1
|
Moss E, Taylor A, Andreou A, Ang C, Arora R, Attygalle A, Banerjee S, Bowen R, Buckley L, Burbos N, Coleridge S, Edmondson R, El-Bahrawy M, Fotopoulou C, Frost J, Ganesan R, George A, Hanna L, Kaur B, Manchanda R, Maxwell H, Michael A, Miles T, Newton C, Nicum S, Ratnavelu N, Ryan N, Sundar S, Vroobel K, Walther A, Wong J, Morrison J. British Gynaecological Cancer Society (BGCS) ovarian, tubal and primary peritoneal cancer guidelines: Recommendations for practice update 2024. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2024; 300:69-123. [PMID: 39002401 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.06.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2024] [Accepted: 06/13/2024] [Indexed: 07/15/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Esther Moss
- College of Life Sciences, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester, LE1 7RH, UK
| | | | - Adrian Andreou
- Royal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust, Combe Park, Bath BA1 3NG, UK
| | - Christine Ang
- Northern Gynaecological Oncology Centre, Gateshead, UK
| | - Rupali Arora
- Department of Cellular Pathology, University College London NHS Trust, 60 Whitfield Street, London W1T 4E, UK
| | | | | | - Rebecca Bowen
- Royal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust, Combe Park, Bath BA1 3NG, UK
| | - Lynn Buckley
- Beverley Counselling & Psychotherapy, 114 Holme Church Lane, Beverley, East Yorkshire HU17 0PY, UK
| | - Nikos Burbos
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital Colney Lane, Norwich NR4 7UY, UK
| | | | - Richard Edmondson
- Saint Mary's Hospital, Manchester and University of Manchester, M13 9WL, UK
| | - Mona El-Bahrawy
- Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road, London W12 0HS, UK
| | | | - Jonathan Frost
- Gynaecological Oncology, Royal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust, Combe Park, Bath, Bath BA1 3NG, UK; University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Raji Ganesan
- Department of Cellular Pathology, Birmingham Women's Hospital, Birmingham B15 2TG, UK
| | | | - Louise Hanna
- Department of Oncology, Velindre Cancer Centre, Whitchurch, Cardiff CF14 2TL, UK
| | - Baljeet Kaur
- North West London Pathology (NWLP), Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road, London W12 0HS, UK
| | - Ranjit Manchanda
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Cancer Research UK Barts Centre, Queen Mary University of London and Barts Health NHS Trust, UK
| | - Hillary Maxwell
- Dorset County Hospital, Williams Avenue, Dorchester, Dorset DT1 2JY, UK
| | - Agnieszka Michael
- Royal Surrey NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford GU2 7XX and University of Surrey, School of Biosciences, GU2 7WG, UK
| | - Tracey Miles
- Royal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust, Combe Park, Bath BA1 3NG, UK
| | - Claire Newton
- Gynaecology Oncology Department, St Michael's Hospital, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol BS1 3NU, UK
| | - Shibani Nicum
- Department of Oncology, University College London Cancer Institute, London, UK
| | | | - Neil Ryan
- The Centre for Reproductive Health, Institute for Regeneration and Repair (IRR), 4-5 Little France Drive, Edinburgh BioQuarter City, Edinburgh EH16 4UU, UK
| | - Sudha Sundar
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham and Pan Birmingham Gynaecological Cancer Centre, City Hospital, Birmingham B18 7QH, UK
| | - Katherine Vroobel
- Department of Cellular Pathology, Royal Marsden Foundation NHS Trust, London SW3 6JJ, UK
| | - Axel Walther
- Bristol Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - Jason Wong
- Department of Histopathology, East Suffolk and North Essex NHS Foundation Trust, Ipswich Hospital, Heath Road, Ipswich IP4 5PD, UK
| | - Jo Morrison
- University of Exeter, Exeter, UK; Department of Gynaecological Oncology, GRACE Centre, Musgrove Park Hospital, Somerset NHS Foundation Trust, Taunton TA1 5DA, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wang J, Apizi A, Tao N, An H. Association between the metabolic score for insulin resistance and prostate cancer: a cross-sectional study in Xinjiang. PeerJ 2024; 12:e17827. [PMID: 39076779 PMCID: PMC11285359 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.17827] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2024] [Accepted: 07/08/2024] [Indexed: 07/31/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Insulin resistance is associated with the development and progression of various cancers. However, the epidemiological evidence for the association between insulin resistance and prostate cancer is still limited. Objectives To investigate the associations between insulin resistance and prostate cancer prevalence. Methods A total of 451 patients who were pathologically diagnosed with prostate cancer in the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University were selected as the case population; 1,863 participants who conducted physical examinations during the same period were selected as the control population. The metabolic score for insulin resistance (METS-IR) was calculated as a substitute indicator for evaluating insulin resistance. The Chi-square test and Mann-Whitney U test were performed to compare the basic information of the case population and control population. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses to define factors that may influence prostate cancer prevalence. The generalized additive model (GAM) was applied to fit the relationship between METS-IR and prostate cancer. Interaction tests based on generalized additive model (GAM) and contour plots were also carried out to analyze the interaction effect of each factor with METS-IR on prostate cancer. Results METS-IR as both a continuous and categorical variable suggested that METS-IR was negatively associated with prostate cancer prevalence. Smoothed curves fitted by generalized additive model (GAM) displayed a nonlinear correlation between METS-IR and prostate cancer prevalence (P < 0.001), and presented that METS-IR was negatively associated with the odds ratio (OR) of prostate cancer. The interaction based on the generalized additive model (GAM) revealed that METS-IR interacted with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c) to influence the prostate cancer prevalence (P = 0.004). Contour plots showed that the highest prevalence probability of prostate cancer was achieved when METS-IR was minimal and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c) or total cholesterol (TC) was maximal. Conclusions METS-IR is nonlinearly and negatively associated with the prevalence of prostate cancer. The interaction between METS-IR and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c) has an impact on the prevalence of prostate cancer. The study suggests that the causal relationship between insulin resistance and prostate cancer still needs more research to confirm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jinru Wang
- College of Public Health, Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, China
| | - Aireti Apizi
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, China
| | - Ning Tao
- College of Public Health, Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, China
| | - Hengqing An
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Talbot A, Jebb SA, Foster C, Realpe AX, Wheatstone P, Buczacki S, Koutoukidis DA. Participants' perspectives of being recruited into a randomised trial of a weight loss intervention before colorectal cancer surgery: a qualitative interview study. BMC Cancer 2024; 24:802. [PMID: 38969979 PMCID: PMC11225294 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-024-12464-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2024] [Accepted: 06/03/2024] [Indexed: 07/07/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The period between cancer diagnosis and surgery presents an opportunity for trials to assess the feasibility of behaviour change interventions. However, this can be a worrying time for patients and may hinder recruitment. We describe the perspectives of patients with excess weight awaiting colorectal cancer surgery about their recruitment into a randomised trial of a prehabilitation weight loss intervention. METHODS We interviewed the first 26 participants from the 8 recruitment sites across England in the 'CARE' feasibility trial. Participants were randomised into either usual care (n = 13) or a low-energy nutritionally-replete total diet replacement programme with weekly remote behavioural support by a dietitian (n = 13). The semi-structured interviews occurred shortly after recruitment and the questions focused on participants' recollections of being recruited into the trial. We analysed data rapidly and then used a mind-mapping technique to develop descriptive themes. Themes were agreed by all co-authors, including a person with lived-experience of colorectal surgery. RESULTS Participants had a mean body mass index (± SD) of 38 kg/m2 (± 6), age of 50 years (± 12), and 42% were female. People who participated in the trial were motivated by the offer of structured weight loss support that could potentially help them improve their surgical outcomes. However, participants also had concerns around the potential unpalatability of the intervention diet and side effects. Positive attitudes of clinicians towards the trial facilitated recruitment but participants were disappointed when they were randomised to usual care due to clinical teams' overemphasis on the benefits of losing weight. CONCLUSIONS Patients were motivated to take part by the prospect of improved surgical outcomes. However, the strong preference to be allocated to the intervention suggests that balanced communication of equipoise is crucial to minimise disappointment from randomisation to usual care and differential dropout from the trial. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN39207707, Registration date 13/03/2023.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amelia Talbot
- Nuffield Department of Primary Health Care Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Primary Care Building, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Woodstock Road, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK
| | - Susan A Jebb
- Nuffield Department of Primary Health Care Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Primary Care Building, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Woodstock Road, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK
| | - Claire Foster
- Centre for Psychosocial Research in Cancer, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK
| | - Alba X Realpe
- NIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, Department of Population Health, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall. 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, Bs8 2PS, UK
| | | | - Simon Buczacki
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus Research Building, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford, UK
| | - Dimitrios A Koutoukidis
- Nuffield Department of Primary Health Care Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Primary Care Building, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Woodstock Road, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bi S, Zhu J, Huang L, Feng W, Peng L, Leng L, Wang Y, Shan P, Kong W, Zhu S. Comprehensive Analysis of the Function and Prognostic Value of TAS2Rs Family-Related Genes in Colon Cancer. Int J Mol Sci 2024; 25:6849. [PMID: 38999959 PMCID: PMC11241446 DOI: 10.3390/ijms25136849] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2024] [Revised: 06/09/2024] [Accepted: 06/19/2024] [Indexed: 07/14/2024] Open
Abstract
In the realm of colon carcinoma, significant genetic and epigenetic diversity is observed, underscoring the necessity for tailored prognostic features that can guide personalized therapeutic strategies. In this study, we explored the association between the type 2 bitter taste receptor (TAS2Rs) family-related genes and colon cancer using RNA-sequencing and clinical datasets from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO). Our preliminary analysis identified seven TAS2Rs genes associated with survival using univariate Cox regression analysis, all of which were observed to be overexpressed in colon cancer. Subsequently, based on these seven TAS2Rs prognostic genes, two colon cancer molecular subtypes (Cluster A and Cluster B) were defined. These subtypes exhibited distinct prognostic and immune characteristics, with Cluster A characterized by low immune cell infiltration and less favorable outcomes, while Cluster B was associated with high immune cell infiltration and better prognosis. Finally, we developed a robust scoring system using a gradient boosting machine (GBM) approach, integrated with the gene-pairing method, to predict the prognosis of colon cancer patients. This machine learning model could improve our predictive accuracy for colon cancer outcomes, underscoring its value in the precision oncology framework.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suzhen Bi
- Institute of Translational Medicine, College of Medicine, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266021, China
| | - Jie Zhu
- Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland (FIMM), HiLIFE, University of Helsinki, 00014 Helsinki, Finland
| | - Liting Huang
- Institute of Translational Medicine, College of Medicine, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266021, China
| | - Wanting Feng
- Institute of Translational Medicine, College of Medicine, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266021, China
| | - Lulu Peng
- Institute of Translational Medicine, College of Medicine, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266021, China
| | - Liangqi Leng
- Institute of Translational Medicine, College of Medicine, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266021, China
| | - Yin Wang
- Institute of Translational Medicine, College of Medicine, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266021, China
| | - Peipei Shan
- Institute of Translational Medicine, College of Medicine, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266021, China
| | - Weikaixin Kong
- Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland (FIMM), HiLIFE, University of Helsinki, 00014 Helsinki, Finland
| | - Sujie Zhu
- Institute of Translational Medicine, College of Medicine, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266021, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Makhlouf S, Atallah NM, Polotto S, Lee AHS, Green AR, Rakha EA. Deciphering the Clinical Behaviour of Invasive Lobular Carcinoma of the Breast Defines an Aggressive Subtype. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:1893. [PMID: 38791971 PMCID: PMC11120092 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16101893] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2024] [Revised: 05/11/2024] [Accepted: 05/13/2024] [Indexed: 05/26/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC), the most common special type of breast cancer (BC), has unique clinical behaviour and is different from invasive ductal carcinoma of no special type (IDC-NST). However, ILC further comprises a diverse group of tumours with distinct features. This study aims to examine the clinicopathological and prognostic features of different variants of ILC, with a particular focus on characterising aggressive subtypes. METHODS A large (n = 7140) well-characterised and histologically reviewed BC cohort with treatment and long-term follow-up data was investigated. The cohort was classified based on the WHO classification of tumours into main histological subtypes, including ILC and IDC-NST. ILCs were further classified into variants. Clinicopathological parameters and patient outcomes in terms of BC-specific survival (BCSS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were evaluated. RESULTS ILC constituted 11% of the cohort. The most common non-classic ILC variants were pleomorphic (pILC) and solid (sILC), constituting 19% of ILC. Compared to classic and related variants (alveolar, trabecular, papillary, and tubulolobular; cILC), pILC and sILC variants were associated with aggressive tumour characteristics. The histologic grade of ILC was an important prognostic variable. The survival patterns identified an aggressive ILC subtype encompassing pILC and high-grade sILC. These tumours, which comprised 14% of the cases, were associated with clinicopathological characteristics of poor prognosis and had high BC-specific death and recurrence rates compared not only to cILC (p < 0.001) but also to IDC-NST (p = 0.02) patients. Contrasting this, cILC patients had significantly longer BCSS and DFS than IDC-NST patients in the first 10 to 15 years of follow-up. Adjuvant chemotherapy did not improve the outcome of patients with aggressive ILC subtypes. CONCLUSIONS pILC and high-grade sILC variants comprise an aggressive ILC subtype associated with poor prognostic characteristics and a poor response to chemotherapy. These results warrant confirmation in randomised clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shorouk Makhlouf
- Nottingham Breast Cancer Research Centre, Academic Unit for Translational Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK; (S.M.); (N.M.A.); (A.R.G.)
- Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut 71515, Egypt
| | - Nehal M. Atallah
- Nottingham Breast Cancer Research Centre, Academic Unit for Translational Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK; (S.M.); (N.M.A.); (A.R.G.)
- Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Menoufia University, Menoufia 32928, Egypt
| | - Susanna Polotto
- Division of Oncoplastic Surgery, Nottingham Breast Institute, Nottingham University Hospitals, NHS Trust, Nottingham NG5 1PB, UK;
| | - Andrew H. S. Lee
- Department of Histopathology, Nottingham University Hospitals, NHS Trust, Nottingham NG5 1PB, UK
| | - Andrew R. Green
- Nottingham Breast Cancer Research Centre, Academic Unit for Translational Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK; (S.M.); (N.M.A.); (A.R.G.)
| | - Emad A. Rakha
- Nottingham Breast Cancer Research Centre, Academic Unit for Translational Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK; (S.M.); (N.M.A.); (A.R.G.)
- Department of Histopathology, Nottingham University Hospitals, NHS Trust, Nottingham NG5 1PB, UK
- Department of Pathology, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha 3050, Qatar
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Chen G, Barlow M, Down L, Mounce LTA, Merriel SWD, Watson J, Martins T, Bailey SER. Exploring ethnic differences in the distribution of blood test results in healthy adult populations to inform earlier cancer detection: a systematic review. Fam Pract 2024:cmae021. [PMID: 38706165 DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cmae021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/07/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In primary care, health professionals use blood tests to investigate nonspecific presentations to inform referral decisions. Reference ranges for the commonly used blood tests in western countries were developed in predominately White populations, and so may perform differently when applied to non-White populations. Knowledge of ethnic variation in blood test results in healthy/general populations could help address ethnic inequalities in cancer referral for diagnosis and outcomes. OBJECTIVE This systematic review explored evidence of ethnic differences in the distribution of selected blood test results among healthy/general populations to inform future research aimed at addressing inequalities in cancer diagnosis. METHODS We searched PubMed and EMBASE to identify studies reporting measures of haemoglobin, MCV, calcium, albumin, platelet count, and CRP in nondiseased adults from at least 2 different ethnic groups. Two reviewers independently screened studies, completed data extraction and quality assessment using an adapted Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Participants were stratified into White, Black, Asian, Mixed, and Other groups. Data were synthesised narratively and meta-analyses were conducted where possible. RESULTS A total of 47 papers were included. Black men and women have lower average values of haemoglobin, MCV, and albumin, and higher average values of CRP relative to their White counterparts. Additionally, Black men have lower average haemoglobin than Asian men, whereas Asian women have lower average CRP values when compared with White women. CONCLUSIONS There is evidence of ethnic differences in average values of haemoglobin, MCV, CRP, and albumin in healthy/general populations. Further research is needed to explore the reasons for these differences. Systematic review registration: CRD42021274580.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ge Chen
- Department of Health and Community Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
- Bristol Dental School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Melissa Barlow
- Department of Health and Community Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Liz Down
- Department of Health and Community Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | | | - Samuel William David Merriel
- Department of Health and Community Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
- Centre for Primary Care & Health Services Research, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Jessica Watson
- Centre for Academic Primary Care (CAPC), Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Tanimola Martins
- Department of Health and Community Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Allen I, Hassan H, Joko-Fru WY, Huntley C, Loong L, Rahman T, Torr B, Bacon A, Knott C, Jose S, Vernon S, Lüchtenborg M, Pethick J, Lavelle K, McRonald F, Eccles D, Morris EJ, Hardy S, Turnbull C, Tischkowitz M, Pharoah P, Antoniou AC. Risks of second primary cancers among 584,965 female and male breast cancer survivors in England: a 25-year retrospective cohort study. THE LANCET REGIONAL HEALTH. EUROPE 2024; 40:100903. [PMID: 38745989 PMCID: PMC11092881 DOI: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.100903] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2024] [Revised: 03/27/2024] [Accepted: 03/28/2024] [Indexed: 05/16/2024]
Abstract
Background Second primary cancers (SPCs) after breast cancer (BC) present an increasing public health burden, with little existing research on socio-demographic, tumour, and treatment effects. We addressed this in the largest BC survivor cohort to date, using a novel linkage of National Disease Registration Service datasets. Methods The cohort included 581,403 female and 3562 male BC survivors diagnosed between 1995 and 2019. We estimated standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) for combined and site-specific SPCs using incidences for England, overall and by age at BC and socioeconomic status. We estimated incidences and Kaplan-Meier cumulative risks stratified by age at BC, and assessed risk variation by socio-demographic, tumour, and treatment characteristics using Cox regression. Findings Both genders were at elevated contralateral breast (SIR: 2.02 (95% CI: 1.99-2.06) females; 55.4 (35.5-82.4) males) and non-breast (1.10 (1.09-1.11) females, 1.10 (1.00-1.20) males) SPC risks. Non-breast SPC risks were higher for females younger at BC diagnosis (SIR: 1.34 (1.31-1.38) <50 y, 1.07 (1.06-1.09) ≥50 y) and more socioeconomically deprived (SIR: 1.00 (0.98-1.02) least deprived quintile, 1.34 (1.30-1.37) most). Interpretation Enhanced SPC surveillance may benefit BC survivors, although specific recommendations require more detailed multifactorial risk and cost-benefit analyses. The associations between deprivation and SPC risks could provide clinical management insights. Funding CRUK Catalyst Award CanGene-CanVar (C61296/A27223). Cancer Research UK grant: PPRPGM-Nov 20∖100,002. This work was supported by core funding from the NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre (NIHR203312)]. The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isaac Allen
- National Disease Registration Service, National Health Service England, London, United Kingdom
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Hend Hassan
- National Disease Registration Service, National Health Service England, London, United Kingdom
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Walburga Yvonne Joko-Fru
- National Disease Registration Service, National Health Service England, London, United Kingdom
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Catherine Huntley
- National Disease Registration Service, National Health Service England, London, United Kingdom
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, United Kingdom
| | - Lucy Loong
- National Disease Registration Service, National Health Service England, London, United Kingdom
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, United Kingdom
| | - Tameera Rahman
- National Disease Registration Service, National Health Service England, London, United Kingdom
- Health Data Insight CIC, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Bethany Torr
- National Disease Registration Service, National Health Service England, London, United Kingdom
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, United Kingdom
| | - Andrew Bacon
- National Disease Registration Service, National Health Service England, London, United Kingdom
| | - Craig Knott
- National Disease Registration Service, National Health Service England, London, United Kingdom
- Health Data Insight CIC, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Sophie Jose
- National Disease Registration Service, National Health Service England, London, United Kingdom
- Health Data Insight CIC, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Sally Vernon
- National Disease Registration Service, National Health Service England, London, United Kingdom
| | - Margreet Lüchtenborg
- National Disease Registration Service, National Health Service England, London, United Kingdom
- Centre for Cancer, Society and Public Health, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Joanna Pethick
- National Disease Registration Service, National Health Service England, London, United Kingdom
| | - Katrina Lavelle
- National Disease Registration Service, National Health Service England, London, United Kingdom
| | - Fiona McRonald
- National Disease Registration Service, National Health Service England, London, United Kingdom
| | - Diana Eccles
- Department of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Eva J.A Morris
- Applied Health Research Unit, Big Data Institute, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Steven Hardy
- National Disease Registration Service, National Health Service England, London, United Kingdom
| | - Clare Turnbull
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, United Kingdom
| | - Marc Tischkowitz
- Department of Medical Genetics, Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, National Institute for Health Research, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Paul Pharoah
- Department of Computational Biomedicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Antonis C. Antoniou
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Steventon L, Nicum S, Man K, Chaichana U, Wei L, Chambers P. A systematic review of ethnic minority participation in randomised controlled trials of systemic therapies for gynecological cancers. Gynecol Oncol 2024; 184:178-189. [PMID: 38330832 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2024.01.052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2023] [Revised: 01/10/2024] [Accepted: 01/30/2024] [Indexed: 02/10/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) must include ethnic minority patients to produce generalisable findings and ensure health equity as cancer incidence rises globally. This systematic review examines participation of ethnic minorities in RCTs of licensed systemic anti-cancer therapies (SACT) for gynecological cancers, defining the research population and distribution of research sites to identify disparities in participation on the global scale. METHODS A systematic review was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement. Phase II and III RCTs of licensed therapies for gynecological cancers published 01/11/2012-01/11/2022 that reported patient race/ethnicity were included. Extracted data included race/ethnicity and research site location. RCT populations were aggregated and participation of groups compared. Global distribution of research sites was described. RESULTS 26 RCTs met inclusion criteria of 351 publications included in full-text screening, representing 17,041 patients. 79.8% were "Caucasian", 9.1% "East Asian", 3.7% "Black/African American" and 6.1% "Other, Unknown, Not Reported". "Caucasian" patients participated at higher rates than all other groups. Of 5,478 research sites, 80.1% were located in North America, 13.0% in Europe, 3.4% in East Asia, 1.3% in the Middle East, 1.3% in South America and 0.8% in Australasia. CONCLUSIONS Ethnic minorities formed smaller proportions of RCT cohorts compared to the general population. The majority of sites were located in North America and Europe, with few in other regions, limiting enrollment of South Asian, South-East Asian and African patients in particular. Efforts to recruit more ethnic minority patients should be made in North America and Europe. More sites in underserved regions would promote equitable access to RCTs and ensure findings are generalisable to diverse groups. This review assessed the global population enrolled in contemporary RCTs for novel therapies now routinely given for gynecological cancers, adding novel understanding of the global distribution of research sites.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luke Steventon
- UCL School of Pharmacy, Mezzanine Floor, BMA House, Tavistock Square, London WC1H 9EU, United Kingdom; University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Medical Oncology Department, 250 Euston Road, London NW1 2PG, United Kingdom
| | - Shibani Nicum
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Medical Oncology Department, 250 Euston Road, London NW1 2PG, United Kingdom; UCL Cancer Institute, Department of Oncology, 72 Huntley Street, London WC1 6DD, United Kingdom
| | - Kenneth Man
- UCL School of Pharmacy, Mezzanine Floor, BMA House, Tavistock Square, London WC1H 9EU, United Kingdom
| | - Ubonphan Chaichana
- UCL School of Pharmacy, Mezzanine Floor, BMA House, Tavistock Square, London WC1H 9EU, United Kingdom
| | - Li Wei
- UCL School of Pharmacy, Mezzanine Floor, BMA House, Tavistock Square, London WC1H 9EU, United Kingdom
| | - Pinkie Chambers
- UCL School of Pharmacy, Mezzanine Floor, BMA House, Tavistock Square, London WC1H 9EU, United Kingdom; University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Medical Oncology Department, 250 Euston Road, London NW1 2PG, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Baxter MA, Denholm M, Kingdon SJ, Kathirgamakarthigeyan S, Parikh S, Shakir R, Johnson R, Martin H, Walton M, Yao W, Swan A, Samuelson C, Ren X, Cooper A, Gray HL, Clifton S, Ball J, Gullick G, Anderson M, Dodd L, Hayhurst H, Salama M, Shotton R, Britton F, Christodoulou T, Abdul-Hamid A, Eichholz A, Evans RM, Wallroth P, Gibson F, Poole K, Rowe M, Harris J. CAnceR IN PreGnancy (CARING) - a retrospective study of cancer diagnosed during pregnancy in the United Kingdom. Br J Cancer 2024; 130:1261-1268. [PMID: 38383704 PMCID: PMC11014900 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-024-02605-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2023] [Revised: 01/25/2024] [Accepted: 01/29/2024] [Indexed: 02/23/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The incidence of cancer diagnosed during pregnancy is increasing. Data relating to investigation and management, as well as maternal and foetal outcomes is lacking in a United Kingdom (UK) population. METHODS In this retrospective study we report data from 119 patients diagnosed with cancer during pregnancy from 14 cancer centres in the UK across a five-year period (2016-2020). RESULTS Median age at diagnosis was 33 years, with breast, skin and haematological the most common primary sites. The majority of cases were new diagnoses (109 patients, 91.6%). Most patients were treated with radical intent (96 patients, 80.7%), however, gastrointestinal cancers were associated with a high rate of palliative intent treatment (63.6%). Intervention was commenced during pregnancy in 68 (57.1%) patients; 44 (37%) had surgery and 31 (26.1%) received chemotherapy. Live births occurred in 98 (81.7%) of the cases, with 54 (55.1%) of these delivered by caesarean section. Maternal mortality during the study period was 20.2%. CONCLUSIONS This is the first pan-tumour report of diagnosis, management and outcomes of cancer diagnosed during pregnancy in the UK. Our findings demonstrate proof of concept that data collection is feasible and highlight the need for further research in this cohort of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M A Baxter
- Division of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.
- Tayside Cancer Centre, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, NHS Tayside, Dundee, UK.
| | - M Denholm
- Department of Oncology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
- Early Cancer Institute, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - S J Kingdon
- Exeter Oncology Centre, Royal Devon University Hospitals NHS Trust, Exeter, UK
| | | | - S Parikh
- Department of Oncology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - R Shakir
- Oncology Department, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - R Johnson
- Oncology Department, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - H Martin
- Department of Oncology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
- Early Cancer Institute, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Cambridge University, Cambridge, UK
| | - M Walton
- Department of Oncology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - W Yao
- Department of Oncology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - A Swan
- Edinburgh Cancer Centre, Western General Hospital, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK
| | - C Samuelson
- Edinburgh Cancer Centre, Western General Hospital, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK
| | - X Ren
- Edinburgh Cancer Centre, Western General Hospital, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK
| | - A Cooper
- Edinburgh Cancer Centre, Western General Hospital, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK
| | - H-L Gray
- Tayside Cancer Centre, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, NHS Tayside, Dundee, UK
| | - S Clifton
- Bristol Haematology and Oncology Centre, Bristol, UK
| | - J Ball
- Bristol Haematology and Oncology Centre, Bristol, UK
| | - G Gullick
- Oncology Department, Royal United Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bath, UK
| | - M Anderson
- Northern Centre for Cancer Care, The Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, The Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - L Dodd
- Northern Centre for Cancer Care, The Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, The Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - H Hayhurst
- Northern Centre for Cancer Care, The Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, The Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - M Salama
- Department of Oncology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - R Shotton
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - F Britton
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - T Christodoulou
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - A Abdul-Hamid
- Department of Oncology, Royal Surrey County Hospital NHS Trust, Surrey, UK
| | - A Eichholz
- Department of Oncology, Buckinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust, Buckinghamshire, UK
| | - R M Evans
- South West Wales Cancer Centre, Swansea Bay NHS Trust, Swansea, UK
| | | | - F Gibson
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
- Centre for Outcomes and Experience Research in Children's Health, Illness and Disability, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - K Poole
- The Institute of Cancer Research, Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, Belmont, Sutton, Surrey, UK
| | - M Rowe
- Sunrise Oncology Centre, Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust, Truro, UK
| | - J Harris
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Law K, McCabe MG, van der Veer SN, Yorke J. The development and validation of a needs assessment tool for use with YOUng adult survivors of a CentrAl Nervous system tumor (YOU-CAN). Neurooncol Pract 2024; 11:205-215. [PMID: 38496913 PMCID: PMC10940824 DOI: 10.1093/nop/npad082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/19/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Adolescent and young adult (AYA) survivors of a central nervous system (CNS) tumor represent a vulnerable group who can experience: social isolation, low rates of employment, and achieving independence can be compromised, leading to poorer quality of life compared with survivors of other cancer types. The aim of this study is to develop and evaluate the validity of a needs assessment tool (NAT) for AYA survivors of a CNS tumor. Methods Items generated using data from 29 qualitative studies and cognitive interviews (n = 8) produced NAT V1.1 (49 items). 128 of 316 eligible participants attending neuro-oncology clinics at 4 NHS sites between June 2022 and March 2023 completed the NAT V1.1 to allow for item reduction and refinement and to evaluate reliability and validity. A pilot study (n = 6) using YOU-CAN in routine follow-up concluded the study. Results Hierarchical analysis and Rasch analysis identified 18- and 15-items for removal, respectively. YOU-CAN, comprised of the remaining 16 items, demonstrates excellent test-retest reliability (intra-class correlation coefficient, 0.901, n = 40) and sufficient correlation with the European Quality of Life questionnaire and Supportive Care Needs Survey (Pearson r = 0.433 and 0.590, respectively). Pilot testing showed YOU-CAN triggered discussions of unmet needs in consultations and highlighted the importance of multidisciplinary support. Conclusions YOU-CAN is a valid and reliable instrument containing items related to concerns about physical and emotional health; family and relationships; self-acceptance; and independence. Future efforts should examine YOU-CAN's feasibility, and develop guidance for managing unmet needs. Routine use of YOU-CAN may improve the identification of otherwise undiscussed unmet needs and opportunities to deliver personalized support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kate Law
- Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- The Christie Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Martin G McCabe
- Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- The Christie Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Sabine N van der Veer
- Centre for Health Informatics, Division of Informatics, Imaging and Data Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Janelle Yorke
- Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- The Christie Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Marsden H, Kemos P, Venzi M, Noy M, Maheswaran S, Francis N, Hyde C, Mullarkey D, Kalsi D, Thomas L. Accuracy of an artificial intelligence as a medical device as part of a UK-based skin cancer teledermatology service. Front Med (Lausanne) 2024; 11:1302363. [PMID: 38585154 PMCID: PMC10996444 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1302363] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2023] [Accepted: 02/27/2024] [Indexed: 04/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction An artificial intelligence as a medical device (AIaMD), built on convolutional neural networks, has demonstrated high sensitivity for melanoma. To be of clinical value, it needs to safely reduce referral rates. The primary objective of this study was to demonstrate that the AIaMD had a higher rate of correctly classifying lesions that did not need to be referred for biopsy or urgent face-to-face dermatologist review, compared to teledermatology standard of care (SoC), while achieving the same sensitivity to detect malignancy. Secondary endpoints included the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and number needed to biopsy to identify one case of melanoma or squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) by both the AIaMD and SoC. Methods This prospective, single-centre, single-arm, masked, non-inferiority, adaptive, group sequential design trial recruited patients referred to a teledermatology cancer pathway (clinicaltrials.gov NCT04123678). Additional dermoscopic images of each suspicious lesion were taken using a smartphone with a dermoscopic lens attachment. The images were assessed independently by a consultant dermatologist and the AIaMD. The outputs were compared with the final histological or clinical diagnosis. Results A total of 700 patients with 867 lesions were recruited, of which 622 participants with 789 lesions were included in the per-protocol (PP) population. In total, 63.3% of PP participants were female; 89.0% identified as white, and the median age was 51 (range 18-95); and all Fitzpatrick skin types were represented including 25/622 (4.0%) type IV-VI skin. A total of 67 malignant lesions were identified, including 8 diagnosed as melanoma. The AIaMD sensitivity was set at 91 and 92.5%, to match the literature-defined clinician sensitivity (91.46%) as closely as possible. In both settings, the AIaMD identified had a significantly higher rate of identifying lesions that did not need a biopsy or urgent referral compared to SoC (p-value = 0.001) with comparable sensitivity for skin cancer. Discussion The AIaMD identified significantly more lesions that did not need to be referred for biopsy or urgent face-to-face dermatologist review, compared to teledermatologists. This has the potential to reduce the burden of unnecessary referrals when used as part of a teledermatology service.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Polychronis Kemos
- Blizard Institute, The Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Mariana Noy
- Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Shameera Maheswaran
- Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Nicholas Francis
- Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, St Mary's Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Christopher Hyde
- Exeter Test Group, Department of Health and Community Sciences, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Lucy Thomas
- Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Down L, Barlow M, Bailey SER, Mounce LTA, Merriel SWD, Watson J, Martins T. Association between patient ethnicity and prostate cancer diagnosis following a prostate-specific antigen test: a cohort study of 730,000 men in primary care in the UK. BMC Med 2024; 22:82. [PMID: 38424555 PMCID: PMC10905783 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-024-03283-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2023] [Accepted: 01/25/2024] [Indexed: 03/02/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Black men have higher prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels and higher prostate cancer incidence and mortality than White men, while Asian men tend to have lower prostate cancer incidence and mortality than White men. Much of the evidence comes from the USA, and information from UK populations is limited. METHODS This retrospective cohort study used data on patients registered at general practices in England contributing to the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) Aurum dataset. Those eligible were men aged 40 and over with a record of ethnicity and a PSA test result recorded between 2010 and 2017 with no prior cancer diagnosis. The aim was to assess the incidence of prostate cancer following a raised PSA test result in men from different ethnic groups. Additionally, incidence of advanced prostate cancer was investigated. Cancer incidence was estimated from multi-level logistic regression models adjusting for potential confounding factors. RESULTS 730,515 men with a PSA test were included (88.9% White). Black men and men with mixed ethnicity had higher PSA values, particularly for those aged above 60 years. In the year following a raised PSA result (using age-specific thresholds), Black men had the highest prostate cancer incidence at 24.7% (95% CI 23.3%, 26.2%); Asian men had the lowest at 13.4% (12.2%, 14.7%); incidence for White men was 19.8% (19.4%, 20.2%). The peak incidence of prostate cancer for all groups was in men aged 70-79. Incidence of prostate cancer diagnosed at an advanced stage was similar between Black and White men. CONCLUSIONS More prostate cancer was diagnosed in Black men with a raised PSA result, but rates of advanced prostate cancer were not higher in this group. In this large primary care-based cohort, the incidence of prostate cancer in men with elevated PSA levels increases with increasing age, even when using age-adjusted thresholds, with Black men significantly more likely to be diagnosed compared to White or Asian men. The incidence of advanced stage prostate cancer at diagnosis was similar for Black and White men with a raised PSA result, but lower for Asian men.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liz Down
- Department of Health and Community Sciences, University of Exeter, St Lukes Campus, Heavitree Road, Exeter, EX1 2LU, UK.
| | - Melissa Barlow
- Department of Health and Community Sciences, University of Exeter, St Lukes Campus, Heavitree Road, Exeter, EX1 2LU, UK
| | - Sarah E R Bailey
- Department of Health and Community Sciences, University of Exeter, St Lukes Campus, Heavitree Road, Exeter, EX1 2LU, UK
| | - Luke T A Mounce
- Department of Health and Community Sciences, University of Exeter, St Lukes Campus, Heavitree Road, Exeter, EX1 2LU, UK
| | - Samuel W D Merriel
- Centre for Primary Care & Health Services Research, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
| | - Jessica Watson
- Centre for Academic Primary Care (CAPC), Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK
| | - Tanimola Martins
- Department of Health and Community Sciences, University of Exeter, St Lukes Campus, Heavitree Road, Exeter, EX1 2LU, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Morris M, Cook A, Dodkins J, Price D, Waller S, Hassan S, Nathan A, Aggarwal A, Payne HA, Clarke N, van der Meulen J, Nossiter J. What can patient-reported experience measures tell us about the variation in patients' experience of prostate cancer care? A cross-sectional study using survey data from the National Prostate Cancer Audit in England. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e078284. [PMID: 38418235 PMCID: PMC10910410 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078284] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2023] [Accepted: 01/30/2024] [Indexed: 03/01/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES A national survey aimed to measure how men with prostate cancer perceived their involvement in and decisions around their care immediately after diagnosis. This study aimed to describe any differences found by socio-demographic groups. DESIGN Cross-sectional study of men who were diagnosed with and treated for prostate cancer. SETTING The National Prostate Cancer Audit patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) survey in England. PARTICIPANTS Men diagnosed in 2014-2016, with non-metastatic prostate cancer, were surveyed. Responses from 32 796 men were individually linked to records from a national clinical audit and to administrative hospital data. Age, ethnicity, deprivation and disease risk classification were used to explore variation in responses to selected questions. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES Responses to five questions from the PREMs survey: the proportion responding to the highest positive category was compared across the socio-demographic characteristics above. RESULTS When adjusted for other factors, older men were less likely than men under the age of 60 to feel side effects had been explained in a way they could understand (men 80+: relative risk (RR)=0.92, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.00), that their views were considered (RR=0.79, 95% CI 0.73 to 0.87) or that they were involved in decisions (RR=0.92, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.00). The latter was also apparent for men who were not white (black men: RR=0.89, 95% CI 0.82 to 0.98; Asian men: RR=0.85, 95% CI 0.75 to 0.96) and, to a lesser extent, for more deprived men. CONCLUSIONS The observed discrepancies highlight the need for more focus on initiatives to improve the experience of ethnic minority patients and those older than 60 years. The findings also argue for further validation of discriminatory instruments to help cancer care providers fully understand the variation in the experience of their patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melanie Morris
- Clinical Effectiveness Unit, Royal College of Surgeons of England, London, London, UK
- Health Services Research & Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London, UK
| | - Adrian Cook
- Clinical Effectiveness Unit, Royal College of Surgeons of England, London, London, UK
| | - Joanna Dodkins
- Clinical Effectiveness Unit, Royal College of Surgeons of England, London, London, UK
| | - Derek Price
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Steve Waller
- Clinical Effectiveness Unit, Royal College of Surgeons of England, London, London, UK
| | - Syreen Hassan
- Health Services Research & Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London, UK
| | - Arjun Nathan
- Clinical Effectiveness Unit, Royal College of Surgeons of England, London, London, UK
| | - Ajay Aggarwal
- Health Services Research & Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London, UK
| | - Heather Ann Payne
- Consultant Clinical Oncologist, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, London, UK
| | - Noel Clarke
- Clinical Effectiveness Unit, Royal College of Surgeons of England, London, London, UK
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Jan van der Meulen
- Health Services Research & Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London, UK
| | - Julie Nossiter
- Clinical Effectiveness Unit, Royal College of Surgeons of England, London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Smith J, Essery R, Yardley L, Richardson A, Slodkowska-Barabasz J, Chavlet C, Foster C, Watson E, Grimmett C, Geraghty AWA, Little P, Sharman G, Burford T, Bacon R, Turner L, Bradbury K. Experiences of using a supported digital intervention for cancer survivors in primary care: a qualitative process evaluation. J Cancer Surviv 2024; 18:144-156. [PMID: 37405560 PMCID: PMC10866764 DOI: 10.1007/s11764-023-01412-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2022] [Accepted: 05/24/2023] [Indexed: 07/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Increasing healthy behaviours (e.g. physical activity) can improve cancer survivors' quality of life. Renewed is a digital intervention developed to provide behaviour change advice with brief healthcare practitioner support. A three-arm randomised controlled trial (Renewed, Renewed with support or a control condition) suggested that prostate cancer survivors in the supported arm had slightly greater estimates of improvements in quality of life compared to other cancer survivors. This study explored participants' experiences using Renewed to understand how it might have worked and why it might have provided greater benefit for prostate cancer survivors and those in the supported arm. METHODS Thirty-three semi-structured telephone interviews with cancer survivors' (breast, colorectal, prostate) from the Renewed trial explored their experiences of using Renewed and their perceptions of the intervention. Data were analysed using inductive thematic analysis. RESULTS Some participants only used Renewed modestly but still made behaviour changes. Barriers to using Renewed included low perceived need, joining the study to advance scientific knowledge or 'to give back', or due to perceived availability of support in their existing social networks. Prostate cancer survivors reported less social support outside of Renewed compared to participants with other cancers. CONCLUSION Renewed may support healthy behaviour changes among cancer survivors even with limited use. Interventions targetting individuals who lack social support may be beneficial. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS Cancer survivors' experiences may inform the development of digital interventions to better serve this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jazzine Smith
- School of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
| | - Rosie Essery
- School of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Lucy Yardley
- School of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- School of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Alison Richardson
- School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | | | | | - Claire Foster
- School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Eila Watson
- Community and Public Health Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK
| | - Chloe Grimmett
- School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | | | - Paul Little
- Primary Care Research, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | | | | | - Roger Bacon
- Patient and Public Involvement Team, Southampton, UK
| | - Lesley Turner
- Patient and Public Involvement Team, Southampton, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Lu J, Feng Y, Guo K, Sun L, Ruan S, Zhang K. Prognostic value of preoperative circulating tumor DNA in non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2024; 150:25. [PMID: 38252173 PMCID: PMC10803397 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-023-05550-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2023] [Accepted: 11/03/2023] [Indexed: 01/23/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Several recent studies have reported the increasing application of preoperative circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) as a biomarker of tumor burden for guiding potential postoperative treatment strategies. METHODS A meta-analysis of prospective/retrospective cohort studies was conducted to compare the prognosis of preoperatively genetically positive and genetically negative NSCLC patients. The endpoints used in the included studies were overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). The objective of the meta-analysis was to comprehensively explore the prognostic value of preoperative ctDNA for patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and its significance in guiding postoperative adjuvant therapy (AT) in patients with NSCLC. RESULTS The preliminary analysis identified 1565 studies, among which only 11 studies fulfilled the eligibility criteria and were finally included in the present systematic review and meta-analysis. The statistical results revealed that the expression of preoperative ctDNA was associated with worse RFS (HR = 3.00; 95% CI 2.26-3.98; I2 = 0%) and OS (HR = 2.77; 95% CI 1.67-4.58; I2 = 0%), particularly in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) patients (RFS: HR = 3.46; 95% CI 2.37-5.05; I2 = 0%; OS: HR = 3.52; 95% CI 1.91-6.49; I2 = 0%) and patients with I-II stage of NSCLC (RFS: HR = 2.84; 95% CI 1.88-4.29; I2 = 0%; OS: HR = 2.60; 95% CI 1.43-4.74; I2 = 0%). Moreover, compared to patients with negative preoperative ctDNA, patients with positive preoperative ctDNA presented greater survival benefits (HR = 0.39; 95% CI 0.22-0.67; I2 = 2%) from postoperative AT. CONCLUSION The evaluation of the prognostic value of preoperative ctDNA revealed that preoperative ctDNA might be used as a prognostic biomarker for patients with LUAD or those with stage I-II NSCLC. In addition, postoperative AT is recommended for NSCLC patients with positive preoperative ctDNA, regardless of the disease stage and subtype.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiamin Lu
- The First School of Clinical Medicine, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang, Chinese Medical University, (Zhejiang Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine), Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Yuqian Feng
- Hangzhou TCM Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Kaibo Guo
- Department of Oncology, Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Leitao Sun
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang, Chinese Medical University, (Zhejiang Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine), Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
| | - Shanming Ruan
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang, Chinese Medical University, (Zhejiang Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine), Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
| | - Kai Zhang
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang, Chinese Medical University, (Zhejiang Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine), Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
- Anji Traditional Chinese Medical Hospital, Huzhou, Zhejiang, China.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Darko N, Millet N, Usman A, Teece L, Moss EL. Exploring the perspectives of underrepresented voices: Perceptions and experiences of uterine cancer for black African, Caribbean, black British, and mixed-black women in the UK to develop strategies for early symptom presentation. Gynecol Oncol 2024; 180:132-138. [PMID: 38091772 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.11.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2023] [Revised: 11/23/2023] [Accepted: 11/26/2023] [Indexed: 02/18/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The uterine cancer (UC) mortality rate in the UK is significantly higher for women who belong to a Black ethnic group compared to those from other ethnic groups. This study aimed to understand the views and experiences of UC amongst Black ethnic minority women in the UK, with a focus on awareness and presentation of red-flag symptoms. METHODS Women of Black African, Caribbean, Black British and Mixed-Black ethnicity were purposefully recruited to participate in focus groups and individual semi-structured interviews. RESULTS Twenty women from different regions in England participated in the study. Reflexive thematic analysis of the data led to the identification of three main themes: 1) Healthcare inequities; 2) Support and sense making with other Black women; and 3) Knowledge dissemination, mobilisation, and empowerment. Perceptions of inequitable healthcare provision and distrust influenced how participants, and their peer networks, approached seeking assistance from healthcare professionals. Concerns were also raised about culturally insensitive information resources, including issues of language, literacy, and representation, all of which served as potential barriers for women within Black ethnic minority groups. CONCLUSIONS The deficiency of targeted knowledge mobilisation and specific UC information aimed at Black ethnicity women living in the UK, reportedly contributes to the dissemination of misconceptions and an atmosphere of apprehension around a UC diagnosis. The insights from this study highlight the significance of designing culturally sensitive strategies to promote informed decision-making and empower the dissemination of accurate health knowledge amongst Black women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Darko
- College of Life Sciences, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester, LE1 7RH, UK.
| | - N Millet
- College of Life Sciences, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester, LE1 7RH, UK
| | - A Usman
- College of Life Sciences, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester, LE1 7RH, UK
| | - L Teece
- College of Life Sciences, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester, LE1 7RH, UK
| | - E L Moss
- College of Life Sciences, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester, LE1 7RH, UK; University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Infirmary Square, Leicester, LE1 5WW, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Rashid T, Bennett JE, Muller DC, Cross AJ, Pearson-Stuttard J, Asaria P, Daby HI, Fecht D, Davies B, Ezzati M. Mortality from leading cancers in districts of England from 2002 to 2019: a population-based, spatiotemporal study. Lancet Oncol 2024; 25:86-98. [PMID: 38096890 PMCID: PMC7615518 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(23)00530-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2023] [Revised: 09/28/2023] [Accepted: 10/10/2023] [Indexed: 01/07/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cancers are the leading cause of death in England. We aimed to estimate trends in mortality from leading cancers from 2002 to 2019 for the 314 districts in England. METHODS We did a high-resolution spatiotemporal analysis of vital registration data from the UK Office for National Statistics using data on all deaths from the ten leading cancers in England from 2002 to 2019. We used a Bayesian hierarchical model to obtain robust estimates of age-specific and cause-specific death rates. We used life table methods to calculate the primary outcome, the unconditional probability of dying between birth and age 80 years by sex, cancer cause of death, local district, and year. We reported Spearman rank correlations between the probability of dying from a cancer and district-level poverty in 2019. FINDINGS In 2019, the probability of dying from a cancer before age 80 years ranged from 0·10 (95% credible interval [CrI] 0·10-0·11) to 0·17 (0·16-0·18) for women and from 0·12 (0·12-0·13) to 0·22 (0·21-0·23) for men. Variation in the probability of dying was largest for lung cancer among women, being 3·7 times (95% CrI 3·2-4·4) higher in the district with the highest probability than in the district with the lowest probability; and for stomach cancer for men, being 3·2 times (2·6-4·1) higher in the district with the highest probability than in the one with the lowest probability. The variation in the probability of dying was smallest across districts for lymphoma and multiple myeloma (95% CrI 1·2 times [1·1-1·4] higher in the district with the highest probability than the lowest probability for women and 1·2 times [1·0-1·4] for men), and leukaemia (1·1 times [1·0-1·4] for women and 1·2 times [1·0-1·5] for men). The Spearman rank correlation between probability of dying from a cancer and district poverty was 0·74 (95% CrI 0·72-0·76) for women and 0·79 (0·78-0·81) for men. From 2002 to 2019, the overall probability of dying from a cancer declined in all districts: the reductions ranged from 6·6% (95% CrI 0·3-13·1) to 30·1% (25·6-34·5) for women and from 12·8% (7·1-18·8) to 36·7% (32·2-41·2) for men. However, there were increases in mortality for liver cancer among men, lung cancer and corpus uteri cancer among women, and pancreatic cancer in both sexes in some or all districts with posterior probability greater than 0·80. INTERPRETATION Cancers with modifiable risk factors and potential for screening for precancerous lesions had heterogeneous trends and the greatest geographical inequality. To reduce these inequalities, factors affecting both incidence and survival need to be addressed at the local level. FUNDING Wellcome Trust, Imperial College London, UK Medical Research Council, and the National Institute of Health Research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Theo Rashid
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK; MRC Centre for Environment and Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - James E Bennett
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK; MRC Centre for Environment and Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - David C Muller
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK; MRC Centre for Environment and Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Amanda J Cross
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK; Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Jonathan Pearson-Stuttard
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK; MRC Centre for Environment and Health, Imperial College London, London, UK; Health Analytics, Lane Clark and Peacock, London, UK
| | - Perviz Asaria
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK; MRC Centre for Environment and Health, Imperial College London, London, UK; Department of Cardiology, Imperial College NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Hima Iyathooray Daby
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK; MRC Centre for Environment and Health, Imperial College London, London, UK; UK Small Area Health Statistics Unit, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Daniela Fecht
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK; MRC Centre for Environment and Health, Imperial College London, London, UK; UK Small Area Health Statistics Unit, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Bethan Davies
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK; MRC Centre for Environment and Health, Imperial College London, London, UK; UK Small Area Health Statistics Unit, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Majid Ezzati
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK; MRC Centre for Environment and Health, Imperial College London, London, UK; Abdul Latif Jameel Institute for Disease and Emergency Analytics, Imperial College London, London, UK; Regional Institute for Population Studies, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Gibson AEJ, Longworth L, Bennett B, Pickard AS, Shaw JW. Assessing the Content Validity of Preference-Based Measures in Cancer. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2024; 27:70-78. [PMID: 37879402 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2023.10.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2023] [Revised: 10/09/2023] [Accepted: 06/08/2023] [Indexed: 10/27/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study assessed the content validity of generic and condition-specific preference-based measures (PBMs) with patients treated for cancer, evaluated against 10 Consensus-Based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments criteria for good content validity, to best inform measurement strategies regarding the use of PBMs in oncology development programs and real-world applications. METHODS Individual, semistructured interviews were conducted with patients who received drug treatment for cancer in the United Kingdom (n = 47) and the United States (n = 49). During the interview, patients completed 3 generic PBMs (EQ-5D-5L, EuroQol Health and Wellbeing measure-Short Form, Château Santé Base) and 2 condition-specific PBMs (Quality of Life Utility-Core 10 Dimension, Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Eight Dimension [FACT-8D]). Interviews were conducted via teleconference, audio recorded, and transcribed verbatim. Transcripts were coded using thematic and content analysis methods. RESULTS Condition-specific measures were evaluated as having better relevancy than generic PBMs. Overall, the FACT-8D was evaluated as holding the best content validity in terms of relevancy, and the EuroQol Health and Wellbeing measure-Short Form received the most favorable evaluation of relevancy for generic PBMs. All measures demonstrated comparable comprehensiveness, with all suggested by patients to be missing concepts. The EQ-5D-5L was evaluated best in terms of comprehensibility. This was followed by the Quality of Life Utility-Core 10 Dimension and FACT-8D; both received similar evaluations. CONCLUSIONS All measures were generally seen by patients as adequate in capturing appropriate aspects of health-related quality of life for measuring cancer outcomes, although together condition-specific measures were evaluated as having better relevancy than generic PBMs. Further health-related quality of life instrument development is encouraged, particularly with regard to the longer-term detrimental impacts of cancer and treatment side effects. Other developments could include new cancer-specific tools inclusive of conventional health items, treatment impacts, and psychological items.
Collapse
|
19
|
Lakhiani A, Cummins C, Kumar S, Long J, Arora V, Balega J, Broadhead T, Duncan T, Edmondson R, Fotopoulou C, Glasspool R, Kolomainen D, Manchanda R, McNally O, Morrison J, Mukhopadhyay A, Naik R, Wood N, Sundar S. Analysis of Anxiety, Depression and Fear of Progression at 12 Months Post-Cytoreductive Surgery in the SOCQER-2 (Surgery in Ovarian Cancer-Quality of Life Evaluation Research) Prospective, International, Multicentre Study. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 16:75. [PMID: 38201503 PMCID: PMC10778036 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16010075] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2023] [Revised: 12/18/2023] [Accepted: 12/20/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Patients with ovarian cancer (OC) often experience anxiety, depression and fear of progression (FOP); however, it is unclear whether surgical complexity has a role to play. We investigated the prevalence of anxiety, depression and FOP at 12 months post-cytoreductive surgery and investigated associations with surgical complexity, patient (age, ethnicity, performance status, BMI) and tumour (stage, disease load) factors. One hundred and forty-one patients with FIGO Stage III-IV OC, who did not have disease progression at 12 months post-surgery, completed the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and FOP short-form questionnaire. Patients underwent surgery with low (40.4%), intermediate (31.2%) and high (28.4%) surgical complexity scores. At 12 months post-surgery, 99 of 141 (70%) patients with advanced OC undergoing surgery experienced clinically significant anxiety, 21 of 141 (14.9%) patients experienced moderate to severe depression and 37 of 140 (26.4%) experienced dysfunctional FOP. No associations were identified between the three different surgical complexity groups with regards to anxiety, depression or FOP scores. Unsurprisingly, given the natural history of the disease, most patients with OC suffer from anxiety, depression and fear of progression after completion of first-line cancer treatment. Surgical complexity at the time of surgery is not associated with a deleterious impact on anxiety, depression or FOP for patients with OC. Patients with OC experience a profound mental health impact and should be offered mental health support throughout their cancer journey.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aarti Lakhiani
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
- Pan-Birmingham Gynaecological Cancer Centre, City Hospital, Birmingham B18 7QH, UK;
| | - Carole Cummins
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
| | - Satyam Kumar
- University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry CV2 2DX, UK
| | - Joanna Long
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
| | - Vivek Arora
- School of Clinical Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
| | - Janos Balega
- Pan-Birmingham Gynaecological Cancer Centre, City Hospital, Birmingham B18 7QH, UK;
| | - Tim Broadhead
- Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK;
| | - Timothy Duncan
- Norfolk & Norwich University Hospital, Norwich NR4 7UY, UK
| | - Richard Edmondson
- Division of Cancer Services, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
| | - Christina Fotopoulou
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London SW7 2BX, UK
| | - Rosalind Glasspool
- Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde and School of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK
| | | | - Ranjit Manchanda
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London EC1M 6BQ, UK
- Department of Health Services Research, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK
| | - Orla McNally
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia
| | - Jo Morrison
- Musgrove Park Hospital, Somerset NHS Foundation Trust, Taunton TA1 5DA, UK;
| | - Asima Mukhopadhyay
- Kolkata Gynecological Oncology Trials and Translational Research Group, Kolkata 700156, India
| | - Raj Naik
- Northern Gynaecological Oncology Centre, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Gateshead Health NHS Foundation Trust, Gateshead NE9 6SX, UK
| | - Nick Wood
- Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Preston PR2 9HT, UK
| | - Sudha Sundar
- Pan-Birmingham Gynaecological Cancer Centre, City Hospital, Birmingham B18 7QH, UK;
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Henley P, Martins T, Zamani R. Assessing Ethnic Minority Representation in Fibromyalgia Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review of Recruitment Demographics. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2023; 20:7185. [PMID: 38131736 PMCID: PMC10742509 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20247185] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2023] [Revised: 12/04/2023] [Accepted: 12/07/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023]
Abstract
The under-representation of non-White participants in Western countries in clinical research has received increased attention, due to recognized physiological differences between ethnic groups, which may affect the efficacy and optimal dosage of some treatments. This review assessed ethnic diversity in pharmaceutical trials for fibromyalgia, a poorly understood chronic pain disorder. We also investigated longitudinal change to non-White participant proportions in trials and non-White participants' likelihood to discontinue with fibromyalgia research between trial stages (retention). First, we identified relevant trials conducted in the United States and Canada between 2000 and 2022, by searching PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library databases. In trials conducted both across the United States and Canada, and exclusively within the United States, approximately 90% of participants were White. A longitudinal analysis also found no change in the proportion of non-White participants in trials conducted across the United States and Canada between 2000 and 2022. Finally, we found no significant differences in trial retention between White and non-White participants. This review highlights the low numbers of ethnic minorities in fibromyalgia trials conducted in the United States and Canada, with no change to these proportions over the past 22 years. Furthermore, non-White participants were not more likely to discontinue with the fibromyalgia research once they were recruited.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Reza Zamani
- Medical School, College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter EX1 2LU, UK (T.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Mandane B, Amirthanayagam A, Patel N, Darko N, Moss EL. Attitudes and barriers to participation in window-of-opportunity trials reported by White and Asian/Asian British ethnicity patients who have undergone treatment for endometrial cancer. Trials 2023; 24:754. [PMID: 38007461 PMCID: PMC10676569 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-023-07572-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2022] [Accepted: 08/04/2023] [Indexed: 11/27/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Window-of-opportunity trials (WOT) are a study design that have been used to investigate drug activity in endometrial cancer (EC). Recruitment to cancer clinical trials by patients from ethnic minority groups is reported to be lower than for patients of White ethnicity. METHODS A verbal questionnaire was conducted with White and Asian/Asian British ethnicity patients who had undergone treatment for EC. Strategic purposeful sampling was used to recruit patients from diverse social/educational backgrounds. Questions explored: background knowledge of clinical research, WOT study design, and views on medications that might be investigated. Thematic analysis was used to explore motivations for WOT participation and perceived barriers. RESULTS In total, 21 patients were recruited to the study (15 White and 6 Asian/Asian British). Views on optimum time to receive trial information differed, preferences ranging from 'at the time of diagnosis' to 'a few days after diagnosis'. The choice of medication under investigation had a strong influence on potential willingness to participate, with greater interest reported in medications derived from vitamins or food supplements rather than hormone-based drugs. Potential barriers to participation included concern over potential side-effects and the emotional/physical burden of a cancer diagnosis prior to major surgery. DISCUSSION This study provides important insights into patients' views on WOT participation in EC and raises issues that need to be considered for future trial design and participant recruitment materials. The timing and format of study information and type of substance under investigation were factors influencing potential participation. Future studies should consider using multi-lingual visual information videos to address information needs, as this may encourage participation by ethnic minority patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Mandane
- Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, De Montfort University, Leicester, UK
- University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Infirmary Square, Leicester, LE1 5WW, UK
| | - A Amirthanayagam
- College of Life Sciences, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester, LE1 7RH, UK
| | - N Patel
- University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Infirmary Square, Leicester, LE1 5WW, UK
| | - N Darko
- College of Life Sciences, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester, LE1 7RH, UK
| | - E L Moss
- University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Infirmary Square, Leicester, LE1 5WW, UK.
- College of Life Sciences, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester, LE1 7RH, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Starmer HM, Cherry MG, Patterson J, Fleming J, Young B. Head and neck lymphedema and quality of life: the patient perspective. Support Care Cancer 2023; 31:696. [PMID: 37962667 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-023-08150-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2023] [Accepted: 10/28/2023] [Indexed: 11/15/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Head and neck lymphedema (HNL) is common after head and neck cancer (HNC). This study aimed to explore quality of life (QoL) in patients with HNL to guide the development of a patient-reported QoL measure. METHODS We conducted semi-structured interviews with 22 HNC survivors with HNL. Interviews explored participants' experiences of living with HNL. Analysis of interview transcripts drew on qualitative content analysis to ensure themes were grounded in patient experience. RESULTS Two main themes were established: "I want to live my life" and "It was like things were short-circuited." These themes encompassed the substantial disruption patients attributed to the HNL and their desire to normalize life. CONCLUSIONS Understanding the impact of HNL on individual patients may be critical to optimizing treatment strategies to improve the physical burden of HNL and QoL. This study provides the framework for developing a patient-reported HNL QoL measure. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS The development of an HNL-specific QoL measure, grounded in the patient perspective, may provide cancer care teams with a tool to better understand HNL's impact on each patient to tailor patient-centered care and optimize QoL outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heather M Starmer
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, Stanford University, 900 Blake Wilbur Drive, Palo Alto, CA, 94305, USA.
- School of Health Sciences/Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
| | - Mary Gemma Cherry
- School of Health Sciences/Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Joanne Patterson
- School of Health Sciences/Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
- Liverpool Head and Neck Center, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Jason Fleming
- Liverpool Head and Neck Center, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Bridget Young
- School of Health Sciences/Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Thomas L, Hyde C, Mullarkey D, Greenhalgh J, Kalsi D, Ko J. Real-world post-deployment performance of a novel machine learning-based digital health technology for skin lesion assessment and suggestions for post-market surveillance. Front Med (Lausanne) 2023; 10:1264846. [PMID: 38020164 PMCID: PMC10645139 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1264846] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2023] [Accepted: 10/10/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Deep Ensemble for Recognition of Malignancy (DERM) is an artificial intelligence as a medical device (AIaMD) tool for skin lesion assessment. Methods We report prospective real-world performance from its deployment within skin cancer pathways at two National Health Service hospitals (UK) between July 2021 and October 2022. Results A total of 14,500 cases were seen, including patients 18-100 years old with Fitzpatrick skin types I-VI represented. Based on 8,571 lesions assessed by DERM with confirmed outcomes, versions A and B demonstrated very high sensitivity for detecting melanoma (95.0-100.0%) or malignancy (96.0-100.0%). Benign lesion specificity was 40.7-49.4% (DERM-vA) and 70.1-73.4% (DERM-vB). DERM identified 15.0-31.0% of cases as eligible for discharge. Discussion We show DERM performance in-line with sensitivity targets and pre-marketing authorisation research, and it reduced the caseload for hospital specialists in two pathways. Based on our experience we offer suggestions on key elements of post-market surveillance for AIaMDs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucy Thomas
- Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Chris Hyde
- Exeter Test Group, Department of Health and Community Sciences, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | - Justin Ko
- Department of Dermatology, Stanford Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Lam J, Aldridge R, Blackburn R, Harron K. How is ethnicity reported, described, and analysed in health research in the UK? A bibliographical review and focus group discussions with young refugees. BMC Public Health 2023; 23:2025. [PMID: 37848866 PMCID: PMC10583485 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-023-16947-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2023] [Accepted: 10/10/2023] [Indexed: 10/19/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The ethnicity data gap pertains to 3 major challenges to address ethnic health inequality: 1) Under-representation of ethnic minorities in research; 2) Poor data quality on ethnicity; 3) Ethnicity data not being meaningfully analysed. These challenges are especially relevant for research involving under-served migrant populations in the UK. We aimed to review how ethnicity is captured, reported, analysed and theorised within policy-relevant research on ethnic health inequities. METHODS We reviewed a selection of the 1% most highly cited population health papers that reported UK data on ethnicity, and extracted how ethnicity was recorded and analysed in relation to health outcomes. We focused on how ethnicity was obtained (i.e. self reported or not), how ethnic groups were categorised, whether justification was provided for any categorisation, and how ethnicity was theorised to be related to health. We held three 1-h-long guided focus groups with 10 young people from Nigeria, Turkistan, Syria, Yemen and Iran. This engagement helped us shape and interpret our findings, and reflect on. 1) How should ethnicity be asked inclusively, and better recorded? 2) Does self-defined ethnicity change over time or context? If so, why? RESULTS Of the 44 included papers, most (19; 43%) used self-reported ethnicity, categorised in a variety of ways. Of the 27 papers that aggregated ethnicity, 13 (48%) provided justification. Only 8 of 33 papers explicitly theorised how ethnicity related to health. The focus groups agreed that 1) Ethnicity should not be prescribed by others; individuals could be asked to describe their ethnicity in free-text which researchers could synthesise to extract relevant dimensions of ethnicity for their research; 2) Ethnicity changes over time and context according to personal experience, social pressure, and nationality change; 3) Migrants and non-migrants' lived experience of ethnicity is not fully inter-changeable, even if they share the same ethnic category. CONCLUSIONS Ethnicity is a multi-dimensional construct, but this is not currently reflected in UK health research studies, where ethnicity is often aggregated and analysed without justification. Researchers should communicate clearly how ethnicity is operationalised for their study, with appropriate justification for clustering and analysis that is meaningfully theorised. We can only start to tackle ethnic health inequity by treating ethnicity as rigorously as any other variables in our research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph Lam
- UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, 30 Guilford St, London, WC1N 1EH, UK.
| | - Robert Aldridge
- Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA
- UCL Institute of Health Informatics, 222 Euston Rd, London, NW1 2DA, UK
| | - Ruth Blackburn
- UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, 30 Guilford St, London, WC1N 1EH, UK
| | - Katie Harron
- UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, 30 Guilford St, London, WC1N 1EH, UK
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Brockhoven F, Raphael M, Currier J, Jäderholm C, Mody P, Shannon J, Starling B, Turner-Uaandja H, Pashayan N, Arteaga I. REPRESENT recommendations: improving inclusion and trust in cancer early detection research. Br J Cancer 2023; 129:1195-1208. [PMID: 37689805 PMCID: PMC10575902 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-023-02414-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2023] [Revised: 08/01/2023] [Accepted: 08/21/2023] [Indexed: 09/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Detecting cancer early is essential to improving cancer outcomes. Minoritized groups remain underrepresented in early detection cancer research, which means that findings and interventions are not generalisable across the population, thus exacerbating disparities in cancer outcomes. In light of these challenges, this paper sets out twelve recommendations to build relations of trust and include minoritized groups in ED cancer research. The Recommendations were formulated by a range of stakeholders at the 2022 REPRESENT consensus-building workshop and are based on empirical data, including a systematic literature review and two ethnographic case studies in the US and the UK. The recommendations focus on: Long-term relationships that build trust; Sharing available resources; Inclusive and accessible communication; Harnessing community expertise; Unique risks and benefits; Compensation and support; Representative samples; Demographic data; Post-research support; Sharing results; Research training; Diversifying research teams. For each recommendation, the paper outlines the rationale, specifications for how different stakeholders may implement it, and advice for best practices. Instead of isolated recruitment, public involvement and engagement activities, the recommendations here aim to advance mutually beneficial and trusting relationships between researchers and research participants embedded in ED cancer research institutions.
Collapse
Grants
- EICEDAAP\100011 Cancer Research UK
- Cancer Research UK (CRUK)
- The International Alliance for Cancer Early Detection, an alliance between Cancer Research UK [EICEDAAP\100011], Canary Center at Stanford University, the University of Cambridge, OHSU Knight Cancer Institute, University College London and the University of Manchester.
- This work was supported by the International Alliance for Cancer Early Detection, an alliance between Cancer Research UK [EICEDAAP\100011], Canary Center at Stanford University, the University of Cambridge, OHSU Knight Cancer Institute, University College London and the University of Manchester.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Maya Raphael
- Department of Social Anthropology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Jessica Currier
- Division of Oncological Sciences, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Christina Jäderholm
- School of Public Health, Oregon Health & Science University-Portland State University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Perveez Mody
- Department of Social Anthropology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Jackilen Shannon
- Division of Oncological Sciences, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Bella Starling
- Vocal, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | | | - Nora Pashayan
- Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, London, UK
| | - Ignacia Arteaga
- Department of Social Anthropology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
- Early Cancer Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Jubber I, Ong S, Bukavina L, Black PC, Compérat E, Kamat AM, Kiemeney L, Lawrentschuk N, Lerner SP, Meeks JJ, Moch H, Necchi A, Panebianco V, Sridhar SS, Znaor A, Catto JWF, Cumberbatch MG. Epidemiology of Bladder Cancer in 2023: A Systematic Review of Risk Factors. Eur Urol 2023; 84:176-190. [PMID: 37198015 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.03.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 60.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2022] [Revised: 03/01/2023] [Accepted: 03/24/2023] [Indexed: 05/19/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT Bladder cancer (BC) is common worldwide and poses a significant public health challenge. External risk factors and the wider exposome (totality of exposure from external and internal factors) contribute significantly to the development of BC. Therefore, establishing a clear understanding of these risk factors is the key to prevention. OBJECTIVE To perform an up-to-date systematic review of BC's epidemiology and external risk factors. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION Two reviewers (I.J. and S.O.) performed a systematic review using PubMed and Embase in January 2022 and updated it in September 2022. The search was restricted to 4 yr since our previous review in 2018. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Our search identified 5177 articles and a total of 349 full-text manuscripts. GLOBOCAN data from 2020 revealed an incidence of 573 000 new BC cases and 213 000 deaths worldwide in 2020. The 5-yr prevalence worldwide in 2020 was 1 721 000. Tobacco smoking and occupational exposures (aromatic amines and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons) are the most substantial risk factors. In addition, correlative evidence exists for several risk factors, including specific dietary factors, imbalanced microbiome, gene-environment risk factor interactions, diesel exhaust emission exposure, and pelvic radiotherapy. CONCLUSIONS We present a contemporary overview of the epidemiology of BC and the current evidence for BC risk factors. Smoking and specific occupational exposures are the most established risk factors. There is emerging evidence for specific dietary factors, imbalanced microbiome, gene-external risk factor interactions, diesel exhaust emission exposure, and pelvic radiotherapy. Further high-quality evidence is required to confirm initial findings and further understand cancer prevention. PATIENT SUMMARY Bladder cancer is common, and the most substantial risk factors are smoking and workplace exposure to suspected carcinogens. On-going research to identify avoidable risk factors could reduce the number of people who get bladder cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ibrahim Jubber
- Academic Urology Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK; Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.
| | - Sean Ong
- EJ Whitten Foundation Prostate Cancer Research Centre, Epworth HealthCare, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | | | - Peter C Black
- Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Eva Compérat
- Department of Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Ashish M Kamat
- Department of Urology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Nathan Lawrentschuk
- EJ Whitten Foundation Prostate Cancer Research Centre, Epworth HealthCare, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Surgery, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Seth P Lerner
- Scott Department of Urology, Dan L. Duncan Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Joshua J Meeks
- Departments of Urology and Biochemistry, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Holger Moch
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Pathology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Andrea Necchi
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Valeria Panebianco
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology, and Pathology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Srikala S Sridhar
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ariana Znaor
- Cancer Surveillance Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
| | - James W F Catto
- Academic Urology Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK; Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | - Marcus G Cumberbatch
- Academic Urology Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK; Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Martins T, Ukoumunne OC, Lyratzopoulos G, Hamilton W, Abel G. Are There Ethnic Differences in Recorded Features among Patients Subsequently Diagnosed with Cancer? An English Longitudinal Data-Linked Study. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:3100. [PMID: 37370710 PMCID: PMC10296232 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15123100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2023] [Revised: 06/02/2023] [Accepted: 06/02/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
We investigated ethnic differences in the presenting features recorded in primary care before cancer diagnosis. METHODS English population-based cancer-registry-linked primary care data were analysed. We identified the coded features of six cancers (breast, lung, prostate, colorectal, oesophagogastric, and myeloma) in the year pre-diagnosis. Logistic regression models investigated ethnic differences in first-incident cancer features, adjusted for age, sex, smoking status, deprivation, and comorbidity. RESULTS Of 130,944 patients, 92% were White. In total, 188,487 incident features were recorded in the year pre-diagnosis, with 48% (89,531) as sole features. Compared with White patients, Asian and Black patients with breast, colorectal, and prostate cancer were more likely than White patients to have multiple features; the opposite was seen for the Black and Other ethnic groups with lung or prostate cancer. The proportion with relevant recorded features was broadly similar by ethnicity, with notable cancer-specific exceptions. Asian and Black patients were more likely to have low-risk features (e.g., cough, upper abdominal pain) recorded. Non-White patients were less likely to have alarm features. CONCLUSION The degree to which these differences reflect disease, patient or healthcare factors is unclear. Further research examining the predictive value of cancer features in ethnic minority groups and their association with cancer outcomes is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tanimola Martins
- Department of Health and Community Sciences, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter St Luke’s Campus, Magdalen Road, Exeter EX1 2LU, UK; (W.H.); (G.A.)
| | - Obioha C. Ukoumunne
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Applied Research Collaboration (ARC) South West Peninsula (PenARC), Department of Health and Community Sciences, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter EX1 2LU, UK;
| | - Georgios Lyratzopoulos
- Epidemiology of Cancer Healthcare & Outcomes (ECHO) Group, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London WC1E 7HB, UK;
| | - Willie Hamilton
- Department of Health and Community Sciences, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter St Luke’s Campus, Magdalen Road, Exeter EX1 2LU, UK; (W.H.); (G.A.)
| | - Gary Abel
- Department of Health and Community Sciences, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter St Luke’s Campus, Magdalen Road, Exeter EX1 2LU, UK; (W.H.); (G.A.)
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Barlow M, Down L, Mounce LTA, Merriel SWD, Watson J, Martins T, Bailey SER. Ethnic differences in prostate-specific antigen levels in men without prostate cancer: a systematic review. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2023; 26:249-256. [PMID: 36456698 PMCID: PMC10247367 DOI: 10.1038/s41391-022-00613-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2022] [Revised: 10/18/2022] [Accepted: 10/31/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Black men are twice as likely to be diagnosed with prostate cancer than White men. Raised prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels can indicate an increased risk of prostate cancer, however it is not known whether PSA levels differ for men of different ethnic groups. METHODS PubMed and Embase were searched to identify studies that reported levels of PSA for men of at least two ethnic groups without a prostate cancer diagnosis or symptoms suggestive of prostate cancer. An adaptation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used to assess risk of bias and study quality. Findings were stratified into the following broad ethnic groups: White, Black, Asian, Hispanic, and Other. Data were analysed in a narrative synthesis due to the heterogeneity of reported PSA measures and methods in the included studies. RESULTS A total of 654 197 males from 13 studies were included. By ethnicity, this included 536 201 White (82%), 38 287 Black (6%), 38 232 Asian (6%), 18 029 Pacific Island (3%), 13 614 Maori (2%), 8 885 Hispanic (1%), and 949 Other (<1%) men aged ≥40 years old. Black men had higher PSA levels than White men, and Hispanic men had similar levels to White men and lower levels than Black men. CONCLUSIONS Black men without prostate cancer have higher PSA levels than White or Hispanic men, which reflects the higher rates of prostate cancer diagnosis in Black men. Despite that, the diagnostic accuracy of PSA for prostate cancer for men of different ethnic groups is unknown, and current guidance for PSA test interpretation does not account for ethnicity. Future research needs to determine whether Black men are diagnosed with similar rates of clinically significant prostate cancer to White men, or whether raised PSA levels are contributing to overdiagnosis of prostate cancer in Black men.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa Barlow
- University of Exeter, St Luke's Campus, Heavitree Road, Exeter, Devon, EX1 2LU, UK.
| | - Liz Down
- University of Exeter, St Luke's Campus, Heavitree Road, Exeter, Devon, EX1 2LU, UK
| | | | | | - Jessica Watson
- University of Bristol, Bristol Medical School, Bristol, BS8 1TH, UK
| | - Tanimola Martins
- University of Exeter, St Luke's Campus, Heavitree Road, Exeter, Devon, EX1 2LU, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
The Influence of Ethnicity on Survival from Malignant Primary Brain Tumours in England: A Population-Based Cohort Study. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15051464. [PMID: 36900254 PMCID: PMC10000771 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15051464] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2023] [Revised: 02/15/2023] [Accepted: 02/20/2023] [Indexed: 03/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In recent years, the completeness of ethnicity data in the English cancer registration data has greatly improved. Using these data, this study aims to estimate the influence of ethnicity on survival from primary malignant brain tumours. METHODS Demographic and clinical data on adult patients diagnosed with malignant primary brain tumour from 2012 to 2017 were obtained (n = 24,319). Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) for the survival of the ethnic groups up to one year following diagnosis. Logistic regressions were then used to estimate odds ratios (OR) for different ethnic groups of (1) being diagnosed with pathologically confirmed glioblastoma, (2) being diagnosed through a hospital stay that included an emergency admission, and (3) receiving optimal treatment. RESULTS After an adjustment for known prognostic factors and factors potentially affecting access to healthcare, patients with an Indian background (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.72-0.98), Any Other White (HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.76-0.91), Other Ethnic Group (HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.62-0.79), and Unknown/Not Stated Ethnicity (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.75-0.88) had better one-year survivals than the White British Group. Individuals with Unknown ethnicity are less likely be diagnosed with glioblastoma (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.58-0.84) and less likely to be diagnosed through a hospital stay that included an emergency admission (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.53-0.69). CONCLUSION The demonstrated ethnic variations associated with better brain tumour survival suggests the need to identify risk or protective factors that may underlie these differences in patient outcomes.
Collapse
|
30
|
Amirthanayagam A, Boulter L, Millet N, McDermott HJ, Morrison J, Taylor A, Miles T, Coton L, Moss EL. Risk Stratified Follow-Up for Endometrial Cancer: The Clinicians' Perspective. Curr Oncol 2023; 30:2237-2248. [PMID: 36826134 PMCID: PMC9955652 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30020173] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2023] [Revised: 01/30/2023] [Accepted: 02/02/2023] [Indexed: 02/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Risk-stratified follow-up for endometrial cancer (EC) is being introduced in many cancer centres; however, there appears to be diversity in the structure and availability of schemes across the UK. This study aimed to investigate clinicians' and clinical specialist nurses' (CNS) experiences of follow-up schemes for EC, including patient-initiated follow-up (PIFU), telephone follow-up (TFU) and clinician-led hospital follow-up (HFU). A mixed-methods study was conducted, consisting of an online questionnaire to CNSs, an audience survey of participants attending a national "Personalising Endometrial Cancer Follow-up" educational meeting, and qualitative semi-structured telephone interviews with clinicians involved in the follow-up of EC. Thematic analysis identified three main themes to describe clinicians' views: appropriate patient selection; changing from HFU to PIFU schemes; and the future of EC follow-up schemes. Many participants reported that the COVID-19 pandemic impacted EC follow-up by accelerating the transition to PIFU/TFU. Overall, there was increasing support for non-HFU schemes for patients who have completed primary treatment of EC; however, barriers were identified for non-English-speaking patients and those who had communication challenges. Given the good long-term outcome associated with EC, greater focus is needed to develop resources to support patients post-treatment and individualise follow-up according to patients' personal needs and preferences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Louise Boulter
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester LE1 5WW, UK
| | - Nessa Millet
- Leicester Cancer Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH, UK
| | - Hilary J. McDermott
- School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough LE11 3TU, UK
| | - Jo Morrison
- Somerset NHS Foundation Trust, Taunton TA1 5DA, UK
| | | | - Tracie Miles
- Royal United Hospital Bath NHS Foundation Trust, Bath BA1 3NG, UK
| | - Lorna Coton
- Royal United Hospital Bath NHS Foundation Trust, Bath BA1 3NG, UK
| | - Esther L. Moss
- Leicester Cancer Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH, UK
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester LE1 5WW, UK
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Otiono K, Nkonge B, Olaiya OR, Pierre S. Dépistage du cancer de la prostate chez les hommes noirs au Canada : Argument en faveur des soins stratifiés en fonction du risque. CMAJ 2023; 195:E101-E105. [PMID: 36649960 PMCID: PMC9851637 DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.220452-f] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Kikachukwu Otiono
- Faculté de médecine Michael G. DeGroote (Otiono), Exploration et commercialisation biomédicales (Nkonge) et Division de chirurgie plastique (Olaiya), Faculté des sciences de la santé, Université McMaster, Hamilton, Ont.; Division d'urologie (Pierre), Hôpital Queensway Carleton, Ottawa, Ont.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Otiono K, Nkonge B, Olaiya OR, Pierre S. Prostate cancer screening in Black men in Canada: a case for risk-stratified care. CMAJ 2022; 194:E1411-E1415. [PMID: 36280242 PMCID: PMC9616133 DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.220452] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Kikachukwu Otiono
- Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine (Otiono), Biomedical Discovery and Commercialization (Nkonge) and Division of Plastic Surgery (Olaiya), Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Division of Urology (Pierre), Queensway Carleton Hospital, Ottawa, Ont.
| | - Brenda Nkonge
- Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine (Otiono), Biomedical Discovery and Commercialization (Nkonge) and Division of Plastic Surgery (Olaiya), Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Division of Urology (Pierre), Queensway Carleton Hospital, Ottawa, Ont
| | - Oluwatobi R Olaiya
- Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine (Otiono), Biomedical Discovery and Commercialization (Nkonge) and Division of Plastic Surgery (Olaiya), Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Division of Urology (Pierre), Queensway Carleton Hospital, Ottawa, Ont
| | - Sean Pierre
- Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine (Otiono), Biomedical Discovery and Commercialization (Nkonge) and Division of Plastic Surgery (Olaiya), Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Division of Urology (Pierre), Queensway Carleton Hospital, Ottawa, Ont
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Nnate DA, Ball J. Current prostate cancer screening and treatment strategies may not support a holistic nationwide program. Cancer 2022; 128:2858-2864. [PMID: 35649153 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.34337] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2022] [Revised: 05/15/2022] [Accepted: 05/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
The diversity of the United Kingdom population and its health care personnel makes it unique for research into evidence-based prostate cancer screening and management strategies. Therefore, ensuring that appropriate systems and services are available to enhance treatment support for men with underlying risk factors should be a priority for health care providers. More efforts are also needed to ensure the representation of men of Black ethnic origin and underserved populations in future prostate cancer research used to inform clinical guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel A Nnate
- School of Health Sciences, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.,Countess of Chester Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Chester, UK
| | - Jacquie Ball
- School of Health Sciences, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.,Clatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Birkenhead, UK
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Abraham S, Foreman N, Sidat Z, Sandhu P, Marrone D, Headley C, Akroyd C, Nicholson S, Brown K, Thomas A, Howells LM, Walter HS. Inequalities in cancer screening, prevention and service engagement between UK ethnic minority groups. BRITISH JOURNAL OF NURSING (MARK ALLEN PUBLISHING) 2022; 31:S14-S24. [PMID: 35648663 DOI: 10.12968/bjon.2022.31.10.s14] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
More people in the UK are living with cancer than ever before. With an increasingly ethnically diverse population, greater emphasis must be placed on understanding factors influencing cancer outcomes. This review seeks to explore UK-specific variations in engagement with cancer services in minority ethnic groups and describe successful interventions. The authors wish to highlight that, despite improvement to engagement and education strategies, inequalities still persist and work to improve cancer outcomes across our communities still needs to be prioritised. There are many reasons why cancer healthcare inequities exist for minority communities, reported on a spectrum ranging from cultural beliefs and awareness, through to racism. Strategies that successfully enhanced engagement included language support; culturally-sensitive reminders; community-based health workers and targeted outreach. Focusing on the diverse city of Leicester the authors describe how healthcare providers, researchers and community champions have worked collectively, delivering targeted community-based strategies to improve awareness and access to cancer services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shalin Abraham
- F2 Academic Foundation Doctor, Leicester Cancer Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester
| | - Nalini Foreman
- Quality Assistant, Leicester Cancer Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester
| | - Zahirah Sidat
- Senior Research Practitioner, Hope Clinical Trials Facility, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester
| | - Pavandeep Sandhu
- Research Technician, Leicester Cancer Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester
| | - Domenic Marrone
- Research Technician, Leicester Cancer Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester
| | - Catherine Headley
- Senior Cancer Services Manager, Leicester City Clinical Commissioning Group, Leicester
| | - Carol Akroyd
- Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care Equality and Diversity Theme Manager, Centre for Ethnic Health Research, University of Leicester, Leicester
| | - Sarah Nicholson
- Hope Clinical Trials Facility Manager/Cancer, Haematology, Urology, Gastroenterology, General Surgery Research Lead, Hope Clinical Trials Facility, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester
| | - Karen Brown
- Professor in Translational Cancer Research, Leicester Cancer Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester
| | - Anne Thomas
- Professor of Cancer Therapeutics, Leicester Cancer Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester
| | - Lynne M Howells
- Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre Translational Research Manager, Leicester Cancer Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester
| | - Harriet S Walter
- Associate Professor of Medical Oncology, Leicester Cancer Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Patel KCR, Hanif W. Ethnic health inequalities in the NHS. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 2022. [DOI: 10.1136/bmj.o607] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
|
36
|
Mohs Z, DeVillers M, Ziegler S, Basson MD, Newman W. Management of Malignant Pleural Effusions in U.S. Veterans: A Retrospective Review. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2022; 28:420-428. [PMID: 36328570 PMCID: PMC9763720 DOI: 10.5761/atcs.oa.22-00124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare malignant pleural effusion (MPE) treatment outcomes and complications among patients receiving indwelling pleural catheter (IPC), talc pleurodesis (TPS), or dual therapy. Outcomes were determined by measuring length of stay (LOS) and post-procedure dyspnea scores. Complications were measured by comparing intervention failures and adverse events. METHODS The Veterans Affairs' Corporate Data Warehouse was utilized to retrospectively review the charts of 314 MPE subjects. Dyspnea scores were estimated by researchers and LOS was determined by adding the duration of stay for all admissions post procedure. Complications were recorded through chart review. RESULTS IPC exhibited higher failure rates than the other approaches 1 year post intervention. Pneumonia/chest infection rate and lung entrapment were also more prevalent. There was no significant difference in dyspnea rates. LOS illustrated a significant difference between groups, with talc patients spending a median of 7 days in the hospital immediately post procedure, while IPC and IPC + TPS patients spent a median of 3 and 2 days, respectively. CONCLUSION Patients receiving IPC or combination treatment spend fewer days in the hospital than TPS patients. However, IPC appears to be associated with more adverse events and higher long-term failure rates than other management strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zachary Mohs
- Department of Internal Medicine, UND School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Grand Forks, ND, USA
| | - Megan DeVillers
- Department of Internal Medicine, UND School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Grand Forks, ND, USA
| | - Stephanie Ziegler
- Department of Internal Medicine, UND School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Grand Forks, ND, USA
| | - Marc D. Basson
- Department of Surgery, UND School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Grand Forks, ND, USA,Corresponding author: Marc D. Basson. Department of Surgery, UND School of Medicine and Health Sciences, 1301 N Columbia Rd, Grand Forks, ND 58203, USA
| | - William Newman
- Department of Internal Medicine, UND School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Grand Forks, ND, USA,Department of Internal Medicine, Fargo Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Fargo, ND, USA
| |
Collapse
|