1
|
Rahn AC, Peper J, Köpke S, Antony G, Liethmann K, Vettorazzi E, Heesen C. Nurse-led immunotreatment DEcision Coaching In people with Multiple Sclerosis (DECIMS) - A cluster- randomised controlled trial and mixed methods process evaluation. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2024; 125:108293. [PMID: 38728999 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2024.108293] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2023] [Revised: 04/11/2024] [Accepted: 04/17/2024] [Indexed: 05/12/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate a nurse-led decision coaching programme aiming to redistribute health professionals' tasks to support immunotherapy decision-making in people with multiple sclerosis (MS). METHODS Cluster-randomised controlled trial with an accompanying mixed methods process evaluation (2014 - 2018). We planned to recruit 300 people with clinically isolated syndrome or relapsing-remitting MS facing immunotherapy decisions in 15 clusters across Germany. Participants in the intervention clusters received up to three decision coaching sessions by a trained nurse and access to an evidence-based online information platform. In the control clusters, participants also had access to the information platform. The primary outcome was informed choice after six months, defined as good risk knowledge and congruent attitude and uptake. RESULTS Twelve nurses from eight clusters participated in the decision coaching training. Due to insufficient recruitment, the randomised controlled trial was terminated prematurely with 125 participants (n = 42 intervention clusters, n = 83 control clusters). We found a non-significant difference between groups for informed choice favouring decision coaching: odds ratio 1.64 (95% CI 0.49-5.53). CONCLUSIONS Results indicate that decision coaching might facilitate informed decision-making in MS compared to providing patient information alone. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Barriers have to be overcome to achieve structural change and successful implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A C Rahn
- Nursing Research Unit, Institute of Social Medicine and Epidemiology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
| | - J Peper
- Nursing Research Unit, Institute of Social Medicine and Epidemiology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - S Köpke
- Institute of Nursing Science, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - G Antony
- Central Information Office Marburg, Fronhausen-Bellnhausen, Germany
| | - K Liethmann
- University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Department of Radiation Oncology, Kiel, Germany; University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Center for integrative Psychiatry ZiP gGmbH, Psychooncology, Kiel, Germany
| | - E Vettorazzi
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - C Heesen
- Institute of Neuroimmunology and Multiple Sclerosis, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zhuang Z, Zeng L. Reflecting on ICU patient's dignity using Taylor's Emancipatory Reflection Model. Nurs Ethics 2024; 31:777-790. [PMID: 37793894 DOI: 10.1177/09697330231202229] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/06/2023]
Abstract
Intensive Care Unit (ICU) patients not only require life-sustaining treatments but also the preservation of their psychological well-being and dignity, and ICU nurses face heavy work pressure, focusing more on life-sustaining treatments for patients, while the patient's psychological experiences are often overlooked. This article aims to explore the issue of nurse-led patient dignity preservation in the ICU from China. Reflection is a process of deep thinking and examining one's actions, experiences, perspectives, or emotions. It involves retrospectively reviewing, analyzing, and evaluating past events to gain insights, understanding, and personal growth. Through reflection, individuals can consider whether their actions align with their values and goals and whether they can learn valuable lessons from them. This article discusses the preservation of patient dignity in the ICU from China based on Taylor's Emancipatory Reflection Model, which involves four steps: constructing, deconstructing, confronting, and reconstructing. The process of reflection incorporates theories such as Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs, Comfort Theory, and the style of Paternalistic Decision-making. This study is of great significance in enhancing Chinese nurse's attention to patient dignity, improving the inpatient experience of ICU patients, and enhancing the quality of nursing practice by critically examining current nursing practices in China and providing improvement recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Li Zeng
- Shenzhen Qianhai Shekou Free Trade Zone Hospital
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Collart C, Craighead C, Yao M, Chien EK, Rose S, Frankel RM, Coleridge M, Hu B, Edmonds BT, Ranzini AC, Farrell RM. Identifying Strategies to Improve Shared Decision Making for Pregnant Patients' Decisions about Prenatal Genetic Screens and Diagnostic Tests. Med Decis Making 2024; 44:689-704. [PMID: 39082665 DOI: 10.1177/0272989x241259016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/27/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Prenatal genetic screens and diagnostic tests are vital components of prenatal care. The first prenatal visit is a critical time in the decision-making process when patients decide whether to use these tests in addition to address a series of other essential prenatal care aspects. We conducted this study to examine the role of a shared decision-making (SDM) instrument to support these discussions. METHODS We conducted a cluster randomized controlled trial of patients allocated to an SDM tool or usual care at their first prenatal visit. Participants completed a baseline survey to measure decision-making needs and preferences. Direct observation was conducted and analyzed using the OPTION scale to measure SDM during prenatal genetic testing discussions. RESULTS Levels of SDM were similar across groups (P = 0.081). The highest levels of SDM were observed during screening test discussions (NEST 2.4 ± 0.9 v. control 2.6 ± 1.0). Lowest levels were observed in discussions about patients' preference for risk versus diagnostic information (NEST 1.0 ± 1.1 v. control 1.2 ± 1.3). CONCLUSION Study findings demonstrate the need for targeted patient-focused and provider-focused efforts to improve SDM to enhance patients' informed decision making about these options. Importantly, patients' baseline knowledge and attitudes need to be considered given that patients with less knowledge may need more carefully crafted communication. HIGHLIGHTS Choices about whether, when, and how to use prenatal genetic tests are highly preference-based decisions, with patients' baseline attitudes about these options as a major driver in health care discussions.The decision-making process is also shaped by patient preferences regarding a shared or informed decision-making process for medical decisions that are highly personal and have significant ramifications for obstetric outcomes.There is a need to develop targeted efforts to improve decision making and enhance patients' ability to make informed decisions about prenatal genetic tests in early pregnancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina Collart
- Obstetrics & Gynecology Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Caitlin Craighead
- Obstetrics & Gynecology Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Meng Yao
- Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Edward K Chien
- Obstetrics & Gynecology Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Susannah Rose
- Experience Safety, Quality and Patient Experience, Clinical Transformation, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | - Marissa Coleridge
- Obstetrics & Gynecology Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Genomic Medicine Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland OH, USA
| | - Bo Hu
- Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | - Angela C Ranzini
- Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The MetroHealth System, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Ruth M Farrell
- Obstetrics & Gynecology Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Genomic Medicine Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland OH, USA
- Center for Bioethics, Clinical Transformation, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Thielmann RR, Hoving C, Cals JW, Crutzen R. Patient online access to medical records in general practice: Perceived effects after one year follow-up. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2024; 125:108309. [PMID: 38705022 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2024.108309] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2023] [Revised: 03/29/2024] [Accepted: 04/29/2024] [Indexed: 05/07/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Online access to medical records is expected to foster patient empowerment and patient-centred healthcare. However, data on actual experienced effects remain limited. We aimed to examine the development of effects patients perceive from online access. METHODS A nationwide online survey (N = 1769) evaluated Dutch patients' use of online access and beliefs about its effects on 16 outcomes at baseline and one-year follow-up. Analyses of Variance (ANOVA) were used to examine within-person belief changes across three user groups: patients who 1) used online access before the study, 2) started use during the study, and 3) did not use it at all. RESULTS There was a small decline in five beliefs around online access facilitating patient empowerment and participation in participants who started using online access during the study compared to at least one other user group. Most changes in beliefs did not differ between groups. CONCLUSION No evidence of benefits from online access was found. The findings might indicate inadequacies in the current system of online access. Possibly, the benefits of online access are contingent upon portal improvements and changes in documentation practices. PRACTICE IMPLICATION Records need to be easily accessible and comprehensible for patients. Consultation practices should enable patient participation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ciska Hoving
- Department of Health Promotion, Maastricht University, the Netherlands
| | - Jochen Wl Cals
- Department of Family Medicine, Maastricht University, the Netherlands
| | - Rik Crutzen
- Department of Health Promotion, Maastricht University, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sandhu S, Hickey M, Koye DN, Braat S, Lew R, Hart R, Norman RJ, Hammarberg K, Anderson RA, Peate M. Eggsurance? A randomized controlled trial of a decision aid for elective egg freezing. Hum Reprod 2024; 39:1724-1734. [PMID: 38876980 PMCID: PMC11291942 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deae121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2023] [Revised: 05/10/2024] [Indexed: 06/16/2024] Open
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION Does a purpose-designed Decision Aid for women considering elective egg freezing (EEF) impact decisional conflict and other decision-related outcomes? SUMMARY ANSWER The Decision Aid reduces decisional conflict, prepares women for decision-making, and does not cause distress. WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN Elective egg-freezing decisions are complex, with 78% of women reporting high decisional conflict. Decision Aids are used to support complex health decisions. We developed an online Decision Aid for women considering EEF and demonstrated that it was acceptable and useful in Phase 1 testing. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION A single-blind, two-arm parallel group randomized controlled trial was carried out. Target sample size was 286 participants. Randomization was 1:1 to the control (existing website information) or intervention (Decision Aid plus existing website information) group and stratified by Australian state/territory and prior IVF specialist consultation. Participants were recruited between September 2020 and March 2021 with outcomes recorded over 12 months. Data were collected using online surveys and data collection was completed in March 2022. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS Females aged ≥18 years, living in Australia, considering EEF, proficient in English, and with internet access were recruited using multiple methods including social media posts, Google advertising, newsletter/noticeboard posts, and fertility clinic promotion. After completing the baseline survey, participants were emailed their allocated website link(s). Follow-up surveys were sent at 6 and 12 months. Primary outcome was decisional conflict (Decisional Conflict Scale). Other outcomes included distress (Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale), knowledge about egg freezing and female age-related infertility (study-specific measure), whether a decision was made, preparedness to decide about egg freezing (Preparation for Decision-Making Scale), informed choice (Multi-Dimensional Measure of Informed Choice), and decision regret (Decision Regret Scale). MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE Overall, 306 participants (mean age 30 years; SD: 5.2) were randomized (intervention n = 150, control n = 156). Decisional Conflict Scale scores were significantly lower at 12 months (mean score difference: -6.99 [95% CI: -12.96, -1.02], P = 0.022) for the intervention versus control group after adjusting for baseline decisional conflict. At 6 months, the intervention group felt significantly more prepared to decide about EEF than the control (mean score difference: 9.22 [95% CI: 2.35, 16.08], P = 0.009). At 12 months, no group differences were observed in distress (mean score difference: 0.61 [95% CI: -3.72, 4.93], P = 0.783), knowledge (mean score difference: 0.23 [95% CI: -0.21, 0.66], P = 0.309), or whether a decision was made (relative risk: 1.21 [95% CI: 0.90, 1.64], P = 0.212). No group differences were found in informed choice (relative risk: 1.00 [95% CI: 0.81, 1.25], P = 0.983) or decision regret (median score difference: -5.00 [95% CI: -15.30, 5.30], P = 0.337) amongst participants who had decided about EEF by 12 months (intervention n = 48, control n = 45). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION Unknown participant uptake and potential sampling bias due to the recruitment methods used and restrictions caused by the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Some outcomes had small sample sizes limiting the inferences made. The use of study-specific or adapted validated measures may impact the reliability of some results. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS This is the first randomized controlled trial to evaluate a Decision Aid for EEF. The Decision Aid reduced decisional conflict and improved women's preparation for decision making. The tool will be made publicly available and can be tailored for international use. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) The Decision Aid was developed with funding from the Royal Women's Hospital Foundation and McBain Family Trust. The study was funded by a National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Project Grant APP1163202, awarded to M. Hickey, M. Peate, R.J. Norman, and R. Hart (2019-2021). S.S., M.P., D.K., and S.B. were supported by the NHMRC Project Grant APP1163202 to perform this work. R.H. is Medical Director of Fertility Specialists of Western Australia and National Medical Director of City Fertility. He has received grants from MSD, Merck-Serono, and Ferring Pharmaceuticals unrelated to this study and is a shareholder of CHA-SMG. R.L. is Director of Women's Health Melbourne (Medical Practice), ANZSREI Executive Secretary (Honorary), RANZCOG CREI Subspecialty Committee Member (Honorary), and a Fertility Specialist at Life Fertility Clinic Melbourne and Royal Women's Hospital Public Fertility Service. R.A.A. has received grants from Ferring Pharmaceuticals unrelated to this study. M.H., K.H., and R.J.N. have no conflicts to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ACTRN12620001032943. TRIAL REGISTRATION DATE 11 August 2020. DATE OF FIRST PATIENT’S ENROLMENT 29 September 2020.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sherine Sandhu
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynaecology & Newborn Health, University of Melbourne, Royal Women’s Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Martha Hickey
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynaecology & Newborn Health, University of Melbourne, Royal Women’s Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Digsu N Koye
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- MISCH (Methods and Implementation Support for Clinical and Health) research Hub, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Sabine Braat
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- MISCH (Methods and Implementation Support for Clinical and Health) research Hub, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Raelia Lew
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynaecology & Newborn Health, University of Melbourne, Royal Women’s Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Reproductive Services Unit, Royal Women’s Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Roger Hart
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Western Australia, King Edward Memorial Hospital, Perth, WA, Australia
- Fertility Specialists of Western Australia and City Fertility, Bethesda Hospital, Claremont, WA, Australia
| | - Robert J Norman
- Robinson Research Institute, Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Karin Hammarberg
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Victorian Assisted Reproductive Treatment Authority, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Richard A Anderson
- Centre for Reproductive Health, Institute for Repair and Regeneration, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Michelle Peate
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynaecology & Newborn Health, University of Melbourne, Royal Women’s Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lautz Z, Kautz-Freimuth S, Shukri A, Redaèlli M, Rhiem K, Schmutzler R, Stock S. Predictors of knowledge and knowledge gain after decision aid use among women with BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2024; 124:108248. [PMID: 38513456 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2024.108248] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2023] [Revised: 02/01/2024] [Accepted: 03/08/2024] [Indexed: 03/23/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To identify factors contributing to baseline knowledge in women with BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants (PVs) and knowledge gain after decision aid (DA) use. METHODS Women with PVs in BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes were randomly assigned to an intervention group (IG) receiving DAs or a control group (CG). Of the total sample, 417 completed the baseline survey and were included in this analysis. Two multiple regression analyses were conducted: baseline data on socio-demographic, medical, decision-related and psychological variables were used to identify predictors for (1) baseline knowledge within the total group and (2) knowledge gain within the IG after DA use three months post study inclusion. RESULTS At baseline, higher education status, no breast cancer history, and lower decisional conflict related to higher knowledge within the total group. After DA use within the IG, higher baseline scores for decisional conflict predicted higher knowledge gain, and higher baseline scores for depression and intrusion predicted lower knowledge gain. CONCLUSIONS This study identified predictors of baseline knowledge and knowledge gain after DA use in women with BRCA1/2 PVs. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Awareness of facilitating and hindering factors on these women's knowledge can improve understanding of their health literacy and enable further targeted support interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zoë Lautz
- Institute of Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, University Hospital Cologne, 50935 Cologne, Germany
| | - Sibylle Kautz-Freimuth
- Institute of Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, University Hospital Cologne, 50935 Cologne, Germany.
| | - Arim Shukri
- Institute of Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, University Hospital Cologne, 50935 Cologne, Germany
| | - Marcus Redaèlli
- Institute of Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, University Hospital Cologne, 50935 Cologne, Germany
| | - Kerstin Rhiem
- Centre for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer and Centre for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany
| | - Rita Schmutzler
- Centre for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer and Centre for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany
| | - Stephanie Stock
- Institute of Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, University Hospital Cologne, 50935 Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Collart C, Craighead C, Yao M, Rose S, Chien EK, Frankel RM, Coleridge M, Hu B, Edmonds BT, Ranzini AC, Farrell RM. Reducing decisional conflict in decisions about prenatal genetic testing: the impact of a dyadic intervention at the start of prenatal care. J Perinat Med 2024; 52:467-477. [PMID: 38669584 PMCID: PMC11143442 DOI: 10.1515/jpm-2023-0442] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2023] [Accepted: 03/19/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Decisional conflict and regret about prenatal genetic screening and diagnostic tests may have important consequences in the current pregnancy and for future reproductive decisions. Identifying mechanisms that reduce conflict associated with the decision to use or decline these options is necessary for optimal patient counseling. METHODS We conducted a cluster-randomized controlled trial of a shared decision-making tool (NEST) at the beginning of prenatal care. Enrolled patients completed follow-up surveys at the time of testing (QTT) and in the second-third trimester (QFF), including the Decision Conflict Scale (DCS). Total DCS scores were analyzed using a multivariate linear mixed-effect model. RESULTS Of the total number of participants (n=502) enrolled, 449 completed the QTT and QFF surveys. The mean age of participants was 31.6±3.8, with most parous at the time of study participation (n=321; 71.7 %). Both the NEST (the intervention) and control groups had lower median total DCS scores at QFF (NEST 13.3 [1.7, 25.0] vs. control 16.7 [1.7, 25.0]; p=0.24) compared to QTT (NEST 20.8 [5.0, 25.0] vs. control 18.3 [3.3, 26.7]; p=0.89). Participants exposed to NEST had lower decisional conflict at QFF compared to control (β -3.889; [CI -7.341, -0.437]; p=0.027). CONCLUSIONS Using a shared decision-making tool at the start of prenatal care decreased decisional conflict regarding prenatal genetic testing. Such interventions have the potential to provide an important form of decision-making support for patients facing the unique type of complex and preference-based choices about the use of prenatal genetic tests.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina Collart
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Caitlin Craighead
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Meng Yao
- Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Susannah Rose
- Department of Biomedical Informatics and Center for Biomedical Ethics and Society, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Edward K. Chien
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | - Marissa Coleridge
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Genomic Medicine Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Bo Hu
- Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | - Angela C. Ranzini
- Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The MetroHealth System, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Ruth M. Farrell
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Genomic Medicine Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Center for Bioethics, Clinical Transformation, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Aboleil-Zoubi O, Gafni-Amsalem C, Peled-Perets L, Mamluk E, Tamir L, Hakrosh S, Kurtzman S, Chervinsky E, Aalimi U, Husam B, Khayat M, Baram-Tsabari A, Shalev SA. The effect of a prior e-learning tool on genetic counseling outcomes in diverse ethnic couples with abnormal Down syndrome screening tests: A randomized controlled trial. J Genet Couns 2024; 33:666-676. [PMID: 37632224 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1774] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2021] [Revised: 07/10/2023] [Accepted: 08/14/2023] [Indexed: 08/27/2023]
Abstract
Genetic counseling (GC) following abnormal Down syndrome (DS) screening tests aims to ensure learning of complex medical concepts and discussion of counselees' personal desires. Pre-GC use of electronic learning tools (e-learning tools) can facilitate GC sessions by allowing more time for dialogue rather than learning medical and genetic concepts, enabling greater focus on the counselee's decisional, psychological, and personal needs. Few studies have investigated such tools for DS screening tests and those who have focused on screening uptake rather than abnormal results and implications. This study evaluated prenatal GC outcomes following implementation of an e-learning tool utilizing an educational animated movie for couples of varied ethnic backgrounds in northern Israel, with abnormal DS screening tests. E-learning tool impact was assessed as knowledge level, informed choices, satisfaction with the intervention and GC process, the state of anxiety and duration of the GC meeting. The 321 study participants were randomized to three groups: animation movie, booklet, and control. All participants had been asked to complete pre- and post-counseling questionnaires. Outcome scores were compared between the research groups. Results showed increased knowledge level in general among participants in the animation group; among minority participants, the highest knowledge level was in the animation group. Anxiety levels and informed choices were not statistically different among the groups. However, watching the animation, Jewish ethnicity, good level of genetic literacy, and academic degree were significant predictors of informed choice, and those who watched the animation were three times more likely to make an informed choice than the control group. Our findings suggest that this e-learning tool is efficient and acceptable for the general population. Special attention is needed for minorities with lower genetic literacy and education.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olfat Aboleil-Zoubi
- The Genetics Institute Emek Medical Center, Afula, Israel
- Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
| | - Chen Gafni-Amsalem
- The Genetics Institute Emek Medical Center, Afula, Israel
- Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
| | | | - Efrat Mamluk
- The Genetics Institute Emek Medical Center, Afula, Israel
| | - Liron Tamir
- The Genetics Institute Emek Medical Center, Afula, Israel
| | - Shadia Hakrosh
- The Genetics Institute Emek Medical Center, Afula, Israel
| | | | | | - Ula Aalimi
- The Genetics Institute Emek Medical Center, Afula, Israel
| | - Bashir Husam
- The Genetics Institute Emek Medical Center, Afula, Israel
| | - Morad Khayat
- The Genetics Institute Emek Medical Center, Afula, Israel
| | - Ayelet Baram-Tsabari
- Faculty of Education in Science and Technology, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
| | - Stavit A Shalev
- The Genetics Institute Emek Medical Center, Afula, Israel
- Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Behnam S, Arabin B. Systematic Reviews on the Prevention of Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes Related to Maternal Obesity to Improve Evidence-Based Counselling. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2024; 84:564-572. [PMID: 38884029 PMCID: PMC11175830 DOI: 10.1055/a-2295-1725] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2024] [Accepted: 03/13/2024] [Indexed: 06/18/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Health professionals and their patients should understand the importance of evidence. In the case of gestational diabetes mellitus, which is often associated with an abnormally high body mass index, the immediate and long-term outcome of women and their offspring depends in part on advice and implementation of lifestyle changes before, during and after pregnancy. Methods Up to September 2023, MEDLINE, CENTRAL, and WEB OF SCIENCE were used to identify systematic reviews and meta-analyses on the prevention of gestational diabetes. The ROBIS and AMSTAR criteria were analyzed for all systematic reviews. Results A total of 36 systematic reviews were identified. Dietary interventions, physical activity or a combined approach all reduced adverse pregnancy outcomes such as gestational diabetes, pregnancy-induced hypertension and related morbidities. Within the randomized controlled trials included in the 36 systematic reviews, the type, intensity and frequency of interventions varied widely. The primary outcomes, reporting and methodological quality of the 36 systematic reviews and meta-analyses also varied.The meta-analysis with the highest ROBIS and AMSTAR-2 scores was selected to design an icon array based on a fact box simulating 100 patients. Conclusions We propose a methodology for selecting the best evidence and transforming it into a format that illustrates the benefits and harms in a way that can be understood by lay patients, even if they cannot read. This model can be applied to counselling for expectant mothers in low and high-income countries, regardless of socioeconomic status, provided that women have access to appropriately trained healthcare providers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susann Behnam
- Clara Angela Foundation Witten und Berlin, Witten, Germany
- Philipps University Marburg, Marburg, Germany
- Dr. Horst Schmidt Hospital, Wiesbaden, Germany
| | - Birgit Arabin
- Clara Angela Foundation Witten und Berlin, Witten, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Pillay J, Guitard S, Rahman S, Saba S, Rahman A, Bialy L, Gehring N, Tan M, Melton A, Hartling L. Patient preferences for breast cancer screening: a systematic review update to inform recommendations by the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care. Syst Rev 2024; 13:140. [PMID: 38807191 PMCID: PMC11134964 DOI: 10.1186/s13643-024-02539-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2024] [Accepted: 04/17/2024] [Indexed: 05/30/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Different guideline panels, and individuals, may make different decisions based in part on their preferences. Preferences for or against an intervention are viewed as a consequence of the relative importance people place on the expected or experienced health outcomes it incurs. These findings can then be considered as patient input when balancing effect estimates on benefits and harms reported by empirical evidence on the clinical effectiveness of screening programs. This systematic review update examined the relative importance placed by patients on the potential benefits and harms of mammography-based breast cancer screening to inform an update to the 2018 Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care's guideline on screening. METHODS We screened all articles from our previous review (search December 2017) and updated our searches to June 19, 2023 in MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and CINAHL. We also screened grey literature, submissions by stakeholders, and reference lists. The target population was cisgender women and other adults assigned female at birth (including transgender men and nonbinary persons) aged ≥ 35 years and at average or moderately increased risk for breast cancer. Studies of patients with breast cancer were eligible for health-state utility data for relevant outcomes. We sought three types of data, directly through (i) disutilities of screening and curative treatment health states (measuring the impact of the outcome on one's health-related quality of life; utilities measured on a scale of 0 [death] to 1 [perfect health]), and (ii) other preference-based data, such as outcome trade-offs, and indirectly through (iii) the relative importance of benefits versus harms inferred from attitudes, intentions, and behaviors towards screening among patients provided with estimates of the magnitudes of benefit(s) and harms(s). For screening, we used machine learning as one of the reviewers after at least 50% of studies had been reviewed in duplicate by humans; full-text selection used independent review by two humans. Data extraction and risk of bias assessments used a single reviewer with verification. Our main analysis for utilities used data from utility-based health-related quality of life tools (e.g., EQ-5D) in patients; a disutility value of about 0.04 can be considered a minimally important value for the Canadian public. When suitable, we pooled utilities and explored heterogeneity. Disutilities were calculated for screening health states and between different treatment states. Non-utility data were grouped into categories, based on outcomes compared (e.g. for trade-off data), participant age, and our judgements of the net benefit of screening portrayed by the studies. Thereafter, we compared and contrasted findings while considering sample sizes, risk of bias, subgroup findings and data on knowledge scores, and created summary statements for each data set. Certainty assessments followed GRADE guidance for patient preferences and used consensus among at least two reviewers. FINDINGS Eighty-two studies (38 on utilities) were included. The estimated disutilities were 0.07 for a positive screening result (moderate certainty), 0.03-0.04 for a false positive (FP; "additional testing" resolved as negative for cancer) (low certainty), and 0.08 for untreated screen-detected cancer (moderate certainty) or (low certainty) an interval cancer. At ≤12 months, disutilities of mastectomy (vs. breast-conserving therapy), chemotherapy (vs. none) (low certainty), and radiation therapy (vs. none) (moderate certainty) were 0.02-0.03, 0.02-0.04, and little-to-none, respectively, though in each case findings were somewhat limited in their applicability. Over the longer term, there was moderate certainty for little-to-no disutility from mastectomy versus breast-conserving surgery/lumpectomy with radiation and from radiation. There was moderate certainty that a majority (>50%) and possibly a large majority (>75%) of women probably accept up to six cases of overdiagnosis to prevent one breast-cancer death; there was some uncertainty because of an indication that overdiagnosis was not fully understood by participants in some cases. Low certainty evidence suggested that a large majority may accept that screening may reduce breast-cancer but not all-cause mortality, at least when presented with relatively high rates of breast-cancer mortality reductions (n = 2; 2 and 5 fewer per 1000 screened), and at least a majority accept that to prevent one breast-cancer death at least a few hundred patients will receive a FP result and 10-15 will have a FP resolved through biopsy. An upper limit for an acceptable number of FPs was not evaluated. When using data from studies assessing attitudes, intentions, and screening behaviors, across all age groups but most evident for women in their 40s, preferences reduced as the net benefit presented by study authors decreased in magnitude. In a relatively low net-benefit scenario, a majority of patients in their 40s may not weigh the benefits as greater than the harms from screening whereas for women in their 50s a large majority may prefer screening (low certainty evidence for both ages). There was moderate certainty that a large majority of women 50 years of age and 50 to 69 years of age, who have usually experienced screening, weigh the benefits as greater than the harms from screening in a high net-benefit scenario. A large majority of patients aged 70-71 years who have recently screened probably think the benefits outweigh the harms of continuing to screen. A majority of women in their mid-70s to early 80s may prefer to continue screening. CONCLUSIONS Evidence across a range of data sources on how informed patients value the potential outcomes from breast-cancer screening will be useful during decision-making for recommendations. The evidence suggests that all of the outcomes examined have importance to women of any age, that there is at least some and possibly substantial (among those in their 40s) variability across and within age groups about the acceptable magnitude of effects across outcomes, and that provision of easily understandable information on the likelihood of the outcomes may be necessary to enable informed decision making. Although studies came from a wide range of countries, there were limited data from Canada and about whether findings applied well across an ethnographically and socioeconomically diverse population. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION Protocol available at Open Science Framework https://osf.io/xngsu/ .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Pillay
- Alberta Research Centre for Health Evidence, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, 11405 87 Avenue NW, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 1C9, Canada.
| | - Samantha Guitard
- Alberta Research Centre for Health Evidence, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, 11405 87 Avenue NW, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 1C9, Canada
| | - Sholeh Rahman
- Alberta Research Centre for Health Evidence, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, 11405 87 Avenue NW, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 1C9, Canada
| | - Sabrina Saba
- Alberta Research Centre for Health Evidence, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, 11405 87 Avenue NW, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 1C9, Canada
| | - Ashiqur Rahman
- Alberta Research Centre for Health Evidence, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, 11405 87 Avenue NW, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 1C9, Canada
| | - Liza Bialy
- Alberta Research Centre for Health Evidence, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, 11405 87 Avenue NW, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 1C9, Canada
| | - Nicole Gehring
- Alberta Research Centre for Health Evidence, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, 11405 87 Avenue NW, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 1C9, Canada
| | - Maria Tan
- Alberta Research Centre for Health Evidence, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, 11405 87 Avenue NW, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 1C9, Canada
| | - Alex Melton
- Alberta Research Centre for Health Evidence, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, 11405 87 Avenue NW, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 1C9, Canada
| | - Lisa Hartling
- Alberta Research Centre for Health Evidence, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, 11405 87 Avenue NW, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 1C9, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Lühnen J, Haastert B, Richter T. Informed Decision-Making with and for People with Dementia-Efficacy of the PRODECIDE Education Program for Legal Representatives: A Randomized Controlled Trial (PRODECIDE-RCT) and Process Evaluation. Geriatrics (Basel) 2024; 9:60. [PMID: 38804317 PMCID: PMC11130972 DOI: 10.3390/geriatrics9030060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2024] [Revised: 03/31/2024] [Accepted: 05/07/2024] [Indexed: 05/29/2024] Open
Abstract
Legal representatives take a major role in healthcare decisions with and for people with dementia, but only a minority has a qualification in this field. The aim was to evaluate the efficacy of the PRODECIDE education program for legal representatives. In a prospective randomized controlled trial, legal representatives (volunteers and professionals, representing at least one person with dementia) were allocated (1:1 computer-generated block randomization) to the intervention (PRODECIDE education program) and control (standard care) groups. The primary outcome measure was knowledge, operationalized as the understanding of decision-making processes and in setting realistic expectations. Only data entry and analyses were blinded. A process evaluation in a mixed methods design was performed. We enrolled 218 legal representatives, and 216 were included in the primary analysis (intervention n = 109, control n = 107). The percentage of correct answers in the knowledge test post intervention was 69.0% in the intervention and 43.4% in the control group (difference 25.6%; CI 95%, 21.3 to 29.8; p < 0.001). In the comparison of professional and voluntary representatives, professionals had 13.6% (CI 95%, 8.0 to 19.2; p < 0.001) more correct answers. The PRODECIDE education program can improve the knowledge of legal representatives, an important prerequisite for evidence-based, informed decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Lühnen
- Unit of Health Sciences and Education, Faculty of Mathematics, Computer Science and Natural Sciences, Universität Hamburg, Martin-Luther-King-Platz 6, 20146 Hamburg, Germany;
- Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Institute of Clinical Nursing Science, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Tanja Richter
- Unit of Health Sciences and Education, Faculty of Mathematics, Computer Science and Natural Sciences, Universität Hamburg, Martin-Luther-King-Platz 6, 20146 Hamburg, Germany;
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Stokholm RN, Stenholt L, Lauridsen HH, Edwards A, Andersen B, Larsen MB. The validity of instruments to measure knowledge in population-based cancer screening targeting individuals at average risk - A systematic review. Prev Med 2024; 182:107940. [PMID: 38513839 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2024.107940] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2023] [Revised: 03/08/2024] [Accepted: 03/18/2024] [Indexed: 03/23/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Relevant knowledge is essential for informed choices about (non)participation in population-based cancer screening. Many instruments have been proposed to assess residents' knowledge about cancer screening programmes but their measurement properties are unknown. This systematic review aims to identify and critically evaluate the measurement properties of instruments to measure knowledge about cancer screening in individuals eligible for population-based screening. METHODS A literature search was undertaken in PubMed, PsycINFO, Embase, CINAHL, Scopus and Web of Science in August 2023. The review included any study reporting one or more measurement properties of the questionnaire or sub-scale used measuring knowledge of cancer screening including breast, colorectal and/or cervical cancer screening. Studies including males aged 45 or older and females aged 20 or older were included. Two independent reviewers screened the articles and assessed the included articles using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN). RESULTS We included 24 instruments, which varied in number and characteristics of items. All instruments were assessed as having an inadequate instrument development. The results of structural validity, internal consistency, criterion validity and reliability were assessed as indeterminate, while construct validity and responsiveness were assessed as sufficient. CONCLUSION This systematic review identified no instruments to measure knowledge about cancer screening where the measurement properties were sufficiently evaluated. There is a lack of focus on content validity and structural validity, and further validation of the instruments is needed. The results indicate a lack of shared understanding or agreement of what constitutes relevant knowledge about cancer screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rikke Nicoline Stokholm
- Department of Public Health Programmes and University Research Clinic for Cancer Screening, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Denmark.
| | | | - Henrik Hein Lauridsen
- Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark
| | - Adrian Edwards
- Department of Public Health Programmes and University Research Clinic for Cancer Screening, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark; Division of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, UK
| | - Berit Andersen
- Department of Public Health Programmes and University Research Clinic for Cancer Screening, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Denmark
| | - Mette Bach Larsen
- Department of Public Health Programmes and University Research Clinic for Cancer Screening, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Gafni-Amsalem C, Aboleil-Zoubi O, Chervinsky E, Aleme O, Khayat M, Bashir H, Perets LP, Mamluk E, Hakrosh S, Kurtzman S, Tamir L, Baram-Tsabari A, Shalev SA. Educational tools support informed decision-making for genetic carrier screening in a heterogenic Israeli population. J Community Genet 2024; 15:137-146. [PMID: 38114746 PMCID: PMC11031536 DOI: 10.1007/s12687-023-00694-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2023] [Accepted: 12/14/2023] [Indexed: 12/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Reproductive genetic carrier screening (RGCS) aims to provide couples with information to make informed decisions. Since 2013, the Israeli Carrier Screening Program has been offered routinely and free of charge to all Israelis of reproductive age, personalized based on religion, ethnicity, and village/tribe where a disorder is frequent. This study evaluated the impact of two educational tools on an informed choice on RGCS uptake and satisfaction with counselling within a heterogeneous population in northern Israel. Participants from diverse sociodemographic population groups were randomly assigned to watch an animated film, read a booklet conveying the same information, or receive no information before counselling for RGCS, and asked to complete pre- and post-counselling questionnaires. A higher informed-decision rate was demonstrated in the film (n=93/141, 66%) and booklet (n=88/131, 67%) groups vs. the non-intervention group (n=62/143, 43%) (P<0.001), assessed by the Multidimensional Measure of Informed Choice. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that allocation to an intervention group, Jewish ethnicity and higher education level, best predicted informed choice. Most participants expressed high levels of satisfaction with the counselling process, regardless of group assignment. While only a minority of participants reported seeking information prior to visiting the clinic, the pre-counselling information interventions were well accepted. Pre-counselling self-learning educational tools should be promoted, easily available, and adjusted linguistically and culturally to targeted populations, to avoid unwanted "automatic" compliance of tested individuals and maximize the potential of informed decision-making. Our study can be applied to other countries where majority and minority ethnic groups access genetic services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chen Gafni-Amsalem
- Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion, Haifa, Israel.
- Genetics Institute, Emek Medical Center, 18101, Afula, Israel.
| | - Olfat Aboleil-Zoubi
- Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion, Haifa, Israel
- Genetics Institute, Emek Medical Center, 18101, Afula, Israel
| | | | - Ola Aleme
- Genetics Institute, Emek Medical Center, 18101, Afula, Israel
| | - Morad Khayat
- Genetics Institute, Emek Medical Center, 18101, Afula, Israel
| | - Husam Bashir
- Genetics Institute, Emek Medical Center, 18101, Afula, Israel
| | | | - Efrat Mamluk
- Genetics Institute, Emek Medical Center, 18101, Afula, Israel
| | - Shadia Hakrosh
- Genetics Institute, Emek Medical Center, 18101, Afula, Israel
| | - Shoshi Kurtzman
- Genetics Institute, Emek Medical Center, 18101, Afula, Israel
| | - Liron Tamir
- Genetics Institute, Emek Medical Center, 18101, Afula, Israel
| | | | - Stavit A Shalev
- Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion, Haifa, Israel
- Genetics Institute, Emek Medical Center, 18101, Afula, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Schmeising-Barnes N, Waller J, Marlow LAV. Attitudes to multi-cancer early detection (MCED) blood tests for population-based screening: A qualitative study in Great Britain. Soc Sci Med 2024; 347:116762. [PMID: 38520825 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.116762] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2023] [Revised: 01/17/2024] [Accepted: 03/05/2024] [Indexed: 03/25/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Trials are underway to test the clinical utility of multi-cancer early detection (MCED) blood tests for screening asymptomatic individuals. We sought to understand the acceptability of MCED blood test screening and potential barriers and facilitators to participation among the general public. METHODS We conducted eleven semi-structured online focus groups with 50-77-year-olds (n = 53) in April-November 2022. Participants were purposefully sampled to include a mix of socio-economic and ethnic backgrounds as well as people who would not want 'a blood test for cancer'. Participants were shown information about MCED blood tests. Transcripts were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. RESULTS Participants showed enthusiasm for MCED screening. Perceived benefits included procedural familiarity and the potential to screen for many cancers. Enthusiasm was driven by beliefs that cancer is a real and increasing risk (both at population level and personally with age) and that early detection reduces treatment burden and cancer mortality. Some felt they would not want to know if they had cancer. The potential for MCED tests to raise anxiety was a concern, especially in a false-positive scenario. Participants wanted to avoid unpleasant and unnecessary procedures. The initial blood test was deemed "less invasive" than current screening tests, but potential follow-up procedures were a concern. Views on MCED screening were influenced by wider factors including dislike of uncertainty, desire for choice and control over one's health, and existing relationships with the NHS. CONCLUSION The introduction of MCED screening is likely to be appealing due to the simplicity and familiarity of the primary test procedure. Test accuracy needs to be high to facilitate acceptability and should be communicated from the outset. Some people would rather not know if they have cancer, and MCEDs will not appeal to all.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ninian Schmeising-Barnes
- Centre for Cancer Screening, Prevention and Early Diagnosis, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK; Cancer Prevention Group, School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Jo Waller
- Centre for Cancer Screening, Prevention and Early Diagnosis, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK; Cancer Prevention Group, School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Laura A V Marlow
- Centre for Cancer Screening, Prevention and Early Diagnosis, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK; Cancer Prevention Group, School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Coulombe F, Laberge AM. The Need to Consider Context: A Systematic Review of Factors Involved in the Consent Process for Genetic Tests from the Perspective of Patients. AJOB Empir Bioeth 2024; 15:93-107. [PMID: 38189769 DOI: 10.1080/23294515.2023.2297935] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2024]
Abstract
Background: Informed consent for genetic tests is a well-established practice. It should be based on good quality information and in keeping with the patient's values. Existing informed consent assessment tools assess knowledge and values. Nevertheless, there is no consensus on what specific elements need to be discussed or considered in the consent process for genetic tests.Methods: We performed a systematic review to identify all factors involved in the decision-making and consent process about genetic testing, from the perspective of patients. Through public databases, we identified studies reporting factors that influence the decision to accept or decline genetic testing. Studies were included if they reported the perspective of patients or at-risk individuals. All articles were thematically coded.Results: 1989 articles were reviewed: 70 met inclusion criteria and 12 additional articles were identified through the references of included studies. Coding of the 82 articles led to the identification of 45 factors involved in decision-making and consent, which were initially divided into three domains: in favor of, against or with an undetermined influence on genetic testing. Each factor was also divided into three subdomains relating to the informed choice concept: knowledge, values or other. The factors in the "other" subdomain were all related to the context of testing (e.g. timing, cost, influence of family members, etc), and were present in all three domains.Conclusions: We describe the network of factors contributing to decision-making and consent process and identify the context of genetic testing as a third component to influence this process. Future studies should consider the evaluation of contextual factors as an important and relevant component of the consent and decision-making process about genetic tests. Based on these results, we plan to develop and test a more comprehensive tool to assess informed consent for genetic testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frédéric Coulombe
- Medical Genetics, McGill University Health Center and McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - Anne-Marie Laberge
- Medical Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, CHU Sainte-Justine and Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
- Bioethics Program, School of Public Health, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Loeb S, Keith SW, Cheng HH, Leader AE, Gross L, Sanchez Nolasco T, Byrne N, Hartman R, Brown LH, Pieczonka CM, Gomella LG, Kelly WK, Lallas CD, Handley N, Mille PJ, Mark JR, Brown GA, Chopra S, McClellan A, Wise DR, Hollifield L, Giri VN. TARGET: A Randomized, Noninferiority Trial of a Pretest, Patient-Driven Genetic Education Webtool Versus Genetic Counseling for Prostate Cancer Germline Testing. JCO Precis Oncol 2024; 8:e2300552. [PMID: 38452310 PMCID: PMC10939575 DOI: 10.1200/po.23.00552] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2023] [Revised: 11/22/2023] [Accepted: 12/12/2023] [Indexed: 03/09/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Germline genetic testing (GT) is important for prostate cancer (PCA) management, clinical trial eligibility, and hereditary cancer risk. However, GT is underutilized and there is a shortage of genetic counselors. To address these gaps, a patient-driven, pretest genetic education webtool was designed and studied compared with traditional genetic counseling (GC) to inform strategies for expanding access to genetic services. METHODS Technology-enhanced acceleration of germline evaluation for therapy (TARGET) was a multicenter, noninferiority, randomized trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04447703) comparing a nine-module patient-driven genetic education webtool versus pretest GC. Participants completed surveys measuring decisional conflict, satisfaction, and attitudes toward GT at baseline, after pretest education/counseling, and after GT result disclosure. The primary end point was noninferiority in reducing decisional conflict between webtool and GC using the validated Decisional Conflict Scale. Mixed-effects regression modeling was used to compare decisional conflict between groups. Participants opting for GT received a 51-gene panel, with results delivered to participants and their providers. RESULTS The analytic data set includes primary outcome data from 315 participants (GC [n = 162] and webtool [n = 153]). Mean difference in decisional conflict score changes between groups was -0.04 (one-sided 95% CI, -∞ to 2.54; P = .01), suggesting the patient-driven webtool was noninferior to GC. Overall, 145 (89.5%) GC and 120 (78.4%) in the webtool arm underwent GT, with pathogenic variants in 15.8% (8.7% in PCA genes). Satisfaction did not differ significantly between arms; knowledge of cancer genetics was higher but attitudes toward GT were less favorable in the webtool arm. CONCLUSION The results of the TARGET study support the use of patient-driven digital webtools for expanding access to pretest genetic education for PCA GT. Further studies to optimize patient experience and evaluate them in diverse patient populations are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stacy Loeb
- Department of Urology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY
- Department of Population Health, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY
- Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY
- Department of Surgery/Urology, Manhattan Veterans Affairs, New York, NY
| | - Scott W. Keith
- Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Department of Pharmacology, Physiology and Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Heather H. Cheng
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Amy E. Leader
- Department of Medical Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Laura Gross
- Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT
- Yale New Haven Health, New Haven, CT
| | - Tatiana Sanchez Nolasco
- Department of Urology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY
- Department of Population Health, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY
- Department of Surgery/Urology, Manhattan Veterans Affairs, New York, NY
| | - Nataliya Byrne
- Department of Urology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY
- Department of Population Health, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY
- Department of Surgery/Urology, Manhattan Veterans Affairs, New York, NY
| | - Rebecca Hartman
- Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Department of Pharmacology, Physiology and Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | | | - Leonard G. Gomella
- Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - William Kevin Kelly
- Department of Medical Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Costas D. Lallas
- Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Nathan Handley
- Department of Medical Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
- Department of Integrative Medicine and Nutritional Sciences, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | - James Ryan Mark
- Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | | | | | - David R. Wise
- Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY
| | | | - Veda N. Giri
- Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT
- Department of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Anraad C, van Empelen P, Ruiter RAC, Rijnders M, van Groessen K, van Keulen HM. Promoting informed decision making about maternal pertussis vaccination: the systematic development of an online tailored decision aid and a centering-based group antenatal care intervention. Front Public Health 2024; 12:1256337. [PMID: 38425460 PMCID: PMC10902124 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1256337] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2023] [Accepted: 01/23/2024] [Indexed: 03/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Maintaining and enhancing vaccine confidence continues to be a challenge. Making an informed decision not only helps to avoid potential future regret but also reduces susceptibility to misinformation. There is an urgent need for interventions that facilitate informed decision-making about vaccines. This paper describes the systematic development of two interventions designed to promote informed decision making and indirectly, acceptance of maternal pertussis vaccination (MPV) in the Netherlands. Materials and methods The 6-step Intervention Mapping (IM) protocol was used for the development of an online tailored decision aid and Centering Pregnancy-based Group Antenatal Care (CP) intervention. A needs assessment was done using empirical literature and conducting a survey and focus groups (1), intervention objectives were formulated at the behavior and determinants levels (2), theoretical methods of behavior change were selected and translated into practical applications (3), which were further developed into the two interventions using user-centered design (4). Finally, plans were developed for implementation (5), and evaluation (6) of the interventions. Results The needs assessment showed that pregnant women often based their decision about MPV on information sourced online and conversations with their partners, obstetric care providers, and peers. Responding to these findings, we systematically developed two interactive, theory-based interventions. We created an online tailored decision aid, subjecting it to four iterations of testing among pregnant women, including those with low literacy levels. Participants evaluated prototypes of the intervention positively on relevance and usability. In addition, a CP intervention was developed with midwives. Conclusion Using IM resulted in the creation of an online decision aid and CP intervention to promote informed decision making regarding MPV. This description of the systematic development of the interventions not only serves to illustrate design rationales, it will also aid the interpretation of the evaluation of the interventions, the development of future interventions promoting informed decision and acceptance of vaccines, and comparisons with other interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte Anraad
- Department of Work and Social Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
- TNO Child Health, Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Pepijn van Empelen
- TNO Child Health, Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Robert A. C. Ruiter
- Department of Work and Social Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Marlies Rijnders
- TNO Child Health, Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research, Leiden, Netherlands
| | | | - Hilde M. van Keulen
- TNO Child Health, Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research, Leiden, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Guigon L, Sánchez LXG, Petit AS, Bonniec AL, Basu P, Rodrigue CM, Préau M, Soler-Michel P, Villain P. Would shared decision-making be useful in breast cancer screening programmes? A qualitative study using focus group discussions to gather evidence from French women with different socioeconomic backgrounds. BMC Public Health 2024; 24:404. [PMID: 38326802 PMCID: PMC10851553 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-17876-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2023] [Accepted: 01/24/2024] [Indexed: 02/09/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To inform the development of an online tool to be potentially used in shared decision-making about breast cancer screening, French women were questioned about participation in breast cancer screening, the health professional's role, and their perceptions of the proposed tool. METHODS We organised focus group discussions with 55 French women. Two different strategies were used to recruit women from high and low socioeconomic backgrounds. We applied both inductive and deductive approaches to conduct a thematic analysis of the discussions. We analysed the responses by using the main determinants from different health behaviour models and compared the two groups. RESULTS Independently of socioeconomic status, the most important determinant for a woman's participation in breast cancer screening was the perceived severity of breast cancer and the perceived benefits of its early detection by screening. Cues to action reported by both groups were invitation letters; recommendations by health professionals, or group/community activities and public events were reported by women from high and low socioeconomic backgrounds, respectively. Among other positive determinants, women from high socioeconomic backgrounds reported making informed decisions and receiving peer support whereas women from low socioeconomic backgrounds reported community empowerment through group/community events. Fear of cancer was reported as a barrier in both groups. Among other barriers, language issues were reported only by women from low socioeconomic backgrounds; women from high socioeconomic backgrounds reported breast cancer screening-related risks other than overdiagnosis and/or overtreatment. Barriers to accessing the online tool to be developed were mainly reported by women from high socioeconomic backgrounds. CONCLUSION Limitations in implementing shared decision-making for women from low socioeconomic backgrounds were highlighted. An online tool that is suitable for all women, regardless of socioeconomic status, would provide "on-demand" reliable and tailored information about breast cancer screening and improve access to health professionals and social exchanges.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laureline Guigon
- Early Detection, Prevention, and Infections (EPR) Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC-WHO), 25 Avenue Tony Garnier, 69007, Lyon, France
| | - Laura X Gil Sánchez
- Early Detection, Prevention, and Infections (EPR) Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC-WHO), 25 Avenue Tony Garnier, 69007, Lyon, France
| | - Anne-Sophie Petit
- Unité Inserm, Université Lumière Lyon, 1296 « Radiations: Défense, Santé, Environnement », Lyon, France
| | - Alice Le Bonniec
- Early Detection, Prevention, and Infections (EPR) Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC-WHO), 25 Avenue Tony Garnier, 69007, Lyon, France
| | - Partha Basu
- Early Detection, Prevention, and Infections (EPR) Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC-WHO), 25 Avenue Tony Garnier, 69007, Lyon, France
| | - Christelle M Rodrigue
- Centre Régional de Coordination des Dépistages des Cancers (CRCDC) Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes, Site Rhône & Métropole de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Marie Préau
- Unité Inserm, Université Lumière Lyon, 1296 « Radiations: Défense, Santé, Environnement », Lyon, France
| | - Patricia Soler-Michel
- Centre Régional de Coordination des Dépistages des Cancers (CRCDC) Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes, Site Rhône & Métropole de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Patricia Villain
- Early Detection, Prevention, and Infections (EPR) Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC-WHO), 25 Avenue Tony Garnier, 69007, Lyon, France.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Lühnen J. Gemeinsam informiert entscheiden. Pflege 2024; 37:1-2. [PMID: 38247324 DOI: 10.1024/1012-5302/a000974] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/23/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Lühnen
- Institut für Klinische Pflegewissenschaft, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Rebitschek FG, Eisenmann Y, Krippner L, Neugebauer E, Schirren CO, Schnuppe K, Hauptmann M. Protecting mass-gathering events in a pandemic with testing tracks and transparent information: an experimental study with festival guests. Psychol Health 2024:1-27. [PMID: 38251635 DOI: 10.1080/08870446.2024.2305644] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2023] [Accepted: 01/10/2024] [Indexed: 01/23/2024]
Abstract
Objective. To enable future open-air festivals during a pandemic, model festivals tested restricted access and behavioural rules to prevent SARS-CoV-2 transmissions. However, the uptake of health-protective measures depends on informed acceptance, meaning people are more likely to follow measures if they understand their effectiveness and related disease risks. Design and main outcome measures. With a series of online surveys, we studied risk perceptions of 6,500 festival guests and the association of perceived effectiveness of protective behaviours with reported compliance. In a scenario-based online experiment (N = 1,958) among festival guests, we tested the effect of informing transparently about the risk-reducing potential of protective measures at festivals on the intention to attend hypothetical events. Results. We found that guests tended to overestimate infection risks while still perceiving them as low. Self-reported mask wearing and distancing at and around the festivals could not be associated with the understanding of the measures' effectiveness. However, in addition to protective measures themselves, providing transparent information about their absolute risk-reducing effect increased intentions to attend festivals that employ varying protective measures. Conclusion. Our findings suggest that the acceptance of protected festivals can be influenced by transparent information about the effectiveness of protective measures. This calls for further research on evidence-based public health communications to improve their impact.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felix G Rebitschek
- Harding Center for Risk Literacy, Faculty of Health Sciences Brandenburg, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany
- Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany
| | - Yvonne Eisenmann
- Center for Clinical Studies, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane (MHB), Neuruppin, Germany
| | - Lena Krippner
- Harding Center for Risk Literacy, Faculty of Health Sciences Brandenburg, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany
| | - Edmund Neugebauer
- Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane (MHB), Neuruppin, Germany
| | - Clara O Schirren
- Harding Center for Risk Literacy, Faculty of Health Sciences Brandenburg, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany
- Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany
| | - Kristin Schnuppe
- Center for Clinical Studies, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane (MHB), Neuruppin, Germany
| | - Michael Hauptmann
- Center for Clinical Studies, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane (MHB), Neuruppin, Germany
- Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane (MHB), Neuruppin, Germany
- Institute of Biostatistics and Registry Research, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane (MHB), Neuruppin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Anraad C, van Empelen P, Ruiter RAC, Rijnders M, van Groessen K, Pronk J, van Keulen H. Promoting informed decision-making about maternal pertussis vaccination in Centering Pregnancy group-antenatal care: A feasibility study. Midwifery 2024; 128:103869. [PMID: 37979552 DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2023.103869] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2023] [Revised: 10/24/2023] [Accepted: 10/31/2023] [Indexed: 11/20/2023]
Abstract
PROBLEM Effective interventions are needed to promote informed decision making about vaccination. BACKGROUND We developed a group-antenatal care (CP; Centering Pregnancy) intervention, i.e., a session about MPV within existing group-care settings, to promote informed decision making about Maternal Pertussis Vaccination in the Netherlands. AIM This study aimed to assess (1) to what extent the intervention was implemented as intended, (2) to what extent the intervention met the needs and wishes of pregnant individuals and midwives facilitating CP. METHODS We conducted exploratory interviews with 6 CP facilitators and 10 CP participants to assess the implementation of the intervention, and how the intervention and its different components were perceived. Interviews were analysed using thematic analysis. In addition, we conducted a pre- and post-intervention survey amongst 35 participants, measuring knowledge about MPV, and MPV attitude and intention. RESULTS The CP intervention was implemented as intended in 6 out of 7 groups. Participants were positive about the interactive CP-methods used to discuss MPV. Participants and facilitators evaluated the intervention as positive and relevant, although the intervention was time-consuming, and some participants had already made the de decision about MPV. Those who had not yet decided indicated that the session was helpful for their decision. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION Discussing MPV in CP care settings is a feasible strategy to support decision making about MPV during pregnancy. The intervention could be improved by discussing the MPV sooner than 16-18 weeks of pregnancy. A larger-scale study is needed to assess effects on MPV uptake and informed decision making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte Anraad
- Department of Work & Social Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, Maastricht 6200 MD, the Netherlands; TNO Child Health, Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research, P.O. Box 3005, Leiden 2316 ZL, the Netherlands.
| | - Pepijn van Empelen
- TNO Child Health, Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research, P.O. Box 3005, Leiden 2316 ZL, the Netherlands
| | - Robert A C Ruiter
- Department of Work & Social Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, Maastricht 6200 MD, the Netherlands
| | - Marlies Rijnders
- TNO Child Health, Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research, P.O. Box 3005, Leiden 2316 ZL, the Netherlands
| | | | - Jeroen Pronk
- TNO Child Health, Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research, P.O. Box 3005, Leiden 2316 ZL, the Netherlands
| | - Hilde van Keulen
- TNO Child Health, Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research, P.O. Box 3005, Leiden 2316 ZL, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Debrabander J. Authenticity and the argument from testability: a bottom-up approach : Author. MEDICINE, HEALTH CARE, AND PHILOSOPHY 2023; 26:583-589. [PMID: 37584838 DOI: 10.1007/s11019-023-10166-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/06/2023] [Indexed: 08/17/2023]
Abstract
Jesper Ahlin Marceta published an article in this journal in which he formulated his "argument from testability", stating that it is impossible, at least practically, to operationalize procedural authenticity. That is, using procedural accounts of authenticity, one cannot reliably differentiate between authentic and inauthentic desires. There are roughly two ways to respond to the argument from testability: top-down and bottom-up. Several authors have endeavored the top-down approach by trying to show that some conceptions of authenticity might be operationalizable after all. At present, however, the bottom-up approach has not been put to the test. That is, no attempt has been made to use a currently existing assessment tool to guide the development of an account of authenticity. In this paper, I will investigate what it means to develop an account of authenticity bottom-up based on measures of concordance. More specifically, I will investigate the following three research questions. First, how do concordance and authenticity relate at a conceptual level? As crucial similarities exist between these concepts, concordance measures seem to offer a good starting point for the bottom-up approach. Second, how do judgements of concordance differ from judgements of authenticity? Both their scope and the way they are justified will turn out to be different. This suggests novel ways to react to Marceta's argument from testability. Third, should we develop a theory of concordance? The positive answer to this question will point towards a central limitation of the bottom-up approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jasper Debrabander
- Department of Philosophy and Moral Sciences, Ghent University, Blandijnberg 2, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Sweeney J, Tichnell C, Christian S, Pendelton C, Murray B, Roter DL, Jamal L, Calkins H, James CA. Characterizing Decision-Making Surrounding Exercise in ARVC: Analysis of Decisional Conflict, Decisional Regret, and Shared Decision-Making. CIRCULATION. GENOMIC AND PRECISION MEDICINE 2023; 16:e004133. [PMID: 38014565 PMCID: PMC10729899 DOI: 10.1161/circgen.123.004133] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2023] [Accepted: 10/25/2023] [Indexed: 11/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Limiting high-intensity exercise is recommended for patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) due to its association with penetrance, arrhythmias, and structural progression. Guidelines recommend shared decision-making (SDM) for exercise level, but there is little evidence regarding its impact. Therefore, we sought to evaluate the extent and implications of SDM for exercise, decisional conflict, and decisional regret in patients with ARVC and at-risk relatives. METHODS Adults diagnosed with ARVC or with positive genetic testing enrolled in the Johns Hopkins ARVC Registry were invited to complete a questionnaire that included exercise history and current exercise, SDM (SDM-Q-9), decisional conflict, and decisional regret. RESULTS The response rate was 64.8%. Two-thirds of participants (68.0%, n=121) reported clinically significant decisional conflict regarding exercise at diagnosis/genetic testing (DCS [decisional conflict scale]≥25), and half (55.1%, n=98) in the past year. Prevalence of decisional regret was also high with 55.3% (n=99) reporting moderate to severe decisional regret (DRS [decisional regret scale]≥25). The extent of SDM was highly variable ranging from no (0) to perfect (100) SDM (mean, 59.6±25.0). Those diagnosed in adolescence (≤age 21) reported significantly more SDM (P=0.013). Importantly, SDM was associated with less decisional conflict (ß=-0.66, R2=0.567, P<0.01) and decisional regret (ß=-0.37, R2=0.180, P<0.001) and no difference in vigorous intensity aerobic exercise in the 6 months after diagnosis/genetic testing or the past year (P=0.56; P=0.34, respectively). CONCLUSIONS SDM is associated with lower decisional conflict and decisional regret; and no difference in postdiagnosis exercise. Our data thus support SDM as the preferred model for exercise discussions for ARVC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Sweeney
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health (J.S., D.L.R.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore
- National Human Genome Research Institute (J.S.), National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - Crystal Tichnell
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine (C.T., C.P., B.M., H.C., C.A.J.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore
| | - Susan Christian
- Department of Medical Genetics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada (S.C.)
| | - Catherine Pendelton
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine (C.T., C.P., B.M., H.C., C.A.J.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore
| | - Brittney Murray
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine (C.T., C.P., B.M., H.C., C.A.J.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore
| | - Debra L. Roter
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health (J.S., D.L.R.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore
| | - Leila Jamal
- Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute (L.J.), National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
- Department of Bioethics, Clinical Center (L.J.), National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - Hugh Calkins
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine (C.T., C.P., B.M., H.C., C.A.J.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore
| | - Cynthia A. James
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine (C.T., C.P., B.M., H.C., C.A.J.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Anraad C, van Empelen P, Ruiter RAC, van Keulen H. Effects of an online tailored decision aid to promote informed decision making about maternal pertussis vaccination in the Netherlands: A randomized controlled trial. Vaccine 2023; 41:7348-7358. [PMID: 37977943 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.10.068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2023] [Revised: 06/30/2023] [Accepted: 10/26/2023] [Indexed: 11/19/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In 2019, maternal pertussis vaccination (MPV) during pregnancy was introduced in the Netherlands. New interventions to promote informed decision making (IDM) about vaccinations are highly needed, especially for new vaccinations. Decision aids (DAs) have the potential to support IDM. This study evaluates the effects of an online DA on IDM and MPV uptake. METHODS Pregnant individuals, recruited for the randomized controlled trial (RCT), who gave informed consent (N = 1,236) were randomly assigned to the control (N = 650; no information) or intervention condition (N = 586; DA at 18 weeks pregnancy). MPV uptake and IDM were primary outcomes, decisional certainty and psychological determinants of MPV uptake were secondary outcomes. Measures were taken at 18 weeks of pregnancy (baseline) and at 20 weeks of pregnancy (post-test); intervention use was logged. Data were analysed using intention-to-treat analyses, logistic regression, and linear mixed regression models. RESULTS Uptake of MPV was high in our sample (92.3 %). No significant effect of the DA condition on MPV uptake was found compared to the control condition. We found that the DA increased IDM (β = 0.24, p < .004) and one of its components level of knowledge about MPV (β = 0.31, p < .004). We also found an increase in decisional certainty (β = 0.24, p < .004), perceived susceptibility (β = 0.24, p < .004), severity of pertussis (β = 0.41, p < .004), and positive affect about MPV (β = 0.15, p < .004). There was a positive association between dose of the intervention and MPV uptake (β = 0.05, p < .004). DISCUSSION The DA seemed effective in promoting IDM about and determinants of MPV uptake. No main effect was found on MPV uptake, but MPV uptake was related to the level of exposure to the DA. People with high intentions towards MPV were overrepresented in the sample. However, effects on IDM were consistent among participants with different levels of MPV intention at baseline.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte Anraad
- Department of Work & Social Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands; TNO Child Health, Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research, P.O. Box 3005, 2316 ZL Leiden, The Netherlands.
| | - Pepijn van Empelen
- TNO Child Health, Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research, P.O. Box 3005, 2316 ZL Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Robert A C Ruiter
- Department of Work & Social Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Hilde van Keulen
- TNO Child Health, Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research, P.O. Box 3005, 2316 ZL Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Berger-Höger B, Lewis KB, Cherry K, Finderup J, Gunderson J, Kaden J, Kienlin S, Rahn AC, Sikora L, Stacey D, Steckelberg A, Zhao J. Determinants of practice for providing decision coaching to facilitate informed values-based decision-making: protocol for a mixed-methods systematic review. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e071478. [PMID: 37968011 PMCID: PMC10660977 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071478] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2022] [Accepted: 10/18/2023] [Indexed: 11/17/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Decision coaching is a non-directive approach to support patients to prepare for making health decisions. It is used to facilitate patients' involvement in informed values-based decision-making and use of evidence-based health information. A recent systematic review revealed low certainty evidence for its effectiveness with and without evidence-based information. However, there may be opportunities to improve the study and use of decision coaching in clinical practice by systematically investigating its determinants of practice. We aim to conduct a systematic review to identify and synthesise the determinants of practice for providing decision coaching to facilitate patient involvement in decision-making from multiple perspectives that influence its use. METHODS AND ANALYSIS We will conduct a mixed-methods systematic review guided by the Cochrane' Handbook of Systematic Reviews. We will include studies reporting determinants of practice influencing decision coaching with or without evidence-based patient information with adults making a health decision for themselves or a family member. Systematic literature searches will be conducted in Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL and PsycINFO via Ovid and CINAHL via EBSCO including quantitative, qualitative and mixed-methods study designs. Additionally, experts in the field will be contacted.Two reviewers will independently screen and extract data. We will synthesise determinants using deductive and inductive qualitative content analysis and a coding frame developed specifically for this review based on a taxonomy of barriers and enablers of shared decision-making mapped onto the major domains of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. We will assess the quality of included studies using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethical approval is not required as this systematic review involves only previously published literature. The results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal, presented at scientific conferences and disseminated to relevant consumer groups. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42022338299.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Birte Berger-Höger
- Institute of Public Health and Nursing Research, Faculty 11 Human and Health Sciences, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany
| | - Krystina B Lewis
- School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Katherine Cherry
- Department of Nephrology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Jeanette Finderup
- Department of Renal Medicine and Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Research Centre for Patient Involvement, Aarhus University & Central Region, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Janet Gunderson
- Patient partner with the Saskatchewan Centre for Patient-Oriented Research and the Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research's (SPOR) Chronic Pain Network, Cochrane, and the Evidence Alliance. Committee member for the Canadian Arthritis Patient Alliance, Saskatchewan, Western Canada, Canada
| | - Jana Kaden
- Institute of Public Health and Nursing Research, Faculty 11 Human and Health Sciences, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany
| | - Simone Kienlin
- Department of Health and Caring Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Langnes, Norway
- Department of Medicine and Healthcare, South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority, Hamar, Norway
| | - Anne C Rahn
- Nursing Research Unit, Institute for Social Medicine and Epidemiology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Lindsey Sikora
- Health Sciences Library, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Dawn Stacey
- School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Anke Steckelberg
- Institute of Health and Nursing Science, Faculty of Medicine, Martin-Luther-University of Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Junqiang Zhao
- School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Gausman J, Saggurti N, Adanu R, Bandoh DAB, Berrueta M, Chakraborty S, Kenu E, Khan N, Langer A, Nigri C, Odikro MA, Pingray V, Ramesh S, Vázquez P, Williams CR, Jolivet RR. Validation of a measure to assess decision-making autonomy in family planning services in three low- and middle-income countries: The Family Planning Autonomous Decision-Making scale (FP-ADM). PLoS One 2023; 18:e0293586. [PMID: 37922257 PMCID: PMC10624301 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293586] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2022] [Accepted: 10/17/2023] [Indexed: 11/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Integrating measures of respectful care is an important priority in family planning programs, aligned with maternal health efforts. Ensuring women can make autonomous reproductive health decisions is an important indicator of respectful care. While scales have been developed and validated in family planning for dimensions of person-centered care, none focus specifically on decision-making autonomy. The Mothers Autonomy in Decision-Making (MADM) scale measures autonomy in decision-making during maternity care. We adapted the MADM scale to measure autonomy surrounding a woman's decision to use a contraceptive method within the context of contraceptive counselling. This study presents a psychometric validation of the Family Planning Autonomous Decision-Making (FP-ADM) scale using data from Argentina, Ghana, and India. METHODS AND FINDINGS We used cross-sectional data from women in four subnational areas in Argentina (n = 890), Ghana (n = 1,114), and India (n = 1,130). In each area, 20 primary sampling units (PSUs) were randomly selected based on probability proportional to size. Households were randomly selected in Ghana and India. In Argentina, all facilities providing reproductive and maternal health services within selected PSUs were included and women were randomly selected upon exiting the facility. Interviews were conducted with a sample of 360 women per district. In total, 890 women completed the FP-ADM in Argentina, 1,114 in Ghana and 1,130 in India. To measure autonomous decision-making within FP service delivery, we adapted the items of the MADM scale to focus on family planning. To assess the scale's psychometric properties, we first examined the eigenvalues and conducted a parallel analysis to determine the number of factors. We then conducted exploratory factor analysis to determine which items to retain. The resulting factors were then identified based on the corresponding items. Internal consistency reliability was assessed with Cronbach's alpha. We assessed both convergent and divergent construct validity by examining associations with expected outcomes related to the underlying construct. The Eigenvalues and parallel analysis suggested a two-factor solution. The two underlying dimensions of the construct were identified as "Bidirectional Exchange of Information" (Factor 1) and "Empowered Choice" (Factor 2). Cronbach's alpha was calculated for the full scale and each subscale. Results suggested good internal consistency of the scale. There was a strong, significant positive association between whether a woman expressed satisfaction with quality of care received from the healthcare provider and her FP-ADM score in all three countries and a significant negative association between a woman's FP-ADM score and her stated desire to switch contraceptive methods in the future. CONCLUSIONS Our results suggest the FP-ADM is a valid instrument to assess decision-making autonomy in contraceptive counseling and service delivery in diverse low- and middle-income countries. The scale evidenced strong construct, convergent, and divergent validity and high internal consistency reliability. Use of the FP-ADM scale could contribute to improved measurement of person-centered family planning services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jewel Gausman
- Women and Health Initiative, Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard University T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
- Maternal and Child Health Nursing Department, School of Nursing, University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
| | | | - Richard Adanu
- Department of Population, Family and Reproductive Health, University of Ghana School of Public Health, Accra, Ghana
| | - Delia A. B. Bandoh
- Department of Epidemiology and Disease Control, University of Ghana School of Public Health, Accra, Greater Accra, Ghana
| | - Mabel Berrueta
- Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | - Ernest Kenu
- Department of Epidemiology and Disease Control, University of Ghana School of Public Health, Accra, Greater Accra, Ghana
| | | | - Ana Langer
- Women and Health Initiative, Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard University T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Carolina Nigri
- Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Magdalene A. Odikro
- Department of Epidemiology and Disease Control, University of Ghana School of Public Health, Accra, Greater Accra, Ghana
| | - Veronica Pingray
- Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | - Paula Vázquez
- Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy, Buenos Aires, Argentina
- Department of Health Science, Kinesiology and Rehabilitation, Universidad Nacional de La Matanza, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Caitlin R. Williams
- Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy, Buenos Aires, Argentina
- Department of Maternal and Child Health, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - R. Rima Jolivet
- Women and Health Initiative, Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard University T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Djuric O, Venturelli F, Bassi MC, Gorini G, Paci E, Mantellini P, Giorgi Rossi P. Recruitment strategies and interventions to increase participation in lung cancer screening programmes: a systematic review protocol. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e074140. [PMID: 37907293 PMCID: PMC10618983 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074140] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2023] [Accepted: 10/16/2023] [Indexed: 11/02/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Despite strong evidence for the efficacy of low-radiation dose CT (LDCT) in reducing lung cancer (LC) mortality, implementing LC screening (LCS) programmes remains a challenge. We aim to systematically review the evidence on the strategies used to recruit the adult population at risk of LC to LDCT within LCS programmes and to estimate the effectiveness of interventions identified, used to reach the potentially eligible population, increase participation and informed choice, and ensure equitable access. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This sequential systematic literature review will consist of three steps: (1) a scoping review of existing strategies and organisational models for LCS; (2) selecting papers reporting relevant outcomes (test coverage, screening participation and informed choice) and comparing results among different models; (3) a systematic review of interventions implemented to increase participation in LCS programmes. Each step will follow the methodological guidelines provided by the Cochrane Collaboration and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. Data sources include electronic databases such as Medline (PubMed version), Embase, CINAHL (Ebsco version), Scopus and Cochrane CENTRAL. The search will be limited to studies published from January 2000 to March 2023 in English, Italian, French, Spanish, Serbian and Croatian language. Findings will be synthesised quantitatively and qualitatively as appropriate. Risk of bias assessment will be only applied to studies selected in the second and third steps. The quality of evidence will be summarised for each outcome using the Grading Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Given that this is a review of existing literature, ethics approval is not required. The results will be published in peer-reviewed scientific journals and presented at relevant conferences. The findings of this review will help guide health authorities in organising LCS programmes and developing recommendations, policies, and actions at national and regional levels. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42023408357.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olivera Djuric
- Epidemiology Unit, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
- Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, Centre for Environmental, Nutritional and Genetic Epidemiology (CREAGEN), Public Health Unit, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Francesco Venturelli
- Epidemiology Unit, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Maria Chiara Bassi
- Scientific Library, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Gorini
- Division of Epidemiology and Clinical Governance, Institute for Study, Prevention and network in Oncology (ISPRO), Florence, Italy
| | - Eugenio Paci
- Italian League against Cancer (LILT), Florence, Italy
| | - Paola Mantellini
- Division of Screening, Institute for Study, Prevention and Network in Oncology (ISPRO), Florence, Italy
| | - Paolo Giorgi Rossi
- Epidemiology Unit, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Kasper J, Lühnen J, Hinneburg J, Siebenhofer A, Posch N, Berger-Höger B, Grafe A, Småstuen MC, Steckelberg A. MAPPinfo - mapping quality of health information: Validation study of an assessment instrument. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0290027. [PMID: 37871040 PMCID: PMC10593225 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2022] [Accepted: 08/01/2023] [Indexed: 10/25/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Health information is a prerequisite for informed choices-decisions, made by individuals about their own health based on knowledge and in congruence with own preferences. Criteria for development, content and design have been defined in a corresponding guideline. However, no instruments exist that provide reasonably operationalised measurement items. Therefore, we drafted the checklist, MAPPinfo, addressing the existing criteria with 19 items. OBJECTIVES The current study aimed to validate MAPPinfo. METHODS Five substudies were conducted subsequently at the Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Germany and the Medical University of Graz, Austria: (1) to determine content validity through expert reviews of the first draft, (2) to determine feasibility using 'think aloud' in piloting with untrained users, (3) to determine inter-rater reliability and criterion validity through a pretest on 50 health information materials, (4) to determine construct validity using 50 developers' self-declarations about development methods as a reference standard, (5) to determine divergent validity in comparison with the Ensuring Quality Information for Patients (EQIP) (expanded) Scale. The analyses used were qualitative methods and correlation-based methods for determining both inter-rater reliability and validity. RESULTS The instrument was considered by experts to operationalise the existing guidelines convincingly. Health and nursing science students found it easy to understand and use. It also had good interrater reliability (mean of T coefficients = .79) and provided a very good estimate of the reference standard (Spearman's rho = .89), implying sound construct validity. Finally, comparison with the EQIP instrument revealed important and distinct areas of similarities and differences. CONCLUSIONS The new instrument is ready for use as a screening instrument without the need for training. According to its underpinning concept the instrument exclusively comprises items which are justified by either ethics or research evidence, implying negligence of not yet evidence based, however, potentially important criteria. Further research is needed to complete the body of evidence-based criteria, aiming at an extension of the guideline and MAPPinfo. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER AsPredicted22546; date of registration: 24 July 2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jürgen Kasper
- Department of Nursing and Health Promotion, Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway
| | - Julia Lühnen
- Institute of Health and Nursing Science, Faculty of Medicine, Martin Luther University, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Jana Hinneburg
- Institute of Health and Nursing Science, Faculty of Medicine, Martin Luther University, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Andrea Siebenhofer
- Institute of General Practice and Evidence-Based Health Services Research, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
- Institute for General Practice, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Nicole Posch
- Institute of General Practice and Evidence-Based Health Services Research, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Birte Berger-Höger
- Institute of Health and Nursing Science, Faculty of Medicine, Martin Luther University, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | | | - Milada Cvancarova Småstuen
- Department of Nursing and Health Promotion, Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway
| | - Anke Steckelberg
- Institute of Health and Nursing Science, Faculty of Medicine, Martin Luther University, Halle (Saale), Germany
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Kautz-Freimuth S, Redaèlli M, Shukri A, Kentenich H, Simic D, Mildenberger V, Schmutzler R, Rhiem K, Stock S. Effectiveness of evidence-based decision aids for women with pathogenic BRCA1 or BRCA2 variants in the german health care context: results from a randomized controlled trial. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2023; 23:223. [PMID: 37845719 PMCID: PMC10580583 DOI: 10.1186/s12911-023-02327-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2023] [Accepted: 10/05/2023] [Indexed: 10/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Women with pathogenic BRCA1 or BRCA2 variants are at high risk for breast and ovarian cancer. Preventive options include risk-reducing breast and ovarian surgeries and intensified breast surveillance. However, individual decision-making is often associated with decisional conflicts. Two evidence-based decision aids have recently been developed for these women (healthy or with unilateral breast cancer) for the German context to support them in their decision-making process. This study evaluated their effectiveness. METHODS In a randomized controlled study, women (aged 18-70 years) with pathogenic BRCA1 or BRCA2 variants were randomly assigned 1:1 to the intervention (IG, n = 230) or control (CG, n = 220) group. All participants received usual care. After baseline survey (t0), IG participants additionally received the DAs. Follow-up surveys were at three (t1) and six (t2) months. Primary outcome was decisional conflict at t1. Secondary analyses included decision status, decision regret, knowledge on risks and preventive options, self-reported psychological symptoms, acceptability of DAs, and preparation for decision-making. RESULTS Of 450 women recruited, 417 completed t0, 398 completed t1 and 386 completed t2. Compared to CG, IG participants had lower decisional conflict scores at t1 (p = 0.049) and t2 (p = 0.006) and higher scores for knowledge (p = 0.004), acceptability (p = 0.000), and preparation for decision-making (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS These DAs can help improve key parameters of decision-making in women with pathogenic BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants and, thus, provide a useful add-on to the current counseling and care concept for these women in Germany. TRIAL REGISTRATION German Clinical Trials Register, DRKS-ID: DRKS00015823, retrospectively registered 14/06/2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sibylle Kautz-Freimuth
- Institute of Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Gleueler Straße 176-178, 50935, Cologne, Germany.
| | - Marcus Redaèlli
- Institute of Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Gleueler Straße 176-178, 50935, Cologne, Germany
| | - Arim Shukri
- Institute of Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Gleueler Straße 176-178, 50935, Cologne, Germany
| | - Hannah Kentenich
- Institute of Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Gleueler Straße 176-178, 50935, Cologne, Germany
| | - Dusan Simic
- Institute of Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Gleueler Straße 176-178, 50935, Cologne, Germany
| | - Vanessa Mildenberger
- Institute of Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Gleueler Straße 176-178, 50935, Cologne, Germany
| | - Rita Schmutzler
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Kerpener Straße 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany
| | - Kerstin Rhiem
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Kerpener Straße 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany
| | - Stephanie Stock
- Institute of Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Gleueler Straße 176-178, 50935, Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Chair SY, Law BMH, Zang Y, Waye MMY, Cheng HY, Chow KM. The effects of decision aids for genetic counselling among people considering genetic testing: A systematic review. J Clin Nurs 2023; 32:6796-6810. [PMID: 37287127 DOI: 10.1111/jocn.16768] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2022] [Revised: 04/26/2023] [Accepted: 05/12/2023] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
AIM To assess the effectiveness of decision aids for genetic counsellees to improve their conflicts in decision-making and psychological well-being when considering genetic tests for inherited genetic diseases, and their knowledge about these tests and their genetic risks. DESIGN Systematic review. DATA SOURCES Six electronic databases (PubMed, MEDLINE, OVID Nursing, APA PsycINFO, EMBASE and CINAHL) were searched from inception to May 2022. REVIEW METHODS Only randomised controlled trials that examined the effect of decision aids for information provision centring genetic testing on outcomes including decisional conflicts, informed choice making, knowledge on genetic risks or genetic tests, and psychological outcomes among participants who had undergone genetic counselling were included. Their risk of bias was assessed using the Version 2 of the Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomised trials. Results were presented narratively. The review was conducted according to the PRISMA checklist. RESULTS Eight included studies examined the effect of booklet-based, computer-based, film-based or web-based decision aids on individuals considering genetic testing for their increased cancer risks. Despite contrasting findings across studies, they showed that decision aids enable genetic counsellees to feel more informed in decision-making on genetic tests, although most showed no effect on decisional conflict. Knowledge of genetic counsellees on genetic risks and genetic tests were increased after the use of decision aids. Most studies showed no significant effect on any psychological outcomes assessed. CONCLUSIONS Review findings corroborate the use of decision aids to enhance the effective delivery of genetic counselling, enabling genetic counsellees to gain more knowledge of genetic tests and feel more informed in making decisions to have these tests. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE Decision aids can be used to support nurse-led genetic counselling for better knowledge acquisition and decision-making among counsellees. NO PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION Patient or public contribution is not applicable as this is a systematic review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sek Ying Chair
- The Nethersole School of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
- Asia-Pacific Genomic and Genetic Nursing Centre, The Nethersole School of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
- The Croucher Laboratory for Human Genomics, The Nethersole School of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Bernard M H Law
- The Nethersole School of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Yuli Zang
- The Nethersole School of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Mary M Y Waye
- The Nethersole School of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
- Asia-Pacific Genomic and Genetic Nursing Centre, The Nethersole School of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
- The Croucher Laboratory for Human Genomics, The Nethersole School of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Ho Yu Cheng
- The Nethersole School of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
- Asia-Pacific Genomic and Genetic Nursing Centre, The Nethersole School of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
- The Croucher Laboratory for Human Genomics, The Nethersole School of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Ka Ming Chow
- The Nethersole School of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
- Asia-Pacific Genomic and Genetic Nursing Centre, The Nethersole School of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
- The Croucher Laboratory for Human Genomics, The Nethersole School of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Lust EER, Bronsgeest K, Henneman L, Crombag N, Bilardo CM, van Vliet-Lachotzki EH, Galjaard RJH, Sikkel E, Haak MC, Bekker MN. Informed choice and routinization of the second-trimester anomaly scan: a national cohort study in the Netherlands. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2023; 23:694. [PMID: 37752446 PMCID: PMC10521538 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-023-05981-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2023] [Accepted: 09/07/2023] [Indexed: 09/28/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Since 2007 all pregnant women in the Netherlands are offered the second-trimester anomaly scan (SAS) in a nationwide prenatal screening program. This study aims to assess the level of informed choice of women opting for the SAS and to evaluate the presence of routinization 16 years after its implementation. It further explores decisional conflict and women's decision making. METHODS This prospective national survey study consisted of an online questionnaire which was completed after prenatal counseling and before undergoing the SAS. Informed choice was measured by the adapted multidimensional measure of informed choice (MMIC) and was defined in case women were classified as value-consistent, if their decision for the SAS was deliberated and made with sufficient knowledge. RESULTS A total of 894/1167 (76.6%) women completed the questionnaire. Overall, 54.8% made an informed choice, 89.6% had good knowledge, 59.8% had deliberated their choice and 92.7% held a positive attitude towards the SAS. Women with low educational attainment (p=0.004) or respondents of non-Western descent (p=0.038) were less likely to make an informed choice. Decisional conflict was low, with a significantly lower decisional conflict score in women that made an informed choice (p<0.001). Most respondents (97.9%) did not perceive pressure to undergo the SAS. CONCLUSIONS Our study showed a relatively low rate of informed choice for the SAS, due to absence of deliberation. Therefore, some routinization seem to be present in the Netherlands. However, most women had sufficient knowledge, did not perceive pressure and experienced low decisional conflict.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eline E R Lust
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, 3508 AB, The Netherlands
| | - Kim Bronsgeest
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Lidewij Henneman
- Department of Human Genetics and Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Neeltje Crombag
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, 3508 AB, The Netherlands
| | - Caterina M Bilardo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Robert-Jan H Galjaard
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Esther Sikkel
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Monique C Haak
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Mireille N Bekker
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, 3508 AB, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Zacher S, Lauberger J, Thiel C, Lühnen J, Steckelberg A. Informed consent for total knee arthroplasty: exploration of patient`s information acquisition and decision-making processes-a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res 2023; 23:978. [PMID: 37697293 PMCID: PMC10494361 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-09993-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2022] [Accepted: 08/31/2023] [Indexed: 09/13/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is an option for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis (OA). Patients have high expectations regarding the benefits of the actual operation. Patients can seek a second opinion on the indication for TKA. In a study, less than half of recommended TKAs were confirmed by the second opinion and conservative treatments are not fully utilized. Informed consent forms that are used in Germany usually do not meet the requirements to support informed decision-making. Our aim was to describe the process from the diagnosis of knee OA through the decision-making process to the informed consent process for TKA, and to understand when, how, and by whom decisions are made. Moreover, we wanted to describe patients' information needs and preferences about knee OA and its treatment, including TKA, and find out what information is provided. We also wanted to find out what information was important for decision-making and identify barriers and facilitators for the optimal use of evidence-based informed consent forms in practice. METHODS We chose a qualitative approach and conducted semi-structured interviews with patients who were going to receive, have received, or have declined TKA, and with general practitioners (GP), office-based as well as orthopaedists and anaesthesiologists in clinics who obtain informed consent. The interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and analysed using qualitative content analysis. RESULTS We conducted interviews with 13 patients, three GPs, four office-based orthopaedists and seven doctors in clinics who had obtained informed consent. Information needs were modelled on subjective disease theory and information conveyed by the doctors. Patients in this sample predominantly made their decisions without having received sufficient information. Trust in doctors and experiences seemed to be more relevant in this sample than fact-based information. Office-based (GPs, orthopaedists) and orthopaedists in clinics had different understandings of their roles and expectations in terms of providing information. CONCLUSIONS We were able to identify structural barriers and assumptions that hinder the implementation of evidence-based informed consent forms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandro Zacher
- Medical Faculty, Institute of Health and Nursing Science, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Magdeburger Straße 8, 06112, Halle (Saale), Germany.
| | - Julia Lauberger
- Medical Faculty, Institute of Health and Nursing Science, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Magdeburger Straße 8, 06112, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Carolin Thiel
- Medical Faculty, Institute of General Practice and Family Medicine, Martin-Luther-University Halle, Magdeburger Straße 8, 06112, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Julia Lühnen
- Medical Faculty, Institute of Health and Nursing Science, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Magdeburger Straße 8, 06112, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Anke Steckelberg
- Medical Faculty, Institute of Health and Nursing Science, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Magdeburger Straße 8, 06112, Halle (Saale), Germany
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Taneja S, Panday J, Popoola A, Greyson D, McDonald SD, Patel T, Vanstone M. Making informed choices about cannabis use during pregnancy and lactation: A qualitative study of information use. Birth 2023; 50:504-512. [PMID: 35848512 DOI: 10.1111/birt.12668] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2021] [Revised: 06/28/2022] [Accepted: 07/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cannabis use during pregnancy and lactation continues to increase as some perceive cannabis to be helpful for symptom management and coping. As such, pregnant and lactating people are faced with challenging decisions, weighing benefits against the potential risks of cannabis use. To help clinicians facilitate informed choices, we explored the self-identified information needs of pregnant and lactating people who are deciding whether or not to use cannabis. We aimed to describe the modes and sources of their information-seeking and their satisfaction with the information they found. METHODS We interviewed 52 people in Canada who made the decision to start, stop, or continue using cannabis during pregnancy and lactation. Participants were recruited from advertisements in prenatal clinics and on social media. We utilized an inductive approach to analysis focused on information used in decision-making about cannabis use, including the process of seeking and evaluating that information. RESULTS Participants were deliberate in their search for information, most commonly seeking information on risks of use. Information sources were mainly online material or people in their social networks. Clinicians were not commonly described as a knowledgeable or supportive source of information. Overwhelmingly, participants described the information they found as insufficient and emphasized the need for more comprehensive and trustworthy sources of information. CONCLUSIONS Participants identified distinct and unmet information needs associated with their decision to use cannabis. They described a desire for clear evidence about the impact of cannabis use, including information about how to balance the benefits they perceived from cannabis use with the risks of harm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shipra Taneja
- Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Janelle Panday
- Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Anuoluwa Popoola
- Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Devon Greyson
- School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Sarah D McDonald
- Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Radiology and Health Research Methods, Evidence & Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Tejal Patel
- Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Meredith Vanstone
- Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Blake SN, Hugtenburg JG, van der Vlugt M, Dekker E, Fransen MP. Decision-making on colorectal cancer screening in Curaçao - interviews with the target population. BMC Public Health 2023; 23:1437. [PMID: 37501171 PMCID: PMC10373279 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-023-16335-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2023] [Accepted: 07/18/2023] [Indexed: 07/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND During the first year of the population based colorectal cancer (CRC) screening program on Curaçao, about 20% of invitees participated. This study explored the target population's perceptions and awareness on CRC (screening), beliefs on the program provision, their preferences and information needs for informed decision-making. METHODS Semi-structured interviews with 23 individuals, who were not yet invited for CRC screening, were recorded, transcribed, coded and analyzed. RESULTS CRC (screening) was discussed in the context of personal health, where own responsibility and food were important. Cancer was perceived as an unpredictable disease that causes suffering and leads to death and was also associated with fear. Despite being aware of the program, most respondents were not familiar with the screening procedure. Provision of the screening program was regarded positively and as an opportunity to contribute to health improvement. This seemed related to the expressed trust in the Caribbean Prevention Center (program organizer). Respondents preferred to make independent decisions about CRC screening participation. A personal approach, visual aids and media were the preferred sources of information. CONCLUSION The results of our interviews suggest that it may be beneficial to provide information on CRC screening in Curaçao within the context of personal health. While including sensitivity to fears and respect for the autonomy of the target population. Finally, electronic media maybe useful in supporting informed decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shacara N Blake
- Caribbean Prevention Center (Fundashon Prevenshon), Willemstad, Curaçao.
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Amsterdam Gastroenterology, Endocrinology and Metabolism (AGEM), Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Jacqueline G Hugtenburg
- Caribbean Prevention Center (Fundashon Prevenshon), Willemstad, Curaçao
- Faculty of Social and Behavioral Sciences, University of Curaçao, Willemstad, Curaçao
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Manon van der Vlugt
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Gastroenterology, Endocrinology and Metabolism (AGEM), Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Evelien Dekker
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Gastroenterology, Endocrinology and Metabolism (AGEM), Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Mirjam P Fransen
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Centre for Nutrition Prevention and Health Services, Bilthoven, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Thielmann RRLC, Hoving C, Cals JWL, Crutzen R. The Effects of Online Access to General Practice Medical Records Perceived by Patients: Longitudinal Survey Study. J Med Internet Res 2023; 25:e47659. [PMID: 37266981 DOI: 10.2196/47659] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2023] [Revised: 05/11/2023] [Accepted: 05/17/2023] [Indexed: 06/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient online access to medical records is assumed to facilitate patient empowerment and advance patient-centered health care. However, to date, the actual effects of online access to medical records perceived by patients and other outcomes are insufficiently empirically tested. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to investigate the effects of online access to medical records on patient empowerment, informed decision-making, and the patient-provider relationship perceived by patients. METHODS A nationwide, 2-wave, longitudinal survey study was conducted among Dutch adults (N=2402). Linear regression analyses were performed. In model 1, the perceived effects of online access to medical records (measured at T1 [first measurement; July 2021]) on 16 outcomes (measured at T2 [second measurement; January 2022]), which were associated with the use of online access to general practice medical records in previous research, were investigated. Model 2 included sociodemographic factors and patient characteristics as confounders. RESULTS Users indicated more strongly than nonusers that online access to medical records would increase their participation in health care, improve the relationship with their general practitioner, and support informed decision-making. These results were robust when adjusted for the influence of confounders. Effect sizes were very small, with unstandardized regression coefficients (B) ranging between -0.39 and 0.28. Higher digital and health literacy were associated with higher ratings of almost all effects. CONCLUSIONS Online access to medical records has the potential to empower patients and foster informed decision-making among patients. The effects in this study were small but might grow over time. Other factors, such as the attitude of general practitioners toward online access to medical records, might moderate these effects. The results indicate that the potential benefits of online access to medical records might be unevenly distributed. We suggest future exploration of the conditions under which online access to medical records can improve health care system functioning and efficiency without increasing health inequality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rosa R L C Thielmann
- School for Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Ciska Hoving
- School for Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Jochen W L Cals
- School for Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Rik Crutzen
- School for Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Van Steijvoort E, Peeters H, Vandecruys H, Verguts J, Peeraer K, Matthijs G, Borry P. Experiences of nonpregnant couples after receiving reproductive genetic carrier screening results in Belgium. Eur J Hum Genet 2023; 31:696-702. [PMID: 36788144 PMCID: PMC9928592 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-023-01310-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2022] [Revised: 01/27/2023] [Accepted: 01/31/2023] [Indexed: 02/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Reproductive genetic carrier screening (RGCS) allows for the identification of couples who have an increased likelihood of conceiving a child with a particular autosomal recessive or X-linked condition. The aim of this study was to assess the level of satisfaction, anxiety, knowledge retention, psychosocial and counseling-related aspects among couples who chose to have RGCS. Participants were initially informed about their screening results by telephone. After obtaining a written report of test results, participants were asked to complete an individual self-administered questionnaire. All participants (n = 67) felt they had enough information to make an informed choice. None of the participants regretted their choice to have RGCS. Test results were most often shared with parents (61%) or siblings (37%). Our findings demonstrate that the information/counseling and reporting strategy that was used in the context of this study led to high participant satisfaction, an increase in knowledge over time and favorable psychosocial and counseling-related outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva Van Steijvoort
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Hilde Peeters
- Department of Human Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Hilde Vandecruys
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Jessa Ziekenhuis Hasselt, Hasselt, Belgium
| | - Jasper Verguts
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Jessa Ziekenhuis Hasselt, Hasselt, Belgium
| | - Karen Peeraer
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Gert Matthijs
- Department of Human Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Pascal Borry
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Damman OC, Henneman L, IJssel DVVD, Timmermans DRM. Conditions for autonomous reproductive decision-making in prenatal screening: A mixed methods study. Midwifery 2023; 119:103607. [PMID: 36753831 DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2023.103607] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2020] [Revised: 07/18/2022] [Accepted: 01/26/2023] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pregnant women should be able to make autonomous and meaningful decisions about prenatal screening for fetal abnormalities. It remains largely unclear which circumstances facilitate or hinder such a decision-making process. OBJECTIVE To investigate what conditions Dutch pregnant women and professional experts consider important for autonomous reproductive decision-making in prenatal screening for fetal abnormalities, and the extent to which, according to women, those conditions are met in practice. METHODS A mixed methods study was conducted in the Netherlands in 2016-2017. A conceptual model was used to interview professional experts (n = 16) and pregnant women (n = 19). Thematic analysis was performed to identify important conditions. Subsequently, a questionnaire assessed the perceived importance of those conditions and the extent to which these were met, in the experience of pregnant women (n = 200). RESULTS Professional experts stressed the importance of information provision, and emphasized a rational decision-making model. Pregnant women differed in what information they felt was needed, and this depended on the screening decision made. Questionnaire findings showed that women prioritized discussion and consensus with partners. Information about test accuracy and miscarriage risk of invasive follow-up testing was also considered important. Two key conditions were not adequately met, in the experience of women: (1) having information about miscarriage risk; (2) not being directed by health professionals in decision-making. CONCLUSION According to women, discussion and consensus with partners was considered a highly important condition for an autonomous and meaningful decision-making process. Access to information about safety of testing and ensuring that women are not being directed in their decision-making by health professionals seem to be areas for improvement in prenatal care practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olga C Damman
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Lidewij Henneman
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Section Community Genetics, Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Dalisa V van den IJssel
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Danielle R M Timmermans
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Wilhelm C, Rebitschek FG. Medizinische Evidenz kompetent kommunizieren. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR HERZ THORAX UND GEFASSCHIRURGIE 2023. [DOI: 10.1007/s00398-023-00568-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/08/2023]
Abstract
ZusammenfassungWie alle Patienten in Deutschland sollen auch jene in der Herzchirurgie, soweit wie möglich, in die klinische Entscheidungsfindung eingebunden werden. Was möglich ist, hängt – neben Patientenvoraussetzungen – maßgeblich von den kommunikativen Fähigkeiten und Werkzeugen ab, die der beratende Arzt einsetzt, um informiertes Entscheiden auf Basis der besten verfügbaren medizinischen Erkenntnisse zu ermöglichen. Anhand von Schlüsselherausforderungen strukturiert dieser narrative Überblick Lösungsansätze für die Nutzung medizinischer Evidenz in Entscheidungsprozessen: unbestimmte Bezugsrahmen, relative Risiken, komplexe Informationen zu Entscheidungsoptionen bis hin zur Interpretation vorangehender diagnostischer Testergebnisse. Die dargestellten Lösungsansätze stellen in die Versorgung integrierbare Werkzeuge dar. Sie erfordern eine Kompetenzstärkung des Fachpersonals und qualitätsgesicherte medizinische Informationsangebote.
Collapse
|
39
|
Griffin E, Hooker G, Grace M, Kaphingst K, Velez Edwards D, Zhao Z, Slamon J. What knowledge is required for an informed choice related to non-invasive prenatal screening? J Genet Couns 2023. [PMID: 36872475 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1690] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2022] [Revised: 01/15/2023] [Accepted: 01/24/2023] [Indexed: 03/07/2023]
Abstract
Non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS) using cell-free DNA is a screening test for fetal aneuploidy offered by a variety of prenatal healthcare providers. Guidelines for genetic screening consistently recommend that providers facilitate informed choices, which have been associated with better psychological and clinical outcomes than uninformed choices. The multidimensional measure of informed choice (MMIC) is a widely used and theory-based measure that combines knowledge, values, and behavior to classify decisions as either informed or uniformed. We implemented a previously validated version of the MMIC for women offered NIPS to describe the choices made by women receiving prenatal care at the Vanderbilt University Medical Center. The survey included the Ottawa Decisional Conflict scale, an outcome measure used for validation of choice categorization. We found that most women (87%) made an informed choice about NIPS. Of the women categorized as uninformed, 67% had insufficient knowledge, and 33% had an attitude discordant with their decision. The vast majority of respondents (92.5%) underwent NIPS and had a positive attitude toward screening (94.3%). Ethnicity (p = 0.04) and education (p = 0.01) were found to be significantly associated with informed choice. Decisional conflict was extremely low among all participants, with only 5.6% of all participants demonstrating any form of decisional conflict, and all being categorized as having made an informed choice. This study suggests that pre-test counseling by a genetic counselor results in high rates of informed choice and low-decisional conflict amongst women offered NIPS by genetic counselors, though more research is required to determine if rates of informed choice remain high when NIPS is offered by other prenatal providers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erin Griffin
- Northern Arizona Healthcare, Sedona, Arizona, USA
| | - Gillian Hooker
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Tennessee, Nashville, USA.,Concert Genetics, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Matthew Grace
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Tennessee, Nashville, USA
| | - Kimberly Kaphingst
- Department of Communication, University of Utah, Utah, Salt Lake City, USA
| | - Digna Velez Edwards
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Tennessee, Nashville, USA
| | - Zhiguo Zhao
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Tennessee, Nashville, USA
| | - Jill Slamon
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Tennessee, Nashville, USA
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Lühnen J, Frese T, Mau W, Meyer G, Mikolajczyk R, Richter M, Schildmann J, Braunisch MC, Fichtner F, Holzmann-Littig C, Kranke P, Popp M, Schaaf C, Schmaderer C, Seeber C, Werner A, Wijnen-Meijer M, Meerpohl JJ, Steckelberg A. Public information needs and preferences on COVID-19: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health 2023; 23:394. [PMID: 36849938 PMCID: PMC9969022 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-023-15131-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2022] [Accepted: 01/24/2023] [Indexed: 03/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Right from the beginning of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic the general public faced the challenge to find reliable and understandable information in the overwhelming flood of information. To enhance informed decision-making, evidence-based information should be provided. Aim was to explore the general public's information needs and preferences on COVID-19 as well as the barriers to accessing evidence-based information. METHODS We performed a cross-sectional study. Nine hundred twenty-seven panel members were invited to an online survey (12/2020-02/2021). The HeReCa-online-panel is installed at the Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg to assess regularly the general public's view on health issues in five regions in Germany. The survey was set up in LimeSurvey, with nine items, multiple-choice and open-ended questions that allowed to gather qualitative data. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively and a content analysis was carried out to categorise the qualitative data. RESULTS Six hundred thirty-six panel members provided data; mean age 52 years, 56.2% female, and 64.9% with higher education qualifications. Asked about relevant topics related to COVID-19, most participants selected vaccination (63.8%), infection control (52%), and long-term effects (47.8%). The following 11 categories were derived from the qualitative analysis representing the topics of interest: vaccination, infection control, long-term effects, therapies, test methods, mental health, symptoms, structures for pandemic control, infrastructure in health care, research. Participants preferred traditional media (TV 70.6%; radio 58.5%; newspaper 32.7%) to social media, but also used the internet as sources of information, becoming aware of new information on websites (28.5%) or via email/newsletter (20.1%). The knowledge question (Which European country is most affected by the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic?) was correctly answered by 7.5% of participants. The Robert Koch Institute (93.7%) and the World Health Organization (78%) were well known, while other organisations providing health information were rarely known (< 10%). Barriers to accessing trustworthy information were lack of time (30.7%), little experience (23.1%), uncertainty about how to get access (22.2%), complexity and difficulties in understanding (23.9%), and a lack of target group orientation (15,3%). CONCLUSIONS There are extensive information needs regarding various aspects on COVID-19 among the general population. In addition, target-specific dissemination strategies are still needed to reach different groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Lühnen
- Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Interdisciplinary Center for Health Sciences, Institute of Health and Nursing Science, Magdeburgerstraße 8, 06112, Halle (Saale), Germany. .,Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Clinic for Internal Medicine I, Halle (Saale), Germany.
| | - Thomas Frese
- Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Interdisciplinary Center for Health Sciences, Institute of General Practice and Family Medicine, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Wilfried Mau
- Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Interdisciplinary Center for Health Sciences, Institute of Rehabilitation Medicine, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Gabriele Meyer
- Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Interdisciplinary Center for Health Sciences, Institute of Health and Nursing Science, Magdeburgerstraße 8, 06112, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Rafael Mikolajczyk
- Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Interdisciplinary Center for Health Sciences; Institute of Medical Epidemiology, Biometrics and Informatics, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Matthias Richter
- Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg; Interdisciplinary Center for Health Sciences; Institute of Medical Sociology, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Jan Schildmann
- Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg; Interdisciplinary Center for Health Sciences, Institute for History and Ethics of Medicine, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Matthias C Braunisch
- Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Department of Nephrology, Munich, Germany
| | - Falk Fichtner
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, University of Leipzig, Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Christopher Holzmann-Littig
- Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Department of Nephrology, Munich, Germany.,Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, TUM Medical Education Center, Munich, Germany
| | - Peter Kranke
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care, Emergency and Pain Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany
| | - Maria Popp
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care, Emergency and Pain Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany
| | - Christian Schaaf
- Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Department of Nephrology, Munich, Germany
| | - Christoph Schmaderer
- Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Department of Nephrology, Munich, Germany
| | - Christian Seeber
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, University of Leipzig, Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Anne Werner
- Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University of Leipzig, University Medical Center Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Marjo Wijnen-Meijer
- Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, TUM Medical Education Center, Munich, Germany
| | - Joerg J Meerpohl
- Cochrane Germany Foundation, Cochrane Germany, Freiburg, Germany.,Medical Center & Faculty of Medicine, Institute for Evidence in Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Anke Steckelberg
- Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Interdisciplinary Center for Health Sciences, Institute of Health and Nursing Science, Magdeburgerstraße 8, 06112, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
French DP, McWilliams L, Bowers S, Woof VG, Harrison F, Ruane H, Hendy A, Evans DG. Psychological impact of risk-stratified screening as part of the NHS Breast Screening Programme: multi-site non-randomised comparison of BC-Predict versus usual screening (NCT04359420). Br J Cancer 2023; 128:1548-1558. [PMID: 36774447 PMCID: PMC9922101 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-023-02156-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2022] [Revised: 01/08/2023] [Accepted: 01/11/2023] [Indexed: 02/13/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adding risk stratification to standard screening via the NHS Breast Screening Programme (NHSBSP) allows women at higher risk to be offered additional prevention and screening options. It may, however, introduce new harms such as increasing cancer worry. The present study aimed to assess whether there were differences in self-reported harms and benefits between women offered risk stratification (BC-Predict) compared to women offered standard NHSBSP, controlling for baseline values. METHODS As part of the larger PROCAS2 study (NCT04359420), 5901 women were offered standard NHSBSP or BC-Predict at the invitation to NHSBSP. Women who took up BC-Predict received 10-year risk estimates: "high" (≥8%), "above average (moderate)" (5-7.99%), "average" (2-4.99%) or "below average (low)" (<2%) risk. A subset of 662 women completed questionnaires at baseline and at 3 months (n = 511) and 6 months (n = 473). RESULTS State anxiety and cancer worry scores were low with no differences between women offered BC-Predict or NHSBSP. Women offered BC-Predict and informed of being at higher risk reported higher risk perceptions and cancer worry than other women, but without reaching clinical levels. CONCLUSIONS Concerns that risk-stratified screening will produce harm due to increases in general anxiety or cancer worry are unfounded, even for women informed that they are at high risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David P. French
- grid.5379.80000000121662407Manchester Centre of Health Psychology, Division of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Coupland Street, Manchester, M13 9PL England ,grid.498924.a0000 0004 0430 9101NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, England ,grid.5379.80000000121662407Manchester Breast Centre, Manchester Cancer Research Centre, University of Manchester, 555 Wilmslow Rd, Manchester, M20 4GJ England
| | - Lorna McWilliams
- grid.5379.80000000121662407Manchester Centre of Health Psychology, Division of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Coupland Street, Manchester, M13 9PL England ,grid.498924.a0000 0004 0430 9101NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, England
| | - Sarah Bowers
- grid.498924.a0000 0004 0430 9101The Nightingale and Prevent Breast Cancer Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M23 9LT England
| | - Victoria G. Woof
- grid.5379.80000000121662407Manchester Centre of Health Psychology, Division of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Coupland Street, Manchester, M13 9PL England
| | | | - Helen Ruane
- grid.498924.a0000 0004 0430 9101The Nightingale and Prevent Breast Cancer Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M23 9LT England
| | - Alice Hendy
- grid.498924.a0000 0004 0430 9101The Nightingale and Prevent Breast Cancer Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M23 9LT England
| | - D. Gareth Evans
- grid.498924.a0000 0004 0430 9101NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, England ,grid.5379.80000000121662407Manchester Breast Centre, Manchester Cancer Research Centre, University of Manchester, 555 Wilmslow Rd, Manchester, M20 4GJ England ,grid.498924.a0000 0004 0430 9101The Nightingale and Prevent Breast Cancer Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M23 9LT England ,grid.5379.80000000121662407Genomic Medicine, Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, The University of Manchester, St Mary’s Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M13 9WL England
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Røssell EL, Bo A, Grønborg TK, Kristiansen IS, Borgquist S, Scherer LD, Støvring H. Danish Women Want to Participate in a Hypothetical Breast Cancer Screening with Harms and No Reduction in Mortality: A Cross-Sectional Survey. Med Decis Making 2023; 43:403-416. [PMID: 36734154 DOI: 10.1177/0272989x231152830] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Informed decision making is recommended in breast cancer screening. Decision aids with balanced information on harms and benefits are recommended to support informed decision making. However, informed screening decision making may be challenged by overly positive attitudes toward cancer screening. We hypothesized that a substantial proportion of Danish women would want to participate in screening regardless of the presented information. Therefore, we aimed to estimate the prevalence of Danish women wanting to participate in a hypothetical breast cancer screening offering no reduction in breast cancer mortality but potential harms related to unnecessary treatment. METHODS In a cross-sectional study, we invited a random sample of 751 women in the nonscreening population aged 44 to 49 y in the Central Denmark Region to an online questionnaire using the official digital mailbox system. The questionnaire included a description of a hypothetical screening and questions about thoughts on breast cancer, health literacy, and questions on the assessment of the hypothetical screening including intended participation, understanding, and belief in information. Data were linked to register data on sociodemographic factors. RESULTS In total, 43.0% (323/751) responded to the questionnaire. Of these, 247 (82.3% [95% confidence interval: 77.5-86.5]) wanted to participate in the hypothetical breast cancer screening (participation group). More than two-thirds in both the participation group and nonparticipation group seemed to understand the presented information. Half of the women who understood the information disbelieved it. CONCLUSIONS Exceeding our expectations, a majority of women wanted to participate in a hypothetical screening with potential harms but no reduction in breast cancer mortality. A large proportion understood but disbelieved the screening information. This could indicate that Danish women make their screening decisions based on beliefs rather than presented screening information. This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT04509063). HIGHLIGHTS The majority of Danish women wanted to participate in a hypothetical breast cancer screening with potential harms related to unnecessary treatment but no reduction in mortality.A large proportion of women understood but disbelieved the hypothetical screening information.Informed decision making may be challenging when women disbelieve the information they receive.Enthusiasm for cancer screening and potential disbelief in information are important factors when developing and improving screening information and invitation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Anne Bo
- Social & Health Services and Labour Market, DEFACTUM, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | | | - Signe Borgquist
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Laura D Scherer
- School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Denver, CO, United States of America
| | - Henrik Støvring
- Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Aubertin P, Frese T, Kasper J, Mau W, Meyer G, Mikolajczyk R, Richter M, Schildmann J, Steckelberg A. Efficacy of Three Numerical Presentation Formats on Lay People's Comprehension and Risk Perception of Fact Boxes-A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2023; 20:2165. [PMID: 36767532 PMCID: PMC9915941 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20032165] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2022] [Revised: 01/15/2023] [Accepted: 01/18/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
(1) Background: Fact boxes present the benefits and harms of medical interventions in the form of tables. Some studies suggest that people with a lower level of education could profit more from graphic presentations. The objective of the study was to compare three different formats in fact boxes with regard to verbatim and gist knowledge in general and according to the educational background. (2) Methods: In May 2020, recruitment started for this randomized controlled trial. Participants were given one out of three presentation formats: natural frequencies, percentages, and graphic. We used Limesurvey® to assess comprehension/risk perception as the primary outcome. The Kruskal-Wallis test and the Mann-Whitney U test were used in addition to descriptive analyses. (3) Results: A total of 227 people took part in the study. Results of the groups were nearly identical in relation to the primary outcome verbatim knowledge, likewise in gist knowledge. However, participants with lower educational qualifications differed from participants with higher educational qualifications in terms of verbatim knowledge in the group percentages. (4) Conclusions: The results indicate that all three forms of presentation are suitable for conveying the content. Further research should take the individual preferences regarding the format into account.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pascal Aubertin
- Institute of Health and Nursing Science, Interdisciplinary Center for Health Sciences, Martin Luther University, Halle-Wittenberg, 06112 Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Thomas Frese
- Institute of General Medicine, Interdisciplinary Center for Health Sciences, Martin Luther University, Halle-Wittenberg, 06112 Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Jürgen Kasper
- Department of Nursing and Health Promotion, Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, 0176 Oslo, Norway
| | - Wilfried Mau
- Institute of Rehabilitation Medicine, Interdisciplinary Center for Health Sciences, Martin Luther University, Halle-Wittenberg, 06112 Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Gabriele Meyer
- Institute of Health and Nursing Science, Interdisciplinary Center for Health Sciences, Martin Luther University, Halle-Wittenberg, 06112 Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Rafael Mikolajczyk
- Institute of Medical Epidemiology, Biometrics and Informatics, Interdisciplinary Center for Health Sciences, Martin Luther University, Halle-Wittenberg, 06112 Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Matthias Richter
- Institute of Medical Sociology, Interdisciplinary Center for Health Sciences, Martin Luther University, Halle-Wittenberg, 06112 Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Jan Schildmann
- Institute for History and Ethics of Medicine, Interdisciplinary Center for Health Sciences, Martin Luther University, Halle-Wittenberg, 06112 Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Anke Steckelberg
- Institute of Health and Nursing Science, Interdisciplinary Center for Health Sciences, Martin Luther University, Halle-Wittenberg, 06112 Halle (Saale), Germany
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Thielmann RR, Hoving C, Schutgens-Kok E, Cals JW, Crutzen R. Patient online access to general practice medical records: A qualitative study on patients' needs and expectations. HEALTH INF MANAG J 2023:18333583221144666. [PMID: 36655702 DOI: 10.1177/18333583221144666] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient online access to medical records is assumed to foster patient empowerment and advance patient-centred healthcare. Since July 2020, patients in the Netherlands have been legally entitled to electronically access their medical record in general practice. Experience from pioneering countries has shown that despite high patient interest, user rates often remain low. How to best support implementation depends on individual needs and expectations of patient populations, which are as yet unknown in the Dutch context. OBJECTIVE To understand Dutch patients' needs and expectations with regard to online access to their medical record in general practice. METHOD Twenty participants completed semi-structured individual interviews via video or telephone call. Transcripts of interviews underwent template analysis combining deductive and inductive coding using Atlas.ti software. RESULTS Patients' needs and expectations ranged across three overlapping areas: (i) prerequisites for getting online access; (ii) using online access; and (iii) the impact on interaction with healthcare providers. Patients expected benefits from online access such as better overview, empowerment and improved communication with their general practitioner but identified needs regarding technological difficulties, data privacy and complex medical language in their record. CONCLUSION The concerns and obstacles participants identified point towards the need for organisational changes in general practice, for example, adjusted documentation practices, and the key role of the general practitioner and staff in promoting and facilitating online access. IMPLICATIONS Implementation strategies addressing needs identified in this study may help to unlock the full potential of online access to achieve desired outcomes of patient involvement and satisfaction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rosa Rlc Thielmann
- Department of Health Promotion, Care and Public Health Research Institute, 5211Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Ciska Hoving
- Department of Health Promotion, Care and Public Health Research Institute, 5211Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Esther Schutgens-Kok
- Department of Health Promotion, Care and Public Health Research Institute, 5211Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Jochen Wl Cals
- Department of Family Medicine, Care and Public Health Research Institute, 5211Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Rik Crutzen
- Department of Health Promotion, Care and Public Health Research Institute, 5211Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Zacher S, Berger-Höger B, Lühnen J, Steckelberg A. Development and Piloting of a Web-Based Tool to Teach Relative and Absolute Risk Reductions. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:ijerph192316086. [PMID: 36498161 PMCID: PMC9739880 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph192316086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2022] [Revised: 11/23/2022] [Accepted: 11/29/2022] [Indexed: 05/10/2023]
Abstract
Interpreting study results is an essential component of decision-making. Both laypeople and healthcare professionals often misinterpret treatment effects that are presented as relative risk reduction. Therefore, we developed and piloted a web-based tool to teach the difference between relative and absolute risk reductions. This project follows the UKMRC-guidance for complex interventions. The tool was developed based on adult learning and design theories. This was followed by a qualitative feasibility study focusing on acceptance, applicability, and comprehensibility with healthcare professionals and laypersons. We conducted think-aloud and semi-structured interviews and analysed them using qualitative content analysis. In addition, we explored calculation skills. Between January 2020 and April 2021, we conducted 22 interviews with 8 laypeople and 14 healthcare professionals from different settings. Overall, the tool proved to be feasible and relevant. With regard to comprehension, we observed an awareness of the interpretation of risk reduction, presented therapy effects were questioned more critically, and the influence of relative effects was recognized. Nevertheless, there were comprehension problems in some of the participants, especially with calculations in connection with low mathematical skills. The tool can be used to improve the interpretation of risk reductions in various target groups and to supplement existing educational programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandro Zacher
- Institute of Health and Nursing Science, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, 06112 Halle (Saale), Germany
- Correspondence:
| | - Birte Berger-Höger
- Institute of Health and Nursing Science, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, 06112 Halle (Saale), Germany
- Institute for Public Health and Nursing Research, University of Bremen, 28359 Bremen, Germany
| | - Julia Lühnen
- Institute of Health and Nursing Science, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, 06112 Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Anke Steckelberg
- Institute of Health and Nursing Science, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, 06112 Halle (Saale), Germany
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Recchia G, Lawrence AC, Freeman AL. Investigating the presentation of uncertainty in an icon array: A randomized trial. PEC INNOVATION 2022; 1:None. [PMID: 36518604 PMCID: PMC9731905 DOI: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2021.100003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2021] [Revised: 10/20/2021] [Accepted: 10/26/2021] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clinicians are often advised to use pictographs to communicate risk, but whether they offer benefits when communicating risk imprecision (e.g., 65%-79%) is unknown. PURPOSE To test whether any of three approaches to visualizing imprecision would more effectively communicate breast and ovarian cancer risk for BRCA1 pathogenic variant carriers. METHODS 1,300 UK residents were presented with a genetic report with information about BRCA1-related risks, with random assignment to one of four formats: no visualization (text alone), or a pictograph using shaded icons, a gradient, or arrows marking range endpoints. We also tested pictographs in two layouts. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and regression was employed. RESULTS There was no effect of format. Participants shown pictographs vs. text alone had better uptake of breast cancer risk messages (p < .05, η 2 = 0.003). Pictographs facilitated memory for the specific amount of risk (p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.019), as did the tabular layout. Individuals not having completed upper secondary education may benefit most. CONCLUSIONS We found weak evidence in favor of using simple pictographs with ranges to communicate BRCA risk (versus text alone), and of the tabular layout. INNOVATION Testing different ways of communicating imprecision within pictographs is a novel and promising line of research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriel Recchia
- Corresponding author at: Centre for Mathematical Sciences, Wilberforce Rd, Cambridge CB3 0WA, UK.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Higgs E, Wain KE, Wynn J, Cho MT, Higgins S, Blaisdell D, Dugan D, Valek S, Cohen S. Measuring quality and value in genetic counseling: The current landscape and future directions. J Genet Couns 2022; 32:315-324. [PMID: 36385723 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1657] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2021] [Revised: 10/27/2022] [Accepted: 10/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Genetic counselors strive to provide high-quality genetic services. To do so, it is essential to define quality in genetic counseling and identify opportunities for improvement. This Professional Issues article provides an overview of the evaluation of healthcare quality in genetic counseling. The National Society of Genetic Counselors' Research, Quality, and Outcomes Committee partnered with Discern Health, a value-based healthcare policy consulting firm, to develop a care continuum model of genetic counseling. Using the proposed model, currently available quality measures relevant to genetic counseling in the US healthcare system were assessed, allowing for the identification of gaps and priority areas for further development. A total of 560 quality measures were identified that can be applied to various aspects of the care continuum model across a range of clinical specialty areas in genetic counseling, although few measures were specific to genetic counseling or genetic conditions. Areas where quality measures were lacking included: attitudes toward genetic testing, family communication, stigma, and issues of justice, equity, diversity, and inclusion. We discuss these findings and other strategies for an evidence-based approach to quality in genetic counseling. Strategic directions for the genetic counseling profession should include a consolidated approach to research on quality and value of genetic counseling, development of quality metrics and patient-experience measures, and engagement with other improvement activities. These strategies will allow for benchmarking, performance improvement, and future implementation in accountability programs which will strengthen genetic counseling as a profession that provides evidence-based high-quality care to all patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Higgs
- Cardiovascular Genetics Program, University of California San Francisco California USA
| | | | - Julia Wynn
- Department of Pediatrics Columbia University Irving Medical Center New York New York USA
| | - Megan T. Cho
- Center for Precision Health Research, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health Bethesda Maryland USA
| | | | - David Blaisdell
- Discern Health, Part of Real Chemistry San Francisco California USA
| | - Donna Dugan
- Discern Health, Part of Real Chemistry San Francisco California USA
| | - Sara Valek
- Discern Health, Part of Real Chemistry San Francisco California USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Van Steijvoort E, Peeters H, Vandecruys H, Verguts J, Peeraer K, Matthijs G, Borry P. Exploring informed choice in preconception reproductive genetic carrier screening by using a modified Multidimensional Measure of Informed Choice. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2022; 105:3313-3318. [PMID: 35906131 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2022.07.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2022] [Revised: 06/08/2022] [Accepted: 07/21/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To explore informed choice in reproductive genetic carrier screening (RGCS). METHODS Women visiting a gynaecologist practice in Flanders (Belgium) were asked to consider participation in a study where RGCS was offered for free to them and their male partner. A modified Multidimensional Measure of Informed Choice was used to determine whether couples who opted for RGCS made an informed choice. In addition, we assessed risk perception, feelings towards RGCS, anxiety and decisional conflict. RESULTS Most participants (82 %, n = 63/77) made an informed choice with regard to RGCS according to our modified MMIC. Thirteen participants made an uninformed choice due to insufficient knowledge and one participant because of insufficient knowledge and value-inconsistency. Anxiety scores were elevated for three participants. Two participants presented with decisional conflict. CONCLUSION Our results show high rates of informed choice among non-pregnant couples who were offered RGCS in a research study and received up to 30 min of pre-test counseling. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Limited resources outside a research context may impact informed choice. Pre-test counselling initiatives for RGCS should ideally be organized in such a way that information can be provided at multiple time points to avoid information overload and to allow for a reflection period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva Van Steijvoort
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Hilde Peeters
- Department of Human Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Hilde Vandecruys
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Jessa Ziekenhuis, Hasselt, Belgium
| | - Jasper Verguts
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Jessa Ziekenhuis, Hasselt, Belgium
| | - Karen Peeraer
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Gert Matthijs
- Department of Human Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Pascal Borry
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Bolt ILLE, Schermer MHN, Bomhof-Roordink H, Timmermans DRM. Informed Decision-Making and Capabilities in Population-based Cancer Screening. Public Health Ethics 2022; 15:289-300. [PMID: 36727101 PMCID: PMC9883722 DOI: 10.1093/phe/phac023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Informed decision-making (IDM) is considered an important ethical and legal requirement for population-based screening. Governments offering such screening have a duty to enable invitees to make informed decisions regarding participation. Various views exist on how to define and measure IDM in different screening programmes. In this paper we first address the question which components should be part of IDM in the context of cancer screening. Departing from two diverging interpretations of the value of autonomy-as a right and as an ideal-we describe how this value is operationalized in the practice of informed consent in medicine and translate this to IDM in population-based cancer screening. Next, we specify components of IDM, which is voluntariness and the requirements of disclosure and understanding. We argue that whereas disclosure should contain all information considered relevant in order to enable authentic IDM, understanding of basic information is sufficient for a valid IDM. In the second part of the paper we apply the capability approach in order to argue for the responsibility of the government to warrant equal and real opportunities for invitees for IDM. We argue that additional conditions beyond mere provision of information are needed in order to do so.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ineke L L E Bolt
- Department of Medical Ethics, Philosophy & History of Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maartje H N Schermer
- Department of Medical Ethics, Philosophy & History of Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hanna Bomhof-Roordink
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Danielle R M Timmermans
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Schwartz PH, Sachs GA. Rethinking Decision Quality: Measures, Meaning, and Bioethics. Hastings Cent Rep 2022; 52:13-22. [PMID: 36537272 DOI: 10.1002/hast.1443] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Studies of patient decision-making use many different measures to evaluate the quality of decisions and the decision-making process, partly to determine whether the ethical goals of informed consent, patient autonomy, and shared decision-making have been achieved. We describe these measures, grouped under three main approaches, and review their limitations, leading to three conclusions. First, no measure or combination of measures can provide a complete assessment of decision quality. Second, the quality of a decision is best characterized vaguely, for instance as "good," "satisfactory," or "poor," and these categorizations depend on qualitative judgments that go beyond quantitative measures. Third, bioethicists should focus on identifying and addressing poor or problematic decisions, rather than trying to incrementally increase decision quality, quantified by a measure. Decision-quality measures can be useful in research and in advancing important goals of bioethics, as long as the challenges of defining and measuring decision quality are recognized.
Collapse
|