1
|
Ho PJ, Khng A, Tan BKT, Khor CC, Tan EY, Lim GH, Yuan JM, Tan SM, Chang X, Tan VKM, Sim X, Dorajoo R, Koh WP, Hartman M, Li J. Characterizing the Relationship between Expression Quantitative Trait Loci (eQTLs), DNA Methylation Quantitative Trait Loci (mQTLs), and Breast Cancer Risk Variants. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:2072. [PMID: 38893190 PMCID: PMC11171367 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16112072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2024] [Revised: 05/21/2024] [Accepted: 05/28/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the association of a polygenic risk score (PRS) for functional genetic variants with the risk of developing breast cancer. METHODS Summary data-based Mendelian randomization (SMR) and heterogeneity in dependent instruments (HEIDI) were used to identify breast cancer risk variants associated with gene expression and DNA methylation levels. A new SMR-based PRS was computed from the identified variants (functional PRS) and compared to an established 313-variant breast cancer PRS (GWAS PRS). The two scores were evaluated in 3560 breast cancer cases and 3383 non-cancer controls and also in a prospective study (n = 10,213) comprising 418 cases. RESULTS We identified 149 variants showing pleiotropic association with breast cancer risk (eQTLHEIDI > 0.05 = 9, mQTLHEIDI > 0.05 = 165). The discriminatory ability of the functional PRS (AUCcontinuous [95% CI]: 0.540 [0.526 to 0.553]) was found to be lower than that of the GWAS PRS (AUCcontinuous [95% CI]: 0.609 [0.596 to 0.622]). Even when utilizing 457 distinct variants from both the functional and GWAS PRS, the combined discriminatory performance remained below that of the GWAS PRS (AUCcontinuous, combined [95% CI]: 0.561 [0.548 to 0.575]). A binary high/low-risk classification based on the 80th centile PRS in controls revealed a 6% increase in cases using the GWAS PRS compared to the functional PRS. The functional PRS identified an additional 12% of high-risk cases but also led to a 13% increase in high-risk classification among controls. Similar findings were observed in the SCHS prospective cohort, where the GWAS PRS outperformed the functional PRS, and the highest-performing PRS, a combined model, did not significantly improve over the GWAS PRS. CONCLUSIONS While this study identified potentially functional variants associated with breast cancer risk, their inclusion did not substantially enhance the predictive accuracy of the GWAS PRS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peh Joo Ho
- Genome Institute of Singapore (GIS), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), 60 Biopolis Street, Singapore 138672, Singapore; (P.J.H.)
- Department of Surgery, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore 119228, Singapore
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore 117549, Singapore
| | - Alexis Khng
- Genome Institute of Singapore (GIS), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), 60 Biopolis Street, Singapore 138672, Singapore; (P.J.H.)
| | - Benita Kiat-Tee Tan
- Department of General Surgery, Sengkang General Hospital, Singapore 544886, Singapore
- Department of Breast Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore 544886, Singapore
- Division of Surgery and Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore 168583, Singapore
| | - Chiea Chuen Khor
- Genome Institute of Singapore (GIS), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), 60 Biopolis Street, Singapore 138672, Singapore; (P.J.H.)
- Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore 169856, Singapore
| | - Ern Yu Tan
- Department of General Surgery, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore 308433, Singapore
- Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technology University, Singapore 639798, Singapore
- Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), 61 Biopolis Street, Singapore 138673, Singapore
| | - Geok Hoon Lim
- KK Breast Department, KK Women’s and Children’s Hospital, Singapore 229899, Singapore
| | - Jian-Min Yuan
- Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Program, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15232, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA
| | - Su-Ming Tan
- Division of Breast Surgery, Changi General Hospital, Singapore 529889, Singapore
| | - Xuling Chang
- Department of Paediatrics, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore 119228, Singapore
- Khoo Teck Puat—National University Children’s Medical Institute, National University Health System, Singapore 119074, Singapore
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia
| | - Veronique Kiak Mien Tan
- Department of Breast Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore 544886, Singapore
- Division of Surgery and Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore 168583, Singapore
| | - Xueling Sim
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore 117549, Singapore
| | - Rajkumar Dorajoo
- Genome Institute of Singapore (GIS), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), 60 Biopolis Street, Singapore 138672, Singapore; (P.J.H.)
- Department of Paediatrics, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore 119228, Singapore
| | - Woon-Puay Koh
- Healthy Longevity Translational Research Programme, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117545, Singapore
- Singapore Institute for Clinical Sciences, Agency for Science Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore 117609, Singapore
| | - Mikael Hartman
- Department of Surgery, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore 119228, Singapore
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore 117549, Singapore
- Department of Surgery, University Surgical Cluster, National University Hospital, Singapore 119074, Singapore
| | - Jingmei Li
- Genome Institute of Singapore (GIS), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), 60 Biopolis Street, Singapore 138672, Singapore; (P.J.H.)
- Department of Surgery, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore 119228, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mars N, Kerminen S, Tamlander M, Pirinen M, Jakkula E, Aaltonen K, Meretoja T, Heinävaara S, Widén E, Ripatti S. Comprehensive Inherited Risk Estimation for Risk-Based Breast Cancer Screening in Women. J Clin Oncol 2024; 42:1477-1487. [PMID: 38422475 PMCID: PMC11095905 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.00295] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2023] [Revised: 11/24/2023] [Accepted: 12/20/2023] [Indexed: 03/02/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Family history (FH) and pathogenic variants (PVs) are used for guiding risk surveillance in selected high-risk women but little is known about their impact for breast cancer screening on population level. In addition, polygenic risk scores (PRSs) have been shown to efficiently stratify breast cancer risk through combining information about common genetic factors into one measure. METHODS In longitudinal real-life data, we evaluate PRS, FH, and PVs for stratified screening. Using FinnGen (N = 117,252), linked to the Mass Screening Registry for breast cancer (1992-2019; nationwide organized biennial screening for age 50-69 years), we assessed the screening performance of a breast cancer PRS and compared its performance with FH of breast cancer and PVs in moderate- (CHEK2)- to high-risk (PALB2) susceptibility genes. RESULTS Effect sizes for FH, PVs, and high PRS (>90th percentile) were comparable in screening-aged women, with similar implications for shifting age at screening onset. A high PRS identified women more likely to be diagnosed with breast cancer after a positive screening finding (positive predictive value [PPV], 39.5% [95% CI, 37.6 to 41.5]). Combinations of risk factors increased the PPVs up to 45% to 50%. A high PRS conferred an elevated risk of interval breast cancer (hazard ratio [HR], 2.78 [95% CI, 2.00 to 3.86] at age 50 years; HR, 2.48 [95% CI, 1.67 to 3.70] at age 60 years), and women with a low PRS (<10th percentile) had a low risk for both interval- and screen-detected breast cancers. CONCLUSION Using real-life screening data, this study demonstrates the effectiveness of a breast cancer PRS for risk stratification, alone and combined with FH and PVs. Further research is required to evaluate their impact in a prospective risk-stratified screening program, including cost-effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nina Mars
- Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland, FIMM, HiLIFE, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA
| | - Sini Kerminen
- Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland, FIMM, HiLIFE, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Max Tamlander
- Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland, FIMM, HiLIFE, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Matti Pirinen
- Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland, FIMM, HiLIFE, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
- Helsinki Institute for Information Technology HIIT and Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
- Department of Public Health, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Eveliina Jakkula
- Department of Clinical Genetics, HUSLAB, HUS Diagnostic Center, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
- Department of Medical Genetics, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Kirsimari Aaltonen
- Department of Clinical Genetics, HUSLAB, HUS Diagnostic Center, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
- Department of Medical Genetics, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Tuomo Meretoja
- Breast Surgery Unit, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
- University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Sirpa Heinävaara
- Department of Public Health, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
- Finnish Cancer Registry, Cancer Society of Finland, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Elisabeth Widén
- Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland, FIMM, HiLIFE, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Samuli Ripatti
- Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland, FIMM, HiLIFE, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA
- Department of Public Health, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Nakamura W, Hirata M, Oda S, Chiba K, Okada A, Mateos RN, Sugawa M, Iida N, Ushiama M, Tanabe N, Sakamoto H, Sekine S, Hirasawa A, Kawai Y, Tokunaga K, Tsujimoto SI, Shiba N, Ito S, Yoshida T, Shiraishi Y. Assessing the efficacy of target adaptive sampling long-read sequencing through hereditary cancer patient genomes. NPJ Genom Med 2024; 9:11. [PMID: 38368425 PMCID: PMC10874402 DOI: 10.1038/s41525-024-00394-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2023] [Accepted: 01/15/2024] [Indexed: 02/19/2024] Open
Abstract
Innovations in sequencing technology have led to the discovery of novel mutations that cause inherited diseases. However, many patients with suspected genetic diseases remain undiagnosed. Long-read sequencing technologies are expected to significantly improve the diagnostic rate by overcoming the limitations of short-read sequencing. In addition, Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) offers adaptive sampling and computationally driven target enrichment technology. This enables more affordable intensive analysis of target gene regions compared to standard non-selective long-read sequencing. In this study, we developed an efficient computational workflow for target adaptive sampling long-read sequencing (TAS-LRS) and evaluated it through application to 33 genomes collected from suspected hereditary cancer patients. Our workflow can identify single nucleotide variants with nearly the same accuracy as the short-read platform and elucidate complex forms of structural variations. We also newly identified several SINE-R/VNTR/Alu (SVA) elements affecting the APC gene in two patients with familial adenomatous polyposis, as well as their sites of origin. In addition, we demonstrated that off-target reads from adaptive sampling, which is typically discarded, can be effectively used to accurately genotype common single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) across the entire genome, enabling the calculation of a polygenic risk score. Furthermore, we identified allele-specific MLH1 promoter hypermethylation in a Lynch syndrome patient. In summary, our workflow with TAS-LRS can simultaneously capture monogenic risk variants including complex structural variations, polygenic background as well as epigenetic alterations, and will be an efficient platform for genetic disease research and diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wataru Nakamura
- Division of Genome Analysis Platform Development, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Pediatrics, Yokohama City University Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Makoto Hirata
- Division of Genetic Medicine and Services, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Molecular Pathology, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Satoyo Oda
- Division of Genetic Medicine and Services, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
- Division of Laboratory Medicine, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kenichi Chiba
- Division of Genome Analysis Platform Development, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ai Okada
- Division of Genome Analysis Platform Development, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Raúl Nicolás Mateos
- Division of Genome Analysis Platform Development, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masahiro Sugawa
- Division of Genome Analysis Platform Development, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Naoko Iida
- Division of Genome Analysis Platform Development, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Mineko Ushiama
- Division of Genetic Medicine and Services, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Clinical Genetics, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Noriko Tanabe
- Division of Genetic Medicine and Services, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiromi Sakamoto
- Division of Genetic Medicine and Services, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Clinical Genetics, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shigeki Sekine
- Division of Molecular Pathology, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Akira Hirasawa
- Department of Clinical Genetics and Genomic Medicine, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan
| | - Yosuke Kawai
- Genome Medical Science Project, Research Institute, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Katsushi Tokunaga
- Genome Medical Science Project, Research Institute, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
- Central Biobank, National Center Biobank Network, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shin-Ichi Tsujimoto
- Department of Pediatrics, Yokohama City University Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Norio Shiba
- Department of Pediatrics, Yokohama City University Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Shuichi Ito
- Department of Pediatrics, Yokohama City University Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Teruhiko Yoshida
- Division of Genetic Medicine and Services, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Clinical Genetics, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yuichi Shiraishi
- Division of Genome Analysis Platform Development, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Yiangou K, Mavaddat N, Dennis J, Zanti M, Wang Q, Bolla MK, Abubakar M, Ahearn TU, Andrulis IL, Anton-Culver H, Antonenkova NN, Arndt V, Aronson KJ, Augustinsson A, Baten A, Behrens S, Bermisheva M, de Gonzalez AB, Białkowska K, Boddicker N, Bodelon C, Bogdanova NV, Bojesen SE, Brantley KD, Brauch H, Brenner H, Camp NJ, Canzian F, Castelao JE, Cessna MH, Chang-Claude J, Chenevix-Trench G, Chung WK, Colonna SV, Couch FJ, Cox A, Cross SS, Czene K, Daly MB, Devilee P, Dörk T, Dunning AM, Eccles DM, Eliassen AH, Engel C, Eriksson M, Evans DG, Fasching PA, Fletcher O, Flyger H, Fritschi L, Gago-Dominguez M, Gentry-Maharaj A, González-Neira A, Guénel P, Hahnen E, Haiman CA, Hamann U, Hartikainen JM, Ho V, Hodge J, Hollestelle A, Honisch E, Hooning MJ, Hoppe R, Hopper JL, Howell S, Howell A, Jakovchevska S, Jakubowska A, Jernström H, Johnson N, Kaaks R, Khusnutdinova EK, Kitahara CM, Koutros S, Kristensen VN, Lacey JV, Lambrechts D, Lejbkowicz F, Lindblom A, Lush M, Mannermaa A, Mavroudis D, Menon U, Murphy RA, Nevanlinna H, Obi N, Offit K, Park-Simon TW, Patel AV, Peng C, Peterlongo P, Pita G, Plaseska-Karanfilska D, Pylkäs K, Radice P, Rashid MU, Rennert G, Roberts E, Rodriguez J, Romero A, Rosenberg EH, Saloustros E, Sandler DP, Sawyer EJ, Schmutzler RK, Scott CG, Shu XO, Southey MC, Stone J, Taylor JA, Teras LR, van de Beek I, Willett W, Winqvist R, Zheng W, Vachon CM, Schmidt MK, Hall P, MacInnis RJ, Milne RL, Pharoah PD, Simard J, Antoniou AC, Easton DF, Michailidou K. Differences in polygenic score distributions in European ancestry populations: implications for breast cancer risk prediction. MEDRXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR HEALTH SCIENCES 2024:2024.02.12.24302043. [PMID: 38410445 PMCID: PMC10896416 DOI: 10.1101/2024.02.12.24302043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/28/2024]
Abstract
The 313-variant polygenic risk score (PRS313) provides a promising tool for breast cancer risk prediction. However, evaluation of the PRS313 across different European populations which could influence risk estimation has not been performed. Here, we explored the distribution of PRS313 across European populations using genotype data from 94,072 females without breast cancer, of European-ancestry from 21 countries participating in the Breast Cancer Association Consortium (BCAC) and 225,105 female participants from the UK Biobank. The mean PRS313 differed markedly across European countries, being highest in south-eastern Europe and lowest in north-western Europe. Using the overall European PRS313 distribution to categorise individuals leads to overestimation and underestimation of risk in some individuals from south-eastern and north-western countries, respectively. Adjustment for principal components explained most of the observed heterogeneity in mean PRS. Country-specific PRS distributions may be used to calibrate risk categories in individuals from different countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristia Yiangou
- Biostatistics Unit, The Cyprus Institute of Neurology and Genetics, Nicosia, Cyprus, 2371
| | - Nasim Mavaddat
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK, CB1 8RN
| | - Joe Dennis
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK, CB1 8RN
| | - Maria Zanti
- Biostatistics Unit, The Cyprus Institute of Neurology and Genetics, Nicosia, Cyprus, 2371
| | - Qin Wang
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK, CB1 8RN
| | - Manjeet K. Bolla
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK, CB1 8RN
| | - Mustapha Abubakar
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, MD, USA, 20850
| | - Thomas U. Ahearn
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, MD, USA, 20850
| | - Irene L. Andrulis
- Fred A, Litwin Center for Cancer Genetics, Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute of Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5G 1X5
- Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5S 1A8
| | - Hoda Anton-Culver
- Department of Medicine, Genetic Epidemiology Research Institute, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA, 92617
| | - Natalia N. Antonenkova
- NN Alexandrov Research Institute of Oncology and Medical Radiology, Minsk, Belarus, 223040
| | - Volker Arndt
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, 69120
| | - Kristan J. Aronson
- Department of Public Health Sciences, and Cancer Research Institute, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada, K7L 3N6
| | | | - Adinda Baten
- Leuven Multidisciplinary Breast Center, Department of Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium, 3000
| | - Sabine Behrens
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, 69120
| | - Marina Bermisheva
- Institute of Biochemistry and Genetics of the Ufa Federal Research Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Ufa, Russia, 450054
- St Petersburg State University, St, Petersburg, Russia, 199034
| | | | - Katarzyna Białkowska
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland, 71-252
| | - Nicholas Boddicker
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA, 55905
| | - Clara Bodelon
- Department of Population Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA, USA, 30303
| | - Natalia V. Bogdanova
- NN Alexandrov Research Institute of Oncology and Medical Radiology, Minsk, Belarus, 223040
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany, 30625
- Gynaecology Research Unit, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany, 30625
| | - Stig E. Bojesen
- Copenhagen General Population Study, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark, 2730
- Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark, 2730
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark, 2200
| | - Kristen D. Brantley
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA, 02115
| | - Hiltrud Brauch
- Dr Margarete Fischer-Bosch-Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Stuttgart, Germany, 70376
- iFIT-Cluster of Excellence, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany, 72074
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Partner Site Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany, 72074
| | - Hermann Brenner
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, 69120
- Division of Preventive Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany, 69120
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, 69120
| | - Nicola J. Camp
- Department of Internal Medicine and Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA, 84112
| | - Federico Canzian
- Genomic Epidemiology Group, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, 69120
| | - Jose E. Castelao
- Oncology and Genetics Unit, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago de Compostela (IDIS) Foundation, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago, SERGAS, Vigo, Spain, 36312
| | - Melissa H. Cessna
- Department of Pathology, Intermountain Healthcare, Salt Lake City, UT, USA, 84143
- Intermountain Biorepository, Intermountain Healthcare, Salt Lake City, UT, USA, 84143
| | - Jenny Chang-Claude
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, 69120
- Cancer Epidemiology Group, University Cancer Center Hamburg (UCCH), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany, 20246
| | - Georgia Chenevix-Trench
- Cancer Research Program, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia, 4006
| | - Wendy K. Chung
- Departments of Pediatrics and Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA, 10032
| | - NBCS Collaborators
- Department of Cancer Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital-Radiumhospitalet, Oslo, Norway, 0379
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway, 0450
- Department of Research, Vestre Viken Hospital, Drammen, Norway, 3019
- Section for Breast- and Endocrine Surgery, Department of Cancer, Division of Surgery, Cancer and Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital-Ullevål, Oslo, Norway, 0450
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway, 0379
- Department of Pathology, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway, 1478
- Department of Tumor Biology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway, 0379
- Department of Oncology, Division of Surgery, Cancer and Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital-Radiumhospitalet, Oslo, Norway, 0379
- National Advisory Unit on Late Effects after Cancer Treatment, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway, 0379
- Department of Oncology, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway, 1478
- Oslo Breast Cancer Research Consortium, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway, 0379
- Department of Medical Genetics, Oslo University Hospital and University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway, 0379
| | - Sarah V. Colonna
- Department of Internal Medicine and Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA, 84112
| | - Fergus J. Couch
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA, 55905
| | - Angela Cox
- Division of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK, S10 2TN
| | - Simon S. Cross
- Division of Neuroscience, School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK, S10 2TN
| | - Kamila Czene
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden, 171 65
| | - Mary B. Daly
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA, 19111
| | - Peter Devilee
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands, 2333 ZA
- Department of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands, 2333 ZA
| | - Thilo Dörk
- Gynaecology Research Unit, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany, 30625
| | - Alison M. Dunning
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK, CB1 8RN
| | - Diana M. Eccles
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK, SO17 1BJ
| | - A. Heather Eliassen
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA, 02115
- Channing Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA, 02115
- Department of Nutrition, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA, 02115
| | - Christoph Engel
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany, 04107
- LIFE - Leipzig Research Centre for Civilization Diseases, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany, 04103
| | - Mikael Eriksson
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden, 171 65
| | - D. Gareth Evans
- Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK, M13 9WL
- North West Genomics Laboratory Hub, Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, St Mary’s Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK, M13 9WL
| | - Peter A. Fasching
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany, 91054
| | - Olivia Fletcher
- The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK, SW7 3RP
| | - Henrik Flyger
- Department of Breast Surgery, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark, 2730
| | - Lin Fritschi
- School of Population Health, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia, 6102
| | - Manuela Gago-Dominguez
- Cancer Genetics and Epidemiology Group, Genomic Medicine Group, Fundación Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago de Compostela (FIDIS), Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago, SERGAS, Santiago de Compostela, Spain, 15706
| | - Aleksandra Gentry-Maharaj
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, University College London, London, UK, WC1V 6LJ
- Department of Women’s Cancer, Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute for Women’s Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Anna González-Neira
- Human Genotyping Unit-CeGen, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Madrid, Spain, 28029
- Spanish Network on Rare Diseases (CIBERER)
| | - Pascal Guénel
- Team ‘Exposome and Heredity’, CESP, Gustave Roussy, INSERM, University Paris-Saclay, UVSQ, Villejuif, France, 94805
| | - Eric Hahnen
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany, 50937
- Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany, 50937
| | - Christopher A. Haiman
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA, 90033
| | - Ute Hamann
- Molecular Genetics of Breast Cancer, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, 69120
| | - Jaana M. Hartikainen
- Cancer RC, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland, 70210
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland, 70210
| | - Vikki Ho
- Health Innovation and Evaluation Hub, Université de Montréal Hospital Research Centre (CRCHUM), Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - James Hodge
- Department of Population Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA, USA, 30303
| | - Antoinette Hollestelle
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands, 3015 GD
| | - Ellen Honisch
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany, 40225
| | - Maartje J. Hooning
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands, 3015 GD
| | - Reiner Hoppe
- Dr Margarete Fischer-Bosch-Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Stuttgart, Germany, 70376
- University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany, 72074
| | - John L. Hopper
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, 3010
| | - Sacha Howell
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
- Nightingale/Prevent Breast Cancer Centre, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- Manchester Breast Centre, Manchester Cancer Research Centre, The Christie Hospital, Manchester, UK
| | - Anthony Howell
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK, M13 9PL
| | - ABCTB Investigators
- Australian Breast Cancer Tissue Bank, Westmead Institute for Medical Research, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia, 2145
| | - kConFab Investigators
- Research Department, Peter MacCallum Cancer Center, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, 3000
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia, 3000
| | - Simona Jakovchevska
- Research Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology ‘Georgi D, Efremov’, MASA, Skopje, Republic of North Macedonia, 1000
| | - Anna Jakubowska
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland, 71-252
- Independent Laboratory of Molecular Biology and Genetic Diagnostics, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland, 171-252
| | - Helena Jernström
- Oncology, Clinical Sciences in Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden, 221 85
| | - Nichola Johnson
- The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK, SW7 3RP
| | - Rudolf Kaaks
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, 69120
| | - Elza K. Khusnutdinova
- Institute of Biochemistry and Genetics of the Ufa Federal Research Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Ufa, Russia, 450054
- Department of Genetics and Fundamental Medicine, Ufa University of Science and Technology, Ufa, Russia, 450076
| | - Cari M. Kitahara
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA, 20892
| | - Stella Koutros
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, MD, USA, 20850
| | - Vessela N. Kristensen
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway, 0450
- Department of Medical Genetics, Oslo University Hospital and University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway, 0379
| | - James V. Lacey
- Department of Computational and Quantitative Medicine, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, USA, 91010
- City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, USA, 91010
| | - Diether Lambrechts
- Laboratory for Translational Genetics, Department of Human Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium, 3000
- VIB Center for Cancer Biology, VIB, Leuven, Belgium, 3001
| | | | - Annika Lindblom
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden, 171 76
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden, 171 76
| | - Michael Lush
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK, CB1 8RN
| | - Arto Mannermaa
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland, 70210
- Translational Cancer Research Area, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland, 70210
- Biobank of Eastern Finland, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Dimitrios Mavroudis
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital of Heraklion, Heraklion, Greece, 711 10
| | - Usha Menon
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, University College London, London, UK, WC1V 6LJ
| | - Rachel A. Murphy
- School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada, V6T 1Z4
- Cancer Control Research, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada, V5Z 1L3
| | - Heli Nevanlinna
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland, 00290
| | - Nadia Obi
- Institute for Occupational and Maritime Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany, 20246
- Institute for Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany, 20246
| | - Kenneth Offit
- Clinical Genetics Research Lab, Department of Cancer Biology and Genetics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA, 10065
- Clinical Genetics Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA, 10065
| | | | - Alpa V. Patel
- Department of Population Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA, USA, 30303
| | - Cheng Peng
- Channing Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA, 02115
| | - Paolo Peterlongo
- Genome Diagnostics Program, IFOM ETS - the AIRC Institute of Molecular Oncology, Milan, Italy, 20139
| | - Guillermo Pita
- Human Genotyping Unit-CeGen, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Madrid, Spain, 28029
| | - Dijana Plaseska-Karanfilska
- Research Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology ‘Georgi D, Efremov’, MASA, Skopje, Republic of North Macedonia, 1000
| | - Katri Pylkäs
- Laboratory of Cancer Genetics and Tumor Biology, Translational Medicine Research Unit, Biocenter Oulu, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland, 90220
- Laboratory of Cancer Genetics and Tumor Biology, Northern Finland Laboratory Centre Oulu, Oulu, Finland, 90220
| | - Paolo Radice
- Unit of Predictice Medicine, Molecular Bases of Genetic Risk, Department of Research, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori (INT), Milan, Italy, 20133
| | - Muhammad U. Rashid
- Molecular Genetics of Breast Cancer, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, 69120
- Department of Basic Sciences, Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre (SKMCH & RC), Lahore, Pakistan, 54000
| | - Gad Rennert
- Technion, Faculty of Medicine and Association for Promotion of Research in Precision Medicine, Haifa, Israel
| | - Eleanor Roberts
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Juan Rodriguez
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden, 171 65
| | - Atocha Romero
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro, Madrid, Spain, 28222
| | - Efraim H. Rosenberg
- Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, 1066 CX
| | | | - Dale P. Sandler
- Epidemiology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, NIH, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA, 27709
| | - Elinor J. Sawyer
- School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Guy’s Campus, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Rita K. Schmutzler
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany, 50937
- Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany, 50937
- Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne (CMMC), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany, 50931
| | - Christopher G. Scott
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA, 55905
| | - Xiao-Ou Shu
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA, 37232
| | - Melissa C. Southey
- Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia, 3168
- Department of Clinical Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, 3010
- Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, 3004
| | - Jennifer Stone
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, 3010
- Genetic Epidemiology Group, School of Population and Global Health, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia, 6000
| | - Jack A. Taylor
- Epidemiology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, NIH, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA, 27709
- Epigenetic and Stem Cell Biology Laboratory, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, NIH, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA, 27709
| | - Lauren R. Teras
- Department of Population Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA, USA, 30303
| | - Irma van de Beek
- Department of Clinical Genetics, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, 1066 CX
| | - Walter Willett
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA, 02115
- Channing Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA, 02115
- Department of Nutrition, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA, 02115
| | - Robert Winqvist
- Laboratory of Cancer Genetics and Tumor Biology, Translational Medicine Research Unit, Biocenter Oulu, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland, 90220
- Laboratory of Cancer Genetics and Tumor Biology, Northern Finland Laboratory Centre Oulu, Oulu, Finland, 90220
| | - Wei Zheng
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA, 37232
| | - Celine M. Vachon
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Division of Epidemiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA, 55905
| | - Marjanka K. Schmidt
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, 1066 CX
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, 1066 CX
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands, 2333 ZA
| | - Per Hall
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden, 171 65
- Department of Oncology, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden, 118 83
| | - Robert J. MacInnis
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, 3010
- Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, 3004
| | - Roger L. Milne
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, 3010
- Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia, 3168
- Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, 3004
| | - Paul D.P. Pharoah
- Department of Computational Biomedicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, West Hollywood, CA, USA, 90069
| | - Jacques Simard
- Genomics Center, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec – Université Laval Research Center, Québec City, Québec, Canada, G1V 4G2
| | - Antonis C. Antoniou
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK, CB1 8RN
| | - Douglas F. Easton
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK, CB1 8RN
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK, CB1 8RN
| | - Kyriaki Michailidou
- Biostatistics Unit, The Cyprus Institute of Neurology and Genetics, Nicosia, Cyprus, 2371
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK, CB1 8RN
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Baliakas P, Munters AR, Kämpe A, Tesi B, Bondeson ML, Ladenvall C, Eriksson D. Integrating a Polygenic Risk Score into a clinical setting would impact risk predictions in familial breast cancer. J Med Genet 2024; 61:150-154. [PMID: 37580114 PMCID: PMC10850617 DOI: 10.1136/jmg-2023-109311] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2023] [Accepted: 07/28/2023] [Indexed: 08/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Low-impact genetic variants identified in population-based genetic studies are not routinely measured as part of clinical genetic testing in familial breast cancer (BC). We studied the consequences of integrating an established Polygenic Risk Score (PRS) (BCAC 313, PRS313) into clinical sequencing of women with familial BC in Sweden. METHODS We developed an add-on sequencing panel to capture 313 risk variants in addition to the clinical screening of hereditary BC genes. Index patients with no pathogenic variant from 87 families, and 1000 population controls, were included in comparative PRS calculations. Including detailed family history, sequencing results and tumour pathology information, we used BOADICEA (Breast and Ovarian Analysis of Disease Incidence and Carrier Estimation Algorithm) V.6 to estimate contralateral and lifetime risks without and with PRS313. RESULTS Women with BC but no pathogenic variants in hereditary BC genes have a higher PRS313 compared with population controls (mean+0.78 SD, p<3e-9). Implementing PRS313 in the clinical risk estimation before their BC diagnosis would have changed the recommended follow-up in 24%-45% of women. CONCLUSIONS Our results show the potential impact of incorporating PRS313 directly in the clinical genomic investigation of women with familial BC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Panagiotis Baliakas
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Science for Life Laboratory, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Arielle R Munters
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Science for Life Laboratory, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Anders Kämpe
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Bianca Tesi
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Marie-Louise Bondeson
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Science for Life Laboratory, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Claes Ladenvall
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Daniel Eriksson
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Akademiska Sjukhuset, Uppsala, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hong JY, Han JH, Jeong SH, Kwak C, Kim HH, Jeong CW. Polygenic risk score model for renal cell carcinoma in the Korean population and relationship with lifestyle-associated factors. BMC Genomics 2024; 25:46. [PMID: 38200428 PMCID: PMC10777500 DOI: 10.1186/s12864-024-09974-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2023] [Accepted: 01/04/2024] [Indexed: 01/12/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The polygenic risk score (PRS) is used to predict the risk of developing common complex diseases or cancers using genetic markers. Although PRS is used in clinical practice to predict breast cancer risk, it is more accurate for Europeans than for non-Europeans because of the sample size of training genome-wide association studies (GWAS). To address this disparity, we constructed a PRS model for predicting the risk of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in the Korean population. RESULTS Using GWAS analysis, we identified 43 Korean-specific variants and calculated the PRS. Subsequent to plotting receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, we selected the 31 best-performing variants to construct an optimal PRS model. The resultant PRS model with 31 variants demonstrated a prediction rate of 77.4%. The pathway analysis indicated that the identified non-coding variants are involved in regulating the expression of genes related to cancer initiation and progression. Notably, favorable lifestyle habits, such as avoiding tobacco and alcohol, mitigated the risk of RCC across PRS strata expressing genetic risk. CONCLUSION A Korean-specific PRS model was established to predict the risk of RCC in the underrepresented Korean population. Our findings suggest that lifestyle-associated factors influencing RCC risk are associated with acquired risk factors indirectly through epigenetic modification, even among individuals in the higher PRS category.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joo Young Hong
- Biomedical Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jang Hee Han
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Seung Hwan Jeong
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Cheol Kwak
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyeon Hoe Kim
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Department of Urology, Myongji Hospital, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea
| | - Chang Wook Jeong
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kachuri L, Chatterjee N, Hirbo J, Schaid DJ, Martin I, Kullo IJ, Kenny EE, Pasaniuc B, Witte JS, Ge T. Principles and methods for transferring polygenic risk scores across global populations. Nat Rev Genet 2024; 25:8-25. [PMID: 37620596 PMCID: PMC10961971 DOI: 10.1038/s41576-023-00637-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 32.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/11/2023] [Indexed: 08/26/2023]
Abstract
Polygenic risk scores (PRSs) summarize the genetic predisposition of a complex human trait or disease and may become a valuable tool for advancing precision medicine. However, PRSs that are developed in populations of predominantly European genetic ancestries can increase health disparities due to poor predictive performance in individuals of diverse and complex genetic ancestries. We describe genetic and modifiable risk factors that limit the transferability of PRSs across populations and review the strengths and weaknesses of existing PRS construction methods for diverse ancestries. Developing PRSs that benefit global populations in research and clinical settings provides an opportunity for innovation and is essential for health equity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linda Kachuri
- Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
- Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Nilanjan Chatterjee
- Department of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Jibril Hirbo
- Department of Medicine Division of Genetic Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
- Vanderbilt Genetics Institute, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Daniel J Schaid
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Iman Martin
- Division of Genomic Medicine, National Human Genome Research Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Iftikhar J Kullo
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Eimear E Kenny
- Institute for Genomic Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Bogdan Pasaniuc
- Department of Computational Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Department of Human Genetics, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - John S Witte
- Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
- Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
- Department of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
- Department of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
| | - Tian Ge
- Psychiatric and Neurodevelopmental Genetics Unit, Center for Genomic Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
- Center for Precision Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
- Stanley Center for Psychiatric Research, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Mbuya-Bienge C, Pashayan N, Kazemali CD, Lapointe J, Simard J, Nabi H. A Systematic Review and Critical Assessment of Breast Cancer Risk Prediction Tools Incorporating a Polygenic Risk Score for the General Population. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:5380. [PMID: 38001640 PMCID: PMC10670420 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15225380] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2023] [Revised: 10/26/2023] [Accepted: 11/03/2023] [Indexed: 11/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the form of a polygenic risk score (PRS) have emerged as a promising factor that could improve the predictive performance of breast cancer (BC) risk prediction tools. This study aims to appraise and critically assess the current evidence on these tools. Studies were identified using Medline, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library up to November 2022 and were included if they described the development and/ or validation of a BC risk prediction model using a PRS for women of the general population and if they reported a measure of predictive performance. We identified 37 articles, of which 29 combined genetic and non-genetic risk factors using seven different risk prediction tools. Most models (55.0%) were developed on populations from European ancestry and performed better than those developed on populations from other ancestry groups. Regardless of the number of SNPs in each PRS, models combining a PRS with genetic and non-genetic risk factors generally had better discriminatory accuracy (AUC from 0.52 to 0.77) than those using a PRS alone (AUC from 0.48 to 0.68). The overall risk of bias was considered low in most studies. BC risk prediction tools combining a PRS with genetic and non-genetic risk factors provided better discriminative accuracy than either used alone. Further studies are needed to cross-compare their clinical utility and readiness for implementation in public health practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cynthia Mbuya-Bienge
- Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC G1V 0A6, Canada; (C.M.-B.); (C.D.K.)
- Oncology Division, CHU de Québec-Université Laval Research Center, Quebec City, QC G1S 4L8, Canada;
| | - Nora Pashayan
- Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK;
| | - Cornelia D. Kazemali
- Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC G1V 0A6, Canada; (C.M.-B.); (C.D.K.)
- Oncology Division, CHU de Québec-Université Laval Research Center, Quebec City, QC G1S 4L8, Canada;
| | - Julie Lapointe
- Oncology Division, CHU de Québec-Université Laval Research Center, Quebec City, QC G1S 4L8, Canada;
| | - Jacques Simard
- Endocrinology and Nephology Division, CHU de Québec-Université Laval Research Center, Quebec City, QC G1V 4G2, Canada;
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC G1V 0A6, Canada
| | - Hermann Nabi
- Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC G1V 0A6, Canada; (C.M.-B.); (C.D.K.)
- Oncology Division, CHU de Québec-Université Laval Research Center, Quebec City, QC G1S 4L8, Canada;
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kim DJ, Kang JH, Kim JW, Cheon MJ, Kim SB, Lee YK, Lee BC. Evaluation of optimal methods and ancestries for calculating polygenic risk scores in East Asian population. Sci Rep 2023; 13:19195. [PMID: 37932343 PMCID: PMC10628155 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-45859-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2023] [Accepted: 10/25/2023] [Indexed: 11/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Polygenic risk scores (PRSs) have been studied for predicting human diseases, and various methods for PRS calculation have been developed. Most PRS studies to date have focused on European ancestry, and the performance of PRS has not been sufficiently assessed in East Asia. Herein, we evaluated the predictive performance of PRSs for East Asian populations under various conditions. Simulation studies using data from the Korean cohort, Health Examinees (HEXA), demonstrated that SBayesRC and PRS-CS outperformed other PRS methods (lassosum, LDpred-funct, and PRSice) in high fixed heritability (0.3 and 0.7). In addition, we generated PRSs using real-world data from HEXA for ten diseases: asthma, breast cancer, cataract, coronary artery disease, gastric cancer, glaucoma, hyperthyroidism, hypothyroidism, osteoporosis, and type 2 diabetes (T2D). We utilized the five previous PRS methods and genome-wide association study (GWAS) data from two biobank-scale datasets [European (UK Biobank) and East Asian (BioBank Japan) ancestry]. Additionally, we employed PRS-CSx, a PRS method that combines GWAS data from both ancestries, to generate a total of 110 PRS for ten diseases. Similar to the simulation results, SBayesRC showed better predictive performance for disease risk than the other methods. Furthermore, the East Asian GWAS data outperformed those from European ancestry for breast cancer, cataract, gastric cancer, and T2D, but neither of the two GWAS ancestries showed a significant advantage on PRS performance for the remaining six diseases. Based on simulation data and real data studies, it is expected that SBayesRC will offer superior performance for East Asian populations, and PRS generated using GWAS from non-East Asian may also yield good results.
Collapse
|
10
|
Chatterjee N, Dun Y. From Hazard Rate to Age-at-Onset Distribution: Mind the Gap. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2023; 32:1477-1478. [PMID: 37698541 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-23-0897] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2023] [Revised: 09/07/2023] [Accepted: 09/08/2023] [Indexed: 09/13/2023] Open
Abstract
A recent study published in the journal claimed that genetic susceptibility to breast cancer occurs mainly due to rare inherited variants. The claim relies on a set of deductive arguments following observations on patterns of age-at-onset distribution of the disease among twin pairs. In this brief commentary, we point out a major gap in the given argument due to the interchangeable use of hazard rates and age-at-onset distribution, and thus conclude that the published study does not provide any evidence against polygenic risk of breast cancer due to common variants. See related article by Yasui et al., p. 1518.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nilanjan Chatterjee
- Department of Biostatistics, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
- Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Yuzheng Dun
- Department of Biostatistics, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Tao LR, Ye Y, Zhao H. Early breast cancer risk detection: a novel framework leveraging polygenic risk scores and machine learning. J Med Genet 2023; 60:960-964. [PMID: 37055164 DOI: 10.1136/jmg-2022-108582] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2022] [Accepted: 03/27/2023] [Indexed: 04/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Breast cancer (BC) is the most common cancer and the second leading cause of cancer death in women; an estimated one in eight women in the USA will develop BC during her lifetime. However, current methods of BC screening, including clinical breast exams, mammograms, biopsies and others, are often underused due to limited access, expense and a lack of risk awareness, causing 30% (up to 80% in low-income and middle-income countries) of patients with BC to miss the precious early detection phase. METHODS This study creates a key step to supplement the current BC diagnostic pipeline: a prescreening platform, prior to traditional detection and diagnostic steps. We have developed BREast CAncer Risk Detection Application (BRECARDA), a novel framework that personalises BC risk assessment using artificial intelligence neural networks to incorporate relevant genetic and non-genetic risk factors. A polygenic risk score (PRS) was enhanced by employing AnnoPred and validated by fivefolds cross-validation, outperforming three existing state-of-the-art PRS methods. RESULTS We used data from 97 597 female participants of the UK BioBank to train our algorithm. Using the enhanced PRS thus trained together with non-genetic information, BRECARDA was evaluated in a testing dataset with 48 074 UK Biobank female participants and achieved a high accuracy of 94.28% and area under the curve of 0.7861. Our optimised AnnoPred outperformed other state-of-the-art methods on quantifying genetic risk, indicating its potential for supplementing the current BC detection tests, population screening and risk evaluation. CONCLUSION BRECARDA can enhance disease risk prediction, identify high-risk individuals for BC screening, facilitate disease diagnosis and improve population-level screening efficiency. It can serve as a valuable and supplemental platform to assist doctors in BC diagnosis and evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lynn Rose Tao
- Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology, Alexandria, Virginia, USA
| | - Yixuan Ye
- Interdepartmental Program in Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Hongyu Zhao
- Department of Biostatistics, Yale School of Public Health, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Ho PJ, Lim EH, Hartman M, Wong FY, Li J. Breast cancer risk stratification using genetic and non-genetic risk assessment tools for 246,142 women in the UK Biobank. Genet Med 2023; 25:100917. [PMID: 37334786 DOI: 10.1016/j.gim.2023.100917] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2023] [Revised: 06/08/2023] [Accepted: 06/09/2023] [Indexed: 06/20/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The benefit of using individual risk prediction tools to identify high-risk individuals for breast cancer (BC) screening is uncertain, despite the personalized approach of risk-based screening. METHODS We studied the overlap of predicted high-risk individuals among 246,142 women enrolled in the UK Biobank. Risk predictors assessed include the Gail model (Gail), BC family history (FH, binary), BC polygenic risk score (PRS), and presence of loss-of-function (LoF) variants in BC predisposition genes. Youden J-index was used to select optimal thresholds for defining high-risk. RESULTS In total, 147,399 were considered at high risk for developing BC within the next 2 years by at least 1 of the 4 risk prediction tools examined (Gail2-year > 0.5%: 47%, PRS2-yea r > 0.7%: 30%, FH: 6%, and LoF: 1%); 92,851 (38%) were flagged by only 1 risk predictor. The overlap between individuals flagged as high-risk because of genetic (PRS) and Gail model risk factors was 30%. The best-performing combinatorial model comprises a union of high-risk women identified by PRS, FH, and, LoF (AUC2-year [95% CI]: 62.2 [60.8 to 63.6]). Assigning individual weights to each risk prediction tool increased discriminatory ability. CONCLUSION Risk-based BC screening may require a multipronged approach that includes PRS, predisposition genes, FH, and other recognized risk factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peh Joo Ho
- Laboratory of Women's Health and Genetics, Genome Institute of Singapore, A∗STAR Research Entities, Singapore; Department of Surgery, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore; Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Elaine H Lim
- Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Mikael Hartman
- Department of Surgery, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore; Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore; Department of Surgery, University Surgical Cluster, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Fuh Yong Wong
- Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Jingmei Li
- Laboratory of Women's Health and Genetics, Genome Institute of Singapore, A∗STAR Research Entities, Singapore; Department of Surgery, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Abstract
Since the publication of the first genome-wide association study for cancer in 2007, thousands of common alleles that are associated with the risk of cancer have been identified. The relative risk associated with individual variants is small and of limited clinical significance. However, the combined effect of multiple risk variants as captured by polygenic scores (PGSs) may be much greater and therefore provide risk discrimination that is clinically useful. We review the considerable research efforts over the past 15 years for developing statistical methods for PGSs and their application in large-scale genome-wide association studies to develop PGSs for various cancers. We review the predictive performance of these PGSs and the multiple challenges currently limiting the clinical application of PGSs. Despite this, PGSs are beginning to be incorporated into clinical multifactorial risk prediction models to stratify risk in both clinical trials and clinical implementation studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xin Yang
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Siddhartha Kar
- MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Early Cancer Institute, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Antonis C Antoniou
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Paul D P Pharoah
- Department of Computational Biomedicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Roberts E, van Veen EM, Byers H, Barnett-Griness O, Gronich N, Lejbkowicz F, Pinchev M, Smith MJ, Howell A, Newman WG, Woodward ER, Harkness EF, Brentnall AR, Cuzick J, Rennert G, Howell SJ, Evans DG. Breast cancer polygenic risk scores derived in White European populations are not calibrated for women of Ashkenazi Jewish descent. Genet Med 2023; 25:100846. [PMID: 37061873 DOI: 10.1016/j.gim.2023.100846] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2022] [Revised: 04/05/2023] [Accepted: 04/06/2023] [Indexed: 04/17/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Polygenic risk scores (PRSs) are a major component of accurate breast cancer (BC) risk prediction but require ethnicity-specific calibration. Ashkenazi Jewish (AJ) population is assumed to be of White European (WE) origin in some commercially available PRSs despite differing effect allele frequencies (EAFs). We conducted a case-control study of WE and AJ women from the Predicting Risk of Cancer at Screening Study. The Breast Cancer in Northern Israel Study provided a separate AJ population-based case-control validation series. METHODS All women underwent Illumina OncoArray single-nucleotide variation (SNV; formerly single-nucleotide polymorphism [SNP]) analysis. Two PRSs were assessed, SNV142 and SNV78. A total of 221 of 2243 WE women (discovery: cases = 111; controls = 110; validation: cases = 651; controls = 1772) and 221 AJ women (cases = 121; controls = 110) were included from the UK study; the Israeli series consisted of 2045 AJ women (cases = 1331; controls = 714). EAFs were obtained from the Genome Aggregation Database. RESULTS In the UK study, the mean SNV142 PRS demonstrated good calibration and discrimination in WE population, with mean PRS of 1.33 (95% CI 1.18-1.48) in cases and 1.01 (95% CI 0.89-1.13) in controls. In AJ women from Manchester, the mean PRS of 1.54 (1.38-1.70) in cases and 1.20 (1.08-1.32) in controls demonstrated good discrimination but overestimation of BC relative risk. After adjusting for EAFs for the AJ population, mean risk was corrected (mean SNV142 PRS cases = 1.30 [95% CI 1.16-1.44] and controls = 1.02 [95% CI 0.92-1.12]). This was recapitulated in the larger Israeli data set with good discrimination (area under the curve = 0.632 [95% CI 0.607-0.657] for SNV142). CONCLUSION AJ women should not be given BC relative risk predictions based on PRSs calibrated to EAFs from the WE population. PRSs need to be recalibrated using AJ-derived EAFs. A simple recalibration using the mean PRS adjustment ratio likely performs well.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eleanor Roberts
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Elke M van Veen
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom; Division of Evolution, Infection and Genomics, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Helen Byers
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom; Division of Evolution, Infection and Genomics, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Ofra Barnett-Griness
- Department of Community Medicine and Epidemiology, Carmel Medical Center, Haifa, Israel
| | - Naomi Gronich
- Department of Community Medicine and Epidemiology, Carmel Medical Center, Haifa, Israel; The Ruth and Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
| | - Flavio Lejbkowicz
- Department of Community Medicine and Epidemiology, Carmel Medical Center, Haifa, Israel
| | - Mila Pinchev
- Department of Community Medicine and Epidemiology, Carmel Medical Center, Haifa, Israel
| | - Miriam J Smith
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom; Division of Evolution, Infection and Genomics, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Anthony Howell
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom; Nightingale/Prevent Breast Cancer Centre, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom; Manchester Breast Centre, Manchester Cancer Research Centre, The Christie Hospital, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - William G Newman
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom; Division of Evolution, Infection and Genomics, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Emma R Woodward
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom; Division of Evolution, Infection and Genomics, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Elaine F Harkness
- Nightingale/Prevent Breast Cancer Centre, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom; Division of Informatics, Imaging & Data Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Adam R Brentnall
- Queen Mary University of London, Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Charterhouse Square, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jack Cuzick
- Queen Mary University of London, Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Charterhouse Square, London, United Kingdom
| | - Gad Rennert
- Department of Community Medicine and Epidemiology, Carmel Medical Center, Haifa, Israel; The Ruth and Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
| | - Sacha J Howell
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom; Nightingale/Prevent Breast Cancer Centre, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom; Manchester Breast Centre, Manchester Cancer Research Centre, The Christie Hospital, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - D Gareth Evans
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom; Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom; Division of Evolution, Infection and Genomics, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom; Nightingale/Prevent Breast Cancer Centre, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom; Manchester Breast Centre, Manchester Cancer Research Centre, The Christie Hospital, Manchester, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Stiller S, Drukewitz S, Lehmann K, Hentschel J, Strehlow V. Clinical Impact of Polygenic Risk Score for Breast Cancer Risk Prediction in 382 Individuals with Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Syndrome. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:3938. [PMID: 37568754 PMCID: PMC10417109 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15153938] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2023] [Revised: 07/21/2023] [Accepted: 07/28/2023] [Indexed: 08/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Single nucleotide polymorphisms are currently not considered in breast cancer (BC) risk predictions used in daily practice of genetic counselling and clinical management of familial BC in Germany. This study aimed to assess the clinical value of incorporating a 313-variant-based polygenic risk score (PRS) into BC risk calculations in a cohort of German women with suspected hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome (HBOC). Data from 382 individuals seeking counselling for HBOC were analysed. Risk calculations were performed using the Breast and Ovarian Analysis of Disease Incidence and Carrier Estimation Algorithm with and without the inclusion of the PRS. Changes in risk predictions and their impact on clinical management were evaluated. The PRS led to changes in risk stratification based on 10-year risk calculations in 13.6% of individuals. Furthermore, the inclusion of the PRS in BC risk predictions resulted in clinically significant changes in 12.0% of cases, impacting the prevention recommendations established by the German Consortium for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer. These findings support the implementation of the PRS in genetic counselling for personalized BC risk assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Stiller
- Institute of Human Genetics, University of Leipzig Medical Center, 04103 Leipzig, Germany
| | - Stephan Drukewitz
- Institute of Human Genetics, University of Leipzig Medical Center, 04103 Leipzig, Germany
- Core Unit for Molecular Tumor Diagnostics (CMTD), National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany
| | - Kathleen Lehmann
- Institute of Human Genetics, University of Leipzig Medical Center, 04103 Leipzig, Germany
| | - Julia Hentschel
- Institute of Human Genetics, University of Leipzig Medical Center, 04103 Leipzig, Germany
| | - Vincent Strehlow
- Institute of Human Genetics, University of Leipzig Medical Center, 04103 Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Hassanin E, Maj C, Klinkhammer H, Krawitz P, May P, Bobbili DR. Assessing the performance of European-derived cardiometabolic polygenic risk scores in South-Asians and their interplay with family history. BMC Med Genomics 2023; 16:164. [PMID: 37438803 PMCID: PMC10339617 DOI: 10.1186/s12920-023-01598-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2023] [Accepted: 07/01/2023] [Indexed: 07/14/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS We aimed to assess the performance of European-derived polygenic risk scores (PRSs) for common metabolic diseases such as coronary artery disease (CAD), obesity, and type 2 diabetes (T2D) in the South Asian (SAS) individuals in the UK Biobank. Additionally, we studied the interaction between PRS and family history (FH) in the same population. METHODS To calculate the PRS, we used a previously published model derived from the EUR population and applied it to the individuals of SAS ancestry from the UKB study. Each PRS was adjusted according to an individual's genotype location in the principal components (PC) space to derive an ancestry adjusted PRS (aPRS). We calculated the percentiles based on aPRS and stratified individuals into three aPRS categories: low, intermediate, and high. Considering the intermediate-aPRS percentile as a reference, we compared the low and high aPRS categories and generated the odds ratio (OR) estimates. Further, we measured the combined role of aPRS and first-degree family history (FH) in the SAS population. RESULTS The risk of developing severe obesity for SAS individuals was almost twofold higher for individuals with high aPRS than for those with intermediate aPRS, with an OR of 1.95 (95% CI = 1.71-2.23, P < 0.01). At the same time, the risk of severe obesity was lower in the low-aPRS group (OR = 0.60, CI = 0.53-0.67, P < 0.01). Results in the same direction were found in the EUR data, where the low-PRS group had an OR of 0.53 (95% CI = 0.51-0.56, P < 0.01) and the high-PRS group had an OR of 2.06 (95% CI = 2.00-2.12, P < 0.01). We observed similar results for CAD and T2D. Further, we show that SAS individuals with a familial history of CAD and T2D with high-aPRS are associated with a higher risk of these diseases, implying a greater genetic predisposition. CONCLUSION Our findings suggest that CAD, obesity, and T2D GWAS summary statistics generated predominantly from the EUR population can be potentially used to derive aPRS in SAS individuals for risk stratification. With future GWAS recruiting more SAS participants and tailoring the PRSs towards SAS ancestry, the predictive power of PRS is likely to improve further.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emadeldin Hassanin
- Luxembourg Centre for Systems Biomedicine, University of Luxembourg, 6 avenue du Swing, Belvaux, L-4367, Luxembourg
- Institute for Genomic Statistics and Bioinformatics, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Carlo Maj
- Centre for Human Genetics, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Hannah Klinkhammer
- Institute for Genomic Statistics and Bioinformatics, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
- Medical Faculty, Institute for Medical Biometry, Informatics and Epidemiology, University Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Peter Krawitz
- Institute for Genomic Statistics and Bioinformatics, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Patrick May
- Luxembourg Centre for Systems Biomedicine, University of Luxembourg, 6 avenue du Swing, Belvaux, L-4367, Luxembourg
| | - Dheeraj Reddy Bobbili
- Luxembourg Centre for Systems Biomedicine, University of Luxembourg, 6 avenue du Swing, Belvaux, L-4367, Luxembourg.
- Wellytics Technologies Pvt Ltd, Hyderabad, India.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Zeng Y, Wang J, Zhong X, Xiang Z, Yang T, Yu S, Dai Z, Xu N, Liu L. The disparities in prognostic prediction and annualized hazard function in different molecular subtypes between young Chinese and White American women with breast cancer. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1199492. [PMID: 37492473 PMCID: PMC10364598 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1199492] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2023] [Accepted: 06/22/2023] [Indexed: 07/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and objectives The prognostic disparities in different molecular subtypes between young Chinese and White American breast cancer patients remain unclear. The goal of this study was to explore the prognostic differences in different molecular subtypes between Chinese and White American patients aged ≤ 40 years. Methods We included Chinese and White female breast cancer patients at or under the age of 40 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (SEER) and the West China Hospital of Sichuan University. The chi-square test, log-rank test, and Cox proportional hazards model were employed to evaluate the distribution and survival disparities in the two racial/ethnic cohorts and different molecular subtypes. An annualized hazard function was used to calculate the annual failure rate among different molecular subtypes. Results This study included 20,859 female breast cancer patients at or under the age of 40, of whom 18,400 were White women and 2,459 were Chinese women. With a median follow-up time of 47 months, the 5-year breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) rates for young Chinese and White women were 93.9% and 90.0%, respectively (P< 0.001). Molecular subtype was found to be a significant predictor in both young Chinese and White patients (P< 0.001), but different trends were observed in the two racial/ethnic cohorts when exploring the association between BCSS and molecular subtypes. Among young White patients, the hormone receptor (HoR) (+)/epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) (+) subtype had the best 5-year BCSS rate, while in young Chinese patients, the HoR (+)/HER2 (+) and HoR (+)/HER2 (-) showed comparable survival curves and both showed superior 5-year BCSS than other subtypes. Stratification by molecular subtypes, young Chinese patients demonstrated a superior 5-year BCSS in HoR (+)/HER2 (-) (96.3% vs 92.9%, P< 0.001) and triple-negative subtypes (88% vs 81.7%, P= 0.006) compared to young White American patients, while no significant differences were found in HoR (+)/HER2 (+) and HER2 enriched tumors. The annual hazard function for BCSS showed that there were significantly different trends in the HoR (+)/HER2 (-) and HoR (+)/HER2 (+) subtypes between young Chinese and White patients. Conclusions There are disparities in prognosis and annualized hazard function between young Chinese and White females with breast cancer in different molecular subtypes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuanyuan Zeng
- Division of Head & Neck Tumor Multimodality Treatment, Cancer Center, and State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Jun Wang
- Division of Head & Neck Tumor Multimodality Treatment, Cancer Center, and State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Xiaorong Zhong
- Breast Center, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Zhongzheng Xiang
- Division of Head & Neck Tumor Multimodality Treatment, Cancer Center, and State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Tian Yang
- Division of Head & Neck Tumor Multimodality Treatment, Cancer Center, and State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Siting Yu
- Division of Head & Neck Tumor Multimodality Treatment, Cancer Center, and State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Zelei Dai
- Division of Head & Neck Tumor Multimodality Treatment, Cancer Center, and State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Ningyue Xu
- Division of Head & Neck Tumor Multimodality Treatment, Cancer Center, and State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Lei Liu
- Division of Head & Neck Tumor Multimodality Treatment, Cancer Center, and State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Wang H, MacInnis RJ, Li S. Family history and breast cancer risk for Asian women: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Med 2023; 21:239. [PMID: 37400822 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-023-02950-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2022] [Accepted: 06/19/2023] [Indexed: 07/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Studies of women of European ancestry have shown that the average familial relative risk for first-degree relatives of women with breast cancer is approximately twofold, but little is known for Asian women. We aimed to provide evidence for the association between family history and breast cancer risk for Asian women by systematically reviewing published literature. METHODS Studies reporting the familial relative risk of breast cancer for Asian women were searched in three online databases and complemented by a manual search. Odds ratios (ORs) for the association between family history and breast cancer risk were pooled across all included studies and by subgroups in terms of the type of family history, age, menopausal status and geographical region. RESULTS The pooled OR for women who have a first-degree relative with breast cancer was 2.46 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.03, 2.97). There was no evidence that the familial risk differed by the type of affected relative (mother versus sisters), the woman's age (< 50 years versus ≥ 50 years), menopausal status (pre versus post) and geographical region (East and Southeast Asia versus other regions) (all P > 0.3). The pooled ORs for women of Asian ancestry with a family history in any relative were similar for those living in non-Asian countries (2.26, 95% CI: 1.42, 3.59) compared with those living in Asian countries (2.18, 95% CI: 1.85, 2.58). CONCLUSIONS Family history of breast cancer is associated with an approximately twofold relative risk of breast cancer for Asian women, which is of similar magnitude to that observed for women of European ancestry. This implies that similar familial factors are implicated in breast cancer risk between women of European and Asian ancestries. Genetic factors are likely to play a substantial role in explaining the breast cancer familial risk for Asian women, as similar risks were observed across different living environments and cultures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heran Wang
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, 207 Bouverie Street, Carlton, VIC, 3053, Australia
- China Astronaut Research and Training Centre, Beijing, 100094, China
| | - Robert J MacInnis
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, 207 Bouverie Street, Carlton, VIC, 3053, Australia
- Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia
| | - Shuai Li
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, 207 Bouverie Street, Carlton, VIC, 3053, Australia.
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB1 8RN, UK.
- Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, 3168, Australia.
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, VIC, 3051, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Jee YH, Ho WK, Park S, Easton DF, Teo SH, Jung KJ, Kraft P. Polygenic risk scores for prediction of breast cancer in Korean women. Int J Epidemiol 2023; 52:796-805. [PMID: 36343017 PMCID: PMC10244045 DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyac206] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2021] [Accepted: 10/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Polygenic risk scores (PRSs) for breast cancer, developed using European and Asian genome-wide association studies (GWAS), have been shown to have good discrimination in Asian women. However, prospective calibration of absolute risk prediction models, based on a PRS or PRS combined with lifestyle, clinical and environmental factors, in Asian women is limited. METHODS We consider several PRSs trained using European and/or Asian GWAS. For each PRS, we evaluate the discrimination and calibration of three absolute risk models among 41 031 women from the Korean Cancer Prevention Study (KCPS)-II Biobank: (i) a model using incidence, mortality and risk factor distributions (reference inputs) among US women and European relative risks; (ii) a recalibrated model, using Korean reference but European relative risks; and (iii) a fully Korean-based model using Korean reference and relative risk estimates from KCPS. RESULTS All Asian and European PRS improved discrimination over lifestyle, clinical and environmental (Qx) factors in Korean women. US-based absolute risk models overestimated the risks for women aged ≥50 years, and this overestimation was larger for models that only included PRS (expected-to-observed ratio E/O = 1.2 for women <50, E/O = 2.7 for women ≥50). Recalibrated and Korean-based risk models had better calibration in the large, although the risk in the highest decile was consistently overestimated. Absolute risk projections suggest that risk-reducing lifestyle changes would lead to larger absolute risk reductions among women at higher PRS. CONCLUSIONS Absolute risk models incorporating PRS trained in European and Asian GWAS and population-appropriate average age-specific incidences may be useful for risk-stratified interventions in Korean women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yon Ho Jee
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Weang-Kee Ho
- School of Mathematical Sciences, Faculty of Science and Engineering, University of Nottingham Malaysia, Semenyih, Selangor, Malaysia
- Cancer Research Malaysia, Subang Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia
| | - Sohee Park
- Department of Biostatistics, Yonsei University Graduate School of Public Health, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Douglas F Easton
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Soo-Hwang Teo
- Cancer Research Malaysia, Subang Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia
- Sime Darby Medical Centre, Subang Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia
| | - Keum Ji Jung
- Institute for Health Promotion, Graduate School of Public Health, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Nuffield Department Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Peter Kraft
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Ragu ME, Lim JMC, Ng PS, Yip CH, Rajadurai P, Teo SH, Pan JW. TP53 somatic mutations in Asian breast cancer are associated with subtype-specific effects. Breast Cancer Res 2023; 25:48. [PMID: 37101199 PMCID: PMC10134541 DOI: 10.1186/s13058-023-01635-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2022] [Accepted: 03/07/2023] [Indexed: 04/28/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recent genomics studies of breast cancer in Asian cohorts have found a higher prevalence of TP53 mutations in Asian breast cancer patients relative to Caucasian patients. However, the effect of TP53 mutations on Asian breast tumours has not been comprehensively studied. METHODS Here, we report an analysis of 492 breast cancer samples from the Malaysian Breast Cancer cohort where we examined the impact of TP53 somatic mutations in relation to PAM50 subtypes by comparing whole exome and transcriptome data from tumours with mutant and wild-type TP53. RESULTS We found that the magnitude of impact of TP53 somatic mutations appears to vary between different subtypes. TP53 somatic mutations were associated with higher HR deficiency scores as well as greater upregulation of gene expression pathways in luminal A and luminal B tumours compared to the basal-like and Her2-enriched subtypes. The only pathways that were consistently dysregulated when comparing tumours with mutant and wild-type TP53 across different subtypes were the mTORC1 signalling and glycolysis pathways. CONCLUSION These results suggest that therapies that target TP53 or other downstream pathways may be more effective against luminal A and B tumours in the Asian population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohana Eswari Ragu
- Cancer Research Malaysia, No. 1, Jalan SS12/1A, 47500, Subang Jaya, Malaysia.
| | | | - Pei-Sze Ng
- Cancer Research Malaysia, No. 1, Jalan SS12/1A, 47500, Subang Jaya, Malaysia
| | - Cheng-Har Yip
- Subang Jaya Medical Centre, No. 1, Jalan SS12/1A, 47500, Subang Jaya, Malaysia
| | - Pathmanathan Rajadurai
- Subang Jaya Medical Centre, No. 1, Jalan SS12/1A, 47500, Subang Jaya, Malaysia
- Jeffrey Cheah School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Monash University Malaysia, Subang Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia
| | - Soo-Hwang Teo
- Cancer Research Malaysia, No. 1, Jalan SS12/1A, 47500, Subang Jaya, Malaysia
- University Malaya Cancer Research Institute, Faculty of Medicine, University Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Jia-Wern Pan
- Cancer Research Malaysia, No. 1, Jalan SS12/1A, 47500, Subang Jaya, Malaysia.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Lakeman IMM, Rodríguez-Girondo MDM, Lee A, Celosse N, Braspenning ME, van Engelen K, van de Beek I, van der Hout AH, Gómez García EB, Mensenkamp AR, Ausems MGEM, Hooning MJ, Adank MA, Hollestelle A, Schmidt MK, van Asperen CJ, Devilee P. Clinical applicability of the Polygenic Risk Score for breast cancer risk prediction in familial cases. J Med Genet 2023; 60:327-336. [PMID: 36137616 DOI: 10.1136/jmg-2022-108502] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2022] [Accepted: 07/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Common low-risk variants are presently not used to guide clinical management of familial breast cancer (BC). We explored the additive impact of a 313-variant-based Polygenic Risk Score (PRS313) relative to standard gene testing in non-BRCA1/2 Dutch BC families. METHODS We included 3918 BC cases from 3492 Dutch non-BRCA1/2 BC families and 3474 Dutch population controls. The association of the standardised PRS313 with BC was estimated using a logistic regression model, adjusted for pedigree-based family history. Family history of the controls was imputed for this analysis. SEs were corrected to account for relatedness of individuals. Using the BOADICEA (Breast and Ovarian Analysis of Disease Incidence and Carrier Estimation Algorithm) V.5 model, lifetime risks were retrospectively calculated with and without individual PRS313. For 2586 cases and 2584 controls, the carrier status of pathogenic variants (PVs) in ATM, CHEK2 and PALB2 was known. RESULTS The family history-adjusted PRS313 was significantly associated with BC (per SD OR=1.97, 95% CI 1.84 to 2.11). Including the PRS313 in BOADICEA family-based risk prediction would have changed screening recommendations in up to 27%, 36% and 34% of cases according to BC screening guidelines from the USA, UK and the Netherlands (National Comprehensive Cancer Network, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, and Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation), respectively. For the population controls, without information on family history, this was up to 39%, 44% and 58%, respectively. Among carriers of PVs in known moderate BC susceptibility genes, the PRS313 had the largest impact for CHEK2 and ATM. CONCLUSIONS Our results support the application of the PRS313 in risk prediction for genetically uninformative BC families and families with a PV in moderate BC risk genes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Inge M M Lakeman
- Department of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Mar D M Rodríguez-Girondo
- Department of Medical Statistics and Bioinformatics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Andrew Lee
- Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Cambridge, UK
| | - Nandi Celosse
- Department of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Merel E Braspenning
- Department of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Klaartje van Engelen
- Department of Human Genetics, Amsterdam UMC Locatie VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Irma van de Beek
- Department of Human Genetics, Amsterdam UMC Locatie VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Annemiek H van der Hout
- Department of Clinical Genetics, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Encarna B Gómez García
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Arjen R Mensenkamp
- Department of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Margreet G E M Ausems
- Department of Medical Genetics, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Maartje J Hooning
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Muriel A Adank
- Family Cancer Clinic, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Antoinette Hollestelle
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marjanka K Schmidt
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Christi J van Asperen
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Peter Devilee
- Department of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Lopes Cardozo JM, Andrulis IL, Bojesen SE, Dörk T, Eccles DM, Fasching PA, Hooning MJ, Keeman R, Nevanlinna H, Rutgers EJ, Easton DF, Hall P, Pharoah PD, van 't Veer LJ, Schmidt MK. Associations of a Breast Cancer Polygenic Risk Score With Tumor Characteristics and Survival. J Clin Oncol 2023; 41:1849-1863. [PMID: 36689693 PMCID: PMC10082287 DOI: 10.1200/jco.22.01978] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2022] [Revised: 10/25/2022] [Accepted: 12/16/2022] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE A polygenic risk score (PRS) consisting of 313 common genetic variants (PRS313) is associated with risk of breast cancer and contralateral breast cancer. This study aimed to evaluate the association of the PRS313 with clinicopathologic characteristics of, and survival following, breast cancer. METHODS Women with invasive breast cancer were included, 98,397 of European ancestry and 12,920 of Asian ancestry, from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium (BCAC), and 683 women from the European MINDACT trial. Associations between PRS313 and clinicopathologic characteristics, including the 70-gene signature for MINDACT, were evaluated using logistic regression analyses. Associations of PRS313 (continuous, per standard deviation) with overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) were evaluated with Cox regression, adjusted for clinicopathologic characteristics and treatment. RESULTS The PRS313 was associated with more favorable tumor characteristics. In BCAC, increasing PRS313 was associated with lower grade, hormone receptor-positive status, and smaller tumor size. In MINDACT, PRS313 was associated with a low risk 70-gene signature. In European women from BCAC, higher PRS313 was associated with better OS and BCSS: hazard ratio (HR) 0.96 (95% CI, 0.94 to 0.97) and 0.96 (95% CI, 0.94 to 0.98), but the association disappeared after adjustment for clinicopathologic characteristics (and treatment): OS HR, 1.01 (95% CI, 0.98 to 1.05) and BCSS HR, 1.02 (95% CI, 0.98 to 1.07). The results in MINDACT and Asian women from BCAC were consistent. CONCLUSION An increased PRS313 is associated with favorable tumor characteristics, but is not independently associated with prognosis. Thus, PRS313 has no role in the clinical management of primary breast cancer at the time of diagnosis. Nevertheless, breast cancer mortality rates will be higher for women with higher PRS313 as increasing PRS313 is associated with an increased risk of disease. This information is crucial for modeling effective stratified screening programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Josephine M.N. Lopes Cardozo
- Department of Surgery, The Netherlands Cancer Institute—Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Irene L. Andrulis
- Fred A. Litwin Center for Cancer Genetics, Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute of Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Stig E. Bojesen
- Copenhagen General Population Study, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Thilo Dörk
- Gynaecology Research Unit, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Diana M. Eccles
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Peter A. Fasching
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetricss, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Maartje J. Hooning
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Renske Keeman
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Heli Nevanlinna
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Emiel J.T. Rutgers
- Department of Surgery, The Netherlands Cancer Institute—Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Douglas F. Easton
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Per Hall
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Oncology, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Paul D.P. Pharoah
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Laura J. van 't Veer
- UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Marjanka K. Schmidt
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute—Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Ayoub A, Lapointe J, Nabi H, Pashayan N. Risk-Stratified Breast Cancer Screening Incorporating a Polygenic Risk Score: A Survey of UK General Practitioners’ Knowledge and Attitudes. Genes (Basel) 2023; 14:genes14030732. [PMID: 36981003 PMCID: PMC10048009 DOI: 10.3390/genes14030732] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2022] [Revised: 02/10/2023] [Accepted: 03/13/2023] [Indexed: 03/19/2023] Open
Abstract
A polygenic risk score (PRS) quantifies the aggregated effects of common genetic variants in an individual. A ‘personalised breast cancer risk assessment’ combines PRS with other genetic and nongenetic risk factors to offer risk-stratified screening and interventions. Large-scale studies are evaluating the clinical utility and feasibility of implementing risk-stratified screening; however, General Practitioners’ (GPs) views remain largely unknown. This study aimed to explore GPs’: (i) knowledge of risk-stratified screening; (ii) attitudes towards risk-stratified screening; and (iii) preferences for continuing professional development. A cross-sectional online survey of UK GPs was conducted between July–August 2022. The survey was distributed by the Royal College of General Practitioners and via other mailing lists and social media. In total, 109 GPs completed the survey; 49% were not familiar with the concept of PRS. Regarding risk-stratified screening pathways, 75% agreed with earlier and more frequent screening for women at high risk, 43% neither agreed nor disagreed with later and less screening for women at lower-than-average risk, and 55% disagreed with completely removing screening for women at much lower risk. In total, 81% felt positive about the potential impact of risk-stratified screening towards patients and 62% felt positive about the potential impact on their practice. GPs selected training of healthcare professionals as the priority for future risk-stratified screening implementation, preferring online formats for learning. The results suggest limited knowledge of PRS and risk-stratified screening amongst GPs. Training—preferably using online learning formats—was identified as the top priority for future implementation. GPs felt positive about the potential impact of risk-stratified screening; however, there was hesitance and disagreement towards a low-risk screening pathway.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aya Ayoub
- National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London SW3 6LY, UK
- Correspondence:
| | - Julie Lapointe
- Oncology Division, CHU de Québec-Université Laval Research Center, Québec City, QC G1R 3S3, Canada
| | - Hermann Nabi
- Oncology Division, CHU de Québec-Université Laval Research Center, Québec City, QC G1R 3S3, Canada
- Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Québec City, QC G1V 0A6, Canada
| | - Nora Pashayan
- Department of Applied Health Research, University College London (UCL), London WC1E 7HB, UK
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Jiao Y, Truong T, Eon-Marchais S, Mebirouk N, Caputo SM, Dondon MG, Karimi M, Le Gal D, Beauvallet J, Le Floch É, Dandine-Roulland C, Bacq-Daian D, Olaso R, Albuisson J, Audebert-Bellanger S, Berthet P, Bonadona V, Buecher B, Caron O, Cavaillé M, Chiesa J, Colas C, Collonge-Rame MA, Coupier I, Delnatte C, De Pauw A, Dreyfus H, Fert-Ferrer S, Gauthier-Villars M, Gesta P, Giraud S, Gladieff L, Golmard L, Lasset C, Lejeune-Dumoulin S, Léoné M, Limacher JM, Lortholary A, Luporsi É, Mari V, Maugard CM, Mortemousque I, Mouret-Fourme E, Nambot S, Noguès C, Popovici C, Prieur F, Pujol P, Sevenet N, Sobol H, Toulas C, Uhrhammer N, Vaur D, Venat L, Boland-Augé A, Guénel P, Deleuze JF, Stoppa-Lyonnet D, Andrieu N, Lesueur F. Association and performance of polygenic risk scores for breast cancer among French women presenting or not a familial predisposition to the disease. Eur J Cancer 2023; 179:76-86. [PMID: 36509001 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.11.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2022] [Revised: 10/26/2022] [Accepted: 11/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Three partially overlapping breast cancer polygenic risk scores (PRS) comprising 77, 179 and 313 SNPs have been proposed for European-ancestry women by the Breast Cancer Association Consortium (BCAC) for improving risk prediction in the general population. However, the effect of these SNPs may vary from one country to another and within a country because of other factors. OBJECTIVE To assess their associated risk and predictive performance in French women from (1) the CECILE population-based case-control study, (2) BRCA1 or BRCA2 (BRCA1/2) pathogenic variant (PV) carriers from the GEMO study, and (3) familial breast cancer cases with no BRCA1/2 PV and unrelated controls from the GENESIS study. RESULTS All three PRS were associated with breast cancer in all studies, with odds ratios per standard deviation varying from 1.7 to 2.0 in CECILE and GENESIS, and hazard ratios varying from 1.1 to 1.4 in GEMO. The predictive performance of PRS313 in CECILE was similar to that reported in BCAC but lower than that in GENESIS (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) = 0.67 and 0.75, respectively). PRS were less performant in BRCA2 and BRCA1 PV carriers (AUC = 0.58 and 0.54 respectively). CONCLUSION Our results are in line with previous validation studies in the general population and in BRCA1/2 PV carriers. Additionally, we showed that PRS may be of clinical utility for women with a strong family history of breast cancer and no BRCA1/2 PV, and for those carrying a predicted PV in a moderate-risk gene like ATM, CHEK2 or PALB2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yue Jiao
- INSERM, U900, Paris, France; Institut Curie, Paris, France; Mines ParisTech, Fontainebleau, France; PSL Research University, Paris, France
| | - Thérèse Truong
- Université Paris-Saclay, UVSQ, INSERM, U1018, Gustave Roussy, CESP, Team Exposome and Heredity, Villejuif, France
| | - Séverine Eon-Marchais
- INSERM, U900, Paris, France; Institut Curie, Paris, France; Mines ParisTech, Fontainebleau, France; PSL Research University, Paris, France
| | - Noura Mebirouk
- INSERM, U900, Paris, France; Institut Curie, Paris, France; Mines ParisTech, Fontainebleau, France; PSL Research University, Paris, France
| | - Sandrine M Caputo
- PSL Research University, Paris, France; Department of Genetics, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Marie-Gabrielle Dondon
- INSERM, U900, Paris, France; Institut Curie, Paris, France; Mines ParisTech, Fontainebleau, France; PSL Research University, Paris, France
| | - Mojgan Karimi
- Université Paris-Saclay, UVSQ, INSERM, U1018, Gustave Roussy, CESP, Team Exposome and Heredity, Villejuif, France
| | - Dorothée Le Gal
- INSERM, U900, Paris, France; Institut Curie, Paris, France; Mines ParisTech, Fontainebleau, France; PSL Research University, Paris, France
| | - Juana Beauvallet
- INSERM, U900, Paris, France; Institut Curie, Paris, France; Mines ParisTech, Fontainebleau, France; PSL Research University, Paris, France
| | - Édith Le Floch
- Centre National de Recherche en Génomique Humaine, Institut de Biologie François Jacob, CEA, Université Paris-Saclay, Evry, France
| | - Claire Dandine-Roulland
- Centre National de Recherche en Génomique Humaine, Institut de Biologie François Jacob, CEA, Université Paris-Saclay, Evry, France
| | - Delphine Bacq-Daian
- Centre National de Recherche en Génomique Humaine, Institut de Biologie François Jacob, CEA, Université Paris-Saclay, Evry, France
| | - Robert Olaso
- Centre National de Recherche en Génomique Humaine, Institut de Biologie François Jacob, CEA, Université Paris-Saclay, Evry, France
| | - Juliette Albuisson
- Centre de Lutte contre le Cancer Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | | | - Pascaline Berthet
- Département de Biopathologie, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France; INSERM, U1245, Rouen, France
| | - Valérie Bonadona
- Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Villeurbanne, France; CNRS UMR 5558, Centre Léon Bérard, Unité de Prévention et épidémiologie Génétique, Lyon, France
| | - Bruno Buecher
- PSL Research University, Paris, France; Department of Genetics, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Olivier Caron
- Gustave Roussy, Département de Médecine Oncologique, Villejuif, France
| | - Mathias Cavaillé
- Université Clermont Auvergne, UMR INSERM, U1240, Clermont Ferrand, France; Département d'Oncogénétique, Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont Ferrand, France
| | - Jean Chiesa
- UF de Génétique Médicale et Cytogénétique, CHRU Caremeau, Nîmes, France
| | - Chrystelle Colas
- PSL Research University, Paris, France; Department of Genetics, Institut Curie, Paris, France; INSERM, U830, Paris, France
| | - Marie-Agnès Collonge-Rame
- Service Génétique et Biologie du Développement - Histologie, CHU Hôpital Saint-Jacques, Besançon, France
| | - Isabelle Coupier
- Hôpital Arnaud de Villeneuve, CHU Montpellier, Service de Génétique Médicale et Oncogénétique, Montpellier, France; INSERM, U896, CRCM Val d'Aurelle, Montpellier, France
| | - Capucine Delnatte
- Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Unité d'Oncogénétique, Saint Herblain, France
| | - Antoine De Pauw
- PSL Research University, Paris, France; Department of Genetics, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Hélène Dreyfus
- Clinique Sainte Catherine, Avignon, CHU de Grenoble, Grenoble, France; Hôpital Couple-Enfant, Département de Génétique, Grenoble, France
| | | | - Marion Gauthier-Villars
- PSL Research University, Paris, France; Department of Genetics, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Paul Gesta
- CH Georges Renon, Service d'Oncogénétique Régional Poitou-Charentes, Niort, France
| | - Sophie Giraud
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Service de Génétique, Groupement Hospitalier Est, Bron, France
| | - Laurence Gladieff
- Institut Claudius Regaud - IUCT-Oncopole, Service d'Oncologie Médicale, Toulouse, France
| | - Lisa Golmard
- PSL Research University, Paris, France; Department of Genetics, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Christine Lasset
- Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Villeurbanne, France; CNRS UMR 5558, Centre Léon Bérard, Unité de Prévention et épidémiologie Génétique, Lyon, France
| | | | - Mélanie Léoné
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Service de Génétique, Groupement Hospitalier Est, Bron, France
| | | | - Alain Lortholary
- Service d'Oncologie Médicale, Centre Catherine de Sienne, Nantes, France; Hôpital Privé du Confluent, Nantes, France
| | - Élisabeth Luporsi
- Service de Génétique UF4128 CHR Metz-Thionville, Hôpital de Mercy, Metz, France
| | - Véronique Mari
- Unité d'Oncogénétique, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France
| | - Christine M Maugard
- Génétique Oncologique Moléculaire, UF1422, Département d'Oncobiologie, LBBM, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France; UF6948 Génétique Oncologique Clinique, évaluation Familiale et Suivi, Strasbourg, France
| | | | | | - Sophie Nambot
- Centre de Lutte contre le Cancer Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France; Institut GIMI, CHU de Dijon, Hôpital d'Enfants, France; Oncogénétique, Dijon, France
| | - Catherine Noguès
- Département d'Anticipation et de Suivi des Cancers, Oncogénétique Clinique, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France; Aix Marseille Université, INSERM, IRD, SESSTIM, Marseille, France
| | - Cornel Popovici
- Département d'Anticipation et de Suivi des Cancers, Oncogénétique Clinique, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France
| | - Fabienne Prieur
- CHU de Saint-Etienne; Hôpital Nord, Service de Génétique, Saint-Etienne, France
| | - Pascal Pujol
- Hôpital Arnaud de Villeneuve, CHU Montpellier, Service de Génétique Médicale et Oncogénétique, Montpellier, France; INSERM, U896, CRCM Val d'Aurelle, Montpellier, France
| | | | - Hagay Sobol
- Département d'Anticipation et de Suivi des Cancers, Oncogénétique Clinique, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France
| | - Christine Toulas
- Institut Claudius Regaud - IUCT-Oncopole, Service d'Oncologie Médicale, Toulouse, France
| | - Nancy Uhrhammer
- Centre Jean Perrin, LBM OncoGenAuvergne, Clermont Ferrand, France
| | - Dominique Vaur
- Département de Biopathologie, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France; INSERM, U1245, Rouen, France
| | - Laurence Venat
- Hôpital Universitaire Dupuytren, Service d'Oncologie Médicale, Limoges, France
| | - Anne Boland-Augé
- Centre National de Recherche en Génomique Humaine, Institut de Biologie François Jacob, CEA, Université Paris-Saclay, Evry, France
| | - Pascal Guénel
- Université Paris-Saclay, UVSQ, INSERM, U1018, Gustave Roussy, CESP, Team Exposome and Heredity, Villejuif, France
| | - Jean-François Deleuze
- Centre National de Recherche en Génomique Humaine, Institut de Biologie François Jacob, CEA, Université Paris-Saclay, Evry, France
| | - Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet
- Department of Genetics, Institut Curie, Paris, France; Département d'Oncogénétique, Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont Ferrand, France; Université Paris-Cité, Paris, France
| | - Nadine Andrieu
- INSERM, U900, Paris, France; Institut Curie, Paris, France; Mines ParisTech, Fontainebleau, France; PSL Research University, Paris, France
| | - Fabienne Lesueur
- INSERM, U900, Paris, France; Institut Curie, Paris, France; Mines ParisTech, Fontainebleau, France; PSL Research University, Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Lee A, Mavaddat N, Cunningham A, Carver T, Ficorella L, Archer S, Walter FM, Tischkowitz M, Roberts J, Usher-Smith J, Simard J, Schmidt MK, Devilee P, Zadnik V, Jürgens H, Mouret-Fourme E, De Pauw A, Rookus M, Mooij TM, Pharoah PP, Easton DF, Antoniou AC. Enhancing the BOADICEA cancer risk prediction model to incorporate new data on RAD51C, RAD51D, BARD1 updates to tumour pathology and cancer incidence. J Med Genet 2022; 59:1206-1218. [PMID: 36162851 PMCID: PMC9691826 DOI: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2022-108471] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2022] [Accepted: 04/23/2022] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND BOADICEA (Breast and Ovarian Analysis of Disease Incidence and Carrier Estimation Algorithm) for breast cancer and the epithelial tubo-ovarian cancer (EOC) models included in the CanRisk tool (www.canrisk.org) provide future cancer risks based on pathogenic variants in cancer-susceptibility genes, polygenic risk scores, breast density, questionnaire-based risk factors and family history. Here, we extend the models to include the effects of pathogenic variants in recently established breast cancer and EOC susceptibility genes, up-to-date age-specific pathology distributions and continuous risk factors. METHODS BOADICEA was extended to further incorporate the associations of pathogenic variants in BARD1, RAD51C and RAD51D with breast cancer risk. The EOC model was extended to include the association of PALB2 pathogenic variants with EOC risk. Age-specific distributions of oestrogen-receptor-negative and triple-negative breast cancer status for pathogenic variant carriers in these genes and CHEK2 and ATM were also incorporated. A novel method to include continuous risk factors was developed, exemplified by including adult height as continuous. RESULTS BARD1, RAD51C and RAD51D explain 0.31% of the breast cancer polygenic variance. When incorporated into the multifactorial model, 34%-44% of these carriers would be reclassified to the near-population and 15%-22% to the high-risk categories based on the UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines. Under the EOC multifactorial model, 62%, 35% and 3% of PALB2 carriers have lifetime EOC risks of <5%, 5%-10% and >10%, respectively. Including height as continuous, increased the breast cancer relative risk variance from 0.002 to 0.010. CONCLUSIONS These extensions will allow for better personalised risks for BARD1, RAD51C, RAD51D and PALB2 pathogenic variant carriers and more informed choices on screening, prevention, risk factor modification or other risk-reducing options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Lee
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Nasim Mavaddat
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Alex Cunningham
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Tim Carver
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Lorenzo Ficorella
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Stephanie Archer
- Primary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Fiona M Walter
- Primary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Marc Tischkowitz
- Department of Medical Genetics and National Institute for Health Research, Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Jonathan Roberts
- Department of Medical Genetics and National Institute for Health Research, Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Juliet Usher-Smith
- Primary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Jacques Simard
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec-Université Laval Research Center, Université Laval, Quebec, Quebec, Canada
| | - Marjanka K Schmidt
- Division of Molecular Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Peter Devilee
- Department of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Vesna Zadnik
- Epidemiology and Cancer Registry, Institute of Oncology, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Hannes Jürgens
- Clinic of Hematology and Oncology, Tartu University Hospital, Tartu, Estonia
| | | | | | - Matti Rookus
- Department of Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Thea M Mooij
- Department of Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Paul Pd Pharoah
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Douglas F Easton
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Antonis C Antoniou
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Hughes E, Wagner S, Pruss D, Bernhisel R, Probst B, Abkevich V, Simmons T, Hullinger B, Judkins T, Rosenthal E, Roa B, Domchek SM, Eng C, Garber J, Gary M, Klemp J, Mukherjee S, Offit K, Olopade OI, Vijai J, Weitzel JN, Whitworth P, Yehia L, Gordon O, Pederson H, Kurian A, Slavin TP, Gutin A, Lanchbury JS. Development and Validation of a Breast Cancer Polygenic Risk Score on the Basis of Genetic Ancestry Composition. JCO Precis Oncol 2022; 6:e2200084. [PMID: 36331239 PMCID: PMC9666117 DOI: 10.1200/po.22.00084] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2022] [Revised: 07/11/2022] [Accepted: 09/08/2022] [Indexed: 08/12/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Polygenic risk scores (PRSs) for breast cancer (BC) risk stratification have been developed primarily in women of European ancestry. Their application to women of non-European ancestry has lagged because of the lack of a formal approach to incorporate genetic ancestry and ancestry-dependent variant frequencies and effect sizes. Here, we propose a multiple-ancestry PRS (MA-PRS) that addresses these issues and may be useful in the development of equitable PRSs across other cancers and common diseases. MATERIALS AND METHODS Women referred for hereditary cancer testing were divided into consecutive cohorts for development (n = 189,230) and for independent validation (n = 89,126). Individual genetic composition as fractions of three reference ancestries (African, East Asian, and European) was determined from ancestry-informative single-nucleotide polymorphisms. The MA-PRS is a combination of three ancestry-specific PRSs on the basis of genetic ancestral composition. Stratification of risk was evaluated by multivariable logistic regression models controlling for family cancer history. Goodness-of-fit analysis compared expected with observed relative risks by quantiles of the MA-PRS distribution. RESULTS In independent validation, the MA-PRS was significantly associated with BC risk in the full cohort (odds ratio, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.40 to 1.46; P = 8.6 × 10-308) and within each major ancestry. The top decile of the MA-PRS consistently identified patients with two-fold increased risk of developing BC. Goodness-of-fit tests showed that the MA-PRS was well calibrated and predicted BC risk accurately in the tails of the distribution for both European and non-European women. CONCLUSION The MA-PRS uses genetic ancestral composition to expand the utility of polygenic risk prediction to non-European women. Inclusion of genetic ancestry in polygenic risk prediction presents an opportunity for more personalized treatment decisions for women of varying and mixed ancestries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Susan M. Domchek
- Basser Center for BRCA, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Charis Eng
- Genomic Medicine Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | | | | | - Jennifer Klemp
- The University of Kansas Cancer Center, The University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS
| | | | - Kenneth Offit
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | - Joseph Vijai
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | | | - Lamis Yehia
- Genomic Medicine Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Ora Gordon
- Providence Health and Services, Renton, WA
| | - Holly Pederson
- Medical Breast Services, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Kumuthini J, Zick B, Balasopoulou A, Chalikiopoulou C, Dandara C, El-Kamah G, Findley L, Katsila T, Li R, Maceda EB, Monye H, Rada G, Thong MK, Wanigasekera T, Kennel H, Marimuthu V, Williams MS, Al-Mulla F, Abramowicz M. The clinical utility of polygenic risk scores in genomic medicine practices: a systematic review. Hum Genet 2022; 141:1697-1704. [PMID: 35488921 PMCID: PMC9055005 DOI: 10.1007/s00439-022-02452-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2022] [Accepted: 03/26/2022] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Genomic medicine aims to improve health using the individual genomic data of people to inform care. While clinical utility of genomic medicine in many monogenic, Mendelian disorders is amply demonstrated, clinical utility is less evident in polygenic traits, e.g., coronary artery disease or breast cancer. Polygenic risk scores (PRS) are subsets of individual genotypes designed to capture heritability of common traits, and hence to allow the stratification of risk of the trait in a population. We systematically reviewed the PubMed database for unequivocal evidence of clinical utility of polygenic risk scores, using stringent inclusion and exclusion criteria. While we identified studies demonstrating clinical validity in conditions where medical intervention based on a PRS is likely to benefit patient outcome, we did not identify a single study demonstrating unequivocally such a benefit, i.e. clinical utility. We conclude that while the routine use of PRSs hold great promise, translational research is still needed before they should enter mainstream clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Judit Kumuthini
- South African National Bioinformatics Institute (SANBI), University of Western Cape, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Brittany Zick
- Global Genomic Medicine Collaborative, Durham, NC USA
| | - Angeliki Balasopoulou
- Institute of Chemical Biology, National Hellenic Research Foundation, 11635 Athens, Greece
| | | | - Collet Dandara
- Division of Human Genetics, Department of Pathology & Institute of Infectious Diseases and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Ghada El-Kamah
- Human Genetics and Genome Research Institute, National Research Centre, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Laura Findley
- National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD USA
| | - Theodora Katsila
- Institute of Chemical Biology, National Hellenic Research Foundation, 11635 Athens, Greece
| | - Rongling Li
- National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD USA
| | - Ebner Bon Maceda
- Center for Human Genetics Services, Institute of Human Genetics, National Institutes of Health, University of the Philippines Manila, Manila, Philippines
| | - Henrietta Monye
- Department of Ophthalmology, University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria
| | | | - Meow-Keong Thong
- Genetic and Metabolism Unit, Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | | | - Hannah Kennel
- Global Genomic Medicine Collaborative, Durham, NC USA
| | - Veeramani Marimuthu
- Department of Genetics and Bioinformatics, Dasman Diabetes Institute, P.O.Box 1180, 15462 Dasman, Kuwait
| | - the G2MC Evidence investigators
- South African National Bioinformatics Institute (SANBI), University of Western Cape, Cape Town, South Africa
- Global Genomic Medicine Collaborative, Durham, NC USA
- Institute of Chemical Biology, National Hellenic Research Foundation, 11635 Athens, Greece
- Division of Human Genetics, Department of Pathology & Institute of Infectious Diseases and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
- Human Genetics and Genome Research Institute, National Research Centre, Cairo, Egypt
- National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD USA
- Center for Human Genetics Services, Institute of Human Genetics, National Institutes of Health, University of the Philippines Manila, Manila, Philippines
- Department of Ophthalmology, University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria
- Epistemonikos Foundation, Santiago, Chile
- Genetic and Metabolism Unit, Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
- Ministry of Health of Sri Lanka, Colombo, Sri Lanka
- Global Genomic Medicine Collaborative, Durham, NC USA
- Department of Genetics and Bioinformatics, Dasman Diabetes Institute, P.O.Box 1180, 15462 Dasman, Kuwait
- Genomic Medicine Institute, Geisinger, Danville, PA 17822 USA
- Department of Genetics and Bioinformatics, Dasman Diabetes Institute, Kuwait City, Kuwait
- Department of Genetic Medicine and Development, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Genève, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | - Fahd Al-Mulla
- Department of Genetics and Bioinformatics, Dasman Diabetes Institute, Kuwait City, Kuwait
| | - Marc Abramowicz
- Department of Genetic Medicine and Development, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Genève, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Giardiello D, Hooning MJ, Hauptmann M, Keeman R, Heemskerk-Gerritsen BAM, Becher H, Blomqvist C, Bojesen SE, Bolla MK, Camp NJ, Czene K, Devilee P, Eccles DM, Fasching PA, Figueroa JD, Flyger H, García-Closas M, Haiman CA, Hamann U, Hopper JL, Jakubowska A, Leeuwen FE, Lindblom A, Lubiński J, Margolin S, Martinez ME, Nevanlinna H, Nevelsteen I, Pelders S, Pharoah PDP, Siesling S, Southey MC, van der Hout AH, van Hest LP, Chang-Claude J, Hall P, Easton DF, Steyerberg EW, Schmidt MK. PredictCBC-2.0: a contralateral breast cancer risk prediction model developed and validated in ~ 200,000 patients. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH : BCR 2022; 24:69. [PMID: 36271417 PMCID: PMC9585761 DOI: 10.1186/s13058-022-01567-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2022] [Accepted: 10/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prediction of contralateral breast cancer (CBC) risk is challenging due to moderate performances of the known risk factors. We aimed to improve our previous risk prediction model (PredictCBC) by updated follow-up and including additional risk factors. METHODS We included data from 207,510 invasive breast cancer patients participating in 23 studies. In total, 8225 CBC events occurred over a median follow-up of 10.2 years. In addition to the previously included risk factors, PredictCBC-2.0 included CHEK2 c.1100delC, a 313 variant polygenic risk score (PRS-313), body mass index (BMI), and parity. Fine and Gray regression was used to fit the model. Calibration and a time-dependent area under the curve (AUC) at 5 and 10 years were assessed to determine the performance of the models. Decision curve analysis was performed to evaluate the net benefit of PredictCBC-2.0 and previous PredictCBC models. RESULTS The discrimination of PredictCBC-2.0 at 10 years was higher than PredictCBC with an AUC of 0.65 (95% prediction intervals (PI) 0.56-0.74) versus 0.63 (95%PI 0.54-0.71). PredictCBC-2.0 was well calibrated with an observed/expected ratio at 10 years of 0.92 (95%PI 0.34-2.54). Decision curve analysis for contralateral preventive mastectomy (CPM) showed the potential clinical utility of PredictCBC-2.0 between thresholds of 4 and 12% 10-year CBC risk for BRCA1/2 mutation carriers and non-carriers. CONCLUSIONS Additional genetic information beyond BRCA1/2 germline mutations improved CBC risk prediction and might help tailor clinical decision-making toward CPM or alternative preventive strategies. Identifying patients who benefit from CPM, especially in the general breast cancer population, remains challenging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniele Giardiello
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.,Institute of Biomedicine, EURAC Research Affiliated Institute of the University of Lübeck, Bolzano, Italy
| | - Maartje J Hooning
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Michael Hauptmann
- Brandenburg Medical School, Institute of Biostatistics and Registry Research, Neuruppin, Germany
| | - Renske Keeman
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Heiko Becher
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Carl Blomqvist
- Department of Oncology, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.,Department of Oncology, Örebro University Hospital, Örebro, Sweden
| | - Stig E Bojesen
- Copenhagen General Population Study, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark.,Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Manjeet K Bolla
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Nicola J Camp
- Department of Internal Medicine and Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Kamila Czene
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Peter Devilee
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.,Department of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Diana M Eccles
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Peter A Fasching
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.,Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Jonine D Figueroa
- Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.,Cancer Research UK Edinburgh Centre, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.,Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Department of Health and Human Services, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Henrik Flyger
- Department of Breast Surgery, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Montserrat García-Closas
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Department of Health and Human Services, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Christopher A Haiman
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Ute Hamann
- Molecular Genetics of Breast Cancer, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - John L Hopper
- Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Anna Jakubowska
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland.,Independent Laboratory of Molecular Biology and Genetic Diagnostics, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Floor E Leeuwen
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Annika Lindblom
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Clinical Genetics, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Jan Lubiński
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Sara Margolin
- Department of Oncology, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Clinical Science and Education, Karolinska Institutet, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Maria Elena Martinez
- Moores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.,Herbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Human Longevity Science, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Heli Nevanlinna
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Ines Nevelsteen
- Department of Oncology, Leuven Multidisciplinary Breast Center, Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven, Louven, Belgium
| | - Saskia Pelders
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Paul D P Pharoah
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.,Department of Oncology, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Sabine Siesling
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Department of HealthTechnology and Services Research, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Melissa C Southey
- Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia.,Department of Clinical Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Annemieke H van der Hout
- Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen, University Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Liselotte P van Hest
- Clinical Genetics, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jenny Chang-Claude
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Cancer Epidemiology Group, University Cancer Center Hamburg (UCCH), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Per Hall
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Oncology, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Douglas F Easton
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.,Department of Oncology, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Ewout W Steyerberg
- Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.,Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marjanka K Schmidt
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. .,Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Saya S, Boyd L, Chondros P, McNamara M, King M, Milton S, Lourenco RDA, Clark M, Fishman G, Marker J, Ostroff C, Allman R, Walter FM, Buchanan D, Winship I, McIntosh J, Macrae F, Jenkins M, Emery J. The SCRIPT trial: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial of a polygenic risk score to tailor colorectal cancer screening in primary care. Trials 2022; 23:810. [PMID: 36163034 PMCID: PMC9513012 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-022-06734-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2022] [Accepted: 09/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Polygenic risk scores (PRSs) can predict the risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) and target screening more precisely than current guidelines using age and family history alone. Primary care, as a far-reaching point of healthcare and routine provider of cancer screening and risk information, may be an ideal location for their widespread implementation. Methods This trial aims to determine whether the SCRIPT intervention results in more risk-appropriate CRC screening after 12 months in individuals attending general practice, compared with standard cancer risk reduction information. The SCRIPT intervention consists of a CRC PRS, tailored risk-specific screening recommendations and a risk report for participants and their GP, delivered in general practice. Patients aged between 45 and 70 inclusive, attending their GP, will be approached for participation. For those over 50, only those overdue for CRC screening will be eligible to participate. Two hundred and seventy-four participants will be randomised to the intervention or control arms, stratified by general practice, using a computer-generated allocation sequence. The primary outcome is risk-appropriate CRC screening after 12 months. For those in the intervention arm, risk-appropriate screening is defined using PRS-derived risk; for those in the control arm, it is defined using family history and national screening guidelines. Timing, type and results of the previous screening are considered in both arms. Objective health service data will capture screening behaviour. Secondary outcomes include cancer-specific worry, risk perception, predictors of CRC screening behaviour, screening intentions and health service use at 1, 6 and 12 months post-intervention delivery. Discussion This trial aims to determine whether a PRS-derived personalised CRC risk estimate delivered in primary care increases risk-appropriate CRC screening. A future population risk-stratified CRC screening programme could incorporate risk assessment within primary care while encouraging adherence to targeted screening recommendations. Trial registration Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry ACTRN12621000092897p. Registered on 1 February 2021. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-022-06734-7.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sibel Saya
- Primary Care Cancer Research Group, Department of General Practice, Centre for Cancer Research, The University of Melbourne, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Level 10, 305 Grattan Street, Melbourne, Victoria, 3000, Australia. .,Centre for Cancer Research, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
| | - Lucy Boyd
- Primary Care Cancer Research Group, Department of General Practice, Centre for Cancer Research, The University of Melbourne, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Level 10, 305 Grattan Street, Melbourne, Victoria, 3000, Australia.,Centre for Cancer Research, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Patty Chondros
- Primary Care Cancer Research Group, Department of General Practice, Centre for Cancer Research, The University of Melbourne, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Level 10, 305 Grattan Street, Melbourne, Victoria, 3000, Australia
| | - Mairead McNamara
- Primary Care Cancer Research Group, Department of General Practice, Centre for Cancer Research, The University of Melbourne, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Level 10, 305 Grattan Street, Melbourne, Victoria, 3000, Australia.,Centre for Cancer Research, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Michelle King
- Primary Care Cancer Research Group, Department of General Practice, Centre for Cancer Research, The University of Melbourne, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Level 10, 305 Grattan Street, Melbourne, Victoria, 3000, Australia.,Centre for Cancer Research, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Shakira Milton
- Primary Care Cancer Research Group, Department of General Practice, Centre for Cancer Research, The University of Melbourne, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Level 10, 305 Grattan Street, Melbourne, Victoria, 3000, Australia.,Centre for Cancer Research, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Richard De Abreu Lourenco
- Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | | | - George Fishman
- Consumer Advisory Group, Primary Care Collaborative Cancer Clinical Trials Group, Carlton, Australia
| | - Julie Marker
- Consumer Advisory Group, Primary Care Collaborative Cancer Clinical Trials Group, Carlton, Australia
| | - Cheri Ostroff
- Centre for Workplace Excellence, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Richard Allman
- Genetic Technologies/Phenogen Sciences, Fitzroy, Australia.,Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Fiona M Walter
- Primary Care Cancer Research Group, Department of General Practice, Centre for Cancer Research, The University of Melbourne, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Level 10, 305 Grattan Street, Melbourne, Victoria, 3000, Australia.,Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Daniel Buchanan
- Centre for Cancer Research, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.,Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.,Department of Clinical Pathology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Ingrid Winship
- Department of Medicine, Melbourne Medical School, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.,Genetic Medicine, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Jennifer McIntosh
- Primary Care Cancer Research Group, Department of General Practice, Centre for Cancer Research, The University of Melbourne, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Level 10, 305 Grattan Street, Melbourne, Victoria, 3000, Australia.,HumaniSE Lab, Department of Software Systems and Cybersecurity, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
| | - Finlay Macrae
- Department of Medicine, Melbourne Medical School, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.,Colorectal Medicine and Genetics, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Mark Jenkins
- Centre for Cancer Research, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.,Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Jon Emery
- Primary Care Cancer Research Group, Department of General Practice, Centre for Cancer Research, The University of Melbourne, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Level 10, 305 Grattan Street, Melbourne, Victoria, 3000, Australia.,Centre for Cancer Research, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Gao G, Zhao F, Ahearn TU, Lunetta KL, Troester MA, Du Z, Ogundiran TO, Ojengbede O, Blot W, Nathanson KL, Domchek SM, Nemesure B, Hennis A, Ambs S, McClellan J, Nie M, Bertrand K, Zirpoli G, Yao S, Olshan AF, Bensen JT, Bandera EV, Nyante S, Conti DV, Press MF, Ingles SA, John EM, Bernstein L, Hu JJ, Deming-Halverson SL, Chanock SJ, Ziegler RG, Rodriguez-Gil JL, Sucheston-Campbell LE, Sandler DP, Taylor JA, Kitahara CM, O’Brien KM, Bolla MK, Dennis J, Dunning AM, Easton DF, Michailidou K, Pharoah PDP, Wang Q, Figueroa J, Biritwum R, Adjei E, Wiafe S, Ambrosone CB, Zheng W, Olopade OI, García-Closas M, Palmer JR, Haiman CA, Huo D. Polygenic risk scores for prediction of breast cancer risk in women of African ancestry: a cross-ancestry approach. Hum Mol Genet 2022; 31:3133-3143. [PMID: 35554533 PMCID: PMC9476624 DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddac102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2021] [Revised: 03/29/2022] [Accepted: 04/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Polygenic risk scores (PRSs) are useful for predicting breast cancer risk, but the prediction accuracy of existing PRSs in women of African ancestry (AA) remains relatively low. We aim to develop optimal PRSs for the prediction of overall and estrogen receptor (ER) subtype-specific breast cancer risk in AA women. The AA dataset comprised 9235 cases and 10 184 controls from four genome-wide association study (GWAS) consortia and a GWAS study in Ghana. We randomly divided samples into training and validation sets. We built PRSs using individual-level AA data by a forward stepwise logistic regression and then developed joint PRSs that combined (1) the PRSs built in the AA training dataset and (2) a 313-variant PRS previously developed in women of European ancestry. PRSs were evaluated in the AA validation set. For overall breast cancer, the odds ratio per standard deviation of the joint PRS in the validation set was 1.34 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.27-1.42] with the area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.581. Compared with women with average risk (40th-60th PRS percentile), women in the top decile of the PRS had a 1.98-fold increased risk (95% CI: 1.63-2.39). For PRSs of ER-positive and ER-negative breast cancer, the AUCs were 0.608 and 0.576, respectively. Compared with existing methods, the proposed joint PRSs can improve prediction of breast cancer risk in AA women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guimin Gao
- Department of Public Health Sciences, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA
| | - Fangyuan Zhao
- Department of Public Health Sciences, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA
| | - Thomas U Ahearn
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20850, USA
| | - Kathryn L Lunetta
- Department of Biostatistics, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02118, USA
| | - Melissa A Troester
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
| | - Zhaohui Du
- Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA 98109, USA
| | - Temidayo O Ogundiran
- Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria
| | - Oladosu Ojengbede
- Centre for Population & Reproductive Health, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria
| | - William Blot
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN 37232, USA
| | - Katherine L Nathanson
- Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Susan M Domchek
- Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Barbara Nemesure
- Department of Family, Population and Preventive Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA
| | - Anselm Hennis
- Department of Family, Population and Preventive Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA
- University of the West Indies, Bridgetown, Bardados
| | - Stefan Ambs
- Laboratory of Human Carcinogenesis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Julian McClellan
- Department of Public Health Sciences, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA
| | - Mark Nie
- Department of Public Health Sciences, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA
| | | | - Gary Zirpoli
- Slone Epidemiology Center, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Song Yao
- Department of Cancer Prevention and Control, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY 14203, USA
| | - Andrew F Olshan
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
| | - Jeannette T Bensen
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
| | - Elisa V Bandera
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ 08903, USA
| | - Sarah Nyante
- Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27514, USA
| | - David V Conti
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA
| | - Michael F Press
- Department of Pathology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA
| | - Sue A Ingles
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA
| | - Esther M John
- Departments of Epidemiology & Population Health and of Medicine (Oncology) and Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94304, USA
| | - Leslie Bernstein
- Biomarkers of Early Detection and Prevention, Department of Population Sciences, Beckman Research Institute, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA 91010, USA
| | - Jennifer J Hu
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136, USA
| | - Sandra L Deming-Halverson
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN 37232, USA
| | - Stephen J Chanock
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20850, USA
| | - Regina G Ziegler
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20850, USA
| | - Jorge L Rodriguez-Gil
- Genomics, Development and Disease Section, Genetic Disease Research Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, Bethesda, MD 20894, USA
| | - Lara E Sucheston-Campbell
- Department of Veterinary Biosciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Dale P Sandler
- Epidemiology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA
| | - Jack A Taylor
- Epidemiology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA
| | - Cari M Kitahara
- Radiation Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Katie M O’Brien
- Epidemiology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA
| | - Manjeet K Bolla
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK
| | - Joe Dennis
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK
| | - Alison M Dunning
- Department of Oncology, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK
| | - Douglas F Easton
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK
- Department of Oncology, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK
| | - Kyriaki Michailidou
- Biostatistics Unit, The Cyprus Institute of Neurology & Genetics, Nicosia 2371, Cyprus
| | - Paul D P Pharoah
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK
- Department of Oncology, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK
| | - Qin Wang
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK
| | - Jonine Figueroa
- Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, The University of Edinburgh Medical School, Edinburgh EH16 5TJ, UK
- Cancer Research UK Edinburgh Centre, Edinburgh EH4 2XR, UK
| | | | | | - Seth Wiafe
- School of Public Health, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA 92350, USA
| | | | - Christine B Ambrosone
- Department of Cancer Prevention and Control, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY 14203, USA
| | - Wei Zheng
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN 37232, USA
| | - Olufunmilayo I Olopade
- Center for Clinical Cancer Genetics & Global Health, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA
| | - Montserrat García-Closas
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20850, USA
| | - Julie R Palmer
- Slone Epidemiology Center, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Christopher A Haiman
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA
| | - Dezheng Huo
- Department of Public Health Sciences, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA
- Center for Clinical Cancer Genetics & Global Health, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Role of Polygenic Risk Score in Cancer Precision Medicine of Non-European Populations: A Systematic Review. Curr Oncol 2022; 29:5517-5530. [PMID: 36005174 PMCID: PMC9406904 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol29080436] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2022] [Revised: 07/28/2022] [Accepted: 08/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
The development of new screening methods and diagnostic tests for traits, common diseases, and cancer is linked to the advent of precision genomic medicine, in which health care is individually adjusted based on a person’s lifestyle, environmental influences, and genetic variants. Based on genome-wide association study (GWAS) analysis, rapid and continuing progress in the discovery of relevant single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) for traits or complex diseases has increased interest in the potential application of genetic risk models for routine health practice. The polygenic risk score (PRS) estimates an individual’s genetic risk of a trait or disease, calculated by employing a weighted sum of allele counts combined with non-genetic variables. However, 98.38% of PRS records held in public databases relate to the European population. Therefore, PRSs for multiethnic populations are urgently needed. We performed a systematic review to discuss the role of polygenic risk scores in advancing precision medicine for different cancer types in multiethnic non-European populations.
Collapse
|
32
|
ALTUNAL Ç, ŞAHİNER İT. The relationship of breast cancer deaths with age groups and urbanization of the population: a multi-country analysis. JOURNAL OF HEALTH SCIENCES AND MEDICINE 2022. [DOI: 10.32322/jhsm.1087030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim: In this retrospective observational study, it was aimed to evaluate the relationship between breast cancer deaths and demographic properties of countries.
Material and Method: The research was conducted on World Health Organization (WHO) 10th International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10) mortality list and World Bank Country Reports (WBCR). Total breast cancer-related deaths, age groups and urban population rates of 14 countries between 1996 and 2017 were evaluated.
Results: Both uncontrolled and controlled correlation analysis results showed that population age distribution had a significant correlation with total breast cancer-related deaths (p0.05). Generalized Linear Model (GLM) results showed that only the country had a significant effect on total breast cancer related deaths (p0.05).
Conclusion: Although reasons such as age and urbanization play an important role among breast cancer risk factors, it is found that they do not affect mortality rates. A total of 22 years of WHO data and 14 country results showed that deaths due to breast cancer are only related to the country. Therefore, countries can minimize deaths due to breast cancer by carrying out more effective struggles, early diagnosis, treatment and awareness activities.
Collapse
|
33
|
TGFBR1*6A as a modifier of breast cancer risk and progression: advances and future prospects. NPJ Breast Cancer 2022; 8:84. [PMID: 35853889 PMCID: PMC9296458 DOI: 10.1038/s41523-022-00446-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2022] [Accepted: 06/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
There is growing evidence that germline mutations in certain genes influence cancer susceptibility, tumor evolution, as well as clinical outcomes. Identification of a disease-causing genetic variant enables testing and diagnosis of at-risk individuals. For breast cancer, several genes such as BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, ATM, and CHEK2 act as high- to moderate-penetrance cancer susceptibility genes. Genotyping of these genes informs genetic risk assessment and counseling, as well as treatment and management decisions in the case of high-penetrance genes. TGFBR1*6A (rs11466445) is a common variant of the TGF-β receptor type I (TGFBR1) that has a global minor allelic frequency (MAF) of 0.051 according to the 1000 Genomes Project Consortium. It is emerging as a high frequency, low penetrance tumor susceptibility allele associated with increased cancer risk among several cancer types. The TGFBR1*6A allele has been associated with increased breast cancer risk in women, OR 1.15 (95% CI 1.01–1.31). Functionally, TGFBR1*6A promotes breast cancer cell proliferation, migration, and invasion through the regulation of the ERK pathway and Rho-GTP activation. This review discusses current findings on the genetic, functional, and mechanistic associations between TGFBR1*6A and breast cancer risk and proposes future directions as it relates to genetic association studies and mechanisms of action for tumor growth, metastasis, and immune suppression.
Collapse
|
34
|
Raz A, Timmermans S, Eyal G, Brothers K, Minari J. Challenges for precision public health communication in the era of genomic medicine. Genet Med 2022; 24:1814-1820. [PMID: 35657379 DOI: 10.1016/j.gim.2022.05.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2021] [Revised: 05/12/2022] [Accepted: 05/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Although still in the early stages of development, the advent of fast, high-output, and cost-effective next-generation DNA sequencing technology is moving precision medicine into public health. Before this shift toward next-generation sequencing in public health settings, individual patients met geneticists after showing symptoms and through limited family screening. In the new era of precision public health, everyone is a possible participant in genetic sequencing, simply by being born (newborn screening), by donating blood (biobanking), or through population screening. These initiatives are increasingly offered to individuals throughout their life and more individuals are encountering opportunities to use DNA sequencing. This article raises awareness of these growing areas and calls for different models of public engagement and communication about genomics, including screening asymptomatic populations, obtaining consent for unspecified and unforeseen future uses of genomic data, and managing variants of uncertain significance. Given that such communication challenges loom large, established norms of practice in genomic medicine and research should be reconsidered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aviad Raz
- Department of Sociology & Anthropology, Ben-Gurion University of the Nagev, Beersheba, Israel.
| | | | - Gil Eyal
- Precision Medicine & Society Program, Department of Sociology, Columbia University, New York, NY
| | - Kyle Brothers
- Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY
| | - Jusaku Minari
- Uehiro Research Division for iPS Cell Ethics, Center for iPS Cell Research and Application (CiRA), Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Luo C, Wang L, Zhang Y, Lu M, Lu B, Cai J, Chen H, Dai M. Advances in breast cancer screening modalities and status of global screening programs. Chronic Dis Transl Med 2022; 8:112-123. [PMID: 35774423 PMCID: PMC9215717 DOI: 10.1002/cdt3.21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2021] [Accepted: 02/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Breast cancer (BC) is the most prevalent malignancy worldwide, and a continued upward trend has been predicted in the coming decades. Screening in selected targeted populations, which is effective in reducing cancer‐related mortality, has been widely implemented in many countries. This review summarizes the advances in BC screening techniques, organized or opportunistic BC screening programs across different countries, and screening modalities recommended by different academic authorities. Mammography is the most widely used and effective technique for BC screening. Other complementary techniques include ultrasound, clinical breast examination, and magnetic resonance imaging. Novel screening tests, including digital breast tomosynthesis and liquid biopsies, are still under development. Globally, the implementation status of BC screening programs is uneven, which is reflected by differences in screening modes, techniques, and population coverage. The recommended optimal screening strategies varied according to the authoritative guidelines. The effectiveness of current screening programs is influenced by several factors, including low detection rate, high false‐positive rate, and unsatisfactory coverage and uptake rates. Exploration of accurate BC risk prediction models and the development of risk‐stratified screening strategies are highly warranted in future research. Mammography is the most widely used and most effective technique; other complementary techniques include ultrasound, clinical breast examination, and magnetic resonance imaging. Globally, the implementation status of breast cancer screening programs is uneven, which is reflected by differences in screening modes, techniques, and examination coverage. Combining effective risk prediction models and advanced screening techniques for risk‐stratified screening strategies may be the future direction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chenyu Luo
- Medical Research Center, Peking Union Medical College Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College Beijing China
| | - Le Wang
- Department of Cancer Prevention Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital) Hangzhou Zhejiang China
| | - Yuhan Zhang
- Medical Research Center, Peking Union Medical College Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College Beijing China
| | - Ming Lu
- Medical Research Center, Peking Union Medical College Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College Beijing China
| | - Bin Lu
- Medical Research Center, Peking Union Medical College Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College Beijing China
| | - Jie Cai
- Department of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College Beijing China
| | - Hongda Chen
- Medical Research Center, Peking Union Medical College Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College Beijing China
| | - Min Dai
- Medical Research Center, Peking Union Medical College Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College Beijing China
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Ho PJ, Ho WK, Khng AJ, Yeoh YS, Tan BKT, Tan EY, Lim GH, Tan SM, Tan VKM, Yip CH, Mohd-Taib NA, Wong FY, Lim EH, Ngeow J, Chay WY, Leong LCH, Yong WS, Seah CM, Tang SW, Ng CWQ, Yan Z, Lee JA, Rahmat K, Islam T, Hassan T, Tai MC, Khor CC, Yuan JM, Koh WP, Sim X, Dunning AM, Bolla MK, Antoniou AC, Teo SH, Li J, Hartman M. Overlap of high-risk individuals predicted by family history, and genetic and non-genetic breast cancer risk prediction models: implications for risk stratification. BMC Med 2022; 20:150. [PMID: 35468796 PMCID: PMC9040206 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-022-02334-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2021] [Accepted: 03/14/2022] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Family history, and genetic and non-genetic risk factors can stratify women according to their individual risk of developing breast cancer. The extent of overlap between these risk predictors is not clear. METHODS In this case-only analysis involving 7600 Asian breast cancer patients diagnosed between age 30 and 75 years, we examined identification of high-risk patients based on positive family history, the Gail model 5-year absolute risk [5yAR] above 1.3%, breast cancer predisposition genes (protein-truncating variants [PTV] in ATM, BRCA1, BRCA2, CHEK2, PALB2, BARD1, RAD51C, RAD51D, or TP53), and polygenic risk score (PRS) 5yAR above 1.3%. RESULTS Correlation between 5yAR (at age of diagnosis) predicted by PRS and the Gail model was low (r=0.27). Fifty-three percent of breast cancer patients (n=4041) were considered high risk by one or more classification criteria. Positive family history, PTV carriership, PRS, or the Gail model identified 1247 (16%), 385 (5%), 2774 (36%), and 1592 (21%) patients who were considered at high risk, respectively. In a subset of 3227 women aged below 50 years, the four models studied identified 470 (15%), 213 (7%), 769 (24%), and 325 (10%) unique patients who were considered at high risk, respectively. For younger women, PRS and PTVs together identified 745 (59% of 1276) high-risk individuals who were not identified by the Gail model or family history. CONCLUSIONS Family history and genetic and non-genetic risk stratification tools have the potential to complement one another to identify women at high risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peh Joo Ho
- Genome Institute of Singapore, Human Genetics, Singapore, Singapore
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
- Department of Surgery, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Weang Kee Ho
- Cancer Research Malaysia, 1 Jalan SS12/1A, 47500 Subang Jaya, Selangor Malaysia
- School of Mathematical Sciences, Faculty of Science and Engineering, University of Nottingham Malaysia, Jalan Broga, 43500 Semenyih, Selangor Malaysia
| | - Alexis J. Khng
- Genome Institute of Singapore, Human Genetics, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Yen Shing Yeoh
- Department of Surgery, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Benita Kiat-Tee Tan
- Department of General Surgery, Sengkang General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
- Department of Breast Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Surgery and Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Ern Yu Tan
- Department of General Surgery, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, 308433 Singapore
- Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technology University, Singapore, Singapore
- Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Geok Hoon Lim
- KK Breast Department, KK Women’s and Children’s Hospital, Singapore, 229899 Singapore
| | - Su-Ming Tan
- Division of Breast Surgery, Changi General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Veronique Kiak Mien Tan
- Department of Breast Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Surgery and Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Cheng-Har Yip
- Subang Jaya Medical Centre, Subang Jaya, Selangor Malaysia
| | - Nur-Aishah Mohd-Taib
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
- Universiti Malaya Cancer Research Institute, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Fuh Yong Wong
- Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Elaine Hsuen Lim
- Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Joanne Ngeow
- Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technology University, Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Cancer Genetics Service, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Wen Yee Chay
- Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Lester Chee Hao Leong
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Wei Sean Yong
- Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Chin Mui Seah
- Division of Breast Surgery, Changi General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Siau Wei Tang
- Department of Surgery, University Surgical Cluster, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Celene Wei Qi Ng
- Department of Surgery, University Surgical Cluster, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Zhiyan Yan
- KK Breast Department, KK Women’s and Children’s Hospital, Singapore, 229899 Singapore
| | - Jung Ah Lee
- KK Breast Department, KK Women’s and Children’s Hospital, Singapore, 229899 Singapore
| | - Kartini Rahmat
- Healthy Longevity Translational Research Programme, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Tania Islam
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
- Universiti Malaya Cancer Research Institute, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Tiara Hassan
- Cancer Research Malaysia, 1 Jalan SS12/1A, 47500 Subang Jaya, Selangor Malaysia
| | - Mei-Chee Tai
- Cancer Research Malaysia, 1 Jalan SS12/1A, 47500 Subang Jaya, Selangor Malaysia
| | - Chiea Chuen Khor
- Genome Institute of Singapore, Human Genetics, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Jian-Min Yuan
- UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA USA
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, PA USA
| | - Woon-Puay Koh
- Healthy Longevity Translational Research Programme, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Singapore Institute for Clinical Sciences, Agency for Science Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore, 117609 Singapore
| | - Xueling Sim
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Alison M. Dunning
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Manjeet K. Bolla
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Antonis C. Antoniou
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Soo-Hwang Teo
- Cancer Research Malaysia, 1 Jalan SS12/1A, 47500 Subang Jaya, Selangor Malaysia
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Jalan Universiti, 50630 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Jingmei Li
- Genome Institute of Singapore, Human Genetics, Singapore, Singapore
- Department of Surgery, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Mikael Hartman
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
- Department of Surgery, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
- Department of Surgery, University Surgical Cluster, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
BREAst screening Tailored for HEr (BREATHE)-A study protocol on personalised risk-based breast cancer screening programme. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0265965. [PMID: 35358246 PMCID: PMC8970365 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265965] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2021] [Accepted: 02/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Routine mammography screening is currently the standard tool for finding cancers at an early stage, when treatment is most successful. Current breast screening programmes are one-size-fits-all which all women above a certain age threshold are encouraged to participate. However, breast cancer risk varies by individual. The BREAst screening Tailored for HEr (BREATHE) study aims to assess acceptability of a comprehensive risk-based personalised breast screening in Singapore. Advancing beyond the current age-based screening paradigm, BREATHE integrates both genetic and non-genetic breast cancer risk prediction tools to personalise screening recommendations. BREATHE is a cohort study targeting to recruit ~3,500 women. The first recruitment visit will include questionnaires and a buccal cheek swab. After receiving a tailored breast cancer risk report, participants will attend an in-person risk review, followed by a final session assessing the acceptability of our risk stratification programme. Risk prediction is based on: a) Gail model (non-genetic), b) mammographic density and recall, c) BOADICEA predictions (breast cancer predisposition genes), and d) breast cancer polygenic risk score. For national implementation of personalised risk-based breast screening, exploration of the acceptability within the target populace is critical, in addition to validated predication tools. To our knowledge, this is the first study to implement a comprehensive risk-based mammography screening programme in Asia. The BREATHE study will provide essential data for policy implementation which will transform the health system to deliver a better health and healthcare outcomes.
Collapse
|
38
|
Mars N, Kerminen S, Feng YCA, Kanai M, Läll K, Thomas LF, Skogholt AH, della Briotta Parolo P, Neale BM, Smoller JW, Gabrielsen ME, Hveem K, Mägi R, Matsuda K, Okada Y, Pirinen M, Palotie A, Ganna A, Martin AR, Ripatti S. Genome-wide risk prediction of common diseases across ancestries in one million people. CELL GENOMICS 2022; 2:None. [PMID: 35591975 PMCID: PMC9010308 DOI: 10.1016/j.xgen.2022.100118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2021] [Revised: 08/24/2021] [Accepted: 03/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Polygenic risk scores (PRS) measure genetic disease susceptibility by combining risk effects across the genome. For coronary artery disease (CAD), type 2 diabetes (T2D), and breast and prostate cancer, we performed cross-ancestry evaluation of genome-wide PRSs in six biobanks in Europe, the United States, and Asia. We studied transferability of these highly polygenic, genome-wide PRSs across global ancestries, within European populations with different health-care systems, and local population substructures in a population isolate. All four PRSs had similar accuracy across European and Asian populations, with poorer transferability in the smaller group of individuals of African ancestry. The PRSs had highly similar effect sizes in different populations of European ancestry, and in early- and late-settlement regions with different recent population bottlenecks in Finland. Comparing genome-wide PRSs to PRSs containing a smaller number of variants, the highly polygenic, genome-wide PRSs generally displayed higher effect sizes and better transferability across global ancestries. Our findings indicate that in the populations investigated, the current genome-wide polygenic scores for common diseases have potential for clinical utility within different health-care settings for individuals of European ancestry, but that the utility in individuals of African ancestry is currently much lower.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nina Mars
- Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland, FIMM, HiLIFE, University of Helsinki, Biomedicum 2U, Tukholmankatu 8, 00290 Helsinki, Finland
| | - Sini Kerminen
- Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland, FIMM, HiLIFE, University of Helsinki, Biomedicum 2U, Tukholmankatu 8, 00290 Helsinki, Finland
| | - Yen-Chen A. Feng
- Psychiatric and Neurodevelopmental Genetics Unit, Center for Genomic Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA,Analytic and Translational Genetics Unit, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA,Stanley Center for Psychiatric Research, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA,Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Masahiro Kanai
- Analytic and Translational Genetics Unit, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA,Stanley Center for Psychiatric Research, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA,Program in Medical and Population Genetics, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Kristi Läll
- Estonian Genome Centre, Institute of Genomics, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia
| | - Laurent F. Thomas
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway,K. G. Jebsen Center for Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway,BioCore - Bioinformatics Core Facility, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Anne Heidi Skogholt
- K. G. Jebsen Center for Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Pietro della Briotta Parolo
- Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland, FIMM, HiLIFE, University of Helsinki, Biomedicum 2U, Tukholmankatu 8, 00290 Helsinki, Finland
| | | | | | - Benjamin M. Neale
- Analytic and Translational Genetics Unit, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA,Stanley Center for Psychiatric Research, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jordan W. Smoller
- Psychiatric and Neurodevelopmental Genetics Unit, Center for Genomic Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA,Stanley Center for Psychiatric Research, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Maiken E. Gabrielsen
- K. G. Jebsen Center for Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway,HUNT Research Center, Department of Public Health and Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Kristian Hveem
- K. G. Jebsen Center for Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Reedik Mägi
- Estonian Genome Centre, Institute of Genomics, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia
| | - Koichi Matsuda
- Department of Computational Biology and Medical Sciences, Graduate school of Frontier Sciences, the University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yukinori Okada
- Department of Statistical Genetics, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan,Laboratory of Statistical Immunology, Immunology Frontier Research Center (WPI-IFReC), Osaka University, Suita, Japan,Integrated Frontier Research for Medical Science Division, Institute for Open and Transdisciplinary Research Initiatives, Osaka University, Suita, Japan,Laboratory for Systems Genetics, RIKEN Center for Integrative Medical Sciences, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Matti Pirinen
- Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland, FIMM, HiLIFE, University of Helsinki, Biomedicum 2U, Tukholmankatu 8, 00290 Helsinki, Finland,Department of Public Health, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland,Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Aarno Palotie
- Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland, FIMM, HiLIFE, University of Helsinki, Biomedicum 2U, Tukholmankatu 8, 00290 Helsinki, Finland,Analytic and Translational Genetics Unit, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA,Stanley Center for Psychiatric Research, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Andrea Ganna
- Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland, FIMM, HiLIFE, University of Helsinki, Biomedicum 2U, Tukholmankatu 8, 00290 Helsinki, Finland,Analytic and Translational Genetics Unit, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA,Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Alicia R. Martin
- Analytic and Translational Genetics Unit, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA,Stanley Center for Psychiatric Research, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA,Program in Medical and Population Genetics, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Samuli Ripatti
- Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland, FIMM, HiLIFE, University of Helsinki, Biomedicum 2U, Tukholmankatu 8, 00290 Helsinki, Finland,Department of Public Health, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland,Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA,Corresponding author
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Ho WK, Tai MC, Dennis J, Shu X, Li J, Ho PJ, Millwood IY, Lin K, Jee YH, Lee SH, Mavaddat N, Bolla MK, Wang Q, Michailidou K, Long J, Wijaya EA, Hassan T, Rahmat K, Tan VKM, Tan BKT, Tan SM, Tan EY, Lim SH, Gao YT, Zheng Y, Kang D, Choi JY, Han W, Lee HB, Kubo M, Okada Y, Namba S, Park SK, Kim SW, Shen CY, Wu PE, Park B, Muir KR, Lophatananon A, Wu AH, Tseng CC, Matsuo K, Ito H, Kwong A, Chan TL, John EM, Kurian AW, Iwasaki M, Yamaji T, Kweon SS, Aronson KJ, Murphy RA, Koh WP, Khor CC, Yuan JM, Dorajoo R, Walters RG, Chen Z, Li L, Lv J, Jung KJ, Kraft P, Pharoah PDB, Dunning AM, Simard J, Shu XO, Yip CH, Taib NAM, Antoniou AC, Zheng W, Hartman M, Easton DF, Teo SH. Polygenic risk scores for prediction of breast cancer risk in Asian populations. Genet Med 2022; 24:586-600. [PMID: 34906514 PMCID: PMC7612481 DOI: 10.1016/j.gim.2021.11.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2021] [Revised: 08/03/2021] [Accepted: 11/09/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Non-European populations are under-represented in genetics studies, hindering clinical implementation of breast cancer polygenic risk scores (PRSs). We aimed to develop PRSs using the largest available studies of Asian ancestry and to assess the transferability of PRS across ethnic subgroups. METHODS The development data set comprised 138,309 women from 17 case-control studies. PRSs were generated using a clumping and thresholding method, lasso penalized regression, an Empirical Bayes approach, a Bayesian polygenic prediction approach, or linear combinations of multiple PRSs. These PRSs were evaluated in 89,898 women from 3 prospective studies (1592 incident cases). RESULTS The best performing PRS (genome-wide set of single-nucleotide variations [formerly single-nucleotide polymorphism]) had a hazard ratio per unit SD of 1.62 (95% CI = 1.46-1.80) and an area under the receiver operating curve of 0.635 (95% CI = 0.622-0.649). Combined Asian and European PRSs (333 single-nucleotide variations) had a hazard ratio per SD of 1.53 (95% CI = 1.37-1.71) and an area under the receiver operating curve of 0.621 (95% CI = 0.608-0.635). The distribution of the latter PRS was different across ethnic subgroups, confirming the importance of population-specific calibration for valid estimation of breast cancer risk. CONCLUSION PRSs developed in this study, from association data from multiple ancestries, can enhance risk stratification for women of Asian ancestry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Weang-Kee Ho
- School of Mathematical Sciences, Faculty of Science and Engineering, University of Nottingham Malaysia, Selangor, Malaysia; Cancer Research Malaysia, Selangor, Malaysia.
| | | | - Joe Dennis
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Xiang Shu
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN; Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Jingmei Li
- Department of Surgery, University Surgical Cluster, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore; Genome Institute of Singapore, Laboratory of Women's Health and Genetics, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Peh Joo Ho
- Genome Institute of Singapore, Laboratory of Women's Health and Genetics, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Iona Y Millwood
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; MRC Population Health Research Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Kuang Lin
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Yon-Ho Jee
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA
| | - Su-Hyun Lee
- Graduate School of Public Health, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Nasim Mavaddat
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Manjeet K Bolla
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Qin Wang
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Kyriaki Michailidou
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Biostatistics Unit, The Cyprus Institute of Neurology & Genetics, Ayios Dometios, Cyprus; Cyprus School of Molecular Medicine, The Cyprus Institute of Neurology & Genetics, Ayios Dometios, Cyprus
| | - Jirong Long
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN
| | | | | | - Kartini Rahmat
- Biomedical Imaging Department, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Veronique Kiak Mien Tan
- Department of Breast Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore; Division of Surgery and Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Benita Kiat Tee Tan
- Department of Breast Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore; Division of Surgery and Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center Singapore, Singapore, Singapore; Department of General Surgery, Sengkang General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Su Ming Tan
- Division of Breast Surgery, Changi General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Ern Yu Tan
- Department of General Surgery, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Swee Ho Lim
- KK Breast Department, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Yu-Tang Gao
- State Key Laboratory of Oncogene and Related Genes & Department of Epidemiology, Shanghai Cancer Institute, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Ying Zheng
- Shanghai Municipal Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shanghai, China
| | - Daehee Kang
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ji-Yeob Choi
- Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Seoul National University Graduate School, Seoul, Korea; Institute of Health Policy and Management, Medical Research Center, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Wonshik Han
- Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea; Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Han-Byoel Lee
- Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea; Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Michiki Kubo
- RIKEN Center for Integrative Medical Sciences (IMS), Yokohama, Japan
| | - Yukinori Okada
- Department of Statistical Genetics, Graduate School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Japan; Integrated Frontier Research for Medical Science Division, Institute for Open and Transdisciplinary Research Initiatives, Osaka University, Suita, Japan; Laboratory of Statistical Immunology, Immunology Frontier Research Center (WPI-IFReC), Osaka University, Suita, Japan
| | - Shinichi Namba
- Department of Statistical Genetics, Graduate School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Japan
| | - Sue K Park
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea; Integrated Major in Innovative Medical Science, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sung-Won Kim
- Department of Surgery, Daerim Saint Mary's Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Chen-Yang Shen
- Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Pei-Ei Wu
- Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Boyoung Park
- Department of Medicine, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kenneth R Muir
- Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, School of Health Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Artitaya Lophatananon
- Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, School of Health Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Anna H Wu
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Chiu-Chen Tseng
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Keitaro Matsuo
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention, Aichi Cancer Center Research Institute, Nagoya, Japan; Division of Cancer Epidemiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Hidemi Ito
- Division of Cancer Information and Control, Aichi Cancer Center Research Institute, Nagoya, Japan; Division of Descriptive Cancer Epidemiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Ava Kwong
- Hong Kong Hereditary Breast Cancer Family Registry, Cancer Genetics Centre, Happy Valley, Hong Kong; Department of Surgery, The University of Hong Kong, Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong; Department of Surgery, Hong Kong Sanatorium & Hospital, Happy Valley, Hong Kong
| | - Tsun L Chan
- Hong Kong Hereditary Breast Cancer Family Registry, Cancer Genetics Centre, Happy Valley, Hong Kong; Department of Pathology, Hong Kong Sanatorium & Hospital, Happy Valley, Hong Kong
| | - Esther M John
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA; Department of Epidemiology & Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
| | - Allison W Kurian
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA; Department of Epidemiology & Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
| | - Motoki Iwasaki
- Division of Epidemiology, Center for Public Health Sciences, National Cancer Center, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Taiki Yamaji
- Division of Epidemiology, Center for Public Health Sciences, National Cancer Center, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Sun-Seog Kweon
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School, Hwasun, Korea; Jeonnam Regional Cancer Center, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Hwasun, Korea
| | - Kristan J Aronson
- Department of Public Health Sciences, and Cancer Research Institute, School of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Rachel A Murphy
- Cancer Control Research, BC Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; School of Population and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Woon-Puay Koh
- Healthy Longevity Translational Research Programme, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore; Singapore Institute for Clinical Sciences, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore, Singapore
| | - Chiea-Chuen Khor
- Genome Institute of Singapore, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore, Singapore
| | - Jian-Min Yuan
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; Department of Epidemiology, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Rajkumar Dorajoo
- Genome Institute of Singapore, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore, Singapore; Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Robin G Walters
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; MRC Population Health Research Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Zhengming Chen
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; MRC Population Health Research Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Liming Li
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, China
| | - Jun Lv
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, China
| | - Keum-Ji Jung
- Institute for Health Promotion, Graduate School of Public Health, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Peter Kraft
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA; Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA
| | - Paul D B Pharoah
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Alison M Dunning
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Jacques Simard
- Genomics Center, CHU de Québec-Université Laval Research Center, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - Xiao-Ou Shu
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN
| | | | - Nur Aishah Mohd Taib
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya Centre, UM Cancer Research Institute, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Antonis C Antoniou
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Wei Zheng
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN
| | - Mikael Hartman
- Department of Surgery, University Surgical Cluster, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore; Department of Surgery, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore; Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Douglas F Easton
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Soo-Hwang Teo
- Cancer Research Malaysia, Selangor, Malaysia; Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya Centre, UM Cancer Research Institute, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Yang Y, Tao R, Shu X, Cai Q, Wen W, Gu K, Gao YT, Zheng Y, Kweon SS, Shin MH, Choi JY, Lee ES, Kong SY, Park B, Park MH, Jia G, Li B, Kang D, Shu XO, Long J, Zheng W. Incorporating Polygenic Risk Scores and Nongenetic Risk Factors for Breast Cancer Risk Prediction Among Asian Women. JAMA Netw Open 2022; 5:e2149030. [PMID: 35311964 PMCID: PMC8938714 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.49030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Polygenic risk scores (PRSs) have shown promise in breast cancer risk prediction; however, limited studies have been conducted among Asian women. OBJECTIVE To develop breast cancer risk prediction models for Asian women incorporating PRSs and nongenetic risk factors. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This diagnostic study included women of Asian ancestry from the Asia Breast Cancer Consortium. PRSs were developed using data from genomewide association studies (GWASs) of breast cancer conducted among 123 041 women with Asian ancestry (including 18 650 women with breast cancer) using 3 approaches: (1) reported PRS for women with European ancestry; (2) breast cancer-associated single-nucleotide variations (SNVs) identified by fine-mapping of GWAS-identified risk loci; and (3) genomewide risk prediction algorithms. A nongenetic risk score (NGRS) was built, including 7 well-established nongenetic risk factors, using data of 416 case participants and 1558 control participants from a prospective cohort study. PRSs were initially validated in an independent data set including 1426 case participants and 1323 control participants and further evaluated, along with the NGRS, in the second data set including 368 case participants and 736 control participants nested within a prospective cohort study. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Logistic regression was used to examine associations of risk scores with breast cancer risk to estimate odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). RESULTS A total of 126 894 women of Asian ancestry were included; 20 444 (16.1%) had breast cancer. The mean (SD) age ranged from 49.1 (10.8) to 54.4 (10.4) years for case participants and 50.6 (9.5) to 54.0 (7.4) years for control participants among studies that provided demographic characteristics. In the prospective cohort, a PRS with 111 SNVs developed using the fine-mapping approach (PRS111) showed a prediction performance comparable with a genomewide PRS that included more than 855 000 SNVs. The OR per SD increase of PRS111 score was 1.67 (95% CI, 1.46-1.92), with an AUC of 0.639 (95% CI, 0.604-0.674). The NGRS had a limited predictive ability (AUC, 0.565; 95% CI, 0.529-0.601). Compared with the average risk group (40th-60th percentile), women in the top 5% of PRS111 and NGRS were at a 3.84-fold (95% CI, 2.30-6.46) and 2.10-fold (95% CI, 1.22-3.62) higher risk of breast cancer, respectively. The prediction model including both PRS111 and NGRS achieved the highest prediction accuracy (AUC, 0.648; 95% CI, 0.613-0.682). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this study, PRSs derived using breast cancer risk-associated SNVs had similar predictive performance in Asian and European women. Including nongenetic risk factors in models further improved prediction accuracy. These findings support the utility of these models in developing personalized screening and prevention strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yaohua Yang
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Ran Tao
- Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Xiang Shu
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Qiuyin Cai
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Wanqing Wen
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Kai Gu
- Shanghai Municipal Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shanghai Institutes of Preventive Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Yu-Tang Gao
- State Key Laboratory of Oncogene and Related Genes and Department of Epidemiology, Shanghai Cancer Institute, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Ying Zheng
- Department of Cancer Prevention, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Sun-Seog Kweon
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School, Hwasun, South Korea
- Jeonnam Regional Cancer Center, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Hwasun, South Korea
| | - Min-Ho Shin
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School, Hwasun, South Korea
| | - Ji-Yeob Choi
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
- Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Eun-Sook Lee
- National Cancer Center Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, Goyang, South Korea
- Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, South Korea
- Research Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, South Korea
| | - Sun-Young Kong
- National Cancer Center Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, Goyang, South Korea
- Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, South Korea
- Research Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, South Korea
| | - Boyoung Park
- Research Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, South Korea
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Min Ho Park
- Department of Surgery, Chonnam National University Medical School & Hospital, Hwasun, South Korea
| | - Guochong Jia
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Bingshan Li
- Department of Molecular Physiology & Biophysics, Vanderbilt Genetics Institute, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Daehee Kang
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
- Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Seoul National University Graduate School, Seoul, South Korea
- Institute of Environmental Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Xiao-Ou Shu
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Jirong Long
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Wei Zheng
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Saghatchian M, Abehsera M, Yamgnane A, Geyl C, Gauthier E, Hélin V, Bazire M, Villoing-Gaudé L, Reyes C, Gentien D, Golmard L, Stoppa-Lyonnet D. Feasibility of personalized screening and prevention recommendations in the general population through breast cancer risk assessment: results from a dedicated risk clinic. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2022; 192:375-383. [PMID: 34994879 PMCID: PMC8739506 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-021-06445-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2021] [Accepted: 11/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/02/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE A personalized approach to prevention and early detection based on known risk factors should contribute to early diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer. We initiated a risk assessment clinic for all women wishing to undergo an individual breast cancer risk assessment. METHODS Women underwent a complete breast cancer assessment including a questionnaire, mammogram with evaluation of breast density, collection of saliva sample, consultation with a radiologist, and a breast cancer specialist. Women aged 40 or older, with 0 or 1 first-degree relative with breast cancer diagnosed after the age of 40 were eligible for risk assessment using MammoRisk, a machine learning-based tool that provides an individual 5-year estimated risk of developing breast cancer based on the patient's clinical data and breast density, with or without polygenic risk scores (PRSs). DNA was extracted from saliva samples for genotyping of 76 single-nucleotide polymorphisms. The individual risk was communicated to the patient, with individualized screening and prevention recommendations. RESULTS A total of 290 women underwent breast cancer assessment, among which 196 women (68%) were eligible for risk assessment using MammoRisk (median age 52, range 40-72). When PRS was added to MammoRisk, 40% (n = 78) of patients were assigned a different risk category, with 28% (n = 55) of patients changing from intermediate to moderate or high risk. CONCLUSION Individual risk assessment is feasible in the general population. Screening recommendations could be given based on individual risk. The use of PRS changed the risk score and screening recommendations in 40% of women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mahasti Saghatchian
- American Hospital of Paris, Neuilly-sur-Seine, France. .,Paris-Descartes University, Paris, France.
| | - Marc Abehsera
- American Hospital of Paris, Neuilly-sur-Seine, France
| | | | - Caroline Geyl
- American Hospital of Paris, Neuilly-sur-Seine, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Lisa Golmard
- INSERM U830 D.R.U.M. Team, Institut Curie Hospital, Paris-University, Paris, France
| | - Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet
- Institut Curie, Paris, France.,INSERM U830 D.R.U.M. Team, Institut Curie Hospital, Paris-University, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Evans DG, van Veen EM, Byers H, Roberts E, Howell A, Howell SJ, Harkness EF, Brentnall A, Cuzick J, Newman WG. The importance of ethnicity: Are breast cancer polygenic risk scores ready for women who are not of White European origin? Int J Cancer 2022; 150:73-79. [PMID: 34460111 PMCID: PMC9290473 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.33782] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2021] [Revised: 07/08/2021] [Accepted: 08/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
Polygenic risk scores (PRS) for disease risk stratification show great promise for application in general populations, but most are based on data from individuals of White European origin. We assessed two well validated PRS (SNP18, SNP143) in the Predicting-Risk-of-Cancer-At-Screening (PROCAS) study in North-West England for breast cancer prediction based on ethnicity. Overall, 9475 women without breast cancer at study entry, including 645 who subsequently developed invasive breast cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ provided DNA. All were genotyped for SNP18 and a subset of 1868 controls were genotyped for SNP143. For White Europeans both PRS discriminated well between individuals with and without cancer. For n = 395 Black (n = 112), Asian (n = 119), mixed (n = 44) or Jewish (n = 120) women without cancer both PRS overestimated breast cancer risk, being most marked for women of Black and Jewish origin (P < .001). SNP143 resulted in a potential mean 40% breast cancer risk overestimation in the combined group of non-White/non-European origin. SNP-PRS that has been normalized based on White European ethnicity for breast cancer should not be used to predict risk in women of other ethnicities. There is an urgent need to develop PRS specific for other ethnicities, in order to widen access of this technology.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Adult
- Aged
- Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics
- Breast Density
- Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology
- Breast Neoplasms/genetics
- Breast Neoplasms/pathology
- Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/epidemiology
- Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/genetics
- Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/pathology
- Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/epidemiology
- Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/genetics
- Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/pathology
- Case-Control Studies
- England/epidemiology
- Ethnicity/genetics
- Female
- Follow-Up Studies
- Genetic Predisposition to Disease
- Humans
- Middle Aged
- Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide
- Prognosis
- Risk Factors
- White People/genetics
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D. Gareth Evans
- Nightingale/Prevent Breast Cancer Centre, Wythenshawe HospitalManchester University NHS Foundation TrustManchesterUK
- Manchester Breast Centre, Manchester Cancer Research CentreThe Christie HospitalManchesterUK
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of ManchesterManchester Academic Health Science CentreManchesterUK
- Clinical Genetics Service, Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustManchesterUK
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustManchesterUK
- Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and HealthUniversity of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science CentreManchesterUK
| | - Elke M. van Veen
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustManchesterUK
- Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and HealthUniversity of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science CentreManchesterUK
| | - Helen Byers
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustManchesterUK
- Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and HealthUniversity of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science CentreManchesterUK
| | - Eleanor Roberts
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of ManchesterManchester Academic Health Science CentreManchesterUK
| | - Anthony Howell
- Nightingale/Prevent Breast Cancer Centre, Wythenshawe HospitalManchester University NHS Foundation TrustManchesterUK
- Manchester Breast Centre, Manchester Cancer Research CentreThe Christie HospitalManchesterUK
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of ManchesterManchester Academic Health Science CentreManchesterUK
| | - Sacha J. Howell
- Nightingale/Prevent Breast Cancer Centre, Wythenshawe HospitalManchester University NHS Foundation TrustManchesterUK
- Manchester Breast Centre, Manchester Cancer Research CentreThe Christie HospitalManchesterUK
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of ManchesterManchester Academic Health Science CentreManchesterUK
| | - Elaine F. Harkness
- Nightingale/Prevent Breast Cancer Centre, Wythenshawe HospitalManchester University NHS Foundation TrustManchesterUK
- Division of Informatics, Imaging & Data Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and HealthUniversity of ManchesterManchesterUK
| | - Adam Brentnall
- Queen Mary University of London, Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive MedicineLondonUK
| | - Jack Cuzick
- Queen Mary University of London, Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive MedicineLondonUK
| | - William G. Newman
- Clinical Genetics Service, Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustManchesterUK
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustManchesterUK
- Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and HealthUniversity of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science CentreManchesterUK
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Emelyanova M, Pokataev I, Shashkov I, Kopantseva E, Lyadov V, Heydarov R, Mikhailovich V. TYMS 3'-UTR Polymorphism: A Novel Association with FOLFIRINOX-Induced Neurotoxicity in Pancreatic Cancer Patients. Pharmaceutics 2021; 14:pharmaceutics14010077. [PMID: 35056973 PMCID: PMC8779442 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14010077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2021] [Revised: 12/17/2021] [Accepted: 12/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a highly fatal malignancy that has the worst 5-year survival rate of all of the common malignant tumors. Surgery, chemotherapy, and/or chemoradiation remain the main tactics for PDAC treatment. The efficacy of chemotherapy is often compromised because of the substantial risk of severe toxicities. In our study, we focused on identification of polymorphisms in the genes involved in drug metabolism, DNA repair and replication that are associated with inter-individual differences in drug-induced toxicities. Using the microarray, we genotyped 12 polymorphisms in the DPYD, XPC, GSTP1, MTHFR, ERCC1, UGT1A1, and TYMS genes in 78 PDAC patients treated with FOLFIRINOX. It was found that the TYMS rs11280056 polymorphism (6 bp-deletion in TYMS 3'-UTR) predicted grade 1-2 neurotoxicity (p = 0.0072 and p = 0.0019, according to co-dominant (CDM) and recessive model (RM), respectively). It is the first report on the association between TYMS rs11280056 and peripheral neuropathy. We also found that PDAC patients carrying the GSTP1 rs1695 GG genotype had a decreased risk for grade 3-4 hematological toxicity as compared to those with the AA or AG genotypes (p = 0.032 and p = 0.014, CDM and RM, respectively). Due to relatively high p-values, we consider that the impact of GSTP1 rs1695 requires further investigation in a larger sample size.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marina Emelyanova
- Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119991 Moscow, Russia; (M.E.); (I.S.); (E.K.); (R.H.)
| | - Ilya Pokataev
- Department of Oncology, Moscow Clinical Oncology Hospital No.1, Moscow City Health Department, 105005 Moscow, Russia; (I.P.); (V.L.)
| | - Igor Shashkov
- Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119991 Moscow, Russia; (M.E.); (I.S.); (E.K.); (R.H.)
- Federal Research Centre ‘Fundamentals of Biotechnology’, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119071 Moscow, Russia
| | - Elena Kopantseva
- Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119991 Moscow, Russia; (M.E.); (I.S.); (E.K.); (R.H.)
| | - Vladimir Lyadov
- Department of Oncology, Moscow Clinical Oncology Hospital No.1, Moscow City Health Department, 105005 Moscow, Russia; (I.P.); (V.L.)
- Department of Oncology and Palliative Medicine, Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education, 123242 Moscow, Russia
- Department of Oncology, Novokuznetsk State Institute for Continuous Medical Education, 654005 Novokuznetsk, Russia
| | - Rustam Heydarov
- Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119991 Moscow, Russia; (M.E.); (I.S.); (E.K.); (R.H.)
| | - Vladimir Mikhailovich
- Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119991 Moscow, Russia; (M.E.); (I.S.); (E.K.); (R.H.)
- Correspondence: or ; Tel./Fax: +7-499-1351177
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Wang Y, Zhu M, Ma H, Shen H. Polygenic risk scores: the future of cancer risk prediction, screening, and precision prevention. MEDICAL REVIEW (BERLIN, GERMANY) 2021; 1:129-149. [PMID: 37724297 PMCID: PMC10471106 DOI: 10.1515/mr-2021-0025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2021] [Accepted: 12/13/2021] [Indexed: 09/20/2023]
Abstract
Genome-wide association studies (GWASs) have shown that the genetic architecture of cancers are highly polygenic and enabled researchers to identify genetic risk loci for cancers. The genetic variants associated with a cancer can be combined into a polygenic risk score (PRS), which captures part of an individual's genetic susceptibility to cancer. Recently, PRSs have been widely used in cancer risk prediction and are shown to be capable of identifying groups of individuals who could benefit from the knowledge of their probabilistic susceptibility to cancer, which leads to an increased interest in understanding the potential utility of PRSs that might further refine the assessment and management of cancer risk. In this context, we provide an overview of the major discoveries from cancer GWASs. We then review the methodologies used for PRS construction, and describe steps for the development and evaluation of risk prediction models that include PRS and/or conventional risk factors. Potential utility of PRSs in cancer risk prediction, screening, and precision prevention are illustrated. Challenges and practical considerations relevant to the implementation of PRSs in health care settings are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuzhuo Wang
- Department of Epidemiology, Center for Global Health, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
- Department of Medical Informatics, School of Biomedical Engineering and Informatics, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| | - Meng Zhu
- Department of Epidemiology, Center for Global Health, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
- Jiangsu Key Lab of Cancer Biomarkers, Prevention and Treatment, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Personalized Medicine, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| | - Hongxia Ma
- Department of Epidemiology, Center for Global Health, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
- Jiangsu Key Lab of Cancer Biomarkers, Prevention and Treatment, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Personalized Medicine, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
- Research Units of Cohort Study on Cardiovascular Diseases and Cancers, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Hongbing Shen
- Department of Epidemiology, Center for Global Health, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
- Jiangsu Key Lab of Cancer Biomarkers, Prevention and Treatment, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Personalized Medicine, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
- Research Units of Cohort Study on Cardiovascular Diseases and Cancers, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Combining genetic risk score with artificial neural network to predict the efficacy of folic acid therapy to hyperhomocysteinemia. Sci Rep 2021; 11:21430. [PMID: 34728708 PMCID: PMC8563886 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-00938-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2021] [Accepted: 10/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Artificial neural network (ANN) is the main tool to dig data and was inspired by the human brain and nervous system. Several studies clarified its application in medicine. However, none has applied ANN to predict the efficacy of folic acid treatment to Hyperhomocysteinemia (HHcy). The efficacy has been proved to associate with both genetic and environmental factors while previous studies just focused on the latter one. The explained variance genetic risk score (EV-GRS) had better power and could represent the effect of genetic architectures. Our aim was to add EV-GRS into environmental factors to establish ANN to predict the efficacy of folic acid therapy to HHcy. We performed the prospective cohort research enrolling 638 HHcy patients. The multilayer perception algorithm was applied to construct ANN. To evaluate the effect of ANN, we also established logistic regression (LR) model to compare with ANN. According to our results, EV-GRS was statistically associated with the efficacy no matter analyzed as a continuous variable (OR = 3.301, 95%CI 1.954-5.576, P < 0.001) or category variable (OR = 3.870, 95%CI 2.092-7.159, P < 0.001). In our ANN model, the accuracy was 84.78%, the Youden's index was 0.7073 and the AUC was 0.938. These indexes above indicated higher power. When compared with LR, the AUC, accuracy, and Youden's index of the ANN model (84.78%, 0.938, 0.7073) were all slightly higher than the LR model (83.33% 0.910, 0.6687). Therefore, clinical application of the ANN model may be able to better predict the folic acid efficacy to HHcy than the traditional LR model. When testing two models in the validation set, we got the same conclusion. This study appears to be the first one to establish the ANN model which added EV-GRS into environmental factors to predict the efficacy of folic acid to HHcy. This model would be able to offer clinicians a new method to make decisions and individual therapeutic plans.
Collapse
|
46
|
Wolfson M, Gribble S, Pashayan N, Easton DF, Antoniou AC, Lee A, van Katwyk S, Simard J. Potential of polygenic risk scores for improving population estimates of women's breast cancer genetic risks. Genet Med 2021; 23:2114-2121. [PMID: 34230637 PMCID: PMC8553614 DOI: 10.1038/s41436-021-01258-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2021] [Revised: 06/09/2021] [Accepted: 06/10/2021] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Breast cancer risk has conventionally been assessed using family history (FH) and rare high/moderate penetrance pathogenic variants (PVs), notably in BRCA1/2, and more recently PALB2, CHEK2, and ATM. In addition to these PVs, it is now possible to use increasingly predictive polygenic risk scores (PRS) as well. The comparative population-level predictive capability of these three different indicators of genetic risk for risk stratification is, however, unknown. METHODS The Canadian heritable breast cancer risk distribution was estimated using a novel genetic mixing model (GMM). A realistically representative sample of women was synthesized based on empirically observed demographic patterns for appropriately correlated family history, inheritance of rare PVs, PRS, and residual risk from an unknown polygenotype. Risk assessment was simulated using the BOADICEA risk algorithm for 10-year absolute breast cancer incidence, and compared to heritable risks as if the overall polygene, including its measured PRS component, and PV risks were fully known. RESULTS Generally, the PRS was most predictive for identifying women at high risk, while family history was the weakest. Only the PRS identified any women at low risk of breast cancer. CONCLUSION PRS information would be the most important advance in enabling effective risk stratification for population-wide breast cancer screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Wolfson
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
| | - Steve Gribble
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Nora Pashayan
- Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, London, UK
| | - Douglas F Easton
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | | | - Andrew Lee
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Cambridge, UK
| | - Sasha van Katwyk
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Jacques Simard
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, Canada
- CHU de Quebec-Université Laval Research Center, Quebec City, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Das Gupta K, Gregory G, Meiser B, Kaur R, Scheepers-Joynt M, McInerny S, Taylor S, Barlow-Stewart K, Antill Y, Salmon L, Smyth C, McInerney-Leo A, Young MA, James PA, Yanes T. Communicating polygenic risk scores in the familial breast cancer clinic. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2021; 104:2512-2521. [PMID: 33706980 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.02.046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2020] [Revised: 02/23/2021] [Accepted: 02/26/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe the communication of polygenic risk scores (PRS) in the familial breast cancer setting. METHODS Consultations between genetic healthcare providers (GHP) and female patients who received their PRS for breast cancer risk were recorded (n = 65). GHPs included genetic counselors (n = 8) and medical practitioners (n = 5) (i.e. clinical geneticists and oncologists). A content analysis was conducted and logistic regression was used to assess differences in communication behaviors between genetic counselors (n = 8) and medical practitioners (n = 5). RESULTS Of the 65 patients, 31 (47.7 %) had a personal history of breast cancer, 18 of whom received an increased PRS (relative risk >1.2). 25/34 unaffected patients received an increased PRS. Consultations were primarily clinician-driven and focused on biomedical information. There was little difference between the biomedical information provided by genetic counselors and medical practitioners. However, genetic counselors were significantly more likely to utilize strategies to build patient rapport and counseling techniques. CONCLUSIONS Our findings provide one of the earliest reports on how breast cancer PRSs are communicated to women. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Key messages for communicating PRSs were identified, namely: discussing differences between polygenic and monogenic testing, the multifactorial nature of breast cancer risk, polygenic inheritance and current limitation of PRSs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kuheli Das Gupta
- Psychosocial Research Group, Prince of Wales Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia
| | - Gillian Gregory
- Psychosocial Research Group, Prince of Wales Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia
| | - Bettina Meiser
- Psychosocial Research Group, Prince of Wales Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia
| | - Rajneesh Kaur
- Psychosocial Research Group, Prince of Wales Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia
| | - Maatje Scheepers-Joynt
- Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and the Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia
| | - Simone McInerny
- Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and the Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia
| | - Shelby Taylor
- Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and the Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia
| | - Kristine Barlow-Stewart
- Northern Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2065, Australia
| | - Yoland Antill
- Familial Cancer Clinic, Cabrini Health, Melbourne, VIC 3144, Australia; Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3800, Australia
| | - Lucinda Salmon
- Clinical Genetics Service, Austin Hospital, Melbourne, VIC 3084, Australia
| | - Courtney Smyth
- Familial Cancer Clinic, Monash Medical Centre, Melbourne, VIC 3168, Australia
| | - Aideen McInerney-Leo
- The University of Queensland Diamantina Institute, Dermatology Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Mary-Anne Young
- Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and the Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia; Kinghorn Centre for Clinical Genomics, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, 2010, Australia
| | - Paul A James
- Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and the Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic, 3052, Australia
| | - Tatiane Yanes
- Psychosocial Research Group, Prince of Wales Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia; The University of Queensland Diamantina Institute, Dermatology Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Du Z, Gao G, Adedokun B, Ahearn T, Lunetta KL, Zirpoli G, Troester MA, Ruiz-Narváez EA, Haddad SA, PalChoudhury P, Figueroa J, John EM, Bernstein L, Zheng W, Hu JJ, Ziegler RG, Nyante S, Bandera EV, Ingles SA, Mancuso N, Press MF, Deming SL, Rodriguez-Gil JL, Yao S, Ogundiran TO, Ojengbe O, Bolla MK, Dennis J, Dunning AM, Easton DF, Michailidou K, Pharoah PDP, Sandler DP, Taylor JA, Wang Q, Weinberg CR, Kitahara CM, Blot W, Nathanson KL, Hennis A, Nemesure B, Ambs S, Sucheston-Campbell LE, Bensen JT, Chanock SJ, Olshan AF, Ambrosone CB, Olopade OI, Yarney J, Awuah B, Wiafe-Addai B, Conti DV, Palmer JR, Garcia-Closas M, Huo D, Haiman CA. Evaluating Polygenic Risk Scores for Breast Cancer in Women of African Ancestry. J Natl Cancer Inst 2021; 113:1168-1176. [PMID: 33769540 PMCID: PMC8418423 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djab050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2020] [Revised: 02/03/2021] [Accepted: 03/22/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Polygenic risk scores (PRSs) have been demonstrated to identify women of European, Asian, and Latino ancestry at elevated risk of developing breast cancer (BC). We evaluated the performance of existing PRSs trained in European ancestry populations among women of African ancestry. METHODS We assembled genotype data for women of African ancestry, including 9241 case subjects and 10 193 control subjects. We evaluated associations of 179- and 313-variant PRSs with overall and subtype-specific BC risk. PRS discriminatory accuracy was assessed using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. We also evaluated a recalibrated PRS, replacing the index variant with variants in each region that better captured risk in women of African ancestry and estimated lifetime absolute risk of BC in African Americans by PRS category. RESULTS For overall BC, the odds ratio per SD of the 313-variant PRS (PRS313) was 1.27 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.23 to 1.31), with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.571 (95% CI = 0.562 to 0.579). Compared with women with average risk (40th-60th PRS percentile), women in the top decile of PRS313 had a 1.54-fold increased risk (95% CI = 1.38-fold to 1.72-fold). By age 85 years, the absolute risk of overall BC was 19.6% for African American women in the top 1% of PRS313 and 6.7% for those in the lowest 1%. The recalibrated PRS did not improve BC risk prediction. CONCLUSION The PRSs stratify BC risk in women of African ancestry, with attenuated performance compared with that reported in European, Asian, and Latina populations. Future work is needed to improve BC risk stratification for women of African ancestry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhaohui Du
- Center for Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Guimin Gao
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Babatunde Adedokun
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Thomas Ahearn
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Department of Health and Human Services, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | | | - Gary Zirpoli
- Slone Epidemiology Center, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Melissa A Troester
- Department of Epidemiology, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | | | | | - Parichoy PalChoudhury
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Department of Health and Human Services, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Jonine Figueroa
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Department of Health and Human Services, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
- Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, The University of Edinburgh Medical School, Edinburgh, UK
- Cancer Research UK Edinburgh Centre, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Esther M John
- Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
- Department of Medicine (Oncology), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Leslie Bernstein
- Division of Biomarkers of Early Detection and Prevention Department of Population Sciences, Beckman Research Institute of the City of Hope, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Wei Zheng
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, and Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Jennifer J Hu
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Regina G Ziegler
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Department of Health and Human Services, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Sarah Nyante
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health and Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Elisa V Bandera
- Department of Population Science, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Sue A Ingles
- Center for Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Nicholas Mancuso
- Center for Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Michael F Press
- Department of Pathology, Keck School of Medicine and Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Sandra L Deming
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, and Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Jorge L Rodriguez-Gil
- Genomics, Development and Disease Section, Genetic Disease Research Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
- Medical Scientist Training Program, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Song Yao
- Department of Cancer Prevention and Control, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Temidayo O Ogundiran
- Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria
| | - Oladosu Ojengbe
- Center for Population and Reproductive Health, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria
| | - Manjeet K Bolla
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Joe Dennis
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Alison M Dunning
- Department of Oncology, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Douglas F Easton
- Department of Oncology, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Kyriaki Michailidou
- Biostatistics Unit, The Cyprus Institute of Neurology and Genetics, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Paul D P Pharoah
- Department of Oncology, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Dale P Sandler
- Epidemiology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
| | - Jack A Taylor
- Epidemiology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
| | - Qin Wang
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Clarice R Weinberg
- Biostatistics and Computational Biology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
| | - Cari M Kitahara
- Radiation Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - William Blot
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, and Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA
- International Epidemiology Institute, Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Katherine L Nathanson
- Department of Medicine, Abramson Cancer Center, The Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Anselm Hennis
- Chronic Disease Research Centre and Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of the West Indies, Bridgetown, Barbados
| | - Barbara Nemesure
- Department of Family, Population and Preventive Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | - Stefan Ambs
- Laboratory of Human Carcinogenesis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Lara E Sucheston-Campbell
- College of Pharmacy, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
- College of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Jeannette T Bensen
- Department of Epidemiology, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Stephen J Chanock
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Department of Health and Human Services, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Andrew F Olshan
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Christine B Ambrosone
- Department of Cancer Prevention and Control, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Olufunmilayo I Olopade
- Department of Medicine, Center for Clinical Cancer Genetics and Global Health, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Julie R Palmer
- Slone Epidemiology Center, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Montserrat Garcia-Closas
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Department of Health and Human Services, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Dezheng Huo
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Christopher A Haiman
- Center for Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Grassmann F, Yang H, Eriksson M, Azam S, Hall P, Czene K. Mammographic features are associated with cardiometabolic disease risk and mortality. Eur Heart J 2021; 42:3361-3370. [PMID: 34338750 PMCID: PMC8423470 DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab502] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2020] [Revised: 04/01/2021] [Accepted: 07/15/2021] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Aims In recent years, microcalcifications identified in routine mammograms were found to be associated with cardiometabolic disease in women. Here, we aimed to systematically evaluate the association of microcalcifications and other mammographic features with cardiometabolic disease risk and mortality in a large screening cohort and to understand a potential genetic contribution. Methods and results This study included 57 867 women from a prospective mammographic screening cohort in Sweden (KARMA) and 49 583 sisters. Cardiometabolic disease diagnoses and mortality and medication were extracted by linkage to Swedish population registries with virtually no missing data. In the cardiometabolic phenome-wide association study, we found that a higher number of microcalcifications were associated with increased risk for multiple cardiometabolic diseases, particularly in women with pre-existing cardiometabolic diseases. In contrast, dense breasts were associated with a lower incidence of cardiometabolic diseases. Importantly, we observed similar associations in sisters of KARMA women, indicating a potential genetic overlap between mammographic features and cardiometabolic traits. Finally, we observed that the presence of microcalcifications was associated with increased cardiometabolic mortality in women with pre-existing cardiometabolic diseases (hazard ratio and 95% confidence interval: 1.79 [1.24–2.58], P = 0.002) while we did not find such effects in women without cardiometabolic diseases. Conclusions We found that mammographic features are associated with cardiometabolic risk and mortality. Our results strengthen the notion that a combination of mammographic features and other breast cancer risk factors could be a novel and affordable tool to assess cardiometabolic health in women attending mammographic screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felix Grassmann
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Nobels väg 12A, Stockholm 171 65, Sweden.,Institute of Medical Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, UK
| | - Haomin Yang
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Nobels väg 12A, Stockholm 171 65, Sweden.,Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, The School of Public Health, Fujian Medical University, Xuefu North Road 1, University Town, Fuzhou 350122, China
| | - Mikael Eriksson
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Nobels väg 12A, Stockholm 171 65, Sweden
| | - Shadi Azam
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Nobels väg 12A, Stockholm 171 65, Sweden
| | - Per Hall
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Nobels väg 12A, Stockholm 171 65, Sweden
| | - Kamila Czene
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Nobels väg 12A, Stockholm 171 65, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Ho PJ, Dorajoo R, Ivanković I, Ong SS, Khng AJ, Tan BKT, Tan VKM, Lim SH, Tan EY, Tan SM, Tan QT, Yan Z, Ngeow J, Sim Y, Chan P, Chuan JCJ, Chan CW, Tang SW, Hartman M, Li J. DNA methylation and breast cancer-associated variants. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2021; 188:713-727. [PMID: 33768416 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-021-06185-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2020] [Accepted: 03/10/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A breast cancer polygenic risk score (PRS) comprising 313 common variants reliably predicts disease risk. We examined possible relationships between genetic variation, regulation, and expression to clarify the molecular alterations associated with these variants. METHODS Genome-wide methylomic variation was quantified (MethylationEPIC) in Asian breast cancer patients (1152 buffy coats from peripheral whole blood). DNA methylation (DNAm) quantitative trait loci (mQTL) mapping was performed for 235 of the 313 variants with minor allele frequencies > 5%. Stability of identified mQTLs (p < 5e-8) across lifetime was examined using a public mQTL database. Identified mQTLs were also mapped to expression quantitative trait loci (eQTLs) in the Genotype-Tissue Expression Project and the eQTLGen Consortium. RESULTS Breast cancer PRS was not associated with DNAm. A higher proportion of significant cis-mQTLs were observed. Of 822 significant cis-mQTLs (179 unique variants) identified in our dataset, 141 (59 unique variants) were significant (p < 5e-8) in a public mQTL database. Eighty-six percent (121/141) of the matched mQTLs were consistent at multiple time points (birth, childhood, adolescence, pregnancy, middle age, post-diagnosis, or treatment). Ninety-three variants associated with DNAm were also cis-eQTLs (35 variants not genome-wide significant). Multiple loci in the breast cancer PRS are associated with DNAm, contributing to the polygenic nature of the disease. These mQTLs are mostly stable over time. CONCLUSIONS Consistent results from DNAm and expression data may reveal new candidate genes not previously associated with breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peh Joo Ho
- Genome Institute of Singapore, Human Genetics, Singapore, Singapore
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Rajkumar Dorajoo
- Genome Institute of Singapore, Human Genetics, Singapore, Singapore
- Health Systems and Services Research, Duke-NUS Medical School Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Ivna Ivanković
- Department of Quantitative Biomedicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Biomedical Informatics, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Seeu Si Ong
- Genome Institute of Singapore, Human Genetics, Singapore, Singapore
- Department of Surgery, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
| | | | - Benita Kiat-Tee Tan
- Department of Breast Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Veronique Kiak Mien Tan
- Department of Breast Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Swee Ho Lim
- KK Breast Department, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore, 229899, Singapore
| | - Ern Yu Tan
- Department of General Surgery, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, 308433, Singapore
| | - Su-Ming Tan
- Division of Breast Surgery, Changi General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Qing Ting Tan
- KK Breast Department, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore, 229899, Singapore
| | - Zhiyan Yan
- KK Breast Department, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore, 229899, Singapore
| | - Joanne Ngeow
- Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technology University, Singapore, Singapore
- Cancer Genetics Service, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Oncology Academic Clinical Program, Duke NUS, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Yirong Sim
- Department of Breast Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Patrick Chan
- Department of General Surgery, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, 308433, Singapore
| | | | - Ching Wan Chan
- Department of Surgery, University Surgical Cluster, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Siau Wei Tang
- Department of Surgery, University Surgical Cluster, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Mikael Hartman
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
- Department of Surgery, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
- Department of Surgery, University Surgical Cluster, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Jingmei Li
- Genome Institute of Singapore, Human Genetics, Singapore, Singapore.
- Department of Surgery, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.
| |
Collapse
|