Insights into the functional roles of alpha(1)-adrenoceptor subtypes in mouse carotid arteries using knockout mice

The pharmacology of α1-adrenoceptor subtypes

This review examines the functions of α₁-adrenoceptor subtypes, particularly in terms of contraction of smooth muscle. There are 3 subtypes of α₁-adrenoceptor, α_1A- α_1B- and α_1D-adrenoceptors. Evidence is presented that the postulated α_1L-adrenoceptor is simply the native α_1A-adrenoceptor at which prazosin has low potency. In most isolated tissue studies, smooth muscle contractions to exogenous agonists are mediated particularly by α_1A-, with a lesser role for α_1D-adrenoceptors, but α_1B-adrenoceptors are clearly involved in contractions of some tissues, for example, the spleen. However, nerve-evoked responses are the most crucial physiologically, so that these studies of exogenous agonists may overestimate the importance of α_1A-adrenoceptors. The major α₁-adrenoceptors involved in blood pressure control by sympathetic nerves are the α_1D- and the α_1A-adrenoceptors, mediating peripheral vasoconstrictor actions. As noradrenaline has high potency at α_1D-adrenceptors, these receptors mediate the fastest response and seem to be targets for neurally released noradrenaline especially to low frequency stimulation, with α_1A-adrenoceptors being more important at high frequencies of stimulation. This is true in rodent vas deferens and may be true in vasopressor nerves controlling peripheral resistance and tissue blood flow. The α_lA-adrenoceptor may act mainly through Ca²⁺ entry through L-type channels, whereas the α_1D-adrenoceptor may act mainly through T-type channels and exhaustable Ca²⁺ stores. α₁-Adrenoceptors may also act through non-G-protein linked second messenger systems. In many tissues, multiple subtypes of α-adrenoceptor are present, and this may be regarded as the norm rather than exception, although one receptor subtype is usually predominant.

G Protein-Coupled Receptor Multimers: A Question Still Open Despite the Use of Novel Approaches

Heteromerization of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) can significantly change the functional properties of involved receptors. Various biochemical and biophysical methodologies have been developed in the last two decades to identify and functionally evaluate GPCR heteromers in heterologous cells, with recent approaches focusing on GPCR complex stoichiometry and stability. Yet validation of these observations in native tissues is still lagging behind for the majority of GPCR heteromers. Remarkably, recent studies, particularly some involving advanced fluorescence microscopy techniques, are contributing to our current knowledge of aspects that were not well known until now, such as GPCR complex stoichiometry and stability. In parallel, a growing effort is being applied to move the field forward into native systems. This short review will highlight recent developments to study the stoichiometry and stability of GPCR complexes and methodologies to detect native GPCR dimers.

Localization of α-adrenoceptors: JR Vane Medal Lecture

This review is based on the JR Vane Medal Lecture presented at the BPS Winter Meeting in December 2011 by J.C. McGrath. A recording of the lecture is included as supporting information. It covers his laboratory's work from 1990 to 2010 on the localization of vascular α1 -adrenoceptors in native tissues, mainly arteries.

MAIN POINTS

(i) α1 -adrenoceptors are present on several cell types in arteries, not only on medial smooth muscle, but also on adventitial, endothelial and nerve cells; (ii) all three receptor subtypes (α1 A , α1 B , α1 D ) are capable of binding ligands at the cell surface, strongly indicating that they are capable of function and not merely expressed. (iii) all of these cell types can take up an antagonist ligand into the intracellular compartments to which endocytosing receptors move; (iv) each individual subtype can exist at the cell surface and intracellularly in the absence of the other subtypes. As functional pharmacological experiments show variations in the involvement of the different subtypes in contractions of different arteries, it is concluded that the presence and disposition of α1 -adrenoceptors in arteries is not a simple guide to their involvement in function. Similar locations of the subtypes, even in different cell types, suggest that differences between the distribution of subtypes in model systems do not directly correlate with those in native tissues. This review includes a historical summary of the alternative terms used for adrenoceptors (adrenergic receptors, adrenoreceptors) and the author's views on the use of colours to illustrate different items, given his partial colour-blindness.

Revisiting cAMP signaling in the carotid body

Chronic carotid body (CB) activation is now recognized as being essential in the development of hypertension and promoting insulin resistance; thus, it is imperative to characterize the chemotransduction mechanisms of this organ in order to modulate its activity and improve patient outcomes. For several years, and although controversial, cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) was considered an important player in initiating the activation of the CB. However, its relevance was partially displaced in the 90s by the emerging role of the mitochondria and molecules such as AMP-activated protein kinase and O₂-sensitive K⁺ channels. Neurotransmitters/neuromodulators binding to metabotropic receptors are essential to chemotransmission in the CB, and cAMP is central to this process. cAMP also contributes to raise intracellular Ca²⁺ levels, and is intimately related to the cellular energetic status (AMP/ATP ratio). Furthermore, cAMP signaling is a target of multiple current pharmacological agents used in clinical practice. This review (1) provides an outline on the classical view of the cAMP-signaling pathway in the CB that originally supported its role in the O₂/CO₂ sensing mechanism, (2) presents recent evidence on CB cAMP neuromodulation and (3) discusses how CB activity is affected by current clinical therapies that modify cAMP-signaling, namely dopaminergic drugs, caffeine (modulation of A_2A/A_2B receptors) and roflumilast (PDE4 inhibitors). cAMP is key to any process that involves metabotropic receptors and the intracellular pathways involved in CB disease states are likely to involve this classical second messenger. Research examining the potential modification of cAMP levels and/or interactions with molecules associated with CB hyperactivity is currently in its beginning and this review will open doors for future explorations.

α1D-Adrenoceptors are responsible for the high sensitivity and the slow time-course of noradrenaline-mediated contraction in conductance arteries

The objective of this study was to determine whether the different time-course characteristics of α₁-adrenoceptor-mediated contraction in arteries can be related to the subtypes involved. Contractile responses to noradrenaline (NA) were compared with inositol phosphate accumulation and extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK)1/2 phosphorylation after α₁-agonist stimuli in the same vessels in the presence or absence of α₁-antagonists in rat or in α₁-subtype knockout (KO) mice. Aorta, where α_1D-AR is the main functional subtype, had higher sensitivity to NA (in respect of inositol phosphate [IP], pERK1/2, and contractile response) than tail artery, where the α_1A-adrenoceptor subtype is predominant. Furthermore, the contraction in aorta exhibited a slower decay after agonist removal and this was consistent in all strains harboring α_1D-adrenoceptors (from rat, α_1B-KO, and wild-type [WT] mice) but was not observed in the absence of the α_1D-adrenoceptor signal (α_1D-adrenoceptor blocked rat aorta or aorta from α_1D-KO). IP formation paralleled α₁-adrenoceptor-mediated contraction (agonist present or postagonist) in aorta and tail artery. High sensitivity to agonist and persistence of response after agonist removal is a property of α_1D-adrenoceptors. Therefore, the preponderance of this subtype in noninnervated conductance arteries such as aorta allows responsiveness to circulating catecholamines and prevents abrupt changes in vessel caliber when the stimulus fluctuates. Conversely, in innervated distributing arteries, high local concentrations of NA are required to activate α_1A-adrenoceptors for a response that is rapid but short lived allowing fine adjustment of the contractile tone by perivascular sympathetic nerves.

Cross-talk with β2 -adrenoceptors enhances ligand affinity properties from endothelial alpha1 D -adrenoceptors that mediates carotid relaxation

OBJECTIVES

Our main objectives were to investigate the affinity properties of endothelial and muscular α1D -adrenoceptors and to characterize the cross-talk between endothelial α1D -adrenoceptors and β2 -adrenoceptors in rat carotid.

METHODS

Relaxation and contraction concentration-response curves for phenylephrine (α1 -adrenergic agonist) were obtained in carotid rings in absence or presence of increasing concentrations of BMY7378 (α1D -adrenergic antagonist), combined or not with increasing concentration of ICI-118,551 (β2 -adrenergic antagonist). Schild analysis was used to estimate the affinity constant from pA2 values of BMY7378.

KEY FINDINGS

BMY7378 produced an unsurmountable antagonism on phenylephrine-induced relaxation but a surmountable antagonism on phenylephrine-induced contraction. BMY7378 potency was higher in inhibiting the relaxation than the contraction induced by phenylephrine because the rightward shifts induced by BMY7378 were greater in the relaxation. The apparent pA2 value for BMY7378 in phenylephrine-induced relaxation was greater than in contraction. When combined with ICI-118,551, BMY7378 yielded a surmountable antagonism on phenylephrine-induced relaxation and presented a pA2 value similar to that obtained in phenylephrine-induced contraction.

CONCLUSIONS

Endothelial α1D -adrenoceptors, which mediates rat carotid relaxation, present high ligand affinity because of the cross-talk with β2 -adrenoceptors, which explains the higher potency of phenylephrine in inducing relaxation than contraction and the atypical unsurmountable antagonism produced by BMY7378 on phenylephrine-induced relaxation.

Heteromerization of G protein-coupled receptors: relevance to neurological disorders and neurotherapeutics

Because G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are numerous, widely expressed and involved in major physiological responses, they represent a relevant therapeutic target for drug discovery, particularly regarding pharmacological treatments of neurological disorders. Among the biological phenomena regulating receptor function, GPCR heteromerization is an important emerging area of interest and investigation. There is increasing evidence showing that heteromerization contributes to the pharmacological heterogeneity of GPCRs by modulating receptor ontogeny, activation and recycling. Although in many cases the physiological relevance of receptor heteromerization has not been fully established, the unique pharmacological and functional properties of heteromers are likely to lead to new strategies in clinical medicine. This review describes the main GPCR heteromers and their implications for major neurological disorders such as Parkinson's disease, schizophrenia and addiction. A better understanding of molecular mechanisms underlying drug interactions related to the targeting of receptor heteromers could provide more specific and efficient therapeutic agents for the treatment of brain diseases.

Interaction between alpha(1)- and alpha(2)-adrenoreceptors contributes to enhanced constrictor effects of norepinephrine in mesenteric veins compared to arteries

Mesenteric veins are more sensitive than arteries to the constrictor effects of sympathetic nerve stimulation and alpha-adrenoceptor agonists. We tested the hypothesis that alpha(1)- and alpha(2)-adrenoceptors interact to enhance adrenergic reactivity of mesenteric veins. We studied neurogenic and agonist-induced constrictions of mesenteric veins and arteries in vitro. Norepinephrine concentration-response curves were left-shifted in veins compared to arteries. UK 14,304 (0.01-1 microM, alpha(2)-adrenoceptor receptor agonist) did not constrict arteries or veins but enhanced constrictions and Ca(2+) signals mediated by alpha(1)-adrenoceptor stimulation in veins. Yohimbine (alpha(2)-adrenoceptor receptor antagonist) and MK912 (alpha(2C)-adrenoceptor receptor antagonist), but not alpha(2A)- or alpha(2B)-adrenoceptor antagonists, produced rightward shifts in norepinephrine concentration-response curves in veins. Pharmacological studies revealed that alpha(1D)-adrenoceptors mediate venous constrictions. Norepinephrine responses in veins from alpha(2C)-adrenoceptor knock-out (KO) mice were not different from wild type veins. Yohimbine inhibited norepinephrine constrictions in alpha(2C)-adrenoceptor KO veins suggesting that there is upregulation of other alpha(2)-adrenoceptors in alpha(2C)-KO mice. These data indicate that alpha(1D)- and alpha(2C)-adrenoceptors interact in veins but not in arteries. This interaction enhances venous adrenergic reactivity. Mesenteric vein-specific alpha(2)-adrenoceptor linked Ca(2+) and perhaps other signaling pathways account for enhanced venous adrenergic reactivity.

Alpha1A/B-knockout mice explain the native alpha1D-adrenoceptor's role in vasoconstriction and show that its location is independent of the other alpha1-subtypes

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Theoretically, three alpha(1)-adrenoceptor subtypes can interact at the signalling level to alter vascular contraction or at the molecular level to alter each other's cellular location. The alpha(1A/B)-adrenoceptor knockout mouse (alpha(1A/B)-KO) was used to study the isolated alpha(1D)-adrenoceptor to consider these potential interactions in native tissue.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

Pharmacological analysis of carotid and mesenteric arteries employed wire myography and fluorescent ligand binding (alpha(1)-adrenoceptor ligand BODIPY FL-prazosin, QAPB).

KEY RESULTS

alpha(1A/B)-KO carotid had clear alpha(1D)-adrenoceptor-induced contractions. In WT carotid alpha(1D)-adrenoceptor dominated but all three alpha(1)-subtypes participated. alpha(1A/B)-KO mesenteric had alpha(1D)-adrenoceptor responses with high sensitivity and small maximum, explaining how alpha(1D)-adrenoceptor could determine agonist sensitivity in WT. In both arteries alpha(1A/B)-KO fluorescence levels were reduced but pharmacologically more consistent with 'pure'alpha(1D)-adrenoceptors. alpha(1D)-Adrenoceptor binding in alpha(1A/B)-KO was observed on the cell surface and intracellularly and was present in a high proportion of smooth-muscle cells in both strains, regardless of artery type.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

'Pure'alpha(1D)-adrenoceptor pharmacology in alpha(1A/B)-KO provides a quantitative standard. Functionally, the alpha(1D)- and alpha(1A)-adrenoceptors produce additive responses and do not significantly compensate for each other. alpha(1D)-Adrenoceptor contributes to sensitivity even in resistance arteries. In alpha(1A/B)-KO, the loss of alpha(1A)- and alpha(1B)-adrenoceptors is reflected by a general decrease in fluorescence, but similar binding distribution to WT indicates that the alpha(1D)-adrenoceptor location in native smooth-muscle cells is not influenced by other alpha(1)-adrenoceptors. Equivalent levels of receptors did not correspond to equivalent responses. In conclusion, alpha(1)-subtypes do not interact but provide independent alternative signals for vascular regulation.

Subtypes of functional alpha1-adrenoceptor

In this review, subtypes of functional alpha1-adrenoceptor are discussed. These are cell membrane receptors, belonging to the seven-transmembrane-spanning G-protein-linked family of receptors, which respond to the physiological agonist noradrenaline. alpha1-Adrenoceptors can be divided into alpha1A-, alpha1B- and alpha1D-adrenoceptors, all of which mediate contractile responses involving Gq/11 and inositol phosphate turnover. A fourth alpha1-adrenoceptor, the alpha1L-, represents a functional phenotype of the alpha1A-adrenoceptor. alpha1-Adrenoceptor subtype knock-out mice have refined our knowledge of the functions of alpha-adrenoceptor subtypes, particuarly as subtype-selective agonists and antagonists are not available for all subtypes. alpha1-Adrenoceptors function as stimulatory receptors involved particularly in smooth muscle contraction, especially contraction of vascular smooth muscle, both in local vasoconstriction and in the control of blood pressure and temperature, and contraction of the prostate and bladder neck. Central actions are now being elucidated.

The alpha 1B/D-adrenoceptor knockout mouse permits isolation of the vascular alpha 1A-adrenoceptor and elucidates its relationship to the other subtypes

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Mesenteric and carotid arteries from the alpha(1B/D)-adrenoceptor knockout (alpha(1B/D)-KO) were employed to isolate alpha(1A)-adrenoceptor pharmacology and location and to reveal these features in the wild-type (WT) mouse.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

Functional pharmacology by wire myography and receptor localization by confocal microscopy, using the fluorescent alpha(1)-adrenoceptor ligand BODIPY FL-Prazosin (QAPB), on mesenteric (an 'alpha(1A)-adrenoceptor' tissue) and carotid (an 'alpha(1D)-adrenoceptor' tissue) arteries.

KEY RESULTS

Alpha(1B/D)-KO mesenteric arteries showed straightforward alpha(1A)-adrenoceptor agonist/antagonist pharmacology. WT had complex pharmacology with alpha(1A)- and alpha(1D)-adrenoceptor components. alpha(1B/D)-KO had a larger alpha(1A)-adrenoceptor response suggesting compensatory up-regulation: no increase in fluorescent ligand binding suggests up-regulation of signalling. alpha(1B/D)-KO carotid arteries had low efficacy alpha(1A)-adrenoceptor responses. WT had complex pharmacology consistent with co-activation of all three subtypes. Fluorescent binding had straightforward alpha(1A)-adrenoceptor characteristics in both arteries of alpha(1B/D)-KO. Fluorescent binding varied between cells in relative intracellular and surface distribution. Total fluorescence was reduced in the alpha(1B/D)-KO due to fewer smooth muscle cells showing fluorescent binding. WT binding was greater and sensitive to alpha(1A)- and alpha(1D)-adrenoceptor antagonists.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

The straightforward pharmacology and fluorescent binding in the alpha(1B/D)-KO was used to interpret the properties of the alpha(1A)-adrenoceptor in the WT. Reduced total fluorescence in alpha(1B/D)-KO arteries, despite a clear difference in the functionally dominant subtype, indicates that measurement of receptor protein is unlikely to correlate with function. Fewer cells bound QAPB in the alpha(1B/D)-KO suggesting different cellular phenotypes of alpha(1A)-adrenoceptor exist. The alpha(1B/D)-KO provides robust assays for the alpha(1A)-adrenoceptor and takes us closer to understanding multi-receptor subtype interactions.

Brain receptor mosaics and their intramembrane receptor-receptor interactions: molecular integration in transmission and novel targets for drug development

The concept of intramembrane receptor-receptor interactions and evidence for their existence was introduced by Agnati and Fuxe in 1980/81 suggesting the existence of heteromerization of receptors. In 1982, they proposed the existence of aggregates of multiple receptors in the plasma membrane and coined the term receptor mosaics (RM). In this way, cell signaling becomes a branched process beginning at the level of receptor recognition at the plasma membrane where receptors can directly modify the ligand recognition and signaling capacity of the receptors within a RM. Receptor-receptor interactions in RM are classified as operating either with classical cooperativity, when consisting of homomers or heteromers of similar receptor subtypes having the same transmitter, or non-classical cooperativity, when consisting of heteromers. It has been shown that information processing within a RM depends not only on its receptor composition, but also on the topology and the order of receptor activation determined by the concentrations of the ligands and the receptor properties. The general function of RM has also been demonstrated to depend on allosteric regulators (e.g., homocysteine) of the receptor subtypes present. RM as integrative nodes for receptor-receptor interactions in conjunction with membrane associated proteins may form horizontal molecular networks in the plasma membrane coordinating the activity of multiple effector systems modulating the excitability and gene expression of the cells. The key role of electrostatic epitope-epitope interactions will be discussed for the formation of the RM. These interactions probably represent a general molecular mechanism for receptor-receptor interactions and, without a doubt, indicate a role for phosphorylation-dephosphorylation events in these interactions. The novel therapeutic aspects given by the RMs will be discussed in the frame of molecular neurology and psychiatry and combined drug therapy appears as the future way to go.

α1-Adrenoceptor-dependent vascular hypertrophy and remodeling in murine hypoxic pulmonary hypertension

Excessive proliferation of vascular wall cells underlies the development of elevated vascular resistance in hypoxic pulmonary hypertension (PH), but the responsible mechanisms remain unclear. Growth-promoting effects of catecholamines may contribute. Hypoxemia causes sympathoexcitation, and prolonged stimulation of α1-adrenoceptors (α1-ARs) induces hypertrophy and hyperplasia of arterial smooth muscle cells and adventitial fibroblasts. Catecholamine trophic actions in arteries are enhanced when other conditions favoring growth or remodeling are present, e.g., injury or altered shear stress, in isolated pulmonary arteries from rats with hypoxic PH. The present study examined the hypothesis that catecholamines contribute to pulmonary vascular remodeling in vivo in hypoxic PH. Mice genetically deficient in norepinephrine and epinephrine production [dopamine β-hydroxylase−/− (DBH−/−)] or α1-ARs were examined for alterations in PH, cardiac hypertrophy, and vascular remodeling after 21 days exposure to normobaric 0.1 inspired oxygen fraction (FiO2). A decrease in the lumen area and an increase in the wall thickness of arteries were strongly inhibited in knockout mice (order of extent of inhibition: DBH−/− = α1D-AR−/− > α1B-AR−/−). Distal muscularization of small arterioles was also reduced (DBH−/− > α1D-AR−/− > α1B-AR−/− mice). Despite these reductions, increases in right ventricular pressure and hypertrophy were not attenuated in DBH−/− and α1B-AR−/− mice. However, hematocrit increased more in these mice, possibly as a consequence of impaired cardiovascular activation that occurs during reduction of FiO2. In contrast, in α1D-AR−/− mice, where hematocrit increased the same as in wild-type mice, right ventricular pressure was reduced. These data suggest that catecholamine stimulation of α1B- and α1D-ARs contributes significantly to vascular remodeling in hypoxic PH.

International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology. LXVII. Recommendations for the Recognition and Nomenclature of G Protein-Coupled Receptor Heteromultimers

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) have long been considered to be monomeric membrane proteins. Although numerous recent studies have indicated that GPCRs can form multimeric complexes, the functional and pharmacological consequences of this phenomenon have remained elusive. With the discovery that the functional GABA(B) receptor is an obligate heterodimer and with the use of energy transfer technologies, it is now accepted that GPCRs can form heteromultimers. In some cases, specific properties of such heteromers not shared by their respective homomers have been reported. Although in most cases these properties have only been observed in heterologous expression systems, there are a few reports describing data consistent with such heteromultimeric GPCR complexes also existing in native tissues. The present article illustrates well-documented examples of such native multimeric complexes, lists a number of recommendations for recognition and acceptance of such multimeric receptors, and gives recommendations for their nomenclature.

Alpha(1A)-adrenoceptors mediate contractions to phenylephrine in rabbit penile arteries

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Maintained penile erection depends on the absence of alpha-adrenoceptor (alpha-AR) activation and so can be facilitated by alpha-blockers. This study seeks the alpha(1)-AR subtypes involved in order to inform the pro-erectile consequences of subtype selective blockade.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

Wire myography was used with dorsal (nutritional supply) and cavernous (erectile inflow) penile arteries; standard alpha-AR-selective agonists and antagonists were employed to classify responses.

KEY RESULTS

In both penile arteries noradrenaline (NA) and phenylephrine (PE, alpha(1)-AR agonist) caused concentration-dependent contractions. Sensitivity to NA was increased by NA uptake blockers, cocaine (3 microM) and corticosterone (30 microM). PE responses were antagonised by phentolamine (non-selective alpha-AR: dorsal pK(B) 8.00, cavernous 8.33), prazosin (non-subtype-selective alpha(1)-AR: dorsal 8.60, cavernous 8.41) and RS100329 (alpha(1A)-AR selective: dorsal 9.03, cavernous 8.80) but not by BMY7378 (alpha(1D)-AR selective: no effect at 1-100 nM) or Rec15/2615 (alpha(1B)-AR selective: no effect at 1-100 nM). Schild analysis was straightforward in cavernous artery, indicating that PE activates only alpha(1A)-AR. In dorsal artery Schild slopes were low, though alpha(1A)-AR was still indicated. Analysis using UK 14,304 and rauwolscine indicated an alpha(2)-AR component in dorsal artery that may account for low slopes to alpha(1)-AR antagonists.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Penile arteries have a predominant, functional alpha(1A)-AR population with little evidence of other alpha(1)-AR subtypes. Dorsal arteries (nutritional supply) also have alpha(2)-ARs. Thus, alpha-AR blockers with affinity for alpha(1A)-AR or alpha(2)-AR would potentially have pro-erectile properties; the combination of these perhaps being most effective. This should inform the design of drugs to assist/avoid penile erection.

Carvedilol-induced antagonism of angiotensin II: a matter of alpha1-adrenoceptor blockade

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether renin-angiotensin system blockade might underlie the favorable metabolic effects of the nonselective beta + alpha1-adrenoceptor blocker carvedilol as compared with the selective beta1-adrenoceptor blocker metoprolol.

METHODS

Human coronary microarteries (HCMAs), obtained from 32 heart valve donors, were mounted in myographs.

RESULTS

Angiotensin II and the alpha1-adrenoceptor agonist phenylephrine constricted HCMAs to maximally 63 +/- 10 and 46 +/- 15% of the contraction to 100 mmol/l K. Neither carvedilol, metoprolol, the nonselective beta-adrenoceptor antagonist propranolol, nor the alpha1-adrenoceptor antagonist prazosin affected the constrictor response to angiotensin II. alpha1-adrenoreceptors and beta-adrenoceptors are thus not involved in the direct constrictor effects of angiotensin II. When added to the organ bath at a subthreshold concentration, angiotensin II greatly amplified the response to phenylephrine. Both carvedilol and the angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptor antagonist irbesartan inhibited this angiotensin II-induced potentiation. Furthermore, carvedilol blocked the angiotensin II-induced amplification of phenylephrine-induced inositol phosphate accumulation in cardiomyocytes.

CONCLUSIONS

AT1-alpha1-receptor crosstalk, involving inositol phosphates, sensitizes HCMAs to alpha1-adrenoceptor agonists. Our results suggest that, in the presence of an increased sympathetic tone, carvedilol provides AT1 receptor blockade via its alpha1-adrenoceptor blocking effects. This could explain the favorable effects of carvedilol versus metoprolol.

The alpha(1D)-adrenergic receptor: cinderella or ugly stepsister

This Perspective focuses on the alpha(1D)-adrenergic receptor (AR), the often neglected sibling of the alpha(1)-AR family. This neglect is due in part to its poor cell-surface expression. However, it has recently been shown that dimerization of the alpha(1D)-AR with either the alpha(1B)-AR or the beta(2)-AR increases alpha(1D)-AR cell-surface expression, and in this issue of Molecular Pharmacology, Hague et al. (p. 45) demonstrate that dimerization of the alpha(1D)-AR with the alpha(1B)-AR not only leads to increased cell-surface expression but also results in the formation of a novel functional entity.

Heterodimers of alpha1B- and alpha1D-adrenergic receptors form a single functional entity

Heterologous expression of alpha(1D)-adrenergic receptors (alpha(1D)-ARs) in most cell types results in intracellular retention and little or no functionality. We showed previously that heterodimerization with alpha(1B)-ARs promotes surface localization of alpha(1D)-ARs. Here, we report that the alpha(1B)-/alpha(1D)-AR interaction has significant effects on the pharmacology and signaling of the receptors, in addition to the effects on trafficking described previously. Upon coexpression of alpha(1B)-ARs and epitope-tagged alpha(1D)-ARs in both human embryonic kidney 293 and DDT(1)MF-2 cells, alpha(1D)-AR binding sites were not detectable with the alpha(1D)-AR selective antagonist 8-[2-(4-(2-methoxyphenyl)piperazin-1-yl)ethyl]-8-azaspiro[4,5]decane-7,9-dione (BMY 7378), despite the ability to detect alpha(1D)-AR protein using confocal microscopy, immunoprecipitation, and a luminometer cell-surface assay. However, the alpha(1B)-AR-selective mutant F18A conotoxin showed a striking biphasic inhibition in alpha(1B)/alpha(1D)-AR-expressing cells, revealing that alpha(1D)-ARs were expressed but did not bind BMY 7378 with high affinity. Studies of norepinephrine-stimulated inositol phosphate formation showed that maximal responses were greatest in alpha(1B)/alpha(1D)-AR-coexpressing cells. Stable coexpression of an uncoupled mutant alpha(1B)-AR (Delta12) with alpha(1D)-ARs resulted in increased responses to norepinephrine. However, Schild plots for inhibition of norepinephrine-stimulated inositol phosphate formation showed a single low-affinity site for BMY 7378. Thus, our findings suggest that alpha(1B)/alpha(1D)-AR heterodimers form a single functional entity with enhanced functional activity relative to either subtype alone and a novel pharmacological profile. These data may help to explain why alpha(1D)-ARs are often pharmacologically undetectable in native tissues when they are coexpressed with alpha(1B)-ARs.