A randomized trial of surgery in the treatment of single metastases to the brain

Short-term survivors with brain metastases have modest benefits from focal and systemic therapies and remain frequent despite improving treatment landscape

Purpose

Therapeutic options for patients with brain metastases (BM) increase. While these lead to considerable survival effects in subgroups, there is limited knowledge about characteristics, prognosticators and treatment effects in patients with BM and short survival.

Methods

Patients with a survival time of ≤ 6 months (short-term survivors, STS), diagnosed with BM between 2009-2021 at a large tertiary cancer center were analysed. Clinical and treatment characteristics, pathological data and causes of death were documented. Descriptive statistics, treatment-specific univariate Kaplan-Meier estimator analyses and multivariate Cox regression were performed.

Results

Among 1248 patients with BM, 480 (38 %) were STS. 256 STS with detailed clinical records were included in this analysis. In univariate and multivariate analysis, Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) (p < 0.001) and number of BM (p = 0.004) were prognostic. In 75 % of patients, the ds-GPA score predicted short-term survival. Use of resection with focal radiotherapy (p < 0.001) and systemic treatment (p < 0.001) appeared prognostically favourable compared to whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) alone. However, survival benefits were very modest, with a median gain of 6 weeks following resection and focal radiotherapy compared to whole-brain radiotherapy, and 3 weeks from systemic treatment. Systemic tumor progression was documented as the cause of death in the majority of patients. Over the examined time period, the ratio between STS and other patients remained without significant change.

Conclusion

Within STS, KPS and number of BM are of prognostic relevance. There is benefit from local and systemic therapy to a limited extent. Shared and carefully discussed individual therapy decisions are necessary.

Precision radiotherapy with molecular-profiling of CNS tumours

Diagnoses of CNS malignancies in the primary and metastatic setting have significantly advanced in the last decade with the advent of molecular pathology. Using a combination of immunohistochemistry, next-generation sequencing, and methylation profiling integrated with traditional histopathology, patient prognosis and disease characteristics can be understood to a much greater extent. This has recently manifested in predicting response to targeted drug therapies that are redefining management practices of CNS tumours. Radiotherapy, along with surgery, still remains an integral part of treating the majority of CNS tumours. However, the rapid advances in CNS molecular diagnostics have not yet been effectively translated into improving CNS radiotherapy. We explore several promising strategies under development to integrate molecular oncology into radiotherapy, and explore future directions that can serve to use molecular diagnostics to personalize radiotherapy. Evolving the management of CNS tumours with molecular profiling will be integral to supporting the future of precision radiotherapy.

Neurosurgical management of brain metastases in the elderly: a prospective study on adverse event prevalence and predictors

The management of brain metastases (BM) in geriatric patients poses significant challenges in the context of an aging population and advances in systemic cancer treatment. This study provides insights into the prevalence and nature of adverse events (AEs) following intracranial surgery in patients aged 65 years and older. It highlights the complexities and implications of treating this demographic patient population and identifies risk factors associated with AEs. This prospective study includes patients aged 65 years and older with BM who underwent surgery between January 2022 and December 2023. A detailed assessment of AEs, defined as any complication occurring within the first 30 days post-surgery, was conducted. Potential risk factors for the occurrence of AEs were examined. The study encompassed 104 patients, averaging 70.1 ± 2.8 years, with 102 undergoing surgery. The mean age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) score was 8.9 ± 1.2, indicating a significant comorbidity burden, predominantly cardiac conditions. The Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) showed substantial improvement post-surgery, increasing from 71.3% ± 7.8 to 75.1% ± 5.0 (p = 0.045). The average hospital stay was 10.6 days. Four non-surgery-related mortalities occurred within the 30-day postoperative period. Surgery-related AEs included wound complications in two patients, with one necessitating surgical revision. Advanced age and comorbidities emerged as significant predictors of AEs. Our findings suggest that neurosurgical intervention for BM in the elderly is a feasible and safe option, demonstrating favorable morbidity and mortality rates. However, careful postoperative monitoring is crucial, especially considering the baseline health status of these patients, which increases their susceptibility to AEs. Standardizing protocols for AE reporting and analysis is essential for improving clinical outcomes and maintaining the quality of healthcare for this patient population.

A clinical model to predict brain metastases in resected early-stage non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Despite the rising diagnosis of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), there remains a limited understanding of the risk factors associated with postoperative brain metastases in early-stage NSCLC. Our goal was to identify the risk factors and construct a predictive model for postoperative brain metastases in this population.

METHODS

This study retrospectively enrolled patients with resected stage I-II NSCLC at the Department of Thoracic Surgery, West China Hospital from January 2015 to January 2021. Risk factors were identified through univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses, followed by the construction of a nomogram. Evaluation of the model involved metrics such as the area under the curve (AUC), C-index, and calibration curves. To ensure reliability, internal validation was performed through bootstrap resampling.

RESULTS

This study included 2106 patients, among whom 67 (3.18%) patients were diagnosed with postoperative brain metastases. Multivariable Cox regression analysis revealed that higher pT and pN stages, along with specific histological subtypes, particularly solid/micropapillary predominant adenocarcinoma, were identified as independent risk factors for brain metastases. The performance of the nomogram in the training set exhibited AUC values of 0.759, 0.788, and 0.782 for predicting 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year occurrences, respectively. Bootstrap resampling validated its reliability, with C-index values of 0.758, 0.799, and 0.792 for the respective timeframes. Calibration curves affirmed consistency of the model.

CONCLUSIONS

A nomogram was developed to predict the likelihood of postoperative brain metastases in individuals with early-stage NSCLC. The tool aids in identifying high-risk patients and facilitating timely interventions.

Brain metastases from lung cancer: recent advances and novel therapeutic opportunities

Metastatic intracranial progression drastically impacts prognosis, therapeutic considerations and quality of life. The increasing incidence of lung cancer patients developing brain metastases (BM) parallels the incorporation of more effective systemic agents and improved surveillance. Our evolving knowledge of BM pathophysiology, along with advancements in surgical, radiotherapy and systemic therapy options, is rapidly changing prognostication and treatment paradigms. Optimal management of BM in the modern era is patient-specific, dependent on performance status, comorbidities, intracranial and extracranial disease burden, leptomeningeal disease, and the presence of targetable mutations. The purpose of this review is to provide a detailed overview of the detection, prognostication, and multidisciplinary, management of BM arising from non-small cell lung cancer and small cell lung cancer. We discuss contemporary evidence and active clinical trials supporting a wide array of treatment options, including surgery, radiosurgery, memory-avoidance whole brain radiation, craniospinal irradiation, chemotherapy, targeted agents and immunotherapy. Multidisciplinary paradigms will continue to evolve as currently accruing randomized trials evaluating these promising treatments options mature.

Stereotactic radiosurgery for 1-10 brain metastases to avoid whole-brain radiotherapy: Results of the CYBER-SPACE randomized phase 2 trial

BACKGROUND

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is an emerging alternative to whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) for treating multiple brain metastases (BM), reducing toxicity, and improving tumor control. The CYBER-SPACE trial compared SRS based on either SPACE or MPRAGE MRI sequence for avoiding or delaying WBRT in patients with 1-10 BM.

METHODS

Patients with 1-10 untreated BM were randomized 1:1 to receive SRS of all lesions based on either SPACE or MPRAGE MRI sequences. If subsequently new BM occurred, SRS was repeated. WBRT was indicated upon occurrence of >10 new BM, leptomeningeal disease, or exhausted SRS-radiotolerance. The primary outcome was freedom from WBRT indication (WBRTi). Secondary outcomes included overall survival (OS), safety, and quality of life.

RESULTS

A total of 202 patients were randomized; SPACE n = 99, MPRAGE n = 103. Twelve-month WBRTi-free survival was 77.1% (95% CI: 69.5%-83.1%) overall, 78.5% (95% CI: 66.7%-86.5%) for SPACE, and 76.0% (95% CI: 65.2%-83.9%) for MPRAGE (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.43-1.63, P = .590). Patients with 5-10 BM had shorter WBRTi-free survival (HR = 3.13, 95% CI: 1.53-6.40, P = .002). Median OS was 13.1 months overall, 10.5 months for SPACE, and 15.2 months for MPRAGE (HR = 1.10, 95% CI: 0.78-1.56, P = .585). Neurologic death rate was 10.1%. Predictors for longer OS included Karnofsky Performance Status >80% (HR = 0.51, 95% CI: 0.33-0.77, P = .002) and concurrent immunotherapy (HR = 0.34, 95% CI: 0.23-0.52, P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

The more sensitive SPACE sequence did not improve outcomes over MPRAGE. SRS with thorough monitoring and immediate re-treatment for new lesions decreases the need for WBRT and achieves low neurologic death rates. SRS should be considered a favorable alternative to WBRT for patients with 1-10 BM.

Utilizing Vision Transformers for Predicting Early Response of Brain Metastasis to Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Stage Gamma Knife Radiosurgery Treatment

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

This study explores the application of vision transformers to predict early responses to stereotactic radiosurgery in patients with brain metastases using minimally pre-processed magnetic resonance imaging scans. The objective is to assess the potential of vision transformers as a predictive tool for clinical decision-making, particularly in the context of imbalanced datasets.

METHODS

We analyzed magnetic resonance imaging scans from 19 brain metastases patients, focusing on axial fluid-attenuated inversion recovery and high-resolution contrast-enhanced T1-weighted sequences. Patients were categorized into responders (complete or partial response) and non-responders (stable or progressive disease).

RESULTS

Despite the imbalanced nature of the dataset, our results demonstrate that vision transformers can predict early treatment responses with an overall accuracy of 99%. The model exhibited high precision (99% for progression and 100% for regression) and recall (99% for progression and 100% for regression). The use of the attention mechanism in the vision transformers allowed the model to focus on relevant features in the magnetic resonance imaging images, ensuring an unbiased performance even with the imbalanced data. Confusion matrix analysis further confirmed the model's reliability, with minimal misclassifications. Additionally, the model achieved a perfect area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC = 1.00), effectively distinguishing between responders and non-responders.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings highlight the potential of vision transformers, aided by the attention mechanism, as a non-invasive, predictive tool for early response assessment in clinical oncology. The vision transformer (ViT) model employed in this study processes MRIs as sequences of patches, enabling the capture of localized tumor features critical for early response prediction. By leveraging patch-based feature learning, this approach enhances robustness, interpretability, and clinical applicability, addressing key challenges in tumor progression prediction following stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). The model's robust performance, despite the dataset imbalance, underscores its ability to provide unbiased predictions. This approach could significantly enhance clinical decision-making and support personalized treatment strategies for brain metastases. Future research should validate these findings in larger, more diverse cohorts and explore the integration of additional data types to further optimize the model's clinical utility.

Cerebellar re-irradiation after whole brain radiotherapy significant symptom relief with minimal toxicity in metastatic brain patients

Whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) remains a standard treatment for extensive brain metastases, providing symptom relief and improved progression-free survival (PFS). Re-irradiation is often necessary for recurrent disease, particularly in the cerebellum, which accounts for 10-20% of cases. Cerebellar metastases are associated with distinct symptoms and poorer prognoses compared to supratentorial lesions. This study evaluates the outcomes of cerebellar-only re-irradiation for brain metastases, with or without stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for supratentorial lesions. A retrospective analysis of 56 patients treated between 2017 and 2023 was conducted. Patients received cerebellar-only re-irradiation after WBRT. Symptom improvement was assessed three months post-treatment. Statistical analyses included t-tests, Mann-Whitney U tests, and multivariable logistic regression. The cohort's median age was 53 years, with breast cancer being the most prevalent histology (71%). Symptom improvement occurred in 75% of patients, with relief rates of 84.6% for nausea, 80% for headache, and 58.3% for dizziness. Dexamethasone use decreased in 76.3% of cases. Median PFS was 39.2%, with a six-month overall survival of 50%. Only 1.7% of patients developed symptomatic radiation necrosis. Factors associated with symptom improvement included younger age, extended intervals between WBRT and re-irradiation, and higher equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions (EQD2). Cerebellar-only re-irradiation is an effective, low-toxicity option for recurrent cerebellar metastases. This approach warrants further validation in prospective studies, particularly in comparison to SRS.

Brain Imaging in Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer-A Systematic Review

Background: Lung cancer frequently metastasizes to the brain, liver, and adrenal glands with a significant negative prognostic impact on overall survival and quality of life (QoL). To optimize treatment and prognosis, adequate staging with the detection of distant metastases is crucial. The incidence of brain metastases in potentially resectable early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is as low as 3%; hence, the need for preoperative brain imaging has been a constant matter of debate, especially in stage II. In stages III and IV NSCLC, neuroimaging is an essential part of staging. Methods: A systematic literature search was performed. Publications from 1999 to 2024, focusing on preoperative brain imaging (BI) in the staging of stages I-IV NSCLC, were included. Data extraction included study population characteristics, the modality of BI, the incidence of brain metastases (BMs), and the main outcomes of the studies. The final included studies were selected according to the PRISMA criteria. In the second step, guidelines on BI in NSCLC staging of major importance were identified and compared. Results: A total of 530 articles were identified, of which 25 articles were selected. Four prospective studies and 21 retrospective investigations were included. Most of the investigations focused on BI in the early stages. The main imaging modality for BI was magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), followed by computed tomography (CT). Besides the identified 25 studies, the most important internationally applied guidelines on brain imaging in the staging of NSCLC were reviewed. While some guidelines agree on preoperative BI in NSCLC stage III (Union for International Cancer Control-UICC eighth edition) patients, other guidelines recommend earlier BI starting from clinical stage II. All mentioned guidelines homogenously recommend BI in patients with symptoms suggestive of brain pathologies. Conclusions: BI in NSCLC staging is recommended in neurologically symptomatic patients suggestive of brain metastases as well as NSCLC patients with stage III disease. Neuroimaging in stage IA patients, as well as in pure GGO (Ground-Glass Opacity) lesions, was considered unnecessary. The predominantly applied imaging modality was ce-MRI (contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging). Inconsistency exists concerning BI in stage II. The identification of prognostic factors for developing BM in patients with early-stage NSCLC could help to clarify which subgroup might benefit from preoperative BI.

Clinical characteristics and outcomes of surgical resection for brain metastases from lung adenocarcinoma

Objective

The purpose of this study was to explore the clinical characteristics, survival time and prognostic factors of patients undergoing craniotomy for brain metastases (BM) from lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD).

Methods

A total of 208 patients with BM from LUAD who underwent craniotomy at the Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Henan province, China from March 2005 to October 2022 were included in this retrospective study. All patients were confirmed as BM of LUAD by histopathology. The clinical data included patient gender, age, occupation, family history of tumor, smoking history, alcohol drinking history, neurological symptoms, history of lung cancer treatment, tumor location, tumor number, tumor size, gene status, expression of S-100, CEA, Ki67, and PD-L1 by immunohistochemistry, KPS after craniotomy, whether tumor therapy was continued after craniotomy, and survival time. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression was used to analyze the prognostic factors of patients undergoing craniotomy for LUAD BM.

Results

A total of 208 patients met the inclusion and exclusion criteria, including 110 males (52.9%) and 98 females (47.1%), with an average age of 61.4 years. 203 patients (97.6%) had neurological symptoms. 84 patients (40.4%) had smoking history, 89 patients (42.8%) had alcohol drinking history, and 31 patients (14.9%) had the family history of tumor. Only 5 patients (2.4%) had received lung cancer treatment before craniotomy. The intracranial location of BM was mostly in the frontal lobe (54, 26.0%) and the metastatic sites were mostly single (117, 56.3%); the metastatic tumor size was mostly between 2-5 cm (141, 67.8%). Genetically, 43.3% patients (90 cases) had EGFR mutations, and immunohistochemical analysis showed that most patients were PD-L1 positive (160, 76.9%) and Ki67 > 30% (137, 65.9%). Most patients (145, 69.7%) had KPS score under 80 after craniotomy. Only 72 patients (34.7%) received continued tumor therapy after craniotomy. 190 patients (91.3%) were successfully followed up. The median survival time was 11.5 months, and the 3-year survival rate was 15.7%. Multivariate analysis revealed that smoking history, Ki67 percentage, KPS after craniotomy, and molecular targeted therapy after craniotomy were independent factors affecting the survival time of patients.

Conclusions

Although survival remains poor, patients who had no-smoking history, Ki67 percentage ≤30%, KPS≥80 after craniotomy, and molecular targeted therapy after craniotomy can improve the prognosis and prolong the survival time.

Survival Among Patients With ERBB2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer and Central Nervous System Disease

Importance

Approximately one-third of patients with ERBB2 (formerly HER2 or HER2/neu)-positive (ERBB2+) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) develop brain metastasis. It is unclear whether patients with disease limited to the central nervous system (CNS) have different outcomes and causes of death compared with those with concomitant extracranial metastasis.

Objective

To assess overall survival (OS) and CNS-related mortality among patients with ERBB2+ breast cancer and a diagnosis of CNS disease by disease distribution (CNS only vs CNS plus extracranial metastasis).

Design, Setting, and Participants

This single-center, retrospective cohort study included patients with ERBB2+ MBC and CNS disease, including parenchymal brain metastasis, leptomeningeal disease (LMD), or dural metastasis, who were treated between August 2010 and April 2022 at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. Data were analyzed between December 2023 and August 2024.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Overall survival, estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method, and CNS-related mortality with cumulative incidence.

Results

The cohort included 274 patients (272 [99.3%] female). The median age was 53.7 years (range, 28.7-87.4 years); 125 patients (45.6%) presented with de novo MBC. At CNS metastasis diagnosis, 73 (26.6%) presented with CNS-only disease. There was a median follow-up of 3.7 years (range, 0.2-12.0 years) from CNS disease diagnosis among those alive at the end of follow-up. Both OS and CNS-related death were significantly correlated with the pattern of presentation: OS was shortest among patients with LMD (1.24 years; 95% CI, 0.89-2.08 years) followed by those with extracranial metastasis (2.16 years; 95% CI, 1.87-2.58 years) and was longest among patients with parenchymal or dural CNS disease only (3.57 years; 95% CI, 2.10-5.63 years) (P = .001). Of 192 patients (70.1%) who died, 106 (55.2%) died of a CNS-related cause. The group with CNS-only disease remained at high risk of death from CNS causes, with a 3-year CNS-related death rate of 33.98% (95% CI, 22.84%-45.43%) and a 3-year death rate from other causes of 6.07% (95% CI, 1.93%-13.69%). On multivariable modeling for CNS-related death, LMD (hazard ratio, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.19-2.93; P = .007) and treatment with whole-brain radiotherapy (hazard ratio, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.13-2.58; P = .01) were associated with CNS-related death.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this cohort study, 55.2% of deaths among patients with ERBB2+ breast cancer and brain metastasis were due to CNS-related causes, with the greatest risk among patients with LMD. CNS-only presentation was associated with improved survival but a higher rate of CNS-related death, supporting an approach of aggressive local therapy for select patients.

Central Nervous System Metastases in Breast Cancer

OPINION STATEMENT

Breast cancer metastasizing to the central nervous system (CNS) encompasses two distinct entities: brain metastases involving the cerebral parenchyma and infiltration of the leptomeningeal space, i.e., leptomeningeal disease. CNS metastases affect 10-15% of patients with hormone receptor-positive-status and nearly one-half of those with HER2-positive and triple-negative breast cancer with distant metastatic disease. Significant clinical morbidity and heterogeneous penetration of the blood-brain barrier by systemic therapies contribute to the poor prognosis associated with brain metastases. Recent advances in radiotherapy, including stereotactic approaches and morbidity-reducing strategies such as the use of memantine and hippocampal avoidance in whole brain radiation, coupled with the development of more effective CNS-penetrant systemic therapies, including small molecules and antibody-drug conjugates, have significantly improved patient outcomes. Consequently, patients with breast cancer CNS metastases have improved survival compared to prior decades, and longitudinal care has become increasingly complex, necessitating a multidisciplinary approach to achieve optimal outcomes for patients.

Utidelone combined with anti‑angiogenic therapy for the treatment of anthracycline/taxane‑treated and endocrine‑resistant HR+/HER2‑ refractory breast cancer with brain metastases: A case report

For patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (mBC), the treatment choices become more complex after progression on first-line CDK4/6 inhibitors combined with endocrine therapy. Currently, there are no guidelines that provide a unified standard protocol for this situation. Almost half of patients with mBC develop brain metastases (BMs), and once BMs occur, the survival of the patient is often significantly reduced. An anti-angiogenic drug and chemotherapy combination of has demonstrated synergistic effects in an mBC cell line. Anti-angiogenic drugs have shown therapeutic efficacy in the treatment of mBC, and utidelone has shown the ability to cross the blood-brain barrier and achieve a high concentration in brain tissue in preclinical studies. The present case report describes a patient with HR+/HER2- mBC and BMs that developed resistance to two CDK4/6 inhibitors and treatments with anthracyclines/taxanes. The patient received a fourth-line treatment regimen combining utidelone with a small-molecule anti-angiogenic drug, namely apatinib or anlotinib. The patient achieved a partial response with this combined regimen, and a progression-free survival (PFS) of 7.6 months, which was the best therapeutic outcome in the entire course of the illness. This result was superior to the second-line treatment with nab-paclitaxel, which resulted in a PFS of 8 months and best overall response of stable disease with slight shrinkage. The present case indicates that a combination of utidelone with apatinib/anlotinib exhibited antitumor activity in a patient with HR+/HER2- mBC with BMs. Therefore, this combination offers a promising therapeutic option for the clinical treatment of patients with breast cancer and BMs.

Conformal Partial Brain Irradiation Versus Stereotactic Radiation Therapy in the Management of Resected Brain Metastases: A Retrospective Study

INTRODUCTION

The standard of care after resection of a single brain metastasis is to treat the cavity with stereotactic radiation therapy (SRT) to minimize the risk of recurrence. However, a prospective randomized trial of SRT demonstrated higher than expected rates of local recurrence, possibly due to geographic miss. Conformal partial brain (CPB) irradiation using conventional fractionation is an alternate technique that allows a larger margin of healthy tissue to be safely irradiated, potentially decreasing the risk of tumor recurrence. We performed a retrospective chart review to compare the results between CPB and SRT treatments.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients receiving postoperative cranial radiotherapy within two months of a brain metastasis resection from 2015 to 2022 were eligible for this retrospective single-institution analysis. Fifty-seven patients met the eligibility criteria (SRT: n=32; CPB: n=25). SRT patients were treated using a robotic linear accelerator with a median dose of 24 Gy in 3 fractions. The median prescribed dose for the CPB group was 33 Gy in 11 fractions.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up was 19.9 months. The crude rate of local recurrence rate was 21.9% (SRT) versus 0% (CPB) (p<0.013). The crude rate of radiation necrosis (RN) was 21.9% (SRT) versus 0% (CPB) (p<0.013). The mean cavity volume was 13 cc (SRT) versus 73 cc (CPB) (p<0.001). Most cases of RN were asymptomatic, although one patient suffered grade 4 status epilepticus.

CONCLUSION

In this single-institution cohort, CPB radiation therapy was statistically associated with a lower risk of both local failure and radiation necrosis as compared to SRT. Despite the cavity being much larger, none of the CPB patients suffered either local failure or radiation necrosis. Postoperative CPB irradiation may be beneficial for large cavity sizes or when it is difficult to delineate the tumor bed.

Development of brain metastases in non-small-cell lung cancer: high-risk features

Aim: Brain metastases (BM) are a common site of disease progression and treatment failure in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and can be identified in up to 30-50% of patients. Although they are common, there is no standardized screening protocol for development of BM in NSCLC. Multiple clinical variables predict increased BM occurrence, and, when present, should be used to initiate screening MRI.Materials & methods: We performed a single center retrospective review of NSCLC patients, examining BM development and overall survival. Available clinical, radiographic and molecular data were reviewed for association with BM and overall survival. A predictive model for BM development was created for multivariate analysis.Results: Risk factors for new BM development in NSCLC included younger age, larger primary lung tumor, Karnofsky performance score (KPS) <70, pre-existing liver or bone metastases, large cell histology and family history of cancer. Factors associated with decreased OS were larger primary lung tumor, extracranial metastases at time of diagnosis, large cell histology and poorly-differentiated carcinoma histology.Conclusion: There are multiple high risk features for developing BM in NSCLC. Each of these factors should routinely be investigated, and presence should prompt brain MRI to allow earlier diagnosis and treatment of BM.

The multidisciplinary management of HER2-positive breast cancer brain metastases: from new biological insights to future therapeutic options

The advent and success of new drugs for treating HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer has led to a constant improvement in disease and progression-free survival as well as overall survival. Despite these advantages, the overall survival and quality of life of patients with HER2-positive breast cancer brain metastases are significantly worse than the ones of patients with HER2-positive breast cancer metastases outside the brain. For this reason, prevention and treatment of brain metastasis remain a major clinical challenge and the keys to further improving the clinical and survival outcomes of HER2-positive breast cancer patients. This review discusses the etiopathogenesis of brain metastasis, the currently available treatments, and the future perspective on new treatment strategies and diagnostic tools.

Lung Cancer with Brain Metastasis-Treatment Strategies and Molecular Characteristics

Lung cancer is a leading cause of brain metastases (BMs), with 10-20% of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) presenting with BMs at diagnosis and 25-50% developing them over the course of their disease. Historically, BMs have posed significant therapeutic challenges, partly due to the blood brain barrier (BBB), which restricts drug penetration to the central nervous system. Consequently, BMs were initially managed with local treatments, including surgical resection, stereotactic radiosurgery, and whole brain radiation therapy. In recent years, however, systemic treatments for BMs have advanced significantly, particularly with the development of molecularly-targeted therapies and immunotherapies. The discovery of driver mutations and the development of novel tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have yielded encouraging intracranial responses in NSCLC patients with actionable genetic alterations (e.g., EGFR, ALK, ROS1). Genomic profiling has also suggested genetic heterogeneity between BMs and primary sites. Immunotherapies, alone or in combination with other treatments, have demonstrated promising results in NSCLC with BMs, although most clinical trials have included only selected patients with asymptomatic or previously treated BMs. In this review, we discuss the molecular and immune characteristics of NSCLC with BMs, analyze intracranial efficacy findings from clinical trials, and explore treatment strategies for lung cancer patients with BMs.

Validation of the graded prognostic assessment and recursive partitioning analysis as prognostic tools using a modern cohort of patients with brain metastases

Background

Prognostic indices for patients with brain metastases (BM) are needed to individualize treatment and stratify clinical trials. Two frequently used tools to estimate survival in patients with BM are the recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) and the diagnosis-specific graded prognostic assessment (DS-GPA). Given recent advances in therapies and improved survival for patients with BM, this study aims to validate and analyze these 2 models in a modern cohort.

Methods

Patients diagnosed with BM were identified via our institution's Tumor Board meetings. Data were retrospectively collected from the date of diagnosis with BM. The concordance of the RPA and GPA was calculated using Harrell's C index. A Cox proportional hazards model with backwards elimination was used to generate a parsimonious model predictive of survival.

Results

Our study consisted of 206 patients diagnosed with BM between 2010 and 2019. The RPA had a prediction performance characterized by Harrell's C index of 0.588. The DS-GPA demonstrated a Harrell's C index of 0.630. A Cox proportional hazards model assessing the effect of age, presence of lung, or liver metastases, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status score of 3/4 on survival yielded a Harrell's C index of 0.616. Revising the analysis with an uncategorized ECOG demonstrated a C index of 0.648.

Conclusions

We found that the performance of the RPA remains unchanged from previous validation studies a decade earlier. The DS-GPA outperformed the RPA in predicting overall survival in our modern cohort. Analyzing variables shared by the RPA and DS-GPA produced a model that performed analogously to the DS-GPA.

Outcomes of Patients with Brain Metastases from Renal Cell Carcinoma Receiving First-line Therapies: Results from the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium

Patients with brain metastases (BrM) from renal cell carcinoma and their outcomes are not well characterized owing to frequent exclusion of this population from clinical trials. We analyzed data for patients with or without BrM using the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC). A total of 389/4799 patients (8.1%) had BrM on initiation of systemic therapy. First-line immuno-oncology (IO)-based combination therapy was associated with longer median overall survival (OS; 32.7 mo, 95% confidence interval [CI] 22.3-not reached) versus tyrosine kinase inhibitor monotherapy (20.6 mo, 95% CI 15.7-24.5; p = 0.019), as were intensive focal therapies with stereotactic radiotherapy or neurosurgery (31.4 mo, 95% CI 22.3-37.5) versus whole-brain radiotherapy alone or no focal therapy (16.5 mo, 95% CI 10.2-21.1; p = 0.028). On multivariable analysis, IO-based regimens (HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.25-0.97; p = 0.040) and stereotactic radiotherapy or neurosurgery (HR 0.48, 95% CI 0.29-0.78; p = 0.003) were independently associated with longer OS, as was IMDC favorable or intermediate risk (HR 0.40, 95% CI 0.24-0.66; p < 0.001). Intensive systemic and focal therapies were associated with better prognosis in this population. Further studies should explore the clinical effectiveness of multimodal strategies. PATIENT SUMMARY: In a large group of patients with advanced kidney cancer, we found that 8.1% had brain metastases when starting systemic therapy. Patients with brain metastases had significantly poorer prognosis than those without brain metastases. Receipt of combination immunotherapy, stereotactic radiotherapy, or neurosurgery was associated with longer overall survival.

Brain Metastases in Gynaecologic Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study Evaluating Treatment Outcomes, Prognostic Factors, and Overall Survival

(1) Background: The objectives of this study were to assess survival of patients with a diagnosis of brain metastases secondary to gynaecologic malignancy and the impact of clinicopathological factors on prognosis in this population. (2) Methods: A retrospective cohort of patients with gynaecologic cancers diagnosed with brain metastases treated with radiation at a tertiary care centre from 1 January 2004 until 30 September 2023 was studied. Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were used to evaluate survival, and cox regression was used to identify significant predictive factors of survival. (3) Results: In total, 103 patients were included in this study. Median age at diagnosis of brain metastases was 59 (range 30-94). Median survival time following diagnosis of brain metastases was 3.6 months (range 0.4-183.8). Survival was significantly longer for patients treated with surgery combined with radiation compared to radiation alone and with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) compared to whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT). Cox regression revealed that primary ovarian malignancy, extracranial disease at diagnosis, and ≥3 brain metastases were associated with poorer prognosis, and complete response to prior treatment was associated with more favourable prognosis. (4) Conclusions: Data from this study will assist in providing evidence-based prognostic information to patients with gynaecologic malignancy diagnosed with brain metastases.

Clinical Implication of Brain Metastases En-Bloc Resection: Surgical Technique Description and Literature Review

Background: The role of brain metastases (BM) surgery is of paramount importance for patients' progression-free and overall survival. "En-bloc" and "piecemeal" resection represent the main surgical techniques. Although en-bloc resection remains the best surgical option, it is not widely adopted or feasible as the first choice. We describe our point of view about the en-bloc surgical technique with an illustrative case and discuss its indications with pros and cons through a comprehensive literature review. Materials and methods: A Medline search up to December 2023 in the Embase and PubMed online electronic databases was made and PRISMA statement was followed. An illustrative case of "en-bloc" resection from our surgical series was also added as a technical note. Results: We describe tips and tricks of our surgical technique and added a surgical video from our series. The literature review disclosed 19 studies. Resulting data suggested that "en-bloc" resection, when feasible, provides lesser risk of leptomeningeal dissemination, local recurrence rates, intraoperative bleeding occurrence and perioperative complications; in addition, it preserves the normal anatomy. Conclusions: En-bloc resection is the gold standard technique for surgical treatment of brain metastases especially for patients with superficial lesions that are small in size and far from eloquent areas.

Advances in the Management of Lung Cancer Brain Metastases

Lung cancer, both non-small cell and small cell, harbors a high propensity for spreading to the central nervous system. Radiation therapy remains the backbone of the management of brain metastases. Recent advances in stereotactic radiosurgery have expanded its indications and ongoing studies seek to elucidate optimal fractionation and coordination with systemic therapies, especially targeted inhibitors with intracranial efficacy. Efforts in whole-brain radiotherapy aim to preserve neurocognition and to investigate the need for prophylactic cranial irradiation. As novel combinatorial strategies are tested and prognostic/predictive biomarkers are identified and tested, the management of brain metastases in lung cancer will become increasingly personalized to optimally balance intracranial efficacy with preserving neurocognitive function and patient values.

Delayed and Concurrent Stereotactic Radiosurgery in Immunotherapy-Naïve Melanoma Brain Metastases

Melanoma remains a formidable challenge in oncology, causing the majority of skin cancer deaths in the United States, with brain metastases contributing substantially to this mortality. This paper reviews the current therapeutic strategies for melanoma brain metastases, with a focus on delayed and concurrent stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). While surgery and traditional chemotherapy offer limited efficacy, recent advances in immunotherapy, particularly immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), have played a major role in the advancement and improved efficacy of the treatment of cancers, including brain metastases. Recent studies indicate that monotherapy with ICIs may lead to a higher median overall survival compared to historical benchmarks, potentially allowing patients to delay radiosurgery. Other studies have found that combining SRS with ICIs demonstrates promise, with results indicating improved intracranial control. Ongoing clinical trials explore novel combinations of immunotherapies and radiotherapies, aiming to optimize treatment outcomes while minimizing adverse effects. As treatment options expand, future studies will be necessary to understand the interplay between therapies and their optimal sequencing to improve patient outcomes.

SEOM-GEM clinical guidelines for cutaneous melanoma (2023)

Cutaneous melanoma incidence is rising. Early diagnosis and treatment administration are key for increasing the chances of survival. For patients with locoregional advanced melanoma that can be treated with complete resection, adjuvant-and more recently neoadjuvant-with targeted therapy-BRAF and MEK inhibitors-and immunotherapy-anti-PD-1-based therapies-offer opportunities to reduce the risk of relapse and distant metastases. For patients with advanced disease not amenable to radical treatment, these treatments offer an unprecedented increase in overall survival. A group of medical oncologists from the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM) and Spanish Multidisciplinary Melanoma Group (GEM) has designed these guidelines, based on a thorough review of the best evidence available. The following guidelines try to cover all the aspects from the diagnosis-clinical, pathological, and molecular-staging, risk stratification, adjuvant therapy, advanced disease therapy, and survivor follow-up, including special situations, such as brain metastases, refractory disease, and treatment sequencing. We aim help clinicians in the decision-making process.

Development of a scoring system to predict local recurrence in brain metastases following complete resection and observation

PURPOSE

Postoperative stereotactic radiosurgery to the resection cavity in patients with brain metastases is guideline-recommended therapy. However, Japanese Clinical Oncology Group 0504 study showed that postoperative observation could be a therapeutic option in patients with completed resected brain metastases. We hereby investigated the incidence and risk factors for local recurrence after complete resection without immediate radiotherapy and developed a scoring system for its prediction.

METHODS

We included 53 patients with 54 brain metastases, who underwent complete resection between January 2016 and December 2021. We identified risk factors for local recurrence and developed a scoring system to predict it using the extracted risk factors, by assigning one point to each risk factor and calculating the total scores for each patient. We evaluated the correlation between the prognostic score and time to local recurrence.

RESULTS

Local recurrence occurred in 37 of 54 tumors (68.5%), with a median follow-up duration of 21.0 months. The median time to local recurrence was 5.1 months. Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that non-lung adenocarcinoma, infratentorial tumors, and no postoperative systemic therapy were identified as risk factors for local recurrence (non-lung adenocarcinoma, p = 0.035; infratentorial tumors, p = 0.044; and no postoperative systemic therapy, p = 0.0069). A score ≥ 2 showed a median time to local recurrence of 2.1 months, starkly contrasting with 30.8 months for a score ≤ 1 (p = 0.0002).

CONCLUSIONS

Non-lung adenocarcinoma, infratentorial tumors, and no postoperative systemic therapy were risk factors for local recurrence. Our scoring system can predict local recurrence, thus potentially aiding treatment decisions.

Effective Personalization of Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Brain Metastases in the Modern Era: Opportunities for Innovation

ABSTRACT

As survival rates improve for patients with metastatic disease, more patients are requiring complex treatment for brain metastases. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a conformal radiotherapy technique that allows high ablative dose to be delivered to a specific target and is a standard effective local therapy for the treatment of patients with limited brain metastases. This review highlights the current landscape of SRS treatment in the context of modern therapeutic advances and identifies new research frontiers to personalize SRS and maximize the therapeutic ratio.

Addressing the unmet need in NSCLC progression with advances in second-line therapeutics

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer mortality globally, with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounting for 85% of cases. Despite advancements in first-line treatments such as immunotherapy and targeted therapies, resistance to these treatments is common, creating a significant unmet need for effective second-line therapies. This review evaluates current and emerging second-line therapeutic options for advanced or metastatic NSCLC, focusing on their efficacy and potential to improve patient outcomes. Anti-angiogenic drugs like ramucirumab combined with chemotherapy, particularly docetaxel, have shown moderate success. Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) targeting specific tumor antigens offer a promising avenue for targeted therapy, while chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy and T-cell receptor therapy leverage the patient's immune system to combat cancer more effectively. mRNA vaccines, although in early stages, show potential for inducing robust immune responses against cancer-specific antigens. Building on this foundation, recent advancements in molecular testing and the exploration of the tumor microenvironment are opening new therapeutic avenues, further enhancing the potential for personalized second-line treatments in NSCLC. While ADCs and bispecific antibodies are gaining traction, more precise biomarkers are needed to optimize treatment response. Regular monitoring through techniques like liquid biopsies allows real-time tracking of mutations such as EGFR T790M, enabling timely therapeutic adjustments. Additionally, the role of neutrophils and macrophages in the tumor microenvironment is increasingly being recognized as a potential therapeutic avenue, with Smad3 emerging as a key target. Further research into drug sequencing, toxicity management, and biomarker development remains crucial to improving NSCLC treatment outcomes.

The impact of tumor resection on survival and functional outcomes for patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma

PURPOSE

The role of tumor resection remains undetermined in treating primary central nervous system lymphomas (PCNSLs). This study aimed to clarify the impact of tumor resection on survival and functional outcomes, and to identify subgroups benefiting from resection.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed records from 2010 to 2021 for PCNSL diagnosed at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou. Patients were categorized by extent of resection: gross total resection (GTR), partial resection (PR), and biopsy. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify prognostic factors for survival and functional outcomes. Subgroup analysis was conducted to characterize patients who benefit from tumor resection.

RESULTS

Of 88 patients, 12 had GTR, 25 had PR, and 51 received biopsy. GTR correlated with longer progression free survival (PFS) (HR 0.25, p=0.039), remaining significant in multivariate analysis (adjusted HR 0.09, p=0.004). In solitary PCNSLs, GTR also independently predicted longer PFS (adjusted HR 0.13, p= 0.023). Patients with dominant tumors measuring ≥ 3 cm trended towards improved overall survival (OS) with cytoreductive surgery versus biopsy (median survival 38.6 months vs 22.3 months, p=0.083). Age ≥ 60 years (adjusted OR 16.9, p = 0.008) and preoperative Karnofsky Performance Scale ≤ 70 (adjusted OR 4.97, p = 0.049) predicted poorer functional outcomes, while radiation therapy (adjusted OR 0.10, p = 0.033) was protective.

CONCLUSIONS

GTR significantly improved PFS in treating PCNSLs, particularly in solitary cases. For patients with dominant tumors measuring ≥ 3 cm, cytoreductive surgery may improve OS. Neither cytoreductive surgery nor GTR correlated with poor functional outcomes.

Treatment of brain metastases from non-small cell lung cancer: preclinical, clinical, and translational research

Lung cancer is the second most common type of cancer and is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the United States. Approximately 10-40% of patients with solid tumors develop brain metastases, with non-small cell lung cancer accounting for approximately 50% of all cases of patients with brain metastases. Many management options are available which can include surgery, radiation, and systemic therapy. A variety of factors go into the selection of management of brain metastases. In this review, we will focus on the treatment strategies and optimizing the management of brain metastases in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

Surgical Resection Followed by Stereotactic Radiosurgery (S+SRS) Versus SRS Alone for Large Posterior Fossa Brain Metastases: A Comparative Analysis of Outcomes and Factors Guiding Treatment Modality Selection

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Around 20% of cancer patients will develop brain metastases (BrMs), with 15-25% occurring in the posterior fossa (PF). Although the effectiveness of systemic therapies is increasing, surgery followed by stereotactic radiosurgery (S+SRS) versus definitive SRS remains the mainstay of treatment. Given the space restrictions within the PF, patients with BrMs in this location are at higher risk of brainstem compression, hydrocephalus, herniation, coma, and death. However, the criteria for treating large PF BrMs with S+SRS versus definitive SRS remains unclear.

METHODS

We reviewed a prospective registry database (2009 to 2020) and identified 64 patients with large PF BrMs (≥4 cc) treated with SRS or S+SRS. Clinical and radiological parameters were analyzed. The two endpoints were overall survival (OS) and local failure (LF).

RESULTS

Patients in the S+SRS group were more highly symptomatic than patients in the SRS group. Gait imbalance and intracranial pressure symptoms were 97% and 80%, and 47% and 35% for S+SRS and SRS, respectively. Radiologically, there were significant differences in the mean volume of the lesions [6.7 cm3 in SRS vs. 29.8 cm3 in the S+SRS cohort, (p < 0.001)]; compression of the fourth ventricle [47% in SRS vs. 96% in S+SRS cohort, (p < 0.001)]; and hydrocephalus [0% in SRS vs. 29% in S+SRS cohort, (p < 0.001)]. Patients treated with S+SRS had a higher Graded Prognostic Assessment (GPA). LF was 12 and 17 months for SRS and S+SRS, respectively. Moreover, the S+SRS group had improved OS (12 vs. 26 months, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

A higher proportion of patients treated with S+SRS presented with hydrocephalus, fourth-ventricle compression, and larger lesion volumes. SRS-alone patients had a lower KPS, a lower GPA, and more brain metastases. S+SRS correlated with improved OS, suggesting that it should be seriously considered for patients with large PF-BrM.

Very early symptomatic metastasis pseudoprogression after stereotactic brain radiosurgery in a melanoma patient treated with BRAF/MEK inhibitors: a case report and review of the literature

Introduction

Significant therapeutic changes have recently occurred in the management of melanoma brain metastases (BMs), both in the field of local treatments, with the rise of stereotactic radiotherapy (RT), as well as in systemic ones, with the advent of immunotherapy and targeted therapies (TT). These advances have brought about new challenges, particularly regarding the potential interactions between new TT (notably BRAF/MEK inhibitors) and irradiation. Through a clinical case, we will discuss a side effect not previously described in the literature: ultra-early pseudoprogression (PP) following brain stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), in a patient treated with dabrafenib-trametinib.

Case presentation

A 61-year-old patient with BRAFV600E-mutated melanoma, receiving second-line dabrafenib-trametinib therapy, was referred for SRS on three progressing meningeal implants, without evidence of systemic progression. Four days after the first RT session (1x6 Gy on a fronto-orbital lesion prescribed 5x6 Gy, and 1x20 Gy single fraction on the other lesions), the patient presented with an epileptic seizure. An MRI, compared to the planning MRI ten days earlier, revealed significant progression of the irradiated lesions. The patient's condition improved with dexamethasone and levetiracetam, and RT was halted out of caution. A follow-up MRI at one month demonstrated a size reduction of all treated lesions. Subsequent imaging at five months revealed further shrinking of the two lesions treated with an ablative dose of 20 Gy, while the under-treated fronto-orbital lesion progressed. These dynamics suggest an initial PP in the three irradiated lesions, followed by good response in the ablatively treated lesions and progression in the partially treated lesion.

Conclusion

To our knowledge, this represents the first documented case of ultra-early PP following brain SRS in a patient receiving concomitant dabrafenib-trametinib. It highlights the need for particular vigilance when using tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) with SRS, and warrants further research into potential treatment interactions between RT and novel systemic agents, as well as the optimal treatment sequence of melanoma BMs.

Brain Metastases in Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: Clinical Presentation, Diagnosis, and Management

Background: Brain metastases (BM) are the most common intracranial neoplasms in adults and are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. The brain is an unusual site for distant metastases of thyroid cancer; indeed, the most common sites are lungs and bones. In this narrative review, we discuss about the clinical characteristics, diagnosis, and treatment options for patients with BM from differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC). Summary: BM can be discovered before initial therapy due to symptoms, but in most patients, BM is diagnosed during follow-up because of imaging performed before starting tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) or due to the onset of neurological symptoms. Older male patients with follicular thyroid cancer (FTC), poorly differentiated thyroid cancer (PDTC), and distant metastases may have an increased risk of developing BM. The gold standard for detection of BM is magnetic resonance imaging with contrast agent administration, which is superior to contrast-enhanced computed tomography. The treatment strategies for patients with BM from DTC remain controversial. Patients with poor performance status are candidates for palliative and supportive care. Neurosurgery is usually reserved for cases where symptoms persist despite medical treatment, especially in patients with favorable prognostic factors and larger lesions. It should also be considered for patients with a single BM in a surgically accessible location, particularly if the primary disease is controlled without other systemic metastases. Additionally, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) may be the preferred option for treating small lesions, especially those in inaccessible areas of the brain or when surgery is not advisable. Whole brain radiotherapy is less frequently used in treating these patients due to its potential side effects and the debated effectiveness. Therefore, it is typically reserved for cases involving multiple BM that are too large for SRS. TKIs are effective in patients with progressive radioiodine-refractory thyroid cancer and multiple metastases. Conclusions: Although routine screening for BM is not recommended, older male patients with FTC or PDTC and distant metastases may be at higher risk and should be carefully evaluated for BM. According to current data, patients who are suitable for neurosurgery seem to have the highest survival benefit, while SRS may be appropriate for selected patient.

Breast Cancer Brain Metastasis: A Comprehensive Review

The mechanisms underlying breast cancer brain metastasis (BCBM) development are complex, and its clinical presentation varies depending on the number, location, and size of brain metastases. Common symptoms include headache, neurologic deficits, and seizures. Diagnosis of BCBM typically relies on neuroimaging techniques, such as magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography scans. Local therapies, such as surgery and stereotactic radiosurgery, can be used to control tumor growth and relieve symptoms. Whole-brain radiotherapy has been a mainstay of treatment for BCBM, but its use has been associated with cognitive decline. Systemic therapy with chemotherapy and targeted agents plays an increasingly important role in the management of BCBM. Novel agents, such as human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-targeted therapies and tyrosine kinase inhibitors, have shown promising results in improving survival for patients with HER2-positive and triple-negative BCBM. This comprehensive review synthesizes current knowledge, clinical insights, and evolving paradigms to provide a robust understanding and roadmap for optimizing the diagnosis and management of BCBM.

Brain Metastasis in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

Background

Breast cancer is an important cause of cancer-related death in women worldwide and represents the second most frequent cause of brain metastases after lung cancer. The aim of this study was to determine the characteristics and outcomes of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients with brain metastasis (BM).

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed a cohort of patients diagnosed with TNBC at the "Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas" (period 2000-2014) to evaluate patients who developed BM. Survival rates were assessed by the Kaplan-Meier method, and prognostic factors were identified with the Cox regression analysis.

Results

Of a total of 2007 TNBC patients, 193 (9.62%) developed BM. Of these, 169 stages I-III patients with a median age of 45 years (range:21-78) were included. The stage in this cohort was 4 (2.4%) clinical stage (CS) I, 23 (13.6%) with CS II and 142 (84.0%) with CS III. Most of these patients presented ECOG ≥2 (68.6%). The most common symptom was headache (74.0%), followed by nausea-vomiting (46.7%). Imaging showed that 80 patients (53.0%) had ≥1 metastatic brain lesion. Regarding the treatment of BM in this cohort, 132 patients (84.6%) received radiotherapy (RT), 2 (1.5%) surgery, and 6 (4.5%) surgery plus RT. The overall survival (OS) rate of BM was 59.8%, 37.3%, and 15.0% at 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively. A multivariate analysis showed RT to be the only factor with a positive impact on the OS of BM (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.48, 95% confidence interval (CI):0.30-0.77, and p = 0.002), while ECOG ≥2 was associated with a worse OS (HR = 1.69, 95%CI:1.15-2.48, and p = 0.007).

Conclusion

Despite the poor prognosis of TNBC patients who develop BM, RT showed a benefit in OS rates, while ECOG ≥2 was the only prognostic factor associated with a worse OS. These results may be useful for multidisciplinary teams for treatment planning in patients with TNBC and BM.

The Surgical Management of Intracranial Metastasis Secondary to Follicular Cell-Derived Thyroid Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Intracranial metastases (ICM) from follicular cell-derived thyroid carcinoma (FCDTC) are rare and are associated with a poor prognosis. The objective of this study is to report our experience in the surgical management of patients with ICM secondary to FCDTC.

METHODS

Patients with FCDTC who underwent surgical resection of an ICM were identified at our institution from 1998 to 2018.

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients were included in this study. Nineteen patients (59%) had involvement of the brain parenchyma only, 8 (25%) had a dural-based metastasis, 3 (9%) had a calvarial metastasis with dural extension, and 2 (6%) had a skull base metastasis with dural extension. In patients who had an R0-1 resection, the estimated lesional control at the site of resection was 91% at 3 years. However, overall ICM control was 37% at 3 years due to the progression of other ICM lesions. The 1-year disease-specific survival (DSS) was 87% and 5-year DSS was 37%.

CONCLUSIONS

ICM management in FCDTC is based on the size, number, and location of metastatic lesions. Complete resection of ICM may provide lesional control at the site of resection, however, DSS is poor due to the presence of other ICMs and metastases at multiple distant sites.

Phase I trial of dose escalation for preoperative stereotactic radiosurgery for patients with large brain metastases

BACKGROUND

Single-session stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or surgical resection alone for brain metastases larger than 2 cm results in unsatisfactory local control. We conducted a phase I trial for brain metastases(>2 cm) to determine the safety of preoperative SRS at escalating doses.

METHODS

Radiosurgery dose was escalated at 3 Gy increments for 3 cohorts based on maximum tumor dimension starting at: 18 Gy for >2-3 cm, 15 Gy for >3-4 cm, and 12 Gy for >4-6 cm. Dose-limiting toxicity was defined as grade III or greater acute toxicity.

RESULTS

A total of 35 patients/36 lesions were enrolled. For tumor size >2-3 cm, patients were enrolled up to the second dose level (21 Gy); for >3-4 cm and >4-6 cm cohorts the third dose level (21 and 18 Gy, respectively) was reached. There were 2 DLTs in the >3-4 cm arm at 21 Gy. The maximum tolerated dose of SRS for >2-3 cm was not reached; and was 18 Gy for both >3-4 cm arm and >4-6 cm arm. With a median follow-up of 64.0 months, the 6- and 12-month local control rates were 85.9% and 76.6%, respectively. One patient developed grade 3 radiation necrosis at 5 months. The 2-year rate of leptomeningeal disease (LMD) was 0%.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative SRS with dose escalation followed by surgical resection for brain metastases greater than 2 cm in size demonstrates acceptable acute toxicity. The phase II portion of the trial will be conducted at the maximum tolerated SRS doses.

Defining the role of surgery for patients with multiple brain metastases

PURPOSE

To better define the role of surgery, we investigated survival and functional outcomes in patients with multiple brain metastases.

METHODS

Pertinent clinical and radiological data of 131 consecutive patients (156 surgeries) were analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTS

Surgical indications included mass effect (84.6%) and need for tissue acquisition (44.9%, for molecularly informed treatment: 10 patients). Major (i.e. CTCAE grade 3-5) neurological, surgical and medical complication were observed in 6 (3.8%), 12 (7.7%), and 12 (7.7%) surgical cases. Median preoperative and discharge KPS were 80% (IQF: 60-90%). Median overall survival (mOS) was 7.4 months. However, estimated 1 and 2 year overall survival rates were 35.6% and 25.1%, respectively. Survival was dismal (i.e. mOS ≤ 2.5 months) in patients who had no postoperative radio- and systemic therapy, or who incurred major complications. Multivariate analysis with all parameters significantly correlated with survival as univariate parameters revealed female sex, oligometastases, no major new/worsened neurological deficits, and postoperative radio- and systemic therapy as independent positive prognostic parameters. Univariate positive prognostic parameters also included histology (best survival in breast cancer patients) and less than median (0.28 cm3) residual tumor load.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgery is a reasonable therapeutic option in many patients with multiple brain metastases. Operations should primarily aim at reducing mass effect thereby preserving the patients' functional health status which will allow for further local (radiation) and systemic therapy. Surgery for the acquisition of metastatic tissue (more recently for molecularly informed treatment) is another important surgical indication. Cytoreductive surgery may also carry a survival benefit by itself.

Role of microsurgical tumor burden reduction in patients with breast cancer brain metastases considering molecular subtypes: a two-center volumetric survival analysis

BACKGROUND

Advancements in metastatic breast cancer (BC) treatment have enhanced overall survival (OS), leading to increased rates of brain metastases (BM). This study analyzes the association between microsurgical tumor reduction and OS in patients with BCBM, considering tumor molecular subtypes and perioperative treatment approaches.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of surgically treated patients with BCBM from two tertiary brain tumor Swiss centers. The association of extent of resection (EOR), gross-total resection (GTR) achievement, and postoperative residual tumor volume (RV) with OS and intracranial progression-free survival (IC-PFS) was evaluated using Cox proportional hazard model.

RESULTS

101 patients were included in the final analysis, most patients (38%) exhibited HER2-/HR + BC molecular subtype, followed by HER2 + /HR + (25%), HER2-/HR- (21%), and HER2 + /HR- subtypes (13%). The majority received postoperative systemic treatment (75%) and radiotherapy (84%). Median OS and intracranial PFS were 22 and 8 months, respectively. The mean pre-surgery intracranial tumor volume was 26 cm3, reduced to 3 cm3 post-surgery. EOR, GTR achievement and RV were not significantly associated with OS or IC-PFS, but higher EOR and lower RV correlated with extended OS in patients without extracranial metastases. HER2-positive tumor status was associated with longer OS, extracranial metastases at BM diagnosis and symptomatic lesions with shorter OS and IC-PFS.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study found that BC molecular subtypes, extracranial disease status, and BM-related symptoms were associated with OS in surgically treated patients with BCBM. Additionally, while extensive resection to minimize residual tumor volume did not significantly affect OS across the entire cohort, it appeared beneficial for patients without extracranial metastases.

The Emerging Role of Immune Checkpoint Blockade for the Treatment of Lung Cancer Brain Metastases

Lung cancer has the highest incidence of brain metastases (BM) among solid organ cancers. Traditionally whole brain radiation therapy has been utilized for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) BM treatment, although stereotactic radiosurgery has emerged as the superior treatment modality for most patients. Highly penetrant central nervous system (CNS) tyrosine kinase inhibitors have also shown significant CNS activity in patients harboring select oncogenic drivers. There is emerging evidence that patients without oncogene-driven tumors derive benefit from the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). The CNS activity of ICIs have not been well studied given exclusion of patients with active BM from landmark trials, due to concerns of inadequate CNS penetration and activity. However, studies have challenged the idea of an immune-privileged CNS, given the presence of functional lymphatic drainage within the CNS and destruction of the blood brain barrier by BM. An emerging understanding of the interactions between tumor and CNS immune cells in the BM tumor microenvironment also support a role for immunotherapy in BM treatment. In addition, posthoc analyses of major trials have shown improved intracranial response and survival benefit of regimens with ICIs over chemotherapy (CT) alone for patients with BM. Two prospective phase 2 trials evaluating pembrolizumab monotherapy and atezolizumab plus CT in patients with untreated NSCLC BM also demonstrated significant intracranial responses. This review describes the interplay between CNS immune cells and tumor cells, discusses current evidence for ICI CNS activity from retrospective and prospective studies, and speculates on future directions of investigation.

Neurosurgical resection of multiple brain metastases: outcomes, complications, and survival rates in a retrospective analysis

PURPOSE

This study investigates the outcomes of microsurgical resection of multiple brain metastasis (BMs).

METHODS

This retrospective, monocentric analysis included clinical data from all consecutive BM patients, who underwent simultaneous resection of ≥ 2 BMs between January 2018 and May 2023. Postoperative neurological and functional outcomes, along with perioperative complications, as well as survival data were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 47 patients, with a median age of 61 years (IQR 48-69), underwent 73 craniotomies (median 2; range 1-3) for resection of 104 BMs. Among patients, 80.8% presented with symptomatic BMs, causing focal neurological deficits in 53% of cases. Gross total resection was achieved in 87.2% of BMs. Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) scores improved in 42.6% of patients, remained unchanged in 46.8%, and worsened in 10.6% after surgery. Perioperative complications were observed in 29.8% of cases, with transient complications occurring in 19.2% and permanent deficits in 10.6%. The 30-days mortality rate was 2.1%. Logistic regression identified eloquent localization (p = 0.036) and infratentorial craniotomy (p = 0.018) as significant predictors of postoperative complications. Concerning overall prognosis, patients with permanent neurological deficits post-surgery (HR 11.34, p = 0.007) or progressive extracranial disease (HR: 4.649; p = 0.006) exhibited inferior survival.

CONCLUSION

Microsurgical resection of multiple BMs leads to clinical stabilization or functional improvement in most patients. Although transient complications do not affect overall survival, the presence of persistent neurological deficits (> 3 months post-surgery) and progressive extracranial disease negatively impact overall survival. This highlights the importance of careful patient selection for resection of multiple BMs.

The Role of Surgery for Stage IV Melanoma

Historically, stage IV melanoma carried a dismal prognosis and surgical resection was the only potential treatment offering long-term survival or palliation of symptomatic disease. With modern systemic therapies that can provide durable disease control for many patients with metastatic disease, we are actively redefining the role of surgery in metastatic melanoma. Contemporary treatment strategies can employ surgical resection in the upfront setting followed by adjuvant therapy, or used in tailored approach following systemic therapy. The combination of surgical resection and modern therapies has been associated with good long-term survival.

Comparative efficacy and safety of sodium fluorescein-guided surgery versus standard white light for resection of brain metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Recent studies have investigated if the sodium fluorescein-guided (SFg) improves the extent of resection of BMs when compared to standard white light (sWL). Therefore, we aimed to assess the comparative efficacy and safety of SFg and sWL for resection of BMs.

METHODS

We searched Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases following Cochrane and PRISMA guidelines for studies reporting comparative data of SFg and WL resection of BMs. We pooled odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals under random effects and applied I² statistics and leave-one-out sensitivity analysis to assess heterogeneity. I² > 40% was considered significant for heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Five studies involving 816 patients were included, of whom 390 underwent BMs resection with SFg and 426 with sWL, and ages ranging between 26 and 86.2 years old. Analysis revealed a statistically significant higher likelihood of complete resection in the SFg group when compared to the sWL group (OR = 2.15, 95%CI: 1.18-3.92, p = 0.01; I² = 47%). Sensitivity analysis revealed a consistent result in all five scenarios, with low heterogeneity in two of the five scenarios. Three studies reported significant improvement in OS in the SFg group, and the qualitative assessment of complications and procedure-related mortality did not provide sufficient information for conclusions.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review and meta-analysis identified a higher likelihood of complete resection in the SFg group when compared to the standard sWL group. This study is the first to directly compare the impact of SFg and sWL on resection outcomes for BMs.

Performance status improvement and advances in systemic treatment after brain metastases resection: a retrospective single-center cohort study of non-small cell lung cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Brain metastasis (BrM) is prevalent among patients with NSCLC, and surgical resection of BrM constitutes a promising treatment strategy for local management and histopathological diagnosis, although it is offered for a select group of patients. Limited information exists concerning the improvement in performance status (PS) following BrM resection or the outcomes stratified by subsequent systemic therapy.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective single-center cohort study including NSCLC patients with surgically resected BrM and focused on the improvement in PS and subsequent therapy after BrM resection.

RESULTS

71 patients were included, and the median overall survival was 18.3 months (95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 8.7, not reached). Patients with NSCLC who underwent surgical resection of BrM showed significant improvement in PS (18% and 39% showed ECOG PS of 0-1, before and after BrM resection, respectively [p = 0.006]), and patients with PS improvement were younger than those with PS unimprovement (median, 62 years versus 66 years; p = 0.041). Regarding subsequent systemic therapy after BrM resection, 21 patients (30%) received cytotoxic chemotherapy, 14 patients (20%) received tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), 3 patients (4%) received immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), and 21 patients (30%) received no subsequent therapy. The survival outcomes of patients stratified by subsequent systemic treatments suggested the tendency that those who received TKI or ICI showed better survival outcomes, although a small number of patients hindered statistical comparisons.

CONCLUSIONS

We describe the outcomes of patients with NSCLC who underwent surgical resection of BrM, revealing that younger patients were more likely to anticipate improvement in PS, and patients who received TKI or ICI after BrM resection tended to exhibit a more preferable prognosis.

Hypofractionated Stereotactic Radiosurgery in the Management of Brain Metastases

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is an important weapon in the management of brain metastases. Single-fraction SRS is associated with local control rates ranging from approximately 70% to 100%, which are largely dependent on lesion and postoperative cavity size. The rates of local control and improved neurocognitive outcomes compared with conventional whole-brain radiation therapy have led to increased adoption of SRS in these settings. However, when treating larger targets and/or targets located in eloquent locations, the risk of normal tissue toxicity and adverse radiation effects within healthy brain tissue becomes significantly higher. Thus, hypofractionated SRS has become a widely adopted approach, which allows for the delivery of ablative doses of radiation while also minimizing the risk of toxicity. This approach has been studied in multiple retrospective reports in both the postoperative and intact settings. While there are no reported randomized data to date, there are trials underway evaluating this paradigm. In this article, we review the role of hypofractionated SRS in the management of brain metastases and emerging data that will serve to validate this treatment approach. Pertinent articles and references were obtained from a comprehensive search of PubMed/MEDLINE and clinicaltrials.gov .

Treatment Options for Brain Metastases

OPINION STATEMENT

Therapies for brain metastasis continue to evolve as the life expectancies for patients have continued to prolong. Novel advances include the use of improved technology for radiation delivery, surgical guidance, and response assessment, along with systemic therapies that can pass through the blood brain barrier. With increasing complexity of treatments and the increased need for salvage treatments, multi-disciplinary management has become significantly more important.

[Brain metastases]

Cerebral metastases in patients with metastatic lung cancer are found in more than 30% of patients at baseline and manifest themselves in two out of three patients during disease evolution. For a long time, the cerebral manifestation of the disease was classified as prognostically unfavorable and hence such patients were regularly excluded from therapy studies. In the context of targeted molecular therapy strategies and established immuno-oncological systemic therapies, the blood-brain barrier no longer represents an insurmountable barrier. However, the treatment of brain metastases requires decision making in a multidisciplinary team within dedicated lung cancer and/or oncology centers. The differentiated treatment decision is based on the number, size and location of the brain metastases, neurology and general condition, comorbidities, potential life expectancy and the patient's wishes, but also tumor biology including molecular targets, extra-cranial tumor burden and availability of a CNS-effective therapy. Systemic therapies as well as neurosurgical and radiotherapeutic concepts are now often combined for optimized and prognosis-improving therapeutic strategies.

Brain Metastasis in the Emergency Department: Epidemiology, Presentation, Investigations, and Management

Brain metastases (BMs) are the most prevalent type of cerebral tumor, significantly affecting survival. In adults, lung cancer, breast cancer, and melanoma are the primary cancers associated with BMs. Symptoms often result from brain compression, and patients may present to the emergency department (ED) with life-threatening conditions. The goal of treatment of BMs is to maximize survival and quality of life by choosing the least toxic therapy. Surgical resection followed by cavity radiation or definitive stereotactic radiosurgery remains the standard approach, depending on the patient's condition. Conversely, whole brain radiation therapy is becoming more limited to cases with multiple inoperable BMs and is less frequently used for postoperative control. BMs often signal advanced systemic disease, and patients usually present to the ED with poorly controlled symptoms, justifying hospitalization. Over half of patients with BMs in the ED are admitted, making effective ED-based management a challenge. This article reviews the epidemiology, clinical manifestations, and current treatment options of patients with BMs. Additionally, it provides an overview of ED management and highlights the challenges faced in this setting. An improved understanding of the reasons for potentially avoidable hospitalizations in cancer patients with BMs is needed and could help emergency physicians distinguish patients who can be safely discharged from those who require observation or hospitalization.

Mathematical modeling of brain metastases growth and response to therapies: A review

Brain metastases (BMs) are the most common intracranial tumor type and a significant health concern, affecting approximately 10% to 30% of all oncological patients. Although significant progress is being made, many aspects of the metastatic process to the brain and the growth of the resulting lesions are still not well understood. There is a need for an improved understanding of the growth dynamics and the response to treatment of these tumors. Mathematical models have been proven valuable for drawing inferences and making predictions in different fields of cancer research, but few mathematical works have considered BMs. This comprehensive review aims to establish a unified platform and contribute to fostering emerging efforts dedicated to enhancing our mathematical understanding of this intricate and challenging disease. We focus on the progress made in the initial stages of mathematical modeling research regarding BMs and the significant insights gained from such studies. We also explore the vital role of mathematical modeling in predicting treatment outcomes and enhancing the quality of clinical decision-making for patients facing BMs.