1
|
Roth ME, Parsons SK, Ganz PA, Wagner LI, Hinds PS, Alexander S, Bingen K, Bober SL, Brackett J, Cella D, Henry NL, Indelicato DJ, Johnson RH, Miller TP, Rosenberg SM, Schmitz KH, Thanarajasingam G, Reeve BB, Salsman JM. Inclusion of a core patient-reported outcomes battery in adolescent and young adult cancer clinical trials. J Natl Cancer Inst 2023; 115:21-28. [PMID: 36266760 PMCID: PMC9830479 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djac166] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2022] [Revised: 08/09/2022] [Accepted: 08/25/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Disparities in care, treatment-related toxicity and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) for adolescents and young adults (AYAs, aged 15-39 years) with cancer are under-addressed partly because of limited collection of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in cancer clinical trials (CCTs). The AYA years include key developmental milestones distinct from younger and older patients, and cancer interrupts attainment of critical life goals. Lack of consensus on a standardized approach to assess HRQoL and treatment-related toxicity in AYA CCTs has limited the ability to improve patient outcomes. The National Cancer Institute's Clinical Trials Network AYA PRO Task Force was assembled to reach consensus on a core set of PROs and foster its integration into AYA CCTs. Eight key considerations for selecting the core PRO AYA battery components were identified: relevance to AYAs; importance of constructs across the age continuum; prioritization of validated measures; availability of measures without licensing fees; availability in multiple languages; applicability to different cancer types and treatments; ability to measure different HRQoL domains and toxicities; and minimized burden on patients and sites. The Task Force used a modified Delphi approach to identify key components of the PRO battery. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) and the PRO Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Measurement System met all criteria and were selected to assess HRQoL and treatment toxicity, respectively. Investigators are rapidly incorporating the recommendations of the Task Force into AYA trials. Inclusion of a standardized assessment of HRQoL and treatment toxicities in AYA CCTs is a vital first step to develop interventions to improve health outcomes for AYAs diagnosed with cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael E Roth
- Division of Pediatrics and Patient Care, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Susan K Parsons
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Tufts Medical Center, and the Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Patricia A Ganz
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Lynne I Wagner
- Department of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest School of Medicine and the Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Winston Salem, NC, USA
| | - Pamela S Hinds
- Department of Nursing Science, Children’s National Hospital, George Washington University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Sarah Alexander
- Division of Haematology/Oncology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Department of Pediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Kristin Bingen
- Division of Pediatric Psychology and Developmental Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Sharon L Bober
- Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Julienne Brackett
- Pediatric Hematology-Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Texas Children’s Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
| | - David Cella
- Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - N Lynn Henry
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Daniel J Indelicato
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Rebecca H Johnson
- Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Mary Bridge Children’s Hospital, MultiCare Health System, Tacoma, WA, USA
| | - Tamara P Miller
- Aflac Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Department of Pediatrics, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Shoshana M Rosenberg
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kathryn H Schmitz
- Public Health Sciences, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA
| | | | - Bryce B Reeve
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Department of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - John M Salsman
- Department of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest School of Medicine and the Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Winston Salem, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mizrach H, Goshe B, Park ER, Recklitis C, Greer JA, Chang Y, Frederick N, Abrams A, Tower MD, Walsh EA, Huang M, Kenney L, Homans A, Miller K, Denninger J, Usmani GN, Peppercorn J, Perez GK. Randomized Waitlist-Control Trial of a Web-Based Stress-Management and Resiliency Program for Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer Survivors: Protocol for the Bounce Back Study. JMIR Res Protoc 2022; 11:e34033. [PMID: 35080500 PMCID: PMC8829691 DOI: 10.2196/34033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2021] [Accepted: 11/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The emotional health of adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer survivors is compromised both during and after cancer treatment. Targeted programs designed to support AYAs’ ability to cope with stress in the years following treatment completion are lacking. Mind-body programs may ameliorate the negative psychological and emotional effects of stress and assist AYAs with managing the psychosocial challenges of early survivorship. Objective Our randomized waitlist-control trial aims to assess the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of a virtual group program (Bounce Back) to promote stress management and resiliency among posttreatment AYAs. Methods Bounce Back is a stress management and resiliency program delivered via videoconference by a trained mental health clinician. Sessions were adapted from an evidence-based mind-body program (Stress Management and Resiliency Training - Relaxation Response Resiliency Program [SMART-3RP]) grounded in relaxation response elicitation, mindfulness, cognitive behavioral therapy, and positive psychology. Seventy-two AYAs (diagnosed with cancer between ages 14 years and 29 years and had completed cancer treatment within the last 5 years) were randomly assigned to the Bounce Back program or waitlist-control group and completed assessments at baseline, 3 months postbaseline, and 6 months postbaseline. The primary aim of the study is to determine the feasibility and acceptability of the Bounce Back program. Descriptive statistics, including means, frequencies, and ranges supplemented by qualitative exit interview feedback will be used to characterize the sample and to summarize feasibility and acceptability. The exploratory aims are to evaluate the preliminary effects of the program on stress coping and psychosocial outcome measures (ie, anxiety, depression) collected across the 3 time points. Results This study was funded by the National Cancer Institute in July 2017. Study procedures were approved by the Dana-Farber Harvard Cancer Center Institutional Review Board in October 2018 (Protocol 18-428). The randomized trial was conducted from July 2019 to March 2021. Quantitative data collection is complete, and qualitative exit interview data collection is ongoing. Results are expected to be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at local, national, or international meetings in the coming years. Conclusions Few evidence-based programs exist that tackle the key transitional issues faced by AYA cancer survivors. Future analyses will help us determine the feasibility and acceptability of the Bounce Back program and its impact on AYA stress coping and psychological well-being. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03768336; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03768336 International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID) DERR1-10.2196/34033
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helen Mizrach
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.,University of Massachusetts Memorial Medical Center, Worcester, MA, United States
| | - Brett Goshe
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Elyse R Park
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | | | - Joseph A Greer
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Yuchiao Chang
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | | | - Annah Abrams
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Mary D Tower
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Emily A Walsh
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Mary Huang
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Lisa Kenney
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Alan Homans
- University of Vermont Medical Center, Burlington, VT, United States
| | - Karen Miller
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - John Denninger
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kahn JM, Pei Q, Friedman DL, Kaplan J, Keller FG, Hodgson D, Wu Y, Appel BE, Bhatia S, Henderson TO, Schwartz CL, Kelly KM, Castellino SM. Survival by age in paediatric and adolescent patients with Hodgkin lymphoma: a retrospective pooled analysis of children's oncology group trials. Lancet Haematol 2022; 9:e49-e57. [PMID: 34971582 PMCID: PMC8815096 DOI: 10.1016/s2352-3026(21)00349-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2021] [Revised: 11/07/2021] [Accepted: 11/09/2021] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adolescents with Hodgkin lymphoma have worse disease outcomes than children. Whether these differences persist within clinical trials is unknown. We examined survival, by age, in patients receiving response-adapted therapy for Hodgkin lymphoma on Children's Oncology Group (COG) trials. METHODS Patients (aged 1-21 years) diagnosed with classical Hodgkin lymphoma and enrolled between Sept 23, 2002, and Jan 19, 2012, on one of three phase 3 COG trials in the USA and Canada were eligible for inclusion. The three COG trials were defined by risk group according to Ann Arbor stage, B-symptoms, and bulk (AHOD0431 [low risk; NCT00302003], AHOD0031 [intermediate risk; NCT00025259], or AHOD0831 [high risk; NCT01026220]). The outcomes of this study were event-free survival (death, relapse, or subsequent neoplasm) and overall survival. Cox proportional hazards models estimated survival, adjusting for disease and treatment factors both overall and in patients with mixed cellularity or non-mixed cellularity (nodular sclerosing and not-otherwise-specified) disease. FINDINGS Of 2155 patients enrolled on the three trials, 1907 (88·4%; 968 [50·8%] male and 939 [49·2%] female; 1227 [64·3%] non-Hispanic White) were included in this analysis. After a median follow-up of 7·4 years (IQR 4·3-10·2), older patients (aged ≥15 years) had worse unadjusted 5-year event-free survival (80% [95% CI 78-83]) than did younger patients (aged <15 years; 86% [83-88]; HR 1·38 [1·11-1·71]; p=0·0038). Older patients also had worse unadjusted 5-year overall survival than did younger patients (96% [95% CI 95-97] vs 99% [98-99]; HR 2·50 [1·41-4·45]; p=0·0012). In patients with non-mixed cellularity histology, older patients had a significantly increased risk of having an event than did younger patients with the same histology (HR 1·32 [1·03-1·68]; p=0·027). Older patients with mixed cellularity had significantly worse 5-year event-free survival than did younger patients in unadjusted (77% [95% CI 65-86] for older patients vs 94% [88-97] for younger patients; HR 2·93 [1·37-6·29]; p=0·0039) and multivariable models (HR 3·72 [1·56-8·91]; p=0·0032). Overall, older patients were more likely to die than younger patients (HR 3·08 [1·49-6·39]; p=0·0025). INTERPRETATION Adolescents (≥15 years) treated on COG Hodgkin lymphoma trials had worse event-free survival and increased risk of death compared with children (<15 years). Our findings highlight the need for prospective studies to examine tumour and host biology, and to test novel therapies across the age spectrum. FUNDING National Institutes of Health, St Baldrick's Foundation, and Lymphoma Research Foundation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justine M Kahn
- Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Qinglin Pei
- Department of Biostatistics, Children's Oncology Group Statistics & Data Center, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Debra L Friedman
- Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA; Department of Pediatrics: Hematology and Oncology, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Joel Kaplan
- Levine Children's Cancer & Blood Disorders, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - Frank G Keller
- Department of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Aflac Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - David Hodgson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Yue Wu
- Department of Biostatistics, Children's Oncology Group Statistics & Data Center, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Burton E Appel
- Children's Cancer Institute, Joseph M Sanzari Children's Hospital, Hackensack, NJ, USA
| | - Smita Bhatia
- Institute for Cancer Outcomes and Survivorship, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Tara O Henderson
- University of Chicago Comer Children's Hospital, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Cindy L Schwartz
- Children's Hospital of Wisconsin, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Kara M Kelly
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Pediatrics, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Sharon M Castellino
- Department of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Aflac Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, GA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Avutu V, Weiss AR, Reed DR, Ahmed SK, Allen-Rhoades WA, Chen YLE, Davis LE, Eaton BR, Hawkins DS, Indelicato DJ, Patel SR, Randall RL, Reinke DK, Riedel RF, Scharschmidt TJ, Thornton KA, Wang D, Janeway KA, Kopp LM. Identified Enrollment Challenges of Adolescent and Young Adult Patients on the Nonchemotherapy Arm of Children's Oncology Group Study ARST1321. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol 2021; 11:328-332. [PMID: 34515544 DOI: 10.1089/jayao.2021.0103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
ARST1321, a trial of patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma, was the first National Clinical Trials Network study codeveloped by pediatric and adult consortia with two treatment cohorts. We report on the findings of a survey to identify barriers to enrolling adolescent and young adult patients (15-39 years) onto the nonchemotherapy arm. The survey response rate was 31% with a 70% completion rate. Common identified reasons for low accrual in order of decreasing frequency included insufficient funding, lack of study awareness or interest, competing trials, toxicity concerns, philosophical differences in the therapy backbone, and regulatory and infrastructure barriers. Clinical Trials.gov ID: NCT02180867.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Viswatej Avutu
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Aaron R Weiss
- Department of Pediatrics, Maine Medical Center, Portland, Maine, USA
| | - Damon R Reed
- Department of Individualized Cancer Management, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Safia K Ahmed
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Wendy A Allen-Rhoades
- Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Yen-Lin E Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Lara E Davis
- Department of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Bree R Eaton
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Douglas S Hawkins
- Department of Pediatrics, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Danny J Indelicato
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Shreyaskumar R Patel
- Department of Medicine, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - R Lor Randall
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, UC Davis Health, Sacramento, California, USA
| | - Denise K Reinke
- Sarcoma Alliance for Research through Collaboration, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Richard F Riedel
- Department of Medicine, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Thomas J Scharschmidt
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Katherine A Thornton
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Dian Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Katherine A Janeway
- Department of Pediatrics, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Lisa M Kopp
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Barry E, Walsh JA, Weinrich SL, Beaupre D, Blasi E, Arenson DR, Jacobs IA. Navigating the Regulatory Landscape to Develop Pediatric Oncology Drugs: Expert Opinion Recommendations. Paediatr Drugs 2021; 23:381-394. [PMID: 34173206 PMCID: PMC8275539 DOI: 10.1007/s40272-021-00455-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Regulatory changes have been enacted in the United States (US) and European Union (EU) to encourage the development of new treatments for pediatric cancer. Here, we review some of the factors that have hampered the development of pediatric cancer treatments and provide a comparison of the US and EU regulations implemented to address this clinical need. We then provide some recommendations for each stage of the oncology drug development pathway to help researchers maximize their chance of successful drug development while complying with regulations. A key recommendation is the engagement of key stakeholders such as regulatory authorities, pediatric oncologists, academic researchers, patient advocacy groups, and a Pediatric Expert Group early in the drug development process. During drug target selection, sponsors are encouraged to consult the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), European Medicines Agency (EMA), and the FDA target list, in addition to relevant US and European consortia that have been established to characterize and prioritize oncology drug targets. Sponsors also need to carefully consider the resourcing requirements for preclinical testing, which include ensuring appropriate access to the most relevant databases, clinical samples, and preclinical models (cell lines and animal models). During clinical development, sponsors can account for the pharmacodynamic (PD)/pharmacokinetic (PK) considerations specific to a pediatric population by developing pediatric formulations, selecting suitable PD endpoints, and employing sparse PK sampling or modeling/simulation of drug exposures where appropriate. Additional clinical considerations include the specific design of the clinical trial, the potential inclusion of children in adult trials, and the value of cooperative group trials.
Collapse
|
6
|
Cherven B, Sampson A, Bober SL, Bingen K, Frederick N, Freyer DR, Quinn GP. Sexual health among adolescent and young adult cancer survivors: A scoping review from the Children's Oncology Group Adolescent and Young Adult Oncology Discipline Committee. CA Cancer J Clin 2021; 71:250-263. [PMID: 33283888 PMCID: PMC8678924 DOI: 10.3322/caac.21655] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2020] [Revised: 10/11/2020] [Accepted: 10/26/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Sexual function is a vital aspect of quality of life among adolescent and young adult (AYA) (ages 15-39 years) cancer survivors. Sexual function encompasses physical, psychosocial, and developmental factors that contribute to sexual health, all of which may be negatively impacted by cancer and treatment. However, limited information is available to inform the care of AYA cancer survivors in this regard. This scoping review, conducted by the Children's Oncology Group AYA Oncology Discipline Committee, summarizes available literature regarding sexual function among AYA cancer survivors, including relevant psychosexual aspects of romantic relationships and body image. Results suggest that, overall, AYA cancer survivors experience a substantial burden of sexual dysfunction. Both physical and psychosocial sequelae influence survivors' sexual health. Interventions to support sexual health and psychosexual adjustment after cancer treatment are needed. Collaborations between the Children's Oncology Group and adult-focused cooperative groups within the National Cancer Institute's National Clinical Trials Network are warranted to advance prospective assessment of sexual dysfunction and test interventions to improve sexual health among AYA cancer survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brooke Cherven
- Aflac Cancer and Blood Disorders Center at Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta
- Emory University School of Medicine
| | - Amani Sampson
- Department of Ob-Gyn, Grossman School of Medicine, New York University
| | - Sharon L. Bober
- Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | | | - Natasha Frederick
- Center for Cancer & Blood Disorders, Connecticut Children’s Medical Center, Hartford, CT
- University of Connecticut School of Medicine
| | - David R. Freyer
- Cancer and Blood Disease Institute, Children’s Hospital Los Angeles
- USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center; Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Gwendolyn P. Quinn
- Department of Ob-Gyn, Grossman School of Medicine, New York University
- Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York University
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Reed DR, Naghavi A, Binitie O. Sarcoma as a Model for Adolescent and Young Adult Care. J Oncol Pract 2020; 15:239-247. [PMID: 31075215 DOI: 10.1200/jop.18.00684] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Sarcomas occur across all ages and are relatively abundant in the adolescent and young adult populations compared with older adults. Because of an overall rarity combined with a broad diversity of diagnoses, expertise is often concentrated in comprehensive cancer centers. The sarcoma model of care is an excellent model for overall adolescent and young adult care. We summarize some of the natural advantages of the field for developing adolescent and young adult programs, review management and referral touchpoints, and summarize recent biologic and clinical trial insights that have affected sarcoma management recently.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Damon R Reed
- 1 H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL
| | - Arash Naghavi
- 1 H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL
| | - Odion Binitie
- 1 H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Roth ME, Unger JM, O'Mara AM, Lewis MA, Budd T, Johnson RH, Pollock BH, Blanke C, Freyer DR. Enrollment of adolescents and young adults onto SWOG cancer research network clinical trials: A comparative analysis by treatment site and era. Cancer Med 2020; 9:2146-2152. [PMID: 32009305 PMCID: PMC7064039 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.2891] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2020] [Accepted: 01/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Few adolescents and young adults (AYAs, 15‐39 years old) enroll onto cancer clinical trials, which hinders research otherwise having the potential to improve outcomes in this unique population. Prior studies have reported that AYAs are more likely to receive cancer care in community settings. The National Cancer Institute (NCI) has led efforts to increase trial enrollment through its network of NCI‐designated cancer centers (NCICC) combined with community outreach through its Community Clinical Oncology Program (CCOP; replaced by the NCI Community Oncology Research Program in 2014). Methods Using AYA proportional enrollment (the proportion of total enrollments who were AYAs) as the primary outcome, we examined enrollment of AYAs onto SWOG therapeutic trials at NCICC, CCOP, and non‐NCICC/non‐CCOP sites from 2004 to 2013 by type of site, study period (2004‐08 vs 2009‐13), and patient demographics. Results Overall, AYA proportional enrollment was 10.1%. AYA proportional enrollment decreased between 2004‐2008 and 2009‐2013 (13.1% vs 8.5%, P < .001), and was higher at NCICCs than at CCOPs and non‐NCICC/non‐CCOPs (14.1% vs 8.3% and 9.2%, respectively; P < .001). AYA proportional enrollment declined significantly at all three site types. Proportional enrollment of AYAs who were Black or Hispanic was significantly higher at NCICCs compared with CCOPs or non‐NCICC/non‐CCOPs (11.5% vs 8.8, P = .048 and 11.5% vs 8.6%, P = .03, respectively). Conclusion Not only did community sites enroll a lower proportion of AYAs onto cancer clinical trials, but AYA enrollment decreased in all study settings. Initiatives aimed at increasing AYA enrollment, particularly in the community setting with attention to minority status, are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael E Roth
- Division of Pediatrics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Joseph M Unger
- SWOG Cancer Research Network Statistics and Data Management Center, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Ann M O'Mara
- Community Oncology and Prevention Trials Research Group, Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | | | - Troy Budd
- Community Oncology and Prevention Trials Research Group, Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Rebecca H Johnson
- Department of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Mary Bridge Children's Hospital and Health Center and Tacoma General Hospital, Tacoma, WA, USA
| | - Brad H Pollock
- Department of Public Health Sciences and the UC Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Davis, CA, USA
| | - Charles Blanke
- Southwest Oncology Group Chair's Office and Knight Cancer Center Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - David R Freyer
- Departments of Pediatrics and Medicine, Cancer and Blood Diseases Institute, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Rao P, Segel JE, McGregor LM, Lengerich EJ, Drabick JJ, Miller B. Attendance at National Cancer Institute and Children's Oncology Group Facilities for Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults with Cancer in Pennsylvania: A Population-Based Study. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol 2019; 9:47-54. [PMID: 31600095 DOI: 10.1089/jayao.2019.0045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: Adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer are a vulnerable population with decreased attendance at National Cancer Institute (NCI) comprehensive cancer centers and Children's Oncology Group (COG) facilities. Decreased attendance at NCI/COG facilities has been associated with poor cancer outcomes. The objective of this study was to evaluate cancer care patterns of AYAs compared with children, within Pennsylvania, and factors associated with attending an NCI/COG facility. Methods: Data from the Pennsylvania Cancer Registry between 2010 and 2015 for patients aged 0-39 years at cancer diagnosis were used. Primary analyses focused on age at diagnosis, insurance status, race, ethnicity, gender, cancer type, stage, diagnosis year, and distance to the NCI/COG facility. The primary outcome was receipt of care at an NCI/COG facility. Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated using multivariable logistic regression models. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to test and estimate robustness. Results: A sample of 15,002 patients, ages 0-39, was obtained, including 8857 patients (59%) who attended an NCI/COG facility. Patients were significantly less likely to attend an NCI/COG facility if they were aged 31-39 years (OR 0.054, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.04-0.07), non-White (OR 0.890, 95% CI 0.80-0.99), Hispanic (OR 0.701, 95% CI 0.59-0.83), female (OR 0.915, 95% CI 0.84-1.00), had Medicaid insurance (OR 0.836, 95% CI 0.75-0.93), and lived further from an NCI/COG facility. Sensitivity analyses largely corroborated the performed estimates. Conclusions: AYAs with cancer in Pennsylvania have disproportionate attendance at specialized NCI/COG facilities across a variety of demographic domains. Enhancing the attendance of AYAs with cancer at these specialized centers is crucial to improve cancer outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pooja Rao
- Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Penn State Health Children's Hospital, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| | - Joel E Segel
- Department of Health Policy and Administration, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania.,Penn State Cancer Institute, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| | - Lisa M McGregor
- Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Penn State Health Children's Hospital, Hershey, Pennsylvania.,Penn State Cancer Institute, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| | - Eugene J Lengerich
- Penn State Cancer Institute, Hershey, Pennsylvania.,Department of Public Health Sciences, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Barbara Miller
- Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Penn State Health Children's Hospital, Hershey, Pennsylvania.,Penn State Cancer Institute, Hershey, Pennsylvania.,Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Pannier ST, Warner EL, Fowler B, Fair D, Salmon SK, Kirchhoff AC. Age-Specific Patient Navigation Preferences Among Adolescents and Young Adults with Cancer. JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR CANCER EDUCATION 2019; 34:242-251. [PMID: 29170930 PMCID: PMC6719558 DOI: 10.1007/s13187-017-1294-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient navigation is increasingly being directed at adolescent and young adult (AYA) patients. This study provides a novel description of differences in AYA cancer patients' preferences for navigation services by developmental age at diagnosis. METHODS Eligible patients were diagnosed with cancer between ages 15 and 39 and had completed at least 1 month of treatment. Between October 2015 and January 2016, patients completed semi-structured interviews about navigation preferences. Summary statistics of demographic and cancer characteristics were generated. Differences in patient navigation preferences were examined through qualitative analyses by developmental age at diagnosis. RESULTS AYAs were interviewed (adolescents 15-18 years N = 8; emerging adults 19-25 years N = 8; young adults 26-39 years N = 23). On average, participants were 4.5 years from diagnosis. All age groups were interested in face-to-face connection with a navigator and using multiple communication platforms (phone, text, email) to follow-up. Three of the most frequently cited needs were insurance, finances, and information. AYAs differed in support, healthcare, and resource preferences by developmental age; only adolescents preferred educational support. While all groups preferred financial and family support, the specific type of assistance (medical versus living expenses, partner/spouse, child, or parental assistance) varied by age group. CONCLUSIONS AYAs with cancer have different preferences for patient navigation by developmental age at diagnosis. AYAs are not a one-size-fits-all population, and navigation programs can better assist AYAs when services are targeted to appropriate developmental ages. Future research should examine fertility and navigation preferences by time since diagnosis. While some navigation needs to span the AYA age range, other needs are specific to developmental age.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samantha T Pannier
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, Cancer Control and Population Sciences, 2000 Circle of Hope, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA.
| | - Echo L Warner
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, Cancer Control and Population Sciences, 2000 Circle of Hope, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA
- University of Utah, College of Nursing, 10 S 2000 E, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA
| | - Brynn Fowler
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, Cancer Control and Population Sciences, 2000 Circle of Hope, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, The University of Chicago, 5841 S. Maryland Ave, MC 4060, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA
| | - Douglas Fair
- Primary Children's Hospital, 100 Mario Capecchi Drive, Salt Lake City, UT, 84132, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah, 100 N Mario Capecchi Drive, Salt Lake City, UT, 84132, USA
| | - Sara K Salmon
- Huntsman Cancer Hospital, Cancer Learning Center, 2000 Circle of Hope, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA
- Intermountain Healthcare, 5121 Cottonwood Street, Murray, UT, 84107, USA
| | - Anne C Kirchhoff
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, Cancer Control and Population Sciences, 2000 Circle of Hope, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah, 100 N Mario Capecchi Drive, Salt Lake City, UT, 84132, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Parsons HM, Penn DC, Li Q, Cress RD, Pollock BH, Malogolowkin MH, Wun T, Keegan TH. Increased clinical trial enrollment among adolescent and young adult cancer patients between 2006 and 2012-2013 in the United States. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2019; 66:e27426. [PMID: 30256525 PMCID: PMC6249090 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.27426] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2018] [Revised: 08/02/2018] [Accepted: 08/03/2018] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Stagnant outcomes for adolescents and young adults (AYAs) 15-39 years of age with cancer are partly attributed to poor enrollment onto clinical trials. Initiatives have focused on increasing accrual, but changes at the population-level are unknown. We examined patterns of clinical trial participation over time in AYA patients with cancer. PROCEDURE We utilized medical record data from AYAs in two population-based National Cancer Institute Patterns of Care Studies identified through the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Program. Among 3135 AYAs diagnosed with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), Hodgkin lymphoma, acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), and sarcoma, we used multivariate logistic regression to evaluate patient and provider characteristics associated with clinical trial enrollment. Interaction terms evaluated variation in clinical trial enrollment across patient and provider characteristics by year of diagnosis. RESULTS From 2006 to 2012-2013, clinical trial participation increased from 14.8% to 17.9% (P < 0.01). Adjusting for patient and provider characteristics, we found lower clinical trial enrollment among those who were older at diagnosis, diagnosed with NHL vs ALL, treated by adult hematologist/oncologists only (vs pediatric hematologist/oncologists), and of non-Hispanic Black race/ethnicity (vs non-Hispanic White) (P < 0.05 for all). Interaction analyses indicate improved clinical trial enrollment from 2006 to 2012-2013 among young adults 25-29 years of age and the uninsured. CONCLUSIONS Although disparities in enrollment onto clinical trials remain for AYAs with cancer, our study identified increasing overall clinical trial participation over time. Further, we identify promising trends in enrollment uptake among AYAs 25-29 years of age and the uninsured.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helen M. Parsons
- Division of Health Policy and Management, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| | | | - Qian Li
- Center for Oncology Hematology Outcomes Research and Training (COHORT) and Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA
| | - Rosemary D. Cress
- Public Health Institute, Cancer Registry of Greater California, Sacramento, CA
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Davis, CA
| | - Brad H. Pollock
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Davis, CA
| | - Marcio H. Malogolowkin
- Department of Pediatrics, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA
| | - Ted Wun
- Center for Oncology Hematology Outcomes Research and Training (COHORT) and Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA
| | - Theresa H.M. Keegan
- Center for Oncology Hematology Outcomes Research and Training (COHORT) and Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Thomas SM, Malvar J, Tran H, Shows J, Freyer DR. A prospective comparison of cancer clinical trial availability and enrollment among adolescents/young adults treated at an adult cancer hospital or affiliated children's hospital. Cancer 2018; 124:4064-4071. [PMID: 30291804 PMCID: PMC6234084 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.31727] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2018] [Revised: 05/23/2018] [Accepted: 05/27/2018] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Low cancer clinical trial (CCT) enrollment may contribute to survival disparities affecting adolescents and young adults (AYAs) (ages 15-39 years). The objective of this study was to evaluate whether differences in CCT availability related to treatment site could explain the low CCT enrollment. METHODS This prospective, observational cohort study was conducted at an academic children's hospital and its affiliated but geographically separated adult cancer hospital within a National Cancer Institute-designated Comprehensive Cancer Center. For consecutive, newly diagnosed AYA patients, it was determined whether an appropriate CCT existed nationally, was available at the treatment site, and was used for enrollment. Proportions of AYAs in these categories were compared between sites using the chi-square test. RESULTS One hundred fifty-two consecutive AYA patients were included from the children's hospital (n = 68; ages 15-20 years) and the adult cancer hospital (n = 84; ages 18-39 years). Although there was no difference in CCT existence for individual AYA patients by site (children's hospital [36 of 68 patients; 52.9%] vs adult cancer hospital [45 of 84 patients; 53.6%]; P = .938), CCT availability was significantly lower at the adult cancer hospital (14 of 84 patients [16.7%] vs 30 of 68 [44.1%] at the children's hospital; P < .001). The proportion of AYAs enrolled was low at both sites (8 of 68 patients [11.8%] vs 6 of 84 patients [7.1%], respectively; P = .327). Fewer existing CCTs were available at the adult cancer hospital (4 of 27 patients [14.8%] vs 8 of 14 patients [57.1%], respectively), and those were directed toward solid tumors and new agents. CONCLUSIONS Efforts to improve low CCT enrollment among AYAs should be differentiated by treatment site. In the adult setting, these efforts should be aimed at improving CCT availability by overcoming site-level barriers to opening existing CCTs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefanie M. Thomas
- Children’s Center for Cancer and Blood Diseases, Children’s Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
- Department of Pediatrics, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Jemily Malvar
- Children’s Center for Cancer and Blood Diseases, Children’s Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Henry Tran
- Department of Pathology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
| | - Jared Shows
- Department of Pathology, Long Beach Memorial/Miller Children’s Hospital, Long Beach, California
| | - David R. Freyer
- Children’s Center for Cancer and Blood Diseases, Children’s Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
- Department of Pediatrics, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
- Department of Medicine and the USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Fern LA, Taylor RM. Enhancing accrual to clinical trials of adolescents and young adults with cancer. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2018; 65:e27233. [PMID: 29749691 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.27233] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2017] [Revised: 03/05/2018] [Accepted: 03/16/2018] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Underrepresentation of young people in cancer research is an international phenomenon and may contribute to poorer outcomes. We sought to identify systematically tested interventions and strategies to improve recruitment. The review identified 13 papers. The following four themes emerged: trial availability/regulatory factors; service configuration/place-of-care factors; recruitment methods and developmental factors specific to young people. We could not identify any studies that had employed prospective interventions to improve recruitment. Without available research studies in which to garner data on adolescents and young adults, we will always be constrained in our ability to provide evidence based care with resultant limitations on our ability to improve outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lorna A Fern
- Cancer Division, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Rachel M Taylor
- Cancer Division, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Bleyer A, Tai E, Siegel S. Role of clinical trials in survival progress of American adolescents and young adults with cancer-and lack thereof. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2018; 65:e27074. [PMID: 29667766 PMCID: PMC6077840 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.27074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2017] [Revised: 02/19/2018] [Accepted: 02/26/2018] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Abstract
In the United States, adolescent and young adult (AYA) patients with cancer have the lowest clinical trial participation rate of all age groups and slower progress in survival improvement than younger patients. Ominously, AYA clinical trial participation has been steadily decreasing since 2010, except in 15-19 year olds and AYAs with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. In order to reverse the accrual trend, multiple changes are necessary, including convincing community oncologists to pursue clinical trials on behalf of their AYA patients and to have the new National Community Oncology Research Program and National Clinical Trials Network lead a coordinated effort to increase accrual.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Archie Bleyer
- Oregon Health&Science University
- University of Texas Medical School at Houston
| | - Eric Tai
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Flerlage JE, Metzger ML, Bhakta N. The management of Hodgkin lymphoma in adolescents and young adults: burden of disease or burden of choice? Blood 2018; 132:376-384. [PMID: 29895665 PMCID: PMC6071556 DOI: 10.1182/blood-2018-01-778548] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2018] [Accepted: 06/01/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Adolescents and young adults (AYAs) comprise the largest age group affected by Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). Despite excellent overall survival of AYA patients with HL due to advances in treatment regimens, therapy-associated late effects continue to be a concern in HL survivors, especially for younger patients who have decades of life remaining. Since the first clinical trial for HL with chemotherapy in 1964, subsequent protocols have attempted to reduce chemotherapy-induced toxicities and yet maintain high overall survival rates. Today, new analytic methods applied to data from survivorship cohorts, such as the recently described cumulative burden of disease metric, can be used to inform changes for future protocols. Although pediatric and adult trial consortia have followed this process, the AYA population, an age cohort split between pediatric and adult health care services, faces many barriers to care and is the least likely to be enrolled in clinical trials. AYA patients with HL theoretically have a choice to be treated in pediatric or adult protocols when presented with these options. Recent efforts by the National Clinical Trials Network, the Children's Oncology Group, and others have been made to ensure that the burden of choice for the AYA population is not greater than the burden of disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jamie E Flerlage
- Department of Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN
- The University of Tennessee Health Sciences Center, Memphis, TN; and
| | - Monika L Metzger
- Department of Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN
- The University of Tennessee Health Sciences Center, Memphis, TN; and
- Department of Global Pediatric Medicine, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN
| | - Nickhill Bhakta
- Department of Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN
- The University of Tennessee Health Sciences Center, Memphis, TN; and
- Department of Global Pediatric Medicine, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Barr RD, Bleyer WA. New horizons on the landscape of AYA oncology. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2017; 64. [PMID: 28741306 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.26291] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2016] [Revised: 09/02/2016] [Accepted: 09/06/2016] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Ronald D Barr
- Departments of Pediatrics, Pathology and Medicine, McMaster University and McMaster Children's Hospital, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - W Archie Bleyer
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Reed DR, Oshrine B, Pratt C, Fridgen O, Elstner C, Wilson L, Soliman H, Lee MC, McLeod HL, Shah B, Donovan KA, Pabbathi S, Turney M, Binitie O, Healy C, Nieder M, Shaw PH, Galligan A, Letson GD, Stern M, Quinn GP, Davies S. Sink or Collaborate: How the Immersive Model Has Helped Address Typical Adolescent and Young Adult Barriers at a Single Institution and Kept the Adolescent and Young Adult Program Afloat. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol 2017; 6:503-511. [PMID: 28777007 PMCID: PMC5725631 DOI: 10.1089/jayao.2017.0051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Damon R Reed
- 1 Adolescent and Young Adult Oncology Program, Moffitt Cancer Center , Tampa, Florida.,2 Sarcoma Department, Moffitt Cancer Center , Tampa, Florida.,5 Department of Individualized Cancer Management, Personalized Medicine Institute , Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| | - Benjamin Oshrine
- 3 Cancer and Blood Disorders Institute, Johns Hopkins All Children's Hospital , St. Petersburg, Florida
| | - Christie Pratt
- 1 Adolescent and Young Adult Oncology Program, Moffitt Cancer Center , Tampa, Florida.,2 Sarcoma Department, Moffitt Cancer Center , Tampa, Florida
| | - Olivia Fridgen
- 1 Adolescent and Young Adult Oncology Program, Moffitt Cancer Center , Tampa, Florida
| | - Cathy Elstner
- 1 Adolescent and Young Adult Oncology Program, Moffitt Cancer Center , Tampa, Florida.,2 Sarcoma Department, Moffitt Cancer Center , Tampa, Florida
| | - Leila Wilson
- 1 Adolescent and Young Adult Oncology Program, Moffitt Cancer Center , Tampa, Florida.,2 Sarcoma Department, Moffitt Cancer Center , Tampa, Florida
| | - Hatem Soliman
- 4 Breast Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center , Tampa, Florida
| | - Marie C Lee
- 4 Breast Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center , Tampa, Florida
| | - Howard L McLeod
- 5 Department of Individualized Cancer Management, Personalized Medicine Institute , Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| | - Bijal Shah
- 6 Malignant Hematology, Moffitt Cancer Center , Tampa, Florida
| | | | - Smitha Pabbathi
- 8 Internal Medicine Department and Survivorship Program, Moffitt Cancer Center , Tampa, Florida
| | - Mary Turney
- 9 Patient and Family Services, Moffitt Cancer Center , Tampa, Florida
| | - Odion Binitie
- 1 Adolescent and Young Adult Oncology Program, Moffitt Cancer Center , Tampa, Florida.,2 Sarcoma Department, Moffitt Cancer Center , Tampa, Florida
| | - Christine Healy
- 9 Patient and Family Services, Moffitt Cancer Center , Tampa, Florida
| | | | - Peter H Shaw
- 3 Cancer and Blood Disorders Institute, Johns Hopkins All Children's Hospital , St. Petersburg, Florida
| | - Andrew Galligan
- 11 Department of Pediatrics, University of South Florida , Tampa, Florida
| | | | - Marilyn Stern
- 12 Department of Child and Family Studies, University of South Florida , Tampa, Florida.,13 Health Outcomes and Behavior Program, Moffitt Cancer Center , Tampa, Florida
| | - Gwendolyn P Quinn
- 1 Adolescent and Young Adult Oncology Program, Moffitt Cancer Center , Tampa, Florida.,13 Health Outcomes and Behavior Program, Moffitt Cancer Center , Tampa, Florida
| | - Simon Davies
- 14 Teen Cancer America , Los Angeles, California
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Isenalumhe LL, Fridgen O, Beaupin LK, Quinn GP, Reed DR. Disparities in Adolescents and Young Adults With Cancer. Cancer Control 2017; 23:424-433. [PMID: 27842332 DOI: 10.1177/107327481602300414] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cancer care for adolescents and young adults (AYAs) focuses on the care of patients aged 15 to 39 years. Historically, this group has favorable outcomes based on a preponderance of diagnoses such as thyroid cancers and Hodgkin lymphoma. Improvements in outcomes among the AYA population have lagged behind compared with younger and older populations. METHODS We discuss and review recent progress in AYA patient care and highlight remaining disparities that exist, including financial disadvantages, need for fertility care, limited clinical trial availability, and other areas of evolving AYA-focused research. RESULTS Survival rates have not improved for this age group as they have for children and older adults. Disparities are present in the AYA population and have contributed to this lack of progress. CONCLUSIONS Recognizing disparities in the care of AYAs with cancer has led many medical specialty disciplines to improve the lives of these patients through advocacy, education, and resource development. Research addressing barriers to clinical trial enrollment in this population, quality-of-life issues, and the improvement of survivorship care is also under way.
Collapse
|
19
|
Unger JM, Cook E, Tai E, Bleyer A. The Role of Clinical Trial Participation in Cancer Research: Barriers, Evidence, and Strategies. AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY EDUCATIONAL BOOK. AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY. ANNUAL MEETING 2017. [PMID: 27249699 DOI: 10.14694/edbk_156686] [Citation(s) in RCA: 93] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Fewer than one in 20 adult patients with cancer enroll in cancer clinical trials. Although barriers to trial participation have been the subject of frequent study, the rate of trial participation has not changed substantially over time. Barriers to trial participation are structural, clinical, and attitudinal, and they differ according to demographic and socioeconomic factors. In this article, we characterize the nature of cancer clinical trial barriers, and we consider global and local strategies for reducing barriers. We also consider the specific case of adolescents with cancer and show that the low rate of trial enrollment in this age group strongly correlates with limited improvements in cancer population outcomes compared with other age groups. Our analysis suggests that a clinical trial system that enrolls patients at a higher rate produces treatment advances at a faster rate and corresponding improvements in cancer population outcomes. Viewed in this light, the issue of clinical trial enrollment is foundational, lying at the heart of the cancer clinical trial endeavor. Fewer barriers to trial participation would enable trials to be completed more quickly and would improve the generalizability of trial results. Moreover, increased accrual to trials is important for patients, because trials provide patients the opportunity to receive the newest treatments. In an era of increasing emphasis on a treatment decision-making process that incorporates the patient perspective, the opportunity for patients to choose trial participation for their care is vital.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph M Unger
- From the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA; St. Charles Health System, Quality Department, Bend, OR
| | - Elise Cook
- From the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA; St. Charles Health System, Quality Department, Bend, OR
| | - Eric Tai
- From the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA; St. Charles Health System, Quality Department, Bend, OR
| | - Archie Bleyer
- From the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA; St. Charles Health System, Quality Department, Bend, OR
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Rieder M, Hawcutt D. Design and conduct of early phase drug studies in children: challenges and opportunities. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2016; 82:1308-1314. [PMID: 27353241 PMCID: PMC5061783 DOI: 10.1111/bcp.13058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2016] [Revised: 06/03/2016] [Accepted: 06/12/2016] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
It has historically been very difficult to conduct early phase drug studies in children for a number of reasons related to ethics, acceptability, rarity, standardization, end points, safety, dosing and feasibility. Over the past decade there have been a number of developments including novel clinical trial design, in silico pharmacology and microdosing that have significantly enhanced the ability of investigators to conduct early phase drug studies in children. While the evolution of drug therapy is creating a series of new challenges, there has never been a better time for conducting drug studies in children.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Rieder
- Department of Paediatrics, Robarts Research Institute, University of Western Ontario, Canada.
- Department of Paediatrics, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
| | - Daniel Hawcutt
- NIHR Alder Hey Clinical Research Facility, Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Chuk MK, Mulugeta Y, Roth-Cline M, Mehrotra N, Reaman GH. Enrolling Adolescents in Disease/Target-Appropriate Adult Oncology Clinical Trials of Investigational Agents. Clin Cancer Res 2016; 23:9-12. [PMID: 27780857 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-16-1367] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2016] [Revised: 09/21/2016] [Accepted: 09/22/2016] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
The enrollment of adolescents with cancer in clinical trials is much lower than that of younger pediatric patients. For adolescents with "adult-type" cancers, lack of access to relevant trials is cited as one of the reasons for this discrepancy. Adolescents are generally not eligible for enrollment in adult oncology trials, and initial pediatric trials for many drugs are conducted years later, often after the drug is approved. As a result, accrual of adolescents to these trials may be slow due to off-label use, prospectively collected safety and efficacy data are lacking at the time of initial approval, and, most importantly, these adolescents have delayed access to effective therapies. To facilitate earlier access to investigational and approved drugs for adolescent patients with cancer, and because drug exposure is most often similar in adolescents and adults, we recommend the inclusion of adolescents (ages 12-17) in disease- and target-appropriate adult oncology trials. This approach requires careful monitoring for any differential safety signals, appropriate pharmacokinetic evaluations, and ensuring that ethical requirements are met. Inclusion of adolescents in adult oncology trials will require the cooperation of investigators, cooperative groups, industry, institutional review boards, and regulatory agencies to overcome real and perceived barriers. Clin Cancer Res; 23(1); 9-12. ©2016 AACR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meredith K Chuk
- Office of Hematology and Oncology Products, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland.
| | - Yeruk Mulugeta
- Office of Clinical Pharmacology, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland
| | - Michelle Roth-Cline
- Office of Pediatric Therapeutics, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland
| | - Nitin Mehrotra
- Office of Clinical Pharmacology, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland
| | - Gregory H Reaman
- Office of Hematology and Oncology Products, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Kahn JM, Keegan T, Tao L, Abrahão R, Bleyer A, Viny AD. Racial disparities in the survival of American children, adolescents, and young adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia, acute myelogenous leukemia, and Hodgkin lymphoma. Cancer 2016; 122:2723-30. [PMID: 27286322 PMCID: PMC4992431 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.30089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 105] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2016] [Revised: 03/11/2016] [Accepted: 04/22/2016] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Race-based survival in children and adolescents with hematologic malignancies has been a national challenge for decades. Large-scale investigations of age- and race-based survival trends over time in these patients have not previously been reported. The objective of this study was to investigate whether race- and age-related differences in pediatric and adolescent and young adult (AYA) leukemia and lymphoma survival persist and to what extent these differences have changed over time. METHODS Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program, this study investigated the outcomes of black and white (1975-2012; n = 27,369) and white and Hispanic (1992-2012; n = 20,574) children (0-14 years old) and AYAs (15-39 years old) with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), acute myelogenous leukemia (AML), and Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). Estimates of 5- and 10-year relative survival were compared over time. RESULTS Trends showed a convergence of survival for white and black children with ALL but a divergence in survival for AYA patients. Hispanic children and AYAs both suffered inferior outcomes. Trends for AML revealed persistent survival differences between black and white children and suggested worsening disparities for AYAs. Survival trends in HL revealed sustained survival differences between black and white AYA patients, whereas no differences were found in Hispanic and white patient outcomes for AML or HL. CONCLUSIONS Although survival for children and AYAs with ALL, AML, and HL has improved over the past 4 decades, differences persist between black, white, and Hispanic children and AYAs; survival disparities between black and white children with ALL have been nearly eliminated. Strategies aimed at identifying causality and reducing disparities are warranted. Cancer 2016. © 2016 American Cancer Society. Cancer 2016;122:2723-2730. © 2016 American Cancer Society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justine M. Kahn
- Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology/Stem Cell Transplantation, Columbia University Medical Center, NY
| | - Theresa Keegan
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, UC Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, CA
| | - Li Tao
- Cancer Prevention Institute of California, Fremont, CA
| | - Renata Abrahão
- Cancer Prevention Institute of California, Fremont, CA
- Department of Non-Communicable Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Archie Bleyer
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, OR
| | - Aaron D. Viny
- Human Oncology & Pathogenesis Program and Leukemia Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Roth ME, O'Mara AM, Seibel NL, Dickens DS, Langevin AM, Pollock BH, Freyer DR. Low Enrollment of Adolescents and Young Adults Onto Cancer Trials: Insights From the Community Clinical Oncology Program. J Oncol Pract 2016; 12:e388-95. [PMID: 27026648 PMCID: PMC4960459 DOI: 10.1200/jop.2015.009084] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Stagnant outcomes for adolescents and young adults (AYAs; 15 to 39 years old) with cancer are partly attributed to poor enrollment onto clinical trials. The National Cancer Institute (NCI) Community Clinical Oncology Program (CCOP) was developed to improve clinical trial participation in the community setting, where AYAs are most often treated. Further, many CCOP sites had pediatric and medical oncologists with collaborative potential for AYA recruitment and care. For these reasons, we hypothesized that CCOP sites enrolled proportionately more AYAs than non-CCOP sites onto Children's Oncology Group (COG) trials. METHODS For the 10-year period 2004 through 2013, the NCI Division of Cancer Prevention database was queried to evaluate enrollments into relevant COG studies. The proportional enrollment of AYAs at CCOP and non-CCOP sites was compared and the change in AYA enrollment patterns assessed. All sites were COG member institutions. RESULTS Although CCOP sites enrolled a higher proportion of patients in cancer control studies than non-CCOP sites (3.5% v 1.8%; P < .001), they enrolled a lower proportion of AYAs (24.1% v 28.2%, respectively; P < .001). Proportional AYA enrollment at CCOP sites decreased during the intervals 2004 through 2008 and 2009 through 2013 (26.7% v 21.7%; P < .001). CONCLUSION Despite oncology practice settings that might be expected to achieve otherwise, CCOP sites did not enroll a larger proportion of AYAs in clinical trials than traditional COG institutions. Our findings suggest that the CCOP (now the NCI Community Oncology Research Program) can be leveraged for developing targeted interventions for overcoming AYA enrollment barriers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael E Roth
- Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Helen DeVos Children's Hospital at Spectrum Health, Grand Rapids, MI; University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX; University of California, Davis; and University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Ann M O'Mara
- Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Helen DeVos Children's Hospital at Spectrum Health, Grand Rapids, MI; University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX; University of California, Davis; and University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Nita L Seibel
- Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Helen DeVos Children's Hospital at Spectrum Health, Grand Rapids, MI; University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX; University of California, Davis; and University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - David S Dickens
- Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Helen DeVos Children's Hospital at Spectrum Health, Grand Rapids, MI; University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX; University of California, Davis; and University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Anne-Marie Langevin
- Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Helen DeVos Children's Hospital at Spectrum Health, Grand Rapids, MI; University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX; University of California, Davis; and University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Brad H Pollock
- Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Helen DeVos Children's Hospital at Spectrum Health, Grand Rapids, MI; University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX; University of California, Davis; and University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - David R Freyer
- Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Helen DeVos Children's Hospital at Spectrum Health, Grand Rapids, MI; University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX; University of California, Davis; and University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Unger JM, Cook E, Tai E, Bleyer A. The Role of Clinical Trial Participation in Cancer Research: Barriers, Evidence, and Strategies. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2016; 35:185-98. [PMID: 27249699 PMCID: PMC5495113 DOI: 10.1200/edbk_156686] [Citation(s) in RCA: 360] [Impact Index Per Article: 45.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/05/2023]
Abstract
Fewer than one in 20 adult patients with cancer enroll in cancer clinical trials. Although barriers to trial participation have been the subject of frequent study, the rate of trial participation has not changed substantially over time. Barriers to trial participation are structural, clinical, and attitudinal, and they differ according to demographic and socioeconomic factors. In this article, we characterize the nature of cancer clinical trial barriers, and we consider global and local strategies for reducing barriers. We also consider the specific case of adolescents with cancer and show that the low rate of trial enrollment in this age group strongly correlates with limited improvements in cancer population outcomes compared with other age groups. Our analysis suggests that a clinical trial system that enrolls patients at a higher rate produces treatment advances at a faster rate and corresponding improvements in cancer population outcomes. Viewed in this light, the issue of clinical trial enrollment is foundational, lying at the heart of the cancer clinical trial endeavor. Fewer barriers to trial participation would enable trials to be completed more quickly and would improve the generalizability of trial results. Moreover, increased accrual to trials is important for patients, because trials provide patients the opportunity to receive the newest treatments. In an era of increasing emphasis on a treatment decision-making process that incorporates the patient perspective, the opportunity for patients to choose trial participation for their care is vital.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Elise Cook
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Eric Tai
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Archie Bleyer
- St Charles Health System, Quality Department, Bend, Oregon
| |
Collapse
|