1
|
Kim GY, Jalali A, Gard G, Yeung JM, Chau H, Gately L, Houli N, Jones IT, Kosmider S, Lee B, Lee M, Nott L, Shapiro JD, Tie J, Thomson B, To YH, Wong V, Wong R, Dunn C, Johns J, Gibbs P. Initial Assessment of Resectability of Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases Versus Clinical Outcome. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2025; 24:72-81. [PMID: 39523153 DOI: 10.1016/j.clcc.2024.10.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2024] [Revised: 10/02/2024] [Accepted: 10/06/2024] [Indexed: 11/16/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgery improves long-term survival for resectable, liver-only metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). With no consensus definition of "resectable" disease, decisions regarding resectability are reliant on the expertise and judgement of the treating clinician working in consultation with a multidisciplinary team (MDT). This study examines the clinical outcome versus initial assessment of resectability in an Australian population with mCRC. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with liver-only mCRC diagnosed January 2009 to December 2022 were identified from the Treatment of Recurrent and Advanced Colorectal Cancer (TRACC) registry. Patients were classified based on prospectively documented treatment assessment as "resectable," "potentially resectable," or "unresectable." The correlation between initial assessment of resectability and clinical outcome, and any impact of clinicopathologic factors were examined. Kaplan-Meier analysis assessed overall survival based on initial resectability assessment and resection status. RESULTS Of 4437 patients with mCRC identified through TRACC, 1250 (28%) had liver-only disease at presentation, with 497 (43%), 277 (24%), and 374 (33%) classified as "unresectable," "potentially resectable," and "resectable," respectively. In total, 516 (41%) ultimately underwent surgical resection, including 30 (6%) of the "initially unresectable," 148 (53%) of the "potentially resectable," and 338 (90%) of the "resectable" at a median of 9.5, 5.9, and 2.4 months from the diagnosis of liver metastases, respectively. Resection in the "unresectable" patient population was associated with younger age (mean age 63 vs. 69, P = .0006), better performance status (ECOG 0-1 100% vs. 74%, P = .0017), and fewer comorbidities (Charlson index 0-3 in 73% vs. 53%, P = .0296) compared with no resection. Median overall survival was longer for resected versus nonresected patients across all categories: "unresectable" (59.2 vs. 17.6 months, P < .0001), "potentially resectable" (57.2 vs. 22.8 months, P < .0001), and "resectable" (108 vs. 55 months, P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS This real-world study demonstrates the potential for "initially unresectable" patients to become surgical candidates following systemic therapy, more likely in younger and fitter patients, with overall excellent survival outcomes in resected patients. This highlights the value of routine, repeated MDT assessments for patients with liver-only disease who are continuing to respond to systemic therapy, even for those initially considered never to be surgical candidates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Grace Y Kim
- Personalised Oncology Division, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
| | - Azim Jalali
- Personalised Oncology Division, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Department of Medical Oncology, Western Health, Footscray, Victoria, Australia; Department of Medical Oncology, Northern Health, Epping, Victoria, Australia; Department of Medical Oncology, Latrobe Regional Hospital, Traralgon, Victoria, Australia
| | - Grace Gard
- Personalised Oncology Division, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Department of Medical Oncology, Western Health, Footscray, Victoria, Australia
| | - Justin M Yeung
- Department of Surgery, Western Precinct, University of Melbourne, Footscray, Victoria, Australia; Department of Colorectal Surgery, Western Health, Footscray, Victoria, Australia
| | - Hieu Chau
- Department of Medical Oncology, Latrobe Regional Hospital, Traralgon, Victoria, Australia
| | - Lucy Gately
- Personalised Oncology Division, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Department of Medical Oncology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Nezor Houli
- Department of Surgery, Western Precinct, University of Melbourne, Footscray, Victoria, Australia
| | - Ian T Jones
- Department of Surgery, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Suzanne Kosmider
- Department of Medical Oncology, Western Health, Footscray, Victoria, Australia
| | - Belinda Lee
- Personalised Oncology Division, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Department of Medical Oncology, Northern Health, Epping, Victoria, Australia; Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Margaret Lee
- Personalised Oncology Division, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Department of Medical Oncology, Western Health, Footscray, Victoria, Australia; Department of Medical Oncology, Eastern Health, Box Hill, Victoria, Australia
| | - Louise Nott
- Department of Medical Oncology, Royal Hobart Hospital, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia; Department of Medical Oncology, Icon Cancer Centre, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
| | - Jeremy D Shapiro
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cabrini Hospital, Malvern, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jeanne Tie
- Personalised Oncology Division, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Benjamin Thomson
- Department of Surgery, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Yat Hang To
- Personalised Oncology Division, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Department of Medical Oncology, Northern Health, Epping, Victoria, Australia; Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Vanessa Wong
- Personalised Oncology Division, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Department of Medical Oncology, Western Health, Footscray, Victoria, Australia; Department of Medical Oncology, Grampians Health, Ballarat, Victoria, Australia
| | - Rachel Wong
- Department of Medical Oncology, Eastern Health, Box Hill, Victoria, Australia; Department of Medical Oncology, Epworth Health, Victoria, Australia
| | - Catherine Dunn
- Personalised Oncology Division, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Julie Johns
- Personalised Oncology Division, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Peter Gibbs
- Personalised Oncology Division, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Department of Medical Oncology, Western Health, Footscray, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yıldırım MS, Güzel Y, Can C, Kaplan İ, Şenses V, Solmaz İ, Başgöz BB, Alakuş ÖF, İleri S, Kömek H. Predictive value of the FIB-4 index, APRI, ALBI score, and GPR for overall survival in treatment-naïve metastatic colorectal cancer patients. BMC Gastroenterol 2025; 25:97. [PMID: 39979908 PMCID: PMC11844044 DOI: 10.1186/s12876-025-03676-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2024] [Accepted: 02/11/2025] [Indexed: 02/22/2025] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The prevalence of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is increasing and is linked to poor overall survival (OS). Previous studies have aimed to determine the predictive value of scores and laboratory tests for OS in mCRC patients, but their findings have been inconclusive. In this research, we focused on determining the prognostic significance of the fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) index, the aspartate aminotransferase (AST) to platelet (PLT) ratio index (APRI), the albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) score, and the gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase to PLT ratio (GPR) with respect to OS in treatment-naïve mCRC patients. METHODS This retrospective study included treatment-naïve mCRC patients. The FIB-4 index, ALBI score, APRI, and GPR were calculated for each participant, and their mortality dates were recorded. The clinical importance of these scores for survival outcomes was evaluated via the Cox regression model, Kaplan-Meier method, and log-rank test. RESULTS The study enrolled 123 untreated mCRC patients. Univariate Cox regression analysis demonstrated that sex and AST/PLT and ALT/PLT counts were not associated with OS (p > 0.05 for all). However, a higher FIB-4 index (p = 0.025), ALBI score (p < 0.001), GPR (p < 0.001), and AST/ALT ratio (p < 0.001) were all associated with poor OS. Additionally, multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated that age (95% CI: 1.009-1.053, p = 0.006), ALBI score (95% CI: 1.234-2.983, p = 0.004), GPR (95% CI: 1.442-2.701, p < 0.001), and AST/ALT (95% CI: 1.193-2.911, p = 0.006) were independent prognostic factors for OS. CONCLUSION The affordable and easily accessible ALBI score, GPR, and AST/ ALT have prognostic value in untreated patients with mCRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mehmet Serdar Yıldırım
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Health Sciences, Gazi Yaşargil Training and Research Hospital, Elazig Road 10th Km. No:1 21070 Uçkuyular, Diyarbakir, Turkey
| | - Yunus Güzel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Health Sciences, Gazi Yaşargil Training and Research Hospital, Diyarbakir, Turkey
| | - Canan Can
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Health Sciences, Gazi Yaşargil Training and Research Hospital, Diyarbakir, Turkey
| | - İhsan Kaplan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Health Sciences, Gazi Yaşargil Training and Research Hospital, Diyarbakir, Turkey
| | - Veysi Şenses
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Health Sciences, Gazi Yaşargil Training and Research Hospital, Diyarbakir, Turkey
| | - İhsan Solmaz
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Health Sciences, Gazi Yaşargil Training and Research Hospital, Elazig Road 10th Km. No:1 21070 Uçkuyular, Diyarbakir, Turkey
| | - Bilgin Bahadır Başgöz
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Health Sciences, Gazi Yaşargil Training and Research Hospital, Elazig Road 10th Km. No:1 21070 Uçkuyular, Diyarbakir, Turkey.
| | - Ömer Faruk Alakuş
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Health Sciences, Gazi Yaşargil Training and Research Hospital, Elazig Road 10th Km. No:1 21070 Uçkuyular, Diyarbakir, Turkey
| | - Serdar İleri
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Health Sciences, Gazi Yaşargil Training and Research Hospital, Diyarbakir, Turkey
| | - Halil Kömek
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Health Sciences, Gazi Yaşargil Training and Research Hospital, Diyarbakir, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Song C, Li W, Cui J, Miao Q, Liu Y, Zhang Z, Nie S, Zhou M, Chai R. Pre-operative prediction of histopathological growth patterns of colorectal cancer liver metastasis using MRI-based radiomic models. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2024; 49:4239-4248. [PMID: 39069557 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-024-04290-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2024] [Revised: 03/10/2024] [Accepted: 03/11/2024] [Indexed: 07/30/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Histopathological growth patterns (HGPs) of colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs) have prognostic value. However, the differentiation of HGPs relies on postoperative pathology. This study aimed to develop a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based radiomic model to predict HGP pre-operatively, following the latest guidelines. METHODS This retrospective study included 93 chemotherapy-naïve patients with CRLMs who underwent contrast-enhanced liver MRI and a partial hepatectomy between 2014 and 2022. Radiomic features were extracted from the tumor zone (RTumor), a 2-mm outer ring (RT+2), a 2-mm inner ring (RT-2), and a combined ring (R2+2) on late arterial phase MRI images. Analysis of variance method (ANOVA) and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) algorithms were used for feature selection. Logistic regression with five-fold cross-validation was used for model construction. Receiver operating characteristic curves, calibrated curves, and decision curve analyses were used to assess model performance. DeLong tests were used to compare different models. RESULTS Twenty-nine desmoplastic and sixty-four non-desmoplastic CRLMs were included. The radiomic models achieved area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.736, 0.906, 0.804, and 0.794 for RTumor, RT-2, RT+2, and R2+2, respectively, in the training cohorts. The AUC values were 0.713, 0.876, 0.785, and 0.777 for RTumor, RT-2, RT+2, and R2+2, respectively, in the validation cohort. RT-2 exhibited the best performance. CONCLUSION The MRI-based radiomic models could predict HGPs in CRLMs pre-operatively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chunlin Song
- Department of Radiology, First Hospital of China Medical University, 155 Nanjing St, Shenyang, 110001, China
| | - Wenhui Li
- Institute of Cancer Research, First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Jingjing Cui
- Department of Research and Development, United Imaging Intelligence, Beijing, China
| | - Qi Miao
- Department of Radiology, First Hospital of China Medical University, 155 Nanjing St, Shenyang, 110001, China
| | - Yi Liu
- Department of Radiology, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Zitian Zhang
- Department of Radiology, First Hospital of China Medical University, 155 Nanjing St, Shenyang, 110001, China
| | - Siru Nie
- Department of Pathology, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Meihong Zhou
- Department of Radiology, Fourth Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Ruimei Chai
- Department of Radiology, First Hospital of China Medical University, 155 Nanjing St, Shenyang, 110001, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sawano H, Matsuoka H, Mizuno T, Kamiya T, Chong Y, Iwama H, Takahara T, Hiro J, Otsuka K, Ishihara T, Hayashi T, Suda K. Risk factors for residual liver recurrence of colorectal cancer after resection of liver metastases and significance of adjuvant chemotherapy. Asian J Surg 2024; 47:5124-5130. [PMID: 39034242 DOI: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2024.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2023] [Revised: 04/05/2024] [Accepted: 07/04/2024] [Indexed: 07/23/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The risk factors for residual liver recurrence after resection of colorectal cancer liver metastases were analyzed separately for synchronous and metachronous metastases. METHODS This retrospective study included 236 patients (139 with synchronous and 97 with metachronous lesions) who underwent initial surgery for colorectal cancer liver metastases from April 2010 to December 2021 at the Fujita Health University Hospital. We performed univariate and multivariate analyses of risk factors for recurrence based on clinical background. RESULTS Univariate analysis of synchronous liver metastases identified three risk factors: positive lymph nodes (p = 0.018, HR = 2.067), ≥3 liver metastases (p < 0.001, HR = 2.382), and use of adjuvant chemotherapy (p = 0.013, HR = 0.560). Multivariate analysis identified the same three factors. For metachronous liver metastases, univariate and multivariate analysis identified ≥3 liver metastases as a risk factor (p = 0.002, HR = 2.988); however, use of adjuvant chemotherapy after hepatic resection was not associated with a lower risk of recurrence for metachronous lesions. Inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis of patients with these lesions with or without adjuvant chemotherapy after primary resection showed that patients with metachronous liver metastases who did not receive this treatment had fewer recurrences when adjuvant therapy was administered after subsequent liver resection, although the difference was not significant. Patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy after hepatic resection had less recurrence but less benefit from this treatment. CONCLUSION Risk factors for liver recurrence after resection of synchronous liver metastases were positive lymph nodes, ≥3 liver metastases, and no postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy. Adjuvant chemotherapy is recommended after hepatic resection of synchronous liver metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiroko Sawano
- College of Pharmacy, Kinjo Gakuin University, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Matsuoka
- Department of Surgery, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Japan.
| | - Tomohiro Mizuno
- Department of Pharmacotherapeutics and Informatics, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Japan
| | - Tadahiro Kamiya
- Department of Surgery, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Japan
| | - Yongchol Chong
- Department of Surgery, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Japan
| | - Hideaki Iwama
- Department of Surgery, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Japan
| | - Takeshi Takahara
- Department of Surgery, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Japan
| | - Junichiro Hiro
- Department of Surgery, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Japan
| | - Koki Otsuka
- Department of Surgery, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Japan
| | - Takuma Ishihara
- Innovative and Clinical Research Promotion Center, Gifu University Hospital, Yanagido, Gifu, Japan
| | | | - Kouichi Suda
- Department of Surgery, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Yang S, Zhang D, Sun Q, Nie H, Zhang Y, Wang X, Huang Y, Sun Y. Single-Cell and Spatial Transcriptome Profiling Identifies the Transcription Factor BHLHE40 as a Driver of EMT in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. Cancer Res 2024; 84:2202-2217. [PMID: 38657117 DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-23-3264] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2023] [Revised: 02/14/2024] [Accepted: 04/18/2024] [Indexed: 04/26/2024]
Abstract
Colorectal cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors in humans, with liver metastasis being the primary cause of mortality. The epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) process endows cancer cells with enhanced metastatic potential. To elucidate the cellular mechanisms driving EMT in colorectal cancer, we analyzed single-cell RNA sequencing data from 11 nonmetastatic primary tumors (TnM) and 11 metastatic primary tumors (TM) from colorectal cancer patients. Compared with the TnM group, the TM samples showed elevated numbers of malignant epithelial cell and cancer-associated fibroblast (CAF) subsets that displayed enrichments of EMT, angiogenesis, and TGFβ signaling pathways. One specific TM-enriched subgroup of malignant epithelial cells underwent EMT to transdifferentiate into CXCL1+ CAFs that subsequently differentiated into SFRP2+ CAFs, which was validated by spatial transcriptomic and pseudotime trajectory analyses. Furthermore, cell-cell communication analysis identified BHLHE40 as a probable key transcription factor driving EMT that was associated with poor prognosis. Finally, in vitro and in vivo experiments functionally substantiated that BHLHE40 promoted the proliferation, invasion, migration, EMT, and liver metastasis of colorectal cancer cells. In summary, this study identified BHLHE40 as a key transcription factor regulating EMT that promotes liver metastasis in colorectal cancer. Significance: Integrated analysis of single-cell RNA sequencing and spatial transcriptomics in metastatic colorectal cancer provides insights into the mechanisms underlying EMT and cancer-associated fibroblast differentiation, which could help improve patient diagnosis and treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sheng Yang
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
- The First School of Clinical Medicine, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
- The Colorectal Institute of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
- Jiangsu Province Engineering Research Center of Colorectal Cancer Precision Medicine and Translational Medicine, Nanjing, China
| | - Dongsheng Zhang
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
- The First School of Clinical Medicine, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
- The Colorectal Institute of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
- Jiangsu Province Engineering Research Center of Colorectal Cancer Precision Medicine and Translational Medicine, Nanjing, China
| | - Qingyang Sun
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
- The First School of Clinical Medicine, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
- The Colorectal Institute of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
- Jiangsu Province Engineering Research Center of Colorectal Cancer Precision Medicine and Translational Medicine, Nanjing, China
| | - Hongxu Nie
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
- The First School of Clinical Medicine, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
- The Colorectal Institute of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
- Jiangsu Province Engineering Research Center of Colorectal Cancer Precision Medicine and Translational Medicine, Nanjing, China
| | - Yue Zhang
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
- The First School of Clinical Medicine, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
- The Colorectal Institute of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
- Jiangsu Province Engineering Research Center of Colorectal Cancer Precision Medicine and Translational Medicine, Nanjing, China
| | - Xiaowei Wang
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
- The First School of Clinical Medicine, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
- The Colorectal Institute of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
- Jiangsu Province Engineering Research Center of Colorectal Cancer Precision Medicine and Translational Medicine, Nanjing, China
| | - Yuanjian Huang
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
- The First School of Clinical Medicine, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
- The Colorectal Institute of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
- Jiangsu Province Engineering Research Center of Colorectal Cancer Precision Medicine and Translational Medicine, Nanjing, China
| | - Yueming Sun
- Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
- The First School of Clinical Medicine, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
- The Colorectal Institute of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
- Jiangsu Province Engineering Research Center of Colorectal Cancer Precision Medicine and Translational Medicine, Nanjing, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Monahan BV, Patel T, Poggio JL. Stage IV Colorectal Cancer at Initial Presentation versus Progression during and after Treatment, Differences in Management: Management Differences for Initial Presentation versus Progression of Disease after Initial Treatment. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2024; 37:108-113. [PMID: 38322603 PMCID: PMC10843884 DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1761626] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2024]
Abstract
Stage IV colorectal cancer is a prevalent disease and understanding the appropriate treatment options is important. Medical oncologic treatment remains the mainstay of treatment in cases where curative resection is not possible. Surgical intervention is indicated if the primary tumor and associated metastases are amenable to curative resection or if obstructive, bleeding, or perforative complications arise from the tumor. New endoscopic techniques can provide palliation and benefit for patients who cannot undergo surgery and may speed time to chemotherapy initiation. Recently, immunotherapy has shown promise at managing, controlling, and regressing advanced disease, in some cases converting it to curative with resection. For patients that progress while on treatment, continued medical therapy remains the mainstay of treatment. Further research into the benefits of asymptomatic primary tumor resection without curative intent needs to be performed. Colorectal cancer, and more specifically metastatic colorectal cancer, continues to have improved 1- and 5-year survival rates and likely will continue to do so over the coming months and years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian V. Monahan
- Department of Surgery, Temple University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Takshaka Patel
- Department of Surgery, Temple University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Juan Lucas Poggio
- Department of Surgery, Temple University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Temple University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ilyas MIM. Epidemiology of Stage IV Colorectal Cancer: Trends in the Incidence, Prevalence, Age Distribution, and Impact on Life Span. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2024; 37:57-61. [PMID: 38322602 PMCID: PMC10843881 DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1761447] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2024]
Abstract
Colorectal cancer is a common malignancy in men and women. Historically, stage IV colorectal cancer has 10 to 15% five-year survival. Developments in the management of colorectal metastatic disease have helped improve the overall survival of stage IV colorectal cancers from 12 to 30 months with some patients achieving disease-free survival.
Collapse
|
8
|
Salamanna F, Contartese D, Errani C, Sartori M, Borsari V, Giavaresi G. Role of bone marrow adipocytes in bone metastasis development and progression: a systematic review. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2023; 14:1207416. [PMID: 37711896 PMCID: PMC10497772 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1207416] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2023] [Accepted: 08/03/2023] [Indexed: 09/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Bone marrow adipocytes (BMAs) are the most plentiful cells in the bone marrow and function as an endocrine organ by producing fatty acids, cytokines, and adipokines. Consequently, BMAs can interact with tumor cells, influencing both tumor growth and the onset and progression of bone metastasis. This review aims to systematically evaluate the role of BMAs in the development and progression of bone metastasis. Methods A comprehensive search was conducted on PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus electronic databases, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement standards, to identify studies published from March 2013 to June 2023. Two independent reviewers assessed and screened the literature, extracted the data, and evaluated the quality of the studies. The body of evidence was evaluated and graded using the ROBINS-I tool for non-randomized studies of interventions and the Systematic Review Centre for Laboratory Animal Experimentation (SYRCLE) tool for in vivo studies. The results were synthesized using descriptive methods. Results The search yielded a total of 463 studies, of which 17 studies were included in the final analysis, including 15 preclinical studies and two non-randomized clinical studies. Analysis of preclinical studies revealed that BMAs play a significant role in bone metastasis, particularly in prostate cancer followed by breast and malignant melanoma cancers. BMAs primarily influence cancer cells by inducing a glycolytic phenotype and releasing or upregulating soluble factors, chemokines, cytokines, adipokines, tumor-derived fatty acid-binding protein (FABP), and members of the nuclear receptor superfamily, such as chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 7 (CCL7), C-X-C Motif Chemokine Ligand (CXCL)1, CXCL2, interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, FABP4, and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPARγ). These factors also contribute to adipocyte lipolysis and regulate a pro-inflammatory phenotype in BMAs. However, the number of clinical studies is limited, and definitive conclusions cannot be drawn. Conclusion The preclinical studies reviewed indicate that BMAs may play a crucial role in bone metastasis in prostate, breast, and malignant melanoma cancers. Nevertheless, further preclinical and clinical studies are needed to better understand the complex role and relationship between BMAs and cancer cells in the bone microenvironment. Targeting BMAs in combination with standard treatments holds promise as a potential therapeutic strategy for bone metastasis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F. Salamanna
- Surgical Sciences and Technologies, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy
| | - D. Contartese
- Surgical Sciences and Technologies, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy
| | - C. Errani
- 3rd Orthopaedic and Traumatologic Clinic Prevalently Oncologic, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy
| | - M. Sartori
- Surgical Sciences and Technologies, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy
| | - V. Borsari
- Surgical Sciences and Technologies, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy
| | - G. Giavaresi
- Surgical Sciences and Technologies, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Constantin GB, Firescu D, Mihailov R, Constantin I, Ștefanopol IA, Iordan DA, Ștefănescu BI, Bîrlă R, Panaitescu E. A Novel Clinical Nomogram for Predicting Overall Survival in Patients with Emergency Surgery for Colorectal Cancer. J Pers Med 2023; 13:jpm13040575. [PMID: 37108961 PMCID: PMC10145637 DOI: 10.3390/jpm13040575] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2023] [Revised: 03/14/2023] [Accepted: 03/21/2023] [Indexed: 04/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Long-term survival after emergency colorectal cancer surgery is low, and its estimation is most frequently neglected, with priority given to the immediate prognosis. This study aimed to propose an effective nomogram to predict overall survival in these patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS We retrospectively studied 437 patients who underwent emergency surgery for colorectal cancer between 2008 and 2019, in whom we analyzed the clinical, paraclinical, and surgical parameters. RESULTS Only 30 patients (6.86%) survived until the end of the study. We identified the risk factors through the univariate Cox regression analysis and a multivariate Cox regression model. The model included the following eight independent prognostic factors: age > 63 years, Charlson score > 4, revised cardiac risk index (RCRI), LMR (lymphocytes/neutrophils ratio), tumor site, macroscopic tumoral invasion, surgery type, and lymph node dissection (p < 0.05 for all), with an AUC (area under the curve) of 0.831, with an ideal agreement between the predicted and observed probabilities. On this basis, we constructed a nomogram for prediction of overall survival. CONCLUSIONS The nomogram created, on the basis of a multivariate logistic regression model, has a good individual prediction of overall survival for patients with emergency surgery for colon cancer and may support clinicians when informing patients about prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Dorel Firescu
- Sf. Ap. Andrei Clinical Emergency County Hospital, 800216 Galati, Romania
- Clinic Surgery Department, Dunarea de Jos University, 800216 Galati, Romania
| | - Raul Mihailov
- Morphological and Functional Sciences Department, Dunarea de Jos University, 800216 Galati, Romania
- Sf. Ap. Andrei Clinical Emergency County Hospital, 800216 Galati, Romania
| | - Iulian Constantin
- Sf. Ap. Andrei Clinical Emergency County Hospital, 800216 Galati, Romania
- Clinic Surgery Department, Dunarea de Jos University, 800216 Galati, Romania
| | - Ioana Anca Ștefanopol
- Morphological and Functional Sciences Department, Dunarea de Jos University, 800216 Galati, Romania
| | - Daniel Andrei Iordan
- Individual Sports and Kinetotherapy Department, Dunarea de Jos University, 800008 Galati, Romania
| | - Bogdan Ioan Ștefănescu
- Sf. Ap. Andrei Clinical Emergency County Hospital, 800216 Galati, Romania
- Clinic Surgery Department, Dunarea de Jos University, 800216 Galati, Romania
| | - Rodica Bîrlă
- General Surgery Department, Carol Davila University, 050474 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Eugenia Panaitescu
- Medical Informatics and Biostatistics Department, Carol Davila University, 050474 Bucharest, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Valenzuela CD, Moaven O, Gawdi R, Stauffer JA, Del Piccolo NR, Cheung TT, Corvera CU, Wisneski AD, Cha C, Mangieri CW, Zarandi NP, Dourado J, Perry KC, Russell G, Shen P. Association of primary tumor laterality with surgical outcomes for colorectal liver metastases: results from the Colorectal Liver Operative Metastasis International Collaborative (COLOMIC). HPB (Oxford) 2022; 24:1351-1361. [PMID: 35289279 PMCID: PMC9356971 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2022.02.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2021] [Revised: 02/01/2022] [Accepted: 02/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Primary laterality of colorectal cancer is thought to be associated with differences in outcomes. Liver metastasis is the most common site of solitary colorectal cancer spread. However, how primary colorectal cancer laterality affects outcomes in colorectal liver metastasis remains unclear. METHODS The Colorectal Liver Operative Metastasis International Collaborative (COLOMIC) of operative hepatectomy cases for colorectal liver metastasis was compiled from five participating institutions. This included consecutive cases from 2000 to 2018 at all sites. A total of 884 patients were included in this study. Univariate, multivariate, and Kaplan-Meier analyses were performed. RESULTS Patients with left-sided versus right-sided cancers had significantly better overall survival: 49.4 vs. 41.8 months (p < 0.05). Patients with KRAS mutations had significantly worse median overall survival compared to KRAS wild-type (43.6 vs 56.1 months; p < 0.001). In left-sided cancers, KRAS mutations were associated with significantly worse median overall survival compared to KRAS wild-type cancers (43.6 vs 56.6 months; p < 0.01). This association was absent in patients with right-sided primary tumors. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed different variable sets (non-overlapping) were associated with overall survival, when comparing left-sided and right-sided cancers. CONCLUSION Understanding how primary tumor laterality and related biological aspects affect long-term outcomes can potentially inform treatment decisions for patients with colorectal liver metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristian D Valenzuela
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Omeed Moaven
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC, USA; Department of Surgical Oncology, Mayo Clinic in Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Rohin Gawdi
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - John A Stauffer
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Mayo Clinic in Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Nico R Del Piccolo
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Mayo Clinic in Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Tan To Cheung
- Department of Surgery, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Carlos U Corvera
- Department of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Andrew D Wisneski
- Department of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Charles Cha
- Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Christopher W Mangieri
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Nima P Zarandi
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Justin Dourado
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Kathleen C Perry
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Gregory Russell
- Department of Biostatistical Sciences, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Perry Shen
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Emmons EC, Bishay S, Du L, Krebs H, Gandhi RT, Collins ZS, O'Hara R, Akhter NM, Wang EA, Grilli C, Brower JS, Peck SR, Petroziello M, Abdel Aal AK, Golzarian J, Kennedy AS, Matsuoka L, Sze DY, Brown DB. Survival and Toxicities after 90Y Transarterial Radioembolization of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in the RESIN Registry. Radiology 2022; 305:228-236. [PMID: 35762890 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.220387] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Background Patients with unresectable, chemorefractory hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer have considerable mortality. The role of transarterial radioembolization (TARE) with yttrium 90 (90Y) microspheres is not defined because most reports are from a single center with limited patient numbers. Purpose To report outcomes in participants with colorectal cancer metastases treated with resin 90Y microspheres from a prospective multicenter observational registry. Materials and Methods This study treated enrolled adult participants with TARE using resin microspheres for liver-dominant metastatic colorectal cancer at 42 centers, with enrollment from July 2015 through August 2020. TARE was used as the first-, second-, or third-line therapy or beyond. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and toxicity outcomes were assessed by line of therapy by using Kaplan-Meier analysis for OS and PFS and Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5, for toxicities. Results A total of 498 participants (median age, 60 years [IQR, 52-69 years]; 298 men [60%]) were treated. TARE was used in first-line therapy in 74 of 442 participants (17%), second-line therapy in 180 participants (41%), and third-line therapy or beyond in 188 participants (43%). The median OS of the entire cohort was 15.0 months (95% CI: 13.3, 16.9). The median OS by line of therapy was 13.9 months for first-line therapy, 17.4 months for second-line therapy, and 12.5 months for third-line therapy (χ2 = 9.7; P = .002). Whole-group PFS was 7.4 months (95% CI: 6.4, 9.5). The median PFS by line of therapy was 7.9 months for first-line therapy, 10.0 months for second-line therapy, and 5.9 months for third-line therapy (χ2 = 8.3; P = .004). TARE-attributable grade 3 or 4 hepatic toxicities were 8.4% for bilirubin (29 of 347 participants) and 3.7% for albumin (13 of 347). Grade 3 and higher toxicities were greater with third-line therapy for bilirubin (P = .01) and albumin (P = .008). Conclusion Median overall survival (OS) after transarterial radioembolization (TARE) with yttrium 90 microspheres for liver-dominant metastatic colorectal cancer was 15.0 months. The longest OS was achieved when TARE was part of second-line therapy. Grade 3 or greater hepatic function toxicity rates were less than 10%. Clinical trial registration no. NCT02685631 Published under a CC BY 4.0 license. Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Liddell in this issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erica C Emmons
- From the Departments of Interventional Radiology (E.C.E., D.B.B.), Biostatistics (L.D.), and Transplant Surgery (L.M.), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 1161 21st Ave S, CCC-1118 Medical Center North, Nashville, TN 37232; Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tenn (S.B.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Cancer Treatment Centers of America, Atlanta, Ga (H.K.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Miami Cardiac and Vascular Institute, Miami, Fla (R.T.G.); Department of Interventional Radiology, University of Kansas, Kansas City, Kan (Z.S.C.); Department of Interventional Radiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah (R.O.); Department of Interventional Radiology, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Md (N.M.A.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC (E.A.W.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Christiana Medical Center, Newark, Del (C.G.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Providence Sacred Heart, Spokane, Wash (J.S.B.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Sanford Health, Sioux Falls, SD (S.R.P.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Roswell Park Memorial Institute, Buffalo, NY (M.P.); Department of Interventional Radiology, University of Texas, Houston, Tex (A.K.A.A.); Department of Interventional Radiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minn (J.G.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, Tenn (A.S.K.); and Department of Interventional Radiology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, Calif (D.Y.S.)
| | - Steven Bishay
- From the Departments of Interventional Radiology (E.C.E., D.B.B.), Biostatistics (L.D.), and Transplant Surgery (L.M.), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 1161 21st Ave S, CCC-1118 Medical Center North, Nashville, TN 37232; Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tenn (S.B.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Cancer Treatment Centers of America, Atlanta, Ga (H.K.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Miami Cardiac and Vascular Institute, Miami, Fla (R.T.G.); Department of Interventional Radiology, University of Kansas, Kansas City, Kan (Z.S.C.); Department of Interventional Radiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah (R.O.); Department of Interventional Radiology, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Md (N.M.A.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC (E.A.W.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Christiana Medical Center, Newark, Del (C.G.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Providence Sacred Heart, Spokane, Wash (J.S.B.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Sanford Health, Sioux Falls, SD (S.R.P.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Roswell Park Memorial Institute, Buffalo, NY (M.P.); Department of Interventional Radiology, University of Texas, Houston, Tex (A.K.A.A.); Department of Interventional Radiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minn (J.G.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, Tenn (A.S.K.); and Department of Interventional Radiology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, Calif (D.Y.S.)
| | - Liping Du
- From the Departments of Interventional Radiology (E.C.E., D.B.B.), Biostatistics (L.D.), and Transplant Surgery (L.M.), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 1161 21st Ave S, CCC-1118 Medical Center North, Nashville, TN 37232; Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tenn (S.B.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Cancer Treatment Centers of America, Atlanta, Ga (H.K.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Miami Cardiac and Vascular Institute, Miami, Fla (R.T.G.); Department of Interventional Radiology, University of Kansas, Kansas City, Kan (Z.S.C.); Department of Interventional Radiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah (R.O.); Department of Interventional Radiology, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Md (N.M.A.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC (E.A.W.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Christiana Medical Center, Newark, Del (C.G.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Providence Sacred Heart, Spokane, Wash (J.S.B.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Sanford Health, Sioux Falls, SD (S.R.P.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Roswell Park Memorial Institute, Buffalo, NY (M.P.); Department of Interventional Radiology, University of Texas, Houston, Tex (A.K.A.A.); Department of Interventional Radiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minn (J.G.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, Tenn (A.S.K.); and Department of Interventional Radiology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, Calif (D.Y.S.)
| | - Henry Krebs
- From the Departments of Interventional Radiology (E.C.E., D.B.B.), Biostatistics (L.D.), and Transplant Surgery (L.M.), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 1161 21st Ave S, CCC-1118 Medical Center North, Nashville, TN 37232; Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tenn (S.B.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Cancer Treatment Centers of America, Atlanta, Ga (H.K.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Miami Cardiac and Vascular Institute, Miami, Fla (R.T.G.); Department of Interventional Radiology, University of Kansas, Kansas City, Kan (Z.S.C.); Department of Interventional Radiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah (R.O.); Department of Interventional Radiology, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Md (N.M.A.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC (E.A.W.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Christiana Medical Center, Newark, Del (C.G.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Providence Sacred Heart, Spokane, Wash (J.S.B.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Sanford Health, Sioux Falls, SD (S.R.P.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Roswell Park Memorial Institute, Buffalo, NY (M.P.); Department of Interventional Radiology, University of Texas, Houston, Tex (A.K.A.A.); Department of Interventional Radiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minn (J.G.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, Tenn (A.S.K.); and Department of Interventional Radiology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, Calif (D.Y.S.)
| | - Ripal T Gandhi
- From the Departments of Interventional Radiology (E.C.E., D.B.B.), Biostatistics (L.D.), and Transplant Surgery (L.M.), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 1161 21st Ave S, CCC-1118 Medical Center North, Nashville, TN 37232; Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tenn (S.B.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Cancer Treatment Centers of America, Atlanta, Ga (H.K.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Miami Cardiac and Vascular Institute, Miami, Fla (R.T.G.); Department of Interventional Radiology, University of Kansas, Kansas City, Kan (Z.S.C.); Department of Interventional Radiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah (R.O.); Department of Interventional Radiology, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Md (N.M.A.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC (E.A.W.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Christiana Medical Center, Newark, Del (C.G.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Providence Sacred Heart, Spokane, Wash (J.S.B.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Sanford Health, Sioux Falls, SD (S.R.P.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Roswell Park Memorial Institute, Buffalo, NY (M.P.); Department of Interventional Radiology, University of Texas, Houston, Tex (A.K.A.A.); Department of Interventional Radiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minn (J.G.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, Tenn (A.S.K.); and Department of Interventional Radiology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, Calif (D.Y.S.)
| | - Zachary S Collins
- From the Departments of Interventional Radiology (E.C.E., D.B.B.), Biostatistics (L.D.), and Transplant Surgery (L.M.), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 1161 21st Ave S, CCC-1118 Medical Center North, Nashville, TN 37232; Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tenn (S.B.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Cancer Treatment Centers of America, Atlanta, Ga (H.K.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Miami Cardiac and Vascular Institute, Miami, Fla (R.T.G.); Department of Interventional Radiology, University of Kansas, Kansas City, Kan (Z.S.C.); Department of Interventional Radiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah (R.O.); Department of Interventional Radiology, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Md (N.M.A.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC (E.A.W.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Christiana Medical Center, Newark, Del (C.G.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Providence Sacred Heart, Spokane, Wash (J.S.B.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Sanford Health, Sioux Falls, SD (S.R.P.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Roswell Park Memorial Institute, Buffalo, NY (M.P.); Department of Interventional Radiology, University of Texas, Houston, Tex (A.K.A.A.); Department of Interventional Radiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minn (J.G.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, Tenn (A.S.K.); and Department of Interventional Radiology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, Calif (D.Y.S.)
| | - Ryan O'Hara
- From the Departments of Interventional Radiology (E.C.E., D.B.B.), Biostatistics (L.D.), and Transplant Surgery (L.M.), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 1161 21st Ave S, CCC-1118 Medical Center North, Nashville, TN 37232; Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tenn (S.B.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Cancer Treatment Centers of America, Atlanta, Ga (H.K.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Miami Cardiac and Vascular Institute, Miami, Fla (R.T.G.); Department of Interventional Radiology, University of Kansas, Kansas City, Kan (Z.S.C.); Department of Interventional Radiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah (R.O.); Department of Interventional Radiology, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Md (N.M.A.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC (E.A.W.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Christiana Medical Center, Newark, Del (C.G.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Providence Sacred Heart, Spokane, Wash (J.S.B.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Sanford Health, Sioux Falls, SD (S.R.P.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Roswell Park Memorial Institute, Buffalo, NY (M.P.); Department of Interventional Radiology, University of Texas, Houston, Tex (A.K.A.A.); Department of Interventional Radiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minn (J.G.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, Tenn (A.S.K.); and Department of Interventional Radiology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, Calif (D.Y.S.)
| | - Nabeel M Akhter
- From the Departments of Interventional Radiology (E.C.E., D.B.B.), Biostatistics (L.D.), and Transplant Surgery (L.M.), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 1161 21st Ave S, CCC-1118 Medical Center North, Nashville, TN 37232; Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tenn (S.B.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Cancer Treatment Centers of America, Atlanta, Ga (H.K.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Miami Cardiac and Vascular Institute, Miami, Fla (R.T.G.); Department of Interventional Radiology, University of Kansas, Kansas City, Kan (Z.S.C.); Department of Interventional Radiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah (R.O.); Department of Interventional Radiology, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Md (N.M.A.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC (E.A.W.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Christiana Medical Center, Newark, Del (C.G.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Providence Sacred Heart, Spokane, Wash (J.S.B.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Sanford Health, Sioux Falls, SD (S.R.P.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Roswell Park Memorial Institute, Buffalo, NY (M.P.); Department of Interventional Radiology, University of Texas, Houston, Tex (A.K.A.A.); Department of Interventional Radiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minn (J.G.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, Tenn (A.S.K.); and Department of Interventional Radiology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, Calif (D.Y.S.)
| | - Eric A Wang
- From the Departments of Interventional Radiology (E.C.E., D.B.B.), Biostatistics (L.D.), and Transplant Surgery (L.M.), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 1161 21st Ave S, CCC-1118 Medical Center North, Nashville, TN 37232; Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tenn (S.B.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Cancer Treatment Centers of America, Atlanta, Ga (H.K.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Miami Cardiac and Vascular Institute, Miami, Fla (R.T.G.); Department of Interventional Radiology, University of Kansas, Kansas City, Kan (Z.S.C.); Department of Interventional Radiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah (R.O.); Department of Interventional Radiology, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Md (N.M.A.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC (E.A.W.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Christiana Medical Center, Newark, Del (C.G.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Providence Sacred Heart, Spokane, Wash (J.S.B.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Sanford Health, Sioux Falls, SD (S.R.P.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Roswell Park Memorial Institute, Buffalo, NY (M.P.); Department of Interventional Radiology, University of Texas, Houston, Tex (A.K.A.A.); Department of Interventional Radiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minn (J.G.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, Tenn (A.S.K.); and Department of Interventional Radiology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, Calif (D.Y.S.)
| | - Christopher Grilli
- From the Departments of Interventional Radiology (E.C.E., D.B.B.), Biostatistics (L.D.), and Transplant Surgery (L.M.), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 1161 21st Ave S, CCC-1118 Medical Center North, Nashville, TN 37232; Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tenn (S.B.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Cancer Treatment Centers of America, Atlanta, Ga (H.K.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Miami Cardiac and Vascular Institute, Miami, Fla (R.T.G.); Department of Interventional Radiology, University of Kansas, Kansas City, Kan (Z.S.C.); Department of Interventional Radiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah (R.O.); Department of Interventional Radiology, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Md (N.M.A.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC (E.A.W.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Christiana Medical Center, Newark, Del (C.G.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Providence Sacred Heart, Spokane, Wash (J.S.B.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Sanford Health, Sioux Falls, SD (S.R.P.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Roswell Park Memorial Institute, Buffalo, NY (M.P.); Department of Interventional Radiology, University of Texas, Houston, Tex (A.K.A.A.); Department of Interventional Radiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minn (J.G.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, Tenn (A.S.K.); and Department of Interventional Radiology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, Calif (D.Y.S.)
| | - Jayson S Brower
- From the Departments of Interventional Radiology (E.C.E., D.B.B.), Biostatistics (L.D.), and Transplant Surgery (L.M.), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 1161 21st Ave S, CCC-1118 Medical Center North, Nashville, TN 37232; Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tenn (S.B.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Cancer Treatment Centers of America, Atlanta, Ga (H.K.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Miami Cardiac and Vascular Institute, Miami, Fla (R.T.G.); Department of Interventional Radiology, University of Kansas, Kansas City, Kan (Z.S.C.); Department of Interventional Radiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah (R.O.); Department of Interventional Radiology, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Md (N.M.A.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC (E.A.W.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Christiana Medical Center, Newark, Del (C.G.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Providence Sacred Heart, Spokane, Wash (J.S.B.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Sanford Health, Sioux Falls, SD (S.R.P.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Roswell Park Memorial Institute, Buffalo, NY (M.P.); Department of Interventional Radiology, University of Texas, Houston, Tex (A.K.A.A.); Department of Interventional Radiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minn (J.G.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, Tenn (A.S.K.); and Department of Interventional Radiology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, Calif (D.Y.S.)
| | - Shannon R Peck
- From the Departments of Interventional Radiology (E.C.E., D.B.B.), Biostatistics (L.D.), and Transplant Surgery (L.M.), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 1161 21st Ave S, CCC-1118 Medical Center North, Nashville, TN 37232; Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tenn (S.B.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Cancer Treatment Centers of America, Atlanta, Ga (H.K.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Miami Cardiac and Vascular Institute, Miami, Fla (R.T.G.); Department of Interventional Radiology, University of Kansas, Kansas City, Kan (Z.S.C.); Department of Interventional Radiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah (R.O.); Department of Interventional Radiology, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Md (N.M.A.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC (E.A.W.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Christiana Medical Center, Newark, Del (C.G.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Providence Sacred Heart, Spokane, Wash (J.S.B.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Sanford Health, Sioux Falls, SD (S.R.P.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Roswell Park Memorial Institute, Buffalo, NY (M.P.); Department of Interventional Radiology, University of Texas, Houston, Tex (A.K.A.A.); Department of Interventional Radiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minn (J.G.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, Tenn (A.S.K.); and Department of Interventional Radiology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, Calif (D.Y.S.)
| | - Michael Petroziello
- From the Departments of Interventional Radiology (E.C.E., D.B.B.), Biostatistics (L.D.), and Transplant Surgery (L.M.), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 1161 21st Ave S, CCC-1118 Medical Center North, Nashville, TN 37232; Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tenn (S.B.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Cancer Treatment Centers of America, Atlanta, Ga (H.K.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Miami Cardiac and Vascular Institute, Miami, Fla (R.T.G.); Department of Interventional Radiology, University of Kansas, Kansas City, Kan (Z.S.C.); Department of Interventional Radiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah (R.O.); Department of Interventional Radiology, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Md (N.M.A.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC (E.A.W.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Christiana Medical Center, Newark, Del (C.G.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Providence Sacred Heart, Spokane, Wash (J.S.B.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Sanford Health, Sioux Falls, SD (S.R.P.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Roswell Park Memorial Institute, Buffalo, NY (M.P.); Department of Interventional Radiology, University of Texas, Houston, Tex (A.K.A.A.); Department of Interventional Radiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minn (J.G.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, Tenn (A.S.K.); and Department of Interventional Radiology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, Calif (D.Y.S.)
| | - Ahmed K Abdel Aal
- From the Departments of Interventional Radiology (E.C.E., D.B.B.), Biostatistics (L.D.), and Transplant Surgery (L.M.), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 1161 21st Ave S, CCC-1118 Medical Center North, Nashville, TN 37232; Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tenn (S.B.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Cancer Treatment Centers of America, Atlanta, Ga (H.K.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Miami Cardiac and Vascular Institute, Miami, Fla (R.T.G.); Department of Interventional Radiology, University of Kansas, Kansas City, Kan (Z.S.C.); Department of Interventional Radiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah (R.O.); Department of Interventional Radiology, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Md (N.M.A.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC (E.A.W.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Christiana Medical Center, Newark, Del (C.G.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Providence Sacred Heart, Spokane, Wash (J.S.B.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Sanford Health, Sioux Falls, SD (S.R.P.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Roswell Park Memorial Institute, Buffalo, NY (M.P.); Department of Interventional Radiology, University of Texas, Houston, Tex (A.K.A.A.); Department of Interventional Radiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minn (J.G.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, Tenn (A.S.K.); and Department of Interventional Radiology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, Calif (D.Y.S.)
| | - Jafar Golzarian
- From the Departments of Interventional Radiology (E.C.E., D.B.B.), Biostatistics (L.D.), and Transplant Surgery (L.M.), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 1161 21st Ave S, CCC-1118 Medical Center North, Nashville, TN 37232; Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tenn (S.B.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Cancer Treatment Centers of America, Atlanta, Ga (H.K.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Miami Cardiac and Vascular Institute, Miami, Fla (R.T.G.); Department of Interventional Radiology, University of Kansas, Kansas City, Kan (Z.S.C.); Department of Interventional Radiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah (R.O.); Department of Interventional Radiology, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Md (N.M.A.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC (E.A.W.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Christiana Medical Center, Newark, Del (C.G.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Providence Sacred Heart, Spokane, Wash (J.S.B.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Sanford Health, Sioux Falls, SD (S.R.P.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Roswell Park Memorial Institute, Buffalo, NY (M.P.); Department of Interventional Radiology, University of Texas, Houston, Tex (A.K.A.A.); Department of Interventional Radiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minn (J.G.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, Tenn (A.S.K.); and Department of Interventional Radiology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, Calif (D.Y.S.)
| | - Andrew S Kennedy
- From the Departments of Interventional Radiology (E.C.E., D.B.B.), Biostatistics (L.D.), and Transplant Surgery (L.M.), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 1161 21st Ave S, CCC-1118 Medical Center North, Nashville, TN 37232; Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tenn (S.B.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Cancer Treatment Centers of America, Atlanta, Ga (H.K.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Miami Cardiac and Vascular Institute, Miami, Fla (R.T.G.); Department of Interventional Radiology, University of Kansas, Kansas City, Kan (Z.S.C.); Department of Interventional Radiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah (R.O.); Department of Interventional Radiology, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Md (N.M.A.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC (E.A.W.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Christiana Medical Center, Newark, Del (C.G.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Providence Sacred Heart, Spokane, Wash (J.S.B.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Sanford Health, Sioux Falls, SD (S.R.P.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Roswell Park Memorial Institute, Buffalo, NY (M.P.); Department of Interventional Radiology, University of Texas, Houston, Tex (A.K.A.A.); Department of Interventional Radiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minn (J.G.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, Tenn (A.S.K.); and Department of Interventional Radiology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, Calif (D.Y.S.)
| | - Lea Matsuoka
- From the Departments of Interventional Radiology (E.C.E., D.B.B.), Biostatistics (L.D.), and Transplant Surgery (L.M.), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 1161 21st Ave S, CCC-1118 Medical Center North, Nashville, TN 37232; Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tenn (S.B.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Cancer Treatment Centers of America, Atlanta, Ga (H.K.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Miami Cardiac and Vascular Institute, Miami, Fla (R.T.G.); Department of Interventional Radiology, University of Kansas, Kansas City, Kan (Z.S.C.); Department of Interventional Radiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah (R.O.); Department of Interventional Radiology, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Md (N.M.A.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC (E.A.W.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Christiana Medical Center, Newark, Del (C.G.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Providence Sacred Heart, Spokane, Wash (J.S.B.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Sanford Health, Sioux Falls, SD (S.R.P.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Roswell Park Memorial Institute, Buffalo, NY (M.P.); Department of Interventional Radiology, University of Texas, Houston, Tex (A.K.A.A.); Department of Interventional Radiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minn (J.G.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, Tenn (A.S.K.); and Department of Interventional Radiology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, Calif (D.Y.S.)
| | - Daniel Y Sze
- From the Departments of Interventional Radiology (E.C.E., D.B.B.), Biostatistics (L.D.), and Transplant Surgery (L.M.), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 1161 21st Ave S, CCC-1118 Medical Center North, Nashville, TN 37232; Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tenn (S.B.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Cancer Treatment Centers of America, Atlanta, Ga (H.K.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Miami Cardiac and Vascular Institute, Miami, Fla (R.T.G.); Department of Interventional Radiology, University of Kansas, Kansas City, Kan (Z.S.C.); Department of Interventional Radiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah (R.O.); Department of Interventional Radiology, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Md (N.M.A.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC (E.A.W.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Christiana Medical Center, Newark, Del (C.G.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Providence Sacred Heart, Spokane, Wash (J.S.B.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Sanford Health, Sioux Falls, SD (S.R.P.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Roswell Park Memorial Institute, Buffalo, NY (M.P.); Department of Interventional Radiology, University of Texas, Houston, Tex (A.K.A.A.); Department of Interventional Radiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minn (J.G.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, Tenn (A.S.K.); and Department of Interventional Radiology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, Calif (D.Y.S.)
| | - Daniel B Brown
- From the Departments of Interventional Radiology (E.C.E., D.B.B.), Biostatistics (L.D.), and Transplant Surgery (L.M.), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 1161 21st Ave S, CCC-1118 Medical Center North, Nashville, TN 37232; Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tenn (S.B.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Cancer Treatment Centers of America, Atlanta, Ga (H.K.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Miami Cardiac and Vascular Institute, Miami, Fla (R.T.G.); Department of Interventional Radiology, University of Kansas, Kansas City, Kan (Z.S.C.); Department of Interventional Radiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah (R.O.); Department of Interventional Radiology, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Md (N.M.A.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC (E.A.W.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Christiana Medical Center, Newark, Del (C.G.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Providence Sacred Heart, Spokane, Wash (J.S.B.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Sanford Health, Sioux Falls, SD (S.R.P.); Department of Interventional Radiology, Roswell Park Memorial Institute, Buffalo, NY (M.P.); Department of Interventional Radiology, University of Texas, Houston, Tex (A.K.A.A.); Department of Interventional Radiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minn (J.G.); Department of Radiation Oncology, Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, Tenn (A.S.K.); and Department of Interventional Radiology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, Calif (D.Y.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Menichelli C, Casamassima F, Aristei C, Ingrosso G, Borghesi S, Arcidiacono F, Lancellotta V, Franzese C, Arcangeli S. Stereotactic radiotherapy for liver oligometastases. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2022; 27:32-39. [PMID: 35402041 PMCID: PMC8989451 DOI: 10.5603/rpor.a2021.0130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2021] [Accepted: 11/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
The liver is the first metastatic site in 15–25% of colorectal cancer patients and one of the first metastatic sites for lung and breast cancer patients. A computed tomography (CT ) scan with contrast medium is a standard procedure for assessing liver lesions but magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) characterizes small lesions better thanks to its high soft-tissue contrast. Positron emission tomography with computed tomography (PET-CT ) plays a complementary role in the diagnosis of liver metastases. Triphasic (arterial, venous and time-delayed) acquisition of contrast-medium CT images is the first step in treatment planning. Since the liver exhibits a relatively wide mobility due to respiratory movements and bowel filling, appropriate techniques are needed for target identification and motion management. Contouring requires precise recognition of target lesion edges. Information from contrast MRI and/or PET-CT is crucial as they best visualize metastatic disease in the parenchyma. Even though different fractionation schedules were reported, doses and fractionation schedules for liver stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT ) have not yet been established. The best local control rates were obtained with BED10 values over 100 Gy. Local control rates from most retrospective studies, which were limited by short follow-ups and included different primary tumors with intrinsic heterogeneity, ranged from 60% to 90% at 1 and 2 years. The most common SRT-related toxicities are increases in liver enzymes, hyperbilirubinemia and hypoalbuminemia. Overall, late toxicity is mild even in long-term follow-ups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Cynthia Aristei
- Radiation Oncology Section, University of Perugia and Perugia General Hospital, Italy
| | - Gianluca Ingrosso
- Radiation Oncology Section, University of Perugia and Perugia General Hospital, Italy
| | - Simona Borghesi
- Radiation Oncology Unit of Arezzo-Valdarno, Azienda USL Toscana Sud Est, Italy
| | | | - Valentina Lancellotta
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, UOC di Radioterapia, Dipartimento di Scienze Radiologiche, Radioterapiche ed Ematologiche, Roma, Italy
| | - Ciro Franzese
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital - IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefano Arcangeli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Policlinico S. Gerardo and University of Milan Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Xiao C, Zhou M, Yang X, Wang H, Tang Z, Zhou Z, Tian Z, Liu Q, Li X, Jiang W, Luo J. Accurate Prediction of Metachronous Liver Metastasis in Stage I-III Colorectal Cancer Patients Using Deep Learning With Digital Pathological Images. Front Oncol 2022; 12:844067. [PMID: 35433467 PMCID: PMC9010865 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.844067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2021] [Accepted: 03/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
ObjectivesMetachronous liver metastasis (LM) significantly impacts the prognosis of stage I-III colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. An effective biomarker to predict LM after surgery is urgently needed. We aimed to develop deep learning-based models to assist in predicting LM in stage I-III CRC patients using digital pathological images.MethodsSix-hundred eleven patients were retrospectively included in the study and randomly divided into training (428 patients) and validation (183 patients) cohorts according to the 7:3 ratio. Digital HE images from training cohort patients were used to construct the LM risk score based on a 50-layer residual convolutional neural network (ResNet-50). An LM prediction model was established by multivariable Cox analysis and confirmed in the validation cohort. The performance of the integrated nomogram was assessed with respect to its calibration, discrimination, and clinical application value.ResultsPatients were divided into low- and high-LM risk score groups according to the cutoff value and significant differences were observed in the LM of the different risk score groups in the training and validation cohorts (P<0.001). Multivariable analysis revealed that the LM risk score, VELIPI, pT stage and pN stage were independent predictors of LM. Then, the prediction model was developed and presented as a nomogram to predict the 1-, 2-, and 3-year probability of LM. The integrated nomogram achieved satisfactory discrimination, with C-indexes of 0.807 (95% CI: 0.787, 0.827) and 0.812 (95% CI: 0.773, 0.850) and AUCs of 0.840 (95% CI: 0.795, 0.885) and 0.848 (95% CI: 0.766, 0.931) in the training and validation cohorts, respectively. Favorable calibration of the nomogram was confirmed in the training and validation cohorts. Integrated discrimination improvement and net reclassification index indicated that the integrated nomogram was superior to the traditional clinicopathological model. Decision curve analysis confirmed that the nomogram has clinical application value.ConclusionsThe LM risk score based on ResNet-50 and digital HE images was significantly associated with LM. The integrated nomogram could identify stage I-III CRC patients at high risk of LM after primary colectomy, so it may serve as a potential tool to choose the appropriate treatment to improve the prognosis of stage I-III CRC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chanchan Xiao
- Department of General Surgery, Hunan Provincial People’s Hospital (The First-Affiliated Hospital of Hunan Normal University), Changsha, China
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Institute of Geriatric Immunology, School of Medicine, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Meihua Zhou
- Department of General Surgery, Hunan Provincial People’s Hospital (The First-Affiliated Hospital of Hunan Normal University), Changsha, China
| | - Xihua Yang
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Chenzhou No. 1 People’s Hospital, Chenzhou, China
| | - Haoyun Wang
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Institute of Geriatric Immunology, School of Medicine, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhen Tang
- Department of General Surgery, Hunan Provincial People’s Hospital (The First-Affiliated Hospital of Hunan Normal University), Changsha, China
| | - Zheng Zhou
- Department of General Surgery, Hunan Provincial People’s Hospital (The First-Affiliated Hospital of Hunan Normal University), Changsha, China
| | - Zeyu Tian
- Department of General Surgery, Hunan Provincial People’s Hospital (The First-Affiliated Hospital of Hunan Normal University), Changsha, China
| | - Qi Liu
- Department of General Surgery, Hunan Provincial People’s Hospital (The First-Affiliated Hospital of Hunan Normal University), Changsha, China
| | - Xiaojie Li
- Department of Pathology, Chenzhou No. 1 People’s Hospital, Chenzhou, China
| | - Wei Jiang
- Department of General Surgery, Hunan Provincial People’s Hospital (The First-Affiliated Hospital of Hunan Normal University), Changsha, China
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Chenzhou No. 1 People’s Hospital, Chenzhou, China
- *Correspondence: Jihui Luo, ; Wei Jiang,
| | - Jihui Luo
- Department of General Surgery, Hunan Provincial People’s Hospital (The First-Affiliated Hospital of Hunan Normal University), Changsha, China
- *Correspondence: Jihui Luo, ; Wei Jiang,
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Karagiannis E, Strouthos I, Leczynski A, Zamboglou N, Ferentinos K. Narrative Review of High-Dose-Rate Interstitial Brachytherapy in Primary or Secondary Liver Tumors. Front Oncol 2022; 12:800920. [PMID: 35299745 PMCID: PMC8920984 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.800920] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2021] [Accepted: 01/31/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
The optimal management of intrahepatic malignancies involves a multidisciplinary approach. Although surgical resection has been considered the only curative approach, the use of several minimally invasive ablative techniques has dramatically increased the last two decades, mainly due to the fact that they provide similar oncological results with significantly decreased morbidity. Among these modalities, interstitial liver brachytherapy, probably the most flexible liver ablative method, with excellent clinical data on its safety and effectiveness, is frequently not even mentioned as an option in the current peer reviewed literature and guidelines. Brachytherapy is a type of radiotherapy utilizing radionuclides that are directly inserted into the tumor. Compared to external beam radiation therapy, brachytherapy has the potential to deliver an ablative radiation dose over a short period of time, with the advantage of a rapid dose fall-off, that allows for sparing of adjacent healthy tissue. For numerous malignancies such as skin, gynecological, breast, prostate, head and neck, bladder, liver and soft-tissue tumors, brachytherapy as a monotherapy or combined with external beam radiation therapy, has become a standard treatment for many decades. This review article aims to describe the high-dose-rate liver brachytherapy technique, its selection criteria, present its advantages and disadvantages, as well as the available clinical data, in order to help physicians to explore and hopefully introduce liver brachytherapy into their clinical routine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Efstratios Karagiannis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, German Oncology Center, Limassol, Cyprus.,Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, European University Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Iosif Strouthos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, German Oncology Center, Limassol, Cyprus.,Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, European University Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Agnes Leczynski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, German Oncology Center, Limassol, Cyprus
| | - Nikolaos Zamboglou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, German Oncology Center, Limassol, Cyprus.,Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, European University Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Konstantinos Ferentinos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, German Oncology Center, Limassol, Cyprus.,Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, European University Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Rakić M, Šabić A, Kliček R, Amić F, Kolovrat M, Đuzel A. Laparoscopic synchronous resection of rectal cancer and liver metastases: A case report and review of the literature. Int J Surg Case Rep 2022; 92:106900. [PMID: 35255420 PMCID: PMC8902603 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2022.106900] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2022] [Revised: 02/23/2022] [Accepted: 02/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction and importance During the past decade, there are several studies which showed the advantages of the laparoscopic approach for treating colorectal cancer (CRC) or colorectal cancer liver metastasis (CRCLM). However, in contrast, there are only a few reports of combined one stage synchronous laparoscopic colorectal and liver metastasis resection, cold one stage minimally invasive approach (MIA). Case presentation Our patient was 51 years old woman. Rectal adenocarcinoma was verified three centimeters from the anal verge. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with rectal protocol modification indicated T1N0MO stage. We decided to do transanal local excision and achieved R0 resection. Half a year after the operation on the control MRI, lymphadenopathy was found along the rectum and possible recurrence of cancer. Also on the MRI was shown solitary, 4.7 × 2.7 × 3.8 cm big metastasis in the IVa/VIII segment of the liver. The patient was shown on a multidisciplinary team and it was decided to do laparoscopic synchronous resection of rectum and liver metastases. Clinical discussion During the last decades many articles with different strategies for treating CRC and liver metastasis were published. Some of them prefered two-stage surgical treatment, like liver first approach which allows initial control of liver metastases, and delivery of preoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer without the fear that liver metastases will meanwhile progress beyond the possibility of cure. Alternatively, the colon first approach is where the adjuvant chemotherapy is combined with the resection of the primary colorectal tumour with liver resection being undertaken (if at all) as a subsequent operation. By developing surgery, anaesthesia and critical care, the one stage approach for patients with CRC and liver metastasis started to be a reasonable option. Conclusion Totally laparoscopic synchronous resection of the colorectal cancer and synchronous colorectal liver metastasis is technically feasible and safe in the hands of the experienced abdominal surgeon. This type of approach offers all the benefits of the laparoscopic minimally invasiveness associated with good oncological outcomes, and it is indicated in well-selected patients. However, the real scientific answer to this question can be given just with randomised control trial which will be a real challenge for endoscopic surgeons in the future. Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer in the world. TLSR of the colorectal cancer and SCRLM is technically feasible and safe in the hands of the experienced abdominal surgeon This type of approach offers all the benefits of the laparoscopic minimally invasiveness associated with good outcomes
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mislav Rakić
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, Clinical Hospital Dubrava, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Ante Šabić
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, Clinical Hospital Dubrava, Zagreb, Croatia.
| | - Robert Kliček
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, Clinical Hospital Dubrava, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Fedor Amić
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, Clinical Hospital Dubrava, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Marijan Kolovrat
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, Clinical Hospital Dubrava, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Antonija Đuzel
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, Clinical Hospital Dubrava, Zagreb, Croatia
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Rompianesi G, Pegoraro F, Ceresa CDL, Montalti R, Troisi RI. Artificial intelligence in the diagnosis and management of colorectal cancer liver metastases. World J Gastroenterol 2022; 28:108-122. [PMID: 35125822 PMCID: PMC8793013 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i1.108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2021] [Revised: 10/12/2021] [Accepted: 12/25/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common malignancy worldwide, with approximately 50% of patients developing colorectal cancer liver metastasis (CRLM) during the follow-up period. Management of CRLM is best achieved via a multidisciplinary approach and the diagnostic and therapeutic decision-making process is complex. In order to optimize patients' survival and quality of life, there are several unsolved challenges which must be overcome. These primarily include a timely diagnosis and the identification of reliable prognostic factors. Furthermore, to allow optimal treatment options, a precision-medicine, personalized approach is required. The widespread digitalization of healthcare generates a vast amount of data and together with accessible high-performance computing, artificial intelligence (AI) technologies can be applied. By increasing diagnostic accuracy, reducing timings and costs, the application of AI could help mitigate the current shortcomings in CRLM management. In this review we explore the available evidence of the possible role of AI in all phases of the CRLM natural history. Radiomics analysis and convolutional neural networks (CNN) which combine computed tomography (CT) images with clinical data have been developed to predict CRLM development in CRC patients. AI models have also proven themselves to perform similarly or better than expert radiologists in detecting CRLM on CT and magnetic resonance scans or identifying them from the noninvasive analysis of patients' exhaled air. The application of AI and machine learning (ML) in diagnosing CRLM has also been extended to histopathological examination in order to rapidly and accurately identify CRLM tissue and its different histopathological growth patterns. ML and CNN have shown good accuracy in predicting response to chemotherapy, early local tumor progression after ablation treatment, and patient survival after surgical treatment or chemotherapy. Despite the initial enthusiasm and the accumulating evidence, AI technologies' role in healthcare and CRLM management is not yet fully established. Its limitations mainly concern safety and the lack of regulation and ethical considerations. AI is unlikely to fully replace any human role but could be actively integrated to facilitate physicians in their everyday practice. Moving towards a personalized and evidence-based patient approach and management, further larger, prospective and rigorous studies evaluating AI technologies in patients at risk or affected by CRLM are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gianluca Rompianesi
- Division of Hepato-Bilio-Pancreatic, Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University Hospital, Naples 80125, Italy
| | - Francesca Pegoraro
- Division of Hepato-Bilio-Pancreatic, Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University Hospital, Naples 80125, Italy
| | - Carlo DL Ceresa
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford OX3 9ES, United Kingdom
| | - Roberto Montalti
- Division of Hepato-Bilio-Pancreatic, Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery, Department of Public Health, Federico II University Hospital, Naples 80125, Italy
| | - Roberto Ivan Troisi
- Division of Hepato-Bilio-Pancreatic, Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University Hospital, Naples 80125, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Targeting Cancer by Using Nanoparticles to Modulate RHO GTPase Signaling. ADVANCES IN EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY 2022; 1357:115-127. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-88071-2_5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
18
|
Peng SH, Mbarak HS, Li YH, Ma C, Shang QL, Chen Z, Bian DJ, Xiao EH. Neoadjuvant intra-arterial versus intravenous chemotherapy in colorectal cancer. Medicine (Baltimore) 2021; 100:e28312. [PMID: 34941125 PMCID: PMC8701446 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000028312] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2021] [Accepted: 11/24/2021] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
To investigate the clinical benefits of transcatheter arterial infusion chemotherapy compared with intravenous chemotherapy in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC).From May 2013 to March 2018, 83 patients (50 men and 33 women) with surgically proven CRC were retrospectively included. Before surgery, 62 patients received conventional systemic chemotherapy, and 21 transcatheter arterial chemotherapy. Basic characteristics, disease control rate (DC), adverse reactions, postoperative complications, and toxicity profiles were collected and compared between the 2 groups.The sigmoid colon (43.37%) was the most common primary tumor location, and the least was the transverse colon (6.02%). Most lesions invaded the subserosa or other structures T3-4 (78.31%), and other lesions invaded the muscular layer T1-2 (21. 69%). The overall DC was 80.65% in the intravenous chemotherapy group and 90.48% in the arterial chemotherapy group (P < .05). Adverse events included myelosuppression and gastrointestinal reactions such as nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, abnormal liver function, and neurotoxicity, which were significantly less common in the intra-arterial group than in the intravenous group (P < .05). Postoperative complications included abdominal infection (11.29% vs 14.29%), intestinal obstruction (6.45% vs 4.76%), anastomotic bleeding (1.61% vs 0.00%), and anastomotic fistula (6.45% vs 4.76%) in the intravenous and intra-arterial groups, respectively (P > .05).Preoperative transcatheter arterial infusion chemotherapy is a safe and effective neoadjuvant chemotherapy measure for CRC with fewer adverse reactions and a higher overall DC.
Collapse
|
19
|
Elsharif M, Roche M, Wilson D, Basak S, Rowe I, Vijayanand D, Feltbower R, Treanor D, Roberts L, Guthrie A, Prasad R, Gilthorpe MS, Attia M, Sourbron S. Hepatectomy risk assessment with functional magnetic resonance imaging (HEPARIM). BMC Cancer 2021; 21:1139. [PMID: 34688256 PMCID: PMC8541801 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-021-08830-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2021] [Accepted: 10/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Post hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) remains a significant risk in patients undergoing curative liver resection for cancer, however currently available PHLF risk prediction investigations are not sufficiently accurate. The Hepatectomy risk assessment with functional magnetic resonance imaging trial (HEPARIM) aims to establish if quantitative MRI biomarkers of liver function & perfusion can be used to more accurately predict PHLF risk and FLR function, measured against indocyanine green (ICG) liver function test. Methods HEPARIM is an observational cohort study recruiting patients undergoing liver resection of 2 segments or more, prior to surgery patients will have both Dynamic Gadoxetate-enhanced (DGE) liver MRI and ICG testing. Day one post op ICG testing is repeated and R15 compared to the Gadoxetate Clearance (GC) of the future liver remnant (FLR-GC) as measure by preoperative DGE- MRI which is the primary outcome, and preoperative ICG R15 compared to GC of whole liver (WL-GC) as a secondary outcome. Data will be collected from medical records, biochemistry, pathology and radiology reports and used in a multi-variate analysis to the value of functional MRI and derive multivariant prediction models for future validation. Discussion If successful, this test will potentially provide an efficient means to quantitatively assess FLR function and PHLF risk enabling surgeons to push boundaries of liver surgery further while maintaining safe practice and thereby offering chance of cure to patients who would previously been deemed inoperable. MRI has the added benefit of already being part of the routine diagnostic pathway and as such would have limited additional burden on patients time or cost to health care systems. (Hepatectomy Risk Assessment With Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging - Full Text View -ClinicalTrials.gov, n.d.) Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04705194 - Registered 12th January 2021 – Retrospectively registered Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-021-08830-4.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamed Elsharif
- Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, St James University teaching Hospital, Level 6, Bexley Wing. St James's Hospital, Beckett Street, Leeds, LS9 7TF, England.
| | - Matthew Roche
- Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, St James University teaching Hospital, Level 6, Bexley Wing. St James's Hospital, Beckett Street, Leeds, LS9 7TF, England
| | - Daniel Wilson
- Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, St James University teaching Hospital, Level 6, Bexley Wing. St James's Hospital, Beckett Street, Leeds, LS9 7TF, England
| | - Susmita Basak
- Biomedical Imaging Sciences Department, Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine LIGHT Laboratories, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, England
| | - Ian Rowe
- Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, St James University teaching Hospital, Level 6, Bexley Wing. St James's Hospital, Beckett Street, Leeds, LS9 7TF, England
| | - Dhakshina Vijayanand
- Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, St James University teaching Hospital, Level 6, Bexley Wing. St James's Hospital, Beckett Street, Leeds, LS9 7TF, England
| | - Richard Feltbower
- Leeds Institute for Data Analytics, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Worsley Building, Clarendon Way, Leeds, LS2 9NL, England
| | - Darren Treanor
- Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, St James University teaching Hospital, Level 6, Bexley Wing. St James's Hospital, Beckett Street, Leeds, LS9 7TF, England.,Department of Clinical Pathology, and Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.,Center for Medical Image Science and Visualization (CMIV), Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.,Level 4, Welcome Trust Brenner Building, St. James's University Hospital, Leeds, LS9 7TF, England
| | - Lee Roberts
- Cardiovascular and Diabetes Research, Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine LIGHT Laboratories, University of Leeds, LS2 9JT, Leeds, England
| | - Ashley Guthrie
- Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, St James University teaching Hospital, Level 6, Bexley Wing. St James's Hospital, Beckett Street, Leeds, LS9 7TF, England
| | - Raj Prasad
- Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, St James University teaching Hospital, Level 6, Bexley Wing. St James's Hospital, Beckett Street, Leeds, LS9 7TF, England
| | - Mark S Gilthorpe
- Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, St James University teaching Hospital, Level 6, Bexley Wing. St James's Hospital, Beckett Street, Leeds, LS9 7TF, England
| | - Magdy Attia
- Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, St James University teaching Hospital, Level 6, Bexley Wing. St James's Hospital, Beckett Street, Leeds, LS9 7TF, England
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Taillieu E, De Meyere C, Nuytens F, Verslype C, D'Hondt M. Laparoscopic liver resection for colorectal liver metastases - short- and long-term outcomes: A systematic review. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2021; 13:732-757. [PMID: 34322201 PMCID: PMC8299931 DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v13.i7.732] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2021] [Revised: 05/16/2021] [Accepted: 06/25/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND For well-selected patients and procedures, laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) has become the gold standard for the treatment of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) when performed in specialized centers. However, little is currently known concerning patient-related and peri-operative factors that could play a role in survival outcomes associated with LLR for CRLM. AIM To provide an extensive summary of reported outcomes and prognostic factors associated with LLR for CRLM. METHODS A systematic search was performed in PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library using the keywords "colorectal liver metastases", "laparoscopy", "liver resection", "prognostic factors", "outcomes" and "survival". Only publications written in English and published until December 2019 were included. Furthermore, abstracts of which no accompanying full text was published, reviews, case reports, letters, protocols, comments, surveys and animal studies were excluded. All search results were saved to Endnote Online and imported in Rayyan for systematic selection. Data of interest were extracted from the included publications and tabulated for qualitative analysis. RESULTS Out of 1064 articles retrieved by means of a systematic and grey literature search, 77 were included for qualitative analysis. Seventy-two research papers provided data concerning outcomes of LLR for CRLM. Fourteen papers were eligible for extraction of data concerning prognostic factors affecting survival outcomes. Qualitative analysis of the collected data showed that LLR for CRLM is safe, feasible and provides oncological efficiency. Multiple research groups have reported on the short-term advantages of LLR compared to open procedures. The obtained results accounted for minor LLR, as well as major LLR, simultaneous laparoscopic colorectal and liver resection, LLR of posterosuperior segments, two-stage hepatectomy and repeat LLR for CRLM. Few research groups so far have studied prognostic factors affecting long-term outcomes of LLR for CRLM. CONCLUSION In experienced hands, LLR for CRLM provides good short- and long-term outcomes, independent of the complexity of the procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Taillieu
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, AZ Groeninge, Kortrijk 8500, Belgium
| | - Celine De Meyere
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, AZ Groeninge, Kortrijk 8500, Belgium
| | - Frederiek Nuytens
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, AZ Groeninge, Kortrijk 8500, Belgium
| | - Chris Verslype
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, KU Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium
| | - Mathieu D'Hondt
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, AZ Groeninge, Kortrijk 8500, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Taillieu E, De Meyere C, Nuytens F, Verslype C, D'Hondt M. Laparoscopic liver resection for colorectal liver metastases — short- and long-term outcomes: A systematic review. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v13.i7.557] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
|
22
|
Singh AK, Rana SS. Endoscopic Ultrasound for Detection of Liver Metastasis: Hope or Hype? JOURNAL OF DIGESTIVE ENDOSCOPY 2021. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1728234] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022] Open
Abstract
AbstractTransabdominal ultrasonography, contrast-enhanced computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are the common diagnostic tests for the detection of hepatic lesions. Use of enhanced and advanced MRI technique, that is, diffusion weighted MRI and hepatocyte-specific contrast agents, has further improved the accuracy of detection of metastatic liver lesions ≤10 mm in diameter. However, even with these advanced imaging modalities sensitivity is low for lesions smaller than 10 mm when compared with standard intraoperative ultrasound. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is an emerging imaging modality with resolution sufficient to detect and sample lesions as small as 5 mm in diameter. In this news and views, we have discussed the role of standard and enhanced EUS for the detection of metastatic liver lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anupam Kumar Singh
- Department of Gastroenterology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India
| | - Surinder S. Rana
- Department of Gastroenterology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Lepore Signorile M, Grossi V, Di Franco S, Forte G, Disciglio V, Fasano C, Sanese P, De Marco K, Susca FC, Mangiapane LR, Nicotra A, Di Carlo G, Dituri F, Giannelli G, Ingravallo G, Canettieri G, Stassi G, Simone C. Pharmacological targeting of the novel β-catenin chromatin-associated kinase p38α in colorectal cancer stem cell tumorspheres and organoids. Cell Death Dis 2021; 12:316. [PMID: 33767160 PMCID: PMC7994846 DOI: 10.1038/s41419-021-03572-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2020] [Revised: 02/22/2021] [Accepted: 03/01/2021] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
The prognosis of locally advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) is currently unsatisfactory. This is mainly due to drug resistance, recurrence, and subsequent metastatic dissemination, which are sustained by the cancer stem cell (CSC) population. The main driver of the CSC gene expression program is Wnt signaling, and previous reports indicate that Wnt3a can activate p38 MAPK. Besides, p38 was shown to feed into the canonical Wnt/β-catenin pathway. Here we show that patient-derived locally advanced CRC stem cells (CRC-SCs) are characterized by increased expression of p38α and are "addicted" to its kinase activity. Of note, we found that stage III CRC patients with high p38α levels display reduced disease-free and progression-free survival. Extensive molecular analysis in patient-derived CRC-SC tumorspheres and APCMin/+ mice intestinal organoids revealed that p38α acts as a β-catenin chromatin-associated kinase required for the regulation of a signaling platform involved in tumor proliferation, metastatic dissemination, and chemoresistance in these CRC model systems. In particular, the p38α kinase inhibitor ralimetinib, which has already entered clinical trials, promoted sensitization of patient-derived CRC-SCs to chemotherapeutic agents commonly used for CRC treatment and showed a synthetic lethality effect when used in combination with the MEK1 inhibitor trametinib. Taken together, these results suggest that p38α may be targeted in CSCs to devise new personalized CRC treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martina Lepore Signorile
- Medical Genetics, National Institute for Gastroenterology, IRCCS 'S. de Bellis' Research Hospital, 70013, Castellana Grotte (Ba), Italy
| | - Valentina Grossi
- Medical Genetics, National Institute for Gastroenterology, IRCCS 'S. de Bellis' Research Hospital, 70013, Castellana Grotte (Ba), Italy.
| | - Simone Di Franco
- Cellular & Molecular Pathophysiology Laboratory, Department of Surgical & Oncological Sciences, University of Palermo, 90127, Palermo, Italy
| | - Giovanna Forte
- Medical Genetics, National Institute for Gastroenterology, IRCCS 'S. de Bellis' Research Hospital, 70013, Castellana Grotte (Ba), Italy
| | - Vittoria Disciglio
- Medical Genetics, National Institute for Gastroenterology, IRCCS 'S. de Bellis' Research Hospital, 70013, Castellana Grotte (Ba), Italy
| | - Candida Fasano
- Medical Genetics, National Institute for Gastroenterology, IRCCS 'S. de Bellis' Research Hospital, 70013, Castellana Grotte (Ba), Italy
| | - Paola Sanese
- Medical Genetics, National Institute for Gastroenterology, IRCCS 'S. de Bellis' Research Hospital, 70013, Castellana Grotte (Ba), Italy
| | - Katia De Marco
- Medical Genetics, National Institute for Gastroenterology, IRCCS 'S. de Bellis' Research Hospital, 70013, Castellana Grotte (Ba), Italy
| | - Francesco Claudio Susca
- Medical Genetics, Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology (DIMO), University of Bari Aldo Moro, 70124, Bari, Italy
| | - Laura Rosa Mangiapane
- Cellular & Molecular Pathophysiology Laboratory, Department of Surgical & Oncological Sciences, University of Palermo, 90127, Palermo, Italy
| | - Annalisa Nicotra
- Cellular & Molecular Pathophysiology Laboratory, Department of Surgical & Oncological Sciences, University of Palermo, 90127, Palermo, Italy
| | - Gabriella Di Carlo
- Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, Operating Unit of Pathological Anatomy, University of Bari Aldo Moro, 70124, Bari, Italy
| | - Francesco Dituri
- Personalized Medicine, National Institute for Gastroenterology, IRCCS 'S. de Bellis' Research Hospital, 70013, Castellana Grotte (Ba), Italy
| | - Gianluigi Giannelli
- Personalized Medicine, National Institute for Gastroenterology, IRCCS 'S. de Bellis' Research Hospital, 70013, Castellana Grotte (Ba), Italy
| | - Giuseppe Ingravallo
- Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, Operating Unit of Pathological Anatomy, University of Bari Aldo Moro, 70124, Bari, Italy
| | - Gianluca Canettieri
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161, Rome, Italy
| | - Giorgio Stassi
- Cellular & Molecular Pathophysiology Laboratory, Department of Surgical & Oncological Sciences, University of Palermo, 90127, Palermo, Italy
| | - Cristiano Simone
- Medical Genetics, National Institute for Gastroenterology, IRCCS 'S. de Bellis' Research Hospital, 70013, Castellana Grotte (Ba), Italy.
- Medical Genetics, Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology (DIMO), University of Bari Aldo Moro, 70124, Bari, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Taillieu E, De Meyere C, D'Hondt M. The role of the laparoscopic approach in two-stage hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases: a single-center experience. Surg Endosc 2021; 36:559-568. [PMID: 33537846 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08317-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2020] [Accepted: 01/09/2021] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In selected patients, laparoscopic liver surgery for the treatment of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) leads to better short-term outcomes and comparable oncologic outcomes in comparison with an open approach. However, its role in two-stage hepatectomy (TSH) remains poorly explored. METHODS A single-center retrospective study was performed to evaluate the role of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) in the first and second stage of TSH. Demographic data, comorbid factors, perioperative outcomes, and short-term outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS Between September 2011 and May 2020, 23 patients were planned to undergo a TSH. The first stage hepatectomy (FSH) was performed laparoscopically in 22 patients (96%) without need for conversion. The median blood loss was 50 cc (IQR 30-100 cc) and postoperative length of hospital stay was 4 days (IQR 2.5-5 days). R0 resections were obtained in 18 FSHs (78%), while all others were R1 vascular (22%). Fourteen patients (61%) underwent a second stage hepatectomy (SSH). All SSHs were anatomically major hepatectomies. SSH was performed laparoscopically in 7 patients (50%), with need for conversion in 1 case (14%). The median blood loss was slightly lower in the open liver resection (OLR) group compared to the LLR group (200 cc (IQR 110-375 cc) vs. 240 cc (IQR 150-400 cc), respectively. The median postoperative length of hospital stay was 3 days shorter in the LLR group compared to the OLR group (4 days (IQR 3.5-4 days) vs. 7 days (IQR 4.5-8.5 days), respectively). CONCLUSIONS The already proven advantages of LLR in the treatment of CRLM favor the role of a laparoscopic approach in TSH for CRLM. In first stage minor or technically major hepatectomy, LLR is progressively becoming the gold standard. Laparoscopic second stage anatomically major hepatectomy is feasible in experienced hands, but should be limited to selected cases and should be performed in expert centers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Taillieu
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, Groeninge Hospital, President Kennedylaan 4, 8500, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Celine De Meyere
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, Groeninge Hospital, President Kennedylaan 4, 8500, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Mathieu D'Hondt
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, Groeninge Hospital, President Kennedylaan 4, 8500, Kortrijk, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Storman D, Swierz MJ, Riemsma RP, Wolff R, Mitus JW, Pedziwiatr M, Kleijnen J, Bala MM. Electrocoagulation for liver metastases. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2021; 1:CD009497. [PMID: 33507555 PMCID: PMC8094173 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd009497.pub3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Primary liver tumours and liver metastases from colorectal carcinoma are two of the most common malignant tumours to affect the liver. The liver is second only to the lymph nodes as the most common site for metastatic disease. More than half of the people with metastatic liver disease will die from metastatic complications. Electrocoagulation by diathermy is a method used to destroy tumour tissue, using a high-frequency electric current generating high temperatures, applied locally with an electrode (needle, blade, or ball). The objective of this method is to destroy the tumour completely, if possible, in a single session. With the time, electrocoagulation by diathermy has been replaced by other techniques, but the evidence is unclear. OBJECTIVES To assess the beneficial and harmful effects of electrocoagulation by diathermy, administered alone or with another intervention, versus no intervention, other ablation methods, or systemic treatments in people with liver metastases. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE Ovid, Embase Ovid, LILACS, Science Citation Index Expanded, Conference Proceedings Citation Index - Science, CINAHL, ClinicalTrials.gov, ICTRP, and FDA to October 2020. SELECTION CRITERIA We considered all randomised trials that assessed beneficial and harmful effects of electrocoagulation by diathermy, administered alone or with another intervention, versus comparators, in people with liver metastases, regardless of the location of the primary tumour. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. We assessed risk of bias of the included trial using predefined risk of bias domains, and presented the review results incorporating the certainty of the evidence using GRADE. MAIN RESULTS We included one randomised clinical trial with 306 participants (175 males; 131 females) who had undergone resection of the sigmoid colon, and who had five or more visible and palpable hepatic metastases. The diagnosis was confirmed by histological assessment (biopsy) and by carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level. The trial was conducted in Iraq. The age of participants ranged between 38 and 79 years. The participants were randomised to four different study groups. The liver metastases were biopsied and treated (only once) in three of the groups: 75 received electrocoagulation by diathermy alone, 76 received electrocoagulation plus allopurinol, 78 received electrocoagulation plus dimethyl sulphoxide. In the fourth intervention group, 77 participants functioning as controls received a vehicle solution of allopurinol 5 mL 4 x a day by mouth; the metastases were left untouched. The status of the liver and lungs was followed by ultrasound investigations, without the use of a contrast agent. Participants were followed for five years. The analyses are based on per-protocol data only analysing 223 participants. We judged the trial to be at high risk of bias. After excluding 'nonevaluable patients', the groups seemed comparable for baseline characteristics. Mortality due to disease spread at five-year follow-up was 98% in the electrocoagulation group (57/58 evaluable people); 87% in the electrocoagulation plus allopurinol group (46/53 evaluable people); 86% in the electrocoagulation plus dimethyl sulphoxide group (49/57 evaluable people); and 100% in the control group (55/55 evaluable people). We observed no difference in mortality between the electrocoagulation alone group versus the control group (risk ratio (RR) 0.98, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.94 to 1.03; 113 participants; very low-certainty evidence). We observed lower mortality in the electrocoagulation combined with allopurinol or dimethyl sulphoxide group versus the control group (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.80 to 0.95; 165 participants; low-certainty evidence). We are very uncertain regarding post-operative deaths between the electrocoagulation alone group versus the control group (RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.07 to 16.12; 152 participants; very low-certainty evidence) and between the electrocoagulation combined with allopurinol or dimethyl sulphoxide groups versus the control group (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.09 to 10.86; 231 participants; very low-certainty evidence). The trial authors did not report data on number of participants with other adverse events and complications, recurrence of liver metastases, time to progression of liver metastases, tumour response measures, and health-related quality of life. Data on failure to clear liver metastases were not provided for the control group. There was no information on funding or conflict of interest. We identified no ongoing trials. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS The evidence on the beneficial and harmful effects of electrocoagulation alone or in combination with allopurinol or dimethyl sulphoxide in people with liver metastases is insufficient, as it is based on one randomised clinical trial at low to very low certainty. It is very uncertain if there is a difference in all-cause mortality and post-operative mortality between electrocoagulation alone versus control. It is also uncertain if electrocoagulation in combination with allopurinol or dimethyl sulphoxide may result in a slight reduction of all-cause mortality in comparison with a vehicle solution of allopurinol (control). It is very uncertain if there is a difference in post-operative mortality between the electrocoagulation combined with allopurinol or dimethyl sulphoxide group versus control. Data on other adverse events and complications, failure to clear liver metastases or recurrence of liver metastases, time to progression of liver metastases, tumour response measures, and health-related quality of life were most lacking or insufficiently reported for analysis. Electrocoagulation by diathermy is no longer used in the described way, and this may explain the lack of further trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dawid Storman
- Chair of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Department of Hygiene and Dietetics, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland
| | - Mateusz J Swierz
- Chair of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Department of Hygiene and Dietetics, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland
| | | | | | - Jerzy W Mitus
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The Maria Sklodowska-Curie Institute, Oncology Center, Krakow Branch; Department of Anatomy, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland
| | - Michal Pedziwiatr
- 2nd Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland
| | - Jos Kleijnen
- School for Public Health and Primary Care (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Malgorzata M Bala
- Chair of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Department of Hygiene and Dietetics, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Pradhan R, Ngo PA, Martínez-Sánchez LDC, Neurath MF, López-Posadas R. Rho GTPases as Key Molecular Players within Intestinal Mucosa and GI Diseases. Cells 2021; 10:cells10010066. [PMID: 33406731 PMCID: PMC7823293 DOI: 10.3390/cells10010066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2020] [Revised: 12/22/2020] [Accepted: 12/28/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Rho proteins operate as key regulators of the cytoskeleton, cell morphology and trafficking. Acting as molecular switches, the function of Rho GTPases is determined by guanosine triphosphate (GTP)/guanosine diphosphate (GDP) exchange and their lipidation via prenylation, allowing their binding to cellular membranes and the interaction with downstream effector proteins in close proximity to the membrane. A plethora of in vitro studies demonstrate the indispensable function of Rho proteins for cytoskeleton dynamics within different cell types. However, only in the last decades we have got access to genetically modified mouse models to decipher the intricate regulation between members of the Rho family within specific cell types in the complex in vivo situation. Translationally, alterations of the expression and/or function of Rho GTPases have been associated with several pathological conditions, such as inflammation and cancer. In the context of the GI tract, the continuous crosstalk between the host and the intestinal microbiota requires a tight regulation of the complex interaction between cellular components within the intestinal tissue. Recent studies demonstrate that Rho GTPases play important roles for the maintenance of tissue homeostasis in the gut. We will summarize the current knowledge on Rho protein function within individual cell types in the intestinal mucosa in vivo, with special focus on intestinal epithelial cells and T cells.
Collapse
|
27
|
Nemeth Z, Wijker W, Lengyel Z, Hitre E, Borbely K. Metabolic Parameters as Predictors for Progression Free and Overall Survival of Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. Pathol Oncol Res 2020; 26:2683-2691. [PMID: 32661836 PMCID: PMC7772167 DOI: 10.1007/s12253-020-00865-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2020] [Accepted: 06/23/2020] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
We tested the prognostic relevance of metabolic parameters and their relative changes in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated with monoclonal antibody and chemotherapy. SUVmax (standardized uptake volume), SAM (standardized added metabolic activity) and TLG (total lesion glycolysis) are assessed with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucosepositron emission tomography and computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) to evaluate total metabolic activity of malignant processes. Our purpose was to investigate the change of glucose metabolism in relation to PFS (progression free survival) and OS (overall survival). Fifty-three patients with mCRC with at least one measurable liver metastasis were included in this prospective, multi-center, early exploratory study. All patients were treated with first-line chemotherapy and targeted therapy. Metabolic parameters, like SUVmax, SAM, normalized SAM (NSAM) and TLG were assessed by FDG-PET/CT, carried out at baseline (scan-1) and after two therapeutic cycle (scan-2). Our results suggested neither SUVmax nor TLG have such prognostic value as NSAM in liver metastases of colorectal cancer. The parameters after the two cycles of chemotherapy proved to be better predictors of the clinical outcome. NSAM after two cycles of treatment has a statistically significant predictive value on OS, while SAM was predictive to the PFS. The follow up normalized SAM after 2 cycles of first line oncotherapy was demonstrated to be useful as prognostic biomarkers for OS in metastatic colorectal cancer. We should introduce this measurement in metastatic colorectal cancer if there is at least one metastasis in the liver.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zsuzsanna Nemeth
- Chemotherapy B and Clinical Pharmacological Department of National Institute of Oncology, Ráth György utca 7-9, Budapest, 1122 Hungary
- Oncology Department of Szent Margit Hospital, Bécsi út 132, Budapest, H-1032 Hungary
| | - Wouter Wijker
- Auxiliis Pharma Ltd, Bokor utca 17, Budapest, H-1037 Hungary
| | - Zsolt Lengyel
- Pozitron Diagnostic Ltd, Hunyadi ut 9-11, Budapest, 1117 Hungary
| | - Erika Hitre
- Chemotherapy B and Clinical Pharmacological Department of National Institute of Oncology, Ráth György utca 7-9, Budapest, 1122 Hungary
| | - Katalin Borbely
- PET Ambulatory Department of National Institute of Oncology, Rath Gyorgy utca 7-9, Budapest, 1122 Hungary
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Lee S, Choe EK, Kim SY, Kim HS, Park KJ, Kim D. Liver imaging features by convolutional neural network to predict the metachronous liver metastasis in stage I-III colorectal cancer patients based on preoperative abdominal CT scan. BMC Bioinformatics 2020; 21:382. [PMID: 32938394 PMCID: PMC7495853 DOI: 10.1186/s12859-020-03686-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Introducing deep learning approach to medical images has rendered a large amount of un-decoded information into usage in clinical research. But mostly, it has been focusing on the performance of the prediction modeling for disease-related entity, but not on the clinical implication of the feature itself. Here we analyzed liver imaging features of abdominal CT images collected from 2019 patients with stage I – III colorectal cancer (CRC) using convolutional neural network (CNN) to elucidate its clinical implication in oncological perspectives. Results CNN generated imaging features from the liver parenchyma. Dimension reduction was done for the features by principal component analysis. We designed multiple prediction models for 5-year metachronous liver metastasis (5YLM) using combinations of clinical variables (age, sex, T stage, N stage) and top principal components (PCs), with logistic regression classification. The model using “1st PC (PC1) + clinical information” had the highest performance (mean AUC = 0.747) to predict 5YLM, compared to the model with clinical features alone (mean AUC = 0.709). The PC1 was independently associated with 5YLM in multivariate analysis (beta = − 3.831, P < 0.001). For the 5-year mortality rate, PC1 did not contribute to an improvement to the model with clinical features alone. For the PC1, Kaplan-Meier plots showed a significant difference between PC1 low vs. high group. The 5YLM-free survival of low PC1 was 89.6% and the high PC1 was 95.9%. In addition, PC1 had a significant correlation with sex, body mass index, alcohol consumption, and fatty liver status. Conclusion The imaging features combined with clinical information improved the performance compared to the standardized prediction model using only clinical information. The liver imaging features generated by CNN may have the potential to predict liver metastasis. These results suggest that even though there were no liver metastasis during the primary colectomy, the features of liver imaging can impose characteristics that could be predictive for metachronous liver metastasis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sangwoo Lee
- Division of Future Convergent, The Cyber University of Korea, Seoul, 03051, South Korea
| | - Eun Kyung Choe
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital Healthcare System Gangnam Center, Seoul, 06236, South Korea.,Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology & Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, B304 Richards Building, 3700 Hamilton Walk, Philadelphia, PA, 19104-6116, USA
| | - So Yeon Kim
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology & Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, B304 Richards Building, 3700 Hamilton Walk, Philadelphia, PA, 19104-6116, USA.,Department of Software and Computer Engineering, Ajou University, Suwon, 16499, South Korea
| | - Hua Sun Kim
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, 03080, South Korea
| | - Kyu Joo Park
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, 03080, South Korea
| | - Dokyoon Kim
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology & Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, B304 Richards Building, 3700 Hamilton Walk, Philadelphia, PA, 19104-6116, USA. .,Institute for Biomedical Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Antineoplastic effects of targeting CCR5 and its therapeutic potential for colorectal cancer liver metastasis. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2020; 147:73-91. [PMID: 32902795 PMCID: PMC7810651 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-020-03382-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2020] [Accepted: 09/01/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Purpose Liver metastasis is observed in up to 50% of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. Available treatment options are limited and disease recurrence is often. Chemokine receptor 5 (CCR5) has attracted attention as novel therapeutic target for treating cancers. In this study, we reinforced the importance of CCR5 as therapeutic target in CRC and its liver metastasis by applying in vitro, in vivo and clinical investigations. Methods By targeting CCR5 via siRNAs or an FDA approved antagonist (maraviroc), we investigated the ensuing antineoplastic effects in three CRC cell lines. An animal model for CRC liver metastasis was used to evaluate time-dependent expressional modulation of the CCR5 axis by cDNA microarray. The model was also used to evaluate the in vivo efficacy of targeting CCR5 by maraviroc. Circulatory and tumor associated levels of CCR5 and its cognate ligands (CCL3, CCL4, CCL5) were analyzed by ELISA, qRT-PCR and immunohistochemistry. Results Targeting the CCR5 inhibited proliferative, migratory and clonogenic properties and interfered with cell cycle-related signaling cascades. In vivo findings showed significant induction of the CCR5 axis during the early liver colonization phase. Treatment with maraviroc significantly inhibited CRC liver metastasis in the animal model. Differential expression profiles of circulatory and tumor associated CCR5/ligands were observed in CRC patients and healthy controls. Conclusion The findings indicate that targeting the CCR5 axis can be an effective strategy for treating CRC liver metastasis. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s00432-020-03382-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
|
30
|
Chen J, Zeng Z, Huang L, Luo S, Dong J, Zhou FH, Zhou K, Wang L, Kang L. Photothermal therapy technology of metastatic colorectal cancer. Am J Transl Res 2020; 12:3089-3115. [PMID: 32774688 PMCID: PMC7407689] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2020] [Accepted: 04/17/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common malignancies. The current treatments of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) are ineffective and the bottleneck problem. It is of significance to explore effective new therapeutic strategies to eradicate mCRC. Photothermal therapy (PTT) is an emerging technology for tumor therapy, with the potential in the treatment of mCRC. In this review, the current treatment approaches to mCRC including surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy interventional therapy, biotherapy, and photothermal therapy are reviewed. In addition, we will focus on the various kinds of nanomaterials used in PTT for the treatment of CRC both in vitro and in vivo models. In conclusion, we will summarize the combined application of PTT with other theranostic methods, and propose future research directions of PTT in the treatment of CRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Junji Chen
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen UniversityGuangzhou 510655, Guangdong, China
- Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen UniversityGuangzhou 510655, Guangdong, China
| | - Ziwei Zeng
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen UniversityGuangzhou 510655, Guangdong, China
- Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen UniversityGuangzhou 510655, Guangdong, China
| | - Liang Huang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen UniversityGuangzhou 510655, Guangdong, China
- Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen UniversityGuangzhou 510655, Guangdong, China
| | - Shuangling Luo
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen UniversityGuangzhou 510655, Guangdong, China
- Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen UniversityGuangzhou 510655, Guangdong, China
| | - Jianghui Dong
- UniSA Clinical and Health Sciences, and UniSA Cancer Research Institute, University of South AustraliaAdelaide, SA 5001, Australia
| | - Fiona H Zhou
- School of Medicine, University of AdelaideAdelaide, SA 5000, Australia
| | - Kun Zhou
- UniSA Clinical and Health Sciences, and UniSA Cancer Research Institute, University of South AustraliaAdelaide, SA 5001, Australia
| | - Liping Wang
- UniSA Clinical and Health Sciences, and UniSA Cancer Research Institute, University of South AustraliaAdelaide, SA 5001, Australia
| | - Liang Kang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen UniversityGuangzhou 510655, Guangdong, China
- Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen UniversityGuangzhou 510655, Guangdong, China
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Oh J, An HJ, Kim JO, Jun HH, Kim WR, Kim EJ, Oh D, Kim JW, Kim NK. Association between Five Common Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor-1 ( PAI-1) Gene Polymorphisms and Colorectal Cancer Susceptibility. Int J Mol Sci 2020; 21:ijms21124334. [PMID: 32570732 PMCID: PMC7352892 DOI: 10.3390/ijms21124334] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2020] [Revised: 06/16/2020] [Accepted: 06/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
The plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) is expressed in many cancer cell types and modulates cancer growth, invasion, and angiogenesis. The present study investigated the association between five PAI-1 gene polymorphisms and colorectal cancer (CRC) risk. Five PAI-1 polymorphisms (−844G > A [rs2227631], −675 4G > 5G [rs1799889], +43G > A [rs6092], +9785G > A [rs2227694], and +11053T > G [rs7242]) were genotyped using a polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism assay in 459 CRC cases and 416 controls. Increased CRC risk was more frequently associated with PAI-1 −675 5G5G polymorphism than with 4G4G (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 1.556; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.012–2.391; p = 0.04). In contrast, for the PAI-1 +11053 polymorphism, we found a lower risk of CRC with the GG genotype (AOR = 0.620; 95% CI: 0.413–0.932; p = 0.02) than with the TT genotype, as well as for recessive carriers (TT + TG vs. GG, AOR = 0.662; 95% CI: 0.469–0.933; p = 0.02). The +43AA genotype was associated with lower overall survival (OS) than the +43GG genotype. Our results suggest that the PAI-1 genotype plays a role in CRC risk. This is the first study to identify an association between five PAI-1 polymorphisms and CRC incidence worldwide.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jisu Oh
- Department of Internal Medicine, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University, Seongnam 13496, Korea; (J.O.); (D.O.)
| | - Hui Jeong An
- Department of Biomedical Science, College of Life Science, CHA University, Seongnam 13488, Korea; (H.J.A.); (J.O.K.)
| | - Jung Oh Kim
- Department of Biomedical Science, College of Life Science, CHA University, Seongnam 13488, Korea; (H.J.A.); (J.O.K.)
| | - Hak Hoon Jun
- Department of Surgery, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University, Seongnam 13496, Korea; (H.H.J.); (W.R.K.)
| | - Woo Ram Kim
- Department of Surgery, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University, Seongnam 13496, Korea; (H.H.J.); (W.R.K.)
| | - Eo Jin Kim
- Department on Internal Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul 05505, Korea;
| | - Doyeun Oh
- Department of Internal Medicine, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University, Seongnam 13496, Korea; (J.O.); (D.O.)
| | - Jong Woo Kim
- Department of Surgery, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University, Seongnam 13496, Korea; (H.H.J.); (W.R.K.)
- Correspondence: (J.W.K.); (N.K.K.); Tel.: +82-31-881-7137 (N.K.K.); Fax: +82-31-881-7249 (N.K.K.)
| | - Nam Keun Kim
- Department of Biomedical Science, College of Life Science, CHA University, Seongnam 13488, Korea; (H.J.A.); (J.O.K.)
- Correspondence: (J.W.K.); (N.K.K.); Tel.: +82-31-881-7137 (N.K.K.); Fax: +82-31-881-7249 (N.K.K.)
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Liebl M, Schulze-Hagen M, Zimmermann M, Pedersoli F, Kuhl C, Bruners P, Isfort P. Microwave Ablation in the Proximity of Surgical Clips: Is there a Safety Issue? Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2020; 43:918-923. [PMID: 32236668 PMCID: PMC7225190 DOI: 10.1007/s00270-020-02453-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2019] [Accepted: 03/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Purpose The purpose of this study was to evaluate the heat generation of surgical clips within the target area of MWA and the influences on the ablation volume. Materials and Methods In bovine liver tissue, 42 ex vivo microwave ablations (60 W; 180 s) were performed. During ablation, the temperature was measured continuously at 4 points of interest (POI), in a distance of 7.5 and 15 mm on each side of the microwave antenna, with a titanium surgical placed at one 7.5-mm POI. Ablation volumes containing large vessels (n = 10) were excluded. For every POI, the mean temperature of 32 ablations was calculated. The mean temperatures were compared between the 4 POI and statistically analyzed using the Student’s t test. Results The mean maximum temperatures at the side of the clip were 88.76 °C/ 195 s and 52.97 °C/ 195 s and at the side without clip 78.75 °C/ 195 s and 43.16 °C/ 195 s, respectively, at POI 7.5 mm and POI 15 mm. The maximum difference of mean temperatures for POI 7.5 mm was 12.91 °C at 84 s (p = 0.022) and for POI 15 mm 9.77 °C at 195 s (p = 0.009). No significant changes in size and shape of the ablation zone could be determined. Conclusions Our study demonstrated significantly higher temperatures adjacent to surgical clips. Also, the temperatures distal to the titanium clip were higher compared to the control location without clip. These findings suggest an increased risk of thermal damage to surrounding tissues during MWA, especially in case of immediate contact to surgical clips.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Liebl
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany.,Hôpital Kirchberg (Hôpitaux Robert Schuman), 9, Rue Edward Steichen, 2540, Luxembourg, Luxembourg
| | - Maximilian Schulze-Hagen
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany
| | - Markus Zimmermann
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany
| | - Federico Pedersoli
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany
| | - Christiane Kuhl
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany
| | - Philipp Bruners
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany
| | - Peter Isfort
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Weber S, Koschade SE, Hoffmann CM, Dubash TD, Giessler KM, Dieter SM, Herbst F, Glimm H, Ball CR. The notch target gene HEYL modulates metastasis forming capacity of colorectal cancer patient-derived spheroid cells in vivo. BMC Cancer 2019; 19:1181. [PMID: 31796022 PMCID: PMC6892194 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-019-6396-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2019] [Accepted: 11/22/2019] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND While colorectal cancer (CRC) patients with localized disease have a favorable prognosis, the five-year-survival rate in patients with distant spread is still below 15%. Hence, a detailed understanding of the mechanisms regulating metastasis formation is essential to develop therapeutic strategies targeting metastasized CRC. The notch pathway has been shown to be involved in the metastatic spread of various tumor entities; however, the impact of its target gene HEYL remains unclear so far. METHODS In this study, we functionally assessed the association between high HEYL expression and metastasis formation in human CRC. Therefore, we lentivirally overexpressed HEYL in two human patient-derived CRC cultures differing in their spontaneous metastasizing capacity and analyzed metastasis formation as well as tumor cell dissemination into the bone marrow after xenotransplantation into NOD.Cg-Prkdcscid Il2rgtm1Wjl/SzJ (NSG) mice. RESULTS HEYL overexpression decreased tumor cell dissemination and the absolute numbers of formed metastases in a sub-renal capsular spontaneous metastasis formation model, addressing all steps of the metastatic cascade. In contrast, metastatic capacity was not decreased following intrasplenic xenotransplantation where the cells are placed directly into the blood circulation. CONCLUSION These results suggest that HEYL negatively regulates metastasis formation in vivo presumably by inhibiting intravasation of metastasis-initiating cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Weber
- Translational Functional Cancer Genomics, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.,Department of Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Sebastian E Koschade
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.,Department of Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Christopher M Hoffmann
- Translational Functional Cancer Genomics, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Taronish D Dubash
- Translational Functional Cancer Genomics, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Klara M Giessler
- Translational Functional Cancer Genomics, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sebastian M Dieter
- Translational Functional Cancer Genomics, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Translational Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Dresden and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Dresden, Germany
| | - Friederike Herbst
- Translational Functional Cancer Genomics, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Translational Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Dresden and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Dresden, Germany
| | - Hanno Glimm
- Translational Functional Cancer Genomics, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Translational Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Dresden and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Dresden, Germany.,Center for Personalized Oncology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus Dresden at TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Claudia R Ball
- Translational Functional Cancer Genomics, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany. .,Department of Translational Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Dresden and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Dresden, Germany. .,Center for Personalized Oncology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus Dresden at TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
McVeigh LE, Wijetunga I, Ingram N, Marston G, Prasad R, Markham AF, Coletta PL. Development of orthotopic tumour models using ultrasound-guided intrahepatic injection. Sci Rep 2019; 9:9904. [PMID: 31289364 PMCID: PMC6616610 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-46410-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2019] [Accepted: 06/25/2019] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Mouse models of human diseases are an essential part of the translational pipeline. Orthotopic tumour mouse models are increasingly being used in cancer research due to their increased clinical relevance over subcutaneous xenograft models, particularly in relation to metastatic disease. In this study, we have developed orthotopic colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRCLM) and primary cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) models in BALB/c nude mice using minimally invasive ultrasound-guided intrahepatic injection. Due to its minimally invasive nature, the method reduced risk from surgical complications whilst being fast and easy to perform and resulted in measurable tumour volumes 1 to 3 weeks post-injection. Tumour volumes were monitored in vivo by weekly high-frequency ultrasound (HF-US) and/or twice weekly bioluminescence imaging (BLI) and confirmed with end-point histology. Take rates were high for human CRC cells (>73%) and for CCA cells (90%). We have demonstrated that this method reliably induces CRCLM and CCAs, in which tumour volume can be monitored throughout using HF-US and/or BLI. This provides a promising experimental tool for future testing of cancer therapeutics in an orthotopic model.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L E McVeigh
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK.
| | - I Wijetunga
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK
| | - N Ingram
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK
| | - G Marston
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK
| | - R Prasad
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, St. James's University Hospital, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK
| | - A F Markham
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK
| | - P L Coletta
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Williamson T, Sultanpuram N, Sendi H. The role of liver microenvironment in hepatic metastasis. Clin Transl Med 2019; 8:21. [PMID: 31263976 PMCID: PMC6603103 DOI: 10.1186/s40169-019-0237-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2019] [Accepted: 06/21/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Metastasis is still poorly understood and thus further research must be conducted to provide insight into the driving factors. Novel research has revealed the significance of the microenvironment in the delegation of metastasis, expanding the field of cancer metastasis to cells and cell environments surrounding the migrated tumor cells. Research on hepatic metastasis is an ever-growing domain of this field, as several primary tumors can metastasize to the liver. The two features within the liver that promote metastasis—cellular and acellular—are found in the current interpretation of liver microenvironment. Novel findings of both are included in this review. Different hypotheses detailing the methods by which metastasis can occur must be included to understand the significance of the microenvironment, as well as a brief overview of the methods that can be used during research. This review aims to highlight the importance of liver microenvironment on the development or potential regression of hepatic metastasis through discussing both acellular and cellular components of liver microenvironment and their interaction with metastasis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tovah Williamson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Nikhila Sultanpuram
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Hossein Sendi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. .,Center for Nanotechnology in Drug Delivery, UNC School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Takahashi EA, Fleming CJ, Andrews JC. Future Liver Remnant Hypertrophy after Portal Vein Embolization Is Inversely Correlated with Intrahepatic Tumor Burden. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2019; 30:435-439. [PMID: 30819489 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2018.10.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2018] [Revised: 10/10/2018] [Accepted: 10/11/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine if there is a correlation between intrahepatic tumor volume and future liver remnant (FLR) hypertrophy after portal vein embolization (PVE). MATERIALS AND METHODS Forty-four consecutive patients with hepatocellular carcinoma or metastatic colorectal cancer who underwent PVE from 2009 to 2017 and who had complete imaging follow-up were retrospectively reviewed. To maximize the accuracy of tumor volume measurements, 11 patients were excluded for having more than 5 intrahepatic tumors. Volumetric analyses of the patient livers before and after PVE, as well as pre-embolization intrahepatic tumor burden, were performed. RESULTS A significant inverse correlation was observed between tumor volume and FLR hypertrophy after PVE (Spearman ρ = -0.53, P = .002). Initial FLR volume was also inversely correlated with subsequent hypertrophy (P = .01). Fourteen patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy 1 month prior to intervention. The number of chemotherapy cycles did not affect hypertrophy (P = .57). Patients with cirrhosis experienced less FLR hypertrophy than patients without cirrhosis (P = .02). CONCLUSIONS Patients with large intrahepatic tumor burden may experience limited FLR hypertrophy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edwin A Takahashi
- Department of Radiology, Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, Minnesota, 55905.
| | - Chad J Fleming
- Department of Radiology, Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, Minnesota, 55905
| | - James C Andrews
- Department of Radiology, Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, Minnesota, 55905
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
A Concise Review of Pelvic Radiation Therapy (RT) for Rectal Cancer with Synchronous Liver Metastases. Int J Surg Oncol 2019; 2019:5239042. [PMID: 31139467 PMCID: PMC6500597 DOI: 10.1155/2019/5239042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2018] [Accepted: 04/03/2019] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and Objective Colorectal cancer is a major health concern as a very common cancer and a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. The liver is a very common site of metastatic spread for colorectal cancers, and, while nearly half of the patients develop metastases during the course of their disease, synchronous liver metastases are detected in 15% to 25% of cases. There is no standardized treatment in this setting and no consensus exists on optimal sequencing of multimodality management for rectal cancer with synchronous liver metastases. Methods Herein, we review the use of pelvic radiation therapy (RT) as part of potentially curative or palliative management of rectal cancer with synchronous liver metastases. Results There is accumulating evidence on the utility of pelvic RT for facilitating subsequent surgery, improving local tumor control, and achieving palliation of symptoms in patients with stage IV rectal cancer. Introduction of superior imaging capabilities and contemporary RT approaches such as Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) and Image Guided Radiation Therapy (IGRT) offer improved precision and toxicity profile of radiation delivery in the modern era. Conclusion Even in the setting of stage IV rectal cancer with synchronous liver metastases, there may be potential for extended survival and cure by aggressive management of primary tumor and metastases in selected patients. Despite lack of consensus on sequencing of treatment modalities, pelvic RT may serve as a critical component of multidisciplinary management. Resectability of primary rectal tumor and liver metastases, patient preferences, comorbidities, symptomatology, and logistical issues should be thoroughly considered in decision making for optimal management of patients.
Collapse
|
38
|
Lange A, Muniraj T, Aslanian HR. Endoscopic Ultrasound for the Diagnosis and Staging of Liver Tumors. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2019; 29:339-350. [PMID: 30846157 DOI: 10.1016/j.giec.2018.12.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Endoscopic ultrasound examination may provide complementary information to cross-sectional imaging in lesions of the liver, portal vein, and surrounding lymph nodes. With fine needle aspiration, endoscopic ultrasound examination is a powerful tool for the diagnosis of focal liver lesions and has usefulness in the evaluation of indeterminate liver lesions. Endoscopic ultrasound examination may influence hepatocellular cancer staging and Endoscopic ultrasound examination with fine needle aspiration of locoregional nodes and portal vein thromboses changes management. Contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound examination and endoscopic ultrasound examination elastography are likely to expand the usefulness of endoscopic ultrasound examination in evaluating liver malignancy with technologic improvements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Lange
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, Yale Primary Care Center, 789 Howard Avenue, New Haven, CT 06511, USA
| | - Thiruvengadam Muniraj
- Section of Digestive Diseases, Laboratory for Medicine and Pediatrics, Yale University School of Medicine, 15 York Street, New Haven, CT 06510, USA
| | - Harry R Aslanian
- Section of Digestive Diseases, Yale University School of Medicine, PO Box 208056, 333 Cedar Street, New Haven, CT 06520, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
deSouza A, Noronha J, Patil P, Mehta S, Engineer R, Ostwal V, Ramaswamy A, Ankathi S, Ramadwar M, Saklani A. Management of colon cancer at a tertiary referral center in India - Patterns of presentation, treatment, and survival outcomes. Indian J Cancer 2019; 56:297-301. [PMID: 31607696 DOI: 10.4103/ijc.ijc_379_18] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
|
40
|
Mogensen MB, Rossing M, Østrup O, Larsen PN, Heiberg Engel PJ, Jørgensen LN, Hogdall EV, Eriksen J, Ibsen P, Jess P, Grauslund M, Nielsen HJ, Nielsen FC, Vainer B, Osterlind K. Genomic alterations accompanying tumour evolution in colorectal cancer: tracking the differences between primary tumours and synchronous liver metastases by whole-exome sequencing. BMC Cancer 2018; 18:752. [PMID: 30029640 PMCID: PMC6053835 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-018-4639-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2017] [Accepted: 06/27/2018] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer (CRC) patients with metastatic disease can become cured if neoadjuvant treatment can enable a resection. The search for predictive biomarkers is often performed on primary tumours tissue. In order to assess the effectiveness of tailored treatment in regard to the primary tumour the differences in the genomic profile needs to be clarified. METHODS Fresh-frozen tissue from primary tumours, synchronous liver metastases and adjacent normal liver was collected from 21 patients and analysed by whole-exome sequencing on the Illumina HiSeq 2500 platform. Gene variants designated as 'damaging' or 'potentially damaging' by Ingenuity software were used for the subsequent comparative analysis. BAM files were used as the input for the analysis of CNAs using NEXUS software. RESULTS Shared mutations between the primary tumours and the synchronous liver metastases varied from 50 to 96%. Mutations in APC, KRAS, NRAS, TP53 or BRAF were concordant between the primary tumours and the metastases. Among the private mutations were well-known driver genes such as PIK3CA and SMAD4. The number of mutations was significantly higher in patients with right- compared to left-sided tumours (102 vs. 66, p = 0.004). Furthermore, right- compared to left-sided tumours had a significantly higher frequency of private mutations (p = 0.023). Similarly, CNAs differed between the primary tumours and the metastases. The difference was mostly comprised of numerical and segmental aberrations. However, novel CNAs were rarely observed in specific CRC-relevant genes. CONCLUSION The examined primary colorectal tumours and synchronous liver metastases had multiple private mutations, indicating a high degree of inter-tumour heterogeneity in the individual patient. Moreover, the acquirement of novel CNAs from primary tumours to metastases substantiates the need for genomic profiling of metastases in order to tailor metastatic CRC therapies. As for the mutational status of the KRAS, NRAS and BRAF genes, no discordance was observed between the primary tumours and the metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M. B. Mogensen
- Department of Oncology, Section 5073, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - M. Rossing
- Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet,Copenhagen University Hospital, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - O. Østrup
- Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet,Copenhagen University Hospital, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - P. N. Larsen
- Department of Surgical Gastroenterology and Transplantation, Rigshospitalet,Copenhagen University Hospital, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - P. J. Heiberg Engel
- Department of Pathology, Roskilde Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, 4000 Roskilde, Denmark
| | - L. N. Jørgensen
- Digestive Disease Center, Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, 2400 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - E. V. Hogdall
- Department of Pathology, Herlev Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, 2730 Herlev, Denmark
| | - J. Eriksen
- Department of Surgical Pathology, Zealand University Hospital, Slagelse Hospital, 4200 Slagelse, Denmark
| | - P. Ibsen
- Department of Pathology, Hvidovre Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, 2650 Hvidovre, Denmark
| | - P. Jess
- Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Roskilde Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, 4000 Roskilde, Denmark
| | - M. Grauslund
- Department of Pathology, Rigshospitalet,Copenhagen University Hospital, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - H. J. Nielsen
- Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Hvidovre Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, 2650 Hvidovre, Denmark
| | - F. C. Nielsen
- Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet,Copenhagen University Hospital, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - B. Vainer
- Department of Pathology, Rigshospitalet,Copenhagen University Hospital, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - K. Osterlind
- Department of Oncology, Section 5073, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Meiers C, Taylor A, Geller B, Toskich B. Safety and initial efficacy of radiation segmentectomy for the treatment of hepatic metastases. J Gastrointest Oncol 2018; 9:311-315. [PMID: 29755770 DOI: 10.21037/jgo.2017.11.02] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Hepatic metastatectomy and ablation are associated with prolonged survival, but not all lesions are anatomically amenable to these therapies. We evaluated safety and initial efficacy of segmental ablative transarterial radioembolization, or radiation segmentectomy (RS), as a treatment for hepatic metastases. Methods A single institution retrospective analysis was performed of patients with hepatic metastases, determined unamenable to resection by a multidisciplinary tumor board, treated with RS from 2015-2017. Safety parameters evaluated were pre and post procedure liver chemistry, MELD score, ALBI grade, platelet count, and adverse events using both Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v 4.0 and Clavien Dindo (CD) classifications. Initial efficacy was evaluated using RECIST, mRECIST, and PERCIST criteria. Results Ten patients underwent between 1-3 RS treatments. There was no clinical treatment toxicity or significant post-treatment change in liver chemistry, MELD, or ALBI score. One patient had a CTCAE Grade 1/CD Grade 1 adverse event. All patients showed partial or complete imaging response at initial assessment (1-3 months). Seven patients demonstrated disease control at a mean of 7.1 months post treatment. Three patients developed out of field disease progression. One RS was technically unsuccessful. Conclusions Early evaluation of segmental radioembolization suggests a safe treatment option for select patients with hepatic metastases. Initial efficacy as definitive radiotherapy with minimal toxicity is promising in anatomic locations unamenable to resection or alternative means of ablation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Craig Meiers
- Department of Radiology, University of Florida, College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Amy Taylor
- Department of Radiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Brian Geller
- Department of Radiology, University of Florida, College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Beau Toskich
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Hu Y, Ding M, Yuan C, Wu K, Smith-Warner SA, Hu FB, Chan AT, Meyerhardt JA, Ogino S, Fuchs CS, Giovannucci EL, Song M. Association Between Coffee Intake After Diagnosis of Colorectal Cancer and Reduced Mortality. Gastroenterology 2018; 154:916-926.e9. [PMID: 29158191 PMCID: PMC5847429 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.11.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2017] [Revised: 11/04/2017] [Accepted: 11/13/2017] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Few studies have examined the association between coffee intake and survival after diagnosis of colorectal cancer (CRC). We performed a prospective study to investigate the association between coffee intake after a diagnosis of CRC and mortality. METHODS We collected data from the Nurses' Health Study (1984-2012) and Health Professionals Follow-up Study (1986-2012), following 1599 patients diagnosed with stage 1, 2, or 3 CRC. CRC was reported on questionnaires and ascertained by review of medical records and pathology reports; intake of food and beverages was determined from responses to semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaires. Participants were asked how often during the previous year that they consumed coffee, with 1 cup as the standard portion size. The first questionnaire response collected at least 6 months but not more than 4 years after diagnosis was used for assessment of post-diagnostic intake (median time from diagnosis to the dietary assessment, 2.2 years). The last semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire prior to diagnosis was used to assess pre-diagnostic dietary intake. RESULTS During a median of 7.8 years of follow-up, we documented 803 deaths, of which 188 were because of CRC. In the multivariable adjusted models, compared with nondrinkers, patients who consumed at least 4 cups of coffee per day had a 52% lower risk of CRC-specific death (hazard ratio [HR] 0.48; 95% CI, 0.28-0.83; P for trend=.003) and 30% reduced risk of all-cause death (HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.54-0.91; P for trend <.001). High intake of caffeinated and decaffeinated coffee (2 or more cups/day) was associated with lower risk of CRC-specific mortality and all-cause mortality. When coffee intake before vs after CRC diagnosis were examined, compared with patients consistently consuming low amounts (less than 2 cups/day), those who maintained a high intake (2 or more cups/day) had a significantly lower risk of CRC-specific death (multivariable HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.44-0.89) and death from any cause (multivariable HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.60-0.85). CONCLUSIONS In an analysis data from the Nurses' Health Study and Health Professionals Follow-up Study, we associated intake of caffeinated and decaffeinated coffee after diagnosis of CRC with lower risk of CRC-specific death and overall death. Studies are needed to determine the mechanisms by which coffee might reduce CRC progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yang Hu
- Department of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Ming Ding
- Department of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Chen Yuan
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Kana Wu
- Department of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Stephanie A Smith-Warner
- Department of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Frank B Hu
- Department of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts; Channing Division of Network Medicine, Division of Preventive Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Andrew T Chan
- Channing Division of Network Medicine, Division of Preventive Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Clinical and Translational Epidemiology Unit and Division of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jeffrey A Meyerhardt
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Shuji Ogino
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts; Program in MPE Molecular Pathological Epidemiology, Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Oncologic Pathology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Charles S Fuchs
- Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, Connecticut; Department of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut; Smilow Cancer Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Edward L Giovannucci
- Department of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts; Channing Division of Network Medicine, Division of Preventive Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Mingyang Song
- Department of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts; Clinical and Translational Epidemiology Unit and Division of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Xiong S, Xiao GW. Reverting doxorubicin resistance in colon cancer by targeting a key signaling protein, steroid receptor coactivator. Exp Ther Med 2018; 15:3751-3758. [PMID: 29581735 PMCID: PMC5863609 DOI: 10.3892/etm.2018.5912] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2017] [Accepted: 12/12/2017] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Although there have been notable improvements in treatments against cancer, further research is required. In colon cancer, nearly all patients eventually experience drug resistance and stop responding to the approved drugs, making treatment difficult. Steroid receptor coactivator (SRC) is an oncogenic nuclear receptor coactivator that serves an important role in drug resistance. The present study generated a doxorubicin-resistant colon cancer cell line, in which the upregulation/activation of SRC was responsible for drug resistance, which in turn activated AKT. Overexpression of receptor tyrosine kinase-like epidermal growth factor receptor and insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor also induced SRC expression. It was observed that doxorubicin resistance in colon cancer also induced epithelial to mesenchymal transition, a decrease in expression of epithelial marker E-cadherin and an increase in the expression of mesenchymal markers, including N-cadherin and vimentin. Additionally, the present study indicated that SRC acts as a common signaling node, and inhibiting SRC in combination with doxorubicin treatment in doxorubicin-resistant cells aids in reversing the resistance. Thus, the present study suggests that activation of SRC is responsible for doxorubicin resistance in colon cancer. However, further research is required to understand the complete mechanism of how drug resistance occurs and how it may be tackled to treat patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sang Xiong
- Department of Oncology, Xuhui District Central Hospital, Shanghai 200031, P.R. China
| | - Gong-Wei Xiao
- Department of Oncology, Xuhui District Central Hospital, Shanghai 200031, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Bao Y, Guo H, Lu Y, Feng W, Sun X, Tang C, Wang X, Shen M. Blocking hepatic metastases of colon cancer cells using an shRNA against Rac1 delivered by activatable cell-penetrating peptide. Oncotarget 2018; 7:77183-77195. [PMID: 27791203 PMCID: PMC5363579 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.12854] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2016] [Accepted: 10/14/2016] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Hepatic metastasis is one of the critical progressions of colon cancer. Blocking this process is key to prolonging survival time in cancer patients. Studies on activatable cell-penetrating peptides (dtACPPs) have demonstrated their potential as gene carriers. It showed high tumor cell-targeting specificity and transfection efficiency and low cytotoxicity in the in vitro settings of drug delivery. However, using this system to silence target genes to inhibit metastasis in colorectal cancer cells has not been widely reported and requires further investigation. In this study, we observed that expression of Rac1, a key molecule for cytoskeletal reorganization, was higher in hepatic metastatic tumor tissue compared with prime colon cancer tissue and that patients with high Rac1-expressing colon cancer showed shorter survival time. Base on these findings, we created dtACPP-PEG-DGL (dtACPPD)/shRac1 nanoparticles and demonstrated that they downregulated Rac1 expression in colon cancer cells. Moreover, we observed inhibitory effects on migration, invasion and adhesion in HCT116 colorectal cancer cells in vitro, and our results showed that Rac1 regulated colon cancer cell matrix adhesion through the regulation of cytofilament dynamics. Moreover, mechanically, repression of Rac1 inhibiting cells migration and invasion by enhancing cell to cell adhesion and reducing cell to extracellular matrix adhesion. Furthermore, when atCDPPD/shRac1 nanoparticles were administered intravenously to a HCT116 xenograft model, significant tumor metastasis to the liver was inhibited. Our results suggest that atCDPP/shRac1 nanoparticles may enable the blockade of hepatic metastasis in colon cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ying Bao
- Department of Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, Huzhou University, The First People's Hospital of Huzhou, Huzhou, 313000, China
| | - Huihui Guo
- Department of Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, Huzhou University, The First People's Hospital of Huzhou, Huzhou, 313000, China
| | - Yongliang Lu
- Department of Medicine, Huzhou University, Huzhou, 313000, China
| | - Wenming Feng
- Department of Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, Huzhou University, The First People's Hospital of Huzhou, Huzhou, 313000, China
| | - Xinrong Sun
- Department of Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, Huzhou University, The First People's Hospital of Huzhou, Huzhou, 313000, China
| | - Chengwu Tang
- Department of Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, Huzhou University, The First People's Hospital of Huzhou, Huzhou, 313000, China
| | - Xiang Wang
- Department of Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, Huzhou University, The First People's Hospital of Huzhou, Huzhou, 313000, China
| | - Mo Shen
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University,Wenzhou, 325000, China
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Griggs RKL, Pathak S, Poston G. An Overview of the Current Management of Bilobar Colorectal Liver Metastases. Indian J Surg Oncol 2017; 8:600-606. [PMID: 29203994 DOI: 10.1007/s13193-017-0686-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2016] [Accepted: 08/01/2017] [Indexed: 10/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Bilobar colorectal liver metastases (BCRLM) present a challenging scenario for liver surgeons globally. The following article aims to provide an overview of the different strategies which may be utilised in order to successfully manage advanced BCRLM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca K L Griggs
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Bristol Royal Infirmary, Upper Maudlin Street, Bristol, BS2 8HW UK
| | - Samir Pathak
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Bristol Royal Infirmary, Upper Maudlin Street, Bristol, BS2 8HW UK
| | - Graeme Poston
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, University Hospital Aintree, Longmoor Lane, Liverpool, L9 7AL UK
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Affiliation(s)
- Muhammad Nadeem Yousaf
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Digestive Diseases, Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Guoping Cai
- Department of Pathology, Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Harry R Aslanian
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Digestive Diseases, Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Valderrama-Treviño AI, Barrera-Mera B, Ceballos-Villalva JC, Montalvo-Javé EE. Hepatic Metastasis from Colorectal Cancer. Euroasian J Hepatogastroenterol 2017; 7:166-175. [PMID: 29201802 PMCID: PMC5670263 DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10018-1241] [Citation(s) in RCA: 151] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2017] [Accepted: 09/22/2017] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
The liver is the most common site of metastasis in patients with colorectal cancer due to
its anatomical situation regarding its portal circulation. About 14 to 18% of patients
with colorectal cancer present metastasis at the first medical consultation, and 10 to 25%
at the time of the resection of the primary colorectal cancer. The incidence is higher
(35%) when a computed tomography (CT) scan is used. In the last decades, a significant increase in the life expectancy of patients with
colorectal cancer has been achieved with different diagnostic and treatment programs.
Despite these improvements, the presence of metastasis, disease recurrence, and advanced
local tumors continue to remain poor prognostic factors. Median survival without treatment is <8 months from the moment of its presentation,
and a survival rate at 5 years of 11% is the best prognosis for those who present with
local metastasis. Even in patients with limited metastatic disease, 5-year survival is
exceptional. Patients with hepatic metastasis of colorectal cancer have a median survival
of 5 to 20 months with no treatment. Approximately 20 to 30% of patients with colorectal
metastasis have disease confined to the liver, and this can be managed with surgery.
Modern surgical strategies at the main hepatobiliary centers have proved that hepatectomy
of 70% of the liver can be performed, with a mortality rate of <5%. It is very important to have knowledge of predisposing factors, diagnostic methods, and
treatment of hepatic metastasis. However, the establishment of newer, efficient,
preventive screening programs for early diagnosis and adequate treatment is vital. How to cite this article: Valderrama-Treviño AI, Barrera-Mera B,
Ceballos-Villalva JC, Montalvo-Javé EE. Hepatic Metastasis from Colorectal Cancer.
Euroasian J Hepato-Gastroenterol 2017;7(2):166-175.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Baltazar Barrera-Mera
- Department of Physiology, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de México, Ciudad de México, México
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Bala MM, Mituś JW, Riemsma RP, Wolff R, Hetnal M, Kukielka A, Kleijnen J. Transarterial (chemo)embolisation versus chemotherapy for colorectal cancer liver metastases. Hippokratia 2017. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd012757] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Malgorzata M Bala
- Jagiellonian University Medical College; Department of Hygiene and Dietetics; Systematic Reviews Unit - Polish Cochrane Branch; Kopernika 7 Krakow Poland 31-034
| | - Jerzy W. Mituś
- Centre of Oncology, Maria Skłodowska - Curie Memorial Institute, Krakow Branch. Department of Anatomy, Jagiellonian University Medical College Krakow, Poland; Department of Surgical Oncology; ul. Garncarska 11 Krakow Poland 31-115
| | - Robert P Riemsma
- Kleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd; Unit 6, Escrick Business Park Riccall Road, Escrick York UK YO19 6FD
| | - Robert Wolff
- Kleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd; Unit 6, Escrick Business Park Riccall Road, Escrick York UK YO19 6FD
| | - Marcin Hetnal
- Rydygier Memorial Hospital; Radiotherapy Centre Amethyst; os. Zlotej Jesieni 1 Krakow Poland 31-826
| | - Andrzej Kukielka
- NU-MED; Centrum Diagnostyki i Terapii Onkologicznej; Aleje Jana Pawła II 10 Zamość Poland 22-400
| | - Jos Kleijnen
- School for Public Health and Primary Care (CAPHRI), Maastricht University; Maastricht Netherlands 6200 MD
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Mohr AM, Gould JJ, Kubik JL, Talmon GA, Casey CA, Thomas P, Tuma DJ, McVicker BL. Enhanced colorectal cancer metastases in the alcohol-injured liver. Clin Exp Metastasis 2017; 34:171-184. [PMID: 28168393 DOI: 10.1007/s10585-017-9838-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2016] [Accepted: 01/16/2017] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Metastatic liver disease is a major cause of mortality in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. Alcohol consumption is a noted risk factor for secondary cancers yet the role of alcoholic liver disease (ALD) in colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) is not defined. This work evaluated tumor cell colonization in the alcoholic host liver using a novel preclinical model of human CRC liver metastases. Immunocompromised Rag1-deficient mice were fed either ethanol (E) or isocaloric control (C) diets for 4 weeks prior to intrasplenic injection of LS174T human CRC cells. ALD and CRLM were evaluated 3 or 5 weeks post-LS174T cell injection with continued C/E diet administration. ALD was confirmed by increased serum transaminases, hepatic steatosis and expression of cytochrome P4502E1, a major ethanol-metabolizing enzyme. Alcohol-mediated liver dysfunction was validated by impaired endocytosis of asialoorosomucoid and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), indicators of hepatocellular injury and progressive CRC disease, respectively. Strikingly, the rate and burden of CRLM was distinctly enhanced in alcoholic livers with metastases observed earlier and more severely in E-fed mice. Further, alcohol-related increases (1.5-3.0 fold) were observed in the expression of hepatic cytokines (TNF-α, IL-1 beta, IL-6, IL-10) and other factors noted to be involved in the colonization of CRC cells including ICAM-1, CCL-2, CCL-7, MMP-2, and MMP-9. Also, alcoholic liver injury was associated with altered hepatic localization as well as increased circulating levels of CEA released from CRC cells. Altogether, these findings indicate that the alcoholic liver provides a permissive environment for the establishment of CRLM, possibly through CEA-related inflammatory mechanisms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashley M Mohr
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - John J Gould
- Research Service, VA Nebraska-Western Iowa Health Care System, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - Jacy L Kubik
- Research Service, VA Nebraska-Western Iowa Health Care System, Omaha, NE, USA.,Department of Internal Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - Geoffrey A Talmon
- Department of Pathology and Microbiology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - Carol A Casey
- Research Service, VA Nebraska-Western Iowa Health Care System, Omaha, NE, USA.,Department of Internal Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - Peter Thomas
- Department of Surgery and Biomedical Sciences, Creighton University, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - Dean J Tuma
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - Benita L McVicker
- Research Service, VA Nebraska-Western Iowa Health Care System, Omaha, NE, USA. .,Department of Internal Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Mbah N, Agle SC, Philips P, Egger ME, Scoggins CR, McMasters KM, Martin RCG. Laparoscopic hepatectomy significantly shortens the time to postoperative chemotherapy in patients undergoing major hepatectomies. Am J Surg 2017; 213:1060-1064. [PMID: 28173934 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.01.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2016] [Revised: 01/14/2017] [Accepted: 01/29/2017] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy occurs with early initiation, but is commonly delayed due to postoperative complications. Minimally invasive surgery is proven to significantly reduce complications and hospital length of stay. This study compares open versus laparoscopic liver resection in patients requiring adjuvant chemotherapy. METHODS 120 consecutive patients with metastatic colorectal liver cancer who underwent liver resection between 2007 through 2012 were reviewed from an IRB prospective database. RESULTS 44 laparoscopic cases were compared to 76 open cases having equivalent resections. Laparoscopic liver resection patients had lower blood loss (276 ml) than patients with open resection (614 ml). Patients with laparoscopy had shorter length of hospital stay (5 days) than patients with open resection (9 days). Patients with laparoscopic resection had a shorter time of chemotherapy initiation postoperatively (24 days v 39 days). Overall complication rates were higher, but statistically insignificant in patients with open resection. CONCLUSIONS Our data showed that the shorter LOS with laparoscopic major hepatectomies allows earlier initiation of chemotherapy compared to the open group, without jeopardizing surgical margins or extent of resection. SUMMARY Over the past decade multiple authors have established that, despite occasional longer operating times, laparoscopic liver surgery is associated with reduced blood loss, reduced postoperative morbidity and shorter hospital stay. The purpose of this analysis was to determine if the advantages of a minimally invasive approach correspond to shorter initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy versus an open approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nsehniitooh Mbah
- University of Louisville, Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Louisville, KY, USA
| | - Steven C Agle
- University of Louisville, Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Louisville, KY, USA
| | - Prejesh Philips
- University of Louisville, Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Louisville, KY, USA
| | - Michael E Egger
- University of Louisville, Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Louisville, KY, USA
| | - Charles R Scoggins
- University of Louisville, Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Louisville, KY, USA
| | - Kelly M McMasters
- University of Louisville, Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Louisville, KY, USA
| | - Robert C G Martin
- University of Louisville, Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Louisville, KY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|