Effect of local standards on the implementation of national guidelines for asthma: primary care agreement with national asthma guidelines

The nationwide retrospective cohort study by Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service proves that asthma management decreases the exacerbation risk of asthma

Medical costs have recently increased in South Korea due to the rising rate of asthma. Primary clinics serve an important role in asthma management, as they are the first stop for patients presenting with symptoms. The Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRA) in South Korea has assessed asthma-management quality since 2013, but studies are lacking on whether these assessments have been performed properly and contribute toward reducing asthma exacerbations. Therefore, we investigated whether the HIRA’s quality assessments have decreased asthma exacerbations using national health insurance claims data from 2013 to 2017 of 83,375 primary-clinic and 15,931 tertiary-hospital patients with asthma. These patients were classified into four groups based on disease severity according to the monthly prescribed amount of asthma medication using K-means clustering. The associations between HIRA assessments and asthma exacerbation were analyzed using a generalized estimating equation. Our results showed that exacerbation odds gradually decreased as the HIRA assessments progressed, especially in the mild-severity group, and that exacerbation risk among patients with asthma decreased in the order of assessment grades: “Unsatisfactory,” “Satisfactory,” and “Tertiary.” Therefore, we may conclude that asthma exacerbations may decrease with high quality asthma management; appropriate quality assessment could be helpful in reducing asthma exacerbations.

Nurse-delivered outpatient asthma education for children and caregivers: a pilot study to promote shared asthma management

OBJECTIVES

To assess the feasibility of nurse-delivered asthma education for caregiver/child dyads in a busy clinic setting, and measure the preliminary effectiveness of the intervention.

METHODS

We conducted a pilot study of nurse-delivered asthma education in a busy outpatient clinic. We enrolled a convenience sample of children (7-16 years) with uncontrolled persistent asthma who had a prescription for an inhaled controller medication and public health insurance. After provider visits, nurses taught dyads using picture-based materials, teach-back methods, and colored labels applied to asthma medications. The intervention was repeated at 1-month follow-up. We assessed feasibility by reviewing nurse documentation in the electronic medical record, detailing whether each component was implemented and the time required for education at each visit. We measured preliminary effectiveness by surveying children and caregivers separately before each clinic visit about asthma management responsibility, self-efficacy, caregiver quality of life, and symptoms; caregivers also completed a final telephone survey 2 months after the follow-up visit. We examined pre-post differences in continuous outcomes within-subjects using Wilcoxon signed rank tests.

RESULTS

We enrolled 22 child/caregiver dyads. Nursing documentation indicated a high rate of component delivery at each visit; the initial and 1-month visits required 25 and 15 min, respectively. We observed significant increases in child responsibility, child/caregiver self-efficacy, caregiver quality of life, and child symptoms at each follow-up.

CONCLUSION

This intervention of patient-centered asthma education can be delivered by nurses to caregiver/child dyads with high fidelity in a busy pediatric practice. Preliminary data indicate potential benefit for both children and caregivers.

Caregiver education to promote appropriate use of preventive asthma medications: what is happening in primary care?

OBJECTIVE

To describe actions taken by providers at primary care visits to promote daily use of preventive asthma medication, and determine whether patient or encounter variables are associated with the receipt of asthma medication education.

METHODS

As part of a larger study in Rochester, NY, caregivers of children (2-12 years old) with asthma were approached before an office visit for well-child, asthma-specific or other illness care from October 2009 to January 2013. Eligibility required persistent symptoms and a prescription for an inhaled asthma controller medication. Caregivers were interviewed within two weeks to discuss the health care encounter.

RESULTS

We identified 185 eligible children from six urban primary care offices (27% Black, 38% Hispanic, 65% Medicaid). Overall, 42% of caregivers reported a discussion of appropriate preventive medication use, fewer than 25% received an asthma action plan, and 17% reported "ideal" medication education (both discussing proper medication use and completing an asthma action plan); no differences were seen upon comparing well-child and asthma-specific visits with other visits. Well-child and asthma-specific visits together were more likely, compared with other visits, to include a recommendation for a follow-up visit (43% versus 23%, p = 0.007). No patient factors were associated with report of preventive medication education.

CONCLUSIONS

Guideline-recommended education for caregivers about preventive-asthma medication is not occurring in the majority of primary care visits for urban children with symptomatic persistent asthma. Novel methods to deliver asthma education may be needed to promote appropriate preventive medication use and reduce asthma morbidity.

Preventive asthma care delivery in the primary care office: missed opportunities for children with persistent asthma symptoms

OBJECTIVE

To describe which National Heart Lung and Blood Institute preventive actions are taken for children with persistent asthma symptoms at the time of a primary care visit and determine how care delivery varies by asthma symptom severity.

METHODS

We approached children (2 to 12 years old) with asthma from Rochester, NY, in the waiting room at their doctor's office. Eligibility required current persistent symptoms. Caregivers were interviewed via telephone within 2 weeks after the visit regarding specific preventive care actions delivered. Bivariate and regression analyses assessed the relationship between asthma symptom severity and actions taken during the visit.

RESULTS

We identified 171 children with persistent asthma symptoms (34% black, 64% Medicaid) from October 2009 to January 2011 at 6 pediatric offices. Overall delivery of guideline-based preventive actions during visits was low. Children with mild persistent symptoms were least likely to receive preventive care. Regression analyses controlling for demographics and visit type (acute or follow-up asthma visit vs non-asthma-related visit) confirmed that children with mild persistent asthma symptoms were less likely than those with more severe asthma symptoms to receive preventive medication action (odds ratio [OR] 0.34, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.14-0.84), trigger reduction discussion (OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.19-0.82), recommendation of follow-up (OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.19-0.87), and receipt of action plan (OR 0.37, 95% CI 0.16-0.86).

CONCLUSIONS

Many children with persistent asthma symptoms do not receive recommended preventive actions during office visits, and children with mild persistent symptoms are the least likely to receive care. Efforts to improve guideline-based asthma care are needed, and children with mild persistent asthma symptoms warrant further consideration.

Improving clinician self-efficacy does not increase asthma guideline use by primary care clinicians

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to show the association between changes in clinician self-efficacy and readiness to change and implementation of an asthma management program (Easy Breathing).

METHODS

A 36 month randomized, controlled trial was conducted involving 24 pediatric practices (88 clinicians). Randomized clinicians received interventions designed to enhance clinician self-efficacy and readiness to change which were measured at baseline and 3 years. Interventions consisted of an educational toolbox, seminars, teleconferences, mini-fellowships, opinion leader visits, clinician-specific feedback, and pay for performance. The primary outcome was program utilization (number of children enrolled in Easy Breathing/year); secondary outcomes included development of a written treatment plan and severity-appropriate therapy.

RESULTS

At baseline, clinicians enrolled 149 ± 147 (mean ± SD) children/clinician/year; 84% of children had a written treatment plan and 77% of plans used severity-appropriate therapy. At baseline, higher self-efficacy scores were associated with greater program utilization (relative rate [RR], 1.34; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04-1.72; P = .04) but not treatment plan development (RR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.29-1.35; P = .23) or anti-inflammatory use (RR, 1.76; 95% CI, 0.92-3.35; P = .09). Intervention clinicians participated in 17 interventions over 36 months. At study end, self-efficacy scores increased in intervention clinicians compared to control clinicians (P = .01) and more clinicians were in an action stage of change (P = .001) but these changes were not associated with changes in primary or secondary outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Self-efficacy scores correlated with program use at baseline and increased in the intervention arm, but these increases were not associated with greater program-related activities. Self-efficacy may be necessary but not sufficient for behavior change.

Partner randomized controlled trial: study protocol and coaching intervention

BACKGROUND

Many children with asthma live with frequent symptoms and activity limitations, and visits for urgent care are common. Many pediatricians do not regularly meet with families to monitor asthma control, identify concerns or problems with management, or provide self-management education. Effective interventions to improve asthma care such as small group training and care redesign have been difficult to disseminate into office practice.

METHODS AND DESIGN

This paper describes the protocol for a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to evaluate a 12-month telephone-coaching program designed to support primary care management of children with persistent asthma and subsequently to improve asthma control and disease-related quality of life and reduce urgent care events for asthma care. Randomization occurred at the practice level with eligible families within a practice having access to the coaching program or to usual care. The coaching intervention was based on the transtheoretical model of behavior change. Targeted behaviors included 1) effective use of controller medications, 2) effective use of rescue medications and 3) monitoring to ensure optimal control. Trained lay coaches provided parents with education and support for asthma care, tailoring the information provided and frequency of contact to the parent's readiness to change their child's day-to-day asthma management. Coaching calls varied in frequency from weekly to monthly. For each participating family, follow-up measurements were obtained at 12- and 24-months after enrollment in the study during a telephone interview. The primary outcomes were the mean change in 1) the child's asthma control score, 2) the parent's quality of life score, and 3) the number of urgent care events assessed at 12 and 24 months. Secondary outcomes reflected adherence to guideline recommendations by the primary care pediatricians and included the proportion of children prescribed controller medications, having maintenance care visits at least twice a year, and an asthma action plan. Cost-effectiveness of the intervention was also measured.

DISCUSSION

Twenty-two practices (66 physicians) were randomized (11 per treatment group), and 950 families with a child 3-12 years old with persistent asthma were enrolled. A description of the coaching intervention is presented.

Treatment of asthma: Identification of the practice behavior and the deviation from the guideline recommendations

BACKGROUND

Despite an exponential development of the understanding of the disease with availability of good therapy and feasibility of good control along with availability of globally accepted guidelines, there remains a significant gap between the guidelines and prevailing practice behavior for treating asthma all over the globe. This perhaps stands as the single most deterrent factor for good asthma care worldwide. The objective of the study is to analyze the asthma prescriptions to find out the available status of the practice behaviour and the deviations from the guideline in asthma practice.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The asthma prescriptions of the referred patients presenting to the OPD services of the IPCR, Kolkata were photocopied and collected. They were further analyzed based on the available information upon a format being prepared on four major areas as qualifications, clinical recording habit, practice of evaluating patients, and treatment habit that stands apparent from the prescribed medications. The doctors were divided into three categories as a) MBBS, b) MD/DNB (medicine and respiratory medicine), and c) DM (non respiratory sub-specialities) and statistical analysis has been performed comparing the three groups as per the performance in the four pre-decided areas.

RESULTS

All the groups fall short of any guideline or text of asthma care in all the areas involved.

CONCLUSION

The practice behaviour of our doctors for asthma care appears deficient in several areas and seems far from guideline recommendations. This needs further evaluation and adoption of appropriate interventions.

Facilitators and barriers to implementing quality measurement in primary mental health care: Systematic review

OBJECTIVE To identify facilitators and barriers to implementing quality measurement in primary mental healthcare as part of a large Canadian study (Continuous Enhancement of Quality Measurement) to identify and select key performances measures for quality improvement in primary mental health care.DATA SOURCES CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and PsycINFO were searched, using various terms that represented the main concepts, for articles published in English between 1996 and 2005.STUDY SELECTION In consultation with a health sciences research librarian, the initial list of identified references was reduced to 702 abstracts, which were assessed for relevance by 2 coders using predetermined selection criteria. Following a consensus process, 34 articles were selected for inclusion in the analysis. An additional 106 citations were identified in the references of these articles, 14 of which were deemed relevant to this study, for a total of 57 empirical articles identified for review. Most articles described implementation of health care innovations and clinical practice guidelines, 5 focused on quality indicators, and 1 examined mental health indicators.SYNTHESIS Content analysis of the 57 articles identified 7 common categories of facilitators and barriers for implementing innovations, guidelines, and quality indicators: indicator characteristics, promotional strategies,implementation strategies, resources, individual-level factors, organizational-level factors, and external factors.Implementation studies in which these factors were addressed were more likely to achieve successful outcomes.CONCLUSION The overlap in facilitators and barriers across implementation of mental health indicators, healthcare innovations, and practice guidelines is not surprising, as they are often related. The overlap strengthens the findings of the limited number of studies of quality indicators. The Continuous Enhancement of Quality Measurement process for identification and selection of indicators has attended to some of these issues by using a rigorous scientific approach and by engaging a range of stakeholders in selecting and prioritizing the indicators.

Customized Asthma Control Test with reflection on sociocultural differences

We evaluated the utility and feasibility of customizing Asthma Control Test (ACT) items to generate a Korean Asthma Control Test (KACT) specific for Korean patients. We surveyed 392 asthma patients with 19 items, selected to reflect the Korean sociocultural context. Guideline ratings were integrated with the evaluations of specialists (i.e., using both guide base rating together with specialist's rating), and items with the greatest discriminating validity were identified. Stepwise regression methods were used to select items. KACT scale scores showed significant differences between the asthma control ratings generated by integrating ratings (r=0.77, P<0.001), by specialist's evaluations (r=0.54, P<0.001), or by FEV(1) percent predicted (r=0.39, P<0.001). Specialist's and guideline ratings detected 56% and 48.6% of patients with well-controlled asthma, respectively. However, the integrated ratings indicated that only 34.3% of the patients in the test sample were well controlled. The overall agreement between KACT and the integrated rating ranged from 45% to 78%, depending on the cut-off points used. It is possible to formulate a valid, useful country-specific diagnostic tool for the assessment of asthma patients based on the original ACT that reflect differences in sociocultural context.

How much do health care providers value a community-based asthma care program? A survey to collect their opinions on the utilities of and barriers to its uptake

BACKGROUND

A comprehensive asthma care program (ACP) based on Canadian Asthma Consensus Guidelines was implemented in 8 primary care sites in Ontario, Canada. A survey was distributed to health care providers' (HCPs) to collect their opinions on the utilities of and barriers to the uptake of the ACP.

METHODS

A 39-item self-administered survey was mailed to 184 HCPs and support staff involved in delivering the ACP at the end of implementation. The items were presented in mixed formats with most items requiring responses on a five-point Likert scale. Distributions of responses were analyzed and compared across types of HCPs and sites.

RESULTS

Of the 184 surveys distributed, 108 (59%) were returned, and of that, 83 were completed by HCPs who had clinical contact with the patients. Overall, 95% of the HCPs considered the ACP useful for improving asthma care management. Most HCPs favored using the asthma care map (72%), believed it decreased uncertainties and variations in patient management (91%), and considered it a convenient and reliable source of information (86%). The most commonly reported barrier was time required to complete the asthma care map. Over half of the HCPs reported challenges to using spirometry, while almost 40% identified barriers to using the asthma action plan.

CONCLUSION

Contrary to the notion that physicians believe that guidelines foster cookbook medicine, our study showed that HCPs believed that the ACP offered an effective and reliable approach for enhancing asthma care and management in primary care.

Comparability of the Asthma Control Test telephone interview administration format with self-administered mail-out mail-back format

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the comparability of ACT * scores from a telephone interview format ('Telephone') against the original paper-and-pencil format ('Paper'). * Asthma Control Test (ACT) is a registered trademark of QualityMetric Incorporated, Lincoln, RI, USA METHODS: This was a randomized, crossover design with subjects completing both paper and telephone interview questionnaires. Subjects were >or=18 years old, with an asthma diagnosis, and receiving treatment within the last year. Eligible subjects were randomized to one of four administration form (AF) groups--(1) Telephone-Telephone, (2) Paper-Paper, (3) Paper-Telephone, (4) Telephone-Paper. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability were compared across groups. Differential item functioning (DIF) tests were conducted at baseline to evaluate AF effects on individual ACT items. Unadjusted and adjusted mean ACT scores were compared between AFs at baseline and unadjusted and adjusted means changes in ACT scores from baseline to follow-up were compared across the four groups. Lastly, the ability of ACT scores to discriminate between self-reported asthma severity was compared between the AFs using ANOVA.

RESULTS

A total of 1090 asthma respondents completed paper (n = 579) and telephone interview (n = 511) questionnaires. Internal consistency reliability of ACT scores at baseline was 0.81 and 0.83 for the paper and telephone AFs, respectively. Test-retest reliabilities ranged from 0.87 to 0.91 across the four groups. Responses to ACT items showed no significant DIF between AFs (chi(2) = 6.6, p = 0.25). ACT scores differed significantly across asthma severity levels in the hypothesized way for both paper (F = 230.1, p < 0.001) and telephone (F = 173.4, p < 0.001) AFs.

CONCLUSION

ACT scores from a telephone interview are reliable and comparable to ACT scores from a self-administered paper-and-pencil format. A potential limitation concerns the representativeness of study participants of asthmatics in the population.

Multicenter implementation of a consensus-developed, evidence-based, spontaneous breathing trial protocol

OBJECTIVE

Evidence-based practice recommendations abound, but implementation is often unstructured and poorly audited. We assessed the ability of a peer network to implement an evidence-based best practice protocol and to measure patient outcomes.

DESIGN

Consensus definition of spontaneous breathing trial followed by implementation in eight academic medical centers.

SETTING

Six medical, two surgical, and two combined medical/surgical adult intensive care units among eight academic medical centers.

STUDY POPULATION

Patients initiating mechanical ventilation through an endotracheal tube during a 12-wk interval formed the study population.

INTERVENTIONS

Adoption and implementation of a common spontaneous breathing trial protocol across multiple intensive care units.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Seven hundred five patients had 3,486 safety screens for conducting a spontaneous breathing trial; 2072 (59%) patients failed the safety screen. Another 379 (11%) patients failed a 2-min tolerance screen and 1,122 (34%) patients had a full 30-120 min spontaneous breathing trial performed. Seventy percent of eligible patients were enrolled. Only 55% of passing spontaneous breathing trials resulted in liberation from mechanical ventilatory support before another spontaneous breathing trial was performed.

CONCLUSIONS

Peer networks can be effective in promoting and implementing evidence-based best practices. Implementation of a best practice (spontaneous breathing trial) may be necessary for, but by itself insufficient to achieve, consistent and timely liberation from ventilator support.

Classifying asthma severity: objective versus subjective measures

National guidelines recommend the use of clinical history and spirometry to determine asthma severity. We examined the usefulness of the six guideline-recommended clinical questions in determining asthma severity and then compared guideline-determined severity to clinician-reported and spirometry-determined severity in a cross-sectional study of 201 children with asthma who were not receiving controller therapy. Four guideline-recommended questions (daytime and nocturnal symptoms, school absenteeism, and exercise impairment) determined asthma severity. Concordance between clinician-reported and spirometry-determined asthma severity was poor (kappa = 0.02). Clinical history alone underestimated spirometry-determined disease severity in 27% of children while spirometry results alone underestimated clinician-determined severity in 40% of children.

Does current asthma control predict future health care use among black preschool-aged inner-city children?

OBJECTIVES

Factors predictive of future asthma must be identified among young inner-city children, who suffer disproportionately from asthma. We investigated whether current asthma control predicts future asthma-related health care use among inner-city preschool-aged children with asthma.

METHODS

A total of 150 inner-city preschool-aged children with asthma were followed prospectively for 6 months. At baseline, symptom frequency and reliever-medication use were assessed to classify children into National Asthma Education and Prevention Program-derived control categories. Long-term controller-medication use was also assessed, as well as asthma-related health care use at baseline and at 3 and 6 months.

RESULTS

The mean age was 4.4 years, 92% were black, and 39% reported long-term controller use. At baseline, 37% were classified as having mild-intermittent, 17% had mild-persistent, 21% had moderate-persistent, and 25% had severe-persistent asthma control. Significant changes in asthma control were observed over time, including 46% of children originally categorized with mild-intermittent asthma who had worsened asthma control by 3 months. Asthma control significantly predicted future health care use 3 months later but not 6 months later. Multivariate analyses showed that, once control status was known, reported use of long-term controller medication added little additional predictive value.

CONCLUSIONS

Among inner-city preschool-aged children, significant fluctuations in asthma control occur as early as 3 months after assessment. Poor control but not long-term controller-medication use is an independent predictor of future asthma-related health care use at 3 months but is not significantly predictive of 6-month outcomes. Therefore, clinicians caring for inner-city children with asthma should consider reassessing asthma control at least every 3 months to identify those at highest future risk and to provide early interventions.

Severity of childhood asthma and human leukocyte antigens type

We sought to learn if Class II HLA genes are associated with the severity of asthma in children. We examined a previously recruited cohort of 340 healthy children who had Class II HLA allele data available. We conducted a comprehensive review of their medical records to determine asthma status and, when present, its severity. We found that Class II HLA alleles, which were previously reported to have an association with asthma incidence, appear to have an association as well with asthma severity. These data support our hypothesis that both the incidence and severity of asthma are heritable and that HLA may play an important role in both development and severity of asthma. Because of limited statistical power, our study findings are subject to further investigation.

A psychometric comparison of three patient-based measures of asthma control

OBJECTIVE

Asthma is a multidimensional disease, characterized by changes in pulmonary function, transient and chronic symptoms, and effects on quality of life. In this study, we compared the psychometric properties and screening accuracy of three patient-based asthma control instruments including: the Asthma Control Test (ACT), a brief instrument developed to assess asthma control of patients in a clinical setting; the Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ), an instrument developed for use in clinical research; and the 'Rules of Two', a tool that has been used in both settings.

METHODS

Patients (N = 313) completed the ACT, ACQ, and Rules of Two during two asthma clinic visits 4-12 weeks apart. Office staff recorded pre- and post-bronchodilator FEV(1) measurements and asthma specialists provided a global rating of asthma control. Internal consistency reliability was computed and construct validity was evaluated using analysis of variance (ANOVA). Logistic regression and receiving operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was conducted to compare the screening accuracy of each measure in identifying patients with uncontrolled or moderate to severe asthma. The responsiveness of each measure to changes in asthma control and severity was tested using correlational and ANOVA methods.

RESULTS

Results show that the ACT and ACQ have comparable reliability, validity, screening accuracy, and responsiveness. The Rules of Two, however, did not meet some standards and therefore has weaker psychometric properties.

CONCLUSION

The ACT and ACQ are comparable asthma control questionnaires. The choice of which questionnaire to use should be informed by considering several factors, such as the intended purpose and setting where the questionnaire will be used, as well as the content, practicality, availability of benchmark scores, and adaptability to multiple administration modes of each questionnaire. One potential limitation of the study is that the data were collected in a clinical setting with limited demographic information. Hence, additional studies are needed to evaluate the psychometric properties of each instrument across demographic and clinical subgroups of the general population.

Forced expiratory volume in 1 second percentage improves the classification of severity among children with asthma

OBJECTIVE

Spirometry is an important component of the National Asthma Education and Prevention Program guidelines for asthma, yet published data show variable associations between forced expiratory volume in 1 second percentage (FEV1%) predicted, symptoms and health care utilization. The objective of this analysis was to examine the association between FEV1% and future risk of exacerbations among a well-characterized population of children with asthma.

METHODS

Using data that are available from the Childhood Asthma Management Program, we examined the relationship between prebronchodilator FEV1% and important clinical outcomes. Multiple observations of FEV1 were available for each patient; multivariate regression analysis, using a general estimating equation approach, was used to control for the correlation between repeated measurements among individuals and potential confounders. FEV1% was categorized into 4 levels and as a continuous variable. Outcomes of interest included mean symptom score (0-3), episode-free days, and asthma-related events (oral steroid use, emergency department visits, and hospitalizations) during the ensuing 4-month period. Our analysis was limited to the placebo group (N = 417).

RESULTS

We observed a clear relationship between prebronchodilator FEV1% and important clinical outcomes. In multivariable models that simultaneously controlled for covariates of interest, age at baseline, time, previous event history, and nocturnal awakenings, a significant relationship between FEV1% and asthma symptoms and serious asthma exacerbations (oral steroids, emergency department visits, and hospitalizations) was observed. Compared with children with an FEV1% > or = 100%, children with FEV1% 80% to 99%, 60% to 79%, and < 60% were 1.3, 1.8, and 4.8, respectively, more likely to have a serious asthma exacerbation during the ensuing 4 months. CONCLUSIONS. In children with mild to moderate asthma, FEV1% predicted is independently associated with future asthma symptoms and health care utilization. Previous asthma-related hospitalizations and nocturnal symptoms also were independently associated with risk for future adverse events. FEV1 is an important component of asthma health status and asthma severity classification.

Asthma care and management before an emergency department visit in children in western Michigan: how well does care adhere to guidelines?

OBJECTIVES

Asthma is one of the more common reasons for children's visits to the emergency departments (EDs). Many studies show that the level of asthma care and self-management in children before an ED visit for asthma is often inadequate; however, most of these studies have been conducted in the inner cities of large urban areas. Our objectives were to describe asthma care and management in children treated for asthma in 3 EDs located in an urban, suburban, or rural setting.

METHODS

We studied a prospective patient cohort consisting of children aged 2 to 17 years who presented with an acute asthma exacerbation at 3 EDs in western Michigan. An in-person questionnaire was administered to the parent or guardian during the ED visit. Information was collected on demographics; asthma history; usual asthma care; frequency of symptoms during the last 4 weeks; current asthma treatment, management, and control; and past emergency asthma care. A telephone interview conducted 2 weeks after the ED visit obtained follow-up information. The 8 quality indicators of asthma care and management were defined based on recommendations from national guidelines.

RESULTS

Of 197 children, 70% were enrolled at the urban site, 18% at the suburban site, and 12% at the rural site. The average age was 7.9 years; 60% were male, and 33% were black. At presentation, nearly half (46%) of the children had mild intermittent asthma, 20% had mild persistent asthma, 15% had moderate persistent asthma, and 19% had severe persistent asthma. One quarter of the children had been hospitalized for asthma, and two thirds had at least 1 previous ED visit in the past year. At least 94% had health insurance coverage and 95% reported having a primary care provider. Less than half of the children had attended at least 2 scheduled asthma appointments with their regular asthma care provider in the past year. Although only 5% of the subjects reported that the ED was their only source of asthma care, at least 30% reported that they always went directly to the ED when they needed urgent asthma care. Only 3 in 5 children possessed either a spacer or a peak-flow meter, whereas approximately 2 in 5 reported having a written asthma action plan. Among those with persistent asthma, there was considerable evidence of undertreatment, with 36% not on either an inhaled corticosteroid or a suitable long-term control medication. Only 20% completed a visit with their regular asthma care provider within 1 week of their ED visit.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite very high levels of health care coverage and access to primary care, the overall quality of asthma care and management fell well short of that recommended by national guidelines.

Asthma Control Test: Reliability, validity, and responsiveness in patients not previously followed by asthma specialists

BACKGROUND

The development of the Asthma Control Test (ACT), a short, simple, patient-based tool for identifying patients with poorly controlled asthma, was recently described in patients under the routine care of an asthma specialist.

OBJECTIVES

We sought to evaluate the reliability and validity of the ACT in a longitudinal study of asthmatic patients new to the care of an asthma specialist.

METHODS

Patients (n=313) completed the ACT and the Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) at 2 physician visits (4-12 weeks apart). Pulmonary function was measured, and asthma specialists rated asthma control.

RESULTS

Internal consistency reliability of the ACT was 0.85 (baseline) and 0.79 (follow-up). Test-retest reliability was 0.77. Criterion validity was demonstrated by significant correlations between baseline ACT scores and baseline specialists' ratings of asthma control (r=0.52, P<.001) and ACQ scores (r=-0.89, P<.001). Discriminant validity was demonstrated, with significant (P<.001) differences in mean ACT scores across patients differing in asthma control, pulmonary function, and treatment recommendation. Responsiveness of the ACT to changes in asthma control and lung function was demonstrated with significant correlations between changes in ACT scores and changes in specialists' ratings (r=0.44, P<.001), ACQ scores (r=-0.69, P<.001), and percent predicted FEV1 values (r=0.29, P<.001). An ACT score of 19 or less provided optimum balance of sensitivity (71%) and specificity (71%) for detecting uncontrolled asthma.

CONCLUSIONS

The ACT is reliable, valid, and responsive to changes in asthma control over time in patients new to the care of asthma specialists. A cutoff score of 19 or less identifies patients with poorly controlled asthma.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

In a clinical setting the ACT should be a useful tool to help physicians identify patients with uncontrolled asthma and facilitate their ability to follow patients' progress with treatment.

Asthma patients' knowledge, perception, and adherence to the asthma guidelines

Asthma patients' knowledge and perceptions about asthma management regimens have been shown to correlate with the quality of their asthma management and outcomes. This study addresses adult ambulatory asthma patients' knowledge and perception of the asthma management guidelines issued by the National Asthma Education and Prevention Program. We interviewed 76 patients at three adult medicine outpatient clinics. Of 37 patients who knew about peak flow monitoring, 21 found it to be useful, only 10 were using it regularly, and 7 had a notation about it in their chart. Eight patients knew about patient self-assessment forms, 6 found them useful, 3 had used one recently, and only 1 patient had one in the chart. Six patients knew about asthma action plans, 4 of them thought that these plans were useful, but only 1 patient was actively using it. This study demonstrates major gaps in the asthma patients knowledge, perceptions, and their adherence to recommendations and also with the documentation in the medical record.

Use of asthma guidelines by primary care providers to reduce hospitalizations and emergency department visits in poor, minority, urban children

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether an organized, citywide asthma management program delivered by primary care providers (PCPs) increases adherence to the National Asthma Education and Prevention Program (NAEPP) Asthma Guidelines and whether adherence to the guidelines by PCPs decreases medical services utilization in low-income, minority children.

STUDY DESIGN

Analysis of the utilization of medical services for a cohort of 3748 children with asthma who presented for care at one of six primary care urban clinics in Hartford, Connecticut, and who were enrolled in a disease management program (Easy Breathing) between June 1, 1998 and August 31, 2002.

RESULTS

Of the 3748 children with physician-confirmed asthma, 48% had persistent disease. Paid claims for inhaled corticosteroids increased 25% ( P <.0001) after enrollment in Easy Breathing. Provider adherence to the NAEPP guidelines for anti-inflammatory therapy increased from 38% to 96%. Easy Breathing children with asthma experienced a 35% decrease in overall hospitalization rates ( P <.006), a 27% decrease in asthma emergency department (ED) visits ( P <.01), and a 19% decrease in outpatient visits ( P <.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

An organized, disease management program increased adherence to the NAEPP guidelines for anti-inflammatory use by PCPs in urban clinics. Adherence to this element of the guidelines by PCPs reduced hospitalizations, ED visits, and outpatient visits for children with asthma.

Classifying asthma: disagreement among specialists

OBJECTIVE

The asthma practice guidelines developed by the National Institutes of Health include a system for classifying asthma severity. The goal of the present study was to assess the interrater reliability of this classification system by measuring agreement among pediatric asthma specialists.

DESIGN

A survey containing eight case summaries was mailed to 24 board-certified pediatric allergists and pulmonologists, who were asked to classify each case according to the national guidelines. The case summaries included the patient's medical history, physical examination, and chest radiograph and pulmonary function test results. Physicians were also asked to interpret the pulmonary function tests, to indicate the main factors used to classify each case (daytime symptoms, nighttime symptoms, pulmonary function testing, or various combinations), and to make treatment recommendations. kappa statistics were used to measure agreement.

RESULTS

Fourteen of 24 surveys mailed (58%) were completed and returned. Agreement was poor for classifying asthma (kappa = 0.29; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.25 to 0.33) and for the main factors used to make the classifications (kappa = 0.19; 95% CI, 0.14 to 0.23). Specialists exhibited higher agreement in their interpretation of pulmonary function tests (no asthma, kappa = 0.66; asthma on baseline, kappa = 0.53; exercise-induced asthma, kappa = 0.65). While physicians' treatment recommendations were consistent with their severity classifications, the low level of agreement in those classifications led to substantial variability in the treatments recommended.

CONCLUSIONS

The low level of agreement among pediatric asthma specialists in classifying asthma severity suggests the need to refine the classification system used in the national guidelines to help ensure the consistent application of those guidelines.

Emergency department management of acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in the elderly: the Multicenter Airway Research Collaboration

OBJECTIVES

To determine adherence of emergency department (ED) management of acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) to current treatment guidelines.

DESIGN

A prospective cohort study, as part of the Multicenter Airway Research Collaboration.

SETTING

The study was performed at 29 EDs in 15 U.S. states and three Canadian provinces.

PARTICIPANTS

ED patients, aged 55 and older, who presented with COPD exacerbation and underwent a structured interview in the ED and another by telephone 2 weeks later.

MEASUREMENTS

Adherence of ED management of COPD exacerbation to that recommended in current treatment guidelines.

RESULTS

The cohort consisted of 397 subjects, of whom 224 (56%) reported only COPD and 173 (44%) reported asthma and COPD. The average age was 70. Most (80%) patients had used rescue medications in the 6 hours before seeking emergency care. Only 31% were evaluated using spirometry and 48% using arterial blood gas measurement. ED treatment included inhaled short-acting beta-agonists for 91% of patients, inhaled anticholinergics for 77%, methylxanthines for 0.3%, systemic corticosteroids for 62%, and antibiotics for 28%. More than half the patients required hospitalization. At 2-week follow-up, 43% of patients reported a relapse event or ongoing exacerbation. Overall, adherence to national and international guidelines was low.

CONCLUSION

Important differences exist between guideline recommendations and actual ED management of COPD exacerbations in older adults. Outcomes after ED treatment are poor and may be related to these shortcomings in quality of care. Better adherence to guideline recommendations when caring for elderly patients with COPD exacerbations may lead to improved clinical outcomes and better resource usage.

A potential pitfall in provider assessments of the quality of asthma control

BACKGROUND

Pediatricians elicit information about asthma control from parents to help formulate management plans. If parents of children with significant asthma symptoms inappropriately indicate good control, physician recommendations may not be optimal. We examined whether a single general question about asthma control might lead to inaccurate assessment of severity.

DESIGN/METHODS

Children 3-7 years of age who met the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) criteria for mild persistent to severe asthma were identified from 40 urban schools. A phone survey of their parents provided demographic information, symptom frequency, medication use, and general interpretation of their child's asthma control. Chi-square analyses compared the parent's general interpretation of control with demographic characteristics and measures of asthma severity.

RESULTS

One hundred sixty of 224 eligible children participated in this study. Seventy-eight percent were described as in good asthma control. General assessment of asthma control did not vary by demographic characteristics. Parents were as likely to describe children with daily asthma symptoms in good control as they were to describe children with less frequent symptoms in good control. Parents were less likely to report good control in children using daily rescue medications when compared with children with less frequent medication use (65% vs 82%, P =.03), but the majority of children in both groups was described as having good control.

CONCLUSIONS

Most parents underestimated the severity of their child's asthma and reported good control with their global assessment. Parents frequently reported good control even when the children had daily asthma symptoms. Pediatricians should ask about specific asthma symptoms during patient encounters because a global question about asthma control likely will result in underestimations of asthma severity.

Health-care resource use by asthmatics in Croatia

We report a survey of the impact of asthma on daily life and on health-care resource use by adult asthma patients in four counties in Croatia. Over a 1-year period beginning November 1998, 185 general practitioners recruited 504 asthma patients, who completed a questionnaire about their drug therapy, health-care resource use, symptoms, limitations in daily activities, and work loss due to asthma. Over a 2-week period, inhaled corticosteroids were used by 51.5% of patients, short-acting and long-acting beta-agonists by 70.8% and 53.5%, respectively, and oral extended-release theophyllines by 29.8%. Nocturnal awakenings were experienced by 58.7% of patients, 75.5% experienced daytime symptoms, and 42.5% were limited in their daily activities. In the previous year, 12.5% of the patients were hospitalized, 33% missed work, and 70% reported reduced effectiveness in the workplace. In the previous 6 months, 35.2% of the patients visited an emergency room due to worsening of asthma symptoms. The human and socioeconomic burden of asthma in Croatia is considerable. These results can help guide the development of asthma policy in Croatia and raise awareness of asthma as a public health issue.

Assessment of asthma severity and treatment by GPs in Belgium: an Asthma Drug Utilization Research Study (ADUR)

A prospective study was performed between June 1996 and December 1997, to identify how general practitioners (GPs) in Belgium assess asthma severity and how they treat asthma according to their severity assessment. Three hundred and sixty-five GPs included 1376 already diagnosed and treated asthmatics. The GPs used a questionnaire providing data on patient demographics, aetiology of asthma, symptoms and medication use. The patients provided a complete diary card of day and night symptoms and morning and evening peak expiratory flow rates during a 3-week period. Asthma severity as assessed by GPs was compared with the severity according to the GINA guidelines. Along the same line, asthma treatment was evaluated according to the GPs assessment of severity and according to the GINA guidelines. Confronting the assessment of asthma severity by the GPs with the GINA criteria revealed that about 20% and 2% of the patients' asthma severity respectively were under- and over-estimated, respectively (using a discrepancy between GPs and GINA assessment of severity by 2 or more classes). Using the GINA criteria for treatment, only 37.5% of the patients seemed to be correctly treated. Taking a discrepancy between GINA assessment and treatment of two classes as an error, 2.3% and 23.4% of the asthmatics are over- and under-treated, respectively. In conclusion, this study provides evidence that GINA guidelines seem not to be adequately interpreted and implemented by GPs in Belgium. Improvement of the assessment of asthma severity is definitely needed and may lead to more appropriate use of asthma medication.

Implementing practice guidelines for depression: applying a new framework to an old problem

We discuss the challenges of implementing clinical practice guidelines for depression in the primary care setting. Multiple potential barriers can limit physician guideline adherence and translation of research into improved patient outcomes. Six primary barriers relate to providers (lack of awareness, lack of familiarity, lack of agreement, lack of self efficacy, lack of outcome expectancy, and inertia of previous practice). In addition, factors related to patient, guideline, and practice environment factors encompass external barriers to adherence. By delineating the underlying barriers to adherence, different interventions that are tailored to improve physician adherence to guidelines can be utilized. We review examples of these barriers, as well as interventions to improve guideline adherence. We also review characteristics of successful interventions to improve physician adherence to guidelines for depression. Since different physicians and practice settings may encounter a variety of barriers, multifaceted interventions that are not focused exclusively on the physician tend to be most effective.

Patient self-management of acute asthma: adherence to national guidelines a decade later

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Children in the emergency department (ED) with acute asthma were enrolled to assess the impact of asthma on their activities of daily living and evaluate their access to care and preventive strategies, determine the proportion who adhered to the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) guidelines for proper steps to take at home during an acute asthma exacerbation, and compare adherence rates for those with persistent and mild intermittent asthma.

DESIGN AND METHODS

Children 2 to 18 years old who presented to the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia's ED with acute asthma exacerbations were enrolled prospectively. Parents and patients completed the 108-item Asthma Exacerbation Response Questionnaire with a focus on determining the home management steps they took both at the onset of the asthma exacerbation and just before coming to the ED.

RESULTS

Among the 433 children studied, 76% had at least 1 doctor visit, 75% had at least 1 ED visit, and 43% had at least 1 hospitalization for asthma in the preceding 12 months. Overall, 64% had persistent asthma by NHLBI criteria, yet just 4% were cared for by an allergist or pulmonologist, 38% took daily anti-inflammatory therapy, and 18% received a daily inhaled corticosteroid. Also, 48% did not use a holding chamber with their metered-dose inhalers, and 66% did not use their peak flow meters. Regarding exacerbation response, 71% did not have a written action plan, and 89% did not maintain a symptom diary. Both at the onset of wheezing and just before coming to the ED, administration of a beta2-agonist was the only step that the majority of children performed. One-third or fewer followed the other steps recommended by the NHLBI, including using a peak flow meter, beginning oral corticosteroids, calling or going to see the doctor, or going to the ED. Children with persistent asthma were not more adherent to the guidelines than those with mild intermittent disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Asthma has a significant adverse effect on the lives of these children. The NHLBI guidelines, first published a decade ago, were designed to reduce asthma's increasing morbidity and mortality, but this study uncovered a high rate of nonadherence with many aspects of the guidelines, including preventive strategies and home management of an exacerbation.

Variations in general practitioners' views of asthma management in four European countries

The aim was to identify differences and similarities in views regarding asthma management among general practitioners in four European countries (Germany, Netherlands, Norway and Sweden), and to explore reasons for suboptimal performance. The results are to be used for the development and tailoring of educational interventions. Semistructured interviews with 20 GPs in each country were conducted and analysed using a phenomenographic approach. The domains of (i) general view of asthma, (ii) the doctor-patient relationship in managing asthma, and (iii) overall management of asthma (treatment goals and evaluation of results) were approached during the interviews. There were different ways of experiencing phenomena related to asthma management both within and between the four countries. Three general views on asthma were found where different perspectives were emphasised: a medical, a 'global' (including community health, social and environmental aspects) and a patient's perspective. Within the medical perspective, only a few German doctors emphasised a psychological aetiology of asthma. The views on the doctor-patient relationship described as 'authoritarian', 'teaching' or 'empowering' occurred similarly in all countries. The majority of the doctors showed confidence in the effectiveness of the pharmaceutical treatment of asthma, some doctors were concerned about limitations, but only in Germany a few doctors were explicitly critical of the values of conventional pharmaceutical treatment. The main treatment goals were either conceived as getting the patient symptom-free (Netherlands, Norway, and Germany) or to control the inflammatory process (Sweden). Several German and some Norwegian doctors expressed the view that patients had to accept the disease and learn how to manage it, while a few German doctors aimed at alternative treatments of asthma. The existence of qualitatively different ways of experiencing asthma management, both in and between countries, calls for consideration when trying to implement general evidence-based treatment guidelines. A variation of approaches in continuing medical education for GPs is needed to address such existing beliefs and conceptions that could sometimes be opposed to the content of educational messages.

Antibiotic use, hospital admissions, and mortality before and after implementing guidelines for nursing home-acquired pneumonia

OBJECTIVES

To compare two strategies for implementing guidelines for nursing home-acquired pneumonia (NHAP) and to measure outcomes associated with treatment in accordance with the guidelines.

DESIGN

Randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

Ten skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) from a single metropolitan area.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients with an episode of pneumonia acquired more than 3 days after admission to SNF (N = 350): 226 preintervention episodes of pneumonia and 116 postintervention episodes.

INTERVENTIONS

Multi-faceted education intervention including small-group consensus process limited to physicians and a similar intervention that included physicians and nurses within randomly selected SNFs.

MEASUREMENTS

Antibiotic use at diagnosis compared with the guidelines, hospital admission, severity of pneumonia, and 30-day mortality.

RESULTS

Data were complete for 344 episodes of NHAP. For the preintervention group (n = 226), 62.2% (79/127) of the episodes were treated with parenteral antibiotics (PA) when PA were recommended by the guidelines and 57.6% (57/99) of episodes were treated with oral antibiotics (OA) when OA were indicated by the guidelines. Postintervention, treatment with PA and OA according to the guidelines was not significantly different between the two groups of randomized SNFs. A multivariate analysis comparing PA use pre- and postintervention for all SNFs, adjusted for variation in the frequency and severity of pneumonia, found significantly more of the postintervention episodes were treated with PA in accordance with the guidelines (P < .02). A preintervention significant difference in 30-day mortality observed between episodes with indications for PA (37.8% (48/127)) and episodes with indications for OA (6.1% (6/99)) (P < .001) was not present postintervention (11.5% (6/52); (23.8% (15/64); P = .06). There was no significant difference in 30-day mortality preintervention and postintervention for episodes with guideline indications for OA (P = .35) or for PA (P = .05) (P = .16 for multivariate analysis). The difference in PA use was not associated with significant differences in hospital admissions for episodes on NHAP.

CONCLUSION

The increase in the use of PA provides evidence that care within SNFs can be significantly changed using standard quality improvement techniques. Use of the guidelines did not significantly affect mortality. The addition of a practical severity of NHAP model or a change in reimbursement structure may enhance the guidelines' impact on hospitalization for NHAP. The financial benefits available with use of the guidelines will be limited unless the guidelines contribute to a reduction in rates of hospitalization.

Toward a representation format for sharable clinical guidelines

Clinical guidelines are being developed for the purpose of reducing medical errors and unjustified variations in medical practice, and for basing medical practice on evidence. Encoding guidelines in a computer-interpretable format and integrating them with the electronic medical record can enable delivery of patient-specific recommendations when and where needed. Since great effort must be expended in developing high-quality guidelines, and in making them computer-interpretable, it is highly desirable to be able to share computer-interpretable guidelines (CIGs) among institutions. Adoption of a common format for representing CIGs is one approach to sharing. Factors that need to be considered in creating a format for sharable CIGs include (i) the scope of guidelines and their intended applications, (ii) the method of delivery of the recommendations, and (iii) the environment, consisting of the practice setting and the information system in which the guidelines will be applied. Several investigators have proposed solutions that improve the sharability of CIGs and, more generally, of medical knowledge. These approaches can be useful in the development of a format for sharable CIGs. Challenges in sharing CIGs also include the need to extend the traditional framework for disseminating guidelines to enable them to be integrated into practice. These extensions include processes for (i) local adaptation of recommendations encoded in shared generic guidelines and (ii) integration of guidelines into the institutional information systems.

Effect of allergist intervention on patient-centered and societal outcomes: allergists as leaders, innovators, and educators

Atopic disorders, which afflict millions of Americans and hundreds of millions worldwide, are at epidemic levels with concomitant increases in morbidity and mortality. Environmental and lifestyle changes over the past three to five decades are proposed causes for this pandemic and as such present major burdens to reverse. The scope of allergy practice bridges directly on this challenge. Allergy as a specialty is a major leader in developing effective strategies to confront this epidemic. Allergists have made major contributions to the understanding of the risk factors, immunology, pathophysiology, immunomodulation, and prevention of atopic and immunologic disorders. Allergist epidemiologists and clinicians have helped develop and implement national and international guidelines in the recognition, management, and prevention of asthma and rhinitis. Allergist clinical researchers are active in (1) outcomes research that demonstrates convincingly the value of allergy as a specialty in asthma, allergic rhinitis, anaphylaxis, drug and food allergy, and other atopic disorders, (2) National Institutes of Health clinical trials that will form the basis for the future treatment of asthma and allergic disease, and (3) pharmaceutical trials that evaluate new, effective, and safe medication to treat atopic disease. Allergist educators, comprising academic and practicing allergists, supported by allied health professionals, national associations, and affiliated lay organizations, provide comprehensive education to fellows, residents, colleague physicians, media, the public, and patients. Documentation of the value of allergists in improving patient-centered and societal outcomes in their core domain, allergy, is the appropriate final topic contribution in the important series "New millennium: The conquest of allergy."

Cost implications for the use of inhaled anti-inflammatory medications in the treatment of asthma

OBJECTIVE

To compare the expected costs of treating patients with asthma with versus without inhaled anti-inflammatory medications, adjusting for other factors that also influence medical care expenditures.

DESIGN

Nonlinear exponential regression analyses were used to estimate relationships between medical care expenditures and treatment with inhaled corticosteroids, sodium cromoglycate (cromolyn) or nedocromil. The regressions adjusted for differences in patients' demographics, location, plan type and severity of illness.

SETTING

Large, self-insured, corporate-sponsored medical plans represented in MarketScan database.

PATIENTS AND PARTICIPANTS

7466 continuously enrolled patients with asthma.

INTERVENTIONS

Treatment with inhaled corticosteroids, sodium cromoglycate or nedocromil.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

(i) Total inpatient, outpatient and pharmaceutical expenditures; and (ii) asthma-related expenditures in the 1996 calendar year.

RESULTS

If all patients had been treated with inhaled anti-inflammatory drugs, total expenditures would be expected to be about $US944.82 per patient lower, on average, than would be the case if no patients received these drugs. Asthma-related expenditures would be about $US498.74 per patient higher, on average, if all patients were treated with these drugs.

CONCLUSIONS

Using inhaled anti-inflammatory agents would be associated with higher asthma-related expenditures but lower total expenditures. Treatment with inhaled anti-inflammatory drugs may represent an investment in better care that pays off with better health and lower total medical care expenditures.

Beliefs about diagnosing asthma in young children

OBJECTIVES

To determine what factors primary care pediatricians believe are important in establishing the initial diagnosis of childhood asthma and to identify variations in physicians' beliefs concerning this clinical decision.

STUDY DESIGN

Massachusetts American Academy of Pediatrics Fellows were surveyed about their beliefs concerning the importance of 20 clinical factors associated with establishing the initial diagnosis of asthma.

RESULTS

Most clinicians considered recurrent wheeze (96%), symptomatic improvement with a bronchodilator (90%), recurrent cough (89%), exclusion of alternative diagnoses (87%), and suggestive peak flow findings (82%) as important in diagnosing asthma. However, there was substantial heterogeneity among clinicians as to which combinations of factors they each considered relevant; for example, only 60% identified all 5 of the above factors to be necessary or important. Further, <50% identified presence of any of the 20 factors as necessary. Although national guidelines cite objective assessment of pulmonary function as essential, spirometry and peak expiratory flow testing were identified as necessary by only 8% and 10%, respectively. Two factors believed to contribute to establishing the asthma diagnosis contradicted the National Asthma Education and Prevention Program guidelines and expert opinion (age >2 years and absence of fever during episodes) and these beliefs were more likely held by those clinicians in practice for >5 years.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of pediatricians believe several common clinical factors establish a diagnosis of childhood asthma, but disagree over what combinations of these factors are important. Some misconceptions persist despite wide dissemination of clinical practice guidelines. We believe that future asthma guidelines will need to organize diagnostic criteria in an easily understood format, like a decision tree, to facilitate early recognition of asthma in young children.

Treatment guideline for nursing home-acquired pneumonia based on community practice

OBJECTIVES

To describe the findings of a retrospective study of the treatment of nursing home-acquired pneumonia (NHAP) in 11 nursing homes in one community and the development of a treatment guideline for NHAP using data from the retrospective study.

DESIGN

A retrospective chart review of 239 episodes of NHAP occurring between November 1, 1997, and April 30, 1998, was performed. Data regarding antibiotic treatment of NHAP were used to revise a treatment guideline developed by the authors. Further refinements of the guideline were made based on small group discussions with physicians and nurse practitioners caring for the study population.

SETTING

Residents with NHAP were identified among the populations of 11 nursing homes in the metropolitan Buffalo, New York area (Erie county). These 11 nursing homes had a total of 2375 beds, comprising nearly one-third of all nursing home beds in the county.

PARTICIPANTS

Nursing home residents with chest X-rays showing infiltrates and signs and symptoms of pneumonia.

MEASUREMENTS

Antibiotic treatment (drug used, route of administration, and duration of treatment), location of initial treatment (nursing home or hospital), and status (alive or dead) of each resident were recorded 30 days after diagnosis of NHAP.

RESULTS

Of the 239 episodes of NHAP, 171 (72%) were initially treated in nursing homes. Of these 171 patients, 105 (61%) were treated only with an oral regimen, whereas 66 (39%) were treated initially with an intramuscular antibiotic and subsequently with an oral regimen. There was no significant difference in 30-day mortality rates between those initially treated in nursing homes (22%) and those initially treated in hospitals (31%; P = .15) or between those initially treated with an oral regimen in nursing homes (21%) and those initially treated with an intramuscular antibiotic in nursing homes (25%; P = .56). There was no consistency in how physicians made the choice to use intramuscular antibiotics in nursing homes, and a logistic model for predicting this approach could explain very little. The frequency of the prescription of various antibiotic agents in nursing homes and in hospitals was tabulated as well as the duration of treatment; specific attention was paid to the timing of the switch to an oral agent among episodes initially treated with a parenteral agent. These data were used in the guideline to make specific recommendations regarding which agent to prescribe, the duration of parenteral therapy, the timing of the switch to an oral regimen, and the duration of treatment. In the setting of informal small groups, the guideline was discussed with physicians who cared for residents with NHAP in the study nursing homes. Revisions made to the guideline were based on these discussions.

CONCLUSIONS

A treatment guideline for NHAP was developed primarily on the basis of the practices of geriatricians in one community. These treatment practices were similar to those reported in the literature in terms of the proportion of patients treated in nursing homes and the antibiotics prescribed. The guideline also provided specific recommendations for timing of the switch to an oral agent after parenteral therapy and for duration of treatment. Studies are in progress to determine if use of this guideline will reduce some of the variation observed in the treatment of NHAP.

Asthma care practices, perceptions, and beliefs of Chicago-area primary-care physicians. Chicago Asthma Surveillance Initiative Project Team

INTRODUCTION

Although primary-care physicians were a principal target audience for the National Asthma Education and Prevention Program (NAEPP), there is little published information describing the postguideline asthma care practices of these physicians or their willingness to embrace the NAEPP guidelines. This study examines asthma care practices of Chicago-area primary-care physicians and assesses these practitioners' perceptions and beliefs about several aspects of the NAEPP guidelines.

METHODS

In 1997, a self-administered survey was mailed to a randomly selected 10% sample of Chicago-area general pediatricians, internists, and family practitioners.

RESULTS

Surveys were returned by 244 of the 405 eligible Chicago-area primary-care physicians (60.2%) in the sample. Of these, 66 (27.6%) were pediatricians, 83 (34.7%) were general internists, and 90 (37.7%) were family practitioners. Physicians reported that 54.6 +/- 2.7% (mean +/- SE) of patients with newly diagnosed asthma have spirometry performed as part of their initial evaluation. For patients with moderate persistent asthma, prescribing of inhaled corticosteroids varied by patient age, with 60.5% of physicians routinely prescribing them for patients < 5 years, compared with 95.7% of physicians prescribing them for patients > or = 5 years. Awareness of the NAEPP guide-lines among these physicians was high, with 88.5% reporting that they have heard of the guidelines, and 73.6% reporting having read them. Of patients with moderate or severe persistent asthma, physicians estimated that 47.7 +/- 2.7% were given written treatment plans.

CONCLUSION

Several aspects of the NAEPP guidelines appear to have been incorporated into clinical practice by Chicago-area primary-care physicians, whereas other recommendations do not appear to have been readily adopted. This information suggests areas for interventions to improve primary care for asthma in the Chicago area.