Risks of second primary cancers among 584,965 female and male breast cancer survivors in England: a 25-year retrospective cohort study

Background

Second primary cancers (SPCs) after breast cancer (BC) present an increasing public health burden, with little existing research on socio-demographic, tumour, and treatment effects. We addressed this in the largest BC survivor cohort to date, using a novel linkage of National Disease Registration Service datasets.

Methods

The cohort included 581,403 female and 3562 male BC survivors diagnosed between 1995 and 2019. We estimated standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) for combined and site-specific SPCs using incidences for England, overall and by age at BC and socioeconomic status. We estimated incidences and Kaplan-Meier cumulative risks stratified by age at BC, and assessed risk variation by socio-demographic, tumour, and treatment characteristics using Cox regression.

Findings

Both genders were at elevated contralateral breast (SIR: 2.02 (95% CI: 1.99-2.06) females; 55.4 (35.5-82.4) males) and non-breast (1.10 (1.09-1.11) females, 1.10 (1.00-1.20) males) SPC risks. Non-breast SPC risks were higher for females younger at BC diagnosis (SIR: 1.34 (1.31-1.38) <50 y, 1.07 (1.06-1.09) ≥50 y) and more socioeconomically deprived (SIR: 1.00 (0.98-1.02) least deprived quintile, 1.34 (1.30-1.37) most).

Interpretation

Enhanced SPC surveillance may benefit BC survivors, although specific recommendations require more detailed multifactorial risk and cost-benefit analyses. The associations between deprivation and SPC risks could provide clinical management insights.

Funding

CRUK Catalyst Award CanGene-CanVar (C61296/A27223). Cancer Research UK grant: PPRPGM-Nov 20∖100,002. This work was supported by core funding from the NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre (NIHR203312)]. The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care.

Sebaceous carcinoma epidemiology, associated malignancies and Lynch/Muir-Torre syndrome screening in England from 2008 to 2018

BACKGROUND

Sebaceous carcinomas (SC) may be associated with the cancer predisposition syndrome Muir-Torre/Lynch syndrome (MTS/LS), identifiable by SC mismatch repair (MMR) screening; however, there is limited data on MMR status of SC.

OBJECTIVE

To describe the epidemiology of SC, copresentation of other cancers, and population level frequency of MMR screening in SC.

METHODS

A population-based retrospective cohort study of SC patients in the National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service in England.

RESULTS

This study included 1077 SC cases (739 extraocular, 338 periocular). Age-standardized incidence rates (ASIR) were higher in men compared with women, 2.74 (95% CI, 2.52-9.69) per 1,000,000 person-years for men versus 1.47 person-years (95% CI, 1.4-1.62) for women. Of the patients, 19% (210/1077) developed at least one MTS/LS-associated malignancy. MMR immunohistochemical screening was performed in only 20% (220/1077) of SC tumors; of these, 32% (70/219) of tumors were MMR deficient.

LIMITATIONS

Retrospective design.

CONCLUSIONS

Incorporation of MMR screening into clinical practice guidelines for the management of SC will increase the opportunity for MTS/LS diagnoses, with implications for cancer surveillance, chemoprevention with aspirin, and immunotherapy treatment targeted to MTS/LS cancers.

Abstract 988: Long-term health outcomes of bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy in women with personal history of breast cancer

Introduction: Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women. Women with personal history of breast cancer are at increased risk of second primary cancers including ovarian cancer. Bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO) is a well-established option for ovarian cancer risk reduction. However, the benefit of ovarian cancer risk reduction should be balanced against the health sequelae caused by the premature estrogen loss. We examined the associations between BSO after breast cancer diagnosis and long-term health outcomes, using large-scale linked electronic health records.

Methods: We selected women diagnosed with invasive breast cancer before the age of 75 between 1995 and 2019 using data from the National Cancer Registration Dataset (NCRD), which describes all cancers registered in England. These women were linked to the Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) Admitted Patient Care (APC) dataset to identify the delivery of BSO, while the use of hormonal replacement therapy (HRT) was identified from the community dispensed prescriptions dataset. Long-term outcomes (e.g., ischemic heart disease) were selected from HES, and the NCRD provided data on second cancer diagnosis and all-cause mortality. Multiple imputation was used to impute missing data on stage, grade, hormonal receptor status and ethnicity. Women were followed from the date of breast cancer diagnosis to development of an outcome of interest or censoring or end of data collection. Multivariable Cox regression was used to examine the associations, with BSO modeled as a time-dependent covariate. The analysis was stratified by patient age at BSO (&lt;55 and ≥55 years).

Results: The study included 566,731 women, with median follow up time 8.40 (IQR: 4.4-14.5) years. Of those, 23,881 women had BSO after their breast cancer diagnosis. BSO before the age of 55 was not associated with all-cause mortality (hazard ratio (HR):1.03, 95%CI:0.98-1.08), while BSO after the age of 55 was associated with a small reduction in the risk of all-cause mortality (HR:0.93, 95%CI:0.89-0.99). BSO before and after the age of 55 was associated with increased risk of ischemic heart disease with HRs of 1.23(95%CI:1.07-1.41) and 1.13(95%CI:1.02-1.25), respectively. There was no association between BSO and cerebrovascular events (HR:0.97, 95%CI:0.82-1.15, for BSO under age 55, HR:0.96, 95%CI:0.87-1.07, for BSO after age 55). Ongoing analyses are investigating the associations stratified by the severity of cardiovascular outcome (fatal/non-fatal) and the use of HRT, and the associations with second cancers and neuropsychiatric outcomes.

Conclusion: BSO after 55 does not appear to be associated with detrimental health effects in women diagnosed with breast cancer. Further examination of the associations between BSO and other long-term health outcomes and the influence of HRT in younger women is needed.

Citation Format: Hend Hassan, Tameera Rahman, Andrew Bacon, Craig Knott, Isaac Allen, Catherine Huntley, Lucy Loong, Yvonne Walburga, Katrina Lavelle, Eva Morris, Steven Hardy, Bethany Torr, Diana M Eccles, Clare Turnbull, Marc Tischkowitz, Paul Pharoah, Antonis C. Antoniou. Long-term health outcomes of bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy in women with personal history of breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 988.

Abstract 3057: Second primary cancer risks for female and male breast cancer survivors

Background: Second primary cancer (SPC) incidence is rising among breast cancer (BC) survivors, but these risks remain unclear. We estimated SPC risks for male and female BC survivors using large-scale electronic health record data from a linkage of National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service data and Hospital Episode Statistics surgical records in England.

Material and Methods: We used a retrospective cohort study design comprising 763,578 female and 4,795 male BC survivors first diagnosed with BC between 1995-2018. We calculated overall and site-specific SPC standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) by comparing observed and expected SPC counts for 19 cancer sites. Study participants were followed from one year after the first BC diagnosis until either a SPC diagnosis (excluding ipsilateral breast and non-melanoma skin cancers), death, migration, relevant surgical procedures, or the end of 2019. Expected SPC counts were calculated using year-, age- and sex-specific cancer incidence rates in the general English population. We stratified the SIRs by age group, sex, and cancer site. We estimated Kaplan-Meier absolute risks of site-specific SPCs and assessed the influence of age at first BC diagnosis using Cox proportional hazards models.

Results: There were 68,550 and 720 incident SPCs among female and male BC survivors, respectively. There was a significant increased risk of all SPCs combined for female BC survivors (SIR: 1.19, 95%CI: 1.18-1.20). There were significant increased risks for SPC at all sites combined, all non-breast sites combined, and at 12 further specific sites for females and at 2 specific sites for males. Among females, the increase was greatest for contralateral breast (SIR: 1.82, 95%CI: 1.79-1.85) and uterine cancers (SIR: 1.80, 95%CI: 1.76-1.85). The risk at all sites combined was higher for women first diagnosed with BC before age 50 (SIR: 1.89, 95%CI: 1.85-1.92) compared to women diagnosed with BC at age 50 or over (SIR: 1.11, 95%CI: 1.10-1.12). The largest associations were observed for contralateral breast (SIR: 3.19, 95%CI: 3.11-3.29) and uterine (SIR: 1.77, 95%CI: 1.73-1.82) SPCs in the younger and older age groups, respectively. Increasing age at first female BC diagnosis was associated with decreasing CBC absolute risks, but significantly increased absolute risks of all other SPCs. Male BC survivors were at increased risk of contralateral breast (SIR: 42.39, 95%CI: 28.39-60.89) and prostate (SIR: 1.29, 95%CI: 1.13-1.46) SPCs.

Conclusions: This is the largest study to date to assess SPC risks following BC in either men or women. SPC risks were significantly increased, both in combination and at specific sites. These findings could help guide clinical management, such as screening recommendations, for BC survivors. Further analysis is underway to investigate the effects of chemotherapy, radiotherapy, hormonal therapy, comorbidities, or germline BC susceptibility.

Citation Format: Isaac Allen, Tameera Rahman, Andrew Bacon, Craig Knott, Sophie Jose, Sally Vernon, Hend Hassan, Catherine Huntley, Lucy Loong, Yvonne Walburga, Katrina Lavelle, Eva Morris, Steven Hardy, Beth Torr, Diana Eccles, Clare Turnbull, Marc Tischkowitz, Paul Pharoah, Antonis C. Antoniou. Second primary cancer risks for female and male breast cancer survivors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 3057.

Lung adenocarcinoma promotion by air pollutants

A complete understanding of how exposure to environmental substances promotes cancer formation is lacking. More than 70 years ago, tumorigenesis was proposed to occur in a two-step process: an initiating step that induces mutations in healthy cells, followed by a promoter step that triggers cancer development1. Here we propose that environmental particulate matter measuring ≤2.5 μm (PM2.5), known to be associated with lung cancer risk, promotes lung cancer by acting on cells that harbour pre-existing oncogenic mutations in healthy lung tissue. Focusing on EGFR-driven lung cancer, which is more common in never-smokers or light smokers, we found a significant association between PM2.5 levels and the incidence of lung cancer for 32,957 EGFR-driven lung cancer cases in four within-country cohorts. Functional mouse models revealed that air pollutants cause an influx of macrophages into the lung and release of interleukin-1β. This process results in a progenitor-like cell state within EGFR mutant lung alveolar type II epithelial cells that fuels tumorigenesis. Ultradeep mutational profiling of histologically normal lung tissue from 295 individuals across 3 clinical cohorts revealed oncogenic EGFR and KRAS driver mutations in 18% and 53% of healthy tissue samples, respectively. These findings collectively support a tumour-promoting role for  PM2.5 air pollutants  and provide impetus for public health policy initiatives to address air pollution to reduce disease burden.

Cancer Before, During and After Pregnancy

Background: The occurrence of cancer during pregnancy is uncommon with an incidence rate of ∼1 in 1000 pregnancies. The rate of pregnancy-associated cancer is increasing and this is partly caused by a trend in delaying child bearing to an older age. Aim: With little data in the UK concerning the number of women diagnosed with cancer during pregnancy, the purpose of this study was to compare incidence of cancer in pregnant women to the general female population. Methods: Cancer registry data for England were linked to hospital activity data to establish pregnancy-associated cancers. For this study, women aged 15 to 44 years diagnosed with a malignant cancer between 2012 and 2014 and a pregnancy or delivery code 1 year before or up to 1 year after diagnosis were defined as pregnant women. Age-standardized and age-specific incidence rates of cancer in pregnant women and the general female population in England were compared by 5-year age-group, geographic region of residence, income deprivation quintile and stage of cancer diagnosis. Results: A total of 3272 pregnancy-associated cancers were identified in 2,503,174 pregnancies. The age-standardized incidence rate (ASIR) of cancer in pregnant women was 48% higher than the equivalent ASIR of cancer in the female population aged 15-44 nationally (173 vs 117 per 100,000). This trend of higher incidence of cancer among pregnant women persisted for most regions, ages and stages, and was particularly high in the most deprived quintile. The most common cancers diagnosed around the time of pregnancy were breast (n = 784), melanoma of skin (n = 504), cervical (n = 498), hematologic (n = 286), ovarian (n = 240) and colorectal (n = 188). Comparing the ASIR of cancer in pregnant women with the female population, by site, rates were over 30% higher for breast cancer (55 vs 41 per 100,000 respectively) and around double those for melanoma (26 vs 13 per 100,000). Conclusion: The higher rates of pregnancy-associated cancers compared with the general female population may be due to frequent obstetric examinations which increases the chances of cancer detection. Further work using a more robust maternity dataset would be required to ascertain timing of cancer diagnosis in relation to delivery.

Abstract P3-13-02: Impact of primary surgery on short-term survival of older breast cancer patients in the UK

Introduction

Lack of surgery for older breast cancer patients may reduce cancer survival. Previous studies did not adjust for comorbidity and tumour characteristics which affect survival.

Methods

In a prospective cohort study investigating older patients' treatment, survival analyses (mean 3.8 years, 95% CI: 3.69-3.83) was undertaken for 910 breast cancer patients aged ≥65 years diagnosed at 22 English hospitals from 1/7/10 to 31/12/12. Primary outcome was breast cancer specific survival. Independent variables included surgery, comorbidity, functional status and tumour characteristics recorded from patient interview (at diagnosis) and case note review. Data analyses included Cox's multiple regression.

Results

Adjusting for tumour stage, comorbidity and functional status, women undergoing primary surgery (n=772) had a third of the hazard of breast cancer death compared to those who did not (n=138) (HR 0.36, 95% CI: 0.20-0.66, p=0.001). The number of observed breast cancer deaths exceeded those expected for participants who did not have primary surgery, were aged ≥85 years, steroid receptor negative or had a higher grade or stage tumour. In univariate analysis women aged ≥85 years had an increased hazard of breast cancer death compared to 65-69 year olds (HR 4.02, 95% CI: 1.61-10.01, p=0.003). Patients' role in the treatment decisions did not alter whether they received surgery or not; those who were active/collaborative were as likely to get surgery as those who were passive (i.e. left the decision up to the Surgeon).

Conclusions

Surgery for older breast cancer patients reduces the hazard of cancer death by a third, independent of age, comorbidity and tumour characteristics. Surgeons must actively advise surgery for all elderly patients.

Cox's proportional hazards regression of breast cancer specific survival (unadjusted n=906)VariableCategoryUnadjusted HRUnivariable 95% CIP ValueAdjusted HR#Multivariable 95% CIP ValuePrimary surgeryNo(ref)  (ref)   Yes0.320.19-0.53&lt;0.0010.360.20-0.660.001Age group (years)65-69(ref)  (ref)   70-741.530.61-3.860.3641.310.52-3.340.565 75-791.350.51-3.540.5481.040.39-2.770.933 80-842.390.92-6.220.0741.720.65-4.560.272 85+4.021.61-10.010.0032.610.99-6.910.053Grade1(ref)  (ref)   21.370.60-3.140.4531.180.51-2.710.704 34.552.01-10.31&lt;0.0013.231.36-7.650.008ER or PR positiveYes(ref)  (ref)   No3.502.02-6.08&lt;0.0012.751.49-5.090.001Tumour StageI(ref)  (ref)   II and IIIa2.251.33-3.810.0021.480.85-2.570.164Co-morbidity (Charlson)0(ref)  (ref)   11.020.60-1.740.9350.970.56-1.670.917 2+0.960.50-1.840.9020.800.41-1.570.518Functional status*Independent (1-2)(ref)  (ref)   Dependent (3-4)1.690.97-2.950.0641.000.53-1.880.995# Adjusted for all other variables in table

(Funded by NIHR Programme Grant).

Citation Format: Bundred N, Lavelle K, Sowerbutts AM, Pilling M, Todd C. Impact of primary surgery on short-term survival of older breast cancer patients in the UK [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-13-02.

Pretreatment health measures and complications after surgical management of elderly women with breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Elderly patients with breast cancer are less likely to be offered surgery, partly owing to co-morbidities and reduced functional ability. However, there is little consensus on how best to assess surgical risk in this patient group.

METHODS

The ability of pretreatment health measures to predict complications was investigated in a prospective cohort study of a consecutive series of women aged at least 70 years undergoing surgery for operable (stage I-IIIa) breast cancer at 22 English breast units between 2010 and 2013. Data on treatment, surgical complications, health measures and tumour characteristics were collected by case-note review and/or patient interview. Outcome measures were all complications and serious complications within 30 days of surgery.

RESULTS

The study included 664 women. One or more complications were experienced by 41·0 per cent of the patients, predominantly seroma or primary/minor infections. Complications were serious in 6·5 per cent. More extensive surgery predicted a higher number of complications, but not serious complications. Older age did not predict complications. Several health measures were associated with complications in univariable analysis, and were included in multivariable analyses, adjusting for type/extent of surgery and tumour characteristics. In the final models, pain predicted a higher count of complications (incidence rate ratio 1·01, 95 per cent c.i. 1·00 to 1·01; P = 0·004). Fatigue (odds ratio (OR) 1·02, 95 per cent c.i. 1·01 to 1·03; P = 0·004), low platelet count (OR 4·19, 1·03 to 17·12: P = 0·046) and pulse rate (OR 0·96, 0·93 to 0·99; P = 0·010) predicted serious complications.

CONCLUSION

The risk of serious complications from breast surgery is low for older patients. Surgical decisions should be based on patient fitness rather than age. Health measures that predict surgical risk were identified in multivariable models, but the effects were weak, with 95 per cent c.i. close to unity.

Why are older women not having surgery for breast cancer? A qualitative study

Objective

Surgery is the mainstay of treatment for breast cancer. However, there is evidence that older women are not receiving this treatment. This study explores reasons why older women are not having surgery.

Methods

Twenty eight in‐depth interviews were conducted with women over 70 years old with operable breast cancer receiving primary endocrine therapy (PET) as their primary treatment. The interviews focused on their perceptions of why they were being treated with PET rather than surgery. Transcripts were analysed using the Framework method.

Results

Based on reasons for PET, patients were divided into three groups: ‘Patient Declined’, ‘Patient Considered’ or ‘Surgeon Decided’. The first group ‘Patient Declined’ absolutely ruled out surgery to treat their breast cancer. These patients were not interested in maximising their survival and rejected surgery citing their age or concerns about impact of treatment on their level of functioning. The second group ‘Patient Considered’ considered surgery but chose to have PET most specifying if PET failed then they could have the operation. Patients viewed this as offering them two options of treatment. The third group ‘Surgeon Decided’ was started by the surgeon on PET. These patients had comorbidities and in most cases the surgeon asserted that the comorbidities were incompatible with surgery.

Conclusions

Older women represent a diverse group and have multifaceted reasons for foregoing surgery. Discussions about breast cancer treatment should be patient centred and adapted to differing patient priorities. © 2015 The Authors. Psycho‐Oncology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Is lack of surgery for older breast cancer patients in the UK explained by patient choice or poor health? A prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Older women have lower breast cancer surgery rates than younger women. UK policy states that differences in cancer treatment by age can only be justified by patient choice or poor health.

METHODS

We investigate whether lack of surgery for older patients is explained by patient choice/poor health in a prospective cohort study of 800 women aged ≥70 years diagnosed with operable (stage 1-3a) breast cancer at 22 English breast cancer units in 2010-2013.

DATA COLLECTION

interviews and case note review.

OUTCOME MEASURE

surgery for operable (stage 1-3a) breast cancer <90 days of diagnosis. Logistic regression adjusts for age, health measures, tumour characteristics, socio-demographics and patient's/surgeon's perceived responsibility for treatment decisions.

RESULTS

In the univariable analyses, increasing age predicts not undergoing surgery from the age of 75 years, compared with 70-74-year-olds. Adjusting for health measures and choice, only women aged ≥85 years have reduced odds of surgery (OR 0.18, 95% CI: 0.07-0.44). Each point increase in Activities of Daily Living score (worsening functional status) reduced the odds of surgery by over a fifth (OR 0.23, 95% CI: 0.15-0.35). Patient's role in the treatment decisions made no difference to whether they received surgery or not; those who were active/collaborative were as likely to get surgery as those who were passive, that is, left the decision up to the surgeon.

CONCLUSION

Lower surgery rates, among older women with breast cancer, are unlikely to be due to patients actively opting out of having this treatment. However, poorer health explains the difference in surgery between 75-84-year-olds and younger women. Lack of surgery for women aged ≥85 years persists even when health and patient choice are adjusted for.

Are lower rates of surgery amongst older women with breast cancer in the UK explained by co-morbidity?

BACKGROUND

Around 60% of women ≥ 80 years old, in the UK do not have surgery for their breast cancer (vs<10% of younger age groups). The extent to which this difference can be accounted for by co-morbidity has not been established.

METHODS

A Cancer Registry/Hospital Episode Statistics-linked data set identified women aged ≥ 65 years diagnosed with invasive breast cancer (between 1 April 1997 and 31 March 2005) in two regions of the UK (n=23038). Receipt of surgery by age was investigated using logistic regression, adjusting for co-morbidity and other patient, tumour and treatment factors.

RESULTS

Overall, 72% of older women received surgery, varying from 86% of 65-69-year olds to 34% of women aged ≥ 85 years. The proportion receiving surgery fell with increasing co-morbidity (Charlson score 0=73%, score 1=66%, score 2+=49%). However, after adjustment for co-morbidity, older age still predicts lack of surgery. Compared with 65-69-year olds, the odds of surgery decreased from 0.74 (95% CI: 0.66-0.83) for 70-74-year olds to 0.13 (95% CI: 0.11-0.14) for women aged ≥ 85 years.

CONCLUSION

Although co-morbidity is associated with a reduced likelihood of surgery, it does not explain the shortfall in surgery amongst older women in the UK. Routine data on co-morbidity enables fairer comparison of treatment across population groups but needs to be more complete.

Older breast cancer survivors' views and preferences for physical activity

Evidence suggests that physical activity improves quality of life and physical functioning among breast cancer patients and survivors. However, previous studies have tended to focus on younger patients, despite higher incidence and lower survival among older breast cancer survivors. In this study we explored physical activity preferences of older breast cancer survivors to inform the development of future targeted interventions. Twenty-nine female breast cancer survivors (1 to 5 years postdiagnosis) aged 59 to 86 (mean 66.54, SD 6.50) took part in either a semistructured interview or a focus group exploring physical activity patterns, motivators, facilitators, barriers, and preferences. The main factors influencing physical activity were body image, weight issues, vitality, mood, and the desire to carry on as normal. Preference was expressed for activities that were gentle, tailored to age and cancer-related abilities, holistic, involving other older breast cancer survivors, and with an instructor who was knowledgeable about both breast cancer and aging.

Do postage stamps versus pre-paid envelopes increase responses to patient mail surveys? A randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Studies largely from the market research field suggest that the inclusion of a stamped addressed envelope, rather than a pre-paid business reply, increases the response rate to mail surveys. The evidence that this is also the case regarding patient mail surveys is limited.

METHODS

The aim of this study is to investigate whether stamped addressed envelopes increase response rates to patient mail surveys compared to pre-paid business reply envelopes and compare the relative costs. A sample of 477 initial non-responders to a mail survey of patients attending breast clinics in Greater Manchester between 1/10/2002 - 31/7/2003 were entered into the trial: 239 were randomly allocated to receive a stamped envelope and 238 to receive a pre-paid envelope in with their reminder surveys. Overall cost and per item returned were calculated.

RESULTS

The response to the stamped envelope group was 31.8% (95% CI: 25.9% - 37.7%) compared to 26.9% (21.3% - 32.5%) for the pre-paid group. The difference (4.9% 95% CI: -3.3% - 13.1%) is not significant at alpha = 0.05 (chi2 = 1.39; 2 tailed test, d.f. = 1; P = 0.239). The stamped envelopes were cheaper in terms of cost per returned item (1.20 pounds) than the pre-paid envelopes (1.67 pounds). However if the set up cost for the licence to use the pre-paid service is excluded, the cost of the stamped envelopes is more expensive than pre-paid returns (1.20 pounds versus 0.73 pounds).

CONCLUSION

Compared with pre-paid business replies, stamped envelopes did not produce a statistically significant increase in response rate to this patient survey. However, the response gain of the stamped strategy (4.9%) is similar to that demonstrated in a Cochrane review (5.3%) of strategies to increase response to general mail surveys. Further studies and meta analyses of patient responses to mail surveys via stamped versus pre-paid envelopes are needed with sufficient power to detect response gains of this magnitude in a patient population.

Older women with operable breast cancer are less likely to have surgery

Background

Older women are less likely to receive standard management for breast cancer than younger postmenopausal women. Whether differences in general health explain variations in the rates of surgery is not known.

Methods

In this prospective cohort study, 76 women aged 65 years or more attending breast units in Greater Manchester completed a survey measuring functional status (Elderly Population Health Status Survey's Activity of Daily Living), generic health status (Short Form 12) and health-related quality of life (European Organization for Research on Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C30). Case-note review assessed co-morbidity (Charlson Index) and management. Primary surgery for operable breast cancer was investigated using logistic regression.

Results

A Charlson Index of 1 or more did not predict the use of surgery (P = 0·363). However, for each point increase on the 1–4 scale indicating worsening functional status, the odds of having surgery decreased by 16 times (odds ratio 0·063). The odds of a woman of 80 years or more having surgery decreased by a factor of 44 (odds ratio 0·023) compared with women aged 65–79 years, accounting for co-morbidity, functional status, pretreatment stage, social deprivation and type of hospital.

Conclusion

Older women were less likely to have surgery for operable breast cancer than younger women, even after accounting for differences in general health and co-morbidity.

Non-standard management of breast cancer increases with age in the UK: a population based cohort of women > or =65 years

Evidence suggests that compared to younger women, older women are less likely to receive standard management for breast cancer. Whether this disparity persists once differences in tumour characteristics have been adjusted for has not been investigated in the UK. A retrospective cohort study involving case note review was undertaken, based on the North Western Cancer Registry database of women aged > or =65 years, resident in Greater Manchester with invasive breast cancer registered over a 1-year period (n=480). Adjusting for tumour characteristics associated with age by logistic regression analyses, older women were less likely to receive standard management than younger women for all indicators investigated. Compared to women aged 65-69 years, women aged > or =80 years with operable (stage 1-3a) breast cancer have increased odds of not receiving triple assessment (OR=5.5, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.1-14.5), not receiving primary surgery (OR=43.0, 95% CI: 9.7-191.3), not undergoing axillary node surgery (OR=27.6, 95% CI: 5.6-135.9) and not undergoing tests for steroid receptors (OR=3.0, 95% CI: 1.7-5.5). Women aged 75-79 years have increased odds of not receiving radiotherapy following breast-conserving surgery compared to women aged 65-69 years (OR=11.0, 95% CI: 2.0-61.6). These results demonstrate that older women in the UK are less likely to receive standard management for breast cancer, compared to younger women and this disparity cannot be explained by differences in tumour characteristics.

Exposure to a community-level HIV prevention intervention: who gets the message

As part of the evaluation of a community-level HIV prevention program for women, this study examined predictors of exposure to print media and community outreach and assessed the relationship between exposure to the intervention and condom use behavior. Data from interviews with 479 women randomly selected from the intervention community in 1995 and 1996 were examined. Analysis of demographic and risk characteristics were conducted to identify predictors of exposure to the project's HIV prevention messages. Additionally, logistic regression analyses were conducted to examine the effects of intervention exposure on condom use, controlling for factors related to exposure. The results revealed that the print media campaign reached the largest number of women. However, women at highest risk did not have high rates of exposure to print media, but had greater exposure to outreach. Exposure to print media had an effect on increased communication with a main partner about condom use, but was not significantly related to condom use last time had sex. There were no significant main effects for exposure to outreach on condom use behavior. An important finding of this analysis was that each intervention strategy was successful in reaching a different portion of the target population and that exposure had differential effects on the condom use behavior of particular segments of the target population.

An analysis of vacancy rates, turnover, and wages among nursing occupations in New York state hospitals, nursing homes, and diagnostic and treatment facilities

This study investigates the balance between the supply and demand for nurses and nurse assistive personnel in New York state. Data collected in 1992 and 1993 from three surveys of hospitals, nursing homes, and diagnostic and treatment facilities are combined, reported, and analyzed. Although there were regional differences, the mean non-New York City vacancy rate was 4% for registered nurses and 5% for licensed practical nurses. The 6-month mean turnover rate for registered nurses was 8%; however, licensed practical nurses, nurse technicians, and nurse attendants had mean turnover rates of 16% and over. Turnover rates were lowest in hospitals. Nurse anesthetists earned the highest salary, a mean of about $61,000 per year. Salaries for nurse anesthetists and other nurses varied substantially by region.

Bilateral renal loss resulting from intravesical formalin instillation

A patient was referred for evaluation of obstructive uropathy after treatment with 10% formalin to control recurrent hemorrhagic radiation cystitis. Progressive bilateral ureteral, pelvic, and renal parenchymal destruction occurred despite ileal ureteral replacement. This complication of therapy reinforces the concept that vesical instillation of formalin should be done only in extreme cases and then only in low concentrations.