AGA Technical Review on the Medical Management of Moderate to Severe Luminal and Perianal Fistulizing Crohn's Disease

Advancements in Targeted Therapies for the Management of Crohn's Disease: A Comprehensive Review

Crohn's disease (CD) is a complex clinical condition characterized by persistent gastrointestinal inflammation that leads to episodes of flare-ups and subsequent healing. The treatment options for this disease are heterogeneous as its impact on different patients is also different. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of recently approved drugs that specifically target certain pathways within cells that are involved in CD pathogenesis. These medicines include biologics like anti-TNF agents, interleukin inhibitors, and small molecule inhibitors; they work by altering the modulation of immune responses and reducing inflammation. These drugs seem promising in terms of inducing remission in moderate to severe CD among various patient populations. Conversely, it is possible to examine how well these drugs perform using gene expression and molecular markers. By understanding these results along with other ongoing trials, personalized medicine can be used more frequently by doctors who will adopt a strategy for an individual patient, maximizing benefits while minimizing adverse effects. There are still some issues that need to be worked out like the high cost associated with these drugs or immunogenicity risk and infectious complications too. In conclusion, there has been a remarkable improvement in CD management over the past decade with customized drugs leading toward a precision medical era. Further understanding of molecular mechanisms implicated in CD pathogenesis and new therapeutic approaches could potentially improve treatment outcomes among affected individuals. This research is crucial in understanding how CD therapeutics are changing, thus facilitating selection by doctors on the most appropriate methods for individualized patient care.

Diagnosis and management of inflammatory bowel disease

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic and relapsing immune-mediated disease of the gastrointestinal tract with a gradually increasing global incidence and prevalence. A prolonged course of IBD leads to a decline in patient quality of life and the creation of a substantial economic burden on society. Owing to the lack of specific diagnostic markers, the diagnosis of IBD still needs a gold standard based on a combination of clinical manifestations, imaging, laboratory, and endoscopic results. Accordingly, the current goals of IBD treatment are to alleviate clinical symptoms and reduce recurrence rates. Therefore, it is imperative to develop a standard set of procedures to diagnose and treat IBD. In this review, we summarize prominent and emerging studies, outline classical and contemporary approaches to diagnosing and managing IBD, and integrate multiple guidelines. Furthermore, we propose the possibility of establishing an early and comprehensive diagnostic workflow and personalized management strategy in the future. We aim to enhance the quality and standardization of diagnostic and treatment procedures for IBD.

Trends in Targeted Therapy Usage in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: TRENDY Study of ENEIDA

Markers that allow for the selection of tailored treatments for individual patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) are yet to be identified. Our aim was to describe trends in real-life treatment usage. For this purpose, patients from the ENEIDA registry who received their first targeted IBD treatment (biologics or tofacitinib) between 2015 and 2021 were included. A subsequent analysis with Machine Learning models was performed. The study included 10,009 patients [71% with Crohn's disease (CD) and 29% with ulcerative colitis (UC)]. In CD, anti-TNF (predominantly adalimumab) were the main agents in the 1st line of treatment (LoT), although their use declined over time. In UC, anti-TNF (mainly infliximab) use was predominant in 1st LoT, remaining stable over time. Ustekinumab and vedolizumab were the most prescribed drugs in 2nd and 3rd LoT in CD and UC, respectively. Overall, the use of biosimilars increased over time. Machine Learning failed to identify a model capable of predicting treatment patterns. In conclusion, drug positioning is different in CD and UC. Anti-TNF were the most used drugs in IBD 1st LoT, being adalimumab predominant in CD and infliximab in UC. Ustekinumab and vedolizumab have gained importance in CD and UC, respectively. The approval of biosimilars had a significant impact on treatment.

Prevalence, incidence, and treatment patterns of fistulizing Crohn disease: A US population-based cohort study

BACKGROUND

Population-based studies for patients with fistulizing Crohn disease (CD), a severe complication of CD, are limited.

OBJECTIVE

To report estimates of the prevalence and incidence rates of fistulizing CD in the United States and examine associated treatment patterns among incident cases.

METHODS

This retrospective, observational cohort study used a US administrative claims database from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2019, with at least 365 days' continuous insurance enrollment. The prevalent patient population comprised patients with incident or existing cases of fistulizing CD. Crude, age, and sex-adjusted prevalence and incidence rates of fistulizing CD were estimated. Baseline characteristics, comorbidities, and CD-related medications and medical procedures were examined for patients with fistulizing CD.

RESULTS

The overall crude prevalence (prevalent cases: n = 5,082) and incidence rates (incident cases: n = 2,399) between 2017 and 2019 were 25.2 (95% CI = 24.5-25.9) per 100,000 persons and 6.9 (95% CI = 6.6-7.1) per 100,000 person-years, respectively. Age- and sex-adjusted prevalence and incidence rates were 24.9 (95% CI = 24.2-25.6) per 100,000 persons and 7.0 (95% CI = 6.7-7.3) per 100,000 person-years, respectively. Approximately half of all patients with incident fistulizing CD were prescribed biologic therapies within 1 year of an incident fistula diagnosis, with anti-tumor necrosis factor therapies the most widely prescribed biologic class; antibiotic and corticosteroid use was also common. Among the incident cases, approximately one-third of patients required surgery during the follow-up period, most of which occurred within 3 months of the index date.

CONCLUSIONS

This study reports age- and sex-adjusted prevalence and incidence rates for fistulizing CD of 24.9 per 100,000 persons and 7.0 per 100,000 person-years, respectively. As a concerning complication of CD, first-year treatment of fistulas in the United States commonly includes anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy, and there is a considerable surgical burden.

Common Instances of Low-value Care in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

Value-based care focuses on improving the quality, effectiveness, and efficiency of health care while controlling costs. Low-value care implies services or interventions that provide little or no benefit to patients, have the potential to cause harm, incur unnecessary cost to patients, or waste limited health care resources. In this review, we discuss common instances of low-value care along the spectrum of management in inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). These include low value care in: (1) diagnosis and monitoring of IBD: utilization of serological markers to screen and diagnose IBD, over-reliance on symptoms for monitoring disease, failure to employ treat-to-target strategies in symptomatic patients with IBD, and annual surveillance colonoscopies in patients at low risk of developing dysplasia; (2) treatment of IBD: use of 5-aminosalicylates in Crohn's disease, continuation of 5-aminosalicylates after escalation to immunosuppressive therapy, chronic corticosteroid use without steroid-sparing strategies, step therapy for Crohn's disease, failure to optimize tumor necrosis factor antagonists in patients with active disease and subsequently de-intensification of therapies in those who have achieved stable remission; and (3) management of hospitalized patients with IBD: routine cross-sectional imaging for patients with IBD presenting to the emergency department, withholding pharmacological prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism in patients hospitalized with IBD flare, and prolonged use of high-dose intravenous corticosteroids in patients with acute severe ulcerative colitis. This review is meant to bring attention to value-based care in IBD and provide guidance to treating practitioners. Future studies on systematic evaluation of high- and low-value care in patients with IBD are warranted.

Effectiveness and safety of vedolizumab and infliximab in biologic-naive patients with Crohn's disease: results from the EVOLVE study

OBJECTIVES

This study compared the real-world effectiveness and safety of α 4 β 7 -integrin inhibitor vedolizumab and anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (anti-TNFα) inhibitor infliximab in biologic-naive patients with Crohn's disease (CD).

METHODS

EVOLVE was a retrospective, multicenter, medical chart review of biologic-naive adults with inflammatory bowel disease receiving vedolizumab or anti-TNFα treatment as first-line biologics in Canada, Greece, and the USA. Twelve-month outcomes were analyzed in vedolizumab- or infliximab-treated patients with moderate-to-severe CD (and subgroups with complicated and noncomplicated CD) including cumulative rates of clinical response, clinical remission, and mucosal healing, and incidence rates of serious adverse events (SAEs) and serious infections (SIs). Inverse probability weighting (IPW) was used to account for baseline differences between treatment groups.

RESULTS

Data were analyzed from 167 patients. In the IPW dataset (99 vedolizumab-treated and 63 infliximab-treated), adjusted 12-month clinical remission rates were 73.1% and 55.2%, respectively ( P  = 0.31). Overall, effectiveness rates were similar across treatment and complicated/noncomplicated disease subgroups. Adjusted 12-month incidence rates (first occurrence/1000 person-years) of SAEs for vedolizumab vs. infliximab: 43.6 vs. 200.9 [hazard ratio (HR) 0.36 (0.09-1.54)]; SIs: 10.8 vs. 96.0 [HR 0.08 (<0.01-2.64)]. AE incidence was significantly lower in vedolizumab- vs. infliximab-treated patients for complicated [131.6 vs. 732.2; HR 0.19 (0.05-0.65)] and noncomplicated [276.3 vs. 494.8; HR 0.59 (0.35-0.99)] disease subgroups.

CONCLUSION

These real-world data on first-line biologics show no differences in 12-month effectiveness outcomes for vedolizumab- vs. infliximab-treated biologic-naive patients with CD. Vedolizumab may have a more favorable safety profile vs. infliximab in patients with complicated and noncomplicated disease.

Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes in Vedolizumab- and Ustekinumab-Exposed Pregnancies: Results From the PIANO Registry

BACKGROUND

Pregnancy outcomes in patients with inflammatory bowel disease with quiescent disease are similar to those in the general population. Data from the Pregnancy Inflammatory bowel disease And Neonatal Outcomes registry have demonstrated the safety of antitumor necrosis factor (TNF) α agents and thiopurines in pregnancy. The objective of this study was to provide information from the Pregnancy Inflammatory bowel disease And Neonatal Outcomes registry on maternal and fetal outcomes in patients exposed to the newer biologics ustekinumab (UST) and vedolizumab (VDZ).

METHODS

In this multicenter prospective observational study, we included pregnant women with singleton pregnancies and a diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease. Questionnaires were administered to women at study intake, each subsequent trimester, delivery, and 4, 9, and 12 months after birth. Bivariate analyses were used to determine the independent effects of specific drug classes on outcomes. The exposure cohorts were VDZ, UST, anti-TNF, immunomodulators, and combination with anti-TNF and immunomodulators. All were compared with no exposure and with biologics/immunomodulators.

RESULTS

There were 1,669 completed pregnancies with 1,610 live births. The maternal mean age was 32.1 (SD 4.6) years at delivery with 66 VDZ exposed and 47 UST exposed. Women on UST were more likely to have Crohn's disease. There was no increased risk of spontaneous abortion, small for gestational age, low birth weight, neonatal intensive care unit stay, congenital malformations, or intrauterine growth restriction with in utero VDZ or UST exposure. The rate of preterm birth was lower (0.0%) for the UST-exposed cohort when compared with other cohorts including VDZ (13.8%), anti-TNF (8.2%), combination therapy (14.2%), immunomodulators (12.3%), and unexposed (9.7%) ( P = 0.03). Rates of serious infections at birth, 4 months, and within the first 12 months of life were comparable among all cohorts. Nonserious infections were lower at 12 months in UST-exposed pregnancies. There was no increased risk signal for placental complications in the VDZ cohort. UST infant concentrations at birth were increased whereas VDZ concentrations were overall decreased compared with maternal serum drug concentration.

DISCUSSION

This analysis of UST and VDZ exposure during pregnancy suggests no increase in complications compared with TNF, immunomodulators, and combination TNF/immunomodulators. No signal was found for increased placental events with either therapy. Continuation of UST and VDZ throughout pregnancy is recommended.

Impact of Concomitant 5-Aminosalicylic Acid Therapy on Vedolizumab Efficacy and Safety in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Post Hoc Analyses of Clinical Trial Data

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The benefit of continuing 5-aminosalicylic acid [5-ASA] treatment when escalating to advanced therapies in patients with inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] is unclear. Vedolizumab is a gut-selective monoclonal anti-α4β7-integrin antibody used to treat moderate to severe IBD. Clinical trial data were analysed post hoc to assess the impact of 5-ASA co-treatment on vedolizumab efficacy and safety in patients with IBD.

METHODS

Data were analysed from patients aged 18-80 years with moderate to severe ulcerative colitis [UC]/Crohn's disease [CD] receiving intravenous [IV]/subcutaneous [SC] vedolizumab. Efficacy data were from four studies [GEMINI 1 and 2 and VISIBLE 1 and 2]; safety data were from seven studies [GEMINI 1‒3 and long-term, VISIBLE 1, 2, and open-label extension]. The impact of 5-ASA co-treatment on clinical and endoscopic outcomes at Weeks 6 and 52 was assessed using multivariate analysis (adjusted odds ratios [aORs] with 95% confidence intervals [CIs]).

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in UC clinical remission [Mayo score ≤2, no subscore >1] rates with vs without 5-ASA at Week 6 [20.7% vs 20.4%, respectively; aOR 0.77, 95% CI 0.43-1.38] or at Week 52 [45.1% vs 40.6%; aOR 1.14, 0.70-1.86], and in CD clinical remission [CD activity index score ≤150] rates at Week 6 [41.4% vs 35.1%; 1.26, 0.86-1.85] or at Week 52 [49.6% vs 37.8%; 1.35, 0.91-1.99]. The incidence of enteric and all infections in vedolizumab IV/SC-treated patients was low with and without 5-ASA.

CONCLUSION

Continuation of concomitant oral 5-ASA after starting vedolizumab had no significant impact on clinical and endoscopic outcomes.

CLINICAL TRIAL IDENTIFIERS

GEMINI 1: NCT00783718, EudraCT 2008-002782-32; GEMINI 2: NCT00783692, EudraCT 2008-00278-33; GEMINI 3: NCT01224171, EudraCT 2009-016488-12; GEMINI long-term safety study: NCT00790933, EudraCT 2008-002784-14; VISIBLE 1: NCT02611830, EudraCT 2015-000480-14; VISIBLE 2: NCT02611817, EudraCT 2015-000481-58; VISIBLE open-label extension: NCT02620046, EudraCT 2015-000482-31.

Case report: A pregnant woman with Crohn disease who used ustekinumab to the 3rd trimester developed severe infection

RATIONALE

Crohn disease (CD) and pregnancy often impact each other, which poses challenges for women with CD to successfully give birth to a healthy baby. The latest guideline recommends that patients with active inflammatory bowel disease delay pregnancy to induce remission and optimize disease control. Research data has showed that the incidence of infection and severe infection in patients treated with ustekinumab (UST) did not increase compared to those treated with a placebo.

PATIENT CONCERNS

This report describes the entire process of a pregnant woman with CD who has undergone ileostomy and long-term enteral nutrition and requires biological agents to control the disease, from conception to delivery. This case was pregnant during CD period and regularly treated with UST to the third trimester, with the onset of sepsis and septic shock at 38 weeks gestation.

DIAGNOSES

The patient was pathologically diagnosed with CD 16 years ago and admitted to our department at 38 weeks gestation.

INTERVENTIONS

After admission to our department, fetal heart monitoring indicated fetal distress, so we immediately terminated the pregnancy by cesarean section. After the diagnosis of septic shock, the patient was transferred to intensive care unit for active anti-infection and symptomatic supportive treatment.

OUTCOMES

The mother only experienced an infection in the third trimester, and cured by active treatment. The newborn was delivered at full term and confirmed to be low birth weight.

LESSONS

Her experience suggests that although pregnant during Crohn active period, a good outcome can be achieved through positively controlling with medication and closely monitoring it. The use of UST during pregnancy appears to be safe for both the mother and fetus but may be associated with severe infections.

Superior Efficacy of Infliximab Versus Adalimumab for First-Line Treatment of Crohn's Perianal Fistulae

BACKGROUND

Crohn's disease perianal fistulae (CD-PAF) occur in 25% of patients and are notoriously challenging to manage. Tumor necrosis factor inhibitors are first line agents.

AIMS

The aim of this study was to compare infliximab (IFX) versus adalimumab (ADA) efficacy in CD-PAF healing over time.

METHODS

A retrospective study at two large-tertiary medical centers was performed. Inclusion criteria were actively draining CD-PAF and initial treatment with IFX or ADA following CD-PAF diagnosis. The primary endpoints were perianal fistula response and remission at 6 and 12 months. Secondary endpoints included biologic persistence over time and dose escalation at 6 and 12 months.

RESULTS

Among 151 patients included in the study, 92 received IFX and 59 received ADA as first line agents after CD-PAF diagnosis. At 6 months, the 64.9% of the IFX group and 34.8% of the ADA group demonstrated CD-PAF clinical improvement (p < 0.01). Univariate and multivariate analyses demonstrated significant differences among the IFX and ADA groups for clinical response at 6-months and 12-months (p = 0.002 and p = 0.042, respectively). There were no factors that predicted response, with the exception of concomitant immunomodulator affecting the 6-month clinical response (p = 0.021). Biologic persistence, characterized by Kaplan Meier methods, was significantly longer in the IFX group compared to the ADA group (Log-rank p = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

IFX induction and maintenance is associated with higher rates of response and remission in CD-PAF healing as well as higher treatment persistence compared to ADA. Additionally, our study supports the use of concomitant immunomodulator therapy for CD-PAF healing and remission.

Development and validation of multiparametric models based on computed tomography enterography to determine endoscopic activity and surgical risk in patients with Crohn's disease: A multi-center study

Objective

To develop novel multiparametric models based on computed tomography enterography (CTE) scores to identify endoscopic activity and surgical risk in patients with Crohn's disease (CD).

Methods

We analyzed 171 patients from 3 hospitals. Correlations between CTE outcomes and endoscopic scores were assessed using Spearman's rank correlation analysis. Predictive models for moderate to severe CD were developed, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed to determine the area under the ROC curve (AUC). A combined nomogram based on CTE scores and clinical variables was also developed for predicting moderate to severe CD and surgery.

Results

CTE scores were significantly correlated with endoscopy scores at the segment level. The global CTE score was an independent predictor of severe (HR = 1.231, 95% CI: 1.048-1.446, p = 0.012) and moderate-to-severe Simplified Endoscopic Scores for Crohn's Disease (SES-CD) (HR = 1.202, 95% CI: 1.090-1.325, p < 0.001). The nomogram integrating CTE and clinical data predicted moderate to severe SES-CD and severe SES-CD scores in the validation cohort with AUCs of 0.837 and 0.807, respectively. The CTE score (HR = 1.18; 95% CI: 1.103-1.262; p = 0.001) and SES-CD score (HR = 3.125, 95% CI: 1.542-6.33; p = 0.001) were independent prognostic factors for surgery-free survival. A prognostic nomogram incorporating CTE scores, SES-CD and C-reactive protein (CRP) accurately predicted the risk of surgery in patients with CD.

Conclusion

The newly developed CTE score and multiparametric models displayed high accuracy in predicting moderate to severe CD and surgical risk for CD patients.

Comparative Safety and Effectiveness of Biologic Therapy for Crohn's Disease: A CA-IBD Cohort Study

BACKGROUND & AIMS

We compared the safety and effectiveness of tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) antagonists vs vedolizumab vs ustekinumab in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) in a multicenter cohort (CA-IBD).

METHODS

We created an electronic health record-based cohort of adult patients with CD who were initiating a new biologic agent (TNF-α antagonists, ustekinumab, vedolizumab) from 5 health systems in California between 2010 and 2017. We compared the risk of serious infections (safety) and all-cause hospitalization and inflammatory bowel disease-related surgery (effectiveness) between different biologic classes using propensity score (PS) matching.

RESULTS

As compared with TNF-α antagonists (n = 1030), 2:1 PS-matched, ustekinumab-treated patients with CD (n = 515) experienced a lower risk of serious infections (hazard ratio [HR], 0.36; 95% CI, 0.20-0.64), without any difference in the risk of hospitalization (HR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.89-1.21) or surgery (HR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.69-1.70). Compared with vedolizumab (n = 221), 1:1 PS-matched, ustekinumab-treated patients with CD (n = 221) experienced a lower risk of serious infections (HR, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.07-0.60), without significant differences in risk of hospitalization (HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.54-1.07) or surgery (HR, 1.42; 95% CI, 0.54-3.72). Compared with TNF-α antagonists (n = 442), 2:1 PS-matched, vedolizumab-treated patients with CD (n = 221) had a similar risk of serious infections (HR, 1.53; 95% CI, 0.84-2.78), hospitalization (HR, 1.32; 95% CI, 0.98-1.77), and surgery (HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.27-1.47). High comorbidity burden, concomitant opiate use, and prior hospitalization were associated with serious infections and hospitalization in biologic-treated patients with CD.

CONCLUSION

In a multicenter cohort of biologic-treated patients with CD, ustekinumab was associated with a lower risk of serious infections compared with TNF-α antagonists and vedolizumab, without any differences in risk of hospitalization or surgery. The risk of serious infections was similar for TNF-α antagonists vs vedolizumab.

Rates and Predictors of Long-term Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Perianal Crohn's Disease on Biologic Therapy

BACKGROUND AND GOALS

Perianal Crohn's disease (pCD) represents an aggressive phenotype with limited studies on long-term outcomes. We evaluated 5-year outcomes of these patients on biologic therapies.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with pCD at a tertiary medical center. We used Kaplan-Meier curves to estimate rates and multivariate logistic regression to identify predictors of long-term outcomes.

RESULTS

We included 311 patients with pCD of which 168 patients were started on biologics [138 anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) α, 14 vedolizumab, 16 ustekinumab] at the time of diagnosis. Anti-TNF use at the time of diagnosis was associated with decreased rates of perianal abscess recurrence [hazard ratio (HR)=0.48, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.32-0.74], whereas ustekinumab use was associated with increased rates of perianal fistula closure (HR=3.58, 95% CI: 1.04-12.35) and decreased rates of perianal abscess recurrence (HR=0.20, 95% CI: 0.07-0.56) at follow-up. Among patients who failed their first anti-TNF, switching to another anti-TNF was associated with decreased rates of colectomy (HR=0.20, 95% CI: 0.04-0.90) and permanent diversion (HR=0.16, 95% CI: 0.03-0.94) compared with ustekinumab, whereas vedolizumab use was associated with decreased perianal fistula closure (HR=0.22, 95% CI: 0.05-0.96) compared with ustekinumab. Predictors of colectomy included colonic disease (odds ratio=2.71, 95% CI: 1.36-5.38) and anal stenosis (odds ratio=4.44, 95% CI: 1.59-12.43).

CONCLUSION

Type of biologic use at the time of pCD diagnosis or after first anti-TNF failure may be associated with long-term outcomes in patients with pCD.

Prioritization in inflammatory bowel disease therapy

INTRODUCTION

Most guidelines for IBD still recommend step-by-step therapy with initially classic drugs such aminosalicylates (in ulcerative colitis) or steroids but avoid prioritizing certain biological drugs and JAK inhibitors in the complicated course. This review provides an aid to pending therapy decisions.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, we analyze the evidence for Crohn's disease as well as ulcerative colitis in order to optimize and 'personalize' the choice of therapy, especially in difficult cases. The relevant publications in Pubmed were identified in a continuous literature review with the key words 'Crohn´s disease' and 'ulcerative colitis.'

EXPERT OPINION

Based on this complex data set following standard therapies steroid-refractory Crohn´s disease should preferentially be treated with combined infliximab plus azathioprine or risankizumab, in second line after their failure with ustekinumab or 7adalimumab. In steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis infliximab plus azathioprine or upadacitinib should be preferred in first line, filgotinib, tofacitinib or ustekinumab in second line. A steroid-dependent course in both diseases requires azathioprine or vedolizumab, in second line infliximab or Janus kinase inhibitors. The conclusions drawn from these complex data may be helpful for individual decision making in daily clinical practice.

Prognostic factors for the efficacy of infliximab in patients with luminal fistulizing Crohn's disease

BACKGROUND

Enteric fistula is one of the penetrating features in Crohn's disease (CD). This study aimed to clarify the prognostic factors for the efficacy of infliximab (IFX) treatment in luminal fistulizing CD patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively included 26 cases diagnosed with luminal fistulizing CD hospitalized in our medical center from 2013 to 2021. The primary outcome of our research was defined as death from all causes and undergoing of any relevant abdominal surgery. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to describe overall survival. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify prognostic factors. A predictive model was constructed using Cox proportional hazard model.

RESULTS

The median follow-up time was 17.5 months (range 6-124 months). The 1- and 2-year surgery-free survival rates were 68.1% and 63.2%, respectively. In the univariate analysis, the efficacy of IFX treatment at 6 months after initiation (P < 0.001, HR 0.23, 95% CI 0.01-0.72) and the existence of complex fistula (P = 0.047, HR 4.11, 95% CI 1.01-16.71) was found significantly related to the overall surgery-free survival, while disease activity at baseline (P = 0.099) also showed predictive potential. The multivariate analysis showed that efficacy at 6 months (P = 0.010) was an independent prognostic factor. The C-index of the model for surgery-free survival was 0.923 (P < 0.001), indicating an acceptable predictive effect.

CONCLUSION

Prognostic model including the existence of complex fistula, disease activity at baseline and efficacy of IFX at 6 months may be useful to predict long-term outcome of luminal fistulizing CD patients.

Effectiveness and safety of ustekinumab in bio-naïve Crohn's disease patients: a multicentre observational retrospective study

Background

Clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of ustekinumab in Crohn's disease (CD). However, more data are necessary on the effectiveness of ustekinumab in bio-naïve patients in real-life studies.

Objectives

The aim of our study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of ustekinumab in patients with CD refractory or intolerant to conventional therapy and without previous exposure to biological drugs.

Design

We performed a nationwide, observational, retrospective, multicentre study including patients with CD, in which ustekinumab was used as the first biological drug.

Methods

The corticosteroid-free clinical and biological response and remission were analysed at weeks 16, 24, 52 and 72. Clinical remission was defined as Harvey-Bradshaw index ⩽ 4 and biological remission as a faecal calprotectin (FC) <250 mg/g and C-reactive protein (CRP) <5 mg/L. Moreover, the persistence of the treatment and any adverse events were assessed.

Results

In all, 84 patients were included in the study, males and females were equally distributed, with a median age of 63 years [interquartile range (IQR): 51-75] and a median disease duration of 6.8 years [IQR: 3.6-17.0]. The majority (86.9%) of patients were treated with ustekinumab as monotherapy, without concomitant immunosuppressive medication. The proportion of patients in corticosteroid-free clinical remission or response at weeks 16, 24, 52 and 72 was 93.3% (56/60), 86.8% (46/53), 82.2% (37/45) and 71.4% (30/42), respectively. CRP returned to normal values in 47.6%, 43.2%, 50% and 52.4% of patients at weeks 16, 24, 52 and 72, respectively. Similarly, FC was normalized in 45.5%, 45.5%, 48.6% and 50% of patients at weeks 16, 24, 52 and 72, respectively. The cumulative probability of remaining on ustekinumab treatment was 84.8% (95% confidence interval: 73.3-91.6) after 72 weeks. Ustekinumab was discontinued in 10 patients (11.9%) within 72 weeks of follow-up. Reasons for discontinuing treatment were lack of response (n = 4), adverse events (n = 4) and death (n = 2). There were no discontinuations because of stable remission.

Conclusions

Ustekinumab was effective and safe in Spanish bio-naïve CD patients, showing a quicker and more durable response than obtained in patients with previous biological treatment. In this cohort of bio-naïve patients starting on ustekinumab, the average age was high.

Plain language summary

Effectiveness and safety of ustekinumab in Crohn's disease patients not previously exposed to other biological therapies Evidence on the use of ustekinumab in biological naïve real-world patients is scarce. Here, we present real-world data evaluating the effectiveness and safety of ustekinumab in 84 bio-naïve patients from 17 Spanish hospitals. We report high rates of both clinical and biological remission. Moreover, after 1 year, 90.4% of patients remained being treated with ustekinumab. The safety profile of ustekinumab in these patient population was favourable. In conclusion, our results show that in patients with CD, ustekinumab could be considered as first-line therapy.

Effectiveness and safety of risankizumab induction therapy for 100 patients with Crohn's disease: A GETAID multicentre cohort study

BACKGROUND

Phase III trials have demonstrated the efficacy of risankizumab in moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease (CD), but no real-world data are currently available. We aimed to assess the short-term effectiveness and safety of risankizumab in patients with CD.

METHODS

From May 2021 to May 2022, all patients with refractory luminal CD treated with risankizumab in 22 French GETAID centres were retrospectively included. The primary endpoint was steroid-free clinical remission at week 12 (Harvey-Bradshaw [HB] score <5). Secondary endpoints included clinical response (≥3-point decrease of HB score and/or (HB) score <5), biochemical remission (CRP ≤ 5 mg/L), need for CD-related surgery and adverse events.

RESULTS

Among the 100 patients included, all have been previously exposed to anti-TNF agents, 94 to vedolizumab, 98 to ustekinumab (all exposed to at least three biologics) and 61 had a previous intestinal resection. All but three (97%) received a 600 mg risankizumab intravenous induction at weeks 0-4-8. At week 12, steroid-free clinical remission was observed in 45.8% of patients, clinical remission in 58% and clinical response in 78.5%. In subgroup analysis restricted to patients with objective signs of inflammation at baseline (n = 79), steroid-free clinical remission at week 12 was observed in 39.2% of patients. Biochemical remission was observed in 50% of patients. Six patients discontinued risankizumab before the week 12 visit due to lack of efficacy. CD-related hospitalisation was needed in six patients, and three underwent intestinal resection. In multivariable analysis, only a history of ustekinumab loss of response (vs primary failure) (odds ratio (OR), 2.80; 95% CI: 1.07-7.82; p = 0.041) was significantly associated with clinical remission at week 12. Twenty adverse events (AE) occurred in 20 patients including 7 serious AE corresponding to 6 CD exacerbation and one severe hypertension.

CONCLUSION

In a cohort of highly refractory patients with luminal CD and multiple prior drug failures including ustekinumab, risankizumab induction provided a clinical response in about 3 out of 4 patients and steroid-free clinical remission in about half of patients.

Korean clinical practice guidelines on biologics for moderate to severe Crohn's disease

Crohn's disease (CD) is a relapsing and progressive condition characterized by diarrhea, abdominal pain, weight loss, and hematochezia that results in serious complications such as perforations, fistulas, and abscesses. Various medications, interventions, and surgical treatments have been used to treat CD. The Korean guidelines for CD management were distributed in 2012 and revised in 2017 by the Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) Research Group of the Korean Association for the Study of Intestinal Diseases. Substantial progress in mucosal immunologic research has elucidated the pathophysiology of IBD, leading to development of biological agents for treatment of CD. The first developed biologic agent, tumor necrosis factor-α agents, were shown to be efficacious in CD, heralding a new era in management of CD. Subsequently, vedolizumab, a monoclonal antibody against integrin α4β7, and ustekinumab, a human monoclonal antibody that inhibits the common p40 subunit of interleukin-12 and interleukin-23, were both approved for clinical use and are efficacious and safe for both induction and maintenance of remission in moderate-to-severe CD patients. Moreover, a recent study showed the non-inferiority of CT-P13, an infliximab biosimilar, compared with infliximab in CD patients. The third Korean guidelines for CD management provide updated information regarding treatment of moderate-to-severe CD patients with biologic agents.

Ustekinumab and Vedolizumab Are Not Associated With Subsequent Cancer in IBD Patients with Prior Malignancy

BACKGROUND

There is little data regarding the risk of new or recurrent cancer in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and a prior history of cancer who are exposed to ustekinumab or vedolizumab. We assessed the risk of subsequent cancer in patients exposed to these agents.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients with IBD and a history of cancer at an academic medical center between January 2013 and December 2020. We collected data on demographics, IBD and cancer disease characteristics, and drug exposures. The primary exposure was immunosuppressive therapy after diagnosis of cancer. The primary outcome was interval development of new or recurrent cancer.

RESULTS

Of 390 patients with IBD and a previous history of cancer, 37 were exposed to vedolizumab, 14 ustekinumab, 41 antitumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF), and 31 immunomodulator; and 267 were not exposed to immunosuppression following cancer diagnosis. During a total median follow-up time of 52 months, 81 (20%) patients developed subsequent cancer: 6 (16%) were exposed to vedolizumab, 2 (14%) to ustekinumab, 3 (10%) to immunomodulators, 12 (29%) to anti-TNF, and 56 (21%) with no immunosuppression (P = .41). In a multivariable Cox model adjusting for age, IBD subtype, smoking, cancer recurrence risk, and cancer stage, there was no increase in subsequent cancer with vedolizumab (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.36; 95% CI, 0.27-7.01) or ustekinumab (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.17-5.41). Patients with more than 1 biologic exposure also did not have an increased risk of subsequent cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

Exposure to ustekinumab or vedolizumab in patients with IBD and a prior history of cancer does not appear to be associated with an increased risk of subsequent new or recurrent cancer.

Association of neutrophil extracellular traps with fistula healing in patients with complex perianal fistulising Crohn's disease

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Perianal fistulising Crohn's disease (pfCD) is a disabling phenotype of Crohn's disease (CD) with suboptimal outcomes. We assessed neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) in perianal fistulas and implicated their roles in pfCD healing.

METHODS

Patients with complex pfCD who developed preplaced seton drainage were recruited during the verified maintenance of remission in CD. Fistula tracts were sampled during definitive surgery plus seton removal. Patient demographics, CD classification, medication strategy, and healing of pfCD were recorded. RNA sequencing was applied for transcriptomic profile analysis. NETs components, including myeloperoxidase (MPO), neutrophil elastase (NE), and citrullinated histone H3 (CitH3), were identified using immunofluorescence. Serum infliximab (IFX), anti-IFX antibodies, and tissue levels of IFX, adalimumab (ADA), MPO and CitH3 were determined using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. Peptidyl arginine deiminase IV (PAD4), tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α, and NE were detected using immunohistochemistry. Gene expression levels of PAD family members were assessed with qPCR.

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients were included, 15 of whom adopted IFX as maintenance treatment. RNA-seq revealed difference in neutrophil associated pathways between unhealed and healed fistulas. NETs components (MPO/NE/CitH3) were detectable in the fistulas and were parallel with the PAD4 levels. Eleven of 21 (52%) patients experienced complete healing of the pfCD 108 weeks post-operatively. Fistula NETs were significantly increased in patients with unhealed pfCD. Increased NETs were associated with abundant TNF-α production and the absence of IFX in fistulas.

CONCLUSIONS

NETs exist in pfCD fistulas, which are associated with unhealed post-operative fistulas in pfCD, suggesting their prognostic roles in pfCD.

Risk of Infections With Ustekinumab and Tofacitinib Compared to Tumor Necrosis Factor α Antagonists in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The comparative safety of therapies is important to inform relative positioning within the therapeutic algorithm. Tumor necrosis factor α antagonists (anti-TNF) are associated with an increased risk of infections. Whether there is a similar increase with ustekinumab (UST) or tofacitinib has not been established.

METHODS

We identified patients with Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis from a national commercial health insurance plan in the United States between 2008 and 2019. Infectious outcomes were ascertained for patients newly initiating anti-TNF, UST, or tofacitinib therapy. Cox proportional hazards models were fit in propensity score-weighted cohorts to compare rates between patients treated with UST or tofacitinib and anti-TNF therapy.

RESULTS

Our study included 19,096, 2420, and 305 patients with inflammatory bowel disease initiating anti-TNF, UST, and tofacitinib therapy, respectively. Over follow-up on-treatment, 7% and 44% of anti-TNF patients had infection-related hospitalizations and developed infections, respectively, compared with 4% and 32% of UST patients and 6% and 41% of tofacitinib patients. In the weighted Cox analysis, UST was associated with a significantly lower risk of infection (hazard ratio [HR], 0.93; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.86-0.99) compared with anti-TNF therapy. There was a trend towards a reduction in infection-related hospitalizations (HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.66-1.03). The risk of infections (HR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.75-1.24) or infection-related hospitalizations (HR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.27-1.05) were similar between patients on tofacitinib and anti-TNF.

CONCLUSIONS

UST is associated with reduced risk of infections compared to anti-TNF biologics in inflammatory bowel disease, whereas no difference was observed between tofacitinib and anti-TNF therapy.

No Benefit of Continuing 5-Aminosalicylates in Patients with Crohn's Disease Treated with Anti-metabolite Therapy

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

5-aminosalicylates (5-ASA) are frequently used in the management of Crohn's disease (CD). We used a de-identified administrative claims database to compare patterns and outcomes of continuing versus stopping 5-ASA in patients with CD who escalated to anti-metabolite monotherapy.

METHODS

Patients with CD on 5-ASA who were new users of anti-metabolite monotherapy and followed for at least 12 months from OptumLabs® Data Warehouse. Three patterns of 5-ASA use were identified: stopped 5-ASA, short-term 5-ASA (use for < 6 months after starting anti-metabolites), or persistent 5-ASA (use for > 6 months after starting anti-metabolites). Outcomes (need for corticosteroids, risk of CD-related hospitalization and/or surgery, treatment escalation to biologic therapy) were compared using Cox proportional hazard analysis adjusting for key covariates, with a 12-month immortal time period.

RESULTS

Of 3036 patients with CD who were new-users of anti-metabolite monotherapy, 667 (21.9%), 626 (20.6%), and 1743 (57.4%) stopped 5-ASA, used 5-ASA transiently or persistently, respectively. Compared to patients who stopped 5-ASA after starting anti-metabolites, persistent 5-ASA use was associated with a higher risk of corticosteroid use (HR, 1.24 [1.08-1.42]), without an increase in risk of CD-related hospitalization (HR, 1.21 [0.98-1.49]), CD-related surgery (HR, 1.28 [0.90-1.80]) or treatment escalation (HR, 0.85 [0.62-1.20]). Sensitivity analyses using a 3-month window after initiation of anti-metabolites to classify patients as continuing vs. stopping 5-ASA showed similar results. Residual confounding by disease severity could not be excluded.

CONCLUSION

5-ASAs are frequently continued long-term even after escalation to anti-metabolite therapy in patients with CD but offer no clinical benefit over stopping 5-ASA.

Comparative efficacy trials in inflammatory bowel disease: current and future implications for practice

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Over the last decade, there has been rapid expansion of the therapeutic armamentarium, and evolution of treatment strategies, for the management of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs). Consequently, there is an increasing need for head-to-head or comparative efficacy trials to inform optimal positioning of therapies, and pragmatic trials comparing treatment strategies to inform treatment approach. In this review, we will discuss the current status and future of comparative efficacy clinical trials in IBD.

RECENT FINDINGS

Pivotal phase IIIB superiority clinical trials have demonstrated superiority of vedolizumab over adalimumab for achieving clinical remission in patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis (VARSITY) and failed to demonstrate superiority of ustekinumab over adalimumab in patients with moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease (SEAVUE). Noninferiority clinical trials of biosimilars have confirmed absence of meaningful differences in safety and efficacy of biosimilar infliximab over originator infliximab, as initial therapy or switching stable patients during maintenance. Network meta-analyses, indirect treatment comparison using patient-level data from placebo-controlled trials and real-world observational studies have inform comparative effectiveness and safety of different therapies for management of IBD.

SUMMARY

Head-to-head clinical trials are critically important to advance the field of IBD. Comparative efficacy trials are slow and expensive to conduct, may not be broadly generalizable, and are not powered for safety events or other relevant outcomes. Alternative approaches to comparative effectiveness such as network meta-analysis and well designed real-world observational studies are able to bridge gaps in clinical practice.

Management of Non-response and Loss of Response to Anti-tumor Necrosis Factor Therapy in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) therapy has been successfully used as first-line biologic treatment for moderate-to-severe inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), in both “step-up” and “top-down” approaches, and has become a cornerstone of IBD management. However, in a proportion of patients the effectiveness of anti-TNF therapy is sub-optimal. Either patients do not achieve adequate initial response (primary non-response) or they lose response after initial success (loss of response). Therapeutic drug monitoring determines drug serum concentrations and the presence of anti-drug antibodies (ADAbs) and can help guide treatment optimization to improve patient outcomes. For patients with low drug concentrations who are ADAb-negative or display low levels of ADAbs, dose escalation is recommended. Should response remain unchanged following dose optimization the question whether to switch within class (anti-TNF) or out of class (different mechanism of action) arises. If ADAb levels are high and the patient has previously benefited from anti-TNF therapy, then switching within class is a viable option as ADAbs are molecule specific. Addition of an immunomodulator may lead to a decrease in ADAbs and a regaining of response in a proportion of patients. If a patient does not achieve a robust therapeutic response with an initial anti-TNF despite adequate drug levels, then switching out of class is appropriate. In conjunction with the guidance above, other factors including patient preference, age, comorbidities, disease phenotype, extra-intestinal manifestations, and treatment costs need to be factored into the treatment decision. In this review we discuss current evidence in this field and provide guidance on therapeutic decision-making in clinical situations.

Fertility and Pregnancy in Crohn's Disease

The prevalence of inflammatory bowel disease is continuing to increase worldwide and is more commonly diagnosed in women of reproductive age. Individuals with Crohn's disease may have inaccurate perceptions regarding the rate of infertility, heritability, and the safety of taking therapies for Crohn's disease during pregnancy, all of which greatly affect their decisions surrounding family planning. Given this area of need for both patients and providers, in this article, we have included the latest evidence on the impact of Crohn's disease on fertility, heritability, pregnancy outcomes, and the safety of medications for Crohn's disease during pregnancy and lactation.

Ustekinumab in Crohn's Disease: New Data for Positioning in Treatment Algorithm

The treatment of patients with moderate to severe Crohn's disease [CD] is still challenging. Therapeutic options include steroids, immunosuppressants, anti-TNFα agents, vedolizumab, and ustekinumab. Ustekinumab is a monoclonal antibody blocking the p40 subunit of IL-12 and IL-23. It showed to be effective and safe in randomised clinical trials and real-life studies and is currently approved for the management of CD patients who are naive to biologics and those who have already been treated with such medications. However, to date, a detailed and approved therapeutic algorithm is not available. The aim of this review is to report the most recent and updated data on the efficacy and safety of ustekinumab for the treatment of patients with moderate to severe CD and to define the optimal management of these patients.

Antibody Response 3 Months After 2-Dose SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Vaccination in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease

INTRODUCTION

The response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) on immune-modifying therapies requires further investigation because previous studies indicate that patients on immune therapy might have decreased antibody concentrations.

METHODS

We present the antireceptor binding domain antibody response over a period of 3 months in 217 patients with IBD who completed standard 2-dose SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine series.

RESULTS

Almost all (98.6%) IBD vaccine recipients had a positive antireceptor binding domain antibody response at least 3 months after vaccination. Decreased antibody titers at 3 months were seen in a subset of patients on antitumor necrosis factor-alpha. Approximately 10% of the participants with high-titer antibodies at 1 month had a decrease to low-positive titers at 3 months, which was mostly observed in those on combination therapy and antitumor necrosis factor-alpha monotherapy.

DISCUSSION

Larger longitudinal studies are required to define the response in IBD population and its clinical impact.

Positioning biologics in the treatment of IBD: A practical guide – Which mechanism of action for whom?

The number of available biological therapies have doubled over the last 10 years and the arrival of novel molecules (interleukin 23p19 inhibitors) is ongoing alongside the development of small molecules. As a result of this vast landscape of treatment, positioning advanced therapies (according to clinical situation, efficacy and safety) is of paramount importance to providing personalized, appropriate IBD treatment.

In this publication the recent available literature is summarized for practical integration into clinical practice including comparative efficacy data, patient and disease demographics. We refer to recent publications and expert opinion in order to facilitate the decision making process of positioning biologicals IBD treatment.

Recent Advances in Understanding Nrf2 Agonism and Its Potential Clinical Application to Metabolic and Inflammatory Diseases

Oxidative stress is a major component of cell damage and cell fat, and as such, it occupies a central position in the pathogenesis of metabolic disease. Nuclear factor-erythroid-derived 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2), a key transcription factor that coordinates expression of genes encoding antioxidant and detoxifying enzymes, is regulated primarily by Kelch-like ECH-associated protein 1 (Keap1). However, involvement of the Keap1–Nrf2 pathway in tissue and organism homeostasis goes far beyond protection from cellular stress. In this review, we focus on evidence for Nrf2 pathway dysfunction during development of several metabolic/inflammatory disorders, including diabetes and diabetic complications, obesity, inflammatory bowel disease, and autoimmune diseases. We also review the beneficial role of current molecular Nrf2 agonists and summarize their use in ongoing clinical trials. We conclude that Nrf2 is a promising target for regulation of numerous diseases associated with oxidative stress and inflammation. However, more studies are needed to explore the role of Nrf2 in the pathogenesis of metabolic/inflammatory diseases and to review safety implications before therapeutic use in clinical practice.

Choosing the right biologic for complications of inflammatory bowel disease

INTRODUCTION

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic, inflammatory condition that involves the intestinal tract, and can also present with extra-intestinal manifestations (EIM). Choosing the right treatment for IBD is often nuanced and decisions can become even more complicated when a patient presents with or develops a complication of the disease.

AREAS COVERED

We aimed to provide an overview of the most common complications of IBD, specifically intestinal and EIM, and summarize the data regarding biologic therapy for treatment of these conditions. A comprehensive literature review was performed using PubMed and Medline databases to identify studies published in the English language relevant to the broad scope of this review.

EXPERT OPINION

There are still significant gaps in our understanding of the pathophysiology of IBD and its treatment, especially in regards to complications of the disease. As novel therapies continue to emerge for treatment of IBD, we feel concurrent examination of their impact on intestinal complications and EIM of IBD is important and should be a priority of future research.

How to Choose the Biologic Therapy in a Bio-Naïve Patient with Inflammatory Bowel Disease

The availability of biologic therapies in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is increasing significantly. This represents more options to treat patients, but also more difficulties in choosing the therapies, especially in the context of bio-naïve patients. Most evidence of safety and efficacy came from clinical trials comparing biologics with placebo, with a lack of head-to-head studies. Network meta-analysis of biologics and real-world studies have been developed to solve this problem. Despite the results of these studies, there are also other important factors to consider before choosing the biologic, such as patient preferences, comorbidities, genetics, and inflammatory markers. Given that resources are limited, another important aspect is the cost of biologic therapy, since biosimilars are widely available and have been demonstrated to be effective with a significant decrease in costs. In this review, we summarize the evidence comparing biologic therapy in both Crohn´s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) in different clinical situations. We also briefly synthesize the evidence related to predictors of biologic response, as well as the biologic use in extraintestinal manifestations and the importance of the drug-related costs.

Biologics: how far can they go in Crohn’s disease?

Crohn’s disease is a chronic gastrointestinal inflammatory disorder, characterized by episodes of relapsing and remitting flares. As the disease mechanism becomes better elucidated, there is a significant increase in the number of available biologic therapies. This article summarizes and synthesizes current Food and Drug Administration-approved biological therapy for Crohn’s disease and examines the positioning of medical therapy as emerging biologics break onto the market.

Managing complex perianal disease after anti-TNF failure: Where to go next?

Crohn's disease is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease that affects various intestinal segments and can involve the perianal region. Although anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents have revolutionized the management of Crohn's disease and improved the prognosis for patients with perianal Crohn's disease (pCD), their long-term effectiveness is limited: over 60% of patients relapse after one year of maintenance therapy. In recent years, significant advances have been made in the treatment of complex perianal fistulas after anti-TNF failure. Concomitant treatment with antibiotics and immunosuppressants improves the effectiveness of anti-TNF agents. Therapeutic drug monitoring and dose adjustment of anti-TNF therapy (targeting a higher trough level) might also improve treatment response. Novel therapeutic strategies might provide new opportunities for pCD management; for example, ustekinumab might be effective after anti-TNF treatment failure, although more studies are needed. As suggested in recent international guidelines, mesenchymal stem cell injection might be an effective, safe treatment for complex pCD.

Epidemiology and Natural History of Perianal Crohn's Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Population-Based Cohorts

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Perianal Crohn's disease (pCD) is a potentially severe phenotype of CD. We conducted a systematic review with meta-analysis to estimate cumulative incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of pCD in population-based cohort studies.

METHODS

Through a systematic literature review through March 1, 2021, we identified population-based inception cohort studies reporting cumulative incidence of perianal disease (primarily abscess and/or fistula) in patients with CD. We estimated the cumulative incidence of pCD at presentation and 1-, 5-, and 10-year follow-up, and risk factors for perianal disease and outcomes including risk of major (bowel resection, proctectomy, ostomy) and minor perianal (incision and drainage, seton placement, etc.) surgery.

RESULTS

In 12 population-based studies, prevalence of pCD was 18.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 12.5%-27.0%) with 1-, 5-, and 10-year risk of perianal disease being 14.3% (95% CI, 7.9%-24.6%), 17.6% (95% CI, 11.3%-26.5%), and 18.9% (95% CI, 15.0%-23.4%), respectively. Approximately 11.5% of patients (95% CI, 6.7%-19.0%) had perianal disease at or before CD diagnosis. Colonic disease location and rectal involvement were associated with higher risk of pCD. Overall, 63.3% of patients (95% CI, 53.3-72.3) required minor perianal surgery and 6.4% of patients (95% CI, 1.8%-20.6%) required major abdominal surgery for pCD. Use of biologic therapy for pCD is common and has steadily increased throughout the years.

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately 1 in 5 patients with CD develops perianal disease within 10 years of CD diagnosis, including 11.5% who have perianal disease at presentation. Approximately two-thirds of patients require perianal surgery, with a smaller fraction requiring major abdominal surgery.

Comparative efficacy and safety of biologic therapies for moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Data are needed to inform the positioning of biologic therapy in the treatment of moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease, both first line and after previous biologic exposure. We aimed to assess the comparative efficacy and safety of biologics in patients with Crohn's disease.

METHODS

We did a systematic review and network meta-analysis of phase 2 and phase 3 randomised controlled trials done in adults (≥18 years) with moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease (Crohn's Disease Activity Index [CDAI] 220-450) treated with tumour necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists, anti-integrin, anti-interleukin (IL)-12 and IL-23p40, or anti-IL23p19 agents, either alone or in combination with immunosuppressants, as their first-line biologic or after previous biologic exposure, compared with placebo or an active comparator. The minimum duration of therapy was 14 days for trials reporting induction of remission in active disease and 22 weeks in trials reporting maintenance of remission. We searched Medline, EMBASE, the Cochrane CENTRAL Register of Controlled Trials, conference proceedings, trial registries, and unpublished data from inception to June 3, 2021, without any language restrictions. Summary estimates of the primary and secondary outcomes were extracted from the published reports; individual patient-level data were not sought. The primary endpoint was induction of clinical remission in patients with active disease (CDAI <150) and maintenance of remission in patients with response to induction therapy, with data extracted from published reports. A network meta-analysis with multivariate consistency model random-effects meta-regression was done, with rankings based on surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) values.

FINDINGS

The search strategy yielded 18 382 citations, of which 31 trials were eligible for inclusion. On the basis of 15 randomised controlled trials including 2931 biologic-naive patients, infliximab monotherapy (odds ratio [OR] 4·53 [95% CI 1·49-13·79]), infliximab combined with azathioprine (7·49 [2·04-27·49]), adalimumab (3·01 [1·25-7·27]), and ustekinumab (2·63 [1·10-6·28]) were associated with significantly higher odds of inducing remission compared to certolizumab pegol (all moderate confidence); infliximab and azathioprine combination therapy was also associated with significantly higher odds of inducing remission than vedolizumab (3·76 [1·01-14·03]; low confidence). On the basis of ten randomised controlled trials including 2479 patients with previous biologic exposure, adalimumab after loss of response to infliximab (OR 2·82 [95% CI 1·20-6·62]; low confidence), and risankizumab (2·10 [1·12-3·92]; moderate confidence), were associated with higher odds of inducing remission than vedolizumab. No differences between active interventions were observed in maintenance trials. Most trials were at low or uncertain risk of bias.

INTERPRETATION

Although biologic treatment choices in patients with moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease must be individualised for each patient, this analysis suggests that either infliximab with azathioprine or adalimumab might be preferred as a first-line therapy, and adalimumab (after infliximab loss of response) or risankizumab might be preferred as a second-line therapy, for induction of clinical remission.

FUNDING

None.

Perianal Imaging in Crohn Disease: Current Status With a Focus on MRI, From the AJR Special Series on Imaging of Inflammation

Fistulizing perianal disease is a frequent, chronic, and often debilitating manifestation of Crohn disease (CD) in adults and children, which in the past was relatively refractory to treatment. The advent of biologic agents such as anti-tumor necrosis factor-α and cellular therapies, used in conjunction with a range of surgical interventions, has greatly improved disease outcomes, although complete remission can still be elusive. This review considers current perianal imaging options, specifically pelvic MRI and endoanal and transperineal ultrasound, and their roles in diagnosis, management, and assessment of treatment response. Pelvic MRI is the first line technique for imaging of perianal CD given the complexity of fistulas encountered in CD. MRI technical acquisition parameters for adults and children and an approach to MRI interpretation and reporting are provided. Anatomic classification systems for fistulising perianal disease are presented. We also explore the history, current landscape, and future developments of MRI features of perianal disease as imaging biomarkers to quantify activity and severity, and consider CD MRI-based inflammatory activity scores. We discuss the reliability and validation of a number of indices (including PEMPAC, MAGNIFI-CD, mVAI, and Van Assche Index), their potential to quantify treatment response, and possible prognostic capabilities.