1
|
Boto T, Tomchik SM. Functional Imaging of Learning-Induced Plasticity in the Central Nervous System with Genetically Encoded Reporters in Drosophila. Cold Spring Harb Protoc 2024; 2024:pdb.top107799. [PMID: 37197830 DOI: 10.1101/pdb.top107799] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/19/2023]
Abstract
Learning and memory allow animals to adjust their behavior based on the predictive value of their past experiences. Memories often exist in complex representations, spread across numerous cells and synapses in the brain. Studying relatively simple forms of memory provides insights into the fundamental processes that underlie multiple forms of memory. Associative learning occurs when an animal learns the relationship between two previously unrelated sensory stimuli, such as when a hungry animal learns that a particular odor is followed by a tasty reward. Drosophila is a particularly powerful model to study how this type of memory works. The fundamental principles are widely shared among animals, and there is a wide range of genetic tools available to study circuit function in flies. In addition, the olfactory structures that mediate associative learning in flies, such as the mushroom body and its associated neurons, are anatomically organized, relatively well-characterized, and readily accessible to imaging. Here, we review the olfactory anatomy and physiology of the olfactory system, describe how plasticity in the olfactory pathway mediates learning and memory, and explain the general principles underlying calcium imaging approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tamara Boto
- Department of Physiology, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland
- Trinity College Institute of Neuroscience, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland
| | - Seth M Tomchik
- Neuroscience and Pharmacology, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa 52242, USA
- Stead Family Department of Pediatrics, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa 52242, USA
- Iowa Neuroscience Institute, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa 52242, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Boto T, Tomchik SM. Imaging Olfactory Learning-Induced Plasticity in Vivo in the Drosophila Brain. Cold Spring Harb Protoc 2024; 2024:pdb.prot108135. [PMID: 37197829 DOI: 10.1101/pdb.prot108135] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/19/2023]
Abstract
In vivo imaging of brain activity in Drosophila allows the dissection of numerous types of biologically important neuronal events. A common paradigm involves imaging neuronal Ca2+ transients, often in response to sensory stimuli. These Ca2+ transients correlate with neuronal spiking activity, which generates voltage-sensitive Ca2+ influx. In addition, there is a range of genetically encoded reporters of membrane voltage and of other signaling molecules, such as second-messenger signaling cascade enzymes and neurotransmitters, enabling optical access to a range of cellular processes. Moreover, sophisticated gene expression systems enable access to virtually any single neuron or neuronal group in the fly brain. The in vivo imaging approach enables the study of these processes and how they change during salient sensory-driven events such as olfactory associative learning, when an animal (fly) is presented an odor (a conditioned stimulus) paired with an unconditioned stimulus (an aversive or appetitive stimulus) and forms an associative memory of this pairing. Optical access to neuronal events in the brain allows one to image learning-induced plasticity following the formation of associative memory, dissecting the mechanisms of memory formation, maintenance, and recall.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tamara Boto
- Department of Physiology, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland
- Trinity College Institute of Neuroscience, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland
| | - Seth M Tomchik
- Neuroscience and Pharmacology, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa 52242, USA
- Stead Family Department of Pediatrics, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa 52242, USA
- Iowa Neuroscience Institute, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa 52242, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Pribbenow C, Owald D. Skewing information flow through pre- and postsynaptic plasticity in the mushroom bodies of Drosophila. Learn Mem 2024; 31:a053919. [PMID: 38876487 PMCID: PMC11199954 DOI: 10.1101/lm.053919.124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2024] [Accepted: 04/26/2024] [Indexed: 06/16/2024]
Abstract
Animal brains need to store information to construct a representation of their environment. Knowledge of what happened in the past allows both vertebrates and invertebrates to predict future outcomes by recalling previous experience. Although invertebrate and vertebrate brains share common principles at the molecular, cellular, and circuit-architectural levels, there are also obvious differences as exemplified by the use of acetylcholine versus glutamate as the considered main excitatory neurotransmitters in the respective central nervous systems. Nonetheless, across central nervous systems, synaptic plasticity is thought to be a main substrate for memory storage. Therefore, how brain circuits and synaptic contacts change following learning is of fundamental interest for understanding brain computations tied to behavior in any animal. Recent progress has been made in understanding such plastic changes following olfactory associative learning in the mushroom bodies (MBs) of Drosophila A current framework of memory-guided behavioral selection is based on the MB skew model, in which antagonistic synaptic pathways are selectively changed in strength. Here, we review insights into plasticity at dedicated Drosophila MB output pathways and update what is known about the plasticity of both pre- and postsynaptic compartments of Drosophila MB neurons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlotta Pribbenow
- Institute of Neurophysiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - David Owald
- Institute of Neurophysiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany
- Einstein Center for Neurosciences Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany
- NeuroCure, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Çoban B, Poppinga H, Rachad EY, Geurten B, Vasmer D, Rodriguez Jimenez FJ, Gadgil Y, Deimel SH, Alyagor I, Schuldiner O, Grunwald Kadow IC, Riemensperger TD, Widmann A, Fiala A. The caloric value of food intake structurally adjusts a neuronal mushroom body circuit mediating olfactory learning in Drosophila. Learn Mem 2024; 31:a053997. [PMID: 38862177 PMCID: PMC11199950 DOI: 10.1101/lm.053997.124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2024] [Accepted: 04/10/2024] [Indexed: 06/13/2024]
Abstract
Associative learning enables the adaptive adjustment of behavioral decisions based on acquired, predicted outcomes. The valence of what is learned is influenced not only by the learned stimuli and their temporal relations, but also by prior experiences and internal states. In this study, we used the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster to demonstrate that neuronal circuits involved in associative olfactory learning undergo restructuring during extended periods of low-caloric food intake. Specifically, we observed a decrease in the connections between specific dopaminergic neurons (DANs) and Kenyon cells at distinct compartments of the mushroom body. This structural synaptic plasticity was contingent upon the presence of allatostatin A receptors in specific DANs and could be mimicked optogenetically by expressing a light-activated adenylate cyclase in exactly these DANs. Importantly, we found that this rearrangement in synaptic connections influenced aversive, punishment-induced olfactory learning but did not impact appetitive, reward-based learning. Whether induced by prolonged low-caloric conditions or optogenetic manipulation of cAMP levels, this synaptic rearrangement resulted in a reduction of aversive associative learning. Consequently, the balance between positive and negative reinforcing signals shifted, diminishing the ability to learn to avoid odor cues signaling negative outcomes. These results exemplify how a neuronal circuit required for learning and memory undergoes structural plasticity dependent on prior experiences of the nutritional value of food.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Büşra Çoban
- Molecular Neurobiology of Behavior, University of Göttingen, 37077 Göttingen, Germany
| | - Haiko Poppinga
- Molecular Neurobiology of Behavior, University of Göttingen, 37077 Göttingen, Germany
| | - El Yazid Rachad
- Molecular Neurobiology of Behavior, University of Göttingen, 37077 Göttingen, Germany
| | - Bart Geurten
- Department of Zoology, Otago University, Dunedin 9016, New Zealand
| | - David Vasmer
- Molecular Neurobiology of Behavior, University of Göttingen, 37077 Göttingen, Germany
| | | | - Yogesh Gadgil
- Molecular Neurobiology of Behavior, University of Göttingen, 37077 Göttingen, Germany
| | | | - Idan Alyagor
- Department of Molecular Cell Biology, Department of Molecular Neuroscience, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 7610001, Israel
| | - Oren Schuldiner
- Department of Molecular Cell Biology, Department of Molecular Neuroscience, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 7610001, Israel
| | | | | | - Annekathrin Widmann
- Molecular Neurobiology of Behavior, University of Göttingen, 37077 Göttingen, Germany
| | - André Fiala
- Molecular Neurobiology of Behavior, University of Göttingen, 37077 Göttingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Yamada D, Davidson AM, Hige T. Cyclic nucleotide-induced bidirectional long-term synaptic plasticity in Drosophila mushroom body. J Physiol 2024; 602:2019-2045. [PMID: 38488688 PMCID: PMC11068490 DOI: 10.1113/jp285745] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2023] [Accepted: 02/21/2024] [Indexed: 03/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Activation of the cAMP pathway is one of the common mechanisms underlying long-term potentiation (LTP). In the Drosophila mushroom body, simultaneous activation of odour-coding Kenyon cells (KCs) and reinforcement-coding dopaminergic neurons activates adenylyl cyclase in KC presynaptic terminals, which is believed to trigger synaptic plasticity underlying olfactory associative learning. However, learning induces long-term depression (LTD) at these synapses, contradicting the universal role of cAMP as a facilitator of transmission. Here, we developed a system to electrophysiologically monitor both short-term and long-term synaptic plasticity at KC output synapses and demonstrated that they are indeed an exception in which activation of the cAMP-protein kinase A pathway induces LTD. Contrary to the prevailing model, our cAMP imaging found no evidence for synergistic action of dopamine and KC activity on cAMP synthesis. Furthermore, we found that forskolin-induced cAMP increase alone was insufficient for plasticity induction; it additionally required simultaneous KC activation to replicate the presynaptic LTD induced by pairing with dopamine. On the other hand, activation of the cGMP pathway paired with KC activation induced slowly developing LTP, proving antagonistic actions of the two second-messenger pathways predicted by behavioural study. Finally, KC subtype-specific interrogation of synapses revealed that different KC subtypes exhibit distinct plasticity duration even among synapses on the same postsynaptic neuron. Thus, our work not only revises the role of cAMP in synaptic plasticity by uncovering the unexpected convergence point of the cAMP pathway and neuronal activity, but also establishes the methods to address physiological mechanisms of synaptic plasticity in this important model. KEY POINTS: Although presynaptic cAMP increase generally facilitates synapses, olfactory associative learning in Drosophila, which depends on dopamine and cAMP signalling genes, induces long-term depression (LTD) at the mushroom body output synapses. By combining electrophysiology, pharmacology and optogenetics, we directly demonstrate that these synapses are an exception where activation of the cAMP-protein kinase A pathway leads to presynaptic LTD. Dopamine- or forskolin-induced cAMP increase alone is not sufficient for LTD induction; neuronal activity, which has been believed to trigger cAMP synthesis in synergy with dopamine input, is required in the downstream pathway of cAMP. In contrast to cAMP, activation of the cGMP pathway paired with neuronal activity induces presynaptic long-term potentiation, which explains behaviourally observed opposing actions of transmitters co-released by dopaminergic neurons. Our work not only revises the role of cAMP in synaptic plasticity, but also provides essential methods to address physiological mechanisms of synaptic plasticity in this important model system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daichi Yamada
- Department of Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, United States
| | - Andrew M. Davidson
- Department of Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, United States
- Department of Cell Biology and Physiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, United States
- Integrative Program for Biological and Genome Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, United States
| | - Toshihide Hige
- Department of Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, United States
- Department of Cell Biology and Physiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, United States
- Integrative Program for Biological and Genome Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, United States
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Davidson AM, Hige T. Roles of feedback and feed-forward networks of dopamine subsystems: insights from Drosophila studies. Learn Mem 2024; 31:a053807. [PMID: 38862171 PMCID: PMC11199952 DOI: 10.1101/lm.053807.123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2023] [Accepted: 11/10/2023] [Indexed: 06/13/2024]
Abstract
Across animal species, dopamine-operated memory systems comprise anatomically segregated, functionally diverse subsystems. Although individual subsystems could operate independently to support distinct types of memory, the logical interplay between subsystems is expected to enable more complex memory processing by allowing existing memory to influence future learning. Recent comprehensive ultrastructural analysis of the Drosophila mushroom body revealed intricate networks interconnecting the dopamine subsystems-the mushroom body compartments. Here, we review the functions of some of these connections that are beginning to be understood. Memory consolidation is mediated by two different forms of network: A recurrent feedback loop within a compartment maintains sustained dopamine activity required for consolidation, whereas feed-forward connections across compartments allow short-term memory formation in one compartment to open the gate for long-term memory formation in another compartment. Extinction and reversal of aversive memory rely on a similar feed-forward circuit motif that signals omission of punishment as a reward, which triggers plasticity that counteracts the original aversive memory trace. Finally, indirect feed-forward connections from a long-term memory compartment to short-term memory compartments mediate higher-order conditioning. Collectively, these emerging studies indicate that feedback control and hierarchical connectivity allow the dopamine subsystems to work cooperatively to support diverse and complex forms of learning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew M Davidson
- Department of Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, USA
- Department of Cell Biology and Physiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, USA
- Integrative Program for Biological and Genome Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, USA
| | - Toshihide Hige
- Department of Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, USA
- Department of Cell Biology and Physiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, USA
- Integrative Program for Biological and Genome Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Jürgensen AM, Sakagiannis P, Schleyer M, Gerber B, Nawrot MP. Prediction error drives associative learning and conditioned behavior in a spiking model of Drosophila larva. iScience 2024; 27:108640. [PMID: 38292165 PMCID: PMC10824792 DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.108640] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2023] [Revised: 11/10/2023] [Accepted: 12/01/2023] [Indexed: 02/01/2024] Open
Abstract
Predicting reinforcement from sensory cues is beneficial for goal-directed behavior. In insect brains, underlying associations between cues and reinforcement, encoded by dopaminergic neurons, are formed in the mushroom body. We propose a spiking model of the Drosophila larva mushroom body. It includes a feedback motif conveying learned reinforcement expectation to dopaminergic neurons, which can compute prediction error as the difference between expected and present reinforcement. We demonstrate that this can serve as a driving force in learning. When combined with synaptic homeostasis, our model accounts for theoretically derived features of acquisition and loss of associations that depend on the intensity of the reinforcement and its temporal proximity to the cue. From modeling olfactory learning over the time course of behavioral experiments and simulating the locomotion of individual larvae toward or away from odor sources in a virtual environment, we conclude that learning driven by prediction errors can explain larval behavior.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna-Maria Jürgensen
- Computational Systems Neuroscience, Institute of Zoology, University of Cologne, 50674 Cologne, Germany
| | - Panagiotis Sakagiannis
- Computational Systems Neuroscience, Institute of Zoology, University of Cologne, 50674 Cologne, Germany
| | - Michael Schleyer
- Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology (LIN), Department of Genetics, 39118 Magdeburg, Germany
- Institute for the Advancement of Higher Education, Faculty of Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-08080, Japan
| | - Bertram Gerber
- Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology (LIN), Department of Genetics, 39118 Magdeburg, Germany
- Institute for Biology, Otto-von-Guericke University, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany
- Center for Brain and Behavioral Sciences (CBBS), Otto-von-Guericke University, 39118 Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Martin Paul Nawrot
- Computational Systems Neuroscience, Institute of Zoology, University of Cologne, 50674 Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Jürgensen AM, Schmitt FJ, Nawrot MP. Minimal circuit motifs for second-order conditioning in the insect mushroom body. Front Physiol 2024; 14:1326307. [PMID: 38269060 PMCID: PMC10806035 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1326307] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2023] [Accepted: 12/22/2023] [Indexed: 01/26/2024] Open
Abstract
In well-established first-order conditioning experiments, the concurrence of a sensory cue with reinforcement forms an association, allowing the cue to predict future reinforcement. In the insect mushroom body, a brain region central to learning and memory, such associations are encoded in the synapses between its intrinsic and output neurons. This process is mediated by the activity of dopaminergic neurons that encode reinforcement signals. In second-order conditioning, a new sensory cue is paired with an already established one that presumably activates dopaminergic neurons due to its predictive power of the reinforcement. We explored minimal circuit motifs in the mushroom body for their ability to support second-order conditioning using mechanistic models. We found that dopaminergic neurons can either be activated directly by the mushroom body's intrinsic neurons or via feedback from the output neurons via several pathways. We demonstrated that the circuit motifs differ in their computational efficiency and robustness. Beyond previous research, we suggest an additional motif that relies on feedforward input of the mushroom body intrinsic neurons to dopaminergic neurons as a promising candidate for experimental evaluation. It differentiates well between trained and novel stimuli, demonstrating robust performance across a range of model parameters.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna-Maria Jürgensen
- Computational Systems Neuroscience, Institute of Zoology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Yamada D, Davidson AM, Hige T. Cyclic nucleotide-induced bidirectional long-term synaptic plasticity in Drosophila mushroom body. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2024:2023.09.28.560058. [PMID: 37808762 PMCID: PMC10557778 DOI: 10.1101/2023.09.28.560058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/10/2023]
Abstract
Activation of the cAMP pathway is one of the common mechanisms underlying long-term potentiation (LTP). In the Drosophila mushroom body, simultaneous activation of odor-coding Kenyon cells (KCs) and reinforcement-coding dopaminergic neurons activates adenylyl cyclase in KC presynaptic terminals, which is believed to trigger synaptic plasticity underlying olfactory associative learning. However, learning induces long-term depression (LTD) at these synapses, contradicting the universal role of cAMP as a facilitator of transmission. Here, we develop a system to electrophysiologically monitor both short-term and long-term synaptic plasticity at KC output synapses and demonstrate that they are indeed an exception where activation of the cAMP/protein kinase A pathway induces LTD. Contrary to the prevailing model, our cAMP imaging finds no evidence for synergistic action of dopamine and KC activity on cAMP synthesis. Furthermore, we find that forskolin-induced cAMP increase alone is insufficient for plasticity induction; it additionally requires simultaneous KC activation to replicate the presynaptic LTD induced by pairing with dopamine. On the other hand, activation of the cGMP pathway paired with KC activation induces slowly developing LTP, proving antagonistic actions of the two second-messenger pathways predicted by behavioral study. Finally, KC subtype-specific interrogation of synapses reveals that different KC subtypes exhibit distinct plasticity duration even among synapses on the same postsynaptic neuron. Thus, our work not only revises the role of cAMP in synaptic plasticity by uncovering the unexpected convergence point of the cAMP pathway and neuronal activity, but also establishes the methods to address physiological mechanisms of synaptic plasticity in this important model.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daichi Yamada
- Department of Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, United States
| | - Andrew M. Davidson
- Department of Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, United States
- Department of Cell Biology and Physiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, United States
- Integrative Program for Biological and Genome Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, United States
| | - Toshihide Hige
- Department of Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, United States
- Department of Cell Biology and Physiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, United States
- Integrative Program for Biological and Genome Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, United States
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Arican C, Schmitt FJ, Rössler W, Strube-Bloss MF, Nawrot MP. The mushroom body output encodes behavioral decision during sensory-motor transformation. Curr Biol 2023; 33:4217-4224.e4. [PMID: 37657449 DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2023.08.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2023] [Revised: 06/30/2023] [Accepted: 08/03/2023] [Indexed: 09/03/2023]
Abstract
Animals form a behavioral decision by evaluating sensory evidence on the background of past experiences and the momentary motivational state. In insects, we still lack understanding of how and at which stage of the recurrent sensory-motor pathway behavioral decisions are formed. The mushroom body (MB), a central brain structure in insects1 and crustaceans,2,3 integrates sensory input of different modalities4,5,6 with the internal state, the behavioral state, and external sensory context7,8,9,10 through a large number of recurrent, mostly neuromodulatory inputs,11,12 implicating a functional role for MBs in state-dependent sensory-motor transformation.13,14 A number of classical conditioning studies in honeybees15,16 and fruit flies17,18,19 have provided accumulated evidence that at its output, the MB encodes the valence of a sensory stimulus with respect to its behavioral relevance. Recent work has extended this notion of valence encoding to the context of innate behaviors.8,20,21,22 Here, we co-analyzed a defined feeding behavior and simultaneous extracellular single-unit recordings from MB output neurons (MBONs) in the cockroach in response to timed sensory stimulation with odors. We show that clear neuronal responses occurred almost exclusively during behaviorally responded trials. Early MBON responses to the sensory stimulus preceded the feeding behavior and predicted its occurrence or non-occurrence from the single-trial population activity. Our results therefore suggest that at its output, the MB does not merely encode sensory stimulus valence. We hypothesize instead that the MB output represents an integrated signal of internal state, momentary environmental conditions, and experience-dependent memory to encode a behavioral decision.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cansu Arican
- Computational Systems Neuroscience, Institute of Zoology, University of Cologne, Zülpicher Str. 47b, 50674 Cologne, Germany.
| | - Felix Johannes Schmitt
- Computational Systems Neuroscience, Institute of Zoology, University of Cologne, Zülpicher Str. 47b, 50674 Cologne, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Rössler
- Behavioral Physiology and Sociobiology (Zoology II), Biozentrum, University of Würzburg, Am Hubland, 97074 Würzburg, Germany
| | - Martin Fritz Strube-Bloss
- Department of Biological Cybernetics and Theoretical Biology, University of Bielefeld, Universitätsstr. 25, 33615 Bielefeld, Germany
| | - Martin Paul Nawrot
- Computational Systems Neuroscience, Institute of Zoology, University of Cologne, Zülpicher Str. 47b, 50674 Cologne, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Poppinga H, Çoban B, Meltzer H, Mayseless O, Widmann A, Schuldiner O, Fiala A. Pruning deficits of the developing Drosophila mushroom body result in mild impairment in associative odour learning and cause hyperactivity. Open Biol 2022; 12:220096. [PMID: 36128716 PMCID: PMC9490343 DOI: 10.1098/rsob.220096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
The principles of how brain circuits establish themselves during development are largely conserved across animal species. Connections made during embryonic development that are appropriate for an early life stage are frequently remodelled later in ontogeny via pruning and subsequent regrowth to generate adult-specific connectivity. The mushroom body of the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster is a well-established model circuit for examining the cellular mechanisms underlying neurite remodelling. This central brain circuit integrates sensory information with learned and innate valences to adaptively instruct behavioural decisions. Thereby, the mushroom body organizes adaptive behaviour, such as associative learning. However, little is known about the specific aspects of behaviour that require mushroom body remodelling. Here, we used genetic interventions to prevent the intrinsic neurons of the larval mushroom body (γ-type Kenyon cells) from remodelling. We asked to what degree remodelling deficits resulted in impaired behaviour. We found that deficits caused hyperactivity and mild impairment in differential aversive olfactory learning, but not appetitive learning. Maintenance of circadian rhythm and sleep were not affected. We conclude that neurite pruning and regrowth of γ-type Kenyon cells is not required for the establishment of circuits that mediate associative odour learning per se, but it does improve distinct learning tasks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haiko Poppinga
- Department of Molecular Neurobiology of Behaviour, University of Göttingen, Julia-Lermontowa-Weg 3, 37077 Göttingen, Germany
| | - Büşra Çoban
- Department of Molecular Neurobiology of Behaviour, University of Göttingen, Julia-Lermontowa-Weg 3, 37077 Göttingen, Germany
| | - Hagar Meltzer
- Departments for Molecular Cell Biology and Molecular Neuroscience, Weizmann Institute of Science, Ullmann Building of Life Sciences, Rehovot 7610001, Israel
| | - Oded Mayseless
- Departments for Molecular Cell Biology and Molecular Neuroscience, Weizmann Institute of Science, Ullmann Building of Life Sciences, Rehovot 7610001, Israel
| | - Annekathrin Widmann
- Department of Molecular Neurobiology of Behaviour, University of Göttingen, Julia-Lermontowa-Weg 3, 37077 Göttingen, Germany
| | - Oren Schuldiner
- Departments for Molecular Cell Biology and Molecular Neuroscience, Weizmann Institute of Science, Ullmann Building of Life Sciences, Rehovot 7610001, Israel
| | - André Fiala
- Department of Molecular Neurobiology of Behaviour, University of Göttingen, Julia-Lermontowa-Weg 3, 37077 Göttingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Pribbenow C, Chen YC, Heim MM, Laber D, Reubold S, Reynolds E, Balles I, Fernández-d V Alquicira T, Suárez-Grimalt R, Scheunemann L, Rauch C, Matkovic T, Rösner J, Lichtner G, Jagannathan SR, Owald D. Postsynaptic plasticity of cholinergic synapses underlies the induction and expression of appetitive and familiarity memories in Drosophila. eLife 2022; 11:80445. [PMID: 36250621 PMCID: PMC9733945 DOI: 10.7554/elife.80445] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2022] [Accepted: 10/17/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
In vertebrates, several forms of memory-relevant synaptic plasticity involve postsynaptic rearrangements of glutamate receptors. In contrast, previous work indicates that Drosophila and other invertebrates store memories using presynaptic plasticity of cholinergic synapses. Here, we provide evidence for postsynaptic plasticity at cholinergic output synapses from the Drosophila mushroom bodies (MBs). We find that the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) subunit α5 is required within specific MB output neurons for appetitive memory induction but is dispensable for aversive memories. In addition, nAChR α2 subunits mediate memory expression and likely function downstream of α5 and the postsynaptic scaffold protein discs large (Dlg). We show that postsynaptic plasticity traces can be induced independently of the presynapse, and that in vivo dynamics of α2 nAChR subunits are changed both in the context of associative and non-associative (familiarity) memory formation, underlying different plasticity rules. Therefore, regardless of neurotransmitter identity, key principles of postsynaptic plasticity support memory storage across phyla.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlotta Pribbenow
- Institute of Neurophysiology, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of HealthBerlinGermany
| | - Yi-chun Chen
- Institute of Neurophysiology, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of HealthBerlinGermany
| | - M-Marcel Heim
- Institute of Neurophysiology, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of HealthBerlinGermany
| | - Desiree Laber
- Institute of Neurophysiology, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of HealthBerlinGermany
| | - Silas Reubold
- Institute of Neurophysiology, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of HealthBerlinGermany
| | - Eric Reynolds
- Institute of Neurophysiology, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of HealthBerlinGermany
| | - Isabella Balles
- Institute of Neurophysiology, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of HealthBerlinGermany
| | - Tania Fernández-d V Alquicira
- Institute of Neurophysiology, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of HealthBerlinGermany
| | - Raquel Suárez-Grimalt
- Institute of Neurophysiology, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of HealthBerlinGermany,Einstein Center for Neurosciences BerlinBerlinGermany
| | - Lisa Scheunemann
- Institute of Neurophysiology, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of HealthBerlinGermany,NeuroCure, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of HealthBerlinGermany,Institut für Biologie, Freie Universität BerlinBerlinGermany
| | - Carolin Rauch
- Institute of Neurophysiology, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of HealthBerlinGermany
| | - Tanja Matkovic
- Institut für Biologie, Freie Universität BerlinBerlinGermany
| | - Jörg Rösner
- NWFZ, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of HealthGreifswaldGermany
| | - Gregor Lichtner
- Institute of Neurophysiology, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of HealthBerlinGermany,Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care, Emergency and Pain MedicineGreifswaldGermany
| | - Sridhar R Jagannathan
- Institute of Neurophysiology, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of HealthBerlinGermany
| | - David Owald
- Institute of Neurophysiology, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of HealthBerlinGermany,Einstein Center for Neurosciences BerlinBerlinGermany,NeuroCure, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of HealthBerlinGermany
| |
Collapse
|