Growth hormone treatment for short stature

Sex Hormones, Growth Hormone, and the Cornea

The growth and maintenance of nearly every tissue in the body is influenced by systemic hormones during embryonic development through puberty and into adulthood. Of the ~130 different hormones expressed in the human body, steroid hormones and peptide hormones are highly abundant in circulation and are known to regulate anabolic processes and wound healing in a tissue-dependent manner. Of interest, differential levels of sex hormones have been associated with ocular pathologies, including dry eye disease and keratoconus. In this review, we discuss key studies that have revealed a role for androgens and estrogens in the cornea with focus on ocular surface homeostasis, wound healing, and stromal thickness. We also review studies of human growth hormone and insulin growth factor-1 in influencing ocular growth and epithelial regeneration. While it is unclear if endogenous hormones contribute to differential corneal wound healing in common animal models, the abundance of evidence suggests that systemic hormone levels, as a function of age, should be considered as an experimental variable in studies of corneal health and disease.

GH Resistance Is a Component of Idiopathic Short Stature: Implications for rhGH Therapy

Idiopathic short stature (ISS) is a term used to describe a selection of short children for whom no precise aetiology has been identified. Molecular investigations have made notable discoveries in children with ISS, thus removing them from this category. However, many, if not the majority of children referred with short stature, are designated ISS. Our interest in defects of GH action, i.e. GH resistance, has led to a study of children with mild GH resistance, who we believe can be mis-categorised as ISS leading to potential inappropriate management. Approval of ISS by the FDA for hGH therapy has resulted in many short children receiving this treatment. The results are extremely variable. It is therefore important to correctly assess and investigate all ISS subjects in order to identify those with mild but unequivocal GH resistance, as in cases of PAPP-A2 deficiency. The correct identification of GH resistance defects will direct therapy towards rhIGF-I rather than rhGH. This example illustrates the importance of recognition of GH resistance among the very large number patients referred with short stature who are labelled as 'ISS'.

Growth failure: 'idiopathic' only after a detailed diagnostic evaluation

The terms 'idiopathic short stature' (ISS) and 'small for gestational age' (SGA) were first used in the 1970s and 1980s. ISS described non-syndromic short children with undefined aetiology who did not have growth hormone (GH) deficiency, chromosomal defects, chronic illness, dysmorphic features or low birth weight. Despite originating in the pre-molecular era, ISS is still used as a diagnostic label today. The term 'SGA' was adopted by paediatric endocrinologists to describe children born with low birth weight and/or length, some of whom may experience lack of catch-up growth and present with short stature. GH treatment was approved by the FDA for short children born SGA in 2001, and by the EMA in 2003, and for the treatment of ISS in the US, but not Europe, in 2003. These approvals strengthened the terms 'SGA' and 'ISS' as clinical entities. While clinical and hormonal diagnostic techniques remain important, it is the emergence of genetic investigations that have led to numerous molecular discoveries in both ISS and SGA subjects. The primary message of this article is that the labels ISS and SGA are not definitive diagnoses. We propose that the three disciplines of clinical evaluation, hormonal investigation and genetic sequencing should have equal status in the hierarchy of short stature assessments and should complement each other to identify the true pathogenesis in poorly growing patients.

The effect of treatment with recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) on linear growth and adult height in children with idiopathic short stature (ISS): a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

Idiopathic short stature (ISS) is a recognized, albeit a controversial indication for treatment with recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH).The objective of the present study was to conduct a systematic review of the literature and meta-analyses of selected studies about the use of rhGH in children with ISS on linear growth and adult height (AH).

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted to identify relevant studies published till February 28, 2017 in the following databases: Medline (PubMed), Scopus and Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials. After exclusion of duplicate studies, 3,609 studies were initially identified. Of those, 3,497 studies were excluded during the process of assessing the title and/or the abstract. The remaining 112 studies were evaluated further by assessing the full text; 21 of them fulfilled all the criteria in order to be included in the current meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Children who received rhGH had significantly higher height increment at the end of the first year, an effect that persisted in the second year of treatment and achieved significantly higher AH than the control group. The difference between the two groups was equal to 5.3 cm (95% CI: 3.4-7 cm) for male and 4.7 cm (95% CI: 3.1-6.3 cm) for female patients.

CONCLUSION

In children with ISS, treatment with rhGH improves short-term linear growth and increases AH compared with control subjects. However, the final decision should be made on an individual basis, following detailed diagnostic evaluation and careful consideration of both risks and benefits of rhGH administration.

The Challenge of Defining and Investigating the Causes of Idiopathic Short Stature and Finding an Effective Therapy

Idiopathic short stature (ISS) comprises a wide range of conditions associated with short stature that elude the conventional diagnostic work-up and are often caused by still largely unknown genetic variants. In the last decade, the improvement of diagnostic techniques has led to the discovery of causal mutations in genes involved in the function of the growth hormone (GH)/insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) axis as well as in growth plate physiology. However, many cases of ISS remain idiopathic. In the future, the more frequent identification of the underlying causes will allow a better stratification of subjects and offer a tailored management. GH therapy has been proposed and approved in some countries for the treatment of children with ISS. To improve the efficacy of GH therapy, trials with GH combined with GnRH agonists, aromatase inhibitors, and even IGF-I have been conducted. This review aims to revise the current definition of ISS and discuss the management of children with ISS on the basis of the most recent evidence.

The Rationale for Growth Hormone Therapy in Children with Short Stature

Growth hormone (GH) was first isolated from cadaver pituitary glands, requiring laborious and expensive collection of glands, followed by extraction and purification of the hormone. This limited supply restricted its use to children with severe GH deficiency who were treated with low dosages and suboptimal schedules. The development of recombinant DNA-derived GH, allowed the production of virtually unlimited amounts of GH, leading to the approval for therapy for a large number of childhood conditions characterized by non-GH deficient short stature. The aim of this review is to provide a critical overview on the daily use of GH in two paradigmatic conditions of non-GH deficient short stature which are children born small for gestational age and with idiopathic short stature, highlighting the available strength of evidence for efficacy and safety.

A 4-Year, Open-Label, Multicenter, Randomized Trial of Genotropin® Growth Hormone in Patients with Idiopathic Short Stature: Analysis of 4-Year Data Comparing Efficacy, Efficiency, and Safety between an Individualized, Target-Driven Regimen and Standard Dosing

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Growth hormone (GH) treatment regimens for children with non-GH-deficient, idiopathic short stature (ISS) have not been optimized. To compare the efficacy, efficiency, and safety of an individualized, target-driven GH regimen with standard weight-based dosing after 4 years of treatment.

METHODS

This is a 4-year, open-label, multicenter, randomized trial comparing individualized, formula-based dosing of Genotropin® versus a widely used ISS dose of Genotropin®. Subjects were prepubertal, had a bone age of 3-10 years for males and 3-9 years for females, were naive to GH treatment, and had a height standard deviation score (Ht SDS) of -3 to -2.25, a height velocity <25th percentile for their bone age, and peak stimulated GH >10 ng/ml. After the first 2 years, the individualized-dosing group was further randomized to either 0.18 or 0.24 mg/kg/week.

RESULTS

At 4 years, subjects in all treatment regimens achieved similar average height gains of +1.3 SDS; however, the individualized dosing regimen utilized less GH to achieve an equivalent height gain.

CONCLUSION

Individualized, formula-based GH dosing, followed by a dose reduction after 2 years, provides a more cost-effective growth improvement in patients with ISS than currently employed weight-based regimens.

Effects of human growth hormone on gonadotropin-releasing hormone neurons in mice

Purpose

Recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) has been widely used to treat short stature. However, there are some concerns that growth hormone treatment may induce skeletal maturation and early onset of puberty. In this study, we investigated whether rhGH can directly affect the neuronal activities of of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH).

Methods

We performed brain slice gramicidin-perforated current clamp recording to examine the direct membrane effects of rhGH on GnRH neurons, and a whole-cell voltage-clamp recording to examine the effects of rhGH on spontaneous postsynaptic events and holding currents in immature (postnatal days 13-21) and adult (postnatal days 42-73) mice.

Results

In immature mice, all 5 GnRH neurons recorded in gramicidin-perforated current clamp mode showed no membrane potential changes on application of rhGH (0.4, 1 µg/mL). In adult GnRH neurons, 7 (78%) of 9 neurons tested showed no response to rhGH (0.2-1 µg/mL) and 2 neurons showed slight depolarization. In 9 (90%) of 10 immature neurons tested, rhGH did not induce any membrane holding current changes or spontaneous postsynaptic currents (sPSCs). There was no change in sPSCs and holding current in 4 of 5 adult GnRH neurons.

Conclusion

These findings demonstrate that rhGH does not directly affect the GnRH neuronal activities in our experimental model.

Growth hormone treatment in short children--short-term and long-term effects on growth

Short children with normal GH responses to arginine-insulin provocation testing and various amounts of spontaneously secreted GH over 24 hours participated in an ongoing study with GH, 0.1 IU/kg/day. A total of 40 prepubertal children have been treated for 1 year. Their mean height velocity increased from 4.6 to 7.5 cm/year. The children with the slowest pretreatment height velocity showed the best increment. An inverse relationship was found between the endogenous GH secretion and the increment in growth; 80% of the children had an endogenous GH secretion of less than 300 milliunits/litre/24 hours, estimated as area under the curve above the calculated baseline. They all showed an increment in height above 2 cm. The remaining 20% all had an endogenous GH secretion of more than 300 milliunits/litre/24 hours, estimated as area under the curve above the calculated baseline. Twenty-four of the children were prepubertal for the following 4 years, and their GH therapy continued. Their height velocity changed from 4.2 cm/year before therapy to 8.1, 6.7, 6.0 and 4.9 cm/year for the 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th years on treatment. Many of them have passed their expected final height, but have still not stopped growing. Those children who were in early puberty when GH treatment started went into a rapid growth spurt and have now stopped growing. They have all reached but not improved their expected final height. In 15 of the children GH treatment was stopped after 1-3 years. Their mean height velocity for the first post-treatment year was 5.1 cm/year; thus, for the group as a whole no 'catch down' was observed.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Craniofacial growth in growth hormone-deficient rats after growth hormone supplementation

INTRODUCTION

Growth hormone (GH) supplementation is an established therapy to increase stature in GH-deficient or short-for-age children, but comparatively little is known of its effects on the craniofacial skeleton.

METHODS

Using a mutant strain of Lewis rats (dw/dw) in which GH levels were 6% to 10% of normal, but other trophic hormones were unaffected, we investigated the differential susceptibility of craniofacial measures to GH supplementation, characterized their potential for partial or complete catch-up growth, and compared their growth changes with those in long bones. At 24 days of age and for 3 subsequent weeks, radiographs of the lateral head, upper limb, and lower limb were obtained from 3 groups of growing rats (n = 8-9 in each group): dwarf (experimental) with GH injection, dwarf (sham) with vehicle injection, and wild type (control) with vehicle injection. The x-ray images were scanned, standardized points digitized, and linear distances measured. Absolute growth curves were generated for each group by using multilevel modeling procedures and iterative generalized least-squares curve fitting.

RESULTS

For every measure, growth differences were evident between the experimental and the sham groups, but the treatment effect varied inversely with relative maturity of the measure. Although all craniofacial measures showed some catch-up growth, only 31% of craniofacial measures had complete catch-up compared with all limb measures. The percentage of catch-up varied inversely with relative maturity of the measure. Our results suggest that the effects of GH supplementation vary considerably, so that measures with the lowest relative maturity (greatest baseline potential) show the greatest treatment effect and catch-up, whereas more mature measures show less growth response to GH replacement.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that, depending on the timing of GH supplementation, there is potential for change in proportions or shape of the craniofacial complex.

Insulin-Like Growth Factor (IGF) Parameters and Tools for Efficacy: The IGF-I Generation Test in Children

Serum levels of growth hormone (GH)-dependent peptides could provide important and valuable measures of GH sensitivity and, potentially, responsiveness. In normal individuals, serum insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) concentrations are dependent on the dose of GH given, with IGF-I responsiveness not decreasing with age. Individuals heterozygous for the E180 GH receptor (GHR) splice mutation have normal IGF-I generation, but those homozygous for the E180 splice mutation have very low basal and stimulated IGF-I concentrations. Similar results are observed for the serum IGF-binding protein 3 (IGFBP-3) response to GH, with a correlation between changes in serum concentrations of IGF-I and changes in IGFBP-3 in normal, heterozygotic, GH-insensitive and GH-deficient participants. In individuals with the E180 splice mutation, IGF-I and IGFBP-3 tests show sensitivity and specificity for detecting GH insensitivity (GHI). In children with idiopathic short stature, it appears that some individuals have selective resistance to GH, with their ability to generate IGF-I more impaired than their ability to generate other GH-dependent peptides. This heterogeneous group may require individualization of GH dosage. IGF generation tests remain the best short-term, in vivo test for classic GHI, although diagnostic tests will undoubtedly require further modification to identify milder pathophysiologic abnormalities.

Growth hormone treatment in non-growth hormone-deficient short children

The unlimited availability of GH obtained by recombinant DNA technology has allowed optimization of treatment in GH-deficient (GHD) children. At the same time it has prompted a number of studies in conditions not characterized by GHD such as Turner syndrome, intrauterine growth retardation, chronic renal failure and other chromosomal and genetic abnormalities associated with short stature. Several controlled and uncontrolled studies have now reported the adult height of patients with short stature and normal GH secretion. Critical reviewing of the data shows that some short non-GHD children may benefit from a prolonged treatment with GH. However, further studies are needed in order to be able to identify the subjects for whom treatment is really beneficial.

High dose growth hormone treatment induces acceleration of skeletal maturation and an earlier onset of puberty in children with idiopathic short stature

BACKGROUND

Long term growth hormone (GH) treatment in children with idiopathic short stature (ISS) results in a relatively small mean gain in final height of 3-9 cm, which may not justify the cost of treatment. As it is unknown whether GH treatment during puberty adds to final height gain, we sought to improve the cost-benefit ratio, employing a study design with high dose GH treatment restricted to the prepubertal period.

AIMS

To assess the effect of short term, high dose GH treatment before puberty on growth, bone maturation, and pubertal onset.

METHODS

Five year results of a randomised controlled study are reported. Twenty six boys and nine girls were randomly assigned to a GH treatment group (n = 17) or a control group (n = 18). Inclusion criteria were: no signs of puberty, height less than -2 SDS, age 4-8 years for girls or 4-10 years for boys, GH concentration >10 micro g/l after provocation, and normal body proportions. To assess GH responsiveness, children assigned to the GH treatment group received GH treatment for two periods of three months (1.5 IU/m2/day and 3.0 IU/m2/day), separated by three month washout periods, during the first year of study. High dose GH treatment (6.0 IU/m2/day) was then started and continued for at least two full years. When puberty occurred, GH treatment was discontinued at the end of a complete year's treatment (for example, three or four years of GH treatment).

RESULTS

In response to at least two years on high dose GH treatment, mean (SD) height SDS for chronological age increased significantly in GH treated children from -2.6 (0.5) to -1.3 (0.5) after two years and -1.4 (0.5) SDS after five years of study. No changes in height SDS were observed in controls. A rapid rate of bone maturation of 3.6 years/2 years in treated children compared to 2 years/2 years in controls was observed in response to two years high dose GH treatment. Height SDS for bone age was not significantly different between groups during the study period. GH treated children entered into puberty at a significantly earlier age compared to controls.

CONCLUSIONS

High dose GH treatment before puberty accelerates bone age and induces an earlier onset of puberty. This may limit the potential therapeutic benefit of this regimen in ISS.

Neuroendocrine control of growth hormone secretion

The secretion of growth hormone (GH) is regulated through a complex neuroendocrine control system, especially by the functional interplay of two hypothalamic hypophysiotropic hormones, GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) and somatostatin (SS), exerting stimulatory and inhibitory influences, respectively, on the somatotrope. The two hypothalamic neurohormones are subject to modulation by a host of neurotransmitters, especially the noradrenergic and cholinergic ones and other hypothalamic neuropeptides, and are the final mediators of metabolic, endocrine, neural, and immune influences for the secretion of GH. Since the identification of the GHRH peptide, recombinant DNA procedures have been used to characterize the corresponding cDNA and to clone GHRH receptor isoforms in rodent and human pituitaries. Parallel to research into the effects of SS and its analogs on endocrine and exocrine secretions, investigations into their mechanism of action have led to the discovery of five separate SS receptor genes encoding a family of G protein-coupled SS receptors, which are widely expressed in the pituitary, brain, and the periphery, and to the synthesis of analogs with subtype specificity. Better understanding of the function of GHRH, SS, and their receptors and, hence, of neural regulation of GH secretion in health and disease has been achieved with the discovery of a new class of fairly specific, orally active, small peptides and their congeners, the GH-releasing peptides, acting on specific, ubiquitous seven-transmembrane domain receptors, whose natural ligands are not yet known.

Effect of growth hormone treatment on adult height of children with idiopathic short stature. Genentech Collaborative Group

BACKGROUND

Short-term administration of growth hormone to children with idiopathic short stature results in increases in growth rate and standard-deviation scores for height. However, the effect of long-term growth hormone therapy on adult height in these children is unknown.

METHODS

We studied 121 children with idiopathic short stature, all of whom had an initial height below the third percentile, low growth rates, and maximal stimulated serum concentrations of growth hormone of at least 10 microg per liter. The children were treated with growth hormone (0.3 mg per kilogram of body weight per week) for 2 to 10 years. Eighty of these children have reached adult height, with a bone age of at least 16 years in the boys and at least 14 years in the girls, and pubertal stage 4 or 5. The difference between the predicted adult height before treatment and achieved adult height was compared with the corresponding difference in three untreated normal or short-statured control groups.

RESULTS

In the 80 children who have reached adult height, growth hormone treatment increased the mean standard-deviation score for height (number of standard deviations from the mean height for chronologic age) from -2.7 to -1.4. The mean (+/-SD) difference between predicted adult height before treatment and achieved adult height was +5.0+/-5.1 cm for boys and +5.9+/-5.2 cm for girls. The difference between predicted and achieved adult height among treated boys was 9.2 cm greater than the corresponding difference among untreated boys with initial standard-deviation scores of less than -2, and the difference among treated girls was 5.7 cm greater than the difference among untreated girls.

CONCLUSION

Long-term administration of growth hormone to children with idiopathic short stature can increase adult height to a level above the predicted adult height and above the adult height of untreated historical control children.

Short-term increments of insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) and IGF-binding protein-3 predict the growth response to growth hormone (GH) therapy in GH-sensitive children

The present study included a cohort of 42 children aged between 1.7 and 15.4 years, who presented with short stature and growth failure. Basal and generated serum levels of insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) and IGF-binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3), measured in an IGF generation test following four or seven daily injections of growth hormone (GH), 0.1 IU/kg (0.033 mg/kg), were analysed in these patients. The growth response to 1 year of GH treatment, 0.6 IU/kg/week (0.2 mg/kg/week), was also investigated. Median height velocity of these patients increased from -1.6 SDS (range, -4.6 to -0.3 SDS) to 3.3 SDS (range, -0.2 to 7.1 SDS) after 1 year of GH treatment, and median height SDS increased by 0.7 SDS (range, 0.1 to 2.2 SDS). Strong correlations were observed between basal and generated IGF-I and IGFBP-3 levels. The increase in IGFBP-3 levels in response to GH in the generation test was a strong predictor of the growth response to GH therapy. All the patients in the present study could be differentiated from patients with GH insensitivity syndrome (GHIS) using the criteria of a diagnostic scoring system for GHIS. The most valuable parameters were the increases in IGF-I and IGFBP-3 levels in the generation test, which excluded 95.2% of the patients from a diagnosis of GHIS.

Changes in serum IGF-I and IGFBP-3 concentrations during the IGF-I generation test performed prospectively in children with short stature

OBJECTIVE

Genotype and phenotype heterogeneity in patients with GH insensitivity syndrome suggests that partial defects exist in the GH receptor. Children with partial GH resistance would be expected to have short stature, elevated GH levels and relatively low levels of IGF-I and IGFBP-3. Provocation tests of the GH-IGF-I axis may help to identify such children. The IGF-I generation test in particular may demonstrate impaired secretion of IGF-I and IGFBP-3. This prospective study assesses the usefulness of the IGF-I generation test in the identification of short children with possible GH insensitivity.

DESIGN

Prepubertal children referred for assessment of short stature underwent a standard GH provocation test followed by an IGF-I generation test.

SUBJECTS

Thirty-seven prepubertal children (14 girls, 23 boys) with short stature (height < 2nd centile UK standards 1990) aged 4.5-12.6 years were investigated prospectively.

METHODS

Assessment included history, physical examination, auxological observations (height, weight, bone age). GH provocation tests (glucagon 15 micrograms/kg i.m. or insulin 0.15 U/kg/i.v.) was followed by an IGF-I generation test (hGH 0.1 iu/kg/s.c. daily for 4 days).

MEASUREMENTS

GH was assayed during the provocation test. IGF-I and IGFBP-3 were measured at 0900 h on day 0 and 4 of the IGF-I generation test. GH and IGF-I were measured by radioimmunoassay, IGFBP-3 by IRMA and basal GHBP by HPLC.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Height SDS was calculated according to the UK Height Standards 1990. The absolute and percentage changes of IGF-I and IGFBP-3 during the IGF-I generation test were calculated.

RESULTS

The 37 children were divided into three groups according to the peak GH level (mean +/- SEM) during the provocation test: Group 1 (peak GH < 20 mU/l) n = 11, five girls, six boys age 7.1 +/- 0.7 years, height SDS -2.5 +/- 0.1, peak GH 14.5 +/- 1.6 mU/l, IGF-I 92.0 +/- 10.4 micrograms/l, IGFBP-3 2.6 +/- 0.4 mg/l. Group 2 (peak GH 20-40 mU/l) n = 12, six girls, six boys age 8.6 +/- 0.7 years, height SDS -2.6 +/- 0.1, peak GH 28.4 +/- 1.6 mU/l, IGF-I 121-5 +/- 13.4 micrograms/l, IGFBP-3 2.9 +/- 0.2 mg/l. Group 3 (peak GH > 40 mU/l) n = 14, three girls, 11 boys, aged 8.5 +/- 0.6 years, height SDS -2.3 +/- 0.1, peak GH 60.7 +/- 4.1 mU/l, IGF-I 112.4 +/- 10.9 micrograms/l, IGFBP-3 3.1 +/- 0.3 mg/l. There were no significant differences in the absolute increases of IGF-I or IGFBP-3 (mean +/- SEM) during the IGF-I generation test, IGF-I; Group 1, 48.8 +/- 9.5 micrograms/l, Group 2, 42.7 +/- 4.8 micrograms/l. Group 3, 45.5 +/- 5.1 micrograms/l, IGFBP-3; Group 1, 1.1 +/- 1.2 mg/l. Group 2, 1.2 +/- 0.2 mg/l, Group 3, 0.85 +/- 0.1 mg/l. There were no significant differences in the percentage increases (mean +/- SEM) of IGF-I; Group 1, 55 +/- 9%, Group 2, 35 +/- 5%, Group 3, 42 +/- 8%, or IGFBP-3; Group 1, 64 +/- 17%, Group 2, 44 +/- 8%, Group 3.32 +/- 6%. GHBP values were normal in all three groups. In Group 3 (peak GH > 40 mU/l) four individual patients had either low basal IGF-I levels (n = 2) (< 5th centile of normal range for age) or low basal IGFBP-3 levels (n = 1) (< 5th centile of normal range for age) or low IGF-I responses in the IGF-I generation test (2 x CV of IGF-I assay) (n = 1). No single subject had all the characteristics of GH insensitivity syndrome.

CONCLUSION

The responses during an IGF-I generation test did not identify a clear group of children with GH insensitivity. Individual patients had low basal IGF-I or IGFBP-3 values and a poor response in the generation test, features which, in the presence of high GH levels on provocation, are consistent with partial GH insensitivity.

Comparison of final heights of growth hormone-treated vs. untreated children with idiopathic growth failure

We measured adult heights (Ht) of 94 healthy GH-sufficient children (peak GH > 10 ng/mL, polyclonal RIA) whose Ht at presentation were more than 2 SD below the mean for chronological age, with normal weight-to-Ht ratios, normal body proportions, and pathologic growth velocity for chronological age. Group 1 (n 36, 6 females) received standardized doses (0.3 mg/kg x week) of GH (mean duration = 41 months), while group 2 (n = 58, 17 females) received no treatment. Our conclusion was that the mean final Ht SD score in the GH-treated group (-1.5) was significantly greater than in the untreated group (-2.1); P < .001. Genetic predisposition to short stature was evident in both groups: the midparental Ht SD score was -1.1 in the treated and -1.0 in the untreated group. Midparental Ht was met or exceeded by 42% of the GH-treated group but only 15% of the untreated group. Final Ht was not significantly different from predicted Ht, except from GH-treated girls, who exceeded their predicted Ht. Although the mean Ht gains (6.8 cm in girls and 3 cm in boys) were modest and variable, GH treatment provided significantly better Ht outcomes for the majority of children with idiopathic growth failure.

Preliminary validation of a prediction model for the short-term growth response to growth hormone therapy in children with idiopathic short stature

A discriminant scoring system, using multivariate analysis, has been developed for pretreatment prediction of responsiveness to a 6-month trial of growth hormone (GH) treatment in short children with subnormal growth velocity, but without GH deficiency. Inclusion criteria included a birth weight above 2.5 kg, height below the 3rd centile for chronological age, height velocity below the 25th centile for bone age, no signs of puberty, a maximal GH response to pharmacological stimulation of above 10 micrograms/l and treatment with GH at a dose of 12-16 IU/m2/week. Children with an increase in height velocity greater than 2.5 cm/year after therapy were considered to be responders. Pretreatment clinical data from 67 patients were employed in a discriminant analysis in order to establish the model. The scoring system developed was as follows: score = -0.4 + 0.92X1 - 0.87X2, where X1 is the height velocity SD score (SDS) for chronological age, and X2 is the bone age SDS for chronological age. This model had a specificity of 96.3% and a sensitivity of 92.5% in predicting the responsiveness to GH. The model has subsequently been applied to a group of 14 patients in order to establish its validity; in this group its sensitivity was 83.3% and its specificity 100%. These preliminary data suggest that the model can be used as a guideline for selecting short, slowly growing, non-GH-deficient children who will respond to short-term GH therapy.

Growth hormone therapy in children with short stature: is bigger better or achievable?

The introduction of recombinant DNA-synthesized human growth hormone in the mid-1980s, and its attendant unlimited supply, have led to wider application of growth hormone therapy in children. Over the past decade, the efficacy of growth hormone treatment in patients with Turner syndrome and chronic renal insufficiency, two conditions in which growth hormone secretion is normal, in improving growth velocity and final height, has also led to the consideration of growth hormone therapy in children with idiopathic short stature. Although thousands of patients with idiopathic short stature are currently being treated with growth hormone, the limited overall results available at this time do not show a significant improvement in final adult height despite an improvement in short-term growth velocity. Potential reasons for this outcome include 1) skeletal age advancing more rapidly than height age, 2) heterogeneity of the patient population comprising idiopathic short stature, 3) inherent inaccuracies of methodological tools, such as measurement of predicted adult height, and 4) a subset of children with idiopathic short stature who may, in fact, have partial growth hormone insensitivity. From a psychological perspective, the consensus of investigations in non-clinic-referred populations of psychosocial function in children with short stature do not indicate a disadvantage compared with children of normal height when socio-economic status is taken into consideration. These results, in conjunction with the minimal gains reported in behavioural measurements in idiopathic short children treated with growth hormone, question the traditional rationale that augmentation of growth velocity results in improvement in psychosocial well-being.

24-hour secretion of growth hormone (GH), insulin-like growth factors-I and -II (IGF-I, -II), prolactin (PRL) and thyrotropin (TSH) in young adults of normal and tall stature

Studies of the growth hormone (GH) secretory dynamics of children with normal and idiopathic short stature (ISS) have revealed that the regulation of the GH-somatomedin (GHS) axis can differ significantly among normal individuals. Information on the GH secretion in idiopathic tall stature (ITS) is scarce. We previously showed that the GH response to stimulation with GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) in male, late adolescents and young adults with ITS is significantly greater than that of their sex and age-matched controls of average height. In the present study, we studied the 24-hour (hr) GH, insulin-like growth factor-I and -II (IGF-I and -II), prolactin (PRL) and thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) secretion by every 30 minutes (min) sampling in 12 young, healthy male Greek army recruits. Group I [n = 6, age 22 + 1.4 years (y.), mean + standard deviation (SD)] had a height of 198.5 + 4.2cm, at least 3 SD's above the mean of the Greek male population. Group II (n = 6, age 20.5 + 1.05 y.) had a height of 169.2 + 3.4cm, within 2SD's of the normal mean. Serum IGF-I levels were determined in both unextracted and extracted samples. Our results indicated that the number of secretory bursts and the circadian panel of GH, IGF-I and -II, PRL and TSH were similar in the two groups. Both the amplitude of the secretory GH peaks (5.08 + 3.07 vs. 3.3 + 0.8 ng/ml, p = 0.19,) and the area under the curve (AUC) of the 24-hour GH secretion (9.8 + 5.5 vs. 6.6 + 1.3 ng/ml/hr, p = 0.2) were higher in group I than in group II, but the difference was not significant. A significant nocturnal increase of both IGF-I and -II levels was found only in extracted human plasma (p < 0.001), whereas measurements of IGF-I in unextracted samples failed to reveal circadian variation (p < 0.1). We conclude that no significant differences were found in this pilot study of the neurosecretory regulation of the GHS axis between individuals of tall and normal stature. A tendency for greater amount of GH secretion per secretory peak was found in persons with tall stature; however, this finding needs to be confirmed in a larger study. IGF-I and -II levels had a significant circadian variation with a large nocturnal surge, when measured in extracted plasma. The latter, might be explained by circadian variation of the circulating IGF-binding proteins and its detection appears to be method of extraction-dependent.

Insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3 generation: an index of growth hormone insensitivity

GH insensitivity may be an inherited condition or may arise as a consequence of disease of malnutrition. Laron syndrome is the most severe form of GH insensitivity, arising from an absent or defective GH receptor. Less severe forms of GH insensitivity, however, may exist, resulting in short stature but in few other features of Laron syndrome. We have identified a heterogeneous group of children with short stature and either high basal (> 10 mU/L) or high peak GH levels (> 40 mU/L) on GH provocation testing, to examine biochemical markers of GH sensitivity. These children received 4 d of GH (0.1 U/kg) and the increment in IGF-I, IGF binding protein (BP)-3, and GHBP was determined. Eight GHD children, commencing GH therapy, were recruited as positive controls. The two groups could not be differentiated by age, height SDS (SD score), height velocity SDS, or body mass index. IGF-I and IGFBP-3 generation were correlated in all children (delta SDS IGF-I versus delta SDS IGFBP-3, r = 0.49, p = 0.03). Neither basal GHBP levels or the increment in GHBP were predictive of the IGF-I or IGFBP-3 response to GH. The GHI group had a significantly reduced IGFBP-3 response to stimulation with 4 d of GH (median percent increment in IGFBP-3, 26%, versus 72% in the GHD group, P = 0.03); their IGF-I response to GH was also reduced (median % increment in IGF-I 75% versus 144% in the GH deficient group), but this did not achieve significance, p = 0.06. In all children, the percentage rise or delta SDS in both IGF-I and IGFBP-3 inversely correlated with the GH peak obtained on provocation testing, the latter being the most significant determinant of GH peak. We propose that the "IGF generation test", in particular IGFBP-3 generation, can be used in the investigation of partial GH insensitivity. Further work, however, is required to establish diagnostic criteria for partial GH insensitivity.

The growth and cardiovascular effects of high dose growth hormone therapy in idiopathic short stature

OBJECTIVE

It is possible that high dose GH treatment may have beneficial effects on growth but important adverse effects on cardiac function. We have therefore investigated the efficacy and cardiovascular effects of high dose biosynthetic human GH (r-hGH) treatment in children with idiopathic short stature and a normal pretreatment height velocity.

STUDY DESIGN

Randomized controlled study.

PATIENTS

Twenty-nine short (height SDS < 1.5), normally growing (height velocity SDS > -1.5), prepubertal children referred to two specialist growth clinics.

INTERVENTIONS

Children were randomly assigned to an observation group or to receive 'standard' (20 IU/m2/week) or 'high' (40 IU/m2/week) dose r-hGH by daily subcutaneous injection. At the end of 1 year the observation group were randomly assigned to 'standard' or 'high' dose r-hGH therapy for the second year of the study. Regular growth, biochemical and echocardiographic monitoring were performed throughout the study period.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Changes in height velocity, HtSDS for bone age (HtSDSBA), left ventricular mass index (LVMI) and left ventricular function (fractional shortening) during 2 years treatment.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven children completed the study. Ht velocity SDS increased with r-hGH therapy in a dose dependent fashion. First-year height velocity SDS was +5.7 in the high dose r-hGH group compared with +2.7 in the standard dose r-hGH group and -0.5 in the observation group (P < 0.001). In those children treated for 2 years HtSDSBA was -0.5 in the high dose group but had not changed significantly in the standard dose group (-1.7) (P = 0.01). After one year r-hGH treatment LVMI was 71 g/m2 (observation group), 73 g/m2 (20 IU/m2/week group) and 74 g/m2 (40 IU/m2/week group) (P = 0.77). LVMI increased significantly from baseline to 76 g/m2 after 2 years therapy with 40 IU/m2/week r-hGH (P = 0.04) but nevertheless remained within the normal range. Fractional shortening did not change significantly over 2 years of r-hGH therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

High dose (40 IU/m2/week) r-hGH treatment of children with idiopathic short stature resulted in a greater short-term acceleration in growth rate than 'standard' dose therapy without an excessive advance in skeletal maturity and probably represents the optimal growth promoting dose for short, normally growing children. Whether continued high dose r-hGH therapy increases final height requires further study. Left ventricular morphology and function remained within the normal range during r-hGH therapy but regular monitoring of cardiovascular status should continue in non-GHD children receiving r-hGH in high doses over a longer time period.

Prediction of the outcome of growth hormone therapy in children with idiopathic short stature. A multivariate discriminant analysis

OBJECTIVE

To identify, with the use of pretreatment clinical data, the children with idiopathic short stature responsive to treatment with growth hormone (GH).

DESIGN

Open, prospective study in a university hospital.

SUBJECTS

Patients admitted to the study met the following criteria: birth weight at least 2.5 kg, no sign of dysmorphic disease, stature less than the 3rd percentile for chronologic age (CA), linear growth velocity (GV) less than the 25th percentile for bone age (BA), no sign of puberty, maximal GH response to pharmacologic stimulation greater than 10 micrograms/L, no evidence of organic disease, treatment with daily subcutaneous administration of GH at a dose of 12 to 16 IU/m2 per week.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Eight pretreatment growth variables and the increase of GV after 6 months of therapy were measured. Children with a change in GV that was greater than 2.5 cm/yr after 6 months of GH therapy were considered responders to GH.

RESULTS

We studied 67 patients (44 boys). Forty patients (60%) were responders. With univariate analysis the variables found to have predictive value were GV (z score for gender and CA), bone age (z score for gender and CA), and percentage of ideal body weight. These variables were employed in a multivariate discriminant analysis. Growth velocity and BA showed the best independent discriminant analysis. Growth velocity and BA showed the best independent discriminant significance in predicting responsiveness to the initial 6 months of GH therapy. The obtained equation was as follows: Score = -0.40 + 0.92X1 - 0.87X2, where X1 is the GV z value for CA and X2 is the BA z value for CA). Using this scoring system, we obtained a specificity of 96.3% and a sensitivity of 92.5% in predicting responsiveness to GH (chi-square with Yates correction, 48.2; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Discriminant analysis may permit the pretreatment prediction of responsiveness to the initial 6 months of GH therapy in short children without GH deficiency.

Growth hormone treatment of idiopathic short stature: analysis of the database from KIGS, the Kabi Pharmacia International Growth Study

Within the Kabi Pharmacia International Growth Study (KIGS) database, there is information on 1017 (700 male/317 female) patients with idiopathic short stature (ISS). These patients were started on recombinant human growth hormone (GH) at a median age of 10.8 years, a bone age of -1.8 SDS, a height of -2.6 SDS and a predicted adult height (PAH) (Bailey-Pinneau method) of -2.5 SDS. The median dose of GH was 0.6 IU/kg body weight/week and the frequency of injections was six/week. According to the relationship with target height the patients were classified into 'familial short stature (FSS)' (height SDS > target height SDS -1.28) and into 'non-FSS' (height SDS < target height SDS -1.28). During the first year of GH treatment there was an overall increment in the median height velocity from 4.4 to 7.4 cm/year. Over 3 years of GH treatment, cross-sectional analysis demonstrated an overall increment in median PAH of 1.2 SDS. There was a positive correlation between gain in PAH and the GH dose (n = 202, r = 0.18, p < 0.01) during the first year. Longitudinal analysis in 84 patients showed an overall increment of PAH of 0.7 SDS over 2 years of treatment. When applying the KIGS first-year prediction model for patients with idiopathic GH deficiency on cohorts of prepubertal children with FSS and non-FSS, a lower responsiveness to GH in the non-FSS group was observed. It is concluded that higher than substitutive doses of GH are required for the long-term improvement of growth in ISS.

The insulin-like growth factor I generation test in the investigation of short stature

Genotypic and phenotypic heterogeneity in patients with growth hormone (GH) insensitivity syndrome suggests that partial defects exist in the GH receptor. The insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) generation test was assessed as a means of identifying partial GH receptor defects in a heterogeneous group of 22 prepubertal children with short stature. In a subgroup of nine patients with peak GH levels of 63.7 +/- 3.7 mU/l during a glucagon tolerance test, the response to the IGF-I generation test was no different from that for the group as a whole (peak GH, 43.3 +/- 4.5 mU/l), despite the fact that this subgroup exhibited a negative relationship between height SDS and peak GH and a positive relationship between height SDS and IGF binding protein-3. This preliminary study therefore suggests that the IGF-I generation test in its present form will not be useful as a primary screening test for partial GH insensitivity. Despite this, the IGF-I generation test has been extremely useful in the confirmation of the diagnosis of GHIS and may therefore also prove useful in the confirmation of partial defects in the GH receptor. A subgroup of short children with peak GH levels above 40 mU/l had some characteristics of partial GH receptor deficiency. These children, to whom GH therapy would not normally be given, may respond better to recombinant human IGF-I.

Characteristics of children with idiopathic short stature in the Kabi Pharmacia International Growth Study, and their response to growth hormone treatment. International Board of the Kabi Pharmacia International Growth Study

The auxological characteristics and the response to growth hormone (GH) treatment of children with idiopathic short stature were studied, using the database of the Kabi Pharmacia International Growth Study. Pretreatment data from a total of 271 children were analysed. The children were selected for a birth weight above -2 SDS. The correlation coefficient of birth weight SDS and birth length SDS was 0.51, compared with 0.72 for the reference population. Median length at birth was -0.6 SDS, which fell to -2.5 SDS by 3 years of age. Thereafter, there was no further loss in height SDS. The response to GH treatment was studied in 222 of these prepubertal children who were given six or seven injections/week over a 3-year period. During this time, the median height SDS increased from -2.5 to -1.5, with those children receiving more than 0.65 IU/kg/week having a greater gain in height SDS than those on 0.5 IU/kg/week or less. The degree of bone age delay did not appear to influence the response to GH therapy.

Clinical diagnoses of children with extremely short stature and their response to growth hormone

This study was undertaken to determine the prevalence of clinical diagnoses in a group of children with extremely short stature (standard deviation score for height, < -2.5) and to determine whether the classification might help in predicting response to human growth hormone (hGH) treatment. We classified 49 children referred consecutively to our outpatient clinic for evaluation of short stature with heights < -2.5 standard deviation score and bone ages < 9 years for girls or < 10 years for boys (to avoid an effect of puberty on the response to hGH). The diagnostic categories were growth hormone (GH) deficiency, constitutional delay, familial short stature, and primordial short stature. After referral, Turner syndrome was diagnosed in two children. The remaining 47 children were classified according to primary criteria, considered essential for the diagnosis, and secondary criteria, considered necessary but of lesser importance. There were five children, four children, no children, and one child classified, respectively, with GH deficiency, constitutional delay, familial short stature, and primordial short stature by using the most rigorous definitions of the diagnoses. There was significant overlap in the diagnoses other than GH deficiency. Growth hormone deficiency defined by the primary criterion of peak stimulated GH values < 5 micrograms/L was the most definitive. Of the 47 children, 7 were classified as GH deficient by this criterion and 5 were classified as GH deficient by the primary and secondary criteria. The mean pretreatment growth rate (3.1 +/- 1.9 cm/yr) of the group with stimulated GH values < 5 micrograms/L was significantly less than that in the other groups (4.2 +/- 1.5 cm/yr). The mean growth rate of the children with GH deficiency during treatment with hGH was greater than that in the other groups and was 3.4 times greater than the pretreatment growth rate. The mean growth rate of children in the other groups during hGH treatment was twofold greater than the pretreatment growth rate. We conclude that except for GH deficiency, children with an extreme degree of short stature are not easily classified by standard diagnostic criteria, and that most short children have a positive response to hGH therapy regardless of the diagnosis; therefore a specific clinical diagnosis should not be used to exclude children from hGH therapy.

The influence of growth hormone (rhGH) therapy on tooth formation in idiopathic short statured children

The purpose of this preliminary study was to evaluate tooth formation in children with idiopathic short stature, before and during treatment with recombinant growth hormone (rhGH). Twenty-nine short-statured children ages 6 to 13 years were assigned into two treatment groups, an "experimental" group (n = 18), which received rhGH, and a "control" group (n = 11), which was observed for 1 year before commencing rhGH treatment. Clinical and radiographic records were obtained at the initial, year 1, and year 2 visits. Tooth formation and stature were assessed by calculating Z-scores, appropriate for the age and gender of each child. Delta-Z scores, which measure the change in Z-score over time, were also calculated between annual visits. Height was measured and recorded every 3 months, and Z-score statural norms for age and gender were derived from the 1977 National Center for Health Services national probability sampling. Tooth formation standards were derived from Moorrees et al. A matched control sample for tooth development was derived from untreated children. Tooth formation was initially delayed although the degree of reduction in stature exceeded the initial degree of delay in tooth formation. During this 2-year study, rhGH therapy had a significant influence on acceleration or gain in stature, but did not have a significant influence on tooth formation.

Conventional and nonconventional uses of growth hormone

Although GH has been available as a therapeutic agent for the GH-deficient child for more than 30 years, the conditions of its use have yet to be optimized. The availability of biosynthetic material has provided researchers with the opportunity to develop the protocols necessary to begin to finally answer the most fundamental questions pertaining to dose, frequency, and duration of treatment. It has also permitted the initiation of prospective trials in a large number of conditions that result in childhood short stature, with the expectation that some or many of them will be treated effectively and safely. Finally, it has opened the door to an entire spectrum of potentially new uses of GH and other growth factors for so-called nonconventional indications. That these have implications that range from the short-term rapid healing of a burn graft site, to the more efficient induction of ovulation, to the long-term preservation of lean body mass has excited the interest of investigators in many fields of medicine and physiology. Thus, the recent progress reported in this paper is really the beginning of the new research that will take place with GH and growth factors.

Evaluation of growth hormone secretion and treatment

The secretion of growth hormone (GH) is regulated by a complex system that includes both neurotransmitters and feedback by hormonal and metabolic substrates. Over the last few years it has been recognized that GH release varies over a wide spectrum from deficient to excessive secretion. The diagnosis of GH deficiency is based on a combination of anthropometric and clinical signs on the one hand and an inadequate stimulated and/or spontaneous GH secretion on the other. There is no distinct boundary between deficient and sufficient GH secretion. The cut-off limit for normal GH release is accordingly relative and has increased over the past decade from 5 to 10 micrograms/l. The effect of GH therapy on growth can be evaluated only after treatment for at least 6 months. There is, therefore, an indisputable need for methods that would reflect growth response soon after the start of treatment. There are several promising biochemical candidates, e.g. the aminoterminal propeptide of type III procollagen, the carboxyterminal propeptide of procollagen I and the bone Gla-protein, which may turn out to be useful early indicators of the growth response to long-term GH therapy.

Predictors of growth response to growth hormone in otherwise normal short children

Sixty prepubertal short children (39 boys) with heights less than 2 SD for age and gender were treated daily for 1 year with recombinant human growth hormone (GH), either 0.1 IU/kg (group 0.1, n = 32) or 0.05 IU/kg (group 0.05, n = 28). Reserve of GH was determined by at least one GH provocative stimulus and 24-hour continuous blood withdrawal to determine the integrated concentration of GH (IC-GH). All participants had a GH response to provocative tests greater than 10 micrograms/L. The height velocity (mean +/- SD) of the group as a whole increased from 4.46 +/- 1.02 to 7.59 +/- 1.65 cm/yr (p less than 0.001). The growth velocity of group 0.1 was significantly greater than that of group 0.05 (8.1 +/- 1.5 vs 7.0 +/- 1.65 cm/yr; p less than 0.01). Bone age did not advance more than 1 year during the treatment period. Growth velocity after 1 year of GH therapy was inversely correlated with the IC-GH in both groups, as was the pretreatment height velocity. We found no correlation of growth velocity during GH therapy with other measures such as parental heights, bone age/chronologic age ratio, maximal GH response to provocative tests, chronologic age, or pretreatment insulin-like growth factor I levels. We conclude that the best predictors for the 1-year growth outcome of short children with a normal GH response to provocative tests are the pretreatment growth velocity and the IC-GH. The short-term benefit from GH therapy in children with a normal growth velocity and a normal IC-GH is poor, whereas marked growth acceleration is noted in children with a low growth velocity and a low 24-hour IC-GH.

The efficacy of ergogenic agents in athletic competition. Part II: Other performance-enhancing agents

OBJECTIVE

To summarize the literature describing the epidemiology, pharmacology, efficacy, and adverse effects associated with growth hormone (GH), caffeine, aerobic metabolism facilitator (AMF), and sympathomimetic use among athletes.

DATA SOURCES

Relevant articles were identified from a MEDLINE search using the search terms "Doping in Sports," "Blood," "Caffeine," "Cocaine," "Erythropoietin," "Somatotropin," and "Sympathomimetics (exploded)." Additional references were found in bibliographies of these articles.

STUDY SELECTION/DATA EXTRACTION

We reviewed studies of ergogenic drug (ED) use among athletes. Interpretation of these studies is difficult because of poor research design and the paucity of information available. This necessitated the inclusion of many anecdotal or conjectural reports in our review.

DATA SYNTHESIS

There are no studies documenting an ergogenic effect associated with GH use in humans or animals. It is still unknown whether GH abuse causes adverse effects in healthy adults, although GH-induced acromegaly has been suspected. Amphetamines, cocaine, and caffeine are thought to improve performance via enhanced concentration among athletes. Amphetamines and cocaine may increase aggressiveness. The ergogenic effects of other sympathomimetics including ephedrine and phenylpropanolamine are unclear. AMFs (e.g., blood doping, epoetin) enhance aerobic metabolism and endurance by increasing the oxygen-carrying capacity of the blood. Risks associated with excessive AMF use include increased blood viscosity and clotting.

CONCLUSIONS

Athletes view EDs as an essential component for success. Without adequate intervention measures, ED abuse is likely to continue unchecked.

Long-term treatment with growth hormone of children with short stature and normal growth hormone secretion

Children with short stature but normal growth rate and/or normal growth hormone response to sleep and secretagogues were treated with recombinant methionyl human growth hormone, 0.3 mg/kg per week. In each year of treatment, about 80% of the subjects maintained an increase in growth rate greater than the defined limit (greater than 1 cm/yr above pretreatment growth rate) for continuation of human growth hormone treatment. Comparison of the group that continued to respond to human growth hormone with the group that did not maintain an accelerated growth rate did not reveal differences in bone age delay, sleep or secretagogue-stimulated human growth hormone secretion, degree of short stature either absolute or relative to target height, and somatomedin C concentration before or after initiation of therapy. The group that failed to respond to the human growth hormone treatment in the first year of treatment was younger and had a higher pretreatment growth rate. Review of the longitudinal growth curves revealed five patterns of response to human growth hormone treatment: (1) failure to increase growth rate in two subjects with height SD scores within 1 SD of target height, (2) failure to increase growth rate in five subjects with height SD scores greater than 1 SD less than the target height, (3) acceleration in growth rate in three subjects that was not maintained until achievement of a height within 1 SD of the target height, (4) acceleration of growth rate in five subjects that was maintained until achievement of a height within 1 SD of the target height, and (5) acceleration in growth rate that was maintained during the 3 years of treatment in 15 subjects who had not attained a height within 1 SD of the target height. We conclude that human growth hormone treatment of some but not all short children with "normal" growth hormone secretion will result in sustained acceleration of growth rate and attainment of prepubertal heights that are closer to but do not exceed their genetic height potential. A clinical trial of human growth hormone may be necessary to determine which subjects will benefit from the treatment.

Predicting and monitoring of growth in children with short stature during the first year of growth hormone treatment

Fifteen prepubertal short stature children (10 girls, 5 boys), mean age 9.6 years (range 5.2-12.7 years), with normal response to growth hormone stimulation tests (group A) or partial growth hormone deficiency (GHD) of idiopathic nature (group B) were included in a controlled longitudinal study for evaluation of predictive parameters for the long-term growth response after administration of biosynthetic human growth hormone (B-hGH). The average knee-heel length velocity for the first 3 months was significantly correlated to total body height velocity during the following 9 months (p less than 0.0008). By contrast, this association could not be found for height velocity during the same period. The increase in serum values of alkaline phosphatase and insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-1) during the first month of treatment was not significantly correlated to height velocity during the first year. During one year of treatment with B-hGH the mean height velocity for groups A and B increased from 4.4 cm/year (range 2.5-6.5) to 7.6 cm/year (range 4.7-10.6). Bone age advanced by 1.08 +/- 0.60 per chronological year. The ratio between total height and knee-heel length prior to treatment was 3.34 +/- 0.10 and after one year 3.33 +/- 0.10, suggesting a proportional linear growth. An inverse relationship was observed between the ratio and chronological age. In conclusion, early knee-heel measurement may be a useful non-invasive predictor of long-term linear growth in children during treatment with growth hormone, and the ratio of total height to lower leg length may be of importance in detecting dysproportional growth.

Near normalization of adolescent height with growth hormone therapy in very short children without growth hormone deficiency

Ten prepubertal children with stature at or below the 1st percentile for height and without growth hormone deficiency received 0.3 U recombinant growth hormone per kilogram daily for 2 years before puberty. Their growth velocity increased from 4 +/- 0.3 cm/yr before treatment to 10.7 +/- 0.6 and 8.8 +/- 0.6 cm, respectively, during the first and second years of treatment, and then remained at 5.7 +/- 0.7 cm the year after the end of growth hormone administration. This resulted in a near normalization of adolescent height. Bone maturation paralleled chronologic age, and therefore the expected final height of the children increased by approximately 10 cm. Administration of growth hormone induced a reversible hyperinsulinemia, with moderate and transient changes in glucose metabolism. A prospective, randomized study, including an untreated cohort, will be needed to confirm the effects on final height and to determine the magnitude of the response in familial short stature.

Growth hormone deficiency following radiation therapy of primary brain tumors in children

The medical records of 123 patients treated for brain tumors at Children's Hospital and Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, between 1985 and 1987 were reviewed. The endocrinological complications of radiation therapy and the effectiveness of growth hormone (GH) replacement therapy were assessed. These were the first 2 years after synthetic GH became available. The disease pathology was confirmed at craniotomy or biopsy in 108 patients. Ninety-five children completed radiation therapy and 65 of these were alive at the time of review; these 65 children represent the study population. The most common tumor types were medulloblastoma, craniopharyngioma, and ependymoma. Endocrine evaluation was initiated with changes in the patients' growth velocity. Patient workup included skeletal x-ray films for determination of bone and analysis of thyroxin, thyroid-stimulating hormone, and somatomedin-C levels. Following 1-dopa and clonidine stimulation, provocative studies of GH levels were performed. Growth hormone failure and short stature were observed in 26 children, most commonly in the 2nd year after tumor treatment. Eight patients with GH failure were also hypothyroid. Hormone replacement therapy was initiated with recombinant GH, 0.05 mg/kg/day, and all children so treated showed an increase in height, with eight patients experiencing catch-up growth. There were no complications of therapy or tumor recurrence. Studies of baseline bone age and somatomedin-C levels on completion of radiation therapy are recommended. Comprehensive endocrine studies should follow changes in the patients' growth velocity. With early GH replacement, catch-up growth is possible and normal adult heights may be achieved.

Growth characteristics and response to growth hormone therapy in patients with hypochondroplasia: genetic linkage of the insulin-like growth factor I gene at chromosome 12q23 to the disease in a subgroup of these patients

Hypochondroplasia, a heterogeneous and usually mild form of chondrodystrophy, is a common cause of short stature. It often goes unrecognized in childhood and is diagnosed in adult life when disproportionate short stature becomes obvious. We performed restriction enzyme analysis of the insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) gene on the families of 20 white British Caucasian children with short stature attributed to hypochondroplasia by radiological and clinical criteria, who were undergoing human growth hormone (r-hGH) treatment, in 60 children with isolated growth hormone deficiency and in 50 normal individuals. The frequency of the heterozygous pattern (Hind III: 8.2, 5.2, 4.8, 3.2 kb fragments, Pvu: 8.4, 5.1, 4.7, 2.5 kb fragments) in children with hypochondroplasia was significantly higher (chi2: P less than 0.05) than in the control groups. The hypochondroplastic children whose response to r-hGH treatment was characterized by a proportionate increase in both spinal and subischial leg length were all heterozygous for two co-inherited IGF-I gene restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) alleles (Hind III: 5.2, 4.8 kb; Pvu II: 5.1, 4.7 kb). Children whose response was characterized by accentuation of the body disproportion by r-hGH treatment were all homozygous for these alleles (Hind III: 4.8, 4.8 kb; Pvu II: 4.7, 4.7 kb). Their response to r-hGH treatment is significantly different (P less than 0.01). Studies of the families of the heterozygous affected children demonstrated strong linkage (lod score 3.311 at zero recombination) of the IGF-I gene locus at chromosome 12q23 to this subgroup of hypochondroplasia. The 5.2 kb Hind III and 5.1 kb Pvu II alleles are in strong linkage disequilibrium with this trait. These data indicate that IGF-I gene may be a candidate gene for involvement in the aetiology of short stature presenting with hypochondroplastic features and a proportionate response to r-hGH treatment; they also provide support for the concept of genetic heterogeneity in chondrodystrophy.

Growth hormone and insulin-like growth factor I: nutritional pathophysiology and therapeutic potential

The growth hormone--insulin-like growth factor I axis has been appreciated for more than 30 years and the effects of malnutrition on this axis for more than 20 years. Over the last decade, advances in molecular biology have permitted enhanced understanding of feedback regulation between growth hormone and IGF-I at the gene level, including limited information on nutritional influences. Similarly, the availability of recombinant human growth hormone has allowed controlled clinical studies demonstrating its net anabolic actions at hypocaloric dietary energy intake levels and its ability to enhance height velocity in children with various causes of diminished growth. Although investigational use of recombinant IGF-I in humans has been limited, its actions are likely to complement those of growth hormone during periods of profound dietary energy deficit. From the information presented, two hypotheses are developed. First, recombinant IGF-I administration will enhance substrate anabolic events during the acutely malnourished state when dietary intake is severely limited. Second, administration of recombinant human growth hormone will accelerate protein anabolism and catch-up growth during the period of recovery from protein-energy malnutrition. Given current clinical investigational tools and the availability of both recombinantly-produced hormones, these are testable hypotheses.

Growth hormone for short stature not due to classic growth hormone deficiency

The advent of recombinant DNA technology has resulted in potentially unlimited supplies of growth hormone. Sufficient quantities are now available not only for the long-term, uninterrupted treatment of GH-deficient children but potentially for the treatment of non-GH-deficient patients with other short stature or growth attenuating disorders. Short-term studies have demonstrated an improvement in the growth rates of subjects with isolated short stature, Turner syndrome, and chronic renal failure; and additional studies are under way to assess the efficacy of GH therapy of other short stature syndromes. However, the long-term efficacy and possible adverse effects of GH treatment in these situations is not known. Until there has been more experience, GH deficiency should remain the primary indication for GH treatment. Growth hormone should not be considered routine therapy for other conditions associated with or resulting in short stature. However, research should continue in these areas to define which children may benefit from GH treatment.

Adult height in boys and girls with untreated short stature and constitutional delay of growth and puberty: accuracy of five different methods of height prediction

To determine how accurately several methods of height prediction estimate adult height, we compared height predictions calculated by the Bayley-Pinneau, Roche-Wainer-Thissen (RWT), target height, and Tanner-Whitehouse Mark I (TW-MI), and Mark II (TW-MII) methods with final adult height in 37 boys and 32 girls with short stature and constitutional delay of growth and puberty. They were first seen at a chronologic age (mean +/- SD) of 14.80 +/- 1.70 years (boys) and 12.87 +/- 2.56 years (girls). Adult height at 23.14 +/- 1.95 years and 21.05 +/- 2.02 years was 170.4 +/- 5.4 cm (boys) and 157.8 +/- 4.2 cm (girls), respectively, and thus within the lower range of normal. Height predictions were calculated for the total group and for patients with parents of normal (group 1) as well as short stature (group 2). For boys, the RWT method gave very accurate results, underestimating adult height by -0.6 cm for the total group. The prediction errors for the other methods were -7.3 cm (TW-MI), -4.2 cm (TW-MII), and +3.1 cm (Bayley-Pinneau method) or +1.7 cm (target height). For girls, no method was superior in estimating adult height. The mean prediction error was -0.8 cm, -2.1 cm, and -1.8 cm with the Bayley-Pinneau, TW-MI, and TW-MII methods, respectively. In contrast, adult height was overpredicted by +2.3 cm and +1.2 cm with the RWT and target height methods. We conclude that patients with short stature and constitutional delay of growth and puberty reach an adult height in the lower range of normal. Height prediction methods differ with respect to their accuracy and their tendency to overestimate or underestimate adult height.

Insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) levels in follicular fluid from human preovulatory follicles: correlation with serum IGF-I levels

Insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) levels were measured in both serum and fluid of preovulatory follicles (n = 156) in 43 women undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF). The mean IGF-I level in follicular fluid (FF) was significantly lower than in serum (0.52 +/- 0.02 IU/L versus 0.66 +/- 0.23 IU/L), and FF levels were significantly correlated with individual serum IGF-I levels as well as with follicular size and FF volume but not with oocyte maturity, granulosa cell appearance, or IVF. This suggests that FF IGF-I levels cannot serve as a clinical indicator for the degree of oocyte/granulosa cell differentiation or a predictor for IVF. Serum IGF-I levels were inversely correlated with the number of human menopausal gonadotropin ampules administered during treatment, suggesting that IGF-I might enhance ovarian gonadotropic stimulation.