1
|
Rybachuk O, Nesterenko Y, Pinet É, Medvediev V, Yaminsky Y, Tsymbaliuk V. Neuronal differentiation and inhibition of glial differentiation of murine neural stem cells by pHPMA hydrogel for the repair of injured spinal cord. Exp Neurol 2023; 368:114497. [PMID: 37517459 DOI: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2023.114497] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2023] [Revised: 06/22/2023] [Accepted: 07/23/2023] [Indexed: 08/01/2023]
Abstract
Currently, several therapeutic methods of treating the effects of spinal cord injury (SCI) are being considered. On the one hand, transplantation of stem cells (SCs), in particular, neural stem/progenitor cells (NSPCs), is promising, as these cells have the potential to differentiate into nervous tissue cells, able to enhance endogenous regeneration and prevent the development of inflammatory processes. On the other hand, it is quite promising to replace the damaged nervous tissue with synthetic matrices, in particular hydrogels, which can create artificial conditions for the regenerative growth of injured nerve fibers through the spinal cord injury area, i.e. stimulate and support axonal regeneration and myelination. In this work, we combined both of these novel approaches by populating (injecting or rehydrating) a heteroporous pHPMA hydrogel (NeuroGel) with murine hippocampal NSPCs. Being inside the hydrogel (10 days of cultivation), NSPCs were more differentiated into neurons: 19.48% ± 1.71% (the NSPCs injection into the hydrogel) and 36.49% ± 4.20% (the hydrogel rehydration in the NSPCs suspension); in control cultures, the level of differentiation in neurons was only 2.40% ± 0.31%. Differentiation of NSPCs into glial cells, in particular into oligodendrocyte progenitor cells, was also observed - 8.89% ± 2.15% and 6.21% ± 0.80% for injection and rehydration variants, respectively; in control - 28.75% ± 2.08%. In the control NSPCs culture, there was a small number of astrocytes - 2.11% ± 0.43%. Inside the hydrogel, NSPCs differentiation in astrocytes was not observed. In vitro data showed that the hydrogel promotes the differentiation of NSPCs into neurons, and inhibits the differentiation into glial cells. And in vivo showed post-traumatic recovery of rat spinal cord tissue after injury followed by implantation of the hydrogel+NSPCs complex (approximately 7 months after SCI). The implant area was closely connected with the recipient tissue, and the recipient cells freely grew into the implant itself. Inside the implant, a formed dense neuronal network was visible. In summary, the results are primarily an experimental ground for further studies of implants based on pHPMA hydrogel with populated different origin SCs, and the data also indicate the feasibility and efficiency of using an integrated approach to reduce possible negative side effects and facilitate the rehabilitation process after a SCI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oksana Rybachuk
- Bogomoletz Institute of Physiology NAS of Ukraine, Kyiv 01601, Ukraine; State Institution National Scientific Center the M.D. Strazhesko Institute of Cardiology, Clinical and Regenerative Medicine, NAMS of Ukraine, Kyiv 03680, Ukraine.
| | - Yuliia Nesterenko
- Bogomoletz Institute of Physiology NAS of Ukraine, Kyiv 01601, Ukraine
| | | | - Volodymyr Medvediev
- Bogomoletz Institute of Physiology NAS of Ukraine, Kyiv 01601, Ukraine; Bogomolets National Medical University, Kyiv 01601, Ukraine
| | - Yurii Yaminsky
- State Institution "Romodanov Neurosurgery Institute, National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine", Kyiv 04050, Ukraine
| | - Vitaliy Tsymbaliuk
- Bogomolets National Medical University, Kyiv 01601, Ukraine; State Institution "Romodanov Neurosurgery Institute, National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine", Kyiv 04050, Ukraine
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Medvediev VV, Oleksenko NP, Pichkur LD, Verbovska SA, Savosko SI, Draguntsova NG, Lontkovskyi YA, Vaslovych VV, Tsymbalyuk VI. Implantation Effect of a Fibrin Matrix Associated with Mesenchymal Wharton’s Jelly Stromal Cells on the Course of an Experimental Spinal Cord Injury. CYTOL GENET+ 2023. [DOI: 10.3103/s0095452723010073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/11/2023]
|
3
|
Patsakos EM, Bayley MT, Kua A, Cheng C, Eng J, Ho C, Noonan VK, Querée M, Craven BC. Development of the Canadian Spinal Cord Injury Best Practice (Can-SCIP) Guideline: Methods and overview. J Spinal Cord Med 2021; 44:S52-S68. [PMID: 34779719 PMCID: PMC8604491 DOI: 10.1080/10790268.2021.1953312] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a life-altering injury that leads to a complex constellation of changes in an individual's sensory, motor, and autonomic function which is largely determined by the level and severity of cord impairment. Available SCI-specific clinical practice guidelines (CPG) address specific impairments, health conditions or a segment of the care continuum, however, fail to address all the important clinical questions arising throughout an individual's care journey. To address this gap, an interprofessional panel of experts in SCI convened to develop the Canadian Spinal Cord Injury Best Practice (Can-SCIP) Guideline. This article provides an overview of the methods underpinning the Can-SCIP Guideline process. METHODS The Can-SCIP Guideline was developed using the Guidelines Adaptation Cycle. A comprehensive search for existing SCI-specific CPGs was conducted. The quality of eligible CPGs was evaluated using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) instrument. An expert panel (n = 52) convened, and groups of relevant experts met to review and recommend adoption or refinement of existing recommendations or develop new recommendations based on evidence from systematic reviews conducted by the Spinal Cord Injury Research Evidence (SCIRE) team. The expert panel voted to approve selected recommendations using an online survey tool. RESULTS The Can-SCIP Guideline includes 585 total recommendations from 41 guidelines, 96 recommendations that pertain to the Components of the Ideal SCI Care System section, and 489 recommendations that pertain to the Management of Secondary Health Conditions section. Most recommendations (n = 281, 48%) were adopted from existing guidelines without revision, 215 (36.8%) recommendations were revised for application in a Canadian context, and 89 recommendations (15.2%) were created de novo. CONCLUSION The Can-SCIP Guideline is the first living comprehensive guideline for adults with SCI in Canada across the care continuum.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eleni M. Patsakos
- KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Mark T. Bayley
- KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ailene Kua
- KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Christiana Cheng
- Praxis Spinal Cord Institute, International Collaboration on Repair Discoveries (ICORD), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Janice Eng
- Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Department of Physiotherapy, GF Strong Rehabilitation Centre, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Chester Ho
- Division of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Vanessa K. Noonan
- Praxis Spinal Cord Institute, International Collaboration on Repair Discoveries (ICORD), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Matthew Querée
- GF Strong Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - B. Catharine Craven
- KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute – University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Advances in the Rehabilitation of the Spinal Cord-Injured Patient: The Orthopaedic Surgeons' Perspective. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2019; 27:e945-e953. [PMID: 31045690 DOI: 10.5435/jaaos-d-18-00559] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Acute traumatic spinal cord injury is a devastating condition affecting 17,700 new patients per year in the United States alone. Typically, orthopaedic surgeons focus on managing the acute surgical aspects of care (eg, surgical spinal decompression and stabilization). However, in the care of these patients, being familiar with how to prognosticate neurologic recovery and manage secondary complications is extremely important. In addition, as an integral part of the multidisciplinary care team, the surgeon should have an awareness of contemporary rehabilitation approaches to maximize function and facilitate reintegration into the community. The purpose of this review article is to provide a surgeon's perspective on these aspects of spinal cord injury care.
Collapse
|