1
|
Smith LE, Martin AF, Brooks SK, Davies R, Stein MV, Amlôt R, Marteau TM, Rubin GJ. Measuring and increasing rates of self-isolation in the context of COVID-19: a systematic review with narrative synthesis. Public Health 2024; 234:224-235. [PMID: 38972797 DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2024.05.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2024] [Revised: 05/24/2024] [Accepted: 05/24/2024] [Indexed: 07/09/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study aimed to investigate (1) definitions of self-isolation used during the COVID-19 pandemic; (2) measures used to quantify adherence and their reliability, validity, and acceptability; (3) rates of self-isolation adherence; and (4) factors associated with adherence. STUDY DESIGN This was a systematic review following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and Synthesis Without Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines (PROSPERO record CRD42022377820). METHODS MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Embase, Web of Science, PsyArXiv, medRxiv, and grey literature sources were searched (1 January 2020 to 13 December 2022) using terms related to COVID-19, isolation, and adherence. Studies were included if they contained original, quantitative data of self-isolation adherence during the COVID-19 pandemic. We extracted definitions of self-isolation, measures used to quantify adherence, adherence rates, and factors associated with adherence. RESULTS We included 45 studies. Self-isolation was inconsistently defined. Four studies did not use self-report measures. Of 41 studies using self-report, one reported reliability; another gave indirect evidence for the lack of validity of the measure. Rates of adherence to self-isolation for studies with only some concerns of bias were 51%-86% for COVID-19 cases, 78%-94% for contacts, and 16% for people with COVID-19-like symptoms. There was little evidence that self-isolation adherence was associated with sociodemographic or psychological factors. CONCLUSIONS There was no consensus in defining, operationalising, or measuring self-isolation, resulting in significant risk of bias in included studies. Future definitions of self-isolation should state behaviours to be enacted and duration. People recommended to self-isolate should be given support. Public health campaigns should aim to increase perceived effectiveness of self-isolation and promote accurate information about susceptibility to infection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L E Smith
- King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, United Kingdom; NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Emergency Preparedness and Response, United Kingdom; UK Health Security Agency, Behavioural Science and Insights Unit, United Kingdom.
| | - A F Martin
- King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, United Kingdom; NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Emergency Preparedness and Response, United Kingdom
| | - S K Brooks
- King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, United Kingdom; NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Emergency Preparedness and Response, United Kingdom
| | - R Davies
- King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, United Kingdom; NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Emergency Preparedness and Response, United Kingdom
| | - M V Stein
- King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, United Kingdom; Department of Psychology, King's College London, United Kingdom
| | - R Amlôt
- King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, United Kingdom; UK Health Security Agency, Behavioural Science and Insights Unit, United Kingdom
| | - T M Marteau
- University of Cambridge, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, United Kingdom
| | - G J Rubin
- King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, United Kingdom; NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Emergency Preparedness and Response, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Alexandrov N, Scott ES, Janssen MF, Lubetkin EI, Yfantopoulos JN, Bonsel GJ, Haagsma JA. The relationship between healthcare access and change in health-related quality-of-life among the general population of five countries during the COVID-19 pandemic. Qual Life Res 2024:10.1007/s11136-024-03704-1. [PMID: 38861096 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-024-03704-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/28/2024] [Indexed: 06/12/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine whether (1) healthcare access at onset of the pandemic and (2) age, gender, socioeconomic status (SES), and pre-existing health status were associated with change in health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) during the COVID-19 pandemic. The study includes a general population sample of five countries. METHODS An online questionnaire was administered to respondents from Greece, Italy, the Netherlands, the UK, and the US at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic between April 22nd and May 5th of 2020, and 1 year later between May 23rd and June 29th of 2021. The questionnaire included questions on demographic background, health status, and HRQoL. The primary outcome was change in HRQoL as measured by the EQ-5D-5L instrument. Specifically, the EQ-5D-5L index and EQ VAS were used. Healthcare access was quantified with regard to the respondent's ease of getting an appointment, waiting time, and opportunity to contact the provider and during analysis dichotomized into "sufficient" versus "insufficient". Linear regression analysis was performed with change in HRQoL as dependent variable and background variables as independent variables. RESULTS In total, 6,765 respondents completed the second questionnaire. 19.8% of total respondents reported insufficient healthcare access. Respondents with insufficient healthcare had both more improved and deteriorated HRQoL compared to respondents with sufficient healthcare, whose HRQoL remained unchanged. We did not find significant interactions between age, gender, SES and/or chronic disease status with healthcare access at onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. CONCLUSION Healthcare access was not associated with cumulative differences in change in HRQoL over a 1-year period in strata of age, gender, SES, and chronic disease status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadja Alexandrov
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Mathieu F Janssen
- Section Medical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Department of Psychiatry, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Erica I Lubetkin
- Department of Community Health and Social Medicine, CUNY School of Medicine, New York City, NY, USA
| | - John N Yfantopoulos
- Health Department of Economics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Gouke J Bonsel
- Department Scientific Support, EuroQol Research Foundation, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tsuchikawa Y, Tanaka S, Kasugai D, Nakagawa R, Shimizu M, Inoue T, Nagaya M, Nasu T, Omote N, Higashi M, Yamamoto T, Jingushi N, Numaguchi A, Nishida Y. Effects of acute phase intensive electrical muscle stimulation in COVID-19 patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation: an observational case-control study. Sci Rep 2024; 14:5254. [PMID: 38438485 PMCID: PMC10912433 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-55969-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2023] [Accepted: 02/29/2024] [Indexed: 03/06/2024] Open
Abstract
We investigated the effects of acute-phase intensive electrical muscle stimulation (EMS) on physical function in COVID-19 patients with respiratory failure requiring invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) in the intensive care unit (ICU). Consecutive COVID-19 patients requiring IMV admitted to a university hospital ICU between January and April 2022 (EMS therapy group) or between March and September 2021 (age-matched historical control group) were included in this retrospective observational case-control study. EMS was applied to both upper and lower limb muscles for up to 2 weeks in the EMS therapy group. The study population consisted of 16 patients undergoing EMS therapy and 16 age-matched historical controls (median age, 71 years; 81.2% male). The mean period until initiation of EMS therapy after ICU admission was 3.2 ± 1.4 days. The EMS therapy group completed a mean of 6.2 ± 3.7 EMS sessions, and no adverse events occurred. There were no significant differences between the two groups in Medical Research Council sum score (51 vs. 53 points, respectively; P = 0.439) or ICU mobility scale at ICU discharge. Addition of upper and lower limb muscle EMS therapy to an early rehabilitation program did not result in improved physical function at ICU discharge in severe COVID-19 patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yohei Tsuchikawa
- Department of Rehabilitation, Nagoya University Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Shinya Tanaka
- Department of Rehabilitation, Nagoya University Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Daisuke Kasugai
- Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Riko Nakagawa
- Department of Rehabilitation, Nagoya University Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Miho Shimizu
- Department of Rehabilitation, Mie University Hospital, Tsu, Japan
| | - Takayuki Inoue
- Department of Rehabilitation, Nagoya University Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Motoki Nagaya
- Department of Rehabilitation, Nagoya University Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Takafumi Nasu
- Department of Rehabilitation, Juko Osu Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Norihito Omote
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Michiko Higashi
- Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Takanori Yamamoto
- Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Naruhiro Jingushi
- Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Atsushi Numaguchi
- Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Yoshihiro Nishida
- Department of Rehabilitation, Nagoya University Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, 466-8560, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Cao Y, Clark JMR, Krause JS. Difficulty Obtaining Daily Necessities and Difficulty Obtaining SCI Services During the COVID-19 Pandemic Among People With Spinal Cord Injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2024; 105:82-87. [PMID: 37598832 DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2023.08.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2023] [Revised: 08/02/2023] [Accepted: 08/03/2023] [Indexed: 08/22/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe the self-reported difficulties during the COVID-19 pandemic on the lives of persons with traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI), and to identify the factors measured prior the pandemic that predict the number of difficulties obtaining daily necessities and difficulties obtaining SCI services during the pandemic. DESIGN Cohort study. SETTING A state SCI outcomes follow-up database in the southeastern United States. PARTICIPANTS 297 participants (N=297) met the following eligibility criteria: (1) ≥18 years of age, (2) traumatic SCI, (3) minimum of 1-year post-injury, and (4) having completed a longitudinal study questionnaire immediately prior to the pandemic (between 12/1/2019 and 03/11/2020). INTERVENTIONS N/A. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S) The outcome measures were the self-reported number of difficulties obtaining daily necessities (difficulties to get food, medication, and routine medical/dental care) and difficulties obtaining SCI services during the pandemic (difficulties to get treatment for SCI-related problems, to maintain regular SCI equipment, and to get SCI supplies). RESULTS Among 297 eligible participants, 247 (83%) have completed the follow-up during the pandemic between December 2020 and December 2021. There were 22% participants having at least 1 difficulty obtaining daily necessities and 19% participants having at least 1 difficulty obtaining SCI services. Younger, ambulatory participants, cervical 1-4 injury level, lower household income, more health conditions, and no routine health care access prior to the pandemic were associated with greater number of difficulties obtaining daily necessities. Women, non-ambulatory participants, marital relation, having need for physical assistance, more health conditions, and no routine health care access prior to the pandemic related to greater number of difficulties obtaining SCI services. CONCLUSIONS People with SCI have experienced living difficulties during the COVID-19 pandemic. Of particular importance, no routine health care access and more health conditions are related to more difficulties obtaining both daily necessities and SCI services after controlling the socio-demographics and injury characteristics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yue Cao
- College of Health Professions, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC
| | - Jillian M R Clark
- College of Health Professions, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC; Mental Health Service, VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA
| | - James S Krause
- College of Health Professions, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
LaVela SL, Wu J, Nevedal AL, Harris AHS, Frayne SM, Arnow KD, Barreto NB, Davis K, Eisenberg D. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on individuals living with spinal cord injury: A qualitative study. Rehabil Psychol 2023; 68:12-24. [PMID: 36395055 PMCID: PMC10593179 DOI: 10.1037/rep0000469] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE To explore the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic as experienced and reported by individuals living with a spinal cord injury (SCI). RESEARCH METHOD/DESIGN Descriptive qualitative design using in-depth semistructured interviews with individuals with SCI (n = 33) followed by thematic analysis. RESULTS Three main themes described impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic. (a) Impact on health care use; subthemes elaborated that this was attributable to in-person health care facility restrictions or individual decisions to delay care. Individuals with SCI experienced lapses in primary and SCI-specialty care, rehabilitation/therapy services, and home care, but some made use of telehealth services. (b) Impact on weight and/or weight management lifestyle behaviors; subthemes discussed that engagement in physical activity declined because of fitness center closures, recreational activity cancellations, and safety precautions limiting community-based and outdoor activities. The pandemic disrupted participants' independence in purchasing and making preferred food selections which impacted healthy eating. Participants ate due to boredom, at nonmealtimes, and consumed unhealthy foods during the pandemic. (c) Impact on psychosocial factors; included subthemes noting reduced social interactions, social participation, and ability to pursue pastimes with family, friends, and groups they belonged to. The pandemic also triggered emotional reactions such as worry, fear, doubt, demotivation, and feelings of social isolation. CONCLUSIONS Our findings highlight the magnitude of consequences faced by individuals with SCI when restrictions to health care, healthy lifestyle endeavors, and social participation occurred during the COVID-19 pandemic. Findings may inform SCI health care providers on what is needed in response to future public health or natural disaster crises. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sherri L. LaVela
- Center of Innovation for Complex Chronic Healthcare, Department of Veterans Affairs, Edward Mines Jr. VA Hospital, Hines, Illinois, United Slates
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University
| | - Justina Wu
- Center for Innovation to Implementation, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California, United States
| | - Andrea L. Nevedal
- Center for Innovation to Implementation, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California, United States
| | - Alex H. S. Harris
- Center for Innovation to Implementation, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California, United States
- Stanford-Surgery Policy Improvement Research & Education Center, Stanford University School of Medicine
| | - Susan M. Frayne
- Center for Innovation to Implementation, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California, United States
- Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine
| | - Katherine D. Arnow
- Stanford-Surgery Policy Improvement Research & Education Center, Stanford University School of Medicine
| | - Nicolas B. Barreto
- Stanford-Surgery Policy Improvement Research & Education Center, Stanford University School of Medicine
| | - Kristen Davis
- Stanford-Surgery Policy Improvement Research & Education Center, Stanford University School of Medicine
| | - Dan Eisenberg
- Center for Innovation to Implementation, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California, United States
- Stanford-Surgery Policy Improvement Research & Education Center, Stanford University School of Medicine
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Oral Manifestations in Children Diagnosed with COVID-19: A Narrative Review. Healthcare (Basel) 2023; 11:healthcare11030288. [PMID: 36766863 PMCID: PMC9914393 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11030288] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2022] [Revised: 01/04/2023] [Accepted: 01/16/2023] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
The COVID-19 disease has many symptoms, including fever, dry cough, tachypnea, and shortness of breath, but other symptoms can accompany the disease. The disease can also have oral manifestations. The aim of this narrative review is to describe the oral manifestations of COVID-19 in children and adolescents by summarizing the current knowledge as it was described in various case reports and original articles. A review of the literature was carried out by searching the online databases PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus, between October 2022 and 12 November 2022. For this narrative review, 890 articles from three databases and manual search were screened. Saliva was discovered to be a potential screening tool for the infection with the SARS-CoV-2, although it is most reliable in the first few days of infection. Different alteration of the oral mucosa, such as ulcers, erosions and gingivitis were reported. Oral manifestations accompanied children with COVID-19-related multisystem inflammatory syndrome, Kawasaki disease, thrombocytopenic purpura and erythema multiforme. COVID-19 had an indirect effect on oral harmful habits by decreasing their frequency during the lockdown. Although they occur more rarely, oral manifestations can accompany COVID-19 disease in children and adolescents, and they can be an early sign of the disease.
Collapse
|
7
|
Lakhani A, Dema S, Hose J, Erdem N, Wollersheim D, Grimbeek P, Charlifue S. What happens post-lockdown for people with disability? Autonomy, quality of life, service access and health changes for people with spinal cord injury in Victoria, Australia after COVID-19 social distancing restrictions. HEALTH & SOCIAL CARE IN THE COMMUNITY 2022; 30:e5366-e5377. [PMID: 35924426 PMCID: PMC9538439 DOI: 10.1111/hsc.13958] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2021] [Revised: 07/05/2022] [Accepted: 07/16/2022] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
Social distancing restrictions are undoubtedly important for controlling the spread of COVID-19 however, they are also adversely impacting population health and health service access. It is important that priority populations with a disability which may already have adverse health, access to health services, and autonomy and participation compared to those without disability, are able to receive preventative health and social care during periods of restriction. The impact of social distancing restrictions on people with disability is not uniform nor well-understood. Research has been cross-sectional and considered data gathered during social distancing restrictions, or longitudinal, considering data gathered during a pre-pandemic baseline. This longitudinal study investigated the impact of lifting social distancing restrictions on priority domains for people with disability including autonomy and participation, access to health services, health issues and quality of life. People with spinal cord injury in Victoria, Australia (n = 71) completed a survey towards the end of social-distancing restrictions (T1) and 6-months post social distancing restrictions (T2). Non-parametric tests for significant differences confirmed that 6-months post-lifting social distancing restrictions participants experienced a significant increase in health conditions, a significant decrease in the number of inaccessible health services, and a significantly lower level of limitations across participation and autonomy, outdoor autonomy and work and education domains. QOL improved 6-months post lifting restrictions, however not to a significant level. The adverse health experienced by people with spinal cord injury after lifting restrictions may in part result from limited health service access and reduced participation during the time of restrictions. Clear definitions of what constitutes as essential care may ensure that eligible and required care remains received during lockdown or instances when service provision is compromised. Health and social care providers should be equipped with the knowledge of priority populations so that their support can be targeted to those most in need.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ali Lakhani
- The School of Psychology and Public HealthLa Trobe UniversityMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
- The Hopkins Centre, Menzies Health Institute QueenslandGriffith UniversityMeadowbrookQueenslandAustralia
- Palliative Care DepartmentEastern HealthWantirnaVictoriaAustralia
| | - Salvatore Dema
- Austin Health ‐ Royal Talbot Rehabilitation CentreKewVictoriaAustralia
| | - Josh Hose
- AQA VictoriaHeidelbergVictoriaAustralia
| | | | - Dennis Wollersheim
- The School of Psychology and Public HealthLa Trobe UniversityMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Gorgey AS, Khalil RE, Alrubaye M, Gill R, Rivers J, Goetz LL, Cifu DX, Castillo T, Caruso D, Lavis TD, Lesnefsky EJ, Cardozo CC, Adler RA. Testosterone and long pulse width stimulation (TLPS) for denervated muscles after spinal cord injury: a study protocol of randomised clinical trial. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e064748. [PMID: 36198461 PMCID: PMC9535184 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064748] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Long pulse width stimulation (LPWS; 120-150 ms) has the potential to stimulate denervated muscles and to restore muscle size in denervated people with spinal cord injury (SCI). We will determine if testosterone treatment (TT)+LPWS would increase skeletal muscle size, leg lean mass and improve overall metabolic health in persons with SCI with denervation. We hypothesise that the 1-year TT+LPWS will upregulate protein synthesis pathways, downregulate protein degradation pathways and increase overall mitochondrial health. METHODS AND ANALYSIS Twenty-four male participants (aged 18-70 years with chronic SCI) with denervation of both knee extensor muscles and tolerance to the LPWS paradigm will be randomised into either TT+neuromuscular electrical stimulation via telehealth or TT+LPWS. The training sessions will be twice weekly for 1 year. Measurements will be conducted 1 week prior training (baseline; week 0), 6 months following training (postintervention 1) and 1 week after the end of 1 year of training (postintervention 2). Measurements will include body composition assessment using anthropometry, dual X-ray absorptiometry and MRI to measure size of different muscle groups. Metabolic profile will include measuring of basal metabolic rate, followed by blood drawn to measure fasting biomarkers similar to hemoglobin A1c, lipid panels, C reactive protein, interleukin-6 and free fatty acids and then intravenous glucose tolerance test to test for insulin sensitivity and glucose effectiveness. Finally, muscle biopsy will be captured to measure protein expression and intracellular signalling; and mitochondrial electron transport chain function. The participants will fill out 3 days dietary record to monitor their energy intake on a weekly basis. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The study was approved by Institutional Review Board of the McGuire Research Institute (ID # 02189). Dissemination plans will include the Veteran Health Administration and its practitioners, the national SCI/D services office, the general healthcare community and the veteran population, as well as the entire SCI community via submitting quarterly letters or peer-review articles. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT03345576.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashraf S Gorgey
- Spinal Cord Injury Service and Disorders, Hunter Holmes McGuire VA Medical Center, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | - Refka E Khalil
- Spinal Cord Injury Service and Disorders, Hunter Holmes McGuire VA Medical Center, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | - Malak Alrubaye
- Spinal Cord Injury Service and Disorders, Hunter Holmes McGuire VA Medical Center, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | - Ranjodh Gill
- Endocrine Service, Hunter Holmes McGuire VA Medical Center, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | - Jeannie Rivers
- Spinal Cord Injury Service and Disorders, Hunter Holmes McGuire VA Medical Center, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | - Lance L Goetz
- Spinal Cord Injury Service and Disorders, Hunter Holmes McGuire VA Medical Center, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | - David X Cifu
- Physical Medicine and Rehab, Commonwealth of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | - Teodoro Castillo
- Spinal Cord Injury Service and Disorders, Hunter Holmes McGuire VA Medical Center, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | - Deborah Caruso
- Spinal Cord Injury Service and Disorders, Hunter Holmes McGuire VA Medical Center, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | - Timothy D Lavis
- Spinal Cord Injury Service and Disorders, Hunter Holmes McGuire VA Medical Center, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | - Edward J Lesnefsky
- Cardiology Service, Hunter Holmes McGuire VA Medical Center, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | - Christopher C Cardozo
- National Center for the Medical Consequences of Spinal Cord Injury and Medical and Surgical Service, James J Peters VA Medical Center, Bronx, New York, USA
| | - Robert A Adler
- Endocrine Service, Hunter Holmes McGuire VA Medical Center, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| |
Collapse
|