1
|
Matveev V, Gao X, Kopyltsov E, Luo J, Wei Q, Ye D, Zhou F, Cabri P, Houchard A, Mahmood A, Xie LP. PRIORITI: Phase 4 study of triptorelin or active surveillance in high-risk prostate cancer. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol 2024. [PMID: 38958195 DOI: 10.1111/ajco.14101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2023] [Revised: 03/28/2024] [Accepted: 06/14/2024] [Indexed: 07/04/2024]
Abstract
AIM To evaluate the efficacy and safety of triptorelin after radical prostatectomy (RP) in patients with negative lymph nodes. METHODS PRIORITI (NCT01753297) was a prospective, open-label, randomized, controlled, phase 4 study conducted in China and Russia. Patients with high-risk (Gleason score ≥ 8 and/or pre-RP prostate-specific antigen [PSA] ≥ 20 ng/mL and/or primary tumor stage 3a) prostate adenocarcinoma without evidence of lymph node or distant metastases were randomized to receive triptorelin 11.25 mg at baseline (≤ 8 weeks after RP) and at 3 and 6 months, or active surveillance. The primary endpoint was biochemical relapse-free survival (BRFS), defined as the time from randomization to biochemical relapse (BR; increased PSA > 0.2 ng/mL). Patients were monitored every 3 months for at least 36 months; the study ended when 61 BRs were observed. RESULTS The intention-to-treat population comprised 226 patients (mean [standard deviation] age, 65.3 [6.4] years), of whom 109 and 117 were randomized to triptorelin or surveillance, respectively. The median BRFS was not reached. The 25th percentile time to BRFS (95% confidence interval) was 39.1 (29.9-not estimated) months with triptorelin and 30.0 (18.6-42.1) months with surveillance (p = 0.16). There was evidence of a lower risk of BR with triptorelin versus surveillance but this was not statistically significant at the 5% level (p = 0.10). Chemical castration was maintained at month 9 in 93.9% of patients who had received triptorelin. Overall, triptorelin was well tolerated and had an acceptable safety profile. CONCLUSION BRFS was observed to be longer with triptorelin than surveillance, but the difference was not statistically significant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Xin Gao
- Department of Urology, Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Evgeny Kopyltsov
- Budgetary Healthcare Institution of Omsk Region, Clinical Oncological Dispensary, Omsk, Russia
| | - Jindan Luo
- Department of Urology, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Qiang Wei
- Department of Urology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Dingwei Ye
- Department of Urology, Fudan University Cancer Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Fangjian Zhou
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Patrick Cabri
- Department of Urology, Ipsen, Boulogne-Billancourt, France
| | - Aude Houchard
- Department of Urology, Ipsen, Boulogne-Billancourt, France
| | - Adnan Mahmood
- Department of Urology, Ipsen, Boulogne-Billancourt, France
| | - Li-Ping Xie
- Department of Urology, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Triner D, Daignault-Newton S, Singhal U, Sessine M, Dess RT, Caram MEV, Borza T, Ginsburg KB, Lane BR, Morgan TM. Variation in management of lymph node positive prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy within a statewide quality improvement consortium. Urol Oncol 2024; 42:220.e1-220.e8. [PMID: 38570271 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.03.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2024] [Revised: 03/11/2024] [Accepted: 03/16/2024] [Indexed: 04/05/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with lymph node positive (pN+) disease found at the time of radical prostatectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer (CaP) are at high risk of disease persistence and progression. Contemporary management trends of pN+ CaP are not well described. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients in the Michigan Urologic Surgery Improvement Collaborative (MUSIC) with clinically localized prostate cancer who underwent radical prostatectomy between 2012 and 2023 with cN0/pN+ disease were identified. The primary outcome was to evaluate patient and practice-level factors associated with time to secondary post-RP treatment. Secondary outcomes included practice-level variation in management of pN+ CaP and rates of secondary treatment modality. To assess factors associated with secondary treatment, a Cox proportional hazards model of a 60-day landmark analysis was performed. RESULTS We identified 666 patients with pN+ disease. Overall, 66% underwent secondary treatment within 12 months post-RP. About 19% of patients with detectable post-RP PSA did not receive treatment. Of patients receiving secondary treatment after 60-days post-RP, 34% received androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) alone, 27% received radiation (RT) alone, 36% received combination, and 4% received other systemic therapies. In the multivariable model, pathologic grade group (GG)3 (HR 1.5; 95%CI: 1.05-2.14), GG4-5 (HR 1.65; 95%CI: 1.16-2.34), positive margins (HR 1.46; 95%CI: 1.13-1.88), and detectable postoperative PSA ≥0.1 ng/ml (HR 3.46; 95%CI: 2.61-4.59) were significantly associated with secondary post-RP treatment. There was wide variation in adjusted practice-level 12-month secondary treatment utilization (28%-79%). CONCLUSIONS The majority pN+ patients receive treatment within 12 months post-RP which was associated with high-risk pathological features and post-RP PSA. Variation in management of pN+ disease highlights the uncertainty regarding the optimal management. Understanding which patients will benefit from secondary treatment, and which type, will be critical to minimize variation in care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Triner
- Department of Urology, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI.
| | | | - Udit Singhal
- Department of Urology, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI; Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Michael Sessine
- Department of Urology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI
| | - Robert T Dess
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Megan E V Caram
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Tudor Borza
- Department of Urology, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Kevin B Ginsburg
- Department of Urology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI
| | - Brian R Lane
- Division of Urology, Corewell Health Hospital System, Grand Rapids, MI
| | - Todd M Morgan
- Department of Urology, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Masterson JM, Luu M, Naser-Tavakolian A, Freedland SJ, Sandler H, Zumsteg ZS, Daskivich TJ. Concurrent prognostic utility of lymph node count and lymph node density for men with pathological node-positive prostate cancer. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2024; 27:264-271. [PMID: 36600045 DOI: 10.1038/s41391-022-00635-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2022] [Revised: 12/05/2022] [Accepted: 12/09/2022] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND While both the number (+LN) and density (LND) of metastatic lymph nodes on radical prostatectomy lymphadenectomy predict mortality in prostate cancer, the independent impact of each on overall mortality (OM) is unknown. METHODS We sampled men who underwent radical prostatectomy and lymphadenectomy between 2004 and 2013 from the National Cancer Database. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards analysis with restricted cubic spline was used to assess the non-linear association of +LN count and LND with OM. RESULTS Of 229,547 men in our sample, 3% (n = 7507) had +LNs, of which 89% had 1-3 +LN and 11% had ≥4 +LN. In multivariable Cox analysis across all patients, OM increased with each additional +LN up to four (HR 1.14, 95%CI 1.06-1.23 per node), with no increase beyond 4 +LN. LND was an independent predictor of OM (HR 1.09, 95%CI 1.06-1.12 per 10% increase). However, after excluding patients with inadequate nodal sampling (<5 LN examined), the variation in OM explained by LND was negligible for patients with ≤3 +LN. In men with 1, 2, and 3 +LN, there was a 0.28%, 0.02%, and 0.50% increase in OM for each 10% increase in LND, compared with 1.9% and 1.6% for men with 4 or 5+ LNs. CONCLUSIONS While +LN count and LND independently predict OM, the impact of LND is negligible in men with ≤3 +LN, who comprise the vast majority of men with +LN. Pathological nodal staging should primarily rely on LN count rather than LND.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John M Masterson
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Michael Luu
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Aurash Naser-Tavakolian
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Stephen J Freedland
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Section of Urology, Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Howard Sandler
- Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Zachary S Zumsteg
- Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Timothy J Daskivich
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
- Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Marra G, Rajwa P, Filippini C, Ploussard G, Montefusco G, Puche-Sanz I, Olivier J, Zattoni F, Moro FD, Magli A, Dariane C, Affentranger A, Grogg JB, Hermanns T, Chiu PK, Malkiewicz B, Kowalczyk K, Van den Bergh RCN, Shariat SF, Bianchi A, Antonelli A, Gallina S, Berchiche W, Sanchez-Salas R, Cathelineau X, Afferi L, Fankhauser CD, Mattei A, Karnes RJ, Scuderi S, Montorsi F, Briganti A, Deandreis D, Gontero P, Gandaglia G. The Prognostic Role of Preoperative PSMA PET/CT in cN0M0 pN+ Prostate Cancer: A Multicenter Study. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2024; 22:244-251. [PMID: 38155081 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2023.11.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2023] [Revised: 11/09/2023] [Accepted: 11/09/2023] [Indexed: 12/30/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT Despite negative preoperative conventional imaging, up to 10% of patients with prostate cancer (PCa) harbor lymph-node involvement (LNI) at radical prostatectomy (RP). The advent of more accurate imaging modalities such as PET/CT improved the detection of LNI. However, their clinical impact and prognostic value are still unclear. We aimed to investigate the prognostic value of preoperative PET/CT in patients node positive (pN+) at RP. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS We retrospectively identified cN0M0 patients at conventional imaging (CT and/or MRI, and bone scan) who had pN+ PCa at RP at 17 referral centers. Patients with cN+ at PSMA/Choline PET/CT but cN0M0 at conventional imaging were also included. Systemic progression/recurrence was the primary outcome; Cox proportional hazards models were used for multivariate analysis. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION We included 1163 pN+ men out of whom 95 and 100 had preoperative PSMA and/or Choline PET/CT, respectively. ISUP grade ≥4 was detected in 66.6%. Overall, 42% of patients had postoperative PSA persistence (≥0.1 ng/mL). Postoperative management included initial observation (34%), ADT (22.7%) and adjuvant RT+/-ADT (42.8%). Median follow-up was 42 months. Patients with cN+ on PSMA PET/CT had an increased risk of systemic progression (52.9% vs. 13.6% cN0 PSMA PET/CT vs. 21.5% cN0 at conventional imaging; P < .01). This held true at multivariable analysis: (HR 6.184, 95% CI: 3.386-11-295; P < .001) whilst no significant results were highlighted for Choline PET/CT. No significant associations for both PET types were found for local progression, BCR, and overall mortality (all P > .05). Observation as an initial management strategy instead of adjuvant treatments was related with an increased risk of metastases (HR 1.808; 95% CI: 1.069-3.058; P < .05). CONCLUSIONS PSMA PET/CT cN+ patients with negative conventional imaging have an increased risk of systemic progression after RP compared to their counterparts with cN0M0 disease both at conventional and/or molecular imaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giancarlo Marra
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin and Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy.
| | - Pawel Rajwa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland
| | - Claudia Filippini
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin and Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | | | - Gabriele Montefusco
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin and Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Ignacio Puche-Sanz
- Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria ibs.GRANADA, Granada, Spain
| | | | - Fabio Zattoni
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, Urology Clinic, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Dal Moro
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, Urology Clinic, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Alessandro Magli
- Dipartimento di Radioterapia Oncologica, Ospedale Santa Maria della misericordia, Udine, Italia
| | - Charles Dariane
- Department of Urology, Hôpital européen Georges-Pompidou, Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | | | | | | | - Peter K Chiu
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, SH Ho Urology Centre, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Bartosz Malkiewicz
- Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Kamil Kowalczyk
- Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland
| | | | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Alberto Bianchi
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Alessandro Antonelli
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Sebastian Gallina
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - William Berchiche
- Department of Urology, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France
| | - Rafael Sanchez-Salas
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | | | - Luca Afferi
- Department of Urology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland
| | | | - Agostino Mattei
- Department of Urology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland
| | | | - Simone Scuderi
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Désirée Deandreis
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin and Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Paolo Gontero
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin and Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Giorgio Gandaglia
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sood A, Zhang LT, Keeley J, Butaney M, Stricker M, Andrews JR, Grauer R, Peabody JO, Rogers CG, Menon M, Abdollah F. Optimizing anti-androgen treatment use among men with pathologic lymph-node positive prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy: the importance of postoperative PSA kinetics. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2024; 27:58-64. [PMID: 35794359 DOI: 10.1038/s41391-022-00572-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2022] [Revised: 06/09/2022] [Accepted: 06/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Optimal postsurgical management of prostate cancer (PCa) patients with nodal metastasis at the time of radical prostatectomy remains unclear. We sought to examine the role of postoperative PSA kinetics and pathologic tumor characteristics in guiding additional hormonal therapy use in pN1 men. METHODS In total, 297 pN1 PCa patients treated with radical prostatectomy and ePLND between 2002 and 2018 were identified within our prospectively maintained institutional cancer data-registry. Following surgery, these patients were managed with either immediate androgen deprivation therapy (iADT) or observation with deferred ADT (dADT). The former was defined as ADT given within ≤6 months of surgery and the latter as >6 months. The primary outcome was metastasis. Regression-tree analysis was used to stratify patients into novel risk-groups based on post-prostatectomy tumor characteristics and PSA kinetics and the corresponding metastasis risk. Multivariable Cox regression analyses tested the impact of iADT versus observation ± dADT on metastasis, cancer-specific mortality, and overall mortality within each risk-group separately. RESULTS The median follow-up was 6.1 years (IQR 3.2-9.0). Regression-tree analysis stratified patients into 3 novel risk-groups (Harrell's C-index 0.79) based on PSA-nadir and time to biochemical failure: group 1 (low-risk) included patients with time to biochemical recurrence >6 months (n = 115), while groups 2 and 3 included patients with biochemical failure within ≤6 months with a postoperative PSA-nadir <1.05 ng/mL (group 2 [intermediate-risk], n = 125) or ≥1.05 ng/mL (group 3 [high-risk], n = 57), respectively. No other patient or tumor characteristics were significant for risk stratification. Within each risk-group, the 10-year metastasis-free survival rates with iADT versus observation ± dADT use were: group 1, 100% versus 95.4% (Log-rank p = 0.738), group 2, 80.6% versus 53.5% (Log-rank p = 0.016), and group 3, 41.5% versus 0% (Log-rank p = 0.015), respectively. Adjusted Cox regression analyses confirmed the benefit of iADT utilization in reducing metastasis in group 2 (p = 0.029) and group 3 (p = 0.008) patients, with no benefit for group 1 patients (p = 0.918). Similar results were noted for cancer-specific and overall mortality. CONCLUSIONS Following radical prostatectomy, early postoperative PSA kinetics may provide valuable information for guiding the timing of ADT initiation-this may reduce over- and undertreatment of pN1 PCa men.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akshay Sood
- VCORE-Vattikuti Urology Institute Center for Outcomes Research, Analytics and Evaluation, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA.
- Vattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA.
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| | - Lawrence T Zhang
- VCORE-Vattikuti Urology Institute Center for Outcomes Research, Analytics and Evaluation, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Jacob Keeley
- VCORE-Vattikuti Urology Institute Center for Outcomes Research, Analytics and Evaluation, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Mohit Butaney
- Vattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Maxwell Stricker
- Vattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Jack R Andrews
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ralph Grauer
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - James O Peabody
- VCORE-Vattikuti Urology Institute Center for Outcomes Research, Analytics and Evaluation, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA
- Vattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Craig G Rogers
- VCORE-Vattikuti Urology Institute Center for Outcomes Research, Analytics and Evaluation, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA
- Vattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Mani Menon
- VCORE-Vattikuti Urology Institute Center for Outcomes Research, Analytics and Evaluation, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA
- Vattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Firas Abdollah
- VCORE-Vattikuti Urology Institute Center for Outcomes Research, Analytics and Evaluation, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA.
- Vattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Jia AY, Spratt DE. Radiotherapy in patients with node-positive prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2024; 27:1-2. [PMID: 36526683 DOI: 10.1038/s41391-022-00631-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2022] [Revised: 11/30/2022] [Accepted: 12/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Angela Y Jia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
| | - Daniel E Spratt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Mazhindu T, Ndlovu N, Borok MZ, Meki S, Nyamhunga A, Havranek EP, Kessler ER, Campbell TB, Flaig TW. Metabolic and cardiovascular disease risk for Zimbabwean men with prostate cancer receiving long-term androgen deprivation therapy. RESEARCH SQUARE 2023:rs.3.rs-3723949. [PMID: 38168443 PMCID: PMC10760221 DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3723949/v1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2024]
Abstract
Introduction Prostate cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality in the majority of sub-Saharan Africa region countries. Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is effective treatment, however ADT is associated with complications including metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular disease. Although cardiovascular disease is a leading cause of mortality among prostate cancer patients, there is limited information on ADT impact on metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular disease risk among Africans. An observational prospective cohort study was carried out in Harare, Zimbabwe. Prostate cancer patients due to be initiated on ADT (medical or surgical) were assessed for metabolic syndrome and a 10-year Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease (ASCVD) 10-year risk probability score was done before ADT and followed up to 9 months. Results 17 black Zimbabwean men were enrolled with a median age 72 years. Most participants (59%) had stage IV disease and 75% opted for surgical castration. At enrolment 23.5% had metabolic syndrome and this increased to 33% after 9 months of ADT. Baseline ASCVD risk was in the high risk category for 68.8% of participants and remained above 50% after 9 months of ADT. In this cohort, there is a 10% absolute increase in metabolic syndrome prevalence amongst African men with prostate cancer within 9 months of ADT initiation.
Collapse
|
8
|
Gottlieb J, Chang SC, Choe J, Grunkemeier GL, Hanes DA, Krasne D, Hoon DSB, Wilson TG. Characterization of Lymph Node Tumor Burden in Node-Positive Prostate Cancer Patients after Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy with Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:3707. [PMID: 37509368 PMCID: PMC10378308 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15143707] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2023] [Revised: 05/18/2023] [Accepted: 07/19/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prostate cancer (PCa) nodal staging does not account for lymph node (LN) tumor burden. The LN anatomical compartment involved with the tumor or the quantified extent of extranodal extension (ENE) have not yet been studied in relation to biochemical recurrence-free survival (BRFS). METHODS Histopathological slides of 66 pN1 PCa patients who underwent extended pelvic lymph node dissection were reviewed. We recorded metrics to quantify LN tumor burden. We also characterized the LN anatomical compartments involved and quantified the extent of ENE. RESULTS The median follow-up time was 38 months. The median number of total LNs obtained per patient was 30 (IQR 23-37). In the risk-adjusted cox regression model, the following variables were associated with BRFS: mean size of the largest LN deposit per patient (log2: adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) = 1.91, p < 0.001), the mean total span of all LN deposits per patient (2.07, p < 0.001), and the mean percent surface area of the LN involved with the tumor (1.58, p < 0.001). There was no significant BRFS association for the LN anatomical compartment or the quantified extent of ENE. CONCLUSION LN tumor burden is associated with BRFS. The LN anatomical compartments and the quantified extent of ENE did not show significant association with BRFS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Josh Gottlieb
- Department of Urologic Oncology, Providence St. John's Cancer Institute, Santa Monica, CA 90404, USA
| | - Shu-Ching Chang
- Department of Biostatistics, Providence St. Joseph Health, Portland, OR 97213, USA
| | - Jane Choe
- Department of Urologic Oncology, Providence St. John's Cancer Institute, Santa Monica, CA 90404, USA
| | - Gary L Grunkemeier
- Department of Biostatistics, Providence St. Joseph Health, Portland, OR 97213, USA
| | - Douglas A Hanes
- Department of Biostatistics, Providence St. Joseph Health, Portland, OR 97213, USA
| | - David Krasne
- Department of Pathology, Providence St. John's Cancer Institute, Santa Monica, CA 90404, USA
| | - Dave S B Hoon
- Department of Translational Molecular Medicine, Providence St. John's Cancer Institute, Santa Monica, CA 90404, USA
| | - Timothy G Wilson
- Department of Urologic Oncology, Providence St. John's Cancer Institute, Santa Monica, CA 90404, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Hayden C, Rahman S, Lokeshwar S, Choksi A, Kim IY. Management of Pathologic Node-Positive Prostate Cancer following Radical Prostatectomy. Curr Oncol Rep 2023; 25:729-734. [PMID: 37071296 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-023-01420-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/27/2023] [Indexed: 04/19/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Approximately 15% of prostate cancer patients have lymph node metastases at the time of radical prostatectomy (RP). However, there is no universally accepted standard of care for these men. The options for treatment in this subset of patients range from observation to a combination of adjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (aADT) and radiation therapy (RT). RECENT FINDINGS A recent systematic review showed that there was no clear choice out of the options above to treat these patients. Studies have shown that patients treated with adjuvant radiation therapy have lower all-cause mortality when compared to patients treated with salvage radiation therapy. In this review, we summarize treatment options for pathologic node-positive (pN1) patients and discuss the urgent need for robust clinical trials that includes observation as the control group to help establish a standard of care for treating patients with node-positive prostate cancer after RP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher Hayden
- Department of Urology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, 06519, USA
| | - Syed Rahman
- Department of Urology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, 06519, USA
| | - Soum Lokeshwar
- Department of Urology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, 06519, USA
| | - Ankur Choksi
- Department of Urology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, 06519, USA
| | - Isaac Y Kim
- Department of Urology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, 06519, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Mahalingam D, Hanni S, Serritella AV, Fountzilas C, Michalek J, Hernandez B, Sarantopoulos J, Datta P, Romero O, Pillai SMA, Kuhn J, Pollak M, Thompson IM. Utilizing metformin to prevent metabolic syndrome due to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT): a randomized phase II study of metformin in non-diabetic men initiating ADT for advanced prostate cancer. Oncotarget 2023; 14:622-636. [PMID: 37335291 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.28458] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/21/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) can lead to metabolic syndrome (MS) and is implicated in ADT-resistance. Metformin showed antineoplastic activity through mTOR inhibition secondary AMPK-activation. MATERIALS AND METHODS To investigate whether metformin mitigated ADT-related MS, we conducted a randomized double-blind phase II trial of metformin 500 mg TID or placebo in non-diabetic patients with biochemically-relapsed or advanced PC due for ADT. Fasting serum glucose, insulin, PSA, metformin, weight and waist circumference (WC) were measured at baseline, week 12 and 28. The primary endpoint was a group of MS metrics. Secondary endpoints include PSA response, safety, serum metformin concentrations and analysis of downstream an mTOR target, phospho-S6-kinase. RESULTS 36 men were randomized to either metformin or placebo. Mean age was 68.4. Mean weight, WC and insulin levels increased in both arms. At week 12 and 28, no statistical differences in weight, WC or insulin were observed in either arm. No significant difference in percentage of patients with PSA <0.2 at week 28 between metformin (45.5%) vs. placebo (46.7%). Analysis in the metformin-arm showed variable down-regulation of phospho-S6 kinase. CONCLUSIONS In our small study, metformin added to ADT did not show a reduced risk of ADT-related MS or differences in PSA response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Devalingam Mahalingam
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX 77030, USA
- Robert H Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
| | - Salih Hanni
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX 77030, USA
| | - Anthony V Serritella
- Robert H Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
| | - Christos Fountzilas
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX 77030, USA
- Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA
| | - Joel Michalek
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX 77030, USA
| | - Brian Hernandez
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX 77030, USA
| | - John Sarantopoulos
- Institute for Drug Development, Mays Cancer Center at University of Texas Health, San Antonio, TX 78229, USA
| | | | - Ofelia Romero
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX 77030, USA
| | | | - John Kuhn
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX 77030, USA
| | - Michael Pollak
- Division of Experimental Medicine, Lady Davis Institute of Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - Ian M Thompson
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX 77030, USA
- Christus Health, San Antonio, TX 78229, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Tang C, Sherry AD, Haymaker C, Bathala T, Liu S, Fellman B, Cohen L, Aparicio A, Zurita AJ, Reuben A, Marmonti E, Chun SG, Reddy JP, Ghia A, McGuire S, Efstathiou E, Wang J, Wang J, Pilie P, Kovitz C, Du W, Simiele SJ, Kumar R, Borghero Y, Shi Z, Chapin B, Gomez D, Wistuba I, Corn PG. Addition of Metastasis-Directed Therapy to Intermittent Hormone Therapy for Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer: The EXTEND Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol 2023; 9:825-834. [PMID: 37022702 PMCID: PMC10080407 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.0161] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 40.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2022] [Accepted: 12/20/2022] [Indexed: 04/07/2023]
Abstract
Importance Despite evidence demonstrating an overall survival benefit with up-front hormone therapy in addition to established synergy between hormone therapy and radiation, the addition of metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) to hormone therapy for oligometastatic prostate cancer, to date, has not been evaluated in a randomized clinical trial. Objective To determine in men with oligometastatic prostate cancer whether the addition of MDT to intermittent hormone therapy improves oncologic outcomes and preserves time with eugonadal testosterone compared with intermittent hormone therapy alone. Design, Setting, Participants The External Beam Radiation to Eliminate Nominal Metastatic Disease (EXTEND) trial is a phase 2, basket randomized clinical trial for multiple solid tumors testing the addition of MDT to standard-of-care systemic therapy. Men aged 18 years or older with oligometastatic prostate cancer who had 5 or fewer metastases and were treated with hormone therapy for 2 or more months were enrolled to the prostate intermittent hormone therapy basket at multicenter tertiary cancer centers from September 2018 to November 2020. The cutoff date for the primary analysis was January 7, 2022. Interventions Patients were randomized 1:1 to MDT, consisting of definitive radiation therapy to all sites of disease and intermittent hormone therapy (combined therapy arm; n = 43) or to hormone therapy only (n = 44). A planned break in hormone therapy occurred 6 months after enrollment, after which hormone therapy was withheld until progression. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary end point was disease progression, defined as death or radiographic, clinical, or biochemical progression. A key predefined secondary end point was eugonadal progression-free survival (PFS), defined as the time from achieving a eugonadal testosterone level (≥150 ng/dL; to convert to nanomoles per liter, multiply by 0.0347) until progression. Exploratory measures included quality of life and systemic immune evaluation using flow cytometry and T-cell receptor sequencing. Results The study included 87 men (median age, 67 years [IQR, 63-72 years]). Median follow-up was 22.0 months (range, 11.6-39.2 months). Progression-free survival was improved in the combined therapy arm (median not reached) compared with the hormone therapy only arm (median, 15.8 months; 95% CI, 13.6-21.2 months) (hazard ratio, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.12-0.55; P < .001). Eugonadal PFS was also improved with MDT (median not reached) compared with the hormone therapy only (6.1 months; 95% CI, 3.7 months to not estimable) (hazard ratio, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.11-0.91; P = .03). Flow cytometry and T-cell receptor sequencing demonstrated increased markers of T-cell activation, proliferation, and clonal expansion limited to the combined therapy arm. Conclusions and Relevance In this randomized clinical trial, PFS and eugonadal PFS were significantly improved with combination treatment compared with hormone treatment only in men with oligometastatic prostate cancer. Combination of MDT with intermittent hormone therapy may allow for excellent disease control while facilitating prolonged eugonadal testosterone intervals. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03599765.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chad Tang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Alexander D. Sherry
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Cara Haymaker
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Tharakeswara Bathala
- Department of Abdominal Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Suyu Liu
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Bryan Fellman
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Lorenzo Cohen
- Department of Palliative, Rehabilitation and Integrative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Ana Aparicio
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Amado J. Zurita
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Alexandre Reuben
- Department of Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Enrica Marmonti
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Stephen G. Chun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Jay P. Reddy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Amol Ghia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Sean McGuire
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Eleni Efstathiou
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Jennifer Wang
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Jianbo Wang
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Patrick Pilie
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Craig Kovitz
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Weiliang Du
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Samantha J. Simiele
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Rachit Kumar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center, Gilbert, Arizona
| | - Yerko Borghero
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center, Gilbert, Arizona
| | - Zheng Shi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
| | - Brian Chapin
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Daniel Gomez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Ignacio Wistuba
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Paul G. Corn
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
The Changing Face of cN0M0 Prostate Cancer Being Found With pN+ After Surgery in the Contemporary Era: Results of an International European Survey on Disease Management. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2022; 21:416.e1-416.e10. [PMID: 36609130 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2022.11.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2022] [Revised: 11/09/2022] [Accepted: 11/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The urological community's opinion over the management of men being found with pathologically positive nodes (pN+) following radical prostatectomy (RP) performed with curative intent after preoperative negative conventional staging (cN0M0) has never been assessed. This remains crucial, especially considering the advent of novel imaging modalities. Our aim was to investigate the current opinion on management of pN+ cN0M0 prostate cancer (PCa) in the European urological community. METHODS Following validation, a 31-item survey, complying with the Cherries checklist, was distributed using a web link from December 2021 to April 2022 to 10 urological societies mailing list. Social media (Twitter, Facebook) were also used. RESULTS We received 253 replies. The majority were Urologists (96.8%), younger than 60 (90.5%); 5.2% did not have access to PET-scans; 78.9% believed pN+ is a multifaceted category; 10-years CSS was marked as 71 to 95% by 17.5%. Gold standard management was stated not being ADT by 80.8% and being RT±ADT by 52.3%. Early sRT±ADT was considered an option vs. aRT±ADT by 72.4%. In case of BCR 71% would perform and decide management based on PSMA-PET whilst 3.7% would not perform PSMA-PET. pN+ management is still unclear for 77.1%. On multivariate analysis PSMA-PET availability related to a lower and higher likelihood of considering aRT±ADT as standard and of considering early salvage versus aRT respectively (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS The Urological community has an acceptable awareness of pN+ disease and management, although it may overestimate disease aggressiveness. The majority consider pN+ PCa as a multifaceted category and rely on a risk-adapted approach. Expectant compared to immediate upfront management and new imaging modalities are increasingly considered.
Collapse
|
13
|
Selecting lymph node-positive patients for adjuvant therapy after radical prostatectomy and extended pelvic lymphadenectomy: An outcome analysis of 100 node-positive patients managed without adjuvant therapy. Curr Urol 2022; 16:232-239. [PMID: 36714232 PMCID: PMC9875212 DOI: 10.1097/cu9.0000000000000129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2021] [Accepted: 01/27/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective The aim of the study is to evaluate the effect of deferred androgen deprivation therapy on biochemical recurrence (BCR) and other survival parameters in node-positive prostate cancer patients after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with bilateral extended pelvic lymph node dissection (RARP + EPLND). Materials and methods Of the 453 consecutive RARP procedures performed from 2011 to 2018, 100 patients with no prior use of androgen deprivation therapy were found to be lymph node (LN) positive and were observed, with initiation of salvage treatment at the time of BCR only. Patients were divided into 1 or 2 LNs (67)-and more than 2 LNs (33)-positive groups to assess survival outcomes. Results At a median follow-up of 21 months (1-70 months), the LN group (p < 0.000), preoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA, p = 0.013), tumor volume (TV, p = 0.031), and LND (p = 0.004) were significantly associated with BCR. In multivariate analysis, only the LN group (p = 0.035) and PSA level (p = 0.026) were statistically significant. The estimated BCR-free survival rates in the 1/2 LN group were 37.6% (27%-52.2%), 26.5% (16.8%-41.7%), and 19.9% (9.6%-41.0%) at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively, with a hazard of developing BCR of 0.462 (0.225-0.948) compared with the more than 2 LN-positive group. Estimated 5-year overall survival, cancer-specific, metastasis-free, and local recurrence-free survival rates were 88.4% (73.1%-100%), 89.5% (74%-100%), 65.1% (46.0%-92.1%), and 94.8% (87.2%-100.0%), respectively, for which none of the factors were significant. Based on cutoff values for PSA, TV, and LND of 30 ng/mL, 30%, and 10%, respectively, the 1/2 LN group was substratified, wherein the median BCR-free survival for the low- and intermediate-risk groups was 40 and 12 months, respectively. Conclusions Nearly one fourth and one fifth of 1/2 node-positive patients were BCR-free at 3 and 5 years after RARP + EPLND. Further substratification using PSA, TV, and LN density may help in providing individualized care regarding the initiation of adjuvant therapy.
Collapse
|
14
|
Cardiovascular toxicities of androgen deprivation therapy in Asian men with localized prostate cancer after curative radiotherapy: a registry-based observational study. CARDIO-ONCOLOGY 2022; 8:4. [PMID: 35287756 PMCID: PMC8919574 DOI: 10.1186/s40959-022-00131-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2021] [Accepted: 02/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Background Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and radiotherapy (RT) are the mainstay treatment for localized prostate cancer and recurrence after surgery. Cardiovascular (CV) toxicity of ADT is increasingly recognized, and the risk relates to pre-existing risk factors and ADT modalities. Despite ethnic differences in the prevalence of CV risk factors and variations of CV mortality, data on ADT-related cardiotoxicities in the Asian population remain inconclusive. Our registry-based study investigated ADT-related major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) after primary or salvage RT. Methods Our study combined two prospectively established registry databases from National Cancer Center Singapore and National Heart Center Singapore. The primary endpoint is time to first MACE after treatment. MACE is defined as myocardial infarction, stroke, unstable angina, or cardiovascular death. Two types of propensity score adjustments, including ADT propensity score as a covariate in the multivariable regression model and propensity score weighting, were applied to balance baseline features and CV risk factors between RT alone and RT + ADT groups. Results From 2000 to 2019, 1940 patients received either RT alone (n = 494) or RT + ADT (n = 1446) were included. After a median follow-up of 10 years (RT) and 7.2 years (RT+ ADT), the cumulative incidence of MACE at 1, 3 and 9 years was 1.2, 5 and 16.2% in RT group, and 1.1, 5.2 and 17.6% in RT + ADT group, respectively. There were no differences in the incidence of MACE between 2 groups (HR 1.01, 95% CI 0.78–1.30, p = 0.969). Pre-treatment CV risk factors were common (80%), and CV disease (15.9%) was the second leading cause of death after prostate cancer (21.1%). On univariate analysis, older age, Indians and Malays, pre-existing CV risk factors, and history of MACE were associated with higher MACE risk. After propensity score adjustments, there remained no significant differences in MACE risk between RT + ADT and RT group on multivariable analysis. Conclusions In our registry-based study, ADT is not associated with increased risk of major cardiovascular events among Southeast Asian men with prostate cancer after curative radiotherapy. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40959-022-00131-4.
Collapse
|
15
|
Miro-Padovani M, Batista da Costa J, Salomon L, Ingels A, De la Taille A. [High risk localized and locally advanced prostate cancer: Long-term oncological outcomes after prostatectomy]. Prog Urol 2022; 32:702-710. [PMID: 35773175 DOI: 10.1016/j.purol.2022.04.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2021] [Revised: 03/21/2022] [Accepted: 04/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION High risk localized and locally advanced forms are responsible for the vast majority of specific deaths from prostate cancer among non-metastatic diseases at diagnosis. No randomized study has yet been published to establish the best local treatment in terms of survival. AIM Conduct a large-volume cohort study with long-term follow-up to analyze specific and overall survival outcomes after surgery. METHOD A single-center retrospective study of all patients operated on for localized high-risk and locally advanced prostate cancer was performed. Actuarial survival analyses and multivariate analyses were performed to discern predictive risk factors. RESULTS Five hundred patients were included. MRI stage was≥iT3a in 40.7% of cases and 50.2% of patients had a Gleason score≥8 on biopsy. The mean follow-up was 63.1 months. The overall, specific and biological recurrence-free survival were respectively 77.6%, 93.9% and 26.8% at 10 years. A PSA level≥20, a Gleason score on biopsy≥9 and a MRI stage≥iT3a were significantly associated with the 10-years biological recurrence risk. CONCLUSION This study shows very good long-term oncological results. In the absence of a randomized controlled trial, these results suggest the primary role of surgery in this indication and support the evolution of current practices. We pointed out very pejorative features that might help selection of the best candidates for surgical treatment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Miro-Padovani
- Service d'urologie et de transplantation rénale, faculté de médecine Paris 12, CHU d'Henri-Mondor, 51, avenue Marechal-de-Lattre-de-Tassigny, 94000 Créteil, France.
| | - J Batista da Costa
- Service d'urologie et de transplantation rénale, faculté de médecine Paris 12, CHU d'Henri-Mondor, 51, avenue Marechal-de-Lattre-de-Tassigny, 94000 Créteil, France.
| | - L Salomon
- Service d'urologie, centre hospitalier Mont-de-Marsan, 417, avenue Pierre-de-Coubertin, 40024 Mont-de-Marsan, France.
| | - A Ingels
- Service d'urologie et de transplantation rénale, faculté de médecine Paris 12, CHU d'Henri-Mondor, 51, avenue Marechal-de-Lattre-de-Tassigny, 94000 Créteil, France.
| | - A De la Taille
- Service d'urologie et de transplantation rénale, faculté de médecine Paris 12, CHU d'Henri-Mondor, 51, avenue Marechal-de-Lattre-de-Tassigny, 94000 Créteil, France.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Cao Y, Deville C. Adjuvant Radiation for Pathologically Node-Positive Prostate Cancer: Evidence When Early Salvage May Not Be Early Enough. J Clin Oncol 2022; 40:2179-2182. [PMID: 35605175 DOI: 10.1200/jco.22.00645] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Yilin Cao
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Curtiland Deville
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Małkiewicz B, Knura M, Łątkowska M, Kobylański M, Nagi K, Janczak D, Chorbińska J, Krajewski W, Karwacki J, Szydełko T. Patients with Positive Lymph Nodes after Radical Prostatectomy and Pelvic Lymphadenectomy—Do We Know the Proper Way of Management? Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14092326. [PMID: 35565455 PMCID: PMC9104304 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14092326] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2022] [Revised: 05/03/2022] [Accepted: 05/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Prostate cancer (PCa) is the second most frequent malignancy in the male population worldwide. Men with a nodal invasion established after radical prostatectomy with lymph node dissection are a heterogeneous group of patients who require more thorough stratification and therapy individualization, which remain uncovered by current guidelines. Considering a multitude of prognostic factors and novel diagnostic techniques, classifying patients into narrower and more specified risk groups should be a vital part of lymph node positive PCa management in the future. Abstract Lymph node invasion in prostate cancer is a significant prognostic factor indicating worse prognosis. While it significantly affects both survival rates and recurrence, proper management remains a controversial and unsolved issue. The thorough evaluation of risk factors associated with nodal involvement, such as lymph node density or extracapsular extension, is crucial to establish the potential expansion of the disease and to substratify patients clinically. There are multiple strategies that may be employed for patients with positive lymph nodes. Nowadays, therapeutic methods are generally based on observation, radiotherapy, and androgen deprivation therapy. However, the current guidelines are incoherent in terms of the most effective management approach. Future management strategies are expected to make use of novel diagnostic tools and therapies, such as photodynamic therapy or diagnostic imaging with prostate-specific membrane antigen. Nevertheless, this heterogeneous group of men remains a great therapeutic concern, and both the clarification of the guidelines and the optimal substratification of patients are required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bartosz Małkiewicz
- Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-566 Wroclaw, Poland; (M.Ł.); (M.K.); (K.N.); (D.J.); (J.C.); (W.K.); (T.S.)
- Correspondence: (B.M.); (J.K.); Tel.: +48-506-158-136 (B.M.)
| | - Miłosz Knura
- Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia, 40-752 Katowice, Poland;
| | - Małgorzata Łątkowska
- Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-566 Wroclaw, Poland; (M.Ł.); (M.K.); (K.N.); (D.J.); (J.C.); (W.K.); (T.S.)
| | - Maximilian Kobylański
- Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-566 Wroclaw, Poland; (M.Ł.); (M.K.); (K.N.); (D.J.); (J.C.); (W.K.); (T.S.)
| | - Krystian Nagi
- Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-566 Wroclaw, Poland; (M.Ł.); (M.K.); (K.N.); (D.J.); (J.C.); (W.K.); (T.S.)
| | - Dawid Janczak
- Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-566 Wroclaw, Poland; (M.Ł.); (M.K.); (K.N.); (D.J.); (J.C.); (W.K.); (T.S.)
| | - Joanna Chorbińska
- Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-566 Wroclaw, Poland; (M.Ł.); (M.K.); (K.N.); (D.J.); (J.C.); (W.K.); (T.S.)
| | - Wojciech Krajewski
- Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-566 Wroclaw, Poland; (M.Ł.); (M.K.); (K.N.); (D.J.); (J.C.); (W.K.); (T.S.)
| | - Jakub Karwacki
- Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-566 Wroclaw, Poland; (M.Ł.); (M.K.); (K.N.); (D.J.); (J.C.); (W.K.); (T.S.)
- Correspondence: (B.M.); (J.K.); Tel.: +48-506-158-136 (B.M.)
| | - Tomasz Szydełko
- Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-566 Wroclaw, Poland; (M.Ł.); (M.K.); (K.N.); (D.J.); (J.C.); (W.K.); (T.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Chung C, Abboud K. Targeting the androgen receptor signaling pathway in advanced prostate cancer. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2022; 79:1224-1235. [PMID: 35390118 DOI: 10.1093/ajhp/zxac105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
DISCLAIMER In an effort to expedite the publication of articles related to the COVID-19 pandemic, AJHP is posting these manuscripts online as soon as possible after acceptance. Accepted manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and copyedited, but are posted online before technical formatting and author proofing. These manuscripts are not the final version of record and will be replaced with the final article (formatted per AJHP style and proofed by the authors) at a later time. PURPOSE This article summarizes current androgen receptor (AR)-directed therapies that have received regulatory approval for the treatment of advanced prostate adenocarcinoma (herein referred to as prostate cancer, PC). SUMMARY PC is an androgen-dependent malignancy in which ligands including testosterone and dihydrotestosterone bind to AR, initiating androgen-AR complex translocation to the nucleus followed by AR-mediated transcription of target genes. Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), including gonadotropin hormone-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists with or without AR antagonists (antiandrogens), GnRH antagonists, or bilateral orchiectomy, forms the backbone of treatment for patients with metastatic castration-naive PC and/or castration-resistant PC (CRPC). ADT is also an option for high-risk, early-stage PC after prostatectomy and/or radiation. While ADT is often very effective as initial therapy, resistance ultimately develops despite suppression of gonadal and/or adrenal androgens, leading to CRCPC, which is characterized by mechanisms such as reactivation of the AR signaling pathway, AR overexpression, and gene mutations in the ligand-binding domain of AR that lead to disease progression, resulting in increased symptom burden and ultimately death. However, disease in patients with CRPC is still dependent on androgen signaling, and these patients continue on ADT to maintain a castrate level of serum testosterone. Novel hormonal therapies including agents that target AR directly (eg, AR antagonists) are often added to ADT in this setting. Targeting the AR signaling pathway led to the development of second-generation AR antagonists, examples of which include enzalutamide, apalutamide, and darolutamide. These agents do not exhibit partial agonism or possess a higher affinity for AR and are not postulated to improve survival outcomes relative to their first-generation counterparts for patients with CRPC. Lastly, the emergence of ADT, including second-generation AR antagonists, has led to the development of supportive care for treatment-related adverse effects. CONCLUSION Major advances have been made in targeting the AR signaling pathway in patients with advanced PC. Further studies are warranted to identify the optimal sequencing of therapies to maximize treatment benefit. Mitigation of treatment-related adverse effects presents new opportunities to advance clinical pharmacy practice.
Collapse
|
19
|
Nicosia L, Mazzola R, Vitale C, Cuccia F, Figlia V, Giaj-Levra N, Ricchetti F, Rigo M, Ruggeri R, Cavalleri S, Alongi F. Postoperative moderately hypofractionated radiotherapy in prostate cancer: a mono-institutional propensity-score-matching analysis between adjuvant and early-salvage radiotherapy. Radiol Med 2022; 127:560-570. [PMID: 35347581 DOI: 10.1007/s11547-022-01479-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2021] [Accepted: 03/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
AIM To evaluate the impact of moderately hypofractionated postoperative radiotherapy (RT) in prostate cancer (PCa). MATERIALS AND METHODS The data of 304 surgically resected PCa patients were analyzed. One hundred and five patients underwent adjuvant RT (aRT), 77 early-savage RT (esRT), and 123 salvage RT (sRT). Biochemical relapse-free survival (BRFS), progression-free survival (PFS) and toxicity were analyzed. A propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to account for potential confounders between aRT and esRT groups. RESULTS The median follow-up was 33 months. Three-year BRFS and PFS were 82 and 85.2%, respectively, in the overall population. At the multivariate analysis, Gleason score and hormone therapy were factors independently correlated with BRFS and PFS. After PSM, there was no difference in BRFS and PFS between aRT and esRT patients. Severe toxicity was represented by grade 3 urinary incontinence (3.5%) and urgency (1%), and aRT correlated with increased any-grade acute toxicity. Severe grade 3 gastrointestinal late toxicity occurred in 1.3% of cases. CONCLUSION Postoperative moderately hypofractionated RT achieved acceptable disease control rate and demonstrated no increased or unexpected toxicity. Future prospective studies should evaluate the role of postoperative RT in patients with unfavorable disease characteristics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Nicosia
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, Negrar, Verona, Italy
| | - Rosario Mazzola
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, Negrar, Verona, Italy
| | - Claudio Vitale
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, Negrar, Verona, Italy
| | - Francesco Cuccia
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, Negrar, Verona, Italy.
| | - Vanessa Figlia
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, Negrar, Verona, Italy
| | - Niccolò Giaj-Levra
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, Negrar, Verona, Italy
| | - Francesco Ricchetti
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, Negrar, Verona, Italy
| | - Michele Rigo
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, Negrar, Verona, Italy
| | - Ruggiero Ruggeri
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, Negrar, Verona, Italy
| | - Stefano Cavalleri
- Urology Division, Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar, Verona, Italy
| | - Filippo Alongi
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Cancer Care Center, Negrar, Verona, Italy
- University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Linxweiler J, Hajili T, Saar M, Maßmann C, Junker K, Stöckle M. Einfluss von lokalen Therapiemaßnahmen auf die Biologie des fortschreitenden Prostatakarzinoms. Urologe A 2022; 61:518-525. [PMID: 35258654 PMCID: PMC9072274 DOI: 10.1007/s00120-022-01788-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Hintergrund In den letzten 15 Jahren zeigt sich ein Trend hin zu einem längeren Überleben beim metastasierten Prostatakarzinom. Neben dem durch neue Medikamente bedingten Fortschritt deuten retrospektive Daten auch auf einen möglichen positiven Effekt einer früheren Primärtumorbehandlung hin. Fragestellung Kann eine Primärtumorbehandlung im Falle einer späteren Metastasierung die Prognose der betroffenen Patienten verbessern und wenn ja, über welche Mechanismen? Material und Methode Wir werteten die klinischen Langzeitergebnisse von 115 Patienten aus, die bei T4-Prostatakarzinomen nach induktiver Hormontherapie an unserer Klinik prostatektomiert worden waren. Weiterhin erfolgte eine kritische Durchsicht und Diskussion der zur oben genannten Fragestellung vorhandenen Literatur. Ergebnisse Von den 115 Patienten hatten 84 im weiteren Verlauf ein biochemisches Rezidiv erlitten, waren also definitiv durch die radikale Prostatektomie nicht geheilt. Das tumorspezifische und das Gesamtüberleben dieser 84 Patienten lag nach 150 Monaten bei 61 % bzw. 44 %. Bemerkenswert war die Beobachtung, dass diese Patienten ein überraschend gutes und langes Ansprechen auf eine Hormontherapie zeigten. Von den 84 Patienten waren nach durchschnittlich 95 Monaten Nachbeobachtungszeit noch 47 am Leben. 31 von ihnen, also ungefähr zwei Drittel, standen immer noch unter einer Standardhormontherapie. Nur 13 hatten eine Resistenz gegen die primäre Hormontherapie entwickelt und entsprechend eine tertiäre Hormontherapie erhalten, auf die sie teilweise aber auch wieder langfristig sensibel blieben. Schlussfolgerungen Die Primärtumorentfernung, zumindest unter den beschriebenen Begleitumständen, scheint die Entwicklung einer Hormonresistenz beim metastasierten Prostatakarzinom hinauszögern und in Einzelfällen sogar ganz verhindern zu können.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johannes Linxweiler
- Klinik für Urologie, Universität des Saarlandes, Kirrberger Str., 66421, Homburg/Saar, Deutschland.
| | - Turkan Hajili
- Klinik für Urologie, Universität des Saarlandes, Kirrberger Str., 66421, Homburg/Saar, Deutschland
- Urologische Klinik, Diako Krankenhaus Flensburg, Flensburg, Deutschland
| | - Matthias Saar
- Klinik für Urologie, Universität des Saarlandes, Kirrberger Str., 66421, Homburg/Saar, Deutschland
- Klinik für Urologie, Universitätsklinikum RWTH Aachen, Aaachen, Deutschland
| | - Christina Maßmann
- Klinik für Urologie, Universität des Saarlandes, Kirrberger Str., 66421, Homburg/Saar, Deutschland
| | - Kerstin Junker
- Klinik für Urologie, Universität des Saarlandes, Kirrberger Str., 66421, Homburg/Saar, Deutschland
| | - Michael Stöckle
- Klinik für Urologie, Universität des Saarlandes, Kirrberger Str., 66421, Homburg/Saar, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Laine C, Gandaglia G, Valerio M, Heidegger I, Tsaur I, Olivier J, Ceci F, van den Bergh RCN, Kretschmer A, Thibault C, Chiu PK, Tilki D, Kasivisvanathan V, Preisser F, Zattoni F, Fankhauser C, Kesch C, Puche-Sanz I, Moschini M, Pradere B, Ploussard G, Marra G. Features and management of men with pN1 cM0 prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy and lymphadenectomy: a systematic review of population-based evidence. Curr Opin Urol 2022; 32:69-84. [PMID: 34812201 DOI: 10.1097/mou.0000000000000946] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW To investigate the features and optimal management of pN+ cM0 prostate cancer (PCa) according to registry-based studies. RECENT FINDINGS Up to 15% of PCa patients harbor lymph node invasion (pN+) at radical prostatectomy plus lymph node dissection. Nonetheless, the optimal management strategy in this setting is not well characterized. SUMMARY We performed a systematic review including n = 13 studies. Management strategies comprised 13 536 men undergoing observation, 11 149 adjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (aADT), 7,075 adjuvant radiotherapy (aRT) +aADT and 705 aRT. Baseline features showed aggressive PCa in the majority of men. At a median follow-up ranging 48-134months, Cancer-related death was 5% and overall-mortality 16.6%. aADT and aRT alone had no cancer-specific survival or overall survival advantages over observation only and over not performing aRT, respectively. aADT plus aRT yielded a survival benefit compared to observation and aADT, which in one study, were limited to certain intermediate-risk categories. Age, Gleason, Charlson score, positive surgical margins, pathological stage, and positive nodes number, but not prostate specific antigen, were most relevant prognostic factors. Our work further confirmed pN+ PCa is a multifaceted disease and will help future research in defining its optimal management based on different risk categories to maximize survival and patient's quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charles Laine
- Department of Urology, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France
| | - Giorgio Gandaglia
- Department of Urology, San Raffaele Hospital and Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Massimo Valerio
- Department of Urology, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Isabel Heidegger
- Department of Urology, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Igor Tsaur
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, Mainz University Medicine, Mainz, Germany
| | | | - Francesco Ceci
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | | | | | - Constance Thibault
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou, Paris, France
| | - Peter K Chiu
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Derya Tilki
- Department of Urology, Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | - Felix Preisser
- Department of Urology, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Fabio Zattoni
- Urology Unit, Santa Maria della Misericordia University Hospital, Udine, Italy
| | | | - Claudia Kesch
- West German Cancer Center; Department of Urology, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Ignacio Puche-Sanz
- Department of Urology, Bio-Health Research Institute, Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, University of Granada Granada, Spain
| | - Marco Moschini
- Department of Urology, San Raffaele Hospital and Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Guillaume Ploussard
- Department of Urology, La Croix du Sud Hospital, Toulouse, France and Institut Universitaire du Cancer Toulouse - Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - Giancarlo Marra
- Department of Urology, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France
- Department of Urology, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
- Department of Urology and Clinical Research Group on Predictive Onco-Urology, APHP, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Hopland OA, Fosså SD, Ottosson F, Brennhovd B, Svindland A, Hole KH, Hernes E, Eri LM, Diep LM, Berge V. Robotic salvage pelvic lymph node dissection for locoregional recurrence after radical prostatectomy: a single institution experience. Scand J Urol 2021; 55:287-292. [PMID: 34196594 DOI: 10.1080/21681805.2021.1946135] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess treatment response (PSA < 0.2 ng/ml), need for additional therapy and complication rate after robot assisted salvage pelvic lymph node dissection (sPLND). MATERIAL AND METHODS Analysis of outcomes data from radical prostatectomy (RP) patients consecutively operated with robot assisted sPLND due to biochemical recurrence and positron-emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT)-detected nodal recurrence of pelvic lymph nodes. RESULTS Sixty-nine patients underwent robotic sPLND after a median time of 47 months post- RP. Sixty-four patients (93%) had malignant lymph nodes upon histological assessment of sPLND specimen. Twenty patients (29%) achieved PSA < 0.2 ng/ml 6 weeks postoperatively. After median (IQR) follow-up of 15 months (10-27), fourteen patients (20%) still had PSA < 0.2 ng/ml without additional therapy and forty-one patients (59%) had started additional therapy. No significant predictor for treatment response was found. Postoperative complications occurred in 14 patients (20%). Eleven of these complications were classified as Clavien-Dindo grade 1. CONCLUSION Oncological benefit of sPLND as the only salvage procedure seems to be limited, though almost one third of patients achieved treatment response. Clinical trials are needed to determine if sPLND as part of a multimodal treatment may improve outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sophie D Fosså
- National Advisory Unit on Late Effects after Cancer Treatment, Radiumhospitalet, Oslo University, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Fredrik Ottosson
- Department of Urology, Radiumhospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Bjørn Brennhovd
- Department of Urology, Radiumhospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Aud Svindland
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Pathology, Radiumhospitalet, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Knut Håkon Hole
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Division of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Eivor Hernes
- Division of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Lars Magne Eri
- Department of Urology, Radiumhospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Lien My Diep
- Oslo Centre for Biostatistics and Epidemiology (OCBE), Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Viktor Berge
- Department of Urology, Radiumhospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Lim J, Onozawa M, Saad M, Ong TA, Malek R, Akaza H. Recent trend of androgen deprivation therapy in newly diagnosed prostate cancer patients: Comparing between high- and middle-income Asian countries. Cancer Sci 2021; 112:2071-2080. [PMID: 33738901 PMCID: PMC8177804 DOI: 10.1111/cas.14889] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2021] [Revised: 03/12/2021] [Accepted: 03/15/2021] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
The number of newly diagnosed prostate cancer cases varies across Asia, with higher mortality-to-incidence ratio reported in developing nations. Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), alone or in combination, remains the mainstay of first-line treatment for advanced prostate cancer. Key findings of extensive research and randomized controlled trials have shaped current clinical practice and influenced clinical guideline recommendations. We describe here the recent trend of ADT in newly diagnosed prostate cancer for Asia focusing on Japan (high-income country) and Malaysia (middle-income country) based on the Asian Prostate Cancer (A-CaP) Study. The combination of radiotherapy and ADT or ADT alone was common in patients with intermediate-to-high risk localized and locally advanced disease. For metastatic prostate cancer, maximum androgen blockade (gonadotrophin-releasing hormone [GnRH] agonist/antagonist plus antiandrogen) was prevalent among the Japanese patients while primary ADT alone with GnRH agonist/antagonist was widely practiced in the Malaysian cohort. Upfront combined therapy (ADT plus docetaxel or androgen receptor pathway inhibitor) has significantly improved the outcomes of patients with metastatic castration-naïve prostate cancer. Its application, however, remains low in our cohorts due to patients' financial capacity and national health insurance coverage. Early detection remains the cornerstone in prostate cancer control to improve treatment outcome and patient survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jasmine Lim
- Department of SurgeryFaculty of MedicineUniversity of MalayaKuala LumpurMalaysia
| | - Mizuki Onozawa
- Department of UrologySchool of MedicineInternational University of Health and WelfareChibaJapan
| | - Marniza Saad
- Department of Clinical OncologyUniversity of Malaya Medical CentreFaculty of MedicineUniversity of MalayaKuala LumpurMalaysia
| | - Teng Aik Ong
- Department of SurgeryFaculty of MedicineUniversity of MalayaKuala LumpurMalaysia
| | | | | | | | - Rohan Malek
- Department of UrologySelayang HospitalMinistry of Health MalaysiaSelangorMalaysia
| | - Hideyuki Akaza
- Strategic Investigation on Comprehensive Cancer NetworkInterfaculty Initiative in Information Studies/Graduate School of Interdisciplinary InformationUniversity of TokyoTokyoJapan
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Hutten RJ, Parsons MW, Weil CR, Tward JD, Lloyd S, Sanchez A, Lester-Coll N, Johnson SB. Temporal Trends and Predictors in Diagnosing Pathologic Node-Positive Prostate Cancer in Clinically Node-Negative Patients. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2021; 19:e360-e366. [PMID: 34130915 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2021.05.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2021] [Revised: 04/14/2021] [Accepted: 05/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Managing pathologically node positive (pN+) prostate cancer (PCa) is controversial. We describe temporal patterns and predictors of pN+ PCa in men with initially surgically managed clinically node negative (cN-) PCa. MATERIALS AND METHODS This observational retrospective analysis of nonmetastatic, cN- PCa uses the National Cancer Database. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify covariates associated with pN+ disease. Cox proportional hazards modeling and Kaplan-Meier analysis were used to evaluate survival patients undergoing radical prostatectomy with or without pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND). RESULTS The rates of radical prostatectomy in men with grade group (GG) 4 and GG5 increased from 47.6% to 53.1% and from 42.5% to 49.5%, respectively. The annual rate increased from 2.02% in 2010 to 5.12% in 2017 (P < .001). The annual rates of PLND increased from 54.3% to 71.7%. The most significant predictor of pN+ PCa was ISUP GG4 (odds ratio [OR] 12.5, P< .001) and GG 5 (OR 26.2, P < .001). Rates of pN+ identification increased from 5.5% to 9.4% in men with GG4 and from 13.4% to 19.5% in men with GG5 (P< .001). In GG4 and GG5, patients undergoing PLND had superior survival to those managed without PLND (P < .01). CONCLUSION Among patients with cN- PCa, the diagnosis of pN+ PCa has become more common over time. GG4 and GG5 are the strongest independent predictors of pN+ disease. Because incidental pN+ results in upstaging these data are useful for informing discussions before radical prostatectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan J Hutten
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Hospital, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Matthew W Parsons
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Hospital, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Christopher R Weil
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Hospital, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Jonathan D Tward
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Hospital, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Shane Lloyd
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Hospital, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Alejandro Sanchez
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Huntsman Cancer Hospital, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Nataniel Lester-Coll
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Larner College of Medicine at the University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont
| | - Skyler B Johnson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Hospital, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Radiotherapy in nodal oligorecurrent prostate cancer. Strahlenther Onkol 2021; 197:575-580. [PMID: 33914101 PMCID: PMC8219546 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-021-01778-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2021] [Accepted: 03/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Objective The current article encompasses a literature review and recommendations for radiotherapy in nodal oligorecurrent prostate cancer. Materials and methods A literature review focused on studies comparing metastasis-directed stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) vs. external elective nodal radiotherapy (ENRT) and studies analyzing recurrence patterns after local nodal treatment was performed. The DEGRO Prostate Cancer Expert Panel discussed the results and developed treatment recommendations. Results Metastasis-directed radiotherapy results in high local control (often > 90% within a follow-up of 1–2 years) and can be used to improve progression-free survival or defer androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) according to prospective randomized phase II data. Distant progression after involved-node SABR only occurs within a few months in the majority of patients. ENRT improves metastases-free survival rates with increased toxicity in comparison to SABR according to retrospective comparative studies. The majority of nodal recurrences after initial local treatment of pelvic nodal metastasis are detected within the true pelvis and common iliac vessels. Conclusion ENRT with or without a boost should be preferred to SABR in pelvic nodal recurrences. In oligometastatic prostate cancer with distant (extrapelvic) nodal recurrences, SABR alone can be performed in selected cases. Application of additional systemic treatments should be based on current guidelines, with ADT as first-line treatment for hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. Only in carefully selected patients can radiotherapy be initially used without additional ADT outside of the current standard recommendations. Results of (randomized) prospective studies are needed for definitive recommendations.
Collapse
|
26
|
Clinically Lymph Node Positive Prostate Cancer: At the Intersection of Focal and Systemic Disease Control. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2021; 26:53-57. [PMID: 31977386 DOI: 10.1097/ppo.0000000000000421] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Clinically node-positive prostate cancer is often found at the time of diagnosis by cross-sectional imaging and remains poorly understood. Advanced imaging modalities such as magnetic resonance imaging nanoparticles or positron emission tomography-based molecular imaging stand to rapidly change the field and hopefully will bring better diagnostic clarity. This will allow for prospective clinical trials using radiographic, clinical, or molecular parameters to establish who may benefit from both localized and systemic treatment intensification and who may avoid overtreatment. Recent advances in metastatic hormone-sensitive disease may offer clues, but direct studies for nodal disease patients remain.
Collapse
|
27
|
Ouyang W, Zhang Y, Long G, Sun G, Liu M, Li F, Yang C, Zeng X, Yang J, Yu X, Wang Z, Liu Z, Guan W, Hu Z, Wang S, Liu X, Li H, Xu H, Ye Z. Androgen receptor splice variant 7 detected by immunohistochemical is an independent poor prognostic marker in men receiving adjuvant androgen-deprivation therapy after radical prostatectomy. Biomark Res 2021; 9:23. [PMID: 33789757 PMCID: PMC8011087 DOI: 10.1186/s40364-021-00276-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2020] [Accepted: 03/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background To evaluate the predictive value of AR-V7 expression detected by immunohistochemical (IHC) in the prognosis of prostate cancer patients receiving adjuvant hormonal therapy (AHT) following radical prostatectomy (RP). Methods We retrospectively collected data of 110 patients with prostate cancer receiving RP, followed by AHT, from Tongji hospital. IHC analysis of AR-V7 expression was performed in a retrospective cohort. Results In total, 110 patients were enrolled, of whom 21 patients (19.1%) were AR-V7-positive and 89 patients (80.9%) were AR-V7-negative. No significant differences in baseline characteristics were found between the two groups. AR-V7-positive patients had shorter progression-free survival (PFS) (HR: 4.26; 95% CI, 1.55 to 11.68; P = 0.003), shorter cancer-special survival (CSS) (HR: 22.47; 95% CI, 2.912 to 173.4; P = 0.003) and shorter overall survival (OS) (HR: 6.61; 95% CI, 1.40 to 31.20; P = 0.017) compared to AR-V7-negative patients. In multivariate analysis, AR-V7 is an independent risk factor for shorter PFS (HR, 3.76; 95% CI, 1.63 to 8.70; P = 0.002), shorter CSS (HR: 9.17; 95% CI, 1.48 to 55.56; P = 0.017) and shorter OS (HR: 4.81; 95% CI, 1.28 to 17.86; P = 0.020). Conclusion The presence of AR-V7 in prostate cancer tissue is independently associated with an unfavorable prognosis for PFS, OS and CSS in patients who received AHT. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40364-021-00276-x.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Ouyang
- Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China.,Hubei Institute of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Yucong Zhang
- Department of Geriatrics, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Gongwei Long
- Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China.,Hubei Institute of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Guoliang Sun
- Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China.,Hubei Institute of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Man Liu
- Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China.,Hubei Institute of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Fan Li
- Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China.,Hubei Institute of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Chunguang Yang
- Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China.,Hubei Institute of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Xing Zeng
- Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China.,Hubei Institute of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Jun Yang
- Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China.,Hubei Institute of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Xiao Yu
- Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China.,Hubei Institute of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Zhihua Wang
- Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China.,Hubei Institute of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Zheng Liu
- Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China.,Hubei Institute of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Wei Guan
- Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China.,Hubei Institute of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Zhiquan Hu
- Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China.,Hubei Institute of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Shaogang Wang
- Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China.,Hubei Institute of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Xiaming Liu
- Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China. .,Hubei Institute of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
| | - Heng Li
- Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China. .,Hubei Institute of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
| | - Hua Xu
- Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China.,Hubei Institute of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Zhangqun Ye
- Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China.,Hubei Institute of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Zhang Q, Huang J, Xie C, Wu T. Adjuvant Chemotherapy in High-Risk Prostate Cancer Patients after Primary Local Therapy: Recurrence, Metastasis, and Survival - A Meta-Analysis. Urol Int 2021; 105:394-401. [PMID: 33784714 DOI: 10.1159/000513941] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2020] [Accepted: 11/28/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Several randomized clinical trials (RCTs) have recently tested adjuvant chemotherapy to high-risk prostate cancer patients (PCA) after primary local therapy. OBJECTIVE The aim of the study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs evaluating the adjuvant chemotherapy in high-risk prostate cancer patients after primary local therapy. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). The secondary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS) and biochemical recurrence-free survival (BRFS). METHODS A systematic review of PubMed/Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases was performed to identify relevant studies published in English up to March 2020. Six trials were selected for inclusion. RESULTS There were 7 studies included in the present study. The meta-analysis did not show a significant OS benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with high-risk prostate cancer after primary local therapy (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.87; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.72-1.05; p = 0.15). But docetaxel in patients with high-risk prostate cancer after primary local therapy was associated with a slightly OS improvement (HR: 0.79; 95% CI, 0.63-0.98; p = 0.03). It also did not show a significant benefit in DFS and BRFS in patients with high-risk prostate cancer (HR: 0.89, 95% CI, 0.75-1.06, p = 0.18; HR: 0.85, 95% CI, 0.69-1.06, p = 0.16). CONCLUSIONS This meta-analysis shows a slightly OS benefit from docetaxel in patients with high-risk prostate cancer after primary local therapy. It did not show a significant benefit in DFS and BRFS from adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with high-risk prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qiang Zhang
- Department of Urology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China
| | - Jing Huang
- Department of Urology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China
| | - Chaofan Xie
- Department of Urology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China
| | - Tao Wu
- Department of Urology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Can local treatment prolong the sensitivity of metastatic prostate cancer to androgen deprivation or even prevent castration resistance? World J Urol 2021; 39:3231-3237. [PMID: 33502558 PMCID: PMC8510934 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-020-03568-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2020] [Accepted: 12/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose A number of observational clinical studies suggest that prior primary tumor treatment favorably influences the course of metastatic prostate cancer (PCa), but its mechanisms of action are still speculative. Here, we describe the long-lasting sensitivity to various forms of androgen deprivation in patients after radical prostatectomy (RP) for locally advanced PCa as one potential mechanism. Methods A consecutive series of 115 radical prostatectomies after inductive therapy for T4 prostate cancer was re-analyzed, and long-term survival, as well as recurrence patterns and responses to different forms of hormonal manipulation, were assessed. Results The estimated biochemical response-free, PCa-specific, and overall survival rates after 200 months were 20%, 65%, and 47% with a median overall survival of 156 months. The majority of patients, although not cured of locally advanced PCa (84/115), showed long-term survival after RP. PCa-specific and overall survival rates of these 84 patients with biochemical recurrence were 61% and 44% at 150 months. Long-term sensitivity to ADT was found to be the main reason for the favorable tumor-specific survival in spite of biochemical recurrence. Conclusions Sensitivity to primary or secondary hormonal manipulation was the main reason for the long-term survival of patients who had not been cured by surgery only. The results suggest that treatment of the primary tumor-bearing prostate delays castration-resistant PCa and enhances the effect of hormonal therapies in a previously unknown manner. The underlying cellular and molecular mechanisms need to be explored in more detailed analyses, which could profoundly impact treatment concepts of locally advanced and metastatic PCa. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00345-020-03568-3.
Collapse
|
30
|
Choi EJ, Xu P, El-Khatib FM, Huynh LM, Yafi FA. Hypogonadism and its treatment among prostate cancer survivors. Int J Impot Res 2020; 33:480-487. [PMID: 33311575 DOI: 10.1038/s41443-020-00387-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2020] [Revised: 11/12/2020] [Accepted: 11/24/2020] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
Adult-onset hypogonadism (AOH) is associated with sexual dysfunction, poor bone mineralization, decreased muscle mass, metabolic syndrome disorder, and cognitive suppression. Historically, testosterone has been contraindicated in men with a history of prostate cancer. However, there has been a modern resurgence in re-evaluating this belief. Not only can testosterone be safely utilized to alleviate AOH symptoms in prostate cancer survivors, it has been also touted as a treatment option for aggressive prostatic cancer. While much work remains in understanding the relationship between testosterone and prostate cancer, those who survive this disease should not be automatically turned away from an opportunity to be treated and restored.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward J Choi
- Department of Urology, University of California, Irvine Health, Orange, CA, USA
| | - Perry Xu
- Department of Urology, University of California, Irvine Health, Orange, CA, USA
| | - Farouk M El-Khatib
- Department of Urology, University of California, Irvine Health, Orange, CA, USA
| | - Linda M Huynh
- Department of Urology, University of California, Irvine Health, Orange, CA, USA
| | - Faysal A Yafi
- Department of Urology, University of California, Irvine Health, Orange, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
A Nationwide Persistent Underutilization of Adjuvant Radiotherapy in North American Prostate Cancer Patients. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2020; 18:489-499.e6. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2020.05.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2020] [Revised: 04/28/2020] [Accepted: 05/03/2020] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
|
32
|
Ceylan Y, Gunlusoy B, Koskderelioglu A, Gedizlioglu M, Degirmenci T. The depressive effects of androgen deprivation therapy in locally advanced or metastatic prostate cancer: a comparative study. Aging Male 2020; 23:733-739. [PMID: 30924381 DOI: 10.1080/13685538.2019.1586869] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022] Open
Abstract
AIM To investigate association of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) with depression and the effect of depression on cognitive functions in men with locally advanced or metastatic prostate cancer. METHODS A total of 144 patients were evaluated in a prospective, comparative study. Group1 consisted of 72 patients with locally advanced or metastatic prostate cancer who received complete ADT treatment continuously for 12 months and group2 (control group) consisted of 72 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy without any additional treatment. MoCA (The Montreal Cognitive Assessment) and HAM-D (Hamilton depression rating scale) tests were used to assess the effects of ADT on depression and cognitive functions. RESULTS According to post-treatment results of MoCA test, patients had lower mean total scores in both the groups. The deficits were especially prominent in the areas of language ability and short-term memory capacity. In the comparison of two groups according to HAM-D tests, the scores were significantly higher in group1 at baseline-6 month, at baseline-12 month and at 6-12 month follow-up period (p = .003, p < .001, p = .023).There was a relationship between depression and deterioration of language and memory functions at 6th (p < .001, p = .002) and 12th months (p < .001, p = .046). Attention function was deteriorated in these patients at 6th (p < .001) and 12th months (p < .001). CONCLUSIONS ADT causes increase in depression and the deterioration of cognitive functions. ADT should be given carefully to these older group of patients with concomitant morbidities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yasin Ceylan
- Urology, University of Health Sciences Izmir Bozyaka Education and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Bulent Gunlusoy
- Urology, University of Health Sciences Izmir Bozyaka Education and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Asli Koskderelioglu
- bNeurology, University of Health Sciences Izmir Bozyaka Education and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Muhtesem Gedizlioglu
- Neurology, University of Health Sciences Izmir Bozyaka Education and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Tansu Degirmenci
- Urology, University of Health Sciences Izmir Bozyaka Education and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND F-Fluciclovine is the most recent prostate cancer (PCa)-directed PET radiotracer approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for detection of recurrent PCa. We report the treatments and outcomes of patients at our institution with PCa recurrences detected on F-fluciclovine PET/CT. METHODS We identified men with recurrent PCa detected on F-fluciclovine PET/CT performed between 2017 and 2018 who were previously treated definitively and analyzed their patterns of care and cancer-specific outcomes. RESULTS We identified 28 men with recurrent PCa detected on F-fluciclovine PET/CT. Twenty-three were initially treated with surgery and 13 also received postoperative radiation therapy (RT). Five patients were initially treated with definitive radiation. After surgery, the median time to F-fluciclovine PET/CT was 67 months (median prostate-specific antigen [PSA] of 1.63 ng/mL). After RT, the median time to F-fluciclovine PET/CT was 95 months with median PSA of 13.31 ng/mL. Six men recurred locally, 9 recurred in the pelvic nodes, 9 had distant nodal recurrences, and 4 had osseous metastases. Of the patients initially treated with surgery, 4 received salvage radiation and 3 received androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Of the patients initially treated with surgery and postoperative RT, 3 received salvage pelvic nodal dissection, 4 received salvage radiation, and 2 received ADT. Of the patients initially treated with radiation, 4 received salvage ADT. All had PSA decline after salvage therapy. CONCLUSIONS F-fluciclovine PET/CT can localize PCa recurrences, and subsequent salvage therapies appear effective with decreasing PSA. Longer follow-up will reveal if these diagnostic tests and subsequent therapies will improve PCa survival.
Collapse
|
34
|
Hueting TA, Cornel EB, Korthorst RA, Pleijhuis RG, Somford DM, van Basten JPA, van der Palen JAM, Koffijberg H. Optimizing the risk threshold of lymph node involvement for performing extended pelvic lymph node dissection in prostate cancer patients: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Urol Oncol 2020; 39:72.e7-72.e14. [PMID: 33121913 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.09.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2020] [Revised: 08/24/2020] [Accepted: 09/05/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) may be omitted in prostate cancer (CaP) patients with a low predicted risk of lymph node involvement (LNI). The aim of the current study was to quantify the cost-effectiveness of using different risk thresholds for predicted LNI in CaP patients to inform decision making on omitting ePLND. METHODS Five different thresholds (2%, 5%, 10%, 20%, and 100%) used in practice for performing ePLND were compared using a decision analytic cohort model with the 100% threshold (i.e., no ePLND) as reference. Compared outcomes consisted of quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and costs. Baseline characteristics for the hypothetical cohort were based on an actual Dutch patient cohort containing 925 patients who underwent ePLND with risks of LNI predicted by the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center web-calculator. The best strategy was selected based on the incremental cost effectiveness ratio when applying a willingness to pay (WTP) threshold of €20,000 per QALY gained. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis was performed with Monte Carlo simulation to assess the robustness of the results. RESULTS Costs and health outcomes were lowest (€4,858 and 6.04 QALYs) for the 100% threshold, and highest (€10,939 and 6.21 QALYs) for the 2% threshold, respectively. The incremental cost effectiveness ratio for the 2%, 5%, 10%, and 20% threshold compared with the first threshold above (i.e., 5%, 10%, 20%, and 100%) were €189,222/QALY, €130,689/QALY, €51,920/QALY, and €23,187/QALY respectively. Applying a WTP threshold of €20.000 the probabilities for the 2%, 5%, 10%, 20%, and 100% threshold strategies being cost-effective were 0.0%, 0.3%, 4.9%, 30.3%, and 64.5% respectively. CONCLUSION Applying a WTP threshold of €20.000, completely omitting ePLND in CaP patients is cost-effective compared to other risk-based strategies. However, applying a 20% threshold for probable LNI to the Briganti 2012 nomogram or the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center web-calculator, may be a feasible alternative, in particular when higher WTP values are considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tom A Hueting
- Department of Health Technology & Services Research, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede.
| | - Erik B Cornel
- Department of urology, Ziekenhuisgroep Twente, Hengelo
| | | | - Rick G Pleijhuis
- Department of internal medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | | | | | - Job A M van der Palen
- Faculty of behavioural, management and social sciences, research methodology, measurement and data analysis, University of Twente, Enschede. Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede
| | - Hendrik Koffijberg
- Department of Health Technology & Services Research, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Radical Prostatectomy Without Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection Is Widely Practiced in High-Risk Patients Despite Poorer Survival. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2020; 18:395-401.e8. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2020.03.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2019] [Revised: 03/05/2020] [Accepted: 03/10/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|
36
|
Marvaso G, Montesano M, Corrao G, De Angelis SP, Gandini S, Mazzola GC, Augugliaro M, Franzetti J, Zerini D, Pepa M, Luzzago S, Mistretta FA, Musi G, Nolè F, De Cobelli O, Orecchia R, Jereczek-Fossa BA. Adjuvant radiotherapy in node positive prostate cancer patients: a debate still on. when, for whom? BJU Int 2020; 127:454-462. [PMID: 32969548 DOI: 10.1111/bju.15228] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the impact of adjuvant radiotherapy (aRT) in patients with prostate cancer (PCa) found to have pathological positive lymph nodes (pN1s) after radical prostatectomy (RP) and extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) with regard to distant recurrence-free survival (RFS), according to both main tumour pathological characteristics and number of positive lymph nodes. Biochemical RFS, local RFS, overall survival (OS) and acute and late toxicity were assessed as secondary endpoints. PATIENTS AND METHODS A retrospective cohort of 187 consecutive patients with pN1 PCa were treated with aRT at the IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy. aRT on the tumour bed and pelvis was administered within 6 months of RP. Androgen deprivation therapy was administered according to the guidelines. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses predicting biochemical RFS, local RFS, distant RFS and OS rates were performed to assess whether the number of pN1s represented an independent prognostic factor. The Youden index was computed to find the optimal threshold for the number of pN1s able to discriminate between patients with or without biochemical and clinical relapse. RESULTS At 5 years, local RFS, distant RFS, biochemical RFS and OS were 68%, 71%, 56% and 94%, respectively. The median follow-up was 49 months. The number of pN1s was significantly associated with biochemical RFS, local RFS and distant RFS. The best threshold for discriminating between patients with or without biochemical and clinical relapse was five pN1s. In multivariate analyses, the number of pN1s was confirmed to be an independent predictor of biochemical RFS, local RFS and distant RFS, but not of OS. Multivariate analyses also showed an increased risk of biochemical relapse for increasing values of initial prostate-specific antigen and for patients with tumour vascular invasion. Local and distant RFS were also inversely correlated with significantly reduced risk for International Society of Urological Pathology grade group <3 (group 1 or 2 compared to group 3). CONCLUSIONS Our data confirmed the encouraging outcomes of patients with pN1 PCa treated with adjuvant treatments and the key role represented by the number of pN1s in predicting biochemical RFS, clinical RFS and distant RFS. Large prospective cohort studies and randomized clinical trials are needed to confirm these results and to identify the subgroup of patients with pN1 PCa who would most benefit from aRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giulia Marvaso
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.,Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Marianna Montesano
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.,Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Giulia Corrao
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.,Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Simone P De Angelis
- Department of Experimental Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Sara Gandini
- Department of Experimental Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Giovanni C Mazzola
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.,Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Matteo Augugliaro
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Jessica Franzetti
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.,Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Dario Zerini
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Matteo Pepa
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefano Luzzago
- Department of Urology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Gennaro Musi
- Department of Urology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Franco Nolè
- Medical Division of Urogenital and Head and Neck Cancer, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Ottavio De Cobelli
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.,Department of Urology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Roberto Orecchia
- Scientific Directorate, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Barbara A Jereczek-Fossa
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.,Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Marra G, Valerio M, Heidegger I, Tsaur I, Mathieu R, Ceci F, Ploussard G, van den Bergh RCN, Kretschmer A, Thibault C, Ost P, Tilki D, Kasivisvanathan V, Moschini M, Sanchez-Salas R, Gontero P, Karnes RJ, Montorsi F, Gandaglia G. Management of Patients with Node-positive Prostate Cancer at Radical Prostatectomy and Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection: A Systematic Review. Eur Urol Oncol 2020; 3:565-581. [PMID: 32933887 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2020.08.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2020] [Revised: 07/07/2020] [Accepted: 08/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Optimal management of prostate cancer (PCa) patients with lymph node invasion at radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection still remains unclear. OBJECTIVE To assess the effectiveness of postoperative treatment strategies for pathologically node-positive PCa patients. The secondary aim was to identify the most relevant prognostic factors to guide the management of pN1 patients. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A systematic review was performed in January 2020 using Medline, Embase, and other databases. A total of 5063 articles were screened, and 26 studies including 12 537 men were selected for data synthesis and included in the current review according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) recommendations. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Ten-year biochemical recurrence (BCR)-free, clinical recurrence-free, cancer-specific (CSS), and overall (OS) survival rates ranged from 28% to 56%, 70% to 92%, 72% to 98%, and 60% to 87.6%, respectively. A total of seven, five, and six studies assessed the oncological outcomes of observation, adjuvant radiotherapy (aRT), or adjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), respectively. Initial observation followed by salvage therapies at the time of recurrence represents a safe option in selected patients with a low disease burden. The use of aRT with or without ADT might improve survival in men with locally advanced disease and a higher number of positive nodes. Risk stratification according to pathological Gleason score, number of positive nodes, pathological stage, and surgical margins status is the key to risk stratification and selection of the optimal postoperative therapy. Limitations of this systematic review are the retrospective design of the studies included and the lack of data on adverse events. CONCLUSIONS While the majority of men with pN1 disease would experience BCR after surgery, long-term disease-free survival has been reported in selected patients. Management options to improve oncological outcomes include observation versus adjuvant therapies such as aRT and/or ADT. Disease characteristics should be used to select the optimal postoperative management for pN1 PCa patients. PATIENT SUMMARY Finding node-positive prostate cancer after a radical prostatectomy often leads to high postoperative prostate-specific antigen levels and is overall a poor prognostic factor. However, this does not necessarily translate into poor survival for all men. Management can be tailored to the severity of disease and options include observation, androgen deprivation therapy, and/or radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giancarlo Marra
- Department of Urology, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
| | | | - Isabel Heidegger
- Department of Urology, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Igor Tsaur
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, Mainz University Medicine, Mainz, Germany
| | | | - Francesco Ceci
- Nuclear Medicine, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Italy
| | - Guillaume Ploussard
- Department of Urology, La Croix du Sud Hospital, Toulouse, France; Institut Universitaire du Cancer Toulouse-Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | | | | | - Constance Thibault
- Department of Oncology, Hopital Europeen Georges Pompidou, Paris, France
| | - Piet Ost
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Derya Tilki
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Urology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Veeru Kasivisvanathan
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK; Department of Urology, University College London Hospital, London, UK
| | - Marco Moschini
- Department of Urology, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France
| | | | - Paolo Gontero
- Department of Urology, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | | | - Francesco Montorsi
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Giorgio Gandaglia
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Park JW, Choi YD. The Relationships between Survivals and Early Salvage Androgen Deprivation Therapy for Non-Organ Confined Prostate Cancer after Radical Prostatectomy. Chonnam Med J 2020; 56:115-120. [PMID: 32509558 PMCID: PMC7250674 DOI: 10.4068/cmj.2020.56.2.115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2020] [Revised: 04/23/2020] [Accepted: 04/24/2020] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is one salvage treatment used when prostate-specific antigen (PSA) recurs after radical prostatectomy (RP), especially in high-risk prostate cancer (PC) patients. However, the optimal timing for salvage ADT (SADT) is still unclear. In this study, we analyzed the efficacy of early SADT for non-organ confined PC. We investigated pathologically confirmed, non-organ confined PC patients who received SADT for PSA recurrence after RP. Patients with distant metastasis, those with lymph node involvement confirmed by lymph node dissection, and those who received neo-adjuvant or adjuvant therapy were excluded. Early SADT was defined as ADT initiated before PSA levels reached 0.5 ng/ml from the nadir PSA level after RP. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses were performed for distant metastasis-free, PC-specific, and overall survival. Data from 345 patients were analyzed. The median follow-up duration was 82 months. The median PSA level was 10.9 ng/ml. Patients with T3b or T4 stage cancers represented 24.9% of the cohort; those with a Gleason score ≥9 represented 15.1%. The 10-year distant metastasis-free survival, PC-specific survival and overall survival were 87.1%, 92.0%, 80.9%, respectively. In univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses, SADT that was initiated when PSA levels were less than 0.5 ng/mL was significantly associated with improved distant metastasis-free survival, PC-specific survival, and overall survival in non-organ confined PC. Early SADT initiated in patients with PSA levels <0.5 ng/mL was associated with increased distant metastasis-free survival, PC-specific survival, and overall survival in non-organ confined PC after RP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jae Won Park
- Department of Urology, Urological Science Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.,Department of Urology, National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, Korea
| | - Young Deuk Choi
- Department of Urology, Urological Science Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
McKay RR, Feng FY, Wang AY, Wallis CJD, Moses KA. Recent Advances in the Management of High-Risk Localized Prostate Cancer: Local Therapy, Systemic Therapy, and Biomarkers to Guide Treatment Decisions. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2020; 40:1-12. [PMID: 32412803 PMCID: PMC10182417 DOI: 10.1200/edbk_279459] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/29/2023]
Abstract
High-risk prostate cancer accounts for approximately 15% of all prostate cancer diagnoses. Patients with high-risk disease have an increased risk of developing biochemical recurrence, metastases, and death from prostate cancer. As the optimal management of high-risk disease in patients with prostate cancer continues to evolve, the contemporary treatment paradigm is moving toward a multidisciplinary integrated approach of systemic and local therapy for patients with high-risk disease. The strategies for definitive, adjuvant, and salvage local treatment, including radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy, serve as the backbone of therapy for patients with localized disease. Systemic therapy decisions regarding use in combination with surgery, choice of therapy (hormone therapy, chemotherapy), and treatment duration continue to be refined. As more effective hormonal agents populate the treatment landscape for advanced prostate cancer, including abiraterone and next-generation antiandrogens, an opportunity is provided to explore these treatments in patients with localized disease in the hope of improving the long-term outcome for patients. Integration of innovative blood and tissue-based biomarkers to guide therapy selection for patients with high-risk disease is an area of active research. Contemporary studies are using such biomarkers to stratify patients and select therapies. In this review, we summarize contemporary evidence for local treatment strategies, systemic therapy options, and biomarkers in development for the management of high-risk prostate cancer in patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rana R McKay
- University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA
| | - Felix Y Feng
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Alice Y Wang
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Lin DW, Shih MC, Aronson W, Basler J, Beer TM, Brophy M, Cooperberg M, Garzotto M, Kelly WK, Lee K, McGuire V, Wang Y, Lu Y, Markle V, Nseyo U, Ringer R, Savage SJ, Sinnott P, Uchio E, Yang CC, Montgomery RB. Veterans Affairs Cooperative Studies Program Study #553: Chemotherapy After Prostatectomy for High-risk Prostate Carcinoma: A Phase III Randomized Study. Eur Urol 2020; 77:563-572. [DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.12.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2019] [Accepted: 12/26/2019] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
41
|
Guo L, Zhu Z, Zhang X. Adding radiotherapy to androgen deprivation therapy in men with node-positive prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy: A meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2020; 99:e19153. [PMID: 32150055 PMCID: PMC7478562 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000019153] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Several studies have tested the addition of adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in node-positive prostate cancer (PCa) after radical prostatectomy (RP). This meta-analysis aims to assess the effects of adding RT to ADT in the treatment of PCa patients with lymph node invasion. METHODS We systematically searched PubMed and Embase through June 2018 for human studies comparing RT plus ADT versus ADT in men with node-positive PCa after RP. The primary end point was overall survival (OS). Secondary end point was cancer-specific survival (CSS). Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the effects of RT plus ADT on OS and CSS were combined across studies using meta-analysis. RESULTS Five studies were selected for inclusion. Overall, 15,524 patients were enrolled in the 5 studies. This included 6309 (40.6%) patients receiving ADT, 4389 (28.3%) patients receiving adjuvant RT plus ADT, and 4826 (31.1%) patients receiving observation. In lymph node-positive PCa patients, the addition of adjuvant RT was associated with improved OS (HR: 0.74; 95% CI, 0.59-0.92; P = .008). Moreover, the addition of adjuvant RT was also associated with a dramatic CSS improvement (HR: 0.40; 95% CI, 0.27-0.59; P = .000). CONCLUSIONS Adding RT to ADT may be a clinically effective treatment option for men with lymph node-positive PCa after RP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lijuan Guo
- Department of Disease Prevention and Control
| | - Zhaowei Zhu
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, PR China
| | - Xuepei Zhang
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, PR China
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Videourology Abstracts. J Endourol 2020. [DOI: 10.1089/end.2020.29074.vid] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
43
|
Inoue S, Hayashi T, Teishima J, Matsubara A. Prevalence of hand joint symptoms in androgen deprivation therapy among japanese patients with prostate cancer. UROLOGICAL SCIENCE 2020. [DOI: 10.4103/uros.uros_41_19] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
|
44
|
George G, Garmo H, Rudman S, Holmberg L, Robinson D, Stattin P, Adolfsson J, Van Hemelrijck M. Long-term adherence to GnRH agonists in men with prostate cancer. A nation-wide population-based study in prostate cancer data base Sweden. Scand J Urol 2019; 54:20-26. [PMID: 31842658 DOI: 10.1080/21681805.2019.1702093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
Aim: Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists are used to treat men with prostate cancer (PCa). To date, no study has fully assessed patterns of adherence to GnRH agonists. We investigated patterns of adherence to GnRH agonists using data from Prostate Cancer data Base Sweden (PCBaSe).Methods: PCBaSe links the National Prostate Cancer Register (NPCR) Sweden to other healthcare registers and demographic databases. Men on primary or secondary GnRH agonists between 2006-2013 entered the study 45 days after GnRH agonists' initiation (run-in period) and exited at 3 years. Medication possession ratio quantified adherents (≥80%). Multivariable logistic regression models included age, injection interval, PCa risk categories, Charlson Comorbidity Index, prior PCa treatment, civil status and year of GnRH initiation. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) expressed odds of adherence.Results: Men on primary GnRH agonists (n = 8,105) were more adherent with increasing age (75-84 years compared to ≤65 years OR: 1.49; 95% CI: 1.23-1.81), longer injection intervals (365 days compared to 90 days OR: 3.29; 95% CI: 2.52-4.30) and higher PCa risk categories at diagnosis (distant metastasis compared to low risk PCa OR: 3.56; 95% CI: 2.54-5.00). Men on secondary GnRH agonists (n = 4,738) were more adherent with increasing age (≥85 years compared to ≤65 years OR: 1.65; 95% CI: 1.23-2.22) and prior PCa treatment (anti-androgens compared to deferred treatment OR: 1.50; 95% CI: 1.23-1.82), (radiotherapy compared to deferred treatment OR: 1.35; 95% CI: 1.11-1.64).Conclusions: Longer injection intervals could be addressed in the clinical setting to improve adherence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gincy George
- Translational Oncology and Urology Research, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Hans Garmo
- Translational Oncology and Urology Research, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Sarah Rudman
- Medical Oncology, Guy's and St Thomas' Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Lars Holmberg
- Translational Oncology and Urology Research, King's College London, London, UK.,Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - David Robinson
- Department of Urology, Ryhov Hospital, Jönköping, Sweden
| | - Pär Stattin
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Jan Adolfsson
- Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Plummer C, Steingart RM, Jurczak W, Iakobishvili Z, Lyon AR, Plastaras JP, Minotti G. Treatment specific toxicities: Hormones, antihormones, radiation therapy. Semin Oncol 2019; 46:414-420. [PMID: 31784040 DOI: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2019.01.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2019] [Accepted: 01/23/2019] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Session IV of the Second International Colloquium on Cardio-Oncology held in Kraków, focused on the cardiovascular risks of using hormone replacement therapy in breast cancer and androgen deprivation therapy in prostate cancer and continued the theme from Session 3 with a discussion of risk reduction strategies. The discussion then moved to an overview of modern radiation therapy and evolving mechanisms of cardioprotection. The risks and late cardiotoxic effects that must be considered in patients treated prior to the "modern era" were enumerated stressing the importance of long term follow-up of this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Richard M Steingart
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY
| | - Wojcech Jurczak
- Department of Haematology, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland
| | | | - Alex R Lyon
- Cardio-Oncology Service, Royal Brompton Hospital, and National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - John P Plastaras
- Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Giorgio Minotti
- University Campus Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo 21,00128 Rome, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Duquesne I, Champy C, Klap J, Chahwan C, Vordos D, de la Taille A, Salomon L. [When to introduce hormone therapy after total prostatectomy with positive lymph nodes? Study of the factors influencing the time of introduction of hormone therapy]. Prog Urol 2019; 29:981-988. [PMID: 31735682 DOI: 10.1016/j.purol.2019.09.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2019] [Revised: 09/26/2019] [Accepted: 09/28/2019] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Adjuvant hormone therapy is the standard treatment after total prostatectomy with positive lymph node. However, this treatment has side effects and at the time of the PSA era and extensive lymph node dissection, this principle is questioned. The aim of this study is to describe the oncological characteristics of patients that may explain the delay in introducing hormone therapy in patients with positive lymph node. METHODS Monocentric, retrospective study of 161 patients from November 1988 to February 2018 in a single French University Hospital, having undergone radical prostatectomy with positive lymph nodes on pathology. For each patient, preoperative data (age, clinical stage, biopsy results, d'Amico classification) and postoperative data (pathological results, number of lymph nodes removed, number of positive lympnodes, recurrence free survival, specific survival and overall survival) were collected. The date of introduction of hormone therapy was noted and survival without hormonal therapy was established according to the Kaplan Meier curve. The pre- and post-operative oncological factors that could influence hormone therapy introduction were investigated with Chi2 and Student tests (statistically significant when P<0.05). RESULTS The mean number of lymph nodes removed was 12 [1-40]. The mean number of positive lymph nodes was 2.5 [1-24], the mean percentage of positive lymph nodes was 25% (2.5-100). After a mean follow-up of 95 months (3-354), 88 patients (54.6%) had no hormonal treatment. The average time to hormonal treatment was 40 months [0-310]. At 3 years, survival without hormone therapy was 52% and 51% at 5 years. Only the percentage of positive lymphnodes appeared to be a significant predictor of the introduction of hormone therapy. (29.32% vs. 21.99%, P=0.047). Hormone-free survival was significantly higher in patients with lymph node involvement less than 25% (P<0.0001) or with less than 2 positive lymph nodes (P=0.0294). CONCLUSION Lymph node invasion is a factor of poor prognosis after total prostatectomy and leads to introduce hormone therapy. Our study identified the percentage and number of positive lymph nodes as factors that identify patients who may be delayed in introducing this hormone therapy. LEVEL OF PROOF 3.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I Duquesne
- Service d'urologie, CHU Henri-Mondor, 51, avenue du Maréchal-de-Lattre-de-Tassigny, 94010 Créteil, France.
| | - C Champy
- Service d'urologie, CHU Henri-Mondor, 51, avenue du Maréchal-de-Lattre-de-Tassigny, 94010 Créteil, France
| | - J Klap
- Service d'urologie, CHU Henri-Mondor, 51, avenue du Maréchal-de-Lattre-de-Tassigny, 94010 Créteil, France
| | - C Chahwan
- Service d'urologie, CHU Henri-Mondor, 51, avenue du Maréchal-de-Lattre-de-Tassigny, 94010 Créteil, France
| | - D Vordos
- Service d'urologie, CHU Henri-Mondor, 51, avenue du Maréchal-de-Lattre-de-Tassigny, 94010 Créteil, France
| | - A de la Taille
- Service d'urologie, CHU Henri-Mondor, 51, avenue du Maréchal-de-Lattre-de-Tassigny, 94010 Créteil, France
| | - L Salomon
- Service d'urologie, CHU Henri-Mondor, 51, avenue du Maréchal-de-Lattre-de-Tassigny, 94010 Créteil, France
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Lieng H, Kneebone A, Hayden AJ, Christie DR, Davis BJ, Eade TN, Emmett L, Holt T, Hruby G, Pryor D, Sidhom M, Skala M, Yaxley J, Shakespeare TP. Radiotherapy for node-positive prostate cancer: 2019 Recommendations of the Australian and New Zealand Radiation Oncology Genito-Urinary group. Radiother Oncol 2019; 140:68-75. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2019.05.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2019] [Revised: 05/11/2019] [Accepted: 05/13/2019] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
|
48
|
Bravi CA, Tin A, Vertosick E, Mazzone E, Bandini M, Dell'Oglio P, Stabile A, Gandaglia G, Fossati N, Sjoberg D, Touijer K, Cozzarini C, Briganti A, Montorsi F, Eastham J, Vickers A. Androgen deprivation therapy in men with node-positive prostate cancer treated with postoperative radiotherapy. Urol Oncol 2019; 38:204-209. [PMID: 31653565 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2019.09.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2019] [Revised: 09/19/2019] [Accepted: 09/22/2019] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In men with node-positive prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy there are limited data on the value of adding androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) to postoperative radiotherapy. OBJECTIVE To determine whether there is a clear oncologic benefit to ADT in the setting of node-positive prostate cancer treated with postoperative radiotherapy. METHODS We analyzed data for 372 prostate cancer patients treated at San Raffaele Hospital with postoperative radiotherapy for node-positive disease after radical prostatectomy, 272 received both ADT and radiotherapy. Eighty-six men were followed without an event for more than 10 years. RESULTS Patients who received postoperative radiotherapy + ADT had more aggressive disease, with higher preoperative PSA level, higher rate of ISUP grade 5, pT3b-T4 tumors and ≥3 positive nodes. At multivariable Cox regression, the comparison between men treated by postoperative radiotherapy + ADT vs. radiotherapy alone did not show a significant difference for overall (hazards ratio: 0.91; 95% confidence interval: 0.45, 1.84; P = 0.8) and cancer-specific survival (hazards ratio: 5.39; 95% confidence intervalI: 0.70, 41.39; P = 0.11). These results remained consistent in a number of sensitivity analyses, including propensity score matching. Consideration of 95% CIs suggests that a clinically significant benefit of ADT in node-positive patients receiving radiotherapy after surgery is unlikely. CONCLUSIONS We can exclude the sort of large survival benefit that would be required to justify the risks and toxicities of ADT in men with node-positive disease receiving postoperative radiotherapy. Awaiting larger and more powered studies on this topic, men with pN+ prostate cancer treated with postoperative radiotherapy should not receive ADT outside well-controlled clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlo Andrea Bravi
- Division of Oncology, Unit of Urology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy; Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
| | - Amy Tin
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Emily Vertosick
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Elio Mazzone
- Division of Oncology, Unit of Urology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Bandini
- Division of Oncology, Unit of Urology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Paolo Dell'Oglio
- Division of Oncology, Unit of Urology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Armando Stabile
- Division of Oncology, Unit of Urology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Giorgio Gandaglia
- Division of Oncology, Unit of Urology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Nicola Fossati
- Division of Oncology, Unit of Urology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Daniel Sjoberg
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Karim Touijer
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Cesare Cozzarini
- Department of Radiotherapy, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Division of Oncology, Unit of Urology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Division of Oncology, Unit of Urology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - James Eastham
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Andrew Vickers
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Unger JM, Nghiem VT, Hershman DL, Vaidya R, LeBlanc M, Blanke CD. Association of National Cancer Institute-Sponsored Clinical Trial Network Group Studies With Guideline Care and New Drug Indications. JAMA Netw Open 2019; 2:e1910593. [PMID: 31483471 PMCID: PMC6727679 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.10593] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2019] [Accepted: 07/14/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Importance National Cancer Institute Clinical Trial Network (NCTN) groups serve a vital role in identifying effective new antineoplastic regimens. However, the downstream clinical effect of their trials has not been systematically examined. Objective To examine the association of NCTN trials with guideline care and new drug indications. Design, Setting, and Participants This retrospective cohort study evaluated phase 3 SWOG Cancer Research Network clinical trials from January 1, 1980, through June 30, 2017. Only completed trials with published results were included. To be considered practice influential (PI), a trial must have been associated with guideline care through its inclusion in National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) clinical guidelines or US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) new drug approvals in favor of a recommended treatment. Data were analyzed from June 15, 2018, through March 29, 2019. Main Outcomes and Measures Estimated overall rate of PI trials, as well as trends over time. The total federal investment supporting the set of trials was also determined. Results In total, 182 trials consisting of 148 028 patients were studied. Eighty-two studies (45.1%; 95% CI, 37.7%-52.6%) were PI, of which 70 (38.5%) influenced NCCN guidelines, 6 (3.3%) influenced FDA new drug approvals, and 6 (3.3%) influenced both. The number of PI trials was 47 of 65 (72.3%) among those with positive findings and 35 of 117 (29.9%) among those with negative findings. Thus, 35 of 82 PI trials (42.7%) were based on studies with negative findings, with nearly half of these studies (17 of 35 [48.6%]) reaffirming standard of care compared with experimental therapy. The total federal investment spent in conducting the trials was $1.36 billion (2017 US dollars), a rate of $7.5 million per study or $16.6 million per PI trial. Conclusions and Relevance Nearly half of all phase 3 trials by one of the NCTN's largest groups were associated with guideline care or new drug indications, including those with positive and negative findings. Compared with the costs of a new drug approval in pharmaceutical companies, typically estimated at more than $1 billion, the amount of federal funds invested to provide this valuable evidence was modest. These results suggest that the NCTN program contributes clinically meaningful, cost-efficient evidence to guide patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph M. Unger
- SWOG Statistics and Data Management Center, Seattle, Washington
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Van T. Nghiem
- SWOG Statistics and Data Management Center, Seattle, Washington
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Dawn L. Hershman
- Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Riha Vaidya
- SWOG Statistics and Data Management Center, Seattle, Washington
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Michael LeBlanc
- SWOG Statistics and Data Management Center, Seattle, Washington
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Charles D. Blanke
- SWOG Group Chair’s Office, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Abstract
The field of prostate cancer has been the subject of extensive research that has resulted in important discoveries and shaped our appreciation of this disease and its management. Advances in our understanding of the epidemiology, natural history, anatomy, detection, diagnosis, grading, staging, imaging, and management of prostate cancer have changed clinical practice and influenced guideline recommendations. The development of the Gleason score and subsequent modifications enabled accurate prediction of prognosis. Increased anatomical understanding and improved surgical techniques resulted in the development of nerve-sparing surgery for radical prostatectomy. The advent of active surveillance has changed the management of low-risk disease, and chemotherapy and hormonal therapy have improved the outcomes of patients with distant disease. Ongoing research and clinical trials are expected to yield more practice-changing results in the near future.
Collapse
|