Spectrum and Burden of Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agent Hyporesponsiveness Among Contemporary Hemodialysis Patients

Short-term effect of low-dose roxadustat combined with erythropoiesis-stimulating agent treatment for erythropoietin-resistant anemia in patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis

Background

Erythropoietin resistance is present in some patients with chronic kidney disease, especially in those undergoing hemodialysis, and is often treated using roxadustat rather than iron supplements and erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs). However, some patients cannot afford full doses of roxadustat. This retrospective study investigated the efficacy of low-dose roxadustat combined with recombinant human erythropoietin (rhuEPO) therapy in 39 patients with erythropoietin-resistant renal anemia undergoing maintenance hemodialysis (3-4 sessions/week).

Methods

The ability of the combination of low-dose roxadustat and rhuEPO to increase the hemoglobin concentration over 12 weeks was assessed. Markers of iron metabolism were evaluated. Eligible adults received 50-60% of the recommended dose of roxadustat and higher doses of rhuEPO.

Results

The mean hemoglobin level increased from 77.67 ± 11.18 g/dL to 92.0 ± 8.35 g/dL after treatment, and the hemoglobin response rate increased to 72%. The mean hematocrit level significantly increased from 24.26 ± 3.99% to 30.04 ± 3.69%. The soluble transferrin receptor level increased (27.29 ± 13.60 mg/L to 38.09 ± 12.78 mg/L), while the total iron binding capacity (49.22 ± 11.29 mg/L to 43.91 ± 12.88 mg/L) and ferritin level (171.05 ± 54.75 ng/mL to 140.83 ± 42.03 ng/mL) decreased.

Conclusion

Therefore, in patients with ESA-resistant anemia who are undergoing hemodialysis, the combination of low-dose roxadustat and rhuEPO effectively improves renal anemia and iron metabolism.

The efficacy and safety of molidustat for anemia in dialysis-dependent and non-dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective

Molidustat is a novel agent investigated for the treatment of anemia in both dialysisdependent (DD) and non-dialysis-dependent (NDD) patients. Its efficacy and safety are still unclear.

Methods

We searched five databases to identify randomized controlled trials comparing molidustat to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) or placebo in patients with anemia.

Results

Six studies containing 2025 eligible participants were identified. For NDD patients, the change in Hb levels from baseline (ΔHb) was significantly higher for molidustat than for placebo [mean difference (MD) = 1.47 (95 % CI: 1.18 to 1.75), P < 0.00001] and ΔHb was also significantly higher for molidustat than for ESAs [MD = 0.25 (95 % CI 0.09 to 0.40), P = 0.002]. For NDD patients, Δhepcidin was significantly lower for molidustat than for placebo [MD = -20.66 (95 % CI: -31.67 to -9.66), P = 0.0002] and Δhepcidin was also significantly lower for molidustat than for ESAs [MD = -24.51 (95 % CI: -29.12 to -19.90), P < 0.00001]. For NDD patients, Δiron was significantly lower for molidustat than for ESAs [MD = -11.85 (95 % CI: -15.52 to -8.18), P < 0.00001], and ΔTSAT was also significantly lower for molidustat than for ESAs [MD = -5.29 (95 % CI: -6.81 to -3.78), P < 0.00001]. For NDD patients, Δferritin was significantly lower for molidustat than for placebo [MD = -90.01 (95 % CI: -134.77 to -45.25), P < 0.00001]. However, for DD-CKD patients, molidustat showed an effect similar to that of ESAs on increasing the Hb level [MD = -0.18 (95 % CI: -0.47 to 0.11), P = 0.23], Δiron level [MD = 3.78 (95 % CI: -7.21 to 14.76), P = 0.5], Δferritin level [MD = 25.03 (95 % CI: -34.69 to 84.75), P = 0.41], and Δhepcidin level [MD = 1.20 (95 % CI: -4.36 to 6.76), P = 0.67]. For DD-CKD patients, compared with the placebo or ESA group, molidustat showed a significantly higher level on ΔTSAT[MD = 3.88 (95 % CI: 2.10 to 5.65), P < 0.0001] and a slightly increased level on ΔTIBC level [MD = 1.08 (95 % CI: -0.07 to 2.23), P = 0.07]. There was no significant difference in the incidence of severe adverse events (SAEs), death, and cardio-related adverse events between molidustat and the ESAs groups.

Conclusions

Moricizine can effectively improves Hb levels in NDD patients and corrects anemia in DD patients without increasing adverse event incidence.

The effect of oral zinc on hemoglobin and dose of erythropoietin in hemodialysis patients

Background

In hemodialysis (HD) patients, low serum zinc level could cause hyporesponsivity to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents and lead to anemia. This study investigated the effects of oral zinc supplements on the required dose of erythropoietin in patients undergoing HD.

Materials and Methods

In a double-blinded randomized trial, 76 HD patients were assigned to 2 groups of 38. One group (intervention) was treated with oral zinc supplements of 210 mg, daily for 6 months, and the other group (control) used placebo capsules for 6 months. The serum zinc level, hemoglobin level, and required dose of erythropoietin, albumin, ferritin, ferrous, and total iron-binding capacity were evaluated 3 and 6 months after intervention.

Results

Repeated measures ANOVA did not show a significant increase in Hb level after 6 months of intervention (P = 0.28). However, the required dose of erythropoietin was decreased, but the changes were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). The changes in the other variables were not statistically significant.

Conclusion

Oral zinc supplementation in HD patients could not increase hemoglobin level irrespective of their serum zinc level.

The Influence of Precursor Depletion and dose Regimens on Resistance to Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agents: Insights from Simulations with Instantaneous Dose-Adaptation Algorithm

Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) have been a common treatment for anemia associated with chronic kidney disease (CKD), while 10-20 % of patients continue to suffer from persistent anemia despite receiving ESA treatments. Our previous findings suggested that intensive ESA usage can cause resistance by depleting the erythroid precursor cells. Here, we used a mechanism-based pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model of ESAs and conducted simulations to evaluate the influence of dose regimens and other factors (such as administration route, individual PK/PD parameters, types of ESAs, and disease status) on ESA resistance with instantaneous dose adaptations in healthy populations and anemic patients. The simulated results show that instantaneous dose-adaptation can reduce ESA resistance, but up to 30 % of subjects still ended up developing ESA resistance in healthy populations. The Smax is markedly higher in hypo-responders than in normal-responders, while hypo-responders possess fewer precursors and experience a faster decline compared to normal-responders. There is a ceiling effect of increasing ESA dosage to improve HGB responses and reduce ESA resistance, and the limit is lower in anemic patients compared to healthy populations. Subcutaneous administrations and ESAs with longer half-lives lead to stronger HGB responses and less resistance at equivalent doses. Taken together, this study indicates that precursor depletion contributes to ESA resistance and dose regimens can greatly influence the occurrence of ESA resistance. Furthermore, ESA treatment for patients showing ESA resistance should avoid continuously increasing doses and instead consider stimulating the renewal of precursors.

Contemporary Practice of Anemia Treatment Among Dialysis Patients in the United States

Introduction

The treatment of anemia is a major activity in the care of patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis (HD). The comparative effectiveness of new pharmacologic treatments, relative to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs), should be anticipated on the bases of controlled trials and current practice. We describe the contemporary practice of anemia treatment in a national cohort of patients undergoing maintenance HD.

Methods

We analyzed the United States Renal Data System (USRDS) data to identify adult patients undergoing in-facility HD in 2016 to 2019. Using the Consolidated Renal Operations in a Web-Enabled Network (CROWNWeb) dataset, we identified hemoglobin and ESA utilization (agent and cumulative dose) during each patient-month, as well as intravenous (IV) iron utilization, ferritin, and transferrin saturation. We compared ESA dosing during the study era to dosing in the Normal Hematocrit Cardiac Trial (NHCT), conducted in the 1990s. We assessed ESA hyporesponsiveness by estimating the prevalence of the following: (i) high erythropoietin resistance index (ERI) and (ii) either 3 or 6 consecutive months with hemoglobin <10 g/dl.

Results

Nearly two-thirds of patient-months had hemoglobin of 10.0 to 11.9 g/dl. Mean ESA utilization was 76.7% per month, with increasing use of pegylated epoetin beta. ESA dosing was stable; epoetin alfa dosing was slightly lower than in the low-target arm of the NHCT. The prevalence of ESA hyporesponsiveness was 22.2% if defined by high ERI, but only 2.1% to 6.0% if defined by 3 to 6 consecutive months with hemoglobin <10 g/dl. Median transferrin saturation was 22.3% with high ERI and persistently low hemoglobin.

Conclusion

Hemoglobin and ESA dosing distributions are stable, with epoetin alfa dosing below the low-target arm of the NHCT. Persistently low hemoglobin occurs infrequently and may reflect iron depletion.

Investigating the relationship between erythropoiesis-stimulating agents and mortality in hemodialysis patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

In recent years, various studies have been conducted to investigate the relationship between erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) and mortality in hemodialysis patients, who showed contradictory results. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the relationship between ESAs and mortality in hemodialysis patients.

METHODS

The current study is a systematic review and meta-analysis based on observational and interventional studies published in the Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Science Direct, PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases between 1980 and the end of 2022. Jadad scale checklist and Newcastle Ottawa scale were used to evaluate the quality of articles. The study data were analyzed using Stata 15 software.

RESULTS

In the initial search, 3933 articles were extracted, and by screening and considering the research criteria, 68 studies were finally included in the meta-analysis. According to the meta-analysis results, the risk ratio (RR) of overall mortality in hemodialysis patients receiving ESAs was equal to 1.19 (95% CI: 1.16-1.23, P ≤ 0.001). The RR of mortality in patients aged 60 years and under was equal to 1.33 (1.15-1.55, P ≤ 0.001), in the age group over 60 years was equal to 1.13 (1.10-1.16, P ≤ 0.001), in randomized clinical trial studies was equal to 1.06 (0.80-1.40, P = 0.701), in cohort studies was equal to 1.20 (1.16-1.25, P ≤ 0.001), in American countries was equal to 1.19 (1.10-1.29, P ≤ 0.001), in Asian countries was equal to 1.15 (1.10-1.19, P ≤ 0.001), and in European countries was equal to 1.18 (1.05-1.34, P = 0.007).

CONCLUSION

The results of the study show that receiving ESAs is associated with a 19% increase in the risk of overall mortality in hemodialysis patients.

Unresolved aspects in the management of renal anemia, a Delphi consensus of the Anemia Group of the S.E.N

Anemia is a common complication of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and is associated with a decrease in quality of life and an increased risk of transfusions, morbidity and mortality, and progression of CKD. The Anemia Working Group of the Sociedad Española de Nefrología conducted a Delphi study among experts in anemia in CKD to agree on relevant unanswered questions by existing evidence. The RAND/UCLA consensus methodology was used. We defined 15 questions with a PICO structure, followed by a review in scientific literature databases. Statements to each question were developed based on that literature review. Nineteen experts evaluated them using an iterative Two-Round Delphi-like process. Sixteen statements were agreed in response to 8 questions related to iron deficiency and supplementation with Fe (impact and management of iron deficiency with or without anemia, iron deficiency markers, safety of i.v. iron) and 7 related to erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESAs) and/or hypoxia-inducible factor stabilizers (HIF), reaching consensus on all of them (individualization of the Hb objective, impact and management of resistance to ESA, ESA in the immediate post-transplant period and HIF stabilizers: impact on ferrokinetics, interaction with inflammation and cardiovascular safety). There is a need for clinical studies addressing the effects of correction of iron deficiency independently of anemia and the impact of anemia treatment with various ESA on quality of life, progression of CKD and cardiovascular events.

Cardiovascular safety of current and emerging drugs to treat anaemia in chronic kidney disease: a safety review

INTRODUCTION

Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) are the standard of treatment for anemia in chronic kidney disease. Hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors (HIF-PHI) are small molecules that stimulate endogenous erythropoietin synthesis.

AREAS COVERED

The cardiovascular safety of ESAs and HIF-PHIs. We performed a PubMed search using several key words, including anemia, chronic kidney disease, safety, erythropoiesis stimulating agents, HIF-PH inhibitors.

EXPERT OPINION

ESAs are well-tolerated drugs with a long history of use; there are safety concerns, especially when targeting high hemoglobin levels. HIF-PHIs have comparable efficacy to ESAs in correcting anemia. Contrary to expectations, randomized phase 3 clinical trials have shown that overall HIF-PHIs were non-inferior to ESA or placebo with respect to the risk of cardiovascular endpoints. In addition, some phase 3 trials raised potential safety concerns regarding cardiovascular and thrombotic events, particularly in non-dialysis patients.Today, HIF-PHIs represent an additional treatment option for anemia in patients with chronic kidney disease. This has made the management of anemia in CKD more complex and heterogeneous. A better understanding of the mechanisms causing hypo-responsiveness to ESAs, combined with an individualized approach that balances ESAs, HIF-PHIs and iron doses, could increase the benefits while reducing the risks.

Effects of hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors versus erythropoiesis-stimulating agents on iron metabolism and inflammation in patients undergoing dialysis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Aims

This study aimed to evaluate the effects of hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors (HIF-PHIs) on iron metabolism and inflammation in dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease (DD-CKD) patients.

Methods

PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov websites were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating HIF-PHIs versus ESAs for DD-CKD patients.

Key findings

Twenty studies with 14,737 participants were included in the meta-analysis, which demonstrated no significant difference in the effect of transferrin saturation and ferritin between HIF-PHIs and the ESAs group (MD, 0.65; 95%CI, -0.45 to 1.75; very low certainty; SMD, -0.03; 95% CI, -0.13 to 0.07; low certainty). However, HIF-PHIs significantly increased the iron (MD, 2.30; 95% CI, 1.40 to 3.20; low certainty), total iron-binding capacity (SMD, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.66 to 0.98; low certainty), and transferrin (SMD, 0.90; 95%CI, 0.74 to 1.05; moderate certainty) levels when compared with the ESAs group. In contrast, the hepcidin level and dosage of intravenous iron were significantly decreased in the HIF-PHIs group compared with the ESAs group (MD, -15.06, 95%CI, -21.96 to -8.16; low certainty; MD, -18.07; 95% CI, -30.05 to -6.09; low certainty). The maintenance dose requirements of roxadustat were independent of baseline CRP or hsCRP levels with respect to the effect on inflammation.

Significance

HIF-PHIs promote iron utilization and reduce the use of intravenous iron therapy. Furthermore, HIF-PHIs, such as roxadustat, maintain the erythropoietic response independent of the inflammatory state. Thus, HIF-PHIs may be an alternative treatment strategy for anemia in DD-CKD patients, where ESA is hyporesponsive due to iron deficiency and inflammation.

Changes in erythropoiesis-stimulating agent responsiveness after transfer to combined therapy with peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis for patients on peritoneal dialysis: A prospective multicenter study in Japan

INTRODUCTION

Inadequate dialysis and fluid overload are corrected after starting combined therapy with peritoneal dialysis (PD) and hemodialysis (HD). However, the effects on anemia management has not been elucidated.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective, multicenter, observational cohort study of 40 PD patients (age, 60 ± 10 years; male, 88%; median PD duration, 28 months) starting combined therapy and investigated changes in several clinical parameters, including erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) resistance index (ERI).

RESULTS

ERI decreased significantly during 6 months after switching to combined therapy (from 11.8 [IQR 8.0-20.4] units/week/kg/(g/dL) to 7.8 [IQR 3.9-18.6] units/week/kg/(g/dL), p = 0.047). Body weight, urinary volume, serum creatinine and the dialysate-to-plasma creatinine ratio (D/P Cr) decreased, whereas hemoglobin and serum albumin increased. In subgroup analysis, the changes in ERI were not affected by cause for starting combined therapy, PD holiday and D/P Cr.

CONCLUSION

Although detailed mechanism was unclear, ESA responsiveness improved after switching from PD alone to combined therapy.

Diagnostic accuracy and clinical usefulness of erythrocyte creatine content to predict the improvement of anaemia in patients receiving maintenance haemodialysis

BACKGROUND

The improvement of anaemia over time by erythropoiesis stimulating agent (ESA) is associated with better survival in haemodialysis patients. We previously reported that erythrocyte creatine content, a marker of erythropoietic capacity, was a reliable marker to estimate the effectiveness of ESA. The aim of this study was to examine the accuracy and clinical usefulness of erythrocyte creatine content to predict the improvement of anaemia in haemodialysis patients.

METHODS

ESA dose was fixed 3 months prior to the enrollment and was maintained throughout the study period. Erythrocyte creatine content and haematologic indices were measured at baseline in 92 patients receiving maintenance haemodialysis. Haemoglobin was also measured 3 months after. Improvement of anaemia was defined as ≥ 0.8 g/dL change in haemoglobin from baseline to 3 months.

RESULTS

Erythrocyte creatine content was significantly higher in 32 patients with improvement of anaemia compared to 60 patients with no improvement of anaemia (2.47 ± 0.74 vs. 1.57 ± 0.49 μmol/gHb, P = 0.0001). When 9 variables (erythrocyte creatine content, ESA dose, reticulocyte, haptoglobin, haemoglobin at baseline, serum calcium, intact parathyroid hormone, transferrin saturation and serum ferritin) were used in the multivariate logistic regression analysis, erythrocyte creatine emerged as the most important variable associated with the improvement of anaemia (P = 0.0001). The optimal cut-off point of erythrocyte creatine content to detect the improvement of anaemia was 1.78 μmol/gHb (Area under the curve: 0.86). Sensitivity and specificity of erythrocyte creatine content to detect the improvement of anaemia were 90.6% and 83.3%.

CONCLUSION

Erythrocyte creatine content is a reliable marker to predict the improvement of anaemia 3 months ahead in patients receiving maintenance haemodialysis.

Three Times Weekly Dosing of Daprodustat versus Conventional Epoetin for Treatment of Anemia in Hemodialysis Patients: ASCEND-TD: A Phase 3 Randomized, Double-Blind, Noninferiority Trial

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Daprodustat is a hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor (HIF-PHI) being investigated for the treatment of anemia of CKD. In this noninferiority trial, we compared daprodustat administered three times weekly with epoetin alfa (epoetin) in patients on prevalent hemodialysis switching from a prior erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA).

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

Patients on hemodialysis with a baseline hemoglobin of 8-11.5 g/dl receiving an ESA were randomized 2:1 to daprodustat three times weekly (n=270) or conventional epoetin (n=137) for 52 weeks. Dosing algorithms aimed to maintain hemoglobin between 10 and 11 g/dl. The primary end point was mean change in hemoglobin from baseline to the average during the evaluation period (weeks 28-52). The principal secondary end point was average monthly intravenous iron dose. Other secondary end points included BP and hemoglobin variability.

RESULTS

Daprodustat three times weekly was noninferior to epoetin for mean change in hemoglobin (model-adjusted mean treatment difference [daprodustat-epoetin], -0.05; 95% confidence interval, -0.21 to 0.10). During the evaluation period, mean (SD) hemoglobin values were 10.45 (0.55) and 10.51 (0.85) g/dl for daprodustat and epoetin groups, respectively. Responders (defined as mean hemoglobin during the evaluation period in the analysis range of 10 to 11.5 g/dl) were 80% in the daprodustat group versus 64% in the epoetin group. Proportionately fewer participants in the daprodustat group versus the epoetin group had hemoglobin values either below 10 g/dl or above 11.5 g/dl during the evaluation period. Mean monthly intravenous iron use was not significantly lower with daprodustat versus epoetin. The effect on BP was similar between groups. The percentage of treatment-emergent adverse events was similar between daprodustat (75%) and epoetin (79%).

CONCLUSIONS

Daprodustat was noninferior to epoetin in hemoglobin response and was generally well tolerated.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY NAME AND REGISTRATION NUMBER

Anemia Studies in Chronic Kidney Disease: Erythropoiesis via a Novel Prolyl Hydroxylase Inhibitor Daprodustat-Three Times Weekly Dosing in Dialysis (ASCEND-TD), NCT03400033.

Roxadustat Versus Epoetin Alfa for Treating Anemia in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease on Dialysis: Results from the Randomized Phase 3 ROCKIES Study

Background

Concerns regarding cardiovascular safety with current treatments for anemia in patients with dialysis-dependent (DD)-CKD have encouraged the development of alternatives. Roxadustat, an oral hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor, stimulates erythropoiesis by increasing endogenous erythropoietin and iron availability.

Methods

In this open-label phase 3 study, patients with DD-CKD and anemia were randomized 1:1 to oral roxadustat three times weekly or parenteral epoetin alfa per local clinic practice. Initial roxadustat dose depended on erythropoiesis-stimulating agent dose at screening for patients already on them and was weight-based for those not on them. The primary efficacy end point was mean hemoglobin change from baseline averaged over weeks 28‒52 for roxadustat versus epoetin alfa, regardless of rescue therapy use, tested for noninferiority (margin, −0.75 g/dl). Adverse events (AEs) were assessed.

Results

Among 2133 patients randomized (n=1068 roxadustat, n=1065 epoetin alfa), mean age was 54.0 years, and 89.1% and 10.8% were on hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis, respectively. Mean (95% confidence interval) hemoglobin change from baseline was 0.77 (0.69 to 0.85) g/dl with roxadustat and 0.68 (0.60 to 0.76) g/dl with epoetin alfa, demonstrating noninferiority (least squares mean difference [95% CI], 0.09 [0.01 to 0.18]; P<0.001). The proportion of patients experiencing ≥1 AE and ≥1 serious AE was 85.0% and 57.6% with roxadustat and 84.5% and 57.5% with epoetin alfa, respectively.

Conclusions

Roxadustat effectively increased hemoglobin in patients with DD-CKD, with an AE profile comparable to epoetin alfa.

Clinical Trial registry name and registration number:

Safety and Efficacy Study of Roxadustat to Treat Anemia in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease, on Dialysis. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02174731.

Effect of Roxadustat on the Pharmacokinetics of Simvastatin, Rosuvastatin, and Atorvastatin in Healthy Subjects: Results From 3 Phase 1, Open-Label, 1-Sequence, Crossover Studies

Roxadustat inhibits breast cancer resistance protein and organic anion transporting polypeptide 1B1, which can affect coadministered statin concentrations. Three open‐label, 1‐sequence crossover phase 1 studies in healthy subjects were conducted to assess effects from steady‐state 200‐mg roxadustat on pharmacokinetics and tolerability of 40‐mg simvastatin (CL‐0537 and CL‐0541), 40‐mg atorvastatin (CL‐0538), or 10‐mg rosuvastatin (CL‐0537). Statins were dosed concomitantly with roxadustat in 28 (CL‐0537) and 24 (CL‐0538) healthy subjects, resulting in increases of maximum plasma concentration (C_max) and area under the plasma concentration–time curve from the time of dosing extrapolated to infinity (AUC_inf) 1.87‐ and 1.75‐fold for simvastatin, 2.76‐ and 1.85‐fold for simvastatin acid, 4.47‐ and 2.93‐fold for rosuvastatin, and 1.34‐ and 1.96‐fold for atorvastatin, respectively. Additionally, simvastatin dosed 2 hours before, and 4 and 10 hours after roxadustat in 28 (CL‐0541) healthy subjects, resulted in increases of C_max and AUC_inf 2.32‐ to 3.10‐fold and 1.56‐ to 1.74‐fold for simvastatin and 2.34‐ to 5.98‐fold and 1.89‐ to 3.42‐fold for simvastatin acid, respectively. These increases were not attenuated by time‐separated statin dosing. No clinically relevant differences were observed for terminal elimination half‐life. Concomitant 200‐mg roxadustat and a statin was generally well tolerated during the study period. Roxadustat effects on statin C_max and AUC_inf were statin and administration time dependent. When coadministered with roxadustat, statin‐associated adverse reactions and the need for statin dose reduction should be evaluated.

Two Phase 3 Studies on Ophthalmological Effects of Roxadustat versus Darbepoetin

Introduction

Roxadustat is an orally administered hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor that represents a novel therapeutic option for patients with anemia of chronic kidney disease (CKD).

Methods

Conducted in Japan, CL-0307 (NCT02952092) and CL-310 (NCT02988973) were phase 3, darbepoetin alfa (DA)-controlled studies conducted in dialysis-dependent (DD) and non–DD (NDD) patients with CKD, respectively, where patients were randomized to receive roxadustat or DA. Ophthalmic imaging and assessments of visual acuity were performed up to week 24 or at study discontinuation. Ophthalmic imaging was centrally evaluated by independent readers masked to the study treatment.

Results

In CL-0307, 302 patients (roxadustat, n = 150; DA, n = 152) received ≥1 dose of the study drug and were included in this analysis. In CL-0310, 262 patients (roxadustat, n = 131; DA, n = 131) received ≥1 dose of the study drug and were included in this analysis. Proportions of DD patients with new or worsening retinal hemorrhages (RHs) in the roxadustat group and DA group were 32.4% (46 of 142) and 36.6% (53 of 145), respectively. Proportions of NDD patients with CKD with new or worsening RH in the roxadustat and DA groups were 31.4% (38 of 121) and 39.8% (51 of 128), respectively. Similar trends were apparent in subgroup analyses: patients with/without RH at baseline and with/without diabetes mellitus at baseline. In both studies, there were no differences in retinal thickness, visual acuity, presence of hard exudates or cotton wool spots, or presence of intra- and subretinal fluid between groups, at any given time point.

Conclusion

In these studies, roxadustat, compared with DA, was not associated with an increased risk of adverse ophthalmologic events in these cohorts.

Daprodustat for the Treatment of Anemia in Patients Undergoing Dialysis

BACKGROUND

Among patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), the use of recombinant human erythropoietin and its derivatives for the treatment of anemia has been linked to a possibly increased risk of stroke, myocardial infarction, and other adverse events. Several trials have suggested that hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors (PHIs) are as effective as erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) in increasing hemoglobin levels.

METHODS

In this randomized, open-label, phase 3 trial, we assigned patients with CKD who were undergoing dialysis and who had a hemoglobin level of 8.0 to 11.5 g per deciliter to receive an oral HIF-PHI (daprodustat) or an injectable ESA (epoetin alfa if they were receiving hemodialysis or darbepoetin alfa if they were receiving peritoneal dialysis). The two primary outcomes were the mean change in the hemoglobin level from baseline to weeks 28 through 52 (noninferiority margin, -0.75 g per deciliter) and the first occurrence of a major adverse cardiovascular event (a composite of death from any cause, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke), with a noninferiority margin of 1.25.

RESULTS

A total of 2964 patients underwent randomization. The mean (±SD) baseline hemoglobin level was 10.4±1.0 g per deciliter overall. The mean (±SE) change in the hemoglobin level from baseline to weeks 28 through 52 was 0.28±0.02 g per deciliter in the daprodustat group and 0.10±0.02 g per deciliter in the ESA group (difference, 0.18 g per deciliter; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.12 to 0.24), which met the prespecified noninferiority margin of -0.75 g per deciliter. During a median follow-up of 2.5 years, a major adverse cardiovascular event occurred in 374 of 1487 patients (25.2%) in the daprodustat group and in 394 of 1477 (26.7%) in the ESA group (hazard ratio, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.81 to 1.07), which also met the prespecified noninferiority margin for daprodustat. The percentages of patients with other adverse events were similar in the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with CKD undergoing dialysis, daprodustat was noninferior to ESAs regarding the change in the hemoglobin level from baseline and cardiovascular outcomes. (Funded by GlaxoSmithKline; ASCEND-D ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02879305.).

Challenging patient phenotypes in the management of anaemia of chronic kidney disease

BACKGROUND

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is often complicated by anaemia, which is associated with disease progression and increased hospital visits, decreased quality of life, and increased mortality.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search of English language peer-reviewed articles in PubMed/MedLine published between 1998 and 2020 related to the treatment of anaemia of CKD was conducted. The United States Renal Database System and Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS) data reports, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the US Food and Drug Administration websites, and published congress abstracts in 2020 were surveyed for relevant information.

RESULTS

Subgroups of patients with anaemia of CKD present a clinical challenge throughout the disease spectrum, including those with end-stage kidney disease, advanced age or resistance to or ineligibility for current standards of care (ie, oral or intravenous iron supplementation, erythropoietin-stimulating agents and red blood cell transfusions). In addition, those with an increased risk of adverse events because of comorbid conditions, such as cardiovascular diseases or diabetes, comprise special populations of patients with an unmet need for interventions to improve clinical outcomes. These comorbidities must be managed in parallel and may have a synergistic effect on overall disease severity.

CONCLUSIONS

Several therapies provide promising opportunities to address gaps with a standard of care, including hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors, which stimulate haematopoiesis through promoting modest increases in serum erythropoietin and improved iron homeostasis. The critical issues in the management of anaemia of CKD in these challenging phenotypes and the clinical utility of new therapeutic agents in development for the treatment of anaemia of CKD should be assessed and the information should be made available to healthcare providers.

Factors Affecting Doses of Roxadustat Versus Darbepoetin Alfa for Anemia in Nondialysis Patients

INTRODUCTION

Roxadustat is an oral hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor for treating anemia of chronic kidney disease (CKD). This post hoc analysis of a Japanese, open-label, partially randomized, phase 3 study in nondialysis-dependent (NDD) CKD patients treated with traditional erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) evaluated dosing trends of roxadustat and darbepoetin alfa (DA) required to maintain target hemoglobin concentrations in patients with risk factors associated with ESA hyporesponsiveness.

METHODS

Patients enrolled in the 1517-CL-0310 study (NCT02988973) that demonstrated noninferiority of roxadustat to DA for change in average hemoglobin levels of week 18-24 from baseline who had used human recombinant erythropoietin or DA before conversion and who were randomized to either roxadustat or DA were included. The endpoints were the average allocated dose of roxadustat and DA per administration in the last 6 weeks (AAD/6W), assessed by subgroups known to be associated with ESA hyporesponsiveness. The analysis of variance was performed by the treatment group to test the influence of subgroup factors on the AAD/6W of study drug. The ratios between the mean AAD/6W in each subgroup category and the within-arm mean AAD/6W were calculated.

RESULTS

Two hundred and sixty-two patients were randomized to either the roxadustat or DA comparative group and received treatment (roxadustat, n = 131; DA, n = 131). Higher mean (standard deviation) doses of both roxadustat (63.15 [24.84] mg) and DA (47.33 [29.79] μg) were required in the highest ESA resistance index (≥6.8) quartile (p = 0.003 and p < 0.001, respectively). Patients with adequate iron repletion had the lowest doses for both roxadustat (45.54 [18.01] mg) and DA (28.13 [20.98] μg). High-sensitivity C-reactive protein ≥28.57 nmol/L and the estimated glomerular filtration rate <15 mL/min/1.73 m2 were associated with requiring higher DA but not roxadustat doses.

DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION

The roxadustat dose required to maintain target hemoglobin in NDD patients in Japan with anemia of CKD relative to DA dose may not be impacted by low-grade inflammation. Roxadustat may be beneficial for ESA-hyporesponsive NDD CKD patients.

Treatment of Anemia in Kidney Disease: Beyond Erythropoietin

Anemia is common in patients with chronic kidney disease. Treatment with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents has decreased transfusion rates, but has not been consistently shown to improve cardiovascular outcomes or quality of life. Moreover, treatment to hemoglobin levels normal for the general population (13-14 g/dL) has resulted in increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality versus lower hemoglobin targets, and some patients with chronic kidney disease do not reach these lower hemoglobin targets despite escalating doses of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents. The pathophysiology of anemia in patients with chronic kidney disease has been informed by the discovery of hypoxia-inducible factor and hepcidin pathways. Recent innovations in anemia treatment leverage knowledge of these pathways to effectively raise hemoglobin levels independent of erythropoiesis-stimulating agent administration. Several agents that stabilize hypoxia-inducible factor are undergoing or have completed phase 3 clinical trials. These agents appear to have equal efficacy as erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in raising hemoglobin levels and have not been associated with major safety signals to date. Because of the potential for off-target effects from non-anemia-related gene transcription by hypoxia-inducible factor stabilization, longer-term follow-up studies and registries will be needed to ensure safety. Agents that modulate hepcidin have undergone early clinical trials with mixed results regarding safety and efficacy in increasing hemoglobin levels. Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors, which also decrease hepcidin levels, have been associated with increased hemoglobin levels among patients with chronic kidney disease in clinical trials exploring proteinuria and kidney disease progression.

Roxadustat for the Maintenance Treatment of Anemia in Patients with End-Stage Kidney Disease on Stable Dialysis: A European Phase 3, Randomized, Open-Label, Active-Controlled Study (PYRENEES)

Introduction

Roxadustat is an orally administered hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor being developed for the treatment of anemia of chronic kidney disease (CKD). This European, phase 3, randomized, open-label, active-controlled study investigated efficacy and safety of roxadustat in patients with end-stage kidney disease on dialysis for at least 4 months.

Methods

Patients were randomized to switch from an erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) (epoetin alfa or darbepoetin alfa) to roxadustat three times/week or to continue their previous ESA. Roxadustat and ESA doses were adjusted to maintain hemoglobin within 10.0–12.0 g/dL during the treatment period (day 1 up to 52–104 weeks). Primary endpoints were hemoglobin change from baseline (CFB) to the average of weeks 28–36 without rescue therapy and hemoglobin CFB to the average of weeks 28–52 regardless of rescue therapy. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were assessed descriptively.

Results

Of 1081 screened patients, 836 were randomized and received treatment (roxadustat, n = 415; ESA, n = 421). The least squares means (95% CI) of the treatment difference (roxadustat − ESA) for hemoglobin CFB to weeks 28–36 (without rescue therapy) and CFB to weeks 28–52 (regardless of rescue therapy) were 0.235 (0.132, 0.339) g/dL and 0.171 (0.082, 0.261) g/dL, respectively, demonstrating non-inferiority of roxadustat to ESA (non-inferiority margin of − 0.75 g/dL). The proportions of patients who achieved target hemoglobin without rescue therapy during weeks 28–36 were 84.2% (roxadustat) and 82.4% (ESA). Roxadustat was superior to ESA in decreasing LDL cholesterol from baseline to the average of weeks 12–28. Serious TEAEs occurred in 50.7% (roxadustat) and 45.0% (ESA) of patients. Common TEAEs in both treatment groups included hypertension, arteriovenous fistula thrombosis, headache, and diarrhea.

Conclusion

Roxadustat was non-inferior to ESAs in maintaining hemoglobin levels in this cohort of patients with anemia of CKD on dialysis for at least 4 months who were previously treated with ESAs. Observed TEAEs were consistent with previous studies.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12325-021-01904-6.

Molidustat for Renal Anemia in Nondialysis Patients Previously Treated with Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agents: A Randomized, Open-Label, Phase 3 Study

INTRODUCTION

Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) are the current standard of care for anemia due to chronic kidney disease (CKD) in patients not undergoing dialysis. Molidustat, an oral hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor, is being investigated as an alternative treatment for renal anemia. Molidustat was evaluated in five phase 3 studies, the molidustat once daily improves renal anemia by inducing erythropoietin (MIYABI) program. The present study investigated the safety and efficacy of molidustat in Japanese patients with renal anemia not undergoing dialysis and previously treated with ESAs.

METHODS

This was a 52-week, active-controlled, randomized (1:1), open-label, parallel-group, multicenter, phase 3 study in Japanese patients with anemia due to CKD (stages 3-5). Molidustat was initiated at 25 mg or 50 mg once daily according to previous ESA dose. The ESA darbepoetin alfa (darbepoetin) was initiated at a starting dose in accordance with the previous ESA dose and injected subcutaneously once every 2 or 4 weeks. Doses were regularly titrated to maintain hemoglobin (Hb) levels in the target range of 11.0-13.0 g/dL. The primary efficacy outcome was the mean Hb level and its change from baseline during the evaluation period (weeks 30-36). The safety outcomes included evaluation of all adverse events.

RESULTS

In total, 164 patients were randomized to receive molidustat (n = 82) or darbepoetin (n = 82). Baseline characteristics were well balanced. Mean (standard deviation) Hb levels at baseline were 11.31 (0.68) g/dL for molidustat and 11.27 (0.64) g/dL for darbepoetin. The mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) for mean Hb levels during the evaluation period for molidustat (11.67 [11.48-11.85] g/dL) and darbepoetin (11.53 [11.31-11.74] g/dL) was within the target range. Based on a noninferiority margin of 1.0 g/dL, molidustat was noninferior to darbepoetin regarding the change in mean Hb level during the evaluation period from baseline, with a least squares mean (95% CI) difference (molidustat-darbepoetin) of 0.13 (-0.15, 0.40) g/dL. The proportion of patients who reported at least 1 treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was 92.7% for molidustat and 96.3% for darbepoetin. TEAEs leading to death were reported in 2 patients (2.4%) in the molidustat group and none in the darbepoetin group; serious TEAEs were reported in 32.9% and 26.8% of patients, respectively.

DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION

Molidustat was noninferior to darbepoetin and maintained Hb levels in the prespecified target range in patients with renal anemia not undergoing dialysis and previously treated with ESA. Molidustat was well tolerated, and no new safety signal was observed.

Managing Anemia across the Stages of Kidney Disease in Those Hyporesponsive to Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agents

BACKGROUND

Patients with CKD frequently have anemia that results from iron-restricted erythropoiesis and inflammation. Anemia of CKD is currently managed with iron supplements and erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) to promote erythropoiesis and with RBC transfusion in severe cases. Hyporesponse to ESAs, or the need for larger than usual doses to attain a given hemoglobin (Hb) level, is associated with increased morbidity and mortality and presents a pressing clinical challenge, particularly for patients on dialysis. This paper reviews ESA hyporesponse and potential new therapeutic options in the management of anemia of CKD.

SUMMARY

The most common causes of ESA hyporesponse include iron deficiency and inflammation, and to a lesser degree, secondary hyperparathyroidism, inadequate dialysis, malnutrition, and concomitant medications. Management of ESA hyporesponse is multipronged and involves treating low level infections, ensuring adequate nutrition, and optimizing iron status and dialysis modality, although some patients can remain refractory. Inflammation directly increases production and secretion of hepcidin, contributes to an impaired response to hypoxia, and suppresses proliferation of erythroid progenitors. Coordination of renal and hepatic erythropoietin (EPO) production and iron metabolism is under the control of hypoxia-inducible factors (HIF), which are in turn regulated by HIF-prolyl hydroxylases (HIF-PHs). HIF-PHs and hepcidin are therefore attractive potential drug targets particularly in patients with ESA hyporesponse. Several oral HIF-PH inhibitors have been evaluated in patients with anemia of CKD and have been shown to increase Hb and reduce hepcidin regardless of inflammation, iron status, or dialysis modality. These sustained effects are achieved through more modest increases in endogenous EPO compared with ESAs. Key Messages: Treatments that address ESA hyporesponse remain a significant unmet clinical need in patients with anemia of CKD. New therapies such as HIF-PH inhibitors have the potential to address fundamental aspects of ESA hyporesponse and provide a new therapeutic option in these patients.

Phase 3 Study of Roxadustat to Treat Anemia in Non-Dialysis-Dependant CKD

Introduction

Roxadustat is an oral hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor that has demonstrated safety and efficacy versus placebo in phase III trials in patients with anemia of chronic kidney disease (CKD) who were not on dialysis (NDD).

Methods

This was a phase III, active-controlled, multicenter, partially randomized, open-label study in Japanese patients with NDD CKD. Patients who had used recombinant human erythropoietin or darbepoetin alfa (DA) before conversion were randomized to roxadustat or DA (comparative arms). Patients who had used epoetin beta pegol before conversion were allocated to roxadustat (reference arm). The primary endpoint was change in average hemoglobin (Hb) level from baseline during the evaluation period (Weeks 18–24). Longer term efficacy and safety were evaluated in roxadustat-treated patients over 52 weeks.

Results

In this study, 334 patients were randomized/allocated to receive treatment (n = 132, roxadustat [comparative]; n = 131, DA [comparative]; n = 71, roxadustat [reference]). The estimated difference between the roxadustat (comparative) and DA (comparative) groups in the least squares mean of change of average Hb levels of Weeks 18 to 24 from baseline was –0.07 g/dl, with the lower limit of 95% confidence interval of –0.23 g/dl, thereby confirming the noninferiority of roxadustat to DA. Common treatment-emergent adverse events (≥3% of patients in any treatment group) observed during the 24-week treatment period included nasopharyngitis, CKD, hyperkalemia, and hypertension.

Conclusion

Roxadustat maintained Hb within 10 to 12 g/dl in NDD CKD patients and was noninferior to DA. The safety profiles observed in this study are consistent with previous studies performed in this patient population.

Anemia management for home dialysis including the new US public policy initiative

Patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) requiring kidney replacement therapy are often treated in conventional dialysis centers at substantial cost and patient inconvenience. The recent United States Executive Order on Advancing American Kidney Health, in addition to focusing on ESKD prevention and reforming the kidney transplantation system, focuses on providing financial incentives to promote a shift toward home dialysis. In accordance with this order, a goal was set to have 80% of incident dialysis patients receiving home dialysis or a kidney transplant by 2025. Compared with conventional in-center therapy, home dialysis modalities, including both home hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis, appear to offer equivalent or improved mortality, clinical outcomes, hospitalization rates, and quality of life in patients with ESKD in addition to greater convenience, flexibility, and cost-effectiveness. Treatment of anemia, a common complication of chronic kidney disease, may be easier to manage at home with a new class of agents, hypoxia-inducible factor-prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors, which are orally administered in contrast to the current standard of care of i.v. iron and/or erythropoiesis-stimulating agents. This review evaluates the clinical, quality-of-life, economic, and social aspects of dialysis modalities in patients with ESKD, including during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic; explores new therapeutics for the management of anemia in chronic kidney disease; and highlights how the proposed changes in Advancing American Kidney Health provide an opportunity to improve kidney health in the United States.

Roxadustat for the treatment of anemia in chronic kidney disease patients not on dialysis: a Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study (ALPS)

BACKGROUND

Roxadustat is an orally active hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor for the treatment of chronic kidney disease (CKD) anemia.

METHODS

This Phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study examined patients with Stages 3-5 CKD, not on dialysis (NCT01887600). Patients were randomized (2:1) to oral roxadustat or placebo three times weekly for 52-104 weeks. This study examined two primary efficacy endpoints: European Union (European Medicines Agency)-hemoglobin (Hb) response, defined as Hb ≥11.0 g/dL that increased from baseline (BL) by ≥1.0 g/dL in patients with Hb >8.0 g/dL or ≥2.0 g/dL in patients with BL Hb ≤8.0 g/dL, without rescue therapy, during the first 24 weeks of treatment; US Food and Drug Administration-change in Hb from BL to the average Hb level during Weeks 28-52, regardless of rescue therapy. Secondary efficacy endpoints and safety were examined.

RESULTS

A total of 594 patients were analyzed (roxadustat: 391; placebo: 203). Superiority of roxadustat versus placebo was demonstrated for both primary efficacy endpoints: Hb response [odds ratio = 34.74, 95% confidence interval (CI) 20.48-58.93] and change in Hb from BL [roxadustat - placebo: +1.692 (95% CI 1.52-1.86); both P < 0.001]. Superiority of roxadustat was demonstrated for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol change from BL, and time to first use of rescue medication (both P < 0.001). The incidences of treatment-emergent adverse events were comparable between groups (roxadustat: 87.7%, placebo: 86.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

Roxadustat demonstrated superior efficacy versus placebo in terms of both Hb response rate and change in Hb from BL. The safety profiles of roxadustat and placebo were comparable.

Roxadustat in treating anemia in dialysis patients (ROAD): protocol and rationale of a multicenter prospective observational cohort study

BACKGROUND

Roxadustat has been shown effective in treating patients with anemia due to chronic kidney disease. However, its long-term effect on clinical outcomes and socioeconomic burden and safety remains unclear.

METHODS/DESIGN

This is a multicenter, prospective, longitudinal observational cohort study assessing if Roxadustat improves prognosis in dialysis patients. Primary outcomes will be major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), defined as composites of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, cerebral infarction, hospitalization because of heart failure; all-cause mortality, and annual economic costs in two years. The data will be collected via Research electronic data capture (REDCap) based database as well as software-based dialysis registry of Sichuan province. The primary outcomes for the ROAD study participants will be compared with those in the dialysis registry cohort. Data at baseline and study follow up will also be compared to assess the association between Roxadustat and long-term clinical outcomes.

DISCUSSION

The main objective of this study is to the assess long-term association of Roxadustat on MACE, all-cause mortality, socio-economic burden, safety in dialysis patients, which will provide guidance for designing further large randomized controlled trials to investigate this clinic question.

STUDY REGISTRATION

The study has been registered in Chinese Clinical Trials Registry (ROAD, ROxadustat in treating Anemia in Dialysis patients, registration number ChiCTR1900025765) and provincial observational cohort database (Renal disEAse observational CoHort database, REACH, ChiCTR1900024926), registered 07 September 2019, http://www.chictr.org.cn .

Renal prognoses by different target hemoglobin levels achieved by epoetin beta pegol dosing to chronic kidney disease patients with hyporesponsive anemia to erythropoiesis-stimulating agent: a multicenter open-label randomized controlled study

BACKGROUND

There is no evidence regarding appropriate target hemoglobin levels in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients with an erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA)-hyporesponsiveness. Therefore, we conducted a randomized controlled study in non-dialysis dependent CKD (NDD-CKD) patients with ESA-hyporesponsiveness, comparing results of intensive versus conservative treatment to maintain hemoglobin levels.

METHODS

This was a multicenter, open-label, randomized, parallel-group study conducted at 89 institutions. Among NDD-CKD patients, those with ESA-hyporesponsive renal anemia were randomly assigned to an intensive treatment group, to which epoetin beta pegol was administered with target hemoglobin level of 11 g/dL or higher, or conservative treatment group, in which the hemoglobin levels at enrollment (within ± 1 g/dL) were maintained. The primary endpoint was the time to the first kidney composite event defined as (1) transition to renal replacement therapy (dialysis or renal transplantation); (2) reduction of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) to less than 6.0 mL/min/1.73 m²; or (3) reduction of eGFR by 30% or more. Secondary endpoints were kidney function (change rate in eGFR), cardiovascular (CV) events, and safety.

RESULTS

Between August 2012 and December 2015, 385 patients were registered, and 362 patients who met the eligibility criteria were enrolled. There was no significant difference in kidney survival or in CV events between the two groups. However, the incidences of the 3 types of kidney composite events tended to differ.

CONCLUSIONS

In NDD-CKD patients with ESA-hyporesponsive renal anemia, the aggressive administration of ESA did not clearly extend kidney survival or result in a significant difference in the incidence of CV events.

Factors affecting the doses of roxadustat vs darbepoetin alfa for anemia treatment in hemodialysis patients

Roxadustat is an oral hypoxia‐inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor for the treatment of anemia in chronic kidney disease (CKD). Emerging evidence suggests that roxadustat may be beneficial for patients who inadequately respond to erythropoiesis‐stimulating agents (ESAs). This post‐hoc analysis of a Japanese, double‐blind, randomized, phase 3 study in hemodialysis‐dependent CKD patients treated with traditional ESAs assessed the impact of factors associated with ESA hyporesponsiveness on roxadustat and darbepoetin alfa (DA) doses required to maintain target hemoglobin. Endpoints included mean of average doses of roxadustat and DA per administration in the last 6 weeks (AAD/6W) by prior ESA‐resistance index (ERI), iron repletion (transferrin saturation; ferritin), and high‐sensitivity C‐reactive protein (hs‐CRP). Of 415 enrolled patients, 303 were randomized (roxadustat, n = 151; DA, n = 152). Weight‐adjusted AAD/6W increased with increasing ERI for roxadustat (ERI <3.3, 0.89 mg/kg; ERI ≥8.4, 1.51 mg/kg) and DA (ERI <3.3, 0.26 μg/kg; ERI ≥8.4, 0.91 μg/kg); the weight‐adjusted AAD/6W relative to within‐arm mean AAD/6W showed a trend toward increased DA doses for the ERI ≥8.4 category (P = .089). AAD/6W remained stable for roxadustat but increased for DA with decreasing baseline iron repletion markers. The relationship between roxadustat doses and end of treatment (EoT) hs‐CRP was not significant (estimated slope, −0.494; P = .814); a trend toward increased DA doses was observed with increasing EoT hs‐CRP (estimated slope, 2.973; P = .075). Roxadustat doses required to maintain target hemoglobin appear to be less affected by factors that underlie ESA hyporesponsiveness, relative to DA; roxadustat may be beneficial for patients hyporesponsive to ESAs.

Roxadustat for treatment of erythropoietin-hyporesponsive anemia in a hemodialysis patient: A case report

BACKGROUND

Hyporesponsiveness to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) is a prevalent problem in patients with chronic kidney disease. It is associated with increased morbidity and mortality in patients who undergo dialysis. A significant proportion of patients do not respond to iron supplementation and conventional ESAs. We report a case of severe ESA hyporesponsiveness-related anemia that was successfully treated with oral roxadustat.

CASE SUMMARY

A 59-year-old Chinese woman had high blood glucose for 25 years, maintenance hemodialysis for 7 years, and recurrent dizziness and fatigue for more than 2 years. Laboratory tests showed severe anemia (hemoglobin level of 54 g/L), though bone marrow biopsy, fluorescence in situ hybridization, and hemolysis tests were within normal ranges. We initially administered first-line therapies and other adjuvant treatments, such as blood transfusions, ESAs, and adequate dialysis, but the patient did not respond as anticipated. Her erythropoietin-resistant anemia was probably not only due to chronic renal insufficiency. The patient received the hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor roxadustat (100 mg, three times weekly). After 12 wk of treatment, the patient’s hemoglobin increased significantly, and her symptoms were alleviated. During the follow-up period, adverse drug reactions were controllable and tolerable.

CONCLUSION

Oral roxadustat is effective and tolerable for the treatment of ESA hypores-ponsiveness-related anemia in patients undergoing hemodialysis.

Clinical and Economic Outcomes of Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agent Hyporesponsiveness in the Post-Bundling Era

Rationale & Objective

Since the change in erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) labeling and bundling of dialysis services in the United States, few studies have addressed the clinical importance of ESA hyporesponsiveness and none have considered health care resource use in this population. We aimed to further explore ESA hyporesponsiveness and its consequences.

Study Design

Retrospective observational cohort study.

Setting & Participants

US Renal Data System Medicare participants receiving dialysis with a minimum 6 months of continuous ESA use from 2012 to 2014.

Predictors

Erythropoietin resistance index (≥2.0 U/kg/wk/g/L) and ESA dose were used to identify ESA hyporesponders and hyporesponsive subgroups: isolated, intermittent, and chronic.

Outcomes

Associations between ESA responsiveness and mortality, cardiovascular hospitalization rates, and health care resource use were evaluated and compared across subgroups.

Analytical Approach

Baseline characteristics were compared using Wilcoxon rank sum tests for continuous variables and χ² tests for categorical variables. Incidence rates of health care resource use were modeled using an unadjusted and adjusted generalized linear model.

Results

Of 834,115 dialysis patients in the CROWNWeb database, 38,891 ESA hyporesponders and 59,412 normoresponders met all inclusion criteria. Compared with normoresponders, hyporesponders were younger women, weighed less, and had longer durations of dialysis (all P < 0.001). Hyporesponders received 3.8-fold higher ESA doses (mean, 94,831 U/mo) and erythropoietin resistance index was almost 5 times higher than in normoresponders. Hyporesponders had lower hemoglobin levels and parathyroid hormone levels > 800 pg/mL, and iron deficiency was present in 26.5% versus 10.9% in normoresponders. One-year mortality was higher among hypo- compared with normoresponders (25.3% vs 22.6%). Hyporesponders also had significantly higher rates of hospitalization for cardiovascular events, emergency department visits, inpatient stays, home health agency visits, skilled nursing facility, and hospice days.

Limitations

Only US Medicare patients were included and different hyporesponder definitions may have influenced the results.

Conclusions

This study explored ESA hyporesponsiveness using new definitions and incorporated clinical and economic outcomes. It established that ESA-hyporesponsive dialysis patients had higher mortality, cardiovascular hospitalization rates, and health care costs as compared with ESA-normoresponsive patients.

Effects of hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors on iron regulation in non-dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease patients with anemia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Phase 2 and phase 3 clinical studies showed that hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors (HIF-PHIs) efficiently increased hemoglobin levels in both dialysis-dependent and non-dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients. However, the effects of HIF-PHIs on iron regulation have not been consistent among clinical trials. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to evaluate the effects of six HIF-PHIs on iron regulation in non-dialysis CKD patients. Electronic databases were searched from inception to April 20, 2020, for eligible studies. Changes from baseline in transferrin saturation (TSAT), total iron-binding capacity (TIBC), iron, ferritin, and hepcidin levels were pooled using the inverse-variance method and presented as the mean difference (MD) or standardized MD (SMD) with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs). Meta-analysis of the included studies showed that, in non-dialysis-dependent CKD patients, HIF-PHIs decreased TSAT (MD, -4.51; 95 % CI, -5.81 to -3.21), ferritin (MD, -47.29; 95 % CI, -54.59 to -40.00) and hepcidin (SMD, -0.94; 95 % CI, -1.25 to -0.62), increased TIBC (MD, 9.15; 95 % CI, 7.08-11.22), and did not affect serum iron (MD, -0.31; 95 % CI, -2.05 to 1.42) despite enhanced erythropoiesis. This systematic review suggests that HIF-PHIs promote iron utilization in non-dialysis-dependent CKD patients. Importantly, HIF-PHIs are associated with increased transferrin levels (and TIBC), leading to reduced TSAT. Therefore, the reduction of TSAT after HIF-PHIs should not be interpreted as iron deficiency.

Erythropoietin Resistance in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease: Current Perspectives

Anemia is a frequent complication of chronic kidney disease, and its primary cause is erythropoietin deficiency. After diagnosis, treatment begins with administration of an erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA). However, some patients present with resistance to ESA, which needs to be reversed, as it can increase the risk of death in patients with kidney disease. Therefore, we provide a discussion of the current literature regarding the factors that can modify the response to this class of drugs and the strategies that can be considered to optimize the benefits of treating anemia.

Potential hazards of recent trends in liberal iron use for renal anemia

A randomized controlled trial,the Proactive IV Iron Therapy in Haemodialysis Patients (PIVOTAL), has recently shown that a high-dose (‘proactive’) intravenous iron regimen was superior to a low-dose (‘reactive’) regimen for hemodialysis patient outcomes and overall safety. However, even in the low-dose group, a substantial amount of iron was administered to maintain serum ferritin >200 ng/mL. This type of comparison may have strongly affected the safety results. Iron has two opposite effects on erythropoiesis: it activates erythroid differentiation directly by supplying iron but inhibits it indirectly by stimulating hepcidin and enhancing oxidative stress. Hepcidin plays an essential role not only in iron homeostasis and the anemia of chronic kidney disease, but also in its complications such as atherosclerosis and infection. Its main stimulation by iron—and to a lesser degree by inflammation—should urge clinicians to avoid prescribing excessive amounts of iron. Furthermore, as serum ferritin is closely correlated with serum hepcidin and iron storage, it would seem preferable to rely mainly on serum ferritin to adjust iron administration, defining an upper limit for risk reduction. Based on our estimations, the optimal range of serum ferritin is ∼50–150 ng/mL, which is precisely within the boundaries of iron management in Japan. Considering the contrasting ranges of target ferritin levels between end-stage renal disease patients in Japan and the rest of the world, the optimal range proposed by us will probably be considered as unacceptable by nephrologists abroad. Only well-balanced, randomized controlled trials with both erythropoiesis-stimulating agents and iron will allow us to settle this controversy.

A pharmacist-managed dosing algorithm for darbepoetin alfa and iron sucrose in hemodialysis patients: A randomized, controlled trial

The attainment of target hemoglobin levels in hemodialysis patients is low. Several factors play a role, such as hyporesponsiveness to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESA), but also suboptimal prescribing of ESA and iron. The goal of this study was to investigate if a pharmacist-managed dosing algorithm for darbepoetin alfa (DA) and iron sucrose improves the attainment of target hemoglobin levels. In this randomized controlled trial, 200 hemodialysis patients from a Dutch teaching hospital were included. In the intervention group (n = 100), a pharmacist monthly provided dose recommendations for DA and iron sucrose based on dosing algorithms. The control group (n = 100) received usual care. In the intervention group, the percentage per patient within the target range (PTR) for hemoglobin (target range 6.8-7.4 mmol/L) and iron status was higher than in the control group (for hemoglobin median 38.5% vs 23.1%, P = .001 and for iron status median 21.1% vs 8.3%, P = .003). The percentage of high hemoglobin levels (>8.1 mmol/L) was lower in the intervention group (median 0.0% vs 7.7%, P = .034). The weekly dose of DA was lower in the intervention group (median 34.0 vs 46.9 mcg, P = .020), whereas iron dose was higher (median 75 vs 0 mg). No difference was found for the percentage of hemoglobin levels below the target range. In conclusion, a pharmacist-managed dosing algorithm for DA and iron sucrose increased the attainment of target levels for hemoglobin and iron status, reduced the percentage of high hemoglobin levels, and was associated with a lower DA and a higher iron sucrose dose.

Mixed hemodiafiltration reduces erythropoiesis stimulating agents requirement in dialysis patients: a prospective randomized study

BACKGROUND

Improved responsiveness to erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESAs) in patients on on-line post-dilution hemodiafiltration (Post-HDF) compared with conventional hemodialysis (HD) was reported by some authors but challenged by others. This prospective, cross-over randomized study tested the hypothesis that an alternative infusion modality of HDF, mixed-dilution HDF (Mixed HDF), could further reduce ESAs requirement in dialysis patients compared to the traditional Post-HDF.

METHODS

One-hundred-twenty prevalent patients from 6 Dialysis Centers were randomly assigned to two six-months treatment sequences: A-B and B-A (A, Mixed HDF; B, Post-HDF). Primary outcome was comparative evaluation of ESA (darbepoetin alfa) requirement and ESA resistance. Treatments efficiency, iron and vitamins status, inflammation and nutrition parameters were monitored.

RESULTS

In sequence A, darbepoetin requirement decreased during Mixed HDF from 29.5 to 23.7 µg/month and increased significantly during Post-HDF (32.3 µg/month at 6th month) while, in sequence B, it increased during Post-HDF from 38.2 to 43.7 µg/month and decreased during Mixed HDF (23.9 µg/month at 6th month). Overall, EPO doses at 6 months on Mixed and Post-HDF were 23.8 and 38.4 µg/month, respectively, P < 0.01. A multiple linear model confirmed that Mixed HDF vs Post-HDF reduced significantly ESA requirement and ESA resistance (P < 0.0001), by a mean of 29% (CI 23-35%) in the last three months of the observation periods.

CONCLUSIONS

Mixed HDF decreased darbepoetin-alfa requirement in dialysis patients. This might help preventing the untoward side effects of high ESA doses, besides having a remarkable economic impact. Additional evidence is needed to confirm this potential benefit of Mixed-HDF.

Relationship between anti-erythropoietin receptor autoantibodies and responsiveness to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in patients on hemodialysis: a multi-center cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

A decreased response to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) leads to refractory anemia and worse prognosis in patients with chronic kidney disease. We examined the association between autoantibodies to the erythropoietin receptor (EPOR) and responsiveness to ESAs in patients on maintenance hemodialysis.

METHODS

A total of 108 Japanese patients on maintenance hemodialysis at three institutions were enrolled. Sera from these patients were screened for anti-EPOR antibodies using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. An ESA resistance index (ERI) was calculated, and patients in the highest ERI quartile were defined as ESA hyporesponsive.

RESULTS

Anti-EPOR antibodies were detected in 11 patients (10%). Body mass index and hemoglobin, platelet, magnesium, and ferritin levels decreased with higher ERI levels. On the other hand, C-reactive protein (CRP) levels and the prevalence of anti-EPOR antibodies increased with higher ERI levels. In multivariate analysis, the presence of anti-EPOR antibodies together with CRP was a significant risk factor for ESA hyporesponsiveness.

CONCLUSIONS

Anti-EPOR antibodies were detected in patients on maintenance hemodialysis, and these autoantibodies were independent factors for hyporesponsiveness to ESAs in these patients.

Molidustat for the treatment of renal anaemia in patients with non-dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease: design and rationale of two phase III studies

INTRODUCTION

Anaemia is a common complication of chronic kidney disease (CKD). Owing to the limitations of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs), the current standard of care, there is a need to develop new therapies. Hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl-hydroxylase (HIF-PH) inhibitors might be a promising new treatment option. Molidustat is an oral HIF-PH inhibitor that stimulates the endogenous, predominantly renal, production of erythropoietin and was generally well tolerated in phase IIb clinical trials. Here, we report the design and rationale of two studies from the molidustat phase III programme: MolIdustat once dailY improves renal Anaemia By Inducing erythropoietin (MIYABI).

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

MIYABI Non-Dialysis-Correction (ND-C) and MIYABI Non-Dialysis-Maintenance (ND-M) are randomised, open-label, parallel-group, multicentre studies that aim to demonstrate the efficacy of molidustat treatment compared with darbepoetin alfa in patients with anaemia and non-dialysis-dependent CKD. The secondary objectives are to assess the safety, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of molidustat treatment. MIYABI ND-C will recruit patients currently untreated with ESAs, whereas patients treated with an ESA will enter MIYABI ND-M. Each study will recruit 150 patients who will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio to receive either molidustat or darbepoetin alfa for 52 weeks, with efficacy evaluated during weeks 30-36. Study drug doses will be titrated regularly using an interactive voice/web response system with the aim of maintaining the patients' haemoglobin (Hb) levels between ≥110 and <130 g/L. The primary objective will be achieved if, in molidustat-treated patients, the mean Hb level remains within the target range during the evaluation period, and if the change in the mean Hb level at evaluation time points from baseline is non-inferior to darbepoetin alfa.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The protocols were approved by ethics committees at all participating sites. These studies will be conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and the Good Clinical Practice guidelines. Results arising from these studies will be published in peer-reviewed journal(s).

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS

NCT03350321; Pre-results, NCT03350347; Pre-results.

Molidustat for the treatment of renal anaemia in patients with dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease: design and rationale of three phase III studies

INTRODUCTION

New medications for anaemia associated with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are desirable, owing to the limitations of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs), the current standard of care. Molidustat is a novel hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl-hydroxylase inhibitor that stimulates erythropoietin production, predominately in the kidney. We report methodological details of three phase III trials, named MolIdustat once dailY improves renal Anaemia By Inducing erythropoietin (MIYABI), designed primarily to investigate the efficacy of molidustat therapy in adults with renal anaemia and dialysis-dependent CKD.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

MIYABI Haemodialysis-Correction (HD-C) is a single-arm trial (24-week treatment duration) in approximately 25 patients on haemodialysis, currently untreated with ESAs. MIYABI Peritoneal Dialysis (PD) is a single-arm trial (36 week treatment duration) in approximately 50 patients on peritoneal dialysis, treated or untreated with ESAs. MIYABI Haemodialysis-Maintenance (HD-M) is a randomised, active-controlled, double-blinded, double-dummy trial (52-week treatment duration) comparing molidustat with darbepoetin alfa in approximately 225 patients on haemodialysis, treated with ESAs. Molidustat (starting dose 75 mg/day) will be titrated 4-weekly to maintain haemoglobin in predetermined target ranges. The primary objective is to evaluate the efficacy of molidustat, using the following measures: the rate of rise in haemoglobin (g/L/week) at the first dose change up to week 8 (MIYABI HD-C); responder rate (MIYABI HD-C and MIYABI PD); mean haemoglobin level during weeks 33-36 and non-inferiority to darbepoetin alfa shown by change in mean haemoglobin level from baseline (MIYABI HD-M). The secondary objectives are to assess safety, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. These trials will provide the first evaluations of molidustat therapy in patients receiving either peritoneal dialysis or currently untreated with ESAs on haemodialysis, and provide further evidence in patients treated with ESAs on haemodialysis.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The protocols were approved by ethics committees at all participating sites. The trials will be conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and Good Clinical Practice. Results arising from these studies will be published in peer-reviewed journal(s).

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS

NCT03351166; Pre-results, NCT03418168; Pre-results, NCT03543657; Pre-results.

Economic and quality of life burden of anemia on patients with CKD on dialysis: a systematic review

Aims: The overall cost and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) associated with current treatments for chronic kidney disease (CKD)-related anemia are not well characterized. A systematic literature review (SLR) was conducted on the costs and HRQoL associated with current treatments for CKD-related anemia among dialysis-dependent (DD) patients. Materials and methods: The authors searched the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, NHS EED, and NHS HTA for English-language publications. Original studies published between January 1, 2000 and March 17, 2017 meeting the following criteria were included: adult population; study focus was CKD-related anemia; included results on patients receiving iron supplementation, red blood cell transfusion, or erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESAs); reported results on HRQoL and/or costs. Studies which included patients with DD-CKD, did not directly compare different treatments, and had designs relevant to the objective were retained. HRQoL and cost outcomes, including healthcare resource utilization (HRU), were extracted and summarized in a narrative synthesis. Results: A total of 1,625 publications were retrieved, 15 of which met all inclusion criteria. All identified studies included ESAs as a treatment of interest. Two randomized controlled trials reported that ESA treatment improves HRQoL relative to placebo. Across eight studies comparing HRQoL of patients achieving high vs low hemoglobin (Hb) targets, aiming for higher Hb targets with ESAs generally led to modest HRQoL improvements. Two studies reported that ESA-treated patients had lower costs and HRU compared to untreated patients. One study found that aiming for higher vs lower Hb targets led to reduced HRU, while two other reported that this led to a reduction in cost-effectiveness. Limitations: Heterogeneity of study designs and outcomes; a meta-analysis could not be performed. Conclusions: ESA-treated patients undergoing dialysis incurred lower costs, lower HRU, and had better HRQoL relative to ESA-untreated patients. However, treatment to higher Hb targets led to modest HRQoL improvements compared to lower Hb targets.

Cardiovascular Event Rates Among Hemodialysis Patients Across Geographical Regions-A Snapshot From The Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS)

Introduction

Cardiovascular (CV) morbidity and mortality are excessively high among hemodialysis (HD) patients. Anemia is a common complication of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and a known risk factor for CV events. To understand the impact of the recent regulatory and guideline changes in anemia management, we examined regional CV event rates in high-risk and erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA)-hyporesponsive HD patients.

Methods

A prospective cohort study including 16,560 HD patients, 8660 CV high-risk, and 884 hyporesponsive to ESAs, from the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS) phase 4 (2009-2011) and phase 5 (2012-2015) was conducted to quantify all-cause mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), and MACE plus heart failure and thromboembolic events (MACE+).

Results

The MACE+ rates (per 100 patient-years) were highest in North America (NA) (19.4; 95% CI = 18.2-20.7), followed by Europe (EU) (17.4; 95% CI = 16.6-18.1) and lowest in Japan (7.5; 95% CI = 6.9-8.1). When restricted to the high CV risk population, rates increased by 36% in NA, 45% in EU, and 72% in Japan. Mortality accounted for >74% of MACE+ events. MACE+ rates in ESA-hyporesponsive patients and high CV risk patients were similar in NA and EU cohorts. There were minimal differences in outcomes between the DOPPS phases 4 and 5.

Conclusion

Cardiovascular event rates are high in the HD population, vary by geographic region, and are substantially higher in high CV risk patients and ESA-hyporesponsive patients; however, the rates appear not to be affected by anemia guideline changes. The findings from this study will be essential to contextualize the design of future CV anemia-related outcome studies and clinical trials.

Effects of Molidustat in the Treatment of Anemia in CKD

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The efficacy and safety of molidustat, a hypoxia-inducible factor-prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor, have been evaluated in three 16-week, phase 2b studies in patients with CKD and anemia who are not on dialysis (DaIly orAL treatment increasing endOGenoUs Erythropoietin [DIALOGUE] 1 and 2) and in those who are on dialysis (DIALOGUE 4).

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

DIALOGUE 1 was a placebo-controlled, fixed-dose trial (25, 50, and 75 mg once daily; 25 and 50 mg twice daily). DIALOGUE 2 and 4 were open-label, variable-dose trials, in which treatment was switched from darbepoetin (DIAGLOGUE 2) or epoetin (DIALOGUE 4) to molidustat or continued with the original agents. Starting molidustat ranged between 25-75 and 25-150 mg daily in DIAGLOGUE 2 and 4, respectively, and could be titrated to maintain hemoglobin levels within predefined target ranges. The primary end point was the change in hemoglobin level between baseline and the mean value from the last 4 weeks of the treatment period.

RESULTS

In DIAGLOGUE 1 (n=121), molidustat treatment was associated with estimated increases in mean hemoglobin levels of 1.4-2.0 g/dl. In DIAGLOGUE 2 (n=124), hemoglobin levels were maintained within the target range after switching to molidustat, with an estimated difference in mean change in hemoglobin levels between molidustat and darbepoetin treatments of up to 0.6 g/dl. In DIAGLOGUE 4 (n=199), hemoglobin levels were maintained within the target range after switching to molidustat 75 and 150 mg, with estimated differences in mean change between molidustat and epoetin treatment of -0.1 and 0.4 g/dl. Molidustat was generally well tolerated, and most adverse events were mild or moderate in severity.

CONCLUSIONS

The overall phase 2 efficacy and safety profile of molidustat in patients with CKD and anemia enables the progression of its development into phase 3.

Anemia management in chronic kidney disease and dialysis: a narrative review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review describes the current state of anemia management with erythropoietin (EPO)-stimulating agents and iron supplementation in both chronic kidney disease and dialysis patients, with a focus on novel therapies.

RECENT FINDINGS

We review the benefits and risks of EPO-stimulating agents, focusing on health-related quality of life and the uncertainties regarding optimal iron utilization in patients with kidney disease. We discuss novel therapies for iron supplementation including iron-based phosphate binders and dialysate iron delivery as well as alternatives to EPO-stimulating agents including hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors.

SUMMARY

Individualization of hemoglobin targets using EPO-stimulating agents and iron supplementation may be considered in younger, healthier patients with kidney disease to improve health-related quality of life. Optimal iron utilization in kidney disease patients is unclear, but novel iron base phosphate binders and dialysate iron delivery may play a role in intravenous iron avoidance and its potential complications. Phase 3 randomized controlled trials of hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors are ongoing and are promising new alternatives to EPO-stimulating agents and their known adverse effects.

Optimal Serum Ferritin Levels for Iron Deficiency Anemia during Oral Iron Therapy (OIT) in Japanese Hemodialysis Patients with Minor Inflammation and Benefit of Intravenous Iron Therapy for OIT-Nonresponders

Background: We determined optimal serum ferritin for oral iron therapy (OIT) in hemodialysis (HD) patients with iron deficiency anemia (IDA)/minor inflammation, and benefit of intravenous iron therapy (IIT) for OIT-nonresponders. Methods: Inclusion criteria were IDA (Hb <120 g/L, serum ferritin <227.4 pmol/L). Exclusion criteria were inflammation (C-reactive protein (CRP) ≥ 5 mg/L), bleeding, or cancer. IIT was withheld >3 months before the study. ΔHb ≥ 20 g/L above baseline or maintaining target Hb (tHB; 120-130 g/L) was considered responsive. Fifty-one patients received OIT (ferrous fumarate, 50 mg/day) for 3 months; this continued in OIT-responders but was switched to IIT (saccharated ferric oxide, 40 mg/week) in OIT-nonresponders for 4 months. All received continuous erythropoietin receptor activator (CERA). Hb, ferritin, hepcidin-25, and CERA dose were measured. Results: Demographics before OIT were similar between OIT-responders and OIT-nonresponders except low Hb and high triglycerides in OIT-nonresponders. Thirty-nine were OIT-responders with reduced CERA dose. Hb rose with a peak at 5 months. Ferritin and hepcidin-25 continuously increased. Hb positively correlated with ferritin in OIT-responders (r = 0.913, p = 0.03) till 5 months after OIT. The correlation equation estimated optimal ferritin of 30-40 ng/mL using tHb (120-130 g/L). Seven OIT-nonresponders were IIT-responders. Conclusions: Optimal serum ferritin for OIT is 67.4-89.9 pmol/L in HD patients with IDA/minor inflammation. IIT may be a second line of treatment for OIT-nonreponders.

Raising awareness on the therapeutic role of cholecalciferol in CKD: a multidisciplinary-based opinion

Vitamin D is recognized to play an essential role in health and disease. In kidney disease, vitamin D analogs have gained recognition for their involvement and potential therapeutic importance. Nephrologists are aware of the use of oral native vitamin D supplementation, however, uncertainty still exists with regard to the use of this treatment option in chronic kidney disease as well as clinical settings related to chronic kidney disease, where vitamin D supplementation may be an appropriate therapeutic choice. Two consecutive meetings were held in Florence in July and November 2016 comprising six experts in kidney disease (N = 3) and bone mineral metabolism (N = 3) to discuss a range of unresolved issues related to the use of cholecalciferol in chronic kidney disease. The panel focused on the following six key areas where issues relating to the use of oral vitamin D remain controversial: (1) vitamin D and parathyroid hormone levels in the general population, (2) cholecalciferol in chronic kidney disease, (3) vitamin D in cardiovascular disease, (4) vitamin D and renal bone disease, (5) vitamin D in rheumatological diseases affecting the kidney, (6) vitamin D and kidney transplantation.

Hemodialysis Disparities in African Americans: The Deeply Integrated Concept of Race in the Social Fabric of Our Society

End-stage renal disease (ESRD) is one of the starkest examples of racial/ethnic disparities in health. Racial/ethnic minorities are 1.5 to nearly 4 times more likely than their non-Hispanic White counterparts to require renal replacement therapy (RRT), with African Americans suffering from the highest rates of ESRD. Despite improvements over the last 25 years, substantial racial differences are persistent in dialysis quality measures such as RRT modality options, dialysis adequacy, anemia, mineral and bone disease, vascular access, and pre-ESRD care. This report will outline the current status of racial disparities in key ESRD quality measures and explore the impact of race. While the term race represents a social construct, its association with health is more complex. Multiple individual and community level social determinants of health are defined by the social positioning of race in the U.S., while biologic differences may reflect distinct epigenetic changes and linkages to ancestral geographic origins. Together, these factors conspire to influence dialysis outcomes among African Americans with ESRD.