P < 0.001), B (P < 0.001), D (P < 0.001), E (P < 0.001) and F (P < 0.001). In particular, an increase of temporal dynamic of Class A, B and E and a decrease of Class D and F were observed. A significant positive association of disease duration with the mean duration of Class A was found. Eight percent of patients with multiple sclerosis were found cognitive impaired, and the multiple linear regression analysis showed a strong prediction of Symbol Digit Modalities Test score by global explained variance of Class A. The EEG microstate analysis in patients with multiple sclerosis, without overt cognitive impairment, showed an increased temporal dynamic of the sensory-related microstates (Class A and B), a reduced presence of the cognitive-related microstates (Class D and F), and a higher activation of a microstate (Class E) associated to the default mode network. These findings might represent an electrophysiological signature of brain reorganization in multiple sclerosis. Moreover, the association between Symbol Digit Modalities Test and Class A may suggest a possible marker of overt cognitive dysfunctions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Baldini
- Neurology Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, Cattinara University Hospital ASUGI, University of Trieste, 34149 Trieste, Italy
| | - Maria Elisa Morelli
- Neurology Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, Cattinara University Hospital ASUGI, University of Trieste, 34149 Trieste, Italy
| | - Arianna Sartori
- Neurology Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, Cattinara University Hospital ASUGI, University of Trieste, 34149 Trieste, Italy
| | - Fulvio Pasquin
- Neurology Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, Cattinara University Hospital ASUGI, University of Trieste, 34149 Trieste, Italy
| | - Alessandro Dinoto
- Neurology Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, Cattinara University Hospital ASUGI, University of Trieste, 34149 Trieste, Italy
| | - Alessio Bratina
- Neurology Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, Cattinara University Hospital ASUGI, University of Trieste, 34149 Trieste, Italy
| | - Antonio Bosco
- Neurology Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, Cattinara University Hospital ASUGI, University of Trieste, 34149 Trieste, Italy
| | - Paolo Manganotti
- Neurology Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, Cattinara University Hospital ASUGI, University of Trieste, 34149 Trieste, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Cacciaguerra L, Sechi E, Rocca MA, Filippi M, Pittock SJ, Flanagan EP. Neuroimaging features in inflammatory myelopathies: A review. Front Neurol 2022; 13:993645. [PMID: 36330423 PMCID: PMC9623025 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.993645] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2022] [Accepted: 08/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Spinal cord involvement can be observed in the course of immune-mediated disorders. Although multiple sclerosis (MS) represents the leading cause of inflammatory myelopathy, an increasing number of alternative etiologies must be now considered in the diagnostic work-up of patients presenting with myelitis. These include antibody-mediated disorders and cytotoxic T cell-mediated diseases targeting central nervous system (CNS) antigens, and systemic autoimmune conditions with secondary CNS involvement. Even though clinical features are helpful to orient the diagnostic suspicion (e.g., timing and severity of myelopathy symptoms), the differential diagnosis of inflammatory myelopathies is often challenging due to overlapping features. Moreover, noninflammatory etiologies can sometimes mimic an inflammatory process. In this setting, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is becoming a fundamental tool for the characterization of spinal cord damage, revealing a pictorial scenario which is wider than the clinical manifestations. The characterization of spinal cord lesions in terms of longitudinal extension, location on axial plane, involvement of the white matter and/or gray matter, and specific patterns of contrast enhancement, often allows a proper differentiation of these diseases. For instance, besides classical features, such as the presence of longitudinally extensive spinal cord lesions in patients with aquaporin-4-IgG positive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (AQP4+NMOSD), novel radiological signs (e.g., H sign, trident sign) have been recently proposed and successfully applied for the differential diagnosis of inflammatory myelopathies. In this review article, we will discuss the radiological features of spinal cord involvement in autoimmune disorders such as MS, AQP4+NMOSD, myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease (MOGAD), and other recently characterized immune-mediated diseases. The identification of imaging pitfalls and mimics that can lead to misdiagnosis will also be examined. Since spinal cord damage is a major cause of irreversible clinical disability, the recognition of these radiological aspects will help clinicians achieve a correct and prompt diagnosis, treat early with disease-specific treatment and improve patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Cacciaguerra
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
- Neuroimaging Research Unit, Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Elia Sechi
- Neurology Unit, Department of Medical, Surgical and Experimental Sciences, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy
| | - Maria A. Rocca
- Neuroimaging Research Unit, Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
- Neurology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Massimo Filippi
- Neuroimaging Research Unit, Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
- Neurology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
- Neurorehabilitation Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
- Neurophysiology Service, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Sean J. Pittock
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
- Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Eoin P. Flanagan
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
- Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Peres DS, Rodrigues P, Viero FT, Frare JM, Kudsi SQ, Meira GM, Trevisan G. Prevalence of depression and anxiety in the different clinical forms of multiple sclerosis and associations with disability: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Brain Behav Immun Health 2022; 24:100484. [PMID: 35856061 PMCID: PMC9287158 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbih.2022.100484] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2022] [Revised: 05/26/2022] [Accepted: 06/28/2022] [Indexed: 10/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic neurodegenerative and autoimmune disease. Motor, sensory and cognitive deficits in MS are commonly accompanied by psychiatric disorders. Depression and anxiety affect the quality of life of MS patients, and the treatment is still not well-established. Prevalence rates in MS patients for depression and anxiety vary widely between studies. However, the prevalence of these psychiatric disorders in the subgroups of MS patients and their association with a disability has not been studied yet. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis proposes to estimate the prevalence of depression and anxiety in MS and to perform subgroup analyses (study type, Extended Disability Status Scale/EDSS, duration of MS, region, type of MS) on observational studies. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (4202125033). A computerized search on PubMed, EMBASE and Scopus for studies on depression and anxiety in MS was performed from 2015 to 2021, and 12 articles were included. Most of the studies in the meta-analysis had a low risk of bias. The prevalence of depression was 27.01% (MS), 15.78% (relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis/RRMS), and 19.13% (progressive multiple sclerosis/PMS). For anxiety the prevalence was 35.19% (MS), 21.40% (RRMS), and 24.07% (PMS). The prevalence of depression/anxiety for patients with EDSS <3 was 26.69/45.56% and for EDSS >3 was 22.96/26.70%. Using HADS-A (8) the prevalence was 38.5% and for depression was 22.4%. Then, our study brought together current data regarding psychiatric disorders in MS patients, which are comorbidities that affect the quality of life of these patients. Prevalence of depression/anxiety for the MS patients was 27.01%/35.19%. Prevalence of depression was 15.78% (RRMS) and 19.13% (PMS). Prevalence of anxiety was 21.40% (RRMS) and 24.07% (PMS). Prevalence of depression/anxiety for the patients with EDSS <3 was 26.69/45.56% and for EDSS >3 was 22.96/26.70%. Prevalence of anxiety using HADS-A (8) was 38.5% and for depression was 22.4%.
Collapse
|
36
|
Lohmeier J, Silva RV, Tietze A, Taupitz M, Kaneko T, Prüss H, Paul F, Infante-Duarte C, Hamm B, Caravan P, Makowski MR. Fibrin-targeting molecular MRI in inflammatory CNS disorders. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2022; 49:3692-3704. [PMID: 35507058 PMCID: PMC9399196 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-022-05807-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2021] [Accepted: 04/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Fibrin deposition is a fundamental pathophysiological event in the inflammatory component of various CNS disorders, such as multiple sclerosis (MS) and Alzheimer's disease. Beyond its traditional role in coagulation, fibrin elicits immunoinflammatory changes with oxidative stress response and activation of CNS-resident/peripheral immune cells contributing to CNS injury. PURPOSE To investigate if CNS fibrin deposition can be determined using molecular MRI, and to assess its capacity as a non-invasive imaging biomarker that corresponds to inflammatory response and barrier impairment. MATERIALS AND METHODS Specificity and efficacy of a peptide-conjugated Gd-based molecular MRI probe (EP2104-R) to visualise and quantify CNS fibrin deposition were evaluated. Probe efficacy to specifically target CNS fibrin deposition in murine adoptive-transfer experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE), a pre-clinical model for MS (n = 12), was assessed. Findings were validated using immunohistochemistry and laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Deposition of fibrin in neuroinflammatory conditions was investigated and its diagnostic capacity for disease staging and monitoring as well as quantification of immunoinflammatory response was determined. Results were compared using t-tests (two groups) or one-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons test. Linear regression was used to model the relationship between variables. RESULTS For the first time (to our knowledge), CNS fibrin deposition was visualised and quantified in vivo using molecular imaging. Signal enhancement was apparent in EAE lesions even 12-h after administration of EP2104-R due to targeted binding (M ± SD, 1.07 ± 0.10 (baseline) vs. 0.73 ± 0.09 (EP2104-R), p = .008), which could be inhibited with an MRI-silent analogue (M ± SD, 0.60 ± 0.14 (EP2104-R) vs. 0.96 ± 0.13 (EP2104-La), p = .006). CNS fibrin deposition corresponded to immunoinflammatory activity (R2 = 0.85, p < .001) and disability (R2 = 0.81, p < .001) in a model for MS, which suggests a clinical role for staging and monitoring. Additionally, EP2104-R showed substantially higher SNR (M ± SD, 6.6 ± 1 (EP2104-R) vs. 2.7 ± 0.4 (gadobutrol), p = .004) than clinically used contrast media, which increases sensitivity for lesion detection. CONCLUSIONS Molecular imaging of CNS fibrin deposition provides an imaging biomarker for inflammatory CNS pathology, which corresponds to pathophysiological ECM remodelling and disease activity, and yields high signal-to-noise ratio, which can improve diagnostic neuroimaging across several neurological diseases with variable degrees of barrier impairment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johannes Lohmeier
- Department of Radiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Campus Charité Mitte (CCM), Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Rafaela V Silva
- Experimental and Clinical Research Center, a cooperation between the Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association and Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Einstein Center for Neurosciences Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
- Max Delbrueck Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association (MDC), Lindenberger Weg 80, 13125, Berlin, Germany
| | - Anna Tietze
- Institute of Neuroradiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Campus Charité Mitte (CCM), Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Matthias Taupitz
- Department of Radiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Campus Charité Mitte (CCM), Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Takaaki Kaneko
- Center for the Evolutionary Origins of Human Behavior, Kyoto University, Inuyama, Aichi, 484-8506, Japan
| | - Harald Prüss
- Department of Neurology and Experimental Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Campus Charité Mitte (CCM) and German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE) Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Friedemann Paul
- NeuroCure Clinical Research Center and Experimental and Clinical Research Center, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Max Delbrueck Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association (MDC), Lindenberger Weg 80, 13125, Berlin, Germany
| | - Carmen Infante-Duarte
- Experimental and Clinical Research Center, a cooperation between the Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association and Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Max Delbrueck Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association (MDC), Lindenberger Weg 80, 13125, Berlin, Germany
| | - Bernd Hamm
- Department of Radiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Campus Charité Mitte (CCM), Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Peter Caravan
- A. A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Institute for Innovation in Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 149 Thirteenth Street, Suite 2301, Charlestown, MB, 02129, USA
| | - Marcus R Makowski
- Department of Radiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Campus Charité Mitte (CCM), Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Radiology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, München, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Hubbard Cristinacce PL, Keaveney S, Aboagye EO, Hall MG, Little RA, O'Connor JPB, Parker GJM, Waterton JC, Winfield JM, Jauregui-Osoro M. Clinical translation of quantitative magnetic resonance imaging biomarkers - An overview and gap analysis of current practice. Phys Med 2022; 101:165-182. [PMID: 36055125 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2022.08.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2022] [Revised: 08/05/2022] [Accepted: 08/17/2022] [Indexed: 10/14/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This overview of the current landscape of quantitative magnetic resonance imaging biomarkers (qMR IBs) aims to support the standardisation of academic IBs to assist their translation to clinical practice. METHODS We used three complementary approaches to investigate qMR IB use and quality management practices within the UK: 1) a literature search of qMR and quality management terms during 2011-2015 and 2016-2020; 2) a database search for clinical research studies using qMR IBs during 2016-2020; and 3) a survey to ascertain the current availability and quality management practices for clinical MRI scanners and associated equipment at research institutions across the UK. RESULTS The analysis showed increased use of all qMR methods between the periods 2011-2015 and 2016-2020 and diffusion-tensor MRI and volumetry to be popular methods. However, the "translation ratio" of journal articles to clinical research studies was higher for qMR methods that have evidence of clinical translation via a commercial route, such as fat fraction and T2 mapping. The number of journal articles citing quality management terms doubled between the periods 2011-2015 and 2016-2020; although, its proportion relative to all journal articles only increased by 3.0%. The survey suggested that quality assurance (QA) and quality control (QC) of data acquisition procedures are under-reported in the literature and that QA/QC of acquired data/data analysis are under-developed and lack consistency between institutions. CONCLUSIONS We summarise current attempts to standardise and translate qMR IBs, and conclude by outlining the ideal quality management practices and providing a gap analysis between current practice and a metrological standard.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sam Keaveney
- MRI Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Downs Road, Sutton, Surrey SM2 5PT, UK; Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, 123 Old Brompton Road, London SW7 3RP, UK
| | - Eric O Aboagye
- Department of Surgery & Cancer, Division of Cancer, Imperial College London, W12 0NN London, UK
| | - Matt G Hall
- National Physical Laboratory, Hampton Road, Teddington TW11 0LW, UK
| | - Ross A Little
- Division of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PT, UK
| | - James P B O'Connor
- Division of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PT, UK; Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, 123 Old Brompton Road, London SW7 3RP, UK
| | - Geoff J M Parker
- Centre for Medical Image Computing, Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, 90 High Holborn, London WC1V 6LJ, UK; Bioxydyn Ltd, Manchester M15 6SZ, UK
| | - John C Waterton
- Bioxydyn Ltd, Manchester M15 6SZ, UK; Division of Informatics, Imaging and Data Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PT, UK
| | - Jessica M Winfield
- MRI Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Downs Road, Sutton, Surrey SM2 5PT, UK; Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, 123 Old Brompton Road, London SW7 3RP, UK
| | - Maite Jauregui-Osoro
- Department of Surgery & Cancer, Division of Cancer, Imperial College London, W12 0NN London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Hamann J, Ettrich B, Hoffman KT, Then Bergh F, Lobsien D. Somatosensory evoked potentials and their relation to microstructural damage in patients with multiple sclerosis—A whole brain DTI study. Front Neurol 2022; 13:890841. [PMID: 36105776 PMCID: PMC9465089 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.890841] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2022] [Accepted: 07/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP) play a pivotal role in the diagnosis and disease monitoring of multiple sclerosis (MS). Delayed latencies are a surrogate for demyelination along the sensory afference. This study aimed to evaluate if SSEP latencies are representative of demyelination of the brain overall, by correlating with cerebral microstructural integrity as measured by Magnetic resonance (MR) diffusion tensor imaging (DTI). Analysis was performed in a hypothesis-free whole brain approach using tract-based spatial statistics (TBSS). Material and methods A total of 46 patients with MS or clinically isolated syndrome were included in the study. Bilateral SSEPs of the median nerve measuring mean N20 latencies (mN20) and Central Conduction Time (CCT), were acquired. MRI scans were performed at 3T. DTI acquisition was done with a single-shot echoplanar imaging technique with 80 diffusion directions. The FSL software package was used to process the DTI datasets and to calculate maps of fractional anisotropy (FA), axial diffusivity (AD), and radial diffusivity (RD). These maps were then further analyzed using the TBSS module. The mean N20 and CCT and the right- and left-sided N20 and CCT were separately correlated to FA, AD, and RD, controlled for age, gender, and EDSS as variables of non-interest. Results Widespread negative correlations of SSEP latencies with FA (p = 0.0005) and positive correlations with RD (p = 0.0003) were measured in distinct white matter tracts, especially the optic tracts, corpus callosum, and posterior corona radiata. No correlation with AD was found in any white matter tract. Conclusion Highly significant correlations of FA and RD to SSEPs suggest that their latency is representative of widespread microstructural change, and especially demyelination in patients suffering from MS, reaching beyond the classic somatosensory regions. This points to the usefulness of SSEPs as a non-invasive tool in the evaluation of microstructural damage to the brain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Hamann
- Institute of Neuroradiology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
- *Correspondence: Jan Hamann
| | - Barbara Ettrich
- Department of Neurology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | | | | | - Donald Lobsien
- Institute of Neuroradiology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, Helios Klinikum Erfurt, Erfurt, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Jensen-Kondering U, Larsen N, Huhndorf M, Jansen O, Lüddecke R, Stürner K, Ravesh MS. Central vein sign in patients with inflammatory lesion of the upper cervical spinal cord on susceptibility weighted imaging at 3 tesla. Preliminary results. Magn Reson Imaging 2022; 93:11-14. [PMID: 35914655 DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2022.07.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2022] [Accepted: 07/23/2022] [Indexed: 10/31/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A central vein sign (CVS) has been described in vivo in patients with MS but also in other inflammatory lesion of the brain such as neuromyelits optica spectrum disease and others. Recently, it has been used to differentiate patients with MS from other inflammatory lesions of the brain. OBJECTIVE It was the goal of this study to demonstrate the feasibility of the depiction of the CVS in patients with inflammatory lesion of the upper cervical spinal cord using susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI). METHODS Consecutive patients with inflammatory lesions of the upper cervical spinal cord were included. Patients were scanned using a 3 T Philips Ingenia CX. The presence of the CVS was assessed by two raters. Demographic and clinical parameters were compared between patients with and those without a CVS. RESULTS 20 patients could be included. 15 patients had a diagnosis of MS. A CVS was present in 8 patients (40%). Agreement between the two raters was substantial (κ = 0.79). Time from first manifestation was significantly different (14 vs. 2 years, p = 0.021) between patients with CVS and without CVS. CONCLUSION The depiction of the CVS in the upper cervical spine is feasible. More research is necessary to evaluate these preliminary results and the value of the CVS in the spinal cord.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- U Jensen-Kondering
- Department of Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany; Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
| | - N Larsen
- Department of Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - M Huhndorf
- Department of Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - O Jansen
- Department of Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - R Lüddecke
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - K Stürner
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - M Salehi Ravesh
- Department of Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Diaz-Hurtado M, Martínez-Heras E, Solana E, Casas-Roma J, Llufriu S, Kanber B, Prados F. Recent advances in the longitudinal segmentation of multiple sclerosis lesions on magnetic resonance imaging: a review. Neuroradiology 2022; 64:2103-2117. [PMID: 35864180 DOI: 10.1007/s00234-022-03019-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2022] [Accepted: 07/12/2022] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic autoimmune disease characterized by demyelinating lesions that are often visible on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Segmentation of these lesions can provide imaging biomarkers of disease burden that can help monitor disease progression and the imaging response to treatment. Manual delineation of MRI lesions is tedious and prone to subjective bias, while automated lesion segmentation methods offer objectivity and speed, the latter being particularly important when analysing large datasets. Lesion segmentation can be broadly categorised into two groups: cross-sectional methods, which use imaging data acquired at a single time-point to characterise MRI lesions; and longitudinal methods, which use imaging data from the same subject acquired at two or more different time-points to characterise lesions over time. The main objective of longitudinal segmentation approaches is to more accurately detect the presence of new MS lesions and the growth or remission of existing lesions, which may be effective biomarkers of disease progression and treatment response. This paper reviews articles on longitudinal MS lesion segmentation methods published over the past 10 years. These are divided into traditional machine learning methods and deep learning techniques. PubMed articles using longitudinal information and comparing fully automatic two time point segmentations in any step of the process were selected. Nineteen articles were reviewed. There is an increasing number of deep learning techniques for longitudinal MS lesion segmentation that are promising to help better understand disease progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Eloy Martínez-Heras
- Center of Neuroimmunology, Laboratory of Advanced Imaging in Neuroimmunological Diseases, Hospital Clinic Barcelona, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi I Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Elisabeth Solana
- Center of Neuroimmunology, Laboratory of Advanced Imaging in Neuroimmunological Diseases, Hospital Clinic Barcelona, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi I Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jordi Casas-Roma
- E-Health Center, Universitat Oberta de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Sara Llufriu
- Center of Neuroimmunology, Laboratory of Advanced Imaging in Neuroimmunological Diseases, Hospital Clinic Barcelona, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi I Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Baris Kanber
- Centre for Medical Image Computing, Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, UK.,National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, University College London, London, UK.,Queen Square MS Centre, Department of Neuroinflammation, Faculty of Brain Sciences, UCL Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Ferran Prados
- E-Health Center, Universitat Oberta de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain.,Centre for Medical Image Computing, Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, UK.,National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, University College London, London, UK.,Queen Square MS Centre, Department of Neuroinflammation, Faculty of Brain Sciences, UCL Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Sundermann B, Billebaut B, Bauer J, Iacoban CG, Alykova O, Schülke C, Gerdes M, Kugel H, Neduvakkattu S, Bösenberg H, Mathys C. Practical Aspects of novel MRI Techniques in Neuroradiology: Part 2 - Acceleration Methods and Implications for Individual Regions. ROFO-FORTSCHR RONTG 2022; 194:1195-1203. [PMID: 35798335 DOI: 10.1055/a-1800-8789] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recently introduced MRI techniques facilitate accelerated examinations or increased resolution with the same duration. Further techniques offer homogeneous image quality in regions with anatomical transitions. The question arises whether and how these techniques can be adopted for routine diagnostic imaging. METHODS Narrative review with an educational focus based on current literature research and practical experiences of different professions involved (physicians, MRI technologists/radiographers, physics/biomedical engineering). Different hardware manufacturers are considered. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS Compressed sensing and simultaneous multi-slice imaging are novel acceleration techniques with different yet complimentary applications. They do not suffer from classical signal-to-noise-ratio penalties. Combining 3 D and acceleration techniques facilitates new broader examination protocols, particularly for clinical brain imaging. In further regions of the nervous systems mainly specific applications appear to benefit from recent technological improvements. KEY POINTS · New acceleration techniques allow for faster or higher resolution examinations.. · New brain imaging approaches have evolved, including more universal examination protocols.. · Other regions of the nervous system are dominated by targeted applications of recently introduced MRI techniques.. CITATION FORMAT · Sundermann B, Billebaut B, Bauer J et al. Practical Aspects of novel MRI Techniques in Neuroradiology: Part 2 - Acceleration Methods and Implications for Individual Regions. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2022; DOI: 10.1055/a-1800-8789.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benedikt Sundermann
- Institute of Radiology and Neuroradiology, Evangelisches Krankenhaus, Medical Campus University of Oldenburg, Germany.,Research Center Neurosensory Science, University of Oldenburg, Germany.,Clinic for Radiology, University Hospital Münster, Germany
| | - Benoit Billebaut
- Clinic for Radiology, University Hospital Münster, Germany.,School for Radiologic Technologists, University Hospital Münster, Germany
| | - Jochen Bauer
- Clinic for Radiology, University Hospital Münster, Germany
| | - Catalin George Iacoban
- Institute of Radiology and Neuroradiology, Evangelisches Krankenhaus, Medical Campus University of Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Olga Alykova
- Institute of Radiology and Neuroradiology, Evangelisches Krankenhaus, Medical Campus University of Oldenburg, Germany
| | | | - Maike Gerdes
- Institute of Radiology and Neuroradiology, Evangelisches Krankenhaus, Medical Campus University of Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Harald Kugel
- Clinic for Radiology, University Hospital Münster, Germany
| | | | - Holger Bösenberg
- Institute of Radiology and Neuroradiology, Evangelisches Krankenhaus, Medical Campus University of Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Christian Mathys
- Institute of Radiology and Neuroradiology, Evangelisches Krankenhaus, Medical Campus University of Oldenburg, Germany.,Research Center Neurosensory Science, University of Oldenburg, Germany.,Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Düsseldorf, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Dominguez-Mozo MI, Casanova I, De Torres L, Aladro-Benito Y, Perez-Perez S, Garcia-Martínez A, Gomez P, Abellan S, De Antonio E, Lopez-De-Silanes C, Alvarez-Lafuente R. microRNA Expression and Its Association With Disability and Brain Atrophy in Multiple Sclerosis Patients Treated With Glatiramer Acetate. Front Immunol 2022; 13:904683. [PMID: 35774792 PMCID: PMC9239306 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.904683] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2022] [Accepted: 05/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BackgroundMicroRNAs are small non-coding RNA that regulate gene expression at a post-transcriptional level affecting several cellular processes including inflammation, neurodegeneration and remyelination. Different patterns of miRNAs expression have been demonstrated in multiple sclerosis compared to controls, as well as in different courses of the disease. For these reason they have been postulated as promising biomarkers candidates in multiple sclerosis.Objectiveto correlate serum microRNAs profile expression with disability, cognitive functioning and brain volume in patients with remitting-relapsing multiple sclerosis.Methodscross-sectional study in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients treated with glatiramer acetate. Disability was measured with Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) and cognitive function was studied with Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT). Brain volume was analyzed with automatic software NeuroQuant®.ResultsWe found an association between miR.146a.5p (rs:0.434, p=0.03) and miR.9.5p (rs:0.516, p=0.028) with EDSS; and miR-146a.5p (rs:-0.476, p=0.016) and miR-126.3p (rs:-0.528, p=0.007) with SDMT. Regarding to the brain volume, miR.9.5p correlated with thalamus (rs:-0.545, p=0.036); miR.200c.3p with pallidum (rs:-0.68, p=0.002) and cerebellum (rs:-0.472, p=0.048); miR-138.5p with amygdala (rs:0.73, p=0.016) and pallidum (rs:0.64, p=0.048); and miR-223.3p with caudate (rs:0.46, p=0.04).ConclusionsThese data support the hypothesis of microRNA as potential biomarkers in this disease. More studies are needed to validate these results and to better understand the role of microRNAs in the pathogenesis, monitoring and therapeutic response of multiple sclerosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- María I Dominguez-Mozo
- Research Group in Environmental Factors of Neurodegenerative Diseases, Health Research Institute Hospital Clínico San Carlos (IdISSC), Madrid, Spain
| | - Ignacio Casanova
- Department of Neurology, Hospital Universitario de Torrejón, Madrid, Spain
- School of Medicine, Universidad Francisco de Vitoria, Madrid, Spain
| | - Laura De Torres
- Department of Neurology, Hospital Universitario de Torrejón, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Silvia Perez-Perez
- Research Group in Environmental Factors of Neurodegenerative Diseases, Health Research Institute Hospital Clínico San Carlos (IdISSC), Madrid, Spain
| | - Angel Garcia-Martínez
- Research Group in Environmental Factors of Neurodegenerative Diseases, Health Research Institute Hospital Clínico San Carlos (IdISSC), Madrid, Spain
| | - Patricia Gomez
- Department of Neurology, Hospital Universitario de Torrejón, Madrid, Spain
- School of Medicine, Universidad Francisco de Vitoria, Madrid, Spain
| | - Sara Abellan
- Department of Neurology, Hospital Universitario de Torrejón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Esther De Antonio
- Department of Radiology, Hospital Universitario de Torrejón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Carlos Lopez-De-Silanes
- Department of Neurology, Hospital Universitario de Torrejón, Madrid, Spain
- School of Medicine, Universidad Francisco de Vitoria, Madrid, Spain
| | - Roberto Alvarez-Lafuente
- Research Group in Environmental Factors of Neurodegenerative Diseases, Health Research Institute Hospital Clínico San Carlos (IdISSC), Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Trotier AJ, Dilharreguy B, Anandra S, Corbin N, Lefrançois W, Ozenne V, Miraux S, Ribot EJ. The Compressed Sensing MP2RAGE as a Surrogate to the MPRAGE for Neuroimaging at 3 T. Invest Radiol 2022; 57:366-378. [PMID: 35030106 PMCID: PMC9390231 DOI: 10.1097/rli.0000000000000849] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2021] [Accepted: 11/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The magnetization-prepared 2 rapid acquisition gradient echo (MP2RAGE) sequence provides quantitative T1 maps in addition to high-contrast morphological images. Advanced acceleration techniques such as compressed sensing (CS) allow its acquisition time to be compatible with clinical applications. To consider its routine use in future neuroimaging protocols, the repeatability of the segmented brain structures was evaluated and compared with the standard morphological sequence (magnetization-prepared rapid gradient echo [MPRAGE]). The repeatability of the T1 measurements was also assessed. MATERIALS AND METHODS Thirteen healthy volunteers were scanned either 3 or 4 times at several days of interval, on a 3 T clinical scanner, with the 2 sequences (CS-MP2RAGE and MPRAGE), set with the same spatial resolution (0.8-mm isotropic) and scan duration (6 minutes 21 seconds). The reconstruction time of the CS-MP2RAGE outputs (including the 2 echo images, the MP2RAGE image, and the T1 map) was 3 minutes 33 seconds, using an open-source in-house algorithm implemented in the Gadgetron framework.Both precision and variability of volume measurements obtained from CAT12 and VolBrain were assessed. The T1 accuracy and repeatability were measured on phantoms and on humans and were compared with literature.Volumes obtained from the CS-MP2RAGE and the MPRAGE images were compared using Student t tests (P < 0.05 was considered significant). RESULTS The CS-MP2RAGE acquisition provided morphological images of the same quality and higher contrasts than the standard MPRAGE images. Similar intravolunteer variabilities were obtained with the CS-MP2RAGE and the MPRAGE segmentations. In addition, high-resolution T1 maps were obtained from the CS-MP2RAGE. T1 times of white and gray matters and several deep gray nuclei are consistent with the literature and show very low variability (<1%). CONCLUSIONS The CS-MP2RAGE can be used in future protocols to rapidly obtain morphological images and quantitative T1 maps in 3-dimensions while maintaining high repeatability in volumetry and relaxation times.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aurélien J. Trotier
- From the Centre de Résonance Magnétique des Systèmes Biologiques, UMR5536, CNRS/Université de Bordeaux
| | - Bixente Dilharreguy
- Biomedical Imaging Facility (pIBIO), UMS3767, CNRS/Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - Serge Anandra
- Biomedical Imaging Facility (pIBIO), UMS3767, CNRS/Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - Nadège Corbin
- From the Centre de Résonance Magnétique des Systèmes Biologiques, UMR5536, CNRS/Université de Bordeaux
- UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, University College of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - William Lefrançois
- From the Centre de Résonance Magnétique des Systèmes Biologiques, UMR5536, CNRS/Université de Bordeaux
| | - Valery Ozenne
- From the Centre de Résonance Magnétique des Systèmes Biologiques, UMR5536, CNRS/Université de Bordeaux
| | - Sylvain Miraux
- From the Centre de Résonance Magnétique des Systèmes Biologiques, UMR5536, CNRS/Université de Bordeaux
| | - Emeline J. Ribot
- From the Centre de Résonance Magnétique des Systèmes Biologiques, UMR5536, CNRS/Université de Bordeaux
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Assessment of 2D conventional and synthetic MRI in multiple sclerosis. Neuroradiology 2022; 64:2315-2322. [PMID: 35583667 DOI: 10.1007/s00234-022-02973-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2022] [Accepted: 05/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To qualitatively and quantitatively compare synthetic and conventional MRI sequences acquired on a 1.5-T system for patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). METHODS Prospective study that involved twenty-seven consecutive relapsing-remitting MS patients scanned on a 1.5-T MRI scanner. The MRI protocol included 2D transverse conventional spin-echo sequences: proton density-weighted (PD), T2-weighted, T2-FLAIR, and T1-weighted. Synthetic images were generated using 2D transverse QRAPMASTER and SyMRI software with the same voxel size, repetition, echo, and inversion times as the conventional sequences. Four raters performed a crosstab qualitative analysis that involved evaluating global image quality, contrast, flow artefacts, and confidence in lesion assessment introducing the concepts of predominance, agreement, and disagreement. A quantitative analysis was also performed and included evaluating the number of lesions (periventricular, juxtacortical, brainstem, and cerebellum) and the contrast-to-noise ratio between regions (CSF, white matter, grey matter, lesions). RESULTS The global image quality assessment showed predominance for better scores for conventional sequences over synthetic sequences, whereas contrast, confidence in lesion assessment, and flow artefacts showed predominance for agreement between sequences. There was predominance for disagreement between all pairs of raters in most of the evaluated qualitative parameters. Synthetic PD and T2-FLAIR images showed higher contrast-to-noise ratios than the corresponding conventional images for most comparison between regions. There were no significant differences in the number of lesions detected for most of the study regions between conventional and synthetic images. CONCLUSION Synthetic MRI can be potentially used as an alternative to conventional brain MRI sequences in the assessment of MS.
Collapse
|
45
|
Sundermann B, Billebaut B, Bauer J, Iacoban CG, Alykova O, Schülke C, Gerdes M, Kugel H, Neduvakkattu S, Bösenberg H, Mathys C. Practical Aspects of novel MRI Techniques in Neuroradiology: Part 1-3D Acquisitions, Dixon Techniques and Artefact Reduction. ROFO-FORTSCHR RONTG 2022; 194:1100-1108. [PMID: 35545104 DOI: 10.1055/a-1800-8692] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recently introduced MRI techniques offer improved image quality and facilitate examinations of patients even when artefacts are expected. They pave the way for novel diagnostic imaging strategies in neuroradiology. These methods include improved 3D imaging, movement and metal artefact reduction techniques as well as Dixon techniques. METHODS Narrative review with an educational focus based on current literature research and practical experiences of different professions involved (physicians, MRI technologists/radiographers, physics/biomedical engineering). Different hardware manufacturers are considered. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS 3D FLAIR is an example of a versatile 3D Turbo Spin Echo sequence with broad applicability in routine brain protocols. It facilitates detection of smaller lesions and more precise measurements for follow-up imaging. It also offers high sensitivity for extracerebral lesions. 3D techniques are increasingly adopted for imaging arterial vessel walls, cerebrospinal fluid spaces and peripheral nerves. Improved hybrid-radial acquisitions are available for movement artefact reduction in a broad application spectrum. Novel susceptibility artefact reduction techniques for targeted application supplement previously established metal artefact reduction sequences. Most of these techniques can be further adapted to achieve the desired diagnostic performances. Dixon techniques allow for homogeneous fat suppression in transition areas and calculation of different image contrasts based on a single acquisition. KEY POINTS · 3D FLAIR can replace 2 D FLAIR for most brain imaging applications and can be a cornerstone of more precise and more widely applicable protocols.. · Further 3D TSE sequences are increasingly replacing 2D TSE sequences for specific applications.. · Improvement of artefact reduction techniques increase the potential for effective diagnostic MRI exams despite movement or near metal implants.. · Dixon techniques facilitate homogeneous fat suppression and simultaneous acquisition of multiple contrasts.. CITATION FORMAT · Sundermann B, Billebaut B, Bauer J et al. Practical Aspects of novel MRI Techniques in Neuroradiology: Part 1-3D Acquisitions, Dixon Techniques and Artefact Reduction. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2022; DOI: 10.1055/a-1800-8692.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benedikt Sundermann
- Institute of Radiology and Neuroradiology, Evangelisches Krankenhaus, Medical Campus University of Oldenburg, Germany.,Research Center Neurosensory Science, University of Oldenburg, Germany.,Clinic for Radiology, University Hospital Münster, Germany
| | - Benoit Billebaut
- Clinic for Radiology, University Hospital Münster, Germany.,School for Radiologic Technologists, University Hospital Münster, Germany
| | - Jochen Bauer
- Clinic for Radiology, University Hospital Münster, Germany
| | - Catalin George Iacoban
- Institute of Radiology and Neuroradiology, Evangelisches Krankenhaus, Medical Campus University of Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Olga Alykova
- Institute of Radiology and Neuroradiology, Evangelisches Krankenhaus, Medical Campus University of Oldenburg, Germany
| | | | - Maike Gerdes
- Institute of Radiology and Neuroradiology, Evangelisches Krankenhaus, Medical Campus University of Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Harald Kugel
- Clinic for Radiology, University Hospital Münster, Germany
| | | | - Holger Bösenberg
- Institute of Radiology and Neuroradiology, Evangelisches Krankenhaus, Medical Campus University of Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Christian Mathys
- Institute of Radiology and Neuroradiology, Evangelisches Krankenhaus, Medical Campus University of Oldenburg, Germany.,Research Center Neurosensory Science, University of Oldenburg, Germany.,Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Düsseldorf, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Kokas Z, Sandi D, Fricska-Nagy Z, Füvesi J, Biernacki T, Köves Á, Fazekas F, Birkás AJ, Katona G, Kovács K, Milanovich D, Dobos E, Kapás I, Jakab G, Csépány T, Bense E, Mátyás K, Rum G, Szolnoki Z, Deme I, Jobbágy Z, Kriston D, Gerócs Z, Diószeghy P, Bors L, Varga A, Kerényi L, Molnár G, Kristóf P, Nagy ZÁ, Sátori M, Imre P, Péntek S, Klivényi P, Kincses ZT, Vécsei L, Bencsik K. Do Hungarian multiple sclerosis care units fulfil international criteria? PLoS One 2022; 17:e0264328. [PMID: 35239686 PMCID: PMC8893632 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264328] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2021] [Accepted: 02/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
A patients Because of the past 3 decades’ extensive research, several disease modifying therapies became available, thus a paradigm change is multiple sclerosis care was necessary. In 2018 a therapeutic guideline was created recommending that treatment of persons with multiple sclerosis should take place in specified care units where the entire spectrum of disease modifying therapies is available, patient monitoring is ensured, and therapy side effects are detected and treated promptly. In 2019 multiple sclerosis care unit criteria were developed, emphasizing personnel and instrumental requirements to provide most professional care. However, no survey was conducted assessing the real-world adaptation of these criteria. Objective To assess whether Hungarian care units fulfil international criteria. Methods A self-report questionnaire was assembled based on international guidelines and sent to Hungarian care units focusing on 3 main aspects: personnel and instrumental background, disease-modifying therapy use, number of people living with multiple sclerosis receiving care in care units. Data on number of persons with multiple sclerosis were compared to Hungarian prevalence estimates. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse data. Results Out of 27 respondent care units, 3 fulfilled minimum requirements and 7 fulfilled minimum and recommended requirements. The least prevalent neighbouring specialties were spasticity and pain specialist, and neuro-ophthalmologist and oto-neurologist. Only 15 centres used all available disease modifying therapies. A total number of 7213 people with multiple sclerosis received care in 27 respondent centres. Compared to prevalence estimates, 2500 persons with multiple sclerosis did not receive multiple sclerosis specific care in Hungary. Conclusion Less than half of Hungarian care units provided sufficient care for people living with multiple sclerosis. Care units employing fewer neighbouring specialties, might have difficulties diagnosing and providing appropriate care for persons with multiple sclerosis, especially for people with progressive disease course, contributing to the reported low number of persons living with multiple sclerosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zsófia Kokas
- Faculty of General Medicine, Department of Neurology, Albert Szent-Györgyi Clinical Centre, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | - Dániel Sandi
- Faculty of General Medicine, Department of Neurology, Albert Szent-Györgyi Clinical Centre, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | - Zsanett Fricska-Nagy
- Faculty of General Medicine, Department of Neurology, Albert Szent-Györgyi Clinical Centre, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | - Judit Füvesi
- Faculty of General Medicine, Department of Neurology, Albert Szent-Györgyi Clinical Centre, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | - Tamás Biernacki
- Faculty of General Medicine, Department of Neurology, Albert Szent-Györgyi Clinical Centre, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | - Ágnes Köves
- Department of Neurology, Bajcsy-Zsilinszky Hospital, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Ferenc Fazekas
- Department of Neurology, Gyula Nyírő Hospital and National Institute of Psychiatry and Addictions, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Adrienne Jóri Birkás
- Department of Neurology, National Institute of Clinical Nerosciences, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Gabriella Katona
- Department of Neurology, National Institute of Rheumatology and Physiotherapy, Budapest, Hungary
| | | | | | - Enikő Dobos
- Department of Neurology, Saint Imre Hospital and University Teaching Hospital, Budapest, Hungary
| | - István Kapás
- Department of Neurology, Saint János Hospital, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Gábor Jakab
- Department of Neurology, Uzsoki Hospital, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Tünde Csépány
- Division of Neurology, University of Debrecen Clinical Center, Debrecen, Hungary
| | - Erzsébet Bense
- Department of Neurology, University of Debrecen Faculty of Medicine, Debrecen, Hungary
| | - Klotild Mátyás
- Department of Neurology, Ferenc Markhot Teaching Hospital, Eger, Hungary
| | - Gábor Rum
- Department of Neurology, Aladár Petz University Teaching Hospital, Győr, Hungary
| | - Zoltán Szolnoki
- Department of Neurology, Kálmán Pándy County Hospital, Gyula, Hungary
| | - István Deme
- Department of Neuology, Mór Kaposi Teaching Hospital, Kaposvár, Hungary
| | - Zita Jobbágy
- Department of Neurology, Kecskemét County Hospital, Kecskemét, Hungary
| | - Dávid Kriston
- Department of Neurology, Borsod-Abaúj-Zemplén County Central Hospital and University Teaching Hospital, Miskolc, Hungary
| | - Zsuzsanna Gerócs
- Department of Neurology, Dorottya Kanizsai Hospital, Nagykanizsa, Hungary
| | - Péter Diószeghy
- Department of Neurology, Aladár Jósa Teaching Hospital, Nyíregyháza, Hungary
| | - László Bors
- Department of Neurology, University of Pécs Clinical Center Pécs, Pécs, Hungary
| | - Adrián Varga
- Department of Neurology, Saint Lázár County Hospital, Salgótarján, Hungary
| | - Levente Kerényi
- Department of Neurology, Fejér County Saint György University Teaching Hospital, Székesfehérvár, Hungary
| | - Gabriella Molnár
- Department of Neurology, János Balassa Hospital, Szekszárd, Hungary
| | - Piroska Kristóf
- Department of Neurology, Jász-Nagykun-Szolnok County Géza Hetényi Hospital, Szolnok, Hungary
| | - Zsuzsanna Ágnes Nagy
- Department of Neurology, Markusovszky University Teaching Hospital, Szombathely, Hungary
| | - Mária Sátori
- Department of Neurology, Saint Borbála Hospital, Tatabánya, Hungary
| | - Piroska Imre
- Department of Neurology, Ferenc Csolnoky Hospital, Veszprém, Hungary
| | - Szilvia Péntek
- Department of Neurology, Zala County Saint Rafael Hospital, Zalaegerszeg, Hungary
| | - Péter Klivényi
- Faculty of General Medicine, Department of Neurology, Albert Szent-Györgyi Clinical Centre, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | - Zsigmond Tamás Kincses
- Faculty of General Medicine, Department of Neurology, Albert Szent-Györgyi Clinical Centre, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
- Faculty of General Medicine, Department of Radiology, Albert Szent-Györgyi Clinical Centre, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | - László Vécsei
- Faculty of General Medicine, Department of Neurology, Albert Szent-Györgyi Clinical Centre, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
- MTA-SZTE Neuroscience Research Group, Szeged, Hungary
| | - Krisztina Bencsik
- Faculty of General Medicine, Department of Neurology, Albert Szent-Györgyi Clinical Centre, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Liu H, Chen B, Zhu Q. Potential application of hydrogel to the diagnosis and treatment of multiple sclerosis. J Biol Eng 2022; 16:10. [PMID: 35395765 PMCID: PMC8991948 DOI: 10.1186/s13036-022-00288-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2021] [Accepted: 03/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic demyelinating disease of the central nervous system. This disorder may cause progressive and permanent impairment, placing significant physical and psychological strain on sufferers. Each progress in MS therapy marks a significant advancement in neurological research. Hydrogels can serve as a scaffold with high water content, high expansibility, and biocompatibility to improve MS cell proliferation in vitro and therapeutic drug delivery to cells in vivo. Hydrogels may also be utilized as biosensors to detect MS-related proteins. Recent research has employed hydrogels as an adjuvant imaging agent in immunohistochemistry assays. Following an overview of the development and use of hydrogels in MS diagnostic and therapy, this review discussed hydrogel’s advantages and future opportunities in the diagnosis and treatment of MS. Graphical abstract ![]()
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haochuan Liu
- Department of Orthopaedics, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Xiantai Street No. 126, Changchun, TX, 130031, PR China
| | - Bing Chen
- Department of Anesthesiology, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Xiantai Street No. 126, Changchun, TX, 130031, PR China.
| | - Qingsan Zhu
- Department of Orthopaedics, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Xiantai Street No. 126, Changchun, TX, 130031, PR China.
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Reith W, Hausmann A, Kettner M. [New MRI guidelines for multiple sclerosis]. Radiologe 2022; 62:322-326. [PMID: 35316355 DOI: 10.1007/s00117-022-00991-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To improve the efficient use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in routine clinical practice, an expert panel has revised the guidelines for its use in the diagnosis and monitoring of multiple sclerosis (MS). OBJECTIVES The revised guidelines now take into account new developments and relevant advances in knowledge, such as the ongoing debate about safety related to intravenous gadolinium-based contrast agents. The value of spinal cord MRI for diagnostic, prognostic, and surveillance purposes has been re-evaluated. Standardization of brain and spinal cord MRI protocols for diagnosis, assessment of prognosis, and monitoring of therapy, as well as the use of 3D-FLAIR (three-dimensional fluid-attenuated inversion recovery) as the most important sequence in the diagnosis of lesions in the brain have been included, as this allows better interpretation and comparability, e.g., in follow-up assessments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wolfgang Reith
- Klinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Neuroradiologie, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Kirrberger Straße, 66424, Homburg-Saar, Deutschland.
| | - Alena Hausmann
- Klinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Neuroradiologie, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Kirrberger Straße, 66424, Homburg-Saar, Deutschland
| | - Michael Kettner
- Klinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Neuroradiologie, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Kirrberger Straße, 66424, Homburg-Saar, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Mattay RR, Davtyan K, Rudie JD, Mattay GS, Jacobs DA, Schindler M, Loevner LA, Schnall MD, Bilello M, Mamourian AC, Cook TS. Economic impact of selective use of contrast for routine follow-up MRI of patients with multiple sclerosis. J Neuroimaging 2022; 32:656-666. [PMID: 35294074 DOI: 10.1111/jon.12984] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2021] [Revised: 02/19/2022] [Accepted: 02/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Imaging and autopsy studies show intracranial gadolinium deposition in patients who have undergone serial contrast-enhanced MRIs. This observation has raised concerns when using contrast administration in patients who receive frequent MRIs. To address this, we implemented a contrast-conditional protocol wherein gadolinium is administered only for multiple sclerosis (MS) patients with imaging evidence of new disease activity on precontrast imaging. In this study, we explore the economic impact of our new MRI protocol. METHODS We compared scanner time and Medicare reimbursement using our contrast-conditional methodology versus that of prior protocols where all patients received gadolinium. RESULTS For 422 patients over 4 months, the contrast-conditional protocol amounted to 60% decrease in contrast injection and savings of approximately 20% of MRI scanner time. If the extra scanner time was used for performing MS follow-up MRIs in additional patients, the contrast-conditional protocol would amount to net revenue loss of $21,707 (∼3.7%). CONCLUSIONS Implementation of a new protocol to limit contrast in MS follow-up MRIs led to a minimal decrease in revenue when controlled for scanner time utilized and is outweighed by other benefits, including substantial decreased gadolinium administration, increased patient comfort, and increased availability of scanner time, which depending on type of studies performed could result in additional financial benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raghav R Mattay
- Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Karapet Davtyan
- Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Jeffrey D Rudie
- Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.,Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Govind S Mattay
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Dina A Jacobs
- Department of Neurology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Matthew Schindler
- Department of Neurology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Laurie A Loevner
- Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Mitchell D Schnall
- Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Michel Bilello
- Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Alexander C Mamourian
- Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.,Department of Radiology, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Tessa S Cook
- Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Wei R, Yan J, Wu H, Meng F, He F, Liu X, Liang H. Irregular degree centrality in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder patients with optic neuritis: A resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Mult Scler Relat Disord 2022; 59:103542. [DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2022.103542] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2021] [Revised: 01/13/2022] [Accepted: 01/18/2022] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|