1
|
Noda Y, Takano M, Wada M, Mimura Y, Nakajima S. Validation of the number of pulses required for TMS-EEG in the prefrontal cortex considering test feasibility. Neuroscience 2024; 554:63-71. [PMID: 39002755 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2024.07.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2024] [Revised: 06/27/2024] [Accepted: 07/08/2024] [Indexed: 07/15/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) combined with electroencephalography (EEG), TMS-EEG, is a useful neuroscientific tool for the assessment of neurophysiology in the human cerebral cortex. Theoretically, TMS-EEG data is expected to have a better data quality as the number of stimulation pulses increases. However, since TMS-EEG testing is a modality that is examined on human subjects, the burden on the subject and tolerability of the test must also be carefully considered. METHOD In this study, we aimed to determine the number of stimulation pulses that satisfy the reliability and validity of data quality in single-pulse TMS (spTMS) for the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). TMS-EEG data for (1) 40-pulse, (2) 80-pulse, (3) 160-pulse, and (4) 240-pulse conditions were extracted from spTMS experimental data for the left DLPFC of 20 healthy subjects, and the similarities between TMS-evoked potentials (TEP) and oscillations across the conditions were evaluated. RESULTS As a result, (2) 80-pulse and (3) 160-pulse conditions showed highly equivalent to the benchmark condition of (4) 240-pulse condition. However, (1) 40-pulse condition showed only weak to moderate equivalence to the (4) 240-pulse condition. Thus, in the DLPFC TMS-EEG experiment, 80 pulses of stimulations was found to be a reasonable enough number of pulses to extract reliable TEPs, compared to 160 or 240 pulses. CONCLUSIONS This is the first substantial study to examine the appropriate number of stimulus pulses that are reasonable and feasible for TMS-EEG testing of the DLPFC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoshihiro Noda
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Mayuko Takano
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan; Teijin Pharma Ltd., Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masataka Wada
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yu Mimura
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shinichiro Nakajima
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wang C, Nie P, Wang P, Wang Y, Zang Y, Zhang Y. The Therapeutic Effect of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Post-stroke Aphasia and the Optimal Treatment Parameters: A Meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2024; 105:1388-1398. [PMID: 37984539 DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2023.11.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2023] [Revised: 10/23/2023] [Accepted: 11/10/2023] [Indexed: 11/22/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This meta-analysis aimed to examine the overall effectiveness of TMS on post-stroke aphasia using a meta-analysis approach, as well as examine the effect of moderating variables (eg, study design, TMS protocol) on the effectiveness of TMS. DATA SOURCES A keyword search was conducted in 5 databases: ERIC, Google Scholar, PsycINFO, MEDLINE, and ProQuest (01/1985-12/2022). The search algorithm included all possible combinations of relevant keywords. Full-text articles were thoroughly examined using forward/backward search methods. STUDY SELECTION Studies were thoroughly screened using the following inclusion criteria: patients were diagnosed with post-stroke aphasia; studies focused on the effect of TMS on post-stroke aphasia; language assessments were conducted at pretest and posttest for TMS treatment and data were reported; studies included both an experimental group (ie, a group with TMS treatment) and a control group (ie, a group without TMS treatment). DATA EXTRACTION Information was extracted from each study including authors, publication year, first language of participants, study design, stroke duration, demographics of participants, TMS protocol, stimulation site, targeting, and statistical data of language performance pre- and post-TMS treatment. DATA SYNTHESIS A total of 17 studies were included in the final review, involving 682 patients with post-stroke aphasia (348 in the experimental group, 334 in the control group). The results showed that TMS treatment has significant immediate (Hedges' g=0.37) and maintenance (Hedges' g=0.34) effects on post-stroke aphasia. Additionally, the moderating variables showed a moderation effect on the effectiveness of TMS. CONCLUSION TMS treatment can significantly improve language ability for post-stroke aphasia. Additionally, this study provides an important reference for selecting the optimal TMS treatment parameters in treating post-stroke aphasia. Specifically, administering 15 sessions of rTMS lasting 10 min over the mirror area within Broca's area may produce the best TMS treatment outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cuicui Wang
- Zhejiang Philosophy and Social Science Laboratory for Research in Early Development and Childcare, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China; College of Education, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China; TMS Center, Deqing Hospital of Hangzhou Normal University, China; Center for Cognition and Brain Disorders, The Affiliated Hospital of Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Peixin Nie
- Cognitive Brain Research Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Finland; Centre of Excellence in Music, Mind, Body, and Brain, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Finland
| | - Peng Wang
- Center for Cognition and Brain Disorders, The Affiliated Hospital of Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China; University of Greifswald, Institute of Psychology, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Yunxia Wang
- Center for Cognition and Brain Disorders, The Affiliated Hospital of Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Yufeng Zang
- TMS Center, Deqing Hospital of Hangzhou Normal University, China; Center for Cognition and Brain Disorders, The Affiliated Hospital of Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China; Institute of Psychological Sciences, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China; Zhejiang Key Laboratory for Research in Assessment of Cognitive Impairments, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Ye Zhang
- Center for Cognition and Brain Disorders, The Affiliated Hospital of Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China; Institute of Psychological Sciences, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China; Zhejiang Key Laboratory for Research in Assessment of Cognitive Impairments, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Holopainen K, Sihvonen AJ, Kauramäki J, Särkämö T, Shulga A. The effects of music combined to paired associative stimulation on motor-evoked potentials and alertness in spinal cord injury patients and healthy subjects. Sci Rep 2024; 14:10194. [PMID: 38702398 PMCID: PMC11068768 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-60984-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2023] [Accepted: 04/29/2024] [Indexed: 05/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Paired associative stimulation (PAS) consisting of high-intensity transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and high-frequency peripheral nerve stimulation (known as high-PAS) induces plastic changes and improves motor performance in patients with incomplete spinal cord injury (SCI). Listening to music during PAS may potentially improve mood and arousal and facilitate PAS-induced neuroplasticity via auditory-motor coupling, but the effects have not been explored. This pilot study aimed to determine if the effect of high-PAS on motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) and subjective alertness can be augmented with music. Ten healthy subjects and nine SCI patients received three high-PAS sessions in randomized order (PAS only, PAS with music synchronized to TMS, PAS with self-selected music). MEPs were measured before (PRE), after (POST), 30 min (POST30), and 60 min (POST60) after stimulation. Alertness was evaluated with a questionnaire. In healthy subjects, MEPs increased at POST in all sessions and remained higher at POST60 in PAS with synchronized music compared with the other sessions. There was no difference in alertness. In SCI patients, MEPs increased at POST and POST30 in PAS only but not in other sessions, whereas alertness was higher in PAS with self-selected music. More research is needed to determine the potential clinical effects of using music during high-PAS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kirsi Holopainen
- BioMag Laboratory, HUS Diagnostic Centre, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki and Aalto University School of Science, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Aleksi J Sihvonen
- Cognitive Brain Research Unit, Department of Psychology and Logopedics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
- Centre of Excellence in Music, Mind, Body and Brain, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
- Clinical Neurosciences, Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
- Department of Neurology, Neurocenter, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Jaakko Kauramäki
- Cognitive Brain Research Unit, Department of Psychology and Logopedics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
- Centre of Excellence in Music, Mind, Body and Brain, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Teppo Särkämö
- Cognitive Brain Research Unit, Department of Psychology and Logopedics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
- Centre of Excellence in Music, Mind, Body and Brain, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Anastasia Shulga
- BioMag Laboratory, HUS Diagnostic Centre, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki and Aalto University School of Science, Helsinki, Finland.
- Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ju P, Zhao D, Ma L, Chen J. Biomarker development perspective: Exploring comorbid chronic pain in depression through deep transcranial magnetic stimulation. J Transl Int Med 2024; 12:123-128. [PMID: 38779118 PMCID: PMC11107179 DOI: 10.2478/jtim-2023-0145] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/25/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Peijun Ju
- Shanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Institute of Traditional Chinese Medicine for Mental Health, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Psychotic Disorders, Shanghai, China
| | - Di Zhao
- Shanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Le Ma
- Shanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Jinghong Chen
- Shanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Institute of Traditional Chinese Medicine for Mental Health, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Psychotic Disorders, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Parmigiani S, Ross JM, Cline CC, Minasi CB, Gogulski J, Keller CJ. Reliability and Validity of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation-Electroencephalography Biomarkers. BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY. COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE AND NEUROIMAGING 2023; 8:805-814. [PMID: 36894435 PMCID: PMC10276171 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2022.12.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2022] [Revised: 11/15/2022] [Accepted: 12/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Noninvasive brain stimulation and neuroimaging have revolutionized human neuroscience with a multitude of applications, including diagnostic subtyping, treatment optimization, and relapse prediction. It is therefore particularly relevant to identify robust and clinically valuable brain biomarkers linking symptoms to their underlying neural mechanisms. Brain biomarkers must be reproducible (i.e., have internal reliability) across similar experiments within a laboratory and be generalizable (i.e., have external reliability) across experimental setups, laboratories, brain regions, and disease states. However, reliability (internal and external) is not alone sufficient; biomarkers also must have validity. Validity describes closeness to a true measure of the underlying neural signal or disease state. We propose that these metrics, reliability and validity, should be evaluated and optimized before any biomarker is used to inform treatment decisions. Here, we discuss these metrics with respect to causal brain connectivity biomarkers from coupling transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) with electroencephalography (EEG). We discuss controversies around TMS-EEG stemming from the multiple large off-target components (noise) and relatively weak genuine brain responses (signal), as is unfortunately often the case in noninvasive human neuroscience. We review the current state of TMS-EEG recordings, which consist of a mix of reliable noise and unreliable signal. We describe methods for evaluating TMS-EEG biomarkers, including how to assess internal and external reliability across facilities, cognitive states, brain networks, and disorders and how to validate these biomarkers using invasive neural recordings or treatment response. We provide recommendations to increase reliability and validity, discuss lessons learned, and suggest future directions for the field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Parmigiani
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California; Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Healthcare System, and the Sierra Pacific Mental Illness, Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Palo Alto, California; Wu Tsai Neuroscience Institute, Stanford, California
| | - Jessica M Ross
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California; Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Healthcare System, and the Sierra Pacific Mental Illness, Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Palo Alto, California; Wu Tsai Neuroscience Institute, Stanford, California
| | - Christopher C Cline
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California; Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Healthcare System, and the Sierra Pacific Mental Illness, Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Palo Alto, California; Wu Tsai Neuroscience Institute, Stanford, California
| | - Christopher B Minasi
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California; Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Healthcare System, and the Sierra Pacific Mental Illness, Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Palo Alto, California; Wu Tsai Neuroscience Institute, Stanford, California
| | - Juha Gogulski
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California; Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Healthcare System, and the Sierra Pacific Mental Illness, Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Palo Alto, California; Wu Tsai Neuroscience Institute, Stanford, California; Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, HUS Diagnostic Center, Clinical Neurosciences, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Corey J Keller
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California; Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Healthcare System, and the Sierra Pacific Mental Illness, Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Palo Alto, California; Wu Tsai Neuroscience Institute, Stanford, California.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Tian D, Izumi SI. Different effects of I-wave periodicity repetitive TMS on motor cortex interhemispheric interaction. Front Neurosci 2023; 17:1079432. [PMID: 37457007 PMCID: PMC10349661 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1079432] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2022] [Accepted: 06/12/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Activity of the neural circuits in the human motor cortex can be probed using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Changing TMS-induced current direction recruits different cortical neural circuits. I-wave periodicity repetitive TMS (iTMS) substantially modulates motor cortex excitability through neural plasticity, yet its effect on interhemispheric interaction remains unclear. Objective To explore the modulation of interhemispheric interaction by iTMS applied in different current directions. Materials and Methods Twenty right-handed healthy young volunteers (aged 27.5 ± 5.0 years) participated in this study with three visits. On each visit, iTMS in posterior-anterior/anterior-posterior direction (PA-/AP-iTMS) or sham-iTMS was applied to the right hemisphere, with corticospinal excitability and intracortical facilitation of the non-stimulated left hemisphere evaluated at four timepoints. Ipsilateral silent period was also measured at each timepoint probing interhemispheric inhibition (IHI). Results PA- and AP-iTMS potentiated cortical excitability concurrently in the stimulated right hemisphere. Corticospinal excitability of the non-stimulated left hemisphere increased 10 min after both PA- and AP-iTMS intervention, with a decrease in short-interval intracortical facilitation (SICF) observed in AP-iTMS only. Immediately after the intervention, PA-iTMS tilted the IHI balance toward inhibiting the non-stimulated hemisphere, while AP-iTMS shifted the balance toward the opposite direction. Conclusions Our findings provide systematic evidence on the plastic modulation of interhemispheric interaction by PA- and AP-iTMS. We show that iTMS induces an interhemispheric facilitatory effect, and that PA- and AP-iTMS differs in modulating interhemispheric inhibition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dongting Tian
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Shin-Ichi Izumi
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
- Graduate School of Biomedical Engineering, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Avnit A, Zibman S, Alyagon U, Zangen A. Abnormal functional asymmetry and its behavioural correlates in adults with ADHD: A TMS-EEG study. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0285086. [PMID: 37228131 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2021] [Accepted: 04/15/2023] [Indexed: 05/27/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Abnormal functional brain asymmetry and deficient response inhibition are two core symptoms of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). We investigated whether these symptoms are inter-related and whether they are underlined by altered frontal excitability and by compromised interhemispheric connectivity. METHODS We studied these issues in 52 ADHD and 43 non-clinical adults by comparing: (1) stop-signal reaction time (SSRT); (2) frontal asymmetry of the N200 event-related potential component, which is evoked during response inhibition and is lateralised to the right hemisphere; (3) TMS-evoked potential (TEP) in the right frontal hemisphere, which is indicative of local cortical excitability; and (4) frontal right-to-left interhemispheric TMS signal propagation (ISP), which is reversely indicative of interhemispheric connectivity. RESULTS Compared to controls, the ADHD group demonstrated elongated SSRT, reduced N200 right-frontal-asymmetry, weaker TEP, and stronger ISP. Moreover, in the ADHD group, N200 right-frontal-asymmetry correlated with SSRT, with TEP, and with symptoms severity. Conversely, no relationship was observed between ISP and N200 right-frontal-asymmetry, and both TEP and ISP were found to be unrelated to SSRT. CONCLUSIONS Our results indicate that abnormal frontal asymmetry is related to a key cognitive symptom in ADHD and suggest that it is underlined by reduced right-frontal excitability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amir Avnit
- Department of Life Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel
- Zlotowski Centre for Neuroscience, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel
| | - Samuel Zibman
- Department of Life Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel
- Zlotowski Centre for Neuroscience, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel
| | - Uri Alyagon
- Department of Life Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel
- Zlotowski Centre for Neuroscience, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel
| | - Abraham Zangen
- Department of Life Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel
- Zlotowski Centre for Neuroscience, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Hernandez-Pavon JC, Veniero D, Bergmann TO, Belardinelli P, Bortoletto M, Casarotto S, Casula EP, Farzan F, Fecchio M, Julkunen P, Kallioniemi E, Lioumis P, Metsomaa J, Miniussi C, Mutanen TP, Rocchi L, Rogasch NC, Shafi MM, Siebner HR, Thut G, Zrenner C, Ziemann U, Ilmoniemi RJ. TMS combined with EEG: Recommendations and open issues for data collection and analysis. Brain Stimul 2023; 16:567-593. [PMID: 36828303 DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2023.02.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2022] [Revised: 02/10/2023] [Accepted: 02/19/2023] [Indexed: 02/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) evokes neuronal activity in the targeted cortex and connected brain regions. The evoked brain response can be measured with electroencephalography (EEG). TMS combined with simultaneous EEG (TMS-EEG) is widely used for studying cortical reactivity and connectivity at high spatiotemporal resolution. Methodologically, the combination of TMS with EEG is challenging, and there are many open questions in the field. Different TMS-EEG equipment and approaches for data collection and analysis are used. The lack of standardization may affect reproducibility and limit the comparability of results produced in different research laboratories. In addition, there is controversy about the extent to which auditory and somatosensory inputs contribute to transcranially evoked EEG. This review provides a guide for researchers who wish to use TMS-EEG to study the reactivity of the human cortex. A worldwide panel of experts working on TMS-EEG covered all aspects that should be considered in TMS-EEG experiments, providing methodological recommendations (when possible) for effective TMS-EEG recordings and analysis. The panel identified and discussed the challenges of the technique, particularly regarding recording procedures, artifact correction, analysis, and interpretation of the transcranial evoked potentials (TEPs). Therefore, this work offers an extensive overview of TMS-EEG methodology and thus may promote standardization of experimental and computational procedures across groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julio C Hernandez-Pavon
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA; Legs + Walking Lab, Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, IL, USA; Center for Brain Stimulation, Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, IL, USA.
| | | | - Til Ole Bergmann
- Neuroimaging Center (NIC), Focus Program Translational Neuroscience (FTN), Johannes Gutenberg University Medical Center, Germany; Leibniz Institute for Resilience Research (LIR), Mainz, Germany
| | - Paolo Belardinelli
- Center for Mind/Brain Sciences - CIMeC, University of Trento, Rovereto, TN, Italy; Department of Neurology & Stroke, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Marta Bortoletto
- Neurophysiology Lab, IRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy
| | - Silvia Casarotto
- Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy; IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi ONLUS, Milan, Italy
| | - Elias P Casula
- Department of Systems Medicine, University of Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Faranak Farzan
- Simon Fraser University, School of Mechatronic Systems Engineering, Surrey, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Matteo Fecchio
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Petro Julkunen
- Department of Technical Physics, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland; Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Elisa Kallioniemi
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, NJ, USA
| | - Pantelis Lioumis
- Department of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland; BioMag Laboratory, HUS Medical Imaging Center, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki University and Aalto University School of Science, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Johanna Metsomaa
- Department of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland; BioMag Laboratory, HUS Medical Imaging Center, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki University and Aalto University School of Science, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Carlo Miniussi
- Center for Mind/Brain Sciences - CIMeC, University of Trento, Rovereto, TN, Italy
| | - Tuomas P Mutanen
- Department of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland; BioMag Laboratory, HUS Medical Imaging Center, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki University and Aalto University School of Science, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Lorenzo Rocchi
- Department of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, United Kingdom; Department of Medical Sciences and Public Health, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Nigel C Rogasch
- University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia; South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, Australia; Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Mouhsin M Shafi
- Berenson-Allen Center for Noninvasive Brain Stimulation, Department of Neurology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Hartwig R Siebner
- Danish Research Centre for Magnetic Resonance, Centre for Functional and Diagnostic Imaging and Research, Copenhagen University Hospital - Amager and Hvidovre, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Gregor Thut
- School of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Christoph Zrenner
- Department of Neurology & Stroke, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany; Temerty Centre for Therapeutic Brain Intervention, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Canada; Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany; Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Ulf Ziemann
- Department of Neurology & Stroke, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany; Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Risto J Ilmoniemi
- Department of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland; BioMag Laboratory, HUS Medical Imaging Center, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki University and Aalto University School of Science, Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Snow NJ, Kirkland MC, Downer MB, Murphy HM, Ploughman M. Transcranial magnetic stimulation maps the neurophysiology of chronic noncancer pain: A scoping review. Medicine (Baltimore) 2022; 101:e31774. [PMID: 36401490 PMCID: PMC9678597 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000031774] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic noncancer pain is a global public health challenge. It is imperative to identify biological markers ("biomarkers") to understand the mechanisms underlying chronic pain and to monitor pain over time and after interventions. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a promising method for this purpose. OBJECTIVES To examine differences in TMS-based outcomes between persons with chronic pain and healthy controls (HCs) and/or before versus after pain-modulating interventions and relationships between pain measures and TMS outcomes; To summarize the neurophysiological mechanisms underlying chronic pain as identified by TMS. METHODS We searched the PubMed database for literature from January 1, 1985, to June 9, 2020, with the keywords "pain" and "transcranial magnetic stimulation." Eligible items included original studies of adult human participants with pain lasting for ≥ 6 months. We completed a narrative synthesis of the study findings stratified by chronic pain etiology (primary pain, neuropathic pain, and secondary musculoskeletal pain). RESULTS The search yielded 1265 records. The final 12 articles included 244 patients with chronic pain (192 females, aged 35-65 years) and 169 HCs (89 females, aged 28-59 years). Abnormalities in TMS outcomes that reflect GABAergic and glutamatergic activities were associated with many of the disorders studied and were distinct for each pain etiology. Chronic primary pain is characterized by reduced intracortical inhibition and corticospinal excitability, chronic neuropathic pain shows evidence of increased excitation and disinhibition, and chronic secondary musculoskeletal pain involves low corticospinal excitability. DISCUSSION TMS could be a useful tool for delineating the neurophysiological underpinnings of chronic pain syndromes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas Jacob Snow
- Recovery and Performance Laboratory, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland & Labrador, St. John’s, NL, Canada
| | - Megan Christine Kirkland
- Recovery and Performance Laboratory, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland & Labrador, St. John’s, NL, Canada
| | - Matthew Bruce Downer
- Recovery and Performance Laboratory, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland & Labrador, St. John’s, NL, Canada
| | - Hannah Margaret Murphy
- Recovery and Performance Laboratory, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland & Labrador, St. John’s, NL, Canada
| | - Michelle Ploughman
- Recovery and Performance Laboratory, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland & Labrador, St. John’s, NL, Canada
- * Correspondence: Michelle Ploughman, Recovery and Performance Laboratory, Rehabilitation Research Unit of NL, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland & Labrador, Dr. Leonard A. Miller Centre, Room 400, 100 Forest Road, St. John’s, Newfoundland and Labrador A1A 1E5, Canada (e-mail: )
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Liu S, Zhang J, Wang A, Wu H, Zhao Q, Long J. Subject adaptation convolutional neural network for EEG-based motor imagery classification. J Neural Eng 2022; 19. [PMID: 36270467 DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/ac9c94] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2022] [Accepted: 10/21/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
Objective.Deep transfer learning has been widely used to address the nonstationarity of electroencephalogram (EEG) data during motor imagery (MI) classification. However, previous deep learning approaches suffer from limited classification accuracy because the temporal and spatial features cannot be effectively extracted.Approach.Here, we propose a novel end-to-end deep subject adaptation convolutional neural network (SACNN) to handle the problem of EEG-based MI classification. Our proposed model jointly optimizes three modules, i.e. a feature extractor, a classifier, and a subject adapter. Specifically, the feature extractor simultaneously extracts the temporal and spatial features from the raw EEG data using a parallel multiscale convolution network. In addition, we design a subject adapter to reduce the feature distribution shift between the source and target subjects by using the maximum mean discrepancy. By minimizing the classification loss and the distribution discrepancy, the model is able to extract the temporal-spatial features to the prediction of a new subject.Main results.Extensive experiments are carried out on three EEG-based MI datasets, i.e. brain-computer interface (BCI) competition IV dataset IIb, BCI competition III dataset IVa, and BCI competition IV dataset I, and the average accuracy reaches to 86.42%, 81.71% and 79.35% on the three datasets respectively. Furthermore, the statistical analysis also indicates the significant performance improvement of SACNN.Significance.This paper reveals the importance of the temporal-spatial features on EEG-based MI classification task. Our proposed SACNN model can make fully use of the temporal-spatial information to achieve the purpose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siwei Liu
- College of Information Science and Technology, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, People's Republic of China
| | - Jia Zhang
- College of Information Science and Technology, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, People's Republic of China
| | - Andong Wang
- Tensor Learning Team, RIKEN AIP, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hanrui Wu
- College of Information Science and Technology, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, People's Republic of China
| | - Qibin Zhao
- Tensor Learning Team, RIKEN AIP, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Jinyi Long
- College of Information Science and Technology, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, People's Republic of China.,Guangdong Key Laboratory of Traditional Chinese Medicine Information Technology, Guangzhou 510632, People's Republic of China.,Pazhou Lab, Guangzhou 510335, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Zazio A, Barchiesi G, Ferrari C, Marcantoni E, Bortoletto M. M1-P15 as a cortical marker for transcallosal inhibition: A preregistered TMS-EEG study. Front Hum Neurosci 2022; 16:937515. [PMID: 36188169 PMCID: PMC9523880 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.937515] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2022] [Accepted: 08/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
In a recently published study combining transcranial magnetic stimulation and electroencephalography (TMS-EEG), an early component of TMS-evoked potentials (TEPs), i.e., M1-P15, was proposed as a measure of transcallosal inhibition between motor cortices. Given that early TEPs are known to be highly variable, further evidence is needed before M1-P15 can be considered a reliable index of effective connectivity. Here, we conceived a new preregistered TMS-EEG study with two aims. The first aim was validating the M1-P15 as a cortical index of transcallosal inhibition by replicating previous findings on its relationship with the ipsilateral silent period (iSP) and with performance in bimanual coordination. The second aim was inducing a task-dependent modulation of transcallosal inhibition. A new sample of 32 healthy right-handed participants underwent behavioral motor tasks and TMS-EEG recording, in which left and right M1 were stimulated both during bimanual tasks and during an iSP paradigm. Hypotheses and methods were preregistered before data collection. Results show a replication of our previous findings on the positive relationship between M1-P15 amplitude and the iSP normalized area. Differently, the relationship between M1-P15 latency and bimanual coordination was not confirmed. Finally, M1-P15 amplitude was modulated by the characteristics of the bimanual task the participants were performing, and not by the contralateral hand activity during the iSP paradigm. In sum, the present results corroborate our previous findings in validating the M1-P15 as a cortical marker of transcallosal inhibition and provide novel evidence of its task-dependent modulation. Importantly, we demonstrate the feasibility of preregistration in the TMS-EEG field to increase methodological rigor and transparency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Agnese Zazio
- Neurophysiology Lab, IRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy
- *Correspondence: Agnese Zazio
| | - Guido Barchiesi
- Neurophysiology Lab, IRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy
- Cognition in Action (CIA) Unit - PHILAB, Department of Philosophy, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Clarissa Ferrari
- Statistics Unit, IRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy
| | - Eleonora Marcantoni
- Neurophysiology Lab, IRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy
| | - Marta Bortoletto
- Neurophysiology Lab, IRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Talbot J, Gatti D, Mitaritonna D, Marchetti M, Convertino G, Mazzoni G. Stimulating a hyper memory: A single case TMS study on an individual with Highly Superior Autobiographical Memory. Brain Stimul 2022; 15:1122-1124. [PMID: 35985471 DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2022.08.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2022] [Revised: 08/08/2022] [Accepted: 08/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/02/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Talbot
- Department of Dynamic and Clinical Psychology, and Health Studies, University La Sapienza, Rome, Italy.
| | - Daniele Gatti
- Department of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Danilo Mitaritonna
- Department of Dynamic and Clinical Psychology, and Health Studies, University La Sapienza, Rome, Italy
| | - Michela Marchetti
- Department of Dynamic and Clinical Psychology, and Health Studies, University La Sapienza, Rome, Italy
| | - Gianmarco Convertino
- Department of Dynamic and Clinical Psychology, and Health Studies, University La Sapienza, Rome, Italy
| | - Giuliana Mazzoni
- Department of Dynamic and Clinical Psychology, and Health Studies, University La Sapienza, Rome, Italy; Department of Psychology, University of Hull, Hull, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Farzan F, Bortoletto M. Identification and verification of a 'true' TMS evoked potential in TMS-EEG. J Neurosci Methods 2022; 378:109651. [PMID: 35714721 DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2022.109651] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2021] [Revised: 04/05/2022] [Accepted: 06/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
The concurrent combination of transcranial magnetic stimulation and electroencephalography (TMS-EEG) can unveil functional neural mechanisms with applications in basic and clinical research. In particular, TMS-evoked potentials (TEPs) potentially allow studying excitability and connectivity of the cortex in a causal manner that is not easily or non-invasively attainable with other neuroimaging techniques. The TEP waveform is obtained by isolating the EEG responses phase-locked to the time of TMS application. The intended component in a TEP waveform is the cortical activation by the TMS-induced electric current, free of instrumental and physiological artifact sources. This artifact-free cortical activation can be referred to as 'true' TEP. However, due to many unwanted auxiliary effects of TMS, the interpretation of 'true' TEPs has not been free of controversy. This paper reviews the most recent understandings of 'true' TEPs and their application. In the first part of the paper, TEP components are defined according to recommended methodologies. In the second part, the verification of 'true' TEP is discussed along with its sensitivity to brain-state, age, and disease. The various proposed origins of TEP components are then presented in the context of existing literature. Throughout the paper, lessons learned from the past TMS-EEG studies are highlighted to guide the identification and interpretation of 'true' TEPs in future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Faranak Farzan
- eBrain Lab, School of Mechatronic Systems Engineering, Simon Fraser University, Surrey, British Columbia, Canada; University of Toronto, Department of Psychiatry, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| | - Marta Bortoletto
- Neurophysiology lab, IRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Identifying novel biomarkers with TMS-EEG - Methodological possibilities and challenges. J Neurosci Methods 2022; 377:109631. [PMID: 35623474 DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2022.109631] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2021] [Revised: 05/09/2022] [Accepted: 05/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Biomarkers are essential for understanding the underlying pathologies in brain disorders and for developing effective treatments. Combined transcranial magnetic stimulation and electroencephalography (TMS-EEG) is an emerging neurophysiological tool that can be used for biomarker development. This method can identify biomarkers associated with the function and dynamics of the inhibitory and excitatory neurotransmitter systems and effective connectivity between brain areas. In this review, we outline the current state of the TMS-EEG biomarker field by summarizing the existing protocols and the possibilities and challenges associated with this methodology.
Collapse
|
15
|
Bridging the gap: TMS-EEG from Lab to Clinic. J Neurosci Methods 2022; 369:109482. [PMID: 35041855 DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2022.109482] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2021] [Revised: 01/09/2022] [Accepted: 01/13/2022] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
The combination of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and electroencephalography (EEG) has reached technological maturity and has been an object of significant scientific interest for over two decades. Ιn parallel, accumulating evidence highlights the potential of TMS-EEG as a useful tool in the field of clinical neurosciences. Nevertheless, its clinical utility has not yet been established, partly because technical and methodological limitations have created a gap between an evolving scientific tool and standard clinical practice. Here we review some of the identified gaps that still prevent TMS-EEG moving from science laboratories to clinical practice. The principal and partly overlapping gaps include: 1) complex and laborious application, 2) difficulty in obtaining high-quality signals, 3) suboptimal accuracy and reliability, and 4) insufficient understanding of the neurobiological substrate of the responses. All these four aspects need to be satisfactorily addressed for the method to become clinically applicable and enter the diagnostic and therapeutic arena. In the current review, we identify steps that might be taken to address these issues and discuss promising recent studies providing tools to aid bridging the gaps.
Collapse
|
16
|
TMS-EEG responses across the lifespan: Measurement, methods for characterisation and identified responses. J Neurosci Methods 2022; 366:109430. [PMID: 34856320 DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2021.109430] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2021] [Revised: 11/02/2021] [Accepted: 11/25/2021] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Abstract
The combination of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and electroencephalography (EEG) allows probing of the neurophysiology of any neocortical brain area in vivo with millisecond accuracy. TMS-EEG is particularly unique compared with other available neurophysiological methods, as it can measure the state and dynamics of excitatory and inhibitory systems separately. Because of these capabilities, TMS-EEG responses are sensitive to the brain state, and the responses are influenced by brain maturation and ageing, making TMS-EEG a suitable method to study age-specific pathophysiology. In this review, we outline the TMS-EEG measurement procedure, the existing methods used for characterising TMS-EEG responses and the challenges associated with identifying the responses. We also summarise the findings thus far on how TMS-EEG responses change across the lifespan and the TMS-EEG features that separate typical and atypical brain maturation and ageing. Finally, we give an overview of the gaps in current knowledge to provide directions for future studies.
Collapse
|
17
|
Precise Modulation Strategies for Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: Advances and Future Directions. Neurosci Bull 2021; 37:1718-1734. [PMID: 34609737 DOI: 10.1007/s12264-021-00781-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2021] [Accepted: 06/23/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a popular modulatory technique for the noninvasive diagnosis and therapy of neurological and psychiatric diseases. Unfortunately, current modulation strategies are only modestly effective. The literature provides strong evidence that the modulatory effects of TMS vary depending on device components and stimulation protocols. These differential effects are important when designing precise modulatory strategies for clinical or research applications. Developments in TMS have been accompanied by advances in combining TMS with neuroimaging techniques, including electroencephalography, functional near-infrared spectroscopy, functional magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography. Such studies appear particularly promising as they may not only allow us to probe affected brain areas during TMS but also seem to predict underlying research directions that may enable us to precisely target and remodel impaired cortices or circuits. However, few precise modulation strategies are available, and the long-term safety and efficacy of these strategies need to be confirmed. Here, we review the literature on possible technologies for precise modulation to highlight progress along with limitations with the goal of suggesting future directions for this field.
Collapse
|
18
|
Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation to the Primary Motor Cortex Reduces Cortical Inhibition: A TMS-EEG Study. Brain Sci 2021; 11:brainsci11091114. [PMID: 34573136 PMCID: PMC8472376 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci11091114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2021] [Revised: 08/17/2021] [Accepted: 08/19/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction: The aim of this study was to reveal the effects of intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) in modulating cortical networks using transcranial magnetic stimulation and electroencephalography (TMS-EEG) recording. Methods: Eighteen young adults participated in our study and received iTBS to the primary motor cortex (M1), supplementary motor area, and the primary visual cortex in three separate sessions. A finger tapping task and ipsilateral single-pulse TMS-EEG recording for the M1 were administrated before and after iTBS in each session. The effects of iTBS in motor performance and TMS-evoked potentials (TEPs) were investigated. Results: The results showed that iTBS to the M1, but not supplementary motor area or the primary visual cortex, significantly reduced the N100 amplitude of M1 TEPs in bilateral hemispheres (p = 0.019), with a more prominent effect in the contralateral hemisphere than in the stimulated hemisphere. Moreover, only iTBS to the M1 decreased global mean field power (corrected ps < 0.05), interhemispheric signal propagation (t = 2.53, p = 0.030), and TMS-induced early α-band synchronization (p = 0.020). Conclusion: Our study confirmed the local and remote after-effects of iTBS in reducing cortical inhibition in the M1. TMS-induced oscillations after iTBS for changed cortical excitability in patients with various neurological and psychiatric conditions are worth further exploration.
Collapse
|
19
|
Ishibashi K, Ishii D, Yamamoto S, Okamoto Y, Wakatabi M, Kohno Y. Asymmetry of Interhemispheric Connectivity during Rapid Movements of Right and Left Hands: A TMS-EEG Study. J Mot Behav 2021; 54:135-145. [PMID: 34180775 DOI: 10.1080/00222895.2021.1930993] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
The interhemispheric signal propagation (ISP) obtained by electroencephalography during transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) allows for the assessment of the interhemispheric connectivity involved in inhibitory processes. To investigate the functional asymmetry of hemispheres during rapid movement, we compared ISP in the left and right hemispheres during rapid hand movements. In 11 healthy right-handed adults, we delivered TMS to the M1 and recorded ISP from the M1 to the contralateral hemisphere. We found that ISP from the left to right hemisphere during right-hand rapid movement was higher than ISP from the right to left hemisphere during the left-hand rapid movement. These results indicate that the left M1 strongly inhibits the right M1, and that the left hemisphere is dominant for rapid movements as well as sequential movements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kiyoshige Ishibashi
- Department of Physical Therapy, Ibaraki Prefectural University of Health Sciences Hospital, Ibaraki, Japan.,Graduate School of Health Sciences, Ibaraki Prefectural University of Health Sciences, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Daisuke Ishii
- Center for Medical Sciences, Ibaraki Prefectural University of Health Sciences, Ibaraki, Japan.,Department of Cognitive Behavioral Physiology, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan
| | - Satoshi Yamamoto
- Department of Physical Therapy, Ibaraki Prefectural University of Health Sciences, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Yoshitaka Okamoto
- Department of Rehabilitation, University of Tsukuba Hospital, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Masahiro Wakatabi
- Department of Physical Therapy, Ibaraki Prefectural University of Health Sciences Hospital, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Yutaka Kohno
- Center for Medical Sciences, Ibaraki Prefectural University of Health Sciences, Ibaraki, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Altered interhemispheric signal propagation in schizophrenia and depression. Clin Neurophysiol 2021; 132:1604-1611. [PMID: 34030057 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2021.03.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2020] [Revised: 02/04/2021] [Accepted: 03/19/2021] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Altered interhemispheric connectivity is implicated in the pathophysiology of schizophrenia (SCZ) and major depressive disorder (MDD) and may account for deficits in lateralized cognitive processes. We measured transcranial magnetic stimulation evoked interhemispheric signal propagation (ISP), a non-invasive measure of transcallosal connectivity, and hypothesized that the SCZ and MDD groups will have increased ISP compared to healthy controls. METHODS We evaluated ISP over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in 34 patients with SCZ and 34 patients with MDD compared to 32 age and sex-matched healthy controls. RESULTS ISP was significantly increased in patients with SCZ and patients with MDD compared to healthy controls but did not differ between patient groups. There were no effects of antidepressant, antipsychotic, and benzodiazepine medications on ISP and our results remained unchanged after re-analysis with a region of interest method. CONCLUSION Altered ISP was found in both SCZ and MDD patient groups. This indicates that disruptions of interhemispheric signaling processes can be indexed with ISP across psychiatric populations. SIGNIFICANCE These findings enhance our knowledge of the physiological mechanisms of interhemispheric imbalances in SCZ and MDD, which may serve as potential treatment targets in future patients.
Collapse
|