Head-to-head trials in inflammatory bowel disease: past, present and future

Advancing therapeutic frontiers: a pipeline of novel drugs for luminal and perianal Crohn's disease management

Crohn's disease (CD) is a chronic, complex inflammatory disorder of the gastrointestinal tract that presents significant therapeutic challenges. Despite the availability of a wide range of treatments, many patients experience primary non-response, secondary loss of response, or adverse events, limiting the overall effectiveness of current therapies. Clinical trials often report response rates below 60%, partly due to stringent inclusion criteria. Emerging therapies that target novel pathways offer promise in overcoming these limitations. This review explores the latest investigational drugs in phases I, II, and III clinical trials for treating both luminal and perianal CD. We highlight promising therapies that target known mechanisms, including selective Janus kinase inhibitors, anti-adhesion molecules, tumor necrosis factor inhibitors, and IL-23 selective inhibitors. In addition, we delve into novel therapeutic strategies such as sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulators, miR-124 upregulators, anti-fractalkine (CX3CL1), anti-TL1A, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma agonists, TGFBRI/ALK5 inhibitors, anti-CCR9 agents, and other innovative small molecules, as well as combination therapies. These emerging approaches, by addressing new pathways and mechanisms of action, have the potential to surpass the limitations of existing treatments and significantly improve CD management. However, the path to developing new therapies for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is fraught with challenges, including complex trial designs, ethical concerns regarding placebo use, recruitment difficulties, and escalating costs. The landscape of IBD clinical trials is shifting toward greater inclusivity, improved patient diversity, and innovative trial designs, such as adaptive and Bayesian approaches, to address these challenges. By overcoming these obstacles, the drug development pipeline can advance more effective, accessible, and timely treatments for CD.

Almond polysaccharides inhibit DSS-induced inflammatory response in ulcerative colitis mice through NF-κB pathway

Ulcerative colitis (UC), a type of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), is a chronic recurrent inflammatory disease of the colon. Our previous findings demonstrated that almond polysaccharide (AP-1) exhibits significant anti-inflammatory activity in vitro. Therefore, this study aimed to explore the ameliorative effect of AP-1 on dextrose sodium sulfate (DSS)-induced UC mice and to elucidate its possible mechanism of action. By observing changes in body weight, fecal viscosity, stool blood, disease activity index, and colon length, we found that AP-1 attenuated inflammation. It inhibited TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6 while boosting anti-inflammatory IL-10 levels. Histomorphologically, AP-1 protected against DSS-induced colonic tissue damage by reducing inflammatory cell infiltration and mucosal injury. It also lowered myeloperoxidase (MPO) and NO while increasing total superoxide dismutase (T-SOD) and glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px) in colonic tissues. Moreover, using the Western blot technique, AP-1 was shown to inhibit the phosphorylation of p65 and IκB-α proteins in the NF-κB/iNOS/COX2 signaling pathway and down-regulate the expression of inflammation-associated proteins COX2 and iNOS, thus slowing down and ameliorating inflammatory processes. Therefore, the safe and effective beneficial effects of AP-1 make it a promising therapeutic strategy for relieving IBD, especially UC.

Multifunctional MnGA Nanozymes for the Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis by Reducing Intestinal Inflammation and Regulating the Intestinal Flora

In ulcerative colitis (UC), the formation of an inflammatory environment is due to the combined effects of excess production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and reactive nitrogen species (RNS), overproduction of proinflammatory cytokines, and disruption of immune system function. There are many kinds of traditional drugs for the clinical treatment of UC, but long-term drug use can cause toxic side effects and drug resistance and can also reduce patient compliance and other drawbacks. Hence, in light of the clinical challenges associated with UC, including the limitations of existing treatments, intense adverse reactions and the development of resistance to medications, no novel therapeutic agents that offer effective relief and maintain a high level of biosafety are urgently needed. Although many anti-inflammatory nanomedicines have been developed by researchers, the development of efficient and nontoxic nanomedicines is still a major challenge in clinical medicine. Using the natural product gallic acid and the metal compound manganese chloride, a highly effective and nontoxic multifunctional nanoenzyme was developed for the treatment of UC. Nanozymes can effectively eliminate ROS and RNS to reduce the inflammation of intestinal epithelial cells caused by oxidation, facilitate the restoration of the intestinal epithelial barrier through the upregulation of tight junction protein expression, and balance the intestinal microbiota to maintain the stability of the intestinal environment. Using a rodent model designed to mimic UC, we monitored body weight, colon length, the spleen index, and the degree of tissue damage and demonstrated that manganese gallate (MnGA) nanoparticles can reduce intestinal inflammation by clearing ROS and active nitrogen. Intestinal flora sequencing revealed that MnGA nanoparticles could regulate the intestinal flora, promote the growth of beneficial bacteria and decrease the levels of detrimental bacteria within the intestinal tract in a mouse model of UC. Thus, MnGA nanoparticles can maintain the balance of the intestinal flora. This study demonstrated that MnGA nanoparticles are excellent antioxidant and effective anti-inflammatory agents, have good biosafety, and can effectively treat UC.

Real-World Comparison of the Effectiveness between Ustekinumab and Vedolizumab in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis Exposed to at least One Anti-TNF Agent

BACKGROUND

Both vedolizumab and ustekinumab can be considered for the treatment of ulcerative colitis [UC], but head-to-head trials are lacking.

AIM

We aimed to compare the effectiveness of vedolizumab and ustekinumab after anti-tumour necrosis factor [anti-TNF] failure in UC patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this multicentre study, we included consecutive adult patients with UC, with partial Mayo score >2 and prior anti-TNF exposure, treated with vedolizumab or ustekinumab between January 2019 and August 2022. Comparisons were performed using propensity score analyses [inverse probability of treatment weighting].

RESULTS

Among a total of 293 patients included, 151 and 142 received vedolizumab and ustekinumab, respectively. After propensity score analysis, steroid-free clinical remission [SFCR] [partial Mayo score ≤2] was achieved at week 16 in 38.0% and 40.3% of patients treated with vedolizumab and ustekinumab, respectively (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.11, 95% confidence interval [0.39-3.13], p = 0.85). Rates of SFCR in patients exposed to one, two, and three lines of biologics/small molecules among patients treated with vedolizumab and ustekinumab were respectively 53.3% vs 62.1% [p = 0.52], 44.4% vs 33.8% [p = 0.52], and 2.6% vs 19.1% [p = 0.027]. Endoscopic remission [SFCR and endoscopic Mayo score ≤1] and histological remission [SFCR, endoscopic remission, and Nancy histological index ≤1] at week 16 were achieved in respectively 5.3% vs 17.5% (aOR = 3.77 [1.25-11.36], p = 0.018) and 2.1% vs 11.1% (aOR = 5.85 [1.47-23.30], p = 0.012) in the vedolizumab and ustekinumab groups. No difference regarding the risk of drug discontinuation between the two groups (aHR = 1.03 [0.51-2.08], p = 0.92) was observed. While no factor was identified for vedolizumab, primary failure to at least one biologic/small molecule (OR = 0.31 [0.11-0.82], p = 0.018) was significantly associated with a decreased rate of SFCR among patients treated with ustekinumab.

CONCLUSION

While no difference in terms of short-term clinical remission was observed, ustekinumab appears to be more effective than vedolizumab in inducing endoscopic and histological remission at week 16 after failure of anti-TNFs in UC.

How comparative studies can inform treatment decisions for Crohn's disease

INTRODUCTION

As new therapies for the treatment of Crohn's disease (CD) are approved, there is an increasing need for evidence that clarifies their positioning and sequencing.

AREAS COVERED

Comparative effectiveness research (CER) aims to inform physicians' decisions when they choose which intervention (drug or treatment strategy) to administer to their patients. Pragmatic head-to-head trials represent the best tools for CER, but only a few have been published in the IBD field. Network meta-analyses can point toward the superiority of one drug over another, but they do not reflect everyday clinical practice. Finally, real-world evidence complements that coming from head-to-head trials and network meta-analyses, assessing the real-life effectiveness of therapeutic interventions.

EXPERT OPINION

There is insufficient evidence to create a definitive therapeutic algorithm for CD, but some general considerations can be made. Anti-TNF-α agents seemingly represent the most 'sustainable' first-line choice, considering benefit-harm ratio and costs; vedolizumab, ustekinumab, and risankizumab may be considered as first-line choice when safety issues become prominent. In the event of pharmacodynamic failure, out-of-class swap is to be preferred - possibly with anti-IL23p19 as the best option, with unclear data regarding upadacitinib positioning; a second anti-TNF-α could be considered, as a second choice, after pharmacokinetic failure.

A Study of Patient Concerns in the Modern Therapeutic Era of Inflammatory Bowel Disease

BACKGROUND

Patient concerns and preferences are important in the management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD: Crohn's disease [CD], ulcerative colitis). In the absence of contemporary data, we aimed to determine patient concerns and preferences and establish if there are demographic or disease-related differences.

METHODS

We surveyed patients with IBD at Massachusetts General Hospital between July and September 2023. The Rating Form of Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patient Concerns (RFIPC) and a set of supplemental questions rated on a visual analog scale (0-100 mm) were administered to patients and compared by age, disease type, sex, and surgery status. Additionally, a survey administered to treating providers gathered insight into the difference between patient and provider perceptions of concerns.

RESULTS

A total of 350 patients and 30 providers completed the survey. The mean age was 47 years; 50% were female, 49% had CD, and 80% were on advanced IBD therapy. Effects of medication (median = 54), energy level (median = 53), and having an ostomy bag (median = 52) were rated highest by patients. Older patients rated most disease complication and treatment-related concerns similar to younger adults; those aged 35-59 years had the greatest level of concern for most questions. Sex, disease activity, and prior surgical history also impacted patients' concerns. Providers perceived patients' worries as higher than those rated by patients themselves.

CONCLUSIONS

A shared decision-making model targeting the achievement of disease remission and addressing concerns rated highly by patients is important to meet the goal of care for patients with IBD.

Risankizumab versus Ustekinumab for Moderate-to-Severe Crohn's Disease

BACKGROUND

The efficacy and safety of risankizumab as compared with ustekinumab in patients with Crohn's disease are unknown.

METHODS

In this phase 3b, multicenter, open-label, randomized, controlled trial with blinded assessment of end points, patients with moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease who had had an inadequate response to anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) therapy or unacceptable side effects with such therapy were randomly assigned to receive risankizumab or ustekinumab at standard doses for 48 weeks. The two primary end points, which were tested sequentially, were clinical remission at week 24 (defined as a Crohn's Disease Activity Index score of <150 [range, 0 to 600, with higher scores indicating more severe disease activity]), which was analyzed in the first 50% of patients to complete the week 24 visit, with a noninferiority margin of 10 percentage points; and endoscopic remission at week 48 (defined as a score of ≤4, a decrease of ≥2 points from baseline, and no subscore >1 in any individual variable on the Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease [range, 0 to 56, with higher scores indicating more severe disease]), which was analyzed for superiority in 100% of the patients. Safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of risankizumab or ustekinumab.

RESULTS

In the full intention-to-treat population for the efficacy analysis, 230 of 255 patients (90.2%) who received risankizumab and 193 of 265 patients (72.8%) who received ustekinumab completed all the assigned treatments. Both primary end points were met; risankizumab was noninferior to ustekinumab with respect to clinical remission at week 24 (58.6% vs. 39.5%; adjusted difference, 18.4 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], 6.6 to 30.3) and superior to ustekinumab with respect to endoscopic remission at week 48 (31.8% vs. 16.2%; adjusted difference, 15.6 percentage points; 95% CI, 8.4 to 22.9; P<0.001). The incidence of adverse events appeared to be similar in the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In this head-to-head clinical trial of risankizumab and ustekinumab involving patients with moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease who had had unacceptable side effects with anti-TNF therapy or an inadequate response to such therapy, risankizumab was noninferior to ustekinumab with respect to clinical remission at week 24 and superior with respect to endoscopic remission at week 48. (Funded by AbbVie; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04524611.).

Lacticaseibacillus casei IB1 Alleviates DSS-Induced Inflammatory Bowel Disease by Regulating the Microbiota and Restoring the Intestinal Epithelial Barrier

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is becoming an increasingly serious health problem in humans and animals. Probiotics can inhibit the development of IBD. Due to the specificity of the strains, the function and mechanism of action of different strains are still unclear. Here, a DSS-induced colitis mouse model was utilized to investigate the ability and mechanism by which Lacticaseibacillus casei IB1 alleviates colitis. Treatment with L. casei IB1 improved DSS-induced colitis in mice, as indicated by increased body weight, colon length, and goblet cell numbers and decreased disease activity index (DAI), proinflammatory factor (TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6) levels, and histopathological scores after intake of IB1. IB1 supplementation also improved the expression of tight junction proteins and inhibited the activation of the MAPK and NF-κB signaling pathways to alleviate intestinal inflammation. In addition, IB1 rebalanced the intestinal microbial composition of colitis mice by increasing the abundance of Faecalibaculum and Alistipes and decreasing the abundance of Bacteroides and Escherichia_Shigella. In summary, L. casei IB1 showed great potential for relieving colitis by regulating the microbiota and restoring the epithelial barrier. It can be used as a potential probiotic for the prevention and treatment of UC in the future.

Alleviating Pyroptosis of Intestinal Epithelial Cells to Restore Mucosal Integrity in Ulcerative Colitis by Targeting Delivery of 4-Octyl-Itaconate

Current therapies primarily targeting inflammation often fail to address the root relationship between intestinal mucosal integrity and the resulting dysregulated cell death and ensuing inflammation in ulcerative colitis (UC). First, UC tissues from human and mice models in this article both emphasize the crucial role of Gasdermin E (GSDME)-mediated pyroptosis in intestinal epithelial cells (IECs) as it contributes to colitis by releasing proinflammatory cytokines, thereby compromising the intestinal barrier. Then, 4-octyl-itaconate (4-OI), exhibiting potential for anti-inflammatory activity in inhibiting pyroptosis, was encapsulated by butyrate-modified liposome (4-OI/BLipo) to target delivery for IECs. In brief, 4-OI/BLipo exhibited preferential accumulation in inflamed colonic epithelium, attributed to over 95% of butyrate being produced and absorbed in the colon. As expected, epithelium barriers were restored significantly by alleviating GSDME-mediated pyroptosis in colitis. Accordingly, the permeability of IECs was restored, and the resulting inflammation, mucosal epithelium, and balance of gut flora were reprogrammed, which offers a hopeful approach to the effective management of UC.

Deciphering Microbial Composition in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Implications for Therapeutic Response to Biologic Agents

Growing evidence suggests that alterations in the gut microbiome impact the development of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs), including Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). Although IBD often requires the use of immunosuppressant drugs and biologic therapies to facilitate clinical remission and mucosal healing, some patients do not benefit from these drugs, and the reasons for this remain poorly understood. Despite advancements, there is still a need to develop biomarkers to help predict prognosis and guide treatment decisions. The aim of this study was to investigate the gut microbiome of IBD patients using biologics to identify microbial signatures associated with responses, following standard accepted criteria. Microbiomes in 66 stool samples from 39 IBD patients, comprising 20 CD and 19 UC patients starting biologic therapies, and 29 samples from healthy controls (HCs) were prospectively analyzed via NGS and an ensemble of metagenomics analysis tools. At baseline, differences were observed in alpha and beta metrics among patients with CD, UC and HC, as well as between the CD and UC groups. The degree of dysbiosis was more pronounced in CD patients, and those with dysbiosis exhibited a limited response to biological drugs. Pairwise differential abundance analyses revealed an increasing trend in the abundance of an unannotated genus from the Clostridiales order, Gemmiger genus and an unannotated genus from the Rikenellaceae family, which were consistently identified in greater abundance in HC. The Clostridium genus was more abundant in CD patients. At baseline, a greater abundance of the Odoribacter and Ruminococcus genera was found in IBD patients who responded to biologics at 14 weeks, whereas a genus identified as SMB53 was more enriched at 52 weeks. The Collinsella genus showed a higher prevalence among non-responder IBD patients. Additionally, a greater abundance of an unclassified genus from the Barnesiellaceae family and one from Lachnospiraceae was observed in IBD patients responding to Vedolizumab at 14 weeks. Our analyses showed global microbial diversity, mainly in CD. This indicated the absence or depletion of key taxa responsible for producing short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs). We also identified an abundance of pathobiont microbes in IBD patients at baseline, particularly in non-responders to biologic therapies. Furthermore, specific bacteria-producing SCFAs were abundant in patients responding to biologics and in those responding to Vedolizumab.

Chronic illness trajectory-based nursing intervention improves the self-care abilities of patients with inflammatory bowel disease

OBJECTIVE

To explore the effects of chronic illness trajectory model (CITM)-based nursing interventions on anxiety, depression, quality of life, medication adherence, and dietary compliance among patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on 112 IBD patients admitted to Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University from January to December 2023. Patients were divided into two groups: a control group (n=62) receiving routine nursing care, and an observation group (n=50) receiving CITM-based nursing care. Assessments of anxiety, depression, self-care ability, daily living ability, and symptom severity were conducted before and after the intervention.

RESULTS

Post-intervention, the observation group demonstrated significantly higher quality of life scores at 1 and 3 months compared to the control group (both P<0.05). Additionally, the observation group showed improved medication adherence and lower symptom scores, with significant differences (both P<0.05). Anxiety and depression levels were also significantly reduced in the observation group compared to the control group (both P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

CITM-based nursing intervention significantly enhances self-care abilities, quality of life, and compliance with medication and dietary regimens in IBD patients. Furthermore, it effectively alleviates anxiety and depression, supporting comprehensive management of this chronic disease.

Mendelian randomisation analysis for intestinal disease: achievement and future

Intestinal disease is a group of complex digestive system diseases imposing a significant burden globally. Identifying the risk factors and potential complications of intestinal disease is important for its prevention and treatment. However, traditional observational clinical studies are limited by confounding factors and reverse causation, making causal inference challenging. Mendelian randomisation (MR) method has been developed to effectively mitigate these constraints and assess the causal relationships. This review briefly introduces the MR method, summarises MR research on intestinal disease and delineates the prospective avenues for future research. Conventional risk factors, such as lifestyle behaviours (eg, physical activity, smoking and alcohol consumption), nutrients (eg, selenium), obesity markers (eg, body mass index and waist-to-hip ratio) and inflammatory biomarkers, have been validated in MR studies. Multiomics MR studies are becoming novel hotspots, which provide a theoretical foundation for the exploration of pathogenesis and the investigation of new drug targets. However, most of the recent studies are based on European individuals, and thus it is necessary to replicate the results in other ancestries. Moreover, triangulation integrating MR and other epidemiology methods is suggested as a validated paradigm for causal inference in future MR studies.

Upadacitinib for the treatment of moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease

Despite an increasing number of therapies for Crohn's disease (CD), half of patients do not respond to initial treatment or lose response over time, highlighting the need for novel therapies. Inhibition of Janus kinases (JAKs) has emerged as an important therapeutic target for CD. Upadacitinib is an orally administered selective JAK1 inhibitor, which is effective for the induction and maintenance of remission in moderately-to-severely active CD, including in patients with prior failure of biological therapy. Nonselective JAK inhibition has been associated with thromboembolic disease, cardiovascular events and malignancy in patients older than 50 years with rheumatoid arthritis and pre-existing cardiovascular risk factors, which should be considered upon prescription. Upadacitinib is the first and currently only oral advanced therapy for CD.

New resource food-arabinogalactan improves DSS-induced acute colitis through intestinal flora and NLRP3 signaling pathway

Colitis can significantly impact daily life. This study utilized DSS to induce acute colitis in mice and examined the regulatory effect of arabinogalactan (AG). The findings demonstrated that AG intake effectively alleviated the phenotype of DSS-induced colitis in mice and protected against small intestine damage. Furthermore, AG suppressed the secretion of pro-inflammatory factors TNF-α and IL-1β, while promoting the secretion of anti-inflammatory factor IL-10. It also inhibited the secretion of LPS in serum and MPO in colon tissue. Additionally, AG regulated the NF-κB/MAPK/PPARγ signaling pathway and inhibited the NLRP3 inflammasome signaling pathway, thereby ameliorating DSS-induced colitis inflammation in mice. AG also influenced the metabolism of short-chain fatty acids, particularly butyrate, in the intestinal tract of mice. Moreover, AG modulated and enhanced the composition of intestinal flora in mice with colitis, increasing the diversity of dominant flora and promoting the growth of beneficial bacteria. These results highlight the protective effects of arabinogalactan against colitis and its potential applications in the food industry.

Using Computer Vision to Improve Endoscopic Disease Quantification in Therapeutic Clinical Trials of Ulcerative Colitis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Endoscopic assessment of ulcerative colitis (UC) typically reports only the maximum severity observed. Computer vision methods may better quantify mucosal injury detail, which varies among patients.

METHODS

Endoscopic video from the UNIFI clinical trial (A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Ustekinumab Induction and Maintenance Therapy in Participants With Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis) comparing ustekinumab and placebo for UC were processed in a computer vision analysis that spatially mapped Mayo Endoscopic Score (MES) to generate the Cumulative Disease Score (CDS). CDS was compared with the MES for differentiating ustekinumab vs placebo treatment response and agreement with symptomatic remission at week 44. Statistical power, effect, and estimated sample sizes for detecting endoscopic differences between treatments were calculated using both CDS and MES measures. Endoscopic video from a separate phase 2 clinical trial replication cohort was performed for validation of CDS performance.

RESULTS

Among 748 induction and 348 maintenance patients, CDS was lower in ustekinumab vs placebo users at week 8 (141.9 vs 184.3; P < .0001) and week 44 (78.2 vs 151.5; P < .0001). CDS was correlated with the MES (P < .0001) and all clinical components of the partial Mayo score (P < .0001). Stratification by pretreatment CDS revealed ustekinumab was more effective than placebo (P < .0001) with increasing effect in severe vs mild disease (-85.0 vs -55.4; P < .0001). Compared with the MES, CDS was more sensitive to change, requiring 50% fewer participants to demonstrate endoscopic differences between ustekinumab and placebo (Hedges' g = 0.743 vs 0.460). CDS performance in the JAK-UC replication cohort was similar to UNIFI.

CONCLUSIONS

As an automated and quantitative measure of global endoscopic disease severity, the CDS offers artificial intelligence enhancement of traditional MES capability to better evaluate UC in clinical trials and potentially practice.

Efficacy and safety of adalimumab biosimilar (HS016) in inflammatory bowel disease from the real-world study

Objective: Adalimumab (ADA) is an effective treatment for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), both ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD). The equal effect between the original ADA and biosimilars from Europe and the United States has been shown. However, the biosimilar of ADA is different in China. The effectiveness and safety data of ADA biosimilar (HS016) in China have yet to be discovered. Patients and methods: 91 patients (75 CD, 16 UC) received HS016 treatment and were enrolled in this study. Therapeutic response and safety profiles were analyzed. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) was also carried out among nonresponse patients. After being considered as "nonresponse" (after three or 6 months of treatment), 20 patients' serum TNFα concentrations were measured and correlated to their disease severity. Results: Among active CD patients (n = 61), 75.4% (46/61) at 12 w, 73.8% (45/61) at 26 w, 50.8% (31/61) at 52 w achieved the clinical response, respectively; 55.7% (34/61) at 12 w, 65.6% (40/61) at 26 w, and 45.9% (28/61) at 52 w achieved clinical remission. The maintained remission rates of CD (n = 14) in clinical remission were 100% (14/14) at 12 w, 78.6% (11/14) at 26 w, and 63.6% (7/11) at 52 w, respectively. Among active UC patients, 37.5% (6/16) at 12 w and 50% (8/16) at 26 w achieved clinical response. Total adverse event rates were 5.5% (5/91) during 52-week visits. Due to the inadequate serum drug concentration, 30.4% (7/23) of patients had poor clinical responses. Elevations of serum anti-drug antibodies occurred in one additional patient (4.3%). Conclusion: ADA biosimilar HS016 had good efficacy and safety in Chinese IBD patients.

Epithelial NAD+ depletion drives mitochondrial dysfunction and contributes to intestinal inflammation

Introduction

We have previously demonstrated that a pathologic downregulation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma coactivator 1-alpha (PGC1α) within the intestinal epithelium contributes to the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, the mechanism underlying downregulation of PGC1α expression and activity during IBD is not yet clear.

Methods

Mice (male; C57Bl/6, Villincre/+;Pgc1afl/fl mice, and Pgc1afl/fl) were subjected to experimental colitis and treated with nicotinamide riboside. Western blot, high-resolution respirometry, nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD+) quantification, and immunoprecipitation were used to in this study.

Results

We demonstrate a significant depletion in the NAD+ levels within the intestinal epithelium of mice undergoing experimental colitis, as well as humans with ulcerative colitis. While we found no decrease in the levels of NAD+-synthesizing enzymes within the intestinal epithelium of mice undergoing experimental colitis, we did find an increase in the mRNA level, as well as the enzymatic activity, of the NAD+-consuming enzyme poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 (PARP1). Treatment of mice undergoing experimental colitis with an NAD+ precursor reduced the severity of colitis, restored mitochondrial function, and increased active PGC1α levels; however, NAD+ repletion did not benefit transgenic mice that lack PGC1α within the intestinal epithelium, suggesting that the therapeutic effects require an intact PGC1α axis.

Discussion

Our results emphasize the importance of PGC1α expression to both mitochondrial health and homeostasis within the intestinal epithelium and suggest a novel therapeutic approach for disease management. These findings also provide a mechanistic basis for clinical trials of nicotinamide riboside in IBD patients.

Questions to consider when caring for patients with ulcerative colitis

Although the management of patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) is well defined by national and international guidelines, there are many debates and open questions related to daily care of UC patients. Here, we aimed to review topics with high clinical relevance including therapy algorithms, potential biomarkers for disease prognosis and response to therapy, the role of interventions targeting the gut microbiota, insights from head-to-head trials, novel UC medications, exit strategies, the impact of COVID19 on UC, care of patients with acute severe disease, cancer screening, and the role of surgery.

Prediction and Verification of Potential Therapeutic Targets for Non-Responders to Infliximab in Ulcerative Colitis

Background

Infliximab (IFX) has been widely used in ulcerative colitis (UC) patients. However, the subsequent effective treatment of IFX non-response in UC patients remains a challenge. This study aims to predict potential therapeutic targets for non-responders by performing a bioinformatic analysis of the data in the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database and validation by biopsies.

Methods

Colonic mucosal biopsies expression profiles of IFX-treated UC patients (GSE73661, GSE16879) were utilized to predict potential therapeutic targets. Bioinformatics analyses were used to explore potential biological mechanisms. CytoHubba was performed to screen hub genes. We used a validation dataset and colonic mucosal biopsies of UC patients to validate hub genes.

Results

A total of 147 DEGs were identified (119 upregulated genes and 28 downregulated genes). GSEA showed that DEGs in GSE73661 were enriched in the pathways of the cytokine-cytokine receptor, the chemokine, and the adhesion molecules system. Based on the PPI network analysis, we identified four hub genes (and the transcription factor NF-κB). Then, we validate the expression of hub genes by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). We found higher expression of IL-6, IL1B, CXCL8, and CCL2 in non-responders compared to responders.

Conclusion

In summary, four potential targets (IL-6, IL1B, CXCL8, and CCL2) were finally identified by performing a bioinformatics analysis of the datasets in the GEO database. Their expression was confirmed in colonic mucosal biopsies of patients with UC. These results can help to further explore the mechanism of non-responders to IFX in UC and to provide potential targets for their subsequent treatment.

Personalizing therapy selection in inflammatory bowel disease

INTRODUCTION

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a complex disease, caused by aberrant immune responses to environmental stimuli where genetic, metabolomic, and environmental variables interact to cause mucosal inflammation. This review sheds light on the different drug and patient related factors that affect personalization of biologics in IBD treatment.

AREAS COVERED

We utilized the online research database PubMed to carry out literature search pertaining to therapies in IBD. We incorporated a combination of primary literature as well as review articles and meta-analyses in writing this clinical review. In this paper, we discuss the mechanisms of action for different biologics, the genotype and phenotype of patients, and pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of drugs, as factors that influence response rates. We also touch upon the role of artificial intelligence in treatment personalization.

EXPERT OPINION

The future of IBD therapeutics is one of precision medicine, based on the identification of aberrant signaling pathways unique to individual patients as well as exploring the exposome, diet, viruses, and epithelial cell dysfunction as part of disease pathogenesis. We need global cooperation for pragmatic study designs as well as equitable access to machine learning/artificial intelligence technology to reach the unfulfilled potential of IBD care.

Update on the role of upadacitinib in the treatment of adults with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis

With further knowledge of the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease, small oral molecules have become available, including the Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors. Upadacitinib (UPA) is a selective JAK1 inhibitor and has become the newest drug in this class, with recent approval for the management of moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis. The large phase III program (including the U-ACHIEVE and U-ACCOMPLISH parallel induction trials and the U-ACHIEVE Maintenance trial) demonstrated superiority over placebo, for all primary and secondary endpoints including key clinical, endoscopic, and histological outcomes utilizing 45 mg orally (po) once daily (OD) during induction and either 30 mg or 15 mg po OD in maintenance. From a safety perspective, UPA has proven to be a safe and well-tolerated medication across immune-mediated diseases with manageable adverse risks such as an increase in herpes zoster. Proper discussion and patient profiling are essential when positioning UPA, considering efficacy and potential risks associated with this highly effective medication.

Comparative Effectiveness Research: A Roadmap to Sail the Seas of IBD Therapies

The drug pipeline for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has dramatically expanded over the last two decades, and it is expected to further grow in the upcoming years with the introduction of new agents with different mechanisms of action. However, such an increase of therapeutic options needs to be paralleled with an appropriate development of research to help physicians in the decision-making process when choosing which drug to prescribe. On the population level, comparative effectiveness research (CER) is intended to explore and identify relevant differences-in terms of both efficacy and safety outcomes-amongst different therapeutic regimens and/or strategies, in order to find the correct placement for each treatment in the therapeutic algorithm. CER revolves around three cornerstones: network meta-analyses, head-to-head trials and real-world studies, each of which has specific pros and cons, and can therefore offer answers to different questions. In this review, we aim to provide an overview on the methodological features specific to each of these research approaches, as well as to illustrate the main findings coming from CER on IBD target therapies (i.e., biologics and small molecules) and to discuss their appropriate interpretation.

Shared decision-making in the management of patients with inflammatory bowel disease

The rapid progress of research into inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has resulted in increasingly more treatment options. Different options have different advantages and disadvantages, and the preferences of patients may also differ. If patients can be invited to the formulation of medical decision-making, their compliance and satisfaction would be improved, thus possibly achieving better therapeutic results. The present review aims to summarize the current literature on shared decision-making (SDM) in the management of IBD, with the goal of promoting the application of SDM.

Comparative efficacy trials in inflammatory bowel disease: current and future implications for practice

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Over the last decade, there has been rapid expansion of the therapeutic armamentarium, and evolution of treatment strategies, for the management of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs). Consequently, there is an increasing need for head-to-head or comparative efficacy trials to inform optimal positioning of therapies, and pragmatic trials comparing treatment strategies to inform treatment approach. In this review, we will discuss the current status and future of comparative efficacy clinical trials in IBD.

RECENT FINDINGS

Pivotal phase IIIB superiority clinical trials have demonstrated superiority of vedolizumab over adalimumab for achieving clinical remission in patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis (VARSITY) and failed to demonstrate superiority of ustekinumab over adalimumab in patients with moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease (SEAVUE). Noninferiority clinical trials of biosimilars have confirmed absence of meaningful differences in safety and efficacy of biosimilar infliximab over originator infliximab, as initial therapy or switching stable patients during maintenance. Network meta-analyses, indirect treatment comparison using patient-level data from placebo-controlled trials and real-world observational studies have inform comparative effectiveness and safety of different therapies for management of IBD.

SUMMARY

Head-to-head clinical trials are critically important to advance the field of IBD. Comparative efficacy trials are slow and expensive to conduct, may not be broadly generalizable, and are not powered for safety events or other relevant outcomes. Alternative approaches to comparative effectiveness such as network meta-analysis and well designed real-world observational studies are able to bridge gaps in clinical practice.

Ascidian-inspired aciduric hydrogels with high stretchability and adhesiveness promote gastric hemostasis and wound healing

Adhesives for gastric hemorrhage are of great clinical significance. However, it remains a major challenge in clinics due to its poor stability under acidic environments and low adhesion to wet tissues. Herein, inspired by the high adhesiveness of the ascidian secretory protein, we designed a series of aciduric bionic hydrogel adhesives (PDTAs) based on poly(γ-glutamic acid) (γ-PGA) and tannic acid (TA). The formation of hydrogel adhesives was attributed to the abundant hydrogen bonds between amide groups of PGA-DA and polyphenol groups of TA. These hydrogel adhesives exhibited enhanced wet tissue adhesion (400%), higher stretchability (800% elongation), and aciduric stability (7 days) compared with commercial fibrin glue. Rodent wound models indicated that the hydrogel adhesives demonstrated significant healing promotion due to ameliorating collagen deposition and angiogenesis. These hydrogel adhesives show great potential in treating gastric hemorrhages and promoting wound healing.

Positioning biologics in the treatment of IBD: A practical guide - Which mechanism of action for whom?

The number of available biological therapies have doubled over the last 10 years and the arrival of novel molecules (interleukin 23p19 inhibitors) is ongoing alongside the development of small molecules. As a result of this vast landscape of treatment, positioning advanced therapies (according to clinical situation, efficacy and safety) is of paramount importance to providing personalized, appropriate IBD treatment. In this publication the recent available literature is summarized for practical integration into clinical practice including comparative efficacy data, patient and disease demographics. We refer to recent publications and expert opinion in order to facilitate the decision making process of positioning biologicals IBD treatment.

GSDMB is increased in IBD and regulates epithelial restitution/repair independent of pyroptosis

Gasdermins are a family of structurally related proteins originally described for their role in pyroptosis. Gasdermin B (GSDMB) is currently the least studied, and while its association with genetic susceptibility to chronic mucosal inflammatory disorders is well established, little is known about its functional relevance during active disease states. Herein, we report increased GSDMB in inflammatory bowel disease, with single-cell analysis identifying epithelial specificity to inflamed colonocytes/crypt top colonocytes. Surprisingly, mechanistic experiments and transcriptome profiling reveal lack of inherent GSDMB-dependent pyroptosis in activated epithelial cells and organoids but instead point to increased proliferation and migration during in vitro wound closure, which arrests in GSDMB-deficient cells that display hyper-adhesiveness and enhanced formation of vinculin-based focal adhesions dependent on PDGF-A-mediated FAK phosphorylation. Importantly, carriage of disease-associated GSDMB SNPs confers functional defects, disrupting epithelial restitution/repair, which, altogether, establishes GSDMB as a critical factor for restoration of epithelial barrier function and the resolution of inflammation.

Inflammatory Bowel Disease Therapeutics: A Focus on Probiotic Engineering

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic inflammatory condition of gastrointestinal (GI) tract with dysregulated mucosal immune functions and disturbed commensal ecosystem of the intestinal lumen. IBD is categorized into two major subsets: Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). Though advent of biologics has shifted the treatment with relatively longer remission compared to small molecule pharmaceuticals, patients still suffer from long-term complications. Since gut-microbiome is now accepted as another human organ holding potential for long-lasting human health, probiotics, and its engineering hold great promises to treat several previously untreatable chronic inflammatory conditions including IBD. Several emerging biological engineering tools have unlimited potential to manipulate probiotic bacterial system. These can produce useful therapeutic biologics with a goal to either ameliorate and/or treat previously untreatable chronic inflammatory conditions. As gut-microbiome is diverse and vary in different ethnic, geographic, and cultural human population, it will be important to develop vision for personalized probiotic treatment and develop the technology thereof to make personalized probiotic options a reality. The aim of this review paper is to present an overview of the current knowledge on both pharmacological and nonpharmacological IBD treatment modalities with a special emphasis on probiotic strains that are developed through the probiotic engineering. These engineered probiotics contain the most anti-inflammatory cytokines found within the human immune response and are currently being used to treat the intestinal inflammation in IBD for the IBD treatment.

Unmet needs in inflammatory bowel disease

Despite the recent developments in the diagnosis and management of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), patients still suffer from disabling bowel symptoms and significant disease complications and many questions remain to improve their care. IBD is a chronic disease, whose management could be divided into the five different stages of chronic diseases, ranging from the pre-treatment evaluation phase to the induction therapy, maintenance therapy, monitor and re-establishment of control and the cessation of the disease. Reconciling these phases with the current unmet needs in IBD could help tailor priorities for research. In this review, some of the unanswered questions in the management of both Crohn’s Disease and Ulcerative Colitis will be addressed, by following this paradigm of chronic diseases’ management.

Lactate-utilizing bacteria ameliorates DSS-induced colitis in mice

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) stem from alterations in the intestinal immune system and microbial dysbiosis, but the precise interactions between bacteria and IBD remain obscure. The commensal microbiota have a profound impact on human health and diseases. Here, we developed a selective culture medium for lactate-utilizing bacteria (LUB) that function as candidate probiotics to ameliorate IBD using a mouse model. Firstly, LUB, including Megasphaera, were enriched from human faeces using a selective medium with lactate. LUB efficiently attenuated the pathology of colitis induced by dextran sulphate sodium (DSS). Next, LUB administration counteracted the dysbiosis associated with the intestinal inflammatory process, and elevated the proportion of Escherichia-Shigella in intestines. Moreover, E. coli isolated from healthy faeces downstream recapitulated lactate-utilizing bacterial community to ameliorate the severity of DSS-induced acute colitis. In conclusion, our finding revealed that LUB were sufficient to exert inflammatory protection against colitis in mice, highlighting a novel therapeutic strategy to use LUB as potentially curable probiotics for therapeutic manipulation for IBD.

Tumour necrosis factor inhibitors in inflammatory bowel disease: the story continues

In the 1990s, tumour necrosis factor-α inhibitor therapy ushered in the biologic therapy era for inflammatory bowel disease, leading to marked improvements in treatment options and patient outcomes. There are currently four tumour necrosis factor-α inhibitors approved as treatments for ulcerative colitis and/or Crohn's disease: infliximab, adalimumab, golimumab and certolizumab pegol. Despite the clear benefits of tumour necrosis factor-α inhibitors, a subset of patients with inflammatory bowel disease either do not respond, experience a loss of response after initial clinical improvement or report intolerance to anti-tumour necrosis factor-α therapy. Optimizing outcomes of these agents may be achieved through earlier intervention, the use of therapeutic drug monitoring and thoughtful switching within class. To complement these approaches, evolving predictive biomarkers may help inform and optimize clinical decision making by identifying patients who might potentially benefit from an alternative treatment strategy. This review will focus on the current use of tumour necrosis factor-α inhibitors in inflammatory bowel disease and the application of personalized medicine to improve future outcomes for all patients.

Etrolizumab versus adalimumab or placebo as induction therapy for moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (HIBISCUS): two phase 3 randomised, controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Etrolizumab is a gut-targeted anti-β7 integrin monoclonal antibody. In an earlier phase 2 induction study, etrolizumab significantly improved clinical remission relative to placebo in patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis. The HIBISCUS studies aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of etrolizumab to adalimumab and placebo for induction of remission in patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis.

METHODS

HIBISCUS I and HIBISCUS II were identically designed, multicentre, phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled and active-controlled studies of etrolizumab, adalimumab, and placebo in adult (18-80 years) patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (Mayo Clinic total score [MCS] of 6-12 with an endoscopic subscore of ≥2, a rectal bleeding subscore of ≥1, and a stool frequency subscore of ≥1) who were naive to tumour necrosis factor inhibitors. All patients had an established diagnosis of ulcerative colitis for at least 3 months, corroborated by both clinical and endoscopic evidence, and evidence of disease extending at least 20 cm from the anal verge. In both studies, patients were randomly assigned (2:2:1) to receive subcutaneous etrolizumab 105 mg once every 4 weeks; subcutaneous adalimumab 160 mg on day 1, 80 mg at week 2, and 40 mg at weeks 4, 6, and 8; or placebo. Randomisation was stratified by baseline concomitant treatment with corticosteroids, concomitant treatment with immunosuppressants, and baseline disease activity. All patients and study site personnel were masked to treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was induction of remission at week 10 (defined as MCS of 2 or lower, with individual subscores of 1 or lower, and rectal bleeding subscore of 0) with etrolizumab compared with placebo. Pooled analyses of both studies comparing etrolizumab and adalimumab were examined for several clinical and endoscopic endpoints. Efficacy was analysed using a modified intent-to-treat population, defined as all randomly assigned patients who received at least one dose of study drug. These trials are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02163759 (HIBISCUS I), NCT02171429 (HIBISCUS II).

FINDINGS

Between Nov 4, 2014, and May 25, 2020, each study screened 652 patients (HIBISCUS I) and 613 patients (HIBISCUS II). Each study enrolled and randomly assigned 358 patients (HIBISCUS I etrolizumab n=144, adalimumab n=142, placebo n=72; HIBISCUS II etrolizumab n=143; adalimumab n=143; placebo n=72). In HIBISCUS I, 28 (19·4%) of 144 patients in the etrolizumab group and five (6·9%) of 72 patients in the placebo group were in remission at week 10, with an adjusted treatment difference of 12·3% (95% CI 1·6 to 20·6; p=0·017) in favour of etrolizumab. In HIBISCUS II, 26 (18·2%) of 143 patients in the etrolizumab group and eight (11·1%) of 72 patients in the placebo group were in remission at week 10, with an adjusted treatment difference of 7·2% (95% CI -3·8 to 16·1; p=0·17). In the pooled analysis, etrolizumab was not superior to adalimumab for induction of remission, endoscopic improvement, clinical response, histological remission, or endoscopic remission; however, similar numerical results were observed in both groups. In HIBISCUS I, 50 (35%) of 144 patients in the etrolizumab group reported any adverse event, compared with 61 (43%) of 142 in the adalimumab group and 26 (36%) of 72 in the placebo group. In HIBISCUS II, 63 (44%) of 143 patients in the etrolizumab group reported any adverse event, as did 62 (43%) of 143 in the adalimumab group and 33 (46%) in the placebo group. The most common adverse event in all groups was ulcerative colitis flare. The incidence of serious adverse events in the pooled patient population was similar for etrolizumab (15 [5%] of 287) and placebo (seven [5%] of 144) and lower for adalimumab (six [2%] of 285). Two patients in the etrolizumab group died; neither death was deemed to be treatment related.

INTERPRETATION

Etrolizumab was superior to placebo for induction of remission in HIBISCUS I, but not in HIBISCUS II. Etrolizumab was well tolerated in both studies.

FUNDING

F Hoffmann-La Roche.

Etrolizumab versus infliximab for the treatment of moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (GARDENIA): a randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, phase 3 study

BACKGROUND

Etrolizumab is a gut-targeted anti-β7 integrin monoclonal antibody. In a previous phase 2 induction study, etrolizumab significantly improved clinical remission versus placebo in patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis. We aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of etrolizumab with infliximab in patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis.

METHODS

We conducted a randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group, phase 3 study (GARDENIA) across 114 treatment centres worldwide. We included adults (age 18-80 years) with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (Mayo Clinic total score [MCS] of 6-12 with an endoscopic subscore of ≥2, a rectal bleeding subscore of ≥1, and a stool frequency subscore of ≥1) who were naive to tumour necrosis factor inhibitors. Patients were required to have had an established diagnosis of ulcerative colitis for at least 3 months, corroborated by both clinical and endoscopic evidence, and evidence of disease extending at least 20 cm from the anal verge. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive subcutaneous etrolizumab 105 mg once every 4 weeks or intravenous infliximab 5 mg/kg at 0, 2, and 6 weeks and every 8 weeks thereafter for 52 weeks. Randomisation was stratified by baseline concomitant treatment with corticosteroids, concomitant treatment with immunosuppressants, and baseline disease activity. All participants and study site personnel were masked to treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who had both clinical response at week 10 (MCS ≥3-point decrease and ≥30% reduction from baseline, plus ≥1-point decrease in rectal bleeding subscore or absolute rectal bleeding score of 0 or 1) and clinical remission at week 54 (MCS ≤2, with individual subscores ≤1); efficacy was analysed using a modified intention-to-treat population (all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study drug). GARDENIA was designed to show superiority of etrolizumab over infliximab for the primary endpoint. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02136069, and is now closed to recruitment.

FINDINGS

Between Dec 24, 2014, and June 23, 2020, 730 patients were screened for eligibility and 397 were enrolled and randomly assigned to etrolizumab (n=199) or infliximab (n=198). 95 (48%) patients in the etrolizumab group and 103 (52%) in the infliximab group completed the study through week 54. At week 54, 37 (18·6%) of 199 patients in the etrolizumab group and 39 (19·7%) of 198 in the infliximab group met the primary endpoint (adjusted treatment difference -0·9% [95% CI -8·7 to 6·8]; p=0·81). The number of patients reporting one or more adverse events was similar between treatment groups (154 [77%] of 199 in the etrolizumab group and 151 [76%] of 198 in the infliximab group); the most common adverse event in both groups was ulcerative colitis (55 [28%] patients in the etrolizumab group and 43 [22%] in the infliximab group). More patients in the etrolizumab group reported serious adverse events (including serious infections) than did those in the infliximab group (32 [16%] vs 20 [10%]); the most common serious adverse event was ulcerative colitis (12 [6%] and 11 [6%]). There was one death during follow-up, in the infliximab group due to a pulmonary embolism, which was not considered to be related to study treatment.

INTERPRETATION

To our knowledge, this trial is the first phase 3 maintenance study in moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis to use infliximab as an active comparator. Although the study did not show statistical superiority for the primary endpoint, etrolizumab performed similarly to infliximab from a clinical viewpoint.

FUNDING

F Hoffmann-La Roche.

Budding Multi-matrix Technology-a Retrospective Approach, Deep Insights, and Future Perspectives

The human race is consistently striving for achieving good health and eliminate disease-causing factors. For the last few decades, scientists have been endeavoring to invent and innovate technologies that can substitute the conventional dosage forms and enable targeted and prolonged drug release at a particular site. The novel multi-matrix technology is a type of matrix formulation where the formulation is embraced to have a matrix system with multiple number of matrices. The MMX technology embraces with a combination of outer hydrophilic layer and amphiphilic/lipophilic core layer, within which drug is encapsulated followed by enteric coating for extended/targeted release at the required site. In comparison to conventional oral drug delivery systems and other drug delivery systems, multi-matrix (MMX) technology formulations afford many advantages. Additionally, it attributes for targeting strategy aimed at the colon and offers modified prolonged drug release. Thus, it has emerged rapidly as a potential alternative option in targeted oral drug delivery. However, the development of this MMX technology formulations is a exigent task and also has its own set of limitations. Due to its promising advantages and colon targeting strategy over the other colon targeted drug delivery systems, premier global companies are exploiting its potential. This article review deep insights into the formulation procedures, drug delivery mechanism, advantages, limitations, safety and efficacy studies of various marketed drug formulations of MMX technology including regulatory perspectives and future perspectives.

Mucosal IL23A expression predicts the response to Ustekinumab in inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND

Biologics against tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF) and the p40 subunit of interleukin (IL)-12 and IL-23 are increasingly used in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) treatment. However, information on response prediction to these agents is limited. Thus, we aimed to identify factors for IBD treatment response prediction.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study in 33 IBD subjects for anti-TNF and a prospective study of 23 IBD and 11 non-IBD subjects for ustekinumab (UST). Mucosal biopsy specimens were obtained before treatment with biologics. The expression of 18 immune-related genes encoding representative cytokines and transcription factors was analyzed by quantitative polymerase chain reaction.

RESULTS

There was no difference between the treatment-resistant and -sensitive groups with regard to clinical characteristics. A higher expression of oncostatin M (OSM) and its receptor OSMR in the intestinal mucosa was most strongly associated with anti-TNF resistance, whereas lower IL23A expression was most strongly associated with UST resistance. In addition to the absolute expression levels of genes, concordant or discordant expression patterns of particular gene sets were associated with treatment sensitivity and resistance.

CONCLUSIONS

The association of anti-TNF resistance and mucosal OSM and OSMR expression was consistent with the results of a previous study in a European cohort. Our observation that IBD subjects with higher mucosal IL23A expression were more likely to achieve remission by UST has not been previously reported. The response to biologics may thus be predicted in IBD patients through the analysis of mucosal gene expression levels and patterns.

Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients' Perspectives of Clinical Trials: A Global Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis

Background

Despite recent progress, inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) therapies with pronounced long-term efficacy and improved safety are needed. IBD clinical trials face challenges with patient recruitment because of study designs, competitive or overlapping trials, and limited numbers of eligible patients. We aimed to better understand patients' awareness of, attitudes toward, and experience with IBD clinical trials.

Methods

This multinational, cross-sectional cohort study of adults with IBD recruited online consisted of 2 components: a quantitative 15-minute online survey completed by all participants and a qualitative 30-minute telephone interview completed by a subset of patients from the United States.

Results

Quantitative survey respondents (N = 226) included patients with ulcerative colitis (52%) and Crohn's disease (48%) from the United States (n = 100, 21 of whom were interviewed), Brazil (n = 26), Canada (n = 25), France (n = 25), Germany (n = 25), and Spain (n = 25); 96% of respondents reported at least a basic understanding of clinical trials. Patients rated conversations with health care providers most helpful for researching trials, but during interviews patients discussed their desire for increased patient-physician communication about trials. Major barriers to participation included invasive screening/monitoring (35% of quantitative responses) and concern over receiving placebo (35%) or suboptimal treatment (33%). Most respondents (68%) reported that clinical trial participants are "guinea pigs" for an experimental treatment.

Conclusions

Opportunities to improve participation in IBD trials include improved communication with health care providers, further patient education, and alternative trial designs. Ultimately, a better understanding of the patient perspective will be important for more informed patients and more successful recruitment and enrollment.

The search for disease-modifying agents in decompensated cirrhosis: From drug repurposing to drug discovery

Patients with decompensated cirrhosis are currently managed through targeted strategies aimed at preventing or treating specific complications. In contrast, a disease-modifying agent should, by definition, be aimed at globally addressing 'decompensated cirrhosis'. To be defined as a disease-modifying agent in decompensated cirrhosis, interventions need to demonstrate an unequivocal benefit on the course of disease in well-designed and adequately powered randomised clinical trials with hard endpoints (i.e. patient survival). These trials also need to define the target population, dosage and timing of administration, factors guiding treatment, temporary or permanent stopping rules, transferability to daily clinical practice, cost-effectiveness, and global treatment access. By eliminating the underlying cause of cirrhosis, aetiologic treatments can still influence the course of decompensated disease by halting or slowing down disease progression or even inducing reversion to the compensated state. In contrast, there remains an unmet clinical need for disease-modifying agents which can antagonise key pathophysiological mechanisms of decompensated cirrhosis, such as portal hypertension, gut translocation, circulatory dysfunction, systemic inflammation, and immunological dysfunction. However, in the last few years, the repurposing of "old drugs" that have already been prescribed for more limited indications in hepatology or for other diseases has provided a few candidates, including human albumin, statins, and poorly absorbable oral antibiotics, which are under further evaluation in large-scale randomised clinical trials. New disease-modifying agents are also expected to be identified in the next decade through the systematic repurposing of existing drugs and the development of novel molecules which are currently undergoing pre-clinical or early clinical testing.

Polydatin has anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects in LPS-induced macrophages and improves DSS-induced mice colitis

Polydatin (PD), a monocrystalline compound isolated from the root and rhizome of Polygonum cuspidatum, is widely used in inhibiting the inflammatory response and oxidative stress. PD has an anti‐inflammatory effect on colitis mice; however, information regulating the mechanism by which maintains the intestinal epithelium barrier is currently scarce. Here, we assessed the anti‐inflammatory and antioxidant of PD in lipopolysaccharide (LPS)‐induced macrophages in vitro, and explored its effects on inhibiting intestinal inflammation and maintaining the intestinal epithelium barrier in dextran sodium sulfate (DSS)‐induced colitis mice. Results showed that PD reduced the level of proinflammatory cytokines and enzymes, including tumor necrosis factor‐α, interleukin‐4 (IL‐4), IL‐6, cyclooxygenase‐2, and inducible nitric oxide synthase, in LPS‐induced macrophages, and improved the expression level of IL‐10. PD maintained the expression of tight junction proteins in medium (LPS‐induced macrophages medium)‐induced MCEC cells. Additionally, PD inhibited the phosphorylation of nuclear factor‐κB (NF‐κB), p65, extracellular signal‐regulated kinase‐1/2, c‐Jun N‐terminal kinase, and p38 signaling pathways in LPS‐induced macrophages and facilitated the phosphorylation of AKT and the nuclear translocation of Nrf2, improving the expression of HO‐1 and NQO1. Furthermore, PD ameliorated the intestinal inflammatory response and improved the dysfunction of the colon epithelium barrier in DSS‐induced colitis mice. Taken together, our results indicated that PD inhibited inflammation and oxidative stress, maintained the intestinal epithelium barrier, and the protective role of PD was associated with the NF‐κB p65, itogen‐activated protein kinases, and AKT/Nrf2/HO‐1/NQO1 signaling pathway.

Breaking the therapeutic ceiling in drug development in ulcerative colitis

Increased knowledge of the intricate pathogenesis of ulcerative colitis has triggered an advance in drug development during the past two decades, resulting in the advent of several biological agents and small-molecule therapies. Although the increase in therapeutic options is positive, remission rates of patients with ulcerative colitis given new therapeutic agents in induction trials remain at a modest 20-30%, seemingly facing a so-called therapeutic ceiling. This therapeutic ceiling requires a critical appraisal and highlights the need for alternative strategies for drug development. In this Review, we objectively itemise the boundaries of therapeutic efficacy in ulcerative colitis, provide possible explanations for the shortcomings of current strategies, and propose solutions to achieve better therapeutic outcomes in ulcerative colitis.

Dilodendron bipinnatum Radlk. extract alleviates ulcerative colitis induced by TNBS in rats by reducing inflammatory cell infiltration, TNF-α and IL-1β concentrations, IL-17 and COX-2 expressions, supporting mucus production and promotes an antioxidant effect

ETHNOPHARMACOLOGICAL RELEVANCE

Dilodendron bipinnatum (Sapindaceae) stem bark decoction and macerate were used to treat uterine inflammation, pain in general, dermatitis and bone fractures. These homemade preparations also have diuretic, stimulant, expectorants and sedative effects and are effective in treating worm infections in the Brazilian Pantanal population. Our previous research confirmed the anti-inflammatory activity of the hydroethanolic extract of inner stem bark of D. bipinnatum (HEDb).

AIM

This work aimed to investigate the efficacy of HEDb in ameliorating experimental colitis in rats and to elucidate the possible mechanisms involved in the anti-ulcerative colitis properties of HEDb in rats and Caco-2 cell line.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The effects on cell viability, IL-8 and TNF-α in human colon adenocarcinoma (Caco-2) were determined by flow cytometer and ELISA. Wistar rats (n = 6-7) were orally gavaged with, vehicle (0.9% saline), HEDb at doses of 20, 100 or 500 mg/kg, or mesalazine at a dose of 500 mg/kg, at 48, 24 and 1 h prior to the administration of trinitrobenzene sulfonic acid via rectal administration to induce colitis. The anti-inflammatory effects of HEDb were assessed macroscopically, by myeloperoxidase (MPO) activity and for glutathione (GSH) concentration in the colon. Additionally, colonic histopathological analyses of UC severity were conducted by different staining methods (H&E, PAS and toluidine blue). Pro-inflammatory cytokines TNF-α and IL-1β were quantified in colonic tissue by ELISA and colonic expressions of COX-2 and IL-17 were analyzed by western blotting.

RESULTS

HEDb was shown to be non-cytotoxic with mean viability of 80% in Caco-2 cells. HEDb pre-treatments of 1, 5 or 20 μg/mL significantly reduced TNF-α production in Caco-2 cells by 21.8% (p < 0.05), 60.5 and 82.1% (p < 0.001) respectively following LPS treatment compared to LPS alone. However, no change in IL-8 production was observed. HEDb pre-treatment of rats subjected to TNBS significantly (p < 0.001) reduced colonic lesion score. Higher doses (100 and 500 mg/kg) caused a sharp downregulation of haemorrhagic damage, leukocyte infiltration, edema and restoration of mucus production. Moreover, mast cell degranulation was inhibited. Colonic MPO activity was reduced following all doses of HEDb, reaching 51.1% ± 1.51 (p < 0.05) with the highest dose. GSH concentration was restored by 58% and 70% following 100 and 500 mg/kg of HEDb, respectively. The oral treatment of HEDb at doses 20, 100 and 500 mg/kg decreased the concentrations of TNF-α and IL-1β at all doses in comparison to vehicle treated control. In addition, HEDb inhibited the COX-2 and IL-17 expressions with maximal effect at 500 mg/kg (60.3% and 65% respectively; p < 0.001). In all trials, the effect of HEDb at all doses being 20, 100 and 500 mg/kg was statistically comparable to mesalazine (500 mg/kg).

CONCLUSIONS

HEDb reduces colonic damage in the TNBS colitis model and relieves oxidative and inflammatory events, at least in part, by increasing mucus production, reducing leukocyte migration and reducing TNF-α (in vivo and in vitro), IL-1β, IL-17 and COX-2 expression. Therefore, HEDb requires further investigation as a candidate for treating IBD.

New Paradigms to Help Decisions in Treatment Choice: Head to Head Trial of Biological Therapies in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

The increasing armamentarium of drugs for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) requires a direct comparison of different therapeutic options in order to guide physicians in the choice of the most appropriate treatment for their patients. Head-to-head trials, considered the gold standard in comparative research in IBD, allow to compare different therapies in the same population and setting, but also to evaluate different treatment strategies. Although head-to-head trials including biologics and immunosuppressive therapy in IBD have been performed decades ago, the interest in these direct comparisons is growing since the publication of the first randomized controlled trial directly comparing biologic agents with different molecular targets. This review provides an overview of the past and current IBD head-to-head trials, considering their respective strengths and limitations in a real-life setting.

Safety of S1P Modulators in Patients with Immune-Mediated Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Sphingosine-1-phosphate modulators are approved for the treatment of multiple sclerosis and are under development for other immune-mediated conditions; however, safety concerns have arisen.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this systematic review was to investigate the safety profile of S1P modulators in patients with multiple sclerosis, ulcerative colitis, Crohn's disease, psoriasis, and systemic lupus erythematosus.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from 1 January, 1990 through 1 April, 2020. We also performed a manual review of conference databases from 2017 through 2020. The primary outcome was the occurrence of adverse events and serious adverse events. We also estimated the occurrence of serious infections, herpes zoster infection, malignancy, bradycardia, atrio-ventricular block, and macular edema. We performed a meta-analysis of controlled studies to assess the risks of such events.

RESULTS

We identified 3843 citations; of these, 26 studies were finally included, comprising 9604 patients who were exposed to a sphingosine-1-phosphate modulator. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials showed an increased risk in herpes zoster infection [risk ratio, 1.75 (95% confidence interval 1.09-2.80)], bradycardia [2.64 (1.77-3.96)], and atrio-ventricular block [1.73 (1.03-2.91)] among subjects exposed to sphingosine-1-phosphate modulators as compared with a placebo or an active comparator.

CONCLUSIONS

We found an increased risk of herpes zoster infection, and transient cardiovascular events among patients treated with sphingosine-1-phosphate modulators.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42020172575.

Intestinal Macrophages at the Crossroad between Diet, Inflammation, and Cancer

Intestinal macrophages are key players in the regulation of the oral tolerance, controlling gut homeostasis by discriminating innocuous antigens from harmful pathogens. Diet exerts a significant impact on human health, influencing the composition of gut microbiota and the developing of several non-communicable diseases, including cancer. Nutrients and microbiota are able to modify the profile of intestinal macrophages, shaping their key function in the maintenance of the gut homeostasis. Intestinal disease often occurs as a breakdown of this balance: defects in monocyte-macrophage differentiation, wrong dietary habits, alteration of microbiota composition, and impairment in the resolution of inflammation may contribute to the development of intestinal chronic inflammation and colorectal cancer. Accordingly, dietary interventions and macrophage-targeted therapies are emerging as innovative tools for the treatment of several intestinal pathologies. In this review, we will describe the delicate balance between diet, microbiota and intestinal macrophages in homeostasis and how the perturbation of this equilibrium may lead to the occurrence of inflammatory conditions in the gut. The understanding of the molecular pathways and dietary factors regulating the activity of intestinal macrophages might result in the identification of innovative targets for the treatments of intestinal pathologies.