A trial of contraceptive methods in women with systemic lupus erythematosus

The impact of hormones in autoimmune cutaneous diseases

INTRODUCTION

Dermatomyositis, systemic and cutaneous lupus erythematosus have a significantly higher prevalence in women than men, emphasizing the relevance of exploring the relationship between sex hormones and autoimmune skin diseases. This review analyzes the interplay between sex hormones and these two skin diseases.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed an extensive literature search using the PubMed database from July to August 2023. Search terms included 'contraceptives', 'pregnancy', 'hormone replacement', 'tamoxifen', and 'aromatase inhibitors'.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

This comprehensive literature review shows that there remains considerable debate regarding the use of hormonal contraceptives and hormonal replacement therapy in individuals with autoimmune skin conditions. Nonetheless, it is well established that their use is contraindicated in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome or when antiphospholipid antibodies are positive. Individuals experiencing disease flares and uncontrolled symptoms should also avoid these interventions. Pregnancy planning should be timed to coincide with well-managed disease states to minimize obstetric and neonatal complications. Hormonal breast cancer treatment requires close skin monitoring.

CONCLUSION

Pregnancy, menopause, contraceptive use, hormone replacement therapy, and breast cancer treatment drugs result in substantial shifts in hormone levels. Additionally, hormone levels are altered by aromatase inhibitors and anti-estrogen medications. These fluctuations can modulate mechanisms influencing autoimmune skin abnormalities.

Clinical Practice Mexican Guidelines for the Treatment of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: 2024 Update

Herein we present the update for the Mexican Guidelines for the Treatment of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. It involves the participation of several experts along the country, following the GRADE system. We included aspects regarding vaccines, pregnancy and cardiovascular risk which were not presented in the previous guidelines in 2017.

Contraceptive Care in the Rheumatic Diseases: A Review

ABSTRACT

Contraception can help individuals with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs) to avoid undesired pregnancies and improve reproductive outcomes. Despite the importance of contraception in the care of females with RMDs, evidence suggests that many of these individuals do not receive consistent or disease-specific counseling regarding contraceptive options. This includes female patients receiving teratogenic prescriptions as part of the management of their RMDs, or who have severe disease activity that might culminate in adverse pregnancy and perinatal outcomes. Contraceptive counseling can help females with RMDs who wish to prevent pregnancy to select a contraceptive method that is best for them.We conducted a narrative review of the primary literature addressing reversible, prescription-based contraception for females with RMDs, framed by published guidelines on contraceptive safety. Many safe and effective contraceptive options are available for females with RMDs. Special considerations must be given to individuals with systemic lupus erythematosus, whose disease activity may be exacerbated by exogenous estrogen. Females with positive antiphospholipid antibodies should avoid estrogen-containing contraception due to an unacceptable risk of thrombosis and should conditionally avoid depot medroxyprogesterone acetate, which appears to have a prothrombotic signature. Limited contraceptive options are available to male patients. Contraceptive care for adolescents with RMDs can be extrapolated from guidelines written for adult patients, with the additional consideration of barrier protection for individuals at risk for sexually transmitted infections. Future research is needed to assess the effects of contraception use on rheumatic disease activity and side effects.

Sex difference in human diseases: mechanistic insights and clinical implications

Sex characteristics exhibit significant disparities in various human diseases, including prevalent cardiovascular diseases, cancers, metabolic disorders, autoimmune diseases, and neurodegenerative diseases. Risk profiles and pathological manifestations of these diseases exhibit notable variations between sexes. The underlying reasons for these sex disparities encompass multifactorial elements, such as physiology, genetics, and environment. Recent studies have shown that human body systems demonstrate sex-specific gene expression during critical developmental stages and gene editing processes. These genes, differentially expressed based on different sex, may be regulated by androgen or estrogen-responsive elements, thereby influencing the incidence and presentation of cardiovascular, oncological, metabolic, immune, and neurological diseases across sexes. However, despite the existence of sex differences in patients with human diseases, treatment guidelines predominantly rely on male data due to the underrepresentation of women in clinical trials. At present, there exists a substantial knowledge gap concerning sex-specific mechanisms and clinical treatments for diverse diseases. Therefore, this review aims to elucidate the advances of sex differences on human diseases by examining epidemiological factors, pathogenesis, and innovative progress of clinical treatments in accordance with the distinctive risk characteristics of each disease and provide a new theoretical and practical basis for further optimizing individualized treatment and improving patient prognosis.

Alignment of contraception use with the ACR reproductive health guidelines in women with systemic lupus erythematosus within the RISE registry

OBJECTIVES

Contraception is crucial for safely timing pregnancies in patients with SLE. This study investigated predictors of contraception documentation in patients with SLE, and the alignment of contraception practices with the 2020 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) guidelines, within the Rheumatology Informatics System for Effectiveness (RISE) registry.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Female patients (aged 18-44 years) with SLE were identified via International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-9/ICD-10 coding within the RISE registry, which includes data from rheumatology clinics across the USA. Eligible patients were required to have ≥1 clinical visit in 2019 (prepandemic) or between 1 April 2020 and 30 March 2021 (mid-pandemic). Adjusted multilevel logistic modelling assessed patient, provider and practice characteristics for associations with contraception documentation. Contraception patterns were identified and compared with the 2020 ACR guidelines.

RESULTS

Contraception documentation rates were similar in the prepandemic and mid-pandemic groups (8.1% and 8.5%, respectively). Higher documentation rates were found in women who were younger, White, and had more visits, as well as those seen within a health system, by a female provider, and within specific regions and electronic health record (EHR) systems. Prescription of a teratogenic medication did not influence contraception documentation or type. Oestrogen-containing contraceptives were prescribed less often to women at high risk for thrombosis (26.2% with thrombotic risk vs 60.6% without, p<0.0001) and history of lupus nephritis (LN) (53.8% with history of LN vs 63.2% without, p=0.024).

CONCLUSIONS

Practices participating in the RISE registry do not currently record contraception in the large majority of women with SLE, although increased documentation in some EHRs suggests that system changes may improve rates of documentation. Women at higher risk for thrombosis were less likely to receive oestrogen, suggesting that warnings against oestrogen use has impacted contraception prescription, although the limited documentation and limited contraception among women taking teratogenic medications suggest a high unmet need.

U.S. Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use, 2024

The 2024 U.S. Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use (U.S. MEC) comprises recommendations for the use of specific contraceptive methods by persons who have certain characteristics or medical conditions. These recommendations for health care providers were updated by CDC after review of the scientific evidence and a meeting with national experts in Atlanta, Georgia, during January 25-27, 2023. The information in this report replaces the 2016 U.S. MEC (CDC. U.S. Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use, 2016. MMWR 2016:65[No. RR-3]:1-103). Notable updates include 1) the addition of recommendations for persons with chronic kidney disease; 2) revisions to the recommendations for persons with certain characteristics or medical conditions (i.e., breastfeeding, postpartum, postabortion, obesity, surgery, deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism with or without anticoagulant therapy, thrombophilia, superficial venous thrombosis, valvular heart disease, peripartum cardiomyopathy, systemic lupus erythematosus, high risk for HIV infection, cirrhosis, liver tumor, sickle cell disease, solid organ transplantation, and drug interactions with antiretrovirals used for prevention or treatment of HIV infection); and 3) inclusion of new contraceptive methods, including new doses or formulations of combined oral contraceptives, contraceptive patches, vaginal rings, progestin-only pills, levonorgestrel intrauterine devices, and vaginal pH modulator. The recommendations in this report are intended to serve as a source of evidence-based clinical practice guidance for health care providers. The goals of these recommendations are to remove unnecessary medical barriers to accessing and using contraception and to support the provision of person-centered contraceptive counseling and services in a noncoercive manner. Health care providers should always consider the individual clinical circumstances of each person seeking contraceptive services. This report is not intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice for individual patients; when needed, patients should seek advice from their health care providers about contraceptive use.

When is the right time to change therapy? An observational study of the time to response to immunosuppressive drugs in systemic lupus erythematosus

OBJECTIVES

To analyse the response to immunosuppressants (IS) in extrarenal flares of SLE to determine the most appropriate timing during follow-up for a change in therapeutic strategy.

METHODS

Observational cohort study including a total of 81 patients with SLE with extrarenal flares requiring a change in IS over the period 2015-2022. Baseline clinical variables were described, and follow-up data at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months time-points were collected.

RESULTS

Among patients flaring that achieved lupus low disease activity state (LLDAS5) at 12 months of follow-up, we identified two subgroups ('late responders' and 'early responders'), which showed no significant differences in demographic characteristics, baseline clinical data, cumulative dosage of glucocorticoids or type of IS. Cox model analysis revealed a significant association of a change in IS (p=0.019) and achieving LLDAS5. Contingency table analysis indicated a significant relationship (p=0.004) between IS change at 6 months and individuals achieving LLDAS5 and remission at 12 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that clinical improvement of extrarenal flares typically occurs within 6 months of initiating IS. This timeframe could represent an appropriate timing to evaluate the response in a treat-to-target approach in SLE.

Modern Management of Pregnancy in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: From Prenatal Counseling to Postpartum Support

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune disease that predominantly affects women of childbearing age. Pregnancy in SLE patients poses unique challenges due to the potential impact on maternal and fetal outcomes. We provide an overview of the management of SLE during pregnancy, including preconception risk stratification and counseling, treatment, and disease activity monitoring. These assessments are critical to minimize maternal and fetal adverse events in pregnant patients with SLE. Disease flares, preeclampsia, antiphospholipid syndrome complications, and maternal mortality are the major risks for a woman with SLE during gestation. Timely treatment of SLE relapse, differentiation of preeclampsia from lupus nephritis, and tailored management for antiphospholipid syndrome are essential for a successful pregnancy. Fetal outcomes include neonatal lupus (NL), preterm birth, cesarean delivery, fetal growth restriction (FGR), and small-for-gestational-age (SGA) infants. We focused on NL, linked to maternal anti-Ro/SS-A and anti-La/SS-B antibodies, which can lead to various manifestations, particularly cardiac abnormalities, in newborns. While there is a common consensus regarding the preventive effect of hydroxychloroquine, the role of echocardiographic monitoring and fluorinated steroid treatment is still debated. Finally, close postpartum monitoring and counseling for subsequent pregnancies are crucial aspects of care.

Issues with pregnancy in systemic lupus

Systemic lupus erythematosus is a disease that affects a large number of young women of childbearing age. Today, pregnancy is considered safe in almost all women with lupus, especially when the disease is under control. However, pregnancies in this population have a higher risk of maternal complications than in the general population. It is therefore important to plan pregnancies as effectively as possible, using effective contraception and pre-pregnancy counselling. In fact, effective, well-tolerated contraception is essential for patients for whom pregnancy cannot be safely envisaged, particularly in the setting of teratogenic treatment or significant disease activity. Preconception counselling is essential and helps to anticipate several aspects of a future pregnancy. Several recent prospective studies have clearly identified risk factors for obstetric complications and disease flare. High level of lupus activity, low complement, primigravida and a history of lupus nephritis are predictive factors of disease flare when antiphospholipid syndrome or antiphospholipid antibodies (specifically for lupus anticoagulant), damage, activity of lupus are predictive for obstetric events. Appropriate therapeutic management is essential, based primarily on the continuation of hydroxychloroquine, although some recent warnings about its use in pregnancy have been discussed controversially. Corticosteroid therapy can be continued at the lowest possible dose, as can certain immunosuppressive drugs. In the case of a history of lupus nephritis, low-dose aspirin is also prescribed. Although still exceptional, the risk of neonatal lupus is also higher, in patients with anti-SSA and anti-SSB antibodies. The aim of this review is to summarise the risk factors for adverse obstetric outcomes and to improve medical and obstetric management in this population of pregnant women with lupus.

Which extra-renal flare is 'difficult to treat' in systemic lupus erythematosus? A one-year longitudinal study comparing traditional and machine learning approaches

OBJECTIVES

To describe phenotypes and outcomes of extra-renal flares in SLE, to identify clusters of extra-renal flares based on baseline features, and to develop a machine learning (ML) tool capable of predicting 'difficult to treat' (D2T) flares.

METHODS

Extra-renal flares that occurred in our cohort over the last five years with at least one year of follow-up were included. Baseline clinical variables were described and flares assigned to clusters. Attainment of remission and low disease activity state (LLDAS) at 12 months were compared. Flares were then considered 'D2T' in case of non-attainment of LLDAS at 6 and 12 months. Baseline features were used to train a ML model able to predict future D2T-flares, at admission. Traditional approaches were then compared with informatic techniques.

RESULTS

Among 420 SLE patients of the cohort, 114 flares occurred between 2015 and 2021; 79 extra-renal flares, predominantly mucocutaneous (24.1%) and musculoskeletal (45.6%), were considered. After 12 months, 79.4% and 49.4% were in LLDAS and in remission, respectively, while 17 flares were classified as D2T (21.5%); D2T flares received a higher cumulative and daily dose of glucocorticoids. Among the clusters, cluster 'D' (mild-moderate flares with mucocutaneous manifestations in patients with history of skin involvement) was associated with the lowest rate of remission. Among clinical data, not being on LLDAS at 3 months was the unique independent predictor of D2T flares.

CONCLUSIONS

Our clusterization well separates extra-renal flares according to their baseline features and may propose a new identification standard. D2T flares, especially refractory skin manifestations, are frequent in SLE and represent an unmet need in the management of the disease as they are associated with higher glucocorticoid (GC) dosage and risk of damage accrual. Our ML model could help in the early identification of D2T flares, flagging them to elevate the attention threshold at admission.

Autoimmune Responses and Therapeutic Interventions for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Comprehensive Review

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) or Lupus is a multifactorial autoimmune disease of multiorgan malfunctioning of extremely heterogeneous and unclear etiology that affects multiple organs and physiological systems. Some racial groups and women of childbearing age are more susceptible to SLE pathogenesis. Impressive progress has been made towards a better understanding of different immune components contributing to SLE pathogenesis. Recent investigations have uncovered the detailed mechanisms of inflammatory responses and organ damage. Various environmental factors, pathogens, and toxicants, including ultraviolet light, drugs, viral pathogens, gut microbiome metabolites, and sex hormones trigger the onset of SLE pathogenesis in genetically susceptible individuals and result in the disruption of immune homeostasis of cytokines, macrophages, T cells, and B cells. Diagnosis and clinical investigations of SLE remain challenging due to its clinical heterogeneity and hitherto only a few approved antimalarials, glucocorticoids, immunosuppressants, and some nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are available for treatment. However, the adverse effects of renal and neuropsychiatric lupus and late diagnosis make therapy challenging. Additionally, SLE is also linked to an increased risk of cardiovascular diseases due to inflammatory responses and the risk of infection from immunosuppressive treatment. Due to the diversity of symptoms and treatment-resistant diseases, SLE management remains a challenging issue. Nevertheless, the use of next-generation therapeutics with stem cell and gene therapy may bring better outcomes to SLE treatment in the future. This review highlights the autoimmune responses as well as potential therapeutic interventions for SLE particularly focusing on the recent therapeutic advancements and challenges.

Treatment with a tissue-selective oestrogen complex does not affect disease pathology but reduces pre-BI cells in lupus-prone mice

OBJECTIVE

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE or lupus) is an autoimmune disease characterized by B-cell dysfunction, production of autoantibodies, and immune complex formation. Lupus is overrepresented in females, indicating that sex hormones play a role in the pathophysiology. Treatment with a tissue-selective oestrogen complex (TSEC) containing conjugated oestrogens and the selective oestrogen receptor modulator bazedoxifene (BZA) protects against postmenopausal vasomotor symptoms and osteoporosis, but its impact on organ damage in lupus is not fully understood.

METHOD

We used ovariectomized MRL/lpr mice, treated with two different physiological doses of 17β-oestradiol-3-benzoate (E2), BZA, or TSEC (E2 plus BZA), to assess early and late B-cell development and to determine histological disease manifestations in the kidneys and salivary glands.

RESULTS

TSEC treatment reduced the frequency of the pre-BI population in bone marrow to levels equivalent to treatment with physiological doses of E2 alone but did not affect any of the other examined B-cell populations. Our earlier studies indicated that TSEC treatment did not aggravate disease development in ovariectomized MRL/lpr mice, while protecting against trabecular bone loss. Here, we follow up on our previous study and show that neither ovariectomy alone nor TSEC treatment of ovariectomized MRL/lpr mice influenced perivascular lymphocyte infiltration to the kidneys or salivary glands.

CONCLUSION

TSEC does not aggravate a mouse model of lupus, when given in doses that protect against postmenopausal lupus-associated bone loss. This indicates that further investigations into TSEC as a treatment for osteoporosis or vasomotor symptoms in postmenopausal women with SLE are warranted.

A Comprehensive Literature Review on Managing Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Addressing Cardiovascular Disease Risk in Females and Its Autoimmune Disease Associations

This review aimed to evaluate the mechanism of premature cardiovascular disease (CVD) in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients, particularly in the female population, and emphasize the need for early management interventions; explore the association between SLE and two autoimmune diseases, myasthenia gravis (MG) and antiphospholipid antibody syndrome (APS), and their management strategies; and evaluate the effectiveness of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions in managing SLE, focusing on premenopausal females, females of childbearing age, and pregnant patients. We conducted a comprehensive literature review to achieve these objectives using various databases, including PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane. The collected data were analyzed and synthesized to provide an evidence-based overview of SLE, its management strategies as an independent disease, and some disease associations. The treatment should be focused on remission, preventing organ damage, and improving the overall quality of life (QOL). Extensive emphasis should also be focused on diagnosing SLE and concurrent underlying secondary diseases timely and managing them appropriately.

Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Consult Series #64: Systemic lupus erythematosus in pregnancy

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic, multisystem, inflammatory autoimmune disease characterized by relapses (commonly called "flares") and remission. Many organs may be involved, and although the manifestations are highly variable, the kidneys, joints, and skin are commonly affected. Immunologic abnormalities, including the production of antinuclear antibodies, are also characteristic of the disease. Maternal morbidity and mortality are substantially increased in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus, and an initial diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus during pregnancy is associated with increased morbidity. Common complications of systemic lupus erythematosus include nephritis, hematologic complications such as thrombocytopenia, and a variety of neurologic abnormalities. The purpose of this document is to examine potential pregnancy complications and to provide recommendations on treatment and management of systemic lupus erythematosus during pregnancy. The following are the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine recommendations: (1) we recommend low-dose aspirin beginning at 12 weeks of gestation until delivery in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus to decrease the occurrence of preeclampsia (GRADE 1B); (2) we recommend that all patients with systemic lupus erythematosus, other than those with quiescent disease, either continue or initiate hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) in pregnancy (GRADE 1B); (3) we suggest that for all other patients with quiescent disease activity who are not taking HCQ or other medications, it is reasonable to engage in shared decision-making regarding whether to initiate new therapy with this medication in consultation with the patient's rheumatologist (GRADE 2B); (4) we recommend that prolonged use (>48 hours) of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) generally be avoided during pregnancy (GRADE 1A); (5) we recommend that COX-2 inhibitors and full-dose aspirin be avoided during pregnancy (GRADE 1B); (6) we recommend discontinuing methotrexate 1-3 months and mycophenolate mofetil/mycophenolic acid at least 6 weeks before attempting pregnancy (GRADE 1A); (7) we suggest the decision to initiate, continue, or discontinue biologics in pregnancy be made in collaboration with a rheumatologist and be individualized to the patient (GRADE 2C); (8) we suggest treatment with a combination of prophylactic unfractionated or low-molecular-weight heparin and low-dose aspirin for patients without a previous thrombotic event who meet obstetrical criteria for antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) (GRADE 2B); (9) we recommend therapeutic unfractionated or low-molecular-weight heparin for patients with a history of thrombosis and antiphospholipid (aPL) antibodies (GRADE 1B); (10) we suggest treatment with low-dose aspirin alone in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and antiphospholipid antibodies without clinical events meeting criteria for antiphospholipid syndrome (GRADE 2C); (11) we recommend that steroids not be routinely used for the treatment of fetal heart block due to anti-Sjögren's-syndrome-related antigen A or B (anti-SSA/SSB) antibodies given their unproven benefit and the known risks for both the pregnant patient and fetus (GRADE 1C); (12) we recommend that serial fetal echocardiograms for assessment of the PR interval not be routinely performed in patients with anti-SSA/SSB antibodies outside of a clinical trial setting (GRADE 1B); (13) we recommend that patients with systemic lupus erythematosus undergo prepregnancy counseling with both maternal-fetal medicine and rheumatology specialists that includes a discussion regarding maternal and fetal risks (GRADE 1C); (14) we recommend that pregnancy be generally discouraged in patients with severe maternal risk, including patients with active nephritis; severe pulmonary, cardiac, renal, or neurologic disease; recent stroke; or pulmonary hypertension (GRADE 1C); (15) we recommend antenatal testing and serial growth scans in pregnant patients with systemic lupus erythematosus because of the increased risk of fetal growth restriction (FGR) and stillbirth (GRADE 1B); and (16) we recommend adherence to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (GRADE 1B).

Sex hormones affect the pathogenesis and clinical characteristics of systemic lupus erythematosus

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) affects women more frequently than men, similar to the female predilection for other autoimmune diseases. Moreover, male patients with SLE exhibit different clinical features than female patients. Sex-associated differences in SLE required special considerations for disease management such as during pregnancy or hormone replacement therapy (HRT). Sex hormones, namely, estrogen and testosterone, are known to affect immune responses and autoimmunity. While estrogen and progesterone promote type I immune response, and testosterone enhances T-helper 1 response. Sex hormones also influence Toll-like receptor pathways, and estrogen receptor signaling is involved in the activation and tolerance of immune cells. Further, the clinical features of SLE vary according to hormonal changes in female patients. Alterations in sex hormones during pregnancy can alter the disease activity of SLE, which is associated with pregnancy outcomes. Additionally, HRT may change SLE status. Sex hormones affect the pathogenesis, clinical features, and management of SLE; thus, understanding the occurrence and exacerbation of disease caused by sex hormones is necessary to improve its management.

Pregnancy in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: a systematic review

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)-a most common disorder in women of reproductive age-has been described to be associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes. Despite the increased health risks for the mother (preeclampsia, lupus flare, arterial hypertension, gestational diabetes mellitus and thrombotic risk when antiphospholipid antibodies are present) and fetus (miscarriage, stillbirth, premature birth, intrauterine growth restriction and neonatal lupus), the majority of patients can deliver healthy neonates. With appropriate management by a multidisciplinary team, composing rheumatologists, obstetricians and neonatologists, women with SLE can achieve better pregnancy outcomes by monitoring associated predictive indicators, raising major concern for severe complications and somewhat early delivery if necessary. In this review, we summarize the latest advances in secondary infertility and pregnancy-related risk perception for lupus patients, with an emphasis on the safety of biological agents (mainly belimumab and rituximab) and traditional therapeutic regimens.

The Impact of Pediatric Rheumatic Diseases on Sexual Health, Family Planning, and Pregnancy

A comprehensive review of reproductive health subtopics, including sexual intercourse, romantic relationships, contraception, sexually transmitted infections, pregnancy, and infertility, as they pertain to patients with pediatric rheumatic diseases and those who care for them.

Optimizing reproductive health management in lupus and Sjogren's syndrome

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

People with childbearing capacity who are diagnosed with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and Sjogren's syndrome (SS) have specific and important reproductive health considerations.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recommendations from the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) and the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) provide rheumatologists and other clinicians with guidance for reproductive health management of patients with rheumatic diseases. Patient-centered reproductive health counseling can help clinicians to operationalize the EULAR and ACR guidelines and enhance patient care.

SUMMARY

Disease activity monitoring, risk factor stratification, and prescription of pregnancy-compatible medications during pregnancy help to anticipate complications and enhance pregnancy outcomes in SLE and SS. Assisted reproductive technologies are also safe among people with well-controlled disease. Safe and effective contraceptive methods are available for patients with SLE and SS, and pregnancy termination appears to be safe among these patients.

Racial Differences in Contraception Encounters and Dispensing Among Female Medicaid Beneficiaries With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

OBJECTIVE

African American and Hispanic women with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) have the highest rates of potentially avoidable pregnancy complications, yet racial disparities in family planning among reproductive-age women with SLE have not been well-studied. Our objective was to examine whether there are racial differences in contraception encounters and dispensing among US Medicaid-insured women with SLE.

METHODS

Using Medicaid claims data from 2000-2010, we identified women ages 18-50 years with SLE. We examined contraception encounters and uptake over 24 months. We used multivariable logistic regression to estimate the odds ratio and 95% confidence interval by race/ethnicity of contraception encounters, any contraception dispensing, and highly effective contraception (HEC) use, adjusted for age, region, year, SLE severity, and contraindication to estrogen. We also compared contraception encounters and dispensing among women with SLE to the general population and women with diabetes mellitus.

RESULTS

We identified 24,693 reproductive-age women with SLE; 43% were African American, 35% White, 15% Hispanic, 4% Asian, 2% other race, and 1% American Indian/Alaska Native. Nine percent had a contraceptive visit, 10% received any contraception, and 2% received HEC. Compared to White women, African American and Asian women had lower odds of contraception dispensing, and African American women had lower odds of HEC use. Women with SLE were more likely to receive HEC than the general population and women with diabetes mellitus.

CONCLUSION

In this study of reproductive-age women with SLE, African American and Asian women had lower odds of contraception dispensing and African American women had lower odds of HEC use. Further study is needed to understand the factors driving these racial disparities among this population.

Guideline for the diagnosis, treatment and long-term management of cutaneous lupus erythematosus

Cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) is an inflammatory, autoimmune disease encompassing a broad spectrum of subtypes including acute, subacute, chronic and intermittent CLE. Among these, chronic CLE can be further classified into several subclasses of lupus erythematosus (LE) such as discoid LE, verrucous LE, LE profundus, chilblain LE and Blaschko linear LE. To provide all dermatologists and rheumatologists with a practical guideline for the diagnosis, treatment and long-term management of CLE, this evidence- and consensus-based guideline was developed following the checklist established by the international Reporting Items for Practice Guidelines in Healthcare (RIGHT) Working Group and was registered at the International Practice Guideline Registry Platform. With the joint efforts of the Asian Dermatological Association (ADA), the Asian Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (AADV) and the Lupus Erythematosus Research Center of Chinese Society of Dermatology (CSD), a total of 25 dermatologists, 7 rheumatologists, one research scientist on lupus and 2 methodologists, from 16 countries/regions in Asia, America and Europe, participated in the development of this guideline. All recommendations were agreed on by at least 80% of the 32 voting physicians. As a consensus, diagnosis of CLE is mainly based on the evaluation of clinical and histopathological manifestations, with an exclusion of SLE by assessment of systemic involvement. For localized CLE lesions, topical corticosteroids and topical calcineurin inhibitors are first-line treatment. For widespread or severe CLE lesions and (or) cases resistant to topical treatment, systemic treatment including antimalarials and (or) short-term corticosteroids can be added. Notably, antimalarials are the first-line systemic treatment for all types of CLE, and can also be used in pregnant patients and pediatric patients. Second-line choices include thalidomide, retinoids, dapsone and MTX, whereas MMF is third-line treatment. Finally, pulsed-dye laser or surgery can be added as fourth-line treatment for localized, refractory lesions of CCLE in cosmetically unacceptable areas, whereas belimumab may be used as fourth-line treatment for widespread CLE lesions in patients with active SLE, or recurrence of ACLE during tapering of corticosteroids. As for management of the disease, patient education and a long-term follow-up are necessary. Disease activity, damage of skin and other organs, quality of life, comorbidities and possible adverse events are suggested to be assessed in every follow-up visit, when appropriate.

Promoting safe sexual practices and sexual health maintenance in pediatric and young adult solid organ transplant recipients

The majority of Americans make their sexual debut during their adolescent years. Preventing pregnancy and STI during this period is vital to ensuring health and safety. As survival has improved after pediatric SOT, chronically immunosuppressed adolescents seek guidance in their medical home on matters of sexual health. Transplant practitioners often do not feel equipped to fully address these needs. This review serves as an introductory sexual preventive care resource for adolescent and young adult (AYA) SOT recipients. First, we review data on safety, efficacy, and use of contraceptive options currently available for transplant recipients with child-bearing potential. Then, we suggest a personalized sexual health discussion focusing on the diagnosis and prevention of STIs in adolescent and young adult transplant recipients. Finally, we present recommendations for STI screening of asymptomatic patients, use of index of suspicion and diagnostic testing in symptomatic patients, and opportunities to optimize STI prevention strategies. Data compiled from studies of adult SOT recipients, general population studies, and published guidelines are often extrapolated for use, as limited data exist in AYA SOT recipients. This informational dearth underscores the need for future research to better characterize the unique needs of AYA SOT recipients.

Contraception decision-making and care among reproductive-aged women with autoimmune diseases

OBJECTIVE

In this qualitative study, we sought to understand better the contraception-related experiences and decision-making of women with autoimmune diseases, a group at high risk for adverse pregnancy and perinatal outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted semi-structured telephone interviews with women ages 18 to 45 who had at least one autoimmune disease diagnosis. Our team recruited from outpatient rheumatology clinics in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. We analyzed our data for content and themes, using inductive and deductive techniques and the constant comparison approach.

RESULTS

The 30 women in the sample ranged from 25 to 44 years old; most were white (73%), married (52%), and had at least one child (53%). Four themes emerged from our interviews: (1) Women's decisions to use contraception were strongly influenced by their diseases and perceptions of their health; (2) Women felt that hormonal contraception was unsafe in the context of their diseases, even women without clear disease-related health risks; (3) Health care providers influenced women's consideration and selection of contraceptive methods; (4) Women rarely expected that their rheumatologists would prescribe their contraception, yet their contraception prescribers lacked knowledge about their disease-specific health risks.

CONCLUSIONS

Women perceived that hormonal contraception is unsafe in the context of their autoimmune diseases and cited medication fatigue and safety concerns as reasons why they did not use contraception. Some women did not appear to receive patient-centered contraception counseling from providers. Our interviews reveal areas for improving contraception care, including augmenting shared decision-making and educating patients and providers about contraception safety.

IMPLICATIONS

Our findings highlight potential tensions between patients' preferences for contraception, safety considerations, and ethical and medically responsible contraception care by health care providers in the rheumatology context. Future work is needed to develop person-centered, medically-appropriate models for contraception care that meet the needs of medically vulnerable populations.

Perception of contraceptive counseling and contraceptive use among systemic lupus erythematosus patients

OBJECTIVES

(1) To evaluate the perception of contraceptive counseling and knowledge regarding the impact of unintended pregnancy and (2) examine the prevalence of, and predictors for contraceptive use among systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients.

STUDY DESIGN

A cross-sectional survey was conducted at the Rheumatology Clinic of a university hospital. SLE patients who attended the clinic from April 2018 to January 2019 and at risk for unintended pregnancy and were invited to be interviewed. The structured interview guide consisted of three parts: personal and obstetric information, perception of contraceptive counseling and knowledge about the impact of unintended pregnancy, and contraceptive use.

RESULTS

The mean age of the 137 patients who gave informed consents was 34 ± 8 years, with 47 patients (34%) stating that they had received contraceptive counseling. Seventy-five patients (52%) reported practicing contraception. The intention to not become pregnant (Odds Ratio; 95% CI = 7.28; 1.75-30.27), perception of adequate contraceptive counseling (2.77; 1.06-7.20) and discussion with partners and physicians about contraception (3.95; 1.64-9.50) were predictors for contraceptive use (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Most patients reported no contraceptive counseling with approximately half of the patients using contraceptive methods within the past three months. Desire to avoid pregnancy, perception of adequate contraceptive counseling, and the influence of partners and physicians were significant predictors for contraceptive use.

IMPLICATIONS

Contraceptive counseling should be routinely included in discussions about disease processes and treatment plans, including access issues. Best practices for contraceptive counseling and integrated, multi-disciplinary team services should be developed and provided in clinical settings.

Update οn the diagnosis and management of systemic lupus erythematosus

Clinical heterogeneity, unpredictable course and flares are characteristics of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Although SLE is-by and large-a systemic disease, occasionally it can be organ-dominant, posing diagnostic challenges. To date, diagnosis of SLE remains clinical with a few cases being negative for serologic tests. Diagnostic criteria are not available and classification criteria are often used for diagnosis, yet with significant caveats. Newer sets of criteria (European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR)/American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 2019) enable earlier and more accurate classification of SLE. Several disease endotypes have been recognised over the years. There is increased recognition of milder cases at presentation, but almost half of them progress overtime to more severe disease. Approximately 70% of patients follow a relapsing-remitting course, the remaining divided equally between a prolonged remission and a persistently active disease. Treatment goals include long-term patient survival, prevention of flares and organ damage, and optimisation of health-related quality of life. For organ-threatening or life-threatening SLE, treatment usually includes an initial period of high-intensity immunosuppressive therapy to control disease activity, followed by a longer period of less intensive therapy to consolidate response and prevent relapses. Management of disease-related and treatment-related comorbidities, especially infections and atherosclerosis, is of paramount importance. New disease-modifying conventional and biologic agents-used alone, in combination or sequentially-have improved rates of achieving both short-term and long-term treatment goals, including minimisation of glucocorticoid use.

Family Planning in Liver Transplant: Patient and Provider Knowledge and Practices

Fertility is often impaired in adolescents and women with cirrhosis, but it is rapidly restored after liver transplantation (LT). Early and unplanned pregnancies confer increased risks to maternal, fetal, and graft health, underscoring the need for reproductive counseling. However, data on reproductive practices or counseling in the LT setting are limited. An anonymous online Qualtrics (Provo, UT) survey was sent to transplant patients and providers to gauge knowledge and practices surrounding contraception and pregnancy. Eligible participants included transplant patients aged 14-45 years and their transplant providers. Patient response was 50.0% (74/148), 14 of whom were pre-LT patients and 60 of whom were post-LT patients. Counseling occurred in 37% of patients prior to transplant and 82% after transplant. Most patients (86%) considered family planning a high priority in their transplant care. Contraception- and pregnancy-specific counseling was provided by LT providers in 60% and 44% of patients, respectively. The most desired mode of counseling by patients was in-person discussion with an LT provider (89%). Despite most post-LT patients receiving counseling, only 41% used contraception during the first year after LT, of whom 32% relied on high failure methods. Of the 31/43 (72.1%) provider responses, 96% voiced interest in additional reproductive education. Most providers (90%) correctly advised that patients delay pregnancy during the first year after LT, although misconceptions about safety of estrogen and intrauterine devices were selected by 53% and 42%, respectively. Some favored resources by providers were educational pamphlets in clinic (88%) and automated note templates to prompt family planning inquiry (72%). Transplant patients and providers have key deficiencies in their knowledge of contraception and corresponding practices. Most post-LT patients receive counseling, yet contraception practices are inadequate for preventing unplanned pregnancy. Discussion with transplant providers was the most favored counseling modality by patients, underscoring our critical role in optimizing post-LT reproductive care.

Update on pregnancy complications in systemic lupus erythematosus

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review summarizes recent research in the field of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and pregnancy with focus on clinical and biochemical predictors of adverse pregnancy outcomes (APOs), accumulating evidence for the safety and efficacy of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) in pregnancy, and the importance of preconception counseling.

RECENT FINDINGS

Ongoing research from PROMISSE investigators (Predictors of Pregnancy Outcome: Biomarkers in Antiphospholipid Antibody Syndrome and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus) adds to the understanding of risk factors for APOs in SLE pregnancies, including aberrant complement activation, incomplete downregulation of lupus-associated transcription factors, and lower socioeconomic status. Evidence supporting numerous advantages for continuing HCQ in pregnancy, as well as support for low-dose aspirin in preeclampsia prevention is reviewed. Practice gaps exist among rheumatologists in ensuring effective contraception when women of childbearing age are undergoing therapy with potentially fetotoxic medications. The publication of organizational guidelines provides evidence-based recommendations on lupus pregnancy management.

SUMMARY

Outcomes of lupus pregnancies continue to improve with understanding of risk factors that predict APOs as well as improvements in disease management. Rheumatologists caring for women with SLE should be familiar with the most up-to-date research in order to optimize pregnancy outcomes in this population.

Systemic lupus erythematosus in pregnancy: high risk, high reward

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The aim of this study was to describe risks of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in pregnancy and the importance of preconception counselling, medication optimization and close surveillance.

RECENT FINDINGS

Advances in care for pregnant patients with SLE have led to improved obstetric outcomes, but maternal and foetal risks continue to be elevated. Conception during periods of disease quiescence and continuation of most medications decrease adverse pregnancy outcomes. Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) appears protective against flares in pregnancy, neonatal congenital heart block and preterm birth.

SUMMARY

SLE in pregnancy confers increased maternal and foetal risks, including disease flares, preeclampsia, preterm birth, foetal growth restriction, neonatal lupus erythematosus (NLE) and congenital heart block. Disease control on an effective medication regimen mitigates many of these risks, but pregnancy in women with SLE remains a high-risk condition requiring multidisciplinary care and an individualized approach to each patient.

Contraception in chronic kidney disease: a best practice position statement by the Kidney and Pregnancy Group of the Italian Society of Nephrology

Even though fertility is reduced, conception and delivery are possible in all stages of CKD. While successful planned pregnancies are increasing, an unwanted pregnancy may have long-lasting deleterious effects, hence the importance of birth control, an issue often disregarded in clinical practice. The evidence summarized in this position statement is mainly derived from the overall population, or other patient categories, in the lack of guidelines specifically addressed to CKD. Oestroprogestagents can be used in early, non-proteinuric CKD, excluding SLE and immunologic disorders, at high risk of thromboembolism and hypertension. Conversely, progestin only is generally safe and its main side effect is intramestrual spotting. Non-medicated intrauterine devices are a good alternative; their use needs to be carefully evaluated in patients at a high risk of pelvic infection, even though the degree of risk remains controversial. Barrier methods, relatively efficacious when correctly used, have few risks, and condoms are the only contraceptives that protect against sexually transmitted diseases. Surgical sterilization is rarely used also because of the risks surgery involves; it is not definitely contraindicated, and may be considered in selected cases. Emergency contraception with high-dose progestins or intrauterine devices is not contraindicated but should be avoided whenever possible, even if far preferable to abortion. Surgical abortion is invasive, but experience with medical abortion in CKD is still limited, especially in the late stages of the disease. In summary, personalized contraception is feasible, safe and should be offered to all CKD women of childbearing age who do not want to get pregnant.

2020 American College of Rheumatology Guideline for the Management of Reproductive Health in Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Diseases

OBJECTIVE

To develop an evidence-based guideline on contraception, assisted reproductive technologies (ART), fertility preservation with gonadotoxic therapy, use of menopausal hormone replacement therapy (HRT), pregnancy assessment and management, and medication use in patients with rheumatic and musculoskeletal disease (RMD).

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of evidence relating to contraception, ART, fertility preservation, HRT, pregnancy and lactation, and medication use in RMD populations, using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology to rate the quality of evidence and a group consensus process to determine final recommendations and grade their strength (conditional or strong). Good practice statements were agreed upon when indirect evidence was sufficiently compelling that a formal vote was unnecessary.

RESULTS

This American College of Rheumatology guideline provides 12 ungraded good practice statements and 131 graded recommendations for reproductive health care in RMD patients. These recommendations are intended to guide care for all patients with RMD, except where indicated as being specific for patients with systemic lupus erythematosus, those positive for antiphospholipid antibody, and/or those positive for anti-Ro/SSA and/or anti-La/SSB antibodies. Recommendations and good practice statements support several guiding principles: use of safe and effective contraception to prevent unplanned pregnancy, pre-pregnancy counseling to encourage conception during periods of disease quiescence and while receiving pregnancy-compatible medications, and ongoing physician-patient discussion with obstetrics/gynecology collaboration for all reproductive health issues, given the overall low level of available evidence that relates specifically to RMD.

CONCLUSION

This guideline provides evidence-based recommendations developed and reviewed by panels of experts and RMD patients. Many recommendations are conditional, reflecting a lack of data or low-level data. We intend that this guideline be used to inform a shared decision-making process between patients and their physicians on issues related to reproductive health that incorporates patients' values, preferences, and comorbidities.

Sex Differences in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Epidemiology, Clinical Considerations, and Disease Pathogenesis

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic, multiorgan, systemic autoimmune disease that is more common in women than men and is typically diagnosed during reproductive age, necessitating sex-specific considerations in care. In women there is no substantive evidence to suggest that SLE reduces fertility, but subfertility may occur as a result of active disease, immunosuppressive drugs, and age-related declines in fertility related to delays in childbearing. Although pregnancy outcomes have improved, SLE still poses risks in pregnancy that contribute to poorer maternal and fetal outcomes. Cyclophosphamide, an important agent for the treatment of severe or life-threatening lupus, may adversely affect fertility, particularly with increases in dose and patient age. Fertility preservation techniques are therefore an important consideration for women and men before cytotoxic treatment. There is mixed evidence as to whether exogenous estrogen in the form of oral contraceptive pills or hormone replacement therapy may increase the risk for the development of SLE, but among women with SLE already diagnosed, combined oral contraceptive pills and hormone replacement therapy do not confer risk for severe flare and remain important in reproductive care. The higher incidence of SLE in women may nonetheless be attributable to effects of endogenous estrogen, as well as failures in X chromosome inactivation, increased Toll-like receptor gene products, and changes in microRNA function. A greater appreciation of the biological underpinnings and consequences of sex differences in SLE may lead to more targeted treatments and improved outcomes for patients with SLE.

ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 206: Use of Hormonal Contraception in Women With Coexisting Medical Conditions

Although numerous studies have addressed the safety and effectiveness of hormonal contraceptive use in healthy women, data regarding women with underlying medical conditions or other special circumstances are limited. The U.S. Medical Eligibility Criteria (USMEC) for Contraceptive Use, 2016 (), which has been endorsed by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, is a published guideline based on the best available evidence and expert opinion to help health care providers better care for women with chronic medical problems who need contraception. The goal of this Practice Bulletin is to explain how to use the USMEC rating system in clinical practice and to specifically discuss the rationale behind the ratings for various medical conditions. Contraception for women with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) (); the use of emergency contraception in women with medical coexisting medical conditions, including obesity, (); and the effect of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) on bone health () are addressed in other documents from the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.

Systemic lupus erythematosus and menopause

Estrogen has been known for a long time to be a trigger on auto-immunity and may influence the course of lupus. Women experiencing systemic lupus are at high risk for premature ovarian insufficiency if using cyclophosphamide, of osteoporosis, arterial ischemic diseases and venous thrombosis at young age. In about 30% of them, an antiphospholipid/anticoagulant antibody can occur which is associated with very high risk of thrombosis. However, the severity of the disease may vary and some women with lupus could benefit from a menopausal hormone therapy (MHT). As a consequence, management of menopause symptoms needs to evaluate carefully the condition of the patient, her lupus history and cardiovascular risk. We will describe the effect of lupus on menopause, of menopause on lupus and report in detail the literature available on MHT and the risk of lupus or the risk of flares in women with lupus. Some other options than MHT for the management of climacteric symptoms will be discussed.

Development of ReproKnow, a reproductive knowledge assessment for women with rheumatic diseases

Background

The objective of this study was to develop an assessment tool, ReproKnow, to evaluate the reproductive health knowledge of women with a wide range of rheumatic diseases.

Methods

The 10-item multiple-choice questionnaire was developed with feedback from a panel of content experts and female patients with rheumatic diseases. Construct validity using known-groups analysis was evaluated through comparison of median total ReproKnow scores between rheumatology fellows and nurses. Female patients aged 18–50 years were recruited to take ReproKnow and demographic questionnaires in two outpatient clinics. Associations between patients’ mean total knowledge scores and demographic characteristics were assessed using independent-sample t-tests. Questions were also categorized by topical area, and the percentages were calculated.

Results

The completion rate of questions in ReproKnow was 100% across all users. Median ReproKnow scores were significantly higher among rheumatology fellows than among nurses (p = 0.045). The 153 patients recruited to the study had at least one of 15 rheumatic diseases. Patients’ mean knowledge score was 5.05 (SD 2.24) out of a possible high score of 10. Patients who were younger, White, and more educated had significantly higher scores than did other patients (p’s < 0.05). Patients who bore children after their disease diagnosis had higher knowledge scores than did women whose children were born prior to their diagnosis; in contrast, women with histories of surgical sterilization or hysterectomy had lower knowledge scores than other women. Knowledge scores of women who used potentially fetotoxic medications did not vary from the remainder of the sample. Patients demonstrated gaps in knowledge about birth outcomes, contraceptive efficacy, and breastfeeding safety.

Conclusions

Initial testing of ReproKnow suggests that it may be a promising tool to assess the reproductive health knowledge of women with diverse rheumatic diseases. Specific knowledge deficits elicited from ReproKnow may be important targets for future educational interventions.

Contraception and preconception counseling in women with autoimmune disease

Appropriate contraception and preconception counseling are critical for women of reproductive age with systemic autoimmune diseases (AIDs) because clinical diagnosis, rheumatology medications, and disease activity may impact the safety or efficacy of certain contraceptives as well as the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. The presence of antiphospholipid (aPL) antibodies (anticardiolipin, anti-β2 glycoprotein I, and lupus anticoagulant) is the most important determinant of contraception choice, as women with these antibodies should not receive estrogen-containing contraceptives because of the increased risk of thrombosis. Prepregnancy counseling generally includes the assessment of preexisting disease-related organ damage, current disease activity, aPL antibodies, anti-Ro/SS-A and anti-La/SS-B antibodies, and medication safety in pregnancy. Quiescent AID for six months on pregnancy-compatible medications optimizes maternal and fetal/neonatal outcomes for most patients.

Use of combined hormonal contraceptives among women with systemic lupus erythematosus with and without medical contraindications to oestrogen

OBJECTIVES

To assess the prevalence of combined hormonal contraceptives (CHCs) in reproductive-age women with SLE with and without possible contraindications and to determine factors associated with their use in the presence of possible contraindications.

METHODS

This observational cohort study included premenopausal women ages 18-45 years enrolled in the SLICC Registry ⩽15 months after SLE onset, with annual assessments spanning 2000-2017. World Health Organization Category 3 or 4 contraindications to CHCs (e.g. hypertension, aPL) were assessed at each study visit. High disease activity (SLEDAI score >12 or use of >0.5 mg/kg/day of prednisone) was considered a relative contraindication.

RESULTS

A total of 927 SLE women contributed 6315 visits, of which 3811 (60%) occurred in the presence of one or more possible contraindication to CHCs. Women used CHCs during 512 (8%) visits, of which 281 (55%) took place in the setting of one or more possible contraindication. The most frequently observed contraindications were aPL (52%), hypertension (34%) and migraine with aura (22%). Women with one or more contraindication were slightly less likely to be taking CHCs [7% of visits (95% CI 7, 8)] than women with no contraindications [9% (95% CI 8, 10)].

CONCLUSION

CHC use was low compared with general population estimates (>35%) and more than half of CHC users had at least one possible contraindication. Many yet unmeasured factors, including patient preferences, may have contributed to these observations. Further work should also aim to clarify outcomes associated with this exposure.

Contraception in autoimmune diseases

Autoimmune diseases (AIDs) affect women and men with a 2:1 ratio, which suggests that hormonal contraceptives play a role in their clinical course. Combined oral contraceptives have complex, sometimes contradictory, effects on AIDs; they can worsen the situation in women with systemic lupus erythematosus and with anti-phospholipid syndrome, conditions in which they are contraindicated. Early studies indicated a positive effect on rheumatoid arthritis (RA), whereas more recent trials failed to do so, possibly because of the lowering of oestrogen content. Evidence of effects on multiple sclerosis (MS) is conflicting: risk may vary depending on the progestin used. Minor adverse effects may exist on inflammatory bowel diseases, and no significant effect was found on autoimmune thyroid diseases. Women can become sensitised to sex hormones. Progestin-only contraceptives may be used, although copper-releasing intra-uterine devices represent the best option. Finally, several organisations have issued guidelines for contraceptive use in women with AIDs.

Contraception for Adolescents with Medically Complex Conditions

Both the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) have developed, published, and updated evidence-based guidelines to support medical providers in the provision of contraceptives to patients with specific medical conditions or characteristics. The goal of these guidelines is to provide recommendations on the safe use of contraceptives with the goal of removing unnecessary medical barriers to access and use of contraceptives, thus decreasing the number of unintended pregnancies. Many medical conditions increase a patient's risk of venous thromboembolism; a risk that may also be increased with specific contraceptives. Specific conditions that require more enhanced contraceptive counseling due to their frequency in adolescence and their association either with adverse events during pregnancy or with increased risk for specific contraceptives are detailed by the WHO and CDC and are summarized herein. Adolescents with morbid obesity, migraine headache, cardiac conditions, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, systemic lupus erythematosus, sickle cell anemia, cystic fibrosis, inflammatory bowel disease, or seizure disorders would benefit from greater attention to the urgency of exploring highly effective contraceptive methods. Details of the considerations that should be used in providing contraceptive care to adolescents with each of these medical conditions, as per WHO and CDC guidelines, are provided in this review. The ultimate goal in contraceptive counseling is the balancing of risk and benefit to arrive at the best therapeutic option, maintaining patient preference as a priority, as that will enhance adherence and comfort with the contraceptive method. Each patient must be assessed for pregnancy risk and be allowed full risk reduction and education regarding contraceptive options.

Reaching a consensus on research priorities for supporting women with autoimmune rheumatic diseases during pre-conception, pregnancy and early parenting: A Nominal Group Technique exercise with lay and professional stakeholders

Background:Women with autoimmune rheumatic diseases (ARDs) find it difficult to get information and support with family planning, pregnancy, and early parenting. A systematic approach to prioritising research is required to accelerate development and evaluation of interventions to meet the complex needs of this population.  Methods:A Nominal Group Technique (NGT) exercise was carried out with lay and professional stakeholders (n=29). Stakeholders were prepared for debate through presentation of available evidence. Stakeholders completed three tasks to develop, individually rank, and reach consensus on research priorities: Task 1 - mapping challenges and services using visual timelines; Task 2 - identifying research topics; Task 3 - individually ranking research topics in priority order. Results of the ranking exercise were fed back to the group for comment.   Results:The main themes emerging from Task 1 were the need for provision of information, multi-disciplinary care, and social and peer support. In Task 2, 15 research topics and 58 sub-topics were identified around addressing the challenges and gaps in care identified during Task 1.  In Task 3, a consensus was reached on the ten research topics that should be given the highest priority. These were individually ranked, resulting in the following order of priorities (from 1 - highest to 10 - lowest): 1. Shared decision-making early in the care pathway; 2. Pre-conception counseling; 3. Information about medication use during pregnancy/breastfeeding; 4. Personalised care planning; 5. Support for partners/family members; 6. Information about local support/disease specific issues; 7. Shared decision-making across the care pathway; 8. Peer-support; 9. Social inequalities in care, and; 10. Guidance on holistic/alternative therapies.    Conclusions:This systematic approach to identification of research priorities from a multi-disciplinary and lay perspective indicated that activities should focus on development and evaluation of interventions that increase patient involvement in clinical decision-making, multi-disciplinary models of care, and timely provision of information.

Fertility, Contraception, and Novel Reproductive Technologies in Chronic Kidney Disease

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) affects hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis function, leading to menstrual abnormalities, sexual dysfunction, functional menopause, and loss of fertility. Pregnancy in a patient with CKD is associated with a higher risk of complications to both the mother and the fetus, highlighting the importance of contraceptive counseling at all stages of CKD. There has been limited research on the safety and efficacy of different contraceptive methods in the CKD population, and it is important to tailor the choice of contraception to the patient's lifestyle and comorbidity status. Cyclophosphamide is a commonly used immunosuppressive agent that impairs fertility in a dose-dependent fashion, with greater impact in older women of child-bearing age. Strategies to reduce the impact of cyclophosphamide on ovarian reserve as well as fertility preservation technologies are options to consider when treating immune-mediated CKD. A multidisciplinary approach in counseling the woman with CKD who wishes to contemplate or avoid pregnancy is necessary to optimize outcomes. Further research in this important area is required.

Reproductive health in women following abdominal organ transplant

Fertility is commonly impaired in women with end-stage kidney and liver disease, although most women will have restoration of fertility within 1 year of transplant. Family planning is therefore critical to discuss with reproductive-aged transplant recipients in the early posttransplant period, in order to ensure timely initiation of contraception, and optimal timing for conception. For women seeking pregnancy, the risks to the mother, graft, and baby should be discussed, including evaluation of immunosuppression safety and potential for adjusting medications prior to conception. With an increasing number of transplant patients now breastfeeding, immunosuppression safety in lactation continues to carry great importance.