The effect of digoxin on mortality and morbidity in patients with heart failure

State of precision medicine for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in a new therapeutic age

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is defined by heart failure (HF) with a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of at least 50%. HFpEF has a complex and heterogeneous pathophysiology with multiple co-morbidities contributing to its presentation. Establishing the diagnosis of HFpEF can be challenging. Two algorithms, the 'Heavy, 2 or more Hypertensive drugs, atrial Fibrillation, Pulmonary hypertension, Elderly age >60, elevated Filling pressures' (H2FPEF) and the 'Heart Failure Association Pre-test assessment, Echocardiography and natriuretic peptide, Functional testing, Final aetiology' (HFA-PEFF), can help to determine the likelihood of HFpEF in individuals with symptoms of HF. Phenotype clusters defined largely by the total number and types of co-morbidities may delineate groups of patients with HFpEF with different management needs. It is important to recognize alternative diagnoses or HFpEF mimics such as infiltrative cardiomyopathies, coronary artery disease, lung disease, anxiety, depression, anaemia, severe obesity, and physical deconditioning, among others. Treatment with sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (dapagliflozin and empagliflozin) is recommended for all patients with HFpEF unless contraindicated. Future research should consider alternative approaches to guide the initial diagnosis and treatment of HFpEF, including phenotype clustering models and artificial intelligence, and consider whether LVEF is the most useful distinguishing feature for categorizing HF. Ongoing clinical trials are evaluating novel pharmacological and device-based approaches to address the pathophysiological consequences of HFpEF.

The Bad Reputation of Digoxin in Atrial Fibrillation-Causality or Bias? Nationwide Nested Case-Control Study

Aims

Studies have reported excess risk of mortality associated with digoxin in atrial fibrillation (AF).This study sought to investigate if these findings could be replicated and whether a potential association could be explained by bias.

Methods

Using Danish Nationwide registers, a nested-case control study from 2012 to 2022 was conducted in a cohort of patients with AF. Cases were defined as death of any cause and the exposure was treatment with digoxin compared with beta blockers/verapamil. To investigate bias, additional analyses with negative control outcomes as case definitions-in which we would not expect a plausible association (eg, nursing home admission)-were employed. Associations were reported as hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI).

Results

A total of 59,748 cases were identified and matched 1:10 with controls (53% men, median age: 84 [IQR: 77-89]). Digoxin was associated with increased rates of mortality in the entire cohort (HR 1.85, 95% CI 1.78-1.92) as well as subgroups such as patients with heart failure (HR 1.84, 95% CI 1.65-2.06), diabetes (HR 1.85, 95% CI 1.6-2.14), and kidney disease (HR 1.37, 95% CI 1.04-1.8). Significant associations with all negative control outcomes were also found, most notably nursing home admissions (HR 1.79, 95% CI 1.67-1.93).

Conclusion

Digoxin use was associated with increased mortality in AF. However, negative control outcomes were also associated with digoxin use indicating that the described association between digoxin and mortality is likely not causal and being prescribed digoxin is merely a marker of more advanced disease and frailty.

Longitudinal blood pressure and cardiovascular outcomes in heart failure: An individual patient data pooling analysis of clinical trials

AIMS

Previous analyses of the relationship between blood pressure (BP) and heart failure (HF) outcomes have primarily used baseline values rather than longitudinal measurements. We aimed to elucidate associations between longitudinal BP and clinical outcomes in patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF), and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF).

METHODS AND RESULTS

We conducted a comprehensive analysis of 28 406 patients from eight trials, evaluating time-dependent BP categorized by tertiles and per 10 mmHg increments in BP on outcomes. The primary endpoint was the time to the first occurrence of a composite endpoint comprising cardiovascular death or HF hospitalization. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed a J-shaped relationship between BP and the composite outcome in HFrEF. Specifically, compared with the middle-level systolic BP (SBP), low SBP was associated with a higher risk of the composite endpoint (hazard ratio [HR] 1.71, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.60-1.82; p < 0.001) and high SBP showed a non-significant change in risk (HR 1.07, 95% CI 0.97-1.18; p = 0.187). Conversely, a U-shaped relationship was observed in HFmrEF and HFpEF. Low SBP was linked to a higher risk of the composite endpoint (HR 1.74, 95% CI 1.47-2.07; p < 0.001), and high SBP similarly increased the risk (HR 1.77, 95% CI 1.45-2.17; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The relationship between BP and HF outcomes is non-linear and closely tied to left ventricular ejection fraction. Low SBP consistently predicts a poor prognosis, whereas high SBP is associated with an increased risk in HFmrEF and HFpEF but not in HFrEF.

DIGitoxin to Improve ouTcomes in patients with advanced chronic Heart Failure (DIGIT-HF): Baseline characteristics compared to recent randomized controlled heart failure trials

AIMS

This report presents the baseline characteristics of patients enrolled in the DIGIT-HF trial and compares them with participants from recent trials with improved outcomes in patients with heart failure (HF) and a reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).

METHODS AND RESULTS

DIGIT-HF, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial enrolling patients with symptomatic HFrEF (New York Heart Association [NYHA] functional class II and left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] ≤30%, or NYHA class III-IV and LVEF ≤40%), compares the efficacy and safety of digitoxin versus placebo in addition to standard treatment. Most baseline characteristics of the intention-to-treat population (1212 patients, mean age 66 ± 11 years, 20% women, mean LVEF 29 ± 7%) were similar to those in recent HFrEF trials. The distribution of NYHA class II, III, and IV was 30%, 66% and 4%, respectively, and indicates that the patients were sicker than in comparator HFrEF trials. Less patients had atrial fibrillation (27%) than those in recent HFrEF trials, but prescription rates of background therapy with beta-blockers (96%), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers/angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors (95%), mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (76%), and diuretics (87%) were high and similar. Overall, 40% of patients were on angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors, 19% on sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors, and 9% on ivabradine. Rates of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD, 64%) and cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT, 25%) devices were much higher than in recent HFrEF trials.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients included in DIGIT-HF display a more severe HF symptom burden and higher rates of ICD/CRT implants compared to participants in recent HFrEF trials, while pharmacotherapy was largely similar.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

EudraCT (2013-005326-38).

Digoxin in rheumatic heart disease - Rationale and design of a multi-centre, placebo controlled double blind randomised controlled trial (Dig-RHD trial)

BACKGROUND

Rheumatic heart disease (RHD), is a public health problem in low and middle-income countries. It causes high morbidity and mortality due to heart failure (HF), but there are no randomised trials of HF-treatments in these patients. Digoxin is an inexpensive drug that is widely used in RHD despite a lack of data on its effect on clinical outcomes. The Digoxin in RHD (Dig-RHD) trial will evaluate the impact of the drug on clinical outcomes in patients with RHD.

METHODS

The Dig-RHD trial is an investigator-initiated multi-centre, pragmatic, randomized placebo-controlled, parallel-arm, superiority trial. Symptomatic adult patients with RHD were randomized to receive oral digoxin or matching placebo on a background of usual care. The primary outcome is a composite of all-cause death, new-onset or worsening HF. Key secondary outcomes are, all-cause death, HF-related death, hospitalization for HF, sudden death, and self-reported quality of life. Patients were enrolled at 12 academic medical centres in India, beginning in February 2022. Enrolment of 1769 patients was completed in August 2024. One interim review of the data by the independent Data Safety Monitoring Board, after half the primary outcome events had accrued, indicated no safety signals. The last follow-up visits are scheduled to complete in December 2025.

CONCLUSION

Dig-RHD is the first randomized trial of digoxin in RHD powered for clinical outcomes, and the results will have major implications for the routine management of patients with RHD. (Clinical trial registration: CTRI/2021/04/032858).

Effect of Digoxin vs Beta-Blockers on Left Atrial Strain for Heart Rate-Controlled Atrial Fibrillation: The DIGOBET-AF Randomized Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Left atrial strain (LAS) has prognostic value in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Consequently, therapies that improve LAS may help reduce AF-related adverse cardiac events. We aimed to compare how digoxin and bisoprolol modulate LAS in patients with AF being treated with rate control.

METHODS

This was a bicentric randomized controlled trial. Patients with AF, naïve to beta-blockers and digoxin, and scheduled for treatment with a rate control strategy were randomized to receive oral bisoprolol 5-10 mg daily or digoxin 0.25 mg daily. The primary aim was to compare the change in peak LAS before and after 30 days of treatment between the two groups.

RESULTS

A total of 60 patients, equally distributed between the two groups, completed the trial. By day 30, there was no significant difference in global peak LAS between the groups. However, when analyzed separately, the two-chamber view showed a significantly higher peak LAS in the digoxin group than in the BB group (mean 7.5 ± standard deviation 3.2% vs. 5.9 ± 3.4%; p = 0.004). Similarly, the four-chamber view also showed a higher peak LAS in the digoxin group (7.2 ± 3.6% vs. 6.4 ± 3.8%; p = 0.047). Considering the entire LAS curve rather than solely the peak value, digoxin significantly increased all LAS curves. In the global and four-chamber view, the digoxin maximum effect occurred significantly earlier than the peak of the LAS curve (p < 0.001). This effect remained constant over the cardiac cycle in the two-chamber curve (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that, in patients with rate-controlled AF, digoxin positively modulates LAS when compared with bisoprolol.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT05540600, https://clinicaltrials.gov .

Digitalis Therapy Is Associated With an Increased Risk of ICD Shock Delivery and Device Revision

BACKGROUND

Digitalis glycosides are employed for rate control of atrial fibrillation and treatment of heart failure. Previous studies suggested potential harmful effects of digitalis therapy. The aim of the present study was to assess the prevalence and potential impact of digitalis therapy on outcomes in patients with systolic failure who were implanted with an ICD- or CRT-ICD system.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The German Device Registry is a nationwide, prospective registry with a 1-year follow-up investigating 4384 patients receiving either ICD or CRT systems in 52 German centers. The present analysis focused on the presence of digitalis therapy in 3826 patients undergoing device implantation. Patients receiving digitalis therapy (n = 800) presented a more severely impaired left ventricular function, higher NYHA class, and an increased incidence of left bundle branch block. Consequently, the implantation of CRT systems was more common in this group. One-year mortality did not significantly differ between both groups (9.1% vs. 7.4%, p = 0.14). Similar results were obtained for the combined endpoint, including death, myocardial infarction, and stroke. ICD shock delivery (19.7% vs. 15.0%, p = 0.006) and device revision (11.4% vs. 7.5%, p < 0.004) were more common in digitalis-treated patients.

CONCLUSION

In this study in patients undergoing ICD or CRT implantation, an association of digitalis therapy with an increased risk of device revision was observed. Of note, mortality or severe cardiovascular events did not differ between both groups. Furthermore, an increased risk of ICD shock delivery was observed in digitalis-treated patients.

Current state of heart failure treatment: are mesenchymal stem cells and their exosomes a future therapy?

Heart failure (HF) represents the terminal stage of cardiovascular disease and remains a leading cause of mortality. Epidemiological studies indicate a high prevalence and mortality rate of HF globally. Current treatment options primarily include pharmacological and non-pharmacological approaches. With the development of mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) transplantation technology, increasing research has shown that stem cell therapy and exosomes derived from these cells hold promise for repairing damaged myocardium and improving cardiac function, becoming a hot topic in clinical treatment for HF. However, this approach also presents certain limitations. This review summarizes the mechanisms of HF, current treatment strategies, and the latest progress in the application of MSCs and their exosomes in HF therapy.

Minimization or withdrawal of oral pharmacotherapy in chronic heart failure patients with improved myocardial function: A systematic review

AIMS

The necessity of lifelong treatment and polypharmacy in chronic heart failure (HF) patients with improved myocardial function remains debated. This systematic review aims to synthesize current literature regarding this issue.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A systematic literature search was performed in MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from the inception to 18 October 2024. Seven studies (n = 552) reporting minimization or withdrawal of pharmacotherapy in chronic HF patients with improved ejection fraction or stable New York Heart Association status were included. Findings were heterogeneous due to variations in study design and protocols. Loop diuretic withdrawal was favoured by one non-randomized study (n = 26) and one randomized controlled trial (RCT) (n = 188). Minimization of angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors (n = 77) or withdrawal of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA) (n = 70) was not favourable. Carvedilol monotherapy was favoured by one small-sample RCT (n = 60). One RCT (n = 51) reported a high overall relapse rate (65%) following multiple drug withdrawal in recovered patients with dilated cardiomyopathy. Another RCT (n = 80) found a low occurrence of cardiac dimensional deterioration (7.5%) following multiple drug withdrawal in post-cardiac resynchronization therapy patients with normalized ejection fraction. However, 28% required drug re-initiation due to cardiac comorbidities.

CONCLUSION

The existing evidence on minimizing or withdrawing oral pharmacotherapy in chronic HF patients with improved myocardial function remains very limited and heterogeneous, supporting only loop diuretic withdrawal and possibly carvedilol monotherapy, but not the minimization or withdrawal of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors, MRA, or the combination of HF medications. Large RCTs are needed to determine the appropriate treatment strategy.

Four Undescribed Oxygenated Cardiac Glycosides From the Fruits of Thevetia peruviana With Their Anticancer Activities

Phytochemical investigation of the extract from Thevetia peruviana fruits resulted in the isolation of 20 cardiac glycosides (1-20), including four previously undescribed compounds (1-4). Their chemical structures were elucidated through comprehensive spectroscopic analyses and quantum chemical calculations. Structurally, compounds 1-4 are neriifolin derivatives featuring an additional hydroxyl group at C-7 (1 and 2), C-17 (3), and C-4 (4) on the aglycone structure, respectively, were identified for the first time in the genus Thevetia. All the isolates were tested for their cytotoxic activities against four human cancer cell lines (MCF-7, HCT-116, HeLa, and HepG2), and their structure-activity relationships were investigated. Of the four previously undescribed compounds, compound 1 demonstrated the strongest cytotoxic effects, with IC50 values ranging from 0.096 to 0.410 µM. Furthermore, compound 1 was found to induce both apoptosis and G2/M phase arrest in a dose-dependent manner toward HepG2 cells.

Contemporary management of ischemic cardiomyopathy: The synergy of medical, revascularization, and device therapies

Ischemic heart disease (IHD) is the leading global cause of death, affecting millions and leading to significant morbidity and mortality. Ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM), a manifestation of IHD, results in severe left ventricular dysfunction due to coronary artery disease and poses a significant challenge due to the complex pathophysiology, variable clinical presentation, and overall poor prognosis. Recent advances in medical therapy, device interventions, and revascularization techniques offer newfound hope in improving ICM patient outcomes. This article reviews the state-of-the-art management approaches for ICM, emphasizing the importance of personalized treatment plans that integrate the various contemporary therapies to address the multiple mechanisms of disease development and progression. A meticulously tailored treatment approach for each individual patient offers the hope of prolonged survival through the synergy of therapies designed to address the different and complex mechanisms that contribute to their disease process.

Coronary Artery Disease and Heart Failure: Medical Management and Future Direction

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a leading etiology of heart failure (HF) and serves as a significant therapeutic target to ameliorate HF-associated morbidity and mortality. Key management considerations include pharmacologic treatment, electrophysiological devices, and coronary revascularization, aimed toward preventing CAD progression, left ventricular remodeling, sudden death, and reinfarction. The optimal revascularization strategy for patients with CAD and HF who are surgical candidates requires careful assessment of each patients' unique risk/benefit profile and individual preferences. Several novel pharmacologic agents are in development with hopes of adding to the armamentarium of treatment of CAD and HF.

Guidelines for treating heart failure

Optimal guideline-directed medical therapy for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction comprises the angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (sacubitril/valsartan), an evidence-based beta-blocker (bisoprolol, carvedilol, or sustained-release metoprolol), a mineralocorticoid antagonist (spironolactone or eplerenone), and a sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor (dapagliflozin or empagliflozin). Optimal guideline-directed medical therapy for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction comprises a sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor with emerging evidence to support the use of a mineralocorticoid antagonist and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists. This review will summarize the evidence behind the guideline recommendations, the impact of newer trials on management of patients with HF, and strategies for implementation into clinical practice.

Digoxin Discontinuation in Patients With HFrEF on Beta-Blockers: Implication for Future 'Knock-Out Trials' in Heart Failure

BACKGROUND

National heart failure guidelines recommend quadruple therapy with renin-angiotensin system inhibitors, beta-blockers, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors for patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), most of whom also receive loop diuretics. However, the guidelines are less clear about the safe approaches to discontinuing older drugs whose decreasing or residual benefit is less well understood. The objective of this study was to examine whether digoxin can be safely discontinued in patients with HFrEF receiving beta-blockers.

METHODS

In OPTIMIZE-HF, of 2477 patients with HFrEF (EF ≤45%) receiving beta-blockers and digoxin, digoxin was discontinued in 450 patients. We assembled a propensity score-matched cohort of 433 pairs of patients in which digoxin continuation vs. discontinuation groups were balanced on 51 baseline characteristics. Using the same approach, from 992 patients not on beta-blockers, we assembled a matched cohort of 198 pairs of patients also balanced on 51 baseline characteristics. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs for 1-year outcomes were estimated.

RESULTS

Among patients receiving beta-blockers, digoxin discontinuation had no association with the combined endpoint of heart failure readmission or death (HR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.85-1.19), heart failure readmission (HR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.85-1.25) or death (HR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.72-1.14). Respective HRs (95% CIs) among patients not receiving beta-blockers were 1.60 (1.25-2.04), 1.62 (1.18-2.22) and 1.43 (1.08-1.89).

CONCLUSIONS

Digoxin can be discontinued without increasing the risk of adverse outcomes in patients with HFrEF receiving beta-blockers. Future studies need to examine the residual benefit of older heart failure drugs to ensure their safe discontinuation in patients with HFrEF receiving newer guideline-directed medical therapy.

Heart Failure Masked as Pulmonary Embolism in Non-adherent Patient With Atrial Fibrillation: Case Report and Analytical Review of the Literature

BACKGROUND/AIM

Atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF) commonly co-occur, significantly increasing morbidity and mortality. Poorly controlled AF can contribute to complications like HF and is associated with conditions, such as stroke and pulmonary embolism (PE). This report involves a man with AF who had persistent respiratory symptoms and left-sided chest pain, initially suspected to be PE, but eventually diagnosed as HF.

CASE REPORT

A 43-year-old male experienced increasing breathlessness, cough, and fatigue. Initially suspected to have a respiratory infection, his persistent symptoms raised concern for PE. The patient had a history of AF, unsuccessful cardioversion, and long-term non-adherence to beta blockers. Initial assessment revealed persistent respiratory symptoms and elevated levels of C-reactive protein, D-dimer, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, and Troponin T. Chest X-ray showed pulmonary congestion, and echocardiogram confirmed a severely impaired ejection fraction (EF <20%). While the differential diagnosis included community-acquired pneumonia, PE, and HF, the final diagnosis was worsening AF and HF with reduced EF, not PE.

CONCLUSION

PE symptoms can overlap with HF, making careful differential diagnosis essential, particularly in AF patients with elevated D-dimer levels, where false positives necessitate caution. This case underscores the importance of thorough differential diagnosis and clinical judgment before ordering tests to avoid misdiagnosis. Long-term non-adherence to beta blockers exacerbated the patient's symptoms, emphasising the critical role of consistent medication use in managing AF and preventing complications like HF. This case report also highlights the importance of thorough investigations, guideline-based treatments and multidisciplinary care in complex AF-HF cases.

Effects of Sacubitril/Valsartan on Survival in Patients with Heart Failure and Significant Valvular Heart Disease

Although the benefits of sacubitril/valsartan in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) are well established, patients with hemodynamically significant mitral regurgitation (MR) were excluded from pivotal trials. We aimed to assess the effects of sacubitril/valsartan on survival in patients with HFrEF and concomitant significant MR. All patients from a single center who underwent echocardiography between June 2008 and December 2020, with a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of less than 40% and hemodynamically significant MR were recruited. Patients were categorized according to drug use and year of the index echocardiogram into the angiotensin receptor/neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI), non-ARNI before 2017, and non-ARNI after 2017 groups. Patients in the ARNI and non-ARNI after 2017 groups were compared directly, whereas patients in the non-ARNI before 2017 group were matched to the ARNI group in a 3:1 ratio. The outcome of interest was all-cause mortality. Death was compared between the groups using univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models. After exclusion by criteria and matching, there remained 610 patients in the ARNI group, 434 in the non-ARNI after 2017 group, and 1,722 in the non-ARNI before 2017 group. During follow-up, all-cause mortality was significantly lower in the ARNI group compared with both non-ARNI after 2017 and non-ARNI before 2017 groups. Multivariate analysis of both pairs of comparison between groups found the use of ARNI to be significantly associated with increased survival. In patients with HFrEF and concomitant significant MR, treatment with sacubitril/valsartan was associated with lower risks of all-cause death.

Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and chronic kidney disease: a focus on therapies and interventions

In heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), the presence of concomitant chronic kidney disease (CKD) predicts poorer cardiovascular outcomes, more aggravated heart failure (HF) status, and higher mortality. Physicians might be reluctant to initiate life-saving anti-HF medications out of fear of worsening renal function and a higher incidence of adverse events. Moreover, international guidelines do not give clear recommendations on managing this subgroup of patients as well as advanced CKD was always an exclusion criterion in most major HF trials. Nevertheless, in this review, we will highlight several recent clinical trials and post-hoc analyses of major trials that showed the safety and efficacy of the different therapies in HFrEF patients with CKD, besides several small-scale cohorts that tested guideline-directed medical therapies in End Stage Kidney Disease (ESKD). Regarding interventions in this subgroup of patients, we will provide up-to-date data on implantable cardioverter defibrillators, cardiac resynchronization therapy, and coronary revascularization, in addition to mitral valve transcatheter edge-to-edge repair and implantable pulmonary artery pressure sensors.

"Cardiac glycosides"-quo vaditis?-past, present, and future?

Up to date, digitalis glycosides, also known as "cardiac glycosides", are inhibitors of the Na+/K+-ATPase. They have a long-standing history as drugs used in patients suffering from heart failure and atrial fibrillation despite their well-known narrow therapeutic range and the intensive discussions on their raison d'être for these indications. This article will review the history and key findings in basic and clinical research as well as potentially overseen pros and cons of these drugs.

Research Progress on Plant-Derived Cardenolides (2010-2023)

Cardenolides are a class of steroidal glycoside compounds that are mainly distributed in plants, have significant physiological activity in the heart, and have been used clinically for over 200 years. To provide a reference for further research and development of these compounds, the phytochemical and biological properties of natural cardenolides (295 compounds in total) isolated between 2010 and 2023 from 17 families and hundreds of species belonging to 70-80 genera were reviewed. In vitro and in vivo studies have indicated that antitumor, antibacterial, and antiviral activities are the most commonly reported pharmacological properties of cardenolides. Antitumor activities have been thoroughly studied to understand their structure-activity relationships, revealing numerous potential anticancer molecules that lay the theoretical foundation for further development of traditional Chinese medicinal herbs and the creation of new drugs.

Consequences of Discontinuing Long-Term Drug Treatment in Patients With Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction

There is uncertainty regarding the clinical effects of discontinuation of drugs for heart failure after long-term use. The withdrawal of long-term treatment can follow 1 of 4 distinct patterns: 1) loss of on-treatment effect with no observed changes following discontinuation (eg, prazosin); 2) attenuation or loss of on-treatment effect with rebound clinical worsening following discontinuation (eg, nitroprusside); 3) persistence of deleterious on-treatment effect followed by clinical worsening after discontinuation (eg, milrinone and flosequinan); and 4) persistence of favorable on-treatment effect followed by clinical worsening after discontinuation (eg, digoxin and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors). Persuasive evidence for persistence of efficacy has been demonstrated for the use of digoxin, diuretic agents, sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors, and (to a limited extent) for angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. Available evidence for worsening of clinical status following the withdrawal of neurohormonal antagonists largely consists of observational studies. However, their findings are difficult to interpret because of considerable confounding related to the fact that drugs were withdrawn for clinical reasons, which represented a more important contributor to the poor outcome of these patients than the withdrawal of an effective drug. Nevertheless, the totality of available evidence points to a meaningful clinical deterioration within a few weeks following the withdrawal for most drugs that have been evaluated for the treatment of heart failure. These findings suggests that that our current emphasis on the implementation of foundational drugs needs to include an equally important emphasis to avoid even short-term gaps in treatment.

Heart Failure and All-Cause Hospitalizations in Patients With Heart Failure: A Meta-Analysis

Importance

Heart failure (HF) hospitalization is a common end point in HF trials; however, how HF hospitalization is associated with all-cause hospitalization in terms of proportionality, correlation of treatment effects, and concomitant reporting has not been studied.

Objective

To determine the ratio of HF to all-cause hospitalizations, whether reported treatment effects on HF hospitalization are associated with treatment effects on all-cause hospitalization, and how often all-cause hospitalization is reported alongside HF hospitalization.

Data Sources

PubMed was searched from inception to September 2, 2024, for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of HF treatments using MeSH (medical subject heading) terms and keywords associated with heart failure, ventricular failure, ventricular dysfunction, and cardiac failure, as well as the names of specific journals.

Study Selection

RCTs of HF treatments and reporting on HF hospitalization published in 1 of 3 leading medical journals (New England Journal of Medicine, The Lancet, or JAMA).

Data Extraction and Synthesis

The PRISMA guidelines were followed. Data extraction was performed by 2 reviewers, and disagreements were resolved by consensus. Trial baseline characteristics and outcome data on HF and all-cause hospitalizations were extracted. The ratio of HF to all-cause hospitalizations was calculated. The association of HF hospitalization effects with all-cause hospitalization effects was evaluated using hierarchical bayesian models with weak priors. The posterior distribution was used to calculate the HF hospitalization treatment effects that would need to be observed before a high probability (97.5%) of a reduction in all-cause hospitalization could be achieved. The proportion of trials reporting all-cause hospitalization was calculated.

Main Outcomes and Measures

HF and all-cause hospitalizations.

Results

Of 113 trials enrolling 261 068 patients (median proportion of female participants, 25.4% [IQR, 21.3%-34.2%]; median age, 66.2 [IQR, 62.8-70.0] years), 60 (53.1%) reported on all-cause hospitalization. The weighted median ratio of HF to all-cause hospitalizations was 45.9% (IQR, 30.7%-51.7%). This ratio was higher in trials with greater proportions of New York Heart Association class III or IV HF, with lower left ventricular ejection fractions, investigating nonpharmaceutical interventions, and that restricted recruitment to patients with HF and reduced ejection fraction. Reported effects on HF and all-cause hospitalizations were well-correlated (R2 = 90.1%; 95% credible interval, 62.3%-99.8%). In a large trial, the intervention would have to decrease the odds of HF hospitalization by 16% to ensure any reduction, 36% to ensure a 10% reduction, and 56% to ensure a 20% reduction in the odds of all-cause hospitalization with 97.5% probability.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this meta-analysis of HF trials, all-cause hospitalization was underreported despite a large burden of non-HF hospitalizations. Large reductions in HF hospitalization must be observed before clinically relevant reductions in all-cause hospitalization can be inferred.

Pharmacogenomic synthetic lethal screens reveal hidden vulnerabilities and new therapeutic approaches for treatment of NF1-associated tumors

Neurofibromatosis Type 1 (NF1) is a common cancer predisposition syndrome, caused by heterozygous loss of function mutations in the tumor suppressor gene NF1. Individuals with NF1 develop benign tumors of the peripheral nervous system (neurofibromas), originating from the Schwann cell linage after somatic loss of the wild type NF1 allele, some of which progress further to malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNST). There is only one FDA approved targeted therapy for symptomatic plexiform neurofibromas and none approved for MPNST. The genetic basis of NF1 syndrome makes associated tumors ideal for using synthetic drug sensitivity approaches to uncover therapeutic vulnerabilities. We developed a drug discovery pipeline to identify therapeutics for NF1-related tumors using isogeneic pairs of NF1-proficient and deficient immortalized human Schwann cells. We utilized these in a large-scale high throughput screen (HTS) for drugs that preferentially kill NF1-deficient cells, through which we identified 23 compounds capable of killing NF1-deficient Schwann cells with selectivity. Multiple hits from this screen clustered into classes defined by method of action. Four clinically interesting drugs from these classes were tested in vivo using both a genetically engineered mouse model of high-grade peripheral nerve sheath tumors and human MPNST xenografts. All drugs tested showed single agent efficacy in these models as well as significant synergy when used in combination with the MEK inhibitor Selumetinib. This HTS platform yielded novel therapeutically relevant compounds for the treatment of NF1-associated tumors and can serve as a tool to rapidly evaluate new compounds and combinations in the future.

Efficacy and safety of low-dose digoxin in patients with heart failure. Rationale and design of the DECISION trial

AIMS

Digoxin is the oldest drug in cardiovascular (CV) medicine, and one trial conducted >25 years ago showed a reduction in heart failure (HF) hospitalizations but no effect on mortality. However, later studies suggested that the dose of digoxin used in that trial (and other studies) may have been too high. The DECISION (Digoxin Evaluation in Chronic heart failure: Investigational Study In Outpatients in the Netherlands) trial will examine the efficacy and safety of low-dose digoxin in HF patients with reduced or mildly reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) with a background of contemporary HF treatment.

METHODS

The DECISION trial is a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled event-driven outcome trial which will investigate the efficacy and safety of low-dose digoxin in patients with chronic HF and LVEF <50%. Both patients with sinus rhythm and atrial fibrillation will be enrolled and will be randomized (1:1) to low-dose digoxin or matching placebo. To maintain a target serum digoxin concentration of 0.5-0.9 ng/ml, dose adjustments are made throughout follow-up based on serum digoxin measurements with dummy values for the placebo group. The primary endpoint is a composite of CV mortality and total HF hospitalizations or total urgent hospital visits for worsening HF, and all endpoints are adjudicated blindly by a Clinical Event Committee. The estimated sample size was 982 patients who will be followed for a median of 3 years, and in December 2023 enrolment was completed after 1002 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The DECISION trial will provide important evidence regarding the effect of (low-dose) digoxin on CV mortality and total HF hospitalizations and urgent hospital visits when added to contemporary HF treatment of patients with reduced or mildly reduced LVEF.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03783429.

Heart Failure in Older People Part 2: Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy

Heart failure is a common cardiovascular disease that affects older people and has a high rate of mortality. Treatment for heart failure has evolved in the past 10 years to include novel evidence-based agents as well as changes in how medications are initiated and up-titrated. Despite evidence of the importance of using four guideline-directed medications, older people are often undertreated with these lifesaving therapies. Senior care pharmacists play an important role in heart failure management among older people by providing therapeutic recommendations; monitoring therapeutic interventions; and educating patients, caregivers, and/ or providers.

Practice patterns of rate control in atrial fibrillation and clinical outcomes from a nationwide cohort

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is common, but there are limited data to guide selection of rate control medications (RCM). Reasons for selection are multivariable, and the impact on outcomes is unknown. We investigated prescribing patterns of RCM among patients with AF. Using a nationwide database, we identified 135,927 patients with AF. We stratified by baseline presence of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and examined prescription rates of RCM as a function of clinical variables. We also evaluated associations with clinical outcomes. Beta blockers (BB) were most commonly prescribed (44.6%), then calcium channel blockers (CCB) (14.0%) and digoxin (8.6%). Patients prescribed BB were more likely male (45.6% vs 43.4%, p < 0.0001), patients prescribed CCB were less likely male (12.0% vs 16.3%, p < 0.0001). There were higher rates of HF hospitalization (HFH) among females and those with Medicaid. Randomized trials are needed to define optimal choice of RCM.

Management of patients with heart failure and chronic kidney disease

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) and heart failure are often co-existing conditions due to a shared pathophysiological process involving neurohormonal activation and hemodynamic maladaptation. A wide range of pharmaceutical and interventional tools are available to patients with CKD, consisting of traditional ones with decades of experience and newer emerging therapies that are rapidly reshaping the landscape of medical care for this population. Management of patients with heart failure and CKD requires a stepwise approach based on renal function and the clinical phenotype of heart failure. This is often challenging due to altered drug pharmacokinetics interactions with various degrees of kidney function and frequent adverse effects from the therapy that lead to poor patient tolerance. Despite a great body of clinical evidence and guidelines that have offered various treatment options for patients with heart failure and CKD, respectively, patients with CKD are still underrepresented in heart failure clinical trials, especially for those with advanced CKD and end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Future studies are needed to better understand the generalizability of these therapeutic options among heart failures with different stages of CKD.

Atrial Fibrillation and Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction: New Assessment of an Old Problem

Atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF)-specifically, heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF)-often coexist, and each contributes to the propagation of the other. This relationship extends from the mechanistic and physiological to clinical syndromes, quality of life, and long-term cardiovascular outcomes. The risk factors for AF and HF overlap and create a critical opportunity to prevent adverse outcomes among patients at greatest risk for either condition. Increasing recognition of the linkages between AF and HF have led to widespread interest in designing diagnostic, predictive, and interventional strategies targeting all aspects of disease, from identifying genetic predisposition to addressing social determinants of health. Advances across this spectrum culminated in updated multisociety guidelines for management of AF, which includes specific consideration of comorbid AF and HF. This review expands on these guidelines by further highlighting relevant clinical trial findings and providing additional context for the evolving recommendations for management in this important and growing population.

The NOS1AP gene rs10494366 common genetic variant does not modify the risk of sudden cardiac death in users of digoxin

AIMS

Common genetic variations in the nitric oxide synthase-1 adaptor protein (NOS1AP) gene are associated with QT-interval prolongation. In a previous study, we observed an association between the rs10494366 variant of this gene and an increased QT-interval shortening in digoxin users. As QT-interval shortening is a risk factor for sudden cardiac death (SCD), in this study, we investigated whether the association between digoxin use and risk of SCD differs in participants with different NOS1AP rs10494366 genotypes.

METHODS

We included 11 377 individuals from the prospective population-based cohort of the Rotterdam Study. We used Cox proportional hazard regression analysis with digoxin as time-dependent exposure to estimate the associations between current digoxin use and the risk of SCD among different rs10494366 genotype groups in the adjusted models. We also studied whether such an association was dose-dependent, comparing high dosage (≥ 0.250 mg), moderate dosage (0.125 mg ≤ dose< 0.250 mg) and low dosage (< 0.125 mg) digoxin users with non-users.

RESULTS

The median baseline age of the total study population was 62 (interquartile range [IQR] 58-71) years. The cumulative incidence of SCD was 4.1% (469 cases), and among them, 74 (15.7%) individuals were current digoxin users at the time of death, during a median follow-up of 11.5 (IQR 6.5-17) years. Current digoxin users had an increased risk of SCD (multivariable adjusted model hazard ratio [HR]: 3.07; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.38-3.98), with no significant differences between the three genotype groups. The adjusted HRs were 4.03 [95% CI: 1.98-8.21] in the minor homozygous GG, 3.46 [95% CI: 2.37-5.04] in the heterozygous TG and 2.56 [95%CI: 1.70-3.86] in the homozygous TT genotype groups. Compared to low- and moderate-dose, high-dose digoxin users with GG genotype had the highest risk of SCD (HR: 5.61 [95% CI: 1.34-23.47]).

CONCLUSIONS

Current use of digoxin is associated with a significantly increased risk of SCD. The NOS1AP gene rs10494366 variant did not modify the digoxin-associated risk of SCD in a population of European ancestry.

How to Optimize Goal-Directed Medical Therapy (GDMT) in Patients with Heart Failure

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Heart failure is a clinical syndrome with signs and symptoms from underlying cardiac abnormality and evidence of pulmonary or systemic congestion on laboratory testing or other objective findings (Bozkurt et al. in Eur J Heart Fail 23:352-380, 2021). Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), when heart failure is due to underlying reduction in ejection fraction to ≤ 40. The goal of this review is to briefly describe the mechanisms and benefits of the various pharmacological interventions described in the 2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA Guidelines focusing on Stage C: Symptomatic Heart Failure HFrEF, while providing basic guidance on safe use of these medications.

RECENT FINDINGS

Use of medications from each class as recommended in the 2022 Guidelines can provide significant morbidity and mortality benefits for our patients. Despite advances in therapeutics for patients with HFrEF, patients are frequently under treated and more research is needed to help optimize management of these complicated patients.

From Hospital to Home: Evidence-Based Care for Worsening Heart Failure

Heart failure (HF) is a leading cause of hospitalization in older adults. Patients are at high risk of readmission and death following hospitalization for HF. There is no standard approach of health care delivery during the hospital-to-home transition period, leaving missed opportunities in care optimization. In this review, we discuss contemporary randomized clinical trials that tested decongestion strategies, disease-modifying therapies, and health care services that inform the care of patients with worsening HF. We provide evidence-informed recommendations for optimizing therapies and improving outcomes during and following hospitalization for HF. These include adequate decongestion with loop diuretics and select sequential nephron blockade strategies based on early evaluation of diuretic response; initiation of disease-modifying pharmacotherapies prior to hospital discharge with close follow-up and optimization after discharge; cardiac rehabilitation; and transitional or palliative care referral post-hospitalization. Evidence-based implementation strategies to facilitate broad uptake include digital health tools and algorithm-driven optimization of pharmacotherapies.

Effect of heart failure pharmacotherapies in patients with heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction

AIMS

The study sought to comprehensively investigate the effect of heart failure (HF) pharmacotherapies in patients with HF with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF). In the absence of randomized controlled trials, guideline recommendations concerning HF-related therapies in patients with HFmrEF are limited.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Consecutive patients hospitalized with HFmrEF were retrospectively included at one institution from 2016 to 2022. The prognostic value of treatment with beta-blockers (BB), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, receptor blockers, or receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ACEi/ARB/ARNI), mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA), and sodium-glucose-linked transport protein 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) was investigated for all-cause mortality at 30 months (a median follow-up) and HF-related rehospitalization. A total of 2109 patients with HFmrEF were included. Treatment with BB [27.0 vs. 35.0%; hazard ratio (HR) = 0.737; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.617-0.881; P = 0.001], ACEi/ARB/ARNI (25.9 vs. 37.6%; HR = 0.612; 95% CI 0.517-0.725; P = 0.001), and SGLT2i (11.9 vs. 29.5%; HR = 0.441; 95% CI 0.236-0.824; P = 0.010) was associated with a lower risk of 30-month all-cause mortality, which was still demonstrated after multivariable adjustment and propensity score matching. In contrast, MRA treatment was not associated with long-term prognosis. The risk of HF-related rehospitalization was not affected by HF pharmacotherapies. Finally, the lowest risk of long-term all-cause mortality was observed in patients with combined use of BB, ACEi/ARB/ARNI, and SGLT2i (HR = 0.456; 95% CI 0.227-0.916; P = 0.027).

CONCLUSION

Beta-blockers, ACEi/ARB/ARNI, and SGLT2i were independently associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality in patients with HFmrEF, specifically when applied as combined 'HF triple therapy'. Randomized studies are needed to investigate the effect of HF-related pharmacotherapies in patients with HFmrEF.

Differences in presentation, diagnosis and management of heart failure in women. A scientific statement of the Heart Failure Association of the ESC

Despite the progress in the care of individuals with heart failure (HF), important sex disparities in knowledge and management remain, covering all the aspects of the syndrome, from aetiology and pathophysiology to treatment. Important distinctions in phenotypic presentation are widely known, but the mechanisms behind these differences are only partially defined. The impact of sex-specific conditions in the predisposition to HF has gained progressive interest in the HF community. Under-recruitment of women in large randomized clinical trials has continued in the more recent studies despite epidemiological data no longer reporting any substantial difference in the lifetime risk and prognosis between sexes. Target dose of medications and criteria for device eligibility are derived from studies with a large predominance of men, whereas specific information in women is lacking. The present scientific statement encompasses the whole scenario of available evidence on sex-disparities in HF and aims to define the most challenging and urgent residual gaps in the evidence for the scientific and clinical HF communities.

Diuretic Treatment in Heart Failure: A Practical Guide for Clinicians

Congestion and fluid retention are the hallmarks of decompensated heart failure and the major reason for the hospitalization of patients with heart failure. Diuretics have been used in heart failure for decades, and they remain the backbone of the contemporary management of heart failure. Loop diuretics is the preferred diuretic, and it has been given a class I recommendation by clinical guidelines for the relief of congestion symptoms. Although loop diuretics have been used virtually among all patients with acute decompensated heart failure, there is still very limited clinical evidence to guide the optimized diuretics use. This is a sharp contrast to the rapidly growing evidence of the rest of the guideline-directed medical therapy of heart failure and calls for further studies. The loop diuretics possess a unique pharmacology and pharmacokinetics that lay the ground for different strategies to increase diuretic efficiency. However, many of these approaches have not been evaluated in randomized clinical trials. In recent years, a stepped and protocolized diuretics dosing has been suggested to have superior benefits over an individual clinician-based strategy. Diuretic resistance has been a major challenge to decongestion therapy for patients with heart failure and is associated with a poor clinical prognosis. Recently, therapy options have emerged to help overcome diuretic resistance to loop diuretics and have been evaluated in randomized clinical trials. In this review, we aim to provide a comprehensive review of the pharmacology and clinical use of loop diuretics in the context of heart failure, with attention to its side effects, and adjuncts, as well as the challenges and future direction.

[Advances in heart failure management]

Heart failure is a pathological condition characterized by substantial prevalence and mortality, particularly in the Western world. Over recent decades, both pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions have emerged, significantly enhancing patient survival and overall quality of life. Moreover, advancements in diverse imaging modalities facilitate precise diagnosis and comprehensive investigation into the fundamental etiology, enabling the development of more precise therapeutic approaches. Nonetheless, discernible gaps persist in comprehending specific facets of this condition, albeit persistent research endeavors seek to elucidate these inquiries.

Effects of Heart Failure Therapies on Atrial Fibrillation: Biological and Clinical Perspectives

Heart failure (HF) and atrial fibrillation (AF) are prevalent cardiovascular diseases that contribute significantly to morbidity, mortality, hospitalisation, and healthcare costs. It is not uncommon for these conditions to coexist and have mutually reinforcing effects. A critical factor in the aetiology of these conditions is oxidative stress, driven by reactive oxygen species (ROS), which contributes to atrial remodelling and fibrosis. The recent introduction of new drugs for the treatment of heart failure has also had an impact on the management of atrial fibrillation due to their influence on oxidative stress. The objective of this review is to analyse the effects of these therapies, including their role in mitigating ROS, on the prevention and treatment of AF in HF patients.

Thirty-day risk of digoxin toxicity among older adults co-prescribed trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole versus amoxicillin: A population-based cohort study

IMPORTANCE

Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) may increase digoxin concentration, a medication with a narrow therapeutic index. Small changes in digoxin concentration could predispose individuals to the risk of toxicity.

OBJECTIVE

To characterize the risk of digoxin toxicity in older adults taking digoxin following co-prescription of TMP-SMX compared with co-prescription of amoxicillin.

DESIGN, SETTINGS, AND PARTICIPANTS

Retrospective population-based cohort study in Ontario, Canada (2002-2020) using linked health care data. Participants comprised 47,961 older adults taking digoxin (58% women; median age 80 years [interquartile range 74-86]) who were newly treated with TMP-SMX (n = 10,273) compared with those newly treated with amoxicillin (n = 37,688).

EXPOSURE

Co-prescription of TMP-SMX versus amoxicillin in older adults concurrently taking digoxin.

MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURE

The primary outcome was a hospital encounter (i.e., hospital admission or emergency department visit) with digoxin toxicity within 30 days of the antibiotic prescription. Inverse probability of treatment weighting on the propensity score was used to balance comparison groups on indicators of baseline health. Weighted risk ratios (RR) were obtained using modified Poisson regression and weighted risk differences (RD) using binomial regression. The number needed to harm (NNH) was calculated as 1/RD.

RESULTS

A hospital encounter with digoxin toxicity occurred in 49/10,273 (0.48%) patients treated with TMP-SMX versus 32/37,688 (0.08%) in those treated with amoxicillin (weighted RR, 5.71 [95% confidence interval (CI), 3.19 to 10.24]; weighted RD, 0.39% [95% CI, 0.25% to 0.53%]; NNH 256 [95% CI, 233 to 400]).

CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE

In older adults taking digoxin, the 30-day risk of a hospital encounter with digoxin toxicity was nearly 6 times higher in those co-prescribed TMP-SMX versus amoxicillin, although the absolute risk difference was low (0.4%). Physicians should prescribe an alternative antibiotic when clinically appropriate. If TMP-SMX must be co-prescribed with digoxin (if the benefit is believed to outweigh the risk), digoxin should be dose-reduced on an individual basis.

Sex-related similarities and differences in responses to heart failure therapies

Although sex-related differences in the epidemiology, risk factors, clinical characteristics and outcomes of heart failure are well known, investigations in the past decade have shed light on an often overlooked aspect of heart failure: the influence of sex on treatment response. Sex-related differences in anatomy, physiology, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and psychosocial factors might influence the response to pharmacological agents, device therapy and cardiac rehabilitation in patients with heart failure. In this Review, we discuss the similarities between men and women in their response to heart failure therapies, as well as the sex-related differences in treatment benefits, dose-response relationships, and tolerability and safety of guideline-directed medical therapy, device therapy and cardiac rehabilitation. We provide insights into the unique challenges faced by men and women with heart failure, highlight potential avenues for tailored therapeutic approaches and call for sex-specific evaluation of treatment efficacy and safety in future research.

Ongoing and Future Clinical Trials of Pharmacotherapy for Heart Failure

Increasing knowledge of the processes leading to heart failure (HF) has allowed significant developments in therapies for HF over the past few decades. Despite the evolution of HF treatment, it still places a large burden on patients and health care systems across the world.We used clinicaltrials.gov to gather information about clinical trials as of August 2023 studying pharmacotherapy for HF. We included interventional trials that were "active, not recruiting", "recruiting", or looking for participants but "not yet recruiting". In total, 119 studies met our criteria of ongoing clinical trials studying novel as well as currently approved HF pharmacotherapies. The major interventions were novel medications/already approved medications for other diseases 29 % (34 trials), sodium-glucose co-transporter inhibitors 21 % (25 trials), angiotensin receptor blocker-neprilysin inhibitors 10 % (12 trials), diuretics 14 % (17 trials) and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists 5 % (6 trials). Ongoing research will aid in reducing the impact of HF and we summarize clinical trials leading the way to better HF treatment in this review.

Clinical Impact of Digitalis Therapy in a Large Multicenter Cohort of CRT-Recipients

(1) Introduction: Digitalis use in patients with severe heart failure is controversial. We assessed the effects of digitalis therapy on mortality in a large, observational study in recipients of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). (2) Methods: Consecutive patients receiving a CRT-defibrillator in three European tertiary referral centers were enrolled and followed-up for a mean 37 months ± 28 months. Digitalis use was assessed at the time of CRT implantation. A multivariate Cox-regression model and propensity score matching were used to determine all-cause mortality as the primary endpoint. CRT-response (defined as improvement of ≥1 NYHA class), echocardiographic improvement (defined as improvement of LVEF of ≥ 5%) and incidence of ICD shocks and rehospitalization were assessed as secondary endpoints in a subgroup of patients. (3) Results: The study comprised 552 CRT-recipients with standard indications, including 219 patients (40%) treated with digitalis. Compared to patients without digitalis, they had more often atrial fibrillation, poorer LVEF and a higher NYHA class (all p ≤ 0.002). Crude analysis of all-cause mortality demonstrated a similar relative risk of death for patients with and without digitalis (HR = 1.14; 95% CI 0.88-1.5; p = 0.40). After adjustment for independent predictors of mortality, digitalis therapy did not alter the risk for death (adjusted HR = 1.04; 95% CI 0.75-1.45; p = 0.82). Furthermore, in comparison to 286 propensity-score-matched patients, mortality was not affected by digitalis intake (propensity-adjusted HR = 1.11; 95% CI 0.72-1.70; p = 0.64). A CRT-response was predominant in digitalis non-users, concerning both improvement of HF symptoms and LVEF (NYHA p < 0.01; LVEF p < 0.01), while patients on digitalis had more often ventricular tachyarrhythmias requiring ICD shock (p = 0.01); although, rehospitalization for cardiac reasons was significantly lower among digitalis users compared to digitalis non-users (HR = 0.58; 95% C. I. 0.40-0.85; p = 0.01). (4) Conclusions: Digitalis therapy had no effect on mortality, but was associated with a reduced response to CRT and increased susceptibility to ventricular arrhythmias requiring ICD shock treatment. Although, digitalis administration positively altered the likelihood for cardiac rehospitalization during follow-up.

Challenging and target-based shifting strategies for heart failure treatment: An update from the last decades

Heart failure (HF) is a major global health problem afflicting millions worldwide. Despite the significant advances in therapies and prevention, HF still carries very high morbidity and mortality, requiring enormous healthcare-related expenditure, and the search for new weapons goes on. Following initial treatment strategies targeting inotropism and congestion, attention has focused on offsetting the neurohormonal overactivation and three main therapies, including angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonists, β-adrenoceptor antagonists, and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, have been the foundation of standard treatment for patients with HF. Recently, a paradigm shift, including angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor, sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor, and ivabradine, has been added. Moreover, soluble guanylate cyclase stimulator, elamipretide, and omecamtiv mecarbil have come out as a next-generation therapeutic agent for patients with HF. Although these pharmacologic therapies have been significantly successful in relieving symptoms, there is still no complete cure for HF. We may be currently entering a new era of treatment for HF with animal experiments and human clinical trials assessing the value of antibody-based immunotherapy and gene therapy as a novel therapeutic strategy. Such tempting therapies still have some challenges to be addressed but may become a weighty option for treatment of HF. This review article will compile the paradigm shifts in HF treatment over the past dozen years or so and illustrate current landscape of antibody-based immunotherapy and gene therapy as a new therapeutic algorithm for patients with HF.

Digoxin is Not Related to Mortality in Patients with Heart Failure: Results from the SELFIE-TR Registry

AIMS

Digoxin has been used in the treatment for heart failure for centuries, but the role of this drug in the modern era is controversial. A particular concern is the recent observational findings suggesting an increase in all-cause mortality with digoxin, although such observations suffer from biased results since these studies usually do not provide adequate compensation for the severity of disease. Using a nationwide registry database, we aimed to investigate whether digoxin is associated with 1-year all-cause mortality in patients with heart failure irrespective of phenotype.

METHODS

A total of 1014 out of 1054 patients in the registry, of whom 110 patients were on digoxin, were included in the study. Multivariable adjustments were done and propensity scores were calculated for various prognostic indicators, including signs and symptoms of heart failure and functional capacity. Crude mortality, mortality adjusted for covariates, mortality in the propensity score-matched cohort, and Bayesian factors (BFs) were analyzed.

RESULTS

Crude 1-year mortality rate did not differ between patients on and off digoxin (17.3% vs 20.1%, log-rank p = 0.46), and digoxin was not related to mortality following multivariable adjustment (hazard ratio 0.87, 95% confidence interval 0.539-1.402, p = 0.57). Similarly, all-cause mortality was similar in 220 propensity-score adjusted patients (17.3% vs 20.0%, log-rank p = 0.55). On Bayesian analyses, there was moderate to strong evidence suggesting a lack of difference between in unmatched cohort (BF10 0.091) and weak-to-moderate evidence in the matched cohort (BF10 0.296).

CONCLUSIONS

In this nationwide cohort, we did not find any evidence for an increased 1-year mortality in heart failure patients on digoxin.

Generalized biomolecular modeling and design with RoseTTAFold All-Atom

Deep-learning methods have revolutionized protein structure prediction and design but are presently limited to protein-only systems. We describe RoseTTAFold All-Atom (RFAA), which combines a residue-based representation of amino acids and DNA bases with an atomic representation of all other groups to model assemblies that contain proteins, nucleic acids, small molecules, metals, and covalent modifications, given their sequences and chemical structures. By fine-tuning on denoising tasks, we developed RFdiffusion All-Atom (RFdiffusionAA), which builds protein structures around small molecules. Starting from random distributions of amino acid residues surrounding target small molecules, we designed and experimentally validated, through crystallography and binding measurements, proteins that bind the cardiac disease therapeutic digoxigenin, the enzymatic cofactor heme, and the light-harvesting molecule bilin.

Insulin Resistance/Hyperinsulinemia, Neglected Risk Factor for the Development and Worsening of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction

Heart failure (HF) has become a subject of continuous interest since it was declared a new pandemic in 1997 because of the exponential increase in hospitalizations for HF in the latest years. HF is the final state to which all heart diseases of different etiologies lead if not adequately treated. It is highly prevalent worldwide, with a progressive increase with age, reaching a prevalence of 10% in subjects over the age of 65 years. During the last two decades, it was possible to see that the prevalence of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) was increasing while that of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) was decreasing. HFpEF is typically characterized by concentric remodeling of the left ventricle (LV) with impaired diastolic function and increased filling pressures. Over the years, also the prevalence of insulin resistance (IR)/hyperinsulinemia (Hyperins) in the general adult population has progressively increased, primarily due to lifestyle changes, particularly in developed and developing countries, with a range that globally ranges between 15.5% and 46.5%. Notably, over 50% of patients with HF also have IR/Hyperins, and the percentage is even higher in those with HFpEF. In the scientific literature, it has been well highlighted that the increased circulating levels of insulin, associated with conditions of insulin resistance, are responsible for progressive cardiovascular alterations over the years that could stimulate the development and/or the worsening of HFpEF. The aim of this manuscript was to review the scientific literature that supports a pathophysiologic connection between IR/Hyperins and HFpEF to stimulate the scientific community toward the identification of hyperinsulinemia associated with insulin resistance as an independent cardiovascular risk factor in the development and worsening of HF, believing that its adequate screening in the general population and an appropriate treatment could reduce the prevalence of HFpEF and improve its progression.

Sensational site: the sodium pump ouabain-binding site and its ligands

Cardiotonic steroids (CTS), used by certain insects, toads, and rats for protection from predators, became, thanks to Withering's trailblazing 1785 monograph, the mainstay of heart failure (HF) therapy. In the 1950s and 1960s, we learned that the CTS receptor was part of the sodium pump (NKA) and that the Na+/Ca2+ exchanger was critical for the acute cardiotonic effect of digoxin- and ouabain-related CTS. This "settled" view was upended by seven revolutionary observations. First, subnanomolar ouabain sometimes stimulates NKA while higher concentrations are invariably inhibitory. Second, endogenous ouabain (EO) was discovered in the human circulation. Third, in the DIG clinical trial, digoxin only marginally improved outcomes in patients with HF. Fourth, cloning of NKA in 1985 revealed multiple NKA α and β subunit isoforms that, in the rodent, differ in their sensitivities to CTS. Fifth, the NKA is a cation pump and a hormone receptor/signal transducer. EO binding to NKA activates, in a ligand- and cell-specific manner, several protein kinase and Ca2+-dependent signaling cascades that have widespread physiological effects and can contribute to hypertension and HF pathogenesis. Sixth, all CTS are not equivalent, e.g., ouabain induces hypertension in rodents while digoxin is antihypertensinogenic ("biased signaling"). Seventh, most common rodent hypertension models require a highly ouabain-sensitive α2 NKA and the elevated blood pressure is alleviated by EO immunoneutralization. These numerous phenomena are enabled by NKA's intricate structure. We have just begun to understand the endocrine role of the endogenous ligands and the broad impact of the ouabain-binding site on physiology and pathophysiology.

Impact of Abnormal Potassium on Arrhythmia Risk During Pediatric Digoxin Therapy

Digoxin is used in children with heart failure and tachyarrhythmia. Its use in patients with single ventricle anatomy has increased following evidence of improved interstage survival after the Norwood procedure. Digoxin has a narrow therapeutic window and may alter serum potassium balance, inducing arrhythmias. We hypothesized digoxin use in the setting of abnormal serum potassium levels is associated with arrhythmias. We reviewed all patients ≤ 18 years who received digoxin while admitted at our institution from 2014 to 2021. Admissions < 2 nights were excluded. We compared patients with a hemodynamically significant arrhythmia to those without. We performed adjusted mixed-effects logistic regression with arrhythmia as the outcome variable and potassium status as the predictor variable; adjusting for weight, route of digoxin administration, digoxin indication, serum creatinine, and number of interacting drugs prescribed. Abnormal potassium was defined as serum levels < 3.5 mmol/L or > 6.0 mmol/L. There were 268 encounters in 171 patients. Potassium levels were abnormal in 75.5% of patients who experienced an arrhythmia during digoxin administration, compared to 42.6% who did not (p < 0.001). Odds of arrhythmia was 138% higher in patients with abnormal potassium receiving digoxin (AOR = 2.38, 95% CI 1.07-5.29, p = 0.03). Receiving intravenous digoxin was also associated with a 7.35 odds of cardiac arrhythmia (AOR 7.35, p = 0.006, 95% CI 1.79-30.26). Odds of arrhythmia is increased during digoxin administration when pediatric patients have abnormal potassium levels. Vigilant attention to potassium levels is essential to prevent adverse outcomes during digoxin therapy.