Agonist-induced internalization and recycling of the human A(3) adenosine receptors: role in receptor desensitization and resensitization

Species dependence of A3 adenosine receptor pharmacology and function

Efforts to fully understand pharmacological differences between G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) species homologues are generally not pursued in detail during the drug development process. To date, many GPCRs that have been successfully targeted are relatively well-conserved across species in amino acid sequence and display minimal variability of biological effects. However, the A3 adenosine receptor (AR), an exciting drug target for a multitude of diseases associated with tissue injury, ischemia, and inflammation, displays as little as 70% sequence identity among mammalian species (e.g., rodent vs. primate) commonly used in drug development. Consequently, the pharmacological properties of synthetic A3AR ligands vary widely, not only in binding affinity, selectivity, and signaling efficacy, but to the extent that some function as agonists in some species and antagonists in others. Numerous heterocyclic antagonists that have nM affinity at the human A3AR are inactive or weakly active at the rat and mouse A3ARs. Positive allosteric modulators, including the imidazo [4,5-c]quinolin-4-amine derivative LUF6000, are only active at human and some larger animal species that have been evaluated (rabbit and dog), but not rodents. A3AR agonists evoke systemic degranulation of rodent, but not human mast cells. The rat A3AR undergoes desensitization faster than the human A3AR, but the human homologue can be completely re-sensitized and recycled back to the cell surface. Thus, comprehensive pharmacological evaluation and awareness of potential A3AR species differences are critical in studies to further understand the basic biological functions of this unique AR subtype. Recombinant A3ARs from eight different species have been pharmacologically characterized thus far. In this review, we describe in detail current knowledge of species differences in genetic identity, G protein-coupling, receptor regulation, and both orthosteric and allosteric A3AR pharmacology.

The role of the ATP-adenosine axis in ischemic stroke

In ischemic stroke, the primary neuronal injury caused by the disruption of energy supply is further exacerbated by secondary sterile inflammation. The inflammatory cascade is largely initiated by the purine adenosine triphosphate (ATP) which is extensively released to the interstitial space during brain ischemia and functions as an extracellular danger signaling molecule. By engaging P2 receptors, extracellular ATP activates microglia leading to cytokine and chemokine production and subsequent immune cell recruitment from the periphery which further amplifies post-stroke inflammation. The ectonucleotidases CD39 and CD73 shape and balance the inflammatory environment by stepwise degrading extracellular ATP to adenosine which itself has neuroprotective and anti-inflammatory signaling properties. The neuroprotective effects of adenosine are mainly mediated through A₁ receptors and inhibition of glutamatergic excitotoxicity, while the anti-inflammatory capacities of adenosine have been primarily attributed to A_2A receptor activation on infiltrating immune cells in the subacute phase after stroke. In this review, we summarize the current state of knowledge on the ATP-adenosine axis in ischemic stroke, discuss contradictory results, and point out potential pitfalls towards translating therapeutic approaches from rodent stroke models to human patients.

Activation of adenosine A3 receptor reduces early brain injury by alleviating neuroinflammation after subarachnoid hemorrhage in elderly rats

The incidence of subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) and hazard ratio of death increase with age. Overactivation of microglia contributes to brain damage. This study aimed to investigate the effects of A3 adenosine receptors (A3R) activation on neurofunction and microglial phenotype polarization in the context of SAH in aged rats. The A3R agonist (CI-IB-MECA) and antagonist (MRS1523) were used in the SAH model. Microglia were cultured to mimic SAH in the presence or absence of CI-IB-MECA and/or siRNA for A3R. The neurofunction and status of the microglial phenotype were evaluated. The P38 inhibitor SB202190 and the STAT6 inhibitor AS1517499 were used to explore the signaling pathway. The results showed that SAH induced microglia to polarize to the M(LPS) phenotype both in vivo and in vitro. CI-IB-MECA distinctly skewed microglia towards the M(IL-4) phenotype and ameliorated neurological dysfunction, along with the downregulation of inflammatory cytokines. Knockdown of A3R or inhibition of P38 and/or STAT6 weakened the effects of CI-IB-MECA on microglial phenotypic shifting. Collectively, our findings suggest that activation of A3R exerted anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective effects by regulating microglial phenotype polarization through P38/STAT6 pathway and indicated that A3R agonists may be a promising therapeutic options for the treatment of brain injury after SAH.

NanoBiT Complementation to Monitor Agonist-Induced Adenosine A1 Receptor Internalization

Receptor internalization in response to prolonged agonist treatment is an important regulator of G protein–coupled receptor (GPCR) function. The adenosine A₁ receptor (A₁AR) is one of the adenosine receptor family of GPCRs, and evidence for its agonist-induced internalization is equivocal. The recently developed NanoBiT technology uses split NanoLuc Luciferase to monitor changes in protein interactions. We have modified the human A₁AR on the N-terminus with the small high-affinity HiBiT tag. In the presence of the large NanoLuc subunit (LgBiT), complementation occurs, reconstituting a full-length functional NanoLuc Luciferase. Here, we have used complemented luminescence to monitor the internalization of the A₁AR in living HEK293 cells. Agonist treatment resulted in a robust decrease in cell-surface luminescence, indicating an increase in A₁AR internalization. These responses were inhibited by the A₁AR-selective antagonist 1,3-dipropyl-8-cyclopentylxanthine (DPCPX), with an antagonist affinity that closely matched that measured using ligand binding with a fluorescent A₁ receptor antagonist (CA200645). The agonist potencies for inducing A₁AR internalization were very similar to the affinities previously determined by ligand binding, suggesting little or no amplification of the internalization response. By complementing the HiBiT tag to exogenous purified LgBiT, it was also possible to perform NanoBRET ligand-binding experiments using HiBiT–A₁AR. This study demonstrates the use of NanoBiT technology to monitor internalization of the A₁AR and offers the potential to combine these experiments with NanoBRET ligand-binding assays.

Structural re-positioning, in silico molecular modelling, oxidative degradation, and biological screening of linagliptin as adenosine 3 receptor (ADORA3) modulators targeting hepatocellular carcinoma

Chemical entities with structural diversity were introduced as candidates targeting adenosine receptor with different clinical activities, containing 3,7-dihydro-1H-purine-2,6-dione, especially adenosine 3 receptors (ADORA3). Our initial approach started with pharmacophore screening of ADORA3 modulators; to choose linagliptin (LIN), approved anti-diabetic drug as Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors, to be studied for its modulating effect towards ADORA3. This was followed by generation, purification, analytical method development, and structural elucidation of oxidative degraded product (DEG). Both of LIN and DEG showed inhibitory profile against hepatocellular carcinoma cell lines with induction of apoptosis at G2/M phase with increase in caspase-3 levels, accompanied by a downregulation in gene and protein expression levels of ADORA3 with a subsequent increase in cAMP. Quantitative in vitro assessment of LIN binding affinity against ADORA3 was also performed to exhibit inhibitory profile at Ki of 37.7 nM. In silico molecular modelling showing binding affinity of LIN and DEG towards ADORA3 was conducted.

Molecular dissection of the human A3 adenosine receptor coupling with β-arrestin2

Besides classical G protein coupling, G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are nowadays well known to show significant signalling via other adaptor proteins, such as β-arrestin2 (βarr2). The elucidation of the molecular mechanism of the GPCR-βarr2 interaction is a prerequisite for the structure-activity based design of biased ligands, which introduces a new chapter in drug discovery. The general mechanism of the interaction is believed to rely on phosphorylation sites, exposed upon agonist binding. However, it is not known whether this mechanism is universal throughout the GPCR family or if GPCR-specific patterns are involved. In recent years, promising orally active agonists for the human A₃ adenosine receptor (A₃AR), a GPCR highly expressed in inflammatory and cancer cells, have been evaluated in clinical trials for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis, and hepatocellular carcinoma. In this study, the effect of cytoplasmic modifications of the A₃AR on βarr2 recruitment was evaluated in transiently transfected HEK293T cells, using a live-cell split-reporter system (NanoBit®, Promega), based on the structural complementation of NanoLuc luciferase, allowing real-time βarr2 monitoring. The A₃AR-selective reference agonist 2-Cl-IB-MECA yielded a robust, concentration dependent (5 nM-1 µM) recruitment of βarr2 (logEC50: -7.798 ± 0.076). The role of putative phosphorylation sites, located in the C-terminal part and cytoplasmic loops, and the role of the 'DRY' motif was evaluated. It was shown that the A₃AR C-terminus was dispensable for βarr2 recruitment. This contrasts with studies in the past for the rat A₃AR, which pointed at crucial C-terminal phosphorylation sites. When combining truncation of the A₃AR with modification of the 'DRY' motif to 'AAY', the βarr2 recruitment was drastically reduced. Recruitment could be partly rescued by back-mutation to 'NQY', or by extending the C-terminus again. In conclusion, other parts of the human A₃AR, either cytosolic or exposed upon receptor activation, rather than the C-terminus alone, are responsible for βarr2 recruitment in a complementary or synergistic way.

Purinergic signalling in brain ischemia

Ischemia is a multifactorial pathology characterized by different events evolving in the time. After ischemia a primary damage due to the early massive increase of extracellular glutamate is followed by activation of resident immune cells, i.e microglia, and production or activation of inflammation mediators. Protracted neuroinflammation is now recognized as the predominant mechanism of secondary brain injury progression. Extracellular concentrations of ATP and adenosine in the brain increase dramatically during ischemia in concentrations able to stimulate their respective specific P2 and P1 receptors. Both ATP P2 and adenosine P1 receptor subtypes exert important roles in ischemia. Although adenosine exerts a clear neuroprotective effect through A1 receptors during ischemia, the use of selective A1 agonists is hampered by undesirable peripheral effects. Evidence up to now in literature indicate that A2A receptor antagonists provide protection centrally by reducing excitotoxicity, while agonists at A2A (and possibly also A2B) and A3 receptors provide protection by controlling massive infiltration and neuroinflammation in the hours and days after brain ischemia. Among P2X receptors most evidence indicate that P2X7 receptor contribute to the damage induced by the ischemic insult due to intracellular Ca(2+) loading in central cells and facilitation of glutamate release. Antagonism of P2X7 receptors might represent a new treatment to attenuate brain damage and to promote proliferation and maturation of brain immature resident cells that can promote tissue repair following cerebral ischemia. Among P2Y receptors, antagonists of P2Y12 receptors are of value because of their antiplatelet activity and possibly because of additional anti-inflammatory effects. Moreover strategies that modify adenosine or ATP concentrations at injury sites might be of value to limit damage after ischemia. This article is part of the Special Issue entitled 'Purines in Neurodegeneration and Neuroregeneration'.

Direct visualisation of internalization of the adenosine A3 receptor and localization with arrestin3 using a fluorescent agonist

Fluorescence based probes provide a novel way to study the dynamic internalization process of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). Recent advances in the rational design of fluorescent ligands for GPCRs have been used here to generate new fluorescent agonists containing tripeptide linkers for the adenosine A3 receptor. The fluorescent agonist BY630-X-(D)-A-(D)-A-G-ABEA was found to be a highly potent agonist at the adenosine A3 receptor in both reporter gene (pEC50 = 8.48 ± 0.09) and internalization assays (pEC50 = 7.47 ± 0.11). Confocal imaging studies showed that BY630-X-(D)-A-(D)-A-G-ABEA was internalized with A3 linked to yellow fluorescent protein, which was blocked by the competitive antagonist MRS1220. Internalization of untagged adenosine A3 could also be visualized with BY630-X-(D)-A-(D)-A-G-ABEA treatment. Further, BY630-X-(D)-A-(D)-A-G-ABEA stimulated the formation of receptor-arrestin3 complexes and was found to localize with these intracellular complexes. This highly potent agonist with excellent imaging properties should be a valuable tool to study receptor internalization. This article is part of the Special Issue entitled 'Fluorescent Tools in Neuropharmacology'.

Cannabinoid 2 receptor- and beta Arrestin 2-dependent upregulation of serotonin 2A receptors

Recent evidence suggests that cannabinoid receptor agonists may regulate serotonin 2A (5-HT(2A)) receptor neurotransmission in the brain, although no molecular mechanism has been identified. Here, we present experimental evidence that sustained treatment with a non-selective cannabinoid agonist (CP55,940) or selective CB2 receptor agonists (JWH133 or GP1a) upregulate 5-HT(2A) receptors in a neuronal cell line. Furthermore, this cannabinoid receptor agonist-induced upregulation of 5-HT(2A) receptors was prevented in cells stably transfected with either CB2 or β-Arrestin 2 shRNA lentiviral particles. Additionally, inhibition of clathrin-mediated endocytosis also prevented the cannabinoid receptor-induced upregulation of 5-HT(2A) receptors. Our results indicate that cannabinoid agonists might upregulate 5-HT(2A) receptors by a mechanism that requires CB2 receptors and β-Arrestin 2 in cells that express both CB2 and 5-HT(2A) receptors. 5-HT(2A) receptors have been associated with several physiological functions and neuropsychiatric disorders such as stress response, anxiety and depression, and schizophrenia. Therefore, these results might provide a molecular mechanism by which activation of cannabinoid receptors might be relevant to some cognitive and mood disorders in humans.

Characterization by flow cytometry of fluorescent, selective agonist probes of the A(3) adenosine receptor

Various fluorescent nucleoside agonists of the A3 adenosine receptor (AR) were compared as high affinity probes using radioligands and flow cytometry (FCM). They contained a fluorophore linked through the C2 or N(6) position and rigid A3AR-enhancing (N)-methanocarba modification. A hydrophobic C2-(1-pyrenyl) derivative MRS5704 bound nonselectively. C2-Tethered cyanine5-dye labeled MRS5218 bound selectively to hA3AR expressed in whole CHO cells and membranes. By FCM, binding was A3AR-mediated (blocked by A3AR antagonist, at least half through internalization), with t1/2 for association 38min in mA3AR-HEK293 cells; 26.4min in sucrose-treated hA3AR-CHO cells (Kd 31nM). Membrane binding indicated moderate mA3AR affinity, but not selectivity. Specific accumulation of fluorescence (50nM MRS5218) occurred in cells expressing mA3AR, but not other mouse ARs. Evidence was provided suggesting that MRS5218 detects endogenous expression of the A3AR in the human promyelocytic leukemic HL-60 cell line. Therefore, MRS5218 promises to be a useful tool for characterizing the A3AR.

Cannabinoid agonists increase the interaction between β-Arrestin 2 and ERK1/2 and upregulate β-Arrestin 2 and 5-HT(2A) receptors

We have recently reported that selective cannabinoid 2 (CB(2)) receptor agonists upregulate 5-HT(2A) receptors by enhancing ERK1/2 signaling in prefrontal cortex (PFCx). Increased activity of cortical 5-HT(2A) receptors has been associated with several neuropsychiatric disorders such as anxiety and schizophrenia. Here we examine the mechanisms involved in this enhanced ERK1/2 activation in rat PFCx and in a neuronal cell model. Sprague-Dawley rats treated with a non-selective cannabinoid agonist (CP55940, 50μg/kg, 7 days, i.p.) showed enhanced co-immunoprecipitation of β-Arrestin 2 and ERK1/2, enhanced pERK protein levels, and enhanced expression of β-Arrestin 2 mRNA and protein levels in PFCx. In a neuronal cell line, we found that selective CB(2) receptor agonists upregulate β-Arrestin 2, an effect that was prevented by selective CB(2) receptor antagonist JTE-907 and CB(2) shRNA lentiviral particles. Additionally, inhibition of clathrin-mediated endocytosis, ERK1/2, and the AP-1 transcription factor also prevented the cannabinoid receptor-induced upregulation of β-Arrestin 2. Our results suggest that sustained activation of CB(2) receptors would enhance β-Arrestin 2 expression possibly contributing to its increased interaction with ERK1/2, thereby driving the upregulation of 5-HT(2A) receptors. The CB(2) receptor-mediated upregulation of β-Arrestin 2 would be mediated, at least in part, by an ERK1/2-dependent activation of AP-1. These data could provide the rationale for some of the adverse effects associated with repeated cannabinoid exposure and shed light on some CB(2) receptor agonists that could represent an alternative therapeutic because of their minimal effect on serotonergic neurotransmission.

Impairment of adenosine A3 receptor activity disrupts neutrophil migratory capacity and impacts innate immune function in vivo

Adenosine possesses potent anti-inflammatory properties which are partly mediated by G(i) -coupled adenosine A3 receptors (A3Rs). A3R agonists have shown clinical benefit in a number of inflammatory conditions although some studies in A3R-deficient mice suggest a pro-inflammatory role. We hypothesised that, in addition to cell signalling effects, A3R compounds might inhibit neutrophil chemotaxis by disrupting the purinergic feedback loop controlling leukocyte migration. Human neutrophil activation triggered rapid upregulation of surface A3R expression which was disrupted by pre-treatment with either agonist (Cl-IB-MECA) or antagonist (MRS1220). Both compounds reduced migration velocity and neutrophil transmigration capacity without impacting the response to chemokines per se. Similar effects were observed in murine neutrophils, while cells from A3R-deficient mice displayed a constitutively impaired migratory phenotype indicating compound-induced desensitisation and genetic ablation had the same functional outcome. In a dextran sodium sulphate-induced colitis model, A3R-deficient mice exhibited reduced colon pathology and decreased tissue myeloperoxidase levels at day 8 - consistent with reduced neutrophil recruitment. However, A3R-deficient mice were unable to resolve the dextran sodium sulphate-induced inflammation and had elevated numbers of tissue-associated bacteria by day 21. Our data indicate that A3Rs play a role in neutrophil migration and disrupting this function has the potential to adversely affect innate immune responses.

Adenosine receptor desensitization and trafficking

As with the majority of G-protein-coupled receptors, all four of the adenosine receptor subtypes are known to undergo agonist-induced regulation in the form of desensitization and trafficking. These processes can limit the ability of adenosine receptors to couple to intracellular signalling pathways and thus reduce the ability of adenosine receptor agonists as well as endogenous adenosine to produce cellular responses. In addition, since adenosine receptors couple to multiple signalling pathways, these pathways may desensitize differentially, while the desensitization of one pathway could even trigger signalling via another. Thus, the overall picture of adenosine receptor regulation can be complex. For all adenosine receptor subtypes, there is evidence to implicate arrestins in agonist-induced desensitization and trafficking, but there is also evidence for other possible forms of regulation, including second messenger-dependent kinase regulation, heterologous effects involving G proteins, and the involvement of non-clathrin trafficking pathways such as caveolae. In this review, the evidence implicating these mechanisms is summarized for each adenosine receptor subtype, and we also discuss those issues of adenosine receptor regulation that remain to be resolved as well as likely directions for future research in this field.

Adenosine mediated desensitization of cAMP signaling enhances T-cell responses

Adenosine has long been regarded as a crucial anti-inflammatory agent that protects the host from excessive damage. It has been reported to play an important role in suppressing immune activation, particularly that of T cells. However, it is a general observation that induction of T-cell activation is an efficient event despite the high adenosine levels that are often present in the affected host due to injury or stress. We report here that prior to antigenic stimulation via TCR/CD3, exposure of T cells to adenosine desensitizes adenosine receptors, so as to create a window of time where the T cells are insensitive to this ubiquitous suppressor. T cells from mice that were pre-exposed to this manipulation showed stronger responses to antigenic stimulation; therefore, the P1 adenosine receptor desensitization demonstrated an adjuvant-like effect. Our results suggest that adenosine receptor desensitization may be a mechanism for T cells to escape the general suppression during early points of T-cell activation and may emerge as a potential alternative for vaccine adjuvants.

A3 adenosine receptor: pharmacology and role in disease

The study of the A(3) adenosine receptor (A(3)AR) represents a rapidly growing and intense area of research in the adenosine field. The present chapter will provide an overview of the expression patterns, molecular pharmacology and functional role of this A(3)AR subtype under pathophysiological conditions. Through studies utilizing selective A(3)AR agonists and antagonists, or A(3)AR knockout mice, it is now clear that this receptor plays a critical role in the modulation of ischemic diseases as well as in inflammatory and autoimmune pathologies. Therefore, the potential therapeutic use of agonists and antagonists will also be described. The discussion will principally address the use of such compounds in the treatment of brain and heart ischemia, asthma, sepsis and glaucoma. The final part concentrates on the molecular basis of A(3)ARs in autoimmune diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis, and includes a description of clinical trials with the selective agonist CF101. Based on this chapter, it is evident that continued research to discover agonists and antagonists for the A(3)AR subtype is warranted.

PSD-95 regulates D1 dopamine receptor resensitization, but not receptor-mediated Gs-protein activation

The present study aims to define the role of postsynaptic density (PSD)-95 in the regulation of dopamine (DA) receptor function. We found that PSD-95 physically associates with either D(1) or D(2) DA receptors in co-transfected HEK-293 cells. Stimulation of DA receptors altered the association between D(1) receptor and PSD-95 in a time-dependent manner. Functional assays indicated that PSD-95 co-expression did not affect D(1) receptor-stimulated cAMP production, Gs-protein activation or receptor desensitization. However, PSD-95 accelerated the recovery of internalized membrane receptors by promoting receptor recycling, thus resulting in enhanced resensitization of internalized D(1) receptors. Our results provide a novel mechanism for regulating DA receptor recycling that may play an important role in postsynaptic DA functional modulation and synaptic neuroplasticity.

Cardioprotective signaling to mitochondria

Mitochondria are central players in the pathophysiology of ischemia-reperfusion. Activation of plasma membrane G-coupled receptors or the Na,K-ATPase triggers cytosolic signaling pathways that result in cardioprotection. Our working hypothesis is that the occupied receptors migrate to caveolae, where signaling enzymes are scaffolded into signalosomes that bud off the plasma membrane and migrate to mitochondria. The signalosome-mitochondria interaction then initiates intramitochondrial signaling by opening the mitochondrial ATP-sensitive K(+) channel (mitoK(ATP)). MitoK(ATP) opening causes an increase in ROS production, which activates mitochondrial protein kinase C epsilon (PKCvarepsilon), which inhibits the mitochondrial permeability transition (MPT), thus decreasing cell death. We review the experimental findings that bear on these hypotheses and other modes of protection involving mitochondria.

Immunohistochemical characterization of adenosine receptors in rat aorta and tail arteries

Adenosine plays an important role in the cardiovascular system, activating adenosine A(1), A(2A), A(2B), and A(3) receptors, and regulating blood flow either by acting directly on vascular cells or indirectly because of its effects on the central or peripheral nervous systems. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether the pattern of distribution of adenosine receptor subtypes is different on elastic and muscular, using abdominal aorta and tail arteries as models. Immunohistochemistry using anti-A(1), anti-A(2A), anti-A(2B), and anti-A(3) receptor antibodies was performed on perfused-fixed/paraffin-embedded arteries from Wistar rats. 3,3'-Diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride (DAB; activated by hydrogen peroxide) staining revealed significant differences in the abundance of A(1), A(2A), and A(3) receptors between abdominal aorta and tail artery and allowed the identification of distinct distribution patterns for A(1), A(2A), A(2B), and A(3) receptors in the tunica adventitia, media, and intima of muscular and elastic arteries. Data are compatible with several previous functional reports supporting that different adenosine receptor subtype expression and/or their distribution in the vessel wall may influence their respective contribution to the control of blood flow.

Conditioning the heart induces formation of signalosomes that interact with mitochondria to open mitoKATP channels

Perfusion of the heart with bradykinin triggers cellular signaling events that ultimately cause opening of mitochondrial ATP-sensitive K+ (mitoKATP) channels, increased H2O2 production, inhibition of the mitochondrial permeability transition (MPT), and cardioprotection. We hypothesized that the interaction of bradykinin with its receptor induces the assembly of a caveolar signaling platform (signalosome) that contains the enzymes of the signaling pathway and that migrates to mitochondria to induce mitoKATP channel opening. We developed a novel method for isolating and purifying signalosomes from Langendorff-perfused rat hearts treated with bradykinin. Fractions containing the signalosomes were found to open mitoKATP channels in mitochondria isolated from untreated hearts via the activation of mitochondrial PKC-epsilon. mitoKATP channel opening required signalosome-dependent phosphorylation of an outer membrane protein. Immunodetection analysis revealed the presence of the bradykinin B2 receptor only in the fraction isolated from bradykinin-treated hearts. Immunodetection and immunogold labeling of caveolin-3, as well as sensitivity to cholesterol depletion and resistance to Triton X-100, attested to the caveolar nature of the signalosomes. Ischemic preconditioning, ischemic postconditioning, and perfusion with ouabain also led to active signalosome fractions that opened mitoKATP channels in mitochondria from untreated hearts. These results provide initial support for a novel mechanism for signal transmission from a plasma membrane receptor to mitoKATP channels.

Translocation of arrestin induced by human A(3) adenosine receptor ligands in an engineered cell line: comparison with G protein-dependent pathways

Structurally diverse ligands were studied in A(3) adenosine receptor (AR)-mediated beta-arrestin translocation in engineered CHO cells. The agonist potency and efficacy were similar, although not identical, to their G protein signaling. However, differences have also been found. MRS542, MRS1760, and other adenosine derivatives, A(3)AR antagonists in cyclic AMP assays, were partial agonists in beta-arrestin translocation, indicating possible biased agonism. The xanthine 7-riboside DBXRM, a full agonist, was only partially efficacious in beta-arrestin translocation. DBXRM was shown to induce a lesser extent of desensitization compared with IB-MECA. In kinetic studies, MRS3558, a potent and selective A(3)AR agonist, induced beta-arrestin translocation significantly faster than IB-MECA and Cl-IB-MECA. Non-nucleoside antagonists showed similar inhibitory potencies as previously reported. PTX pretreatment completely abolished ERK1/2 activation, but not arrestin translocation. Thus, lead candidates for biased agonists at the A(3)AR have been identified with this arrestin-translocation assay, which promises to be an effective tool for ligand screening.

Internalization and desensitization of adenosine receptors

Until now, more than 800 distinct G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) have been identified in the human genome. The four subtypes of the adenosine receptor (A₁, A_2A, A_2B and A₃ receptor) belong to this large family of GPCRs that represent the most widely targeted pharmacological protein class. Since adenosine receptors are widespread throughout the body and involved in a variety of physiological processes and diseases, there is great interest in understanding how the different subtypes are regulated, as a basis for designing therapeutic drugs that either avoid or make use of this regulation. The major GPCR regulatory pathway involves phosphorylation of activated receptors by G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs), a process that is followed by binding of arrestin proteins. This prevents receptors from activating downstream heterotrimeric G protein pathways, but at the same time allows activation of arrestin-dependent signalling pathways. Upon agonist treatment, adenosine receptor subtypes are differently regulated. For instance, the A₁Rs are not (readily) phosphorylated and internalize slowly, showing a typical half-life of several hours, whereas the A_2AR and A_2BR undergo much faster downregulation, usually shorter than 1 h. The A₃R is subject to even faster downregulation, often a matter of minutes. The fast desensitization of the A₃R after agonist exposure may be therapeutically equivalent to antagonist occupancy of the receptor. This review describes the process of desensitization and internalization of the different adenosine subtypes in cell systems, tissues and in vivo studies. In addition, molecular mechanisms involved in adenosine receptor desensitization are discussed.

Role of adenosine A3 receptors on CA1 hippocampal neurotransmission during oxygen-glucose deprivation episodes of different duration

The role of adenosine A3 receptors in synaptic transmission under severe (7 min) and shorter (2-5 min) ischemic conditions, obtained by oxygen and glucose deprivation (OGD), was investigated in rat hippocampal slices. The effects of selective A3 agonists or antagonists were examined on field excitatory postsynaptic potentials (fEPSPs) extracellularly recorded at the dendritic level of the CA1 pyramidal region. The novel, selective A3 antagonist LJ1251 ((2R,3R,4S)-2-(2-chloro-6-(3-iodobenzylamino)-9H-purin-9-yl)tetrahydrothiophene-3,4-diol, 0.1-10 nM) protected hippocampal slices from irreversible fEPSP depression induced by severe OGD and prevented or delayed the appearance of anoxic depolarization. Similar results were obtained when severe OGD was carried out with a long, receptor-desensitizing exposure to various selective A3 agonists: 5'-N-methylcarboxamidoadenosine derivatives Cl-IB-MECA (N6-(3-iodobenzyl)-2-chloro), VT72 (N6-methoxy-2-phenylethynyl), VT158 (N6-methoxy-2-phenylethynyl), VT160 (N6-methoxy-2-(2-pyridinyl)-ethynyl), and VT163 (N6-methoxy-2-p-acetylphenylethynyl) and AR132 (N6-methyl-2-phenylethynyladenosine). The selective A3 antagonist MRS1523 (3-propyl-6-ethyl-5-[(ethylthio)carbonyl]-2-phenyl-4-propyl-3-pyridine carboxylate, 100 nM) reduced fEPSP depression evoked by 2-min OGD and induced a faster recovery of fEPSP amplitude after 5-min OGD. Similar results were obtained for 2- or 5-min OGD applied in the presence of each of the A3 agonists tested. Shorter exposure to A3 agonists significantly delayed the recovery of fEPSP amplitude after 5-min OGD. This indicates that A3 receptors, stimulated by selective A3 agonists, undergo desensitization during OGD. It is inferred that CA1 hippocampal A3 receptors stimulated by adenosine released during brief ischemia (2 and 5 min) might exert A1-like protective effects on neurotransmission. Severe ischemia would transform the A3 receptor-mediated effects from protective to injurious.

Differential distribution of adenosine receptors in rat cochlea

Adenosine is a constitutive cell metabolite that can be released from cells via specific bi-directional transporters and is an end-point for nucleotide hydrolysis. In the extracellular space, adenosine becomes a signalling molecule for P1 (adenosine) receptors that modulate physiological responses in a wide range of mammalian tissues. Whereas adenosine signalling has been implicated in the regulation of cochlear blood flow and in cochlear protection from oxidative damage, the potential roles for adenosine signalling in the modulation of sound transduction and auditory neurotransmission have not been established. We have characterised the expression and distribution of adenosine receptors in the rat cochlea. mRNA transcripts for all four subtypes of adenosine receptors (A(1), A(2A), A(2B) and A(3)) were detected in dissected cochlear tissue by using reverse transcription/polymerase chain reaction analysis. The protein distribution for the A(1), A(2A) and A(3) receptor subtypes was identified by immunoperoxidase histochemistry and confocal immunofluorescence labelling. These receptors were differentially expressed in the organ of Corti, spiral ganglion neurones, lateral wall tissues and cochlear blood vessels. The distribution of adenosine receptors in sensory and neural tissues and in the vasculature coincided with other elements of purinergic signalling (P2X and P2Y receptors, ectonucleotidases), consistent with the integrative regulation of many physiological processes in the cochlea by extracellular nucleotides and nucleosides. Our study provides a framework for further investigation of adenosine signalling in the inner ear, including putative roles in oxidative stress responses.

Radioligand binding and functional responses of ligands for human recombinant adenosine A(3) receptors

The binding and functional properties of adenosine receptor ligands were compared in Chinese hamster ovary cells transfected with human adenosine A(3) receptors. Inhibition of [(125)I]-aminobenzyl-5'-N-methylcarboamidoadenosine ([(125)I]-AB-MECA) binding by adenosine receptor ligands was examined in membrane preparations. Inhibition of forskolin-induced cAMP accumulation by agonists was measured using a cAMP enzyme immunoassay. The rank order of agonist potency for both assays was N(6)-(3-iodobenzyl)-adenosine-5'-N-methyluronamide (IB-MECA) > 5'-N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine (NECA) > (-)-N(6)-[(R)-phenylisopropyl] adenosine (R-PIA) > 4-aminobenzyl-5'-N-methylcarboxamidoadenosine (AB-MECA) > N(6)-cyclopentyl adenosine (CPA) > adenosine. The radioligand binding rank order of antagonist potency was N-[9-chloro-2-(2-furanyl)[1,2,4]-triazolo[1,5-c]quinazolin-5-benzeneacetamide (MRS1220) > 1,3-dipropyl-8-cyclopentylxanthine (DPCPX) > 8-phenyltheophylline (8-PT) > 8-(p-sulfophenyl)-theophylline (8-SPT). MRS1220 competitively inhibited the effect of IB-MECA on cAMP production, with a K(B) value of 0.35 nm. These data are characteristic of adenosine A(3) receptors. The absence of Mg(2+) and presence of guanosine 5'-(gamma-thio)triphosphate (GTPgammaS) significantly reduced agonist binding inhibition potency, indicating binding to high- and low-affinity states. The IB-MECA, NECA and R-PIA IC(50) values were greater for the cAMP assay than for radioligand binding, suggesting an efficient stimulus-response transduction pathway.

Receptor recycling mediates plasma membrane recovery of dopamine D1 receptors in dendrites and axons after agonist-induced endocytosis in primary cultures of striatal neurons

The pharmacological stimulation of G-protein-coupled receptor induces receptor internalization. Receptor's fate after the step of internalization remains poorly characterized despite its incidence on the neuronal responsiveness. In this context, we studied the dopamine (DA) D1 receptor (D1R) trafficking in a model of striatal neuronal culture that endogenously express the D1R. We first characterized by immunohistochemistry the spatial distribution of the compartments involved in the endocytic pathways and then the D1R trafficking in dendrites and axons. In dendrites, immunohistochemical analysis showed that acute stimulation by the D1R agonist SKF 82958 (1 microM) induces an internalization of D1R in early endosomes labeled with Alexa-488-conjugated transferrin. We show that, 20 min after removal of the agonist, the D1R immunolabeling pattern returns to the basal state in dendrites and in axons. Recovery was unaffected by cycloheximide (70 microM) but was prevented by monensin (100 microM) that inhibits endosomal acidification and receptor recycling. These data suggest that dendritic and axonal D1Rs are internalized after agonist stimulation and targeted to the recycling pathway demonstrating that the machinery involved in GPCR endocytosis and recycling is functional both in dendrites and in axons. Temporal characteristics observed for the recovery of D1R density to the basal state and those observed for the resensitization process strongly suggest that D1R recycling supports the receptor resensitization.

Adenosine receptor agonists: from basic medicinal chemistry to clinical development

Adenosine is a physiological nucleoside which acts as an autocoid and activates G protein-coupled membrane receptors, designated A(1), A(2A), A(2B) and A(3). Adenosine plays an important role in many (patho)physiological conditions in the CNS as well as in peripheral organs and tissues. Adenosine receptors are present on virtually every cell. However, receptor subtype distribution and densities vary greatly. Adenosine itself is used as a therapeutic agent for the treatment of supraventricular paroxysmal tachycardia and arrhythmias and as a vasodilatatory agent in cardiac imaging. During the past 20 years, a number of selective agonists for A(1), A(2A) and A(3) adenosine receptors have been developed, all of them structurally derived from adenosine. Several such compounds are currently undergoing clinical trials for the treatment of cardiovascular diseases (A(1)and A(2A)), pain (A(1)), wound healing (A(2A)), diabetic foot ulcers (A(2A)), colorectal cancer (A(3)) and rheumatoid arthritis (A(3)). Clinical evaluation of some A(1) and A(2A) adenosine receptor agonists has been discontinued. Major problems include side effects due to the wide distribution of adenosine receptors; low brain penetration, which is important for the targeting of CNS diseases; short half-lifes of compounds; or a lack of effects, in some cases perhaps due to receptor desensitisation or to low receptor density in the targeted tissue. Partial agonists, inhibitors of adenosine metabolism (adenosine kinase and deaminase inhibitors) or allosteric activators of adenosine receptors may be advantageous for certain indications, as they may exhibit fewer side effects.

Adenosine receptors involved in modulation of noradrenaline release in isolated rat tail artery

Adenosine receptors involved in the modulation of noradrenaline release from postganglionic sympathetic nerves in rat tail artery were characterized by studying the effects of adenosine-receptor agonists and antagonists on electrically evoked tritium overflow (100 pulses, 5 Hz) and by immunohistochemistry. The adenosine A1 receptor-selective agonist N6-cyclopentyladenosine (CPA; 1-100 nM) and the non-selective adenosine receptor agonist N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine (NECA; 1-10 microM) decreased tritium overflow. These effects were blocked by the adenosine A1 receptor-selective antagonist 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine (DPCPX; 30 nM). The adenosine A(2A) receptor-selective agonist 2-p-(2-carboxyethyl)phenethylamino-5'-N-ethylcarboxamido adenosine (CGS 21680; 1-100 nM) enhanced tritium overflow, an effect blocked by the adenosine A(2A) receptor-selective antagonist 5-amino-7-(2-phenylethyl)-2-(2-furyl)-pyrazolo-[4,3-e]-1,2,4-triazolo[1,5-c]pyrimidine (SCH 58261; 20 nM) but not changed by the adenosine A(2B) receptor-selective antagonist N-(4-acetylphenyl)-2-[4-(2,3,6,7-tetrahydro-2,6-dioxo-1,3-dipropyl-1H-purin-8-yl) phenoxy]acetamide (MRS 1706; 20 nM). In the presence of DPCPX (30 nM), NECA enhanced tritium overflow, an effect abolished by MRS 1706 but not influenced by SCH 58261. Immunohistochemistry revealed immunoreactivity for all adenosine-receptor subtypes. Areas of co-localization were found for neurofilament with adenosine A1, A(2A) and A(2B) but not A3 receptors. In conclusion, the present study provides functional and morphological evidence for the occurrence of multiple adenosine receptor-mediated modulation of noradrenaline release in the rat tail: inhibition mediated by adenosine A1 receptors and facilitation mediated by both adenosine A(2A) and A(2B) receptors.

Effects of lipid rafts on dynamics of retroviral entry and trafficking: Quantitative analysis

The association of cell surface receptors with sterol-sphingolipid-enriched microdomains of the plasma membrane, so-called lipid rafts, may affect the receptor-mediated entry and trafficking dynamics of viruses. A model retrovirus, subgroup A avian sarcoma and leukosis virus (ASLV-A), can initiate infection by binding to either of two forms of the tumor virus subgroup A (TVA) receptor, a lipid-raft-associated glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchored receptor (TVA800) or a transmembrane receptor (TVA950). Narayan et al. previously found that virus particles bound to TVA950 were more rapidly internalized than virions bound to TVA800, and the internalization via TVA950 exhibited biphasic kinetics. To explore potential molecular mechanisms for these results we developed a mathematical model that accounts for internalization of viruses through cellular pits, trafficking to an endosomal compartment where fusion occurs, and viral DNA synthesis. By fitting the model to experimental data we found that viruses bound to TVA950 were internalized up to 2.6-fold more rapidly than viruses bound to TVA800. Two- to threefold greater lateral diffusivities of transmembrane proteins, relative to GPI-anchored proteins, observed in other systems, suggest that the internalization rate of ASLV-A is diffusion-limited. Furthermore, by allowing for recycling of internalized TVA950-bound viruses back to the cell surface, we can account for the observed biphasic internalization kinetics. This mechanism is also consistent with the observed slower rate of DNA synthesis for viruses that enter via TVA950. Overall, the model provides a means to generate new experimentally testable hypotheses and sets a foundation for building a quantitative and integrated understanding of viral entry, trafficking, and intracellular dynamics.

A3 adenosine receptor activation in melanoma cells: association between receptor fate and tumor growth inhibition

Activation of the Gi protein-coupled A3 adenosine receptor (A3AR) has been implicated in the inhibition of melanoma cell growth by deregulating protein kinase A and key components of the Wnt signaling pathway. Receptor activation results in internalization/recycling events that play an important role in turning on/off receptor-mediated signal transduction pathways. Thus, we hereby examined the association between receptor fate, receptor functionality, and tumor growth inhibition upon activation with the agonist 1-deoxy-1-[6-[[(3-iodophenyl)-methyl]amino]-9H-purine-9-yl]-N-methyl-beta-D-ribofuranuronamide (IB-MECA). Results showed that melanoma cells highly expressed A3AR on the cell surface, which was rapidly internalized to the cytosol and "sorted" to the endosomes for recycling and to the lysosomes for degradation. Receptor distribution in the lysosomes was consistent with the down-regulation of receptor protein expression and was followed by mRNA and protein resynthesis. At each stage, receptor functionality was evidenced by the modulation in cAMP level and the downstream effectors protein kinase A, glycogen synthase kinase-3beta, c-Myc, and cyclin D1. The A3AR antagonist MRS 1523 counteracted the internalization process as well as the modulation in the expression of the signaling proteins, demonstrating that the responses are A3AR-mediated. Supporting this notion are the in vivo studies showing tumor growth inhibition upon IB-MECA treatment and reverse of this response when IB-MECA was given in combination with MRS 1523. In addition, in melanoma tumor lesions derived from IB-MECA-treated mice, the expression level A3AR and the downstream key signaling proteins were modulated in the same pattern as was seen in vitro. Altogether, our observations tie the fate of A3AR to modulation of downstream molecular mechanisms leading to tumor growth inhibition both in vitro and in vivo.

Signalling from adenosine receptors to mitogen-activated protein kinases

The purine nucleoside adenosine acts via four distinct adenosine receptor subtypes: the adenosine A(1), A(2A), A(2B), and A(3) receptor. They are all G protein-coupled receptors (GPCR) coupling to classical second messenger pathways such as modulation of cAMP production or the phospholipase C (PLC) pathway. In addition, they couple to mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPK), which could give them a role in cell growth, survival, death and differentiation. Although each of the adenosine receptors can activate one or more of the MAPKs, the mechanisms appear to differ substantially, both between receptor subtypes in the same cell type and between the same receptor in different cell types.

Evidence for functional adenosine A3 receptors in microglia cells

Adenosine exerts its effects through four subtypes of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs): adenosine A1 and A3 receptors (A3R), which generally couple to Gi proteins and adenosine A2A and A2B receptors that activate Gs proteins. Though there is evidence for the expression of mRNA for the A3R in the central nervous system, evidence for functional receptors has depended on drugs with uncertain specificity. Here, we show that A3Rs mediating functional responses are present in microglia cells. By selectively stimulating the A3R in both primary mouse microglia cells and the N13 microglia cell line with the agonist Cl-IB-MECA, we have found a biphasic, partly Gi protein-dependent influence on the phosphorylation of the extracellular signal-regulated protein kinase 1/2 (ERK1/2). ERK1/2 activation was assessed by immunoblotting with phospho-specific antibodies. The involvement of the A3R in Cl-IB-MECA-induced ERK1/2 phosphorylation was confirmed by demonstrating that those effects are absent in primary mouse microglia cells isolated from mice lacking the gene for the A3R.

Pharmacological analysis of calcium responses mediated by the human A3 adenosine receptor in monocyte-derived dendritic cells and recombinant cells

Extensive characterization of adenosine receptors expressed by human monocyte-derived dendritic cells (MDDCs) was performed with quantitative polymerase chain reaction, radioligand binding, and calcium signaling. Transcript for the A3 adenosine receptor was elevated more than 100-fold in immature MDDCs compared with monocyte precursors. A3 receptor transcript was substantially diminished, and A2A receptor transcript increased, by lipopolysaccharide maturation of MDDCs. Saturation binding of N(6)-(3-[(125)I]iodo-4-aminobenzyl)-adenosine-5'-N-methyluronamide ([(125)I]AB-MECA) to membranes from immature MDDCs yielded B(max) of 298 fmol/mg of protein and K(D) of 0.7 nM. Competition against [(125)I]AB-MECA binding confirmed the site to be the A3 receptor. Adenosine elicited pertussis toxin-sensitive calcium responses with EC(50) values ranging as low as 2 nM. The order of potency for related agonists was N(6)-(3-iodobenzyl)-adenosine-5'-N-methylcarboxamide (IB-MECA) >/= I-AB-MECA > 2Cl-IB-MECA >/= adenosine > 2-[p-(2-carboxyethyl)phenylethylamino]-5'-N-ethylcarboxyamidoadenosine (CGS21680). The order of efficacy was adenosine >/= CGS21680 > IB-MECA >/= I-AB-MECA > 2Cl-IB-MECA. Calcium responses to 2Cl-IB-MECA and CGS21680, and the lower range of adenosine concentrations, were completely blocked by 10 nM N-(2-methoxyphenyl)-N-[2-(3-pyridyl)quinazolin-4-yl]urea (VUF5574) but not by 7-(2-phenylethyl)-5-amino-2-(2-furyl)-pyrazolo-[4,3-e]-1,2,4-triazolo[1,5-c]pyrimidine (SCH58261) or 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine. Pretreatment with 100 nM 2Cl-IB-MECA eliminated responses to CGS21680 but not to monocyte inhibitory protein-1alpha. For comparison, dose-response functions were obtained from double-recombinant human embryonic kidney 293 cells expressing the human A3 receptor and a chimeric Galphaq-i3 protein, which was required to establish A3-mediated calcium signaling. The pharmacological profile of calcium signaling elicited by adenosine-related agonists in the double-recombinant cells was essentially identical to that obtained from immature MDDCs. Our results provide an extensive analysis of A3-mediated calcium signaling and unequivocally identify immature MDDCs as native expressers of the human A3 receptor.

Regional differences in the adenosine A(2) receptor-mediated modulation of contractions in rat vas deferens

Adenosine receptors involved in modulation of contractions were characterized in the bisected rat vas deferens by combining pharmacological and immunohistochemical approaches. In both portions, noradrenaline-elicited contractions were enhanced by the adenosine A(1) receptor agonist N(6)-cyclopentyladenosine (CPA), and inhibited by the non-selective adenosine receptor agonist 5'-N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine (NECA) in the presence of the adenosine A(1) receptor antagonist 1,3-dipropyl-8-cyclopentyl-l,3-dipropylxanthine (DPCPX). The adenosine A(2A) receptor agonist 2-p-(2-carboxyethyl)phenethyl-amino-5'-N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine (CGS 21680) also inhibited noradrenaline-elicited contractions but only in the prostatic portion. Contractions elicited by the stable ATP analogue alpha,beta-methyleneATP (alpha,beta-MeATP) were inhibited only by NECA in the presence of DPCPX and only in the prostatic portion. This study provides functional evidence for the presence, in both portions of the rat vas deferens, of an adenosine A(1) receptor-mediated enhancement and of an adenosine A(2) receptor-mediated inhibition of contractions. The latter effect is mediated by both A(2A) and A(2B) subtypes in the prostatic portion but only by the A(2B) subtype in the epididymal portion. This regional variation is supported by the immunohistochemical results that revealed an adenosine A(2A) receptor immunoreactivity not co-localized with nerve fibres more abundant in the prostatic than in the epididymal portion.

Characterization of DeY1, a novel Y-box gene specifically expressed in differentiating male germ cells of planarians

Y-box proteins are conserved regulatory factors that play a key role in coordinating gene activity with protein synthesis by influencing both the transcription and translation of specific subsets of genes. We report the identification of a novel Y-box gene, DeY1, whose transcripts are found in the testes of sexual planarians. DeY1 is expressed in spermatogonia, spermatocytes and spermatids, while no expression is detected in spermatozoa. No DeY1 transcripts are found in the blastema during regeneration. The subcellular distribution of DeY1 protein was analyzed by electron microscope immunocytochemistry. Immunolabelling was found in the nucleus of spermatogonia, in both the nucleus and the cytoplasm of spermatocytes, and in the cytoplasm of spermatids.

A3 adenosine receptors in human astrocytoma cells: agonist-mediated desensitization, internalization, and down-regulation

A(3) adenosine receptor activation has been previously demonstrated to result in both neuroprotective and neurodegenerative effects, depending upon specific pathophysiological conditions. This dual effect may depend on receptor regulation mechanisms that are able to change receptor availability and/or function. In the present study, we investigated desensitization, internalization, and down-regulation of native A(3) adenosine receptors in human astrocytoma cells after exposure to the agonist 2-chloro-N6-(3-iodobenzyl)-N-methyl-5'-carbamoyladenosine (Cl-IBMECA). Cl-IBMECA induced a concentration-dependent inhibition of adenylyl cyclase activity with an EC(50) value of 2.9 +/- 0.1 nM. The effect was suggested to be mediated by A(3) adenosine receptor subtype by the use of selective adenosine receptor antagonists. Cell treatment with pertussis toxin abolished Cl-IBMECA-mediated inhibition of adenylyl cyclase activity, evidencing an A(3) receptor coupling to inhibitory G protein. Short-term exposure to the agonist Cl-IBMECA (100 nM) caused rapid receptor desensitization, within 15 min. Agonist-induced desensitization was accompanied by receptor internalization: A(3) adenosine receptor internalized with rapid kinetics, within 30 min, after cell exposure to 100 nM Cl-IBMECA. The localization of A(3) adenosine receptors on the plasma membrane and in intracellular compartments was directly revealed by immunogold electron microscopy. After desensitization, the removal of agonist led to the restoration of A(3) adenosine receptor functioning through receptor recycling to the cell surface within 120 min. Prolonged agonist exposure (1-24 h) resulted in a marked down-regulation of A(3) adenosine receptors that reached 21.9 +/- 2.88% of control value after 24 h. After down-regulation, the recovery of receptor functioning was slow (24 h) and associated with the restoration of receptor levels close to control values. In conclusion, our results demonstrated that A(3) receptors, in astrocytoma cells, are regulated after short- and long-term agonist exposure.

A3 adenosine receptor as a target for cancer therapy

Targeting the A3 adenosine receptor (A3AR) by adenosine or a synthetic agonist to this receptor (IB-MECA and Cl-IB-MECA) results in a differential effect on tumor and on normal cells. Both the adenosine and the agonists inhibit the growth of various tumor cell types such as melanoma, colon or prostate carcinoma and lymphoma. This effect is specific and is exerted on tumor cells only. Moreover, exposure of peripheral blood mononuclear cells to adenosine or the agonists leads to the induction of granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) production. When given orally to mice, the agonists suppress the growth of melanoma, colon and prostate carcinoma in these animals, while inducing a myeloprotective effect via the induction of G-CSF production. The de-regulation of the Wnt signaling pathway was found to be involved in the anticancer effect. Receptor activation induces inhibition of adenylyl cyclase with a subsequent decrease in the level of protein kinase A and protein kinase B/Akt leading to activation of glycogen synthase kinase-3beta, a key element in the Wnt pathway. The oral bioavailability of the synthetic A3AR agonists, and their induced systemic anticancer and myeloprotective effect, renders them potentially useful in three different modes of treatment: as a stand-alone anticancer treatment, in combination with chemotherapy to enhance its therapeutic index and myelprotection. It is evident that use of the A3AR agonist for increasing the therapeutic index of chemotherapy may also invariably give rise to myeloprotection and vice versa. The A3AR agonists are thus a promising new class of agents for cancer therapy.

Adenosine receptors: G protein-mediated signalling and the role of accessory proteins

Ever since the discovery of the effects of adenosine in the circulation, adenosine receptors continue to represent a promising drug target. Firstly, this is due to the fact that the receptors are expressed in a large variety of cells; in particular, the actions of adenosine (or, respectively, of the antagonistic methylxanthines) in the central nervous system, in the circulation, on immune cells and on other tissues can be beneficial in certain disorders. Secondly, there exists a large number of ligands, which have been generated by introducing several modifications in the structure of the lead compounds (adenosine and methylxanthine), some of them highly specific. Four adenosine receptor subtypes have been identified by molecular cloning; they belong to the family of G protein-coupled receptors, which transfer signals by activating heterotrimeric G proteins. It has been appreciated recently that accessory proteins impinge on the receptor/G protein interaction and thus modulate the signalling reaction. These accessory components may be thought as adaptors that redirect the signalling pathway to elicit a cell-specific response. Here, we review the recent literature on adenosine receptors and place a focus on the role of accessory proteins in the organisation of adenosine receptor signalling. These components have been involved in receptor sorting, in the control of signal amplification and in the temporal regulation of receptor activity, while the existence of others is postulated on the basis of atypical cellular reactions elicited by receptor activation.

7-Nitrobenzofurazan (NBD) derivatives of 5'-N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine (NECA) as new fluorescent probes for human A(3) adenosine receptors

New fluorescent ligands for adenosine receptors (ARs), obtained by the insertion, in the N(6) position of NECA, of NBD-moieties with linear alkyl spacers of increasing length, proved to possess a high affinity and selectivity for the A(3) subtype expressed in CHO cells. In fluorescence microscopy assays, compound 2d, the most active and selective for human A(3)-AR, permitted visualization and localization of this human receptor subtype, showing its potential suitability for internalization and trafficking studies in living cells.

Desensitization of type 1 angiotensin II receptor subtypes in the rat kidney

Differences involving serine residues in the sequence of the carboxyl-terminal tail of type 1 angiotensin II (Ang II) receptor subtypes AT(1A) and AT(1B) suggest differences in desensitization ability. We examined the Ang II-induced homologous desensitization patterns of both receptor subtypes in freshly isolated renal structures: glomerulus (Glom), afferent arteriole, and cortical thick ascending limb (CTAL), whose content in each subtype mRNA is different, by measuring variations in intracellular calcium concentration. A preexposure to a maximal dose of Ang II, followed by a second application of the same concentration, induced: 1) a complete desensitization in Glom, where AT(1A) and AT(1B) mRNAs were expressed in similar proportions, and 2) no or partial desensitization in afferent arteriole and CTAL, where AT(1A) mRNA was predominant. In the absence of nephron structure containing only AT(1B) mRNA, we studied rat anterior pituitary cells that exhibit high content in this subtype and observed that desensitization was not complete. In Glom, CTAL, and pituitary cells, desensitization proceeded in a dose-dependent manner. In Glom and CTAL, desensitization occurred via a PKC-independent mechanism. These results suggest that desensitization does not depend on the nature of Ang II receptor subtype but either on the proportion of each subtype in a given cell and/or on cell specific type. This could allow adaptive biological responses to Ang II appropriate to the specific function of a given cell type.

Pharmacological characterization of adenosine receptors in PGT-beta mouse pineal gland tumour cells

1. The adenosine receptor in mouse pinealocytes was identified and characterized using pharmacological and physiological approaches. 2. Expression of the two adenosine receptor subtypes A2B and A3 was detected in mouse pineal glands and PGT-beta cells by polymerase chain reaction and nucleotide sequencing. 3. Adenosine and 5'-N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine (NECA) evoked cyclic AMP generation but the A2)-selective agonist 2-(4-(2-carboxyethyl)phenylethylamino)adenosine-5'-N-ethylcarboxamideadenosine (CGS 21680) and the A1-specific agonists R-N(6)-(2-phenylisopropyl)adenosine (R-PIA) and N(6)-cyclopentyladenosine (CPA) had little effect on intracellular cyclic AMP levels. The A2B receptor selective antagonists alloxazine and enprofylline completely blocked NECA-mediated cyclic AMP accumulation. 4. Treatment of cells with the A3-selective agonist N(6)-(3-iodobenzyl)-5'-(N-methylcarbamoyl)adenosine (IB-MECA) inhibited the elevation of the cyclic AMP level induced by NECA or isoproterenol in a concentration-dependent manner with maximal inhibition of 40 - 50%. These responses were blocked by the specific A3 adenosine receptor antagonist MRS 1191. Pretreatment of the cells with pertussis toxin attenuated the IB-MECA-induced responses, suggesting that this effect occurred via the pertussis toxin-sensitive inhibitory G proteins. 5. IB-MECA also caused a concentration-dependent elevation in [Ca(2+)]i and IP3 content. Both the responses induced by IB-MECA were attenuated by treatment with U73122 or phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate. 6. These data suggest the presence of both A2B and A3 adenosine receptors in mouse pineal tumour cells and that the A2B receptor is positively coupled to adenylyl cyclase whereas the A3 receptor is negatively coupled to adenylyl cyclase and also coupled to phospholipase C.

Adenosine in the treatment of stroke: yes, maybe, or absolutely not?

Agonist stimulation of adenosine A(1) receptors has been consistently shown to result in reduction of brain damage following experimentally induced global and focal brain ischaemia in animals. Unsurprisingly, the use of adenosine A(1) receptors as targets for the development of clinical therapeutics suitable for treatment of ischaemic brain disorders has been suggested by many authors. The latest studies of adenosine and its receptors indicate that adenosine-mediated actions might be far more complex than originally anticipated, casting some doubt about the rapid development of stroke treatment based on adenosine. This review discusses the possible role of adenosine receptor subtypes (A(1), A(2) and A(3)) in the context of their potential as therapeutics in stroke.