1
|
Xue J, Zhu Y, Pan Y, Huang H, Wei L, Peng Y, Xi H, Zhou S, Wu H, Gu Z, Huang W, Wang H, Duan R. Strategic Implementation of Fragile X Carrier Screening in China: A Focused Pilot Study. J Mol Diagn 2024:S1525-1578(24)00156-9. [PMID: 39032823 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2024.06.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2024] [Revised: 06/20/2024] [Accepted: 06/25/2024] [Indexed: 07/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Fragile X syndrome (FXS) is the leading genetic cause of intellectual disability and autism spectrum disorders. Female premutation carriers exhibit no obvious symptoms during reproductive age, but the premutation allele can expand to full mutation when transmitted to the fetus.. Given the relatively low prevalence but large population, the distinct healthcare system, the middle-income economic status, and low awareness among public and medical professionals, the optimal genetic screening strategy remains unknown. We conducted a pilot study of Fragile X carrier screening in China, involving 22,245 pregnant women and women with childbearing intentions, divided into control and pilot groups. The prevalence of Fragile X carriers in the control group was 1/850, similar to East Asian populations. Strikingly, the prevalence of Fragile X carriers in the pilot group was 1/356, which can be attributed to extensive medical training, participant education, and rigorous genetic counseling and testing protocols. Cost-effectiveness analyses of four strategies-no screening, population-based screening, targeted screening, and our pilot screening-indicated that our pilot screening was the most cost-effective option. A follow-up survey revealed that 55% of respondents reported undergoing screening due to their family history. We have successfully established a standardized system, addressing the challenges of low prevalence, limited awareness, and genetic testing complexities. Our study provides practical recommendations for implementing Fragile X carrier screening in China.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jin Xue
- Center for Medical Genetics, School of Life Sciences, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China; Department of Medical Genetics, Hunan Children's Hospital, The Affiliated Children's Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Yingbao Zhu
- Center for Medical Genetics, School of Life Sciences, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Yi Pan
- Center for Medical Genetics, School of Life Sciences, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Hongjing Huang
- Center for Medical Genetics, School of Life Sciences, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Liyi Wei
- Center for Medical Genetics, School of Life Sciences, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Ying Peng
- Prenatal Diagnosis Center, National Health Commission Key Laboratory of Birth Defects for Research and Prevention, Hunan Provincial Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Hui Xi
- Prenatal Diagnosis Center, National Health Commission Key Laboratory of Birth Defects for Research and Prevention, Hunan Provincial Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Shihao Zhou
- Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Regional Hereditary Birth Defects Prevention and Control, Changsha Hospital for Maternal & Child Health Care Affiliated to Hunan Normal University, Changsha, China
| | - Hongliang Wu
- Yueyang Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Yueyang, Hunan, China
| | - Zhenxiang Gu
- Huaihua Hospital for Maternal and Child Health Care, Huaihua, Hunan, China
| | - Wen Huang
- Center for Medical Genetics, School of Life Sciences, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Hua Wang
- Department of Medical Genetics, Hunan Children's Hospital, The Affiliated Children's Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
| | - Ranhui Duan
- Center for Medical Genetics, School of Life Sciences, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China; Hunan Key Laboratory of Medical Genetics, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China; Hunan Key Laboratory of Animal Models for Human Diseases, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Liang JW, Christensen KD, Green RC, Kraft P. Evaluating the utility of multi-gene, multi-disease population-based panel testing accounting for uncertainty in penetrance estimates. NPJ Genom Med 2024; 9:30. [PMID: 38760335 PMCID: PMC11101660 DOI: 10.1038/s41525-024-00414-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2023] [Accepted: 04/19/2024] [Indexed: 05/19/2024] Open
Abstract
Panel germline testing allows for the efficient detection of deleterious variants for multiple conditions, but the benefits and harms of identifying these variants are not always well understood. We present a multi-gene, multi-disease aggregate utility formula that allows the user to consider adding or removing each gene in a panel based on variant frequency, estimated penetrances, and subjective disutilities for testing positive but not developing the disease and testing negative but developing the disease. We provide credible intervals for utility that reflect uncertainty in penetrance estimates. Rare, highly penetrant deleterious variants tend to contribute positive net utilities for a wide variety of user-specified disutilities, even when accounting for parameter estimation uncertainty. However, the clinical utility of deleterious variants with moderate, uncertain penetrance depends more on assumed disutilities. The decision to include a gene on a panel depends on variant frequency, penetrance, and subjective utilities and should account for uncertainties around these factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jane W Liang
- Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Data Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Kurt D Christensen
- Center for Healthcare Research in Pediatrics, Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Robert C Green
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA
- Mass General Brigham, Boston, MA, USA
- Ariadne Labs, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Peter Kraft
- Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
- Program in Genetic Epidemiology and Statistical Genetics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sideris M, Menon U, Manchanda R. Screening and prevention of ovarian cancer. Med J Aust 2024; 220:264-274. [PMID: 38353066 DOI: 10.5694/mja2.52227] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2023] [Accepted: 12/11/2023] [Indexed: 03/07/2024]
Abstract
Ovarian cancer remains the most lethal gynaecological malignancy with 314 000 cases and 207 000 deaths annually worldwide. Ovarian cancer cases and deaths are predicted to increase in Australia by 42% and 55% respectively by 2040. Earlier detection and significant downstaging of ovarian cancer have been demonstrated with multimodal screening in the largest randomised controlled trial of ovarian cancer screening in women at average population risk. However, none of the randomised trials have demonstrated a mortality benefit. Therefore, ovarian cancer screening is not currently recommended in women at average population risk. More frequent surveillance for ovarian cancer every three to four months in women at high risk has shown good performance characteristics and significant downstaging, but there is no available information on a survival benefit. Population testing offers an emerging novel strategy to identify women at high risk who can benefit from ovarian cancer prevention. Novel multicancer early detection biomarker, longitudinal multiple marker strategies, and new biomarkers are being investigated and evaluated for ovarian cancer screening. Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) decreases ovarian cancer incidence and mortality and is recommended for women at over a 4-5% lifetime risk of ovarian cancer. Pre-menopausal women without contraindications to hormone replacement therapy (HRT) undergoing RRSO should be offered HRT until 51 years of age to minimise the detrimental consequences of premature menopause. Currently risk-reducing early salpingectomy and delayed oophorectomy (RRESDO) should only be offered to women at increased risk of ovarian cancer within the context of a research trial. Pre-menopausal early salpingectomy is associated with fewer menopausal symptoms and better sexual function than bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. A Sectioning and Extensively Examining the Fimbria (SEE-FIM) protocol should be used for histopathological assessment in women at high risk of ovarian cancer who are undergoing surgical prevention. Opportunistic salpingectomy may be offered at routine gynaecological surgery to all women who have completed their family. Long term prospective opportunistic salpingectomy studies are needed to determine the effect size of ovarian cancer risk reduction and the impact on menopause.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michail Sideris
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Usha Menon
- Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Ranjit Manchanda
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
- Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, University College London, London, UK
- Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wiley LK, Shortt JA, Roberts ER, Lowery J, Kudron E, Lin M, Mayer D, Wilson M, Brunetti TM, Chavan S, Phang TL, Pozdeyev N, Lesny J, Wicks SJ, Moore ET, Morgenstern JL, Roff AN, Shalowitz EL, Stewart A, Williams C, Edelmann MN, Hull M, Patton JT, Axell L, Ku L, Lee YM, Jirikowic J, Tanaka A, Todd E, White S, Peterson B, Hearst E, Zane R, Greene CS, Mathias R, Coors M, Taylor M, Ghosh D, Kahn MG, Brooks IM, Aquilante CL, Kao D, Rafaels N, Crooks KR, Hess S, Barnes KC, Gignoux CR. Building a vertically integrated genomic learning health system: The biobank at the Colorado Center for Personalized Medicine. Am J Hum Genet 2024; 111:11-23. [PMID: 38181729 PMCID: PMC10806731 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2023.12.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2022] [Revised: 11/30/2023] [Accepted: 12/01/2023] [Indexed: 01/07/2024] Open
Abstract
Precision medicine initiatives across the globe have led to a revolution of repositories linking large-scale genomic data with electronic health records, enabling genomic analyses across the entire phenome. Many of these initiatives focus solely on research insights, leading to limited direct benefit to patients. We describe the biobank at the Colorado Center for Personalized Medicine (CCPM Biobank) that was jointly developed by the University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus and UCHealth to serve as a unique, dual-purpose research and clinical resource accelerating personalized medicine. This living resource currently has more than 200,000 participants with ongoing recruitment. We highlight the clinical, laboratory, regulatory, and HIPAA-compliant informatics infrastructure along with our stakeholder engagement, consent, recontact, and participant engagement strategies. We characterize aspects of genetic and geographic diversity unique to the Rocky Mountain region, the primary catchment area for CCPM Biobank participants. We leverage linked health and demographic information of the CCPM Biobank participant population to demonstrate the utility of the CCPM Biobank to replicate complex trait associations in the first 33,674 genotyped individuals across multiple disease domains. Finally, we describe our current efforts toward return of clinical genetic test results, including high-impact pathogenic variants and pharmacogenetic information, and our broader goals as the CCPM Biobank continues to grow. Bringing clinical and research interests together fosters unique clinical and translational questions that can be addressed from the large EHR-linked CCPM Biobank resource within a HIPAA- and CLIA-certified environment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura K Wiley
- Colorado Center for Personalized Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA; Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | - Jonathan A Shortt
- Colorado Center for Personalized Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA; Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | - Emily R Roberts
- Colorado Center for Personalized Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | - Jan Lowery
- Colorado Center for Personalized Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA; University of Colorado Cancer Center, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA; Department of Community and Behavioral Health, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | - Elizabeth Kudron
- Colorado Center for Personalized Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA; Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA; Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | - Meng Lin
- Colorado Center for Personalized Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA; Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | - David Mayer
- Colorado Center for Personalized Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA; Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | - Melissa Wilson
- Colorado Center for Personalized Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA; Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | - Tonya M Brunetti
- Colorado Center for Personalized Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | - Sameer Chavan
- Colorado Center for Personalized Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | - Tzu L Phang
- Colorado Center for Personalized Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | - Nikita Pozdeyev
- Colorado Center for Personalized Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA; Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA; Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | - Joseph Lesny
- Colorado Center for Personalized Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | - Stephen J Wicks
- Colorado Center for Personalized Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | - Ethan T Moore
- Colorado Center for Personalized Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | - Joshua L Morgenstern
- Colorado Center for Personalized Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | - Alanna N Roff
- Colorado Center for Personalized Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | - Elise L Shalowitz
- Colorado Center for Personalized Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | - Adrian Stewart
- Colorado Center for Personalized Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | - Cole Williams
- Colorado Center for Personalized Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | - Michelle N Edelmann
- Colorado Center for Personalized Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | - Madelyne Hull
- Colorado Center for Personalized Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | - J Tacker Patton
- Colorado Center for Personalized Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | - Lisen Axell
- CU Cancer Center, Hereditary Cancer Clinic, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | - Lisa Ku
- CU Cancer Center, Hereditary Cancer Clinic, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | - Yee Ming Lee
- Colorado Center for Personalized Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA; Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Colorado Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | | | | | - Emily Todd
- Colorado Center for Personalized Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA; UCHealth, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | | | - Brett Peterson
- Colorado Center for Personalized Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | | | - Richard Zane
- UCHealth, Aurora, CO 80045, USA; University of Colorado School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | - Casey S Greene
- Colorado Center for Personalized Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA; Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | - Rasika Mathias
- Colorado Center for Personalized Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | - Marilyn Coors
- Colorado Center for Personalized Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | - Matthew Taylor
- Colorado Center for Personalized Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA; Division of Cardiology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | - Debashis Ghosh
- Department of Biostatistics and Informatics, Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | - Michael G Kahn
- Colorado Center for Personalized Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | - Ian M Brooks
- Colorado Center for Personalized Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA; Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | - Christina L Aquilante
- Colorado Center for Personalized Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA; Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | - David Kao
- Colorado Center for Personalized Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA; Division of Cardiology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA; CARE Innovation Center, UCHealth, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | - Nicholas Rafaels
- Colorado Center for Personalized Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | - Kristy R Crooks
- Colorado Center for Personalized Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA; Department of Pathology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | | | - Kathleen C Barnes
- Colorado Center for Personalized Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.
| | - Christopher R Gignoux
- Colorado Center for Personalized Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA; Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wildin RS. Cost Effectiveness of Genomic Population Health Screening in Adults: A Review of Modeling Studies and Future Directions. J Appl Lab Med 2024; 9:92-103. [PMID: 38167759 DOI: 10.1093/jalm/jfad093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2023] [Accepted: 10/09/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Detecting actionable health risks for genetic diseases prior to symptomatic presentation at population scale using genomic test technologies is a preventive health innovation being piloted in multiple locations. Standard practice is to screen for risks only in those with personal or family history of specific disease. Genomic population heath screening has proven feasible and potentially scalable. The value of this intervention in terms of economic benefit has been scientifically modeled by several groups. CONTENT Eight recent cost-effectiveness modeling studies for high penetrance monogenic dominant diseases that used input parameters from 3 different countries are reviewed. Results and their uses in refining implementations are analyzed and the roles for laboratory medicine in facilitating success are discussed. SUMMARY The reviewed studies generally found evidence for cost-effectiveness of genomic population health screening in at least a subset of their base case screening scenario. Sensitivity analyses identified opportunities for improving the likelihood of cost-effectiveness. On the whole, the modeling results suggest genomic population health screening is likely to be cost-effective for high penetrance disorders in younger adults, especially with achievable reductions in test cost effected partially through combining tests for individual disorders into one screening procedure. Policies founded on the models studied should consider limitations of the modeling methods and the potential for impacts on equity and access in the design and implementation of genomic screening programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert S Wildin
- Departments of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine and Pediatrics, The Larner College of Medicine at the University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, United States
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lacaze P, Marquina C, Tiller J, Brotchie A, Kang YJ, Merritt MA, Green RC, Watts GF, Nowak KJ, Manchanda R, Canfell K, James P, Winship I, McNeil JJ, Ademi Z. Combined population genomic screening for three high-risk conditions in Australia: a modelling study. EClinicalMedicine 2023; 66:102297. [PMID: 38192593 PMCID: PMC10772163 DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102297] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2023] [Revised: 10/12/2023] [Accepted: 10/13/2023] [Indexed: 01/10/2024] Open
Abstract
Background No previous health-economic evaluation has assessed the impact and cost-effectiveness of offering combined adult population genomic screening for mutliple high-risk conditions in a national public healthcare system. Methods This modeling study assessed the impact of offering combined genomic screening for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer, Lynch syndrome and familial hypercholesterolaemia to all young adults in Australia, compared with the current practice of clinical criteria-based testing for each condition separately. The intervention of genomic screening, assumed as an up-front single cost in the first annual model cycle, would detect pathogenic variants in seven high-risk genes. The simulated population was 18-40 year-olds (8,324,242 individuals), modelling per-sample test costs ranging AU$100-$1200 (base-case AU$200) from the year 2023 onwards with testing uptake of 50%. Interventions for identified high-risk variant carriers follow current Australian guidelines, modelling imperfect uptake and adherence. Outcome measures were morbidity and mortality due to cancer (breast, ovarian, colorectal and endometrial) and coronary heart disease (CHD) over a lifetime horizon, from healthcare-system and societal perspectives. Outcomes included quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), discounted 5% annually (with 3% discounting in scenario analysis). Findings Over the population lifetime (to age 80 years), the model estimated that genomic screening per-100,000 individuals would lead to 747 QALYs gained by preventing 63 cancers, 31 CHD cases and 97 deaths. In the total model population, this would translate to 31,094 QALYs gained by preventing 2612 cancers, 542 non-fatal CHD events and 4047 total deaths. At AU$200 per-test, genomic screening would require an investment of AU$832 million for screening of 50% of the population. Our findings suggest that this intervention would be cost-effective from a healthcare-system perspective, yielding an ICER of AU$23,926 (∼£12,050/€14,110/US$15,345) per QALY gained over the status quo. In scenario analysis with 3% discounting, an ICER of AU$4758/QALY was obtained. Sensitivity analysis for the base case indicated that combined genomic screening would be cost-effective under 70% of simulations, cost-saving under 25% and not cost-effective under 5%. Threshold analysis showed that genomic screening would be cost-effective under the AU$50,000/QALY willingness-to-pay threshold at per-test costs up to AU$325 (∼£164/€192/US$208). Interpretation Our findings suggest that offering combined genomic screening for high-risk conditions to young adults would be cost-effective in the Australian public healthcare system, at currently realistic testing costs. Other matters, including psychosocial impacts, ethical and societal issues, and implementation challenges, also need consideration. Funding Australian Government, Department of Health, Medical Research Future Fund, Genomics Health Futures Mission (APP2009024). National Heart Foundation Future Leader Fellowship (102604).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Lacaze
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia
| | - Clara Marquina
- Health Economics and Policy Evaluation Research (HEPER) Group, Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia
| | - Jane Tiller
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia
| | - Adam Brotchie
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia
| | - Yoon-Jung Kang
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, A Joint Venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, NSW 2011, Australia
| | - Melissa A. Merritt
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, A Joint Venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, NSW 2011, Australia
| | - Robert C. Green
- Mass General Brigham, Broad Institute, Ariadne Labs and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Gerald F. Watts
- School of Medicine, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA 6009, Australia
- Departments of Cardiology and Internal Medicine, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, WA, 6001, Australia
| | - Kristen J. Nowak
- Public and Aboriginal Health Division, Western Australia Department of Health, East Perth, WA, 6004, Australia
- Centre for Medical Research, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, 6009, Australia
| | - Ranjit Manchanda
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London, EC1M 6BQ, UK
- Department of Health Services Research, Faculty of Public Health & Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, WC1E 7HT, UK
| | - Karen Canfell
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, A Joint Venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, NSW 2011, Australia
| | - Paul James
- Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter McCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia
- Department of Genomic Medicine, Royal Melbourne Hospital City Campus, Parkville, VIC, 3050, Australia
- Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3050, Australia
| | - Ingrid Winship
- Department of Genomic Medicine, Royal Melbourne Hospital City Campus, Parkville, VIC, 3050, Australia
- Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3050, Australia
| | - John J. McNeil
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia
| | - Zanfina Ademi
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia
- Health Economics and Policy Evaluation Research (HEPER) Group, Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Busnelli A, Ciani O, Caroselli S, Figliuzzi M, Poli M, Levi-Setti PE, Tarricone R, Capalbo A. Implementing preconception expanded carrier screening in a universal health care system: A model-based cost-effectiveness analysis. Genet Med 2023; 25:100943. [PMID: 37489580 DOI: 10.1016/j.gim.2023.100943] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2023] [Revised: 07/17/2023] [Accepted: 07/18/2023] [Indexed: 07/26/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The limited evidence available on the cost-effectiveness (CE) of expanded carrier screening (ECS) prevents its widespread use in most countries, including Italy. Herein, we aimed to estimate the CE of 3 ECS panels (ie, American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics [ACMG] Tier 1 screening, "Focused Screening," testing 15 severe, highly penetrant conditions, and ACMG Tier 3 screening) compared with no screening, the health care model currently adopted in Italy. METHODS The reference population consisted of Italian couples seeking pregnancy with no increased personal/familial genetic risk. The CE model was developed from the perspective of the Italian universal health care system and was based on the following assumptions: 100% sensitivity of investigated screening strategies, 77% intervention rate of at-risk couples (ARCs), and no risk to conceive an affected child by risk-averse couples opting for medical interventions. RESULTS The incremental CE ratios generated by comparing each genetic screening panel with no screening were: -14,875 ± 1,208 €/life years gained (LYG) for ACMG1S, -106,863 ± 2,379 €/LYG for Focused Screening, and -47,277 ± 1,430 €/LYG for ACMG3S. ACMG1S and Focused Screening were dominated by ACMG3S. The parameter uncertainty did not significantly affect the outcome of the analyses. CONCLUSION From a universal health care system perspective, all the 3 ECS panels considered in the study would be more cost-effective than no screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Busnelli
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele-Milan, Italy; IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano-Milan, Italy.
| | - Oriana Ciani
- Center for Research on Health and Social Care Management, SDA Bocconi, Milan, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Paolo Emanuele Levi-Setti
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele-Milan, Italy; IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano-Milan, Italy
| | - Rosanna Tarricone
- Center for Research on Health and Social Care Management, SDA Bocconi, Milan, Italy; Department of Social and Political Science, Bocconi University, Milan, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Carrier Screening Programs for Cystic Fibrosis, Fragile X Syndrome, Hemoglobinopathies and Thalassemia, and Spinal Muscular Atrophy: A Health Technology Assessment. ONTARIO HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT SERIES 2023; 23:1-398. [PMID: 37637488 PMCID: PMC10453298] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/29/2023]
Abstract
Background We conducted a health technology assessment to evaluate the safety, effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness of carrier screening programs for cystic fibrosis (CF), fragile X syndrome (FXS), hemoglobinopathies and thalassemia, and spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) in people who are considering a pregnancy or who are pregnant. We also evaluated the budget impact of publicly funding carrier screening programs, and patient preferences and values. Methods We performed a systematic literature search of the clinical evidence. We assessed the risk of bias of each included study using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool and the Risk of Bias Assessment tool for Non-randomized Studies (RoBANS), and the quality of the body of evidence according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) Working Group criteria. We performed a systematic economic literature search and conducted cost-effectiveness analyses comparing preconception or prenatal carrier screening programs to no screening. We considered four carrier screening strategies: 1) universal screening with standard panels; 2) universal screening with a hypothetical expanded panel; 3) risk-based screening with standard panels; and 4) risk-based screening with a hypothetical expanded panel. We also estimated the 5-year budget impact of publicly funding preconception or prenatal carrier screening programs for the given conditions in Ontario. To contextualize the potential value of carrier screening, we spoke with 22 people who had sought out carrier screening. Results We included 107 studies in the clinical evidence review. Carrier screening for CF, hemoglobinopathies and thalassemia, FXS, and SMA likely results in the identification of couples with an increased chance of having an affected pregnancy (GRADE: Moderate). Screening likely impacts reproductive decision-making (GRADE: Moderate) and may result in lower anxiety among pregnant people, although the evidence is uncertain (GRADE: Very low).We included 21 studies in the economic evidence review, but none of the study findings were directly applicable to the Ontario context. Our cost-effectiveness analyses showed that in the short term, preconception or prenatal carrier screening programs identified more at-risk pregnancies (i.e., couples that tested positive) and provided more reproductive choice options compared with no screening, but were associated with higher costs. While all screening strategies had similar values for health outcomes, when comparing all strategies together, universal screening with standard panels was the most cost-effective strategy for both preconception and prenatal periods. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) of universal screening with standard panels compared with no screening in the preconception period were $29,106 per additional at-risk pregnancy detected and $367,731 per affected birth averted; the corresponding ICERs in the prenatal period were about $29,759 per additional at-risk pregnancy detected and $431,807 per affected birth averted.We estimated that publicly funding a universal carrier screening program in the preconception period over the next 5 years would require between $208 million and $491 million. Publicly funding a risk-based screening program in the preconception period over the next 5 years would require between $1.3 million and $2.7 million. Publicly funding a universal carrier screening program in the prenatal period over the next 5 years would require between $128 million and $305 million. Publicly funding a risk-based screening program in the prenatal period over the next 5 years would require between $0.8 million and $1.7 million. Accounting for treatment costs of the screened health conditions resulted in a decrease in the budget impact of universally provided carrier screening programs or cost savings for risk-based programs.Participants value the perceived potential positive impact of carrier screening programs such as medical benefits from early detection and treatment, information for reproductive decision-making, and the social benefit of awareness and preparation. There was a strong preference expressed for thorough, timely, unbiased information to allow for informed reproductive decision-making. Conclusions Carrier screening for CF, FXS, hemoglobinopathies and thalassemia, and SMA is effective at identifying at-risk couples, and test results may impact preconception and reproductive decision-making.The cost-effectiveness and budget impact of carrier screening programs are uncertain for Ontario. Over the short term, carrier screening programs are associated with higher costs, and also higher chances of detecting at-risk pregnancies compared with no screening. The 5-year budget impact of publicly funding universal carrier screening programs is larger than that of risk-based programs. However, accounting for treatment costs of the screened health conditions results in a decrease in the total additional costs for universal carrier screening programs or in cost savings for risk-based programs.The people we spoke with who had sought out carrier screening valued the potential medical benefits of early detection and treatment, particularly the support and preparation for having a child with a potential genetic condition.
Collapse
|
9
|
O'Brien TD, Potter AB, Driscoll CC, Goh G, Letaw JH, McCabe S, Thanner J, Kulkarni A, Wong R, Medica S, Week T, Buitrago J, Larson A, Camacho KJ, Brown K, Crist R, Conrad C, Evans-Dutson S, Lutz R, Mitchell A, Anur P, Serrato V, Shafer A, Marriott LK, Hamman KJ, Mulford A, Wiszniewski W, Sampson JE, Adey A, O'Roak BJ, Harrington CA, Shannon J, Spellman PT, Richards CS. Population screening shows risk of inherited cancer and familial hypercholesterolemia in Oregon. Am J Hum Genet 2023; 110:1249-1265. [PMID: 37506692 PMCID: PMC10432140 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2023.06.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2023] [Revised: 06/28/2023] [Accepted: 06/29/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023] Open
Abstract
The Healthy Oregon Project (HOP) is a statewide effort that aims to build a large research repository and influence the health of Oregonians through providing no-cost genetic screening to participants for a next-generation sequencing 32-gene panel comprising genes related to inherited cancers and familial hypercholesterolemia. This type of unbiased population screening can detect at-risk individuals who may otherwise be missed by conventional medical approaches. However, challenges exist for this type of high-throughput testing in an academic setting, including developing a low-cost high-efficiency test and scaling up the clinical laboratory for processing large numbers of samples. Modifications to our academic clinical laboratory including efficient test design, robotics, and a streamlined analysis approach increased our ability to test more than 1,000 samples per month for HOP using only one dedicated HOP laboratory technologist. Additionally, enrollment using a HIPAA-compliant smartphone app and sample collection using mouthwash increased efficiency and reduced cost. Here, we present our experience three years into HOP and discuss the lessons learned, including our successes, challenges, opportunities, and future directions, as well as the genetic screening results for the first 13,670 participants tested. Overall, we have identified 730 pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants in 710 participants in 24 of the 32 genes on the panel. The carrier rate for pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants in the inherited cancer genes on the panel for an unselected population was 5.0% and for familial hypercholesterolemia was 0.3%. Our laboratory experience described here may provide a useful model for population screening projects in other states.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy D O'Brien
- Knight Diagnostic Laboratories, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA
| | - Amiee B Potter
- Knight Diagnostic Laboratories, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA
| | - Catherine C Driscoll
- Knight Diagnostic Laboratories, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA; Cancer Early Detection Advanced Research Center, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97201, USA
| | - Gregory Goh
- Knight Diagnostic Laboratories, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA; Cancer Early Detection Advanced Research Center, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97201, USA
| | - John H Letaw
- Knight Diagnostic Laboratories, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA
| | - Sarah McCabe
- Knight Diagnostic Laboratories, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA
| | - Jane Thanner
- Information Technology Group, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97201, USA
| | - Arpita Kulkarni
- Knight Diagnostic Laboratories, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA
| | - Rossana Wong
- Knight Diagnostic Laboratories, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA
| | - Samuel Medica
- Integrated Genomics Laboratory, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA
| | - Tiana Week
- Integrated Genomics Laboratory, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA
| | - Jacob Buitrago
- Integrated Genomics Laboratory, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA
| | - Aaron Larson
- Integrated Genomics Laboratory, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA
| | - Katie Johnson Camacho
- Cancer Early Detection Advanced Research Center, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97201, USA
| | - Kim Brown
- Knight Cancer Institute, Community Outreach and Engagement, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97201, USA
| | - Rachel Crist
- Knight Cancer Institute, Community Outreach and Engagement, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97201, USA
| | - Casey Conrad
- Cancer Early Detection Advanced Research Center, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97201, USA
| | - Sara Evans-Dutson
- Cancer Early Detection Advanced Research Center, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97201, USA
| | - Ryan Lutz
- Knight Cancer Institute, Community Outreach and Engagement, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97201, USA
| | - Asia Mitchell
- Cancer Early Detection Advanced Research Center, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97201, USA
| | - Pavana Anur
- Cancer Early Detection Advanced Research Center, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97201, USA
| | - Vanessa Serrato
- Knight Cancer Institute, Community Outreach and Engagement, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97201, USA
| | - Autumn Shafer
- University of Oregon, School of Journalism and Communication, Portland, OR 97209, USA
| | | | - K J Hamman
- Department of Molecular & Medical Genetics, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA
| | - Amelia Mulford
- Department of Molecular & Medical Genetics, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA
| | - Wojciech Wiszniewski
- Department of Molecular & Medical Genetics, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA
| | - Jone E Sampson
- Department of Molecular & Medical Genetics, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA
| | - Andrew Adey
- Cancer Early Detection Advanced Research Center, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97201, USA; Department of Molecular & Medical Genetics, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA
| | - Brian J O'Roak
- Department of Molecular & Medical Genetics, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA
| | - Christina A Harrington
- Integrated Genomics Laboratory, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA; Department of Molecular & Medical Genetics, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA
| | - Jackilen Shannon
- Knight Cancer Institute, Community Outreach and Engagement, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97201, USA; Division of Oncological Sciences, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA
| | - Paul T Spellman
- Cancer Early Detection Advanced Research Center, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97201, USA; Department of Molecular & Medical Genetics, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA
| | - C Sue Richards
- Knight Diagnostic Laboratories, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA; Department of Molecular & Medical Genetics, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Xi Q, Jin S, Morris S. Economic evaluations of predictive genetic testing: A scoping review. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0276572. [PMID: 37531363 PMCID: PMC10395838 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276572] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2022] [Accepted: 04/03/2023] [Indexed: 08/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Predictive genetic testing can provide information about whether or not someone will develop or is likely to develop a specific condition at a later stage in life. Economic evaluation can assess the value of money for such testing. Studies on the economic evaluation of predictive genetic testing have been carried out in a variety of settings, and this research aims to conduct a scoping review of findings from these studies. We searched the PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane databases with combined search terms, from 2019 to 2022. Relevant studies from 2013 to 2019 in a previous systematic review were also included. The study followed the recommended stages for undertaking a scoping review. A total of 53 studies were included, including 33 studies from the previous review and 20 studies from the search of databases. A significant number of studies focused on the US, UK, and Australia (34%, 23%, and 11%). The most frequently included health conditions were cancer and cardiovascular diseases (68% and 19%). Over half of the studies compared predictive genetic testing with no genetic testing, and the majority of them concluded that at least some type of genetic testing was cost-effective compared to no testing (94%). Some studies stated that predictive genetic testing is becoming more cost-effective with the trend of lowering genetic testing costs. Studies on predictive genetic testing covered various health conditions, particularly cancer and cardiovascular diseases. Most studies indicated that predictive genetic testing is cost-effective compared to no testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qin Xi
- Primary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Shihan Jin
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Health Economics, Leonard D. Schaeffer Center for Health Policy and Economics, School of Pharmacy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
| | - Stephen Morris
- Primary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Guzauskas GF, Garbett S, Zhou Z, Schildcrout JS, Graves JA, Williams MS, Hao J, Jones LK, Spencer SJ, Jiang S, Veenstra DL, Peterson JF. Population Genomic Screening for Three Common Hereditary Conditions : A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. Ann Intern Med 2023; 176:585-595. [PMID: 37155986 DOI: 10.7326/m22-0846] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The cost-effectiveness of screening the U.S. population for Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Tier 1 genomic conditions is unknown. OBJECTIVE To estimate the cost-effectiveness of simultaneous genomic screening for Lynch syndrome (LS), hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome (HBOC), and familial hypercholesterolemia (FH). DESIGN Decision analytic Markov model. DATA SOURCES Published literature. TARGET POPULATION Separate age-based cohorts (ages 20 to 60 years at time of screening) of racially and ethnically representative U.S. adults. TIME HORIZON Lifetime. PERSPECTIVE U.S. health care payer. INTERVENTION Population genomic screening using clinical sequencing with a restricted panel of high-evidence genes, cascade testing of first-degree relatives, and recommended preventive interventions for identified probands. OUTCOME MEASURES Incident breast, ovarian, and colorectal cancer cases; incident cardiovascular events; quality-adjusted survival; and costs. RESULTS OF BASE-CASE ANALYSIS Screening 100 000 unselected 30-year-olds resulted in 101 (95% uncertainty interval [UI], 77 to 127) fewer overall cancer cases and 15 (95% UI, 4 to 28) fewer cardiovascular events and an increase of 495 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) (95% UI, 401 to 757) at an incremental cost of $33.9 million (95% UI, $27.0 million to $41.1 million). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was $68 600 per QALY gained (95% UI, $41 800 to $88 900). RESULTS OF SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS Screening 30-, 40-, and 50-year-old cohorts was cost-effective in 99%, 88%, and 19% of probabilistic simulations, respectively, at a $100 000-per-QALY threshold. The test costs at which screening 30-, 40-, and 50-year-olds reached the $100 000-per-QALY threshold were $413, $290, and $166, respectively. Variant prevalence and adherence to preventive interventions were also highly influential parameters. LIMITATIONS Population averages for model inputs, which were derived predominantly from European populations, vary across ancestries and health care environments. CONCLUSION Population genomic screening with a restricted panel of high-evidence genes associated with 3 CDC Tier 1 conditions is likely to be cost-effective in U.S. adults younger than 40 years if the testing cost is relatively low and probands have access to preventive interventions. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE National Human Genome Research Institute.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gregory F Guzauskas
- The CHOICE Institute, Department of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (G.F.G., S.J.)
| | - Shawn Garbett
- Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee (S.G., J.S.S.)
| | - Zilu Zhou
- Department of Health Policy, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee (Z.Z., J.A.G.)
| | - Jonathan S Schildcrout
- Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee (S.G., J.S.S.)
| | - John A Graves
- Department of Health Policy, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee (Z.Z., J.A.G.)
| | - Marc S Williams
- Department of Genomic Health, Geisinger, Danville, Pennsylvania (M.S.W.)
| | - Jing Hao
- Department of Genomic Health and Department of Population Health Sciences, Geisinger, Danville, Pennsylvania (J.H.)
| | - Laney K Jones
- Department of Population Health Sciences and Heart Institute, Geisinger, Danville, Pennsylvania (L.K.J.)
| | - Scott J Spencer
- Institute for Public Health Genetics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (S.J.S.)
| | - Shangqing Jiang
- The CHOICE Institute, Department of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (G.F.G., S.J.)
| | - David L Veenstra
- The CHOICE Institute, Department of Pharmacy, and Institute for Public Health Genetics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington (D.L.V.)
| | - Josh F Peterson
- Department of Biomedical Informatics and Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee (J.F.P.)
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Dikilitas O, Sherafati A, Saadatagah S, Satterfield BA, Kochan DC, Anderson KC, Chung WK, Hebbring SJ, Salvati ZM, Sharp RR, Sturm AC, Gibbs RA, Rowley R, Venner E, Linder JE, Jones LK, Perez EF, Peterson JF, Jarvik GP, Rehm HL, Zouk H, Roden DM, Williams MS, Manolio TA, Kullo IJ. Familial Hypercholesterolemia in the Electronic Medical Records and Genomics Network: Prevalence, Penetrance, Cardiovascular Risk, and Outcomes After Return of Results. CIRCULATION. GENOMIC AND PRECISION MEDICINE 2023; 16:e003816. [PMID: 37071725 PMCID: PMC10113961 DOI: 10.1161/circgen.122.003816] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2022] [Accepted: 01/03/2023] [Indexed: 02/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The implications of secondary findings detected in large-scale sequencing projects remain uncertain. We assessed prevalence and penetrance of pathogenic familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) variants, their association with coronary heart disease (CHD), and 1-year outcomes following return of results in phase III of the electronic medical records and genomics network. METHODS Adult participants (n=18 544) at 7 sites were enrolled in a prospective cohort study to assess the clinical impact of returning results from targeted sequencing of 68 actionable genes, including LDLR, APOB, and PCSK9. FH variant prevalence and penetrance (defined as low-density lipoprotein cholesterol >155 mg/dL) were estimated after excluding participants enrolled on the basis of hypercholesterolemia. Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate the odds of CHD compared to age- and sex-matched controls without FH-associated variants. Process (eg, referral to a specialist or ordering new tests), intermediate (eg, new diagnosis of FH), and clinical (eg, treatment modification) outcomes within 1 year after return of results were ascertained by electronic health record review. RESULTS The prevalence of FH-associated pathogenic variants was 1 in 188 (69 of 13,019 unselected participants). Penetrance was 87.5%. The presence of an FH variant was associated with CHD (odds ratio, 3.02 [2.00-4.53]) and premature CHD (odds ratio, 3.68 [2.34-5.78]). At least 1 outcome occurred in 92% of participants; 44% received a new diagnosis of FH and 26% had treatment modified following return of results. CONCLUSIONS In a multisite cohort of electronic health record-linked biobanks, monogenic FH was prevalent, penetrant, and associated with presence of CHD. Nearly half of participants with an FH-associated variant received a new diagnosis of FH and a quarter had treatment modified after return of results. These results highlight the potential utility of sequencing electronic health record-linked biobanks to detect FH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ozan Dikilitas
- Department of Internal Medicine (O.D.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine (O.D., A.S., S.S., B.A.S., D.C.K., I.J.K.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Alborz Sherafati
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine (O.D., A.S., S.S., B.A.S., D.C.K., I.J.K.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Seyedmohammad Saadatagah
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine (O.D., A.S., S.S., B.A.S., D.C.K., I.J.K.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Benjamin A Satterfield
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine (O.D., A.S., S.S., B.A.S., D.C.K., I.J.K.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - David C Kochan
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine (O.D., A.S., S.S., B.A.S., D.C.K., I.J.K.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Katherine C Anderson
- Department of Medicine (K.C.A., J.E.L., J.F.P.), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Wendy K Chung
- Departments of Pediatrics and Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York (W.K.C.)
| | | | - Zachary M Salvati
- Genomic Medicine Institute, Geisinger, Danville, PA (Z.M.S., A.C.S., L.K.J., M.S.W.)
| | - Richard R Sharp
- Biomedical Ethics Research Program (R.R.S.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Amy C Sturm
- Genomic Medicine Institute, Geisinger, Danville, PA (Z.M.S., A.C.S., L.K.J., M.S.W.)
| | - Richard A Gibbs
- Human Genome Sequencing Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX (R.A.G., E.V.)
| | - Robb Rowley
- National Human Genome Research Institute, Bethesda, MD (R.R., T.A.M.)
| | - Eric Venner
- Human Genome Sequencing Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX (R.A.G., E.V.)
| | - Jodell E Linder
- Department of Medicine (K.C.A., J.E.L., J.F.P.), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Laney K Jones
- Genomic Medicine Institute, Geisinger, Danville, PA (Z.M.S., A.C.S., L.K.J., M.S.W.)
| | - Emma F Perez
- Division of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA (E.F.P.)
| | - Josh F Peterson
- Department of Medicine (K.C.A., J.E.L., J.F.P.), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Gail P Jarvik
- Departments of Medicine (Medical Genetics) and Genome Sciences, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle (G.P.J.)
| | - Heidi L Rehm
- Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Partners Healthcare Personalized Medicine, Cambridge (H.L.R., H.Z.)
| | - Hana Zouk
- Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Partners Healthcare Personalized Medicine, Cambridge (H.L.R., H.Z.)
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston (H.Z.)
| | - Dan M Roden
- Departments of Medicine, Pharmacology, and Biomedical Informatics (D.M.R.), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Marc S Williams
- Genomic Medicine Institute, Geisinger, Danville, PA (Z.M.S., A.C.S., L.K.J., M.S.W.)
| | - Teri A Manolio
- National Human Genome Research Institute, Bethesda, MD (R.R., T.A.M.)
| | - Iftikhar J Kullo
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine (O.D., A.S., S.S., B.A.S., D.C.K., I.J.K.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
- Gonda Vascular Ctr (I.J.K.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Lacaze P, Manchanda R, Green RC. Prioritizing the detection of rare pathogenic variants in population screening. Nat Rev Genet 2023; 24:205-206. [PMID: 36639513 DOI: 10.1038/s41576-022-00571-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Lacaze
- Public Health Genomics, Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
| | - Ranjit Manchanda
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, CRUK Barts Centre, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK
- Department of Health Services Research, Faculty of Public Health & Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Robert C Green
- Mass General Brigham, Broad Institute, Ariadne Labs and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Stoltze UK, Hagen CM, van Overeem Hansen T, Byrjalsen A, Gerdes AM, Yakimov V, Rasmussen S, Bækvad-Hansen M, Hougaard DM, Schmiegelow K, Hjalgrim H, Wadt K, Bybjerg-Grauholm J. Combinatorial batching of DNA for ultralow-cost detection of pathogenic variants. Genome Med 2023; 15:17. [PMID: 36918911 PMCID: PMC10013285 DOI: 10.1186/s13073-023-01167-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2022] [Accepted: 02/28/2023] [Indexed: 03/16/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Next-generation sequencing (NGS) based population screening holds great promise for disease prevention and earlier diagnosis, but the costs associated with screening millions of humans remain prohibitive. New methods for population genetic testing that lower the costs of NGS without compromising diagnostic power are needed. METHODS We developed double batched sequencing where DNA samples are batch-sequenced twice - directly pinpointing individuals with rare variants. We sequenced batches of at-birth blood spot DNA using a commercial 113-gene panel in an explorative (n = 100) and a validation (n = 100) cohort of children who went on to develop pediatric cancers. All results were benchmarked against individual whole genome sequencing data. RESULTS We demonstrated fully replicable detection of cancer-causing germline variants, with positive and negative predictive values of 100% (95% CI, 0.91-1.00 and 95% CI, 0.98-1.00, respectively). Pathogenic and clinically actionable variants were detected in RB1, TP53, BRCA2, APC, and 19 other genes. Analyses of larger batches indicated that our approach is highly scalable, yielding more than 95% cost reduction or less than 3 cents per gene screened for rare disease-causing mutations. We also show that double batched sequencing could cost-effectively prevent childhood cancer deaths through broad genomic testing. CONCLUSIONS Our ultracheap genetic diagnostic method, which uses existing sequencing hardware and standard newborn blood spots, should readily open up opportunities for population-wide risk stratification using genetic screening across many fields of clinical genetics and genomics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ulrik Kristoffer Stoltze
- Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, KBH Ø, Denmark. .,Department of Clinical Genetics, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, KBH Ø, Denmark.
| | - Christian Munch Hagen
- Department of Congenital Disorders, Statens Serum Institute, 2300, KBH S, Artillerivej 5, Denmark
| | - Thomas van Overeem Hansen
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, KBH Ø, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Copenhagen University, Blegdamsvej 3B, 2200, KBH N, Denmark
| | - Anna Byrjalsen
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, KBH Ø, Denmark
| | - Anne-Marie Gerdes
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, KBH Ø, Denmark
| | - Victor Yakimov
- Department of Congenital Disorders, Statens Serum Institute, 2300, KBH S, Artillerivej 5, Denmark
| | - Simon Rasmussen
- Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research, Copenhagen University, Blegdamsvej 3B, 2200, KBH N, Denmark
| | - Marie Bækvad-Hansen
- Department of Congenital Disorders, Statens Serum Institute, 2300, KBH S, Artillerivej 5, Denmark
| | - David Michael Hougaard
- Department of Congenital Disorders, Statens Serum Institute, 2300, KBH S, Artillerivej 5, Denmark
| | - Kjeld Schmiegelow
- Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, KBH Ø, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Copenhagen University, Blegdamsvej 3B, 2200, KBH N, Denmark
| | - Henrik Hjalgrim
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Copenhagen University, Blegdamsvej 3B, 2200, KBH N, Denmark.,Danish Cancer Society Research Centre, Danish Cancer Society, Strandboulevarden 49, 2100, KBH Ø, Denmark.,Department of Epidemiology Research, Statens Serum Institut, 2300, KBH S, Artillerivej 5, Denmark.,Department of Haematology, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark
| | - Karin Wadt
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, KBH Ø, Denmark
| | - Jonas Bybjerg-Grauholm
- Department of Congenital Disorders, Statens Serum Institute, 2300, KBH S, Artillerivej 5, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Li R, Liu H, Fairley CK, Ong JJ, Guo Y, Lu P, Zou Z, Xie L, Zhuang G, Li Y, Shen M, Zhang L. mRNA-based COVID-19 booster vaccination is highly effective and cost-effective in Australia. Vaccine 2023; 41:2439-2446. [PMID: 36781332 PMCID: PMC9894775 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.01.075] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2022] [Revised: 01/30/2023] [Accepted: 01/31/2023] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Australia implemented an mRNA-based booster vaccination strategy against the COVID-19 Omicron variant in November 2021. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the booster strategy over 180 days. METHODS We developed a decision-analytic Markov model of COVID-19 to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of a booster strategy (administered 3 months after 2nd dose) in those aged ≥ 16 years, from a healthcare system perspective. The willingness-to-pay threshold was chosen as A$ 50,000. RESULTS Compared with 2-doses of COVID-19 vaccines without a booster, Australia's booster strategy would incur an additional cost of A$0.88 billion but save A$1.28 billion in direct medical cost and gain 670 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) in 180 days of its implementation. This suggested the booster strategy is cost-saving, corresponding to a benefit-cost ratio of 1.45 and a net monetary benefit of A$0.43 billion. The strategy would prevent 1.32 million new infections, 65,170 hospitalisations, 6,927 ICU admissions and 1,348 deaths from COVID-19 in 180 days. Further, a universal booster strategy of having all individuals vaccinated with the booster shot immediately once their eligibility is met would have resulted in a gain of 1,599 QALYs, a net monetary benefit of A$1.46 billion and a benefit-cost ratio of 1.95 in 180 days. CONCLUSION The COVID-19 booster strategy implemented in Australia is likely to be effective and cost-effective for the Omicron epidemic. Universal booster vaccination would have further improved its effectiveness and cost-effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rui Li
- China-Australia Joint Research Center for Infectious Diseases, School of Public Health, Xi'an Jiaotong University Health Science Center, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710061, China
| | - Hanting Liu
- China-Australia Joint Research Center for Infectious Diseases, School of Public Health, Xi'an Jiaotong University Health Science Center, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710061, China
| | - Christopher K Fairley
- China-Australia Joint Research Center for Infectious Diseases, School of Public Health, Xi'an Jiaotong University Health Science Center, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710061, China; Melbourne Sexual Health Centre, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia; Central Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Jason J Ong
- China-Australia Joint Research Center for Infectious Diseases, School of Public Health, Xi'an Jiaotong University Health Science Center, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710061, China; Melbourne Sexual Health Centre, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia; Central Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Yuming Guo
- China-Australia Joint Research Center for Infectious Diseases, School of Public Health, Xi'an Jiaotong University Health Science Center, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710061, China; Melbourne Sexual Health Centre, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia; Central Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Pengyi Lu
- China-Australia Joint Research Center for Infectious Diseases, School of Public Health, Xi'an Jiaotong University Health Science Center, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710061, China
| | - Zhuoru Zou
- China-Australia Joint Research Center for Infectious Diseases, School of Public Health, Xi'an Jiaotong University Health Science Center, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710061, China
| | - Li Xie
- China-Australia Joint Research Center for Infectious Diseases, School of Public Health, Xi'an Jiaotong University Health Science Center, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710061, China
| | - Guihua Zhuang
- China-Australia Joint Research Center for Infectious Diseases, School of Public Health, Xi'an Jiaotong University Health Science Center, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710061, China; Key Laboratory for Disease Prevention and Control and Health Promotion of Shaanxi Province, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710061, China
| | - Yan Li
- Department of Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA; Department of Obstetrics, Gynaecology, and Reproductive Science, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Mingwang Shen
- China-Australia Joint Research Center for Infectious Diseases, School of Public Health, Xi'an Jiaotong University Health Science Center, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710061, China; Key Laboratory for Disease Prevention and Control and Health Promotion of Shaanxi Province, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710061, China.
| | - Lei Zhang
- China-Australia Joint Research Center for Infectious Diseases, School of Public Health, Xi'an Jiaotong University Health Science Center, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710061, China; Melbourne Sexual Health Centre, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia; Central Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, College of Public Health, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, Henan, China.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Real World Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Population Screening for BRCA Variants among Ashkenazi Jews Compared with Family History-Based Strategies. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14246113. [PMID: 36551598 PMCID: PMC9776581 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14246113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2022] [Revised: 11/24/2022] [Accepted: 12/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Identifying carriers of pathogenic BRCA1/BRCA2 variants reduces cancer morbidity and mortality through surveillance and prevention. We analyzed the cost-effectiveness of BRCA1/BRCA2 population screening (PS) in Ashkenazi Jews (AJ), for whom carrier rate is 2.5%, compared with two existing strategies: cascade testing (CT) in carrier’s relatives (≥25% carrier probability) and international family history (IFH)-based guidelines (>10% probability). We used a decision analytic-model to estimate quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) gained, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for PS vs. alternative strategies. Analysis was conducted from payer-perspective, based on actual costs. Per 1000 women, the model predicted 21.6 QALYs gained, a lifetime decrease of three breast cancer (BC) and four ovarian cancer (OC) cases for PS vs. CT, and 6.3 QALYs gained, a lifetime decrease of 1 BC and 1 OC cases comparing PS vs. IFH. PS was less costly compared with CT (−3097 USD/QALY), and more costly than IFH (+42,261 USD/QALY), yet still cost-effective, from a public health policy perspective. Our results are robust to sensitivity analysis; PS was the most effective strategy in all analyses. PS is highly cost-effective, and the most effective screening strategy for breast and ovarian cancer prevention. BRCA testing should be available to all AJ women, irrespective of family history.
Collapse
|
17
|
Wildin RS, Gerrard DL, Leonard DGB. Real-World Results from Combined Screening for Monogenic Genomic Health Risks and Reproductive Risks in 300 Adults. J Pers Med 2022; 12:jpm12121962. [PMID: 36556183 PMCID: PMC9782229 DOI: 10.3390/jpm12121962] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2022] [Revised: 10/28/2022] [Accepted: 11/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
New methods and demonstrations of feasibility guide future implementation of genomic population health screening programs. This is the first report of genomic population screening in a primary care, non-research setting using existing large carrier and health risk gene sequencing panels combined into one 432-gene test that is offered to adults of any health status. This report summarizes basic demographic data and analyses patterns of pathogenic and likely pathogenic genetic findings for the first 300 individuals tested in this real-world scenario. We devised a classification system for gene results to facilitate clear message development for our Genomic Medicine Action Plan messaging tool used to summarize and activate results for patients and primary care providers. Potential genetic health risks of various magnitudes for a broad range of disorders were identified in 16% to 34% of tested individuals. The frequency depends on criteria used for the type and penetrance of risk. 86% of individuals are carriers for one or more recessive diseases. Detecting, reporting, and guiding response to diverse genetic health risks and recessive carrier states in a single primary care genomic screening test appears feasible and effective. This is an important step toward exploring an exome or genome sequence as a multi-purpose clinical screening tool.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert S. Wildin
- Laboratory Medicine and Pediatrics & Departments of Pathology, Robert Larner M.D. College of Medicine at the University of Vermont, University of Vermont Health Network, Burlington, VT 05401, USA
- Correspondence:
| | - Diana L. Gerrard
- Laboratory Medicine & Department of Pathology, University of Vermont Medical Center, Burlington, VT 05401, USA
| | - Debra G. B. Leonard
- Laboratory Medicine & Department of Pathology, Robert Larner M.D. College of Medicine at the University of Vermont, University of Vermont Health Network, Burlington, VT 05401, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Mighton C, Shickh S, Aguda V, Krishnapillai S, Adi-Wauran E, Bombard Y. From the patient to the population: Use of genomics for population screening. Front Genet 2022; 13:893832. [PMID: 36353115 PMCID: PMC9637971 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2022.893832] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2022] [Accepted: 09/26/2022] [Indexed: 10/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Genomic medicine is expanding from a focus on diagnosis at the patient level to prevention at the population level given the ongoing under-ascertainment of high-risk and actionable genetic conditions using current strategies, particularly hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC), Lynch Syndrome (LS) and familial hypercholesterolemia (FH). The availability of large-scale next-generation sequencing strategies and preventive options for these conditions makes it increasingly feasible to screen pre-symptomatic individuals through public health-based approaches, rather than restricting testing to high-risk groups. This raises anew, and with urgency, questions about the limits of screening as well as the moral authority and capacity to screen for genetic conditions at a population level. We aimed to answer some of these critical questions by using the WHO Wilson and Jungner criteria to guide a synthesis of current evidence on population genomic screening for HBOC, LS, and FH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chloe Mighton
- Genomics Health Services Research Program, St. Michael’s Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Salma Shickh
- Genomics Health Services Research Program, St. Michael’s Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Vernie Aguda
- Genomics Health Services Research Program, St. Michael’s Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Centre for Medical Education, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - Suvetha Krishnapillai
- Genomics Health Services Research Program, St. Michael’s Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Ella Adi-Wauran
- Genomics Health Services Research Program, St. Michael’s Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Yvonne Bombard
- Genomics Health Services Research Program, St. Michael’s Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Manchanda R, Sideris M. Population based genetic testing for cancer susceptibility genes: quo vadis. BJOG 2022; 130:125-130. [PMID: 36017754 PMCID: PMC10087260 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.17283] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2022] [Revised: 07/23/2022] [Accepted: 08/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Ranjit Manchanda
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Barts CRUK Cancer Centre, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London EC1M 6BQ, UK.,Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Barts Health NH Trust, EC1A 7BE, London, UK.,Department of Health Services Research and Policy, School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London WC1H 9SH, London, UK.,Department of Gynaecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Michail Sideris
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Barts CRUK Cancer Centre, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London EC1M 6BQ, UK.,Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Barts Health NH Trust, EC1A 7BE, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Jürgens H, Roht L, Leitsalu L, Nõukas M, Palover M, Nikopensius T, Reigo A, Kals M, Kallak K, Kütner R, Budrikas K, Kuusk S, Valvere V, Laidre P, Toome K, Rekker K, Tooming M, Ülle Murumets, Kahre T, Kruuv-Käo K, Õunap K, Padrik P, Metspalu A, Esko T, Fischer K, Tõnisson N. Precise, Genotype-First Breast Cancer Prevention: Experience With Transferring Monogenic Findings From a Population Biobank to the Clinical Setting. Front Genet 2022; 13:881100. [PMID: 35938029 PMCID: PMC9355130 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2022.881100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2022] [Accepted: 06/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Although hereditary breast cancer screening and management are well accepted and established in clinical settings, these efforts result in the detection of only a fraction of genetic predisposition at the population level. Here, we describe our experience from a national pilot study (2018–2021) in which 180 female participants of Estonian biobank (of >150,000 participants in total) were re-contacted to discuss personalized clinical prevention measures based on their genetic predisposition defined by 11 breast cancer–related genes. Our results show that genetic risk variants are relatively common in the average-risk Estonian population. Seventy-five percent of breast cancer cases in at-risk subjects occurred before the age of 50 years. Only one-third of subjects would have been eligible for clinical screening according to the current criteria. The participants perceived the receipt of genetic risk information as valuable. Fluent cooperation of project teams supported by state-of-art data management, quality control, and secure transfer can enable the integration of research results to everyday medical practice in a highly efficient, timely, and well-accepted manner. The positive experience in this genotype-first breast cancer study confirms the value of using existing basic genomic data from population biobanks for precise prevention.
Collapse
|
21
|
Cost-effectiveness of population-wide genomic screening for Lynch syndrome in the United States. Genet Med 2022; 24:1017-1026. [PMID: 35227606 DOI: 10.1016/j.gim.2022.01.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2021] [Revised: 01/21/2022] [Accepted: 01/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Genomic screening for Lynch syndrome (LS) could prevent colorectal cancer (CRC) by identifying high-risk patients and instituting intensive CRC screening. We estimated the cost-effectiveness of a population-wide LS genomic screening vs family history-based screening alone in an unselected US population. METHODS We developed a decision-analytic Markov model including health states for precancer, stage-specific CRC, and death and assumed an inexpensive test cost of $200. We conducted sensitivity and threshold analyses to evaluate model uncertainty. RESULTS Screening unselected 30-year-olds for LS variants resulted in 48 (95% credible range [CR] = 35-63) fewer overall CRC cases per 100,000 screened individuals, leading to 187 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs; 95% CR = 123-260) gained at an incremental cost of $24.6 million (95% CR = $20.3 million-$29.1 million). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was $132,200, with an 8% and 71% probability of being cost-effective at $100,000 and $150,000 per QALY willingness-to-pay thresholds, respectively. CONCLUSION Population LS screening may be cost-effective in younger patient populations under a $150,000 willingness-to-pay per QALY threshold and with a relatively inexpensive test cost. Further reductions in testing costs and/or the inclusion of LS testing within a broader multiplex screening panel are needed for screening to become highly cost-effective.
Collapse
|
22
|
Lacaze PA, Tiller J, Winship I, Lacaze P, Tiller J, Winship I, Brotchie A, McNeil J, Zalcberg J, Thomas D, Milne R, James P, Delatycki M, Young M, Nowak K, Nguyen‐Dumont T, Southey M, Ademi Z, Bruinsma F, Riaz M, Terrill B, Kirk J, Tucker K, Andrews L, Pachter N, Susman R, Poplawski N, Wallis M, Watts G, Nicholls S, Macrae F, Sturm A, Green R, Ahern S, Revote J, Von Saldern S, Powell S, Rice T. Population DNA screening for medically actionable disease risk in adults. Med J Aust 2022; 216:278-280. [PMID: 35267197 PMCID: PMC9314023 DOI: 10.5694/mja2.51454] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2021] [Revised: 01/10/2022] [Accepted: 01/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Ingrid Winship
- Royal Melbourne Hospital Melbourne VIC
- University of Melbourne Melbourne VIC
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Hull LE, Natarajan P. Self-rated family health history knowledge among All of Us program participants. Genet Med 2022; 24:955-961. [PMID: 35058155 PMCID: PMC8995381 DOI: 10.1016/j.gim.2021.12.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2021] [Revised: 12/12/2021] [Accepted: 12/14/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Disparities in access to genetics services are well-documented. Family health history is routinely used to determine whether patients should be screened for heritable conditions. We sought to explore variation in levels of self-rated family health history knowledge as a possible contributer to this disparity. METHODS We performed a cross-sectional analysis of survey data from the All of Us Research Program. We compared the characteristics of participants who reported "None," "Some", and "A lot" of family health history knowledge using multinomial logistic regression. RESULTS Self-rated family health history data were available for 116,799 participants. A minority of survey participants (37%) endorsed "A lot" of knowledge about their family health history (n = 43,661). Most participants (60%) endorsed "Some" family health history knowledge (n = 69,914) and 3% (n = 3224) endorsed "None." In adjusted analyses, those who indicated "Some" family health history knowledge or "None" were more likely to be assigned male sex at birth, identify as possible gender and sexual minorities, have a self-reported race other than White, have a lower household annual income (<$25,000), or report lower educational attainment ( CONCLUSION Family health history knowledge may be limited, especially among traditionally underserved populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leland E Hull
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
| | - Pradeep Natarajan
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Cardiovascular Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Program in Medical and Population Genetics and Cardiovascular Disease Initiative, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Simões Corrêa Galendi J, Kautz-Freimuth S, Stock S, Müller D. Uptake Rates of Risk-Reducing Surgeries for Women at Increased Risk of Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Applied to Cost-Effectiveness Analyses: A Scoping Systematic Review. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14071786. [PMID: 35406563 PMCID: PMC8997187 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14071786] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2021] [Revised: 03/23/2022] [Accepted: 03/26/2022] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary For women who have tested positive for BRCA mutations, the decision to make use of preventive surgical options, such as risk-reducing mastectomy (RRM) or risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO), depends on the women’s personal preferences and the cultural/social context. Among others, the cost-effectiveness of RRM and RRSO can be affected by the uptake rate of these preventive surgical options. Uptake rates of surgery should be given more attention in the conceptualization of health economic modeling studies for RRM and RRSO. Prospective multicenter studies are recommended to reflect regional and national variations in women’s preferences for preventive surgery. Abstract The cost-effectiveness of genetic screen-and-treat strategies for women at increased risk for breast and ovarian cancer often depends on the women’s willingness to make use of risk-reducing mastectomy (RRM) or salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO). To explore the uptake rates of RRM and RRSO applied in health economic modeling studies and the impact of uptake rates on the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER), we conducted a scoping literature review. In addition, using our own model, we conducted a value of information (VOI) analysis. Among the 19 models included in the review, the uptake rates of RRM ranged from 6% to 47% (RRSO: 10% to 88%). Fifty-seven percent of the models applied retrospective data obtained from registries, hospital records, or questionnaires. According to the models’ deterministic sensitivity analyses, there is a clear trend that a lower uptake rate increased the ICER and vice versa. Our VOI analysis showed high decision uncertainty associated with the uptake rates. In the future, uptake rates should be given more attention in the conceptualization of health economic modeling studies. Prospective studies are recommended to reflect regional and national variations in women’s preferences for preventive surgery.
Collapse
|
25
|
Johnson K, Saylor KW, Guynn I, Hicklin K, Berg JS, Lich KH. A systematic review of the methodological quality of economic evaluations in genetic screening and testing for monogenic disorders. Genet Med 2022; 24:262-288. [PMID: 34906467 PMCID: PMC8900524 DOI: 10.1016/j.gim.2021.10.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2021] [Accepted: 10/13/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Understanding the value of genetic screening and testing for monogenic disorders requires high-quality, methodologically robust economic evaluations. This systematic review sought to assess the methodological quality among such studies and examined opportunities for improvement. METHODS We searched PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, and Web of Science for economic evaluations of genetic screening/testing (2013-2019). Methodological rigor and adherence to best practices were systematically assessed using the British Medical Journal checklist. RESULTS Across the 47 identified studies, there were substantial variations in modeling approaches, reporting detail, and sophistication. Models ranged from simple decision trees to individual-level microsimulations that compared between 2 and >20 alternative interventions. Many studies failed to report sufficient detail to enable replication or did not justify modeling assumptions, especially for costing methods and utility values. Meta-analyses, systematic reviews, or calibration were rarely used to derive parameter estimates. Nearly all studies conducted some sensitivity analysis, and more sophisticated studies implemented probabilistic sensitivity/uncertainty analysis, threshold analysis, and value of information analysis. CONCLUSION We describe a heterogeneous body of work and present recommendations and exemplar studies across the methodological domains of (1) perspective, scope, and parameter selection; (2) use of uncertainty/sensitivity analyses; and (3) reporting transparency for improvement in the economic evaluation of genetic screening/testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karl Johnson
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Katherine W Saylor
- Department of Public Policy, College of Arts and Sciences, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Isabella Guynn
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Karen Hicklin
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Jonathan S Berg
- Department of Genetics, School of Medicine, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Kristen Hassmiller Lich
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Abstract
Increased demand for in vitro fertilization (IVF) due to socio-demographic trends, and supply facilitated by new technologies, converged to transform the way a substantial proportion of humans reproduce. The purpose of this article is to describe the societal and demographic trends driving increased worldwide demand for IVF, as well as to provide an overview of emerging technologies that promise to greatly expand IVF utilization and lower its cost.
Collapse
|
27
|
Blout Zawatsky CL, Shah N, Machini K, Perez E, Christensen KD, Zouk H, Steeves M, Koch C, Uveges M, Shea J, Gold N, Krier J, Boutin N, Mahanta L, Rehm HL, Weiss ST, Karlson EW, Smoller JW, Lebo MS, Green RC. Returning actionable genomic results in a research biobank: Analytic validity, clinical implementation, and resource utilization. Am J Hum Genet 2021; 108:2224-2237. [PMID: 34752750 PMCID: PMC8715145 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2021.10.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2021] [Accepted: 10/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Over 100 million research participants around the world have had research array-based genotyping (GT) or genome sequencing (GS), but only a small fraction of these have been offered return of actionable genomic findings (gRoR). Between 2017 and 2021, we analyzed genomic results from 36,417 participants in the Mass General Brigham Biobank and offered to confirm and return pathogenic and likely pathogenic variants (PLPVs) in 59 genes. Variant verification prior to participant recontact revealed that GT falsely identified PLPVs in 44.9% of samples, and GT failed to identify 72.0% of PLPVs detected in a subset of samples that were also sequenced. GT and GS detected verified PLPVs in 1% and 2.5% of the cohort, respectively. Of 256 participants who were alerted that they carried actionable PLPVs, 37.5% actively or passively declined further disclosure. 76.3% of those carrying PLPVs were unaware that they were carrying the variant, and over half of those met published professional criteria for genetic testing but had never been tested. This gRoR protocol cost approximately $129,000 USD per year in laboratory testing and research staff support, representing $14 per participant whose DNA was analyzed or $3,224 per participant in whom a PLPV was confirmed and disclosed. These data provide logistical details around gRoR that could help other investigators planning to return genomic results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carrie L Blout Zawatsky
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Medical and Population Genetics, Broad Institute, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA; Ariadne Labs, Boston, MA 02215, USA; The MGH Institute of Health Professions, Boston, MA 02129, USA
| | - Nidhi Shah
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Medical and Population Genetics, Broad Institute, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Kalotina Machini
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
| | - Emma Perez
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Kurt D Christensen
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Hana Zouk
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
| | - Marcie Steeves
- Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA; Center for Genomic Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | | | - Melissa Uveges
- Connell School of Nursing, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA 02467, USA
| | - Janelle Shea
- Division of Medical Genetics, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Nina Gold
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Center for Genomic Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
| | - Joel Krier
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Natalie Boutin
- Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
| | - Lisa Mahanta
- Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA; Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
| | - Heidi L Rehm
- Medical and Population Genetics, Broad Institute, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Center for Genomic Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
| | - Scott T Weiss
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA; Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
| | - Elizabeth W Karlson
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
| | - Jordan W Smoller
- Medical and Population Genetics, Broad Institute, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Center for Genomic Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
| | - Matthew S Lebo
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Medical and Population Genetics, Broad Institute, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA; Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
| | - Robert C Green
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Medical and Population Genetics, Broad Institute, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA; Ariadne Labs, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Reisel D, Baran C, Manchanda R. Preventive population genomics: The model of BRCA related cancers. ADVANCES IN GENETICS 2021; 108:1-33. [PMID: 34844711 DOI: 10.1016/bs.adgen.2021.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
Preventive population genomics offers the prospect of population stratification for targeting screening and prevention and tailoring care to those at greatest risk. Within cancer, this approach is now within reach, given our expanding knowledge of its heritable components, improved ability to predict risk, and increasing availability of effective preventive strategies. Advances in technology and bioinformatics has made population-testing technically feasible. The BRCA model provides 30 years of insight and experience of how to conceive of and construct care and serves as an initial model for preventive population genomics. Population-based BRCA-testing in the Jewish population is feasible, acceptable, reduces anxiety, does not detrimentally affect psychological well-being or quality of life, is cost-effective and is now beginning to be implemented. Population-based BRCA-testing and multigene panel testing in the wider general population is cost-effective for numerous health systems and can save thousands more lives than the current clinical strategy. There is huge potential for using both genetic and non-genetic information in complex risk prediction algorithms to stratify populations for risk adapted screening and prevention. While numerous strides have been made in the last decade several issues need resolving for population genomics to fulfil its promise and potential for maximizing precision prevention. Healthcare systems need to overcome significant challenges associated with developing delivery pathways, infrastructure expansion including laboratory services, clinical workforce training, scaling of management pathways for screening and prevention. Large-scale real world population studies are needed to evaluate context specific population-testing implementation models for cancer risk prediction, screening and prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dan Reisel
- EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Chawan Baran
- Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, CRUK Barts Centre, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London, United Kingdom
| | - Ranjit Manchanda
- Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, CRUK Barts Centre, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London, United Kingdom; Department of Gynaecological Oncology, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, United Kingdom; Department of Health Services Research, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Marquina C, Lacaze P, Tiller J, Riaz M, Sturm AC, Nelson MR, Ference BA, Pang J, Watts GF, Nicholls SJ, Zoungas S, Liew D, McNeil J, Ademi Z. Population genomic screening of young adults for familial hypercholesterolaemia: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Eur Heart J 2021; 43:3243-3254. [PMID: 34788414 DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab770] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2021] [Revised: 07/29/2021] [Accepted: 10/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
AIMS The aim of this study was to assess the impact and cost-effectiveness of offering population genomic screening to all young adults in Australia to detect heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH). METHODS AND RESULTS We designed a decision analytic Markov model to compare the current standard of care for heterozygous FH diagnosis in Australia (opportunistic cholesterol screening and genetic cascade testing) with the alternate strategy of population genomic screening of adults aged 18-40 years to detect pathogenic variants in the LDLR/APOB/PCSK9 genes. We used a validated cost-adaptation method to adapt findings to eight high-income countries. The model captured coronary heart disease (CHD) morbidity/mortality over a lifetime horizon, from healthcare and societal perspectives. Risk of CHD, treatment effects, prevalence, and healthcare costs were estimated from published studies. Outcomes included quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), costs and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), discounted 5% annually. Sensitivity analyses were undertaken to explore the impact of key input parameters on the robustness of the model. Over the lifetime of the population (4 167 768 men; 4 129 961 women), the model estimated a gain of 33 488years of life lived and 51 790 QALYs due to CHD prevention. Population genomic screening for FH would be cost-effective from a healthcare perspective if the per-test cost was ≤AU$250, yielding an ICER of <AU$28 000 per QALY gained. From a societal perspective, population genomic screening would be cost-saving. ICERs from societal perspective remained cost-saving after adaptation to other countries. CONCLUSION Based on our model, offering population genomic screening to all young adults for FH could be cost-effective, at testing costs that are feasible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clara Marquina
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, 553 St Kilda Rd, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia
| | - Paul Lacaze
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, 553 St Kilda Rd, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia
| | - Jane Tiller
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, 553 St Kilda Rd, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia
| | - Moeen Riaz
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, 553 St Kilda Rd, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia
| | - Amy C Sturm
- Genomic Medicine Institute, 100 North Academy Avenue, Geisinger, PA 17822, USA
| | - Mark R Nelson
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, 553 St Kilda Rd, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia.,Menzies Institute for Medical Research, 17 Liverpool St, Hobart, TAS 7000, Australia
| | - Brian A Ference
- University of Cambridge, Centre for Naturally Randomised Trials, The Old Schools, Trinity Ln, Cambridge CB2 1TN, UK
| | - Jing Pang
- School of Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Hwy, Perth, WA 6009, Australia
| | - Gerald F Watts
- School of Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Hwy, Perth, WA 6009, Australia.,Lipid Disorders Clinic, Cardiometabolic Service, Department of Cardiology, Royal Perth Hospital, Victoria Square, Perth, WA 6000, Australia.,Lipid Disorders Clinic, Cardiometabolic Service, Department of Internal Medicine, Royal Perth Hospital, Victoria Square, Perth, WA 6000, Australia
| | - Stephen J Nicholls
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, 553 St Kilda Rd, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia
| | - Sophia Zoungas
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, 553 St Kilda Rd, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia
| | - Danny Liew
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, 553 St Kilda Rd, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia
| | - John McNeil
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, 553 St Kilda Rd, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia
| | - Zanfina Ademi
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, 553 St Kilda Rd, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
González-Teshima LY, Payán-Gómez C, Saldarriaga W. Fragile X Syndrome Secondary to in Vitro Fertilization With a Family Egg Donor: A Case Report and Review of the Literature. J Family Reprod Health 2021; 15:130-135. [PMID: 34721603 PMCID: PMC8520665 DOI: 10.18502/jfrh.v15i2.6455] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: To evidence the need for screening fragile X syndrome (FXS) in egg donors in assisted reproduction protocols. Case report: This is the report of a boy with FXS who inherited the mutated allele from an ovule donated by the mother´s sister through an assisted reproduction protocol. Identifying premutation (PM) carriers of FXS amongst gamete donors isn’t part of the obligatory genetic analysis for donors and is only considered by most of the in vitro fertility societies and guidelines as part of the extension screening tests. Conclusion: It is cost-effective to do pre-conceptional screening for the PM or full mutation (FM) of the FMR1 gene affected in FXS in every woman undergoing assisted reproductive methods, including gamete donors even without a positive family history of intellectual disabilities. This case supports the need of rethinking the guidelines on the necessary gamete donor screening tests in assisted reproduction protocols.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - César Payán-Gómez
- Department of Biology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Rosario University, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Wilmar Saldarriaga
- School of Basic Sciences, Valle University, Cali, Colombia.,School of Medicine, Valle Hospital, Valle University, Cali, Colombia
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Seed LM. Horizon Scanning in Cancer Genomics: How Advances in Genomic Medicine Will Change Cancer Care Over the Next Decade. CURRENT GENETIC MEDICINE REPORTS 2021; 9:37-46. [PMID: 34306823 PMCID: PMC8280651 DOI: 10.1007/s40142-021-00200-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Advances in genomic medicine have the potential to revolutionise cancer patient care by driving forwards the clinical practice of precision oncology. This review aims to outline how genomic medicine advances may alter the care of cancer patients and their families over the next 10 years. RECENT FINDINGS The translation of oncogenomic advances into the clinical environment will likely be facilitated by the increasing availability of next-generation sequencing technologies and the increasing genomic literacy of healthcare professionals. The implementation of the centralised, nationwide NHS Genomic Medicine Service promises to improve equity of cancer care and to facilitate personalisation of almost every stage of the care pathway, from informing population screening and how we diagnose cancer to delivering prognoses and surveillance. Advances in cancer pharmacogenomics, and other "omics" technologies, have a tremendous potential to optimise patient care. Genomic medicine advances will also enhance the care offered to cancer patients' families. SUMMARY Genomic medicine advances are likely to transform almost every aspect of a cancer patient's care pathway. Cancer care will profoundly improve over the next decade, increasing UK cancer survival rates and improving patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lydia M. Seed
- School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0SP UK
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Penetrance and outcomes at 1-year following return of actionable variants identified by genome sequencing. Genet Med 2021; 23:1192-1201. [PMID: 33824501 PMCID: PMC9839314 DOI: 10.1038/s41436-021-01142-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2020] [Revised: 02/26/2021] [Accepted: 03/01/2021] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE We estimated penetrance of actionable genetic variants and assessed near-term outcomes following return of results (RoR). METHODS Participants (n = 2,535) with hypercholesterolemia and/or colon polyps underwent targeted sequencing of 68 genes and 14 single-nucleotide variants. Penetrance was estimated based on presence of relevant traits in the electronic health record (EHR). Outcomes occurring within 1-year of RoR were ascertained by EHR review. Analyses were stratified by tier 1 and non-tier 1 disorders. RESULTS Actionable findings were present in 122 individuals and results were disclosed to 98. The average penetrance for tier 1 disorder variants (67%; n = 58 individuals) was higher than in non-tier 1 variants (46.5%; n = 58 individuals). After excluding 45 individuals (decedents, nonresponders, known genetic diagnoses, mosaicism), ≥1 outcomes were noted in 83% of 77 participants following RoR; 78% had a process outcome (referral to a specialist, new testing, surveillance initiated); 68% had an intermediate outcome (new test finding or diagnosis); 19% had a clinical outcome (therapy modified, risk reduction surgery). Risk reduction surgery occurred more often in participants with tier 1 than those with non-tier 1 variants. CONCLUSION Relevant phenotypic traits were observed in 57% whereas a clinical outcome occurred in 19% of participants with actionable genomic variants in the year following RoR.
Collapse
|
33
|
Anderson JL, Kruisselbrink TM, Lisi EC, Hughes TM, Steyermark JM, Winkler EM, Berg CM, Vierkant RA, Gupta R, Ali AH, Faubion SS, Aoudia SL, McAllister TM, Farrugia G, Stewart AK, Lazaridis KN. Clinically Actionable Findings Derived From Predictive Genomic Testing Offered in a Medical Practice Setting. Mayo Clin Proc 2021; 96:1407-1417. [PMID: 33890576 DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2020.08.051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2020] [Revised: 08/28/2020] [Accepted: 08/31/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the presence of clinically actionable results and other genetic findings in an otherwise healthy population of adults seen in a medical practice setting and offered "predictive" genomic testing. PATIENTS AND METHODS In 2014, a predictive genomics clinic for generally healthy adults was launched through the Mayo Clinic Executive Health Program. Self-identified interested patients met with a genomic nurse and genetic counselor for pretest advice and education. Two genome sequencing platforms and one gene panel-based health screen were offered. Posttest genetic counseling was available for patients who elected testing. From March 1, 2014, through June 1, 2019, 1281 patients were seen and 301 (23.5%) chose testing. Uptake rates increased to 36.3% [70 of 193]) in 2019 from 11.8% [2 of 17] in 2014. Clinically actionable results and genetic findings were analyzed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS Clinically actionable results were detected in 11.6% of patients (35 of 301), and of those, 51.7% (15 of 29) with a cancer or cardiovascular result = did not have a personal or family history concerning for a hereditary disorder. The most common actionable results were in the BCHE, BRCA2, CHEK2, LDLR, MUTYH, and MYH7 genes. A carrier of at least one recessive condition was found in 53.8% of patients (162 of 301). At least one variant associated with multifactorial disease was found in 44.5% (134 of 301) (eg, 25 patients were heterozygous for the F5 factor V Leiden variant associated with thrombophilia risk). CONCLUSION Our predictive screening revealed that 11.6% of individuals will test positive for a clinically actionable, likely pathogenic/pathogenic variant. This finding suggests that wider knowledge and adoption of predictive genomic services could be beneficial in medical practice, although additional studies are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Emily C Lisi
- Center for Individualized Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | | | - Erin M Winkler
- Center for Individualized Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Corinne M Berg
- Center for Individualized Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Robert A Vierkant
- Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Ruchi Gupta
- Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Ahmad H Ali
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | - Stacy L Aoudia
- Center for Individualized Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | - Gianrico Farrugia
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - A Keith Stewart
- Center for Individualized Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Konstantinos N Lazaridis
- Center for Individualized Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Christensen KD, Bell M, Zawatsky CLB, Galbraith LN, Green RC, Hutchinson AM, Jamal L, LeBlanc JL, Leonhard JR, Moore M, Mullineaux L, Petry N, Platt DM, Shaaban S, Schultz A, Tucker BD, Van Heukelom J, Wheeler E, Zoltick ES, Hajek C. Precision Population Medicine in Primary Care: The Sanford Chip Experience. Front Genet 2021; 12:626845. [PMID: 33777099 PMCID: PMC7994529 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2021.626845] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2020] [Accepted: 02/11/2021] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Genetic testing has the potential to revolutionize primary care, but few health systems have developed the infrastructure to support precision population medicine applications or attempted to evaluate its impact on patient and provider outcomes. In 2018, Sanford Health, the nation's largest rural nonprofit health care system, began offering genetic testing to its primary care patients. To date, more than 11,000 patients have participated in the Sanford Chip Program, over 90% of whom have been identified with at least one informative pharmacogenomic variant, and about 1.5% of whom have been identified with a medically actionable predisposition for disease. This manuscript describes the rationale for offering the Sanford Chip, the programs and infrastructure implemented to support it, and evolving plans for research to evaluate its real-world impact.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kurt D Christensen
- Center for Healthcare Research in Pediatrics, Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, MA, United States.,Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.,Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, United States
| | - Megan Bell
- Sanford Health Imagenetics, Sioux Falls, SD, United States
| | - Carrie L B Zawatsky
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.,Ariadne Labs, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Lauren N Galbraith
- Center for Healthcare Research in Pediatrics, Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Robert C Green
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, United States.,Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.,Ariadne Labs, Boston, MA, United States.,Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | | | - Leila Jamal
- National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, United States.,Department of Bioethics, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - Jessica L LeBlanc
- Center for Healthcare Research in Pediatrics, Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, MA, United States
| | | | - Michelle Moore
- Sanford Health Imagenetics, Sioux Falls, SD, United States
| | - Lisa Mullineaux
- Mayo Clinic Genomics Laboratory, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Natasha Petry
- Sanford Health Imagenetics, Fargo, ND, United States.,Department of Pharmacy Practice, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND, United States
| | - Dylan M Platt
- Sanford Health Imagenetics, Sioux Falls, SD, United States
| | - Sherin Shaaban
- Department of Pathology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, United States.,ARUP Laboratories, Salt Lake City, UT, United States
| | - April Schultz
- Sanford Health Imagenetics, Sioux Falls, SD, United States.,Sanford School of Medicine, University of South Dakota, Sioux Falls, SD, United States
| | | | - Joel Van Heukelom
- Sanford Health Imagenetics, Sioux Falls, SD, United States.,Sanford School of Medicine, University of South Dakota, Sioux Falls, SD, United States
| | | | - Emilie S Zoltick
- Center for Healthcare Research in Pediatrics, Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Catherine Hajek
- Sanford Health Imagenetics, Sioux Falls, SD, United States.,Sanford School of Medicine, University of South Dakota, Sioux Falls, SD, United States
| | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Naslavsky MS, Vidigal M, Matos LDRB, Cória VR, Batista PB, Razuk Á, Saldiva PHN, Dolhnikoff M, Schidlowski L, Prando C, Cunha-Neto E, Condino-Neto A, Passos-Bueno MR, Zatz M. Extreme phenotypes approach to investigate host genetics and COVID-19 outcomes. Genet Mol Biol 2021; 44:e20200302. [PMID: 33651876 PMCID: PMC7924362 DOI: 10.1590/1678-4685-gmb-2020-0302] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2020] [Accepted: 01/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
COVID-19 comprises clinical outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 infection and is highly heterogeneous, ranging from asymptomatic individuals to deceased young adults without comorbidities. There is growing evidence that host genetics play an important role in COVID-19 severity, including inborn errors of immunity, age-related inflammation and immunosenescence. Here we present a brief review on the known order of events from infection to severe system-wide disturbance due to COVID-19 and summarize potential candidate genes and pathways. Finally, we propose a strategy of subject's ascertainment based on phenotypic extremes to take part in genomic studies and elucidate intrinsic risk factors involved in COVID-19 severe outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michel Satya Naslavsky
- Universidade de São Paulo, Instituto de Biociências, Departamento de Genética e Biologia Evolutiva, Centro de Pesquisa sobre o Genoma Humano e Células-Tronco, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Mateus Vidigal
- Universidade de São Paulo, Instituto de Biociências, Departamento de Genética e Biologia Evolutiva, Centro de Pesquisa sobre o Genoma Humano e Células-Tronco, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Larissa do Rêgo Barros Matos
- Universidade de São Paulo, Instituto de Biociências, Departamento de Genética e Biologia Evolutiva, Centro de Pesquisa sobre o Genoma Humano e Células-Tronco, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Vivian Romanholi Cória
- Universidade de São Paulo, Instituto de Biociências, Departamento de Genética e Biologia Evolutiva, Centro de Pesquisa sobre o Genoma Humano e Células-Tronco, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | | | | | | | - Marisa Dolhnikoff
- Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP), Departamento de Patologia, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Laire Schidlowski
- Instituto de Pesquisa Pelé Pequeno Príncipe, Faculdades Pequeno Príncipe, Hospital Pequeno Príncipe, Curitiba, PR, Brazil
| | - Carolina Prando
- Instituto de Pesquisa Pelé Pequeno Príncipe, Faculdades Pequeno Príncipe, Hospital Pequeno Príncipe, Curitiba, PR, Brazil
| | - Edécio Cunha-Neto
- Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, Instituto do Coração, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Antonio Condino-Neto
- Universidade de São Paulo, Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas, Laboratório de Imunologia Humana, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Maria Rita Passos-Bueno
- Universidade de São Paulo, Instituto de Biociências, Departamento de Genética e Biologia Evolutiva, Centro de Pesquisa sobre o Genoma Humano e Células-Tronco, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Mayana Zatz
- Universidade de São Paulo, Instituto de Biociências, Departamento de Genética e Biologia Evolutiva, Centro de Pesquisa sobre o Genoma Humano e Células-Tronco, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Bylstra Y, Lim WK, Kam S, Tham KW, Wu RR, Teo JX, Davila S, Kuan JL, Chan SH, Bertin N, Yang CX, Rozen S, Teh BT, Yeo KK, Cook SA, Jamuar SS, Ginsburg GS, Orlando LA, Tan P. Family history assessment significantly enhances delivery of precision medicine in the genomics era. Genome Med 2021; 13:3. [PMID: 33413596 PMCID: PMC7791763 DOI: 10.1186/s13073-020-00819-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2020] [Accepted: 12/07/2020] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Family history has traditionally been an essential part of clinical care to assess health risks. However, declining sequencing costs have precipitated a shift towards genomics-first approaches in population screening programs rendering the value of family history unknown. We evaluated the utility of incorporating family history information for genomic sequencing selection. METHODS To ascertain the relationship between family histories on such population-level initiatives, we analysed whole genome sequences of 1750 research participants with no known pre-existing conditions, of which half received comprehensive family history assessment of up to four generations, focusing on 95 cancer genes. RESULTS Amongst the 1750 participants, 866 (49.5%) had high-quality standardised family history available. Within this group, 73 (8.4%) participants had an increased family history risk of cancer (increased FH risk cohort) and 1 in 7 participants (n = 10/73) carried a clinically actionable variant inferring a sixfold increase compared with 1 in 47 participants (n = 17/793) assessed at average family history cancer risk (average FH risk cohort) (p = 0.00001) and a sevenfold increase compared to 1 in 52 participants (n = 17/884) where family history was not available (FH not available cohort) (p = 0.00001). The enrichment was further pronounced (up to 18-fold) when assessing only the 25 cancer genes in the American College of Medical Genetics (ACMG) Secondary Findings (SF) genes. Furthermore, 63 (7.3%) participants had an increased family history cancer risk in the absence of an apparent clinically actionable variant. CONCLUSIONS These findings demonstrate that the collection and analysis of comprehensive family history and genomic data are complementary and in combination can prioritise individuals for genomic analysis. Thus, family history remains a critical component of health risk assessment, providing important actionable data when implementing genomics screening programs. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02791152 . Retrospectively registered on May 31, 2016.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yasmin Bylstra
- SingHealth Duke-NUS Institute of Precision Medicine, Singapore Health Services, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Weng Khong Lim
- SingHealth Duke-NUS Institute of Precision Medicine, Singapore Health Services, Singapore, Singapore.,Cancer and Stem Cell Biology, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.,SingHealth Duke-NUS Genomic Medicine Center, Singapore Health Services, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Sylvia Kam
- SingHealth Duke-NUS Institute of Precision Medicine, Singapore Health Services, Singapore, Singapore.,Department of Paediatrics, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Koei Wan Tham
- SingHealth Duke-NUS Institute of Precision Medicine, Singapore Health Services, Singapore, Singapore.,Department of Physiology, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - R Ryanne Wu
- Center for Applied Genomics and Precision Medicine, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Jing Xian Teo
- SingHealth Duke-NUS Institute of Precision Medicine, Singapore Health Services, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Sonia Davila
- SingHealth Duke-NUS Institute of Precision Medicine, Singapore Health Services, Singapore, Singapore.,SingHealth Duke-NUS Genomic Medicine Center, Singapore Health Services, Singapore, Singapore.,Cardiovascular and Metabolic Disorders, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Jyn Ling Kuan
- SingHealth Duke-NUS Institute of Precision Medicine, Singapore Health Services, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Sock Hoai Chan
- Cancer Genetics Service, Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Nicolas Bertin
- Centre for Big Data and Integrative Genomics, Genome Institute of Singapore, Agency for Science Technology and Research, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Cheng Xi Yang
- National Heart Research Institute Singapore, National Heart Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Steve Rozen
- SingHealth Duke-NUS Institute of Precision Medicine, Singapore Health Services, Singapore, Singapore.,Cancer and Stem Cell Biology, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Bin Tean Teh
- SingHealth Duke-NUS Institute of Precision Medicine, Singapore Health Services, Singapore, Singapore.,National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Khung Keong Yeo
- Cardiovascular and Metabolic Disorders, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.,Department of Cardiology, National Heart Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Stuart Alexander Cook
- SingHealth Duke-NUS Institute of Precision Medicine, Singapore Health Services, Singapore, Singapore.,Cardiovascular and Metabolic Disorders, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.,Department of Cardiology, National Heart Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Saumya Shekhar Jamuar
- SingHealth Duke-NUS Institute of Precision Medicine, Singapore Health Services, Singapore, Singapore.,SingHealth Duke-NUS Genomic Medicine Center, Singapore Health Services, Singapore, Singapore.,Department of Paediatrics, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.,Paediatric Academic Clinical Programme, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Geoffrey S Ginsburg
- Center for Applied Genomics and Precision Medicine, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Lori A Orlando
- Center for Applied Genomics and Precision Medicine, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
| | - Patrick Tan
- SingHealth Duke-NUS Institute of Precision Medicine, Singapore Health Services, Singapore, Singapore. .,Cancer and Stem Cell Biology, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore. .,Genome Institute of Singapore, Agency for Science Technology and Research, Singapore, Singapore.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Park JE, Yun SA, Roh EY, Yoon JH, Shin S, Ki CS. Carrier Frequency of Spinal Muscular Atrophy in a Large-scale Korean Population. Ann Lab Med 2020; 40:326-330. [PMID: 32067433 PMCID: PMC7054693 DOI: 10.3343/alm.2020.40.4.326] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2019] [Revised: 09/29/2019] [Accepted: 01/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is an autosomal recessive disease characterized by progressive proximal muscle weakness and atrophy. Given the recent introduction of gene therapies, knowledge of the SMA carrier frequency in various populations has become important for developing screening programs for this disease. In total, 1,581 anonymous DNA samples from an umbilical cord blood bank were tested for SMN1 and SMN2 gene copies using a multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification assay. Twenty-nine of the 1,581 newborns [1.83%; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.25–2.66%] were SMA carriers with one copy of SMN1, and no homozygous SMN1 deletion was detected. The carrier frequency in this population was estimated to be 1,834 per 100,000 (95% CI, 1,254–2,659) or 1 in 55 (95% CI, 1/79–1/38). Our data indicate that SMA carriers are not uncommon in the Korean population and may serve as a reference for designing a population screening program in Korea.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jong Eun Park
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Hanyang University Guri Hospital, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Guri, Korea
| | - Sun Ae Yun
- Center for Clinical Medicine, Samsung Biomedical Research Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Eun Youn Roh
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Boramae Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jong Hyun Yoon
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Boramae Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sue Shin
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Boramae Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
| | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Martin CL, Wain KE, Oetjens MT, Tolwinski K, Palen E, Hare-Harris A, Habegger L, Maxwell EK, Reid JG, Walsh LK, Myers SM, Ledbetter DH. Identification of Neuropsychiatric Copy Number Variants in a Health Care System Population. JAMA Psychiatry 2020; 77:1276-1285. [PMID: 32697297 PMCID: PMC7376464 DOI: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2020.2159] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Population screening for medically relevant genomic variants that cause diseases such as hereditary cancer and cardiovascular disorders is increasing to facilitate early disease detection or prevention. Neuropsychiatric disorders (NPDs) are common, complex disorders with clear genetic causes; yet, access to genetic diagnosis is limited. We explored whether inclusion of NPD in population-based genomic screening programs is warranted by assessing 3 key factors: prevalence, penetrance, and personal utility. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the suitability of including pathogenic copy number variants (CNVs) associated with NPD in population screening by determining their prevalence and penetrance and exploring the personal utility of disclosing results. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS In this cohort study, the frequency of 31 NPD CNVs was determined in patient-participants via exome data. Associated clinical phenotypes were assessed using linked electronic health records. Nine CNVs were selected for disclosure by licensed genetic counselors, and participants' psychosocial reactions were evaluated using a mixed-methods approach. A primarily adult population receiving medical care at Geisinger, a large integrated health care system in the United States with the only population-based genomic screening program approved for medically relevant results disclosure, was included. The cohort was identified from the Geisinger MyCode Community Health Initiative. Exome and linked electronic health record data were available for this cohort, which was recruited from February 2007 to April 2017. Data were collected for the qualitative analysis April 2017 through February 2018. Analysis began February 2018 and ended December 2019. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The planned outcomes of this study include (1) prevalence estimate of NPD-associated CNVs in an unselected health care system population; (2) penetrance estimate of NPD diagnoses in CNV-positive individuals; and (3) qualitative themes that describe participants' responses to receiving NPD-associated genomic results. RESULTS Of 90 595 participants with CNV data, a pathogenic CNV was identified in 708 (0.8%; 436 women [61.6%]; mean [SD] age, 50.04 [18.74] years). Seventy percent (n = 494) had at least 1 associated clinical symptom. Of these, 28.8% (204) of CNV-positive individuals had an NPD code in their electronic health record, compared with 13.3% (11 835 of 89 887) of CNV-negative individuals (odds ratio, 2.21; 95% CI, 1.86-2.61; P < .001); 66.4% (470) of CNV-positive individuals had a history of depression and anxiety compared with 54.6% (49 118 of 89 887) of CNV-negative individuals (odds ratio, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.31-1.80; P < .001). 16p13.11 (71 [0.078%]) and 22q11.2 (108 [0.119%]) were the most prevalent deletions and duplications, respectively. Only 5.8% of individuals (41 of 708) had a previously known genetic diagnosis. Results disclosure was completed for 141 individuals. Positive participant responses included poignant reactions to learning a medical reason for lifelong cognitive and psychiatric disabilities. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE This study informs critical factors central to the development of population-based genomic screening programs and supports the inclusion of NPD in future designs to promote equitable access to clinically useful genomic information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christa Lese Martin
- Autism & Developmental Medicine Institute, Geisinger, Danville, Pennsylvania
| | - Karen E. Wain
- Autism & Developmental Medicine Institute, Geisinger, Danville, Pennsylvania
| | - Matthew T. Oetjens
- Autism & Developmental Medicine Institute, Geisinger, Danville, Pennsylvania
| | - Kasia Tolwinski
- Autism & Developmental Medicine Institute, Geisinger, Danville, Pennsylvania,Biomedical Ethics Unit, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Emily Palen
- Autism & Developmental Medicine Institute, Geisinger, Danville, Pennsylvania
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Scott M. Myers
- Autism & Developmental Medicine Institute, Geisinger, Danville, Pennsylvania
| | - David H. Ledbetter
- Autism & Developmental Medicine Institute, Geisinger, Danville, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Singh K, Bijarnia-Mahay S, Ramprasad VL, Puri RD, Nair S, Sharda S, Saxena R, Kohli S, Kulshreshtha S, Ganguli I, Gujral K, Verma IC. NGS-based expanded carrier screening for genetic disorders in North Indian population reveals unexpected results - a pilot study. BMC MEDICAL GENETICS 2020; 21:216. [PMID: 33138774 PMCID: PMC7607710 DOI: 10.1186/s12881-020-01153-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2020] [Accepted: 10/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Background To determine the carrier frequency and pathogenic variants of common genetic disorders in the north Indian population by using next generation sequencing (NGS). Methods After pre-test counselling, 200 unrelated individuals (including 88 couples) were screened for pathogenic variants in 88 genes by NGS technology. The variants were classified as per American College of Medical Genetics criteria. Pathogenic and likely pathogenic variants were subjected to thorough literature-based curation in addition to the regular filters. Variants of unknown significance were not reported. Individuals were counselled explaining the implications of the results, and cascade screening was advised when necessary. Results Of the 200 participants, 52 (26%) were found to be carrier of one or more disorders. Twelve individuals were identified to be carriers for congenital deafness, giving a carrier frequency of one in 17 for one of the four genes tested (SLC26A4, GJB2, TMPRSS3 and TMC1 in decreasing order). Nine individuals were observed to be carriers for cystic fibrosis, with a frequency of one in 22. Three individuals were detected to be carriers for Pompe disease (frequency one in 67). None of the 88 couples screened were found to be carriers for the same disorder. The pathogenic variants observed in many disorders (such as deafness, cystic fibrosis, Pompe disease, Canavan disease, primary hyperoxaluria, junctional epidermolysis bullosa, galactosemia, medium chain acyl CoA deficiency etc.) were different from those commonly observed in the West. Conclusion A higher carrier frequency for genetic deafness, cystic fibrosis and Pompe disease was unexpected, and contrary to the generally held view about their prevalence in Asian Indians. In spite of the small sample size, this study would suggest that population-based carrier screening panels for India would differ from those in the West, and need to be selected with due care. Testing should comprise the study of all the coding exons with its boundaries in the genes through NGS, as all the variants are not well characterized. Only study of entire coding regions in the genes will detect carriers with adequate efficiency, in order to reduce the burden of genetic disorders in India and other resource poor countries. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12881-020-01153-4.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kanika Singh
- Institute of Medical Genetics and Genomics, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - Sunita Bijarnia-Mahay
- Institute of Medical Genetics and Genomics, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi, India.
| | | | - Ratna Dua Puri
- Institute of Medical Genetics and Genomics, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - Sandhya Nair
- Medgenome Laboratories Pvt Ltd., Bangalore, India
| | | | - Renu Saxena
- Institute of Medical Genetics and Genomics, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - Sudha Kohli
- Institute of Medical Genetics and Genomics, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - Samarth Kulshreshtha
- Institute of Medical Genetics and Genomics, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - Indrani Ganguli
- Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - Kanwal Gujral
- Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - Ishwar C Verma
- Institute of Medical Genetics and Genomics, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi, India.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Guzauskas GF, Garbett S, Zhou Z, Spencer SJ, Smith HS, Hao J, Hassen D, Snyder SR, Graves JA, Peterson JF, Williams MS, Veenstra DL. Cost-effectiveness of Population-Wide Genomic Screening for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer in the United States. JAMA Netw Open 2020; 3:e2022874. [PMID: 33119106 PMCID: PMC7596578 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.22874] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Genomic screening for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) in unselected women offers an opportunity to prevent cancer morbidity and mortality, but the potential clinical impact and cost-effectiveness of such screening have not been well studied. OBJECTIVE To estimate the lifetime incremental incidence of HBOC and the quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), costs, and cost-effectiveness of HBOC genomic screening in an unselected population vs family history-based testing. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS In this study conducted from October 27, 2017, to May 3, 2020, a decision analytic Markov model was developed that included health states for precancer, for risk-reducing mastectomy (RRM) and risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO), for earlier- and later-stage HBOC, after cancer, and for death. A complimentary cascade testing module was also developed to estimate outcomes in first-degree relatives. Age-specific RRM and RRSO uptake probabilities were estimated from the Geisinger MyCode Community Health Initiative and published sources. Parameters including RRM and RRSO effectiveness, variant-specific cancer risk, costs, and utilities were derived from published sources. Sensitivity and scenario analyses were conducted to evaluate model assumptions and uncertainty. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Lifetime cancer incidence, QALYs, life-years, and direct medical costs for genomic screening in an unselected population vs family history-based testing only were calculated. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated as the difference in cost between strategies divided by the difference in QALYs between strategies. Earlier-stage and later-stage cancer cases prevented and total cancer cases prevented were also calculated. RESULTS The model found that population screening of 30-year-old women was associated with 75 (95% credible range [CR], 60-90) fewer overall cancer cases and 288 QALYs (95% CR, 212-373 QALYs) gained per 100 000 women screened, at an incremental cost of $25 million (95% CR, $21 millon to $30 million) vs family history-based testing; the ICER was $87 700 (78% probability of being cost-effective at a threshold of $100 000 per QALY). In contrast, population screening of 45-year-old women was associated with 24 (95% CR, 18-29) fewer cancer cases and 97 QALYs (95% CR, 66-130 QALYs) gained per 100 000 women screened, at an incremental cost of $26 million (95% CR, $22 million to $30 million); the ICER was $268 200 (0% probability of being cost-effective at a threshold of $100 000 per QALY). A scenario analysis without cascade testing increased the ICER to $92 600 for 30-year-old women and $354 500 for 45-year-old women. A scenario analysis assuming a 5% absolute decrease in mammography screening in women without a variant was associated with the potential for net harm (-90 QALYs per 100 000 women screened; 95% CR, -180 to 10 QALYs). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE The results of this study suggest that population HBOC screening may be cost-effective among younger women but not among older women. Cascade testing of first-degree relatives added a modest improvement in clinical and economic value. The potential for harm conferred by inappropriate reduction in mammography among noncarriers should be quantified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gregory F. Guzauskas
- The Comparative Health Outcomes, Policy & Economics (CHOICE) Institute, Department of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Shawn Garbett
- Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Zilu Zhou
- Department of Health Policy, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Scott J. Spencer
- Institute for Public Health Genetics, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Hadley S. Smith
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Jing Hao
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Geisinger, Danville, Pennsylvania
| | - Dina Hassen
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Geisinger, Danville, Pennsylvania
| | - Susan R. Snyder
- Department of Health Policy and Behavioral Sciences, Georgia State University, Atlanta
| | - John A. Graves
- Department of Health Policy, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Josh F. Peterson
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | | | - David L. Veenstra
- The Comparative Health Outcomes, Policy & Economics (CHOICE) Institute, Department of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle
- Institute for Public Health Genetics, University of Washington, Seattle
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Manchanda R, Lieberman S, Gaba F, Lahad A, Levy-Lahad E. Population Screening for Inherited Predisposition to Breast and Ovarian Cancer. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 2020; 21:373-412. [DOI: 10.1146/annurev-genom-083118-015253] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
The discovery of genes underlying inherited predisposition to breast and ovarian cancer has revolutionized the ability to identify women at high risk for these diseases before they become affected. Women who are carriers of deleterious variants in these genes can undertake surveillance and prevention measures that have been shown to reduce morbidity and mortality. However, under current strategies, the vast majority of women carriers remain undetected until they become affected. In this review, we show that universal testing, particularly of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes, fulfills classical disease screening criteria. This is especially true for BRCA1 and BRCA2 in Ashkenazi Jews but is translatable to all populations and may include additional genes. Utilizing genetic information for large-scale precision prevention requires a paradigmatic shift in health-care delivery. To address this need, we propose a direct-to-patient model, which is increasingly pertinent for fulfilling the promise of utilizing personal genomic information for disease prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ranjit Manchanda
- Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London EC1M 6BQ, United Kingdom;,
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London E1 1FR, United Kingdom
| | - Sari Lieberman
- Medical Genetics Institute, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem 9103102, Israel;,
- Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 9112102, Israel
| | - Faiza Gaba
- Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London EC1M 6BQ, United Kingdom;,
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London E1 1FR, United Kingdom
| | - Amnon Lahad
- Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 9112102, Israel
- Clalit Health Services, Jerusalem 9548323, Israel
| | - Ephrat Levy-Lahad
- Medical Genetics Institute, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem 9103102, Israel;,
- Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 9112102, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Grzymski JJ, Elhanan G, Morales Rosado JA, Smith E, Schlauch KA, Read R, Rowan C, Slotnick N, Dabe S, Metcalf WJ, Lipp B, Reed H, Sharma L, Levin E, Kao J, Rashkin M, Bowes J, Dunaway K, Slonim A, Washington N, Ferber M, Bolze A, Lu JT. Population genetic screening efficiently identifies carriers of autosomal dominant diseases. Nat Med 2020; 26:1235-1239. [DOI: 10.1038/s41591-020-0982-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 69] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2019] [Accepted: 06/12/2020] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
|
43
|
Buchanan AH, Lester Kirchner H, Schwartz MLB, Kelly MA, Schmidlen T, Jones LK, Hallquist MLG, Rocha H, Betts M, Schwiter R, Butry L, Lazzeri AL, Frisbie LR, Rahm AK, Hao J, Willard HF, Martin CL, Ledbetter DH, Williams MS, Sturm AC. Clinical outcomes of a genomic screening program for actionable genetic conditions. Genet Med 2020; 22:1874-1882. [PMID: 32601386 PMCID: PMC7605431 DOI: 10.1038/s41436-020-0876-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 71] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2020] [Revised: 06/12/2020] [Accepted: 06/12/2020] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Three genetic conditions—hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome, Lynch syndrome, and familial hypercholesterolemia—have tier 1 evidence for interventions that reduce morbidity and mortality, prompting proposals to screen unselected populations for these conditions. We examined the impact of genomic screening on risk management and early detection in an unselected population. Methods Observational study of electronic health records (EHR) among individuals in whom a pathogenic/likely pathogenic variant in a tier 1 gene was discovered through Geisinger’s MyCode project. EHR of all eligible participants was evaluated for a prior genetic diagnosis and, among participants without such a diagnosis, relevant personal/family history, postdisclosure clinical diagnoses, and postdisclosure risk management. Results Eighty-seven percent of participants (305/351) did not have a prior genetic diagnosis of their tier 1 result. Of these, 65% had EHR evidence of relevant personal and/or family history of disease. Of 255 individuals eligible to have risk management, 70% (n = 179) had a recommended risk management procedure after results disclosure. Thirteen percent of participants (41/305) received a relevant clinical diagnosis after results disclosure. Conclusion Genomic screening programs can identify previously unrecognized individuals at increased risk of cancer and heart disease and facilitate risk management and early cancer detection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - H Lester Kirchner
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Geisinger, Danville, PA, USA
| | | | | | - Tara Schmidlen
- Genomic Medicine Institute, Geisinger, Danville, PA, USA
| | - Laney K Jones
- Genomic Medicine Institute, Geisinger, Danville, PA, USA
| | | | - Heather Rocha
- Genomic Medicine Institute, Geisinger, Danville, PA, USA
| | - Megan Betts
- Genomic Medicine Institute, Geisinger, Danville, PA, USA
| | | | - Loren Butry
- Genomic Medicine Institute, Geisinger, Danville, PA, USA
| | | | | | | | - Jing Hao
- Genomic Medicine Institute, Geisinger, Danville, PA, USA.,Department of Population Health Sciences, Geisinger, Danville, PA, USA
| | - Huntington F Willard
- Genomic Medicine Institute, Geisinger, Danville, PA, USA.,Genome Medical, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Christa L Martin
- Genomic Medicine Institute, Geisinger, Danville, PA, USA.,Autism and Developmental Medicine Institute, Geisinger, Lewisburg, PA, USA
| | - David H Ledbetter
- Genomic Medicine Institute, Geisinger, Danville, PA, USA.,Autism and Developmental Medicine Institute, Geisinger, Lewisburg, PA, USA
| | | | - Amy C Sturm
- Genomic Medicine Institute, Geisinger, Danville, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Smit AK, Reyes-Marcelino G, Keogh L, Cust AE, Newson AJ. 'There is a lot of good in knowing, but there is also a lot of downs': public views on ethical considerations in population genomic screening. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS 2020; 47:medethics-2019-105934. [PMID: 32434901 DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2019-105934] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2019] [Revised: 04/28/2020] [Accepted: 05/04/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
Publics are key stakeholders in population genomic screening and their perspectives on ethical considerations are relevant to programme design and policy making. Using semi-structured interviews, we explored social views and attitudes towards possible future provision of personalised genomic risk information to populations to inform prevention and/or early detection of relevant conditions. Participants were members of the public (n=30) who had received information on their personal genomic risk of melanoma as part of a research project. The focus of the analysis presented here is participants' views regarding ethical considerations relevant to population genomic screening more generally. Data were analysed thematically and four key themes related to ethical considerations were identified: (i) personal responsibility for health: 'forewarned is forearmed'; (ii) perceptions of, and responses to, genetic fatalism; (iii) implications for parenting and reproduction; (iv) divided views on choosing to receive genomic risk information. Ethical considerations underlying these themes include the valorisation of information and choice, paternalism, non-directiveness and increasing responsibilisation of individuals in health and healthcare. These findings arguably indicate a thin public conceptualisation of population genomic testing, which draws heavily on how these themes tend to be described in existing social discourses. Findings suggest that further public engagement is required to increase complexity of debate, to consider (for example) the appropriate place of individual and social interests in population genomic testing. Further discernment of relevant ethical approaches, drawing on ethical frameworks from both public health and clinical settings, will also assist in determining the appropriate implementation of population genomic screening for complex conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amelia K Smit
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Public Health, Sydney Health Ethics, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Public Health, Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Research, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Gillian Reyes-Marcelino
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Public Health, Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Research, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Louise Keogh
- Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Anne E Cust
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Public Health, Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Research, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Ainsley J Newson
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Public Health, Sydney Health Ethics, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Lhotova K, Stolarova L, Zemankova P, Vocka M, Janatova M, Borecka M, Cerna M, Jelinkova S, Kral J, Volkova Z, Urbanova M, Kleiblova P, Machackova E, Foretova L, Hazova J, Vasickova P, Lhota F, Koudova M, Cerna L, Tavandzis S, Indrakova J, Hruskova L, Kosarova M, Vrtel R, Stranecky V, Kmoch S, Zikan M, Macurek L, Kleibl Z, Soukupova J. Multigene Panel Germline Testing of 1333 Czech Patients with Ovarian Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:E956. [PMID: 32295079 PMCID: PMC7226062 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12040956] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2020] [Revised: 04/07/2020] [Accepted: 04/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Ovarian cancer (OC) is the deadliest gynecologic malignancy with a substantial proportion of hereditary cases and a frequent association with breast cancer (BC). Genetic testing facilitates treatment and preventive strategies reducing OC mortality in mutation carriers. However, the prevalence of germline mutations varies among populations and many rarely mutated OC predisposition genes remain to be identified. We aimed to analyze 219 genes in 1333 Czech OC patients and 2278 population-matched controls using next-generation sequencing. We revealed germline mutations in 18 OC/BC predisposition genes in 32.0% of patients and in 2.5% of controls. Mutations in BRCA1/BRCA2, RAD51C/RAD51D, BARD1, and mismatch repair genes conferred high OC risk (OR > 5). Mutations in BRIP1 and NBN were associated with moderate risk (both OR = 3.5). BRCA1/2 mutations dominated in almost all clinicopathological subgroups including sporadic borderline tumors of ovary (BTO). Analysis of remaining 201 genes revealed somatic mosaics in PPM1D and germline mutations in SHPRH and NAT1 associating with a high/moderate OC risk significantly; however, further studies are warranted to delineate their contribution to OC development in other populations. Our findings demonstrate the high proportion of patients with hereditary OC in Slavic population justifying genetic testing in all patients with OC, including BTO.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Klara Lhotova
- Institute of Biochemistry and Experimental Oncology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, 128 53 Prague, Czech Republic; (K.L.); (L.S.); (P.Z.); (M.J.); (M.B.); (M.C.); (S.J.); (J.K.); (Z.V.); (Z.K.)
- Institute of Biology and Medical Genetics, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, 128 00 Prague, Czech Republic; (M.U.); (P.K.)
| | - Lenka Stolarova
- Institute of Biochemistry and Experimental Oncology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, 128 53 Prague, Czech Republic; (K.L.); (L.S.); (P.Z.); (M.J.); (M.B.); (M.C.); (S.J.); (J.K.); (Z.V.); (Z.K.)
| | - Petra Zemankova
- Institute of Biochemistry and Experimental Oncology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, 128 53 Prague, Czech Republic; (K.L.); (L.S.); (P.Z.); (M.J.); (M.B.); (M.C.); (S.J.); (J.K.); (Z.V.); (Z.K.)
- Institute of Biology and Medical Genetics, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, 128 00 Prague, Czech Republic; (M.U.); (P.K.)
| | - Michal Vocka
- Department of Oncology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, 128 08 Prague, Czech Republic;
| | - Marketa Janatova
- Institute of Biochemistry and Experimental Oncology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, 128 53 Prague, Czech Republic; (K.L.); (L.S.); (P.Z.); (M.J.); (M.B.); (M.C.); (S.J.); (J.K.); (Z.V.); (Z.K.)
- Institute of Biology and Medical Genetics, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, 128 00 Prague, Czech Republic; (M.U.); (P.K.)
| | - Marianna Borecka
- Institute of Biochemistry and Experimental Oncology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, 128 53 Prague, Czech Republic; (K.L.); (L.S.); (P.Z.); (M.J.); (M.B.); (M.C.); (S.J.); (J.K.); (Z.V.); (Z.K.)
- Institute of Biology and Medical Genetics, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, 128 00 Prague, Czech Republic; (M.U.); (P.K.)
| | - Marta Cerna
- Institute of Biochemistry and Experimental Oncology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, 128 53 Prague, Czech Republic; (K.L.); (L.S.); (P.Z.); (M.J.); (M.B.); (M.C.); (S.J.); (J.K.); (Z.V.); (Z.K.)
| | - Sandra Jelinkova
- Institute of Biochemistry and Experimental Oncology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, 128 53 Prague, Czech Republic; (K.L.); (L.S.); (P.Z.); (M.J.); (M.B.); (M.C.); (S.J.); (J.K.); (Z.V.); (Z.K.)
| | - Jan Kral
- Institute of Biochemistry and Experimental Oncology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, 128 53 Prague, Czech Republic; (K.L.); (L.S.); (P.Z.); (M.J.); (M.B.); (M.C.); (S.J.); (J.K.); (Z.V.); (Z.K.)
| | - Zuzana Volkova
- Institute of Biochemistry and Experimental Oncology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, 128 53 Prague, Czech Republic; (K.L.); (L.S.); (P.Z.); (M.J.); (M.B.); (M.C.); (S.J.); (J.K.); (Z.V.); (Z.K.)
| | - Marketa Urbanova
- Institute of Biology and Medical Genetics, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, 128 00 Prague, Czech Republic; (M.U.); (P.K.)
| | - Petra Kleiblova
- Institute of Biology and Medical Genetics, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, 128 00 Prague, Czech Republic; (M.U.); (P.K.)
| | - Eva Machackova
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, 656 53 Brno, Czech Republic; (E.M.); (L.F.); (J.H.); (P.V.)
| | - Lenka Foretova
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, 656 53 Brno, Czech Republic; (E.M.); (L.F.); (J.H.); (P.V.)
| | - Jana Hazova
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, 656 53 Brno, Czech Republic; (E.M.); (L.F.); (J.H.); (P.V.)
| | - Petra Vasickova
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, 656 53 Brno, Czech Republic; (E.M.); (L.F.); (J.H.); (P.V.)
| | - Filip Lhota
- Department of Medical Genetics, Centre for Medical Genetics and Reproductive Medicine, Gennet, 170 00 Prague, Czech Republic; (F.L.); (M.K.); (L.C.)
| | - Monika Koudova
- Department of Medical Genetics, Centre for Medical Genetics and Reproductive Medicine, Gennet, 170 00 Prague, Czech Republic; (F.L.); (M.K.); (L.C.)
| | - Leona Cerna
- Department of Medical Genetics, Centre for Medical Genetics and Reproductive Medicine, Gennet, 170 00 Prague, Czech Republic; (F.L.); (M.K.); (L.C.)
| | - Spiros Tavandzis
- Department of Medical Genetics, AGEL Laboratories, AGEL Research and Training Institute, 741 01 Novy Jicin, Czech Republic; (S.T.); (J.I.)
| | - Jana Indrakova
- Department of Medical Genetics, AGEL Laboratories, AGEL Research and Training Institute, 741 01 Novy Jicin, Czech Republic; (S.T.); (J.I.)
| | - Lucie Hruskova
- Department of Medical Genetics, GHC Genetics, 110 00 Prague, Czech Republic;
| | - Marcela Kosarova
- Department of Medical Genetics, Pronatal, 147 00 Prague, Czech Republic;
| | - Radek Vrtel
- Department of Medical Genetics, University Hospital Olomouc, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc, 779 00 Olomouc, Czech Republic;
| | - Viktor Stranecky
- Research Unit for Rare Diseases, Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, 12808 Prague, Czech Republic; (V.S.); (S.K.)
| | - Stanislav Kmoch
- Research Unit for Rare Diseases, Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, 12808 Prague, Czech Republic; (V.S.); (S.K.)
| | - Michal Zikan
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Hospital Na Bulovce and First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, 180 81 Prague, Czech Republic;
| | - Libor Macurek
- Laboratory of Cancer Cell Biology, Institute of Molecular Genetics of the Czech Academy of Sciences, 142 20 Prague, Czech Republic;
| | - Zdenek Kleibl
- Institute of Biochemistry and Experimental Oncology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, 128 53 Prague, Czech Republic; (K.L.); (L.S.); (P.Z.); (M.J.); (M.B.); (M.C.); (S.J.); (J.K.); (Z.V.); (Z.K.)
| | - Jana Soukupova
- Institute of Biochemistry and Experimental Oncology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, 128 53 Prague, Czech Republic; (K.L.); (L.S.); (P.Z.); (M.J.); (M.B.); (M.C.); (S.J.); (J.K.); (Z.V.); (Z.K.)
- Institute of Biology and Medical Genetics, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, 128 00 Prague, Czech Republic; (M.U.); (P.K.)
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Patel AP, Wang M, Fahed AC, Mason-Suares H, Brockman D, Pelletier R, Amr S, Machini K, Hawley M, Witkowski L, Koch C, Philippakis A, Cassa CA, Ellinor PT, Kathiresan S, Ng K, Lebo M, Khera AV. Association of Rare Pathogenic DNA Variants for Familial Hypercholesterolemia, Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Syndrome, and Lynch Syndrome With Disease Risk in Adults According to Family History. JAMA Netw Open 2020; 3:e203959. [PMID: 32347951 PMCID: PMC7292735 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3959] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Pathogenic DNA variants associated with familial hypercholesterolemia, hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome, and Lynch syndrome are widely recognized as clinically important and actionable when identified, leading some clinicians to recommend population-wide genomic screening. OBJECTIVES To assess the prevalence and clinical importance of pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants associated with each of 3 genomic conditions (familial hypercholesterolemia, hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome, and Lynch syndrome) within the context of contemporary clinical care. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This cohort study used gene-sequencing data from 49 738 participants in the UK Biobank who were recruited from 22 sites across the UK between March 21, 2006, and October 1, 2010. Inpatient hospital data date back to 1977; cancer registry data, to 1957; and death registry data, to 2006. Statistical analysis was performed from July 22, 2019, to November 15, 2019. EXPOSURES Pathogenic or likely pathogenic DNA variants classified by a clinical laboratory geneticist. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Composite end point specific to each genomic condition based on atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease events for familial hypercholesterolemia, breast or ovarian cancer for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome, and colorectal or uterine cancer for Lynch syndrome. RESULTS Among 49 738 participants (mean [SD] age, 57 [8] years; 27 144 female [55%]), 441 (0.9%) harbored a pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant associated with any of 3 genomic conditions, including 131 (0.3%) for familial hypercholesterolemia, 235 (0.5%) for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome, and 76 (0.2%) for Lynch syndrome. Presence of these variants was associated with increased risk of disease: for familial hypercholesterolemia, 28 of 131 carriers (21.4%) vs 4663 of 49 607 noncarriers (9.4%) developed atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease; for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome, 32 of 116 female carriers (27.6%) vs 2080 of 27 028 female noncarriers (7.7%) developed associated cancers; and for Lynch syndrome, 17 of 76 carriers (22.4%) vs 929 of 49 662 noncarriers (1.9%) developed colorectal or uterine cancer. The predicted probability of disease at age 75 years despite contemporary clinical care was 45.3% for carriers of familial hypercholesterolemia, 41.1% for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome, and 38.3% for Lynch syndrome. Across the 3 conditions, 39.7% (175 of 441) of the carriers reported a family history of disease vs 23.2% (34 517 of 148 772) of noncarriers. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE The findings suggest that approximately 1% of the middle-aged adult population in the UK Biobank harbored a pathogenic variant associated with any of 3 genomic conditions. These variants were associated with an increased risk of disease despite contemporary clinical care and were not reliably detected by family history.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aniruddh P Patel
- Division of Cardiology and Center for Genomic Medicine, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
- Cardiovascular Disease Initiative, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Minxian Wang
- Cardiovascular Disease Initiative, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| | - Akl C Fahed
- Division of Cardiology and Center for Genomic Medicine, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
- Cardiovascular Disease Initiative, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Heather Mason-Suares
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Partners HealthCare Personalized Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Deanna Brockman
- Division of Cardiology and Center for Genomic Medicine, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
- Cardiovascular Disease Initiative, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Renee Pelletier
- Division of Cardiology and Center for Genomic Medicine, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
- Cardiovascular Disease Initiative, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Sami Amr
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Partners HealthCare Personalized Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Kalotina Machini
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Partners HealthCare Personalized Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Megan Hawley
- Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Partners HealthCare Personalized Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Leora Witkowski
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Partners HealthCare Personalized Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Christopher Koch
- Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Partners HealthCare Personalized Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Anthony Philippakis
- Cardiovascular Disease Initiative, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| | - Christopher A Cassa
- Cardiovascular Disease Initiative, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Division of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Patrick T Ellinor
- Division of Cardiology and Center for Genomic Medicine, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
- Cardiovascular Disease Initiative, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Sekar Kathiresan
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Verve Therapeutics, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| | - Kenney Ng
- Center for Computational Health, IBM Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| | - Matthew Lebo
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Partners HealthCare Personalized Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Amit V Khera
- Division of Cardiology and Center for Genomic Medicine, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
- Cardiovascular Disease Initiative, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Evans O, Gaba F, Manchanda R. Population-based genetic testing for Women's cancer prevention. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2020; 65:139-153. [PMID: 32245629 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2020.02.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2020] [Accepted: 02/26/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Germline mutations in cancer-susceptibility-genes (CSG) can dramatically increase womens' lifetime risk of ovarian, endometrial, breast and bowel cancers. Identification of unaffected carriers is important to enable proactive engagement with highly effective screening and preventive options to minimise cancer risk. Currently, a family-history model is used to identify individuals with CSGs. Complex regional referral guidelines specify the family-history criteria required before an individual is eligible for genetic-testing. This model is ineffective, resource intense, misses >50% CSG carriers, is associated with underutilisation of genetic-testing services and delays detection of mutation carriers. Although awareness and detection of CSG-carriers has improved, over 97% carriers remain unidentified. This reflects significant missed opportunities for precision-prevention. Population-based genetic-testing (PBGT) represents a novel healthcare strategy with the potential to dramatically improve detection of unaffected CSG-carriers along with enabling population risk-stratification for cancer precision-prevention. Several research studies have assessed the impact, feasibility, acceptability, long-term psychological outcomes and cost-effectiveness of population-based BRCA-testing in the Ashkenazi-Jewish population. Initial data on PBGT in the general-population is beginning to emerge and large implementation studies investigating PBGT in the general-population are needed. This review will summarise the current research into the clinical, psycho-social, health-economic, societal and ethical consequences of a PBGT model for women's cancer precision-prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olivia Evans
- Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Barts CRUK Cancer Centre, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London, EC1M 6BQ, UK; Department of Gynaecological Oncology, St Bartholomew's Hospital, EC1A 7BE, London, UK
| | - Faiza Gaba
- Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Barts CRUK Cancer Centre, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London, EC1M 6BQ, UK; Department of Gynaecological Oncology, St Bartholomew's Hospital, EC1A 7BE, London, UK
| | - Ranjit Manchanda
- Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Barts CRUK Cancer Centre, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London, EC1M 6BQ, UK; Department of Gynaecological Oncology, St Bartholomew's Hospital, EC1A 7BE, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Hernandez-Nieto C, Alkon-Meadows T, Lee J, Cacchione T, Iyune-Cojab E, Garza-Galvan M, Luna-Rojas M, Copperman AB, Sandler B. Expanded carrier screening for preconception reproductive risk assessment: Prevalence of carrier status in a Mexican population. Prenat Diagn 2020; 40:635-643. [PMID: 32003480 DOI: 10.1002/pd.5656] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2019] [Revised: 12/30/2019] [Accepted: 01/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Genetic carrier screening has the potential to identify couples at risk of having a child affected with an autosomal recessive or X-linked disorder. However, the current prevalence of carrier status for these conditions in developing countries is not well defined. This study assesses the prevalence of carrier status of selected genetic conditions utilizing an expanded, pan-ethnic genetic carrier screening panel (ECS) in a large population of Mexican patients. METHODS Retrospective chart review of all patients tested with a single ECS panel at an international infertility center from 2012 to 2018 were included, and the prevalence of positive carrier status in a Mexican population was evaluated. RESULTS Eight hundred five individuals were analyzed with ECS testing for 283 genetic conditions. Three hundred fifty-two carriers (43.7%) were identified with 503 pathogenic variants in 145 different genes. Seventeen of the 391 participating couples (4.34%) were identified as being at-risk couples. The most prevalent alleles found were associated with alpha thalassemia, cystic fibrosis, GJB2 nonsyndromic hearing loss, biotinidase deficiency, and familial Mediterranean fever. CONCLUSION Based on the prevalence and severity of Mendelian disorders, we recommend that couples who wish to conceive regardless of their ethnicity background explore carrier screening and genetic counseling prior to reproductive medical treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlos Hernandez-Nieto
- Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Reproductive Medicine associates of New York, New York, USA.,Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Reproductive Medicine associates of New York-Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Tamar Alkon-Meadows
- Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Reproductive Medicine associates of New York, New York, USA.,Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Reproductive Medicine associates of New York-Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Joseph Lee
- Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Reproductive Medicine associates of New York, New York, USA
| | - Teresa Cacchione
- Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Reproductive Medicine associates of New York, New York, USA
| | - Esther Iyune-Cojab
- Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Reproductive Medicine associates of New York-Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Maria Garza-Galvan
- Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Reproductive Medicine associates of New York-Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Martha Luna-Rojas
- Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Reproductive Medicine associates of New York, New York, USA.,Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Reproductive Medicine associates of New York-Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Alan B Copperman
- Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Reproductive Medicine associates of New York, New York, USA.,Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Science, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.,Sema4, A Mount Sinai Venture, Stamford CT, USA
| | - Benjamin Sandler
- Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Reproductive Medicine associates of New York, New York, USA.,Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Science, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.,Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Reproductive Medicine associates of New York-Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Cost-effectiveness of long-term clinical management of BRCA pathogenic variant carriers. Genet Med 2020; 22:831-839. [DOI: 10.1038/s41436-020-0751-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2019] [Accepted: 01/13/2020] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
|
50
|
Abstract
Next generation DNA sequencing (NGS) has the potential to improve the diagnostic and prognostic utility of newborn screening programmes. This study assesses the feasibility of automating NGS on dried blood spot (DBS) DNA in a United Kingdom National Health Service (UK NHS) laboratory. An NGS panel targeting the entire coding sequence of five genes relevant to disorders currently screened for in newborns in the UK was validated on DBS DNA. An automated process for DNA extraction, NGS and bioinformatics analysis was developed. The process was tested on DBS to determine feasibility, turnaround time and cost. The analytical sensitivity of the assay was 100% and analytical specificity was 99.96%, with a mean 99.5% concordance of variant calls between DBS and venous blood samples in regions with ≥30× coverage (96.8% across all regions; all variant calls were single nucleotide variants (SNVs), with indel performance not assessed). The pipeline enabled processing of up to 1000 samples a week with a turnaround time of four days from receipt of sample to reporting. This study concluded that it is feasible to automate targeted NGS on routine DBS samples in a UK NHS laboratory setting, but it may not currently be cost effective as a first line test.
Collapse
|